A validated method for the simultaneous quantification of cannabidiol, Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol, and their metabolites in human plasma and application to plasma samples from an oral cannabidiol open-label trial

Effects of Cannabidiol Ingestion on Thermoregulatory and Inflammatory Responses to Treadmill Exercise in the Heat in Recreationally Active Males

PURPOSE

Exertional heat stress can induce systemic endotoxin exposure and a proinflammatory cascade, likely impairing thermoregulation. Cannabidiol (CBD) is protective in preclinical models of tissue ischemia and inflammation. Therefore, this study examined the effects of CBD ingestion on exercise-induced thermoregulatory and inflammatory responses.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blinded study, 13 active males (age 25 ± 5 yr; peak oxygen uptake (V̇O 2peak ) 50.4 ± 3.2 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ) ingested 298 mg CBD or placebo 105 min before 1 h treadmill exercise (60%-65% V̇O 2peak ) in 32°C and 50% relative humidity. Core temperature, skin temperature, heart rate, subjective outcomes, and sweat loss were assessed during/after exercise. Plasma osmolality, plasma volume changes, and plasma markers of intestinal damage (I-FABP), monocyte activation (CD14), and inflammatory cytokine responses (IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) were assessed at baseline, pre-exercise, and 20 and 90 min post-exercise.

RESULTS

Core temperature (∆ 1.69°C ± 0.48°C (CBD) and 1.79°C ± 0.53°C (Placebo)) and I-FABP increased during exercise, with no differences between conditions ( P > 0.050). Mean (95% confidence interval) CD14 was 1776 (463 to 3090) pg·mL -1 greater 90 min post-exercise in placebo ( P = 0.049). Median (interquartile range) peak IL-6 concentration was -0.8 (-1.1 to -0.3) pg·mL -1 less in CBD ( P = 0.050), whereas the between-condition difference in IL-6 area under curve was -113 (-172 to 27) (pg·mL -1 )·270 min ( P = 0.054).

CONCLUSIONS

CBD did not affect thermoregulation during exertional heat stress but appeared to elicit minor immunosuppressive effects, reducing CD14 and IL-6 responses, warranting investigation in humans under more severe heat strain and other proinflammatory scenarios.

A sleepy cannabis constituent: cannabinol and its active metabolite influence sleep architecture in rats

Medicinal cannabis is being used worldwide and there is increasing use of novel cannabis products in the community. Cannabis contains the major cannabinoids, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), but also an array of minor cannabinoids that have undergone much less pharmacological characterization. Cannabinol (CBN) is a minor cannabinoid used in the community in "isolate' products and is claimed to have pro-sleep effects comparable to conventional sleep medications. However, no study has yet examined whether it impacts sleep architecture using objective sleep measures. The effects of CBN on sleep in rats using polysomnography were therefore examined. CBN increased total sleep time, although there was evidence of biphasic effects with initial sleep suppression before a dramatic increase in sleep. CBN increased both non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. The magnitude of the effect of CBN on NREM was comparable to the sleep aid zolpidem, although, unlike CBN, zolpidem did not influence REM sleep. Following CBN dosing, 11-hydroxy-CBN, a primary metabolite of CBN surprisingly attained equivalently high brain concentrations to CBN. 11-hydroxy-CBN was active at cannabinoid CB1 receptors with comparable potency and efficacy to Δ9-THC, however, CBN had much lower activity. We then discovered that the metabolite 11-hydroxy-CBN also influenced sleep architecture, albeit with some subtle differences from CBN itself. This study shows CBN affects sleep using objective sleep measures and suggests an active metabolite may contribute to its hypnotic action.

Recent advances in the chromatographic analysis of endocannabinoids and phytocannabinoids in biological samples

Endocannabinoid system, including endocannabinoid neurotransmitters (eCBs), has gained much attention over the last years due to its involvement with the pathophysiology of diseases and the potential use of Cannabis sativa (marijuana). The identification of eCBs and phytocannabinoids in biological samples for forensic, clinical, or therapeutic drug monitoring purposes constitutes a still significant challenge. In this scoping review, the recent advantages, and limitations of the eCBs and phytocannabinoids quantification in biological samples are described. Published studies from 2018-2023 were searched in 8 databases, and after screening and exclusions, the selected 38 articles had their data tabulated, summarized, and analyzed. The main characteristics of the eCBs and phytocannabinoids analyzed and the potential use of each biological sample were described, indicating gaps in the literature that still need to be explored. Well-established and innovative sample preparation protocols, and chromatographic separations, such as GC, HPLC, and UHPLC, are reviewed highlighting their respective advantages, drawbacks, and challenges. Lastly, future approaches, challenges, and tendencies in the quantification analysis of cannabinoids are discussed.

Innovative LC-MS/MS method for therapeutic drug monitoring of fenfluramine and cannabidiol in the plasma of pediatric patients with epilepsy

We present a novel liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for quantifying fenfluramine (FFA), its active metabolite norfenfluramine (norFFA), and Epidyolex®, a pure cannabidiol (CBD) oral solution in plasma. Recently approved by the EMA for the adjunctive treatment of refractory seizures in patients with Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes aged above 2 years, FFA and CBD still do not have established therapeutic blood ranges, and thus need careful drug monitoring to manage potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. Our method, validated by ICH guidelines M10, utilizes a rapid extraction protocol from 100 µL of human plasma and a reversed-phase C-18 HPLC column, with deuterated internal standards. The Thermofisher Quantiva triple-quadrupole MS coupled with an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC allowed multiple reaction monitoring detection, ensuring precise analyte quantification. The assay exhibited linear responses across a broad spectrum of concentrations: ranging from 1.64 to 1000 ng/mL for both FFA and CBD, and from 0.82 to 500 ng/mL for norFFA. The method proves accurate and reproducible, free from matrix effect. Additionally, FFA stability in plasma at 4 °C and -20 °C for up to 7 days bolsters its clinical applicability. Plasma concentrations detected in patients samples, expressed as mean ± standard deviation, were 0.36 ± 0.09 ng/mL for FFA, 19.67 ± 1.22 ng/mL for norFFA. This method stands as a robust tool for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of FFA and CBD, offering significant utility in assessing drug-drug interactions in co-treated patients, thus contributing to optimized patient care in complex therapeutic scenarios.

An Intravenous Pharmacokinetic Study of Cannabidiol Solutions in Piglets through the Application of a Validated Ultra-High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for the Simultaneous Quantification of CBD and Its Carboxylated Metabolite in Plasma

Cannabidiol (CBD) has multiple therapeutic benefits that need to be maximized by optimizing its bioavailability. Numerous formulations are therefore being developed and their pharmacokinetics need to be studied, requiring analytical methods and data from intravenous administration. As CBD is susceptible to hepatic metabolism, the requirement of any method is to quantify metabolites such as 7-COOH-CBD. We demonstrated that CBD and 7-COOH-CBD could be simultaneously and correctly quantified in piglet plasma by using an UHPLC-MS/MS technique. The validated method allowed for an accurate bioanalysis of an intravenously injected solution consisting of CBD-HPβCD complexes. The experimental pharmacokinetic profile of CBD showed multi-exponential decay characterized by a fast apparent distribution half-life (0.25 h) and an elimination half-life of two hours. The profile of 7-COOH-CBD was not linked with the first-pass metabolism, since 80% of the maximum metabolite concentration was reached at the first sampling time point, without any decrease during the period of study. A two-compartment model was optimal to describe the experimental CBD profile. This model allowed us to calculate macro-micro constants and volumes of distribution (Vss = 3260.35 ± 2286.66 mL) and clearance (1514.5 ± 261.16 mL·h-1), showing that CBD is rapidly distributed to peripheral tissues once injected and slowly released into the bloodstream.

SPME as a green sample-preparation technique for the monitoring of phytocannabinoids and endocannabinoids in complex matrices

The endocannabinoid system (ECS), particularly its signaling pathways and ligands, has garnered considerable interest in recent years. Along with clinical work investigating the ECS' functions, including its role in the development of neurological and inflammatory conditions, much research has focused on developing analytical protocols enabling the precise monitoring of the levels and metabolism of the most potent ECS ligands: exogenous phytocannabinoids (PCs) and endogenous cannabinoids (endocannabinoids, ECs). Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is an advanced, non-exhaustive sample-preparation technique that facilitates the precise and efficient isolation of trace amounts of analytes, thus making it appealing for the analysis of PCs and ECs in complex matrices of plant and animal/human origin. In this paper, we review recent forensic medicine and toxicological studies wherein SPME has been applied to monitor levels of PCs and ECs in complex matrices, determine their effects on organism physiology, and assess their role in the development of several diseases.

Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol in Tourette Syndrome

BACKGROUND: Tourette syndrome is characterized by chronic motor and vocal tics. There is preliminary evidence of benefit from cannabis products containing Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and that coadministration of cannabidiol (CBD) improves the side-effect profile and safety. METHODS: In this double-blind, crossover trial, participants with severe Tourette syndrome were randomly assigned to a 6-week treatment period with escalating doses of an oral oil containing 5 mg/ml of THC and 5 mg/ml of CBD, followed by a 6-week course of placebo, or vice versa, separated by a 4-week washout period. The primary outcome was the total tic score on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS; range, 0 to 50 [higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms]). Secondary outcomes included video-based assessment of tics, global impairment, anxiety, depression, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Outcomes were correlated with plasma levels of cannabinoid metabolites. A computerized cognitive battery was administered at the beginning and the end of each treatment period. RESULTS: Overall, 22 participants (eight female participants) were enrolled. Reduction in total tic score (at week 6 relative to baseline) as measured by the YGTSS was 8.9 (±7.6) in the active group and 2.5 (±8.5) in the placebo group. In a linear mixed-effects model, there was a significant interaction of treatment (active/placebo) and visit number on tic score (coefficient = −2.28; 95% confidence interval, −3.96 to −0.60; P=0.008), indicating a greater decrease (improvement) in tics under active treatment. There was a correlation between plasma 11-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol levels and the primary outcome, which was attenuated after exclusion of an outlier. The most common adverse effect in the placebo period was headache (n=7); in the active treatment period, it was cognitive difficulties, including slowed mentation, memory lapses, and poor concentration (n=8). CONCLUSIONS: In severe Tourette syndrome, treatment with THC and CBD reduced tics and may reduce impairment due to tics, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorder; although in some participants this was associated with slowed mentation, memory lapses, and poor concentration. (Funded by the Wesley Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, and the Lambert Initiative for Cannabinoid Therapeutics, a philanthropically-funded research organization at the University of Sydney, Australia; Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12618000545268.)

Cannabinol (CBN; 30 and 300 mg) effects on sleep and next-day function in insomnia disorder ('CUPID' study): protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, three-arm, proof-of-concept trial

OBJECTIVE

Insomnia is the most prevalent sleep disorder, with few effective pharmacotherapies. Anecdotal reports and recent preclinical research suggest that cannabinol (CBN), a constituent of Cannabis sativa derived from delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, could be an effective treatment. Despite this, the isolated effects of CBN on sleep have yet to be systematically studied in humans.

METHODS

The present protocol paper describes a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, three-arm, cross-over, proof-of-concept study which investigates the effects of CBN on sleep and next-day function in 20 participants with clinician-diagnosed insomnia disorder and an Insomnia Severity Index Score ≥15. Participants receive a single fixed oral liquid dose of 30 mg CBN, 300 mg CBN and matched placebo, in random order on three treatment nights; each separated by a 2-week wash-out period. Participants undergo overnight sleep assessment using in-laboratory polysomnography and next-day neurobehavioural function tests. The primary outcome is wake after sleep onset minutes. Secondary outcomes include changes to traditional sleep staging, sleep-onset latency and absolute spectral power during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Tertiary outcomes include changes to sleep spindles during NREM sleep, arousal indices, absolute spectral power during REM sleep and subjective sleep quality. Safety-related and exploratory outcomes include changes to next-day simulated driving performance, subjective mood and drug effects, postural sway, alertness and reaction time, overnight memory consolidation, pre and post-sleep subjective and objective sleepiness; and plasma, urinary, and salivary cannabinoid concentrations. The study will provide novel preliminary data on CBN efficacy and safety in insomnia disorder, which will inform larger clinical trials.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Human Research Ethics Committee approval has been granted by Bellberry (2021-08-907). Study findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at academic conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05344170.

Simultaneous Assessment of Serum Levels and Pharmacologic Effects of Cannabinoids on Endocannabinoids and N-Acylethanolamines by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Introduction: The primary compounds of Cannabis sativa, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), inflict a direct influence on the endocannabinoid system-a complex lipid signaling network with a central role in neurotransmission and control of inhibitory and excitatory synapses. These phytocannabinoids often interact with endogenously produced endocannabinoids (eCBs), as well as their structurally related N-acylethanolamines (NAEs), to drive neurobiological, nociceptive, and inflammatory responses. Identifying and quantifying changes in these lipid neuromodulators can be challenging owing to their low abundance in complex matrices. Materials and Methods: This article describes a robust liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the extraction and quantification of the eCBs anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol, along with their congener NAEs oleoylethanolamine and palmitoylethanolamine, and phytocannabinoids CBD, Δ9-THC, and 11-Nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, a major metabolite of Δ9-THC. Our method was applied to explore pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects from intraperitoneal injections of Δ9-THC and CBD on circulating levels of eCBs and NAEs in rodent serum. Results: Detection limits ranged from low nanomolar to picomolar in concentration for eCBs (0.012-0.24 pmol/mL), NAEs (0.059 pmol/mL), and phytocannabinoids (0.24-0.73 pmol/mL). Our method displayed good linearity for calibration curves of all analytes (R2>0.99) as well as acceptable accuracy and precision, with quality controls not deviating >15% from their nominal value. Our LC-MS/MS method reliably identified changes to these endogenous lipid mediators that followed a causal relationship, which was dependent on both the type of phytocannabinoid administered and its pharmaceutical preparation. Conclusion: We present a rapid and reliable method for the simultaneous quantification of phytocannabinoids, eCBs, and NAEs in serum using LC-MS/MS. The accuracy and sensitivity of our assay infer it can routinely monitor endogenous levels of these lipid neuromodulators in serum and their response to external stimuli, including cannabimimetic agents.

How long does a single oral dose of cannabidiol persist in plasma? Findings from three clinical trials

A growing number of clinical trials (CTs) are investigating the therapeutic potential of cannabidiol (CBD), a non-intoxicating phytocannabinoid found in Cannabis sativa. These CTs often use crossover experimental designs requiring 'washout' (clearance) periods. However, the length of time CBD persists in plasma (its 'window of detection') is unclear and could be significant. Indeed, the structurally related phytocannabinoid, Δ⁹ -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), has a long window of detection in plasma. We investigated the extent to which CBD and its major metabolites persist in plasma. Data from three CTs that measured plasma cannabinoid concentrations ≥7 days after administering a single oral dose of CBD were pooled. The CBD doses were as follows: CT #1: 300 mg; CT #2: 200 mg (and 10 mg THC); and CT #3: 15, 300 and 1500 mg (one per treatment session). Thirty-two participants were included in the analysis, 17 of whom (from CT #3) provided repeated measures. Overall, 0% (15 mg), 60% (200 mg), 28% (300 mg) and 100% (1500 mg) of participants had detectable concentrations (i.e., >0.25 ng·ml^-1 ) of CBD in plasma ≥7 days post-treatment (some, several weeks post-treatment). A zero-inflated negative binomial mixed-effects regression analysis (R² _m  = 0.44; R² _c  = 0.73) predicted that, on average, a 13 day washout period would reduce plasma CBD concentrations to 'zero' (i.e., <0.25 ng·ml^-1 ) if a single oral dose of 300 mg was consumed. Higher doses require longer washout periods; concomitant medications may also affect clearance. In conclusion, CBD has a long window of detection in plasma. Crossover studies involving CBD should, therefore, be conducted with caution, particularly when higher doses and/or chronic dosing regimens are used.

Determination of urinary metabolites of cannabidiol, Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol, and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol by automated online μSPE-LC-MS/MS method

In this study, an automated online micro-solid-phase extraction (μSPE)-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the detection of metabolites of cannabidiol (CBD), Δ⁸-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁸-THC), and Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁹-THC), particularly 7-carboxy- cannabidiol (7-COOH-CBD), 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ⁸-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁸-THCCOOH), 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁹-THCCOOH), and 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ⁹- tetrahydrocannabinol-glucuronide (Δ⁹-THCCOOH-glu) in urine. An instrument top sample preparation (ITSP) cartridge was introduced to increase the sensitivity toward analytes and decrease the matrix effect of the urine. LC-MS/MS analysis was performed in the multiple-reaction monitoring mode, and the analytes were separated using an Acquity UPLC HSS T3 (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.8 µm) column and gradient elution with water containing 0.05 % acetic acid and methanol as the mobile phase. The calibration range was 0.5-200 ng/mL for all the analytes, with a correlation coefficient (r) of ≥0.996 and a weighting factor of 1/x². The limits of detection for 7-COOH-CBD, Δ⁸-THCCOOH, Δ⁹-THCCOOH, and Δ⁹-THCCOOH-glu were 0.06, 0.02, 0.03, and 0.1 ng/mL, respectively. The intra- and inter-day accuracy ranged from -8.0 to 6.2 % and -7.3 to 7.8 % with a precision of ≤7.2 % and ≤6.2 %, respectively. The method was also validated for selectivity, recovery, matrix effect, stability, and dilution integrity. The developed method was successfully applied to the analysis of 78 urine samples, and 7-COOH-CBD, Δ⁸-THCCOOH, Δ⁹-THCCOOH, and Δ⁹-THCCOOH-glu were detected in 54 urine samples at normalized concentrations of 1.1, 0.6-939.1, 0.9-2595.0, and 1.3-527.6 ng/mg creatinine, respectively.

Effects of cannabidiol on simulated driving and cognitive performance: A dose-ranging randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Cannabidiol (CBD), a major cannabinoid of Cannabis sativa, is widely consumed in prescription and non-prescription products. While CBD is generally considered 'non-intoxicating', its effects on safety-sensitive tasks are still under scrutiny.

AIM

We investigated the effects of CBD on driving performance.

METHODS

Healthy adults (n = 17) completed four treatment sessions involving the oral administration of a placebo, or 15, 300 or 1500 mg CBD in a randomised, double-blind, crossover design. Simulated driving performance was assessed between ~45-75 and ~210-240 min post-treatment (Drives 1 and 2) using a two-part scenario with 'standard' and 'car following' (CF) components. The primary outcome was standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), a well-established measure of vehicular control. Cognitive function, subjective experiences and plasma CBD concentrations were also measured. Non-inferiority analyses tested the hypothesis that CBD would not increase SDLP by more than a margin equivalent to a 0.05% blood alcohol concentration (Cohen's d_z = 0.50).

RESULTS

Non-inferiority was established during the standard component of Drive 1 and CF component of Drive 2 on all CBD treatments and during the standard component of Drive 2 on the 15 and 1500 mg treatments (95% CIs < 0.5). The remaining comparisons to placebo were inconclusive (the 95% CIs included 0 and 0.50). No dose of CBD impaired cognition or induced feelings of intoxication (ps > 0.05). CBD was unexpectedly found to persist in plasma for prolonged periods of time (e.g. >4 weeks at 1500 mg).

CONCLUSION

Acute, oral CBD treatment does not appear to induce feelings of intoxication and is unlikely to impair cognitive function or driving performance (Registration: ACTRN12619001552178).

Effects of Cannabidiol on Exercise Physiology and Bioenergetics: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial

Background

Cannabidiol (CBD) has demonstrated anti-inflammatory, analgesic, anxiolytic and neuroprotective effects that have the potential to benefit athletes. This pilot study investigated the effects of acute, oral CBD treatment on physiological and psychological responses to aerobic exercise to determine its practical utility within the sporting context.

Methods

On two occasions, nine endurance-trained males (mean ± SD V̇O_2max: 57.4 ± 4.0 mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹) ran for 60 min at a fixed intensity (70% V̇O_2max) (RUN 1) before completing an incremental run to exhaustion (RUN 2). Participants received CBD (300 mg; oral) or placebo 1.5 h before exercise in a randomised, double-blind design. Respiratory gases (V̇O₂), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), heart rate (HR), blood glucose (BG) and lactate (BL) concentrations, and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and pleasure–displeasure were measured at three timepoints (T1–3) during RUN 1. V̇O_2max, RER_max, HR_max and time to exhaustion (TTE) were recorded during RUN 2. Venous blood was drawn at Baseline, Pre- and Post-RUN 1, Post-RUN 2 and 1 h Post-RUN 2. Data were synthesised using Cohen’s d_z effect sizes and 85% confidence intervals (CIs). Effects were considered worthy of further investigation if the 85% CI included ± 0.5 but not zero.

Results

CBD appeared to increase V̇O₂ (T2: + 38 ± 48 mL·min⁻¹, d_z: 0.25–1.35), ratings of pleasure (T1: + 0.7 ± 0.9, d_z: 0.22–1.32; T2: + 0.8 ± 1.1, d_z: 0.17–1.25) and BL (T2: + 3.3 ± 6.4 mmol·L⁻¹, d_z: > 0.00–1.03) during RUN 1 compared to placebo. No differences in HR, RPE, BG or RER were observed between treatments. CBD appeared to increase V̇O_2max (+ 119 ± 206 mL·min⁻¹, d_z: 0.06–1.10) and RER_max (+ 0.04 ± 0.05 d_z: 0.24–1.34) during RUN 2 compared to placebo. No differences in TTE or HR_max were observed between treatments. Exercise increased serum interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, tumour necrosis factor-α, lipopolysaccharide and myoglobin concentrations (i.e. Baseline vs. Post-RUN 1, Post-RUN 2 and/or 1-h Post-RUN 2, p’s < 0.05). However, the changes were small, making it difficult to reliably evaluate the effect of CBD, where an effect appeared to be present. Plasma concentrations of the endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide (AEA), increased Post-RUN 1 and Post-RUN 2, relative to Baseline and Pre-RUN 1 (p’s < 0.05). CBD appeared to reduce AEA concentrations Post-RUN 2, compared to placebo (− 0.95 ± 0.64 pmol·mL⁻¹, d_z: − 2.19, − 0.79).

Conclusion

CBD appears to alter some key physiological and psychological responses to aerobic exercise without impairing performance. Larger studies are required to confirm and better understand these preliminary findings.

Trial Registration This investigation was approved by the Sydney Local Health District’s Human Research Ethics Committee (2020/ETH00226) and registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000941965).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40798-022-00417-y.

A description of Cannabinoid levels in Cannabis oil by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in a reference laboratory of North-Italy

BACKGROUND

Cannabis oils from FM2®, Bedica®, Bediol®, Bedrocan®, Bedrolite® and Pedanios 22/1® are largely used for medical purposes such as spasticity, chronic pain and appetite stimulating. Several studies showed cannabinoids action on CB1 and CB2 receptors reduces the hyperalgesic phase in inflammatory pain, leading to an improvement of conditions. The active compounds of these galenic preparations show a high variability making titration mandatory. For this reason, the exact oil composition knowledge is fundamental for personalizing therapy. This amis at adapting the correct dose to the patient, improving safety and efficacy of the galenic formulation, choosing the best preparation for each patient.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate oil preparations variability among different galenic laboratories in order to highlight the importance of titration activity.

METHODS

Cannabis pharmacological active compounds titration has been performed in a large cohort of galenic laboratories in Italy. CBD, CBN, THC, THCA and CBDA quantification was carried out by a previous validated method in UHPLC-MS/MS.

RESULTS

A number of 4318 samples of Cannabis oil from 83 pharmacies between January 2021 and February 2022 were evaluated. All galenic preparation specialities showed statistically significant differences among galenic laboratories (p-value < 0.001). THCA and CBDA concentrations were investigated as percentage of the extration yelds for total THC and CBD: these compounds had different values in the same specialities among distinct galenic laboratories. Moreover, seasonal variability in analytes concentrations was observed.

CONCLUSION

This study described a wide range of oily samples from a large number of galenic laboratories, compared to published papers. In conclusion, knowledge of the exact oil composition is fundamental in the perspective of personalized therapy. Further studies aiming at the correlation between galenic composition and cannabinoids pharmacokinetics, clinical outcomes and toxic effects could be useful to improve our knowledge.

Citalopram and Cannabidiol: In Vitro and In Vivo Evidence of Pharmacokinetic Interactions Relevant to the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders in Young People

BACKGROUND

Cannabidiol (CBD), a major nonintoxicating constituent of cannabis, exhibits anxiolytic properties in preclinical and human studies and is of interest as a novel intervention for treating anxiety disorders. Existing first-line pharmacotherapies for these disorders include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and other antidepressants. Cannabidiol has well-described inhibitory action on cytochrome P450 (CYP450) drug-metabolizing enzymes and significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between CBD and various anticonvulsant medications (eg, clobazam) have been described in the treatment of epilepsy. Here, we examined the likelihood of DDIs when CBD is added to medications prescribed in the treatment of anxiety.

METHODS

The effect of CBD on CYP450-mediated metabolism of the commonly used antidepressants fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, and mirtazapine were examined in vitro. Cannabidiol-citalopram interactions were also examined in vivo in patients (n = 6) with anxiety disorders on stable treatment with citalopram or escitalopram who received ascending daily doses of adjunctive CBD (200-800 mg) over 12 weeks in a recent clinical trial.

RESULTS

Cannabidiol minimally affected the metabolism of sertraline, fluoxetine, and mirtazapine in vitro. However, CBD significantly inhibited CYP3A4 and CYP2C19-mediated metabolism of citalopram and its stereoisomer escitalopram at physiologically relevant concentrations, suggesting a possible in vivo DDI. In patients on citalopram or escitalopram, the addition of CBD significantly increased citalopram plasma concentrations, although it was uncertain whether this also increased selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-mediated adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Further pharmacokinetic examination of the interaction between CBD and citalopram/escitalopram is clearly warranted, and clinicians should be vigilant around the possibility of treatment-emergent adverse effects when CBD is introduced to patients taking these antidepressants.