Sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure: efficacy and safety in and outside clinical trials

The Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Supraventricular and Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) frequently experience electrical disturbances, such as ventricular or atrial fibrillation (AF). Sacubitril/Valsartan (SV) therapy has been linked to lower rates of mortality, ventricular tachycardia (VT), and ventricular fibrillation (VF), with decreased reliance on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. However, studies on the antiarrhythmic effects of SV in patients with ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) devices are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of SV therapy on antiarrhythmic pacing, defibrillation shock occurrences, and the burden of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with HFrEF who have ICD or CRT-D devices.

METHOD

This study was conducted at a HF outpatient clinic involving patients with HFrEF treated with SV. Primary outcomes included the incidence of VT, VF, non-sustained VT (NsVT), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), and related interventions such as antiarrhythmic pacing (ATP) and defibrillation shocks.

RESULT

A total of 181 HFrEF patients completed at least 12 months of follow-up, with a mean age of 63.39 ± 12 years; 36.5% were male, and 60.8% had an ICD. Device interrogation revealed a significant reduction in VF incidents (7 vs. 15, p = 0.025) and a decrease in the combined outcome of VT and VF (17 vs. 24, p = 0.047). The need for ICD interventions such as ATP and shocks also significantly decreased following the initiation of SV therapy (10 vs. 24, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

SV therapy significantly reduces the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias, particularly VT and VF, while decreasing the need for clinical interventions related to implanted devices.

Left ventricular function improvement during angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor treatment in a cohort of HFrEF/HFmrEF patients

AIMS

Heart failure (HF) patients may lack improvement of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) despite optimal HF medication comprising an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI). Therefore, we aimed to identify key predictors for LV functional enhancement and prognostic reverse cardiac remodelling in HF patients on ARNI treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 294 consecutive patients with HF with reduced (HFrEF) or mildly reduced (HFmrEF) ejection fraction in our 'EnTruth' patient registry. LVEF was determined by echocardiography at initiation of ARNI and at 12 months of follow-up. We assessed the predictive value of clinically relevant patient-, HF- and treatment-related parameters in regard to changes in LVEF and all-cause mortality using medoid clustering and the XGBoost machine learning algorithm.

RESULTS

Cluster analysis integrating clinically relevant patient characteristics unveiled four characteristic sub-phenotypes of patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF, respectively. Distinct clusters exhibit a strong (P < 0.05) therapeutic response to ARNI treatment and enhanced LV function. Key patient criteria, such as duration and aetiology of HF, renal function and de novo ARNI treatment, were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with change of LVEF and independently predicted cardiac remodelling. By training various machine learning models on relevant clinical parameters, stratification of LVEF improvement by XGBoost resulted in a high prediction accuracy. The stratification of patients with HFrEF [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.77] and HFmrEF (AUC = 0.70) led to an increased diagnostic accuracy of LVEF improvement in the validation cohort. Using machine learning, the likelihood of cardiac remodelling following ARNI treatment, as indicated by our newly established EnTruth score, was directly associated with absolute LVEF improvement in both HFrEF (r = 0.51, P < 0.0001) and HFmrEF (r = 0.42, P = 0.001). Ultimately, patients with HFrEF and a high EnTruth score have a lower risk of all-cause mortality (P < 0.05 in survival analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

Recognition of essential clinical factors by integrating machine learning and cluster analyses may help to identify HF patients benefiting from improvement of LVEF following ARNI treatment. Early identification of those patients with a high response to ARNI treatment may allow a more refined selection of patients benefiting from an early escalation of HF treatment or interventional therapy.

Sacubitril/valsartan attenuates inflammation and myocardial fibrosis in Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) primarily manifests as a cardiomyopathy induced by physical or emotional stress, remains a poorly understood condition with no established treatments. In this study, we investigated the potential of sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) to increase the survival of TTS patients and reduce inflammation and myocardial fibrosis in experimental models.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate whether sac/val could improve survival rates in TTS patients, mitigate cardiac remodeling in vivo, and explore its anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic mechanisms in vitro.

METHODS

Clinical cases from the Chinese Takotsubo syndrome (ChiTTS) registry were analyzed to assess patient survival rates. In addition, we used isoprenaline (ISO)-induced TTS-like animal models, pre-treated with sac/val, to evaluate cardiac function and inflammatory response. Additionally, the effects of isoprenaline on cardiomyocytes and myocardial fibroblasts, as well as protection from rhBNP, were thoroughly studied.

RESULTS

In TTS patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 0.45, hyperglycemia, emotional stress, and inflammation were identified as independent risk factors. Moreover, the baseline characteristics of the TTS patients, heart rate, emotional triggers, female sex (%), WBC count, IL-6 concentration, PCT, ALT, AST and TG were significantly associated with decreasing left ventricular ejection fraction. In TTS patients, sac/val reduced inflammation, evidenced by lower levels of white blood cells and interleukin 6, compared to patients who did not receive sac/val by day 30. In animal models, Sac/val improved cardiac dysfunction in ISO-induced TTS-like cardiomyopathy and decreased myocardial inflammatory responses (IL-18 and Mac-3) by inhibiting the TLR4/NF-κB pathway and fibrosis through the inhibition of the TGFβ1/Smad pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that sac/val decreased inflammatory responses, myocardial edema, and fibrosis, resulting in an increased percentage of survivors in the TTS group. Similar to findings from in vivo and in vitro experiments, sac/val exerted cardioprotective effects by reducing the inflammatory response and reversing myocardial remodeling mediated by the TLR4/NF-κB and TGFβ1/Smad pathways. In conclusion, these findings highlight the anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects of sac/val in individuals with TTS.

Plasma biomarkers for predicting heart failure in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Background

Heart failure (HF) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is characterized by high mortality and disability rates, which highlights the need of timely and effective revascularization. Recent studies suggested the potential predictivity of biomarkers NT-proBNP, cTNT, PLR, NLR, and GDF-15 in cardiovascular events, but their value in HF patients post-AMI still require further verification. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify potent biomarkers for prognosticating the development of HF subsequent to AMI, and to devise early interception and therapeutic strategies.

Methods

A total of 170 patients with AMI were enrolled in this study, including 44 patients with post-AMI HF and 126 patients with post-AMI non-HF. We measured the serum biomarkers NT-proBNP, cTNT, PLR, NLR, and GDF-15 in all patients using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Subsequently, we performed t-tests to assess the predictive value of these biomarkers for post-AMI HF.

Results

In the group of HF patients, cTNT, NT-proBNP, GDF-15 and NLR was significantly higher than in the group without HF, but PLR was not. The AUC of NLR to predict HF after AMI was 0.632 (95%CI: 0.542-0.723), P=0.010, with a cut-off value of (3.86×109)/L, GDF-15 was 0.661 (95%CI: 0.560-0.763), P=0.002, with a cutoff value of 1.35 ng/mL, and NT-proBNP was 0.82 (95%CI: 0.723-0.876), P<0.001, with a cut-off value of 1444 pg/mL.

Conclusions

In five biomarkers, there is predictive value in NT-proBNP, NLR, GDF-15 for patients with HF after AMI.

Cardiometabolic effects of sacubitril/valsartan in a rat model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

The promising results obtained in the PARADIGM-HF trial prompted the approval of sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) as a first-in-class treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. The effect of SAC/VAL treatment was also studied in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and, although improvements in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, HF hospitalizations, and cardiovascular deaths were observed, these results were not so promising. However, the demand for HFpEF therapies led to the approval of SAC/VAL as an alternative treatment, although further studies are needed. We aimed to elucidate the effects of a 9-week SAC/VAL treatment in cardiac function and metabolism using a preclinical model of HFpEF, the Zucker Fatty and Spontaneously Hypertensive (ZSF1) rats. We found that SAC/VAL significantly improved diastolic function parameters and modulated respiratory quotient during exercise. Ex-vivo studies showed that SAC/VAL treatment significantly decreased heart, liver, spleen, and visceral fat weights; cardiac hypertrophy and percentage of fibrosis; lipid infiltration in liver and circulating levels of cholesterol and sodium. Moreover, SAC/VAL reduced glycerophospholipids, cholesterol, and cholesteryl esters while increasing triglyceride levels in cardiac tissue. In conclusion, SAC/VAL treatment improved diastolic and hepatic function, respiratory metabolism, reduced hypercholesterolemia and cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy, and was able to modulate cardiac metabolic profile. Our findings might provide further insight into the therapeutic benefits of SAC/VAL treatment in obese patients with HFpEF.

Underlying mechanisms of ketotherapy in heart failure: current evidence for clinical implementations

Heart failure (HF) is a life-threatening cardiac syndrome characterized by high morbidity and mortality, but current anti-heart failure therapies have limited efficacy, necessitating the urgent development of new treatment drugs. Exogenous ketone supplementation helps prevent heart failure development in HF models, but therapeutic ketosis in failing hearts has not been systematically elucidated, limiting the use of ketones to treat HF. Here, we summarize current evidence supporting ketotherapy in HF, emphasizing ketone metabolism in the failing heart, metabolic and non-metabolic therapeutic effects, and mechanisms of ketotherapy in HF, involving the dynamics within the mitochondria. We also discuss clinical strategies for therapeutic ketosis, aiming to deepen the understanding of the characteristics of ketone metabolism, including mitochondrial involvement, and its clinical therapeutic potential in HF.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment strategies

The prevalence of HF with preserved ejection raction (HFpEF, with EF ≥50%) is increasing across all populations with high rates of hospitalization and mortality, reaching up to 80% and 50%, respectively, within a 5-year timeframe. Comorbidity-driven systemic inflammation is thought to cause coronary microvascular dysfunction and increased epicardial adipose tissue, leading to downstream friborsis and molecular changes in the cardiomyocyte, leading to increased stiffness and diastolic dynsfunction. HFpEF poses unique challenges in terms of diagnosis due to its complex and diverse nature. The diagnosis of HFpEF relies on a combination of clinical assessment, imaging studies, and biomarkers. An additional important step in diagnosing HFpEF involves excluding certain cardiac diagnoses that may be specific underlying causes of HFpEF or may be masquerading as HFpEF and require specific alternative treatment approaches. In addition to administering sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors to all patients, the most effective approach to enhance clinical outcomes may involve tailored therapy based on each patient's unique clinical profile. Exercise should be recommended for all patients to improve the quality of life. Glucagon-like peptide-1 1 agonists are a promising treatment option in obese HFpEF patients. Novel approaches targeting inflammation are also in early phase trials.

High-intensity care for GDMT titration

Heart failure (HF) is a systemic disease associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, increased risk of hospitalizations, and low quality of life. Therefore, effective, systemic treatment strategies are necessary to mitigate these risks. In this manuscript, we emphasize the concept of high-intensity care to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in HF patients. The document highlights the importance of achieving optimal recommended doses of GDMT medications, including beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors to improve patient outcomes, achieve effective, sustainable decongestion, and improve patient quality of life. The document also discusses potential obstacles to GDMT optimization, such as clinical inertia, physiological limitations, comorbidities, non-adherence, and frailty. Lastly, it also attempts to provide possible future scenarios of high-intensive care that could improve patient outcomes.

Relevant adverse events and drug discontinuation of sacubitril/valsartan in a real-world Japanese cohort: REVIEW-HF registry

BACKGROUND

The characteristics, tolerability, and outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) who are treated with sacubitril/valsartan remain unclear in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide multicenter study to evaluate the features and outcomes of patients newly prescribed sacubitril/valsartan for the management of HF. We analyzed adverse events (AEs) related to sacubitril/valsartan at 3 months, which were defined as hypotension, worsening renal function, hyperkalemia, and angioedema. Additionally, the association between AEs and outcomes was examined.

RESULTS

Among 993 patients, the mean age was 70 years and 291 (29.3 %) were female, and 22.8 % had left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50 %. Of them, 20.8 % had systolic blood pressure (sBP) <100 mmHg, and 19.5 % had estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 at baseline, which were the populations excluded from the eligibility in landmark trials. AEs related to sacubitril/valsartan were observed in 22.5 % of the patients at 3 months. Overall, 22.6 % of patients discontinued sacubitril/valsartan, and hypotension was the most common event leading to drug discontinuation. After adjustment, patients who had worse HF symptoms (New York Heart Association III or IV), sBP <100 mmHg, and eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 were associated with a higher risk of AEs related to sacubitril/valsartan. Additionally, patients experiencing AEs had a higher risk of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization than those who did not.

CONCLUSION

In Japan, sacubitril/valsartan was also prescribed to patients not eligible for landmark trials, and AEs were observed at a relatively high rate from soon after treatment initiation. Physicians should closely monitor patients for these events, especially in patients anticipated to have a higher risk of AEs.

Rationale, Design, and Interim Observations of the Steady Movement With Innovating Leadership for Heart Failure (SMILE HF) Registry: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Registry for Patients With Acute Heart Failure

Background and Objectives

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalization and death worldwide. The Steady Movement with Innovating Leadership for Heart Failure (SMILE HF) aims to evaluate the clinical characteristics, management, hospital course, and long-term outcomes of patients hospitalized for acute HF in South Korea.

Methods

This prospective, observational multicenter cohort study was conducted on consecutive patients hospitalized for acute HF in nine university hospitals since September 2019. Enrolment of 2000 patients should be completed in 2024, and follow-up is planned through 2025.

Results

Interim analysis of 1,052 consecutive patients was performed to understand the baseline characteristics. The mean age was 69±15 years; 57.6% were male. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 39±15%. The prevalences of HF with reduced ejection fraction, HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction, and HF with preserved ejection fraction were 50.9%, 15.3%, and 29.2%. Ischemic cardiomyopathy (CMP) was the most common etiology (32%), followed by tachycardia-induced CMP (12.8%) and idiopathic dilated CMP (9.5%). The prescription rate of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor, beta-blockers, spironolactone, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors at discharge were 76.8%, 66.5%, 50.0%, and 17.5%, respectively. The post-discharge 90-day mortality and readmission rates due to HF aggravation were 2.0% and 6.4%, respectively. Our analysis reveals the current state of acute HF in South Korea.

Conclusions

Our interim analysis provides valuable insights into the clinical characteristics, management, and early outcomes of acute HF patients in South Korea, highlighting the current state and treatment patterns in this population.

Effect of sacubitril-valsartan on left ventricular remodeling and NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure complicated with hypertension and reduced ejection fraction

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of sacubitril-valsartan on left ventricular remodeling and NT-proBNP in heart failure patients with hypertension and reduced ejection fraction.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 112 heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and concomitant hypertension who were treated in Baoji Central Hospital from May 2019 to October 2021. Standard heart failure treatment was applied in both groups. Besides, the observation group (n=60) was additionally treated with sacubitril/valsartan (initial dose of 50 mg twice daily, adjusted every 2-4 weeks by doubling the dose to a maximum of 200 mg twice daily based on the patients' actual conditions and tolerance), and the control group (n=52) received valsartan (80 mg once daily). The treatment duration for both groups was 6 months. Therapeutic efficacy, blood pressure, echocardiographic parameters, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and left ventricular remodeling before and after treatment were recorded and compared between the two groups, as well as the adverse drug reactions during the treatment and life quality after treatment. Finally, multifactor regression analysis was performed to screen the independent risk factors affecting patient prognosis.

RESULTS

Compared with the CG, the overall response rate in the OG was evidently higher (P < 0.001); the improvements in blood pressure, NT-proBNP, interventricular septal thickness (IVST), left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWT) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were more significant in the OG (all P < 0.001). Both groups showed marked improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and (left ventricular end-systolic diameter) LVESD compared to baseline, with more significant improvement in the OG compared with the CG (all P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. However, post-treatment quality of life was much higher in the OG compared to the CG (P < 0.001). Comorbid diabetes and treatment regimen were identified as independent risk factors affecting patient prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Sacubitril-valsartan can effectively improve blood pressure, cardiac function and ventricular remodeling in patients with HFrEF and hypertension without increasing adverse reactions. It is highly safe and worthy of clinical promotion.

Sacubitril/Valsartan Alleviates Cardiac Remodeling and Dysfunction in L-NAME-Induced Hypertension and Hypertensive Heart Disease

There is ample evidence on the benefit of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) in heart failure, yet data regarding the potential protective action of ARNIs in hypertensive heart disease are sparse. The aim of this study was to show whether an ARNI exerts a protective effect in a model of Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)-induced hypertension with a hypertensive heart and to compare this potential benefit with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril. Five groups of adult male Wistar rats were studied (14 per group) for four weeks: untreated controls; ARNI (68 mg/kg/day); L-NAME (40 mg/kg/day); L-NAME treated with ARNI; and L-NAME treated with captopril (100 mg/kg/day). L-NAME administration induced hypertension, accompanied by increased left ventricular (LV) weight and fibrotic rebuilding of the LV in terms of increased concentration and content of hydroxyproline in insoluble collagen and in total collagen and with a histological finding of fibrosis. These alterations were associated with a compromised systolic and diastolic LV function. Treatment with either an ARNI or captopril reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP), alleviated LV hypertrophy and fibrosis, and prevented the development of both systolic and diastolic LV dysfunction. Moreover, the serum levels of prolactin and prolactin receptor were reduced significantly by ARNI and slightly by captopril. In conclusion, in L-NAME-induced hypertension, the dual inhibition of neprilysin and AT1 receptors by ARNI reduced SBP and prevented the development of LV hypertrophy, fibrosis, and systolic and diastolic dysfunction. These data suggest that ARNI could provide protection against LV structural remodeling and functional disorders in hypertensive heart disease.

Dapagliflozin versus sacubitril-valsartan for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction

Background and aim

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with an increased risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and cardiovascular death (CVD). Both dapagliflozin and sacubitril-valsartan have recently shown convincing reductions in the combined risk of CVD and HF hospitalizations in patients with HF and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or HFpEF. We aimed to investigate the cost-per-outcome implications of dapagliflozin vs sacubitril-valsartan in the treatment of HFmrEF or HFpEF patients.

Methods

We compared the annualized cost needed to treat (CNT) to prevent the composite outcome of total HF hospitalizations and CVD with dapagliflozin or sacubitril-valsartan. The CNT was estimated by multiplying the annualized number needed to treat (aNNT) by the annual cost of therapy. The aNNT was calculated based on data collected from the DELIVER trial for dapagliflozin and a pooled analysis of the PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF trials for sacubitril-valsartan. Costs were based on 2022 US prices. Scenario analyses were performed to attenuate the differences in the studies' populations.

Results

The aNNT with dapagliflozin in DELIVER was 30 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21-62) versus 44 (95% CI: 25-311) with sacubitril-valsartan in a pooled analysis of PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF, with an annual cost of $4,951 and $5,576, respectively. The corresponding CNTs were $148,547.13 (95% CI: $103,982.99-$306,997.39) for dapagliflozin and $245,346.77 (95% CI: $139,401.58-1,734,155.60) for sacubitril-valsartan for preventing the composite outcome of CVD and HF hospitalizations. The CNT for preventing all-cause mortality was lower for dapagliflozin than sacubitril-valsartan $1,128,958.15 [CI: $401,077.24-∞] vs $2,185,816.71 [CI: $607,790.87-∞].

Conclusion

Dapagliflozin provides a better monetary value than sacubitril-valsartan in preventing the composite outcome of total HF hospitalizations and CVD among patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF.

Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity and risk factors

Doxorubicin (DOX) is an anthracycline antibiotic widely used as a chemotherapeutic agent to treat solid tumours and hematologic malignancies. Although useful in the treatment of cancers, the benefit of DOX is limited due to its cardiotoxic effect that is observed in a large number of patients. In the literature, there is evidence that the presence of various factors may increase the risk of developing DOX-induced cardiotoxicity. A better understanding of the role of these different factors in DOX-induced cardiotoxicity may facilitate the choice of the therapeutic approach in cancer patients suffering from various cardiovascular risk factors. In this review, we therefore discuss the latest findings in both preclinical and clinical research suggesting a link between DOX-induced cardiotoxicity and various risk factors including sex, age, ethnicity, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, obesity, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and co-medications.

[Therapy of heart failure with reduced pump function]

HFrEF causes significant morbidity and mortality and represents a major public health burden. Recently, there have been significant scientific advances in the treatment of HFrEF, with ARNI, BB, MRA, and SGLT-2i forming the GDMT for HFrEF. Basic quadruple therapy has been shown to significantly reduce of HF hospitalizations, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. In addition, new initiation and titration procedures have recently been introduced that may progressively improve the management and prognosis of HFrEF. Further efforts are also needed to improve the use of GDMT, which is currently underutilized.

The efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared with ACEI/ARB in the treatment of heart failure following acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose: To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (SV) by comparison with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for the treatment of heart failure caused by acute myocardial infarction (HF-AMI) based on current randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: Several electronic databases were searched up to 27 May 2023. Primary endpoints were the efficacy including the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and 6-min walk test (6MWT) and secondary endpoints were the safety including the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and adverse reaction (AE). Results: A total of 14 RCTs were included and all patients were from China. Among included 1,991 patients, 997 patients received SVs and 994 patients received ACEIs/ARBs. The pooled results demonstrated that patients in the SV group showed significantly better efficacy representing as increased LVEF [weighted mean difference (WMD): 4.43%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.84%-6.02%, p < 0.001] and 6MWT (WMD: 30.84 m, 95% CI: 25.65 m-36.03 m, p < 0.001) and decreased LVEDD (WMD: -3.24 mm, 95% CI: -4.96 mm ∼ -1.52 mm, p < 0.001) and NT-proBNP (WMD: -188.12 pg/mL, 95% CI: -246.75 pg/mL ∼ 129.49 pg/mL, p < 0.001), which was also verified by subgroup analysis based on the history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Besides, the SV group showed significantly lower incidence rate of MACE [relative risk (RR): 0.60, 95% CI: 0.47-0.75, p < 0.001] and patients receiving SVs in the non-PCI group also showed lower incidence of AE (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.20-0.71, p = 0.002). Conclusion: For the treatment of HF-AMI, SV is more effective and safer than ACEI/ARB based on current evidence, but more high-quality RCTs are still needed to verify above findings.

[Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy in old age]

Cardiovascular diseases are the most frequent cause of disability and death. Evidence-based pharmacotherapy is the basis for successful treatment of common diseases, such as hypertension, heart failure, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillation. The proportion of older people with several diseases (multimorbidity) who need five or more drugs daily (polypharmacy) is steadily increasing. Evidence on the efficacy and safety of drugs in these patients is, however, limited because they are often excluded or underrepresented in clinical trials. In addition, clinical guidelines mostly focus on single diseases and only occasionally deal with the challenges in the pharmacotherapy of older multimorbid patients with polypharmacy. This article describes the options and special features of pharmacotherapy for hypertension, chronic heart failure and dyslipidemia, as well as antithrombotic treatment in (very) old people.

The emerging role of sacubitril/valsartan in pulmonary hypertension with heart failure

Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease (PH-LHD) represents approximately 65%-80% of all patients with PH. The progression, prognosis, and mortality of individuals with left heart failure (LHF) are significantly influenced by PH and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Consequently, cardiologists should devote ample attention to the interplay between HF and PH. Patients with PH and HF may not receive optimal benefits from the therapeutic effects of prostaglandins, endothelin receptor antagonists, or phosphodiesterase inhibitors, which are specific drugs for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Sacubitril/valsartan, the angiotensin receptor II blocker-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), was recommended as the first-line therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) by the 2021 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines. Although ARNI is effective in treating left ventricular (LV) enlargement and lower ejection fraction, its efficacy in treating individuals with PH and HF remains underexplored. Considering its vasodilatory effect at the pre-capillary level and a natriuretic drainage role at the post-capillary level, ARNI is believed to have a broad range of potential applications in treating PH-LHD. This review discusses the fundamental pathophysiological connections between PH and HF, emphasizing the latest research and potential benefits of ARNI in PH with various types of LHF and RV dysfunction.

Cardiac Reverse Remodeling in Ischemic Heart Disease with Novel Therapies for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Despite the improvements in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) and acute myocardial infarction (MI) over the past 20 years, ischemic heart disease (IHD) continues to be the most common cause of heart failure (HF). In clinical trials, over 70% of patients diagnosed with HF had IHD as the underlying cause. Furthermore, IHD predicts a worse outcome for patients with HF, leading to a substantial increase in late morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. In recent years, new pharmacological therapies have emerged for the treatment of HF, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, selective cardiac myosin activators, and oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, demonstrating clear or potential benefits in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Interventional strategies such as cardiac resynchronization therapy, cardiac contractility modulation, or baroreflex activation therapy might provide additional therapeutic benefits by improving symptoms and promoting reverse remodeling. Furthermore, cardiac regenerative therapies such as stem cell transplantation could become a new therapeutic resource in the management of HF. By analyzing the existing data from the literature, this review aims to evaluate the impact of new HF therapies in patients with IHD in order to gain further insight into the best form of therapeutic management for this large proportion of HF patients.

Real-world comparative effectiveness of ARNI versus ACEi/ARB in HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction

AIMS

Sacubitril/valsartan is a first-in-class angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) with a class-1 guideline recommendation. We assessed the real-world effectiveness of ARNI versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) on all-cause and cardiovascular (CV)-related mortality and hospitalizations in heart failure (HF) with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction (EF).

METHODS

Patient-level clinical, laboratory, drug dispensation, hospitalization, and mortality data were derived from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) and interlinked databases (1 April 2016-31 December 2020). Eligible ARNI:ACEi/ARB patients (n = 7275:24,604) had a left ventricular EF < 50%. Mortality and hospitalizations with ARNI (≤ 3 months pre-/post-1 April 2016 index [SwedeHF]; n = 1506) versus ACEi/ARB (≤ 3 months post-index; n = 17,108) were assessed using propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) with clinical variables, and sensitivity analysis (1:2/1:3 with, and 1:2 without clinical variables).

RESULTS

ARNI induced a 23% reduction in all-cause mortality versus ACEi/ARB (1:1 hazard ratio [HR; 95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.77 [0.63-0.95], p = 0.013), and a non-significant 23% relative risk reduction in CV-related mortality (0.77 [0.54-1.09], p = 0.13), but no difference in all-cause or CV-related hospitalization (1.02 [0.91-1.13]; p = 0.76; 1.01 [0.91-1.15]; p = 0.84, respectively). Sensitivity analyses confirmed all-cause mortality was reduced for ARNI versus ACEi/ARB (HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.82-0.99], p = 0.026), but not CV-related mortality (HR 1.04 [95% CI 0.89-1.22], p = 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide real-world study including a population of patients with HF with reduced or mildly reduced EF, ARNI as part of guideline-led Swedish clinical practice was associated with a statistically significant relative risk reduction in all-cause mortality compared with ACEi/ARB.