Association of antidiabetic medication use, cognitive decline, and risk of cognitive impairment in older people with type 2 diabetes: Results from the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging

Metformin, Cognitive Function, and Changes in the Gut Microbiome

The decline in cognitive function and the prevalence of neurodegenerative disorders are among the most serious threats to health in old age. The prevalence of dementia has reached 50 million people worldwide and has become a major public health problem. The causes of age-related cognitive impairment are multiple, complex, and difficult to determine. However, type 2 diabetes (T2D) is linked to an enhanced risk of cognitive impairment and dementia. Human studies have shown that patients with T2D exhibit dysbiosis of the gut microbiota. This dysbiosis may contribute to the development of insulin resistance and increased plasma lipopolysaccharide concentrations. Metformin medication mimics some of the benefits of calorie restriction and physical activity, such as greater insulin sensitivity and decreased cholesterol levels, and hence may also have a positive impact on aging in humans. According to recent human investigations, metformin might partially restore gut dysbiosis related to T2D. Likewise, some studies showed that metformin reduced the risk of dementia and improved cognition, although not all studies are concordant. Therefore, this review focused on those human studies describing the effects of metformin on the gut microbiome (specifically the changes in taxonomy, function, and circulating metabolomics), the changes in cognitive function, and their possible bidirectional implications.

Metformin, age-related cognitive decline, and brain pathology

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relation of metformin with change in cognition and brain pathology. During a mean of 8 years (SD = 5.5) of annual follow-up visits, 262/3029 participants were using metformin at any time during the study. Using a linear-mixed effect model adjusted for age, sex, and education, metformin users had slower decline on a score of global cognition compared to non-users (estimate = 0.017, SE = 0.007, p = 0.027). Analyses of cognitive domains showed a slower decline in episodic memory and semantic memory specifically. In sensitivity analysis, when examining any diabetes medication use vs none, no association was observed of any diabetes medication use with cognitive function. In the autopsy subset of 1584 participants, there was no difference in the level of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology or the presence of infarcts (of any size or location) between groups of metformin users vs non-users. However, in additional analyses, metformin users had higher odds of subcortical infarcts, and lower odds of atherosclerosis and arteriosclerosis.

Association between cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older from Chile: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Few studies in Latin America have examined the association between cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive impairment (CI) in a nationally representative sample. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the prevalence of CI in a nationally representative sample of adults aged 60 years or older from Chile and to investigate the association between cardiovascular risk factors and CI.

METHODS

Data from the cross-sectional 2016-2017 National Health Survey of Chile, which included 2031 adults (63.7% women) was used. Body mass index, metabolic syndrome (blood pressure, triglycerides, fasting glucose or treatment for diabetics, waist circumference, and HDL cholesterol), risk of cardiovascular disease (history and measured variables, using the Framingham risk score), tobacco use, and physical activity were measured. CI was assessed using the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE).

RESULTS

Overall, the prevalence of CI was 12.2% at the national level. Significant differences in CI were observed by age, education level, risk of cardiovascular disease, and smoking. High risk of cardiovascular disease was associated with higher odds of CI (OR: 2.04; 95%CI: 1.20-3.45) compared to low risk. Smoking was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of CI (OR: 0.56; 95%CI: 0.36-0.87) compared to never smoking. Body mass index, metabolic syndrome, and physical activity were not associated with CI.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided additional support for previous findings on the relationship between cognitive decline and an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease. Worse CI was associated with the group with the highest risk of cardiovascular disease, and the presence of lifestyle factors, such as obesity and physical inactivity, exacerbate this relationship, but not being a current smoker.

The Association between Metformin Use and Risk of Developing Severe Dementia among AD Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

This study explores the potential impact of metformin on the development of severe dementia in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). With an emerging interest in the role of the APOE genotype in mediating metformin's effects on cognitive decline in AD patients, we sought to investigate whether metformin usage is associated with a reduced risk of severe dementia. Using data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database (2005-2021), we identified 1306 participants with both AD and T2DM on diabetes medications. These individuals were categorized based on metformin usage, and a propensity score-matched cohort of 1042 participants was analyzed. Over an average follow-up of 3.6 years, 93 cases of severe dementia were observed. A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that metformin users and non-users had similar probabilities of remaining severe dementia-free (log-rank p = 0.56). Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for covariates showed no significant association between metformin usage and a lower risk of severe dementia (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.63-1.46; p = 0.85). A subgroup analysis based on APOE ε4 carrier status demonstrated consistent results, with metformin use not correlating with a reduced severe dementia risk. In conclusion, our findings from a substantial cohort of AD and T2DM patients suggest that metformin usage is not significantly associated with a decreased risk of severe dementia. This observation persists across APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers, indicating a lack of genotype-mediated effect.

Metformin Adherence Reduces the Risk of Dementia in Patients With Diabetes: A Population-based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Metformin is widely used as the first-line drug for type 2 diabetes mellitus and has numerous benefits apart from lowering blood glucose. However, metformin-retained regimen is challenged by newly launching, powerful glucose-lowering antiglycemic agents. This population-based cohort study examined the association between metformin adherence and the risk of dementia and Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

Diabetic patients with metformin-included combination antiglycemic therapy were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database and categorized into metformin-adherent and -nonadherent groups according to the medical record of the first year prescription. Patients contraindicated with metformin, severe diabetic complications, and poor drug compliance were excluded. The study outcome was the diagnosis of dementia or PD.

RESULTS

A total of 31 384 matched pairs were included after using propensity score matching and both groups were followed up for an average of 5 years. Metformin adherence was associated with a significantly lower risk of dementia (adjusted hazard risk ratio = 0.72, P < .001) but not PD (adjusted hazard risk ratio = 0.97, P = .825). Subgroup analysis revealed that the risk of dementia was significantly reduced in metformin-adherent patients, both male and female, aged >65 or ≤ 65 years, and with or without concurrent insulin treatment. This effect was not influenced by concurrent insulin treatment, which may eliminate the bias caused by the severity of diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

Despite the launching of numerous new oral antiglycemic agents, metformin may provide further benefit on lowering risk of dementia beyond conventional glycemic control according to the real-world evidence.

Sensitivity of Individual and Composite Test Scores from the Cogstate Brief Battery to Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia Due to Alzheimer's Disease

BACKGROUND

The Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB) is a computerized cognitive test battery used commonly to identify cognitive deficits related to Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, AD and normative samples used to understand the sensitivity of the CBB to AD in the clinic have been limited, as have the outcome measures studied.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the sensitivity of CBB outcomes, including potential composite scores, to cognitive impairment in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia due to AD, in carefully selected samples.

METHODS

Samples consisted of 4,871 cognitively unimpaired adults and 184 adults who met clinical criteria for MCI (Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5) or dementia (CDR > 0.5) due to AD and CBB naive. Speed and accuracy measures from each test were examined, and theoretically- and statistically-derived composites were created. Sensitivity and specificity of classification of cognitive impairment were compared between outcomes.

RESULTS

Individual CBB measures of learning and working memory showed high discriminability for AD-related cognitive impairment for CDR 0.5 (AUCs ∼ 0.79-0.88), and CDR > 0.5 (AUCs ∼ 0.89-0.96) groups. Discrimination ability for theoretically derived CBB composite measures was high, particularly for the Learning and Working Memory (LWM) composite (CDR 0.5 AUC = 0.90, CDR > 0.5 AUC = 0.97). As expected, statistically optimized linear composite measures showed strong discrimination abilities albeit similar to the LWM composite.

CONCLUSIONS

In older adults, the CBB is effective for discriminating cognitive impairment due to MCI or AD-dementia from unimpaired cognition with the LWM composite providing the strongest sensitivity.

Food Insufficiency, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Status, and 9-Year Trajectory of Cognitive Function in Older Adults: The Longitudinal National Health and Aging Trends Study, 2012-2020

BACKGROUND

Despite findings from cross-sectional studies, how food insecurity experience/Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) status relates to cognitive decline over time has not been fully understood.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the longitudinal associations between food insecurity/SNAP status and cognitive function in older adults (≥65 y).

METHODS

Longitudinal data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study 2012-2020 were analyzed (n = 4578, median follow-up years = 5 y). Participants reported food insecurity experience (5-item) and were classified as food sufficient (FS, no affirmative answer) and food insufficient (FI, any affirmative answer). The SNAP status was defined as SNAP participants, SNAP eligible nonparticipants (≤200% Federal Poverty Line, FPL), and SNAP ineligible nonparticipants (>200% FPL). Cognitive function was measured via validated tests in 3 domains, and the standardized domain-specific and combined cognitive function z-scores were calculated. Mixed-effect models with a random intercept were used to study how FI or SNAP status was associated with combined and domain-specific cognitive z-scores over time, adjusting for static and time-varying covariates.

RESULTS

At baseline, 96.3% of the participants were FS and 3.7% were FI. In a subsample (n = 2832), 10.8% were SNAP participants, 30.7% were SNAP eligible nonparticipants, and 58.6% were SNAP ineligible nonparticipants. Compared with the FS group in the adjusted model (FI vs. FS), FI was associated with faster decline in the combined cognitive function scores [-0.043 (-0.055, -0.032) vs. -0.033 (-0.035, -0.031) z-scores per year, P-interaction = 0.064]. Cognitive decline rates (z-scores per year) in the combined score were similar in SNAP participants (β = -0.030; 95% CI: -0.038, -0.022) and SNAP ineligible nonparticipants (β = -0.028; 95% CI: -0.032, -0.024), both of which were slower than the rate in SNAP eligible nonparticipants (β = -0.043; 95% CI: -0.048, -0.038; P-interaction < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Food sufficiency and SNAP participation may be protective factors preventing accelerated cognitive decline in older adults.

The effect of metformin on cognitive function: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Most people are familiar with metformin as a diabetic treatment option. Different positive benefits have been found for it, in addition to its anti-diabetes properties. Cognitive function enhancement is the most recent characteristic that has been studied. This study aimed to look at the evidence on the effects of metformin on cognitive performance. Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases were searched systematically. After eliminating duplicates and irrelevant documents, the findings were screened. The documents that remained were scanned and data were extracted. Nineteen studies were qualified for meta-analysis after evaluating 3827 identified records. There was no significant relationship between metformin therapy and cognitive performance in none of the studies including cross-sectionals, cohorts, and clinical trials (p > 0.05). Results show that metformin has no significant effect on improving cognitive function or protecting against any dementia including vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease, and cognitive impairment as well.

Glucose-lowering drugs, cognition, and dementia: The clinical evidence

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an important risk factor for dementia. The possibility to mitigate this risk by controlling T2DM is compelling; however, different glucose-lowering drugs have different effects on the brain by virtue of their different mechanisms of action. The clinical and epidemiological data appear mixed, warranting careful critical evaluation of the human studies. Here we examine the evidence in the context of dementia prevention and treatment, both for people with and without T2DM. We discuss the evidence on this scaffold of research directions, identifying methodological complexities in the extant literature (e.g. comparator discrepancies, changes in the therapeutic landscape), and the implications of different outcome measures (e.g. neuropsychological). We consider possible implications of cerebrovascular protection vs. effects on progression of neurodegenerative proteinopathy, and we present a research roadmap for glucose-lowering drugs in cognitive neurology, including neuroimaging, and fluid biomarkers. We conclude that there is great potential to advance personalized strategies to prevent and treat dementia with glucose-lowering drugs.

Polypharmacy and Cognition Function Among Rural Adults

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy (using≥5 medications) is associated with poor health outcomes. Mixed results from past studies surrounding chronic medication use, control of chronic conditions, and their effects on cognitive performance warrant further attention.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate a link between polypharmacy and cognition function in rural-dwelling adults in Texas, USA.

METHODS

Project FRONTIER (Facing Rural Obstacles to Healthcare Now Through Intervention, Education & Research) is a cross-sectional epidemiological study using community-based participatory research in three counties of Texas. Residents age > 40 were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome is cognitive impairment, and exposures of interest are polypharmacy; comorbidities; and diabetes, hypertension, and depression medication. Logistic regression was used to assess association.

RESULTS

Six hundred eighty-nine individuals participated; the mean age was 61, and the majority were female (68.7%).The median number of medications taken by participants was 3.3 (IQR: 0-5); the rate of polypharmacy was 29.6%. Anti-hypertensive agents were the most common medications (15%) used. Polypharmacy users were 2.84 times more likely to have cognitive impairment [OR: 2.84, 95%CI (1.32-6.09)] than those using < 5 medications. Participants on hypertensive medications had 1.85 times higher odds [OR: 1.85, 95%CI (1.14-3.01)] of having cognitive impairment than those who did not have cognitive impairment.

CONCLUSION

Polypharmacy increases the odds of cognitive impairment. The odds of presenting with cognitive impairment increased as the number of medications increased. Additionally, we identified a large, concerning number of participants with pharmacotherapy and poor chronic disease management. A larger study should examine medication adherence among rural elders to manage chronic disease and any healthcare barriers to adherence.

Metabolic Syndrome: Is It Time to Add the Central Nervous System?

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is a set of cardio-metabolic risk factors that includes central obesity, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemias. The syndrome affects 25% of adults worldwide. The definition of MS has evolved over the last 80 years, with various classification systems and criteria, whose limitations and benefits are currently the subject of some controversy. Likewise, hypotheses regarding the etiology of MS add more confusion from clinical and epidemiological points of view. The leading suggestion for the pathophysiology of MS is insulin resistance (IR). IR can affect multiple tissues and organs, from the classic “triumvirate” (myocyte, adipocyte, and hepatocyte) to possible effects on organs considered more recently, such as the central nervous system (CNS). Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may be clinical expressions of CNS involvement. However, the association between MCI and MS is not understood. The bidirectional relationship that seems to exist between these factors raises the questions of which phenomenon occurs first and whether MCI can be a precursor of MS. This review explores shared pathophysiological mechanisms between MCI and MS and establishes a hypothesis of a possible MCI role in the development of IR and the appearance of MS.

Repurposing of Anti-Diabetic Agents as a New Opportunity to Alleviate Cognitive Impairment in Neurodegenerative and Neuropsychiatric Disorders

Cognitive impairment is a shared abnormality between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and many neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and schizophrenia. Emerging evidence suggests that brain insulin resistance plays a significant role in cognitive deficits, which provides the possibility of anti-diabetic agents repositioning to alleviate cognitive deficits. Both preclinical and clinical studies have evaluated the potential cognitive enhancement effects of anti-diabetic agents targeting the insulin pathway. Repurposing of anti-diabetic agents is considered to be promising for cognitive deficits prevention or control in these neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders. This article reviewed the possible relationship between brain insulin resistance and cognitive deficits. In addition, promising therapeutic interventions, especially current advances in anti-diabetic agents targeting the insulin pathway to alleviate cognitive impairment in AD and schizophrenia were also summarized.

Metabolic Aspects of Adenosine Functions in the Brain

Adenosine, acting both through G-protein coupled adenosine receptors and intracellularly, plays a complex role in multiple physiological and pathophysiological processes by modulating neuronal plasticity, astrocytic activity, learning and memory, motor function, feeding, control of sleep and aging. Adenosine is involved in stroke, epilepsy and neurodegenerative pathologies. Extracellular concentration of adenosine in the brain is tightly regulated. Adenosine may be generated intracellularly in the central nervous system from degradation of AMP or from the hydrolysis of S-adenosyl homocysteine, and then exit via bi-directional nucleoside transporters, or extracellularly by the metabolism of released nucleotides. Inactivation of extracellular adenosine occurs by transport into neurons or neighboring cells, followed by either phosphorylation to AMP by adenosine kinase or deamination to inosine by adenosine deaminase. Modulation of the nucleoside transporters or of the enzymatic activities involved in the metabolism of adenosine, by affecting the levels of this nucleoside and the activity of adenosine receptors, could have a role in the onset or the development of central nervous system disorders, and can also be target of drugs for their treatment. In this review, we focus on the contribution of 5'-nucleotidases, adenosine kinase, adenosine deaminase, AMP deaminase, AMP-activated protein kinase and nucleoside transporters in epilepsy, cognition, and neurodegenerative diseases with a particular attention on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Huntington's disease. We include several examples of the involvement of components of the adenosine metabolism in learning and of the possible use of modulators of enzymes involved in adenosine metabolism or nucleoside transporters in the amelioration of cognition deficits.

Does the Abbreviated Mental Test Accurately Predict Cognitive Impairment in Thai Older Adults? A Retrospective Study

The Abbreviated Mental Test is a screening tool for cognitive impairment in older adults now used in Thailand's annual national cognitive assessment required for all community-dwelling older adults in Thailand, however its validity has not been established for this purpose. This retrospective study evaluated the results of this abbreviated test as well as the Mini Mental State Examination, in a sample of older adults who participated in the national cognitive assessment in 2018 in Udon Thani Province, Thailand. Of the 174,227 cases, 1518 cases had scores on both tests. The Mini-Mental State Examination is performed on a select group of individuals who scored low on the initial and briefer test. Results indicated that the proportion of cognitive impairment as defined by the Abbreviated Mental Test (87.7%) was five times higher than indicated by the more rigorous Mini-Mental State Examination (16.3%). At the AMT standard cut point of 8 out of a total possible score of 10 for the presence of cognitive impairment, sensitivity was low (12.8%) but specificity was high (90.3%), while the optimal cut-point of 5 on the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve errs on the side of being highly sensitive but not specific enough to screen for cognitive impairment. Additionally, one item on the AMT was answered incorrectly by 95% of responders. Although brief and easy to administer, the AMT may be a suboptimal choice for screening for cognitive impairment. When administered by volunteer health workers, the AMT may also possess limited reliability and validity. Cognitive screening administered by nurses should be considered to help detect cognitive impairment older adults dwelling in the community.

Relationships between memory decline and the use of metformin or DPP4 inhibitors in people with type 2 diabetes with normal cognition or Alzheimer's disease, and the role APOE carrier status

INTRODUCTION

Few studies have examined memory decline among patients with type 2 diabetes using different oral hypoglycemic drugs.

METHODS

Participants with normal cognition (NC) or Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia using a hypoglycemic medication (2005 to 2019) were identified from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center database. Delayed memory was assessed using the Wechsler Memory Scale Revised-Logical Memory test. Associations between oral drug classes and memory over time were examined using mixed-effects models with inverse probability treatment weights.

RESULTS

In NC (n = 1192), metformin use was associated with better memory performance over time, whereas in AD (n = 807), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor use was associated with a slower rate of memory decline. Interaction effects suggested greater benefit associated with DPP4 inhibitor use among APOE ε4 carriers.

DISCUSSION

Associations between different oral hypoglycemic drugs and memory change were not consistent between cognitively normal elderly and those with AD dementia. APOE ε4 genotype modified some relationships.

Metformin therapy and cognitive dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a risk factor for cognitive dysfunction. The relationship between metformin therapy and cognitive function in patients with T2D is unknown. Therefore, we determined the relationship between metformin therapy and cognitive function in patients with T2D using a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We systematically searched the Cochrane library, PubMed, and Embase to identify studies showing correlations, and we calculated hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

We identified 10 studies including 254,679 participants. Metformin significantly reduced the occurrence of cognitive dysfunction in patients with T2D (HR 0.90; 95% CI [0.88, 0.92]). Compared with other hypoglycemic drugs, sulfonylureas also improved cognitive dysfunction (HR 0.92; 95% CI [0.88, 0.95]). Thiazolidinediones gave no statistically significant improvement in cognitive dysfunction (HR 0.97; 95% CI [0.87, 1.07]). The use of insulin aggravated cognitive dysfunction (HR 1.34; 95% CI [1.24, 1.43]). In the subgroup analysis of various regions controlling for age, gender, education, diabetes course, complications, metformin administration and dosage, and follow-up time, metformin significantly improved cognitive dysfunction in patients in the Americas and Europe (HR 0.69; 95% CI [0.63, 0.74]), (HR 0.71; 95% CI [0.66, 0.76], respectively), while metformin did not significantly improve cognitive dysfunction in Asian patients (HR 0.99; 95% CI [0.96, 1.01]).

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin significantly improved cognitive dysfunction in patients with T2D. Sulfonylureas also improved cognitive dysfunction. Thiazolidinediones had no significant effect on cognitive dysfunction. The use of insulin aggravated cognitive dysfunction. Metformin improved cognitive dysfunction more significantly in patients in the Americas and Europe than in Asia.

Benzodiazepines and Related Drugs as a Risk Factor in Alzheimer's Disease Dementia

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) and Z-drugs are compounds widely prescribed in medical practice due to their anxiolytic, hypnotic, and muscle relaxant properties. Yet, their chronic use is associated with cases of abuse, dependence, and relapse in many patients. Furthermore, elderly people are susceptible to alterations in pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics as well as to drug interaction due to polypharmacy. These situations increase the risk for the appearance of cognitive affectations and the development of pathologies like Alzheimer's disease (AD). In the present work, there is a summary of some clinical studies that have evaluated the effect of BZDs and Z-drugs in the adult population with and without AD, focusing on the relationship between their use and the loss of cognitive function. Additionally, there is an assessment of preclinical studies focused on finding molecular proof on the pathways by which these drugs could be involved in AD pathogenesis. Moreover, available data (1990-2019) on BZD and Z-drug use among elderly patients, with and without AD, was compiled in this work. Finally, the relationship between the use of BZD and Z-drugs for the treatment of insomnia and the appearance of AD biomarkers was analyzed. Results pointed to a vicious circle that would worsen the condition of patients over time. Likewise, it put into relevance the need for close monitoring of those patients using BZDs that also suffer from AD. Consequently, future studies should focus on optimizing strategies for insomnia treatment in the elderly by using other substances like melatonin agonists, which is described to have a much more significant safety profile.

Review of clinical nerve repair strategies for neurorestoration of central nervous system tumor damage

Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are common. In recent years, with the continuous development and popularization of neurosurgery and the advancement of diagnostic and therapeutic instruments, the diagnosis and treatment of diseases have made great progress, but the prognosis of patients depends on multiple clinical factors. In this study, we selected various literatures in the PubMed and Google Scholar search engines using the keywords "nerve repair strategies" , "central nervous system tumor" as well as searched scientifically reviewed historical perspectives and recent advancements and achievements in Neurorestoratology of the CNS. Therefore, this study focuses on the Neurorestoratology of the CNS and its prospects, aiming to provide scientific guidance for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of CNS tumors in the future, and improve the prognosis and quality of life of patients.

Exercise and metformin counteract altered mitochondrial function in the insulin-resistant brain

Insulin resistance associates with increased risk for cognitive decline and dementia; however, the underpinning mechanisms for this increased risk remain to be fully defined. As insulin resistance impairs mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and increases ROS in skeletal muscle, we considered whether similar events occur in the brain, which - like muscle - is rich in insulin receptors and mitochondria. We show that high-fat diet-induced (HFD-induced) brain insulin resistance in mice decreased mitochondrial ATP production rate and oxidative enzyme activities in brain regions rich in insulin receptors. HFD increased ROS emission and reduced antioxidant enzyme activities, with the concurrent accumulation of oxidatively damaged mitochondrial proteins and increased mitochondrial fission. Improvement of insulin sensitivity by both aerobic exercise and metformin ameliorated HFD-induced abnormalities. Moreover, insulin-induced enhancement of ATP production in primary cortical neurons and astrocytes was counteracted by the insulin receptor antagonist S961, demonstrating a direct effect of insulin resistance on brain mitochondria. Further, intranasal S961 administration prevented exercise-induced improvements in ATP production and ROS emission during HFD, supporting that exercise enhances brain mitochondrial function by improving insulin action. These results support that insulin sensitizing by exercise and metformin restores brain mitochondrial function in insulin-resistant states.

The effects of weight loss and metformin on cognition among breast cancer survivors: Evidence from the Reach for Health study

OBJECTIVE

Breast cancer survivors experience problems with cognition that interfere with daily life and can last for years. In the general population, obesity and diabetes are risk factors for cognitive decline, and weight loss can improve cognition; however, the impact of intentional weight loss on cancer survivors' cognition has not been tested. We investigated the impact of weight loss and metformin on changes in cognitive function in a sample of breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

Overweight/obese postmenopausal breast cancer survivors (n = 333) were randomized to a weight loss intervention versus control and metformin versus placebo in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Outcomes were changes in five cognitive domains from baseline to 6 months measured by objective neurocognitive tests.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant intervention effects for the metformin or weight loss interventions in five neurocognitive domains. Baseline body mass index (BMI) was a significant effect modifier of the changes in verbal functioning for the weight loss (P = 0.009) and metformin interventions (P = 0.0125). These effect modifications were independent of percent weight loss achieved during the 6-month study period.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized controlled trial of weight loss and metformin interventions that examined changes to cognition among breast cancer survivors suggests that these interventions may not improve cognitive functioning among breast cancer survivors in general. However, weight loss may improve verbal functioning among individuals with a higher BMI.

Brain insulin action: Implications for the treatment of schizophrenia

Insulin action in the central nervous system is a major regulator of energy balance and cognitive processes. The development of central insulin resistance is associated with alterations in dopaminergic reward systems and homeostatic signals affecting food intake, glucose metabolism, body weight and cognitive performance. Emerging evidence has highlighted a role for antipsychotics (APs) to modulate central insulin-mediated pathways. Although APs remain the cornerstone treatment for schizophrenia they are associated with severe metabolic complications and fail to address premorbid cognitive deficits, which characterize the disorder of schizophrenia. In this review, we first explore how the hypothesized association between schizophrenia and CNS insulin dysregulation aligns with the use of APs. We then investigate the proposed relationship between CNS insulin action and AP-mediated effects on metabolic homeostasis, and different domains of psychopathology, including cognition. We briefly discuss a potential role of CNS insulin signaling to explain the hypothesized, but somewhat controversial association between therapeutic efficacy and metabolic side effects of APs. Finally, we propose how this knowledge might inform novel treatment strategies to target difficult to treat domains of schizophrenia. This article is part of the issue entitled 'Special Issue on Antipsychotics'.

Roles for osteocalcin in brain signalling: implications in cognition- and motor-related disorders

It is now generally accepted that the extra-skeleton functionalities of bone are multifaceted. Its endocrine functions came first to light when it was realized that osteoblasts, the bone forming cells, maintain energy homeostasis by improving glucose metabolism, insulin sensitivity and energy expenditure through osteocalcin, a multipurpose osteokine secreted by osteoblasts. Recently, the emerging knowledge on the functional aspects of this osteokine expanded to properties including adult and maternal regulation of cognitive functions. Therapeutic potential of this osteokine has also been recently reported in experimental Parkinson’s disease models. This review highlights such findings on the functions of osteocalcin in the brain and emphasizes on exploring and analyzing much more in-depth basic and clinical studies.

Antidiabetic treatment on memory and spatial learning: From the pancreas to the neuron

The detrimental effects of constant hyperglycemia on neural function have been quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated in the setting of diabetes mellitus. Some of the hallmark features of diabetic encephalopathy (DE) are impaired synaptic adaptation and diminished spatial learning capacity. Chronic and progressive cognitive dysfunction, perpetuated by several positive feedback mechanisms in diabetic subjects, facilitates the development of early-onset dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Despite the numerous clinical manifestations of DE having been described in detail and their pathophysiological substrate having been elucidated in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, an effective therapeutic approach is yet to be proposed. Therefore, the aim of this review is to summarize the growing body of evidence concerning the effect of current antidiabetic treatment options on diabetic and non-DE.

Cognition and drug adherence to oral hypoglycemic and antihypertensive agents in older adults

Background and objectives: Chronic disorders such as diabetes mellitus type II and hypertension have been associated with cognitive decline in older adults. It is unclear whether adherence to antihypertensive and oral hypoglycemic agents impact cognitive health. The objectives are to study the association between adherence to antihypertensive and oral hypoglycemic agents and cognitive status in community-living older adults. Methods: We used data from a large representative sample of older adults (N=2,286) covered under a public drug insurance plan in Quebec and participating in Quebec's health survey on older adults (ESA-study) with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥22 at baseline (T1) and examined one year later (T2). Participants with hypertension and diabetes mellitus type II were identified according to criteria used in the Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System. Antihypertensive and oral hypoglycemic prescriptions delivered were ascertained via Quebec's pharmaceutical database (RAMQ). Medication adherence was calculated using the medication possession ratio as a continuous variable in the year prior to and following baseline interview. Multivariate linear regressions were used to study the percentage change in MMSE scores between interviews (T1,T2) as a function of adherence to antihypertensive and oral hypoglycemic agents (before and after T1) controlling for potential confounders. Results: In participants with diabetes mellitus type II only, adherence to oral hypoglycemics was not associated with a change in MMSE scores. In participants with hypertension only, the change in MMSE scores was associated with adherence to antihypertensives (β 1.23; 95%CI: 0.29-2.17). In participants with comorbid hypertension and diabetes mellitus type II, the change in MMSE scores was associated with adherence to both antihypertensive and oral hypoglycemic agents (β 0.75; 95%CI: 0.01-1.48). Conclusions: Adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents and antihypertensive agents among older adults with hypertension and comorbid diabetes mellitus type II can have a preserving effect on cognitive health in older adults. Further research on the long-term impact on cognition is recommended.