1
|
Parsons MT, de la Hoya M, Richardson ME, Tudini E, Anderson M, Berkofsky-Fessler W, Caputo SM, Chan RC, Cline MS, Feng BJ, Fortuno C, Gomez-Garcia E, Hadler J, Hiraki S, Holdren M, Houdayer C, Hruska K, James P, Karam R, Leong HS, Martins A, Mensenkamp AR, Monteiro AN, Nathan V, O'Connor R, Pedersen IS, Pesaran T, Radice P, Schmidt G, Southey M, Tavtigian S, Thompson BA, Toland AE, Turnbull C, Vogel MJ, Weyandt J, Wiggins GAR, Zec L, Couch FJ, Walker LC, Vreeswijk MPG, Goldgar DE, Spurdle AB. Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel. Am J Hum Genet 2024; 111:2044-2058. [PMID: 39142283 PMCID: PMC11393667 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The ENIGMA research consortium develops and applies methods to determine clinical significance of variants in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes. An ENIGMA BRCA1/2 classification sub-group, formed in 2015 as a ClinGen external expert panel, evolved into a ClinGen internal Variant Curation Expert Panel (VCEP) to align with Food and Drug Administration recognized processes for ClinVar contributions. The VCEP reviewed American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association of Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) classification criteria for relevance to interpreting BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Statistical methods were used to calibrate evidence strength for different data types. Pilot specifications were tested on 40 variants and documentation revised for clarity and ease of use. The original criterion descriptions for 13 evidence codes were considered non-applicable or overlapping with other criteria. Scenario of use was extended or re-purposed for eight codes. Extensive analysis and/or data review informed specification descriptions and weights for all codes. Specifications were applied to pilot variants with pre-existing ClinVar classification as follows: 13 uncertain significance or conflicting, 14 pathogenic and/or likely pathogenic, and 13 benign and/or likely benign. Review resolved classification for 11/13 uncertain significance or conflicting variants and retained or improved confidence in classification for the remaining variants. Alignment of pre-existing ENIGMA research classification processes with ACMG/AMP classification guidelines highlighted several gaps in the research processes and the baseline ACMG/AMP criteria. Calibration of evidence strength was key to justify utility and strength of different data types for gene-specific application. The gene-specific criteria demonstrated value for improving ACMG/AMP-aligned classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Parsons
- Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, 28040 Madrid Spain
| | | | - Emma Tudini
- Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | | | | | - Sandrine M Caputo
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, and Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, 75005 Paris, France
| | | | - Melissa S Cline
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, Genomics, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Bing-Jian Feng
- Department of Dermatology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Cristina Fortuno
- Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Encarna Gomez-Garcia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna Hadler
- Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | | | - Megan Holdren
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Claude Houdayer
- University Rouen Normandie, Inserm U1245 and CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics, FHU G4 Génomique, F-76000 Rouen, France
| | | | - Paul James
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rachid Karam
- Ambry Genetics Corporation, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, USA
| | - Huei San Leong
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | | | - Arjen R Mensenkamp
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Alvaro N Monteiro
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Vaishnavi Nathan
- Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | | | - Inge Sokilde Pedersen
- Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Tina Pesaran
- Ambry Genetics Corporation, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, USA
| | - Paolo Radice
- Predictive Medicine: Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk, Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Gunnar Schmidt
- Institute of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Melissa Southey
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, The Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Sean Tavtigian
- Department of Oncological Sciences and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Bryony A Thompson
- Department of Pathology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia
| | - Amanda E Toland
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Translational Genetics Team, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Maartje J Vogel
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jamie Weyandt
- Ambry Genetics Corporation, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, USA
| | - George A R Wiggins
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Logan C Walker
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Maaike P G Vreeswijk
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - David E Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jain S, Bakolitsa C, Brenner SE, Radivojac P, Moult J, Repo S, Hoskins RA, Andreoletti G, Barsky D, Chellapan A, Chu H, Dabbiru N, Kollipara NK, Ly M, Neumann AJ, Pal LR, Odell E, Pandey G, Peters-Petrulewicz RC, Srinivasan R, Yee SF, Yeleswarapu SJ, Zuhl M, Adebali O, Patra A, Beer MA, Hosur R, Peng J, Bernard BM, Berry M, Dong S, Boyle AP, Adhikari A, Chen J, Hu Z, Wang R, Wang Y, Miller M, Wang Y, Bromberg Y, Turina P, Capriotti E, Han JJ, Ozturk K, Carter H, Babbi G, Bovo S, Di Lena P, Martelli PL, Savojardo C, Casadio R, Cline MS, De Baets G, Bonache S, Díez O, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, Fernández A, Montalban G, Ootes L, Özkan S, Padilla N, Riera C, De la Cruz X, Diekhans M, Huwe PJ, Wei Q, Xu Q, Dunbrack RL, Gotea V, Elnitski L, Margolin G, Fariselli P, Kulakovskiy IV, Makeev VJ, Penzar DD, Vorontsov IE, Favorov AV, Forman JR, Hasenahuer M, Fornasari MS, Parisi G, Avsec Z, Çelik MH, Nguyen TYD, Gagneur J, Shi FY, Edwards MD, Guo Y, Tian K, Zeng H, Gifford DK, Göke J, Zaucha J, Gough J, Ritchie GRS, Frankish A, Mudge JM, Harrow J, Young EL, Yu Y, Huff CD, Murakami K, Nagai Y, Imanishi T, Mungall CJ, Jacobsen JOB, Kim D, Jeong CS, Jones DT, Li MJ, Guthrie VB, Bhattacharya R, Chen YC, Douville C, Fan J, Kim D, Masica D, Niknafs N, Sengupta S, Tokheim C, Turner TN, Yeo HTG, Karchin R, Shin S, Welch R, Keles S, Li Y, Kellis M, Corbi-Verge C, Strokach AV, Kim PM, Klein TE, Mohan R, Sinnott-Armstrong NA, Wainberg M, Kundaje A, Gonzaludo N, Mak ACY, Chhibber A, Lam HYK, Dahary D, Fishilevich S, Lancet D, Lee I, Bachman B, Katsonis P, Lua RC, Wilson SJ, Lichtarge O, Bhat RR, Sundaram L, Viswanath V, Bellazzi R, Nicora G, Rizzo E, Limongelli I, Mezlini AM, Chang R, Kim S, Lai C, O’Connor R, Topper S, van den Akker J, Zhou AY, Zimmer AD, Mishne G, Bergquist TR, Breese MR, Guerrero RF, Jiang Y, Kiga N, Li B, Mort M, Pagel KA, Pejaver V, Stamboulian MH, Thusberg J, Mooney SD, Teerakulkittipong N, Cao C, Kundu K, Yin Y, Yu CH, Kleyman M, Lin CF, Stackpole M, Mount SM, Eraslan G, Mueller NS, Naito T, Rao AR, Azaria JR, Brodie A, Ofran Y, Garg A, Pal D, Hawkins-Hooker A, Kenlay H, Reid J, Mucaki EJ, Rogan PK, Schwarz JM, Searls DB, Lee GR, Seok C, Krämer A, Shah S, Huang CV, Kirsch JF, Shatsky M, Cao Y, Chen H, Karimi M, Moronfoye O, Sun Y, Shen Y, Shigeta R, Ford CT, Nodzak C, Uppal A, Shi X, Joseph T, Kotte S, Rana S, Rao A, Saipradeep VG, Sivadasan N, Sunderam U, Stanke M, Su A, Adzhubey I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev S, Rousseau F, Schymkowitz J, Van Durme J, Tavtigian SV, Carraro M, Giollo M, Tosatto SCE, Adato O, Carmel L, Cohen NE, Fenesh T, Holtzer T, Juven-Gershon T, Unger R, Niroula A, Olatubosun A, Väliaho J, Yang Y, Vihinen M, Wahl ME, Chang B, Chong KC, Hu I, Sun R, Wu WKK, Xia X, Zee BC, Wang MH, Wang M, Wu C, Lu Y, Chen K, Yang Y, Yates CM, Kreimer A, Yan Z, Yosef N, Zhao H, Wei Z, Yao Z, Zhou F, Folkman L, Zhou Y, Daneshjou R, Altman RB, Inoue F, Ahituv N, Arkin AP, Lovisa F, Bonvini P, Bowdin S, Gianni S, Mantuano E, Minicozzi V, Novak L, Pasquo A, Pastore A, Petrosino M, Puglisi R, Toto A, Veneziano L, Chiaraluce R, Ball MP, Bobe JR, Church GM, Consalvi V, Cooper DN, Buckley BA, Sheridan MB, Cutting GR, Scaini MC, Cygan KJ, Fredericks AM, Glidden DT, Neil C, Rhine CL, Fairbrother WG, Alontaga AY, Fenton AW, Matreyek KA, Starita LM, Fowler DM, Löscher BS, Franke A, Adamson SI, Graveley BR, Gray JW, Malloy MJ, Kane JP, Kousi M, Katsanis N, Schubach M, Kircher M, Mak ACY, Tang PLF, Kwok PY, Lathrop RH, Clark WT, Yu GK, LeBowitz JH, Benedicenti F, Bettella E, Bigoni S, Cesca F, Mammi I, Marino-Buslje C, Milani D, Peron A, Polli R, Sartori S, Stanzial F, Toldo I, Turolla L, Aspromonte MC, Bellini M, Leonardi E, Liu X, Marshall C, McCombie WR, Elefanti L, Menin C, Meyn MS, Murgia A, Nadeau KCY, Neuhausen SL, Nussbaum RL, Pirooznia M, Potash JB, Dimster-Denk DF, Rine JD, Sanford JR, Snyder M, Cote AG, Sun S, Verby MW, Weile J, Roth FP, Tewhey R, Sabeti PC, Campagna J, Refaat MM, Wojciak J, Grubb S, Schmitt N, Shendure J, Spurdle AB, Stavropoulos DJ, Walton NA, Zandi PP, Ziv E, Burke W, Chen F, Carr LR, Martinez S, Paik J, Harris-Wai J, Yarborough M, Fullerton SM, Koenig BA, McInnes G, Shigaki D, Chandonia JM, Furutsuki M, Kasak L, Yu C, Chen R, Friedberg I, Getz GA, Cong Q, Kinch LN, Zhang J, Grishin NV, Voskanian A, Kann MG, Tran E, Ioannidis NM, Hunter JM, Udani R, Cai B, Morgan AA, Sokolov A, Stuart JM, Minervini G, Monzon AM, Batzoglou S, Butte AJ, Greenblatt MS, Hart RK, Hernandez R, Hubbard TJP, Kahn S, O’Donnell-Luria A, Ng PC, Shon J, Veltman J, Zook JM. CAGI, the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation, establishes progress and prospects for computational genetic variant interpretation methods. Genome Biol 2024; 25:53. [PMID: 38389099 PMCID: PMC10882881 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-03113-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) aims to advance the state-of-the-art for computational prediction of genetic variant impact, particularly where relevant to disease. The five complete editions of the CAGI community experiment comprised 50 challenges, in which participants made blind predictions of phenotypes from genetic data, and these were evaluated by independent assessors. RESULTS Performance was particularly strong for clinical pathogenic variants, including some difficult-to-diagnose cases, and extends to interpretation of cancer-related variants. Missense variant interpretation methods were able to estimate biochemical effects with increasing accuracy. Assessment of methods for regulatory variants and complex trait disease risk was less definitive and indicates performance potentially suitable for auxiliary use in the clinic. CONCLUSIONS Results show that while current methods are imperfect, they have major utility for research and clinical applications. Emerging methods and increasingly large, robust datasets for training and assessment promise further progress ahead.
Collapse
|
3
|
Zanti M, O'Mahony DG, Parsons MT, Li H, Dennis J, Aittomäkkiki K, Andrulis IL, Anton-Culver H, Aronson KJ, Augustinsson A, Becher H, Bojesen SE, Bolla MK, Brenner H, Brown MA, Buys SS, Canzian F, Caputo SM, Castelao JE, Chang-Claude J, Czene K, Daly MB, De Nicolo A, Devilee P, Dörk T, Dunning AM, Dwek M, Eccles DM, Engel C, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Gago-Dominguez M, García-Closas M, García-Sáenz JA, Gentry-Maharaj A, Geurts - Giele WR, Giles GG, Glendon G, Goldberg MS, Garcia EBG, Güendert M, Guénel P, Hahnen E, Haiman CA, Hall P, Hamann U, Harkness EF, Hogervorst FB, Hollestelle A, Hoppe R, Hopper JL, Houdayer C, Houlston RS, Howell A, Jakimovska M, Jakubowska A, Jernström H, John EM, Kaaks R, Kitahara CM, Koutros S, Kraft P, Kristensen VN, Lacey JV, Lambrechts D, Léoné M, Lindblom A, Lubiński J, Lush M, Mannermaa A, Manoochehri M, Manoukian S, Margolin S, Martinez ME, Menon U, Milne RL, Monteiro AN, Murphy RA, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Newman WG, Offit K, Park SK, James P, Peterlongo P, Peto J, Plaseska-Karanfilska D, Punie K, Radice P, Rashid MU, Rennert G, Romero A, Rosenberg EH, Saloustros E, Sandler DP, Schmidt MK, Schmutzler RK, Shu XO, Simard J, Southey MC, Stone J, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Tamimi RM, Tapper WJ, Taylor JA, Teo SH, Teras LR, Terry MB, Thomassen M, Troester MA, Vachon CM, Vega A, Vreeswijk MP, Wang Q, Wappenschmidt B, Weinberg CR, Wolk A, Zheng W, Feng B, Couch FJ, Spurdle AB, Easton DF, Goldgar DE, Michailidou K. A likelihood ratio approach for utilizing case-control data in the clinical classification of rare sequence variants: application to BRCA1 and BRCA2. Hum Mutat 2023; 2023:9961341. [PMID: 38725546 PMCID: PMC11080979 DOI: 10.1155/2023/9961341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
A large number of variants identified through clinical genetic testing in disease susceptibility genes, are of uncertain significance (VUS). Following the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), the frequency in case-control datasets (PS4 criterion), can inform their interpretation. We present a novel case-control likelihood ratio-based method that incorporates gene-specific age-related penetrance. We demonstrate the utility of this method in the analysis of simulated and real datasets. In the analyses of simulated data, the likelihood ratio method was more powerful compared to other methods. Likelihood ratios were calculated for a case-control dataset of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), and compared with logistic regression results. A larger number of variants reached evidence in favor of pathogenicity, and a substantial number of variants had evidence against pathogenicity - findings that would not have been reached using other case-control analysis methods. Our novel method provides greater power to classify rare variants compared to classical case-control methods. As an initiative from the ENIGMA Analytical Working Group, we provide user-friendly scripts and pre-formatted excel calculators for implementation of the method for rare variants in BRCA1, BRCA2 and other high-risk genes with known penetrance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Zanti
- Biostatistics Unit, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Denise G. O'Mahony
- Biostatistics Unit, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Michael T. Parsons
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Hongyan Li
- Cancer Control and Population Science, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kristiina Aittomäkkiki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Irene L. Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Medicine, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Kristan J. Aronson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, and Cancer Research Institute, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Annelie Augustinsson
- Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences in Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Heiko Becher
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stig E. Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Manjeet K. Bolla
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Melissa A. Brown
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Saundra S. Buys
- Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Federico Canzian
- Genomic Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sandrine M. Caputo
- Service de Génétique, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, Paris, France
| | - Jose E. Castelao
- Oncology and Genetics Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur (IISGS), Xerencia de Xestion Integrada de Vigo-SERGAS, Vigo, Spain
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - GC-HBOC study Collaborators
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mary B. Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Arcangela De Nicolo
- Center for Omics Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Alison M. Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Miriam Dwek
- School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK
| | - Diana M. Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- LIFE - Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Manuela Gago-Dominguez
- Genomic Medicine Group, International Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology Group, Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - José A. García-Sáenz
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Graham G. Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gord Glendon
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark S. Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Encarna B. Gómez Garcia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Melanie Güendert
- Molecular Epidemiology Group, C080, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, University Womens Clinic Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Guénel
- Team 'Exposome and Heredity', CESP, Gustave Roussy, INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Villejuif, France
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christopher A. Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elaine F. Harkness
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Nightingale & Genesis Prevention Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Frans B.L. Hogervorst
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Reiner Hoppe
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany
- University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - John L. Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Claude Houdayer
- Department of Genetics, F76000 and Normandy University, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Richard S. Houlston
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - ABCTB Investigators
- Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Milena Jakimovska
- Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 'Georgi D. Efremov', MASA, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Helena Jernström
- Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences in Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Esther M. John
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cari M. Kitahara
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stella Koutros
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vessela N. Kristensen
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - James V. Lacey
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- VIB Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Melanie Léoné
- Genetic and Cancer Medical Laboratory HCL-CLB, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Michael Lush
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Biobank of Eastern Finland, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mehdi Manoochehri
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Margolin
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Elena Martinez
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Roger L. Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alvaro N. Monteiro
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Rachel A. Murphy
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Susan L. Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - William G. Newman
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Research Lab, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sue K. Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Paul James
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- Genome Diagnostics Program, IFOM - ETS the AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Julian Peto
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska
- Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 'Georgi D. Efremov', MASA, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
| | - Kevin Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Muhammad U. Rashid
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Basic Sciences, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (SKMCH & RC), Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Gad Rennert
- Clalit National Cancer Control Center, Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| | - Atocha Romero
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Efraim H. Rosenberg
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Dale P. Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Marjanka K. Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec – Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Melissa C. Southey
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer Stone
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Genetic Epidemiology Group, School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Service de Génétique, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Department of Tumour Biology, INSERM U830, Paris, France
- Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Rulla M. Tamimi
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jack A. Taylor
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
- Epigenetic and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Soo Hwang Teo
- Breast Cancer Research Programme, Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, UM Cancer Research Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Lauren R. Teras
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odence C, Denmark
| | - Melissa A. Troester
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Celine M. Vachon
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ana Vega
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Maaike P.G. Vreeswijk
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Qin Wang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Clarice R. Weinberg
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Bingjian Feng
- Department of Dermatology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amanda B. Spurdle
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - David E. Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kyriaki Michailidou
- Biostatistics Unit, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Paolis E, Paris I, Tilocca B, Roncada P, Foca L, Tiberi G, D’Angelo T, Pavese F, Muratore M, Carbognin L, Garganese G, Masetti R, Di Leone A, Fabi A, Scambia G, Urbani A, Generali D, Minucci A, Santonocito C. Assessing the pathogenicity of BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance: Relevance and challenges for breast cancer precision medicine. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1053035. [PMID: 36741700 PMCID: PMC9891372 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1053035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide. Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes account for approximately 50% of all hereditary BC, with 60-80% of patients characterized by Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) at an early stage phenotype. The identification of a pathogenic BRCA1/2 variant has important and expanding roles in risk-reducing surgeries, treatment planning, and familial surveillance. Otherwise, finding unclassified Variants of Unknown Significance (VUS) limits the clinical utility of the molecular test, leading to an "imprecise medicine". Methods We reported the explanatory example of the BRCA1 c.5057A>C, p.(His1686Pro) VUS identified in a patient with TNBC. We integrated data from family history and clinic-pathological evaluations, genetic analyses, and bioinformatics in silico investigations to evaluate the VUS classification. Results Our evaluation posed evidences for the pathogenicity significance of the investigated VUS: 1) association of the BRCA1 variant to cancer-affected members of the family; 2) absence of another high-risk mutation; 3) multiple indirect evidences derived from gene and protein structural analysis. Discussion In line with the ongoing efforts to uncertain variants classification, we speculated about the relevance of an in-depth assessment of pathogenicity of BRCA1/2 VUS for a personalized management of patients with BC. We underlined that the efficient integration of clinical data with the widest number of supporting molecular evidences should be adopted for the proper management of patients, with the final aim of effectively guide the best prognostic and therapeutic paths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa De Paolis
- Clinical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Operations (UOC), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,Department of Basic Biotechnological Sciences, Intensivological and Perioperative Clinics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,*Correspondence: Ida Paris,
| | - Bruno Tilocca
- Department of Health Science, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Paola Roncada
- Department of Health Science, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Laura Foca
- Clinical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Operations (UOC), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giordana Tiberi
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Tatiana D’Angelo
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Pavese
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Margherita Muratore
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Carbognin
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Garganese
- Gynaecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy,Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Sezione di Ginecologia ed Ostetricia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Masetti
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alba Di Leone
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fabi
- Unit of Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer, Scientific Directorate, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Urbani
- Clinical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Operations (UOC), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,Department of Basic Biotechnological Sciences, Intensivological and Perioperative Clinics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Generali
- Department of Medical, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Angelo Minucci
- Departmental Unit of Molecular and Genomic Diagnostics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Concetta Santonocito
- Clinical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Operations (UOC), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,Department of Basic Biotechnological Sciences, Intensivological and Perioperative Clinics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thomassen M, Mesman RLS, Hansen TVO, Menendez M, Rossing M, Esteban‐Sánchez A, Tudini E, Törngren T, Parsons MT, Pedersen IS, Teo SH, Kruse TA, Møller P, Borg Å, Jensen UB, Christensen LL, Singer CF, Muhr D, Santamarina M, Brandao R, Andresen BS, Feng B, Canson D, Richardson ME, Karam R, Pesaran T, LaDuca H, Conner BR, Abualkheir N, Hoang L, Calléja FMGR, Andrews L, James PA, Bunyan D, Hamblett A, Radice P, Goldgar DE, Walker LC, Engel C, Claes KBM, Macháčková E, Baralle D, Viel A, Wappenschmidt B, Lazaro C, Vega A, Vreeswijk MPG, de la Hoya M, Spurdle AB. Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach. Hum Mutat 2022; 43:1921-1944. [PMID: 35979650 PMCID: PMC10946542 DOI: 10.1002/humu.24449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Skipping of BRCA2 exon 3 (∆E3) is a naturally occurring splicing event, complicating clinical classification of variants that may alter ∆E3 expression. This study used multiple evidence types to assess pathogenicity of 85 variants in/near BRCA2 exon 3. Bioinformatically predicted spliceogenic variants underwent mRNA splicing analysis using minigenes and/or patient samples. ∆E3 was measured using quantitative analysis. A mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) based assay was used to determine the impact of 18 variants on mRNA splicing and protein function. For each variant, population frequency, bioinformatic predictions, clinical data, and existing mRNA splicing and functional results were collated. Variant class was assigned using a gene-specific adaptation of ACMG/AMP guidelines, following a recently proposed points-based system. mRNA and mESC analysis combined identified six variants with transcript and/or functional profiles interpreted as loss of function. Cryptic splice site use for acceptor site variants generated a transcript encoding a shorter protein that retains activity. Overall, 69/85 (81%) variants were classified using the points-based approach. Our analysis shows the value of applying gene-specific ACMG/AMP guidelines using a points-based approach and highlights the consideration of cryptic splice site usage to appropriately assign PVS1 code strength.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical GeneticsOdense University HospitalOdence CDenmark
| | - Romy L. S. Mesman
- Department of Human GeneticsLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenthe Netherlands
| | - Thomas V. O. Hansen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, RigshospitaletCopenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Mireia Menendez
- Hereditary Cancer ProgramCatalan Institute of Oncology, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDTP, CIBERONCHospitalet de LlobregatSpain
| | - Maria Rossing
- Center for Genomic Medicine, RigshospitaletCopenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Ada Esteban‐Sánchez
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Emma Tudini
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Therese Törngren
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences LundLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Michael T. Parsons
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Inge S. Pedersen
- Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
- Clinical Cancer Research CenterAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
| | - Soo H. Teo
- Breast Cancer Research ProgrammeCancer Research MalaysiaSubang JayaSelangorMalaysia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Torben A. Kruse
- Department of Clinical GeneticsOdense University HospitalOdence CDenmark
| | - Pål Møller
- Department of Tumour BiologyThe Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Åke Borg
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences LundLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Uffe B. Jensen
- Department of Clinical GeneticsAarhus University HospitalAarhus NDenmark
| | | | - Christian F. Singer
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Daniela Muhr
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Marta Santamarina
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina XenómicaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGASSantiago de CompostelaSpain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER)MadridSpain
| | - Rita Brandao
- Department of Clinical GeneticsMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtthe Netherlands
| | - Brage S. Andresen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the Villum Center for Bioanalytical SciencesUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | - Bing‐Jian Feng
- Department of DermatologyHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Daffodil Canson
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lesley Andrews
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Care CentreSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Paul A. James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer CenterMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Dave Bunyan
- Human Development and Health, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| | - Amanda Hamblett
- Middlesex Health Shoreline Cancer CenterWestbrookConnecticutUSA
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of ResearchFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT)MilanItaly
| | - David E. Goldgar
- Department of DermatologyHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Logan C. Walker
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical ScienceUniversity of OtagoChristchurchNew Zealand
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | | | - Eva Macháčková
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsMasaryk Memorial Cancer InstituteBrnoCzech Republic
| | - Diana Baralle
- Human Development and Health, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| | - Alessandra Viel
- Division of Functional Onco‐genomics and GeneticsCentro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCSAvianoItaly
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Conxi Lazaro
- Hereditary Cancer ProgramCatalan Institute of Oncology, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDTP, CIBERONCHospitalet de LlobregatSpain
| | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina XenómicaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGASSantiago de CompostelaSpain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER)MadridSpain
| | - ENIGMA Consortium
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | | | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Amanda B. Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mahdouani M, Ben Ahmed S, Hmila F, Rais H, Ben Sghaier R, Saad H, Ben Said M, Masmoudi S, Hmida D, Brieger A, Zeuzem S, Saad A, Gribaa M, Plotz G. Functional characterization of MLH1 missense variants unveils mechanisms of pathogenicity and clarifies role in cancer. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0278283. [PMID: 36454741 PMCID: PMC9714755 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Lynch syndrome is a heritable condition caused by a heterozygous germline inactivating mutation of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, most commonly the MLH1 gene. However, one third of the identified alterations are missense variants, for which the clinical significance is unclear in many cases. We have identified three MLH1 missense alterations (p.(Glu736Lys), p.(Pro640Thr) and p.(Leu73Pro)) in six individuals from large Tunisian families. For none of these alterations, a classification of pathogenicity was available, consequently diagnosis, predictive testing and targeted surveillance in affected families was impossible. We therefore performed functional laboratory testing using a system testing stability as well as catalytic activity that includes clinically validated reference variants. Both p.(Leu73Pro) and p.(Pro640Thr) were found to be non-functional due to severe defects in protein stability and catalytic activity. In contrast, p.(Glu736Lys) was comparable to the wildtype protein and therefore considered a neutral substitution. Analysis of residue conservation and of the structural roles of the substituted residues corroborated these findings. In conjunction with the available clinical data, two variants fulfil classification criteria for class 4 "likely pathogenic". The findings of this work clarify the mechanism of pathogenicity of two unclear MLH1 variants and enables predictive testing and targeted surveillance in members of carrier families worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marwa Mahdouani
- Laboratory of Human Cytogenetics, Molecular Genetics and Reproductive Biology, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia
- Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Monastir, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Slim Ben Ahmed
- Department of Oncology, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia
- Faculty of Medicine Ibn El Jazzar of Sousse, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Fahmi Hmila
- Faculty of Medicine Ibn El Jazzar of Sousse, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Henda Rais
- Medical Service, Salah Azaiez Institute, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Rihab Ben Sghaier
- Laboratory of Human Cytogenetics, Molecular Genetics and Reproductive Biology, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia
- Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Monastir, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Hanene Saad
- Laboratory of Human Cytogenetics, Molecular Genetics and Reproductive Biology, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia
- Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Monastir, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Mariem Ben Said
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Screening Processes, Centre of Biotechnology of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
| | - Saber Masmoudi
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Screening Processes, Centre of Biotechnology of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
| | - Dorra Hmida
- Laboratory of Human Cytogenetics, Molecular Genetics and Reproductive Biology, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia
- Faculty of Medicine Ibn El Jazzar of Sousse, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Angela Brieger
- Biomedical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefan Zeuzem
- Biomedical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ali Saad
- Laboratory of Human Cytogenetics, Molecular Genetics and Reproductive Biology, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia
- Faculty of Medicine Ibn El Jazzar of Sousse, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Moez Gribaa
- Laboratory of Human Cytogenetics, Molecular Genetics and Reproductive Biology, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia
- Faculty of Medicine Ibn El Jazzar of Sousse, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Guido Plotz
- Biomedical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nepomuceno TC, Dos Santos APP, Fernandes VC, Elias ABR, Gomes TT, Suarez-Kurtz G, Iversen ES, Couch FJ, Monteiro ANA, Carvalho MA. Assessment of small in-frame indels and C-terminal nonsense variants of BRCA1 using a validated functional assay. Sci Rep 2022; 12:16203. [PMID: 36171434 PMCID: PMC9519549 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20500-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA1 (Breast Cancer 1, early onset) is linked to breast and ovarian cancer predisposition. Still, the risks conferred by a significant portion of BRCA1 variants identified in the population remains unknown. Most of these variants of uncertain significance are missense alterations. However, the functional implications of small in-frame deletions and/or insertions (indels) are also difficult to predict. Our group has previously evaluated the functional impact of 347 missense variants using an extensively validated transcriptional activity assay. Here we show a systematic assessment of 30 naturally occurring in-frame indels located at the C-terminal region of BRCA1. We identified positions sensitive and tolerant to alterations, expanding the knowledge of structural determinants of BRCA1 function. We further designed and assessed the impact of four single codon deletions in the tBRCT linker region and six nonsense variants at the C-terminus end of BRCA1. Amino acid substitutions, deletions or insertions in the disordered region do not significantly impact activity and are not likely to constitute pathogenic alleles. On the other hand, a sizeable fraction of in-frame indels at the BRCT domain significantly impact function. We then use a Bayesian integrative statistical model to derive the probability of pathogenicity for each variant. Our data highlights the importance of assessing the impact of small in-frame indels in BRCA1 to improve risk assessment and clinical decisions for carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thales C Nepomuceno
- Divisão de Pesquisa Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130, Brazil.,Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Ana P P Dos Santos
- Divisão de Pesquisa Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130, Brazil
| | - Vanessa C Fernandes
- Divisão de Pesquisa Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130, Brazil
| | - Anna B R Elias
- Divisão de Pesquisa Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130, Brazil
| | - Thiago T Gomes
- Divisão de Pesquisa Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130, Brazil
| | - Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz
- Divisão de Pesquisa Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130, Brazil
| | - Edwin S Iversen
- Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | | | - Alvaro N A Monteiro
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| | - Marcelo A Carvalho
- Divisão de Pesquisa Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130, Brazil. .,Laboratório de Genética Molecular, Instituto Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Senador Furtado, Campus Rio de Janeiro121, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 20270-021, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Frequency of germline genetic variants in women with a personal or family history of breast cancer from Brazil. Mol Biol Rep 2022; 49:9509-9520. [PMID: 35980532 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-022-07840-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND About 5-10% of breast cancer cases are related to genetic and hereditary factors. The application of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in oncology has allowed the identification of genetic variants present in several genes related to the increased risk of breast cancer. This study aimed to determine the frequency of germline genetic variants in patients with a family and/or personal history of breast cancer. METHODS An analysis of positive reports from NGS panels was carried out in female individuals with a personal and/or family history of breast cancer, present in the database of a private laboratory in Brazil. RESULTS From about 2000 reports, 183 individuals presented 219 different germline genetic variants. The genes with the highest number of variants were BRCA2 (16.0%), ATM (15.0%) and BRCA1 (12.8%). Among the variants found, 78 were either pathogenic or probably pathogenic, accounting for 35% of all variants discovered. The gene with the highest proportion of pathogenic/probably pathogenic variants was TP53 (80%) and the most frequent pathogenic variant was also reported in this gene (c.1010G > A p.(Arg337His)). Furthermore, the study obtained a high proportion of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) (65%) and approximately 32% of the variants found were in genes of moderate penetrance. CONCLUSIONS Our results could improve the risk estimation and clinical follow-up of Brazilian patients with a history of breast cancer.
Collapse
|
9
|
Clark KA, Paquette A, Tao K, Bell R, Boyle JL, Rosenthal J, Snow AK, Stark AW, Thompson BA, Unger J, Gertz J, Varley KE, Boucher KM, Goldgar DE, Foulkes WD, Thomas A, Tavtigian SV. Comprehensive evaluation and efficient classification of BRCA1 RING domain missense substitutions. Am J Hum Genet 2022; 109:1153-1174. [PMID: 35659930 PMCID: PMC9247830 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA1 is a high-risk susceptibility gene for breast and ovarian cancer. Pathogenic protein-truncating variants are scattered across the open reading frame, but all known missense substitutions that are pathogenic because of missense dysfunction are located in either the amino-terminal RING domain or the carboxy-terminal BRCT domain. Heterodimerization of the BRCA1 and BARD1 RING domains is a molecularly defined obligate activity. Hence, we tested every BRCA1 RING domain missense substitution that can be created by a single nucleotide change for heterodimerization with BARD1 in a mammalian two-hybrid assay. Downstream of the laboratory assay, we addressed three additional challenges: assay calibration, validation thereof, and integration of the calibrated results with other available data, such as computational evidence and patient/population observational data to achieve clinically applicable classification. Overall, we found that 15%-20% of BRCA1 RING domain missense substitutions are pathogenic. Using a Bayesian point system for data integration and variant classification, we achieved clinical classification of 89% of observed missense substitutions. Moreover, among missense substitutions not present in the human observational data used here, we find an additional 45 with concordant computational and functional assay evidence in favor of pathogenicity plus 223 with concordant evidence in favor of benignity; these are particularly likely to be classified as likely pathogenic and likely benign, respectively, once human observational data become available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen A Clark
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Andrew Paquette
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Kayoko Tao
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Russell Bell
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Julie L Boyle
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Judith Rosenthal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Angela K Snow
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Alex W Stark
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Bryony A Thompson
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Joshua Unger
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Jason Gertz
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Katherine E Varley
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Kenneth M Boucher
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
| | - David E Goldgar
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - William D Foulkes
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada; Research Institute McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada; Departments of Medicine, Human Genetics, and Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Alun Thomas
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
| | - Sean V Tavtigian
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lin ZB, Li J, Ye L, Sun HS, Yu AY, Chen SH, Li FF. Novel SOX2 mutation in autosomal dominant cataract-microcornea syndrome. BMC Ophthalmol 2022; 22:70. [PMID: 35148715 PMCID: PMC8840263 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02291-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Congenital cataract-microcornea syndrome (CCMC) is characterized by the association of congenital cataract and microcornea without any other systemic anomaly or dysmorphism. Although several causative genes have been reported in patients with CCMC, the genetic etiology of CCMC is yet to be clearly understood. Purpose To unravel the genetic cause of autosomal dominant family with CCMC. Methods All patients and available family members underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic clinical examination in the hospital by expert ophthalmologists and carried out to clinically diagnosis. All the patients were screened by whole-exome sequencing and then validated using co-segregation by Sanger sequencing. Results Four CCMC patients from a Chinese family and five unaffected family members were enrolled in this study. Using whole-exome sequencing, a missense mutation c.295G > T (p.A99S, NM_003106.4) in the SOX2 gene was identified and validated by segregation analysis. In addition, this missense mutation was predicted to be damaging by multiple predictive tools. Variant p.Ala99Ser was located in a conservation high mobility group (HMG)-box domain in SOX2 protein, with a potential pathogenic impact of p.Ala99Ser on protein level. Conclusions A novel missense mutation (c.295G > T, p.Ala99Ser) in the SOX2 gene was found in this Han Chinese family with congenital cataract and microcornea. Our study determined that mutations in SOX2 were associated with CCMC, warranting further investigations on the pathogenesis of this disorder. This result expands the mutation spectrum of SOX2 and provides useful information to study the molecular pathogenesis of CCMC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Bo Lin
- The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jin Li
- The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lu Ye
- Shanxi Eye Hospital, Xi'an People's Hospital (Xi'an Fourth Hospital), Affiliated Guangren Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Hai-Sen Sun
- The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - A-Yong Yu
- The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Shi-Hao Chen
- The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Fen-Fen Li
- The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fanale D, Pivetti A, Cancelliere D, Spera A, Bono M, Fiorino A, Pedone E, Barraco N, Brando C, Perez A, Guarneri MF, Russo TDB, Vieni S, Guarneri G, Russo A, Bazan V. BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome: looking for the hidden meaning. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 172:103626. [PMID: 35150867 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome is caused by germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes. These genes are very large and their mutations are heterogeneous and scattered throughout the coding sequence. In addition to the above-mentioned mutations, variants of uncertain/unknown significance (VUSs) have been identified in BRCA genes, which make more difficult the clinical management of the patient and risk assessment. In the last decades, several laboratories have developed different databases that contain more than 2000 variants for the two genes and integrated strategies which include multifactorial prediction models based on direct and indirect genetic evidence, to classify the VUS and attribute them a clinical significance associated with a deleterious, high-low or neutral risk. This review provides a comprehensive overview of literature studies concerning the VUSs, in order to assess their impact on the population and provide new insight for the appropriate patient management in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Fanale
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessia Pivetti
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Daniela Cancelliere
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonio Spera
- Department of Radiotherapy, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, ASP of Agrigento, Agrigento, Italy
| | - Marco Bono
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessia Fiorino
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Erika Pedone
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Nadia Barraco
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Chiara Brando
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessandro Perez
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Tancredi Didier Bazan Russo
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Salvatore Vieni
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Italy
| | - Girolamo Guarneri
- Gynecology Section, Mother - Child Department, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
| | - Viviana Bazan
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Value of the loss of heterozygosity to BRCA1 variant classification. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:9. [PMID: 35039532 PMCID: PMC8764043 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00361-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
At least 10% of the BRCA1/2 tests identify variants of uncertain significance (VUS) while the distinction between pathogenic variants (PV) and benign variants (BV) remains particularly challenging. As a typical tumor suppressor gene, the inactivation of the second wild-type (WT) BRCA1 allele is expected to trigger cancer initiation. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the WT allele is the most frequent mechanism for the BRCA1 biallelic inactivation. To evaluate if LOH can be an effective predictor of BRCA1 variant pathogenicity, we carried out LOH analysis on DNA extracted from 90 breast and seven ovary tumors diagnosed in 27 benign and 55 pathogenic variant carriers. Further analyses were conducted in tumors with PVs yet without loss of the WT allele: BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation, next-generation sequencing (NGS) of BRCA1/2, and BRCAness score. Ninety-seven tumor samples were analyzed from 26 different BRCA1 variants. A relatively stable pattern of LOH (65.4%) of WT allele for PV tumors was observed, while the allelic balance (63%) or loss of variant allele (15%) was generally seen for carriers of BV. LOH data is a useful complementary argument for BRCA1 variant classification.
Collapse
|
13
|
Collaco JM, Raraigh KS, Betz J, Aksit MA, Blau N, Brown J, Dietz HC, MacCarrick G, Nogee LM, Sheridan MB, Vernon HJ, Beaty TH, Louis TA, Cutting GR. Accurate assignment of disease liability to genetic variants using only population data. Genet Med 2021; 24:87-99. [PMID: 34906463 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The growing size of public variant repositories prompted us to test the accuracy of pathogenicity prediction of DNA variants using population data alone. METHODS Under the a priori assumption that the ratio of the prevalence of variants in healthy population vs that in affected populations form 2 distinct distributions (pathogenic and benign), we used a Bayesian method to assign probability to a variant belonging to either distribution. RESULTS The approach, termed Bayesian prevalence ratio (BayPR), accurately parsed 300 of 313 expertly curated CFTR variants: 284 of 296 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in 1 distribution and 16 of 17 benign/likely benign variants in another. BayPR produced an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.99 for 103 functionally confirmed missense CFTR variants, which is equal to or exceeds 10 commonly used algorithms (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve range = 0.54-0.99). Application of BayPR to expertly curated variants in 8 genes associated with 7 Mendelian conditions led to the assignment of a disease-causing probability of ≥80% to 1350 of 1374 (98.3%) pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and of ≤20% to 22 of 23 (95.7%) benign/likely benign variants. CONCLUSION Irrespective of the variant type or functional effect, the BayPR approach provides probabilities of pathogenicity for DNA variants responsible for Mendelian disorders using only the variant counts in affected and unaffected population samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Collaco
- Eudowood Division of Pediatric Respiratory Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Karen S Raraigh
- McKusick-Nathans Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Joshua Betz
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Melis Atalar Aksit
- McKusick-Nathans Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nenad Blau
- Division of Metabolism, University Children's Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Jordan Brown
- McKusick-Nathans Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Harry C Dietz
- McKusick-Nathans Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD
| | - Gretchen MacCarrick
- McKusick-Nathans Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lawrence M Nogee
- Eudowood Neonatal Pulmonary Division, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Molly B Sheridan
- McKusick-Nathans Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Hilary J Vernon
- McKusick-Nathans Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Terri H Beaty
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Thomas A Louis
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Garry R Cutting
- McKusick-Nathans Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee M, Shorthouse D, Mahen R, Hall BA, Venkitaraman AR. Cancer-causing BRCA2 missense mutations disrupt an intracellular protein assembly mechanism to disable genome maintenance. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:5588-5604. [PMID: 33978741 PMCID: PMC8191791 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer-causing missense mutations in the 3418 amino acid BRCA2 breast and ovarian cancer suppressor protein frequently affect a short (∼340 residue) segment in its carboxyl-terminal domain (DBD). Here, we identify a shared molecular mechanism underlying their pathogenicity. Pathogenic BRCA2 missense mutations cluster in the DBD’s helical domain (HD) and OB1-fold motifs, which engage the partner protein DSS1. Pathogenic - but not benign – DBD mutations weaken or abolish DSS1-BRCA2 assembly, provoking mutant BRCA2 oligomers that are excluded from the cell nucleus, and disable DNA repair by homologous DNA recombination (HDR). DSS1 inhibits the intracellular oligomerization of wildtype, but not mutant, forms of BRCA2. Remarkably, DSS1 expression corrects defective HDR in cells bearing pathogenic BRCA2 missense mutants with weakened, but not absent, DSS1 binding. Our findings identify a DSS1-mediated intracellular protein assembly mechanism that is disrupted by cancer-causing BRCA2 missense mutations, and suggest an approach for its therapeutic correction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miyoung Lee
- Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK
| | - David Shorthouse
- Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK
| | - Robert Mahen
- Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK
| | - Benjamin A Hall
- Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK
| | - Ashok R Venkitaraman
- Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK.,The Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore 117599 & Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 8A Biomedical Grove 138648, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chevrier S, Richard C, Collot T, Mananet H, Arnould L, Boidot R. An Algorithm Combining Patient Performance Status, Second Hit Analysis, PROVEAN and Dann Prediction Tools Could Foretell Sensitization to PARP Inhibitors in Digestive, Skin, Ovarian and Breast Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133113. [PMID: 34206535 PMCID: PMC8268870 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary PARP inhibitors, a family of targeted cancer therapeutics, have been shown to be efficient in patients with some deficiencies in the homologous recombination machinery. However, a quick and reliable identification of patients who would benefit from such therapies remains a challenge. In particular, patients with tumors carrying variants of unknown significance (VUS) in homologous recombination genes do not currently benefit from PARP inhibitor treatments. In this study, we present an algorithm that may allow classification of these variants with regard to their impact on tumor responsiveness to PARP inhibitors. If validated on a larger patient sample, our algorithm would allow patients with tumors potentially responsive to PARP inhibitors to benefit from this therapy. Abstract PARP inhibitors yield interesting outcomes for patients with ovarian tumors harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, but also with other tumors with homologous repair (HR) deficiency. About 40% of variants are variants of unknown significance (VUS), blocking the use of PARP inhibitors. In this study, we analyzed NGS data from 78 metastatic patients treated with PARP inhibitors. We tested NGS data and in silico predictions to classify VUS as potentially benign or deleterious. Among 41 patients treated with olaparib, three had tumors harboring benign and 26 pathogenic variants, while 12 had VUS. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) analysis showed that benign variants did not respond to olaparib whereas pathogenic variants were associated with a median PFS of 190 days. Surprisingly, median PFS of patients with VUS-carrying tumors suggested that some of them may be sensitive to PARP inhibitors. By testing different in silico predictions and variant allelic frequency, we obtained an algorithm predicting VUS sensitivity to PARP inhibitors for patients with a Performance Status below 3. Our work suggests that VUS in HR genes could be predicted as benign or deleterious, which may increase the number of patients eligible for PARP inhibitor treatment. Further studies in a larger sample are warranted to validate our prediction algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy Chevrier
- Department of Biology and Pathology of Tumors, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center-UNICANCER, 21079 Dijon, France; (S.C.); (C.R.); (L.A.)
| | - Corentin Richard
- Department of Biology and Pathology of Tumors, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center-UNICANCER, 21079 Dijon, France; (S.C.); (C.R.); (L.A.)
| | - Thomas Collot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center-UNICANCER, 21079 Dijon, France;
| | - Hugo Mananet
- Platform of Transfer in Cancer Biology, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center-UNICANCER, 21079 Dijon, France;
| | - Laurent Arnould
- Department of Biology and Pathology of Tumors, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center-UNICANCER, 21079 Dijon, France; (S.C.); (C.R.); (L.A.)
| | - Romain Boidot
- Department of Biology and Pathology of Tumors, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center-UNICANCER, 21079 Dijon, France; (S.C.); (C.R.); (L.A.)
- UMR CNRS 6302, University of Burgundy, 21079 Dijon, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-3-80-73-77-67; Fax: +33-3-80-73-77-82
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schmutzler RK. Quality and Quantity: How to Organize a Countrywide Genetic Counseling and Testing. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16:196-201. [PMID: 34248460 PMCID: PMC8248770 DOI: 10.1159/000515429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND About 30% of all women with breast or ovarian cancer exhibit a family history of the disease. So far, the genetic cause could be deciphered in about 30% of these cases. The results demonstrate a high genetic heterogeneity, with high-risk and moderate-risk genes and low-risk variants contributing alone or in concert to the development of cancer. Furthermore, it has been shown that the genotype significantly determines the phenotype and that knowledge of the phenotype is as important as the genotype to offer adequate and risk-adapted prevention to persons at risk. For newly identified risk genes, however, the phenotype is not sufficiently characterized at first, and thus prevention measures are not sufficiently evaluated. SUMMARY The German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer has developed a concept for collecting the missing data in the context of knowledge-generating care and at the same time ensuring care based on the best available knowledge. Core elements of this concept are: structured and standardized care, an outcome-oriented evaluation based on a comprehensive registry, networking with certified breast and gynecological cancer centers combined with regular training on state-of-the-art care for doctors, and compilation of comprehensible patient information. This comprehensive concept has been incorporated into contracts for specialized care with health insurers and thus ensures nationwide care at the highest scientific and clinical levels. KEY MESSAGES This article describes how to implement a concept of evidence-generating care for risk-adjusted prevention in a nationwide health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Katharina Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jimenez-Sainz J, Jensen RB. Imprecise Medicine: BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS), the Challenges and Benefits to Integrate a Functional Assay Workflow with Clinical Decision Rules. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12050780. [PMID: 34065235 PMCID: PMC8161351 DOI: 10.3390/genes12050780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Pathological mutations in homology-directed repair (HDR) genes impact both future cancer risk and therapeutic options for patients. HDR is a high-fidelity DNA repair pathway for resolving DNA double-strand breaks throughout the genome. BRCA2 is an essential protein that mediates the loading of RAD51 onto resected DNA breaks, a key step in HDR. Germline mutations in BRCA2 are associated with an increased risk for breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. Clinical findings of germline or somatic BRCA2 mutations in tumors suggest treatment with platinum agents or PARP inhibitors. However, when genetic analysis reveals a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in the BRCA2 gene, precision medicine-based decisions become complex. VUS are genetic changes with unknown pathological impact. Current statistics indicate that between 10–20% of BRCA sequencing results are VUS, and of these, more than 50% are missense mutations. Functional assays to determine the pathological outcome of VUS are urgently needed to provide clinical guidance regarding cancer risk and treatment options. In this review, we provide a brief overview of BRCA2 functions in HDR, describe how BRCA2 VUS are currently assessed in the clinic, and how genetic and biochemical functional assays could be integrated into the clinical decision process. We suggest a multi-step workflow composed of robust and accurate functional assays to correctly evaluate the potential pathogenic or benign nature of BRCA2 VUS. Success in this precision medicine endeavor will offer actionable information to patients and their physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judit Jimenez-Sainz
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
- Correspondence: (J.J.-S.); (R.B.J.); Tel.:+1-203-737-6456 (R.B.J.)
| | - Ryan B. Jensen
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
- Correspondence: (J.J.-S.); (R.B.J.); Tel.:+1-203-737-6456 (R.B.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nguyen-Dumont T, Stewart J, Winship I, Southey MC. Rare genetic variants: making the connection with breast cancer susceptibility. AIMS GENETICS 2021. [DOI: 10.3934/genet.2015.4.281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
AbstractThe practice of clinical genetics in the context of breast cancer predisposition has reached another critical point in its evolution. For the past two decades, genetic testing offered to women attending clinics has been limited to BRCA1 and BRCA2 unless other syndromic indicators have been evident (e.g. PTEN and TP53 for Cowden and Li-Fraumeni syndrome, respectively). Women (and their families) who are concerned about their personal and/or family history of breast and ovarian cancer have enthusiastically engaged with clinical genetics services, anticipating a genetic cause for their cancer predisposition will be identified and to receive clinical guidance for their risk management and treatment options. Genetic testing laboratories have demonstrated similar enthusiasm for transitioning from single gene to gene panel testing that now provide opportunities for the large number of women found not to carry mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, enabling them to undergo additional genetic testing. However, these panel tests have limited clinical utility until more is understood about the cancer risks (if any) associated with the genetic variation observed in the genes included on these panels. New data is urgently needed to improve the interpretation of the genetic variation data that is already reported from these panels and to inform the selection of genes included in gene panel tests in the future. To address this issue, large internationally coordinated research studies are required to provide the evidence-base from which clinical genetics for breast cancer susceptibility can be practiced in the era of gene panel testing and oncogenetic practice.Two significant steps associated with this process include i) validating the genes on these panels (and those likely to be added in the future) as bona fide1
breast cancer predisposition genes and ii) interpreting the variation, on a variant-by-variant basis in terms of their likely “pathogenicity”—a process commonly referred to as “variant classification” that will enable this new genetic information to be used at an individual level in clinical genetics services. Neither of these fundamental steps have been achieved for the majority of genes included on the panels.We are thus at a critical point for translational research in breast cancer clinical genetics—how can rare genetic variants be interpreted such that they can be used in clinical genetics services and oncogenetic practice to identify and to inform the management of families that carry these variants?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tú Nguyen-Dumont
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia
| | - Jenna Stewart
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia
| | - Ingrid Winship
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia
| | - Melissa C. Southey
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Agata S, Tognazzo S, Alducci E, Matricardi L, Moserle L, Barana D, Montagna M. Segregation analysis of the BRCA2 c.9227G>T variant in multiple families suggests a pathogenic role in breast and ovarian cancer predisposition. Sci Rep 2020; 10:13987. [PMID: 32814805 PMCID: PMC7438490 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70729-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Classification of variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes has a major impact on the clinical management of subjects at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer. The identification of a pathogenic variant allows for early detection/prevention strategies in healthy carriers as well as targeted treatments in patients affected by BRCA-associated tumors. The BRCA2 c.9227G>T p.(Gly3076Val) variant recurs in families from Northeast Italy and is rarely reported in international databases. This variant substitutes the evolutionary invariant glycine 3076 with a valine in the DNA binding domain of the BRCA2 protein, thus suggesting a high probability of pathogenicity. We analysed clinical and genealogic data of carriers from 15 breast/ovarian cancer families in whom no other pathogenic variants were detected. The variant was shown to co-segregate with breast and ovarian cancer in the most informative families. Combined segregation data led to a likelihood ratio of 81,527:1 of pathogenicity vs. neutrality. We conclude that c.9227G>T is a BRCA2 pathogenic variant that recurs in Northeast Italy. It can now be safely used for the predictive testing of healthy family members to guide preventive surgery and/or early tumor detection strategies, as well as for PARP inhibitors treatments in patients with BRCA2-associated tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Agata
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Silvia Tognazzo
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Elisa Alducci
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Laura Matricardi
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Lidia Moserle
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniela Barana
- Oncology Unit, Local Health and Social Care Unit ULSS8 Berica, Montecchio Maggiore, Italy
| | - Marco Montagna
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Considerations in assessing germline variant pathogenicity using cosegregation analysis. Genet Med 2020; 22:2052-2059. [PMID: 32773770 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0920-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) have developed guidelines for classifying germline variants as pathogenic or benign to interpret genetic testing results. Cosegregation analysis is an important component of the guidelines. There are two main approaches for cosegregation analysis: meiosis counting and Bayes factor-based quantitative methods. Of these, the ACMG/AMP guidelines employ only meiosis counting. The accuracy of either approach has not been sufficiently addressed in previous works. METHODS We analyzed hypothetical, simulated, and real-life data to evaluate the accuracy of each approach for cancer-associated genes. RESULTS We demonstrate that meiosis counting can provide incorrect classifications when the underlying genetic basis of the disease departs from simple Mendelian situations. Some Bayes factor approaches are currently implemented with inappropriate penetrance. We propose an improved penetrance model and describe several critical considerations, including the accuracy of cosegregation for moderate-risk genes and the impact of pleiotropy, population, and birth year. We highlight a webserver, COOL (Co-segregation Online, http://BJFengLab.org/ ), that implements an accurate Bayes factor cosegregation analysis. CONCLUSION An appropriate penetrance model improves the accuracy of Bayes factor cosegregation analysis for high-penetrant variants, and is a better choice than meiosis counting whenever feasible.
Collapse
|
21
|
Curated multiple sequence alignment for the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) gene and accuracy of in silico pathogenicity predictions. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0233673. [PMID: 32750050 PMCID: PMC7402488 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Computational algorithms are often used to assess pathogenicity of Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) that are found in disease-associated genes. Most computational methods include analysis of protein multiple sequence alignments (PMSA), assessing interspecies variation. Careful validation of PMSA-based methods has been done for relatively few genes, partially because creation of curated PMSAs is labor-intensive. We assessed how PMSA-based computational tools predict the effects of the missense changes in the APC gene, in which pathogenic variants cause Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Most Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic APC variants are protein-truncating changes. However, public databases now contain thousands of variants reported as missense. We created a curated APC PMSA that contained >3 substitutions/site, which is large enough for statistically robust in silico analysis. The creation of the PMSA was not easily automated, requiring significant querying and computational analysis of protein and genome sequences. Of 1924 missense APC variants in the NCBI ClinVar database, 1800 (93.5%) are reported as VUS. All but two missense variants listed as P/LP occur at canonical splice or Exonic Splice Enhancer sites. Pathogenicity predictions by five computational tools (Align-GVGD, SIFT, PolyPhen2, MAPP, REVEL) differed widely in their predictions of Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic (range 17.5–75.0%) and Benign/Likely Benign (range 25.0–82.5%) for APC missense variants in ClinVar. When applied to 21 missense variants reported in ClinVar and securely classified as Benign, the five methods ranged in accuracy from 76.2–100%. Computational PMSA-based methods can be an excellent classifier for variants of some hereditary cancer genes. However, there may be characteristics of the APC gene and protein that confound the results of in silico algorithms. A systematic study of these features could greatly improve the automation of alignment-based techniques and the use of predictive algorithms in hereditary cancer genes.
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Variants of uncertain significance in the era of high-throughput genome sequencing: a lesson from breast and ovary cancers. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH : CR 2020; 39:46. [PMID: 32127026 PMCID: PMC7055088 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-020-01554-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The promising expectations about personalized medicine have opened the path to routine large-scale sequencing and increased the importance of genetic counseling for hereditary cancers, among which hereditary breast and ovary cancers (HBOC) have a major impact. High-throughput sequencing, or Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), has improved cancer patient management, ameliorating diagnosis and treatment decisions. In addition to its undeniable clinical utility, NGS is also unveiling a large number of variants that we are still not able to clearly define and classify, the variants of uncertain significance (VUS), which account for about 40% of total variants. At present, VUS use in the clinical context is challenging. Medical reports may omit this kind of data and, even when included, they limit the clinical utility of genetic information. This has prompted the scientific community to seek easily applicable tests to accurately classify VUS and increase the amount of usable information from NGS data. In this review, we will focus on NGS and classification systems for VUS investigation, with particular attention on HBOC-related genes and in vitro functional tests developed for ameliorating and accelerating variant classification in cancer.
Collapse
|
24
|
Palacios J, de la Hoya M, Bellosillo B, de Juan I, Matías-Guiu X, Lázaro C, Palanca S, Osorio A, Rojo F, Rosa-Rosa JM, Cigudosa JC. Mutational Screening of BRCA1/2 Genes as a Predictive Factor for Therapeutic Response in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Consensus Guide from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP-IAP) and the Spanish Society of Human Genetics (AEGH). Virchows Arch 2020; 476:195-207. [PMID: 31797087 PMCID: PMC7028830 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-019-02709-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Germline/somatic BRCA-mutated ovarian carcinomas (OC) are associated to have better response with platinum-based chemotherapy and long-term prognosis than non-BRCA-associated OCs. In addition, these mutations are predictive factors to response to Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Different positioning papers have addressed the clinical recommendations for BRCA testing in OC. This consensus guide represents a collection of technical recommendations to address the detection of BRCA1/2 mutations in the molecular diagnostic testing strategy for OC. Under the coordination of Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP-IAP) and the Spanish Society of Human Genetics (AEGH), these recommendations have been developed by pathologists and geneticists taking into account previously published recommendations and their experience in the molecular characterization of these genes. Since the implementation of BRCA testing as a predictive factor can initiate the workflow by testing germline mutations in the blood or by testing both germline and somatic mutations in tumor tissue, distinctive features of both strategies are discussed. Additionally, the recommendations included in this paper provide some references, quality parameters, and genomic tools aimed to standardize and facilitate the clinical genomic diagnosis of OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Palacios
- Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
- Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
- Universidad de Alcalá, 28801, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
- CIBER-ONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029, Madrid, Spain.
| | - M de la Hoya
- CIBER-ONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029, Madrid, Spain
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, Spain
| | - B Bellosillo
- CIBER-ONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029, Madrid, Spain
- Laboratorio de Diagnóstico Molecular, Servicio de Patología, Hospital del Mar, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I de Juan
- Unidad de Biología Molecular, Servicio de Análisis Clínicos, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | - X Matías-Guiu
- CIBER-ONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029, Madrid, Spain
- Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, 08908, L'Hospitalet, Spain
| | - C Lázaro
- CIBER-ONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029, Madrid, Spain
- Unidad de Diagnóstico Molecular, Institut Català d'Oncologia, (ICO-IDIBELL-ONCOBELL), 08908, L'Hospitalet, Spain
| | - S Palanca
- Unidad de Biología Molecular, Servicio de Análisis Clínicos, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | - A Osorio
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Centre (CNIO), 28029, Madrid, Spain
- CIBER-ER, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - F Rojo
- CIBER-ONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029, Madrid, Spain
- Departamento de Patología, Fundación Jímenez-Díaz, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - J M Rosa-Rosa
- Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, 28034, Madrid, Spain
- CIBER-ONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - J C Cigudosa
- NIMGenetics, Parque Científico de Madrid, Campus Cantoblanco, 28049, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Arason A, Agnarsson BA, Johannesdottir G, Johannsson OT, Hilmarsdottir B, Reynisdottir I, Barkardottir RB. The BRCA1 c.4096+3A>G Variant Displays Classical Characteristics of Pathogenic BRCA1 Mutations in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancers, But Still Allows Homozygous Viability. Genes (Basel) 2019; 10:E882. [PMID: 31683985 PMCID: PMC6896150 DOI: 10.3390/genes10110882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Revised: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Mutations in BRCA1 result in predisposal to breast and ovarian cancers, but many variants exist with unknown clinical significance (VUS). One is BRCA1 c.4096+3A>G, which affects production of the full-length BRCA1 transcript, while augmenting transcripts lacking most or all of exon 11. Nonetheless, homozygosity of this variant has been reported in a healthy woman. We saw this variant cosegregate with breast and ovarian cancer in several family branches of four Icelandic pedigrees, with instances of phenocopies and a homozygous woman with lung cancer. We found eight heterozygous carriers (0.44%) in 1820 unselected breast cancer cases, and three (0.15%) in 1968 controls (p = 0.13). Seeking conclusive evidence, we studied tumors from carriers in the pedigrees for wild-type-loss of heterozygosity (wtLOH) and BRCA1-characteristic prevalence of estrogen receptor (ER) negativity. Of 15 breast and six ovarian tumors, wtLOH occurred in nine breast and all six ovarian tumours, and six of the nine breast tumors with wtLOH were ER-negative. These data accord with a pathogenic BRCA1-mutation. Our findings add to the current knowledge of BRCA1, and the role of its exon 11 in cancer pathogenicity, and will be of use in clinical genetic counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adalgeir Arason
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
- BMC (Biomedical Center), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
| | - Bjarni A Agnarsson
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
| | - Gudrun Johannesdottir
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
| | - Oskar Th Johannsson
- BMC (Biomedical Center), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
- Department of Oncology, Landspitali, The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
| | - Bylgja Hilmarsdottir
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
- BMC (Biomedical Center), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
| | - Inga Reynisdottir
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
- BMC (Biomedical Center), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
| | - Rosa B Barkardottir
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
- BMC (Biomedical Center), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cao Y, Sun Y, Karimi M, Chen H, Moronfoye O, Shen Y. Predicting pathogenicity of missense variants with weakly supervised regression. Hum Mutat 2019; 40:1579-1592. [PMID: 31144781 PMCID: PMC6744350 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Quickly growing genetic variation data of unknown clinical significance demand computational methods that can reliably predict clinical phenotypes and deeply unravel molecular mechanisms. On the platform enabled by the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI), we develop a novel "weakly supervised" regression (WSR) model that not only predicts precise clinical significance (probability of pathogenicity) from inexact training annotations (class of pathogenicity) but also infers underlying molecular mechanisms in a variant-specific manner. Compared to multiclass logistic regression, a representative multiclass classifier, our kernelized WSR improves the performance for the ENIGMA Challenge set from 0.72 to 0.97 in binary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and from 0.64 to 0.80 in ordinal multiclass AUC. WSR model interpretation and protein structural interpretation reach consensus in corroborating the most probable molecular mechanisms by which some pathogenic BRCA1 variants confer clinical significance, namely metal-binding disruption for p.C44F and p.C47Y, protein-binding disruption for p.M18T, and structure destabilization for p.S1715N.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Cao
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843-3128, United States
| | - Yuanfei Sun
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843-3128, United States
| | - Mostafa Karimi
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843-3128, United States
| | - Haoran Chen
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843-3128, United States
| | - Oluwaseyi Moronfoye
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843-3128, United States
| | - Yang Shen
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843-3128, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Parsons MT, Tudini E, Li H, Hahnen E, Wappenschmidt B, Feliubadaló L, Aalfs CM, Agata S, Aittomäki K, Alducci E, Alonso‐Cerezo MC, Arnold N, Auber B, Austin R, Azzollini J, Balmaña J, Barbieri E, Bartram CR, Blanco A, Blümcke B, Bonache S, Bonanni B, Borg Å, Bortesi B, Brunet J, Bruzzone C, Bucksch K, Cagnoli G, Caldés T, Caliebe A, Caligo MA, Calvello M, Capone GL, Caputo SM, Carnevali I, Carrasco E, Caux‐Moncoutier V, Cavalli P, Cini G, Clarke EM, Concolino P, Cops EJ, Cortesi L, Couch FJ, Darder E, de la Hoya M, Dean M, Debatin I, Del Valle J, Delnatte C, Derive N, Diez O, Ditsch N, Domchek SM, Dutrannoy V, Eccles DM, Ehrencrona H, Enders U, Evans DG, Farra C, Faust U, Felbor U, Feroce I, Fine M, Foulkes WD, Galvao HC, Gambino G, Gehrig A, Gensini F, Gerdes A, Germani A, Giesecke J, Gismondi V, Gómez C, Gómez Garcia EB, González S, Grau E, Grill S, Gross E, Guerrieri‐Gonzaga A, Guillaud‐Bataille M, Gutiérrez‐Enríquez S, Haaf T, Hackmann K, Hansen TV, Harris M, Hauke J, Heinrich T, Hellebrand H, Herold KN, Honisch E, Horvath J, Houdayer C, Hübbel V, Iglesias S, Izquierdo A, James PA, Janssen LA, Jeschke U, Kaulfuß S, Keupp K, Kiechle M, Kölbl A, Krieger S, Kruse TA, Kvist A, Lalloo F, Larsen M, Lattimore VL, Lautrup C, Ledig S, Leinert E, Lewis AL, Lim J, Loeffler M, López‐Fernández A, Lucci‐Cordisco E, Maass N, Manoukian S, Marabelli M, Matricardi L, Meindl A, Michelli RD, Moghadasi S, Moles‐Fernández A, Montagna M, Montalban G, Monteiro AN, Montes E, Mori L, Moserle L, Müller CR, Mundhenke C, Naldi N, Nathanson KL, Navarro M, Nevanlinna H, Nichols CB, Niederacher D, Nielsen HR, Ong K, Pachter N, Palmero EI, Papi L, Pedersen IS, Peissel B, Perez‐Segura P, Pfeifer K, Pineda M, Pohl‐Rescigno E, Poplawski NK, Porfirio B, Quante AS, Ramser J, Reis RM, Revillion F, Rhiem K, Riboli B, Ritter J, Rivera D, Rofes P, Rump A, Salinas M, Sánchez de Abajo AM, Schmidt G, Schoenwiese U, Seggewiß J, Solanes A, Steinemann D, Stiller M, Stoppa‐Lyonnet D, Sullivan KJ, Susman R, Sutter C, Tavtigian SV, Teo SH, Teulé A, Thomassen M, Tibiletti MG, Tischkowitz M, Tognazzo S, Toland AE, Tornero E, Törngren T, Torres‐Esquius S, Toss A, Trainer AH, Tucker KM, van Asperen CJ, van Mackelenbergh MT, Varesco L, Vargas‐Parra G, Varon R, Vega A, Velasco Á, Vesper A, Viel A, Vreeswijk MPG, Wagner SA, Waha A, Walker LC, Walters RJ, Wang‐Gohrke S, Weber BHF, Weichert W, Wieland K, Wiesmüller L, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Woodward ER, Zachariae S, Zampiga V, Zeder‐Göß C, Investigators KC, Lázaro C, De Nicolo A, Radice P, Engel C, Schmutzler RK, Goldgar DE, Spurdle AB. Large scale multifactorial likelihood quantitative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants: An ENIGMA resource to support clinical variant classification. Hum Mutat 2019; 40:1557-1578. [PMID: 31131967 PMCID: PMC6772163 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The multifactorial likelihood analysis method has demonstrated utility for quantitative assessment of variant pathogenicity for multiple cancer syndrome genes. Independent data types currently incorporated in the model for assessing BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants include clinically calibrated prior probability of pathogenicity based on variant location and bioinformatic prediction of variant effect, co-segregation, family cancer history profile, co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant in the same gene, breast tumor pathology, and case-control information. Research and clinical data for multifactorial likelihood analysis were collated for 1,395 BRCA1/2 predominantly intronic and missense variants, enabling classification based on posterior probability of pathogenicity for 734 variants: 447 variants were classified as (likely) benign, and 94 as (likely) pathogenic; and 248 classifications were new or considerably altered relative to ClinVar submissions. Classifications were compared with information not yet included in the likelihood model, and evidence strengths aligned to those recommended for ACMG/AMP classification codes. Altered mRNA splicing or function relative to known nonpathogenic variant controls were moderately to strongly predictive of variant pathogenicity. Variant absence in population datasets provided supporting evidence for variant pathogenicity. These findings have direct relevance for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant evaluation, and justify the need for gene-specific calibration of evidence types used for variant classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T. Parsons
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Emma Tudini
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Hongyan Li
- Cancer Control and Population Science, Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Lidia Feliubadaló
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Cora M. Aalfs
- Department of Clinical GeneticsAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Simona Agata
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOVIRCCSPaduaItaly
| | - Kristiina Aittomäki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Helsinki University HospitalUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Elisa Alducci
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOVIRCCSPaduaItaly
| | | | - Norbert Arnold
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus KielChristian‐Albrechts University KielKielGermany
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, University Hospital of Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus KielChristian‐Albrechts University KielKielGermany
| | - Bernd Auber
- Institute of Human GeneticsHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
| | - Rachel Austin
- Genetic Health QueenslandRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Jacopo Azzollini
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and HematologyFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Judith Balmaña
- High Risk and Cancer Prevention GroupVall d'Hebron Institute of OncologyBarcelonaSpain
- Department of Medical OncologyUniversity Hospital of Vall d'HebronBarcelonaSpain
| | - Elena Barbieri
- Department of Oncology and HaematologyUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Claus R. Bartram
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
| | - Ana Blanco
- Fundación Pública galega Medicina Xenómica‐SERGASGrupo de Medicina Xenómica‐USC, CIBERER, IDISSantiago de CompostelaSpain
| | - Britta Blümcke
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Sandra Bonache
- Oncogenetics GroupVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO)BarcelonaSpain
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEOEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - Åke Borg
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences LundLund UniversityLundSweden
| | | | - Joan Brunet
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Carla Bruzzone
- Unit of Hereditary CancerIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly
| | - Karolin Bucksch
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Giulia Cagnoli
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and HematologyFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Trinidad Caldés
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San CarlosIdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Almuth Caliebe
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital of Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus KielChristian‐Albrechts University KielKielGermany
| | | | - Mariarosaria Calvello
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEOEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - Gabriele L. Capone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics UnitUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
| | - Sandrine M. Caputo
- Service de GénétiqueInstitut CurieParisFrance
- Paris Sciences Lettres Research UniversityParisFrance
| | - Ileana Carnevali
- UO Anatomia PatologicaOspedale di Circolo ASST SettelaghiVareseItaly
| | - Estela Carrasco
- High Risk and Cancer Prevention GroupVall d'Hebron Institute of OncologyBarcelonaSpain
| | | | | | - Giulia Cini
- Division of Functional Onco‐genomics and Genetics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO)IRCCSAvianoItaly
| | - Edward M. Clarke
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Paola Concolino
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.GemelliIRCCSRomeItaly
| | - Elisa J. Cops
- Parkville Familial Cancer CentrePeter MacCallum Cancer CenterMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and HaematologyUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesota
| | - Esther Darder
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San CarlosIdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Michael Dean
- Laboratory of Translational Genomics, DCEGNational Cancer InstituteGaithersburgMaryland
| | - Irmgard Debatin
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
| | - Jesús Del Valle
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Nicolas Derive
- Service de GénétiqueInstitut CurieParisFrance
- Paris Sciences Lettres Research UniversityParisFrance
| | - Orland Diez
- Oncogenetics GroupVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO)BarcelonaSpain
- Clinical and Molecular Genetics AreaUniversity Hospital Vall d'HebronBarcelonaSpain
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Susan M. Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvania
| | - Véronique Dutrannoy
- Institute of Medical and Human GeneticsCharité –Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | | | - Hans Ehrencrona
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Laboratory MedicineOffice for Medical Services ‐ Region SkåneLundSweden
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Laboratory MedicineLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Ute Enders
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Universities Foundation TrustSt. Mary's HospitalManchesterUK
- Genomic Medicine, North West Genomics hub, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Universities Foundation TrustSt. Mary's HospitalManchesterUK
| | - Chantal Farra
- Medical GeneticsAmerican University of Beirut Medical CenterBeirutLebanon
| | - Ulrike Faust
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied GenomicsUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
| | - Ute Felbor
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity Medicine GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
| | - Irene Feroce
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEOEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - Miriam Fine
- Adult Genetics UnitRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideAustralia
| | - William D. Foulkes
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and OncologyMcGill UniversityMontréalQCCanada
| | | | | | - Andrea Gehrig
- Department of Human GeneticsUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | - Francesca Gensini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics UnitUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
| | - Anne‐Marie Gerdes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, RigshospitaletCopenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Aldo Germani
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea University HospitalSapienza UniversityRomeItaly
| | - Jutta Giesecke
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Viviana Gismondi
- Unit of Hereditary CancerIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly
| | - Carolina Gómez
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Encarna B. Gómez Garcia
- Department of Clinical GeneticsMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Sara González
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Elia Grau
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Sabine Grill
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TechnischenUniversität MünchenMunichGermany
| | - Eva Gross
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Haaf
- Department of Human GeneticsUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | - Karl Hackmann
- Institute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav CarusTU DresdenDresdenGermany
| | - Thomas V.O. Hansen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, RigshospitaletCopenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
| | | | - Jan Hauke
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Tilman Heinrich
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied GenomicsUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
| | - Heide Hellebrand
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TechnischenUniversität MünchenMunichGermany
| | | | - Ellen Honisch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital DüsseldorfHeinrich‐Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Judit Horvath
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
| | - Claude Houdayer
- Department of Genetics, F76000 and Normandy University, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized MedicineRouen University HospitalRouenFrance
| | - Verena Hübbel
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Silvia Iglesias
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Angel Izquierdo
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Paul A. James
- Parkville Familial Cancer CentrePeter MacCallum Cancer CenterMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Linda A.M. Janssen
- Department of Clinical GeneticsLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Udo Jeschke
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Silke Kaulfuß
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity Medical Center GöttingenGöttingenGermany
| | - Katharina Keupp
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TechnischenUniversität MünchenMunichGermany
| | - Alexandra Kölbl
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Sophie Krieger
- Laboratoire de Biologie Clinique et OncologiqueCentre Francois BaclesseCaenFrance
- Genomics and Personalized Medecine in Cancer and Neurological DisordersNormandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized MedicineRouenFrance
- Normandie UniversitéUNICAENCaenFrance
| | - Torben A. Kruse
- Department of Clinical GeneticsOdense University HospitalOdense CDenmark
| | - Anders Kvist
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences LundLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Genomic Medicine, North West Genomics hub, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Universities Foundation TrustSt. Mary's HospitalManchesterUK
| | - Mirjam Larsen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Vanessa L. Lattimore
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical ScienceUniversity of OtagoChristchurchNew Zealand
| | - Charlotte Lautrup
- Department of Clinical GeneticsAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
- Clinical Cancer Research CenterAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
| | - Susanne Ledig
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
| | - Elena Leinert
- Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
| | | | - Joanna Lim
- Breast Cancer Research ProgrammeCancer Research MalaysiaSubang JayaSelangorMalaysia
| | - Markus Loeffler
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Adrià López‐Fernández
- High Risk and Cancer Prevention GroupVall d'Hebron Institute of OncologyBarcelonaSpain
| | - Emanuela Lucci‐Cordisco
- UOC Genetica Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS and Istituto di Medicina GenomicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus KielChristian‐Albrechts University KielKielGermany
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and HematologyFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Monica Marabelli
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEOEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - Laura Matricardi
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOVIRCCSPaduaItaly
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
| | | | - Setareh Moghadasi
- Department of Clinical GeneticsLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Marco Montagna
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOVIRCCSPaduaItaly
| | - Gemma Montalban
- Oncogenetics GroupVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO)BarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Eva Montes
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Luigi Mori
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Science, University of Brescia c/o 2nd Internal MedicineHospital of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Lidia Moserle
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOVIRCCSPaduaItaly
| | | | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus KielChristian‐Albrechts University KielKielGermany
| | - Nadia Naldi
- Division of OncologyUniversity Hospital of ParmaParmaItaly
| | - Katherine L. Nathanson
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvania
| | - Matilde Navarro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University HospitalUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Cassandra B. Nichols
- Genetic Services of Western AustraliaKing Edward Memorial HospitalPerthAustralia
| | - Dieter Niederacher
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital DüsseldorfHeinrich‐Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | | | - Kai‐ren Ong
- West Midlands Regional Genetics ServiceBirmingham Women's Hospital Healthcare NHS TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Nicholas Pachter
- Genetic Services of Western AustraliaKing Edward Memorial HospitalPerthAustralia
- Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
| | - Edenir I. Palmero
- Molecular Oncology Research CenterBarretos Cancer HospitalSão PauloBrazil
- Barretos School of Health SciencesDr. Paulo Prata ‐ FACISBSão PauloBrazil
| | - Laura Papi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics UnitUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
| | - Inge Sokilde Pedersen
- Clinical Cancer Research CenterAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
- Molecular DiagnosticsAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
| | - Bernard Peissel
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and HematologyFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Pedro Perez‐Segura
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San CarlosIdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Katharina Pfeifer
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TechnischenUniversität MünchenMunichGermany
| | - Marta Pineda
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Esther Pohl‐Rescigno
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Nicola K. Poplawski
- Adult Genetics UnitRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideAustralia
- School of Paediatrics and Reproductive HealthUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
| | - Berardino Porfirio
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics UnitUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
| | - Anne S. Quante
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TechnischenUniversität MünchenMunichGermany
| | - Juliane Ramser
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TechnischenUniversität MünchenMunichGermany
| | - Rui M. Reis
- Molecular Oncology Research CenterBarretos Cancer HospitalSão PauloBrazil
- Health Sciences SchoolUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal
- ICVS/3B's‐PT Government Associate LaboratoryBragaPortugal
| | - Françoise Revillion
- Laboratoire d'Oncogenetique Moleculaire HumaineCentre Oscar LambretLilleFrance
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | | | - Julia Ritter
- Institute of Medical and Human GeneticsCharité –Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Daniela Rivera
- Unit of Hereditary CancerIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly
| | - Paula Rofes
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Andreas Rump
- Institute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav CarusTU DresdenDresdenGermany
| | - Monica Salinas
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Ana María Sánchez de Abajo
- Servicio de Análisis Clínicos y Bioquímica Clínica, Complejo HospitalarioUniversitario Insular Materno‐Infantil de Gran CanariaLas Palmas de Gran CanaríaSpain
| | - Gunnar Schmidt
- Institute of Human GeneticsHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
| | - Ulrike Schoenwiese
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Jochen Seggewiß
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
| | - Ares Solanes
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Doris Steinemann
- Institute of Human GeneticsHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
| | - Mathias Stiller
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity Hospital LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Dominique Stoppa‐Lyonnet
- Service de GénétiqueInstitut CurieParisFrance
- Department of Tumour BiologyINSERM U830ParisFrance
- Université Paris DescartesParisFrance
| | - Kelly J. Sullivan
- Genetic Health Service NZ‐ Northern HubAuckland District Health BoardAucklandNew Zealand
| | - Rachel Susman
- Genetic Health QueenslandRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
| | - Sean V. Tavtigian
- Department of Oncological ServicesUniversity of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUtah
- Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah
| | - Soo H. Teo
- Breast Cancer Research ProgrammeCancer Research MalaysiaSubang JayaSelangorMalaysia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Alex Teulé
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical GeneticsOdense University HospitalOdense CDenmark
| | | | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical GeneticsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Silvia Tognazzo
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOVIRCCSPaduaItaly
| | - Amanda E. Toland
- Department of Cancer Biology and GeneticsThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusOhio
| | - Eva Tornero
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Therese Törngren
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences LundLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Sara Torres‐Esquius
- High Risk and Cancer Prevention GroupVall d'Hebron Institute of OncologyBarcelonaSpain
| | - Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and HaematologyUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Alison H. Trainer
- Parkville Familial Cancer CentrePeter MacCallum Cancer CenterMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of medicineUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Katherine M. Tucker
- Prince of Wales Clinical SchoolUniversity of NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Department of Medical OncologyPrince of Wales HospitalRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Marion T. van Mackelenbergh
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus KielChristian‐Albrechts University KielKielGermany
| | - Liliana Varesco
- Unit of Hereditary CancerIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly
| | - Gardenia Vargas‐Parra
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Raymonda Varon
- Institute of Medical and Human GeneticsCharité –Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública galega Medicina Xenómica‐SERGASGrupo de Medicina Xenómica‐USC, CIBERER, IDISSantiago de CompostelaSpain
| | - Ángela Velasco
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Anne‐Sophie Vesper
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital DüsseldorfHeinrich‐Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Alessandra Viel
- Division of Functional Onco‐genomics and Genetics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO)IRCCSAvianoItaly
| | | | - Sebastian A. Wagner
- Department of MedicineHematology/Oncology, Goethe‐University FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
| | - Anke Waha
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Logan C. Walker
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical ScienceUniversity of OtagoChristchurchNew Zealand
| | - Rhiannon J. Walters
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Shan Wang‐Gohrke
- Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
| | | | - Wilko Weichert
- Institute of PathologyTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany
| | - Kerstin Wieland
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Lisa Wiesmüller
- Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of GynecologyUniversity Medical Center HamburgHamburgGermany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | - Emma R. Woodward
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Universities Foundation TrustSt. Mary's HospitalManchesterUK
- Genomic Medicine, North West Genomics hub, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Universities Foundation TrustSt. Mary's HospitalManchesterUK
| | - Silke Zachariae
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Valentina Zampiga
- Biosciences LaboratoryIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCSMeldolaItaly
| | | | - KConFab Investigators
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Research DepartmentPeter MacCallum Cancer CenterMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Conxi Lázaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of ResearchFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT)MilanItaly
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - David E. Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUtah
| | - Amanda B. Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cline MS, Babbi G, Bonache S, Cao Y, Casadio R, de la Cruz X, Díez O, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, Katsonis P, Lai C, Lichtarge O, Martelli PL, Mishne G, Moles-Fernández A, Montalban G, Mooney SD, O’Conner R, Ootes L, Özkan S, Padilla N, Pagel KA, Pejaver V, Radivojac P, Riera C, Savojardo C, Shen Y, Sun Y, Topper S, Parsons MT, Spurdle AB, Goldgar DE. Assessment of blind predictions of the clinical significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Hum Mutat 2019; 40:1546-1556. [PMID: 31294896 PMCID: PMC6744348 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Testing for variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (commonly referred to as BRCA1/2), has emerged as a standard clinical practice and is helping countless women better understand and manage their heritable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Yet the increased rate of BRCA1/2 testing has led to an increasing number of Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS), and the rate of VUS discovery currently outpaces the rate of clinical variant interpretation. Computational prediction is a key component of the variant interpretation pipeline. In the CAGI5 ENIGMA Challenge, six prediction teams submitted predictions on 326 newly-interpreted variants from the ENIGMA Consortium. By evaluating these predictions against the new interpretations, we have gained a number of insights on the state of the art of variant prediction and specific steps to further advance this state of the art.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giulia Babbi
- Biocomputing Group, FaBiT Department, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sandra Bonache
- Oncogenetics Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of
Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yue Cao
- Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Rita Casadio
- Biocomputing Group, FaBiT Department, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Xavier de la Cruz
- Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics Research Unit,
Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis
Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Orland Díez
- Oncogenetics Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of
Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics Research Unit,
Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Carmen Lai
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Baylor
College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Olivier Lichtarge
- Department of Medical and Human Genetics, Baylor College
of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Baylor
College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Pharmacology, Baylor College of Medicine,
Houston, TX, USA
- Computational and Integrative Biomedical Research
Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Alejandro Moles-Fernández
- Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics Research Unit,
Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Montalban
- Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics Research Unit,
Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Lars Ootes
- Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics Research Unit,
Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Selen Özkan
- Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics Research Unit,
Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Natalia Padilla
- Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics Research Unit,
Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Predrag Radivojac
- Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
- Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Casandra Riera
- Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics Research Unit,
Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Yang Shen
- Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Yuanfei Sun
- Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | - David E. Goldgar
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake
City, UT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Katsonis P, Lichtarge O. CAGI5: Objective performance assessments of predictions based on the Evolutionary Action equation. Hum Mutat 2019; 40:1436-1454. [PMID: 31317604 PMCID: PMC6900054 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Many computational approaches estimate the effect of coding variants, but their predictions often disagree with each other. These contradictions confound users and raise questions regarding reliability. Performance assessments can indicate the expected accuracy for each method and highlight advantages and limitations. The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) community aims to organize objective and systematic assessments: They challenge predictors on unpublished experimental and clinical data and assign independent assessors to evaluate the submissions. We participated in CAGI experiments as predictors, using the Evolutionary Action (EA) method to estimate the fitness effect of coding mutations. EA is untrained, uses homology information, and relies on a formal equation: The fitness effect equals the functional sensitivity to residue changes multiplied by the magnitude of the substitution. In previous CAGI experiments (between 2011 and 2016), our submissions aimed to predict the protein activity of single mutants. In 2018 (CAGI5), we also submitted predictions regarding clinical associations, folding stability, and matching genomic data with phenotype. For all these diverse challenges, we used EA to predict the fitness effect of variants, adjusted to specifically address each question. Our submissions had consistently good performance, suggesting that EA predicts reliably the effects of genetic variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Katsonis
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Olivier Lichtarge
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pharmacology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Computational and Integrative Biomedical Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Padilla N, Moles-Fernández A, Riera C, Montalban G, Özkan S, Ootes L, Bonache S, Díez O, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, de la Cruz X. BRCA1- and BRCA2-specific in silico tools for variant interpretation in the CAGI 5 ENIGMA challenge. Hum Mutat 2019; 40:1593-1611. [PMID: 31112341 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) germline variants disrupting the DNA protective role of these genes increase the risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. Correct identification of these variants then becomes clinically relevant, because it may increase the survival rates of the carriers. Unfortunately, we are still unable to systematically predict the impact of BRCA1/2 variants. In this article, we present a family of in silico predictors that address this problem, using a gene-specific approach. For each protein, we have developed two tools, aimed at predicting the impact of a variant at two different levels: Functional and clinical. Testing their performance in different datasets shows that specific information compensates the small number of predictive features and the reduced training sets employed to develop our models. When applied to the variants of the BRCA1/2 (ENIGMA) challenge in the fifth Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI 5) we find that these methods, particularly those predicting the functional impact of variants, have a good performance, identifying the large compositional bias towards neutral variants in the CAGI sample. This performance is further improved when incorporating to our prediction protocol estimates of the impact on splicing of the target variant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natàlia Padilla
- Research Unit in Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Casandra Riera
- Research Unit in Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Montalban
- Oncogenetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Selen Özkan
- Research Unit in Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lars Ootes
- Research Unit in Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sandra Bonache
- Oncogenetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Orland Díez
- Oncogenetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.,Area of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, University Hospital of Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Xavier de la Cruz
- Research Unit in Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Germline Missense Variants in BRCA1: New Trends and Challenges for Clinical Annotation. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11040522. [PMID: 31013702 PMCID: PMC6520942 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11040522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic testing allows for the identification of germline DNA variations, which are associated with a significant increase in the risk of developing breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). Detection of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant triggers several clinical management actions, which may include increased surveillance and prophylactic surgery for healthy carriers or treatment with the PARP inhibitor therapy for carriers diagnosed with cancer. Thus, standardized validated criteria for the annotation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants according to their pathogenicity are necessary to support clinical decision-making and ensure improved outcomes. Upon detection, variants whose pathogenicity can be inferred by the genetic code are typically classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, likely benign, or benign. Variants whose impact on function cannot be directly inferred by the genetic code are labeled as variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS) and are evaluated by multifactorial likelihood models that use personal and family history of cancer, segregation data, prediction tools, and co-occurrence with a pathogenic BRCA variant. Missense variants, coding alterations that replace a single amino acid residue with another, are a class of variants for which determination of clinical relevance is particularly challenging. Here, we discuss current issues in the missense variant classification by following a typical life cycle of a BRCA1 missense variant through detection, annotation and information dissemination. Advances in massively parallel sequencing have led to a substantial increase in VUS findings. Although the comprehensive assessment and classification of missense variants according to their pathogenicity remains the bottleneck, new developments in functional analysis, high throughput assays, data sharing, and statistical models are rapidly changing this scenario.
Collapse
|
32
|
Fernandes VC, Golubeva VA, Di Pietro G, Shields C, Amankwah K, Nepomuceno TC, de Gregoriis G, Abreu RBV, Harro C, Gomes TT, Silva RF, Suarez-Kurtz G, Couch FJ, Iversen ES, Monteiro ANA, Carvalho MA. Impact of amino acid substitutions at secondary structures in the BRCT domains of the tumor suppressor BRCA1: Implications for clinical annotation. J Biol Chem 2019; 294:5980-5992. [PMID: 30765603 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.ra118.005274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Revised: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic testing for BRCA1, a DNA repair protein, can identify carriers of pathogenic variants associated with a substantially increased risk for breast and ovarian cancers. However, an association with increased risk is unclear for a large fraction of BRCA1 variants present in the human population. Most of these variants of uncertain clinical significance lead to amino acid changes in the BRCA1 protein. Functional assays are valuable tools to assess the potential pathogenicity of these variants. Here, we systematically probed the effects of substitutions in the C terminus of BRCA1: the N- and C-terminal borders of its tandem BRCT domain, the BRCT-[N-C] linker region, and the α1 and α'1 helices in BRCT-[N] and -[C]. Using a validated transcriptional assay based on a fusion of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain to the BRCA1 C terminus (amino acids 1396-1863), we assessed the functional impact of 99 missense variants of BRCA1. We include the data obtained for these 99 missense variants in a joint analysis to generate the likelihood of pathogenicity for 347 missense variants in BRCA1 using VarCall, a Bayesian integrative statistical model. The results from this analysis increase our understanding of BRCA1 regions less tolerant to changes, identify functional borders of structural domains, and predict the likelihood of pathogenicity for 98% of all BRCA1 missense variants in this region recorded in the population. This knowledge will be critical for improving risk assessment and clinical treatment of carriers of BRCA1 variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa C Fernandes
- From the Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Programa de Pesquisa Clínica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20231-050
| | - Volha A Golubeva
- the Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612
| | - Giuliano Di Pietro
- the Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612; the Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Campus São Cristóvão, Brazil 49100-000
| | - Cara Shields
- the Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612
| | - Kwabena Amankwah
- the Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612
| | - Thales C Nepomuceno
- From the Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Programa de Pesquisa Clínica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20231-050; the Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612
| | - Giuliana de Gregoriis
- From the Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Programa de Pesquisa Clínica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20231-050
| | - Renata B V Abreu
- From the Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Programa de Pesquisa Clínica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20231-050
| | - Carly Harro
- the Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612; the Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Florida Cancer Biology Ph.D. Program, Tampa, Florida 33612
| | - Thiago T Gomes
- the Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20270-021, Brazil
| | - Ricceli F Silva
- the Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20270-021, Brazil
| | - Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz
- From the Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Programa de Pesquisa Clínica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20231-050
| | - Fergus J Couch
- the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Edwin S Iversen
- the Department of Statistics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710
| | - Alvaro N A Monteiro
- the Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612.
| | - Marcelo A Carvalho
- From the Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Programa de Pesquisa Clínica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20231-050.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Duraturo F, Liccardo R, De Rosa M, Izzo P. Genetics, diagnosis and treatment of Lynch syndrome: Old lessons and current challenges. Oncol Lett 2019; 17:3048-3054. [PMID: 30867733 PMCID: PMC6396136 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.9945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder associated with germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. The carriers of pathogenic mutations in these genes have an increased risk of developing a colorectal cancer and/or LS-associated cancer. The LS-associated cancer types include carcinomas of the endometrium, small intestine, stomach, pancreas and biliary tract, ovary, brain, upper urinary tract and skin. The criteria for the clinical diagnosis of LS and the procedures of the genetic testing for identification of pathogenetic mutations carriers in MMR genes have long been known. A crucial point in the mutation detection analysis is the correct definition of the pathogenecity associated with MMR genetic variants, especially in order to include the mutation carriers in the endoscopy surveillance programs more suited to them. Therefore, this may help to improve the LS-associated cancer prevention programs. In the present review, we also report the recent discoveries in molecular genetics of LS, such as the new roles of MMR protein and immune response of MMR repair deficiency in colorectal cancer. Finally, we discuss the main therapeutic approaches, including immunotherapy, which represent a valid alternative to traditional therapeutic methods and extend the life expectancy of patients that have already developed LS-associated colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Duraturo
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples I-80131, Italy
| | - Raffaella Liccardo
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples I-80131, Italy
| | - Marina De Rosa
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples I-80131, Italy
| | - Paola Izzo
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples I-80131, Italy.,CEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples I-80131, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
A functional assay-based procedure to classify mismatch repair gene variants in Lynch syndrome. Genet Med 2018; 21:1486-1496. [PMID: 30504929 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0372-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To enhance classification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes in the cancer predisposition Lynch syndrome, we developed the cell-free in vitro MMR activity (CIMRA) assay. Here, we calibrate and validate the assay, enabling its integration with in silico and clinical data. METHODS Two sets of previously classified MLH1 and MSH2 variants were selected from a curated MMR gene database, and their biochemical activity determined by the CIMRA assay. The assay was calibrated by regression analysis followed by symmetric cross-validation and Bayesian integration with in silico predictions of pathogenicity. CIMRA assay reproducibility was assessed in four laboratories. RESULTS Concordance between the training runs met our prespecified validation criterion. The CIMRA assay alone correctly classified 65% of variants, with only 3% discordant classification. Bayesian integration with in silico predictions of pathogenicity increased the proportion of correctly classified variants to 87%, without changing the discordance rate. Interlaboratory results were highly reproducible. CONCLUSION The CIMRA assay accurately predicts pathogenic and benign MMR gene variants. Quantitative combination of assay results with in silico analysis correctly classified the majority of variants. Using this calibration, CIMRA assay results can be integrated into the diagnostic algorithm for MMR gene variants.
Collapse
|
35
|
Schaafsma GCP, Vihinen M. Representativeness of variation benchmark datasets. BMC Bioinformatics 2018; 19:461. [PMID: 30497376 PMCID: PMC6267811 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2478-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Benchmark datasets are essential for both method development and performance assessment. These datasets have numerous requirements, representativeness being one. In the case of variant tolerance/pathogenicity prediction, representativeness means that the dataset covers the space of variations and their effects. Results We performed the first analysis of the representativeness of variation benchmark datasets. We used statistical approaches to investigate how proteins in the benchmark datasets were representative for the entire human protein universe. We investigated the distributions of variants in chromosomes, protein structures, CATH domains and classes, Pfam protein families, Enzyme Commission (EC) classifications and Gene Ontology annotations in 24 datasets that have been used for training and testing variant tolerance prediction methods. All the datasets were available in VariBench or VariSNP databases. We tested also whether the pathogenic variant datasets contained neutral variants defined as those that have high minor allele frequency in the ExAC database. The distributions of variants over the chromosomes and proteins varied greatly between the datasets. Conclusions None of the datasets was found to be well representative. Many of the tested datasets had quite good coverage of the different protein characteristics. Dataset size correlates to representativeness but only weakly to the performance of methods trained on them. The results imply that dataset representativeness is an important factor and should be taken into account in predictor development and testing. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2478-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerard C P Schaafsma
- Protein Structure and Bioinformatics, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, BMC B13, SE-221 84, Lund, Sweden
| | - Mauno Vihinen
- Protein Structure and Bioinformatics, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, BMC B13, SE-221 84, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lee JS, Oh S, Park SK, Lee MH, Lee JW, Kim SW, Son BH, Noh DY, Lee JE, Park HL, Kim MJ, Cho SI, Lee YK, Park SS, Seong MW. Reclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance: a multifactorial analysis of multicentre prospective cohort. J Med Genet 2018; 55:794-802. [PMID: 30415210 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Revised: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) variants classified ambiguously as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are a major challenge for clinical genetic testing in breast cancer; their relevance to the cancer risk is unclear and the association with the response to specific BRCA1/2-targeted agents is uncertain. To minimise the proportion of VUS in BRCA1/2, we performed the multifactorial likelihood analysis and validated this method using an independent cohort of patients with breast cancer. METHODS We used a data set of 2115 patients with breast cancer from the nationwide multicentre prospective Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer study. In total, 83 BRCA1/2 VUSs (BRCA1, n=26; BRCA2, n=57) were analysed. The multifactorial probability was estimated by combining the prior probability with the overall likelihood ratio derived from co-occurrence of each VUS with pathogenic variants, personal and family history, and tumour characteristics. The classification was compared with the interpretation according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines. An external validation was conducted using independent data set of 810 patients. RESULTS We were able to redefine 38 VUSs (BRCA1, n=10; BRCA2, n=28). The revised classification was highly correlated with the ACMG/AMP guideline-based interpretation (BRCA1, p for trend=0.015; BRCA2, p=0.001). Our approach reduced the proportion of VUS from 19% (154/810) to 8.9% (72/810) in the retrospective validation data set. CONCLUSION The classification in this study would minimise the 'uncertainty' in clinical interpretation, and this validated multifactorial model can be used for the reliable annotation of BRCA1/2 VUSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jee-Soo Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sohee Oh
- Department of Biostatistics SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sue Kyung Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min-Hyuk Lee
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Won Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Ho Son
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong-Young Noh
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Eon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hai-Lin Park
- Department of Surgery, Kangnam CHA Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Man Jin Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Im Cho
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Kyung Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Sup Park
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Moon-Woo Seong
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Brnich SE, Rivera-Muñoz EA, Berg JS. Quantifying the potential of functional evidence to reclassify variants of uncertain significance in the categorical and Bayesian interpretation frameworks. Hum Mutat 2018; 39:1531-1541. [PMID: 30095857 PMCID: PMC6548460 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Revised: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Additional variant interpretation tools are required to effectively harness genomic sequencing for clinical applications. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) published guidelines for clinical sequence variant interpretation, incorporating different types of data that lend varying levels of support towards a benign or pathogenic interpretation. Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are those with either contradictory or insufficient evidence, and their uncertainty complicates patient counseling and management. Functional assays may provide a solution to evidence gaps relegating variants to the VUS category, but the impact of functional evidence in this framework has not been assessed. We employ an algorithmic analysis of the ACMG/AMP combining rules to assess how the availability of strong functional evidence could theoretically improve the ability to make a benign or pathogenic assertion. We follow this with analysis of actual evidence combinations met by variants through expert curations as part of the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). We also examine the impact of functional evidence in a Bayesian adaptation of the ACMG/AMP framework. This lays the groundwork for an evidence-based prioritization of assay development and variant assessment by identifying genes and variants that may benefit the most from functional data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E. Brnich
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Edgar A. Rivera-Muñoz
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonathan S. Berg
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Petitalot A, Dardillac E, Jacquet E, Nhiri N, Guirouilh-Barbat J, Julien P, Bouazzaoui I, Bonte D, Feunteun J, Schnell JA, Lafitte P, Aude JC, Noguès C, Rouleau E, Lidereau R, Lopez BS, Zinn-Justin S, Caputo SM. Combining Homologous Recombination and Phosphopeptide-binding Data to Predict the Impact of BRCA1 BRCT Variants on Cancer Risk. Mol Cancer Res 2018; 17:54-69. [PMID: 30257991 DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-17-0357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2017] [Revised: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BRCA1 mutations have been identified that increase the risk of developing hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. Genetic screening is now offered to patients with a family history of cancer, to adapt their treatment and the management of their relatives. However, a large number of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are detected. To better understand the significance of these variants, a high-throughput structural and functional analysis was performed on a large set of BRCA1 VUS. Information on both cellular localization and homology-directed DNA repair (HR) capacity was obtained for 78 BRCT missense variants in the UMD-BRCA1 database and measurement of the structural stability and phosphopeptide-binding capacities was performed for 42 mutated BRCT domains. This extensive and systematic analysis revealed that most characterized causal variants affect BRCT-domain solubility in bacteria and all impair BRCA1 HR activity in cells. Furthermore, binding to a set of 5 different phosphopeptides was tested: all causal variants showed phosphopeptide-binding defects and no neutral variant showed such defects. A classification is presented on the basis of mutated BRCT domain solubility, phosphopeptide-binding properties, and VUS HR capacity. These data suggest that HR-defective variants, which present, in addition, BRCT domains either insoluble in bacteria or defective for phosphopeptide binding, lead to an increased cancer risk. Furthermore, the data suggest that variants with a WT HR activity and whose BRCT domains bind with a WT affinity to the 5 phosphopeptides are neutral. The case of variants with WT HR activity and defective phosphopeptide binding should be further characterized, as this last functional defect might be sufficient per se to lead to tumorigenesis. IMPLICATIONS: The analysis of the current study on BRCA1 structural and functional defects on cancer risk and classification presented may improve clinical interpretation and therapeutic selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambre Petitalot
- Service de Génétique, Département de Biologie des Tumeurs, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris Sud, UMR 9198, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Elodie Dardillac
- Institut Gustave Roussy, CNRS UMR 8200, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Team labeled "Ligue 2014," Villejuif, France
| | - Eric Jacquet
- Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles, CNRS UPR 2301, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Naima Nhiri
- Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles, CNRS UPR 2301, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Josée Guirouilh-Barbat
- Institut Gustave Roussy, CNRS UMR 8200, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Team labeled "Ligue 2014," Villejuif, France
| | - Patrick Julien
- Service de Génétique, Département de Biologie des Tumeurs, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Isslam Bouazzaoui
- Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris Sud, UMR 9198, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Dorine Bonte
- Institut Gustave Roussy, CNRS UMR 8200, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean Feunteun
- Institut Gustave Roussy, CNRS UMR 8200, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Jeff A Schnell
- Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles, CNRS UPR 2301, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Philippe Lafitte
- Service de Génétique, Département de Biologie des Tumeurs, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Aude
- Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris Sud, UMR 9198, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Catherine Noguès
- Service de Génétique, Département de Biologie des Tumeurs, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Etienne Rouleau
- Service de Génétique, Département de Biologie des Tumeurs, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Rosette Lidereau
- Service de Génétique, Département de Biologie des Tumeurs, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Bernard S Lopez
- Institut Gustave Roussy, CNRS UMR 8200, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Team labeled "Ligue 2014," Villejuif, France
| | - Sophie Zinn-Justin
- Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris Sud, UMR 9198, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Substantial evidence for the clinical significance of missense variant BRCA1 c.5309G>T p.(Gly1770Val). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 172:497-503. [PMID: 30105462 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4903-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Classification of rare BRCA1 missense variants presents a major challenge for the counseling and treatment of patients. Variant classification can be complicated by conflicting lines of evidence. BRCA1 c.5309G>T p.(Gly1770Val) has been shown to abrogate BRCA1 protein homologous DNA repair; however, multiple sequence alignment demonstrates a lack of sequence conservation at this position, suggesting that glycine at position 1770 may not be essential for cellular maintenance in humans. We analyzed clinical information to resolve the classification of BRCA1 c.5309G>T p.(Gly1770Val). METHODS We performed multifactorial likelihood analysis combining segregation data for 14 informative families, and breast tumor histopathological data for 17 variant carriers, ascertained through the ENIGMA consortium. RESULTS Bayes segregation analysis gave a likelihood ratio of 101:1 in favor of pathogenicity. The vast majority of breast tumors showed features indicative of pathogenic variant carrier status, resulting in a likelihood ratio of 15800794:1 towards pathogenicity. Despite a low prior probability of pathogenicity (0.03) based on bioinformatic prediction, multifactorial likelihood analysis including segregation and histopathology analysis gave a posterior probability of > 0.99 and final classification of Pathogenic. CONCLUSIONS We provide evidence that BRCA1 c.5309G>T p.(Gly1770Val), previously described as a Moroccan founder variant, should be treated as a disease-causing variant despite a lack of evolutionary conservation at this amino acid position. Additionally, we stress that bioinformatic information should be used in combination with other data, either direct clinical evidence or some form of clinical calibration, to arrive at a final clinical classification.
Collapse
|
40
|
Rosenthal EA, Ranola JMO, Shirts BH. Power of pedigree likelihood analysis in extended pedigrees to classify rare variants of uncertain significance in cancer risk genes. Fam Cancer 2018; 16:611-620. [PMID: 28534081 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-017-9989-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Rare and private variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are routinely identified in clinical panel, exome, and genome sequencing. We investigated the power of single family co-segregation analysis to aid classification of VUS. We simulated thousands of pedigrees using demographics in China and the United States, segregating benign and pathogenic variants. Genotypes and phenotypes were simulated using penetrance models for Lynch syndrome and breast/ovarian cancer. We calculated LOD scores adjusted for proband ascertainment (LODadj), to determine power to yield quantitative evidence for, or against, pathogenicity of the VUS. Power to classify VUS was higher for Chinese than United States pedigrees. The number of affected individuals explained the most variation in LODadj (21-38%). The distance to the furthest affected relative (FAR) from the proband explained 1-7% of the variation for the benign VUS and Lynch associated cancers. Minimum age of onset (MAO) explained 5-13% of the variation in families with pathogenic breast/ovarian cancer variants. Random removal of 50% of the phenotype/genotype data reduced power and the variation in LODadj was best explained by FAR followed by the number of affected individuals and MAO when the founder was only two generations from the proband. Power to classify benign variants was ~2x power to classify pathogenic variants. Affecteds-only analysis resulted in virtually no power to correctly classify benign variants and reduced power to classify pathogenic variants. These results can be used to guide recruitment efforts to classify rare and private VUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth A Rosenthal
- Division of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - John Michael O Ranola
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brian H Shirts
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mercatanti A, Lodovichi S, Cervelli T, Galli A. CRIMEtoYHU: a new web tool to develop yeast-based functional assays for characterizing cancer-associated missense variants. FEMS Yeast Res 2018; 17:4562592. [PMID: 29069390 DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/fox078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 09/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Evaluation of the functional impact of cancer-associated missense variants is more difficult than for protein-truncating mutations and consequently standard guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants have been recently proposed. A number of algorithms and software products were developed to predict the impact of cancer-associated missense mutations on protein structure and function. Importantly, direct assessment of the variants using high-throughput functional assays using simple genetic systems can help in speeding up the functional evaluation of newly identified cancer-associated variants. We developed the web tool CRIMEtoYHU (CTY) to help geneticists in the evaluation of the functional impact of cancer-associated missense variants. Humans and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae share thousands of protein-coding genes although they have diverged for a billion years. Therefore, yeast humanization can be helpful in deciphering the functional consequences of human genetic variants found in cancer and give information on the pathogenicity of missense variants. To humanize specific positions within yeast genes, human and yeast genes have to share functional homology. If a mutation in a specific residue is associated with a particular phenotype in humans, a similar substitution in the yeast counterpart may reveal its effect at the organism level. CTY simultaneously finds yeast homologous genes, identifies the corresponding variants and determines the transferability of human variants to yeast counterparts by assigning a reliability score (RS) that may be predictive for the validity of a functional assay. CTY analyzes newly identified mutations or retrieves mutations reported in the COSMIC database, provides information about the functional conservation between yeast and human and shows the mutation distribution in human genes. CTY analyzes also newly found mutations and aborts when no yeast homologue is found. Then, on the basis of the protein domain localization and functional conservation between yeast and human, the selected variants are ranked by the RS. The RS is assigned by an algorithm that computes functional data, type of mutation, chemistry of amino acid substitution and the degree of mutation transferability between human and yeast protein. Mutations giving a positive RS are highly transferable to yeast and, therefore, yeast functional assays will be more predictable. To validate the web application, we have analyzed 8078 cancer-associated variants located in 31 genes that have a yeast homologue. More than 50% of variants are transferable to yeast. Incidentally, 88% of all transferable mutations have a reliability score >0. Moreover, we analyzed by CTY 72 functionally validated missense variants located in yeast genes at positions corresponding to the human cancer-associated variants. All these variants gave a positive RS. To further validate CTY, we analyzed 3949 protein variants (with positive RS) by the predictive algorithm PROVEAN. This analysis shows that yeast-based functional assays will be more predictable for the variants with positive RS. We believe that CTY could be an important resource for the cancer research community by providing information concerning the functional impact of specific mutations, as well as for the design of functional assays useful for decision support in precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Mercatanti
- Yeast Genetics and Genomics Group, Laboratory of Functional Genetics and Genomics, Institute of Clinical Physiology CNR, via G. Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Samuele Lodovichi
- Yeast Genetics and Genomics Group, Laboratory of Functional Genetics and Genomics, Institute of Clinical Physiology CNR, via G. Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
- PhD program in Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Tiziana Cervelli
- Yeast Genetics and Genomics Group, Laboratory of Functional Genetics and Genomics, Institute of Clinical Physiology CNR, via G. Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Alvaro Galli
- Yeast Genetics and Genomics Group, Laboratory of Functional Genetics and Genomics, Institute of Clinical Physiology CNR, via G. Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Colombo M, Lòpez‐Perolio I, Meeks HD, Caleca L, Parsons MT, Li H, De Vecchi G, Tudini E, Foglia C, Mondini P, Manoukian S, Behar R, Garcia EBG, Meindl A, Montagna M, Niederacher D, Schmidt AY, Varesco L, Wappenschmidt B, Bolla MK, Dennis J, Michailidou K, Wang Q, Aittomäki K, Andrulis IL, Anton‐Culver H, Arndt V, Beckmann MW, Beeghly‐Fadel A, Benitez J, Boeckx B, Bogdanova NV, Bojesen SE, Bonanni B, Brauch H, Brenner H, Burwinkel B, Chang‐Claude J, Conroy DM, Couch FJ, Cox A, Cross SS, Czene K, Devilee P, Dörk T, Eriksson M, Fasching PA, Figueroa J, Fletcher O, Flyger H, Gabrielson M, García‐Closas M, Giles GG, González‐Neira A, Guénel P, Haiman CA, Hall P, Hamann U, Hartman M, Hauke J, Hollestelle A, Hopper JL, Jakubowska A, Jung A, Kosma V, Lambrechts D, Le Marchand L, Lindblom A, Lubinski J, Mannermaa A, Margolin S, Miao H, Milne RL, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Olson JE, Peterlongo P, Peto J, Pylkäs K, Sawyer EJ, Schmidt MK, Schmutzler RK, Schneeweiss A, Schoemaker MJ, See MH, Southey MC, Swerdlow A, Teo SH, Toland AE, Tomlinson I, Truong T, van Asperen CJ, van den Ouweland AM, van der Kolk LE, Winqvist R, Yannoukakos D, Zheng W, Dunning AM, Easton DF, Henderson A, Hogervorst FB, Izatt L, Offitt K, Side LE, van Rensburg EJ, EMBRACE S, HEBON S, McGuffog L, Antoniou AC, Chenevix‐Trench G, Spurdle AB, Goldgar DE, de la Hoya M, Radice P. The BRCA2 c.68-7T > A variant is not pathogenic: A model for clinical calibration of spliceogenicity. Hum Mutat 2018; 39:729-741. [PMID: 29460995 PMCID: PMC5947288 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Revised: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 02/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Although the spliceogenic nature of the BRCA2 c.68-7T > A variant has been demonstrated, its association with cancer risk remains controversial. In this study, we accurately quantified by real-time PCR and digital PCR (dPCR), the BRCA2 isoforms retaining or missing exon 3. In addition, the combined odds ratio for causality of the variant was estimated using genetic and clinical data, and its associated cancer risk was estimated by case-control analysis in 83,636 individuals. Co-occurrence in trans with pathogenic BRCA2 variants was assessed in 5,382 families. Exon 3 exclusion rate was 4.5-fold higher in variant carriers (13%) than controls (3%), indicating an exclusion rate for the c.68-7T > A allele of approximately 20%. The posterior probability of pathogenicity was 7.44 × 10-115 . There was neither evidence for increased risk of breast cancer (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.86-1.24) nor for a deleterious effect of the variant when co-occurring with pathogenic variants. Our data provide for the first time robust evidence of the nonpathogenicity of the BRCA2 c.68-7T > A. Genetic and quantitative transcript analyses together inform the threshold for the ratio between functional and altered BRCA2 isoforms compatible with normal cell function. These findings might be exploited to assess the relevance for cancer risk of other BRCA2 spliceogenic variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Colombo
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic TestingDepartment of ResearchFondazione IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT)MilanItaly
| | - Irene Lòpez‐Perolio
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONCHospital Clinico San CarlosIdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Huong D. Meeks
- Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah
| | - Laura Caleca
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic TestingDepartment of ResearchFondazione IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT)MilanItaly
| | - Michael T. Parsons
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbane, QLD 4006Australia
| | - Hongyan Li
- Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah
| | - Giovanna De Vecchi
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic TestingDepartment of ResearchFondazione IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT)MilanItaly
| | - Emma Tudini
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbane, QLD 4006Australia
| | - Claudia Foglia
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic TestingDepartment of ResearchFondazione IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT)MilanItaly
| | - Patrizia Mondini
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic TestingDepartment of ResearchFondazione IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT)MilanItaly
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical GeneticsDepartment of Medical Oncology and HematologyFondazione IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT)MilanItaly
| | - Raquel Behar
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONCHospital Clinico San CarlosIdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Encarna B. Gómez Garcia
- Department of Clinical Genetics and GROWSchool for Oncology and Developmental BiologyMUMCMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity HospitalLMU MunichGermany
| | - Marco Montagna
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology UnitVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV ‐ IRCCSPaduaItaly
| | - Dieter Niederacher
- Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital DüsseldorfHeinrich‐Heine UniversityDuesseldorfGermany
| | - Ane Y. Schmidt
- Center for Genomic MedicineRigshospitaletUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | | | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian CancerUniversity Hospital of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO)Medical FacultyUniversity Hospital of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Manjeet K. Bolla
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyDepartment of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyDepartment of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Kyriaki Michailidou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyDepartment of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Department of Electron Microscopy/Molecular PathologyThe Cyprus Institute of Neurology and GeneticsNicosiaCyprus
| | - Qin Wang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyDepartment of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Kristiina Aittomäki
- Department of Clinical GeneticsHelsinki University HospitalUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Irene L. Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer GeneticsLunenfeld‐Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai HospitalTorontoOntario
- Department of Molecular GeneticsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Hoda Anton‐Culver
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of California IrvineIrvineCalifornia
| | - Volker Arndt
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging ResearchGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐NurembergComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNErlangenGermany
| | - Alicia Beeghly‐Fadel
- Division of EpidemiologyDepartment of MedicineVanderbilt Epidemiology CenterVanderbilt‐Ingram Cancer CenterVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleTennessee
| | - Javier Benitez
- Human Cancer Genetics ProgramSpanish National Cancer Research CentreMadridSpain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER)ValenciaSpain
| | - Bram Boeckx
- VIB Center for Cancer BiologyVIBLeuvenBelgium
- Laboratory for Translational GeneticsDepartment of Human GeneticsUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Natalia V. Bogdanova
- Department of Radiation OncologyHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
- Gynaecology Research UnitHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical RadiologyMinskBelarus
| | - Stig E. Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population StudyHerlevand Gentofte HospitalCopenhagen University HospitalHerlevDenmark
- Department of Clinical BiochemistryHerlev and Gentofte HospitalCopenhagen University HospitalHerlevDenmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and GeneticsIstituto Europeo di OncologiaMilanItaly
| | - Hiltrud Brauch
- Dr. Margarete Fischer‐Bosch‐Institute of Clinical PharmacologyStuttgartGermany
- University of TübingenTübingenGermany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging ResearchGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
- Division of Preventive OncologyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Barbara Burwinkel
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
- Molecular Epidemiology GroupC080German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Jenny Chang‐Claude
- Division of Cancer EpidemiologyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
- Research Group Genetic Cancer EpidemiologyUniversity Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH)University Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Don M. Conroy
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyDepartment of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyMayo ClinicRochesterNew York
| | - Angela Cox
- Sheffield Institute for Nucleic Acids (SInFoNiA)Department of Oncology and MetabolismUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Simon S. Cross
- Academic Unit of PathologyDepartment of NeuroscienceUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of PathologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Department of Human GeneticsLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research UnitHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐NurembergComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNErlangenGermany
- David Geffen School of MedicineDepartment of Medicine Division of Hematology and OncologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCalifornia
| | - Jonine Figueroa
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and InformaticsThe University of Edinburgh Medical SchoolEdinburghUK
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsNational Cancer InstituteRockvilleMaryland
| | - Olivia Fletcher
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research CentreThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Henrik Flyger
- Department of Breast SurgeryHerlev and Gentofte HospitalCopenhagen University HospitalHerlevDenmark
| | - Marike Gabrielson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | | | - Graham G. Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology & Intelligence DivisionCancer Council VictoriaMelbourneAustralia
- Centre for Epidemiology and BiostatisticsMelbourne School of Population and Global healthThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | - Anna González‐Neira
- Human Cancer Genetics ProgramSpanish National Cancer Research CentreMadridSpain
| | - Pascal Guénel
- Cancer & Environment GroupCenter for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP)INSERMUniversity Paris‐SudUniversity Paris‐SaclayVillejuifFrance
| | - Christopher A. Haiman
- Department of Preventive MedicineKeck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCalifornia
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast CancerDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Mikael Hartman
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public HealthNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
- Department of SurgeryNational University Health SystemSingaporeSingapore
| | - Jan Hauke
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian CancerUniversity Hospital of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO)Medical FacultyUniversity Hospital of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC)University of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Antoinette Hollestelle
- Department of Medical OncologyFamily Cancer ClinicErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - John L. Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and BiostatisticsMelbourne School of Population and Global healthThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and PathologyPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Audrey Jung
- Division of Cancer EpidemiologyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Veli‐Matti Kosma
- Translational Cancer Research AreaUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
- Institute of Clinical MedicinePathology and Forensic MedicineUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
- Imaging CenterDepartment of Clinical PathologyKuopio University HospitalKuopioFinland
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- VIB Center for Cancer BiologyVIBLeuvenBelgium
- Laboratory for Translational GeneticsDepartment of Human GeneticsUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Loid Le Marchand
- Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHawaii
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Department of Genetics and PathologyPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- Translational Cancer Research AreaUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
- Institute of Clinical MedicinePathology and Forensic MedicineUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
- Imaging CenterDepartment of Clinical PathologyKuopio University HospitalKuopioFinland
| | - Sara Margolin
- Department of Clinical Science and Education SödersjukhusetKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Hui Miao
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public HealthNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - Roger L. Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology & Intelligence DivisionCancer Council VictoriaMelbourneAustralia
- Centre for Epidemiology and BiostatisticsMelbourne School of Population and Global healthThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | - Susan L. Neuhausen
- Department of Population SciencesBeckman Research Institute of City of HopeDuarteCalifornia
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyHelsinki University HospitalUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Janet E. Olson
- Department of Health Sciences ResearchMayo ClinicRochesterNew York
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- IFOMThe FIRC (Italian Foundation for Cancer Research) Institute of Molecular OncologyMilanItaly
| | - Julian Peto
- Department of Non‐Communicable Disease EpidemiologyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| | - Katri Pylkäs
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor BiologyCancer and Translational Medicine Research UnitBiocenter OuluUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor BiologyNorthern Finland Laboratory Centre OuluOuluFinland
| | | | - Marjanka K. Schmidt
- Division of Molecular PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and EpidemiologyThe Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian CancerUniversity Hospital of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO)Medical FacultyUniversity Hospital of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC)University of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
- National Center for Tumor DiseasesUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
| | | | - Mee Hoong See
- Breast Cancer Research UnitCancer Research InstituteUniversity Malaya Medical CentreKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | | | - Anthony Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Division of Breast Cancer ResearchThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Soo H. Teo
- Breast Cancer Research UnitCancer Research InstituteUniversity Malaya Medical CentreKuala LumpurMalaysia
- Cancer Research MalaysiaSubang JayaSelangorMalaysia
| | - Amanda E. Toland
- Department of Molecular VirologyImmunology and Medical GeneticsComprehensive Cancer CenterThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusOhio
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research CentreUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Thérèse Truong
- Cancer & Environment GroupCenter for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP)INSERMUniversity Paris‐SudUniversity Paris‐SaclayVillejuifFrance
| | | | | | - Lizet E. van der Kolk
- Family Cancer ClinicThe Netherlands Cancer Institute ‐ Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Robert Winqvist
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor BiologyCancer and Translational Medicine Research UnitBiocenter OuluUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor BiologyNorthern Finland Laboratory Centre OuluOuluFinland
| | - Drakoulis Yannoukakos
- Molecular Diagnostics LaboratoryINRASTESNational Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”AthensGreece
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of EpidemiologyDepartment of MedicineVanderbilt Epidemiology CenterVanderbilt‐Ingram Cancer CenterVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleTennessee
| | | | - Alison M. Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyDepartment of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyDepartment of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyDepartment of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Alex Henderson
- Institute of Genetic MedicineCentre for LifeNewcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS TrustNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Frans B.L. Hogervorst
- Family Cancer ClinicThe Netherlands Cancer Institute ‐ Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical GeneticsGuy's and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Kenneth Offitt
- Clinical Genetics Research LaboratoryDept. of MedicineCancer Biology and GeneticsMemorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew York
| | - Lucy E. Side
- Wessex Clinical Genetics ServiceMailpoint 627, Princess Anne Hospital, Coxford Road, Southampton, SO16 5YA
| | | | - Study EMBRACE
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyDepartment of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeStrangeways Research LaboratoryWorts CausewayCambridgeUK
| | - Study HEBON
- The Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON)Coordinating center: Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Lesley McGuffog
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyDepartment of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Antonis C. Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyDepartment of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Georgia Chenevix‐Trench
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbane, QLD 4006Australia
| | - Amanda B. Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbane, QLD 4006Australia
| | | | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONCHospital Clinico San CarlosIdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic TestingDepartment of ResearchFondazione IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT)MilanItaly
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Caputo SM, Léone M, Damiola F, Ehlen A, Carreira A, Gaidrat P, Martins A, Brandão RD, Peixoto A, Vega A, Houdayer C, Delnatte C, Bronner M, Muller D, Castera L, Guillaud-Bataille M, Søkilde I, Uhrhammer N, Demontety S, Tubeuf H, Castelain G, Jensen UB, Petitalot A, Krieger S, Lefol C, Moncoutier V, Boutry-Kryza N, Nielsen HR, Sinilnikova O, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Spurdle AB, Teixeira MR, Coulet F, Thomassen M, Rouleau E. Full in-frame exon 3 skipping of BRCA2 confers high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 2018; 9:17334-17348. [PMID: 29707112 PMCID: PMC5915120 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Accepted: 02/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA2 gene are associated with a cumulative high risk of breast/ovarian cancer. Several BRCA2 variants result in complete loss of the exon-3 at the transcript level. The pathogenicity of these variants and the functional impact of loss of exon 3 have yet to be established. As a collaboration of the COVAR clinical trial group (France), and the ENIGMA consortium for investigating breast cancer gene variants, this study evaluated 8 BRCA2 variants resulting in complete deletion of exon 3. Clinical information for 39 families was gathered from Portugal, France, Denmark and Sweden. Multifactorial likelihood analyses were conducted using information from 293 patients, for 7 out of the 8 variants (including 6 intronic). For all variants combined the likelihood ratio in favor of causality was 4.39*1025. These results provide convincing evidence for the pathogenicity of all examined variants that lead to a total exon 3 skipping, and suggest that other variants that result in complete loss of exon 3 at the molecular level could be associated with a high risk of cancer comparable to that associated with classical pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. In addition, our functional study shows, for the first time, that deletion of exon 3 impairs the ability of cells to survive upon Mitomycin-C treatment, supporting lack of function for the altered BRCA2 protein in these cells. Finally, this study demonstrates that any variant leading to expression of only BRCA2 delta-exon 3 will be associated with an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mélanie Léone
- Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Hospices Civils de Lyon/Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Asa Ehlen
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3348, Orsay, France.,Université Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3348, Orsay, France
| | - Aura Carreira
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3348, Orsay, France.,Université Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3348, Orsay, France
| | - Pascaline Gaidrat
- Inserm-U1245, UNIROUEN, Normandie University, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France
| | - Alexandra Martins
- Inserm-U1245, UNIROUEN, Normandie University, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France
| | | | - Ana Peixoto
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Vega
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | - Claude Houdayer
- Institut Curie, Service de Génétique, Paris, France.,Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Danièle Muller
- Laboratoire d'Oncogénétique, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Laurent Castera
- Laboratoire de biologie et de génétique du cancer, CLCC François Baclesse, INSERM 1079 Centre Normand de Génomique et de Médecine Personnalisée, Caen, France
| | | | - Inge Søkilde
- Section of Molecular Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Nancy Uhrhammer
- Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale, CLCC Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Hélène Tubeuf
- Inserm-U1245, UNIROUEN, Normandie University, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France.,Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France
| | - Gaïa Castelain
- Inserm-U1245, UNIROUEN, Normandie University, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France
| | | | - Uffe Birk Jensen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Sophie Krieger
- Laboratoire de biologie et de génétique du cancer, CLCC François Baclesse, INSERM 1079 Centre Normand de Génomique et de Médecine Personnalisée, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Nadia Boutry-Kryza
- Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Hospices Civils de Lyon/Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Olga Sinilnikova
- Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Hospices Civils de Lyon/Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Genetics and Comp utational Biology Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Florence Coulet
- Laboratoire d'Oncogénétique et d'Angiogénétique Moléculaire, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Čalyševa J, Vihinen M. PON-SC - program for identifying steric clashes caused by amino acid substitutions. BMC Bioinformatics 2017; 18:531. [PMID: 29187139 PMCID: PMC5707825 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-017-1947-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Amino acid substitutions due to DNA nucleotide replacements are frequently disease-causing because of affecting functionally important sites. If the substituting amino acid does not fit into the protein, it causes structural alterations that are often harmful. Clashes of amino acids cause local or global structural changes. Testing structural compatibility of variations has been difficult due to the lack of a dedicated method that could handle vast amounts of variation data produced by next generation sequencing technologies. Results We developed a method, PON-SC, for detecting protein structural clashes due to amino acid substitutions. The method utilizes side chain rotamer library and tests whether any of the common rotamers can be fitted into the protein structure. The tool was tested both with variants that cause and do not cause clashes and found to have accuracy of 0.71 over five test datasets. Conclusions We developed a fast method for residue side chain clash detection. The method provides in addition to the prediction also visualization of the variant in three dimensional structure. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-017-1947-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelena Čalyševa
- Protein Structure and Bioinformatics, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, BMC B13, SE-22 184, Lund, Sweden.,Present address: EMBL Heidelberg, Meyerhofstraße 1, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mauno Vihinen
- Protein Structure and Bioinformatics, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, BMC B13, SE-22 184, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abdulrahman AA, Heintzelman RC, Corbman M, Garcia FU. Invasive breast carcinomas with ATM gene variants of uncertain significance share distinct histopathologic features. Breast J 2017; 24:291-297. [PMID: 28986972 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2016] [Revised: 02/21/2017] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
The increasing availability of next-generation sequencing for clinical research dramatically improved our understanding of breast cancer genetics and resulted in detection of new mutation variants. Cancer risk data relating to some of these variants are insufficient, prompting the designation of variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The histopathologic characteristics of these variants have not been previously described. We propose to depict these characteristics and determine if invasive carcinomas with similar VUS genes share similar histomorphologic features. In total, 28 invasive breast cancers with VUS were retrospectively identified. Tumor sections were reviewed and a predefined set of histopathologic characteristics were documented and compared. Nine of the 28 cases were variants in the ATM gene and were found to share similar histologic characteristics; all had tumor cells with low nuclear grade, absent tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, as well as a marked desmoplastic response. A subset of the above findings were identified in variants of other genes but none had all findings collectively. Furthermore, variants of ATM gene had smaller tumor size, lower pathologic T stage at presentation, and more favorable surrogate molecular subtype compared to variants of other genes. These findings could potentially be used to reclassify VUS and predict which patients may harbor ATM mutations, and hence could have implications in triaging toward ATM variant identification for potential future targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed A Abdulrahman
- Department of Pathology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rebecca C Heintzelman
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America at Eastern Regional Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Melanie Corbman
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America at Eastern Regional Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Fernando U Garcia
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America at Eastern Regional Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Moghadasi S, Meeks HD, Vreeswijk MP, Janssen LA, Borg Å, Ehrencrona H, Paulsson-Karlsson Y, Wappenschmidt B, Engel C, Gehrig A, Arnold N, Hansen TVO, Thomassen M, Jensen UB, Kruse TA, Ejlertsen B, Gerdes AM, Pedersen IS, Caputo SM, Couch F, Hallberg EJ, van den Ouweland AM, Collée MJ, Teugels E, Adank MA, van der Luijt RB, Mensenkamp AR, Oosterwijk JC, Blok MJ, Janin N, Claes KB, Tucker K, Viassolo V, Toland AE, Eccles DE, Devilee P, Van Asperen CJ, Spurdle AB, Goldgar DE, García EG. The BRCA1 c. 5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) intermediate risk variant: breast and ovarian cancer risk estimation and recommendations for clinical management from the ENIGMA consortium. J Med Genet 2017; 55:15-20. [PMID: 28490613 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We previously showed that the BRCA1 variant c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) was associated with an intermediate risk of breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). This study aimed to assess these cancer risks for R1699Q carriers in a larger cohort, including follow-up of previously studied families, to further define cancer risks and to propose adjusted clinical management of female BRCA1*R1699Q carriers. METHODS Data were collected from 129 BRCA1*R1699Q families ascertained internationally by ENIGMA (Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles) consortium members. A modified segregation analysis was used to calculate BC and OC risks. Relative risks were calculated under both monogenic model and major gene plus polygenic model assumptions. RESULTS In this cohort the cumulative risk of BC and OC by age 70 years was 20% and 6%, respectively. The relative risk for developing cancer was higher when using a model that included the effects of both the R1699Q variant and a residual polygenic component compared with monogenic model (for BC 3.67 vs 2.83, and for OC 6.41 vs 5.83). CONCLUSION Our results confirm that BRCA1*R1699Q confers an intermediate risk for BC and OC. Breast surveillance for female carriers based on mammogram annually from age 40 is advised. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy should be considered based on family history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Setareh Moghadasi
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Huong D Meeks
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Maaike Pg Vreeswijk
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Am Janssen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Åke Borg
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Hans Ehrencrona
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Laboratory Medicine, Office for Medical Services, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Centre of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Centre for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Centre for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andrea Gehrig
- Centre of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.,Department of Medical Genetics, University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.,Institute of Human Genetics, University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Norbert Arnold
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thomas Van Overeem Hansen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarK.,Department of Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarK
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Uffe Birk Jensen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Torben A Kruse
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Bent Ejlertsen
- Department of Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarK.,Department of Oncology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne-Marie Gerdes
- Department of Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarK.,Department of Clinical Genetics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Inge Søkilde Pedersen
- Section of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Fergus Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Emily J Hallberg
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Margriet J Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Teugels
- Familial Cancer Clinic and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Brussels, Belgium
| | - Muriel A Adank
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob B van der Luijt
- Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan C Oosterwijk
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus J Blok
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Janin
- Department of Service de Génétique, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | | | - Kathy Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Service, Prince of Wales (and St George Hospitals) Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Valeria Viassolo
- Department of Oncogenetics and Cancer Prevention Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Amanda Ewart Toland
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Diana E Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christie J Van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Genetics and Computational Biology Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Brisbane, Australia
| | - David E Goldgar
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Encarna Gómez García
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Novel Implications in Molecular Diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017; 2017:2595098. [PMID: 28250766 PMCID: PMC5303590 DOI: 10.1155/2017/2595098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Accepted: 01/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
About 10% of total colorectal cancers are associated with known Mendelian inheritance, as Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) and Lynch syndrome (LS). In these cancer types the clinical manifestations of disease are due to mutations in high-risk alleles, with a penetrance at least of 70%. The LS is associated with germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. However, the mutation detection analysis of these genes does not always provide informative results for genetic counseling of LS patients. Very often, the molecular analysis reveals the presence of variants of unknown significance (VUSs) whose interpretation is not easy and requires the combination of different analytical strategies to get a proper assessment of their pathogenicity. In some cases, these VUSs may make a more substantial overall contribution to cancer risk than the well-assessed severe Mendelian variants. Moreover, it could also be possible that the simultaneous presence of these genetic variants in several MMR genes that behave as low risk alleles might contribute in a cooperative manner to increase the risk of hereditary cancer. In this paper, through a review of the recent literature, we have speculated a novel inheritance model in the Lynch syndrome; this could pave the way toward new diagnostic perspectives.
Collapse
|
48
|
Flower KJ, Shenker NS, El-Bahrawy M, Goldgar DE, Parsons MT, Spurdle AB, Morris JR, Brown R, Flanagan JM. DNA methylation profiling to assess pathogenicity of BRCA1 unclassified variants in breast cancer. Epigenetics 2016; 10:1121-32. [PMID: 26727311 PMCID: PMC4844213 DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2015.1111504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Germline pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 increase risk of developing breast cancer. Screening for mutations in BRCA1 frequently identifies sequence variants of unknown pathogenicity and recent work has aimed to develop methods for determining pathogenicity. We previously observed that tumor DNA methylation can differentiate BRCA1-mutated from BRCA1-wild type tumors. We hypothesized that we could predict pathogenicity of variants based on DNA methylation profiles of tumors that had arisen in carriers of unclassified variants. We selected 150 FFPE breast tumor DNA samples [47 BRCA1 pathogenic mutation carriers, 65 BRCAx (BRCA1-wild type), 38 BRCA1 test variants] and analyzed a subset (n=54) using the Illumina 450K methylation platform, using the remaining samples for bisulphite pyrosequencing validation. Three validated markers (BACH2, C8orf31, and LOC654342) were combined with sequence bioinformatics in a model to predict pathogenicity of 27 variants (independent test set). Predictions were compared with standard multifactorial likelihood analysis. Prediction was consistent for c.5194-12G>A (IVS 19-12 G>A) (P>0.99); 13 variants were considered not pathogenic or likely not pathogenic using both approaches. We conclude that tumor DNA methylation data alone has potential to be used in prediction of BRCA1 variant pathogenicity but is not independent of estrogen receptor status and grade, which are used in current multifactorial models to predict pathogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty J Flower
- a Epigenetics Unit; Department of Surgery and Cancer; Imperial College London ; UK
| | - Natalie S Shenker
- a Epigenetics Unit; Department of Surgery and Cancer; Imperial College London ; UK
| | - Mona El-Bahrawy
- b Department of Histopathology ; Hammersmith Hospital; Imperial College London ; UK
| | - David E Goldgar
- c Huntsman Cancer Institute; University of Utah ; Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| | - Michael T Parsons
- d QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute ; Brisbane , QLD , Australia
| | | | | | - Amanda B Spurdle
- d QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute ; Brisbane , QLD , Australia
| | - Joanna R Morris
- f Genome Stability Unit; School of Cancer Sciences; University of Birmingham ; UK
| | - Robert Brown
- a Epigenetics Unit; Department of Surgery and Cancer; Imperial College London ; UK.,g Section of Molecular Pathology; Institute for Cancer Research ; Sutton , UK
| | - James M Flanagan
- a Epigenetics Unit; Department of Surgery and Cancer; Imperial College London ; UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Béroud C, Letovsky SI, Braastad CD, Caputo SM, Beaudoux O, Bignon YJ, Bressac-De Paillerets B, Bronner M, Buell CM, Collod-Béroud G, Coulet F, Derive N, Divincenzo C, Elzinga CD, Garrec C, Houdayer C, Karbassi I, Lizard S, Love A, Muller D, Nagan N, Nery CR, Rai G, Revillion F, Salgado D, Sévenet N, Sinilnikova O, Sobol H, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Toulas C, Trautman E, Vaur D, Vilquin P, Weymouth KS, Willis A, Eisenberg M, Strom CM. BRCA Share: A Collection of Clinical BRCA Gene Variants. Hum Mutat 2016; 37:1318-1328. [DOI: 10.1002/humu.23113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2016] [Accepted: 09/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Béroud
- Aix Marseille Univ; INSERM, GMGF Marseille France
- APHM; Hôpital TIMONE Enfants; Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire; Marseille France
| | | | | | - Sandrine M. Caputo
- Service de Génétique; Department de Biologie des Tumeurs; Institut Curie; Paris France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Florence Coulet
- Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Laboratoire d'Oncogénétique et Angiogénétique moléculaire; Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Paris France
| | - Nicolas Derive
- Service de Génétique; Department de Biologie des Tumeurs; Institut Curie; Paris France
| | | | | | | | - Claude Houdayer
- Service de Génétique; Department de Biologie des Tumeurs; Institut Curie; Paris France
- Université Paris Descartes; Paris France
| | | | - Sarab Lizard
- CHU de Dijon; Hôpital d'Enfants; Service de Génétique Médicale Dijon France
| | - Angela Love
- Quest Diagnostics; Marlborough Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Ghadi Rai
- Aix Marseille Univ; INSERM, GMGF Marseille France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Service de Génétique; Department de Biologie des Tumeurs; Institut Curie; Paris France
- Université Paris Descartes; Paris France
| | | | - Edwin Trautman
- Laboratory Corporation of America; Westborough Massachusetts
| | - Dominique Vaur
- Laboratoire de biologie et de génétique du cancer; CLCC François Baclesse; INSERM 1079 Centre Normand de Génomique et de Médecine Personnalisée; Caen France
| | - Paul Vilquin
- Laboratoire de Biologie Cellulaire et Hormonale (CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve); Montpellier France
| | | | - Alecia Willis
- Laboratory Corporation of America; Research Triangle Park North Carolina
| | - Marcia Eisenberg
- Laboratory Corporation of America; Research Triangle Park North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Weiderpass E, Tyczynski JE. Epidemiology of Patients with Ovarian Cancer with and Without a BRCA1/2 Mutation. Mol Diagn Ther 2016; 19:351-64. [PMID: 26476542 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-015-0168-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer survival rates have improved only slightly in recent decades; however, treatment of this disease is expected to undergo rapid change as strategies incorporating molecular-targeted therapies enter clinical practice. Carriers of deleterious mutations (defined as a harmful mutation) in either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene (BRCAm) have a significantly increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. Epidemiology data in large (>500 patients) unselected ovarian cancer populations suggest that the expected incidence rate for BRCAm in this population is 12-14 %. Patients with a BRCAm are typically diagnosed at a younger age than those without a BRCAm. Associations with BRCAm vary according to ethnicity, with women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent being 10 times more likely to have a BRCAm than the general population. In terms of survival, patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer who have a BRCAm may have improved overall survival compared with patients who do not carry a BRCAm. Although genetic testing for BRCAm remains relatively uncommon in ovarian cancer patients, testing is becoming cheaper and increasingly accessible; however, this approach is not without numerous social, ethical and policy issues. Current guidelines recommend BRCAm testing in specific ovarian cancer patients only; however, with the emergence of treatments that are targeted at patients with a BRCAm, genetic testing of all patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer may lead to improved patient outcomes in this patient population. Knowledge of BRCAm status could, therefore, help to inform treatment decisions and identify relatives at increased risk of developing cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabete Weiderpass
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, PO Box 281, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. .,Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway. .,Genetic Epidemiology Group, Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland.
| | | |
Collapse
|