1
|
Sahu S, Sullivan TL, Mitrophanov AY, Galloux M, Nousome D, Southon E, Caylor D, Mishra AP, Evans CN, Clapp ME, Burkett S, Malys T, Chari R, Biswas K, Sharan SK. Saturation genome editing of 11 codons and exon 13 of BRCA2 coupled with chemotherapeutic drug response accurately determines pathogenicity of variants. PLoS Genet 2023; 19:e1010940. [PMID: 37713444 PMCID: PMC10529611 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The unknown pathogenicity of a significant number of variants found in cancer-related genes is attributed to limited epidemiological data, resulting in their classification as variant of uncertain significance (VUS). To date, Breast Cancer gene-2 (BRCA2) has the highest number of VUSs, which has necessitated the development of several robust functional assays to determine their functional significance. Here we report the use of a humanized-mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) line expressing a single copy of the human BRCA2 for a CRISPR-Cas9-based high-throughput functional assay. As a proof-of-principle, we have saturated 11 codons encoded by BRCA2 exons 3, 18, 19 and all possible single-nucleotide variants in exon 13 and multiplexed these variants for their functional categorization. Specifically, we used a pool of 180-mer single-stranded donor DNA to generate all possible combination of variants. Using a high throughput sequencing-based approach, we show a significant drop in the frequency of non-functional variants, whereas functional variants are enriched in the pool of the cells. We further demonstrate the response of these variants to the DNA-damaging agents, cisplatin and olaparib, allowing us to use cellular survival and drug response as parameters for variant classification. Using this approach, we have categorized 599 BRCA2 variants including 93-single nucleotide variants (SNVs) across the 11 codons, of which 28 are reported in ClinVar. We also functionally categorized 252 SNVs from exon 13 into 188 functional and 60 non-functional variants, demonstrating that saturation genome editing (SGE) coupled with drug sensitivity assays can enhance functional annotation of BRCA2 VUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sounak Sahu
- Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Teresa L. Sullivan
- Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Alexander Y. Mitrophanov
- Statistical Consulting and Scientific Programming, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | - Darryl Nousome
- CCR Bioinformatics Resource, Leidos Biomedical Sciences, Inc. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Eileen Southon
- Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Dylan Caylor
- Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Arun Prakash Mishra
- Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Christine N. Evans
- Genome Modification Core, Laboratory Animal Sciences Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Michelle E. Clapp
- Genome Modification Core, Laboratory Animal Sciences Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Sandra Burkett
- Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Tyler Malys
- Statistical Consulting and Scientific Programming, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Raj Chari
- Genome Modification Core, Laboratory Animal Sciences Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Kajal Biswas
- Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Shyam K. Sharan
- Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li H, Engel C, de la Hoya M, Peterlongo P, Yannoukakos D, Livraghi L, Radice P, Thomassen M, Hansen TVO, Gerdes AM, Nielsen HR, Caputo SM, Zambelli A, Borg A, Solano A, Thomas A, Parsons MT, Antoniou AC, Leslie G, Yang X, Chenevix-Trench G, Caldes T, Kwong A, Pedersen IS, Lautrup CK, John EM, Terry MB, Hopper JL, Southey MC, Andrulis IL, Tischkowitz M, Janavicius R, Boonen SE, Kroeldrup L, Varesco L, Hamann U, Vega A, Palmero EI, Garber J, Montagna M, Van Asperen CJ, Foretova L, Greene MH, Selkirk T, Moller P, Toland AE, Domchek SM, James PA, Thorne H, Eccles DM, Nielsen SM, Manoukian S, Pasini B, Caligo MA, Lazaro C, Kirk J, Wappenschmidt B, Spurdle AB, Couch FJ, Schmutzler R, Goldgar DE. Risks of breast and ovarian cancer for women harboring pathogenic missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 compared with those harboring protein truncating variants. Genet Med 2022; 24:119-129. [PMID: 34906479 PMCID: PMC10170303 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Germline genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants has been a part of clinical practice for >2 decades. However, no studies have compared the cancer risks associated with missense pathogenic variants (PVs) with those associated with protein truncating (PTC) variants. METHODS We collected 582 informative pedigrees segregating 1 of 28 missense PVs in BRCA1 and 153 pedigrees segregating 1 of 12 missense PVs in BRCA2. We analyzed 324 pedigrees with PTC variants in BRCA1 and 214 pedigrees with PTC variants in BRCA2. Cancer risks were estimated using modified segregation analysis. RESULTS Estimated breast cancer risks were markedly lower for women aged >50 years carrying BRCA1 missense PVs than for the women carrying BRCA1 PTC variants (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.9 [2.4-6.2] for PVs vs 12.8 [5.7-28.7] for PTC variants; P = .01), particularly for missense PVs in the BRCA1 C-terminal domain (HR = 2.8 [1.4-5.6]; P = .005). In case of BRCA2, for women aged >50 years, the HR was 3.9 (2.0-7.2) for those heterozygous for missense PVs compared with 7.0 (3.3-14.7) for those harboring PTC variants. BRCA1 p.[Cys64Arg] and BRCA2 p.[Trp2626Cys] were associated with particularly low risks of breast cancer compared with other PVs. CONCLUSION These results have important implications for the counseling of at-risk women who harbor missense PVs in the BRCA1/2 genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongyan Li
- Cancer Control and Population Science, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- Genome Diagnostics Program, IFOM - the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Drakoulis Yannoukakos
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, National Centre for Scientific Research "Demokritos", INRASTES Institute of Nuclear & Radiological Sciences & Technology, Energy & Safety, Athens, Greece
| | - Luca Livraghi
- Medical Oncology Unit, AZIENDA SOCIO SANITARIA TERRITORIALE PAPA GIOVANNI XXIII, Bergamo, Italy; University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Thomas V O Hansen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne-Marie Gerdes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henriette R Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics Sygehus Lillebaelt, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Sandrine M Caputo
- Service de Génétique, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Paris Sciences and Lettres Research University, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Zambelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, AZIENDA SOCIO SANITARIA TERRITORIALE PAPA GIOVANNI XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Ake Borg
- Divisions of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Angela Solano
- INBIOMED, Faculty of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, CONICET and Genotyping Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, CEMIC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Abigail Thomas
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Michael T Parsons
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Goska Leslie
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Xin Yang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Trinidad Caldes
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ava Kwong
- Cancer Genetics Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong; Department of Surgery, LKS Faculty of Medicine,University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Inge Søkilde Pedersen
- Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Clinical Cancer Research Center and Department of Clinical Genetics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, The Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University of Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Charlotte K Lautrup
- Clinical Cancer Research Center and Department of Clinical Genetics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, The Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University of Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health and Stanford Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ramunas Janavicius
- Department of Human and Medical Genetics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania; State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Susanne E Boonen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lone Kroeldrup
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Liliana Varesco
- Unit of Hereditary Cancer, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública galega Medicina Xenómica-SERGAS, Grupo de Medicina Xenómica-USC, CIBERER, IDIS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Edenir I Palmero
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil; National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Judy Garber
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Marco Montagna
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, IOV - Istituto Oncologico Veneto - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Christi J Van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lenka Foretova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Mark H Greene
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Tina Selkirk
- NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago, Evanston, IL
| | - Pal Moller
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Center for Hereditary Tumors, HELIOS-Klinikum Wuppertal, University of Witten-Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Amanda E Toland
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Paul A James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Heather Thorne
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah M Nielsen
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Barbara Pasini
- Medical Genetics Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Maria A Caligo
- SOD Genetica Molecolare, University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Conxi Lazaro
- ONCOBELL-IDIBELL-IDIBGI-IGTP, CIBERONC, Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Judy Kirk
- Familial Cancer Service, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - David E Goldgar
- Cancer Control and Population Science, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shamsani J, Kazakoff SH, Armean IM, McLaren W, Parsons MT, Thompson BA, O'Mara TA, Hunt SE, Waddell N, Spurdle AB. A plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that uses MaxEntScan to predict variant spliceogenicity. Bioinformatics 2020; 35:2315-2317. [PMID: 30475984 PMCID: PMC6596880 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Revised: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Summary Assessing the pathogenicity of genetic variants can be a complex and challenging task. Spliceogenic variants, which alter mRNA splicing, may yield mature transcripts that encode non-functional protein products, an important predictor of Mendelian disease risk. However, most variant annotation tools do not adequately assess spliceogenicity outside the native splice site and thus the disease-causing potential of variants in other intronic and exonic regions is often overlooked. Here, we present a plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that packages MaxEntScan and extends its functionality to provide splice site predictions using a maximum entropy model. The plugin incorporates a sliding window algorithm to predict splice site loss or gain for any variant that overlaps a transcript feature. We also demonstrate the utility of the plugin by comparing our predictions to two mRNA splicing datasets containing several cancer-susceptibility genes. Availability and implementation Source code is freely available under the Apache License, Version 2.0: https://github.com/Ensembl/VEP_plugins. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jannah Shamsani
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane QLD, Australia
| | - Stephen H Kazakoff
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane QLD, Australia
| | - Irina M Armean
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - Will McLaren
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael T Parsons
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane QLD, Australia
| | - Bryony A Thompson
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne VIC, Australia
| | - Tracy A O'Mara
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane QLD, Australia
| | - Sarah E Hunt
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicola Waddell
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane QLD, Australia
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Monteiro AN, Bouwman P, Kousholt AN, Eccles DM, Millot GA, Masson JY, Schmidt MK, Sharan SK, Scully R, Wiesmüller L, Couch F, Vreeswijk MPG. Variants of uncertain clinical significance in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes: best practices in functional analysis for clinical annotation. J Med Genet 2020; 57:509-518. [PMID: 32152249 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alvaro N Monteiro
- Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Peter Bouwman
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arne N Kousholt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
| | - Gael A Millot
- Hub-DBC, Institut Pasteur, USR 3756 CNRS, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Yves Masson
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Laval University Cancer Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shyam K Sharan
- National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Ralph Scully
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Walker LC, Lattimore VL, Kvist A, Kleiblova P, Zemankova P, de Jong L, Wiggins GAR, Hakkaart C, Cree SL, Behar R, Houdayer C, Investigators KC, Parsons MT, Kennedy MA, Spurdle AB, de la Hoya M. Comprehensive Assessment of BARD1 Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Splicing With Implications for Variant Classification. Front Genet 2019; 10:1139. [PMID: 31803232 PMCID: PMC6877745 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Case-control analyses have shown BARD1 variants to be associated with up to >2-fold increase in risk of breast cancer, and potentially greater risk of triple negative breast cancer. BARD1 is included in several gene sequencing panels currently marketed for the prediction of risk of cancer, however there are no gene-specific guidelines for the classification of BARD1 variants. We present the most comprehensive assessment of BARD1 messenger RNA splicing, and demonstrate the application of these data for the classification of truncating and splice site variants according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines. Methods: Nanopore sequencing, short-read RNA-seq (whole transcriptome and targeted), and capillary electrophoresis analysis were performed by four laboratories to investigate alternative BARD1 splicing in blood, breast, and fimbriae/ovary related specimens from non-cancer affected tissues. Splicing data were also collated from published studies of nine different tissues. The impact of the findings for PVS1 annotation was assessed for truncating and splice site variants. Results: We identified 62 naturally occurring alternative spliced BARD1 splicing events, including 19 novel events found by next generation sequencing and/or reverse transcription PCR analysis performed for this study. Quantitative analysis showed that naturally occurring splicing events causing loss of clinically relevant domains or nonsense mediated decay can constitute up to 11.9% of overlapping natural junctions, suggesting that aberrant splicing can be tolerated up to this level. Nanopore sequencing of whole BARD1 transcripts characterized 16 alternative isoforms from healthy controls, revealing that the most complex transcripts combined only two alternative splicing events. Bioinformatic analysis of ClinVar submitted variants at or near BARD1 splice sites suggest that all consensus splice site variants in BARD1 should be considered likely pathogenic, with the possible exception of variants at the donor site of exon 5. Conclusions: No BARD1 candidate rescue transcripts were identified in this study, indicating that all premature translation-termination codons variants can be annotated as PVS1. Furthermore, our analysis suggests that all donor and acceptor (IVS+/-1,2) variants can be considered PVS1 or PVS1_strong, with the exception of variants targeting the exon 5 donor site, that we recommend considering as PVS1_moderate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan C. Walker
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | - Anders Kvist
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Petra Kleiblova
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| | - Petra Zemankova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| | - Lucy de Jong
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - George A. R. Wiggins
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Christopher Hakkaart
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Simone L. Cree
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Raquel Behar
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, Spain
| | - Claude Houdayer
- Department of Genetics, F76000 and Normandy University, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - kConFab Investigators
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Research Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael T. Parsons
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Martin A. Kennedy
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Amanda B. Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Quantifying BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA Isoform Expression Levels in Single Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20030693. [PMID: 30736279 PMCID: PMC6387195 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20030693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 spliceogenic variants are often associated with an elevated risk of breast and ovarian cancers. Analyses of BRCA1 and BRCA2 splicing patterns have traditionally used technologies that sample a population of cells but do not account for the variation that may be present between individual cells. This novel proof of concept study utilises RNA in situ hybridisation to measure the absolute expression of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA splicing events in single lymphoblastoid cells containing known spliceogenic variants (BRCA1c.671-2 A>G or BRCA2c.7988 A>T). We observed a large proportion of cells (>42%) in each sample that did not express mRNA for the targeted gene. Increased levels (average mRNA molecules per cell) of BRCA2 ∆17_18 were observed in the cells containing the known spliceogenic variant BRCA2c.7988 A>T, but cells containing BRCA1c.671-2 A>G were not found to express significantly increased levels of BRCA1 ∆11, as had been shown previously. Instead, we show for each variant carrier sample that a higher proportion of cells expressed the targeted splicing event compared to control cells. These results indicate that BRCA1/2 mRNA is expressed stochastically, suggesting that previously reported results using RT-PCR may have been influenced by the number of cells with BRCA1/2 mRNA expression and may not represent an elevation of constitutive mRNA expression. Detection of mRNA expression in single cells allows for a more comprehensive understanding of how spliceogenic variants influence the expression of mRNA isoforms. However, further research is required to assess the utility of this technology to measure the expression of predicted spliceogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants in a diagnostic setting.
Collapse
|
7
|
Caleca L, Colombo M, van Overeem Hansen T, Lázaro C, Manoukian S, Parsons MT, Spurdle AB, Radice P. GFP-Fragment Reassembly Screens for the Functional Characterization of Variants of Uncertain Significance in Protein Interaction Domains of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:E151. [PMID: 30696104 PMCID: PMC6406614 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11020151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes has led to the identification of many unique variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Multifactorial likelihood models that predict the odds ratio for VUS in favor or against cancer causality, have been developed, but their use is conditioned by the amount of necessary data, which are difficult to obtain if a variant is rare. As an alternative, variants mapping to the coding regions can be examined using in vitro functional assays. BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins promote genome protection by interacting with different proteins. In this study, we assessed the functional effect of two sets of variants in BRCA genes by exploiting the green fluorescent protein (GFP)-reassembly in vitro assay, which was set-up to test the BRCA1/BARD1, BRCA1/UbcH5a, and BRCA2/DSS1 interactions. Based on the findings observed for the validation panels of previously classified variants, BRCA1/UbcH5a and BRCA2/DSS1 binding assays showed 100% sensitivity and specificity in identifying pathogenic and non-pathogenic variants. While the actual efficiency of these assays in assessing the clinical significance of BRCA VUS has to be verified using larger validation panels, our results suggest that the GFP-reassembly assay is a robust method to identify variants affecting normal protein functioning and contributes to the classification of VUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Caleca
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | - Mara Colombo
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | - Thomas van Overeem Hansen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Conxi Lázaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology. Program in Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology (Oncobell), IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08900 Barcelona, Spain.
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | - Michael T Parsons
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane 4029, Australia.
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane 4029, Australia.
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Heczkova M, Machackova E, Macinga P, Gallmeier E, Cahova M, Spicak J, Jirsa M, Foretova L, Hucl T. Functional evaluation of variants of unknown significance in the BRCA2 gene identified in genetic testing. Cancer Biol Ther 2019; 20:633-641. [PMID: 30638113 DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2018.1550566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Heterozygous germline BRCA2 mutations predispose to breast, ovarian, pancreatic and other types of cancer. The presence of a pathogenic mutation in patients or their family members warrants close surveillance or prophylactic surgery. Besides clearly pathogenic mutations, variants leading only to a single amino acid substitution are often identified. The influence of such variants on cancer risk is often unknown, making their presence a major clinical problem. When genetic methods are insufficient to classify these variants, functional assays with various cellular models are performed. We developed and applied a new syngeneic model of human cancer cells to test all variants of unknown significance in exon 18 identified by genetic testing of high-risk cancer patients in the Czech Republic, via introduction of constructs containing each of these variants into the wild-type allele of BRCA2-heterozygous DLD1 cells (BRCA2wt/Δex11). We found unaffected DNA repair function of BRCA2 in cell lines BRCA27997G>C/Δex11, BRCA28111C>T/Δex11, BRCA28149G>T/Δex11, BRCA28182G>A/Δex11, and BRCA28182G>T/Δex11, whereas the cell line BRCA28168A>G/Δex11 and the nonsense mutation carrying line BRCA28305G>T/Δex11 did affect protein function. Targeting the BRCA2 wild-type allele with a construct carrying the variant c.7988A> G resulted in incorporation exclusively into the already defective allele in all viable clones, strongly suggesting a detrimental phenotype. Our model thus offers a valuable tool for the functional evaluation of unclassified variants in the BRCA2 gene and provides a stable and distributable cellular resource for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Heczkova
- a Center for Experimental Medicine , Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , Prague , Czech Republic
| | - Eva Machackova
- b Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics , Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute , Brno , Czech Republic
| | - Peter Macinga
- c Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , Prague , Czech Republic
| | - Eike Gallmeier
- d Department of Internal Medicine , Philipps University of Marburg , Marburg , Germany
| | - Monika Cahova
- a Center for Experimental Medicine , Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , Prague , Czech Republic
| | - Julius Spicak
- c Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , Prague , Czech Republic
| | - Milan Jirsa
- a Center for Experimental Medicine , Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , Prague , Czech Republic
| | - Lenka Foretova
- b Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics , Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute , Brno , Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Hucl
- a Center for Experimental Medicine , Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , Prague , Czech Republic.,c Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , Prague , Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Farber-Katz S, Hsuan V, Wu S, Landrith T, Vuong H, Xu D, Li B, Hoo J, Lam S, Nashed S, Toppmeyer D, Gray P, Haynes G, Lu HM, Elliott A, Tippin Davis B, Karam R. Quantitative Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Germline Splicing Variants Using a Novel RNA-Massively Parallel Sequencing Assay. Front Oncol 2018; 8:286. [PMID: 30101128 PMCID: PMC6072868 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) is becoming widespread. However, the interpretation of variants of unknown significance (VUS) in HBOC genes, such as the clinically actionable genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, remain a challenge. Among the variants that are frequently classified as VUS are those with unclear effects on splicing. In order to address this issue we developed a high-throughput RNA-massively parallel sequencing assay—CloneSeq—capable to perform quantitative and qualitative analysis of transcripts in cell lines and HBOC patients. This assay is based on cloning of RT-PCR products followed by massive parallel sequencing of the cloned transcripts. To validate this assay we compared it to the RNA splicing assays recommended by members of the ENIGMA (Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles) consortium. This comparison was performed using well-characterized lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) generated from carriers of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline variants that have been previously described to be associated with splicing defects. CloneSeq was able to replicate the ENIGMA results, in addition to providing quantitative characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline splicing alterations in a high-throughput fashion. Furthermore, CloneSeq was used to analyze blood samples obtained from carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline sequence variants, including the novel uncharacterized alteration BRCA1 c.5152+5G>T, which was identified in a HBOC family. CloneSeq provided a high-resolution picture of all the transcripts induced by BRCA1 c.5152+5G>T, indicating it results in significant levels of exon skipping. This analysis proved to be important for the classification of BRCA1 c.5152+5G>T as a clinically actionable likely pathogenic variant. Reclassifications such as these are fundamental in order to offer preventive measures, targeted treatment, and pre-symptomatic screening to the correct individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzette Farber-Katz
- Translational Genomics Laboratory, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| | - Vickie Hsuan
- Translational Genomics Laboratory, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| | - Sitao Wu
- Department of Bioinformatics, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| | - Tyler Landrith
- Translational Genomics Laboratory, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| | - Huy Vuong
- Department of Bioinformatics, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| | - Dong Xu
- Department of Bioinformatics, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| | - Bing Li
- Department of Bioinformatics, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| | - Jayne Hoo
- Department of Research and Development, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| | - Stephanie Lam
- Department of Research and Development, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| | - Sarah Nashed
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Deborah Toppmeyer
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Phillip Gray
- Department of Research and Development, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| | - Ginger Haynes
- Translational Genomics Laboratory, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| | - Hsiao-Mei Lu
- Department of Bioinformatics, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| | - Aaron Elliott
- Department of Research and Development, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| | - Brigette Tippin Davis
- Department of Research and Development, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| | - Rachid Karam
- Translational Genomics Laboratory, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lattimore VL, Pearson JF, Currie MJ, Spurdle AB, Robinson BA, Walker LC. Investigation of Experimental Factors That Underlie BRCA1/2 mRNA Isoform Expression Variation: Recommendations for Utilizing Targeted RNA Sequencing to Evaluate Potential Spliceogenic Variants. Front Oncol 2018; 8:140. [PMID: 29774201 PMCID: PMC5943536 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PCR-based RNA splicing assays are commonly used in diagnostic and research settings to assess the potential effects of variants of uncertain clinical significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2. The Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) consortium completed a multicentre investigation to evaluate differences in assay design and the integrity of published data, raising a number of methodological questions associated with cell culture conditions and PCR-based protocols. We utilized targeted RNA-seq to re-assess BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA isoform expression patterns in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) previously used in the multicentre ENIGMA study. Capture of the targeted cDNA sequences was carried out using 34 BRCA1 and 28 BRCA2 oligonucleotides from the Illumina Truseq Targeted RNA Expression platform. Our results show that targeted RNA-seq analysis of LCLs overcomes many of the methodology limitations associated with PCR-based assays leading us to make the following observations and recommendations: (1) technical replicates (n > 2) of variant carriers to capture methodology induced variability associated with RNA-seq assays, (2) LCLs can undergo multiple freeze/thaw cycles and can be cultured up to 2 weeks without noticeably influencing isoform expression levels, (3) nonsense-mediated decay inhibitors are essential prior to splicing assays for comprehensive mRNA isoform detection, (4) quantitative assessment of exon:exon junction levels across BRCA1 and BRCA2 can help distinguish between normal and aberrant isoform expression patterns. Experimentally derived recommendations from this study will facilitate the application of targeted RNA-seq platforms for the quantitation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA aberrations associated with sequence variants of uncertain clinical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Lattimore
- Mackenzie Cancer Research Group, Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - John F Pearson
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Unit, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.,Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Margaret J Currie
- Mackenzie Cancer Research Group, Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Genetics and Computational Biology Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Bridget A Robinson
- Mackenzie Cancer Research Group, Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.,Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Logan C Walker
- Mackenzie Cancer Research Group, Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Caputo SM, Léone M, Damiola F, Ehlen A, Carreira A, Gaidrat P, Martins A, Brandão RD, Peixoto A, Vega A, Houdayer C, Delnatte C, Bronner M, Muller D, Castera L, Guillaud-Bataille M, Søkilde I, Uhrhammer N, Demontety S, Tubeuf H, Castelain G, Jensen UB, Petitalot A, Krieger S, Lefol C, Moncoutier V, Boutry-Kryza N, Nielsen HR, Sinilnikova O, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Spurdle AB, Teixeira MR, Coulet F, Thomassen M, Rouleau E. Full in-frame exon 3 skipping of BRCA2 confers high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 2018; 9:17334-17348. [PMID: 29707112 PMCID: PMC5915120 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Accepted: 02/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA2 gene are associated with a cumulative high risk of breast/ovarian cancer. Several BRCA2 variants result in complete loss of the exon-3 at the transcript level. The pathogenicity of these variants and the functional impact of loss of exon 3 have yet to be established. As a collaboration of the COVAR clinical trial group (France), and the ENIGMA consortium for investigating breast cancer gene variants, this study evaluated 8 BRCA2 variants resulting in complete deletion of exon 3. Clinical information for 39 families was gathered from Portugal, France, Denmark and Sweden. Multifactorial likelihood analyses were conducted using information from 293 patients, for 7 out of the 8 variants (including 6 intronic). For all variants combined the likelihood ratio in favor of causality was 4.39*1025. These results provide convincing evidence for the pathogenicity of all examined variants that lead to a total exon 3 skipping, and suggest that other variants that result in complete loss of exon 3 at the molecular level could be associated with a high risk of cancer comparable to that associated with classical pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. In addition, our functional study shows, for the first time, that deletion of exon 3 impairs the ability of cells to survive upon Mitomycin-C treatment, supporting lack of function for the altered BRCA2 protein in these cells. Finally, this study demonstrates that any variant leading to expression of only BRCA2 delta-exon 3 will be associated with an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mélanie Léone
- Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Hospices Civils de Lyon/Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Asa Ehlen
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3348, Orsay, France.,Université Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3348, Orsay, France
| | - Aura Carreira
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3348, Orsay, France.,Université Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3348, Orsay, France
| | - Pascaline Gaidrat
- Inserm-U1245, UNIROUEN, Normandie University, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France
| | - Alexandra Martins
- Inserm-U1245, UNIROUEN, Normandie University, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France
| | | | - Ana Peixoto
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Vega
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | - Claude Houdayer
- Institut Curie, Service de Génétique, Paris, France.,Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Danièle Muller
- Laboratoire d'Oncogénétique, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Laurent Castera
- Laboratoire de biologie et de génétique du cancer, CLCC François Baclesse, INSERM 1079 Centre Normand de Génomique et de Médecine Personnalisée, Caen, France
| | | | - Inge Søkilde
- Section of Molecular Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Nancy Uhrhammer
- Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale, CLCC Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Hélène Tubeuf
- Inserm-U1245, UNIROUEN, Normandie University, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France.,Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France
| | - Gaïa Castelain
- Inserm-U1245, UNIROUEN, Normandie University, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France
| | | | - Uffe Birk Jensen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Sophie Krieger
- Laboratoire de biologie et de génétique du cancer, CLCC François Baclesse, INSERM 1079 Centre Normand de Génomique et de Médecine Personnalisée, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Nadia Boutry-Kryza
- Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Hospices Civils de Lyon/Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Olga Sinilnikova
- Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Hospices Civils de Lyon/Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Genetics and Comp utational Biology Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Florence Coulet
- Laboratoire d'Oncogénétique et d'Angiogénétique Moléculaire, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guidugli L, Shimelis H, Masica DL, Pankratz VS, Lipton GB, Singh N, Hu C, Monteiro AN, Lindor NM, Goldgar DE, Karchin R, Iversen ES, Couch FJ. Assessment of the Clinical Relevance of BRCA2 Missense Variants by Functional and Computational Approaches. Am J Hum Genet 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.013 helena] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2022] Open
|
13
|
Guidugli L, Shimelis H, Masica DL, Pankratz VS, Lipton GB, Singh N, Hu C, Monteiro ANA, Lindor NM, Goldgar DE, Karchin R, Iversen ES, Couch FJ. Assessment of the Clinical Relevance of BRCA2 Missense Variants by Functional and Computational Approaches. Am J Hum Genet 2018; 102:233-248. [PMID: 29394989 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Many variants of uncertain significance (VUS) have been identified in BRCA2 through clinical genetic testing. VUS pose a significant clinical challenge because the contribution of these variants to cancer risk has not been determined. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of VUS in the BRCA2 C-terminal DNA binding domain (DBD) by using a validated functional assay of BRCA2 homologous recombination (HR) DNA-repair activity and defined a classifier of variant pathogenicity. Among 139 variants evaluated, 54 had ?99% probability of pathogenicity, and 73 had ?95% probability of neutrality. Functional assay results were compared with predictions of variant pathogenicity from the Align-GVGD protein-sequence-based prediction algorithm, which has been used for variant classification. Relative to the HR assay, Align-GVGD significantly (p < 0.05) over-predicted pathogenic variants. We subsequently combined functional and Align-GVGD prediction results in a Bayesian hierarchical model (VarCall) to estimate the overall probability of pathogenicity for each VUS. In addition, to predict the effects of all other BRCA2 DBD variants and to prioritize variants for functional studies, we used the endoPhenotype-Optimized Sequence Ensemble (ePOSE) algorithm to train classifiers for BRCA2 variants by using data from the HR functional assay. Together, the results show that systematic functional assays in combination with in silico predictors of pathogenicity provide robust tools for clinical annotation of BRCA2 VUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Guidugli
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Hermela Shimelis
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - David L Masica
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Vernon S Pankratz
- Division of Nephrology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | - Gary B Lipton
- Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Namit Singh
- Department of Structural Biology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | - Chunling Hu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Alvaro N A Monteiro
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Noralane M Lindor
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - David E Goldgar
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Rachel Karchin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Edwin S Iversen
- Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Hereditary predisposition accounts for approximately 10% of all breast cancers and is mostly associated with germline mutations in high-penetrance genes encoding for proteins participating in DNA repair through homologous recombination (BRCA1 and BRCA2). With the advent of massive parallel next-generation DNA sequencing, simultaneous analysis of multiple genes with a short turnaround time and at a low cost has become possible. The clinical validity and utility of multi-gene panel testing is getting better characterized as more data on the significance of moderate-penetrance genes are collected from large, cancer genetic testing studies. In this chapter, we attempt to provide a general guide for interpretation of panel gene testing in breast cancer and use of the information obtained for clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Fountzilas
- Cancer Therapy and Research Center, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, 7979 Wurzbach Road, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Virginia G Kaklamani
- Cancer Therapy and Research Center, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, 7979 Wurzbach Road, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pedersen IS, Schmidt AY, Bertelsen B, Ernst A, Andersen CLT, Kruse T, Rossing M, Thomassen M. A Danish national effort of BRCA1/2 variant classification. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:159-162. [PMID: 29168416 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1400693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Søkilde Pedersen
- Section of Molecular Diagnostics, Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ane Y. Schmidt
- Centre for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Bertelsen
- Centre for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Anja Ernst
- Section of Molecular Diagnostics, Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Torben Kruse
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Maria Rossing
- Centre for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
de Jong LC, Cree S, Lattimore V, Wiggins GAR, Spurdle AB, Miller A, Kennedy MA, Walker LC. Nanopore sequencing of full-length BRCA1 mRNA transcripts reveals co-occurrence of known exon skipping events. Breast Cancer Res 2017; 19:127. [PMID: 29183387 PMCID: PMC5706335 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-017-0919-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Laboratory assays evaluating the effect of DNA sequence variants on BRCA1 mRNA splicing may contribute to classification by providing molecular evidence. However, our knowledge of normal and aberrant BRCA1 splicing events to date has been limited to data derived from assays targeting partial transcript sequences. This study explored the utility of nanopore sequencing to examine whole BRCA1 mRNA transcripts and to provide accurate categorisation of in-frame and out-of-frame splicing events. Methods The exon structure of BRCA1 transcripts from a previously studied control lymphoblastoid cell line were assessed using MinION nanopore sequencing of long-range reverse transcriptase-PCR amplicons. Results Our study identified and characterised 32 complete BRCA1 isoforms, including 18 novel isoforms which showed skipping of multiple contiguous and/or non-contiguous exons. Furthermore, we show that known BRCA1 exon skipping events, such as Δ(9,10) and Δ21, can co-occur in a single transcript, with some isoforms containing four or more alternative splice junctions. Fourteen novel isoforms were formed entirely from a combination of previously identified alternative splice junctions, suggesting that the total number of BRCA1 isoforms might be lower than the number of splicing events reported previously. Conclusions Our results highlight complexity in BRCA1 transcript structure that has not been described previously. This finding has key implications for predicting the translation frame of splicing transcripts, important for interpreting the clinical significance of spliceogenic variants. Future research is warranted to quantitatively assess full-length BRCA1 transcript levels, and to assess the application of nanopore sequencing for routine evaluation of potential spliceogenic variants. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0919-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy C de Jong
- Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Simone Cree
- Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Vanessa Lattimore
- Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Genetics and Computational Biology Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Allison Miller
- Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Martin A Kennedy
- Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Logan C Walker
- Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Functional classification of DNA variants by hybrid minigenes: Identification of 30 spliceogenic variants of BRCA2 exons 17 and 18. PLoS Genet 2017; 13:e1006691. [PMID: 28339459 PMCID: PMC5384790 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2016] [Revised: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Mutation screening of the breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 identifies a large fraction of variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS) whose functional and clinical interpretations pose a challenge for genomic medicine. Likewise, an increasing amount of evidence indicates that genetic variants can have deleterious effects on pre-mRNA splicing. Our goal was to investigate the impact on splicing of a set of reported variants of BRCA2 exons 17 and 18 to assess their role in hereditary breast cancer and to identify critical regulatory elements that may constitute hotspots for spliceogenic variants. A splicing reporter minigene with BRCA2 exons 14 to-20 (MGBR2_ex14-20) was constructed in the pSAD vector. Fifty-two candidate variants were selected with splicing prediction programs, introduced in MGBR2_ex14-20 by site-directed mutagenesis and assayed in triplicate in MCF-7 cells. Wild type MGBR2_ex14-20 produced a stable transcript of the expected size (1,806 nucleotides) and structure (V1-[BRCA2_exons_14–20]–V2). Functional mapping by microdeletions revealed essential sequences for exon recognition on the 3’ end of exon 17 (c.7944-7973) and the 5’ end of exon 18 (c.7979-7988, c.7999-8013). Thirty out of the 52 selected variants induced anomalous splicing in minigene assays with >16 different aberrant transcripts, where exon skipping was the most common event. A wide range of splicing motifs were affected including the canonical splice sites (15 variants), novel alternative sites (3 variants), the polypyrimidine tract (3 variants) and enhancers/silencers (9 variants). According to the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), 20 variants could be classified as pathogenic (c.7806-2A>G, c.7806-1G>A, c.7806-1G>T, c.7806-1_7806-2dup, c.7976+1G>A, c.7977-3_7978del, c.7977-2A>T, c.7977-1G>T, c.7977-1G>C, c.8009C>A, c.8331+1G>T and c.8331+2T>C) or likely pathogenic (c.7806-9T>G, c.7976G>C, c.7976G>A, c.7977-7C>G, c.7985C>G, c.8023A>G, c.8035G>T and c.8331G>A), accounting for 30.8% of all pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants of exons 17–18 at the BRCA Share database. The remaining 8 variants (c.7975A>G, c.7977-6T>G, c.7988A>T, c.7992T>A, c.8007A>G, c.8009C>T, c.8009C>G, and c.8072C>T) induced partial splicing anomalies with important ratios of the full-length transcript (≥70%), so that they remained classified as VUS. Aberrant splicing is therefore especially prevalent in BRCA2 exons 17 and 18 due to the presence of active ESEs involved in exon recognition. Splicing functional assays with minigenes are a valuable strategy for the initial characterization of the splicing outcomes and the subsequent clinical interpretation of variants of any disease-gene, although these results should be checked, whenever possible, against patient RNA. A significant proportion of disease-causing mutations of inherited disorders impair splicing. Massive sequencing projects of genetic diseases generate thousands of sequence variations that require functional and clinical interpretations. We have shown that splicing reporter minigenes of the breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are useful tools to functionally test DNA variants. In this work, we have constructed a 7-exon BRCA2 minigene (exons 14 to 20) where we mapped critical splicing regulatory sequences and tested 52 selected variants of exons 17 and 18 detected in breast cancer patients. We finely located three DNA segments on both exons that presumably contain splicing enhancer sequences. We observed that a total of 30 variants of any type disrupted the splicing patterns and, given the severity of their outcomes, we classified 20 of them as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. We also showed that a wide range of splicing elements were affected including canonical and novel 5’ and 3’ splice sites, the polypyrimidine tract and enhancer and silencer sequences. We concluded that splicing aberrations are frequent in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and that minigenes are valuable tools to functionally classify DNA variants of any human disease gene under the splicing viewpoint.
Collapse
|
18
|
Rodríguez-Balada M, Roig B, Martorell L, Melé M, Salvat M, Vilella E, Borràs J, Gumà J. In silico, in vitro and case-control analyses as an effective combination for analyzing BRCA1 and BRCA2 unclassified variants in a population-based sample. Cancer Genet 2016; 209:487-492. [PMID: 27886673 DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2016.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2016] [Revised: 08/12/2016] [Accepted: 09/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Ascertaining the clinical consequences of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) is currently indispensable for providing effective genetic counseling and preventive actions for families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). To this end, we conducted a combination of in silico prediction and cDNA splicing analyses of 13 BRCA1 and 10 BRCA2 VUS identified in our cohort as well as a case-control analysis in a population-based sample of 10 recurrent VUS. We observed consistent results between the in silico predictions and sequencing analyses for all analyzed VUS. An abnormal cDNA pattern was observed for variants c.212+1G>A and c.5278-1G>A in BRCA1 and c.516+2T>A and c.8168A>G in BRCA2 according to in silico splicing prediction. A case-control study of VUS confirmed the polymorphisms of the c.67+62A>G, c.7008-62A>G and c.8851G>A BRCA2 variants previously published. c.4068G>A in the BRCA2 gene can also be considered a polymorphism due to its occurrence at a frequency greater than 1% in our population. Our study shows that employing population-based analysis and a combination of several in silico methods yields highly accurate information, resulting in a reliable tool for selecting variants for cDNA sequencing analysis in routine cancer genetic counseling units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Rodríguez-Balada
- Cancer Genetic Counseling Unit (Oncology Research Group), Institut d'Oncologia de la Catalunya Sud (IOCS), Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Av. Del Dr. Josep Laporte, Reus, Spain
| | - Bàrbara Roig
- Cancer Genetic Counseling Unit (Oncology Research Group), Institut d'Oncologia de la Catalunya Sud (IOCS), Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Av. Del Dr. Josep Laporte, Reus, Spain
| | - Lourdes Martorell
- Hospital Universitari Institut Pere Mata, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, CIBERSAM, C/Sant Llorenç, Reus, Spain
| | - Mireia Melé
- Cancer Genetic Counseling Unit (Oncology Research Group), Institut d'Oncologia de la Catalunya Sud (IOCS), Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Av. Del Dr. Josep Laporte, Reus, Spain
| | - Mònica Salvat
- Cancer Genetic Counseling Unit (Oncology Research Group), Institut d'Oncologia de la Catalunya Sud (IOCS), Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Av. Del Dr. Josep Laporte, Reus, Spain
| | - Elisabet Vilella
- Hospital Universitari Institut Pere Mata, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, CIBERSAM, C/Sant Llorenç, Reus, Spain
| | - Joan Borràs
- Cancer Genetic Counseling Unit (Oncology Research Group), Institut d'Oncologia de la Catalunya Sud (IOCS), Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Av. Del Dr. Josep Laporte, Reus, Spain
| | - Josep Gumà
- Cancer Genetic Counseling Unit (Oncology Research Group), Institut d'Oncologia de la Catalunya Sud (IOCS), Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Av. Del Dr. Josep Laporte, Reus, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vallée MP, Di Sera TL, Nix DA, Paquette AM, Parsons MT, Bell R, Hoffman A, Hogervorst FBL, Goldgar DE, Spurdle AB, Tavtigian SV. Adding In Silico Assessment of Potential Splice Aberration to the Integrated Evaluation of BRCA Gene Unclassified Variants. Hum Mutat 2016; 37:627-39. [PMID: 26913838 PMCID: PMC4907813 DOI: 10.1002/humu.22973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2015] [Accepted: 01/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Clinical mutation screening of the cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 generates many unclassified variants (UVs). Most of these UVs are either rare missense substitutions or nucleotide substitutions near the splice junctions of the protein coding exons. Previously, we developed a quantitative method for evaluation of BRCA gene UVs—the “integrated evaluation”—that combines a sequence analysis‐based prior probability of pathogenicity with patient and/or tumor observational data to arrive at a posterior probability of pathogenicity. One limitation of the sequence analysis‐based prior has been that it evaluates UVs from the perspective of missense substitution severity but not probability to disrupt normal mRNA splicing. Here, we calibrated output from the splice‐site fitness program MaxEntScan to generate spliceogenicity‐based prior probabilities of pathogenicity for BRCA gene variants; these range from 0.97 for variants with high probability to damage a donor or acceptor to 0.02 for exonic variants that do not impact a splice junction and are unlikely to create a de novo donor. We created a database http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/ that provides the combined missense substitution severity and spliceogenicity‐based probability of pathogenicity for BRCA gene single‐nucleotide substitutions. We also updated the BRCA gene Ex‐UV LOVD, available at http://hci‐exlovd.hci.utah.edu, with 77 re‐evaluable variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime P Vallée
- Department of Molecular Medicine, CHUQ Research Center, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Tonya L Di Sera
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - David A Nix
- ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Andrew M Paquette
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Russel Bell
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Andrea Hoffman
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - David E Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Sean V Tavtigian
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fackenthal JD, Yoshimatsu T, Zhang B, de Garibay GR, Colombo M, De Vecchi G, Ayoub SC, Lal K, Olopade OI, Vega A, Santamariña M, Blanco A, Wappenschmidt B, Becker A, Houdayer C, Walker LC, López-Perolio I, Thomassen M, Parsons M, Whiley P, Blok MJ, Brandão RD, Tserpelis D, Baralle D, Montalban G, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, Díez O, Lazaro C, Spurdle AB, Radice P, de la Hoya M. Naturally occurring BRCA2 alternative mRNA splicing events in clinically relevant samples. J Med Genet 2016; 53:548-58. [PMID: 27060066 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2015] [Accepted: 03/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the two principal tumour suppressor genes associated with inherited high risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Genetic testing of BRCA1/2 will often reveal one or more sequence variants of uncertain clinical significance, some of which may affect normal splicing patterns and thereby disrupt gene function. mRNA analyses are therefore among the tests used to interpret the clinical significance of some genetic variants. However, these could be confounded by the appearance of naturally occurring alternative transcripts unrelated to germline sequence variation or defects in gene function. To understand which novel splicing events are associated with splicing mutations and which are part of the normal BRCA2 splicing repertoire, a study was undertaken by members of the Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) consortium to characterise the spectrum of naturally occurring BRCA2 mRNA alternate-splicing events. METHODS mRNA was prepared from several blood and breast tissue-derived cells and cell lines by contributing ENIGMA laboratories. cDNA representing BRCA2 alternate splice sites was amplified and visualised using capillary or agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by sequencing. RESULTS We demonstrate the existence of 24 different BRCA2 mRNA alternate-splicing events in lymphoblastoid cell lines and both breast cancer and non-cancerous breast cell lines. CONCLUSIONS These naturally occurring alternate-splicing events contribute to the array of cDNA fragments that may be seen in assays for mutation-associated splicing defects. Caution must be observed in assigning alternate-splicing events to potential splicing mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Toshio Yoshimatsu
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Bifeng Zhang
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Mara Colombo
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milano, Italy
| | - Giovanna De Vecchi
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milano, Italy
| | - Samantha C Ayoub
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kumar Lal
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica-SERGAS, Grupo de Medicina Xenómica-USC, CIBERER, IDIS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Marta Santamariña
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica-SERGAS, Grupo de Medicina Xenómica-USC, CIBERER, IDIS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Ana Blanco
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica-SERGAS, Grupo de Medicina Xenómica-USC, CIBERER, IDIS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Medical Faculty, Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexandra Becker
- Medical Faculty, Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | - Claude Houdayer
- Service de Génétique and INSERM U830, Institut Curie and Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Logan C Walker
- Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Irene López-Perolio
- Laboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Michael Parsons
- Genetics and Computational Biology Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Phillip Whiley
- Genetics and Computational Biology Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marinus J Blok
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rita D Brandão
- Maastricht Science Programme, Faculty of Humanities and Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Demis Tserpelis
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Diana Baralle
- Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Gemma Montalban
- Oncogenetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez
- Oncogenetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Orland Díez
- Oncogenetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Clinical and Molecular Genetics Area, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Conxi Lazaro
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Hereditary Cancer Program, IDIBELL-Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Genetics and Computational Biology Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milano, Italy
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Laboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Eccles DM, Mitchell G, Monteiro ANA, Schmutzler R, Couch FJ, Spurdle AB, Gómez-García EB. BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing-pitfalls and recommendations for managing variants of uncertain clinical significance. Ann Oncol 2015; 26:2057-65. [PMID: 26153499 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2014] [Accepted: 06/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing use of BRCA1/2 testing for tailoring cancer treatment and extension of testing to tumour tissue for somatic mutation is moving BRCA1/2 mutation screening from a primarily prevention arena delivered by specialist genetic services into mainstream oncology practice. A considerable number of gene tests will identify rare variants where clinical significance cannot be inferred from sequence information alone. The proportion of variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS) is likely to grow with lower thresholds for testing and laboratory providers with less experience of BRCA. Most VUS will not be associated with a high risk of cancer but a misinterpreted VUS has the potential to lead to mismanagement of both the patient and their relatives. DESIGN Members of the Clinical Working Group of ENIGMA (Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles) global consortium (www.enigmaconsortium.org) observed wide variation in practices in reporting, disclosure and clinical management of patients with a VUS. Examples from current clinical practice are presented and discussed to illustrate potential pitfalls, explore factors contributing to misinterpretation, and propose approaches to improving clarity. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Clinicians, patients and their relatives would all benefit from an improved level of genetic literacy. Genetic laboratories working with clinical geneticists need to agree on a clinically clear and uniform format for reporting BRCA test results to non-geneticists. An international consortium of experts, collecting and integrating all available lines of evidence and classifying variants according to an internationally recognized system, will facilitate reclassification of variants for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine Academic Unit of Cancer Sciences, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - G Mitchell
- Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Hereditary Cancer Program, Department of Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - A N A Monteiro
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| | - R Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - F J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - A B Spurdle
- Molecular Cancer Epidemiology Laboratory, Division of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, BNE, Herston, Australia
| | - E B Gómez-García
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Biunno I, Aceto G, Awadelkarim KD, Morgano A, Elhaj A, Eltayeb EA, Abuidris DO, Elwali NE, Spinelli C, De Blasio P, Rovida E, Mariani-Costantini R. BRCA1 point mutations in premenopausal breast cancer patients from Central Sudan. Fam Cancer 2015; 13:437-44. [PMID: 24729269 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-014-9717-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Premenopausal breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers of women in rural Africa and part of the disease load may be related to hereditary predisposition, including mutations in the BRCA1 gene. However, the BRCA1 mutations associated with BC in Africa are scarcely characterized. We report here 33 BRCA1 point mutations, among which 2 novel missense variants, found in 59 Central Sudanese premenopausal BC patients. The high fractions of mutations with intercontinental and uniquely African distribution (17/33, 51.5 % and 14/33, 42.4 %, respectively) are in agreement with the high genetic diversity expected in an African population. Overall 24/33 variants (72.7 %) resulted neutral; 8/33 of unknown significance (24.3 %, including the 2 novel missense mutations); 1 (3.0 %) overtly deleterious. Notably, in silico studies predict that the novel C-terminal missense variant c.5090G>A (p.Cys1697Tyr) affects phosphopeptide recognition by the BRCA1 BRCT1 domain and may have a pathogenic impact. Genetic variation and frequency of unique or rare mutations of uncertain clinical relevance pose significant challenges to BRCA1 testing in Sudan, as it might happen in other low-resource rural African contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Biunno
- Institute for Genetic and Biomedical Research, National Research Council, Via Fantoli 16/15, 20138, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gambino G, Tancredi M, Falaschi E, Aretini P, Caligo MA. Characterization of three alternative transcripts of the BRCA1 gene in patients with breast cancer and a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer who tested negative for pathogenic mutations. Int J Mol Med 2015; 35:950-6. [PMID: 25683334 PMCID: PMC4356434 DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2014] [Accepted: 01/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The study of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and their alterations has been essential to the understanding of the development of familial breast and ovarian cancers. Many of the variants identified have an unknown pathogenic significance. These include variants which determine alternative mRNA splicing, identified in the intronic regions and those are capable of destroying the splicing ability. The aim of this study was to detect BRCA1/BRCA2 aberrant transcripts resulting from alternative splicing, in women with a known family history and/or early onset of breast and/or ovarian cancer, tested wild-type for BRCA1 and BRCA2. The identification and characterization of aberrant transcripts through the analysis of mRNA levels in blood lymphocytes may help us to recognize families otherwise misclassified as wild-type BRCA1 and BRCA2. Blood samples were collected from 13 women that had a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer and tested negative for pathogenic mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Total RNA was analyzed for the presence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 naturally occuring and pathological transcripts using RT-PCR. In 2 out of the 13 samples, 2 alternative transcripts of the BRCA1 gene were identified. These were probably pathogenic as they lacked exon 17 and exon 15, respectively, giving rise to a truncated protein. In addition to these, we identified the Δ17–19 transcript in 1 patient, which gives rise to a protein with an in-frame deletion of 69 amino acids. In conclusion, this study on alternative transcripts of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes revealed the presence of isoforms (prevalence of 15%) in blood samples from women with breast and ovarian cancer that were probably pathogenic, that were not detected by conventional methods of mutation screening based on direct sequencing of all coding regions, intron-exons junctions and MLPA analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetana Gambino
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy
| | - Mariella Tancredi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Falaschi
- Section of Genetic Oncology, Santa Chiara University Hospital, Pisa 56126, Italy
| | - Paolo Aretini
- Fondazione Pisana per la Scienza - ONLUS, Pisa 56126, Italy
| | - Maria Adelaide Caligo
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
An Integrated in Silico Approach to Analyze the Involvement of Single Amino Acid Polymorphisms in FANCD1/BRCA2-PALB2 and FANCD1/BRCA2-RAD51 Complex. Cell Biochem Biophys 2014; 70:939-56. [DOI: 10.1007/s12013-014-0002-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
25
|
Multifactorial likelihood assessment of BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants confirms that BRCA1:c.122A>G(p.His41Arg) is a pathogenic mutation. PLoS One 2014; 9:e86836. [PMID: 24489791 PMCID: PMC3904950 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2013] [Accepted: 12/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Rare exonic, non-truncating variants in known cancer susceptibility genes such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 are problematic for genetic counseling and clinical management of relevant families. This study used multifactorial likelihood analysis and/or bioinformatically-directed mRNA assays to assess pathogenicity of 19 BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants identified following patient referral to clinical genetic services. Two variants were considered to be pathogenic (Class 5). BRCA1:c.4484G> C(p.Arg1495Thr) was shown to result in aberrant mRNA transcripts predicted to encode truncated proteins. The BRCA1:c.122A>G(p.His41Arg) RING-domain variant was found from multifactorial likelihood analysis to have a posterior probability of pathogenicity of 0.995, a result consistent with existing protein functional assay data indicating lost BARD1 binding and ubiquitin ligase activity. Of the remaining variants, seven were determined to be not clinically significant (Class 1), nine were likely not pathogenic (Class 2), and one was uncertain (Class 3).These results have implications for genetic counseling and medical management of families carrying these specific variants. They also provide additional multifactorial likelihood variant classifications as reference to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of bioinformatic prediction tools and/or functional assay data in future studies.
Collapse
|
26
|
Guidugli L, Carreira A, Caputo SM, Ehlen A, Galli A, Monteiro ANA, Neuhausen SL, Hansen TVO, Couch FJ, Vreeswijk MPG. Functional assays for analysis of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA2. Hum Mutat 2013; 35:151-64. [PMID: 24323938 DOI: 10.1002/humu.22478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2013] [Accepted: 10/28/2013] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Missense variants in the BRCA2 gene are routinely detected during clinical screening for pathogenic mutations in patients with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer. These subtle changes frequently remain of unknown clinical significance because of the lack of genetic information that may help establish a direct correlation with cancer predisposition. Therefore, alternative ways of predicting the pathogenicity of these variants are urgently needed. Since BRCA2 is a protein involved in important cellular mechanisms such as DNA repair, replication, and cell cycle control, functional assays have been developed that exploit these cellular activities to explore the impact of the variants on protein function. In this review, we summarize assays developed and currently utilized for studying missense variants in BRCA2. We specifically depict details of each assay, including variants of uncertain significance analyzed, and describe a validation set of (genetically) proven pathogenic and neutral missense variants to serve as a golden standard for the validation of each assay. Guidelines are proposed to enable implementation of laboratory-based methods to assess the impact of the variant on cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Guidugli
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Whiley PJ, de la Hoya M, Thomassen M, Becker A, Brandão R, Pedersen IS, Montagna M, Menéndez M, Quiles F, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, De Leeneer K, Tenés A, Montalban G, Tserpelis D, Yoshimatsu T, Tirapo C, Raponi M, Caldes T, Blanco A, Santamariña M, Guidugli L, de Garibay GR, Wong M, Tancredi M, Fachal L, Ding YC, Kruse T, Lattimore V, Kwong A, Chan TL, Colombo M, De Vecchi G, Caligo M, Baralle D, Lázaro C, Couch F, Radice P, Southey MC, Neuhausen S, Houdayer C, Fackenthal J, Hansen TVO, Vega A, Diez O, Blok R, Claes K, Wappenschmidt B, Walker L, Spurdle AB, Brown MA. Comparison of mRNA splicing assay protocols across multiple laboratories: recommendations for best practice in standardized clinical testing. Clin Chem 2013; 60:341-52. [PMID: 24212087 DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.210658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate evaluation of unclassified sequence variants in cancer predisposition genes is essential for clinical management and depends on a multifactorial analysis of clinical, genetic, pathologic, and bioinformatic variables and assays of transcript length and abundance. The integrity of assay data in turn relies on appropriate assay design, interpretation, and reporting. METHODS We conducted a multicenter investigation to compare mRNA splicing assay protocols used by members of the ENIGMA (Evidence-Based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles) consortium. We compared similarities and differences in results derived from analysis of a panel of breast cancer 1, early onset (BRCA1) and breast cancer 2, early onset (BRCA2) gene variants known to alter splicing (BRCA1: c.135-1G>T, c.591C>T, c.594-2A>C, c.671-2A>G, and c.5467+5G>C and BRCA2: c.426-12_8delGTTTT, c.7988A>T, c.8632+1G>A, and c.9501+3A>T). Differences in protocols were then assessed to determine which elements were critical in reliable assay design. RESULTS PCR primer design strategies, PCR conditions, and product detection methods, combined with a prior knowledge of expected alternative transcripts, were the key factors for accurate splicing assay results. For example, because of the position of primers and PCR extension times, several isoforms associated with BRCA1, c.594-2A>C and c.671-2A>G, were not detected by many sites. Variation was most evident for the detection of low-abundance transcripts (e.g., BRCA2 c.8632+1G>A Δ19,20 and BRCA1 c.135-1G>T Δ5q and Δ3). Detection of low-abundance transcripts was sometimes addressed by using more analytically sensitive detection methods (e.g., BRCA2 c.426-12_8delGTTTT ins18bp). CONCLUSIONS We provide recommendations for best practice and raise key issues to consider when designing mRNA assays for evaluation of unclassified sequence variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip J Whiley
- Genetics & Computational Biology Division, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
de Garibay GR, Acedo A, García-Casado Z, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, Tosar A, Romero A, Garre P, Llort G, Thomassen M, Díez O, Pérez-Segura P, Díaz-Rubio E, Velasco EA, Caldés T, de la Hoya M. Capillary electrophoresis analysis of conventional splicing assays: IARC analytical and clinical classification of 31 BRCA2 genetic variants. Hum Mutat 2013; 35:53-7. [PMID: 24123850 DOI: 10.1002/humu.22456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2013] [Accepted: 09/23/2013] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Rare sequence variants in "high-risk" disease genes, often referred as unclassified variants (UVs), pose a serious challenge to genetic testing. However, UVs resulting in splicing alterations can be readily assessed by in vitro assays. Unfortunately, analytical and clinical interpretation of these assays is often challenging. Here, we explore this issue by conducting splicing assays in 31 BRCA2 genetic variants. All variants were assessed by RT-PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis and direct sequencing. If assays did not produce clear-cut outputs (Class-2 or Class-5 according to analytical International Agency for Research on Cancer guidelines), we performed qPCR and/or minigene assays. The latter were performed with a new splicing vector (pSAD) developed by authors of the present manuscript (patent #P201231427 CSIC). We have identified three clinically relevant Class-5 variants (c.682-2A>G, c.7617+1G>A, and c.8954-5A>G), and 27 analytical Class-2 variants (not inducing splicing alterations). In addition, we demonstrate that rs9534262 (c.7806-14T>C) is a BRCA2 splicing quantitative trait locus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gorka Ruiz de Garibay
- Laboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Di Giacomo D, Gaildrat P, Abuli A, Abdat J, Frébourg T, Tosi M, Martins A. Functional analysis of a large set of BRCA2 exon 7 variants highlights the predictive value of hexamer scores in detecting alterations of exonic splicing regulatory elements. Hum Mutat 2013; 34:1547-57. [PMID: 23983145 DOI: 10.1002/humu.22428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2013] [Accepted: 08/14/2013] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Exonic variants can alter pre-mRNA splicing either by changing splice sites or by modifying splicing regulatory elements. Often these effects are difficult to predict and are only detected by performing RNA analyses. Here, we analyzed, in a minigene assay, 26 variants identified in the exon 7 of BRCA2, a cancer predisposition gene. Our results revealed eight new exon skipping mutations in this exon: one directly altering the 5' splice site and seven affecting potential regulatory elements. This brings the number of splicing regulatory mutations detected in BRCA2 exon 7 to a total of 11, a remarkably high number considering the total number of variants reported in this exon (n = 36), all tested in our minigene assay. We then exploited this large set of splicing data to test the predictive value of splicing regulator hexamers' scores recently established by Ke et al. (). Comparisons of hexamer-based predictions with our experimental data revealed high sensitivity in detecting variants that increased exon skipping, an important feature for prescreening variants before RNA analysis. In conclusion, hexamer scores represent a promising tool for predicting the biological consequences of exonic variants and may have important applications for the interpretation of variants detected by high-throughput sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Di Giacomo
- Inserm U1079, University of Rouen, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, Rouen, France; Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Walker LC, Whiley PJ, Houdayer C, Hansen TVO, Vega A, Santamarina M, Blanco A, Fachal L, Southey MC, Lafferty A, Colombo M, De Vecchi G, Radice P, Spurdle AB. Evaluation of a 5-Tier Scheme Proposed for Classification of Sequence Variants Using Bioinformatic and Splicing Assay Data: Inter-Reviewer Variability and Promotion of Minimum Reporting Guidelines. Hum Mutat 2013; 34:1424-31. [DOI: 10.1002/humu.22388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2012] [Accepted: 07/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Logan C. Walker
- Department of Pathology; University of Otago; Christchurch; New Zealand
| | | | - Claude Houdayer
- Service de Génétique, INSERM U830, Institut Curie et Université Paris Descartes; Sorbonne Paris Cité; Paris; France
| | - Thomas V. O. Hansen
- Center for Genomic Medicine; Copenhagen University Hospital; Rigshospitalet; Copenhagen; Denmark
| | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica-SERGAS, Grupo de Medicina Xenómica-USC; CIBERER, IDIS; Santiago de Compostela; Spain
| | - Marta Santamarina
- Grupo de Medicina Xenómica -USC, University of Santiago de Compostela; CIBERER; IDIS; Santiago de Compostela; Spain
| | - Ana Blanco
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica-SERGAS, Grupo de Medicina Xenómica-USC; CIBERER, IDIS; Santiago de Compostela; Spain
| | - Laura Fachal
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica-SERGAS, Grupo de Medicina Xenómica-USC; CIBERER, IDIS; Santiago de Compostela; Spain
| | - Melissa C. Southey
- Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology; The University of Melbourne; Melbourne; Victoria; Australia
| | | | - Mara Colombo
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predicted Medicine; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumouri (INT); Milan; Italy
| | - Giovanna De Vecchi
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predicted Medicine; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumouri (INT); Milan; Italy
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predicted Medicine; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumouri (INT); Milan; Italy
| | - Amanda B. Spurdle
- Molecular Cancer Epidemiology Laboratory, Genetics and Computational Biology Division; Queensland Institute of Medical Research; Herston; Queensland; Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lindor NM, Goldgar DE, Tavtigian SV, Plon SE, Couch FJ. BRCA1/2 sequence variants of uncertain significance: a primer for providers to assist in discussions and in medical management. Oncologist 2013; 18:518-24. [PMID: 23615697 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION DNA variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are common outcomes of clinical genetic testing for susceptibility to cancer. A statistically rigorous model that provides a pathogenicity score for each variant has been developed to aid in the clinical management of patients undergoing genetic testing. METHODS The information in this article is derived from multiple publications on VUS in BRCA genes, distilled for communicating with clinicians who may encounter VUS in their practice. RESULTS The posterior probability scores for BRCA1 or BRCA2 VUS, calculated from a multifactorial likelihood model, are explained, and links for looking up specific VUS are provided. The International Agency on Cancer Research (IARC) of the World Health Organization has proposed a simple five-tier system for clinical management that is not widely known to clinicians. Classes 1 and 2 in this system are managed as neutral variants, classes 4 and 5 are managed as pathogenic variants, and class 3 variants still have insufficient evidence to move to either end of this scale and, thus, cannot be used in medical management. CONCLUSIONS Development of models that integrate multiple independent lines of evidence has allowed classification of a growing number of VUS in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The pathogenicity score that is generated by this model maps to the IARC system for clinical management, which will assist clinicians in the medical management of those patients who obtain a VUS result upon testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noralane M Lindor
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Comparative in vitro and in silico analyses of variants in splicing regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and characterization of novel pathogenic mutations. PLoS One 2013; 8:e57173. [PMID: 23451180 PMCID: PMC3579815 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2012] [Accepted: 01/18/2013] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Several unclassified variants (UVs) have been identified in splicing regions of disease-associated genes and their characterization as pathogenic mutations or benign polymorphisms is crucial for the understanding of their role in disease development. In this study, 24 UVs located at BRCA1 and BRCA2 splice sites were characterized by transcripts analysis. These results were used to evaluate the ability of nine bioinformatics programs in predicting genetic variants causing aberrant splicing (spliceogenic variants) and the nature of aberrant transcripts. Eleven variants in BRCA1 and 8 in BRCA2, including 8 not previously characterized at transcript level, were ascertained to affect mRNA splicing. Of these, 16 led to the synthesis of aberrant transcripts containing premature termination codons (PTCs), 2 to the up-regulation of naturally occurring alternative transcripts containing PTCs, and one to an in-frame deletion within the region coding for the DNA binding domain of BRCA2, causing the loss of the ability to bind the partner protein DSS1 and ssDNA. For each computational program, we evaluated the rate of non-informative analyses, i.e. those that did not recognize the natural splice sites in the wild-type sequence, and the rate of false positive predictions, i.e., variants incorrectly classified as spliceogenic, as a measure of their specificity, under conditions setting sensitivity of predictions to 100%. The programs that performed better were Human Splicing Finder and Automated Splice Site Analyses, both exhibiting 100% informativeness and specificity. For 10 mutations the activation of cryptic splice sites was observed, but we were unable to derive simple criteria to select, among the different cryptic sites predicted by the bioinformatics analyses, those actually used. Consistent with previous reports, our study provides evidences that in silico tools can be used for selecting splice site variants for in vitro analyses. However, the latter remain mandatory for the characterization of the nature of aberrant transcripts.
Collapse
|
33
|
Fuchs-Telem D, Padalon-Brauch G, Sarig O, Sprecher E. Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma caused by activation of a cryptic splice site in KRT9. Clin Exp Dermatol 2013; 38:189-92: quiz 192. [PMID: 23397986 DOI: 10.1111/ced.12059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/03/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma (EPPK) is caused by mutations in KRT9 and less often, KRT1. All known mutations in KRT9 have been found in regions of the gene encoding the conserved central α-helix rod domain. In the present study, we investigated the molecular basis of EPPK in a patient of Ashkenazi Jewish origin. The patient was found to carry a novel missense mutation in KRT9, resulting in the substitution of a poorly conserved leucine for valine at position 11 of the amino acid sequence. Despite its unusual location, the mutation was shown to be pathogenic through activation of a cryptic donor splice site, resulting in the deletion of 162 amino acids. The present data indicate the need to screen keratin genes in their entirety, as mutations altering domains of lesser functional importance may exert their deleterious effect at the transcriptional level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Fuchs-Telem
- Department of Dermatology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Spurdle AB, Whiley PJ, Thompson B, Feng B, Healey S, Brown MA, Pettigrew C, Van Asperen CJ, Ausems MGEM, Kattentidt-Mouravieva AA, van den Ouweland AMW, Lindblom A, Pigg MH, Schmutzler RK, Engel C, Meindl A, Caputo S, Sinilnikova OM, Lidereau R, Couch FJ, Guidugli L, Hansen TVO, Thomassen M, Eccles DM, Tucker K, Benitez J, Domchek SM, Toland AE, Van Rensburg EJ, Wappenschmidt B, Borg Å, Vreeswijk MPG, Goldgar DE. BRCA1 R1699Q variant displaying ambiguous functional abrogation confers intermediate breast and ovarian cancer risk. J Med Genet 2012; 49:525-32. [PMID: 22889855 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical classification of rare sequence changes identified in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 is essential for appropriate genetic counselling of individuals carrying these variants. We previously showed that variant BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln in the BRCA1 transcriptional transactivation domain demonstrated equivocal results from a series of functional assays, and proposed that this variant may confer low to moderate risk of cancer. METHODS Measures of genetic risk (report of family history, segregation) were assessed for 68 BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) families recruited through family cancer clinics, comparing results with 34 families carrying the previously classified pathogenic BRCA1 c.5095C>T p.Arg1699Trp (R1699W) mutation at the same residue, and to 243 breast cancer families with no BRCA1 pathogenic mutation (BRCA-X). RESULTS Comparison of BRCA1 carrier prediction scores of probands using the BOADICEA risk prediction tool revealed that BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln variant carriers had family histories that were less 'BRCA1-like' than BRCA1 c.5095C>T p.Arg1699Trp mutation carriers (p<0.00001), but more 'BRCA1-like' than BRCA-X families (p=0.0004). Further, modified segregation analysis of the subset of 30 families with additional genotyping showed that BRCA1 c.5096G >A p.Arg1699Gln had reduced penetrance compared with the average truncating BRCA1 mutation penetrance (p=0.0002), with estimated cumulative risks to age 70 of breast or ovarian cancer of 24%. CONCLUSIONS Our results provide substantial evidence that the BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) variant, demonstrating ambiguous functional deficiency across multiple assays, is associated with intermediate risk of breast and ovarian cancer, highlighting challenges for risk modelling and clinical management of patients of this and other potential moderate-risk variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda B Spurdle
- Division of Genetics and Population Health, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wappenschmidt B, Becker AA, Hauke J, Weber U, Engert S, Köhler J, Kast K, Arnold N, Rhiem K, Hahnen E, Meindl A, Schmutzler RK. Analysis of 30 putative BRCA1 splicing mutations in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families identifies exonic splice site mutations that escape in silico prediction. PLoS One 2012; 7:e50800. [PMID: 23239986 PMCID: PMC3519833 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2012] [Accepted: 10/25/2012] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Screening for pathogenic mutations in breast and ovarian cancer genes such as BRCA1/2, CHEK2 and RAD51C is common practice for individuals from high-risk families. However, test results may be ambiguous due to the presence of unclassified variants (UCV) in the concurrent absence of clearly cancer-predisposing mutations. Especially the presence of intronic or exonic variants within these genes that possibly affect proper pre-mRNA processing poses a challenge as their functional implications are not immediately apparent. Therefore, it appears necessary to characterize potential splicing UCV and to develop appropriate classification tools. We investigated 30 distinct BRCA1 variants, both intronic and exonic, regarding their spliceogenic potential by commonly used in silico prediction algorithms (HSF, MaxEntScan) along with in vitro transcript analyses. A total of 25 variants were identified spliceogenic, either causing/enhancing exon skipping or activation of cryptic splice sites, or both. Except from a single intronic variant causing minor effects on BRCA1 pre-mRNA processing in our analyses, 23 out of 24 intronic variants were correctly predicted by MaxEntScan, while HSF was less accurate in this cohort. Among the 6 exonic variants analyzed, 4 severely impair correct pre-mRNA processing, while the remaining two have partial effects. In contrast to the intronic alterations investigated, only half of the spliceogenic exonic variants were correctly predicted by HSF and/or MaxEntScan. These data support the idea that exonic splicing mutations are commonly disease-causing and concurrently prone to escape in silico prediction, hence necessitating experimental in vitro splicing analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Division of Molecular Gynaeco-Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexandra A. Becker
- Division of Molecular Gynaeco-Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan Hauke
- Division of Molecular Gynaeco-Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ute Weber
- Division of Molecular Gynaeco-Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefanie Engert
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar at the Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Juliane Köhler
- Division of Molecular Gynaeco-Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Norbert Arnold
- Division of Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Division of Molecular Gynaeco-Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Division of Molecular Gynaeco-Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar at the Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Division of Molecular Gynaeco-Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Guidugli L, Pankratz VS, Singh N, Thompson J, Erding CA, Engel C, Schmutzler R, Domchek S, Nathanson K, Radice P, Singer C, Tonin PN, Lindor NM, Goldgar DE, Couch FJ. A classification model for BRCA2 DNA binding domain missense variants based on homology-directed repair activity. Cancer Res 2012; 73:265-75. [PMID: 23108138 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-2081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The relevance of many BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) to breast cancer has not been determined due to limited genetic information from families carrying these alterations. Here, we classified six new variants as pathogenic or nonpathogenic by analysis of genetic information from families carrying 64 individual BRCA2 DNA binding domain (DBD) missense mutations using a multifactorial likelihood model of cancer causality. Next, we evaluated the use of a homology-directed DNA break repair (HDR) functional assay as a method for inferring the clinical relevance of VUS in the DBD of BRCA2 using 18 established nonpathogenic missense variants and all 13 established pathogenic missense mutations from the BRCA2 DBD. Compared with the known status of these variants based on the multifactorial likelihood model, the sensitivity of the HDR assay for pathogenic mutations was estimated at 100% [95% confidence interval (CI): 75.3%-100%] and specificity was estimated at 100% (95% CI: 81.5%-100%). A statistical classifier for predicting the probability of pathogenicity of BRCA2 DBD variants was developed using these functional results. When applied to 33 additional VUS, the classifier identified eight with 99% or more probability of nonpathogenicity and 18 with 99% or more probability of pathogenicity. Thus, in the absence of genetic evidence, a cell-based HDR assay can provide a probability of pathogenicity for all VUS in the BRCA2 DBD, suggesting that the assay can be used in combination with other information to determine the cancer relevance of BRCA2 VUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Guidugli
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Millot GA, Carvalho MA, Caputo SM, Vreeswijk MPG, Brown MA, Webb M, Rouleau E, Neuhausen SL, Hansen TVO, Galli A, Brandão RD, Blok MJ, Velkova A, Couch FJ, Monteiro ANA. A guide for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance. Hum Mutat 2012; 33:1526-37. [PMID: 22753008 DOI: 10.1002/humu.22150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2012] [Accepted: 05/29/2012] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Germline mutations in the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 confer an estimated lifetime risk of 56-80% for breast cancer and 15-60% for ovarian cancer. Since the mid 1990s when BRCA1 was identified, genetic testing has revealed over 1,500 unique germline variants. However, for a significant number of these variants, the effect on protein function is unknown making it difficult to infer the consequences on risks of breast and ovarian cancers. Thus, many individuals undergoing genetic testing for BRCA1 mutations receive test results reporting a variant of uncertain clinical significance (VUS), leading to issues in risk assessment, counseling, and preventive care. Here, we describe functional assays for BRCA1 to directly or indirectly assess the impact of a variant on protein conformation or function and how these results can be used to complement genetic data to classify a VUS as to its clinical significance. Importantly, these methods may provide a framework for genome-wide pathogenicity assignment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaël A Millot
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 3244 Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Houdayer C, Caux-Moncoutier V, Krieger S, Barrois M, Bonnet F, Bourdon V, Bronner M, Buisson M, Coulet F, Gaildrat P, Lefol C, Léone M, Mazoyer S, Muller D, Remenieras A, Révillion F, Rouleau E, Sokolowska J, Vert JP, Lidereau R, Soubrier F, Sobol H, Sevenet N, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Hardouin A, Tosi M, Sinilnikova OM, Stoppa-Lyonnet D. Guidelines for splicing analysis in molecular diagnosis derived from a set of 327 combined in silico/in vitro studies on BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Hum Mutat 2012; 33:1228-38. [DOI: 10.1002/humu.22101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 191] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2011] [Revised: 03/15/2012] [Accepted: 03/30/2012] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
39
|
Yoshikawa Y, Morimatsu M, Ochiai K, Okuda K, Taoda T, Chikazawa S, Shimamura A, Omi T, Bonkobara M, Orino K, Watanabe K. Establishment of a PCR analysis method for canine BRCA2. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5:173. [PMID: 22471976 PMCID: PMC3355023 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2012] [Accepted: 04/03/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mammary tumors are the most common tumor type in both human and canine females. In women, carriers of mutations in BRCA2, a tumor suppressor gene product, have a higher risk of breast cancer. Canine BRCA2 has also been suggested to have a relationship with mammary tumors. However, clearly deleterious BRCA2 mutations have not been identified in any canine mammary tumors, as appropriate methods to detect mutations or a consensus BRCA2 sequence have not been reported. FINDINGS For amplification and sequencing of BRCA2, we designed 14 and 20 PCR primer sets corresponding to the BRCA2 open reading frame (ORF) and all 27 exons, respectively, including exon-intron boundaries of the canine BRCA2 regions, respectively. To define the consensus canine BRCA2 ORF sequence, we used established methods to sequence the full-length canine BRCA2 ORF sequence from two ovaries and a testis obtained from individual healthy mongrel dogs and partially sequence BRCA2 genomic sequences in 20-56 tumor-free dogs, each aged over 6 years. Subsequently, we compared these sequences and seven previously reported sequences, and defined the most common base sequences as the consensus canine BRCA2 ORF sequence. Moreover, we established a detection method for identifying splicing variants. Unexpectedly, we also identified novel splicing variants in normal testes during establishment of these methods. CONCLUSIONS The present analysis methods for determining the BRCA2 base sequence and for detecting BRCA2 splicing variants and the BRCA2 ORF consensus sequence are useful for better understanding the relationship between canine BRCA2 mutation status and cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasunaga Yoshikawa
- Laboratory of Veterinary Biochemistry, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kitasato University, Aomori 034-8628, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Spurdle AB, Healey S, Devereau A, Hogervorst FBL, Monteiro ANA, Nathanson KL, Radice P, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Tavtigian S, Wappenschmidt B, Couch FJ, Goldgar DE. ENIGMA--evidence-based network for the interpretation of germline mutant alleles: an international initiative to evaluate risk and clinical significance associated with sequence variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Hum Mutat 2011; 33:2-7. [PMID: 21990146 DOI: 10.1002/humu.21628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 237] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2011] [Accepted: 09/26/2011] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
As genetic testing for predisposition to human diseases has become an increasingly common practice in medicine, the need for clear interpretation of the test results is apparent. However, for many disease genes, including the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, a significant fraction of tests results in the detection of a genetic variant for which disease association is not known. The finding of an "unclassified" variant (UV)/variant of uncertain significance (VUS) complicates genetic test reporting and counseling. As these variants are individually rare, a large collaboration of researchers and clinicians will facilitate studies to assess their association with cancer predisposition. It was with this in mind that the ENIGMA consortium (www.enigmaconsortium.org) was initiated in 2009. The membership is both international and interdisciplinary, and currently includes more than 100 research scientists and clinicians from 19 countries. Within ENIGMA, there are presently six working groups focused on the following topics: analysis, clinical, database, functional, tumor histopathology, and mRNA splicing. ENIGMA provides a mechanism to pool resources, exchange methods and data, and coordinately develop and apply algorithms for classification of variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2. It is envisaged that the research and clinical application of models developed by ENIGMA will be relevant to the interpretation of sequence variants in other disease genes.
Collapse
|
41
|
Thomassen M, Blanco A, Montagna M, Hansen TVO, Pedersen IS, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, Menéndez M, Fachal L, Santamariña M, Steffensen AY, Jønson L, Agata S, Whiley P, Tognazzo S, Tornero E, Jensen UB, Balmaña J, Kruse TA, Goldgar DE, Lázaro C, Diez O, Spurdle AB, Vega A. Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 splicing variants: a collaborative report by ENIGMA consortium members. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 132:1009-23. [PMID: 21769658 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1674-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2011] [Accepted: 07/05/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 predispose carriers to early onset breast and ovarian cancer. A common problem in clinical genetic testing is interpretation of variants with unknown clinical significance. The Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) consortium was initiated to evaluate and implement strategies to characterize the clinical significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. As an initial project of the ENIGMA Splicing Working Group, we report splicing and multifactorial likelihood analysis of 25 BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants from seven different laboratories. Splicing analysis was performed by reverse transcriptase PCR or mini gene assay, and sequencing to identify aberrant transcripts. The findings were compared to bioinformatic predictions using four programs. The posterior probability of pathogenicity was estimated using multifactorial likelihood analysis, including co-occurrence with a deleterious mutation, segregation and/or report of family history. Abnormal splicing patterns expected to lead to a non-functional protein were observed for 7 variants (BRCA1 c.441+2T>A, c.4184_4185+2del, c.4357+1G>A, c.4987-2A>G, c.5074G>C, BRCA2 c.316+5G>A, and c.8754+3G>C). Combined interpretation of splicing and multifactorial analysis classified an initiation codon variant (BRCA2 c.3G>A) as likely pathogenic, uncertain clinical significance for 7 variants, and indicated low clinical significance or unlikely pathogenicity for another 10 variants. Bioinformatic tools predicted disruption of consensus donor or acceptor sites with high sensitivity, but cryptic site usage was predicted with low specificity, supporting the value of RNA-based assays. The findings also provide further evidence that clinical RNA-based assays should be extended from analysis of invariant dinucleotides to routinely include all variants located within the donor and acceptor consensus splicing sites. Importantly, this study demonstrates the added value of collaboration between laboratories, and across disciplines, to collate and interpret information from clinical testing laboratories to consolidate patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Soenderboulevard 29, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Théry JC, Krieger S, Gaildrat P, Révillion F, Buisine MP, Killian A, Duponchel C, Rousselin A, Vaur D, Peyrat JP, Berthet P, Frébourg T, Martins A, Hardouin A, Tosi M. Contribution of bioinformatics predictions and functional splicing assays to the interpretation of unclassified variants of the BRCA genes. Eur J Hum Genet 2011; 19:1052-8. [PMID: 21673748 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
A large fraction of sequence variants of unknown significance (VUS) of the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 may induce splicing defects. We analyzed 53 VUSs of BRCA1 or BRCA2, detected in consecutive molecular screenings, by using five splicing prediction programs, and we classified them into two groups according to the strength of the predictions. In parallel, we tested them by using functional splicing assays. A total of 10 VUSs were predicted by two or more programs to induce a significant reduction of splice site strength or activation of cryptic splice sites or generation of new splice sites. Minigene-based splicing assays confirmed four of these predictions. Five additional VUSs, all at internal exon positions, were not predicted to induce alterations of splice sites, but revealed variable levels of exon skipping, most likely induced by the modification of exonic splicing regulatory elements. We provide new data in favor of the pathogenic nature of the variants BRCA1 c.212+3A>G and BRCA1 c.5194-12G>A, which induced aberrant out-of-frame mRNA forms. Moreover, the novel variant BRCA2 c.7977-7C>G induced in frame inclusion of 6 nt from the 3' end of intron 17. The novel variants BRCA2 c.520C>T and BRCA2 c.7992T>A induced incomplete skipping of exons 7 and 18, respectively. This work highlights the contribution of splicing minigene assays to the assessment of pathogenicity, not only when patient RNA is not available, but also as a tool to improve the accuracy of bioinformatics predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Christophe Théry
- Inserm U614, IFRMP, Faculty of Medicine and Department of Genetics, University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, Rouen, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Characterisation of unclassified variants in the BRCA1/2 genes with a putative effect on splicing. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 129:971-82. [PMID: 21638052 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1599-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2011] [Accepted: 05/14/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
A subset of the unclassified variants (UVs) identified during genetic screening of BRCA1/2 genes may affect splicing. We assessed at RNA level the effect of four BRCA1 and ten BRCA2 UVs with a putative splice effect, as predicted in silico. The variants selected for this study were beyond the positions -1, -2 or +1, +2 from the exon, and were not previously described (n = 8) or their effect on splicing was not assessed previously (n = 6). Lymphocytes from UV carriers and healthy controls were cultured and treated with puromycin to prevent nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. The relative contribution of each allele to the various transcripts was assessed using combinations of allele-specific and transcript-specific primers. BRCA2 c.425G>T, c.7976+3_7976+4del and c.8754+3G>C give rise to aberrant transcripts BRCA2Δ4, BRCA2Δ17 and retention of 46nt of intron 21, respectively, and were considered pathogenic. BRCA1 c.4987-3C>G gives rise to BRCA1Δ17 that is likely pathogenic; however, residual expression of the full-length transcript from the variant allele could not be excluded. BRCA1 c.692C>T, c.693G>A and BRCA2 c.6935A>T, besides expressing the full-length transcript, increased expression of BRCA1Δ11 and BRCA2Δ12, respectively. As these are naturally occurring isoforms, also observed in controls, the clinical relevance is unclear. The seven remaining UVs did not affect splicing and three intronic variants were therefore classified as neutral. In conclusion, the RNA analysis results clarified the clinical relevance of 6 of the 14 studied UVs and thereby greatly improve the genetic counselling of high-risk breast/ovarian cancer patients carrying these classified variants.
Collapse
|
44
|
Mucaki EJ, Ainsworth P, Rogan PK. Comprehensive prediction of mRNA splicing effects of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Hum Mutat 2011; 32:735-42. [DOI: 10.1002/humu.21513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2010] [Accepted: 04/08/2011] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
45
|
Whiley PJ, Guidugli L, Walker LC, Healey S, Thompson BA, Lakhani SR, Da Silva LM, Tavtigian SV, Goldgar DE, Brown MA, Couch FJ, Spurdle AB. Splicing and multifactorial analysis of intronic BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence variants identifies clinically significant splicing aberrations up to 12 nucleotides from the intron/exon boundary. Hum Mutat 2011; 32:678-87. [PMID: 21394826 DOI: 10.1002/humu.21495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2010] [Accepted: 02/22/2011] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Clinical management of breast cancer families is complicated by identification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence alterations of unknown significance. Molecular assays evaluating the effect of intronic variants on native splicing can help determine their clinical relevance. Twenty-six intronic BRCA1/2 variants ranging from the consensus dinucleotides in the splice acceptor or donor to 53 nucleotides into the intron were identified in multiple-case families. The effect of the variants on splicing was assessed using HSF matrices, MaxEntScan and NNsplice, followed by analysis of mRNA from lymphoblastoid cell lines. A total of 12 variants were associated with splicing aberrations predicted to result in production of truncated proteins, including a variant located 12 nucleotides into the intron. The posterior probability of pathogenicity was estimated using a multifactorial likelihood approach, and provided a pathogenic or likely pathogenic classification for seven of the 12 spliceogenic variants. The apparent disparity between experimental evidence and the multifactorial predictions is likely due to several factors, including a paucity of likelihood information and a nonspecific prior probability applied for intronic variants outside the consensus dinucleotides. Development of prior probabilities of pathogenicity incorporating bioinformatic prediction of splicing aberrations should improve identification of functionally relevant variants and enhance multifactorial likelihood analysis of intronic variants.
Collapse
|
46
|
Radice P, De Summa S, Caleca L, Tommasi S. Unclassified variants in BRCA genes: guidelines for interpretation. Ann Oncol 2011; 22 Suppl 1:i18-23. [PMID: 21285146 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
In the last few years, several studies have focused on the interpretation of unclassified variants (UVs) of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Analysis of UVs through a unique approach is not sufficient to understand their role in the development of tumors. Thus, it is clear that assembling results from different sources (genetic and epidemiological data, histopathological features, and in vitro and in silico analyses) represents a powerful way to classify such variants. Building reliable integrated models for UV classification requires the joining of many working groups to collaborative consortia, allowing data exchange and improvements of methods. This will lead to improvement in the predictivity of gene testing in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and, consequently, to an increase in the number of families that can be correctly classified as linked or unlinked to these genes, allowing more accurate genetic counseling and clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
It appears that all types of genomic nucleotide variations can be deleterious by affecting normal pre-mRNA splicing via disruption/creation of splice site consensus sequences. As it is neither pertinent nor realistic to perform functional testing for all of these variants, it is important to identify those that could lead to a splice defect in order to restrict experimental transcript analyses to the most appropriate cases. In silico tools designed to provide this type of prediction are available. In this chapter, we present in silico splice tools integrated in the Alamut (Interactive Biosoftware) application and detail their use in routine diagnostic applications. At this time, in silico predictions are useful for variants that decrease the strength of wild-type splice sites or create a cryptic splice site. Importantly, in silico predictions are not sufficient to classify variants as neutral or deleterious: they should be used as part of the decision-making process to detect potential candidates for splicing anomalies, prompting molecular geneticists to carry out transcript analyses in a limited and pertinent number of cases which could be managed in routine settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claude Houdayer
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Institut Curie, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|