Safety and effectiveness of long-term allopurinol-thiopurine maintenance treatment in inflammatory bowel disease

Uphill battle: Innovation of thiopurine therapy in global inflammatory bowel disease care

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract that encompasses two major conditions: Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Historically, IBD has been primarily reported in western countries, but over the past decades, its prevalence is rapidly increasing, especially in lower and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as India and China and also in Sub-Saharan Africa. The prevalence of IBD in LMICs has been the subject of growing concern due to the impact of access to public healthcare and the burden it places on healthcare resources. The classical thiopurines face significant challenges due to cessation of therapy in approximately half of patients within one year due to side effects or ineffectiveness. In this article, we highlight innovating thiopurine treatment for IBD patients in downregulating side effects and improving efficacy.

Clinical trial: Combination allopurinol-thiopurine versus standard thiopurine in patients with IBD escalating to immunomodulators (the DECIDER study)

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines are established treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet concerns remain regarding their safety.

AIM

To evaluate the use of thiopurine-allopurinol combination therapy compared to standard thiopurine therapy in IBD.

METHODS

We performed a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of thiopurine-allopurinol versus thiopurine with placebo for adults commencing a thiopurine for IBD. Patients had active disease at baseline; dosing of therapy was based on a pre-specified regimen and subsequent metabolites. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a composite of symptomatic disease activity remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index <5 for Crohn's disease, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index <4 for ulcerative colitis) and a faecal calprotectin <150 μg/g after 26 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

The trial was terminated early due to slow recruitment. We randomised 102 participants (54 thiopurine-allopurinol, 48 thiopurine with placebo) with similar age (median 42 vs 48 years) and sex distribution (46% women per group). A higher proportion achieved the primary outcome in the thiopurine-allopurinol group (50% vs 35%, p = 0.14) and fewer participants stopped their allocated therapy due to adverse events (11% vs 29%, p = 0.02). Also, within the thiopurine-allopurinol group, thiopurine dose adjustments were less frequent (69% vs 92%, p = 0.03), a higher proportion achieved an early therapeutic 6-TGN level at week 6 (71% vs 53%, p = 0.19), and adverse events attributed to therapy were less frequent (15% vs 44%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Thiopurine-allopurinol therapy is safe and mitigates thiopurine adverse effects, thus enhancing tolerability without compromising efficacy (ACTRN12613001347752).

The Effectiveness and Safety of First-Line Thioguanine in Thiopurine-Naïve Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

Currently thioguanine is solely used as treatment for inflammatory bowel disease after azathioprine and/or mercaptopurine failure. This study aimed to determine the safety, effectiveness, and 12-month drug survival of thioguanine in thiopurine-naïve patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in thiopurine-naïve patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with thioguanine as first thiopurine derivate. Clinical effectiveness was defined as the continuation of thioguanine without the (re)initiation of concurrent biological therapy, systemic corticosteroids, or a surgical intervention. All adverse events were categorized by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients (male 39%, Crohn's disease 53%) were included with a median treatment duration of 25 months and a median thioguanine dosage of 20 mg/d. Clinical effectiveness at 12 months was observed in 53% of patients, and 78% of these responding patients remained responsive until the end of follow-up. During the entire follow-up period, 26 patients were primary nonresponders, 8 had a secondary loss of response, and 11 patients were unable to cease therapy with systemic corticosteroids within 6 months and were therefore classified as nonresponders. After 12 months, thioguanine was still used by 86% of patients. Fifty (44%) patients developed adverse events (grade 1 or 2) and 9 (8%) patients ceased therapy due to the occurrence of adverse events. An infection was documented in 3 patients, none of them requiring hospitalization and pancytopenia occurred in 2 other patients. No signs of nodular regenerative hyperplasia or portal hypertension were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

At 12 months, first-line thioguanine therapy was clinically effective in 53% of thiopurine-naïve inflammatory bowel disease patients with an acceptable safety profile.

Risk factors and management of hyperuricemia after renal transplantation

Hyperuricemia (HUA) is a common complication after renal transplantation. Currently, there is no uniform consensus on factors which increase the risk for and treatment of HUA in renal transplant recipients. The purpose of this review is to summarize current and proposed risk factors and strategies to manage HUA after renal transplantation in order to assist renal function protection and prolong graft survival time.

Classic drugs in the time of new drugs: real-world, long-term outcomes of thiopurine monotherapy in 1016 patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines remain recommended as maintenance therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Despite their widespread use, long-term effectiveness data are sparse and safety is an increasingly debated topic which thwarts proper delineation in the current IBD treatment algorithm.

AIMS

To document effectiveness and safety of thiopurine monotherapy in patients with IBD, using the population-based IBD South-Limburg (IBDSL) cohort METHODS: All patients starting thiopurine monotherapy as maintenance between 1991 and 2014 were included. Therapy was defined as effective if there was no escalation to biologicals, no course of corticosteroids, no surgery and no hospitalisation for active disease during treatment. Long-term effectiveness was assessed by adjusting for differences in follow-up using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Mid- to long-term safety regarding cancer incidence and clinically relevant liver disease was documented.

RESULTS

In total, 1016 patients (643 Crohn's disease [CD]; 373 ulcerative colitis [UC]) received thiopurine monotherapy at a median of 15.2 (Q1-Q3 4.2-48.5) months after diagnosis. During follow-up, effectiveness rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 64%, 45%, 32%, respectively, in CD and and 66%, 41%, 36%, respectively in UC. No statistically significant differences in effectiveness were observed after stratification for era of initiation (pre-biological vs biological, CD: p = 0.56; UC: p = 0.43). Sixteen non-melanoma skin cancers (incidence rate [IR] 3.33/1000 PY), five lymphomas (IR 1.04/1000 PY) and one urinary tract cancer (IR 0.21/1000 PY) were recorded. Two cases of portal hypertension were identified.

CONCLUSION

In real-world practice, thiopurine monotherapy remains effective, safe and durable for patients with CD or UC, including in the era of biologics.

Cytotoxicity of Thiopurine Drugs in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The effectiveness of thiopurine drugs in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was confirmed more than a half-century ago. It was proven that these can be essential immunomodulatory medications. Since then, they have been used routinely to maintain remission of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The cytotoxic properties of thiopurines and the numerous adverse effects of the treatment are controversial. However, the research subject of their pharmacology, therapy monitoring, and the search for predictive markers are still very relevant. In this article, we provide an overview of the current knowledge and findings in the field of thiopurines in IBD, focusing on the aspect of their cytotoxicity. Due to thiopurines’ benefits in IBD therapy, it is expected that they will still constitute an essential part of the CD and UC treatment algorithm. More studies are still required on the modulation of the action of thiopurines in combination therapy and their interaction with the gut microbiota.

Low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol versus azathioprine monotherapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (AAUC): An investigator-initiated, open, multicenter, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Retrospective studies suggest that for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) combination therapy with low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol (L-AZA/ALLO) may result in higher remission rates than monotherapy with azathioprine (AZA). We prospectively investigated the effects of these drugs for remission in patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

METHODS

Open-label, unblinded, randomised, controlled, investigator-initiated, multicentre study conducted at eight hospital sites in Denmark. Adult patients with established UC, who were steroid dependent/refractory, thiopurine naïve, had a normal thiopurine methyltransferase, and achieved remission with steroids or infliximab were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned by the investigators (1:1) to 52 weeks of treatment with once daily oral AZA (median dose 50 mg) combined with ALLO 100 mg versus AZA monotherapy (median dose 200 mg), using a computer-generated randomisation list with blocks of six. The trial was open without masking. All randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in primary and safety analyses (intention to treat population). The primary outcome was steroid and infliximab free remission after 52 weeks, defined as a Mayo Score of ≤1 and no rectal bleeding. The trial is completed and is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03101800).

FINDINGS

Between January 9, 2017 and February 10, 2021, 47 patients were randomised to l-AZA/ALLO and 42 to AZA and received at least one dose of the study drug. After 52 weeks, 20 of 47 (43%) patients in the l-AZA/ALLO group and nine of 42 (21%) patients in the AZA group achieved remission (odds ratio 2·54 [95% CI 1·00 to 6.78, p < 0·048]). Fourteen patients (30%) in the l-AZA/ALLO group and 16 (38%) in the AZA group were withdrawn from the study due to adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

This study suggests that after one year l-AZA/ALLO therapy may be associated with a beneficial effect on steroid- and infliximab-free clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe UC and should be considered as first line therapy.

FUNDING

Funding for AAUC was provided by The Capital Region of Denmark (Regionernes Medicinpulje (6062/16)).

Azathioprine with Allopurinol Is a Promising First-Line Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND

Beneficial response to first-line immunosuppressive azathioprine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is low due to high rates of adverse events. Co-administrating allopurinol has been shown to improve tolerability. However, data on this co-therapy as first-line treatment are scarce.

AIM

Retrospective comparison of long-term effectiveness and safety of first-line low-dose azathioprine-allopurinol co-therapy (LDAA) with first-line azathioprine monotherapy (AZAm) in patients with IBD without metabolite monitoring.

METHODS

Clinical benefit was defined as ongoing therapy without initiation of steroids, biologics or surgery. Secondary outcomes included CRP, HBI/SCCAI, steroid withdrawal and adverse events.

RESULTS

In total, 166 LDAA and 118 AZAm patients (median follow-up 25 and 27 months) were evaluated. Clinical benefit was more frequently observed in LDAA patients at 6 months (74% vs. 53%, p = 0.0003), 12 months (54% vs. 37%, p = 0.01) and in the long-term (median 36 months; 37% vs. 24%, p = 0.04). Throughout follow-up, AZAm patients were 60% more likely to fail therapy, due to a higher intolerance rate (45% vs. 26%, p = 0.001). Only 73% of the effective AZA dose was tolerated in AZAm patients, while LDAA could be initiated and maintained at its target dose. Incidence of myelotoxicity and elevated liver enzymes was similar in both cohorts, and both conditions led to LDAA withdrawal in only 2%. Increasing allopurinol from 100 to 200-300 mg/day significantly lowered liver enzymes in 5/6 LDAA patients with hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our poor AZAm outcomes emphasize that optimization of azathioprine is needed. We demonstrated a long-term safe and more effective profile of first-line LDAA. This co-therapy may therefore be considered standard first-line immunosuppressive.

Low-Dose Azathioprine in Combination with Allopurinol: The Past, Present and Future of This Useful Duo

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are complex immune-mediated inflammatory diseases that are associated with significant morbidity around the world. As our understanding of IBD, and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, advances the number of therapeutic targets has increased which has rapidly driven the development and introduction of new therapies. While these new therapies have shown promise they come with the significant drawback of high costs. For many IBD patients around the world the cost of newer therapies is prohibitive which means treating clinicians often need to turn to optimising simpler, older, and inexpensive medications. The concept of optimising well established cheaper medications is not unique to the management of IBD as health systems all over the world look to reduce costs while simultaneously improving patient outcomes. Despite thiopurines being used in the management IBD for over 60 years, many clinicians are still hesitant to use them due to perceptions around limited efficacy and poor tolerance. One method identified to potentially increase utilisation of thiopurines involves the coadministration of allopurinol. In this review we will explore the history, pharmacology, recent studies and give recommendations for the utilisation of the usual duo of azathioprine combined with allopurinol.

Optimizing Thiopurine Therapy with a Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitor in Patients with Systemic Autoimmune Diseases: A Single-Centre Experience

Background

Thiopurines are a mainstay of therapy for autoimmune diseases. However, up to 20% to 30% of patients experience overproduction of the methylated metabolites, known as 6-MMP, to the detriment of the active metabolite, 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN). These patients, commonly referred to as "shunters", are predisposed to thiopurine resistance and hepatotoxicity. In patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, the combination of thiopurine with a xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI) is used to reverse this skewed metabolism and to prevent treatment failure or hepatotoxicity. Data on the use of this strategy for patients with other diseases are limited.

Objectives

To investigate and describe the use of thiopurine-XOI combination therapy in shunters with systemic autoimmune diseases.

Methods

Shunters treated in the study hospital between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2015, were identified using the hospital's laboratory database, and clinical data were collected retrospectively. For each patient with optimization of thiopurine therapy, clinical and laboratory data were assessed over a 6-month period.

Results

Thirty-four patients were identified as shunters; for 14 of these patients, thiopurine therapy was optimized with an XOI. In these 14 patients, the median dose of azathioprine was reduced from 1.95 to 0.78 mg/kg with combination therapy. In addition, median 6-TGN level increased from 135 to 385 pmol/8 × 10⁸ erythrocytes (p = 0.001); furthermore, 6-TGN levels rose to above 235 pmol/8 ×10⁸ erythrocytes for 11 of the 14 patients. Conversely, the median 6-MMP level decreased from 6267 to 271 pmol/8 × 10⁸ erythrocytes (p = 0.001). Except for a 12% increase in mean corpuscular volume, no clinically significant changes in blood count were recorded. Notable infections were reported in 3 patients, and 1 patient had to discontinue treatment because of cytopenia. After 6 months, median prednisone daily dose was reduced by 74%, from 16.7 mg to 4.4 mg (p = 0.005), and 4 patients had been weaned off corticosteroids. Of the 14 patients, 11 (79%) were in full remission, and 2 (14%) were in partial remission.

Conclusion

Optimizing thiopurine therapy with an XOI may be a safe and effective strategy for patients with systemic autoimmune diseases.

Evolving Role of Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Biologics and New Small Molecules

In recent years, with the increasing availability of biologic therapies and due to safety concerns, the role of thiopurines in the management of inflammatory bowel disease has been questioned. While acknowledging that the benefit/risk ratio of biologic therapies is very high, they are expensive and are not required by a majority of patients. Therefore, thiopurines do retain an important role as steroid-sparing and maintenance agents when used as monotherapy, and in combination therapy with biologics due to their clinical and pharmacokinetic optimization of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in particular. Safety concerns with thiopurines are real but also relatively rare, and with careful pre-treatment screening and ongoing monitoring thiopurine benefits outweigh risks in the majority of appropriately selected patients. Measurement of newer pharmacogenomic markers such as nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15), when combined with knowledge of existing known mutations (e.g., thiopurine S-methyltransferase-TPMT), will hopefully minimize the risk of potentially life-threatening leukopenia by allowing for pre-treatment dosing stratification. Further optimization of thiopurine dosing via measurement of thiopurine metabolites should be performed routinely and is superior to weight-based dosing. The association of thiopurines with malignancies including lymphoproliferative disorders needs to be recognized in all patients and individualized in each patient. The decrease in lymphoma risk after thiopurine cessation provides an incentive for thiopurine de-escalation in appropriate patients after a period of prolonged deep remission. This review will summarize the current role of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease management and provide recommendations for commencing and monitoring therapy, and when to consider de-escalation.

2,3,5,4'-Tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-β-D-glucoside, a major bioactive component from Polygoni multiflori Radix (Heshouwu) suppresses DSS induced acute colitis in BALb/c mice by modulating gut microbiota

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), which is a common idiopathic digestive disease without a specific cure or treatment for improvement. Because Polygoni multiflori Radix has a traditional medicinal use to treat intestinal diseases, and the water extract of this herbal medicine had a positive influence on dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) induced UC model in our study. Meanwhile 2,3,5,4'-tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-β-D-glucoside (TSG) as the major component of the water extract of Polygoni multiflori Radix with yield of more than 10% exhibited the remarkable anti-inflammatory activity in vivo and in vitro, we predicted that TSG may contribute to benefit intestinal tract presented by the water extract of Polygoni multiflori Radix. Therefore, the present study aims to explore the pharmacological effect of this compound on UC model and its possible mechanism to regulate intestinal function through gut microbiota.

METHODS

Ulcerative colitis model was established in BALb/c mice by continuously administrating 3% (w/v) DSS aqueous solution for one week. The disease activity index (DAI), colon length, histopathological examination by H&E and the levels of tight junction proteins (TJP) by immunofluorescence staining were performed in ulcerative colitis model following the protocol. Furthermore, the levels of main inflammatory factors like TNF-α, IL-β, IL-6, and IL-10 were analyzed by the ELIZA kits for the further confirmation of anti-inflammatory activity of TSG on ulcerative colitis model. Finally, 16S rDNA sequencing technology was conducted to explore the composition and relative abundance of gut microbiota of different treatment groups.

RESULTS

TSG treatments effectively increased body weight about 5% of those in DSS group (p < 0.001) as well remarkably reduced the DAI scores to the 50% of those in DSS group (p < 0.001) in the UC model. TSG treatments of either 25 mg/kg (TSG-25) or 100 mg/kg (TSG-100) dosage restored epithelial barrier structure and exhibited obviously intact colon histology with reduced signs of inflammatory cells infiltration, preserved epithelia barrier, restored crypt structure, and increased numbers of goblet cells. TSG treatments could markedly lessen the histopathologic score two or three times than those in DSS group (p < 0.001). Especially for TSG-100 treatment, the fluorescence intensity of ZO-1 and Occludin were nearly back to 80% of those in normal group, and were 1.5 times more than those in the DSS group (p < 0.001). Additionally, direct evidence pointed to TSG as a therapeutically active molecule in the prevention and treatment of UC by significantly reducing the production of these pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 (p < 0.05-0.001) and increasing the levels of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (p < 0.05-0.001). Finally, it was found TSG treatments significantly raised the relative abundances of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes with a dose-dependently and improved the homeostasis of the gut microbiota composition which disrupted by DSS through increasing genus level Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136 and decreasing genus level of Helicobacter, Bacteroides, Parabacteroides.

CONCLUSION

The present results suggested that TSG treatments had a desirable pharmacological effect on acute colitis induced by DSS in the mice as well showed the possible mechanism relate to improve the intestinal function through balancing the gut microbiota of intestinal flora.

Influence of allopurinol on thiopurine associated toxicity: A retrospective population-based cohort study

Aims

Thiopurines are important for treating inflammatory bowel disease, but are often discontinued due to adverse effects. Concomitant use of allopurinol might lower the risk of these unwanted effects, but large studies in the general population are lacking. The aims of this study were to evaluate rates of hepatotoxicity, myelotoxicity, pancreas toxicity and therapy persistence in adult thiopurine users with or without allopurinol.

Methods

A retrospective population‐based cohort study was conducted within current thiopurine users (Clinical Practice Research Datalink). Among these patients, co‐use of allopurinol was compared to non‐use. Hazard ratios (HRs) for hepatotoxicity, myelotoxicity and pancreatitis were derived using time‐dependent Cox proportional hazards models, and were adjusted for potential confounders. Persistence of thiopurine use was evaluated using Log‐rank statistics.

Results

Patients using thiopurines (n = 37 360) were identified of which 1077 were concomitantly taking allopurinol. A 58% decreased risk of hepatotoxicity was observed in those concomitantly taking allopurinol (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.30–0.60; NNT 46). Rate of myelotoxicity (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.89–1.03) was not influenced. Risk of pancreatitis was increased (HR 3.00; 95% CI 1.01–8.93; NNH 337), but was only seen in those with active gout (suggesting confounding by indication). Finally, allopurinol co‐users were able to maintain thiopurine therapy over twice as long as those not on allopurinol (3.9 years vs. 1.8 years, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

In thiopurine users, allopurinol is associated with a 58% reduced risk of hepatotoxicity. In addition, thiopurine persistence was prolonged by 2.1 years in allopurinol users. These data support the use of allopurinol in individuals requiring thiopurine therapy.

Management of inflammatory bowel disease in children: It is time for an individualised approach

Paediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease (PO-IBD) is associated with greater morbidity compared to adult-onset IBD. However, as not all children with PO-IBD will have poor outcome and the best management decisions involve weighing risks versus benefit and wishes of patient's and family, we review risk factors of IBD progression in children and summarise rapidly expanding treatment choices, potential drug-related adverse events and risk minimisation strategies, ending with new treatment paradigms focusing on long-term goal of intestinal healing. For the purpose of this article, we have outlined the conventional approach, including medications currently licenced and available for use in Australia for paediatric IBD through the Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme and briefly discuss other promising therapies that are shown to be effective in adults but are undergoing paediatric clinical trials.

The Medical Management of Paediatric Crohn's Disease: an ECCO-ESPGHAN Guideline Update

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to provide an evidence-supported update of the ECCO-ESPGHAN guideline on the medical management of paediatric Crohn's disease [CD].

METHODS

We formed 10 working groups and formulated 17 PICO-structured clinical questions [Patients, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome]. A systematic literature search from January 1, 1991 to March 19, 2019 was conducted by a medical librarian using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases. A shortlist of 30 provisional statements were further refined during a consensus meeting in Barcelona in October 2019 and subjected to a vote. In total 22 statements reached ≥ 80% agreement and were retained.

RESULTS

We established that it was key to identify patients at high risk of a complicated disease course at the earliest opportunity, to reduce bowel damage. Patients with perianal disease, stricturing or penetrating behaviour, or severe growth retardation should be considered for up-front anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] agents in combination with an immunomodulator. Therapeutic drug monitoring to guide treatment changes is recommended over empirically escalating anti-TNF dose or switching therapies. Patients with low-risk luminal CD should be induced with exclusive enteral nutrition [EEN], or with corticosteroids when EEN is not an option, and require immunomodulator-based maintenance therapy. Favourable outcomes rely on close monitoring of treatment response, with timely adjustments in therapy when treatment targets are not met. Serial faecal calprotectin measurements or small bowel imaging [ultrasound or magnetic resonance enterography] are more reliable markers of treatment response than clinical scores alone.

CONCLUSIONS

We present state-of-the-art guidance on the medical treatment and long-term management of children and adolescents with CD.

Review article: opportunities to improve and expand thiopurine therapy for autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines in combination with glucocorticoids are used as first-line, second-line and maintenance therapies in autoimmune hepatitis and opportunities exist to improve and expand their use.

AIMS

To describe the metabolic pathways and key factors implicated in the efficacy and toxicity of the thiopurine drugs and to indicate the opportunities to improve outcomes by monitoring and manipulating metabolic pathways, individualising dosage and strengthening the response.

METHODS

English abstracts were identified in PubMed by multiple search terms. Full-length articles were selected for review, and secondary and tertiary bibliographies were developed.

RESULTS

Thiopurine methyltransferase activity and 6-tioguanine (6-thioguanine) nucleotide levels influence drug efficacy and safety, and they can be manipulated to improve treatment response and prevent myelosuppression. Methylated thiopurine metabolites are associated with hepatotoxicity, drug intolerance and nonresponse and their production can be reduced or bypassed. Universal pre-treatment assessment of thiopurine methyltransferase activity and individualisation of dosage to manipulate metabolite thresholds could improve outcomes. Early detection of thiopurine resistance by metabolite testing, accurate estimations of drug onset and strength by surrogate markers and adjunctive use of allopurinol could improve the management of refractory disease. Dose-restricted tioguanine (thioguanine) could expand treatment options by reducing methylated metabolites, increasing the bioavailability of 6-tioguanine nucleotides and ameliorating thiopurine intolerance or resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of thiopurines in autoimmune hepatitis can be improved by investigational efforts that establish monitoring strategies that allow individualisation of dosage and prediction of outcome, increase bioavailability of the active metabolites and demonstrate superiority to alternative agents.

A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low-dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients

BACKGROUND

Both tioguanine and low-dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol (LDTA) can be considered for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) when conventional thiopurines fail due to adverse events.

AIM

To compare the safety of tioguanine and LDTA in IBD patients.

METHODS

Inflammatory bowel disease patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to adverse events and initiated LDTA in standard care were identified in the prospective ICC Registry. IBD patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to adverse events and initiated tioguanine were enrolled in three university hospitals. Patients on concomitant biologicals were excluded. The primary outcome was discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes included: safety outcomes and surgery-, biological- and corticosteroid-free clinical remission (physician global assessment = 0) after 104 weeks. Both multiple logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to correct for confounders.

RESULTS

In total, 182 IBD patients treated with tioguanine (n = 94) or LDTA (n = 88) were included with a median follow-up of 104 weeks (IQR 91-104). Of these, 19% (tioguanine: 20%, LDTA: 18%) of patients discontinued therapy due to adverse events. After adjusting for confounders, there were no differences in terms of discontinuation rate due to adverse events (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.15-1.68, P = 0.26), adverse events (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.44-1.81, P = 0.75), infections (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.40-2.73, P = 0.93), hospitalisations (OR 2.00, 95% CI 0.64-6.23, P = 0.23) or clinical remission (OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.33-1.68, P = 0.48). All results are comparable with the propensity score matched cohort.

CONCLUSION

Nineteen percent of IBD patients with prior failure to conventional thiopurines due to adverse events discontinued therapy with tioguanine or LDTA due to adverse events. Either therapy may be considered before escalating to biological therapy.

Idebenone Protects against Acute Murine Colitis via Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Mechanisms

Oxidative stress is a key player of the inflammatory cascade responsible for the initiation of ulcerative colitis (UC). Although the short chain quinone idebenone is considered a potent antioxidant and a mitochondrial electron donor, emerging evidence suggests that idebenone also displays anti-inflammatory activity. This study evaluated the impact of idebenone in the widely used dextran sodium sulphate (DSS)-induced mouse model of acute colitis. Acute colitis was induced in C57BL/6J mice via continuous exposure to 2.5% DSS over 7 days. Idebenone was co-administered orally at a dose of 200 mg/kg body weight. Idebenone significantly prevented body weight loss and improved the disease activity index (DAI), colon length, and histopathological score. Consistent with its reported antioxidant function, idebenone significantly reduced the colonic levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and nitric oxide (NO), and increased the expression of the redox factor NAD(P)H (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate) dehydrogenase quinone-1 (NQO-1) in DSS-exposed mice. Immunohistochemistry revealed a significantly increased expression of tight junction proteins, which protect and maintain paracellular intestinal permeability. In support of an anti-inflammatory activity, idebenone significantly attenuated the elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in colon tissue. These results suggest that idebenone could represent a promising therapeutic strategy to interfere with disease pathology in UC by simultaneously inducing antioxidative and anti-inflammatory pathways.

Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

According to recent clinical consensus, pharmacotherapy of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is, or should be, personalized medicine. IBD treatment is complex, with highly different treatment classes and relatively few data on treatment strategy. Although thorough evidence-based international IBD guidelines currently exist, appropriate drug and dose choice remains challenging as many disease (disease type, location of disease, disease activity and course, extraintestinal manifestations, complications) and patient characteristics [(pharmaco-)genetic predisposition, response to previous medications, side-effect profile, necessary onset of response, convenience, concurrent therapy, adherence to (maintenance) therapy] are involved. Detailed pharmacological knowledge of the IBD drug arsenal is essential for choosing the right drug, in the right dose, in the right administration form, at the right time, for each individual patient. In this in-depth review, clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic considerations are provided for tailoring treatment with the most common IBD drugs. Development (with consequent prospective validation) of easy-to-use treatment algorithms based on these considerations and new pharmacological data may facilitate optimal and effective IBD treatment, preferably corroborated by effectiveness and safety registries.

Thiopurines with low-dose allopurinol (ThiLDA)-a prospective clinical one-way crossover trial

PURPOSE

Many patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) who have a high 6-methylmercaptopurine/6-thioguanine (6-MMP/6-TGN) ratio receive allopurinol 100 mg in addition to thiopurines to optimize metabolite concentrations. However, some patients do not tolerate allopurinol at this dosage. The aim of this study was to determine the intra-patient effect of reducing the allopurinol dosage from 100 to 50 mg, in terms of metabolite concentrations, enzyme activities, efficacy, and tolerability.

METHODS

A prospective non-inferiority one-way crossover study was performed. CD and UC patients with stable disease using a thiopurine and allopurinol 100 mg were switched to 50 mg for 1 month. Primary outcomes were thiopurine metabolite concentrations. Secondary outcomes were enzyme activities of xanthine oxidase, thiopurine methyltransferase and hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase, disease activity, and tolerability.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were included. Treatment with allopurinol 50 mg compared with 100 mg resulted in a significant decrease in mean 6-TGN levels (761 to 625 pmol/8 × 10⁸ RBC; p = 0.005) and a significant increase in mean 6-MMP levels (451 to 665 pmol/8 × 10⁸ RBC; p = 0.01). However, the mean metabolite concentrations were still therapeutic. Enzyme activities, disease activity scores, and patient experiences did not alter significantly. Generally, UC patients were more positive about their improved treatment than CD patients.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with 50 mg allopurinol led to a decrease of 6-TGN levels compared with 100 mg allopurinol. Disease activity, side effects, and patient experience, however, were similar between allopurinol 100 and 50 mg. UC patients seem to benefit and prefer lower doses whereas the contrary is seen in CD patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT trial registry - number 2016-001638-84.

Thiopurine Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Focus on Metabolism and Pharmacogenetics

Thiopurines have been widely used for the maintenance of remission or steroid sparing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. However, potential drug-related adverse events frequently interfere with their use. Indeed, drug withdrawals associated with adverse reactions have been reported in approximately 25% of patients. To balance the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of thiopurines, regular monitoring of biomarkers (complete blood cell count, liver function test, and metabolic profiles), steady dose escalation, and pretreatment thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) genotype screening have been routinely recommended. However, the complex thiopurine metabolic pathway and individual differences attributed to pharmacogenetic diversity limit the effectiveness of these strategies in the optimization of thiopurine therapy. Recently, in an effort to facilitate more accurate and personalized prediction of thiopurine response or toxicity, novel genetic markers including NUDT15 and FTO genes were discovered. These discoveries are remarkable because TPMT screening has minimal efficacy for predicting myelosuppression especially in Asian populations, despite the fact that thee populations have a higher frequency of myelosuppression than Western populations. This review focuses on the current understanding of the metabolic pathway and the pharmacogenetics of thiopurines and suggests a personalized preventive strategy against potential adverse drug reactions to optimize their therapeutic application.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: risk factors for thiopurine-induced leukopenia in IBD

BACKGROUND

Thiopurine-induced leukopenia, a frequently observed and potentially life-threatening adverse event, complicates the clinical management of IBD patients.

AIM

To assess risk factors for thiopurine-induced leukopenia in IBD.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS and Cochrane library were searched for studies reporting at least one risk factor for thiopurine-induced leukopenia. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated for each potential risk factor using a random effects model. Studies that were not eligible for meta-analysis were described qualitatively.

RESULTS

Seventy articles were included, 34 (11 229 patients) were included in meta-analyses. A significantly higher thiopurine-induced leukopenia risk was found for TPMT (OR 3.9, 95% [CI] 2.5-6.1) and for NUDT15 R139C (OR 6.9, 95% CI 5.2-9.1), G52A (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.3-7.9) and 36_37ins/delGGAGTC variant carriers (OR 5.6, 95% CI 2.8-11.4). A potential association between high 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) or 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) levels and leukopenia was observed, since most studies reported higher metabolite levels in leukopenic patients (6-TGN: 204-308 (Lennard method) and 397 (Dervieux method), 6-MMP: 4020-10 450 pmol/8 x 10⁸ RBC) compared to controls (6-TGN: 170-212 (Lennard method) and 269 (Dervieux method), 6-MMP: 1025-4550 pmol/8 x 10⁸ RBC).

CONCLUSIONS

TPMT and NUDT15 variants predict thiopurine-induced leukopenia. High 6-TGN and 6-MMP levels might induce leukopenia, although exact cut-off values remain unclear. Potential preventive measures to reduce the risk of thiopurine-induced leukopenia include pre-treatment TPMT and NUDT15 genotyping. Routine thiopurine metabolite measurement might be efficient, yet cut-off levels must be validated in advance.

Outcome of concomitant treatment with thiopurines and allopurinol in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A nationwide Danish cohort study

BACKGROUND

Thiopurine and allopurinol in combination are associated with clinical remission in inflammatory bowel diseases but their influence on subsequent outcomes is unclear. We compared outcomes during exposure to both thiopurines and allopurinol versus thiopurines alone.

METHODS

We established a nationwide cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases exposed to thiopurines ± allopurinol during 1999-2014, using registry data. Patients were followed until hospitalization, surgery, anti-TNFα, or death (as a primary composite outcome). We used Poisson regression analyses to calculate incidence rate ratios overall and stratified by calendar period (assuming the combined exposure was unintended before 2009).

RESULTS

A total of 10,367 patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease, n = 5484; ulcerative colitis, n = 4883) received thiopurines. Of these, 217 (2.1%) also received allopurinol. During 24,714 person years of follow-up, we observed 40 outcomes among thiopurine-allopurinol-exposed patients, and 4745 outcomes among those who were thiopurine exposed; incidence rate ratio, 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.73). The incidence rate ratios decreased over time: 4.88 (95% confidence interval 2.53-9.45) for 1999-2003, 2.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.17-4.09) for 2004-2008 and 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.23) for 2009-2014.

CONCLUSION

Our nationwide inflammatory bowel disease cohort study shows that concomitant thiopurine-allopurinol is as safe to use as thiopurines alone, with a tendency towards a positive effect on clinical outcomes in recent calendar periods when combined use was intended.

Real-life study of safety of thiopurine-allopurinol combination therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity rarely affect maintenance treatment

BACKGROUND

Low-dose thiopurine-allopurinol (LDTA) combination therapy is a commonly applied optimisation strategy in IBD patients with a skewed thiopurine metabolism.

AIM

To assess continued LDTA maintenance treatment at annual intervals and explore risk factors for treatment cessation METHODS: Adult IBD patients treated with LDTA between 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively included. Data on the incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events (AEs), including hepatotoxicity and myelotoxicity resulting in imposing LDTA therapy cessation and associated risk factors were collected.

RESULTS

In total, 221 IBD patients (46% male, median age 42 years) were included. Maintenance LDTA treatment was continued in 78% of patients at 1 year (n = 145), 66% at 2 years (n = 83), 57% at 3 years (n = 52) and 52% at 4 years (n = 33). Treatment in patients receiving LDTA therapy for AEs during thiopurine monotherapy was more often continued than in patients initiating LDTA for other indications (eg, ineffectiveness of thiopurine monotherapy, routinely discovered skewed metabolism) (P = 0.016). Myelotoxicity during thiopurine monotherapy resolved in 87% and hepatotoxicity in 86% after median of 1.2 and 1.4 months after LDTA initiation. Cumulative incidence of AEs during LDTA resulting in therapy cessation within total follow-up of 449 treatment-years was 7% for clinical AEs, 4% for myelotoxicity and 1% for hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

LDTA therapy is a safe and beneficial optimisation strategy in IBD patients. Continued maintenance LDTA treatment is 52% after 4 years of treatment and most commonly affected by ineffectiveness of LDTA rather than LDTA-attributed toxicity. LDTA optimisation strategy is most advantageous in patients failing thiopurine monotherapy due to AEs.

Key insights from therapeutic drug monitoring in Crohn's disease patients

INTRODUCTION

The incidence and prevalence of Crohn's disease are increasing causing a significant disease burden. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is advocated as a promising tool for personalized or individual-tailored therapy strategies and has been welcomed as a new means to improve current therapy strategies. Nevertheless, pharmacokinetic-based TDM has limitations, and straightforward target concentrations for most therapies are lacking. Areas covered: In the following concise review of literature, key insights of TDM in thiopurine, methotrexate, anti-TNF, vedolizumab and ustekinumab therapy for Crohn's disease are being described. Expert opinion: Therapeutic drug monitoring may, up till now, be helpful to adjust thiopurine and infliximab therapy, primarily in a reactive setting, in case of inefficacy and of occurrence of adverse event. With this restricted application, the goal of individualized therapy based on TDM has not yet been achieved.

Nonsynonymous Polymorphism in Guanine Monophosphate Synthetase Is a Risk Factor for Unfavorable Thiopurine Metabolite Ratios in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Up to 20% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are refractory to thiopurine therapy preferentially produce 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) at the expense of 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN), resulting in a high 6-MMP:6-TGN ratio (>20). The objective of this study was to evaluate whether genetic variability in guanine monophosphate synthetase (GMPS) contributes to preferential 6-MMP metabolizer phenotype.

METHODS

Exome sequencing was performed in a cohort of IBD patients with 6-MMP:6-TGN ratios of >100 to identify nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs). In vitro assays were performed to measure GMPS activity associated with these nsSNPs. Frequency of the nsSNPs was measured in a cohort of 530 Caucasian IBD patients.

RESULTS

Two nsSNPs in GMPS (rs747629729, rs61750370) were detected in 11 patients with very high 6-MMP:6-TGN ratios. The 2 nsSNPs were predicted to be damaging by in silico analysis. In vitro assays demonstrated that both nsSNPs resulted in a significant reduction in GMPS activity (P < 0.05). The SNP rs61750370 was significantly associated with 6-MMP:6-TGN ratios ≥100 (odds ratio, 5.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-25.12; P < 0.031) in a subset of 264 Caucasian IBD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The GMPS SNP rs61750370 may be a reliable risk factor for extreme 6MMP preferential metabolism.

The teratogenicity of allopurinol: A comprehensive review of animal and human studies

Allopurinol is widely used in the management of multiple disorders including gout, kidney stones and inflammatory bowel disease. Despite of long-term experience, its safety in pregnancy has been debated due to reports on possible teratogenicity. We aimed to review the literature on the safety of allopurinol in pregnancy and offspring. In animals, allopurinol induced species-specific reproductive toxicity. In humans, a total of 53 allopurinol exposed infants were reported in the literature. Major congenital malformations were reported in two cases with a comparable pattern of multiple abnormalities. Five other infants had minor birth defects. In conclusion, the association between allopurinol and teratogenicity appears to be weak and limited to two reports with uncertain causality. However, the available data are insufficient to make a certain judgement, and as allopurinol treatment evolves, report and prospective follow-up of all exposed infants (i.e. deviant and normal cases) should be encouraged.

Clinical experience of optimising thiopurine use through metabolite measurement in inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Thiopurine therapy can be optimised by determining the concentration of the drug's metabolites.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis on a prospective database of 31 patients with inflammatory bowel disease who failed therapy with thiopurines. Thiopurine metabolites (6-thioguanine, 6-TGN and 6-methylmercaptopurine, 6-MMP) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (Laboratorios Cerba, Barcelona) and treatment was duly adjusted in accordance with the results. Clinical response was reassessed after six months.

RESULT

Despite the appropriate theoretical dose of thiopurines being administered, the dose was insufficient in 45.6% of patients (nonadherence to treatment suspected in 6.45%) and 16.2% received an excessive dose or the drug was metabolised by other metabolic pathways. After treatment was optimised based on metabolite levels, only 25.8% (8/31) were prescribed a biological agent, while 74.2% of cases (23/31) were managed through dose optimisation alone.

DISCUSSION

Monitoring thiopurine metabolite levels may help clinicians to assess non-responsive patients before adding or switching to another drug (generally a biological agent), thereby avoiding any additional costs or potential toxicity. This strategy may also help to identify patients receiving an insufficient dose and those with an alternative metabolic pathway, who could be candidates for low-dose AZA with allopurinol, as well as patients who are suspected of being non-adherent. In three out of four patients, switching to a biological agent can be avoided.

Low-dose thiopurine with allopurinol co-therapy overcomes thiopurine intolerance and allows thiopurine continuation in inflammatory bowel disease

AIMS

To assess the utility and tolerability of thiopurine-allopurinol co-therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with intolerance to thiopurine monotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study assessed cases of thiopurine intolerance then switched to thiopurine allopurinol co-therapy between 2011 and 2015 at two centres. Indications for switch, dosing and subsequent clinical outcomes (including thiopurine persistence) were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 767 patients on thiopurines for IBD, 89 (12%) were switched to co-therapy for intolerance. 64/89 (72%) had Crohn's disease, 38 (43%) were males, median age at switch was 40y (range 17-78), median IBD duration 6y (0-29). Median follow-up was 1.9y (0-5). Reasons for switching to co-therapy included fatigue (37%), hepatotoxicity (23%), nausea (23%), arthralgia (10%), headache (12%) and hypersensitivity reaction (4%). Overall, 66 (74%) patients remained on co-therapy until most recent review and achieved a clinical response. High rates of overcoming intolerance (62-100%) occurred with co-therapy for all reasons above, although fatigue was less amenable to switching than non-fatigue indications (62% vs 91%, p = <0.001). Of 34 patients not escalated to biologics with endoscopic data, 15 were in remission (44%) at most recent review.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose thiopurine combined with allopurinol appears safe and effective in overcoming intolerances to thiopurine monotherapy in many cases.

Randomised clinical trial: efficacy, safety and dosage of adjunctive allopurinol in azathioprine/mercaptopurine nonresponders (AAA Study)

BACKGROUND

Thiopurine hypermethylation towards 6-methylmercaptopurine (6MMP) instead of 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6TGN) is associated with inefficacy in patients with IBD. Allopurinol reverses such hypermethylation.

AIMS

To prospectively determine efficacy of allopurinol-thiopurine combination and to compare 2 doses of allopurinol.

DESIGN

In a multicentre, double-blind trial, patients with clinically active or steroid-dependent IBD and thiopurine shunting were randomised to 50 or 100 mg/d allopurinol and 25% of their screening thiopurine dose, which was subsequently optimised, aiming for 6TGN of 260-500 pmol/8x10⁸ RBCs. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission at 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Of 73 patients, 39 (53% [95% CI 42-65]) achieved steroid-free remission, (54% with 50 mg/d and 53% with 100 mg/d). 81% were able to discontinue steroids. Therapeutic 6TGN levels were achieved in both groups. Final thiopurine doses were lower with 100 mg/d allopurinol (P < 0.005). 6MMP: 6TGN ratio decreased from mean 64 to 4 (P < 0.001), being higher with 50 mg/d (6 ± 1.83) than for 100 mg/d ([1 ± 0.16], P = 0.003). Three patients on 50 mg/d failed to sustain low ratios at 24 weeks. Toxicity was minimal; three patients on 50 mg/d allopurinol developed transient leukopenia. Alanine aminotransferase concentrations decreased (P < 0.001) similarly in both arms. Faecal calprotectin levels at study end were lower in patients who achieved the primary endpoint (median 171 [85-541] vs 821[110-5892] ug/g, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose allopurinol-thiopurine combination safely reverses shunting and optimises 6TGN with associated improvement in disease activity. 100 mg/d allopurinol is preferable due to greater metabolite profile stability and lower thiopurine dose without additional toxicity.

Addition of Allopurinol for Altering Thiopurine Metabolism to Optimize Therapy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Thiopurine drugs, including azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine, are used commonly in patients with inflammatory bowel disease for maintenance of remission. Although generally well tolerated, adverse effects lead to discontinuation in a significant minority of patients. Pharmacogenomic studies have suggested that metabolic breakdown of azathioprine in an individual is genetically determined. Coupled with the fact that certain thiopurine metabolites, notably 6-thioguanine nucleotide and 6-methylmercaptopurine, are associated with antiinflammatory effects and adverse effects, respectively, some investigators have examined intentionally shunting the metabolism of azathioprine toward increasing 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels by using low doses of the xanthine oxidoreductase inhibitor allopurinol to improve efficacy and decrease toxicity of azathioprine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We performed a search of the MEDLINE and Embase databases for basic and clinical research reports of this modality. Pertinent articles were retrieved, reviewed, and assessed by the authors. Case series, cohort studies, and one randomized trial have investigated adding allopurinol to azathioprine therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Most reports primarily examined metabolite levels in these patients. In general, the literature suggests that this modality was successful at significantly increasing 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels while decreasing 6-methylmercaptopurine levels. Several small reports have suggested that patients with increased 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels had improved symptoms or symptom remission. Adverse effects and discontinuation rates remained similar or were improved in patients who were taking a thiopurine and started allopurinol. In conclusion, the addition of allopurinol may be an option for optimizing thiopurine metabolite production in select patients with low 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels. Appropriate care and monitoring of these patients are mandatory to prevent neutropenia or other adverse effects.

Clinical Value of Mercaptopurine After Failing Azathioprine Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines have been widely accepted as immunosuppressive therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. However, many patients have to discontinue thiopurines due to intolerance or ineffectiveness. A therapeutically beneficial effect of switching from azathioprine (AZA) to mercaptopurine (MP) after developing adverse events (AEs) has been reported. The authors assessed the clinical value of MP therapy after AZA discontinuation due to intolerance and, secondary, due to ineffectiveness.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, the authors analyzed data from patients in whom AZA therapy had failed and who were subsequently treated with MP.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients initiated MP therapy after intolerance to AZA. Intolerance reoccurred in 22 (58%) patients and the remaining 16 (42%) tolerated MP. In 18 out of 48 patients (38%), the AEs that led to discontinuation of MP were similar to those of AZA. A longer duration of prior AZA use was more common in patients who were subsequently tolerant for MP (5.3 versus 1.2 months; P = 0.04). Twenty-two patients discontinued AZA due to ineffectiveness. Eight (36%) patients had clinical benefit from a switch to MP. Six out of these 8 (75%) patients used allopurinol alongside MP, due to ineffectiveness based on a skewed thiopurine metabolism. Patients were more likely to have clinical benefit if the interval between both thiopurines was longer (4.4 versus 0.01 months; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors showed that a noteworthy number of patients benefitted therapeutically from a switch from AZA to MP when failing due to intolerance or ineffectiveness; however, the percentage was lower than previously reported in literature.

Optimizing Thiopurine Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Among 2 Real-life Intercept Cohorts: Effect of Allopurinol Comedication?

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines (azathioprine and mercaptopurine) are frequently used immunosuppressive drugs to maintain remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Half of the conventional thiopurine-derivative users have to discontinue treatment within 5 years, mainly because of intolerable adverse events. Over recent years, different strategies to optimize thiopurine treatment were suggested, yet, studies describing the clinical effectiveness of these strategies remain scarce. The aims of this study were to compare tolerability and sustained clinical benefit of conventional thiopurine derivatives therapy among two 5-year real-life intercept cohorts and to assess the clinical value of specifically allopurinol cotherapy.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center cohort study, we analyzed data from patients in whom weight-based thiopurine monotherapy was initiated between 2005 and 2009 (cohort 1) or between 2010 and 2014 (cohort 2). The initiation of the second cohort was synchronic to the start of allopurinol-based optimization in our center. Optimization strategies were extracted from patient charts.

RESULTS

In total, 105 patients were included (60 in cohort 1, and 45 in cohort 2). Metabolite measurement was performed in 37% versus 84% of the patients (P < 0.001). Subsequent optimization strategies were applied in 33% versus 58% of the patients because of inadequate metabolite concentrations, intolerance, or ineffectiveness (P = 0.01). Allopurinol was coadministered to therapy in 18 patients (40%) in the second cohort. Therapy was switched to thioguanine in 11 versus 6 patients (P > 0.05). Overall, total duration was longer in the second cohort (10.8 versus 34.1 months, P < 0.001). The number of ongoing thiopurine users (20% versus 49%) and sustained clinical benefit (13% versus 38%) were higher in the second cohort (both P < 0.05). This was mainly because of a decrease in hepatotoxicity after optimization (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimization of thiopurine therapy by the use of therapeutic drug monitoring with subsequent administration of allopurinol cotherapy successfully enhanced sustained clinical benefit and tolerability in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Allopurinol in combination with thiopurine induces mucosal healing and improves clinical and metabolic outcomes in IBD

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines, azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) are common maintenance medications for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Excessive methylation via thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) frequently causes therapeutic failure. Allopurinol reduces excessive 6-methyl-mercaptopurine (6-MMP) while enhancing 6-thioguanine (6-TGN) levels. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical, metabolic and endoscopic impact of allopurinol in combination with low-dose thiopurine in IBD.

METHODS

Retrospective review of consecutive cases treated with allopurinol. Metabolites and their ratios (6-MMP/6-TGN) were compared pre- and post-allopurinol. Clinical and endoscopic remission were assessed.

RESULTS

Allopurinol (n = 66) reduced mean dose of AZA by 70% (p < 0.01). Baseline levels (SD) 6-TGN, 6-MMP and 6-MMP/6-TGN were 165 (64), 9388 (5234) and 59.8 (30.3), respectively. These values improved on allopurinol to 297 (102), 896 (1031) and 3.4 (4.0), respectively (p < 0.0001). Therapeutic 6-TGN level (>235) was achieved in 49/58 cases on allopurinol combination therapy, versus 9/58 monotherapy (p = 0.0001). Among the thiopurine failure group (40 patients), clinical remission or response was observed in 65% and 22% of patients, respectively. In the asymptomatic group with excessive 6-MMP, 11/14 achieved sustained remission on allopurinol. Repeat colonoscopy (n = 28) showed mostly endoscopic remission (67.9%) or improvement (17.8%). Few had unimproved lesions (14.3%). Importantly, 46% of cases had complete mucosal healing. Two patients had cancer on combination therapy (de novo pancreatic cancer and fatal recurrence of metastatic testicular cancer). Elevated transaminases were reduced on allopurinol (48.2 versus 6.9%) (p < 0.001); no change in leukopenic or infectious events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Allopurinol in combination with low-dose thiopurine corrected excessive 6-MMP levels, resulting in clinical remission and mucosal healing in the majority of cases. The potential cancer risk of allopurinol and thiopurine combination therapy needs further research.

Thiopurine metabolite levels in patients with atopic dermatitis and/or chronic hand/foot eczema treated with azathioprine

BACKGROUND

Azathioprine is frequently used in severe eczema. It is converted in the liver into active metabolites, including 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) and methylated 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP). In the past, the therapeutic potential of azathioprine may have not been fully utilized. Recent investigations on inflammatory bowel disease have led to a better understanding of azathioprine metabolism and optimizing treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether measuring thiopurine metabolites in circulation can improve the effectiveness and safety of azathioprine treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis and/or chronic hand/foot eczema.

METHODS

Azathioprine metabolite levels were measured in eczema patients during maintenance treatment (Part I) and dose escalation (Part II). Clinical effectiveness, hepatotoxicity, and bone marrow suppression were analyzed and TPMT genotype was assessed.

RESULTS

A wide variation in metabolite levels in all dose groups was observed. In Part I (32 patients), there were no significant differences in 6-TGN levels between clinical responders and non-responders (p = .806). No hepatoxicity or myelotoxicity was observed. In Part II, all 6-TGN and 6-MMP levels increased during dose escalation. Hypermethylation was observed in 2/8 patients.

CONCLUSION

For individual eczema patients treated with azathioprine, routinely measuring 6-TGN and 6-MMP can be helpful in optimizing azathioprine dose, improving clinical effectiveness, and preventing side effects.

American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Role of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), which involves measurement of drug or active metabolite levels and anti-drug antibodies, is a promising strategy that can be used to optimize inflammatory bowel disease therapeutics. It is based on the premise that there is a relationship between drug exposure and outcomes, and that considerable inter-individual variability exists in how patients metabolize the drug (pharmacokinetics) and the magnitude and duration of response to therapy (pharmacodynamics). Therefore, the American Gastroenterological Association has prioritized clinical guidelines on the role of TDM in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. To inform these clinical guidelines, this technical review was developed in accordance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework for interventional and prognostic studies, and focused on the application of TDM for biologic therapy, specifically anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents, and for thiopurines. Focused questions address the benefits and risks of a strategy of reactive TDM (in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease) to guide treatment changes compared with empiric treatment changes, and the benefits and risks of a strategy of routine proactive TDM (during routine clinical care in patients with quiescent disease) compared with no routine TDM. Additionally, the review addresses the benefits and risks of routine measurement of thiopurine methyltransferase enzyme activity or genotype before starting thiopurine therapy compared with empiric weight-based dosing and explores the performance of different trough drug concentrations for anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and thiopurines to inform clinical decision making when applying TDM in a reactive setting. Due to a paucity of data, this review does not address the role of TDM for more recently approved biologic agents, such as vedolizumab or ustekinumab.

Azathioprine with Allopurinol: Lower Deoxythioguanosine in DNA and Transcriptome Changes Indicate Mechanistic Differences to Azathioprine Alone

BACKGROUND

Use of azathioprine (AZA) for inflammatory bowel disease is limited by side effects or poor efficacy. Combining low-dose azathioprine with allopurinol (LDAA) bypasses side effects, improves efficacy, and may be appropriate as first-line therapy. We test the hypothesis that standard-dose azathioprine (AZA) and LDAA treatments work by similar mechanisms, using incorporation of the metabolite deoxythioguanosine into patient DNA, white-blood cell counts, and transcriptome analysis as biological markers of drug effect.

METHODS

DNA was extracted from peripheral whole-blood from patients with IBD treated with AZA or LDAA, and analyzed for DNA-incorporated deoxythioguanosine. Measurement of red-blood cell thiopurine metabolites was part of usual clinical practice, and pre- and on-treatment (12 wk) blood samples were used for transcriptome analysis.

RESULTS

There were no differences in reduction of white-cell counts between the 2 treatment groups, but patients on LDAA had lower DNA-incorporated deoxythioguanosine than those on AZA; for both groups, incorporated deoxythioguanosine was lower in patients on thiopurines for 24 weeks or more (maintenance of remission) compared to patients treated for less than 24 weeks (achievement of remission). Patients on LDAA had higher levels of red-blood cell thioguanine nucleotides than those on AZA, but there was no correlation between these or their methylated metabolites, and incorporated deoxythioguanosine. Transcriptome analysis suggested down-regulation of immune responses consistent with effective immunosuppression in patients receiving LDAA, with evidence for different mechanisms of action between the 2 therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

LDAA is biologically effective despite lower deoxythioguanosine incorporation into DNA, and has different mechanisms of action compared to standard-dose azathioprine.

6-methylmercaptopurine-induced leukocytopenia during thiopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Thiopurines have a favorable benefit-risk ratio in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. A feared adverse event of thiopurine therapy is myelotoxicity, mostly occurring due to toxic concentrations of the pharmacologically active metabolites 6-thioguaninenucleotides. In oncology, myelosuppression has also been associated with elevated 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP). In this case series, we provide a detailed overview of 6-MMP-induced myelotoxicity in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively scrutinized pharmacological laboratory databases of five participating centers over a 5-year period. Patients with leukocytopenia at time of elevated 6-MMP levels (>5700 pmol/8 × 10⁸ red blood cells) were included for detailed chart review.

RESULTS

In this case series, we describe demographic, clinical, and pharmacological aspects of 24 cases of 6-MMP-induced myelotoxicity on weight-based thiopurine therapy with a median steady-state 6-MMP level of 14 500 pmol/8 × 10⁸ red blood cells (range 6600-48 000). All patients developed leukocytopenia (white blood cell count 2.7 ± 0.9 × 10⁹ /L) after a median period of 11 weeks after initiation of thiopurine therapy (interquartile range 6-46 weeks). Eighteen patients (75%) developed concurrent anemia (median hemoglobin concentration 6.9 × 10⁹ /L), and four patients developed concurrent thrombocytopenia (median platelet count 104 × 10⁹ /L). Leukocytopenia resolved in 20 patients (83%) within 4 weeks upon altered thiopurine treatment regimen, and white blood cell count was increasing, but not yet normalized, in the remaining four patients.

CONCLUSION

We observed that thiopurine-induced myelotoxicity also occurs because of (extremely) high 6-MMP concentrations in patients with a skewed thiopurine metabolism. Continued treatment with adapted thiopurine therapy was successful in almost all patients.

Hepatic complications induced by immunosuppressants and biologics in inflammatory bowel disease

The incidence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is rising worldwide. The therapeutic options for IBD are expanding, and the number of drugs with new targets will rapidly increase in coming years. A rapid step-up approach with close monitoring of intestinal inflammation is extensively used. The fear of side effects represents one the most limiting factor of their use. Despite a widespread use for years, drug induced liver injury (DILI) management remains a challenging situation with Azathioprine and Methotrexate. DILI seems less frequent with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and new biologic therapies. The aim of this review is to report incidence, physiopathology and practical guidelines in case of DILI occurrence with the armamentarium of old and new drugs in the field of IBD.

Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia of the Liver in Patients with IBD Treated with Allopurinol-Thiopurine Combination Therapy

BACKGROUND

Thiopurine therapy, particularly thioguanine, has been associated with nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) of the liver. Combination therapy of allopurinol and an adapted low-dose thiopurine leads to a pharmacokinetic profile that has similarities to that of thioguanine. Therefore, allopurinol-thiopurine combination therapy may also be associated with NRH of the liver. We assessed the prevalence of NRH in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with allopurinol-thiopurine combination therapy by liver biopsy specimen examination.

METHODS

An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in a Dutch IBD-referral center. Adult patients with IBD, treated for at least 1 year with allopurinol-thiopurine combination therapy were eligible. All patients underwent a liver biopsy, after standard laboratory and thiopurine metabolite concentration assessments. Histopathology was assessed by an experienced liver pathologist.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with IBD were included. The mean duration of combination therapy at the time of the liver biopsy was 24.7 months (SD 5.7). NRH was observed in one of the biopsies (4.8%), any grade of nodularity was observed in 3 biopsy specimens (14%). Other findings included phlebosclerosis (24%), perisinusoidal fibrosis (81%), sinusoidal dilatation (43%), perivenular fibrosis (14%), and periportal fibrosis (29%). Around the time of biopsy, the median 6-thioguanine nucleotide and 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide concentrations were 705 pmol × 10 red blood cells (RBC) (interquartile range 498-915) and 355 pmol × 10 RBC (interquartile range 225-670).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of histologically assessed NRH in patients with IBD, who were treated with allopurinol-thiopurine combination therapy, was 5%. This percentage is in line with thiopurine-naive and thioguanine-using patients with IBD. None of the included patients had clinical symptoms or signs suggestive of (noncirrhotic) portal hypertension.

Early prediction of thiopurine-induced hepatotoxicity in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal complaints and general malaise are common limiting adverse reactions of azathioprine and mercaptopurine in IBD patients, often related to high steady-state 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide (6-MMPR) metabolite concentrations.

AIM

To determine the predictive value of 6-MMPR concentrations 1 week after treatment initiation (T1) for the development of these adverse reactions, especially hepatotoxicity, during the first 20 weeks of treatment.

METHODS

The cohort study consisted of the first 270 IBD patients starting thiopurine treatment as part of the Dutch randomised-controlled trial evaluating pre-treatment thiopurine S-methyltransferase genotype testing (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00521950). Blood samples for metabolite assessment were collected at T1. Hepatotoxicity was defined by alanine aminotransaminase elevations >2 times the upper normal limit or a ratio of alanine aminotransaminase/alkaline phosphatase ≥5.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (17%) presented hepatotoxicity during the first 20 weeks of thiopurine treatment. A T1 6-MMPR threshold of 3615 pmol/8 × 10⁸ erythrocytes was defined. Analysis of patients on stable thiopurine dose (n = 174) showed that those exceeding the 6-MMPR threshold were at increased risk of hepatotoxicity: OR = 3.8 (95% CI: 1.8-8.0). Age, male gender and BMI were significant determinants. A predictive algorithm was developed based on these determinants and the 6-MMPR threshold to assess hepatotoxicity risk [AUC = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.91)]. 6-MMPR concentrations above the threshold also correlated with gastrointestinal complaints: OR = 2.4 (95% CI: 1.4-4.3), and general malaise: OR = 2.0 (95% CI: 1.1-3.7).

CONCLUSIONS

In more than 80% of patients, thiopurine-induced hepatotoxicity could be explained by elevated T1 6-MMPR concentrations and the independent risk factors age, gender and BMI, allowing personalised thiopurine treatment in IBD to prevent early failure.