microRNA146a expression in lupus patients with and without renal complications

Systemic lupus erythematosus: From non-coding RNAs to exosomal non-coding RNAs

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), as an immunological illness, frequently impacts young females. Both vulnerabilities to SLE and the course of the illness's clinical symptoms have been demonstrated to be affected by individual differences in non-coding RNA expression. Many non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are out of whack in patients with SLE. Because of the dysregulation of several ncRNAs in peripheral blood of patients suffering from SLE, these ncRNAs to be showed valuable as biomarkers for medication response, diagnosis, and activity. NcRNAs have also been demonstrated to influence immune cell activity and apoptosis. Altogether, these facts highlight the need of investigating the roles of both families of ncRNAs in the progress of SLE. Being aware of the significance of these transcripts perhaps elucidates the molecular pathogenesis of SLE and could open up promising avenues to create tailored treatments during this condition. In this review we summarized various non-coding RNAs and Exosomal non-coding RNAs in SLE.

Dysregulated MicroRNAs in the Pathogenesis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Comprehensive Review

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a chronic autoimmune disease of which clinical presentation is vastly heterogeneous, ranging from mild skin rashes to severe renal diseases. Treatment goal of this illness is to minimize disease activity and prevent further organ damage. In recent years, much research has been done on the epigenetic aspects of SLE pathogenesis, for among the various factors known to contribute to the pathogenic process, epigenetic factors, especially microRNAs, bear the most therapeutic potential that can be altered unlike congenital genetic factors. This article reviews and updates what has been discovered so far about the pathogenesis of lupus, while focusing on the dysregulation of microRNAs in lupus patients in comparison to healthy controls along with the potentially pathogenic roles of the microRNAs commonly reported to be either upregulated or downregulated. Furthermore, this review includes microRNAs of which results are controversial, suggesting possible explanations for such discrepancies and directions for future research. Moreover, we aimed to emphasize the point that had been overlooked so far in studies regarding microRNA expression levels; that is, which specimen was used to assess the dysregulation of microRNAs. To our surprise, a vast number of studies have not considered this factor and have analyzed the potential role of microRNAs in general. Despite extensive investigations done on microRNA levels, their significance and potential role remain a mystery, which calls for further studies on this particular subject in regard of which specimen is used for assessment.

Type I interferon pathway assays in studies of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the literature for assay methods that aim to evaluate type I interferon (IFN-I) pathway activation and to harmonise-related terminology.

METHODS

Three databases were searched for reports of IFN-I and rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases. Information about the performance metrics of assays measuring IFN-I and measures of truth were extracted and summarised. A EULAR task force panel assessed feasibility and developed consensus terminology.

RESULTS

Of 10 037 abstracts, 276 fulfilled eligibility criteria for data extraction. Some reported more than one technique to measure IFN-I pathway activation. Hence, 276 papers generated data on 412 methods. IFN-I pathway activation was measured using: qPCR (n=121), immunoassays (n=101), microarray (n=69), reporter cell assay (n=38), DNA methylation (n=14), flow cytometry (n=14), cytopathic effect assay (n=11), RNA sequencing (n=9), plaque reduction assay (n=8), Nanostring (n=5), bisulphite sequencing (n=3). Principles of each assay are summarised for content validity. Concurrent validity (correlation with other IFN assays) was presented for n=150/412 assays. Reliability data were variable and provided for 13 assays. Gene expression and immunoassays were considered most feasible. Consensus terminology to define different aspects of IFN-I research and practice was produced.

CONCLUSIONS

Diverse methods have been reported as IFN-I assays and these differ in what elements or aspects of IFN-I pathway activation they measure and how. No 'gold standard' represents the entirety of the IFN pathway, some may not be specific for IFN-I. Data on reliability or comparing assays were limited, and feasibility is a challenge for many assays. Consensus terminology should improve consistency of reporting.

Candidate MicroRNA Biomarkers in Lupus Nephritis: A Meta-analysis of Profiling Studies in Kidney, Blood and Urine Samples

CONTEXT

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a kidney disease caused by systemic lupus erythematosus in which kidneys are attacked by the immune system. So far, various investigations have reported altered miRNA expression profiles in LN patients and different miRNAs have been introduced as biomarkers and/or therapeutic targets in LN. The aim of this study was to introduce a consensus panel of potential miRNA biomarkers by performing a meta-analysis of miRNA profiles in the LN patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature review approach was performed to find LN-related miRNA expression profiles in renal tissues, blood, and urine samples. After selecting the eligible studies and performing the data extraction, meta-analysis was done based on the vote-counting rank strategy as well as meta-analysis of p-values. The meta-miRNAs and their related genes were subjected to functional enrichment analyses and network construction.

RESULTS

The results of the meta-analysis of 41 studies were three lists of consensus miRNAs with altered expression profiles in the various tissue samples of LN patients (meta-analysis of p-values < 0.05). Of the 13 studies on kidney tissue, the meta-miRNAs were let-7a, miR-198, let-7e, miR-145, and miR-26a. In addition, meta-miRNAs of miR-199a, miR-21, miR-423, miR-1260b, miR-589, miR-150, miR-155, miR-146a, and miR-183 from 21 studies on blood samples, and miR-146a, miR-204, miR-30c, miR-3201, and miR-1273e from 11 studies on urine samples can be considered as non-invasive biomarker panels for LN. Functional enrichment analysis on the meta-miRNA lists confirmed the involvement of their target genes in nephropathy-related signaling pathways.

CONCLUSION

Using a meta-analytical approach, our study proposes three meta-miRNA panels that could be the target of further research to assess their potential as therapeutic targets/biomarkers in LN disease.

Association between type I interferon pathway activation and clinical outcomes in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider

BACKGROUND

Type I interferons (IFN-I) contribute to a broad range of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Compelling evidence suggests that the measurement of IFN-I pathway activation may have clinical value. Although several IFN-I pathway assays have been proposed, the exact clinical applications are unclear. We summarise the evidence on the potential clinical utility of assays measuring IFN-I pathway activation.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted across three databases to evaluate the use of IFN-I assays in diagnosis and monitor disease activity, prognosis, response to treatment and responsiveness to change in several RMDs.

RESULTS

Of 366 screened, 276 studies were selected that reported the use of assays reflecting IFN-I pathway activation for disease diagnosis (n=188), assessment of disease activity (n=122), prognosis (n=20), response to treatment (n=23) and assay responsiveness (n=59). Immunoassays, quantitative PCR (qPCR) and microarrays were reported most frequently, while systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis, myositis, systemic sclerosis and primary Sjögren's syndrome were the most studied RMDs. The literature demonstrated significant heterogeneity in techniques, analytical conditions, risk of bias and application in diseases. Inadequate study designs and technical heterogeneity were the main limitations. IFN-I pathway activation was associated with disease activity and flare occurrence in SLE, but their incremental value was uncertain. IFN-I pathway activation may predict response to IFN-I targeting therapies and may predict response to different treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence indicates potential clinical value of assays measuring IFN-I pathway activation in several RMDs, but assay harmonisation and clinical validation are urged. This review informs the EULAR points to consider for the measurement and reporting of IFN-I pathway assays.

Crosstalk between miR-146a and pro-inflammatory cytokines in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

microRNA-146a (miR-146a) plays an essential role in immune anomalies and organ injury of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by regulating the disease's inflammation and complications. Here, we analyzed the expression of miR-146a in SLE and a panel of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, and TNF-α). Association between all measured parameters and the disease's clinical manifestation and response to treatment was monitored. Our study populations were 113 SLE patients and 104 healthy volunteers. miR-146a expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was measured by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). The content of the plasma cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, and TNF-α) was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Compared with healthy controls, miR-146a expression was significantly increased (p < 0.05) in lupus patients. The analysis of the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) of miR-146a showed 91% sensitivity and 70% specificity. IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-17 cytokines were significantly increased (p < 0.001), while IL-8 and TNF-α were significantly decreased (p < 0.001) in SLE patients against controls. The expression of miR-146a and TNF-α was upregulated considerably in SLE patients with severe disease activity. miR-146a expression was positively correlated with IL-6. Our results pointed to the elevation of miR-146a as a trade marker of SLE patients. Reduction of IL-8 and TNF-α in combination with an elevation of IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-17 might refer to miR-146a's dual effect in controlling inflammation in lupus. Although we shed some light on the role of miR-146a in SLE, further study is recommended to improve our results.

Clinical application of microRNAs in glomerular diseases

RNA interference (RNAi) occurs in all organisms and modulates most, if not all, biological pathways. It is the process by which non-coding RNAs, including microRNAs (miRs), regulate gene transcription and post-transcriptional processing of messenger RNA (mRNA). A single miR can modulate several genes within a cell, and several miRs can regulate expression of the same gene, adding tiers of complexity to regulation of gene expression. MicroRNAs and other RNAi approaches have been successfully used in vitro and in vivo to selectively manipulate gene transcription, making them pivotal agents for basic science research and candidates for targeted therapeutics. This review will focus on miRs and their potential as biomarkers and novel therapeutics for glomerular disease.

mir-146a genetic polymorphisms in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Correlation with disease manifestations

This study aimed to investigate the genetic polymorphisms of miR-146a SNPs (rs2910164, rs57095329, and rs2431697) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and their association with clinical manifestations. The implication of SNPs on miR-146a expression level was also evaluated. SLE patients (113) and healthy controls (104) were registered in this study. The miR-146a SNPs were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction/restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Quantitative real-time PCR was used to measure the miR-146a expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Our results showed that the genotype frequency of miR-146a SNPs didn't deviate significantly from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). The AG genotype and G allele of miR-146a (rs57095329 A/G) might be considered a risk factor for the disease (OR = 2.27; CI: 0.78–6.57 and OR: 2.35; CI: 0.79–6.92 for AG genotype and G allele, respectively). Although, no statistical significance in the distribution of miR-146a SNPs (rs2910164, rs57095329, and rs2431697) was found, indicating the lack of association between the three SNPs and SLE susceptibility. Significantly, the higher frequency of the AA genotype of miR-146a (rs57095329) was associated with pancytopenia (P < 0.05), while the CT genotype of miR-146a (rs2431697) was associated (P < 0.05) with the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). SLE patients had significantly higher levels of miR-146a compared to controls (P < 0.05). Elevation of miR-146a was independent of any SNP genotypes. In conclusion, this pilot study shows no association between miR-146a SNPs in our population group and susceptibility to lupus. Studies concerning other miRNAs in larger sample sizes are essential for a better understanding of their role in susceptibility to SLE disease.

•

This study is concerned with genetic polymorphisms of miR-146a in Lupus patients.

•

The AG genotype and G allele of miR-146a (rs57095329 A/G) might be considered a risk factor.

•

No significance in the distribution of miR-146a SNPs (rs2910164, rs57095329, and rs2431697).

•

miR-146a level was significantly elevated in SLE irrespective to any SNP genotypes.

•

AA genotype of rs57095329 was associated with pancytopenia while the CT genotype of rs2431697 was associated with the APS.

MicroRNAs in Lupus Nephritis-Role in Disease Pathogenesis and Clinical Applications

MicroRNAs (miRs) are non-coding small RNAs that act as epigenetic modulators to regulate the protein levels of target mRNAs without modifying the genetic sequences. The role of miRs in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis (LN) is increasingly recognized and highly complex. Altered levels of different miRs are observed in the blood, urine and kidney tissues of murine LN models and LN patients. Accumulating evidence suggests that these miRs can modulate immune cells and various key inflammatory pathways, and their perturbations contribute to the aberrant immune response in LN. The dysregulation of miRs in different resident renal cells and urinary exosomes can also lead to abnormal renal cell proliferation, inflammation and kidney fibrosis in LN. While miRs may hold promise in various clinical applications in LN patients, there are still many potential limitations and safety concerns for their use. Further studies are worthwhile to examine the clinical utility of miRs in the diagnosis, disease activity monitoring, prognostication and treatment of LN.

MicroRNAs in Several Cutaneous Autoimmune Diseases: Psoriasis, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus and Atopic Dermatitis

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous small non-coding RNA molecules that regulate the gene expression at a post-transcriptional level and participate in maintaining the correct cell homeostasis and functioning. Different specific profiles have been identified in lesional skin from autoimmune cutaneous diseases, and their deregulation cause aberrant control of biological pathways, contributing to pathogenic conditions. Detailed knowledge of microRNA-affected pathways is of crucial importance for understating their role in skin autoimmune diseases. They may be promising therapeutic targets with novel clinical implications. They are not only present in skin tissue, but they have also been found in other biological fluids, such as serum, plasma and urine from patients, and therefore, they are potential biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis and response to treatment. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of the role of described miRNAs in several cutaneous autoimmune diseases: psoriasis (Ps, 33 miRNAs), cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE, 2 miRNAs) and atopic dermatitis (AD, 8 miRNAs). We highlight their role as crucial elements implicated in disease pathogenesis and their applicability as biomarkers and as a novel therapeutic approach in the management of skin inflammatory diseases.

Mechanistic insights into environmental and genetic risk factors for systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease involving multiple organ systems with diverse presentation, primarily affecting women of reproductive age. Various genetic and environmental risk factors are involved in the pathogenesis of SLE, and many SLE susceptibility genes have been identified recently; however, gene therapy is not a viable clinical option at this time. Thus, environmental risks factors, particularly regional characteristics that can be controlled, need to be further investigated. Here, we systematically explored these risk factors, including ultraviolet radiation, seasonal distribution, geographical distribution, and climate factors, and also summarized the mechanisms related to these risk factors. Probable mechanisms were explicated in at least four aspects including inflammatory mediators, apoptosis and autophagy in keratinocytes, epigenetic factors, and gene-environment interactions. This information is expected to provide practical insights into these risk factors in order to benefit patients with SLE and facilitate the development of potential therapeutic strategies.