Pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection

Virological surveillance, molecular phylogeny, and evolutionary dynamics of hepatitis C virus subtypes 1a and 4a isolates in patients from Saudi Arabia

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) subtypes are pre-requisite to predict endemicity, epidemiology, clinical pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection. HCV genotypes 4 and 1 are the most prevalent in Saudi Arabia, however; less consensus data exist on circulating HCV subtypes in infected individuals. This study was aimed to demonstrate the virological surveillance, phylogenetic analysis, and evolutionary relationship of HCV genotypes 4 and 1 subtypes in the Saudi population with the rest of the world. Fifty-five clinical specimens from different parts of the country were analyzed based on 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) amplification, direct sequencing, and for molecular evolutionary genetic analysis. Pair-wise comparison and multiple sequence alignment were performed to determine the nucleotide conservation, nucleotide variation, and positional mutations within the sequenced isolates. The evolutionary relationship of sequenced HCV isolates with referenced HCV strains from the rest of the world was established by computing pairwise genetic distances and generating phylogenetic trees. Twelve new sequences were submitted to GenBank, NCBI database. The results revealed that HCV subtype 4a is more prevalent preceded by 1a in the Saudi population. Molecular phylogeny predicts the descendants’ relationship of subtype 4a isolates very close to Egyptian prototype HCV strains, while 1a isolates were homogeneous and clustering to the European and North American genetic lineages. The implications of this study highlight the importance of HCV subtyping as an indispensable tool to monitor the distribution of viral strains, to determine the risk factors of infection prevalence, and to investigate clinical differences of treatment outcomes among intergenotypic and intragenotypic isolates in the treated population.

Challenge of hepatitis C in Egypt and hepatitis B in Mauritania

Egypt has one of the highest prevalence rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the world, mostly with genotype 4 that is highly associated with severe fibrosis. As a consequence, hepatocellular carcinoma has become the leading cause of cancer in this country. Mauritania is a highly endemic area for hepatitis B virus (HBV). HBV and HCV could both be iatrogenically transmitted through infected blood products, infected needles, and medical equipment improperly sterilized. Adequate and efficient healthcare and public health measures with good surveillance programs, access for screening, prevention strategies, and successful treatment are needed to halt the spread of these diseases. Herein, we have reviewed the epidemiology, modes of transmission, predisposing factors, and novel treatment modalities of these viruses. We have proposed practices and interventions to decrease the risk of transmission of HCV and HBV in the affected countries, including strict adherence to standard precautions in the healthcare setting, rigorous education and training of patients and healthcare providers, universal screening of blood donors, use of safety-engineered devices, proper sterilization of medical equipment, hepatitis B vaccination, as well as effective direct-acting antiviral agents for the treatment of HCV.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of New HCV Treatments in Egyptian Cirrhotic and Non-Cirrhotic Patients: A Societal Perspective

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir (SOF) + ribavirin (RBV), SOF + daclatasvir (DCV), and SOF + ledipasvir (LDV) + RBV compared with SOF + pegylated interferon alfa (pegIFN) + RBV in the treatment of patients infected with hepatitis C virus in Egypt.

METHODS

Two Markov models were developed on the basis of the Egyptian clinical data and practice and were derived from published sources. The clinical parameters were derived from two sources: the Egypt multicenter national treatment program and previously published randomized clinical trials. The utility of the health states was derived using the available published data. Direct medical costs were obtained from the National Liver Institute database.

RESULTS

In noncirrhotic patients, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of US $2330 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for the SOF + LDV + RBV, -US $9043/QALY for the SOF + DCV, and -US $1332/QALY for the SOF + RBV regimens were yielded. In cirrhotic patients, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of -US $4170/QALY gained for the SOF + LDV + RBV, -US $9515/QALY for the SOF + DCV, and -US $2289/QALY for the SOF + RBV regimens were yielded. The SOF + DCV regimen was the most cost-saving option for cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. Deterministic sensitivity analyses remain robust.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study concludes that the SOF + DCV regimen among other currently available regimens is the most cost-saving option that yields the most favorable future health economic outcomes compared with the SOF + pegIFN + RBV regimen across a broad spectrum of patients, including those with cirrhosis.

Sustained virological response and its treatment predictors in hepatitis C virus genotype 4 compared to genotypes 1, 2, and 3: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PEG-IFN+RBV) may be more cost-effective than direct-acting antivirals in resource-limited settings. Current literature suggests sustained virological response (SVR) in hepatitis C virus genotype 4 (HCV-4) is similar to genotype 1 (HCV-1), but worse than 2 and 3 (HCV-2/3). However, few studies have compared treatment response between these groups and these have been limited by small sample sizes with heterogeneous designs. We performed a meta-analysis of SVR predictors in HCV-4 versus HCV-1, 2, and 3 patients treated with PEG-IFN+RBV.

METHODS

In November 2013, we searched for 'genotype 4' in MEDLINE/EMBASE databases and scientific conferences. We included original articles with ≥25 treatment-naïve HCV-4 and comparisons to HCV-1, 2, and/or 3 patients treated with PEG-IFN+RBV. Random effects modelling was used with heterogeneity defined by Cochrane Q-test (p value<0.10) and I(2) statistic (>50%).

RESULTS

Five studies with 20 014 patients (899 HCV-4; 12 033 HCV-1; and 7082 HCV-2/3 patients) were included. SVR was 53% (CI 43% to 62%) for HCV-4, 44% (CI 40% to 47%) for HCV-1; and 73% (CI 58% to 84%) for HCV-2/3. SVR with EVR (early virological response) was 75% (CI 61% to 86%) in HCV-4; 64% (CI 46% to 79%) in HCV-1; and 85% (CI 71% to 93%) in HCV-2/3. SVR without EVR was 10% (CI 6% to 17%) for HCV-4; 13% (CI 12% to 15%) for HCV-1; and 23% (CI 16% to 33%) for HCV-2/3.

CONCLUSIONS

SVR rates are similar in HCV-4 (∼50%) and HCV-1 (∼40%). Lack of EVR is a good stopping rule for HCV-4 and HCV-1 since only 10% subsequently achieve SVR. In HCV-4 patients with EVR, three-quarters can expect to achieve SVR with PEG-IFN+RBV.

A European single centre experience of management of hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection with pegylated-interferon and ribavirin

New direct acting antiviral agents are revolutionising hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. However, to date limited clinical trial data exists for outcomes in genotype 4 (GT4) HCV patients. GT4 HCV is more common in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, and limited data exists to date for outcomes in Europe. We report the first "real-life" sustained virological response (SVR) outcomes using pegylated interferon and ribavirin for HCV GT4 in the UK, and the largest European single centre cohort. HCV GT4 patients treated at a London, UK centre between 2002 and 2014 were assessed for SVR outcomes. Patient age, sex, region of origin, co-infection with HIV, pre-treatment liver biopsy histological assessment, genotype subtyping, treatment duration, and dose reductions were compared against SVR outcomes on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed on results with P < 0.1. A total of 118 patients were treated with HCV GT4 during the study period, 57 achieved SVR (48%). On univariate analysis age ≥45 (P < 0.0001), high viral load (P < 0.0001), Ishak staging 5-6 (P < 0.0001), and non-Egyptian Africans (P = 0.0059) were all negatively associated with SVR. Eastern Europeans appeared to have higher SVR (P < 0.0001). Using multivariate correlation viral load (P = 0.0005); Ishak staging (P = 0.0031) and age (P = 0.0003) were associated with SVR but not country of origin (P = 0.0645). Outcomes with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for HCV GT4 in this "real-life" setting were sub-optimal especially in the context of newer regimens. Patients with older age, high viral loads, and advanced disease need prioritisation for alternative treatments.

Meta-analysis: influence of host and viral factors in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin

The burden of hepatitis C virus genotype 4 (HCV-4) is high in Africa and East Mediterranean countries. Previous reports estimate sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in HCV-4 to be ∼20-70%. However, many of these studies are limited by different study designs and small sample sizes. Our aim was to evaluate treatment outcome and host/viral factors on SVR in HCV-4 patients treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PEG IFN+RBV) in a systematic and quantitative manner. A comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE for 'genotype 4' was conducted in November 2013. Abstracts from American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Asian Pacific Study of the Liver, Digestive Disease Week, and European Association for the Study of the Liver in 2012/2013 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were original studies with at least 25 treatment-naive HCV-4 patients treated with PEG IFN+RBV. Exclusion criteria were coinfection with HIV, hepatitis B virus, or other genotypes. Effect sizes were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was determined by Cochrane Q-test (P<0.05) and I statistic (>50%). We included 51 studies (11 102 HCV-4 patients) in the primary analysis. Pooled SVR was 53% [95% confidence interval (CI): 50-55%] (Q-statistic=269.20, P<0.05; I=81.43). On subgroup analyses, SVR was significantly associated with lower viral load, odds ratio (OR) 3.05 (CI: 1.80-5.17, P<0.001); mild fibrosis, OR 3.17 (CI: 2.19-4.59, P<0.001); and favorable IL28B polymorphisms, rs12979860 CC versus CT/TT, OR 4.70 (CI: 2.87-7.69, P<0.001), and rs8099917 TT versus GT/GG, OR 5.21 (CI: 2.31-11.73, P<0.001). HCV-4 patients treated with PEG IFN+RBV may expect SVR rates of ∼50%. Lower viral load, mild fibrosis, and favorable IL28B (rs12979860 CC and rs8099917 TT) are positively associated with SVR.

Pegylated versus standard interferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C genotype 4: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Treatment of hepatitis C genotype 4 (HCV-G4) with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) has not been adequately studied and is considered to be challenging. The aim of this meta-analysis is to systematically review and evaluate the effectiveness of 48 weeks of combined PEG IFN plus ribavirin (RBV) compared to standard interferon (IFN) plus RBV. The outcome of interest is sustained virological response (SVR).

METHODS

We searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCT) through May 2012. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool the risk ratio (RR) of achieving SVR across trials.

RESULTS

Five RCT enrolling 386 patients were included. The PEG IFN/RBV group had increased likelihood of achieving SVR (RR = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-2.10). SVR was significantly higher in PEG IFN-α-2a compared to the -α-2b group (P = 0.02). There was no statistically significant effect of ribavirin dosage on SVR (P = 0.55). The quality of evidence was moderate overall and limited by heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

In treatment-naive patients with HCV-G4, treatment with PEG IFN plus RBV achieves higher SVR rate than treatment with IFN plus RBV.

Role of different regions of the hepatitis C virus genome in the therapeutic response to interferon-based treatment

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is considered a significant risk factor in HCV-induced liver diseases and development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nucleotide substitutions in the viral genome result in its diversification into quasispecies, subtypes and distinct genotypes. Different genotypes vary in their infectivity and immune response due to these nucleotide/amino acid variations. The current combination treatment for HCV infection is pegylated interferon α (PEG-IFN-α) with ribavirin, with a highly variable response rate mainly depending upon the HCV genotype. Genotypes 2 and 3 are found to respond better than genotypes 1 and 4, which are more resistant to IFN-based therapies. Different studies have been conducted worldwide to explore the basis of this difference in therapy response, which identified some putative regions in the HCV genome, especially in Core and NS5a, and to some extent in the E2 region, containing specific sequences in different genotypes that act differently with respect to the IFN response. In the review, we try to summarize the role of HCV proteins and their nucleotide sequences in association with treatment outcome in IFN-based therapy.

Influence of HCV genotype 1 subtypes on the virus response to PEG interferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin therapy

New factors that influence the viral response in HCV non-genotype 2/3 patients must be identified in order to optimize anti-HCV treatment. This multicenter prospective study evaluates the influence of HCV variability and pharmacological parameters on the virological response of these patients to pegylated interferon α2a (peg-IFN-α2a: 180 µg/week) and ribavirin (RBV; 800-1,200 mg/day) for 48 weeks. HCV subtypes were identified by sequencing the NS5B region. Serum RBV and peg-IFN-α2a concentrations were measured at weeks 4 and 12. The 115 patients (67 men; median age = 49, range 31-76) included 64 who had never been treated and 27 co-infected with HIV. The mean baseline HCV RNA was 6.30 ± 0.06 log IU/ml and the HCV genotypes were: G1 (n = 93) with 1a (n = 37) and 1b (n = 50), G4 (n = 20) and G5 (n = 2). Most patients (79/108; 73%) had an early virological response. Independent predictors of an early virological response were interferon naive patients (OR=  2.98, 95% CI: 1.15-7.72) and RBV of >2,200 ng/ml at week 12 (OR = 3.41, 95% CI: 1.31-8.90). Forty of 104 patients (38%) had a sustained virological response. The only independent predictors of a sustained virological response were subtype 1b (OR = 6.82, 95% CI: 1.7-26.8), and HCV RNA <15 IU/ml at week 12 (OR = 25, 95% CI: 6.4-97.6). Thus a serum RBV concentration of >2,200 ng/ml was associated with an early virological response and patients infected with HCV subtype 1b had a better chance of a sustained virological response than did those infected with subtype 1a.

Recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B and C in special population groups (migrants, intravenous drug users and prison inmates)

The global spread of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), their high chronicity rates and their progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, are major public health problems. Research and intervention programmes for special population groups are needed in order to assess their infection risk and set up suitable prevention and control strategies. Aim of this paper is to give health care professionals information on HBV and HCV infections amongst migrants, drug users and prison inmates. The manuscript is an official Position Paper on behalf of the following Scientific Societies: Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (A.I.S.F.), Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases (S.I.M.I.T.), Italian Federation Department's Operators and Addiction Services (FederSerD), Italian Prison Medicine and Healthcare Society (S.I.M.S.Pe.). The considered population groups, having a high prevalence HBV and HCV infections, require specific interventions. In this context, the expression "special population" refers to specific vulnerable groups at risk of social exclusion, such as migrants, prison inmates, and intravenous drug users. When dealing with special population groups, social, environmental and clinical factors should be considered when selecting candidates for therapy as indicated by national and international guidelines.

Hepatitis C virus genotype 4 therapy: progress and challenges

The hepatitis C virus genotype 4 (HCV-4) is prevalent in Egypt, the Middle East and Africa. Recently, the epidemiology of HCV-4 has changed and this genotype has begun to cross borders and spread to several regions in Europe through immigration and injection drug use. HCV-4 has been considered a difficult-to-treat genotype based on the low sustained virological response (SVR) rates obtained with conventional interferon (IFN)-based regimens. Pegylated interferons (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin therapy for chronic HCV-4 has been associated with increased SVR rates of more than 60%. Shorter treatment of chronic HCV-4 patients with rapid and early virological responses has been associated with high SVR rates, better compliance, fewer adverse events and lower costs. Despite this progress, the treatment of HCV-4 non-responders, injection drug users, patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus, thalassaemic patients, patients on haemodialysis and patients with HCV-4 recurrence after liver transplantation still represents a significant therapeutic challenge. Treatment of HCV-4 has markedly improved, with higher sustained response rates and the possibility of shorter regimens. Despite the recent progress in the treatment of HCV-4, more research is required to optimize current therapy and include genotype 4 patients in clinical trials on emerging therapies such as specifically targeted antiviral therapy for HCV with protease and/or polymerase inhibitors.

Hepatitis C virus genotyping using an oligonucleotide microarray based on the NS5B sequence

The genotype of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is essential for determining treatment duration in clinical practice and for epidemiological and clinical studies. Currently, few genotyping assays that determine the HCV subtype are available. This report describes a microarray-based molecular technique for identifying the HCV genotype and subtype. It uses low-density hydrogel-based biochips containing genotype- and subtype-specific oligonucleotides based on the sequences of the NS5B region of the HCV genome. The biochip contains 120 oligonucleotides that identify genotypes 1 to 6 and 36 (1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2i, 2j, 2k, 2l, 2m, 3a, 3b, 3k, 4a, 4c, 4d, 4f, 4h, 4i, 4k, 4n, 4o, 4p, 4r, 4t, 5a, 6a, 6b, 6d, 6g, 6h, and 6k) subtypes. The procedure included amplification of a 380-nucleotide (nt) fragment of NS5B and its hybridization on the biochip. Tests on 345 HCV-positive samples showed that the assay agreed with NS5B sequencing 100% for the genotype and 99.7% for the subtype. The hybridization on the microarray and the NS5B sequence were in 100% agreement for identifying the most common subtypes, 1a, 1b, 4a, 4d, and 3a. This approach is a promising tool for HCV genotyping, especially for implementing the new anti-HCV drugs that require accurate identification of clinically relevant subtypes.

Insulin resistance predicts rapid virologic response to peginterferon/ribavirin combination therapy in hepatitis C genotype 4 patients

OBJECTIVES

In patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) of genotype 4, the predictors of rapid virologic response (RVR) have not been determined adequately. We aimed to assess which pretreatment variables might predict an RVR and a sustained virologic response (SVR).

METHODS

A total of 131 non-diabetic, genotype 4 CHC patients were enrolled for analysis and treated with peginterferon-alpha-2b/ribavirin. Insulin resistance (IR) was evaluated by homeostasis model assessment-IR (HOMA-IR). Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA levels were measured at baseline, during therapy and at follow-up.

RESULTS

The overall SVR rate was 60.3%. The SVR rate in patients with an RVR was 100%. Age, HOMA-IR, fibrosis, severity of the steatosis, and HCV viral load were all significantly associated with RVR in the univariate analysis. After logistic regression, both HOMA-IR (odds ratio: 0.12, P=0.002) and HCV viral load (odds ratio: 1.43, P=0.02) remained independent variables associated with RVR. Age, HOMA-IR, viral load, fibrosis, RVR, and "complete" early virological response were all significantly associated with SVR in the univariate analysis. After logistic regression, fibrosis (odds ratio: 5.23, P=0.007), HOMA-IR (odds ratio: 14.29, P=0.004), and viral load (odds ratio: 0.16, P=0.005) were independent factors associated with SVR. By linear regression, body mass index (P=0.001) and waist circumference (P=0.0003) were independently associated with HOMA-IR.

CONCLUSIONS

IR is a major determinant of both RVR and SVR in genotype 4 CHC patients. HOMA-IR would seem to be a useful tool for predicting the response to therapy.

Sequence diversity of hepatitis C virus 6a within the extended interferon sensitivity-determining region correlates with interferon-alpha/ribavirin treatment outcomes

Studies on the association between sequence variability of the interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) of hepatitis C virus and the outcome of treatment have reached conflicting results. In this study, 25 patients infected with HCV 6a who had received interferon-alpha/ribavirin combination treatment were analyzed for the sequence variations. 14 of them had the full genome sequences obtained from a previous study, whereas the other 11 samples were sequenced for the extended ISDR (eISDR). This eISDR fragment covers 192 bp (64 amino acids) upstream and 201 bp (67 amino acids) downstream from the ISDR previously defined for HCV 1b. The comparison between interferon-alpha resistance and response groups for the amino acid mutations located in the full genome (6 and 8 patients respectively) as well as the mutations located in the eISDR (10 and 15 patients respectively) showed that the mutations I2160V, I2256V, V2292I (P<0.05) within eISDR were significantly associated with resistance to treatment. However, the extent of amino acid variations within previously defined ISDR was not associated with resistance to treatment as previously reported. Four amino acid variations I248V (P=0.03-0.06) within E1, R445K (P=0.02-0.05) and S747T (P=0.03) within E2, I861V (P=0.01) within NS2 which located outside the eISDR may also associate with treatment outcome as identified by a prescreening of variations within 14 HCV 6a full genomes.

The neglected hepatitis C virus genotypes 4, 5 and 6: an international consensus report

Abstract Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 4, 5 and 6 represent >20% of all HCV cases worldwide. HCV-4 is mainly seen in Egypt, where it represents 90% of all HCV cases. Antischistosomal therapy was the main cause of contamination there, followed by procedures performed by informal providers and traditional healers such as dental care, wound treatment, circumcision, deliveries, excision and scarification. It is also highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa and in the Middle East. In Europe, its prevalence has recently increased particularly among intravenous drug users and in immigrants. HCV-5 is mainly found in South Africa, where it represents 40% of all HCV genotypes, but four pockets of HCV-5 were found in France, Spain, Syria and Belgium and sporadic cases were found elsewhere. The mode of transmission is mainly iatrogenic and transfusion. HCV-6 is found in Hong Kong, Vietnam, Thailand and Myanmar and also in American and Australian from Asian origin. The response to treatment in HCV-4 is intermediate between HCV-1 and HCV-2 and HCV-3. A sustained viral response is achieved in 43-70% with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. It is higher in Egyptians than Europeans and Africans and is negatively related to insulin resistance and to the severity of fibrosis. It increases to >80% with 24 weeks of therapy only if a rapid virological response is achieved. In HCV-5, a sustained virological response is achieved in >60% with 48 weeks of therapy. HCV-6 is also considered an easy-to-treat genotype, leading to a response in 60-85% of cases.

Pioglitazone improves virological response to peginterferon alpha-2b/ribavirin combination therapy in hepatitis C genotype 4 patients with insulin resistance

BACKGROUND & AIM

Insulin resistance (IR) affects sustained virological response (SVR). The use of insulin-sensitizing agents has been proposed to improve therapy outcome. The safety and efficacy of pioglitazone on insulin sensitivity and SVR in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 4 with IR receiving standard antiviral therapy were evaluated in a randomized-controlled study.

METHODS

Ninety-seven previously untreated patients with CHC and IR [homeostasis model assessment (HOMA>2)] were randomly assigned into two arms; (arm A; n=48) were given pioglitazone 30 mg/day combined with peginterferon (Peg-IFN)-alpha-2b/ribavirin (RBV) for 48 weeks, and (arm B; n=49) were given standard of care (Peg-IFN-alpha-2b/RBV for 48 weeks); HOMA index and hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV RNA) levels were measured at baseline, during therapy and follow-up. Treatment was stopped in patients without an early virological response or those who were HCV RNA positive at 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Baseline data of both groups were comparable, with no significant statistical differences. The percentages of rapid virological response (RVR) and SVR were significantly higher in patients given triple therapy compared with standard of care (27.08 vs. 6.1%; P=0.006 and 60.4 vs. 38.7%; P=0.04 respectively); patients in arm A showed a greater decrease in the HOMA index than those in arm B (-1.8 +/- 0.3, -2.1 +/- 0.3 vs. -1.1 +/- 0.6, -1.3 +/- 0.7) at week 24 and at the end of follow-up (P=0.001 at both time points). The triple therapy was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of pioglitazone, Peg-IFN-alpha-2b and ribavirin increased RVR, SVR and decreased IR, compared with patients given Peg-IFN plus ribavirin without an increase in adverse events.

Current challenges in viral hepatitis, antimicrobial resistance and the influenza pandemic

The 3rd Ditan International Conference on Infectious Diseases was held from 29 July to 2 August 2009 at the Beijing International Conference Center, Beijing, China. Over 1000 participants from 27 countries attended the 4-day conference, titled 'World Dialogue on Infectious Diseases'. A broad range of topics were covered this year, including TB, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, HIV, influenza and gastrointestinal infections. In addition, there was a particularly strong focus on two contrasting topics of viral hepatitis and antibiotic resistance, which is the focus of this meeting report.

Poor response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin in older women infected with hepatitis C virus of genotype 1b in high viral loads

BACKGROUND

Response to treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C, with reference to age and gender, has not been examined fully.

AIM

The influence of gender and age on treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin was evaluated in a retrospective study.

METHODS

PEG-IFN and ribavirin were given for 48 weeks to 179 men and 121 women infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) of genotype 1b in high viral loads (>100 kIU/ml).

RESULTS

Sustained virological response at 24 weeks after treatment was poorer in women than men who were aged >or=50 years (22% vs 53%, P < 0.001). Among the patients aged >or=50 years who had received >or=80% of the doses of PEG-IFN, ribavirin, or both, women responded less often than men (26% vs 64%, P < 0.001; 33% vs 61%, P = 0.022; and 32% vs 63%, P = 0.016; respectively). In multivariate analysis, male gender, retention of indocyanine green, ribavirin dose and compliance with therapy increased sustained virological response.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to combined PEG-IFN and ribavirin is poorer in female than male patients with hepatitis C who are aged >or=50 years, irrespective of compliance with treatment. Low estrogen levels in older women could be responsible for their impaired response to PEG-IFN and ribavirin.

Improved virologic response in chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 treated with nitazoxanide, peginterferon, and ribavirin

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates of 50%-60% have been achieved in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 treated with peginterferon plus ribavirin. The safety and efficacy of nitazoxanide plus peginterferon alfa-2a, with or without ribavirin, were evaluated in a randomized controlled trial at 2 centers in Egypt.

METHODS

Previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C and genotype 4 infection were assigned randomly to groups that were given standard of care (peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 48 weeks, n = 40), nitazoxanide monotherapy for 12 weeks followed by nitazoxanide plus peginterferon alfa-2a for 36 weeks (n = 28), or nitazoxanide monotherapy for 12 weeks followed by nitazoxanide plus peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 36 weeks (n = 28). Therapeutics included nitazoxanide (500 mg) twice daily, peginterferon alfa-2a (180 microg) once weekly, and weight-based ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day).

RESULTS

The percentages of rapid virologic response (RVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 of combination therapy, and SVR were significantly higher in patients given the triple therapy compared with the standard of care (64% vs 38%, P = .048; and 79% vs 50%, P = .023; respectively). Patients given nitazoxanide plus peginterferon alfa-2a had intermediate rates of RVR (54%) and SVR (61%). Adverse events were similar across treatment groups except for higher rates of anemia in the groups receiving ribavirin.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of nitazoxanide, peginterferon alfa-2a, and ribavirin increased the percentages of patients with RVR and SVR, compared with patients given peginterferon plus ribavirin, without an increase in adverse events.

Hepatitis C genotype 4 therapy: increasing options and improving outcomes

Hepatitis C virus genotype 4 (HCV-G4) is prevalent in the Middle East and Africa and has spread to several regions in Europe. HCV-G4 represents a major health problem in Egypt, with a prevalence rate of 13%. Recently, HCV-G4 has been spreading in Europe particularly among intravenous drug users (IDU) populations, who represent the main reservoir for HCV in Europe. This article reviews the current therapeutic strategies for HCV-G4 infections in different populations. HCV-G4 has been considered a difficult-to-treat genotype because of the poor sustained virological response (SVR) rates reported with a conventional interferon (IFN)-based regimen. Pegylated IFN and ribavirin combination therapy was associated with significant improvements in SVR rates that currently exceed 60%, particularly with individualized therapy. Lower response rates have been reported in specific situations, namely chronic HCV-G4 infection in IDUs and patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Rapid and early virological responses have been useful tools for determination of the duration of therapy.

IN CONCLUSION

therapy of HCV-G4 has shown significant improvements, with higher sustained response rates and possibilities for a shorter duration. More research is required to optimize therapy in special populations such as IDUs and HIV-co-infected patients.

Serum concentrations of ribavirin and pegylated interferon and viral responses in patients infected with HIV and HCV

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects a substantial proportion of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Patients infected with both HCV and HIV respond poorly to anti-HCV treatment with pegylated interferon alpha and ribavirin. But few data are available on the influence of ribavirin and interferon concentrations on treatment outcome for these patients. This study investigated the relationship between the serum pegylated interferon and ribavirin concentrations 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation, and treatment outcome in 35 HCV-HIV coinfected patients. The pegylated interferon and ribavirin concentrations at months 3 and 6 were similar. The pegylated interferon concentrations at 3 months in responders and nonresponders were similar. However, responders tended to have higher ribavirin concentrations (2,322 ng/ml) than nonresponders (1,833 ng/ml; P = 0.08). Responders infected with HCV genotype 1 or 4 had higher ribavirin concentrations (2,672 ng/ml) than did similarly infected nonresponders (1,758 ng/ml; P = 0.04). ROC curve analysis showed that a ribavirin concentration of 2,300 ng/ml was the best threshold for predicting a nonresponse (ROC area = 0.80 +/- 0.12). Thus ribavirin concentrations influence treatment outcome in HIV patients infected with HCV genotype 1 or 4. Monitoring ribavirin concentrations could help adapt ribavirin concentrations and improve the sustained virological response.

Viral kinetic of HCV genotype-4 during pegylated interferon alpha 2a: ribavirin therapy

Kinetics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) during pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and early monitoring of viral decline were recently described to predict treatment outcomes and in turn reduce the course of treatment, adverse effects and cost. However, there is limited (if any) information on the viral dynamics of HCV-4. Our aim is to follow the HCV-RNA kinetics during PEG-IFN alpha 2a and ribavirin therapy and the best time for predicting sustained viral response (SVR) in genotype-4 patients. Serum HCV-RNA levels before initial dosing (baseline level) and at 24 h, week 1, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 48 and week 72 were assessed in 84 HCV genotype-4 patients treated weekly by PEG-IFN alpha 2a and daily ribavirin. At the end of treatment, out of the 84 treated patients, 19 (22.6%) were non-responders while 65 (77%) showed end-of-treatment response (ETR). However, 8 patients relapsed (9.5%), thus the SVR was observed in 57 patients (67.9%). Younger patients were more likely to attain SVR, where the odds of SVR increased by a factor of 0.94 for each year increase in age (95% CI: 0.90-0.99, P = 0.019). Although a significant negative correlation between stage of fibrosis and rate of viral decline at weeks 1 and 4 (P < 0.005 and 0.001, respectively) was seen, neither fibrosis stage (χ(2) = 3.4882, P > 0.1) nor grade of inflammation (χ(2) = 0.0057, P > 0.1) significantly predicted response to treatment. Non-responders had no or only a limited decline at week 1 and week 4, whereas sustained virological responders had a significant decline at both week 1 and week 4. Area under the (receiver operating characteristic) curve (AUC) revealed that week 12 is better than any other time point in predicting the SVR (AUC = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94-1.01), (sensitivity 98.3%; 95% CI: 90.7-99.9), (specificity 88.5%; 95% CI: 71.0-96.0), positive predictive value of 94.9% and negative predictive value of 95.8%. A drop of more than 1.17 log viral load at week 1 and viral clearance or decline >3 log were considered as the earliest predictors of SVR. In genotype-4 patients, while failure to achieve an EVR at week 12 predicts non-response, an RVR at week 1 and week 4 98% guaranteed SVR. These findings further re-enforce the value of week 12 in the course of IFN treatment. Genotype-4 patients who show significant viral clearance (>1.17 log viral load) by the first week of treatment and viral clearance >3 log by week 4 are expected to show SVR and should therefore be assigned to a shorter drug regimen lasting for 24 weeks. Those unfortunate cases who do not achieve viral clearance by week 1 or week 4 should not be deprived from the treatment but rather given more time till week 12 before being classified as non-responders.

Very Early Viral Kinetics on Interferon Treatment in Chronic Hepatitis C virus Genotype 4 Infection

Background

Interferon (IFN)-resistant hepatitis C virus strains limit efficacy of antiviral combination therapy in patients infected with genotypes 1 and 4. A single test dose of IFN was useful to identify non-responders to IFN-α2b/ribavirin (RBV) or likely non-responders to pegylated (PEG)-IFN-α2a/RBV therapy in genotype 1 patients. Our aim was to investigate this approach in genotype 4 patients.

Methods

Viral load was measured in 46 patients before and 24 h after 10 megaunits (MU) IFN-α2b, and before and during 2 weeks of daily 5 MU IFN-α2b administration. Thereafter, patients received 48 weeks combination therapy with either 180 μg PEG-IFN-α2a/week ( n=33), 1.5 μg/kg PEG-IFN-α2b/week ( n=7) or 5 MU IFN-α2b/2 days ( n=6), along with 1–1.2g RBV/day. For prediction analysis the largest group (PEG-IFN-α2a) was evaluated only.

Results

Median 24 h log10 change after 10 MU IFN-α2b was 1.15 (range 0.08–2.48) and after 5 MU IFN-α2b was 0.81 (-0.12–2.22; P<0.0001). Log10 changes after 2 weeks on 5 MU IFN-α2b daily and 24 h after 10 MU were the best predictors of early virological response (defined by negativity of a standard qualitative PCR) to PEG-IFN-α2a/RBV combination therapy (area under curve [AUC]=0.97; P<0.001, receiver operating characteristics), 24 h log10 change after 10 MU was the best predictor of sustained virological response (SVR; AUC=0.91, P=0.001).

Conclusion

As in genotype 1 patients, there is large variation in IFN responsiveness, including the presence of resistant strains, in genotype 4 patients. A 24 h log10 change after 10 MU IFN-α2b is an excellent predictor of SVR on PEG-IFNα2a/RBV combination therapy. This test may be useful to obtain homogeneous groups for clinical studies and could help in clinical decision making.

Hepatitis C genotype 4: What we know and what we don't yet know

Hepatitis C virus genotype 4 (HCV-4) is the most common variant of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the Middle East and Africa, particularly Egypt. This region has the highest prevelance of HCV worldwide, with more than 90% of infections due to genotype 4. HCV-4 has recently spread in several Western countries, particularly in Europe, due to variations in population structure, immigration, and routes of transmission. The features of HCV-4 infection and the appropriate therapeutic regimen have not been well characterized. This review discusses the virology, epidemiology, natural history, histology, clinical data, and treatment options for patients with HCV-4 infections. Early reports on the treatment of patients with chronic HCV-4 with conventional interferon (IFN)-alpha monotherapy indicated poor rates of sustained viral response (SVR), which improved slightly when combined with ribavirin. Pegylated IFN and ribavirin combination therapy has dramatically improved the response rates, with recent clinical trials showing rates that exceed 60%. These data can now be used as a platform for further research to define optimal treatment duration and predictors of SVR in patients with HCV-4 infection.

CONCLUSION

HCV-4 infection is spreading beyond its strongholds in Africa and the Middle East. Recent clinical trials show that HCV-4 is not difficult to treat, as the response to treatment may be at an intermediate level compared with genotype 1 and genotypes 2 or 3. Tailored treatment options that are comparable to the treatment approaches for genotype 1, 2, and 3 patients to optimize treatment for each patient are now being developed.

Sustained virologic response to peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin in 335 patients with chronic hepatitis C: a tertiary care center experience

BACKGROUND/AIM

This retrospective study assessed the efficacy, safety, and the predictors of sustained viral response (SVR) to a 48-week-course of peginterferon alpha-2a (Pegasys) and ribavirin combination therapy in 335 consecutive Saudi patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical, biochemical, and virological parameters were collected at time 0 (pretreatment) and at 12, 24, 48, and 72 weeks posttreatment. The mean +/- SD age was 49.1 +/- 13.0 years; 229 (68.4%) were males, mean +/- SD body mass index was 27.8 +/- 7.4, 85 (25.4%) were diabetic, 25 (7.5%) had renal impairment, 136 (40.6%) had previously received interferon +/- ribavirin therapy, and 247 (73.7%) underwent pretreatment liver biopsy. Patients with genotypes 1, 2 or 3, 4 and mixed genotype were 60 (22.15%), 30 (11.0%), 148 (54.4%), and 34 (12.5%), respectively.

RESULTS

Early viral response (>or=2-log10 HCV-RNA decline 12 weeks posttreatment) was achieved in 253 (75.3%). Patients who completed 48 weeks of treatment were 292 (87.1%); of these, 121 (75.6%) achieved ETVR, 161 (55.1%) continued to have SVR and 60 (20.5%) had a viral relapse following end-of-treatment response, that is 48.1 and 17.9% of all patients (n = 335), respectively. Nonresponders (NR) were 71 (24.3%) patients and 43 (12.8%) were unable to complete treatment (due to side effects or loss to follow up). Compared to the relapsers, patients with SVR were significantly younger (P = 0.000), nondiabetics (P = 0.015), had higher serum albumin (P = 0.007), had less pretreatment inflammatory grade (P = 0.011), infected with genotypes 2 or 3 (P = 0.014), and treatment-naïve patients (P = 0.001). However, in stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis, only treatment naiveté and low pretreatment inflammatory score were the independent predictors of SVR (P = 0.005 and P = 0.018, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy, if tolerated and completed, is effective in treating chronic HCV patients, especially those with no previous interferon therapy and lower pretreatment inflammatory grade.

Full-length genome sequences of hepatitis C virus subtype 4f

Hepatitis C virus genotype 4 (HCV-4) is very common in central Africa, prevalent in the Middle East, and is becoming increasingly frequent among southern Europeans. We have determined the complete nucleotide sequences of HCV-4f strains and investigated their phylogenetic relationships with other genotypes. We amplified the complete genome of two HCV subtype 4f strains, IFBT84 and IFBT88. The HCV-4f strains have a total of 9181 and 9304 nt, respectively, including the 5' untranslated region followed by a single open reading frame. There was no evidence of genomic recombination in the IFBT84 and IFBT88 strains. The sequences of the HCV-4f strain genomes are closer to those of HCV-1b than to genotypes 2, 3, 5 and 6. It is important to know the full-length sequences of HCV-4 subtypes in order to classify them correctly and to obtain more detailed knowledge about HCV epidemiology and sensitivity to interferon.

Improving outcome in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 4

Several factors influence treatment outcomes among patients with chronic hepatitis C. A trend is growing to adapt an individualized treatment approach to optimize treatment outcomes among chronic hepatitis C patients. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype is an important factor that determines treatment outcomes among patients with chronic hepatitis C. HCV has six genotypes, and genotype 4 (G4) accounts for 20% of all global HCV infections. Patients with G4 are underrepresented in clinical trials involving patients with chronic hepatitis C because most patients infected with G4 are in Egypt, Africa, and Middle Eastern countries. Therefore, there is little information about the predictors of response to standard treatment among chronic hepatitis C patients with HCV G4. Initial evidence suggested that patients with G4 HCV are as difficult to treat as patients with G1; however, recent evidence suggests that the response rates to treatment among patients with G4 may be better than those with G1 but not those with G2 or G3. This review discusses the clinical data among patients with G4 and assesses the impact of an individualized approach on improved treatment outcomes in these patients.

Clinical and pathological characteristics and response to combination therapy of genotype 4 chronic hepatitis C patients: experience from a spanish center

This observational study evaluated the characteristics of genotype 4 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients and their response to combination therapy in Spain. 383 patients with CHC, 44 with genotype 4-HCV infection, were investigated. Nineteen genotype 4-HCV infected patients received IFNalpha-2b (3 MU three times weekly) plus ribavirin (1-1.2 g/day) and ten received Peg-IFNalpha-2b (1.5 microg/kg/week) plus ribavirin (1-1.2 g/day) for 12 months. A sustained virological response (SVR) was evaluated. Genotype 4-HCV was detected in 11.5% of patients, and was significantly associated with a higher proportion of infection through intravenous drug use (46% vs 11%; p<0.001), a higher alcohol intake (35% vs. 7%; p<0.001), higher proportion of anti-HBc positivity (41% vs. 22%; p<0.05), lower ALT (87+/-50 vs. 139+/-142 IU/L; p<0.001) and AST (53+/-30 vs. 85+/-126 IU/L; p<0.001) levels, lower viremia (4.1 +/- 7.7 (x 10(5)) vs . 7.3 +/- 9.8 IU(x 10(5) )/mL) p<0.05) and less fibrosis (stage 3-4 in 21% vs. 32%; p<0.06). Sixteen (55%) out of the 29 patients treated with combination therapy achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) while 10 (36%) were non-responders and 3 (9% relapsed. In conclusion, the lower stage of fibrosis, lower viremia and higher SVR rate than genotype 1 suggest a less aggressive pattern of diseased caused by this genotype.

The epidemiology of hepatitis C infection in the United States

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the United States has remained constant from 1988 through 2002, although the peak age of infection has increased. While the number of new HCV cases is declining, the rates of HCV-associated morbidity and mortality are increasing. We reviewed the risk factors for HCV infection, the laboratory methods used to diagnose it, the dynamics of disease progression, and the natural history of HCV infection.

METHODS

Medline searches were performed using the key word HCV, together with incidence, risk factors, demographics, diagnostic methods, disease progression, natural history, normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT), fibrosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

RESULTS

Three characteristics-abnormal serum ALT, history of injection drug use, and blood transfusion before 1992-identified 85% of HCV-positive individuals 20-59 years old. About 75%-85% of acutely infected individuals progress to chronic infection, with up to 20% developing liver cirrhosis over 20-25 years, putting them at increased risk for end-stage liver disease and/or HCC. HCV-associated cirrhosis is the leading cause of liver transplantation in the United States. Rates of infection are higher in non-Hispanic blacks than in non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans and higher in men than in women. In the United States, over 70% of HCV-infected individuals are infected with genotype 1.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV infection is more prevalent than human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis B virus infection and is particularly common among certain demographic groups. Individual rates of fibrosis progression vary, but identification of host and viral characteristics associated with disease progression may reveal the mechanisms of HCV-associated hepatic fibrosis/cirrhosis.

Epidemiological characteristics and response to peginterferon plus ribavirin treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection

Hepatitis C virus genotype 4 (HCV-4) infection is progressing in Europe, where epidemiology and sustained virological response (SVR) seem to be different than in the Middle East. We analysed epidemiological features and SVR rates in a retrospective study of 1532 HCV-4-infected patients, including 1056 patients infected in France, 227 immigrants infected in Egypt and 249 in sub-Saharan Africa. SVR rates were assessed in 242 naive patients of the 1532, who received peginterferon plus ribavirin for 48 weeks. HCV subtype 4a or 4d was the most common among patients infected in France, where the predominant route of transmission was intravenous drug abuse. The 4a subtype was largely predominant (93%) among patients infected in Egypt, where transmission was mostly because of parenteral treatment for schistosomiasis. More than seven different subtypes and no predominant route of infection were found in patients infected in sub-Saharan Africa. Liver fibrosis was significantly less severe in patients infected in France and Africa than in patients infected in Egypt. SVR rates were higher in patients infected in Egypt, compared with those infected in France or Africa (54.9%, 40.3% and 32.4%, respectively, P < 0.05). An overall better response was observed in patients infected with the 4a subtype. In multivariate analysis, two factors were associated independently with SVR: the Egyptian origin of transmission and the absence of severe fibrosis. In conclusion, the distribution of HCV-4 subtypes varies with the geographical origin of transmission and affects the SVR following antiviral treatment.

Response rates to pegylated interferon and ribavirin in HCV/HIV coinfection: a research synthesis

Several recent trials have determined varying rates of response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (peg-IFN + RIB) in hepatitis C virus (HCV)/human immunodeficiency virus-coinfected patients. We sought to identify a pooled response rate and sources of interstudy variability. A literature search was conducted to identify randomized or prospective studies evaluating response rates to peg-IFN + RIB in coinfected patients. A Bayesian hierarchical model was used to estimate overall response rate. Between-study variance was calculated and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Meta-regression was employed to identify sources of between-study variability. The literature search yielded seven studies of 146, which matched keywords and inclusion criteria. The combined patient total was 784. Individual intention-to-treat response rates ranged from 27.3% to 44.2%. The pooled Bayesian estimate of percent response was 33.3%. Significant interstudy heterogeneity was detected. Meta-regression yielded no significant effects of covariates on response rate. Subanalyses by CD4+, HCV viral load and genotype yielded sustained virological response (SVR) odds ratios of 0.73 for low CD4+, 0.41 for high viral load and 0.30 for genotype 1/4. The pooled response rate is not attributable to any one study. Response is poor compared with HCV-monoinfected patients. Interstudy variability is not satisfactorily explained by factors influencing individual response, but may be due to differences between studies unavailable for inclusion in this analysis. However, both genotype 1/4 and high HCV viral load at baseline were significantly associated with a reduction in odds of SVR in pooled subanalysis. Improved treatments are needed in coinfected patients, especially with genotype 1/4 and high viral load.

Effectiveness of interferon plus ribavirin combination in the treatment of naive patients with hepatitis C virus type 5. A French multicentre retrospective study

AIM

To assess the rate of sustained virological response in naïve hepatitis C virus-type 5 patients treated by standard interferon or pegylated-interferon [corrected] (peg-interferon) and ribavirin combination for 48 weeks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 87 hepatitis C virus patients were included from 12 centres in France; 28 patients received interferon plus ribavirin and 59 were treated with peg-interferon plus ribavirin.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were: mean age 58 +/- 11 years, sex ratio 1, 66% had metavir fibrosis score >or=F2, 21% were cirrhotics and 53% had pretherapeutic viral load >or=800,000 IU/mL. Sustained virological response was achieved in 64% and 58% of hepatitis C virus-5 patients treated with interferon and peg-interferon, respectively (NS). In adherent patients, sustained virological response was obtained in 75% of patients. Sustained virological response in hepatitis C virus-5 patients (60%) was significantly higher than sustained virological response in hepatitis C virus-1 patients (37%) (P = 0.0499) and not significantly different from sustained virological response in hepatitis C virus-2-3 patients (63%) (P = 0.8098).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy is effective in 60% of hepatitis C virus-5-infected patients. Sustained virological response seems better in hepatitis C virus-5 patients than in hepatitis C virus-1 patients, and is similar to that of hepatitis C virus-2-3 patients. More studies are needed to determine optimal duration of treatment in hepatitis C virus-5 patients.

Serum islet cell autoantibodies during interferon alpha treatment in patients with HCV-genotype 4 chronic hepatitis

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of end-stage liver disease worldwide and HCV genotype 4 (HCV4) is predominant in African and Middle Eastern countries. It is well established that interferon-a (IFNa) treatment for HCV may trigger serum autoantibodies against pancreatic islet cells (ICA) in a subgroup of patients. Available data on the incidence of ICA during IFNa therapy for chronic HCV4 infection are not conclusive. We investigated the appearance of ICA in 40 naïve Egyptian patients (38 males, 32 +/- 6 years) with histologically defined chronic HCV4 infection undergoing IFNa treatment at a dose of 9-million U/week for 24 weeks. Serum samples were collected at baseline and following IFNa therapy and ICA were detected using indirect immunofluorescence. Baseline evaluation indicated that 2/40 (5%) patients had detectable serum ICA. After the completion of the treatment scheme, 12/38 (32%) previously ICA negative patients became ICA positive; however, no patient developed impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or diabetes during follow-up. In conclusion, we submit that IFNa treatment for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) may induce serum ICA in one-third of Egyptian patients with HCV4. These autoantibodies, however, do not lead to alterations in glucose metabolism.