Prediction of the response to peg-interferon-alfa in patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B using decline of HBV DNA during treatment

Effects of pegylated interferon-α based therapies on functional cure and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma development in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection continues to pose a serious global health threat and a significant socio-economic burden in many areas of the world. Almost all current clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection recommend that eligible patients pursue the optimal treatment endpoint, which is defined as HBsAg loss with or without anti-HBs seroconversion. This review describes the effects of various regimens containing pegylated interferon (peg-IFN)-alpha on functional cure and the outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with CHB. Peg-IFN-α monotherapy is a treatment option recommended by local and international clinical practice guidelines to help more CHB patients achieve a sustained off-treatment virological response, which is particularly appropriate for relatively young patients who demand a finite treatment approach. Peg-IFN-α add-on or sequential therapy in patients who have achieved a suppressed viral load after nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) therapy may offer further benefits on HBeAg seroconversion and HBsAg decline, although the effects of de novo combination therapy with peg-IFN-α and NAs on long-term outcomes remain unclear. Evaluation of baseline and on-treatment predictors is useful for selecting the patients who are likely to achieve additional benefits. Furthermore, some recent studies have shown that peg-IFN-α-based therapy results in better prevention of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially in high-risk patients.

Dynamic prediction of childhood high blood pressure in a population-based birth cohort: a model development study

OBJECTIVES

To develop a dynamic prediction model for high blood pressure at the age of 9-10 years that could be applied at any age between birth and the age of 6 years in community-based child healthcare.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Data were used from 5359 children in a population-based prospective cohort study in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

OUTCOME MEASURE

High blood pressure was defined as systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥95th percentile for gender, age and height. Using multivariable pooled logistic regression, the predictive value of characteristics at birth, and of longitudinal information on the body mass index (BMI) of the child until the age of 6 years, was assessed. Internal validation was performed using bootstrapping.

RESULTS

227 children (4.2%) had high blood pressure at the age of 9-10 years. Final predictors were maternal hypertensive disease during pregnancy, maternal educational level, maternal prepregnancy BMI, child ethnicity, birth weight SD score (SDS) and the most recent BMI SDS. After internal validation, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.65 (prediction at age 3 years) to 0.73 (prediction at age 5-6 years).

CONCLUSIONS

This prediction model may help to monitor the risk of developing high blood pressure in childhood which may allow for early targeted primordial prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Anti-HBV effect of interferon-thymosin α1 recombinant proteins in transgenic Dunaliella salina in vitro and in vivo

The aim of the present study was to investigate the anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) effect of interferon (IFN)-thymosin α1 (TA1) in a transgenic Dunaliella salina (TDS) system in vitro and in vivo. The toxicity of TDS in the HepG2.2.15 cell line was assessed using an MTT assay. The effect of TDS on the secretion of HBV early antigen (HBeAg) and HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) in culture supernatants was measured using ELISA. In addition, HBV-DNA was analyzed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Drug treatment experiments were performed in vivo on ducks congenitally infected with duck HBV (DHBV). The drug was administered once daily for 21 continuous days. Blood was drawn from all ducks prior to treatment, following treatment for 7, 14 and 21 days, and following drug withdrawal for 5 days. Serum DHBV-DNA was determined using quantitative PCR. In addition, the histology of duck liver tissues was assessed using hematoxylin and eosin, and orcein staining. The results demonstrated that TDS suppressed cell viability and HBsAg and HBeAg secretion in HepG2.2.15 cells. Furthermore, the treatment index values for HBsAg and HBeAg following TDS treatment were 2.96 and 3.07 respectively, which were greater than those of the IFN-α treated group. In addition, the DHBV-infected duck model experiments indicated that serum DHBV-DNA levels were significantly decreased in the group of TDS (20 g/kg) following treatment for 7, 14 and 21 days compared with the control group. Following withdrawal of the drug for 5 days, the levels of DHBV-DNA did not relapse in the medium and high dose groups of TDS (10 and 20 g/kg, respectively). Histological analysis of duck liver also demonstrated that TDS and IFN-α treatment alleviated inflammation and HBsAg signals in duck livers. In conclusion, TDS markedly suppresses HBV replication in vitro and in vivo and its anti-HBV effect is greater than that of IFN-α.

Prediction model for sustained hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion to peginterferon alfa-2a in chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Clinically applicable models to predict hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) response to peginterferon (PEG-IFN) are scarce. This study aimed to develop simple scoring systems, based on multiple parameters, for predicting sustained HBeAg seroconversion to PEG-IFN.

METHODS

Eighty-five treatment-naïve patients with HBeAg-positive CHB underwent 52-week PEG-IFN treatment and 24-week follow-up. Logistic regression analysis assessed parameters at baseline and weeks 12, 24, and 52 to predict HBeAg seroconversion at week 24 off-treatment. The best three predictors at each time point were included in prediction models of PEG-IFN therapy efficacy.

RESULTS

The three most meaningful predictors were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 5 × ULN, HBeAg ≤ 500 S/CO, and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) > 10.7 S/CO at baseline; HBeAg ≤ 20 S/CO, anti-HBc > 11.7 S/CO, and HBeAg decline > 1 log₁₀ S/CO at week 12; ALT > 2 × ULN, HBeAg ≤ 15 S/CO, and anti-HBc > 10.4 S/CO at week 24; HBeAg ≤ 5 S/CO, anti-HBc > 11.1 S/CO, and hepatitis B virus DNA decline > 2 log₁₀ copies/mL at week 52. Parameters meeting optimal cutoff thresholds were scored 1 or otherwise scored 0. For total scores of 0 versus 3 at baseline and weeks 12, 24, and 52, response rates were 6.3%, 12.5%, 0%, and 0% versus 90.0%, 83.3%, 76.9%, and 86.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully established prediction models for PEG-IFN response in HBeAg-positive CHB.

Prediction of Preadolescent Overweight and Poor Cardiometabolic Outcome in Children up to 6 Years of Age: Research Protocol

Background

Dynamic risk estimations may enable targeting primary prevention of overweight and overweight-related adverse cardiometabolic outcome in later life, potentially serving as a valuable addition to universal primary prevention. This approach seems particularly promising in young children, as body mass index (BMI) changes at a young age are highly predictive of these outcomes, and parental lifestyle interventions at a young age are associated with improved long-term outcome.

Objective

This paper describes the design of our study, which aims to develop digitized tools that can be implemented in the Dutch Child Health Care (CHC) system or by pediatricians for children up to 6 years of age. These tools will enable (1) dynamically predicting the development of overweight, hypertension or prehypertension, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) values, and high total cholesterol to HDL-C ratio by early adolescence and (2) identifying children who are likely to have poor cardiometabolic outcome by the age of 5-6 years and by the age of 10 years.

Methods

Data will be obtained from the Generation R (n=7893) and Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy (PIAMA; n=3963) cohorts, two Dutch prenatally recruited cohorts. We will select candidate predictors that can be assessed during the first visit and/or during subsequent visits to the CHC center or pediatrician, including sex; parental age, education level, and BMI; smoking exposure; ethnicity; birth weight; gestational age; breastfeeding versus formula feeding; and growth data through the age of 6 years. We will design dynamic prediction models that can be updated with new information obtained during subsequent CHC visits, allowing each measurement to be added to the model. Performance of the model will be assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. Finally, the model will be validated both internally and externally using the combined cohort data and then converted into a computer-assisted tool called ProCOR (Prediction Of Child CardiOmetabolic Risk).

Results

This is an ongoing research project financed by the Dutch government. The first results are expected in 2016.

Conclusions

This study may contribute to the national implementation of digitized tools for assessing the risk of overweight and related cardiometabolic outcome in young children, enabling targeted primary prevention, ultimately yielding relevant health gains and improved resource allocation.

Toll-IL1 receptor-mediated innate immune responses vary across HBV genotype and predict treatment response to pegylated-IFN in HBeAg-positive CHB patients

Patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) have suppressed TLR2 expression, function and cytokine production. The aim of this study was to explore the importance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype in innate immune responses and investigate whether Toll-like receptor (TLR) expression/function has potential roles as predictive biomarkers of successful therapy with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) therapy of HBeAg seroconversion in HBeAg-positive patients. We showed that as early as 4 weeks after initiation of Peg-IFN, future HBeAg seroconverters had significantly elevated levels of TLR2 expression on monocytes. TLR2-associated IL-6 production at baseline and week 4 of therapy and TLR4 IL-6 production at week 4 were also markedly elevated in HBeAg seroconverters. HBV genotype also influenced treatment response, with genotypes A and B more likely to seroconvert than D. We were able to demonstrate that these differences were due in part to the interaction of the specific HBeAg proteins with TLR pathway adaptor molecules, and these interactions were genotype dependent. HBeAg-mediated modulation of TLR signalling was also observed in Huh7 cells, following stimulation with Pam3Cys. Importantly, the addition of IFN-α to TLR2-stimulated cells cotransfected with an HBeAg expression plasmid reversed HBeAg-mediated suppression of hepatocytes. These findings demonstrate that patients with an activated inflammatory response are much more likely to respond to IFN therapy, with TLR responses showing promise as potential biomarkers of HBeAg seroconversion in this setting. Furthermore, our findings suggest there is differential genotype-specific HBeAg suppression of innate signalling pathways which may account for some of the clinical differences observed across the CHB spectrum.

Models for predicting hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion in response to interferon-α in chronic hepatitis B patients

AIM: To develop models to predict hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion in response to interferon (IFN)-α treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients.

METHODS: We enrolled 147 treatment-naïve HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients in China and analyzed variables after initiating IFN-α1b treatment. Patients were tested for serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hepatitis B virus-DNA, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen, HBeAg, antibody to hepatitis B e antigen (anti-HBe), and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) at baseline and 12 wk, 24 wk, and 52 wk after initiating treatment. We performed univariate analysis to identify response predictors among the variables. Multivariate models to predict treatment response were constructed at baseline, 12 wk, and 24 wk.

RESULTS: At baseline, the 3 factors correlating most with HBeAg seroconversion were serum ALT level > 4 × the upper limit of normal (ULN), HBeAg ≤ 500 S/CO, and anti-HBc > 11.4 S/CO. At 12 wk, the 3 factors most associated with HBeAg seroconversion were HBeAg level ≤ 250 S/CO, decline in HBeAg > 1 log₁₀ S/CO, and anti-HBc > 11.8 S/CO. At 24 wk, the 3 factors most associated with HBeAg seroconversion were HBeAg level ≤ 5 S/CO, anti-HBc > 11.4 S/CO, and decline in HBeAg > 2 log₁₀ S/CO. Each variable was assigned a score of 1, a score of 0 was given if patients did not have any of the 3 variables. The 3 factors most strongly correlating with HBeAg seroconversion at each time point were used to build models to predict the outcome after IFN-α treatment. When the score was 3, the response rates at the 3 time points were 57.7%, 83.3%, and 84.0%, respectively. When the score was 0, the response rates were 2.9%, 0.0%, and 2.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Models with good negative and positive predictive values were developed to calculate the probability of response to IFN-α therapy.

HBsAg quantification to optimize treatment monitoring in chronic hepatitis B patients

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels in serum have been shown to reflect active intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and to have additional value as a marker of on-treatment efficacy. In the past few years, immunoassays to quantify HBsAg have been developed to monitor HBsAg kinetics during treatment. Although HBsAg quantification cannot replace HBV DNA measurement in clinical practice, the combined use of HBsAg quantification and HBV DNA measurements could help predict treatment outcome. One of the most important results of the studies in this new marker is that a decline in HBsAg titres during pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) treatment is a strong predictor of response so that a 'week 12 stopping rule' could be established for both Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. However, the positive predictive value (PPV) for a sustained viral response (SVR) remains low. The role of HBsAg measurements during nucloes(t)ides analogue (NAs) treatment is unclear. It may be a useful marker for stopping NAs by limiting the chance of relapse or for add-on strategies. Monitoring serum HBsAg levels in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients during treatment may provide significant complementary information to HBV DNA measurements.

Enhanced levels of interleukin-8 are associated with hepatitis B virus infection and resistance to interferon-alpha therapy

The objective of this study was to analyze the expression levels of IL-8 in serum and liver tissues from patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection and to investigate whether IL-8 may antagonize interferon-alpha (IFN-α) antiviral activity against HBV. IL-8 expression in serum was determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and fluorescence-based quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) was used to measure IL-8 mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in patients with CHB. IL-8 protein expression was detected in liver biopsy tissues by immunohistochemistry. In addition, the differences in serum IL-8 and PBMCs mRNA levels were also observed in patients with different anti-viral responses to IFN-α. Compared to normal controls, serum IL-8 protein and mRNA levels were increased in CHB patients, IL-8 levels were positively correlated with the severity of liver inflammation/fibrosis. Moreover, serum IL-8 protein and mRNA levels were positively correlated with serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and negatively correlated with serum prealbumin (PA) level. IL-8 expression was mainly located in portal area of liver tissues and was increased with the severity of liver inflammation and fibrosis stage. The expression serum and mRNA levels of IL-8 in the CHB patients with a complete response to IFN-α are significantly lower than that of the patients with non-response to IFN-α treatment. It is suggested that IL-8 might play important roles in the pathogenesis of CHB. Moreover, interferon resistance may be related to the up-regulation of IL-8 expression in the patients did not respond to IFN-α treatment.

Relationship between hepatitis B virus genotype B and C and response to interferon therapy in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Previous studies examining the relationship between hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype B and C and response to interferon therapy in Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B patients have yielded conflicting results. We aim to summarize data to reach firm conclusions on the role of HBV genotype B and C in response to interferon therapy.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant articles published up to March 2013. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by fixed- or random-effects models. Heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were also assessed.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were identified. All studies except for those evaluating the rate of end-of-treatment HBeAg seroconversion exhibited significant heterogeneity. There were significant differences in rates of end-of-treatment alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization, HBV DNA negative, and HBeAg seroconversion between the genotype B and genotype C groups, but not in HBeAg clearance. The pooled results showed higher rates of sustained ALT normalization (OR = 2.24, 95%CI 1.53-3.27), HBV DNA negative (OR = 2.60, 95%CI 1.65-4.12), HBeAg clearance (OR = 2.13, 95%CI 1.29-3.52) and HBeAg seroconversion (OR = 1.95, 95%CI 1.27-2.98) in patients with genotype B than those with genotype C. The sensitivity analysis did not alter the effects observed in the primary analysis. There was no evidence of publication bias except for HBeAg clearance rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current meta-analysis indicate that HBV genotype B patients receiving interferon therapy respond better to treatment compared with genotype C patients, but this needs to be further examined.

The natural course of chronic hepatitis B virus infection and its management

Chronic infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) runs a long natural course during which underlying changes in liver histology can progress to cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation, as well as to hepatocellular carcinoma. Therapeutic intervention is currently aiming at suppression of HBV replication by applying a number of pharmacological agents. For an optimum use of available therapies, good knowledge of the natural course of chronic infection, as well as of the role played by several viral, host, and environmental factors, is mandatory. The larger part of this chapter deals with how to treat the various subsets of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), using mainly three first-line drugs: pegylated interferon-α2a, entecavir, and tenofovir, administered either in finite courses or indefinitely. The frequency of virological, serological, biochemical, and histological responses in the various subsets of patients, both during and after stopping treatment, is reviewed. It is stressed that the application of the highly potent antivirals entecavir and tenofovir, with acceptable safety records and with a high barrier to HBV resistance, represents major progress in the treatment of CHB. Despite the hitherto important developments in the treatment of viral hepatitis B, clinical cure of chronic HBV infection with HBsAg loss is achievable only in a few treated patients while eradication of HBV infection appears unrealistic. Development of new pharmacological agents acting at multiple targets of the replicative cycle of HBV may achieve higher efficacy and even cure of CHB.

Monitoring prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury

The choice of disease-specific versus generic scales is common to many fields of medicine. In the area of traumatic brain injury, evidence is coming forward that disease-specific prognostic models and disease-specific scoring systems are preferable in the intensive care setting. In monitoring prognosis, the use of a calibration belt in validation studies potentially provides accurate and intuitively attractive insight into performance. This approach deserves further empirical evaluation of its added value as well as its limitations.

Response-guided peginterferon therapy in hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B using serum hepatitis B surface antigen levels

On-treatment levels of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) may predict response to peginterferon (PEG-IFN) therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but previously proposed prediction rules have shown limited external validity. We analyzed 803 HBeAg-positive patients treated with PEG-IFN in three global studies with available HBsAg measurements. A stopping-rule based on absence of a decline from baseline was compared to a prediction-rule that uses HBsAg levels of <1,500 IU/mL and >20,000 IU/mL to identify patients with high and low probabilities of response. Patients with an HBsAg level <1,500 IU/mL at week 12 achieved response (HBeAg loss with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at 6 months posttreatment) in 45%. At week 12, patients without a decline in HBsAg achieved a response in 14%, compared to only 6% of patients with HBsAg >20,000 IU/mL, but performance varied across HBV genotype. In patients treated with PEG-IFN monotherapy (n = 465), response rates were low in patients with genotypes A or D if there was no decline of HBsAg by week 12 (negative predictive value [NPV]: 97%-100%), and in patients with genotypes B or C if HBsAg at week 12 was >20,000 IU/mL (NPV: 92%-98%). At week 24, nearly all patients with HBsAg >20,000 IU/mL failed to achieve a response, irrespective of HBV genotype (NPV for response and HBsAg loss 99% and 100%).

CONCLUSION

HBsAg is a strong predictor of response to PEG-IFN in HBeAg-positive CHB. HBV genotype-specific stopping-rules may be considered at week 12, but treatment discontinuation is indicated in all patients with HBsAg >20,000 IU/mL at week 24, irrespective of HBV genotype.

Establishment and application of hepatitis B virus persistent replication model in IFNAR(-/-) mouse

The type I interferon and IFNAR play an important role in hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and anti-HBV therapy. However, its mechanism of action is still poorly understood. To gain more insights into the role of type I interferon and type I interferon receptor (IFNAR) in HBV infection, we established an HBV persistent replication IFNAR knockout (IFNAR(-/-)) mouse model and preliminarily applied this model. At first, the progeny of IFNAR(-/-) mouse was reproduced. Then hydrodynamic injection with pAAV/HBV1.2 plasmid was conducted to establish the persistent HBV replication IFNAR(-/-) mouse model. At last, we applied this model to evaluate the effect of nucleoside analogues entecavir (ETV) on HBV replication. It was found that there was no difference in the serum HBsAg and HBeAg levels and HBcAg expression in the liver tissue between the ETV treated groups and normal saline (NS) treated group, but the serum HBV DNA levels were significantly suppressed 10, 25, 40 and 55 days after the ETV treatment [P=0.035, P=0.00, P=0.149 and P=0.084, IFNAR knockout (KO) control group vs. C57BL/6 ETV groups, respectively; P=0.081, P=0.001, P=0.243 and P=0.147, IFNAR KO control group vs. IFNAR KO ETV groups, respectively]. Interestingly, there was no difference in serum HBV DNA levels between the ETV treated IFNAR(-/-) and C57BL/6 mice. This result suggests that HBV suppression during ETV treatments doesn't depend on type I interferon and IFNAR. Collectively, persistent HBV replication IFNAR(-/-) mouse model that we established is a useful and convenient tool to detect the function of the type I interferon and IFNAR in HBV infection and anti-HBV treatments.

Influence of age and HBeAg status on the correlation between HBV DNA and hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation between serum HBV DNA level and the severity of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

Liver function, serological markers of HBV and serum HBV DNA quantification were assayed in 215 CHB patients who also underwent liver biopsy. Liver pathology was regarded as the evaluation criteria to evaluate the correlation between serum HBV DNA level and the severity of liver inflammation and fibrosis.

RESULTS

Of the 215 patients, 136 were HBeAg-positive and 79 were HBeAg-negative; 134 patients had mild hepatic inflammation and fibrosis and 81 had significant hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in pathological diagnosis. We found that positive correlation between the severity of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis and serum HBV DNA level was only present in HBeAg-negative patients but not HBeAg-positive patients (P < 0.001). Patients' age was a key factor influencing the correlation between serum HBV DNA level and the severity of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. the cutoff values to predict the severity of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis were 33.5 and 36 years, respectively. Using 35 years as the cutoff value, positive correlation between serum HBV DNA level and hepatic inflammation and fibrosis was observed in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients aged ≥ 35 years (P < 0.05), however no correlation was observed in HBeAg-positive patients aged <35 years.

CONCLUSIONS

There was positive correlation between serum HBV DNA level and hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients' aged ≥ 35 years, but in patients aged <35 years, positive correlation was only observed in HBeAg-negative patients.

IL28B genotype is not useful for predicting treatment outcome in Asian chronic hepatitis B patients treated with pegylated interferon-α

BACKGROUND AND AIM

IL28B genotype predicts response to pegylated interferon (peg-IFN)-based therapy in chronic hepatitis C. However, the utility of IL28B genotyping in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) cohorts treated with peg-IFN is unclear. It was investigated whether IL28B genotype is associated with peg-IFN treatment outcomes in a predominantly Asian CHB cohort.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of CHB patients treated with 48 weeks of peg-IFN monotherapy. IL28B genotype (rs12979860) was determined (TaqMan allelic discrimination kit). Baseline hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA, alanine aminotransferase, and liver histology were available. The primary end-points were HBV e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion with HBV-DNA < 2000 IU/mL 24 weeks post-therapy (HBeAg-positive patients) and HBV-DNA < 2000 IU/mL 24 weeks after peg-IFN (HBeAg-negative patients). The association between IL28B genotype and peg-IFN outcomes was analyzed.

RESULTS

IL28B genotype was determined for 96 patients. Eighty-eight percent were Asian, 62% were HBeAg positive, and 13% were METAVIR stage F3-4. Median follow-up time was 39.3 months. The majority of patients carried the CC IL28B genotype (84%). IL28B genotype did not differ according to HBeAg status. The primary end-points were achieved in 27% of HBeAg-positive and 61% of HBeAg-negative patients. There was no association between IL28B genotype and the primary end-point in either group. Furthermore, there was no difference in HBeAg loss alone, HBV surface antigen, alanine aminotransferase normalization, or on-treatment HBV-DNA levels according to IL28B genotype.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of a small possible effect size and high frequency in Asian populations, IL28B genotyping is likely to have, at best, limited clinical utility for predicting peg-IFN treatment outcome for CHB patients in the Asia-Pacific region.

Management of chronic hepatitis B: Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver consensus guidelines

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a dynamic disease that is influenced by host and virological factors. The management of CHB has become more complex with the increasing use of long-term oral nucleos⁄tide analogue antiviral therapies and the availability of novel diagnostic assays. Furthermore, there is often a lack of robust data to guide optimal management such as the selection of therapy, duration of treatment, potential antiviral side effects and the treatment of special populations. In November 2011, the Canadian Liver Foundation and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver convened a consensus conference to review the literature and analyze published data, including other international expert guidelines on CHB management. The proceedings of the consensus conference are summarized and provide updated clinical practice guidelines to assist Canadian health care providers in the prevention, diagnosis, assessment and treatment of CHB.

Hepatitis B e antigen levels and response to peginterferon: influence of precore and basal core promoter mutants

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) levels may predict response to peginterferon (PEG-IFN) but are also influenced by presence of precore (PC) and core promoter (BCP) mutants. HBeAg was measured in 214 patients treated with PEG-IFN±lamivudine for 52weeks. Patients were classified at baseline as wildtype (WT) or non-WT (detectable PC/BCP mutants). Combined response (HBeAg loss with HBV DNA<2000IU/mL), HBeAg response (HBeAg loss with HBV DNA>2000IU/mL) or non-response was assessed at week78. Mean baseline HBeAg levels were 2.65logIU/mL in combined responders, 2.48 in non-responders and 2.24 in HBeAg responders (p=0.034). Baseline HBeAg levels were not associated with combined response after stratification by WT/non-WT. Within the PEG-IFN monotherapy group (n=104), patients with HBeAg<1logIU/mL at week24 had a higher probability of combined response (29% versus 12%, p=0.041). After stratification by WT/non-WT, WT patients with HBeAg<1logIU/mL at week24 had a probability of combined response of 78% (versus 19% in patients with >1logIU/mL, p<0.001), whereas no difference in response rates was observed in non-WT patients (p=0.848). The relationship between HBeAg levels and response to PEG-IFN depends upon the presence of PC/BCP mutants. HBeAg levels should therefore not be routinely used to select patients for PEG-IFN, nor for monitoring of therapy.

Combination therapy with peginterferonα-2a and adefovir dipivoxil for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: A prospective multicenter cohort study

AIM: To analyze the efficacy and safety of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) as an add-on therapy in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who have a suboptimal response to peginterferonα-2a (Peg-IFNα-2a) treatment for 48 weeks, and to evaluate the predictors of response to the combination therapy.

METHODS: Ninety HBeAg-positive CHB patients who had been being treated with Peg-IFNα-2a for 24 weeks and had HBV DNA ≥ 2.0 × 10³ IU/mL and HBV DNA decrease ≥ 2 log10 IU/mL were randomly assigned either to add on ADV (group A1, 45 patients) or to continue Peg-IFNα-2a monotherapy (group A2, 45 patients).Other 55 patients with HBV DNA < 2.0 × 10³ IU/mL were assigned to continue Peg-IFNα-2a monotherapy. The levels of HBV DNA, HBsAg, HBeAg and ALT at baseline and during treatment were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS: The rates of undetectable serum HBV DNA at weeks 36 and 48 were highest in group B, followed by group A1 and group A2 (P < 0.01). HBV DNA level at week 36 declined more significantly in group B than in group A1, and in group A1 than in group A2 (both P < 0.01). At week 48, HBV DNA level declined more significantly in groups A1 than in group A2 (P < 0.01), while there was no significant difference between group A1 and B. Rates of HBeAg loss and HBeAg seroconversion in groups A1, A2 and B were not statistically different at weeks 36 and 48. Amplitude of HBeAg seroconversion rate from week 24 to week 48 in group A1 was higher than those in group A2 and group B (both P < 0.01). There were 4, 1 and 2 cases of HBsAg reduction in group A1, group A2 and group B at week 48, respectively. Rates of ALT normalization in group A1, group A2 and group B were not statistically different at weeks 36 and 48. All the patients finished 48-week therapy without severe adverse effects. Rate of undetectable serum HBV DNA in group A1 was only associated with the amplitude of HBV DNA level at week 36. HBV DNA reduction levels at week 36 from baseline or week 24 could predict undetectable serum HBV DNA at week 48 with a PPV of 90.5% and 95.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: ADV as an add-on therapy in patients with HBeAg-positive CHB who have a suboptimal response to Peg-IFNα-2a treatment for 48 weeks could improve HBeAg seroconversion rate and undetectable HBV DNA rate with tolerable adverse effects. HBV DNA reduction levels at week 36 from baseline or week 24 could predict the viral response to the combination therapy at week 48.

Is there any value to hepatitis B virus genotype analysis?

Hepatitis B may cause a varying spectrum of diseases ranging from an asymptomatic or mild anicteric acute illness, to severe or fulminant hepatitis. Similarly, the outcome of chronic hepatitis B is variable. Viral factors associated with outcome of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection include hepatitis B e antigen status, HBV DNA, genotype, and HBV variants. HBV genotypes and subgenotypes have been associated with differences in clinical and virological characteristics, indicating that they may play a role in the virus-host relationship. A total of ten hepatitis B virus genotypes have been defined with a distinct geographical distribution. Hitherto, genotypes A, B, C and D have been studied most extensively. The HBV genotype appears to influence not only the natural history of HBV related liver disease but also the response to HBV treatment. HBV genotypes are also linked with both core promoter and BCP mutations. Progression to chronic infection appears to occur more frequently following acute infection with genotypes A and D than with the other studied genotypes. Genotypes A and B appear to have higher rates of spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion. More advanced liver disease and progression to HCC is more often seen in chronic infection with genotypes C and D in contrast to genotypes A and B. More specifically, genotypes A1, C, B2-B5 and H appear to be associated with more serious complications than genotypes A2, B1 and B6. These observations suggest important pathogenic differences between HBV genotypes. Genotypes A and B have higher response rates to interferon based therapy than genotypes C and D. Knowledge of HBV genotype enables clinicians to identify those patients at increased risk of disease progression whilst aiding the selection of appropriate antiviral therapy. Genotyping and monoclonal subtyping can provide useful information for epidemiological studies. In conclusion, genotyping of chronic HBV infections can help practicing physicians identify those at risk of disease progression and determine optimal anti-viral therapy.

Review article: current antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

The indications and endpoints for treatment of chronic hepatitis B continue to evolve. The aim of the therapy for chronic hepatitis B is to achieve a long-term continued suppression of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to prevent disease progression leading to the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM

To summarise current literature on therapy of chronic hepatitis B, with a focus on indications for therapy, preferred treatment options, and management of resistance and partial responders.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature, with a focus on international guidelines, was performed.

RESULTS

Seven drugs are licensed for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in many countries. The selection of a drug with high potency and low rate of resistance is essential to achieve rapid and long-term viral suppression. The prevention of the sequelae of antiviral drug resistance and appropriate management of viral breakthrough are major goals of current management. The addition or change to an antiviral agent that is not cross-resistant is critical to restore suppression of viral replication for patients with breakthrough resistance. Patient adherence to medication is essential to achieve adequate HBV DNA suppression.

CONCLUSIONS

The current treatment strategy of chronic hepatitis B is now standard: initial selection of entecavir, tenofovir, or peginterferon alfa-2a. Future studies are required to determine if combination therapy using two oral agents or peginterferon with an oral agent with a high genetic barrier to resistance might be superior to standard current monotherapy.

Effects of interferon-α/β on HBV replication determined by viral load

Interferons α and β (IFN-α/β) are type I interferons produced by the host to control microbial infections. However, the use of IFN-α to treat hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients generated sustained response to only a minority of patients. By using HBV transgenic mice as a model and by using hydrodynamic injection to introduce HBV DNA into the mouse liver, we studied the effect of IFN-α/β on HBV in vivo. Interestingly, our results indicated that IFN-α/β could have opposite effects on HBV: they suppressed HBV replication when viral load was high and enhanced HBV replication when viral load was low. IFN-α/β apparently suppressed HBV replication via transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulations. In contrast, IFN-α/β enhanced viral replication by inducing the transcription factor HNF3γ and activating STAT3, which together stimulated HBV gene expression and replication. Further studies revealed an important role of IFN-α/β in stimulating viral growth and prolonging viremia when viral load is low. This use of an innate immune response to enhance its replication and persistence may represent a novel strategy that HBV uses to enhance its growth and spread in the early stage of viral infection when the viral level is low.

Natural history of chronic hepatitis B in Euro-Mediterranean and African countries

Data derived from population, case-control, and cohort studies conducted in several Euro-Mediterranean and African countries disclose impressive similarities in the age and modes of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission and in the prevalence, duration, and outcome of the four phases of the natural history of chronic infection. Perinatal HBV infection is rare while the vast majority of chronic infections originate from horizontal HBV transmission to infants and children. HBeAg loss and seroconversion to anti-HBe occur in a few years time, usually during the second decade of life. HBeAg-negative/anti-HBe-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB), predominates in these countries being 7-9 times more frequent than HBeAg-positive CHB. The predominance of HBeAg-negative CHB is largely linked to the molecular characteristics of HBV genotype D prevailing in European and African countries of the Mediterranean basin and of genotype E and subgenotype A1 that prevail in the other parts of Africa. The molecular characteristics of the African subgenotype A1 differ from those of European subgenotype A2 explaining the fact that patients infected subgenotype A1 demonstrate an earlier loss of HBeAg and seroconversion to anti-HBe during the natural course of HBV infection compared to those infected with subgenotype A2. It is proposed that the molecular characteristics of HBV genotypes and subgenotypes prevailing in Euro-Mediterranean and African countries acting in concert with host and environmental factors largely determine the natural history of chronic HBV infection and its significant differences from countries of HBV genotype C and B and of subgenotype Ae predominance. The knowledge of the natural history of chronic HBV infection in Euro-Mediterranean and African countries combined with wide screening programs for prompt recognition and treatment of chronic HBV infection both in its HBeAg-positive and -negative immune reactive phases can be expected to increase the efficacy of current and future therapeutic strategies.

Antiviral drugs for HBV liver disease

INTRODUCTION

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection affects about 400 million people around the globe and is among the world's leading causes of death. The management of CHB has evolved rapidly, several therapeutic options are now available to prevent both progression of liver disease and anticipated liver morbidity and mortality.

AREAS COVERED

Current treatment modalities for CHB patients, together with suggestions from our own experience are summarized. The most relevant works published in recent years on pegylated interferon, nucleos(t)ides analogues (NUC) and the 2009 update of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Practice Guidelines and the 2009 European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis B are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Pegylated interferon and NUC have advantages and limitations, as short-term interferon treatment induces a sustained virological response in a third of patients, whereas long-term suppressive therapy by NUC rapidly inhibits HBV replication in most patients but drug resistance and safety in the long-term will remain the most important unresolved questions. Careful evaluation of patient history, staging of liver disease and virological factors should guide the start of treatment and the choice to the most appropriate individualized treatment strategy in all CHB patients.

Milestones and perspectives in viral hepatitis B

There have been numerous research milestones since the discovery of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) in the 1960s. These mark major advances in the serology and epidemiology of HBV infection, in identifying the wide clinical spectrum of acute and chronic hepatic diseases as well as the extrahepatic conditions induced by this virus, the molecular biology of the virus including its variants and mutants, its molecular diagnosis and monitoring, the host immune responses to the infecting virus, the pathogenesis and immunopathogenesis of liver disease as well as its natural course and outcome. These landmark discoveries are the firm background for current and future developments in treatment. There are three consecutive and partly overlapping chronological periods to treatment milestones beginning with recombinant standard interferon-alpha (IFN-α) in the 1980s, then oral antivirals from 1998 to the present and in 2005 pegylated IFN-α (PEG-IFN). The renewed interest in PEG-IFN-α treatment is now focused on both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B and it now also aims at HBsAg loss when associated with on-treatment monitoring of serum HBV DNA and HBsAg levels, resulting in the closest thing to a cure of hepatitis B. The impressive progress made in all aspects of hepatitis B research suggests that curative therapy may be developed for all patients and for all phases of HBV infection in the foreseeable future. However for the moment, realistic efforts should be made to make treatment as widely available and affordable as possible and to apply current therapies to significantly reduce HBV morbidity and mortality.

Treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with nucleos(t)ide analogues

Current agents used in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) can be classified into interferons-α (IFN-α: standard or pegylated) and nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs). NUCs are now used in most CHB patients for several reasons. They can be given to all CHB patients, even those with contraindications to IFN-α. NUCs are more convenient to use (one oral tablet daily) than IFN-α (subcutaneous injections) and are well tolerated with a good safety profile, while IFN-α has frequent and potentially severe side effects and worsens the patient's quality of life. All NUCs are potent anti-hepatitis B virus agents (all but adefovir are more potent than IFN-α) with entecavir(ETV) and tenofovir offering the highest potency and most importantly minimal to negligible risk of resistance during long-term monotherapy [corrected]. Prolongation of entecavir or tenofovir monotherapy maintains and slightly increases the initially high virological remission rates (67-76% of HBeAg-positive and 90-93% of HBeAg-negative patients) and this is expected to result in improved long-term outcomes. The need for long-term, perhaps indefinite, treatment is the main limitation of NUCs and the finite duration (48 weeks) the main advantage of IFN-α. However, only a minority of IFN-α-treated patients achieve durable sustained off-treatment responses (HBeAg-positive: 30-35%, HBeAg-negative: 20-25%), while NUCs may be safely discontinued in HBeAg-positive patients with stable HBeAg seroconversion. Because there will always be concerns for safety and family planning issues with long-term therapy, NUCs should be used judiciously and should not be prescribed in young CHB patients with mild liver disease.

The Role of Interferon in Hepatitis B Therapy

Despite the introduction of new nucleos(t)ide analogues in recent years, peginterferon is still recommended as a potential first-line treatment option by current practice guidelines for the management of chronic hepatitis B. Peginterferon offers the advantage of higher sustained off-treatment response rates compared to nucleos(t)ide analogues because of its immunomodulatory effects. Sustained transition to the inactive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carrier state can be achieved in about 30% of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients and 20% of HBeAg-negative patients. Recent studies have focused on identification of pretreatment and on-treatment factors that allow the selection of patients who are likely to achieve a sustained response to peginterferon therapy in order to avoid the side-effects and costs associated with unnecessary treatment. Future studies need to address whether specific virologic benchmarks can guide individualized decisions concerning therapy continuation and whether peginterferon combined with new potent nucleos(t)ide analogues improves treatment outcomes.

[Development of clevudine resistance after switching from lamivudine in a patient with chronic hepatitis B]

Background/Aims

Newly developed and potent antiviral agents suffer from the problem of drug resistance. Multidrug resistance is a major impediment in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). In line with American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines, adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) add-on therapy is recommended in the case of lamivudine resistance, while tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is recommended for ADV or entecavir (ETV) resistance. TDF is currently not available in Korea. ADV+ETV combination therapy may be a viable alternative to TDF in patients with either ADV or ETV resistance. However, the efficacy of ADV+ETV combination therapy in patients with CHB and multidrug resistance is unclear. This study investigated the efficacy of ADV+ETV combination therapy in patients with multidrug resistance.

Methods

Twenty-five patients were enrolled and were administered ADV+ETV combination therapy for at least 6 months. Blood was drawn at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after commencing treatment, and the following blood parameters were analyzed: alanine transaminase, hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg), anti-hepatitis B e-antigen, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels. The initial virological response (IVR) was defined as an HBV DNA level of <4 log₁₀ copies/mL after 6 months of combination therapy.

Results

The IVR rate was 76%. The proportion of patients with a high viral load (≥5.0 log) dropped from 76% at baseline to only 5% after 6 months of treatment. The biochemical response rate during the first 6 months was 71%. HBeAg was lost in 2 patients (10%).

Conclusions

ADV+ETV combination therapy induced a good IVR in CHB patients who were refractory to more than 2 antiviral agents. This regimen may be a good alternative to TDF in Korea, where that drug is not available.