Phase II study of preoperative chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin followed by gastrectomy for clinically resectable type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancers (JCOG0210)

Neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 therapy for patients with large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer: short-term outcomes of a multicenter, phase II study (OGSG1902)

BACKGROUND

Large type 3 (≥ 8 cm) and type 4 gastric cancers (GCs) have poor prognoses and necessitate multidisciplinary treatment. A multi-institutional phase II study (OGSG1902) was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) in these patients.

METHODS

Patients with large type 3 or type 4 GC without distant metastasis, except for positive peritoneal cytology (CY), were enrolled. Patients received three courses of neoadjuvant DOS therapy (docetaxel 40 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 via intravenous infusion, and S-1 80 mg/m2 orally for 14 days, repeated every 3 weeks) followed by gastrectomy. After R0 resection, adjuvant docetaxel/S-1 therapy was administered for 1 year.

RESULTS

From October 2019 to February 2022, 48 patients were enrolled. NAC was completed in 91.7% of patients. The R0 resection rate was 89.6%. The pathological response rate (Grade 1b-3) was 66.7%. Among patients with measurable lesions, the response rate was 50.0%. The CY-negative conversion rate was 80.0%, and the protocol completion rate was 45.8%. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events during NAC, including neutropenia and appetite loss, occurred in 37.5% of patients. Major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade IIIa or higher) were observed in 2.1% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

NAC with DOS for large type 3 or type 4 GC followed by gastrectomy demonstrated promising efficacy, high pathological response rates, and an acceptable toxicity profile. Further evaluation of long-term survival outcomes is ongoing.

Oncological similarities between large type 3 and type 4 tumors in patients with resectable gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of a multi-institutional dataset

BACKGROUND

Large type 3 (diameter ≥ 8 cm) and type 4 gastric cancers have been arbitrarily combined in Japan as a single entity. However, whether these two types are oncologically similar remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify this issue.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed a database of 3,575 patients from nine institutions who underwent gastrectomy between 2010 and 2014. Using propensity scores to balance significant variables, we compared prognoses and tumor recurrences.

RESULTS

Of patients with clinical T3/T4 who underwent R0 resection, 75 and 73 had large type 3 and 4 tumors, respectively. Patients with type 4 tumors had significantly lower overall survival rates than those of patients with large type 3 tumors (hazard ratio [HR] 1.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-2.74). However, among the large type 3 tumors, a remarkable difference in prognosis was observed between the differentiated and undifferentiated histological types. A comparison was made between large type 3 with undifferentiated phenotype and type 4, each with 39 patients after propensity score matching. Outcomes in both groups were similar in terms of overall survival (HR 1.28; 95% CI 0.73-2.25) and relapse-free survival (HR 1.34; 95% CI 0.80-2.27). No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of peritoneal recurrence (35.9% vs. 46.1%, P = 0.36) and lymph node recurrence (25.6% vs. 12.8%, P = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Large type 3 tumors with undifferentiated phenotype and type 4 tumors were oncologically similar. This subgroup could be considered as a new entity for future clinical trials.

Perioperative systemic and prophylactic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for type 4/large type 3 gastric cancer: DRAGON-10

Large type 3 and type 4 gastric cancers (GC) have a significantly poor prognosis, primarily due to their high predisposition for peritoneal dissemination. The application of intraperitoneal chemotherapy has emerged as a viable therapeutic strategy for managing GC patients with peritoneal metastasis. This study is planned to enroll 37 resectable large type 3 or type 4 GC patients. These patients are scheduled to undergo a treatment comprising preoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel, oxaliplatin and S-1, followed by D2 gastrectomy, and concluding with postoperative treatments that include prophylactic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The study's primary objective is to evaluate the 3-year peritoneal recurrence rate. Secondary objectives are to assess the 3-year disease-free survival, 3-year overall survival and to monitor the adverse events.Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2400083253 (https://www.chictr.org.cn).

Perioperative chemotherapy improves survival of patients with locally advanced diffuse gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Whether patients with diffuse gastric cancer, which is insensitive to chemotherapy, can benefit from neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy has long been controversial.

AIM

To investigate whether perioperative chemotherapy can improve survival of patients with locally advanced diffuse gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 2684 patients with locally advanced diffuse gastric cancer from 18 population-based cancer registries in the United States were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with surgery alone, perioperative chemotherapy improved the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Before stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), the median overall survival (OS) times were 40.0 months and 13.0 months (P < 0.001), respectively. After IPTW, the median OS times were 33.0 months and 17.0 months (P < 0.001), respectively. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer compared with adjuvant chemotherapy after IPTW. After IPTW, the median OS times were 38.0 months in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 42.0 months in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (P = 0.472).

CONCLUSION

Patients with diffuse gastric cancer can benefit from perioperative chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in survival between patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those who received adjuvant chemotherapy.

Perioperative chemotherapy with docetaxel plus oxaliplatin and S-1 (DOS) versus oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) for the treatment of locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (MATCH): an open-label, randomized, phase 2 clinical trial

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether addition of docetaxel to the combination of a platinum and fluoropyrimidine could provide more clinical benefits than doublet chemotherapies in the perioperative treatment for locally advanced gastric/gastro-esophageal junction (LAG/GEJ) cancer in Asia. In this randomized, phase 2 study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of perioperative docetaxel plus oxaliplatin and S-1 (DOS) versus oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) in LAG/GEJ adenocarcinoma patients.

METHODS

Patients with cT3-4 Nany M0 G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were randomized (1:1) to receive 4 cycles of preoperative DOS or SOX followed by D2 gastrectomy and another 4 cycles of postoperative chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR).

RESULTS

From Aug, 2015 to Dec, 2019,154 patients were enrolled and 147 patients included in final analysis, with a median age of 60 (26-73) years. DOS resulted in significantly higher MPR (25.4 vs. 11.8%, P = 0.04). R0 resection rate, the 3-year PFS and 3-year OS rates were 78.9 vs. 61.8% (P = 0.02), 52.3 vs. 35% (HR 0.667, 95% CI: 0.432-1.029, Log rank P = 0.07) and 57.5 vs. 49.2% (HR 0.685, 95% CI: 0.429-1.095, Log rank P = 0.11) in the DOS and SOX groups, respectively. Patients who acquired MPR experienced significantly better survival. DOS had similar tolerance to SOX.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative DOS improved MPR significantly and tended to produce longer PFS compared to SOX in LAG/GEJ cancer in Asia, and might be considered as a preferred option for perioperative chemotherapy and worth further investigation.

Early endpoints of a randomized phase II trial of preoperative chemotherapy with S-1/CDDP with or without trastuzumab followed by surgery for HER2-positive resectable gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with extensive lymph node metastasis: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1301C (Trigger Study)

BACKGROUND

This randomized phase II study explored the superiority of trastuzumab plus S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) over SP alone as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for HER2-positive resectable gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

Eligible patients with HER2-positive gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer and extensive lymph node metastasis were randomized to receive three or four courses of preoperative chemotherapy with SP (arm A) or SP plus trastuzumab (arm B). Following gastrectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 was administered for 1 year in both arms. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and the sample size was 130 patients in total. The trial is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031180006.

RESULTS

This report elucidates the early endpoints, including pathological findings and safety. The study was terminated early due to slow patient accruals. In total, 46 patients were allocated to arm A (n = 22) and arm B (n = 24). NAC was completed in 20 patients (91%) in arm A and 23 patients (96%) in arm B, with similar incidences of grade 3-4 hematological and non-hematological adverse events. Objective response rates were 50% in arm A and 84% in arm B (p = 0·065). %R0 resection rates were 91% and 92%, and pathological response rates (≥ grade 1b in Japanese classification) were 23% and 50% (p = 0·072) in resected patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Trastuzumab can be safely added to platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy as NAC, and it has the potential to contribute to higher antitumor activity against locally advanced, HER2-positive gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer with extensive nodal metastasis.

The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is different for type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

In the JCOG0501 study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) failed to demonstrate survival benefits for type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer (GC). The prognosis of these patients is still poor. We conducted this study to explore the value of NAC with non-SP regimens for type 4 and large type 3 ​GC in the Chinese population.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from our electronic medical record system. Patients with large type 3 or type 4 ​GC who underwent D2 gastrectomy and AC were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received NAC: the CSC (NAC ​+ ​surgery ​+ ​AC) and SC (surgery ​+ ​AC) groups. The survival and perioperative outcomes for large type 3 or type 4 ​GC were analyzed between the CSC and SC groups, separately.

RESULTS

Between May 2009 and December 2018, 189 patients were reviewed. Among large type 3 ​GC, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients in the CSC and SC groups were 54.4 ​% and 28.0 ​%, respectively (P ​= ​0.0008). Among type 4 ​GC, the 5-year OS rates for patients in the CSC and SC groups were 15.8 ​% and 24.8 ​%, respectively (P ​> ​0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed NAC can improve the prognosis of large type 3 ​GC. However, NAC did not demonstrate significant survival advantages for type 4 ​GC.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer in Japan: Consensus meeting at the 77th general meeting of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery

Treatment strategy for locally advanced gastric cancer differs worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is considered one of the promising treatment options for locally advanced gastric cancer, even in Japan, and clinical trials have been conducted or are ongoing. A consensus meeting was organized at the 77th general meeting of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery in 2022, in which the current status and future prospects of NAC for locally advanced gastric cancer were discussed. Participants at the meeting looked forward to the results of the JCOG1509 trial, providing solid evidence regarding NAC. The optimal indications and regimens for NAC were also debated. Patients with cStage III gastric cancer are the main targets of NAC in Japan, and a doublet regimen of S-1 and oxaliplatin was preferred by the participants. However, the feasibility of a triplet regimen with S-1, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel, and that with 5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel has been demonstrated, and these could become treatment options in Japan. Other points of discussion include perioperative chemotherapy to avoid peritoneal recurrence and for patients with dMMR/MSI-high tumors. The panel regarded NAC as a promising treatment option, and NAC will become the standard treatment for cStage III gastric cancer in Japan if an ongoing clinical trial successfully demonstrates its efficacy.

Randomized phase II study comparing neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/docetaxel versus docetaxel/oxaliplatin/S-1 for patients with type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer

Macroscopic type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer, mostly overlapping with scirrhous or linitis plastica type, exhibit a highly invasive nature and show unfavorable prognosis after curative surgery, even with adjuvant chemotherapy. A randomized phase III trial (JCOG0501) failed to demonstrate a survival advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin for this population. The current authors initiated a randomized phase II study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/docetaxel versus docetaxel/oxaliplatin/S-1 for type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer. 76 patients are planned to be enrolled over two years. The primary end point is the proportion of patients with a pathological response (grade 1b or higher) and secondary end points include overall survival and adverse events. Clinical Trial Registration: jRCTs031230231 (rctportal.niph.go.jp).

Application and progress of palliative therapy in advanced gastric carcinomas

Gastric carcinomas have high morbidity and mortality. It produces no noticeable symptoms in the early stage while causing complex complications in its advanced stage, making treatment difficult. Palliative therapy aims to relieve the symptoms of cancer patients and focuses on improving their quality of life. At present, five palliative therapies for advanced gastric carcinomas are offered: resection, gastrojejunostomy, stenting, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. In recent years, palliative therapy has been used in the clinical treatment of advanced gastric carcinomas and related complications because of its efficacy in gastric outlet obstruction and gastric bleeding. In the future, multimodal and interdisciplinary palliative therapies can be applied to control general symptoms to improve patients’ condition, prolong their lifespan and improve their quality of life.

Risk model and factors for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer-a two-center cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Due to inconsistency in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) response in advanced gastric cancer (GC), the indications remain the source of controversy. This study focused on identifying factors related to NACT chemosensitivity and providing the best treatment for GC cases.

METHODS

Clinical data in 867 GC cases treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were downloaded from two medical centers between January 2014 and December 2020, and analyzed by logistic regression and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) for identifying potential factors that predicted NACT response and might be incorporated in constructing the prediction nomogram.

RESULTS

After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, totally 460 cases were enrolled, among which, 307 were males (66.74%) whereas 153 were females (33.26%), with the age of 24-77 (average, 59.37 ± 10.60) years. Consistent with RECIST standard, 242 patients were classified into effective group (PR or CR) while 218 were into ineffective group (PD or SD), with the effective rate of 52.61%. In training set, LASSO and logistic regression analysis showed that five risk factors were significantly associated with NACT effectiveness, including tumor location, Smoking history, T and N stages, and differentiation. In terms of our prediction model, its C-index was 0.842. Moreover, calibration curve showed that the model-predicted results were in good consistence with actual results. Validation based on internal and external validation sets exhibited consistency between training set results and ours.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified five risk factors which were significantly associated with NACT response, including smoking history, clinical T stage, clinical N stage, tumor location and differentiation. The prediction model that exhibited satisfying ability to predict NACT effectiveness was constructed, which may be adopted for identifying the best therapeutic strategy for advanced GC by gastrointestinal surgeons.

Poorly cohesive cells gastric carcinoma including signet-ring cell cancer: Updated review of definition, classification and therapeutic management

While the incidence of gastric cancer (GC) in general has decreased worldwide in recent decades, the incidence of diffuse cancer historically comprising poorly cohesive cells-GC (PCC-GC) and including signet ring cell cancer is rising. Literature concerning PCC-GC is scarce and unclear, mostly due to a large variety of historically used definitions and classifications. Compared to other histological subtypes of GC, PCC-GC is nevertheless characterized by a distinct set of epidemiological, histological and clinical features which require a specific diagnostic and therapeutic approach. The aim of this review was to provide an update on the definition, classification and therapeutic strategies of PCC-GC. We focus on the updated histological definition of PCC-GC, along with its implications on future treatment strategies and study design. Also, specific considerations in the diagnostic management are discussed. Finally, the impact of some recent developments in the therapeutic management of GC in general such as the recently validated taxane-based regimens (5-Fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel), the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as well as pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy and targeted therapy have been reviewed in depth for their relative importance for PCC-GC in particular.

Laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) has drawn increasing attention over the years. Although LTG has shown surgical benefits compared to open TG (OTG) in early stage gastric cancer (GC), little is known about the surgical and oncological outcomes of LTG for advanced GC following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).

AIM

To compare the long- and short-term outcomes of advanced GC patients who underwent LTG vs OTG following NAT.

METHODS

Advanced GC patients who underwent TG following NAT between April 2011 and May 2018 at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were enrolled and stratified into two groups: LTG and OTG. Propensity score matching analysis was performed at a 1:1 ratio to overcome possible bias.

RESULTS

In total, 185 patients were enrolled (LTG: 78; OTG: 109). Of these, 138 were paired after propensity score matching. After adjustment for propensity score matching, baseline parameters were similar between the two groups. Compared to OTG, LTG was associated with a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (P = 0.012). The rates of R0 resection, lymph node harvest, and postoperative morbidity did not significantly differ between the two groups. Overall survival (OS) outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Pathological T and N stages were found to be independent risk factors for OS.

CONCLUSION

LTG can be a feasible method for advanced GC patients following NAT, as it appears to be associated with better short- and comparable long-term outcomes compared to OTG.

Development and validation of pretreatment nomogram for disease-specific mortality in gastric cancer-A competing risk analysis

Background

In several reports, gastric cancer nomograms for predicting overall or disease‐specific survival have been described. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) introduced the attractiveness of disease‐specific mortality (DSM) as an endpoint of risk model. This study aimed to develop the first pretreatment gastric cancer nomogram for predicting DSM that considers competing risks (CRs).

Methods

The prediction model was developed using data for 5231 gastric cancer patients. Fifteen prognosticators, which were registered at diagnosis, were evaluated. The nomogram for DSM was created as visualizations of the multivariable Fine and Gray regression model. An independent cohort for external validation consisted of 389 gastric cancer patients from a different institution. The performance of the model was assessed by discrimination (Harrell's concordance (C)‐index), calibration, and decision curve analysis. DSM and CRs were evaluated, paying special attention to host‐related factors such as age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), by using Gray's univariable method.

Results

Fourteen prognostic factors were selected to develop the nomogram. The new nomogram for DSM exhibited good discrimination. Its C‐index of 0.887 surpassed that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical staging (0.794). The C‐index was 0.713 (AJCC, 0.582) for the external validation cohort. The nomogram showed good performance internally and externally, in the calibration and decision curve analysis. Host‐related factors including age and ECOG PS, were strongly correlated with competing risks.

Conclusions

The newly developed nomogram accurately predicts DSM, which can be used for patient counseling in clinical practice.

Development of a Quantitative Diagnostic Criterion for Gastric Linitis Plastica: Findings From a Large Single-Institutional Study

Gastric linitis plastica (GLP) is a descriptive term but lacks a quantitative definition. Several relatively quantitative criteria had been proposed, such as tumor involving a limit of one-third or two-thirds of the gastric surface. However, these criteria needed doctors to subjectively judge tumor infiltration area, which made diagnosis difficult to be objective and reproducible. This study aimed to propose a quantitative diagnostic criterion for distinguishing GLP. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 2,907 patients with Borrmann III and IV gastric cancer (GC) who underwent gastrectomy between 2011 and 2018 in our center. The Kaplan–Meier curves showed that patients with an observed tumor size more than 8 cm had obviously lower overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates than those with a size less than 8 cm(p < 0.001; p < 0.001). However, there was no significantly different prognosis of patients with tumor sizes between more than 8 cm and more than 10 cm (p = 0.248; p = 0.534). Moreover, patients with tumor sizes greater than 8 cm more presented with advanced stage and had extremely poor 3-year OS and DFS (31.4%; 29.3%), with a stronger propensity toward peritoneal metastasis. Therefore, we considered patients’ observed tumor size more than 8 cm as a critical value for distinguishing the prognosis of Borrmann III and IV GC. Furthermore, we proposed an observed tumor size more than 8 cm as a quantitative diagnostic criterion for GLP on the premise of satisfying the originally descriptive and pathological definition regardless of Borrmann type.

Phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin for gastric cancer clinical T4 or N2-3

In Japan, the standard treatment for stage II or III gastric cancer is D2 gastrectomy followed by administration of S-1 for one year. However, patients with stage III disease have unsatisfactory survival rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of S-1 and oxaliplatin for advanced gastric cancer. Patients with cT4 or cN2-3 gastric cancer were scheduled to receive two courses of chemotherapy (130 mg/m² oxaliplatin on Day 1, 80 mg/m² S-1 per day twice daily for 14 days) followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate. The secondary endpoints were rates of completion of protocol treatment, pathological response, and adverse events; and 3-year overall survival, 5-year overall survival, and 5-year recurrence-free survival. Between May 2016 and March 2019, 30 patients were enrolled in the study, all of whom completed the protocol treatment. The R0 resection rate (primary endpoint) was 93.3% (95% confidence interval: 77.9-99.2). The pathological response rate was 63.3%. Grade 3-4 toxicities included anemia (3.3%), anorexia (6.7%), and fatigue (3.3%). Relative dose intensities were 91.2% and 94.2% for S-1 and oxaliplatin, respectively. Neoadjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin is highly effective, achieving an acceptable R0 resection rate with relatively few severe toxicities and good compliance.Trial registration: Registry name: A prospective intervention study on the availability of preoperative SOX therapy for T4 or N2-3 gastric cancer. Trial ID: UMIN: UMIN000024656. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R00002836.

Prognostic impact of surgery after chemotherapy for type 4 gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical indications for, and prognostic impact of surgery after, chemotherapy for type 4 gastric cancer.

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were 67 patients who received chemotherapy for type 4 gastric cancer. The patients were grouped into those with progressive disease (PD group) and those without PD (non-PD group), according to the tumor response to chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Distant metastases developed in 58 patients. With regard to tumor response, there were 16 patients in the PD group and 51 patients in the non-PD group. The prognosis of the PD group patients was significantly poorer than that of the non-PD group patients (p < 0.0001). R0 resection was performed for 21 of 23 patients who underwent surgery after chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed tumor response and surgery as independent prognostic factors (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0009, respectively). Moreover, multivariate analysis of the surgery group revealed that metastatic nodal status (N0-1 vs. N2-3) and residual tumor status (R0 vs. R1-2) were significant independent prognostic factors (p = 0.0258 and p = 0.0458, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that surgery after chemotherapy for type 4 gastric cancer may improve the prognosis of responders with N0-1 status, who undergo curative R0 resection.

Short-term results of a phase II study of preoperative docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer

Background

A multi-institutional phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 therapy in marginally resectable advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients with macroscopic type 4, large macroscopic type 3 and bulky lymph node metastasis received two cycles of preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 therapy (docetaxel 40 mg/m² and cisplatin 60 mg/m² on day 1, and S-1 80 mg/m² for 14 days, every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was the pathological response rate, with an expected value of 65%.

Results

Thirty-one patients were enrolled in this study. The pathological response rate was 54.8%, and it was higher than the threshold value but lower than the expected rate. The R0 resection rate was 93.5%. The frequencies of grade 3–4 toxicities during docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 therapy were 41.9% for neutropenia, 6.5% for febrile neutropenia and 32.3% for nausea/vomiting. Grade 2 and 3 surgical morbidities occurred in 23.3 and 6.7% of the patients, respectively.

Conclusions

Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 therapy was feasible in terms of chemotherapy-related toxicities and surgical morbidity, but the effect did not achieve the expected value. The association between the pathological response rate and survival will be evaluated in the final analysis of this clinical trial.

Preoperative chemotherapy could modify recurrence patterns through postoperative complications in patients with gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Postoperative infectious complications have a negative impact on survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. It is recently reported that preoperative chemotherapy may eliminate this negative impact. This study aimed to confirm whether preoperative chemotherapy can eliminate the negative impact of postoperative infectious complications (IC) on survival outcomes and elucidate the association between postoperative infectious complications and recurrence patterns.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of 86 patients who received preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 followed by R0 gastrectomy at the Kitasato University between 2006 and 2016. Patients who developed grade II or higher infectious complications during hospitalization were grouped into the IC group, while others were grouped into the non-IC (NIC) group. Survival outcomes and recurrence patterns were analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

Infectious complications with Clavien-Dindo classification of grade II or higher were found in 12 patients (14.0%, IC group). The median observational period was 61 months. Overall survival and progression-free survival were similar in the IC and NIC groups. Recurrence occurred in 39 patients. The proportions of peritoneal and lymph node recurrences were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the proportion of distant metastasis in the IC group was significantly higher than that in NIC group (3/4 [75%] vs. 9/35 [17%], p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological stage after neoadjuvant therapy plays a stronger role in recurrence than postoperative complications. Lymph node and peritoneal metastasis may be suppressed by preoperative chemotherapy.

Gastrectomy with or without neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin for type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer (JCOG0501): an open-label, phase 3, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Specific treatment strategies are sorely needed for scirrhous-type gastric cancer still, which has poor prognosis. Based on the promising results of our previous phase II study (JCOG0210), we initiated a phase III study to confirm the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients aged 20-75 years without a macroscopic unresectable factor as confirmed via staging laparoscopy were randomly assigned to surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (Arm A) or NAC (S-1plus cisplatin) followed by D2 gastrectomy plus adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (Arm B). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Between October 2005 and July 2013, 316 patients were enrolled, allocating 158 patients to each arm. In Arm B, in which NAC was completed in 88% of patients. Significant downstaging based on tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, and peritoneal cytology was observed using NAC. Excluding the initial 16 patients randomized before the first revision of the protocol, 149 and 151 patients in arms A and B, respectively, were included in the primary analysis. The 3-year OS rates were 62.4% [95% confidence interval (CI)  54.1-69.6] in Arm A and 60.9% (95% CI  52.7-68.2) in Arm B. The hazard ratio of Arm B against Arm A was 0.916 (95% CI  0.679-1.236).

CONCLUSIONS

For type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer, NAC with S-1 plus cisplatin failed to demonstrate a survival benefit. D2 surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard treatment.

The role of laparoscopic staging for the management of gastric cancer

AİM Staging laparoscopy enables us to perform palliative treatment, neo-adjuvant therapy for curative resection or direct curative resection and making a decision with minimal morbidity by avoiding from unnecessary laparotomies. In the present study, the importance of staging lapafoscopy was retrospectively investigated by using clinical and pathologic data. METHODS Data of 70 out of 350 patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy due to gastric cancer at Surgical Oncology department between August 2013 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Peritoneal biopsy was positive for malignity in 41 (58.5%) and negative in 29 (41.5%) of the patients who underwent SL. Peritoneal cytology (PC) results were negative in 32 (45.7%) patients and positive in 38 (54.3%) patients. Peritoneal biopsy and cytology results were concurrently positive in 35 patients and concurrently negative in 26 patients. CONCLUSİONS In conclusion, even the most developed imaging methods cannot provide 100% staging, therefore SL plays an important role in treatment of gastric cancer and laparoscopic staging is essential as a simple, inexpensive, safe and well tolerated method in patients who have the suspicion of peritoneal disease and who cannot be clearly evaluated with pre-operative methods.

Feasibility and Safety of Perioperative Chemotherapy With Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Docetaxel for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients in China

Background

Neoadjuvant fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) has shown significant benefits for gastric cancer patients. However, it has not been well accepted in Asian countries. We conducted a prospective study on the safety and feasibility of the FLOT regimen in Chinese patients.

Methods

Patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction received four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with the FLOT regimen. The completion status of chemotherapy, adverse events, postoperative morbidities, and pathological tumor regression were analyzed. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival are presented.

Results

Altogether, 10 patients were enrolled, and all patients completed four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There were no severe hematological adverse events (grade 3 or above), except for a case of grade 3 anemia. All 10 patients underwent radical gastrectomy. Nine patients had R0 resection, and three patients had complete or subtotal pathological tumor regression. Nine patients completed four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, but only one patient completed the full dose of adjuvant chemotherapy. The dose of adjuvant chemotherapy was reduced by 25% or less in the other patients. The median follow-up time was 23.13 months, eight patients achieved the overall survival endpoint, and seven patients had relapse-free survival for this period. Two patients died of disease progression.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that the neoadjuvant FLOT regimen is safe and effective for Chinese patients. Dose adjustment is necessary for adjuvant chemotherapy. The pathological regression and survival rates need reevaluation in a larger cohort. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT03646591).

Posttherapy topographical nodal status, ypN-site, predicts survival of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative surgical resection for non-type 4 locally advanced gastric cancer: supplementary analysis of JCOG1004-A

BACKGROUND

Perioperative treatment is an accepted standard approach for treating locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Histopathological tumor regression with < 10% residual tumor is a globally accepted prognosticator in LAGC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and curative surgery. However, despite a response of the primary tumor, a significant percentage of patients dies from recurrence and identification of those at risk for relapse remains challenging. We re-estimated the value of histopathological tumor regression as a prognosticator alongside other factors, especially posttherapy topographical nodal status, ypN-site.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Individual patient data including clinicopathological variables were used from the four JCOG trials investigating NAC (JCOG0001, JCOG0002, JCOG0210, JCOG0405) for analyzing prognosticators in patients with curative surgery excluding those with type 4 AGC by univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Among 85 patients, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 46.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 35.0-56.4] with a median follow-up of 3.2 years. On univariable analysis, histopathological tumor regression with ≥ 10% residual tumor and ypN-site 2-3 were negatively associated with OS [≥ 10% residual tumor: hazard ratio (HR) 2.60; 95% CI 1.22-5.54; P = 0.014; ypN2-3: HR 3.59; 95% CI 1.60-8.06; P = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, only ypN-site 2-3 was predictive of OS (HR 3.67; 95% CI 1.55-8.69; P = 0.003), whereas histopathological tumor regression with ≥ 10% residual tumor was not (HR 2.24; 95% CI 0.98-5.10; P = 0.055).

CONCLUSIONS

ypN-site may have greater impact on OS than histopathological tumor regression in patients who received NAC plus surgery for non-type 4 LAGC.

Phase II Study of Preoperative Intra-Arterial Epirubicin, Etoposide, and Oxaliplatin Combined with Oral S-1 Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Borrmann Type 4 Gastric Cancer

Purpose

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative, intra-arterial perfusion of epirubicin, etoposide, and oxaliplatin combined with oral chemotherapy S-1 (SEEOX) for the treatment of type 4 gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods

A single-center, single-arm phase II trial was conducted on 36 patients with histologically proven type 4 gastric cancer without distant peritoneal or organ metastasis. Patients received 3, 21-day courses of SEEOX preoperative chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcomes assessed were chemotherapeutic response, radical resection rate, pathological regression, toxicities, postoperative morbidity, and mortality.

Results

All patients were at an advanced stage of cancer (stage III or IV) and completed the entire course of treatment. Based on changes in tumor volume and peritoneal metastasis, the objective response rate was 55.6% (20/36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38.5%–72.6%) and the disease control rate was 69.4% (25/36; 95% CI, 53.6%–85.3%). The radical resection rate was 75% (27/36; 95% CI, 60.1%–89.9%) and the proportion of R0 resections was 66.7% (21/36; 95% CI, 50.5%–82.8%). The pathological response rate was 33.3%, of which 13.9% showed complete pathological regression. The median survival was 27.1 months (95% CI, 22.24–31.97 months), and the 2-year OS was 48.5% (95% CI, 30.86%–66.1%).

Conclusions

Preoperative SEEOX is a safe and effective treatment for type 4 gastric cancer. Based on these preliminary data, a phase III study will be conducted to confirm the superiority of this regimen over standard treatment.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02949258

A "Just Enough" Gross Proximal Margin Length Ensuring Pathologically Complete Resection in Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Introduction

The objective of this study is to determine a "just enough" gross proximal margin (PM) length to ensure a pathologically negative PM in distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. There is a discrepancy between the gross and pathological proximal boundaries of gastric cancer. We must transect the stomach maintaining some safety margins to obtain a pathologically negative PM. However, we have no standard to indicate where to transect the stomach.

Methods

Patients undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer were enrolled. A new parameter named ΔPM, which corresponded to the pathological extension proximal to the gross tumor boundary toward the resection stump, was evaluated. The number of patients was counted in each ΔPM range of 1-cm increments. The maximum ΔPM was defined as the first value at which the number of patients became 0, and it was determined as the recommended gross PM length for each disease type.

Results

In cT1, 259 and 330 patients were assigned to differentiated (Dif) and undifferentiated types (Und), respectively. The maximum ΔPM was 20 mm for Dif and 40 mm for Und. In cT2-4, 194 and 490 patients were assigned to the expansive (Exp) and infiltrative (Inf) growth types. The maximum ΔPM was 30 mm for Exp. The maximum ΔPM was 50 mm for Inf of less than 80 mm and 60 mm for Inf of 80 mm or more.

Conclusions

A newly recommended gross PM length to ensure pathologically negative PMs in distal gastrectomy for each gastric cancer type was determined.

Subtotal gastrectomy combined with chemotherapy: An effective therapy for patients with circumscribed Borrmann type IV gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Although Borrmann type IV (B-4) gastric cancer has a higher mortality rate and presents distant metastasis easily, especially peritoneal metastasis, when diagnosed, some B-4 patients were found to have no distant metastasis by preoperative detection and underwent curative surgery, which was defined as circumscribed B-4 in our study. In this study, we focused on the circumscribed B-4 patients without distant metastasis during surgery to identify factors related to prognosis and postoperative peritoneal cavity metastasis (PPCM), which is important for selecting an appropriate therapeutic strategy.

AIM

To identify factors related to the prognosis and PPCM of B-4 patients.

METHODS

A total of 117 B-4 patients who underwent gastrectomy between January 2005 and December 2012 were included in this study. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox multivariate models. Pearson correlation analyses were performed to identify the factors related to PPCM. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0.

RESULTS

Lymph node status, gastrectomy type, and postoperative chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors in 117 circumscribed B-4 patients. Subtotal gastrectomy combined with chemotherapy could significantly improve the long-term survival time. Six patients who were diagnosed with pN0 and received the combination therapy had a 3-year survival rate of 100% and a median survival of 77.7 mo. Even for patients with metastatic lymph nodes (n = 13), the combination therapy also increased the 3-year overall survival rate to 57.1%. In addition, positive lymph node status was the only factor (P = 0.005) correlated with PPCM in certain B-4 patients, and chemotherapy was useful for suppressing PPCM in patients with subtotal gastrectomy but not in those with total gastrectomy.

CONCLUSION

Lymph node status is an independent prognostic factor for circumscribed B-4 patients. In addition, subtotal gastrectomy and postoperative chemotherapy could effectively improve prognosis and even suppress PPCM.

Therapeutic value of splenectomy to dissect splenic hilar lymph nodes for type 4 gastric cancer involving the greater curvature, compared with other types

BACKGROUND

Whether splenectomy for splenic hilar lymph node (No. 10) dissection in type 4 gastric cancer involving the greater curvature is necessary is not established. Patients with type 4 gastric cancer often experience peritoneal relapse, despite curative surgery, and total gastrectomy with splenectomy is frequently associated with infectious complications.

METHOD

Patients with cT2-T4 gastric cancer in the upper or middle third of the stomach, or both, involving the greater curvature who underwent R0 total gastrectomy with splenectomy between 2006 and 2016 were selected. Clinicopathological findings, postoperative complications, the incidence of lymph node metastasis, and the therapeutic value index of each station were compared between type 4 and non-type 4 gastric cancer.

RESULTS

We enrolled 50 patients with type 4 and 60 with non-type 4. The former had a significantly higher proportion of the undifferentiated type and larger and deeper tumors. The overall incidence of Grade III or higher complications was 20.9%. The incidence of No. 10 metastasis was 26.0% in type 4 and 31.7% in non-type 4. Although the therapeutic value index of the No. 10 was 13.7 in type 4 and 15.0 in non-type 4, the index of type 4 ranked just below several peri-gastric stations and seventh, while that in non-type 4 ranked second.

CONCLUSION

Splenectomy for No. 10 dissection may be oncologically valid for type 4 gastric cancer involving the greater curvature. A safer procedure for No. 10 dissection should be established.

Indications of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced Gastric Cancer patients based on pre-treatment clinicalpathological and laboratory parameters

Objective: There are controversial indications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Here, we aimed to identify indications for NAT based on pre-treatment clinicopathological and laboratory parameters.

Methods: This study included a retrospective cohort of 1083 LAGC patients who had underwent radical D2 gastrectomy in the Cancer Hospital of China Medical University between 2012 and 2016. After propensity score matching, 756 patients were recruited and were separated into NAT (n=378) or primary surgery (PS) (n=378) groups. Cox regression identified pre-treatment risk factors for overall survival (OS). A nomogram was established to predict OS and calculate scores for risk factors. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) determined cut off values, where the entire patient cohort was divided into low and high risk groups.

Results: Seven risk factors that were significantly related to OS were incorporated in the nomogram. These risk factors included age, tumor size, tumor site, carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), clinical T stage (cT) and clinical N stage (cN). The model contained a C-index of 0.637. The calibration curve revealed anticipated values that were reflective of actual values. The decision curve revealed an achievement of optimal clinical impact when threshold possibility was 0-54%. Next, the cohort was split into low (≤ 252 points) or high (> 252 points) risk groups based on the 5-year OS projected by RPA. The PS group showed a worse OS compared to the NAT group for high-risk patients (P =0.004). There was no significant difference when comparing OS between the PS and NAT groups for low-risk patients (P =0.407).

Conclusions: A feasible, quantifiable and practical prognostic tool was generated to screen for potential survival benefits for patients receiving NAT. Surgeons can use this model to identify optimal treatment regimens for individualized treatment strategies during the diagnosis of LAGC patients. For these patients, NAT is suggested for high-risk patients.

Prognostic impact of Borrmann classification on advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort from a single institution in western China

Background

Due to the controversy over the prognostic significance of Borrmann type in patients with gastric cancer (GC), the present study was to investigate the clinical value of Borrmann type in advanced GC.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 2092 patients with advanced GC and subsequently examined the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients stratified by Borrmann type.

Results

Patients were divided into three groups according to Borrmann type (Borrmann types I+II, III, and IV). Patients with Borrmann types III and IV had larger size, more poorly differentiated tumor type, more advanced tumor stage, and higher chance of involving the entire stomach. The overall survival (OS) rates were significantly different among the three groups (p < 0.001). Stratification analysis revealed significant OS rates among the three groups in tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage III (p < 0.001) and TNM stage IV (p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis revealed that Borrmann types, adjuvant chemotherapy, curative resection, and TNM stage were all independent predictors of OS among GC patients. The subgroup analysis indicated that Borrmann type was an independent predictor of OS among GC patients who undergone curative resection and with TNM stage III cancer. However, curative resection and postoperative chemotherapy failed to prolong the survival of patients with Borrmann type IV.

Conclusions

The clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with three Borrmann types of GC were different. Borrmann type can be simply used as a valuable factor to predict survival in advanced GC patients, especially in those TNM stage III undergoing curative resection. Additionally, more attention should be paid to the treatment for Borrmann type IV GC.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) for gastric cancer patients in China (Preprint).. [DOI: 10.2196/preprints.22615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) has shown significant benefits for gastric cancer patients. However, it has not been well accepted in Asian countries.

OBJECTIVE

So we conducted a prospective study on the safety and feasibility of this regimen in Chinese patients.

METHODS

Patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric received 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with the FLOT regimen. The completion status of chemotherapy, adverse events, postoperative morbidities and pathological tumor regression were analyzed. The two-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival are presented. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT03646591).

RESULTS

Altogether, 10 patients were enrolled, and all patients completed 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There were no severe hematological adverse events (grade 3 or above), except for a case of grade 3 anemia. Four patients had grade 3 or 4 vomiting, and all other non-hematological adverse events were grade 2 or below. All 10 patients underwent radical gastrectomy. There was no anastomotic leakage, reoperation or death due to surgical complications. Nine patients had R0 resection, and 3 patients had complete or subtotal pathological tumor regression. Nine patients completed 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, but only one patient completed the full dose of adjuvant chemotherapy. The dose of adjuvant chemotherapy was reduced by 25% or less in the other patients. The median follow-up time was 23.13 months, 8 patients achieved the overall survival endpoint, and 7 patients had relapse-free survival for this period. Two patients died of disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the neoadjuvant FLOT regimen is safe and effective for Chinese patients. Dose adjustment is necessary for adjuvant chemotherapy. The pathological regression and survival rates need reevaluation in a larger cohort.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery for high-risk advanced gastric cancer: long-term results of KDOG1001 trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term survival outcomes of KDOG1001 trial after a minimum follow-up of 3 years.

METHODS

Patients with bulky N2 lymph nodes, linitis plastica (type 4), or large ulcero-invasive-type tumors (type 3) received up to four 28-day cycles of DCS neoadjuvant chemotherapy (docetaxel at 40 mg/m², cisplatin at 60 mg/m² on day 1, and S-1 at 40 mg/m² twice daily for 2 weeks) followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy plus adjuvant S-1 therapy for 1 year. The final preplanned analysis of long-term outcomes including overall survival and relapse-free survival was conducted after minimum follow-up of 3 years. This trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, number UMIN 000003642, and has been completed.

RESULTS

From May 2010 through January 2017, 40 patients were enrolled. All included patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DCS followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, and 32 (80%) completed adjuvant S-1 therapy for 1 year. After a median follow-up for surviving patients of 68 months at the last follow-up in January 2020, 3-year overall survival rate was 77.5% (95% confidence interval 62.1-87.9%), while 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 62.5% (95% confidence interval 46.8-76.0%).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 4 cycles of DCS followed by D2 gastrectomy plus adjuvant S-1 was associated with relatively good long-term oncologic outcomes for patients with the high-risk gastric cancer.

Dragon III- Phase 1: Feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) for locally-advanced gastric cancer patients in China.. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.22.20110668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Background

Neoadjuvant fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) has shown significant benefits for gastric cancer patients. However, it has not been well accepted in Asian countries. We conducted a prospective study on the safety and feasibility of FLOT regimen in Chinese patients.

Methods

Patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction received 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with the FLOT regimen. The completion status of chemotherapy, adverse events, postoperative morbidities and pathological tumor regression were analyzed. The two-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival are presented.

Results

Altogether, 10 patients were enrolled, and all patients completed 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There were no severe hematological adverse events (grade 3 or above), except for a case of grade 3 anemia. All 10 patients underwent radical gastrectomy. Nine patients had R0 resection, and 3 patients had complete or subtotal pathological tumor regression. Nine patients completed 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, but only one patient completed the full dose of adjuvant chemotherapy. The dose of adjuvant chemotherapy was reduced by 25% or less in the other patients. The median follow-up time was 23.13 months, 8 patients achieved the overall survival endpoint, and 7 patients had relapse-free survival for this period. Two patients died of disease progression.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that the neoadjuvant FLOT regimen is safe and effective for Chinese patients. Dose adjustment is necessary for adjuvant chemotherapy. The pathological regression and survival rates need reevaluation in a larger cohort.

The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT03646591).

Current status of perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer and JCOG perspectives

Perioperative treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer has been inconsistent between Japan and the Western countries. In Japan, D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is regarded as standard treatment, while neoadjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy is considered to be a standard in the Western countries. Stomach Cancer Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) has conducted many perioperative chemotherapy trials. After the publishing of positive results of ACTS-GC trial, stage-specific adjuvant chemotherapy protocols are planned. JCOG1104 was conducted as to demonstrate the non-inferiority of four courses of S-1 to standard eight courses of S-1, because the efficacy of S-1 appears to be sufficient in stage II. The trial failed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of four courses of S-1. S-1 for 1 year is still recognized to be a standard for stage II gastric cancer. For stage III, studies with more intensive treatments were planned as the efficacy of S-1 monotherapy seems to be insufficient. As in the Western countries, JCOG planned the perioperative chemotherapy. However, the clinical staging is a serious issue to select optimal patients for perioperative chemotherapy. JCOG conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate the validity of clinical staging in JCOG1302A. From the results of this study, cT3-4 and cN1-3 are selected as optimal candidate for perioperative chemotherapy. JCOG1509 was conducted to demonstrate the superiority of perioperative chemotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy in these cohorts. Perioperative chemotherapy for marginally resectable tumours such as linitis plastica or extensive nodal disease and special type of cancer like HER2 positive are also conducted.

Linitis Plastica: a Distinct Type of Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with linitis plastica (LP) gastric cancer is reported to be poor. The purpose of our retrospective study was to characterize the clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes of patients with LP, using a univocal definition.

METHODS

We defined LP as gastric cancer that involves more than 1/3 of the gastric wall macroscopically. We reviewed a prospectively maintained institutional database of gastric cancer patients and summarized and compared clinicopathologic factors of patients with and without LP who had undergone gastrectomy. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching, and their overall survival (OS) rates and durations were compared. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted, using gastrectomy as a time-varying covariate.

RESULTS

We identified 740 patients with radiographically non-metastatic gastric cancer, 157 (21.2%) of whom had LP. Most patients with LP had advanced-stage disease (75.8% had stage IV disease, mainly due to peritoneal involvement). Patients with LP had significantly shorter OS durations than did those without LP in the entire cohort (median OS, 14.0 vs. 33.5 months; p value < 0.001) and in the surgical cohort (median OS after gastrectomy, 21.8 vs. 91.0 months; p < 0.001), as well as in the propensity-matched surgical cohort. In the LP cohort, chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.594; p = 0.076), chemoradiation therapy (HR = 0.346; p = 0.001), and gastrectomy (HR = 0.425; p = 0.003) were associated with a longer OS.

CONCLUSIONS

LP is a phenotype of gastric cancer that often presents at an advanced stage, with a high rate of peritoneal involvement. The survival durations of patients with LP were poor in our study, even in the surgical cohort. The use of preoperative chemotherapy, chemoradiation therapy, and gastrectomy appeared to be important in carefully selected patients with localized LP.

Neoadjuvant therapy strategies for advanced gastric cancer: Current innovations and future challenges

Gastric cancer, which has a high incidence and poor prognosis, remains a therapeutic challenge. Recently, neoadjuvant therapy has attracted increasing attention due to high recurrence rate and low survival rate after resection in most patients with advanced stage. Clinical trials show that neoadjuvant approaches confer a significant survival advantage for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer. The specific advantages of chemoradiotherapy compared with chemotherapy have not been clarified; optimal regimens and cycles, particularly in the preoperative setting, should be studied further; and trials aimed at determining the role of targeted and immunological therapies should be conducted.

Effect of apatinib plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection on pathologic response in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: A single-arm, open-label, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

The evidence of combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy with targeted therapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer is inadequate. We conducted a single-arm phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1, oxaliplatin and apatinib (SOXA) in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve patients received three preoperative cycles of S-1 (80-120 mg/day on days 1-14) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m² on day 1) and two cycles of apatinib (500 mg/day for 21 days) at 3-week intervals, followed by surgery. The primary end-point was pathologic response rate (pRR). This trial is registered at ChiCTR.gov.cn: ChiCTR-OPC-16010061.

RESULTS

Of 29 patients included, median age was 60 (range, 43-73) years; 20 (69.0%) were male. The pRR was 89.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.7%-97.8%; 26 of 29 patients; P < 0.001) with 28 patients treated with surgery. All 29 patients were available for preoperative response evaluation, achieving an objective response rate of 79.3% (95% CI, 60.3%-92.0%) and a disease control rate of 96.6% (95% CI, 82.2%-99.9%). The margin-free resection rate was 96.6% (95% CI, 82.2%-99.9%). The pathologic complete response rate was 13.8% (95%CI, 1.2%-26.3%). Downstaging of overall TNM stage was observed in 16 (55.2%) patients. During neoadjuvant therapy, 10 (34.5%) patients had grade ≥III adverse events. No treatment-related death occurred. Surgery-related complications were observed in 12 of 28 (42.9%) patients.

CONCLUSION

SOXA followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma showed favourable activity and manageable safety. A randomised controlled trial in locally advanced gastric or oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04208347).

Graded histologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an optimal criterion for treatment change in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer

Background

The necessity for changing the postoperative therapy regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer after ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery is unclear because there are no criteria to determine which patients can benefit from this treatment. We assessed whether graded histologic regression of <50% could be the criterion for regimen modification.

Methods

The study was designed as a matched-pair case-control investigation to minimize intergroup heterogeneity. Patients were stratified into two groups in which they either continued in the same course of treatment or changed the regimen to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

Thirty-six patients were stratified into two groups. The adjuvant chemotherapy regimen of 12 patients was changed, while 24 patients continued on the same regimen. During an average follow-up period of 36 months, there was no difference observed in overall survival in the two groups (median, 24.0 vs. 31.0 months, P=0.863). In a subgroup analysis, however, patients in the changed regimen group with ypTNM stage III disease tended to have superior overall survival, though this effect was not significant (median, 23.0 vs. 14.0 months, P=0.123). Post-therapy nodal status was associated with overall survival in the multivariate analysis (P=0.014, HR 12.503, 95% CI: 1.664-93.919). Most adverse events were categorized as grade 1 or 2, and all treatments were well tolerated.

Conclusions

Changing treatment based on a graded histologic regression of <50% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not prolong overall survival in patients with gastric cancer. However, changing the adjuvant regimen did reveal a trend towards improved overall survival in the ypTNM stage III subgroup, which merits further investigation using a larger sample size.

Pathological response measured using virtual microscopic slides for gastric cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Although pathological response is a common endpoint used to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for gastric cancer, the problem of a low rate of concordance from evaluations among pathologists remains unresolved. Moreover, there is no globally accepted consensus regarding the optimal evaluation. A previous study based on a clinical trial suggested that pathological response measured using digitally captured virtual microscopic slides predicted patients’ survival well. However, the pathological concordance rate of this approach and its usefulness in clinical practice were unknown.

AIM

To investigate the prognostic utility of pathological response measured using digital microscopic slides in clinical practice.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated pathological specimens of gastric cancer patients who underwent NAC followed by surgery and achieved R0 resection between March 2009 and May 2015. Residual tumor area and primary tumor beds were measured in one captured image slide, which contained the largest diameter of the resected specimens. We classified patients with < 10% residual tumor relative to the primary tumorous area as responders, and the rest as non-responders; we then compared overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) between these two groups. Next, we compared the prognostic utility of this method using conventional Japanese criteria.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were evaluated. The concordance rate between two evaluators was 96.2%. Median RFS of 25 responders and 29 non-responders was not reached (NR) vs 18.2 mo [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.35, P = 0.023], and median OS was NR vs 40.7 mo (HR = 0.3, P = 0.016), respectively. This prognostic value was statistically significant even after adjustment for age, eastern cooperative oncology group performance status, macroscopic type, reason for NAC, and T- and N-classification (HR = 0.23, P = 0.018). This result was also observed even in subgroup analyses for different macroscopic types (Borrmann type 4/non-type 4) and histological types (differentiated/undifferentiated). Moreover, the adjusted HR for OS between responders and non-responders was lower in this method than that in the conventional histological evaluation of Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma criteria (0.23 vs 0.39, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The measurement of pathological response using digitally captured virtual microscopic slides may be useful in clinical practice.

Conversion Surgery for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis Based on the Diagnosis of Second-Look Staging Laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

Patients with positive peritoneal cytology (CY1) or peritoneal dissemination (P1) have significantly poor prognosis. We performed pre-therapeutic staging laparoscopy (SL) to diagnose peritoneal metastasis for patients with advanced gastric cancer. When peritoneal metastasis disappears by chemotherapy for patients with CY1 or P1, we have intention to perform conversion surgery (CS). This study aims to clarify the clinical significance of CS for such patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes of 115 patients with advanced gastric cancer (large type 3, type 4, serosa-invasion) who underwent SL between 2005 and 2014. Disappearance of peritoneal metastasis was confirmed by second-look SL.

RESULTS

CY0P0, CY1P0, and P1 were found in 56, 26, and 33 patients, respectively. In patients with CY1P0, 12 patients (66.7%) underwent CS (R0) as peritoneal cytology turned negative. All cases received S-1-based regimens, with median five treatment courses. The survival of patients with CS was significantly longer than those without CS (median survival time (MST); 41 vs. 11 months, respectively, P < 0.001). We observed no difference in overall survival between patients who underwent CS and patients with CY0P0 at the first SL (P = 0.913). All patients with P1 received chemotherapy. As peritoneal metastasis of five patients (15.2%) disappeared by chemotherapy, those patients underwent the CS (R0). The survival of patients who underwent CS was significantly longer than those who did not (MST; 31 vs. 10 months, respectively, P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that conversion surgery contributes to improvement in survival of patients with peritoneal metastasis.

Randomized phase III trial of gastrectomy with or without neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin for type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer, the short-term safety and surgical results: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG0501)

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with linitis plastica (type 4) and large (≥ 8 cm) ulcero-invasive-type (type 3) gastric cancer is extremely poor, even after extended surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Given the promising results of our previous phase II study evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with S-1 plus cisplatin (JCOG0210), we performed a phase III study to confirm the efficacy of NAC in these patients, with the safety and surgical results are presented here.

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomized to gastrectomy plus adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (Arm A) or NAC followed by gastrectomy + adjuvant chemotherapy (Arm B). The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS). This trial is registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as C000000279.

RESULTS

From February 2007 to July 2013, 300 patients were randomized (Arm A 149, Arm B 151). NAC was completed in 133 patients (88%). Major grade 3/4 adverse events during NAC were neutropenia (29.3%), nausea (5.4%), diarrhea (4.8%), and fatigue (2.7%). Gastrectomy was performed in 147 patients (99%) in Arm A and 139 patients (92%) in Arm B. The operation time was significantly shorter in Arm B than in Arm A (median 255 vs. 240 min, respectively; p = 0.024). There were no significant differences in Grade 2-4 morbidity and mortality (25.2% and 1.3% in Arm A and 15.8% and 0.7% in Arm B, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

NAC for type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer followed by D2 gastrectomy can be safely performed without increasing the morbidity or mortality.

The impact of histological type on the accuracy of preoperative N staging in patients with gastric cancer

Background

The low accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer (GC) complicates decisions on patient indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

We investigated the use of preoperative clinical diagnosis of lymph node involvement (cN) in GC patients compared with postoperative pathological diagnosis.

Results

In a series of 265 patients enrolled at the University of Yamanashi Hospital, the overall sensitivity was 44.4% and specificity was 93.4% of CT for detecting lymph node metastasis. The positive and negative predictive values were 80.0% and 73.8%, respectively. The negative predictive value was lower for undifferentiated adenocarcinoma than that for differentiated adenocarcinoma (64.9% vs. 78.7%, p = 0.034). In cT2 ≤ and cN2 ≤ GC, overdiagnosis of lymph node metastasis was significantly more frequent in patients with differentiated (50.0%) than in undifferentiated (13.3%) adenocarcinoma (p = 0.046).

Conclusions

Diagnostic accuracy of lymph node involvement depended on histological type and cT-stage. Thus, considering preoperative histological type in GC, it may be useful to decide treatment plan.

Is curative gastrectomy justified for gastric cancer with cytology positive as the only stage IV factor?

AIMS

The prognosis of patients with gastric cancer and stage IV factors is poor. However, several recent studies have identified that curative surgery followed by S-1 chemotherapy for cytology positive (CY1) only patients contributed to a better prognosis. This study was designed to compare the prognosis between curative and palliative gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy in CY1 only stage IV gastric cancer.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2016, 1507 patients underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Of these, 51 consecutive patients with only CY1 factor who underwent gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy were enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

(1) Twenty three (45%) patients underwent curative D2 or D2+ gastrectomy, and the remaining 28 (55%) patients underwent palliative gastrectomy, followed by S-1 based or another historical recommended chemotherapy postoperatively. (2) Compared with patients undergoing palliative gastrectomy, patients undergoing curative gastrectomy had a significantly better prognosis (P = 0.042; median survival time: curative vs. palliative, 22.6 months vs. 11.8 months) and a lower incidence of recurrences (P = 0.091). Two- and five-year overall survival rates of patients following curative gastrectomy were 48.2% and 18.2%, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed that venous invasion [P = 0.006; hazard ratio (HR), 3.70 (95% CI: 1.27-9.43)] and curative gastrectomy [P < 0.005; HR, 0.28 (95% CI: 0.12-0.87)] were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

Curative gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy might be justified to improve the prognosis of patients with only CY1 Stage IV gastric cancer.

Tumor blood supply may predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and survival in patients with gastric cancer

Objectives

We investigated the prognostic value of tumor blood supply in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 53 patients with advanced GC treated with FLEEOX chemotherapy. The tumor computed tomography (CT) enhancement value was measured before chemotherapy (CT1; arterial phase CT–plain phase CT). The liver parenchyma CT enhancement value (CT2) was also measured using the same method, to eliminate individual differences. Tumor blood supply was defined as good or poor based on the median CT1/CT2 values. We evaluated the relationships between tumor blood supply and response to chemotherapy, clinicopathologic characteristics, and overall survival (OS).

Results

A good blood supply (GBS) was associated with significantly better clinical and pathological responses to chemotherapy than a poor blood supply (PBS). The 3-year OS was 65.8% for the entire cohort. Patients with a GBS had a significantly higher OS (78.57%) than those with a PBS (54.44%). Additionally, patients with Bormann type III GC had a better blood supply than those with type II GC.

Conclusion

Patients with advanced GC and a GBS are more likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy than those with a PBS. Blood supply may thus be a predictor for chemotherapy response.

A phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1, followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for high-risk advanced gastric cancer: results of the KDOG1001 trial

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with gastric cancer with bulky node metastasis, linitis plastica (type 4), or large ulcero-invasive-type tumors (type 3) remains poor. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) for establishing a new treatment modality that improves prognosis.

METHODS

Patients received up to four 28-day cycles of DCS therapy (docetaxel at 40 mg/m², cisplatin at 60 mg/m² on day 1, and S-1 at 40 mg/m² twice daily for 2 weeks) followed by gastrectomy with D2 nodal dissection. S-1 chemotherapy was administered for 1 year after surgical resection. The primary endpoint was the percentage of complete resections of the primary tumor with clear margins (R0 resection). The planned sample size was 40; this was calculated based on an expected R0 rate of 85% and a threshold R0 rate of 65%, with a one-sided alpha of 5% and a power of 90%.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2017, 40 patients were enrolled. The R0 resection rate was 90%. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events during DCS therapy were leukocytopenia (27.5%), neutropenia (55.0%), and hyponatremia (22.5%). The most common grade 3 or 4 surgical morbidity was pancreatic fistula (12.5%); mortality was 0%. The pathological response rate was 57.5% with a grade 3 histological response rate of 8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DCS was feasible and showed a sufficient R0 resection rate. A future study with a sufficient follow-up period should confirm survival outcomes.

Outcomes of preoperative S-1 and docetaxel combination chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The therapeutic outcomes of stage III gastric cancer patient receiving D2 gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy remain unsatisfactory. To improve the long-term outcomes in this population, the combination of docetaxel and S-1 (DS) therapy can be expected to be a useful regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of NAC-DS for clinical stage III gastric cancer.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2013, 26 patients were enrolled. Patients with clinical stage III gastric cancer received two courses of docetaxel 40 mg/m² on day 1, 15 and S-1 40 mg/m² bid orally on day 1-7, 15-21 every 4 weeks, followed by radical D2 gastrectomy. Short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Yokohama City University, and was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) database (ID: 000011521).

RESULTS

Of 26 patients, 24 (92.3%) patients completed two courses of NAC. After NAC-DS, Grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 5 (19.2%) patients including one patient with febrile neutropenia, anemia in 1 (3.8%) patient and diarrhea in 1 (3.8%) patient. All patients underwent R0 gastrectomy and pathological response was found in 15 (57.6%) patients. Postoperatively, Clavien-Dindo grade II complication occurred in 8 (30.7%) patients and no mortality was observed. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 57.7%, median OS was 78.7 months and recurrence free survival (RFS) was 49.0%, median RFS was 45.4 months with 66.5 months median follow-up. Pathological response (HR = 0.091, 95% CI 0.011-0.730, p = 0.016) and > 5% body weight loss before NAC-DS (HR = 0.133, 95% CI 0.023-0.765, p = 0.024) were independent risk factors for recurrence, > 5% body weight loss before NAC-DS (HR = 0.133, 95% CI 0.023-0.765, p = 0.024) were independent risk factors for overall survival by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

NAC-DS demonstrated acceptable toxicity with a high R0 resection rate in clinical stage III gastric cancer patients, especially in patients with good nutritional status. Further prospective study is warranted to compare the long-term outcomes between with and without NAC-DS.

Re-emerging role of macroscopic appearance in treatment strategy for gastric cancer

Pathological outcomes are definitely the most important prognostic factors in gastric cancer, but they can be obtained only after surgical resection. Use of preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is becoming widespread for aggressive human cancer, so clinical factors such as macroscopic features are important as they are highly predictive for patient prognosis. In gastric cancer, the macroscopic type represents a distinct prognosis; Type 0 represents early gastric cancer with excellent prognosis, but, among advanced tumors, giant Type III and Type IV tumors have a dismal prognosis. Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) Stomach Cancer Study Group adopted macroscopic features as high-risk entities in clinical trials. It makes sense for risk classification to use macroscopic phenotypes because The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Network has lately subcategorized different histologies associated with specific macroscopic types by the molecular features of the whole genome. Dismal prognosis of Type IV gastric cancer is notorious, but similar prognosis was seen in giant Type III gastric cancer defined as 8 cm or beyond, both of which are unique for their propensity of peritoneal dissemination. In this review, clinical relevance including prognosis of such macroscopic high-risk features will be separately debated in the context of precision medicine and updated prognostic outcomes will be presented under the present standard therapy of curative surgery followed by postoperative S-1 chemotherapy. Moreover, promising emerging novel therapeutic strategies including trimodal potent regimens or intraperitoneal chemotherapy will be described for such aggressive gastric cancer.

Co-operative groups in the development of chemotherapy for gastric cancer

In the multimodality treatment strategy for gastric cancer, chemotherapy has an important role in conferring survival benefit. For the last three decades, great progress has been achieved in adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy. Powerful combination regimens using doublet or triplet cytotoxic agents have been developed and new molecular targeted drugs, including trastuzumab and ramucirumab, have been introduced in clinical practice. These advances have resulted from the accumulation of many clinical trials. A well-designed phase III trial can change standard treatment; however, such a trial is hard to complete due to its huge cost and need to recruit many patients. Some co-operative groups have actively made efforts at fundraising and patient recruitment, which can make implementation of high-quality and large-scale phase III trials possible. This review summarizes the development of chemotherapy for gastric cancer with focus on co-operative groups around the world, considering effective treatment developments in gastric cancer. We studied 11 active co-operative groups, including six in Europe, two in the United States, and three in Japan, that have completed one or more phase III trials cited in the major guidelines. Each co-operative group had its own characteristics and contributed to the establishment of standard treatment in each region. International collaboration in the development of gastric cancer treatment may be difficult due to regional differences in standards of care, particularly for resectable gastric cancer. Whereas, intergroup collaboration within each region is a reasonable method to effectively develop treatments for resectable and advanced gastric cancer.

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with intraperitoneal paclitaxel, S-1, and intravenous cisplatin and paclitaxel for stage IIIA or IIIB gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

We carried out a phase II trial to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising a single intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel, followed by intravenous administrations of paclitaxel and cisplatin with S-1 for clinical stage III gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer were eligible. A laparoscopic survey was performed to confirm CY0 and P0. Intraperitoneal paclitaxel (60 mg/m ² ) was administered, followed by systemic chemotherapy. Surgery was performed after two cycles of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the response rate of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints were adverse events, pathological response rate, and overall survival rate.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled. Planned cycles were completed in all patients. Grade 3/4 leukopenia and grade 3/4 neutropenia were observed in four (20%) and seven (35%) patients, respectively. The overall response rate was 70% (partial response: 14, stable disease: 5, progressive disease: 1). All patients underwent R0 gastrectomy with D2 lymph-node dissection, with no surgery-related deaths. The pathological response rate was 65% (13 of 20). The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 90.0% and 77.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy including intraperitoneal paclitaxel followed by sequential intravenous paclitaxel and cisplatin with S-1 for resectable advanced gastric cancer is feasible and effective.

Pathological Complete Response by S-1 Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer

A pathological complete response (pCR) to treatment for gastric cancer is a rare event, even when powerful treatment regimens are used. Herein, a case of 61-year-old male referred to our hospital with advanced gastric cancer who achieved a pCR following chemotherapy using S-1, and subsequently underwent total gastrectomy is reported. His initial esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed an irregular, nodular, ulcerated lesion in the upper third of the stomach that was analyzed by biopsy to be a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed gastric wall thickening and lymph node swelling in the perigastric area. The patient was clinically diagnosed with cT3N1M0, stage IIB advanced gastric cancer. The patient decided against curative surgery due to his work circumstances and was started on S-1 (80 mg/m2) chemotherapy administered orally twice a day for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of no chemotherapy. After four such courses of systemic S-1 chemotherapy, EGD showed a small, reddened lesion with aggregated, whitish lines. The gastric wall thickening and lymphadenopathy in the perigastric area were also reduced remarkably. The patient subsequently agreed to surgery, undergoing total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Gross examination of the surgically resected specimen showed a slightly erythrogenic, flat lesion measuring 1.5×1.0 cm. Pathological examination of the resected specimen and harvested lymph nodes detected no malignant cells. The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient has continued to receive S-1 chemotherapy, with no evidence of recurrence at 4 months post-surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is only the second case of a gastric cancer patient achieving a pCR by S-1 monotherapy reported in the English literature and indicates the potential adoption of curative resection after S-1 chemotherapy as a treatment strategy for advanced gastric cancer.

Value of Preoperative PET-CT in the Prediction of Pathological Stage of Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative precise staging is essential for the treatment of gastric cancer (GC); however, the diagnostic accuracy of conventional modalities needs to be increased. The present study investigated the clinical value of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for the staging of GC.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 117 patients with a clinical diagnosis of advanced GC who underwent PET-CT followed by gastrectomy. The incidence of FDG uptake in the primary tumor or lymph nodes and its relationship with clinicopathological factors, particularly pathological stage (pStage) III/IV, were examined.

RESULTS

FDG uptake in the primary tumor was noted in 83 patients (70.9%). FDG uptake in the lymph nodes was detected in 21 patients (17.9%), and its sensitivity and specificity for lymph node metastasis were 22.7 and 90.5%, respectively. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that FDG uptake in the primary tumor (odds ratio (OR) 2.764; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.104-7.459, p = 0.029) and that in the lymph nodes (OR 4.660; 95% CI 1.675-13.84, p = 0.003) were factors independently associated with pStage III/IV. FDG uptake in the primary tumor detected pStage III/IV with higher sensitivity (80.4%) and that in lymph nodes found pStage III/IV with higher specificity (88.7%) than those of upper endoscopy plus CT (60.9 and 67.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

PET-CT appears to be a useful complementary modality in the assessment of pStage III/IV because of the high sensitivity of FDG uptake in the primary tumor and the high specificity of FDG uptake in the lymph nodes.