Metabolic syndrome in liver transplantation: relation to etiology and immunosuppression

Key challenges of post-liver transplant weight management

Liver transplantation serves as a life-saving intervention for patients with end-stage liver disease, yet long-term survival remains a challenge. Post-liver transplant obesity seems to have a significant contribution to this challenge and it emerges as a significant risk factor for graft steatosis, metabolic syndrome and de-novo malignancy development. This review synthesizes current literature on prevalence, risk factors and management strategies for post-liver transplant obesity, emphasizing its impact on graft and patient survival. Literature review consultation was conducted in Medline/PubMed, SciELO and EMBASE, with the combination of the following keywords: Weight management, liver transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy, lifestyle interventions, bariatric surgery. Immunosuppressive therapy has a significant influence on long-term survival of liver transplant patients, yet it seems to have lesser effect on post-transplant obesity development than previously thought. However, it significantly contributes to the development of other components of metabolic syndrome. Key predisposing factors for post-transplant obesity development encompass elevated recipient and donor body mass index, a history of alcoholic liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, male gender, the absence of cellular rejection and the marital status of the recipient. Tailored immunosuppressive regimens, pharmacotherapy, lifestyle interventions and bariatric surgery represent key components in mitigating post-transplant obesity and improving long-term survival and quality of life in this group of patients. Timely identification and intervention thus hold paramount importance. Further research is warranted to refine optimal management strategies and enhance outcomes in this patient population.

The role of the nervous system in liver diseases

The nervous system significantly participates in maintaining homeostasis, and modulating repair and regeneration processes in the liver. Moreover, the nervous system also plays an important role in the processes associated with the development and progression of liver disease, and can either potentiate or inhibit these processes. The aim of this review is to describe the mechanisms and pathways through which the nervous system influences the development and progression of liver diseases, such as alcohol-associated liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cholestatic liver disease, hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Possible therapeutic implications based on modulation of signals transduction between the nervous system and the liver are also discussed.

Obesity-associated Inflammation and Alloimmunity

Obesity is a worldwide health problem with a rapidly rising incidence. In organ transplantation, increasing numbers of patients with obesity accumulate on waiting lists and undergo surgery. Obesity is in general conceptualized as a chronic inflammatory disease, potentially impacting alloimmune response and graft function. Here, we summarize our current understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms that control obesity-associated adipose tissue inflammation and provide insights into mechanisms affecting transplant outcomes, emphasizing on the beneficial effects of weight loss on alloimmune responses.

Minimizing Metabolic and Cardiac Risk Factors to Maximize Outcomes After Liver Transplantation

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading complication after liver transplantation and has a significant impact on patients' outcomes posttransplant. The major risk factors for post-liver transplant CVD are age, preexisting CVD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, chronic kidney disease, and metabolic syndrome. This review explores the contemporary strategies and approaches to minimizing cardiometabolic disease burden in liver transplant recipients. We highlight areas for potential intervention to reduce the mortality of patients with metabolic syndrome and CVD after liver transplantation.

Distribution and developmental timing of zebrafish liver innervation

Hepatic innervation regulates multiple aspects of liver function, repair and regeneration, and liver denervation is associated with higher rates of metabolic disorders in humans. However, the mechanisms regulating the development of the hepatic nervous system, as well as the role of the hepatic nervous system in liver development and maturation, are still largely unknown. Zebrafish are a widely used model of liver development and regeneration, but hepatic innervation in zebrafish has not yet been described in detail. Here, we examine the extent and developmental timing of hepatic innervation in zebrafish. We demonstrate that innervation is restricted to large bile ducts and blood vessels in both juvenile and adult zebrafish livers, as we find no evidence for direct innervation of hepatocytes. Innervation contacting the periphery of the liver is visible as early as 72 h post-fertilization, while intrahepatic innervation is not established until 21 days post-fertilization. Therefore, zebrafish hepatic innervation resembles that of previously examined fish species, making them an excellent model to investigate both the role of the hepatic nervous system during liver maturation and the mechanisms governing the elaboration of the intrahepatic nerve network between fish and mammals.

Neuroimmune modulation in liver pathophysiology

The liver, the largest organ in the human body, plays a multifaceted role in digestion, coagulation, synthesis, metabolism, detoxification, and immune defense. Changes in liver function often coincide with disruptions in both the central and peripheral nervous systems. The intricate interplay between the nervous and immune systems is vital for maintaining tissue balance and combating diseases. Signaling molecules and pathways, including cytokines, inflammatory mediators, neuropeptides, neurotransmitters, chemoreceptors, and neural pathways, facilitate this complex communication. They establish feedback loops among diverse immune cell populations and the central, peripheral, sympathetic, parasympathetic, and enteric nervous systems within the liver. In this concise review, we provide an overview of the structural and compositional aspects of the hepatic neural and immune systems. We further explore the molecular mechanisms and pathways that govern neuroimmune communication, highlighting their significance in liver pathology. Finally, we summarize the current clinical implications of therapeutic approaches targeting neuroimmune interactions and present prospects for future research in this area.

Post-Liver Transplant Metabolic Syndrome

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the second most frequent cause of liver transplantation following alcoholic liver disease. With longer follow-up and increased survival rates, the occurrence rate of the metabolic syndrome is increasing with time among liver transplant recipients. Reappearances of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after transplantation, both as recurring cases and new instances, are prevalent; nonetheless, the recurrence of fibrosis is minimal. Recognizing populations at elevated risk and enhancing the management of metabolic-related conditions are crucial for maintaining a healthy transplanted organ, particularly considering the prolonged utilization of immunosuppressive treatments. Furthermore, NASH-related cirrhosis patients who had transplant are at a greater risk of cardiovascular, renal events and increased incidence of cancer, necessitating a unique care strategy. This review discusses post-transplant metabolic syndrome, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention strategy, recurrent and de novo NAFLD and customized immunosuppression.

The Effects of Sustained Immunosuppression Withdrawal After Liver Transplantation on Metabolic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Liver transplant (LT) recipients often experience adverse effects of immunosuppressive (IS) drugs, especially on metabolic profiles. Selected LT recipients can achieve successful IS withdrawal; however, its effects on metabolic syndrome (MS) are unknown.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center study investigating the incidence and/or regression of MS in 75 selected LT recipients who were previously enrolled in prospective IS withdrawal trials between 1999 and 2017. Patients who were transplanted due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis/metabolic-associated fatty liver disease were excluded, as well as those with a follow-up <3 y after IS weaning.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (58.7%) achieved sustained withdrawal or minimization of immunosuppression (WMIS) and 31 patients (41.3%) required reintroduction of immunosuppression (no-WMIS). Among LT recipients who were metabolically healthy (n = 52, 69.3%) before the start of IS weaning, there was a significantly lower rate of de novo MS in WMIS patients compared with no-WMIS patients after 5 y (8.3% and 47.8%, respectively, P = 0.034). Of 23 LT recipients (30.7%) who had MS at the time of commencing IS withdrawal, complete regression of MS was observed in 47.1% of WMIS patients and in none (0%) of the no-WMIS patients after 5 y (P = 0.054). Furthermore, individual components of MS were better controlled in IS-weaned patients, such as arterial hypertension and abnormal serum lipids.

CONCLUSIONS

Achievement of sustained IS withdrawal reduces the incidence of de novo MS development in metabolically healthy patients and increases the likelihood of MS regression in patients with established MS. The foreseeable long-term beneficial effects of these favorable metabolic changes on morbidity and mortality of LT recipients require further investigation.

Association of Abdominal Aortic Calcification With the Postoperative Metabolic Syndrome Components After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the risk factors for components of metabolic syndrome, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, more than a year after liver transplantation.

METHODS

This study included 164 patients with liver failure secondary to acute and chronic liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent liver transplantation between 2000 and 2019. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors associated with metabolic syndrome components after liver transplantation.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 10.5 years. Of the 164 patients who underwent liver transplantation, 144 (87.8%) developed components of metabolic syndrome after liver transplantation. The most common cause of liver failure was hepatitis C virus infection (34.1%). The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma was 36.0%. In univariate analysis, preoperative diabetes mellitus was a significantly more common component of metabolic syndrome than the others. In multivariate analysis, preoperative abdominal aortic calcification was a risk factor for the new onset of all components of metabolic syndrome after liver transplantation, despite the varying degree of calcification at risk of development (odds ratio for diabetes mellitus = 3.487, P = .0069; odds ratio for hypertension = 2.914, P = .0471; odds ratio for dyslipidemia = 3.553, P = .0030).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative abdominal aortic calcification was significantly associated with the development of each metabolic syndrome component after liver transplantation.

Post-transplant Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Metabolic Syndrome After Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Indians

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is common but is not well described in the living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) setting.

METHODS

The study was conducted at a large volume LDLT center in north India. Adult (age >18 years at the time of transplant) liver transplantation (LT) recipients were included. Patients with any history of alcohol use were excluded. The study was conducted prospectively from July 2022 to April 2023, and all patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up after transplant attending outpatient services were included. NAFLD was diagnosed by ultrasound showing steatosis in the absence of other etiologies.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 103 males and 14 females, aged 48 ± 10 years at the time of LT and 53 ± 10 years at the time of inclusion in the study. The median follow-up from LT was 62 (32-97 months). A total of 39 (33%) patients suffered from post-LT NAFLD. NAFLD was recurrent in 9/23 (39%, in patients with NASH or cryptogenic cirrhosis as etiology of LT) and de novo in 30/94 (31%). Pre and post-LT higher body mass index, presence of diabetes and higher serum triglycerides values were associated with the development of post-LT NAFLD. Post-transplant metabolic syndrome was present in 58/95 (61%) LDLT recipients using HbA1c 5.7 to 6.4 as a marker of prediabetes.

CONCLUSION

Post-LT NAFLD was present in one-third of the patients and metabolic syndrome in the majority of the patients at a median follow-up of 62 months after LDLT.

Donor Diabetes and Steatosis Affects Recipient Survival Following Liver Transplantation Based on Etiology of Liver Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) offers patients with decompensated cirrhosis the best chance at long-term survival. With the rising prevalence of diabetes, further clarity is needed on the impact of receiving a liver allograft from a donor with diabetes on post-LT outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the impact of donor diabetes on clinical outcomes after LT.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing registry data of LT recipients from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021. Outcomes analysis was performed using Cox proportional model for all-cause mortality and graft failure. Confounding was reduced by coarsened exact matching causal inference analysis.

RESULTS

Of 66 960 donors identified, 7178 (10.7%) had diabetes. Trend analysis revealed a longitudinal increase in the prevalence of donor diabetes ( P  < 0.001). Importantly, donor diabetes was associated with increased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.19; P  < 0.001) and graft failure (HR: 1.16; 95% CI, 1.11-1.22; P  < 0.001). Receiving donor organ with diabetes reduced graft survival in patients who received LT for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis (HR: 1.26; 95% CI, 1.13-1.41; P  < 0.001) but not other etiologies of cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor diabetes was associated with worse outcomes post-LT, particularly in patients receiving LT for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis. Future studies are needed to better understand the mechanism underlying this association to develop better risk stratification and clinical practice to improve the outcomes of the transplanted patients.

Primary Care Utilization, Preventative Screening, and Control of Metabolic Syndrome in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis Liver Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVES

Patients with pre-transplant metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) are at high risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) after liver transplant. While many patients are co-managed by a transplant team, most preventative screening and MetS management may occur in the primary care setting. We aimed to evaluate primary care utilization by MASH liver transplant recipients as well as MetS screening and control.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review that included adults who underwent liver transplant for MASH or cryptogenic cirrhosis at a single institution from January 2010 to December 2016, had available primary care data, and at least 36-months of follow-up post-transplant. Measures included primary care utilization, adherence to screening guidelines, and control of MetS. We used Fischer's exact test to explore the association of primary care utilization with screening and control.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients met inclusion criteria with 366 visits reviewed. The median time to first visit was 68 days post-transplant and patients had a median of 9 total visits. Few patients met screening guidelines for diabetes (8.1%) or hyperlipidemia (10.8%). The percentage of patients with control of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia decreased over the 36-month follow-up period. Primary care utilization was not associated with adherence to screening recommendations for diabetes (P = .141) or hyperlipidemia (P = .103). Higher primary care utilization was not associated with control of hypertension (P = .107), diabetes (P = .871), or hyperlipidemia (P = .999).

CONCLUSION

More research is needed to investigate barriers to screening and management of MetS conditions in this high-risk patient population in the primary care setting as well as to optimize post-transplant care coordination.

Exercise interventions for adults after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The finding that exercise is inversely related to metabolic syndrome after transplantation is novel and suggests that exercise interventions might provide a means for reducing metabolic syndrome complications in liver transplantation recipients. The use of exercise for increasing the physical activity daily levels by more frequent, higher intensity, and longer duration of training sessions, or the sum of these components may be necessary to counteract the effects of the pretransplant reduced activity, metabolic disturbances, and post-transplant immunosuppression, as well as improve physical function and aerobic capacity following liver transplantation. Regular physical activity has a long-term positive impact on recovery following various surgical procedures including transplantation, giving people the opportunity to return to an active life with their families, in society, and in their professional life. Likewise, specific muscle strength training may attenuate the loss of strength after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of exercise-based interventions in adults after liver transplantation compared to no exercise, sham interventions, or another type of exercise.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 2 September 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials in liver transplantation recipients comparing any type of exercise with no exercise, sham interventions, or another type of exercise.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. all-cause mortality; 2. serious adverse events; and 3. health-related quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were 4. a composite of cardiovascular mortality and cardiac disease; 5. aerobic capacity; 6. muscle strength; 7. morbidity; 8. non-serious adverse events; and 9. cardiovascular disease post-transplantation. We assessed risk of bias of the individual trials using RoB 1, described the interventions using the TIDieR checklist, and used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three randomised clinical trials. The trials randomised 241 adults with liver transplantation, of which 199 participants completed the trials. The trials were conducted in the USA, Spain, and Turkey. They compared exercise versus usual care. The duration of the interventions ranged from two to 10 months. One trial reported that 69% of participants who received the exercise intervention were adherent to the exercise prescription. A second trial reported a 94% adherence to the exercise programme, with participants attending 45/48 sessions. The remaining trial reported a 96.8% adherence to the exercise intervention during the hospitalisation period. Two trials received funding; one from the National Center for Research Resources (US) and the other from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Spain). The remaining trial did not receive funding. All trials were at an overall high risk of bias, derived from high risk of selective reporting bias and attrition bias in two trials. The results on all-cause mortality showed a higher risk of death in the exercise group versus the control group, but these results are very uncertain (risk ratio (RR) 3.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 13.37; 2 trials, 165 participants; I² = 0%; very low-certainty evidence). The trials did not report data on serious adverse events excluding mortality or non-serious adverse events. However, all trials reported that there were no adverse effects associated with exercise. We are very uncertain on whether exercise compared with usual care has a beneficial or harmful effect on health-related quality of life assessed using the 36-item Short Form Physical Functioning subscale at the end of the intervention (mean difference (MD) 10.56, 95% CI -0.12 to 21.24; 2 trials, 169 participants; I² = 71%; very low-certainty evidence). None of the trials reported data on composite of cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular disease, and cardiovascular disease post-transplantation. We are very uncertain if there are differences in aerobic capacity in terms of VO2peak at the end of the intervention between groups (MD 0.80, 95% CI -0.80 to 2.39; 3 trials, 199 participants; I² = 0%; very low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain if there are differences in muscle strength at end of the intervention between groups (MD 9.91, 95% CI -3.68 to 23.50; 3 trials, 199 participants; I² = 44%; very low-certainty evidence). One trial measured perceived fatigue using the Checklist Individual Strength (CIST). Participants in the exercise group showed a clinically important lower degree of fatigue perception than participants in the control group, with a mean reduction of 40 points in the CIST (95% CI 15.62 to 64.38; 1 trial, 30 participants).  We identified three ongoing studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on very low-certainty evidence in our systematic review, we are very uncertain of the role of exercise training (aerobic, resistance-based exercises, or both) in affecting mortality, health-related quality of life, and physical function (i.e. aerobic capacity and muscle strength) in liver transplant recipients. There were few data on the composite of cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular disease post-transplantation, and adverse event outcomes. We lack larger trials with blinded outcome assessment, designed according to the SPIRIT statement and reported according to the CONSORT statement.

Immunotolerance in liver transplantation: a primer for the clinician

The use of immunosuppressive medications for solid organ transplantation is associated with cardiovascular, metabolic, and oncologic complications. On the other hand, the development of graft rejection is associated with increased mortality and graft dysfunction. Liver transplant recipients can withdraw from immunosuppression without developing graft injury while preserving an adequate antimicrobial response - a characteristic known as immunotolerance. Immunotolerance can be spontaneously or pharmacologically achieved. Contrary to the classic dogma, clinical studies have elucidated low rates of true spontaneous immunotolerance (no serologic or histological markers of immune injury) among liver transplant recipients. However, clinical, serologic, and tissue biomarkers can aid in selecting patients in whom immunosuppression can be safely withdrawn. For those who failed an immunosuppression withdrawal trial or are at high risk of rejection, pharmacological interventions for immunotolerance induction are under development. In this review, we provide an overview of the mechanisms of immunotolerance, the clinical studies investigating predictors and biomarkers of spontaneous immunotolerance, as well as the potential pharmacological interventions for inducing it.

Current status of liver transplantation for non-B non-C liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma

Recently, non-B non-C chronic liver diseases, including alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), have markedly increased worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as well as decompensated liver cirrhosis. In Japan, where the source of liver grafts is strongly dependent on living donors, efforts have been made to unify the indications for eligibility of HCC patients for LT, leading to the development of 5-5-500 criteria. Along with the expansion of eligibility for LT, the current changing trends in underlying liver diseases of LT recipients, which are related to the rising tide of non-B non-C cirrhosis and HCC, are highlighting the importance of peri-transplant management of patients with various comorbidities. The post-LT prognosis of patients with ALD is significantly affected by de novo malignancies and metabolic syndrome-related complications as well as posttransplant alcohol relapse. NAFLD/NASH patients often suffer from obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and other metabolic syndrome-related disorders, and nonneoplastic factors such as cardiovascular events and recurrence of NAFLD/NASH have a significant impact on post-LT outcomes. Patient management in the peri-transplant period as well as risk assessment for LT are key to improving post-LT outcomes in the era of a growing number of cases of LT for non-B non-C liver diseases.

mTORi-based immunosuppression reduces HCC recurrence at the expense of increased adverse side effects: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sirolimus and everolimus are mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) that can reduce relapse rates following liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Herein, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of mTORi and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in reducing HCC recurrence and survival adverse effects (AEs) in HCC patients after LT. Systematic literature searches were conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases up to October 2021. The primary outcomes of interest were tumor recurrence rates and overall survival. The secondary outcomes were the characterization and incidence of AEs. A total of 38 trials involving 10,607 participants was included in the analysis. The incidence of recurrence and overall mortality was significantly lower in the mTORi than in the CNI group (relative ratio [RR]: .78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .68-.89 and RR: .76, 95% CI: .67-.86, respectively). The incidence of some AEs and complications such as acne, anemia, abnormal healing, dyslipidemia, depression, diarrhea, edema, headache/migraine, hypercholesterolemia, incisional hernia, infection, leukopenia, mouth ulceration, pyrexia, proteinuria, pruritis, rash, and thrombocytopenia were higher in the mTORi than in the CNI group. mTORi reduced the recurrence incidence and overall 5-year mortality rate but increased many other incidences of AEs compared with that by CNI. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of the risks and benefits of mTORi use when managing patients undergoing LT for HCC.

Metabolic mechanisms for and treatment of NAFLD or NASH occurring after liver transplantation

The rising tide of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) associated with the obesity epidemic is a major health concern worldwide. NAFLD - specifically its more advanced form, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related cirrhosis - is now the fastest growing indication for liver transplantation in the USA and Europe. Although the short-term and mid-term overall survival rates of patients who receive a liver transplant for NASH-related cirrhosis are essentially similar to those of patients who receive a transplant for other liver indications, recipients with NASH-related cirrhosis have an increased risk of waiting-list mortality and of developing recurrent liver disease and cardiometabolic complications in the longer term after liver transplantation. This Review provides a brief overview of the epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH and the occurrence of NAFLD or NASH in patients after liver transplantation for NASH and other liver indications. It also discusses the putative metabolic mechanisms underlying the emergence of NAFLD or NASH after liver transplantation as well as optimal therapeutic approaches for recipients of liver transplants, including the management of cardiometabolic comorbidities, tailored immunosuppression, lifestyle changes and pharmacotherapy for NAFLD.

Most Cases of Cryptogenic Cirrhosis May be Nonobese Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis-Risk Factors of Liver Steatosis After Liver Transplantation for Cryptogenic Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Study

Aim The course of cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC) after liver transplantation (LT) is unknown. We therefore clarified the natural course post-LT for CC and investigated the etiology of CC. Methods Eighteen patients who underwent LT for CC were included. To rule out the possibility of NASH in patients with CC, those with a history of obesity or liver steatosis found pretransplantation were excluded. A liver biopsy was performed one year after LT and annually thereafter. Results Liver steatosis and steatohepatitis were identified in 61% and 39% of patients after LT, respectively, with a median time to the onset of 12 and 27 months, respectively. There were no other pathological findings such as liver allograft rejection, autoimmune hepatitis, or primary biliary cholangitis. The body mass index after LT (28.5 vs. 22.4 kg/m²; P=0.002) and mean muscle attenuation at the time of LT were significantly higher (33.3 vs. 25.8 Hounsfield units, P=0.03) and the postoperative hospitalization period shorter (50 vs. 102 days; P=0.02) in the steatosis group than in the non-steatosis group. Recipients were significantly younger in the steatohepatitis subgroup than in the simple steatosis subgroup (55.0 vs. 63.5 years old; P=0.04). Conclusions Despite excluding CC patients with a history of obesity, we observed that patients with CC had a high prevalence of steatosis after LT than those without CC. Young patients with a favorable postoperative course were noted to have a high risk of NASH after LT for CC. Patients with CC may represent cases of non-obese NASH.

Bariatric surgery, obesity and liver transplantation

The obesity epidemic has profoundly impacted the epidemiology and trends of liver disease. In the current era, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) progressing to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has emerged as the second leading indication for liver transplant (LT) and has been associated with the rising rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with and without underlying cirrhosis. Obesity has been associated with poor post-transplant outcomes including lower patient and graft survival; higher risk of post-operative metabolic complications; poor wound healing; and higher infection rates. Bariatric surgery is currently the most effective management of morbid obesity and has been offered to patients both in the pre and post LT setting. The techniques attempted in LT recipients most commonly include sleeve gastrectomy (SG), gastric bypass surgery with few cases of gastric banding and biliopancreatic diversion. However, there is lack of evidence-based data on the optimal management for patients with obesity and who are liver transplant candidates and/or recipients. In the following discussion, we present the highlights from a review of the literature.

New-onset Obesity After Lung Transplantation: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant (LTx) recipients who gain weight after transplantation may experience an upward shift in body mass index (BMI) that places them in the obese category. The incidence, risk factors, and impact on metabolic health and mortality of new-onset obesity have not been documented in the LTx setting.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included 564 LTx recipients. Individuals were stratified according to their BMI trajectories from pretransplant evaluation up to 10 y posttransplant. New-onset obesity was defined as a pretransplant BMI <30 kg/m2 and posttransplant BMI >30 kg/m2. The incidence, risk factors, and posttransplant diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, and mortality of recipients with new-onset obesity were compared with those of nonobese (BMI <30 kg/m2, pre/post-LTx), consistently obese (BMI >30 kg/m2, pre/post-LTx), and obese recipients with weight loss (BMI >30 kg/m2 pre-LTx, BMI <30 kg/m2 post-LTx).

RESULTS

We found that 14% of recipients developed obesity after transplantation. Overweight individuals (odds ratio [OR]: 9.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] [4.86-16.69]; P < 0.001) and candidates with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 6.93; 95% CI [2.30-20.85]; P = 0.001) and other diagnoses (OR: 4.28; 95% CI [1.22-14.98]; P = 0.023) were at greater risk. Multivariable regression analysis showed that new-onset obesity was associated with a greater risk of metabolic syndrome (hazard ratio: 1.70; 95% CI [1.17-2.46]; P = 0.005), but not of posttransplant diabetes mellitus, than nonobesity. Recipients with new-onset obesity had a survival comparable to that of consistently obese individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

A greater understanding of the multifaceted nature of post-LTx obesity may lead to interventions that are better tailored to the characteristics of these individuals.

Posttransplant complications in the setting of acute-on-chronic liver failure and considerations regarding immunosuppression

Content available: Audio Recording.

Ex vivo generation of regulatory T cells from liver transplant recipients using costimulation blockade

The potential of adoptive cell therapy with regulatory T cells (Tregs) to promote transplant tolerance is under active exploration. However, the impact of specific transplant settings and protocols on Treg manufacturing is not well-delineated. Here, we compared the use of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients before or after liver transplantation to the use of healthy control PBMCs to determine their suitability for Treg manufacture using ex vivo costimulatory blockade with belatacept. Despite liver failure or immunosuppressive therapy, the capacity for Treg expansion during the manufacturing process was preserved. These experiments did not identify performance or quality issues that disqualified the use of posttransplant PBMCs-the currently favored protocol design. However, as Treg input correlated with output, significant CD4-lymphopenia in both pre- and posttransplant patients limited Treg yield. We therefore turned to leukapheresis posttransplant to improve absolute yield. To make deceased donor use feasible, we also developed protocols to substitute splenocytes for PBMCs as allostimulators. In addition to demonstrating that this Treg expansion strategy works in a liver transplant context, this preclinical study illustrates how characterizing cellular input populations and their performance can both inform and respond to clinical trial design and Treg manufacturing requirements.

An Essential Guide for Managing Post-Liver Transplant Patients: What Primary Care Physicians Should Know

With long-term survival after liver transplantation becoming the rule, care for medical problems arising over time in liver-transplanted patients gained increasing importance. The most common causes of death occurring more than 1 year after liver transplantation are unrelated to liver diseases and facilitated by immunosuppressive treatments; examples are malignancies, renal failure, and cardiovascular, metabolic, and infectious diseases. Recipients receive life-long follow-up care at transplant centers, however, the increasing number of liver-transplanted patients is saturating the health care supply that transplant centers have to offer. Primary care physicians are increasingly exposed to liver-transplanted patients, even in the early periods after transplant, and an understanding of the most common risks and complications faced by these patients would enhance their care. This article reviews the long-term care of liver transplant recipients, emphasizing the key internal medicine-related issues that should be known by primary care physicians. A specific section is devoted to implementing strategies to involve these physicians in the long-term follow-up of liver-transplanted patients in close collaboration with transplant hepatologists.

DO THE IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE DRUGS AFFECT THE HYPOTHALAMIC NUCLEI INVOLVED IN THE REGULATION OF FOOD INTAKE? AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

PURPOSE

Immunosuppressive drugs are essential for reducing the rejection risk in post-transplant patients, which is commonly associated with this procedure. However, side effects of those drugs on the hypothalamic nuclei involved in the food intake regulation, excessive weight gain, and also associated comorbidities are still unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze possible changes in the neuronal morphology and cell density in the paraventricular nuclei, lateral hypothalamic area, dorsomedial nuclei, and ventromedial and arcuate nuclei in Wistar rats submitted to immunosuppressive treatment with tacrolimus (TAC) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).

METHODS

Adult male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to the following groups according to the oral treatment administered for 14 weeks: control, sham (placebo), TAC (1 mg/kg of weight), and MMF (30 mg/kg of weight). After treatment, the animals were sacrificed and their brains fixed for later histological staining. Subsequently, the slides were photodocumented for stereological analysis of the hypothalamic nuclei.

RESULTS

All experimental groups showed a weight gain throughout the study. There was no significant difference in neuronal density/number of cells in the hypothalamic nuclei between groups. Morphological changes were not detected in the hypothalamic neurons.

CONCLUSION

Treatments with immunosuppressants could not modify the morphological and cell density aspects of the hypothalamic nuclei during this supplementation period.

Hepatic Nervous System in Development, Regeneration, and Disease

The liver is innervated by autonomic and sensory fibers of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems that regulate liver function, regeneration, and disease. Although the importance of the hepatic nervous system in maintaining and restoring liver homeostasis is increasingly appreciated, much remains unknown about the specific mechanisms by which hepatic nerves both influence and are influenced by liver diseases. While recent work has begun to illuminate the developmental mechanisms underlying recruitment of nerves to the liver, evolutionary differences contributing to species-specific patterns of hepatic innervation remain elusive. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the development of the hepatic nervous system and its role in liver regeneration and disease. We also highlight areas in which further investigation would greatly enhance our understanding of the evolution and function of liver innervation.

A prospective longitudinal assessment of de novo metabolic syndrome after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

De novo metabolic syndrome (MS) is a frequent complication after liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this prospective study is to identify potential risk factors longitudinally associated to post-LT de novo MS. Patients without pre-LT MS who underwent LT between April 2013 and October 2017 were prospectively included. Metabolic variables were collected at LT and at 6, 12 and 24 months post-LT.

RESULTS

63 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (76% male, mean age 53.6±9.5 years). The prevalence of de novo MS was 46%, 43% and 49% at 6, 12, and 24 months after LT respectively. Among other MS components, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, hypertension and hypertriglyceridemia significantly increased after LT. Considering the baseline characteristics at the adjusted analysis, alcoholic liver disease (OR 4.17, 95%CI 1.20-14.51; p = 0.03) and hypertension pre-LT (OR 11.3, 95%CI 1.49-85.46; p = 0.02 were confirmed as independent risk factors of post-LT de novo MS. In the time varying analysis, only eGFR (OR 0.97, 95%IC 0.97-0.98; p<0.0001) was found associated with post-LT de novo MS.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo MS frequently occurs shortly after LT, affecting nearly half of patients at 24 months post-LT. Lifestyle modifications should be recommended starting early post-LT, particularly for patients with established risk factors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The Need to Update Endpoints and Outcome Analysis in the Rapidly Changing Field of Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) survival rates have continued to improve over the last decades, mostly due to the reduction of mortality early after transplantation. The advancement is facilitating a liberalization of access to LT, with more patients with higher risk profiles being added to the waiting list. At the same time, the persisting organ shortage fosters strategies to rescue organs of high-risk donors. This is facilitated by novel technologies such as machine perfusion. Owing to these developments, reconsideration of the current and emerging endpoints for the assessment of the efficacy of existing and new therapies is warranted. While conventional early endpoints in LT have focused on the damage induced to the parenchyma, the fate of the bile duct and the recurrence of the underlying disease have a stronger impact on the long-term outcome. In light of this evolving landscape, we here attempt to reflect on the appropriateness of the currently used endpoints in the field of LT trials.

Multidirectional facets of obesity management in the metabolic syndrome population after liver transplantation

The obesity pandemic has resulted in an increasing demand for liver transplantation and has significantly altered the profile of liver transplant candidates in addition to affecting posttransplantation outcomes. In this review, we discuss a broad range of clinical approaches that warrant attention to provide comprehensive and patient‐centred medical care to liver transplant recipients, and to be prepared to confront the rapidly changing clinical challenges and ensuing dilemmas. Adipose tissue is a complex and metabolically active organ. Visceral fat deposition is a key predictor of overall obesity‐related morbidity and mortality. Limited pharmacological options are available for the treatment of obesity in the liver transplant population. Bariatric surgery may be an alternative in eligible patients. The rapidly increasing prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global concern; NAFLD affects both pre‐ and posttransplantation outcomes. Numerous studies have investigated pharmacological and nonpharmacological management of NAFLD and some of these have shown promising results. Liver transplant recipients are constantly exposed to numerous factors that result in intestinal microbiota alterations, which were linked to the development of obesity, diabetes type 2, metabolic syndrome (MS), NAFLD, and hepatocellular cancer. Microbiota modifications with probiotics and prebiotics bring gratifying results in the management of metabolic complications. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is successfully performed in many medical indications. However, the safety and efficacy profiles of FMT in immunocompromised patients remain unclear. Obesity together with immunosuppressive treatment, may affect the pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic properties of coadministered medications. Individualized immunosuppressive regimens are recommended following liver transplantation to address possible metabolic concerns. Effective and comprehensive management of metabolic complications is shown to yield multiple beneficial results in the liver transplant population and may bring gratifying results in improving long‐term survival rates.

Role of circadian rhythm and autonomic nervous system in liver function: a hypothetical basis for improving the management of hepatic encephalopathy

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common, incapacitating complication of cirrhosis that affects many patients with cirrhosis. Although several therapies have proven effective in the treatment and prevention of this condition, several patients continue to suffer from covert disease or episodes of relapse. The circadian rhythm has been demonstrated to be pivotal for many body functions, including those of the liver. Here, we explore the impact of circadian rhythm-dependent signaling on the liver and discuss the evidence of its impact on liver pathology and metabolism. We describe the various pathways through which circadian influences are mediated. Finally, we introduce a novel method for improving patient response to drugs aimed at treating HE by utilizing the circadian rhythm. A digital system that introduces a customization-based technique for improving the response to therapies is presented as a hypothetical approach for improving the effectiveness of current medications used for the treatment of recurrent and persistent hepatic encephalopathy.

Weight gain following pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetes is associated with a worse glycemic profile: A retrospective cohort study

AIMS

Evaluate the weight trajectories after pancreas transplantation (PT) and their relationships with pancreas graft outcomes in type 1 diabetes (T1D).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study. T1D individuals who underwent PT were recruited (T1D-PT; n = 194) and divided into three groups according to transplantation date: 1999-2004 (n = 57), 2005-2009 (n = 79), 2010-2015 (n = 58). For weight comparisons, a random sample of T1D without renal impairment was also recruited during 2015 (n = 61; T1D-control).

RESULTS

The median follow-up for the T1D-PT group was 11.1 years. Despite significant weight loss at 6 months (65.7 ± 12.4 vs. 64.1 ± 11.4 Kg; p < 0.001), a stepped increase was seen thereafter (60 months: 68.0 ± 14.0 Kg; p < 0.001). Participants from the 2010-2015 period showed higher weight gain (p < 0.001), outweighing that observed in the T1D-control (60 months: +4.69 ± 8.49 vs. -0.97 ± 4.59 Kg; p = 0.003). Weight gain between 6 and 36 months was directly associated with fasting glucose and HbA1c at 36 months, and with HbA1c at 60 months (p < 0.05). However, in Cox-regression models adjusted for age, sex, and several recipient and PT-related variables, the third tertile of weight gain between 6 and 36 months showed a non-significant increase in the graft failure/dysfunction (HR 2.33 [0.75-7.27]).

CONCLUSIONS

Weight gain post-PT was associated with glucose-related biochemical markers of graft dysfunction, which needs confirmation in further studies.

Atherogenic Dyslipidemia After Liver Transplantation: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly atherosclerosis-associated CVD, is a major cause of long-term mortality after liver transplantation (LT). The liver is central in lipid homeostasis, and changes associated with insulin resistance, weight gain, adipose tissue inflammation, and development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) after LT promote atherogenesis. These factors synergistically alter lipid homeostasis, thereby leading to the production of proatherogenic lipoproteins, which contribute to the heighted risk of CVD-associated events observed in LT recipients. Although the exact mechanism promoting this shift of a proatherogenic lipoprotein profile is currently not known, the choice of immunosuppression and preexisting metabolic risk factors (ie, NAFLD) are likely contributors. This shift in proatherogenic lipoprotein subparticles presents clinical challenges as the traditional lipid profile employed in clinical practice may not fully capture this atherogenic risk. This review focuses on lipoprotein metabolism and atherogenesis in LT recipients.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of post-transplant diabetes mellitus in liver transplant recipients

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) compromises long-term survival in liver transplant (LT) recipients. The aim of this study was to determine incidence of PTDM after LT and risk factors associated with it. A literature search was conducted, and prospective studies that reported on the incidence of PTDM in LT adult patients on tacrolimus, sirolimus, or cyclosporine were included. We performed random effects meta-analyses for the incidence of PTDM stratified by immunosuppressant and time period. Of 9817 articles identified, 26 studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 21 studies were eligible for the quantitative analysis representing 79 559 LT recipients in 32 separate treatment arms. The proportion of patients who developed PTDM by two-three years was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.10-0.24) for cyclosporine, 0.23 (95% CI: 0.14-0.36) for tacrolimus, and 0.27 (95% CI: 0.23-0.30) for sirolimus. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that sirolimus-based immunosuppression was associated with a higher incidence of PTDM than tacrolimus or cyclosporine at two-three years. However, there were only two studies that compared all three drugs which is a limitation of the study and requires more studies with patients on sirolimus. Recipient factors increasing the risk of PTDM are older age, male sex, and high BMI.

Individualized treatment options for patients with non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic liver disease

The obesity pandemic has led to a significant increase in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). While dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases guide treatment in patients without signs of liver fibrosis, liver related morbidity and mortality becomes relevant for MAFLD's progressive form, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and upon development of liver fibrosis. Statins should be prescribed in patients without significant fibrosis despite concomitant liver diseases but are underutilized in the real-world setting. Bariatric surgery, especially Y-Roux bypass, has been proven to be superior to conservative and/or medical treatment for weight loss and resolution of obesity-associated diseases, but comes at a low but existent risk of surgical complications, reoperations and very rarely, paradoxical progression of NASH. Once end-stage liver disease develops, obese patients benefit from liver transplantation (LT), but may be at increased risk of perioperative infectious complications. After LT, metabolic comorbidities are commonly observed, irrespective of the underlying liver disease, but MAFLD/NASH patients are at even higher risk of disease recurrence. Few studies with low patient numbers evaluated if, and when, bariatric surgery may be an option to avoid disease recurrence but more high-quality studies are needed to establish clear recommendations. In this review, we summarize the most recent literature on treatment options for MAFLD and NASH and highlight important considerations to tailor therapy to individual patient's needs in light of their risk profile.

Liver Transplant Recipient, Caregiver, and Provider Perceptions of Cardiovascular Disease and Related Risk Factors After Transplant

Liver transplant recipients (LTRs) are at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We sought to characterize LTR, informal caregiver, and health care provider perceptions about CVD care after liver transplantation (LT) to inform the design of solutions to improve care. Participants included adult LTRs, their caregivers, and multispecialty health care providers recruited from an urban tertiary care network who participated in 90-minute focus groups and completed a brief survey. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis, and survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. A total of 17 LTRs, 9 caregivers, and 22 providers participated in 7 separate focus groups. Most (93.3%) LTRs and caregivers were unaware of the risk of CVD after LT. Although 54.5% of providers were confident discussing CVD risk factors with LTRs, only 36.3% were confident managing CVD risk factors in LTRs, and only 13.6% felt that CVD risk factors in their LTR patients were well controlled. Barriers to CVD care for LTRs included (1) lack of awareness of CVD risk after LT, (2) lack of confidence in an ability to provide proper CVD care to LTRs, (3) reluctance to provide CVD care without transplant provider review, and (4) complexity of communication with the multidisciplinary LTR care team about CVD care. Participant recommendations included improved education for LTRs and caregivers about CVD risk factors, electronic health record alerts for providers, clearly defined CVD care provider roles, increased use of the transplant pharmacist, and multidisciplinary provider meetings to discuss care plans for LTRs. Multiple barriers to CVD care after LT were identified, and targeted recommendations were proposed by participants. Transplant centers should integrate participants' recommendations when designing interventions to optimize CVD care for LTRs.

Metabolic Consequences of Solid Organ Transplantation

Metabolic complications affect over 50% of solid organ transplant recipients. These include posttransplant diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, dyslipidemia, and obesity. Preexisting metabolic disease is further exacerbated with immunosuppression and posttransplant weight gain. Patients transition from a state of cachexia induced by end-organ disease to a pro-anabolic state after transplant due to weight gain, sedentary lifestyle, and suboptimal dietary habits in the setting of immunosuppression. Specific immunosuppressants have different metabolic effects, although all the foundation/maintenance immunosuppressants (calcineurin inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors) increase the risk of metabolic disease. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the emerging knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of these different metabolic complications, and the potential genetic contribution (recipient +/- donor) to these conditions. These metabolic complications impact both graft and patient survival, particularly increasing the risk of cardiovascular and cancer-associated mortality. The current evidence for prevention and therapeutic management of posttransplant metabolic conditions is provided while highlighting gaps for future avenues in translational research.

Long-term Management of the Adult Liver Transplantation Recipients

The survival of liver transplantation (LT) recipients has been improved remarkably in short-term. The major causes of mortality in long-term include nonimmunological causes such as cardiovascular, de novo malignancy, chronic kidney disease, and recurrence of primary disease. Rejection-related mortality is rare in the long-term after LT. We discuss nonrejection causes of long-term morbidity/mortality, risk factors, and management strategies in LT recipients. In addition, we discuss osteoporosis, contraception, and pregnancy in LT recipients.

Assessment of Steatosis and Fibrosis in Liver Transplant Recipients Using Controlled Attenuation Parameter and Liver Stiffness Measurements

AIM

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of increased controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurements (LSM) as surrogate markers of liver steatosis and fibrosis in liver transplant recipient (LTR). Secondary objectives were to determine the predictors of increased CAP and LSM in population of LTR.

METHODS

In this prospective, cross-sectional study, we have evaluated 175 LTRs' mean age as 61 (53-65) with a functioning graft for more than one year who came for regular outpatient examinations to the Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital (UH) Merkur, Zagreb, Croatia.

RESULTS

Of 175 analyzed LTRs, 34.28% had obesity, 64.00% had hypertension, 38.28% had diabetes, and 58.85% had hyperlipidemia. The prevalence of liver steatosis was 68.57%, while the prevalence of severe liver steatosis was 46.85%. On multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with liver steatosis were male gender, total cholesterol as positive predictor, and HDL as negative predictor, and independent factors positively associated with severe liver steatosis were higher body mass index (BMI) and higher triglyceride levels. The prevalence of moderate liver fibrosis was 54.85%, while the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis was 24%. On multivariate analysis, independent factors positively associated with moderate fibrosis were gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and CAP, while the independent factor positively associated with advanced fibrosis was GGT.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed high prevalence of increased CAP and LSM measurements as surrogate markers of liver steatosis and fibrosis. Metabolic syndrome components were highly present and were associated with CAP and LSM values as well as in the pretransplant setting. Due to high prevalence of metabolic comorbidities and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in LTRs and the lack of the abnormal liver test in a significant number of these patients, TE with CAP may be a reasonable initial assessment for LTRs with one or more components of the metabolic syndrome.

Obesity Management of Liver Transplant Waitlist Candidates and Recipients

Obesity is increasing in prevalence in liver transplant candidates and recipients. The rise in liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis reflects this increase. Management of obesity in liver transplant candidates can be challenging due to the presence of decompensated cirrhosis and sarcopenia. Obesity may increase peritransplant morbidity but does not have an impact on long-term post-transplant survival. Bariatric surgery may be a feasible option in select patients before, during, or after liver transplantation. Use of weight loss drugs and/or endoscopic therapies for obesity management ultimately may play a role in liver transplant patients, but more research is needed to determine safety.

Metabolic Disorders After Liver Transplantation

Early after surgery, liver transplant (LT) recipients often develop weight gain due to an increase of caloric intake and fat mass (without recovery of muscle frame). This modification of body composition together with a negative metabolic impact of immunosuppressive drugs leads to a high prevalence of all the main metabolic disorders. Indeed, as expected, transplanted patients show a higher cardiovascular risk in comparison with general population. Notably, seeing the increase of mean age of transplanted population, metabolic disorders represent the true challenge for the transplant community. Considering the lack of evidences or clear indications about prevention, early diagnosis and treatment of metabolic disorders after LT, it would be mandatory to develop targeted further studies on this matter.

Association between obesity after liver transplantation and steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis of the graft

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis has become one of the leading causes of liver transplantation. The development of steatosis, as well as the link to inflammation and fibrosis, after transplantation remain poorly understood. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the influence of obesity on histopathological changes of the graft during long-term follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 1494 longitudinal liver biopsies of 271 recipients were evaluated during a follow-up period of 5 to 10 years. Clinical and laboratory parameters as well as histopathological categories of steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis were explored by routine protocol biopsies.

RESULTS

The BMI and prevalence of diabetes mellitus significantly increased after transplantation (P < .01). Diabetes and de novo obesity were significantly associated with the degree of graft steatosis. There was no correlation between former steatosis and inflammation or fibrosis. Inflammation was a precursor of fibrosis, and fibrosis increased over the first 3 years (P < .01). No severe graft dysfunction was observed.

CONCLUSION

Obesity and diabetes mellitus correlated with higher grades of steatosis and de novo steatosis after transplantation. Metabolic syndrome must be considered as a serious post-transplant complication that can cause histopathological alteration. However, the progress from steatosis to steatohepatitis is not as common as expected.

Cardiovascular and metabolic disease in the liver transplant recipient

Liver transplantation has led to great improvements in long-term survival in patients with decompensated liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of non-graft-related deaths and has increased prevalence in liver allograft recipients. This is partly secondary to higher post-transplant rates of metabolic risk factors-notably obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus, which comprise metabolic syndrome. Post-transplantation metabolic syndrome is expected to be a growing factor in morbidity and mortality as transplant candidates trend older, the rates of metabolic risk factors in the general population increase, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis grows disproportionally as an indication for transplantation, and post-transplantation survival lengthens. This review discusses the incidence and contributory factors for post-transplant increases in metabolic disease, as well as the burden of cardiovascular disease in the liver allograft recipient. Patients with pre-transplant diabetes or obesity are at particularly high risk for post-transplant metabolic syndrome, and would likely benefit from closer surveillance and more aggressive medical management of risk factors. In metabolic disease resistant to initial medical therapies, tailoring of immunosuppressive regimens may further assist in minimizing long-term cardiovascular disease, although this must be done with caution to avoid worsening the risk of graft failure.

Pregnancy Weight Gain as a Predictor of Fetal Wellbeing in Liver Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND Gestational weight gain (GWG) is an important index influencing perinatal outcomes. Inappropriate weight gain during pregnancy is strongly associated with multiple pregnancy complications. In pregnant liver transplant recipients whose risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes is already high, this aspect may be even more significant. The present study analyzed the gestational weight gain in female liver transplant recipients and its effect on neonatal complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cohort study of retrospective data was performed in the 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw. There were 23 patients who fulfilled all inclusion criteria. The gestational weight gain was analyzed in the context of pre-pregnancy BMI, immunosuppression, and perinatal outcomes. RESULTS The preterm delivery rate was 39.13% and GWG increased according to the duration of pregnancy. The model adjusted to week of delivery revealed no association between weight gain and the length of pregnancy (p=0.82). GWG in liver transplant recipients did not affect hypotrophy incidence, adverse perinatal outcomes, or caesarian delivery rate. A positive correlation between GWG and neonatal birth weight was observed (p=0.06). One patient, with coexisting PIH, had a stillbirth at 23 weeks. In all other cases, the 5-min Apgar score was 10 points. CONCLUSIONS Current obstetrical recommendations do not consider patients with chronic diseases undergoing immunosuppressive treatment. Proper counselling and preparing liver transplant recipients for pregnancy, especially optimizing maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, may be an important element in improving perinatal outcomes by lowering the risk of maternal complications. GWG itself is not relevant as a predictor of term gestation, but it might be important in achieving eutrophic fetus growth.

Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with liver transplant

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to describe characteristics of liver transplant patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) as well as in-hospital outcomes including the mortality and peri-procedural complications from the largest publicly available inpatient database in the United States from 2002 to 2014.

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of PCI are well studied in patients with end-stage liver disease but not well studied in patients who receive liver transplant (LT).

METHODS

Data derived from Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) were analyzed for years 2002-2014. Adult Hospitalizations with PCI were identified using ICD-9-CM procedure codes. LT status and various complications were identified by using previously validated ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. Endpoints were in-hospital mortality and peri-procedural complications. Propensity match analysis was performed to compare the endpoints between two groups.

RESULTS

During the study period, 8,595,836 patients underwent PCI; 4,080 (0.04%) patients had prior LT status. 93% of patients were above age 59 years, 79% were males and 69% were nonwhites. Out of the total patients with LT status, 73% had hypertension, 57% had diabetes mellitus, and 47% had renal failure. Post-PCI complications were studied further in both liver and non-LT patients after 1:1 propensity match which showed the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was higher in LT group (12.3 vs 10.7%, p = .024) but dialysis requiring AKI was similar.

CONCLUSION

Among the LT recipients undergoing PCI, majority were nonwhite males. Almost more than half of the recipients had diabetes mellitus and renal failure. Incidence of AKI was higher in LT group, but other peri-procedural complications were comparable.

Clinical considerations in the management of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis pre- and post-transplant: A multi-system challenge

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, and the fastest growing indication for liver transplantation in the United States. NASH is now the leading etiology for liver transplantation in women, the second leading indication for men, and the most common cause amongst recipients aged 65 years and older. Patients with end-stage liver disease related to NASH represent a unique and challenging patient population due the high incidence of associated comorbid diseases, including obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and hypertension. These challenges manifest in the pre-liver transplantation period with increased waitlist times and waitlist mortality. Furthermore, these patients carry considerable risk of morbidity and mortality both before after liver transplantation, with high rates of T2D, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, poor nutrition, and disease recurrence. Successful transplantation for these patients requires identification and management of their comorbidities in the face of liver failure. Multidisciplinary evaluations include a thorough pre-transplant workup with a complete cardiac evaluation, control of diabetes, nutritional support, and even, potentially, consultation with a bariatric surgeon. This article provides a comprehensive review of the conditions and challenges facing patients with NASH cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation and provides recommendations for evaluation and management to optimize them before liver transplantation to produce successful outcomes.

The Relationship Between Hypoadiponectinemia and Cardiovascular Events in Liver Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation (LT). Serum adiponectin levels inversely correlate with CVD-related outcomes, but the relationship between hypoadiponectinemia and CVD after LT is unknown. Thus, the aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate this relationship in LT recipients (LTR).

METHODS

LTR were prospectively enrolled (N = 130) between January 1, 2012, and January 1, 2014. Baseline adiponectin levels were drawn at enrollment and patients were followed for CVD events. Hypoadiponectinemia was defined as serum adiponectin <10 µg/mL. The primary endpoint was a composite CVD outcome consisting of myocardial infarction, angina, need for coronary revascularization, stroke, or cardiac death.

RESULTS

The mean age was 58 ± 11 years and prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidemia was 40%, 35%, and 40%, respectively. A total of 20 CVD events were noted, after median follow up of 45 months. Hypoadiponectinemia was significantly associated with future risk of CVD events (hazard ratio, 3.519; 95% confidence interval, 1.180-10.499, P = 0.024). This association was independent of traditional CVD risk factors including age, gender, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and choice of immunosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypoadiponectinemia is a strong independent predictor of future cardiovascular events in LTR, which can be incorporated in clinical practice to assess CVD risk assessment after LT.

Medical management of metabolic and cardiovascular complications after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation represents the only curative option for patients with end-stage liver disease, fulminant hepatitis and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Even though major advances in transplantation in the last decades have achieved excellent survival rates in the early post-transplantation period, long-term survival is hampered by the lack of improvement in survival in the late post transplantation period (over 5 years after transplantation). The main etiologies for late mortality are malignancies and cardiovascular complications. The latter are increasingly prevalent in liver transplant recipients due to the development or worsening of metabolic syndrome and all its components (arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, renal injury, etc.). These comorbidities result from a combination of pre-liver transplant features, immunosuppressive agent side-effects, changes in metabolism and hemodynamics after liver transplantation and the adoption of a sedentary lifestyle. In this review we describe the most prevalent metabolic and cardiovascular complications present after liver transplantation, as well as proposing management strategies.

Risk factors for the metabolic syndrome components of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia after living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is the most common long-term complication after liver transplantation, and it has been increasing in incidence. The aim of this study was to clarify the risk factors for each MS component -hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia-after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), including characteristics of living-donors.

METHODS

Data related to clinicopathological parameters including MS components in 461 consecutive patients who underwent LDLT were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Prevalence of all MS components (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia) increased from 9.3%, 16.5%, and 7.2% before LDLT to 44.9%, 45.3%, and 50.8% after LDLT, respectively. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, the three factors, cyclosporine use (OR 2.086, P = 0.001), recipient age (OR 1.036, P = 0.001), and BMI (OR 1.072, P = 0.026) were independent predictors for post-LDLT hypertension. Next, the three factors, male recipient (OR 2.471, P < 0.001), recipient age (OR 1.039, P = 0.002), and donor BMI (OR 1.124, P = 0.012) were independent for post-LDLT diabetes mellitus. The four factors, cyclosporine use (OR 2.015, P = 0.001), prolonged prednisolone use (OR 1.928, P = 0.002), recipient age (OR 1.019, P = 0.037), and GRWR (OR 0.316, P = 0.037) were independent for post-LDLT dyslipidemia as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only recipient-related factors but also donor-related factors were independently associated with each targeted post-LDLT MS component.