1
|
Drechsel KCE, IJgosse IM, Slaats S, Raasen L, Stoutjesdijk FS, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Wallace WH, Beishuizen A, Körholz D, Mauz-Körholz C, Cepelova M, Uyttebroeck A, Ronceray L, Kaspers GJL, Broer SL, Veening MA. Fertility-Preserving Treatments and Patient- and Parental Satisfaction on Fertility Counseling in a Cohort of Newly Diagnosed Boys and Girls with Childhood Hodgkin Lymphoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2109. [PMID: 38893227 PMCID: PMC11171249 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 05/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of fertility-preserving (FP) treatments and fertility counseling that was offered in a cohort of newly diagnosed children with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). METHODS In this observational study, boys and girls with cHL aged ≤ 18 years with scheduled treatment according to the EuroNet-PHL-C2 protocol were recruited from 18 sites (5 countries), between January 2017 and September 2021. In 2023, a subset of Dutch participants (aged ≥ 12 years at time of diagnosis) and parents/guardians were surveyed regarding fertility counseling. RESULTS A total of 101 boys and 104 girls were included. Most post-pubertal boys opted for semen cryopreservation pre-treatment (85% of expected). Invasive FP treatments were occasionally chosen for patients at a relatively low risk of fertility based on scheduled alkylating agent exposure (4/5 testicular biopsy, 4/4 oocyte, and 11/11 ovarian tissue cryopreservation). A total of 17 post-menarchal girls (20%) received GnRH-analogue co-treatment. Furthermore, 33/84 parents and 26/63 patients responded to the questionnaire. Most reported receiving fertility counseling (97%/89%). Statements regarding the timing and content of counseling were generally positive. Parents and patients considered fertility counseling important (94%/87% (strongly agreed) and most expressed concerns about (their child's) fertility (at diagnosis 69%/46%, at present: 59%/42%). CONCLUSION Systematic fertility counseling is crucial for all pediatric cHL patients and their families. FP treatment should be considered depending on the anticipated risk and patient factors. We encourage the development of a decision aid for FP in pediatric oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja C. E. Drechsel
- Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.A.V.)
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irene M. IJgosse
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sofie Slaats
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lisanne Raasen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Francis S. Stoutjesdijk
- Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.A.V.)
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.A.V.)
| | - W. Hamish Wallace
- Department of Haematology/Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK
| | - Auke Beishuizen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Haematology/Oncology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dieter Körholz
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Giessen—Zentrum für Kinderheilkunde und Jugendmedizin, Feulgenstr. 12, 35392 Giessen, Germany (C.M.-K.)
| | - Christine Mauz-Körholz
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Giessen—Zentrum für Kinderheilkunde und Jugendmedizin, Feulgenstr. 12, 35392 Giessen, Germany (C.M.-K.)
- Clinic for Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Faculty of the Martin-Luther University of Halle, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120 Halle, Germany
| | - Michaela Cepelova
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Faculty Hospital Motol and 2nd Medical Faculty, Charles University, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague 5, Czech Republic
| | - Anne Uyttebroeck
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, KU Leuven, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Leila Ronceray
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, St. Anna Children’s Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 6, A-1090 Wien, Austria
| | - Gertjan J. L. Kaspers
- Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.A.V.)
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Simone L. Broer
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet A. Veening
- Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.A.V.)
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marino JL, Peate M, McNeil R, Orme LM, McCarthy MC, Glackin A, Sawyer SM. Experiences of Family and Partner Support in Fertility Decision-Making Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: A National Australian Study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:180-188. [PMID: 37339458 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To understand how adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer experience family and partner involvement in fertility preservation (FP) decision-making. Methods: As part of a nationally representative Australian cross-sectional study of 15-25-year olds with cancer, 196 participants (mean age 19.9 [standard deviation 3.2] years at diagnosis; 51% male) were surveyed regarding FP decision-making. Results: One hundred sixty-one (83%) participants reported discussion of potential effects of cancer and its treatment on fertility, of whom 57 (35%) did not undertake FP (51% of females; 19% of males). Parental involvement (mothers 62%, fathers 45%) in decision-making was considered helpful, including for 73% of 20-25-year olds with partners. Sisters and brothers were involved less often, yet rated helpful in 48% and 41% of cases, respectively. Older participants were more likely than younger ones to have involved partners (47% vs. 22%, p = 0.001) and less likely to have involved mothers (56% vs. 71%, p = 0.04) or fathers (39% vs. 55%, p = 0.04). Conclusion: This is the first quantitative study to explore family and partner involvement in AYA FP decision-making in both females and males in a nationally representative sample. Parents are important resources who commonly assist AYAs with these complex decisions. Although many AYAs will be the main decision-makers when it comes to FP, particularly as AYAs mature, these data suggest that resources and support should be available for and inclusive of parents, partners, and siblings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Marino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Robyn McNeil
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Lisa M Orme
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- ONTrac at Peter Mac, Victorian Youth Cancer Service, Peter MacCallum Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Maria C McCarthy
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Aoife Glackin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - Susan M Sawyer
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kawasaki Y, Hirai K, Nii M, Kizawa Y, Uchinuno A. Actual situation of decision-making support from medical staff when cancer patients make treatment choices. Future Oncol 2023; 19:2263-2272. [PMID: 37905530 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: We investigated factors involved in decision-making support provided by physicians, nurses, pharmacists and medical and psychiatric social workers involved in cancer care. Materials & methods: A questionnaire survey on decision-making support was conducted. The level of clinician support was classified as 'supporting patients' 'decision-making process regarding cancer treatment', 'no support for patients' 'decision-making process regarding cancer treatment' or 'team-based support for patients' 'decision-making process regarding cancer treatment'. Results: Physicians estimated that 83.7% of patients made a cancer treatment decision within 1 week, but 45.4% of patients had difficulty making a decision. Conclusion: Medical personnel should support patients who have difficulty making decisions, establish a screening method to identify those needing support and develop a system providing decision-making support through interprofessional work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Kawasaki
- College of Nursing Art & Science, University of Hyogo, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kei Hirai
- Osaka University Graduate School of Human Sciences, Suita, Japan
| | - Manabu Nii
- Department of Electronics & Computer Science, University of Hyogo, Himeji, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kizawa
- Department of Palliative & Supportive Care, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Atsuko Uchinuno
- Faculty of Nursing, Tsuruga Nursing University, Tsuruga, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH, Anderson B, Burstein HJ, Chew H, Dang C, Elias AD, Giordano SH, Goetz MP, Goldstein LJ, Hurvitz SA, Isakoff SJ, Jankowitz RC, Javid SH, Krishnamurthy J, Leitch M, Lyons J, Mortimer J, Patel SA, Pierce LJ, Rosenberger LH, Rugo HS, Sitapati A, Smith KL, Smith ML, Soliman H, Stringer-Reasor EM, Telli ML, Ward JH, Wisinski KB, Young JS, Burns J, Kumar R. Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:691-722. [PMID: 35714673 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 358] [Impact Index Per Article: 179.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The therapeutic options for patients with noninvasive or invasive breast cancer are complex and varied. These NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer include recommendations for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, and management of breast cancer during pregnancy. The content featured in this issue focuses on the recommendations for overall management of ductal carcinoma in situ and the workup and locoregional management of early stage invasive breast cancer. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer, visit NCCN.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jame Abraham
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Rebecca Aft
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Doreen Agnese
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | | | | | - Chau Dang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sara H Javid
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington
| | | | | | - Janice Lyons
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | - Hope S Rugo
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John H Ward
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zaami S, Melcarne R, Patrone R, Gullo G, Negro F, Napoletano G, Monti M, Aceti V, Panarese A, Borcea MC, Scorziello C, Ventrone L, Mamedov SN, Meggiorini ML, Vergine M, Giacomelli L. Oncofertility and Reproductive Counseling in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11051311. [PMID: 35268402 PMCID: PMC8911138 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Improving the prognosis of breast cancer patients is of utmost importance in terms of increasing survival rates. Modern medicine has therefore prioritized better quality of life for patients, even after the disease, through a better management of the potential long-term side effects induced by anticancer treatments. Fertility preservation and family planning are therefore crucial issues to be addressed in all cancer patients of reproductive age. Along those lines, a new branch of medicine with distinct multidisciplinary characteristics has developed over the years: oncofertility. Although both national and international guidelines value reproductive counseling as an essential aspect of the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway, part and parcel of the informed consent process, it is not included within the protocols adopted by the operating units for the care and management of neoplastic diseases. Objective. This study aimed to evaluate the activity of the Breast Unit of the Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy, and the degree of compliance with guidelines. By knowing the strengths and weaknesses of such approaches, the standards of care offered to breast cancer patients can be improved. Materials and methods. A retrospective study based on a review of medical records was conducted between 2014 and 2021. Patients under 40 years of age diagnosed with non-metastatic malignancies were included who received chemotherapy treatment, namely neoadjuvant, adjuvant or adjuvant hormone therapy. Results. The data were extracted from the medical records of 51 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 41% of whom received reproductive counseling, and of these, 43% decided to undertake a path of fertility preservation. Factors such as the absence of children and young age reportedly favored both the interest in counseling proposals by the medical staff and the decision to undertake a path of fertility preservation. Conclusions. The study shows that there has been growing interest in the topic of oncofertility, especially in light of law 219/2017. Therefore, since 2018, multiple proposals for reproductive counseling have been set forth, but there was not an equally growing demand for fertility preservation practices, which can be explained by the invasive nature of such practices, the patients’ concern about their own state of health, and poor or inadequate information. Such impediments highlight the importance of standardized counseling and the need for a multidisciplinary medical team to support the patient in the decision-making process. The study also revealed a drop in the number of patients receiving counseling due to the COVID-19 pandemic, contrary to the positive trend that was recorded prior to the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Zaami
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.N.); (G.N.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Rossella Melcarne
- Department of Surgical Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (M.C.B.); (C.S.); (L.V.); (S.N.M.); (M.V.); (L.G.)
| | - Renato Patrone
- ICTUS, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Gullo
- In Vitro Fertilization Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Villa Sofia Cervello Hospital, University of Palermo, 90146 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Francesca Negro
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.N.); (G.N.)
| | - Gabriele Napoletano
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.N.); (G.N.)
| | - Marco Monti
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (M.M.); (M.L.M.)
| | - Valerio Aceti
- Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| | - Alessandra Panarese
- General and Transplant Surgery Department, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche Applicate e Biotecnologiche (DISCAB), University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Maria Carola Borcea
- Department of Surgical Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (M.C.B.); (C.S.); (L.V.); (S.N.M.); (M.V.); (L.G.)
| | - Chiara Scorziello
- Department of Surgical Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (M.C.B.); (C.S.); (L.V.); (S.N.M.); (M.V.); (L.G.)
| | - Luca Ventrone
- Department of Surgical Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (M.C.B.); (C.S.); (L.V.); (S.N.M.); (M.V.); (L.G.)
| | - Samira Nicole Mamedov
- Department of Surgical Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (M.C.B.); (C.S.); (L.V.); (S.N.M.); (M.V.); (L.G.)
| | - Maria Letizia Meggiorini
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (M.M.); (M.L.M.)
| | - Massimo Vergine
- Department of Surgical Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (M.C.B.); (C.S.); (L.V.); (S.N.M.); (M.V.); (L.G.)
| | - Laura Giacomelli
- Department of Surgical Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (M.C.B.); (C.S.); (L.V.); (S.N.M.); (M.V.); (L.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grégoire-Briard F, Mitsakakis N, Hayawi L, Dumont T. Evaluation of Fertility Preservation Counseling and Treatments for Female Oncology Patients in an Urban Pediatric Canadian Center. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2021; 11:518-524. [PMID: 34936499 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Several international organizations and guidelines have recommended implementation of structured fertility preservation (FP) discussions with patients and their families before initiation of chemotherapy and radiation treatments in children. This study aimed to identify current trends and rates in FP counseling and treatments at a Canadian pediatric tertiary care center. Objectives were to measure guideline adherence for FP counseling at our institution by determining (1) the frequency of FP counseling in pediatric female oncological patients at our institution, (2) the frequency of FP treatment in this study population, and (3) the factors associated with FP pre-treatment counseling. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed, including all pediatric and adolescent female patients (age <18) seen in consultation by the oncology team. Demographic data, as well as documentation of FP counseling and referral to a reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) specialist and subsequent FP treatment were collected. Results: A total of 89 female pediatric patients were included in our study. Forty-two patients received fertility counseling (47.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 37.2-57.5). Only 29/42 (69.0%; 95% CI: 54-80.9) received counseling before onset of treatment. A 12/42 (41.4%; 95% CI: 25-59.3) of the patients who received FP counseling were referred to an REI specialist and 11/12 proceeded with FP treatment (37.9%, 95% CI: 22.7-56). Conclusion: This study presents contemporary data on the rates of FP counseling in Canadian pediatric female oncological patients and demonstrates low rates of FP counseling in our patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Grégoire-Briard
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicholas Mitsakakis
- CHEO Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lamia Hayawi
- CHEO Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tania Dumont
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,CHEO Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cheng HY, Chau HC, Cheung CKC, Yang LS, Lee SLK, Leung AWK, Li CK, Lam TTN, Yeung NCY, Cheung YT. Perceptions of Infertility Risk Among Chinese Parents of Children with Cancer: A Qualitative Study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2021; 11:394-401. [PMID: 34613849 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Anticancer treatment may be associated with damage to the reproductive organs and risk of infertility in children with cancer. The collectivist cultural norms of Asian societies may lead Chinese parents to have unique concerns regarding infertility. This qualitative study explored the perceptions of infertility risk and parenthood among parents of childhood cancer survivors in Hong Kong. Methods: Thirteen parents were recruited via a snowball sampling approach from a nongovernmental organization in Hong Kong, representing nine survivors of childhood cancer (leukemia n = 5, solid tumors n = 4). The in-depth semistructured interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was performed using ATLAS.ti 8. Results: Parents mostly perceived their children's fertility status as a distant concern (n = 11, 85%) but emphasized the need for timely information from clinicians when their children reach young adulthood (n = 8, 62%). They reported receiving inconsistent fertility information from different oncology practitioners (n = 9, 69%). A few parents acknowledged that under the influence of the Chinese culture, their children, especially sons, have an important duty to continue the family lineage. However, even if the cancer treatment were associated with infertility risk, almost all parents (n = 12, 92%) stated that it would still not affect their willingness to let their child undergo treatment because survival and cure were still their highest priority. Conclusion: Our findings suggest the need to proactively provide fertility information to parents both during active treatment and when survivors reach reproductive age. Future studies should evaluate the benefits of developing culturally relevant decision-making aids to address parents' informational needs regarding fertility issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ho Yu Cheng
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Ho Cheung Chau
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Cedric Ka Chun Cheung
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Lok Sum Yang
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Samantha Lai-Ka Lee
- Department of Paediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Alex Wing Kwan Leung
- Department of Paediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Chi Kong Li
- Department of Paediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Teddy Tai Ning Lam
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Little Life Warriors Society Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Nelson Chun Yiu Yeung
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yin Ting Cheung
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Omani-Samani R, Vesali S, Navid B, Mohajeri M, Rafsanjani KA, Aghamaleki SZN, Mohammadi M. Adult cancer patients and parents of younger cancer patients have little information about fertility preservation: a survey of knowledge and attitude. MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL 2021. [DOI: 10.1186/s43043-021-00072-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Impaired fertility is one of the side effects of effective cancer therapy. Saving the potential or storing the material to enable people to have biological children after cancer treatment can be of high importance to many cancer survivors. Therefore, we designed a study to determine knowledge and attitudes to fertility preservation (FP) in adult cancer patients and the parents of patients with cancer. Participants who completed this survey were a convenience sample of 384 parents of cancer patients < 18 years and cancer patients ≥ 18 years from two large referral hospitals. A 25-item self-administered questionnaire measured knowledge and attitudes to FP. Responses were yes/no, or on a 4-point Likert scale (greatly, usually, rarely, never) scored from 1 for never to 4 for greatly.
Results
Most parents and most cancer patients were unaware of the FP methods of embryo cryopreservation (96.3% and 88.4%, respectively) and sperm cryopreservation (97.5% and 89.0%, respectively). Attitudes among cancer patients and parents to use of FP options, based on a 4-point Likert scale, were determined by financial cost, lack of access and information on FP options.
Conclusion
Of concern in this sample of Iranian adult cancer patients and their parents is that knowledge of the fertility risk associated with cancer therapy and knowledge of FP treatment options was generally poor, particularly among the parents. To enable cancer patients or their parents to make the best decisions about using FP services, oncologists and fertility specialists should discuss FP options during their consultation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ferrari A, Stark D, Peccatori FA, Fern L, Laurence V, Gaspar N, Bozovic-Spasojevic I, Smith O, De Munter J, Derwich K, Hjorth L, van der Graaf WTA, Soanes L, Jezdic S, Blondeel A, Bielack S, Douillard JY, Mountzios G, Saloustros E. Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer: a position paper from the AYA Working Group of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE). ESMO Open 2021; 6:100096. [PMID: 33926710 PMCID: PMC8103533 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
It is well recognised that adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer have inequitable access to oncology services that provide expert cancer care and consider their unique needs. Subsequently, survival gains in this patient population have improved only modestly compared with older adults and children with cancer. In 2015, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) established the joint Cancer in AYA Working Group in order to increase awareness among adult and paediatric oncology communities, enhance knowledge on specific issues in AYA and ultimately improve the standard of care for AYA with cancer across Europe. This manuscript reflects the position of this working group regarding current AYA cancer care, the challenges to be addressed and possible solutions. Key challenges include the lack of specific biological understanding of AYA cancers, the lack of access to specialised centres with age-appropriate multidisciplinary care and the lack of available clinical trials with novel therapeutics. Key recommendations include diversifying interprofessional cooperation in AYA care and specific measures to improve trial accrual, including centralising care where that is the best means to achieve trial accrual. This defines a common vision that can lead to improved outcomes for AYA with cancer in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | - D Stark
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, School of Medicine University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - F A Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - L Fern
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V Laurence
- Medical Oncology Department and SIREDO Oncology Center (Care, Innovation and Research for Children and AYA with Cancer), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - N Gaspar
- Department of Oncology for Child and Adolescent, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - I Bozovic-Spasojevic
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
| | - O Smith
- National Children's Cancer Service, Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin and Systems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J De Munter
- University Hospital Ghent Cancer Center, UZ Gent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Derwich
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Transplantology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - L Hjorth
- Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Pediatrics, Lund, Sweden
| | - W T A van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L Soanes
- Teenage Cancer Trust, London, UK
| | - S Jezdic
- Scientific and Medical Division, European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - A Blondeel
- Department of Scientific Programme Coordination, European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE), Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Bielack
- Zentrum für Kinder, Jugend und Frauenmedizin Pädiatrie 5, KlinikumStuttgart - Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - J-Y Douillard
- Scientific and Medical Division, European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - G Mountzios
- 2nd Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Trial Unit, Henry Dunant Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - E Saloustros
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mulder RL, Font-Gonzalez A, Hudson MM, van Santen HM, Loeffen EAH, Burns KC, Quinn GP, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Byrne J, Haupt R, Wallace WH, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Anazodo A, Anderson RA, Barnbrock A, Beck JD, Bos AME, Demeestere I, Denzer C, Di Iorgi N, Hoefgen HR, Kebudi R, Lambalk C, Langer T, Meacham LR, Rodriguez-Wallberg K, Stern C, Stutz-Grunder E, van Dorp W, Veening M, Veldkamp S, van der Meulen E, Constine LS, Kenney LB, van de Wetering MD, Kremer LCM, Levine J, Tissing WJE. Fertility preservation for female patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: recommendations from the PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e45-e56. [PMID: 33539753 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30594-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Female patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer are at increased risk for fertility impairment when treatment adversely affects the function of reproductive organs. Patients and their families desire biological children but substantial variations in clinical practice guidelines reduce consistent and timely implementation of effective interventions for fertility preservation across institutions. As part of the PanCareLIFE Consortium, and in collaboration with the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group, we reviewed the current literature and developed a clinical practice guideline for fertility preservation in female patients who were diagnosed with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer at age 25 years or younger, including guidance on risk assessment and available methods for fertility preservation. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to grade the available evidence and to form the recommendations. This clinical practice guideline leverages existing evidence and international expertise to develop transparent recommendations that are easy to use to facilitate the care of female patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer who are at high risk for fertility impairment. A complete review of the existing evidence, including a quality assessment, transparent reporting of the guideline panel's decisions, and achievement of global interdisciplinary consensus, is an important result of this intensive collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée L Mulder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Anna Font-Gonzalez
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Melissa M Hudson
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control and Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Hanneke M van Santen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Erik A H Loeffen
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Karen C Burns
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Gwendolyn P Quinn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Population Health, and Division of Medical Ethics, New York University School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Riccardo Haupt
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit and DOPO Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - W Hamish Wallace
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Anderson
- Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anke Barnbrock
- Division for Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, Department for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Joern D Beck
- Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; LESS Group, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Annelies M E Bos
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction and Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CUB-Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christian Denzer
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
| | - Natascia Di Iorgi
- Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Holly R Hoefgen
- Division of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rejin Kebudi
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey; Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cornelis Lambalk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thorsten Langer
- Division Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Lillian R Meacham
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of Hematology/Oncology and Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kenny Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Catharyn Stern
- Melbourne IVF, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Eveline Stutz-Grunder
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Wendy van Dorp
- Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Margreet Veening
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Saskia Veldkamp
- Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Lisa B Kenney
- Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jennifer Levine
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wim J E Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jin Z, Griffith MA, Rosenthal AC. Identifying and Meeting the Needs of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2021; 23:17. [PMID: 33449203 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-01011-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are a vulnerable population with unique needs that are under-recognized and often overlooked by healthcare providers. This review focuses on identifying and meeting some of those needs including adherence to treatment, financial implications, impact on fertility and intimacy, issues with work/school, isolation, challenges with re-entry, and long-term side effects and survivorship. RECENT FINDINGS Survival rates have not improved in adolescents and young adults with cancer at the same rate as in children and older adults (the so called "AYA gap"). Restricted or delayed access to care and inconsistent cancer treatment and follow-up care contribute to this. Importantly, fertility preservation options have broadened and efforts to provide age appropriate counseling prior to treatment have improved. Additionally, AYAs face a variety of psychosocial issues while dealing with a cancer diagnosis during critical developmental years, and yet data pertaining to the successful identification and management of these issues is lacking. As a result, there has been recent increasing awareness that this patient population warrants strong advocates, additional research, and requires age group specific resources to be successful in navigating their cancer experience during treatment and into survivorship care. Members of the healthcare team should familiarize themselves with the unique needs of AYA cancer patients to provide optimal patient care. In order to build upon early progress, this group calls for additional study particularly when it comes to barriers to enrollment for AYA-specific research (including clinical trials), recognizing psychosocial needs (both during and after treatment), transition planning for returning to life after cancer, and managing long-term effects of treatment (including neuro cognitive changes). In addition, access to financial resources and appropriate mental health support needs to be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohui Jin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Melody A Griffith
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Korte E, Schilling R, Balcerek M, Campbell H, Dirksen U, Herrmann G, Kepakova K, Kepak T, Klco-Brosius S, Kruseova J, Kunstreich M, Lackner H, Langer T, Panasiuk A, Stefanowicz J, Strauß G, Ranft A, Byrne J, Goldbeck L, Borgmann-Staudt A. Fertility education for adolescent cancer patients: Gaps in current clinical practice in Europe. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2020; 29:e13279. [PMID: 32567091 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As adolescent cancer patients may suffer from infertility following treatment, fertility counselling is essential. Our aim was to explore the current situation in four European countries in terms of (I) education about the risk for infertility, (II) counselling on fertility preservation, (III) patients' knowledge on fertility, (IV) sufficiency of information and (V) uptake of cryopreservation. METHODS In total, 113 patients (13-20 years) at 11 study centres completed a self-report questionnaire three and six months after cancer diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS As many as 80.2% of participants reported having received education about the risk for infertility prior to treatment, 73.2% recalled counselling on fertility preservation. Only 52.3% stated they felt sufficiently informed to make a decision. Inability to recall counselling on fertility preservation (OR = 0.03, CI: 0.00-0.47) and female gender (OR = 0.11, CI: 0.03-0.48) was associated with lower use of cryopreservation, whereas older age was associated with higher use. CONCLUSION Fertility counselling was available to a relatively high proportion of patients, and it did influence the utilisation of cryopreservation. However, many patients did not feel sufficiently informed. Further improvement is needed to enable adolescent cancer patients to make an informed decision on fertility preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Korte
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralph Schilling
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Magdalena Balcerek
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health, BIH, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Uta Dirksen
- University Hospital Essen Pediatrics III, West German Cancer Centre, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Research Centre (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gloria Herrmann
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Katerina Kepakova
- University Hospital Brno & International Clinical Research Center (FNUSA-ICRC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Kepak
- University Hospital Brno & International Clinical Research Center (FNUSA-ICRC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Marina Kunstreich
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Haematology and Immunology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Herwig Lackner
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Thorsten Langer
- Paediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Joanna Stefanowicz
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Gabriele Strauß
- Helios Kliniken Berlin-Buch, Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Andreas Ranft
- University Hospital Essen Pediatrics III, West German Cancer Centre, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Research Centre (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Lutz Goldbeck
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Anja Borgmann-Staudt
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Patel V, Jones P, Judd A, Senko V, Altieri G, Pettee D. Recollection of Fertility Discussion in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Patients: A Single-Institution Study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2020; 9:72-77. [DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Vanisha Patel
- Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio
| | - Pamela Jones
- Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio
| | - Alexis Judd
- Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio
| | - Valerie Senko
- Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio
| | - Gina Altieri
- Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio
| | - Daniel Pettee
- Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk for chronic illness uncertainty in 4 domains: ambiguity about the state of their illness; lack of information about the disease, its treatment, and comorbidities; complexity of the healthcare system and relationship with healthcare providers; and unpredictability of the illness course and outcome. Chronic uncertainty has been associated with posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to explore how young adults with CHD experience uncertainty and to describe the relationship between PTSS and the appraisal and management process. METHODS An exploratory, mixed methods design was used. Data were collected in person and via Skype from 25 participants (19-35 years old), who were diagnosed with CHD during childhood and able to read and write English. In-depth interviews and the University of California at Los Angeles Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index were used to collect data. Qualitative data were analyzed using the constant comparative method. RESULTS The 4 domains of uncertainty were evident in the narratives. The PTSD mean (SD) score was 31.3 (7.7). Six participants met criteria for PTSD. Narrative analysis revealed a relationship between severity of PTSS and the appraisal and management of uncertainty. Participants with PTSD used management strategies that included avoidance, reexperiencing, and hyperarousal. CONCLUSIONS Young adults with CHD may be at risk for the development of long-term psychological stress and PTSD in the setting of chronic uncertainty. Regular monitoring to identify PTSS/PTSD may be a means to promote treatment adherence and participation in healthcare.
Collapse
|
15
|
Sisk BA, Canavera K, Sharma A, Baker JN, Johnson LM. Ethical issues in the care of adolescent and young adult oncology patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27608. [PMID: 30623573 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2018] [Revised: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The diagnosis and treatment of cancer leads to short-term and long-term challenges for every patient. This is especially true for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer who strive to gain independence, autonomy, confidence, and social status while developing into adulthood. In this article, we review prominent ethical issues in AYA oncology that are related to autonomy, shared decision-making, care refusal or abandonment, end-of-life care, truth telling, and fertility preservation. Clinicians should recognize that AYA patients develop at their own pace; the onus lies with clinicians to determine the patient's interests, values, maturity, and desire to participate in decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A Sisk
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kristin Canavera
- Division of Psychology, Department of Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Akshay Sharma
- Department of Bone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Justin N Baker
- Division of Quality-of-Life and Palliative Care, Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Liza-Marie Johnson
- Division of Quality-of-Life and Palliative Care, Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Anazodo A, Laws P, Logan S, Saunders C, Travaglia J, Gerstl B, Bradford N, Cohn R, Birdsall M, Barr R, Suzuki N, Takae S, Marinho R, Xiao S, Qiong-Hua C, Mahajan N, Patil M, Gunasheela D, Smith K, Sender L, Melo C, Almeida-Santos T, Salama M, Appiah L, Su I, Lane S, Woodruff TK, Pacey A, Anderson RA, Shenfield F, Ledger W, Sullivan E. How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care. Hum Reprod Update 2019; 25:159-179. [PMID: 30462263 PMCID: PMC6390168 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmy038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Revised: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fertility preservation (FP) is an important quality of life issue for cancer survivors of reproductive age. Despite the existence of broad international guidelines, the delivery of oncofertility care, particularly amongst paediatric, adolescent and young adult patients, remains a challenge for healthcare professionals (HCPs). The quality of oncofertility care is variable and the uptake and utilization of FP remains low. Available guidelines fall short in providing adequate detail on how oncofertility models of care (MOC) allow for the real-world application of guidelines by HCPs. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the components of oncofertility care as defined by patient and clinician representatives, and identify the barriers, facilitators and challenges, so as to improve the implementation of oncofertility services. SEARCH METHODS A systematic scoping review was conducted on oncofertility MOC literature published in English between 2007 and 2016, relating to 10 domains of care identified through consumer research: communication, oncofertility decision aids, age-appropriate care, referral pathways, documentation, training, supportive care during treatment, reproductive care after cancer treatment, psychosocial support and ethical practice of oncofertility care. A wide range of electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, AEIPT, Education Research Complete, ProQuest and VOCED) were searched in order to synthesize the evidence around delivery of oncofertility care. Related citations and reference lists were searched. The review was undertaken following registration (International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) registration number CRD42017055837) and guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). OUTCOMES A total of 846 potentially relevant studies were identified after the removal of duplicates. All titles and abstracts were screened by a single reviewer and the final 147 papers were screened by two reviewers. Ten papers on established MOC were identified amongst the included papers. Data were extracted from each paper and quality scores were then summarized in the oncofertility MOC summary matrix. The results identified a number of themes for improving MOC in each domain, which included: the importance of patients receiving communication that is of a higher quality and in different formats on their fertility risk and FP options; improving provision of oncofertility care in a timely manner; improving access to age-appropriate care; defining the role and scope of practice of all HCPs; and improving communication between different HCPs. Different forms of decision aids were found useful for assisting patients to understand FP options and weigh up choices. WIDER IMPLICATIONS This analysis identifies core components for delivery of oncofertility MOC. The provision of oncofertility services requires planning to ensure services have safe and reliable referral pathways and that they are age-appropriate and include medical and psychological oncofertility care into the survivorship period. In order for this to happen, collaboration needs to occur between clinicians, allied HCPs and executives within paediatric and adult hospitals, as well as fertility clinics across both public and private services. Training of both cancer and non-cancer HCPs is needed to improve the knowledge of HCPs, the quality of care provided and the confidence of HCPs with these consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Nelune Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paula Laws
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Shanna Logan
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Fertility and Research Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carla Saunders
- Centre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jo Travaglia
- Centre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brigitte Gerstl
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Nelune Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Natalie Bradford
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Richard Cohn
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mary Birdsall
- Fertility Associates, 7 Ellerslie Racecourse Drive, Auckland City, New Zealand
| | - Ronald Barr
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nao Suzuki
- St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Kawasaki Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan
| | - Seido Takae
- St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Kawasaki Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan
| | - Ricardo Marinho
- Pro Criar Medicina Reprodutiva, Rua Bernardo Guimarães 2063, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Shuo Xiao
- Reproductive Health and Toxicology Lab, Dept. Environmental Health Sciences, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Discovery I, 915 Greene St, Rm 327, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Chen Qiong-Hua
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, 55 Zhenhai Road, Siming Qu, Xiamen Shi 35, China
| | - Nalini Mahajan
- Mother and Child Hospital, D-59 Defence Colony, New Delhi, India
| | - Madhuri Patil
- Dr. Patil’s Fertility and Endoscopy Center, Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Endoscopic Surgery and Andrology, Bangalore, India
| | - Devika Gunasheela
- Gunasheela Surgical & Maternity Hospital, No. 1, Dewan Madhava Road, Opp. M. N. Krishna Rao Park, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Kristen Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, 420 E Superior Street, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Leonard Sender
- Children’s Hospital Orange County, 1201 W La Veta Avenue, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Cláudia Melo
- Centro de Preservação da Fertilidade, Serviço de Medicina da Reprodução, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Edifício de São Jerónimo, Piso 2, Praceta Professor Mota Pinto, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Teresa Almeida-Santos
- Centro de Preservação da Fertilidade, Serviço de Medicina da Reprodução, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Edifício de São Jerónimo, Piso 2, Praceta Professor Mota Pinto, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Mahmoud Salama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, 420 E Superior Street, Chicago, IL, USA
- Reproductive Medicine Department, National Research Center, Buhouth Street 33, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Leslie Appiah
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Department of Paediatric Surgery, 700 Children’s Drive, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Irene Su
- University of California San Diego, 355 Dickinson St # 315, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sheila Lane
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, UK
- University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, UK
| | - Teresa K Woodruff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, 420 E Superior Street, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Allan Pacey
- Academic Unit of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Level 4, The Jessop Wing, Tree Root Walk, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh University, 47 Little France Crescent, Scotland, UK
| | - Francoise Shenfield
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospital, 25 Grafton Way, London, UK
| | - William Ledger
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Fertility and Research Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Sullivan
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Parton C, Ussher JM, Perz J. Hope, burden or risk: a discourse analytic study of the construction and experience of fertility preservation in the context of cancer. Psychol Health 2019; 34:456-477. [DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1543764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Parton
- Western Sydney University, Translational Health Research Institute, Campbelltown Campus, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jane M. Ussher
- Western Sydney University, Translational Health Research Institute, Campbelltown Campus, Sydney, Australia
| | - Janette Perz
- Western Sydney University, Translational Health Research Institute, Campbelltown Campus, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Anazodo A, Ataman-Millhouse L, Jayasinghe Y, Woodruff TK. Oncofertility-An emerging discipline rather than a special consideration. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e27297. [PMID: 29972282 PMCID: PMC6150802 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Revised: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Originally absent from the oncologist's consult, then placed in a 'quality of life' rubric, oncofertility should now be an essential part of a comprehensive cancer treatment plan in patients of reproductive age, including adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Oncofertility encompasses the endocrine health of the patient, as well as fertility management options. Thus, pubertal transitions in males and females, bone health, and menstrual health are all part of this discipline, enabling practitioners to work in interdisciplinary teams to solve problems in reproductive health. This review provides a summary of the essential considerations required for the assessement of reproductive risk and choice of fertility preservation options as well as considerations for developing oncofertility services for AYAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- School of Women’s and Children’s Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney
| | - Lauren Ataman-Millhouse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Yasmin Jayasinghe
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology University of Melbourne Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne
| | - Teresa K. Woodruff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wright E, Norton W, Geary M. Nurses' experiences of undertaking fertility-related discussions with teenagers and young adults with cancer: An interpretive phenomenological analysis. J Adv Nurs 2018; 74:2860-2870. [PMID: 30019433 DOI: 10.1111/jan.13804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to explore and interpret nurses' experiences, feelings and associated meanings attached to undertaking fertility-related discussions with teenagers and young adults with cancer. The study also aims to advance an understanding of factors which facilitate or hinder such discussions, to progress clinical practice. BACKGROUND Improved cancer treatments have increased survival rates for many teenagers and young adults. However, as a side-effect of treatment, infertility may result. International and UK studies suggest this patient population may not be provided with adequate opportunities to discuss this important issue. Little is known about nurses' experiences of undertaking fertility-related discussions. DESIGN Qualitative Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis. METHODS Eleven semistructured interviews were conducted between February and May 2016 with purposively selected nurses working in a Teenage Cancer Trust Unit in a UK hospital. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis. FINDINGS Nurses experienced a perceived lack of knowledge resulting in avoidance of raising fertility issues. Nurses expressed a specific need for more knowledge and education which was viewed as an essential prerequisite to their participation in discussions. The limited time frame for female patients to preserve fertility prior to commencement of treatment was felt to inhibit both fertility-related discussion and fertility preservation. CONCLUSION Ongoing education and support for nurses may ensure teenage and young adult cancer patients' reproductive needs are met. Nurses need to consider ways to ensure female patients benefit from improved information regarding infertility risks and preservation options to support their reproductive needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Wright
- De Montfort University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Leicester, UK
| | - Wendy Norton
- De Montfort University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Leicester, UK
| | - Martyn Geary
- De Montfort University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ehrbar V, Urech C, Tschudin S. Fertility decision-making in cancer patients – current status and future directions. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/23809000.2018.1503539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Ehrbar
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Corinne Urech
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sibil Tschudin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pacey AA. Focus on fertility preservation. HUM FERTIL 2018; 21:1-2. [PMID: 29490556 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2018.1443380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Allan A Pacey
- a Academic Unit of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Department of Oncology and Metabolism , School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Sheffield , Sheffield , UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ussher JM, Parton C, Perz J. Need for information, honesty and respect: patient perspectives on health care professionals communication about cancer and fertility. Reprod Health 2018; 15:2. [PMID: 29304873 PMCID: PMC5756327 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-017-0441-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals affected by cancer report a need for information about fertility from health care professionals (HCPs), in order to inform decision making and alleviate anxiety. However, there is evidence that many health professionals do not engage in such discussions. METHOD A mixed method design was used to examine the construction and subjective experience of communication with health professionals about fertility in the context of cancer, from the perspective of patients. A survey was completed by 693 women and 185 men, across a range of cancer tumour types and age groups, and in-depth one-to-one interviews conducted with a purposively selected subsample of survey respondents, 61 women and 17 men. The chi square test for independence was used to test for group differences between women and men on closed survey items. Thematic analysis was used to examine the open ended survey responses and interviews. RESULTS Significantly more women (57%, n = 373) than men (46%, n = 80) (X2(2517) = 6.54, p = .011) reported that they had discussed fertility with a HCP since diagnosis of cancer. Satisfaction with the discussion was reported by 65% (n = 242) of women and 69% (n = 54) (ns) of men. This discussion was reported to have been initiated by the patient or their partner in 44% (n = 165) of women and 47% (n = 37) (ns) of men. In the interviews and open ended surveys three themes were identified: Feeling heard and informed about fertility after cancer: Positive experiences of HCP communication; "I was never given full disclosure": HCP silence or reticence about discussing fertility after cancer, including the sub-theme "Their primary concern is getting me cancer free": Constructions of absence of fertility communication by HCPs; and Confusion and lack of compassion: Unsatisfactory information provision about fertility and cancer. CONCLUSION Discussion with a HCP about fertility concerns, and satisfaction with the discussion, was associated with reports of lower patient distress, greater knowledge and understanding of the consequences of cancer on fertility, involvement in the decision making process about fertility preservation, and satisfaction with health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M. Ussher
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, 2751 Australia
| | - Chloe Parton
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, 2751 Australia
| | - Janette Perz
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, 2751 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sisk BA, Mack JW, Ashworth R, DuBois J. Communication in pediatric oncology: State of the field and research agenda. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:10.1002/pbc.26727. [PMID: 28748597 PMCID: PMC6902431 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Revised: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
From the time of diagnosis through either survivorship or end of life, communication between healthcare providers and patients or parents can serve several core functions, including fostering healing relationships, exchanging information, responding to emotions, managing uncertainty, making decisions, and enabling patient/family self-management. We systematically reviewed all studies that focused on communication between clinicians and patients or parents in pediatric oncology, categorizing studies based on which core functions of communication they addressed. After identifying gaps in the literature, we propose a research agenda to further the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A. Sisk
- Department of Pediatrics, St. Louis Children’s, Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Medicine, Boston Children’s, Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel Ashworth
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington, University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - James DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington, University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zarnegar S, Gosiengfiao Y, Rademaker A, Casey R, Albritton KH. Recall of Fertility Discussion by Adolescent Female Cancer Patients: A Survey-Based Pilot Study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2017; 7:249-253. [PMID: 29058500 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Many adolescent female cancer patients will survive into their reproductive years. Pediatric oncologists are advised to discuss oncofertility during treatment planning. In this pilot study, 19 adolescent females completed a retrospective survey assessing recall of a fertility discussion, satisfaction with fertility knowledge, and multiple factors that may influence recall, including parental involvement in decision-making. Eleven respondents (58%) remembered a discussion about infertility risk and 9 (47%) about fertility preservation. Most who recalled a discussion were satisfied with their fertility knowledge (10/11, 90.9%). In this study, we validated the feasibility of survey administration and identified trends in oncofertility counseling at our center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Zarnegar
- 1 Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, New York
| | - Yasmin Gosiengfiao
- 2 Pediatric Hematology, Oncology & Stem Cell Transplantation, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago , Chicago, Illinois
| | - Alfred Rademaker
- 3 Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robert Casey
- 4 Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders , Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Karen H Albritton
- 5 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cook Children's Hospital , Fort Worth, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Barlevy D, Elger BS, Wangmo T, Ravitsky V. Adolescent oncofertility discussions: Recommendations from a systematic literature review. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2017; 8:106-115. [PMID: 28949840 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1305006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing cancer incidence and survivorship rates have made late-term effects, such as effects on fertility, a salient issue for adolescent cancer patients. While various barriers make it difficult for health care professionals to discuss oncofertility with adolescents and their parents, there are numerous reasons to hold such discussions, based on professional obligations and the ethical principles of respect for autonomy and beneficence. This systematic literature review presents and critically examines recommendations for adolescent oncofertility discussions. METHODS Conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, this systematic literature review includes English, French, and German articles published up until December 31, 2014. Articles were sought via a combination of search terms in four databases. RESULTS Eighty of 96 articles included in this review address recommendations for improving adolescent oncofertility discussions. These recommendations deal with how, when, what, and with whom professionals ought to have these discussions, as well as various systemic barriers and ways to address them. CONCLUSIONS Based upon the principles of beneficence, respect for autonomy, and justice, we endorse several recommendations for oncofertility discussions with adolescents and their parents, including having a specific professional on the health care team initiate these discussions with all newly diagnosed patients; regularly doing so before, during, and after treatment; allowing adolescents to decide for themselves whom they wish to include in such discussions; employing various forms of communication; obtaining both adolescent assent and parental consent for fertility preservation (FP) procedures, especially at each stage (e.g., procurement and use); properly educating and training professionals to discuss oncofertility; promoting interdisciplinary collaboration; creating and implementing guidelines and policies; and ensuring equity of access to FP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorit Barlevy
- a Institute for Biomedical Ethics , University of Basel
| | | | - Tenzin Wangmo
- a Institute for Biomedical Ethics , University of Basel
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- b Bioethics Program, School of Public Health , University of Montreal
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Taylor JF, Ott MA. Fertility Preservation after a Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Adolescents', Parents', and Providers' Perspectives, Experiences, and Preferences. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2016; 29:585-598. [PMID: 27108230 PMCID: PMC5903553 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2015] [Revised: 04/01/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Survival into adulthood is now a reality for many adolescents facing cancer. Fertility preservation (FP) is rapidly advancing, but oncology providers and health systems struggle to incorporate the newest FP technologies into the clinical care of adolescents. Our objective was to systematically review and synthesize the available data regarding the perspectives, experiences, and preferences of adolescents, parents, and oncology providers about FP to inform clinical implementation of FP technologies. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Knowledge, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsychInfo) were systematically searched for studies published between January 1999 and May 2014. Adolescents were defined as 12-18 years at the time of diagnosis or designated as pubertal/postpubertal and younger than 18 years of age. Studies were assessed for methodological quality, data were extracted using a standardized form, and results were synthesized using guidelines for a narrative syntheses of quantitative and qualitative data. RESULTS In total, 1237 records were identified, with 22 articles, representing 17 unique studies that met the inclusion criteria. The following topics were consistently observed across studies and populations: (1) fertility in trust; (2) decision-making challenges; (3) provider knowledge and practices; and (4) discrepancies between desired and actual experiences. CONCLUSION Despite the challenges associated with a new cancer diagnosis, adolescents and parents value the opportunity to discuss fertility concerns and preservation options. Providers play an important role in addressing these topics for families and efforts should be made to incorporate FP discussions into routine cancer care for all adolescents, with attention paid to the unique needs of adolescents and their parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia F Taylor
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| | - Mary A Ott
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Benedict C, Thom B, Kelvin JF. Fertility preservation and cancer: challenges for adolescent and young adult patients. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2016; 10:87-94. [PMID: 26730794 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW With increasing survival rates, fertility is an important quality of life concern for many young cancer patients. There is a critical need for improvements in clinical care to ensure patients are well informed about infertility risks and fertility preservation options and to support them in their reproductive decision-making prior to treatment. RECENT FINDINGS Several barriers prevent fertility from being adequately addressed in the clinical context. Providers' and patients' incomplete or inaccurate understanding of infertility risks exacerbate patients' reproductive concerns. For female patients in particular, making decisions about fertility preservation before treatment often leads to decision conflict, reducing the likelihood of making informed, value-based decisions, and posttreatment regret and distress. Recent empirically based interventions to improve provider training around fertility issues and to support patient decision-making about fertility preservation show promise. SUMMARY Providers should be knowledgeable about the infertility risks associated with cancer therapies and proactively address fertility with all patients who might one day wish to have a child. Comprehensive counseling should also include related issues such as contraceptive use and health implications of early menopause, regardless of desire for future children. Although the negative psychosocial impact of cancer-related infertility is now well accepted, limited work has been done to explore how to improve clinical management of fertility issues in the context of cancer care. Evidence-based interventions should be developed to address barriers and provide psychosocial and decision-making support to patients who are concerned about their fertility and interested in fertility preservation options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Benedict
- aDepartment of Medicine, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Manhasset bSurvivorship Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ramphal R, Aubin S, Czaykowski P, De Pauw S, Johnson A, McKillop S, Szwajcer D, Wilkins K, Rogers P. Adolescent and young adult cancer: principles of care. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 23:204-9. [PMID: 27330350 DOI: 10.3747/co.23.3013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults (ayas) with cancer in active treatment face a number of barriers to optimal care. In the present article, we focus on the 3 critical domains of care for ayas-medical, psychosocial, and research-and how changes to the system could overcome barriers. We summarize the current literature, outline recommended principles of care, raise awareness of barriers to optimal care, and suggest specific changes to the system to overcome those barriers in the Canadian context. Many of the recommendations can nevertheless be applied universally. These recommendations are endorsed by the Canadian Task Force on Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and build on outcomes from two international workshops held by that group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ramphal
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - S Aubin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - P Czaykowski
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - S De Pauw
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
| | - A Johnson
- Division of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, BC Children's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - S McKillop
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
| | - D Szwajcer
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - K Wilkins
- Faculty of Nursing, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB
| | - P Rogers
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ellis SJ, Wakefield CE, McLoone JK, Robertson EG, Cohn RJ. Fertility concerns among child and adolescent cancer survivors and their parents: A qualitative analysis. J Psychosoc Oncol 2016; 34:347-62. [DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2016.1196806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
30
|
Barlevy D, Wangmo T, Elger BS, Ravitsky V. Attitudes, Beliefs, and Trends Regarding Adolescent Oncofertility Discussions: A Systematic Literature Review. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2016; 5:119-34. [DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dorit Barlevy
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tenzin Wangmo
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Bernice S. Elger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- Bioethics Program, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Long CJ, Ginsberg JP, Kolon TF. Fertility Preservation in Children and Adolescents With Cancer. Urology 2016; 91:190-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.10.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2015] [Revised: 10/26/2015] [Accepted: 10/27/2015] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
32
|
Factors associated with the receipt of fertility preservation services along the decision-making pathway in young Canadian female cancer patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 33:265-80. [PMID: 26560157 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0608-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2015] [Accepted: 10/28/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigated the factors associated with the receipt of fertility preservation (FP) services along the decision-making pathway in young Canadian female cancer patients. The roles of the oncologists were examined. METHODS A total of 188 women who were diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 18-39 after the year 2000 and had finished active cancer treatment by the time of the survey (2012-2013) participated in the study. Logistic regression models and Pearson χ (2) tests were used for analyses. RESULTS The mean ages of participants at diagnosis and at survey time were 30.2 (SD = 3.7) and 33.9 (SD = 5.9). One quarter (n = 45, 23.9 %) did not recall having a fertility discussion with their oncologists. Of the three quarters who had a fertility discussion (n = 143, 76.1 %), discussions were equally initiated by oncologists (n = 71) and patients (n = 72). Of the 49 women (26 %) who consulted a fertility specialist, 17 (9 %) underwent a FP procedure. Fertility concern at diagnosis was the driving force of the receipt of FP services at all decision points. Our findings suggest that not only was the proactive approach of oncologists in initiating a fertility discussion important, the quality of the discussion was equally critical in the decision-making pathway. CONCLUSIONS Oncologists play a pivotal role in the provision of fertility services in that they are not only gate keepers, knowledge brokers, and referral initiators of FP consultation, but also they are catalysts in supporting cancer patients making important FP decision in conjunction with the consultation provided by a fertility specialist.
Collapse
|
33
|
Stark D, Bielack S, Brugieres L, Dirksen U, Duarte X, Dunn S, Erdelyi D, Grew T, Hjorth L, Jazbec J, Kabickova E, Konsoulova A, Kowalczyk J, Lassaletta A, Laurence V, Lewis I, Monrabal A, Morgan S, Mountzios G, Olsen P, Renard M, Saeter G, van der Graaf W, Ferrari A. Teenagers and young adults with cancer in Europe: from national programmes to a European integrated coordinated project. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2015; 25:419-27. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2015] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- D. Stark
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology; Leeds Institute of Oncology and St James's University Hospital; University of Leeds; Leeds UK
| | - S. Bielack
- Klinikum Stuttgart; Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine; Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology); Olgahospital; Stuttgart Germany
| | - L. Brugieres
- Department of Children and Adolescents Oncology; Institut Gustave Roussy; Villejuif France
| | - U. Dirksen
- University Hospital Muenster; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology; Westfalian Wilhelms University; Muenster Germany
- Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús; Madrid Spain
| | - X. Duarte
- Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa; Lisbon Portugal
| | - S. Dunn
- Teenage Cancer Trust; London UK
| | | | - T. Grew
- Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School; Oxford UK
| | - L. Hjorth
- Department of Pediatrics; Skåne University Hospital; Clinical Sciences Lund University; Lund Sweden
| | - J. Jazbec
- Division of Pediatrics; Unit of Hematooncology; University Medical Centre Ljubljana; Ljubljana Slovenia
| | | | | | - J.R. Kowalczyk
- Children's University Hospital; Skubiszewski Medical University of Lublin; Lublin Poland
| | - A. Lassaletta
- Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús; Madrid Spain
| | - V. Laurence
- Department of Medical and Pediatric Oncology; Institut Curie; Paris France
| | - I. Lewis
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust; Liverpool
| | - A. Monrabal
- Spanish Association of Adolescents and Young Adult with Cancer; London
| | - S. Morgan
- Teenage Cancer Trust Unit; St James's University Hospital; Leeds UK
| | - G. Mountzios
- University of Athens School of Medicine; Athens Greece
| | - P.R. Olsen
- Department of Oncology; Aarhus University Hospital; Aarhus C Denmark
| | - M. Renard
- Department of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology; University Hospitals Leuven; Leuven Belgium
| | - G. Saeter
- Institute for Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo Norway
| | - W.T. van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology; Radboud University Medical Centre; Nijmegen the Netherlands
| | - A. Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori; Milan Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Perceptions of Infertility Risks Among Female Pediatric Cancer Survivors Following Gonadotoxic Therapy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2015; 37:368-72. [PMID: 25985237 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000000349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Research has established that childhood cancer treatments can place survivors at risk for reproductive health problems, yet little is known about pediatric survivors' perceptions of their risk for infertility and worry about future family planning. The purpose of this study was to explore factors that affect awareness of risk for and worry about infertility among female pediatric cancer survivors aged 10 to 21 (N=48) and their parents (N=41) following exposure to treatments associated with reproductive late effects. The majority of female childhood cancer survivors (71%) and their parents (95%) reported worry about infertility following gonadotoxic therapy. Cross-sectional data indicated that survivors' awareness of risk for and worry about infertility increase during adolescence, whereas parents' awareness of risk and worry generally remain constant throughout their daughters' development. Survivor worry about infertility was predicted by a variety of factors, yet parent worry about infertility was only associated with increased gonadotoxic radiation exposure. Overall, these findings reinforce the necessity of developmentally appropriate education about reproductive health risks and fertility preservation options across the continuum of pediatric oncology care from diagnosis to survivorship.
Collapse
|
35
|
Anderson RA, Mitchell RT, Kelsey TW, Spears N, Telfer EE, Wallace WHB. Cancer treatment and gonadal function: experimental and established strategies for fertility preservation in children and young adults. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015; 3:556-67. [PMID: 25873571 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(15)00039-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 191] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Preservation of gonadal function is an important priority for the long-term health of cancer survivors of both sexes and all ages at treatment. Loss of opportunity for fertility is a prime concern in both male and female cancer survivors, but endocrine effects of gonadal damage are likewise central to long-term health and wellbeing. Some fertility preservation techniques, such as semen and embryo cryopreservation, are established and successful in adults, and development of oocyte vitrification has greatly improved the potential to cryopreserve unfertilised oocytes. Despite being recommended for all pubertal male patients, sperm banking is not universally practised in paediatric oncology centres, and very few adolescent-friendly facilities exist. All approaches to fertility preservation have specific challenges in children and teenagers, including ethical, practical, and scientific issues. For young women, cryopreservation of ovarian cortical tissue with later replacement has resulted in at least 40 livebirths, but is still regarded as experimental in most countries. For prepubertal boys, testicular biopsy cryopreservation is offered in some centres, but how that tissue might be used in the future is unclear, and so far no evidence suggests that fertility can be restored. For both sexes, these approaches involve an invasive procedure and have an uncertain risk of tissue contamination in haematological and other malignancies. Decision making for all these approaches needs assessment of the individual's risk of fertility loss, and is made at a time of emotional distress. Development of this specialty needs better provision of information for patients and their medical teams, and improvements in service provision, to match technical and scientific advances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Rod T Mitchell
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Thomas W Kelsey
- School of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Norah Spears
- Centre for Integrative Physiology, Hugh Robson Building, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Evelyn E Telfer
- Centre for Integrative Physiology, Hugh Robson Building, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - W Hamish B Wallace
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sigismondi C, Papaleo E, Viganò P, Vailati S, Candiani M, Ottolina J, Di Mattei VE, Mangili G. Fertility preservation in female cancer patients: a single center experience. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER 2015; 34:56-60. [PMID: 25556619 PMCID: PMC4302090 DOI: 10.5732/cjc.014.10252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Advances in cancer treatment allow women to be cured and live longer. However, the necessary chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens have a negative impact on future fertility. Oncofertility has emerged as a new interdisciplinary field to address the issue of gonadotoxicity associated with cancer treatment and to facilitate fertility preservation, including oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. These fertility issues are often inadequately addressed, and referral rates to oncofertility centers are low. The aim of this study was to report the 3-year experience of the San Raffaele Oncofertility Unit. A total of 96 patients were referred to the Oncofertility Unit for evaluation after the diagnosis of cancer and before gonadotoxic treatment between April 2011 and June 2014. Of the 96 patients, 30 (31.2%) were affected by breast cancers, 20 (20.8%) by sarcomas, 28 (29.2%) by hematologic malignancies, 13 (13.5%) by central nervous system cancers, 3 (3.1%) by bowel tumors, 1 (1.0%) by Wilms' tumor, and 1 (1.0%) by a thyroid tumor; 47 (49.0%) were referred for oocyte cryopreservation before starting chemotherapy, 20 (20.8%) were referred for ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and 29 (30.2%) were not recruited. The mean time between the patients' counseling and oocyte retrieval was 15 days (range, 2–37 days). The mean time between the laparoscopic surgery and the beginning of treatment was 4 days (range, 2–10 days). The number of patients who were referred increased over time, whereas the rate of patients who were not recruited decreased, showing an improvement in referrals to the Oncofertility Unit and in the patients' counseling and understanding. Our results indicate that an effective multidisciplinary oncofertility team is necessary for prompt referrals and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Sigismondi
- Gynecology Department, Preservation of Fertility Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano 20132, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Shaw PH, Reed DR, Yeager N, Zebrack B, Castellino SM, Bleyer A. Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Oncology in the United States: A Specialty in Its Late Adolescence. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2015; 37:161-9. [PMID: 25757020 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000000318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Over the last 30 years, it has become apparent that oncology patients ages 15 to 39 have not reaped the same rewards of improved survival that we have seen in younger and older patients. As a result, in 2006 the Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Oncology Progress Review Group convened and examined the factors that impact the care of the 70,000 new cases per year (approximately 7% of all new cases) in the United States and published their findings. The reasons for inferior survival gains are of course multiple and include the settings in which patients are cared for, clinical trial enrollment, insurance coverage, varied treatment of sarcomas, varied treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the psychosocial impact of cancer and cancer survivorship. A new area of a yet-to-be completely defined subspecialty was born out of this meeting: AYA oncology. As a medical community we realized that these patients do not fit neatly into the pediatric nor adult world and, therefore, require a unique approach which many individuals, oncology centers, advocacy groups, and cooperative trial groups have started to address. This group of dedicated providers and advocates has made strides but there is still much work to be done on the local, national, and international level to make up for shortcomings in the medical system and improve outcomes. We review key components of AYA cancer care in 2015 that all providers should be aware of, how far we have come, where this movement is headed, and the obstacles that continue to stand in the way of better cure rates and quality of life after cure for this unique group of patients. Like an adolescent maturing into adulthood, this movement has learned from the past and is focused on moving into the future to achieve its goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter H Shaw
- *Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA †Sarcoma Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL ‡Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH §University of Michigan School of Social Work, Ann Arbor, MI ∥Department of Pediatrics, Section on Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC ¶Quality Department, St Charles Health System, Bend, OR
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Quinn GP, Block RG, Clayman ML, Kelvin J, Arvey SR, Lee JH, Reinecke J, Sehovic I, Jacobsen PB, Reed D, Gonzalez L, Vadaparampil ST, Laronga C, Lee MC, Pow-Sang J, Eggly S, Franklin A, Shah B, Fulp WJ, Hayes-Lattin B. If you did not document it, it did not happen: rates of documentation of discussion of infertility risk in adolescent and young adult oncology patients' medical records. J Oncol Pract 2014; 11:137-44. [PMID: 25549654 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2014.000786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The adolescent and young adult (AYA) population is underserved because of unique late-effect issues, particularly future fertility. This study sought to establish rates of documentation of discussion of risk of infertility, fertility preservation (FP) options, and referrals to fertility specialists in AYA patients' medical records at four cancer centers. METHODS All centers reviewed randomized records within the top four AYA disease sites (breast, leukemia/lymphoma, sarcoma, and testicular). Eligible records included those of patients: diagnosed in 2011, with no prior receipt of gonadotoxic therapy; age 18 to 45 years; with no multiple primary cancers; and for whom record was not second opinion. Quality Oncology Practice Initiative methods were used to evaluate documentation of discussion of risk of infertility, discussion of FP options, and referral to a fertility specialist. RESULTS Of 231 records, 26% documented infertility risk discussion, 24% documented FP option discussion, and 13% documented referral to a fertility specialist. Records were less likely to contain evidence of infertility risk and FP option discussions for female patients (P = .030 and .004, respectively) and those with breast cancer (P = .021 and < .001, respectively). Records for Hispanic/Latino patients were less likely to contain evidence of infertility risk discussion (P = .037). Records were less likely to document infertility risk discussion, FP option discussion, and fertility specialist referral for patients age ≥ 40 years (P < .001, < .001, and .002, respectively) and those who already had children (all P < .001). CONCLUSION The overall rate of documentation of discussion of FP is low, and results show disparities among specific groups. Although greater numbers of discussions may be occurring, there is a need to create interventions to improve documentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwendolyn P Quinn
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Rebecca G Block
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Marla L Clayman
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Joanne Kelvin
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Sarah R Arvey
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Ji-Hyun Lee
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Joyce Reinecke
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Ivana Sehovic
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Paul B Jacobsen
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Damon Reed
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Luis Gonzalez
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Christine Laronga
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - M Catherine Lee
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Julio Pow-Sang
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Susan Eggly
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Anna Franklin
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Bijal Shah
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - William J Fulp
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Brandon Hayes-Lattin
- Moffitt Cancer Center; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; LIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Preserving Fertility in Children and Adolescents with Cancer. CHILDREN-BASEL 2014; 1:166-85. [PMID: 27417474 PMCID: PMC4928722 DOI: 10.3390/children1020166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2014] [Revised: 07/21/2014] [Accepted: 07/23/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
In the face of excellent survival rates for pediatric and adolescent cancer, preserving the opportunity to have biological children is an important component of long term quality of life. Yet, modern chemotherapeutic regimens continue to pose a threat to fertility. The only fertility preservation methods available to pre-pubertal children of both genders is cryopreservation of gonadal tissue, a highly experimental intervention, or shielding/re-location of reproductive tissue in the setting of radiation. These techniques are available in the post pubertal population as well, but post pubertal patients also have the option for cryopreservation of gametes, a process that is much simpler in males than females. For this reason, prior to the initiation of therapy, sperm banking should be considered standard of care for males, while consideration of embryo or oocyte cryopreservation should be limited to those females at risk of developing ovarian failure. Attention to reproductive health and fertility preservation should continue after the completion of therapy. Establishing programs that streamline access to current fertility preservation techniques will assist in ensuring that all eligible patients can avail themselves of current options.
Collapse
|
40
|
Lester-Coll NH, Morse CB, Zhai HA, Both S, Ginsberg JP, Gracia CR, Lustig RA, Tochner Z, Hill-Kayser CE. Preserving Fertility in Adolescent Girls and Young Women Requiring Craniospinal Irradiation: A Case Report and Discussion of Options to Be Considered Prior to Treatment. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2014; 3:96-99. [PMID: 24940532 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2013.0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is associated with infertility risk for adolescent/young adult women. We explore two methods of reducing ovarian exposure: oophoropexy (surgical removal of the ovaries from the path of the X-ray beam) and proton therapy (to allow the beam to stop without exposing the ovaries/uterus). In the case discussed, oophoropexy followed by X-ray CSI reduced ovarian dose to that at which 50% of oocytes are expected to survive, and the patient appears to have viable oocytes; this technique did not reduce uterine dose. Proton therapy would have eliminated the ovarian and uterine dose and the need for oophoropexy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nataniel H Lester-Coll
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher B Morse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Huifang A Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stefan Both
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jill P Ginsberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. ; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Clarisa R Gracia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert A Lustig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Zelig Tochner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christine E Hill-Kayser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Naessén S, Bergström I, Ljungman P, Landgren BM. Long-term follow-up of bone density, general and reproductive health in female survivors after treatment for haematological malignancies. Eur J Haematol 2014; 93:137-42. [DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Naessén
- Department of Woman and Child Health; Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Karolinska University Hospital; Stockholm Sweden
| | - Ingrid Bergström
- Department of Clinical Science; Intervention and Technology; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
| | - Per Ljungman
- Division of Hematology; Department of Medicine Huddinge; Department of Hematology; Karolinska University Hospital; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
| | - Britt-Marie Landgren
- Department of Clinical Science; Intervention and Technology; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pacey AA, Eiser C. The importance of fertility preservation in cancer patients. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 14:487-9. [PMID: 24506112 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2014.883283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The potential risks of anti-cancer therapy for male and female fertility are well understood, yet evidence suggests that fewer patients than predicted actually preserve their fertility before therapy begins. Studies of post-pubertal males and females suggest that the approach of health professionals in oncology is vital in facilitating successful sperm and egg banking. For men, this seems to be compounded by a general lack of understanding about their personal risk of infertility. Those involved in delivering anticancer therapy therefore have a vital role to play in providing timely information and facilitating efficient referral to fertility services. In the future, this is likely to become more important if new fertility preservation strategies such as ovarian and testicular tissue banking become more routinely used, with implications for both pre- and post-pubertal individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan Anthony Pacey
- University of Sheffield - Human Metabolism, Level 4, The Jessop Wing Tree Root Walk, Sheffield S10 2SF, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|