The Spemann organizer of Xenopus is patterned along its anteroposterior axis at the earliest gastrula stage

Organizing activities of axial mesoderm

For almost a century, developmental biologists have appreciated that the ability of the embryonic organizer to induce and pattern the body plan is intertwined with its differentiation into axial mesoderm. Despite this, we still have a relatively poor understanding of the contribution of axial mesoderm to induction and patterning of different body regions, and the manner in which axial mesoderm-derived information is interpreted in tissues of changing competence. Here, with a particular focus on the nervous system, we review the evidence that axial mesoderm notochord and prechordal mesoderm/mesendoderm act as organizers, discuss how their influence extends through the different axes of the developing organism, and describe how the ability of axial mesoderm to direct morphogenesis impacts on its role as a local organizer.

Gastrulation: Its Principles and Variations

As epiblast cells initiate development into various somatic cells, they undergo a large-scale reorganization, called gastrulation. The gastrulation of the epiblast cells produces three groups of cells: the endoderm layer, the collection of miscellaneous mesodermal tissues, and the ectodermal layer, which includes the neural, epidermal, and associated tissues. Most studies of gastrulation have focused on the formation of the tissues that provide the primary route for cell reorganization, that is, the primitive streak, in the chicken and mouse. In contrast, how gastrulation alters epiblast-derived cells has remained underinvestigated. This chapter highlights the regulation of cell and tissue fate via the gastrulation process. The roles and regulatory functions of neuromesodermal progenitors (NMPs) in the gastrulation process, elucidated in the last decade, are discussed in depth to resolve points of confusion. Chicken and mouse embryos, which form a primitive streak as the site of mesoderm precursor ingression, have been investigated extensively. However, primitive streak formation is an exception, even among amniotes. The roles of gastrulation processes in generating various somatic tissues will be discussed broadly.

The organizer: What it meant, and still means, to developmental biology

This article is about how the famous organizer experiment has been perceived since it was first published in 1924. The experiment involves the production of a secondary embryo under the influence of a graft of a dorsal lip from an amphibian gastrula to a host embryo. The early experiments of Spemann and his school gave rise to a view that the whole early amphibian embryo was "indifferent" in terms of determination, except for a special region called "the organizer". This was viewed mainly as an agent of neural induction, also having the ability to generate an anteroposterior body pattern. Early biochemical efforts to isolate a factor emitted by the organizer were not successful but culminated in the definition of "neuralizing (N)" and "mesodermalizing (M)" factors present in a wide variety of animal tissues. By the 1950s this view became crystallized as a "two gradient" model involving the N and M factors, which explained the anteroposterior patterning effect. In the 1970s, the phenomenon of mesoderm induction was characterized as a process occurring before the commencement of gastrulation. Reinvestigation of the organizer effect using lineage labels gave rise to a more precise definition of the sequence of events. Since the 1980s, modern research using the tools of molecular biology, combined with microsurgery, has explained most of the processes involved. The organizer graft should now be seen as an experiment which involves multiple interactions: dorsoventral polarization following fertilization, mesoderm induction, the dorsalizing signal responsible for neuralization and dorsoventral patterning of the mesoderm, and additional factors responsible for anteroposterior patterning.

Bmp Signal Gradient Modulates Convergent Cell Movement via Xarhgef3.2 during Gastrulation of Xenopus Embryos

Gastrulation is a critical step in the establishment of a basic body plan during development. Convergence and extension (CE) cell movements organize germ layers during gastrulation. Noncanonical Wnt signaling has been known as major signaling that regulates CE cell movement by activating Rho and Rac. In addition, Bmp molecules are expressed in the ventral side of a developing embryo, and the ventral mesoderm region undergoes minimal CE cell movement while the dorsal mesoderm undergoes dynamic cell movements. This suggests that Bmp signal gradient may affect CE cell movement. To investigate whether Bmp signaling negatively regulates CE cell movements, we performed microarray-based screening and found that the transcription of Xenopus Arhgef3.2 (Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor) was negatively regulated by Bmp signaling. We also showed that overexpression or knockdown of Xarhgef3.2 caused gastrulation defects. Interestingly, Xarhgef3.2 controlled gastrulation cell movements through interacting with Disheveled (Dsh2) and Dsh2-associated activator of morphogenesis 1 (Daam1). Our results suggest that Bmp gradient affects gastrulation cell movement (CE) via negative regulation of Xarhgef3.2 expression.

Integration of Wnt and FGF signaling in the Xenopus gastrula at TCF and Ets binding sites shows the importance of short-range repression by TCF in patterning the marginal zone

During Xenopus gastrulation, Wnt and FGF signaling pathways cooperate to induce posterior structures. Wnt target expression around the blastopore falls into two main categories: a horseshoe shape with a dorsal gap, as in Wnt8 expression; or a ring, as in FGF8 expression. Using ChIP-seq, we show, surprisingly, that the FGF signaling mediator Ets2 binds near all Wnt target genes. However, β-catenin preferentially binds at the promoters of genes with horseshoe patterns, but further from the promoters of genes with ring patterns. Manipulation of FGF or Wnt signaling demonstrated that 'ring' genes are responsive to FGF signaling at the dorsal midline, whereas 'horseshoe' genes are predominantly regulated by Wnt signaling. We suggest that, in the absence of active β-catenin at the dorsal midline, the DNA-binding protein TCF binds and actively represses gene activity only when close to the promoter. In contrast, genes without functional TCF sites at the promoter may be predominantly regulated by Ets at the dorsal midline and are expressed in a ring. These results suggest recruitment of only short-range repressors to potential Wnt targets in the Xenopus gastrula.

On the nature and function of organizers

Organizers, which comprise groups of cells with the ability to instruct adjacent cells into specific states, represent a key principle in developmental biology. The concept was first introduced by Spemann and Mangold, who showed that there is a cellular population in the newt embryo that elicits the development of a secondary axis from adjacent cells. Similar experiments in chicken and rabbit embryos subsequently revealed groups of cells with similar instructive potential. In birds and mammals, organizer activity is often associated with a structure known as the node, which has thus been considered a functional homologue of Spemann's organizer. Here, we take an in-depth look at the structure and function of organizers across species and note that, whereas the amphibian organizer is a contingent collection of elements, each performing a specific function, the elements of organizers in other species are dispersed in time and space. This observation urges us to reconsider the universality and meaning of the organizer concept.

Summary: This Review re-evaluates the notion of Spemann's organizer as identified in amphibians, highlighting the spatiotemporal dispersion of equivalent elements in mouse and the key influence of responsiveness to organizer signals.

Specification of anteroposterior axis by combinatorial signaling during Xenopus development

The specification of anteroposterior (AP) axis is a fundamental and complex patterning process that sets up the embryonic polarity and shapes a multicellular organism. This process involves the integration of distinct signaling pathways to coordinate temporal-spatial gene expression and morphogenetic movements. In the frog Xenopus, extensive embryological and molecular studies have provided major advance in understanding the mechanism implicated in AP patterning. Following fertilization, cortical rotation leads to the transport of maternal determinants to the dorsal region and creates the primary dorsoventral (DV) asymmetry. The activation of maternal Wnt/ß-catenin signaling and a high Nodal signal induces the formation of the Nieuwkoop center in the dorsal-vegetal cells, which then triggers the formation of the Spemann organizer in the overlying dorsal marginal zone. It is now well established that the Spemann organizer plays a central role in building the vertebrate body axes because it provides patterning information for both DV and AP polarities. The antagonistic interactions between signals secreted in the Spemann organizer and the opposite ventral region pattern the mesoderm along the DV axis, and this DV information is translated into AP positional values during gastrulation. The formation of anterior neural tissue requires simultaneous inhibition of zygotic Wnt and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signals, while an endogenous gradient of Wnt, fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), retinoic acid (RA) signaling, and collinearly expressed Hox genes patterns the trunk and posterior regions. Collectively, DV asymmetry is mostly coupled to AP polarity, and cell-cell interactions mediated essentially by the same regulatory networks operate in DV and AP patterning. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Models for patterning primary embryonic body axes: The role of space and time

Models for the generation and interpretation of spatial patterns are discussed. Crucial for these processes is an intimate link between self-enhancing and antagonistic reactions. For spatial patterning, long-ranging antagonistic reactions are required that restrict the self-enhancing reactions to generate organizing regions. Self-enhancement is also required for a permanent switch-like activation of genes. This self-enhancement is antagonized by the mutual repression of genes, making sure that in a particular cell only one gene of a set of possible genes become activated - a long range inhibition in the 'gene space'. The understanding how the main body axes are initiated becomes more straightforward if the evolutionary ancestral head/brain pattern and the trunk pattern is considered separately. To activate a specific gene at particular concentration of morphogenetic gradient, observations are compatible with a systematic and time-requiring 'promotion' from one gene to the next until the local concentration is insufficient to accomplish a further promotion. The achieved determination is stable against a fading of the morphogen, as required to allow substantial growth. Minor modifications lead to a purely time-dependent activation of genes; both mechanisms are involved to pattern the anteroposterior axis. A mutual activation of cell states that locally exclude each other accounts for many features of the segmental patterning of the trunk. A possible scenario for the evolutionary invention of segmentation is discussed that is based on a reemployment of interactions involved in asexual reproduction.

Proteomic analysis of differences in ectoderm and mesoderm membranes by DiGE

Ectoderm and mesoderm can be considered as prototypes for epithelial and mesenchymal cell types. These two embryonic tissues display clear differences in adhesive and motility properties, which are phenomenologically well characterized but remain largely unexplored at the molecular level. Because the key downstream regulations must occur at the plasma membrane and in the underlying actin cortical structures, we have set out to compare the protein content of membrane fractions from Xenopus ectoderm and mesoderm tissues using 2-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (DiGE). We have thus identified several proteins that are enriched in one or the other tissues, including regulators of the cytoskeleton and of cell signaling. This study represents to our knowledge the first attempt to use proteomics specifically targeted to the membrane-cortex compartment of embryonic tissues. The identified components should help unraveling a variety of tissue-specific functions in the embryo.

xCITED2 Induces Neural Genes in Animal Cap Explants of Xenopus Embryos

Neural tissue is arisen from presumptive ectoderm via inhibition of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling during Xenopus early development. Previous studies demonstrate that ectopic expression of dominant negative BMP4 receptor (DNBR) produces neural tissue in animal cap explants (AC) and also increases the expression level of various genes involved in neurogenesis. To investigate detail mechanism of neurogenesis in transcriptional level, we analyzed RNAs increased by DNBR using total RNA sequencing analysis and identified several candidate genes. Among them, xCITED2 (Xenopus CBP/p300-interacting transcription activator) was induced 4.6 fold by DNBR and preferentially expressed in neural tissues at tadpole stage. Ectopic expression of xCITED2 induced anterior neural genes without mesoderm induction and reduced BMP downstream genes, an eye specific marker and posterior neural marker. Taken together, these results suggest that xCITED2 may have a role in the differentiation of anterior neural tissue during Xenopus early development.

Enzymes, embryos, and ancestors

In the 1950s, cellular regulatory mechanisms were newly recognized; with Arthur Pardee I investigated the initial enzyme of pyrimidine biosynthesis, which he discovered is controlled by feedback inhibition. The protein proved unusual in having separate but interacting sites for substrates and regulators. Howard Schachman and I dissociated the protein into different subunits, one binding regulators and one substrates. The enzyme became an early prime example of allostery. In developmental biology I studied the egg of the frog, Xenopus laevis, characterizing early processes of axis formation. My excellent students and I described cortical rotation, a 30° movement of the egg's cortex over tracks of parallel microtubules anchored to the underlying cytoplasmic core, and we perturbed it to alter Spemann's organizer and effect spectacular phenotypes. The entire sequence of events has been elucidated by others at the molecular level, making Xenopus a prime example of vertebrate axis formation. Marc Kirschner, Christopher Lowe, and I then compared hemichordate (half-chordate) and chordate early development. Despite anatomical-physiological differences, these groups share numerous steps of axis formation, ones that were probably already in use in their pre-Cambrian ancestor. I've thoroughly enjoyed exploring these areas during a 50-year period of great advances in biological sciences by the worldwide research community.

A student team in a University of Michigan biomedical engineering design course constructs a microfluidic bioreactor for studies of zebrafish development

The zebrafish is a valuable model for teaching developmental, molecular, and cell biology; aquatic sciences; comparative anatomy; physiology; and genetics. Here we demonstrate that zebrafish provide an excellent model system to teach engineering principles. A seven-member undergraduate team in a biomedical engineering class designed, built, and tested a zebrafish microfluidic bioreactor applying microfluidics, an emerging engineering technology, to study zebrafish development. During the semester, students learned engineering and biology experimental design, chip microfabrication, mathematical modeling, zebrafish husbandry, principles of developmental biology, fluid dynamics, microscopy, and basic molecular biology theory and techniques. The team worked to maximize each person's contribution and presented weekly written and oral reports. Two postdoctoral fellows, a graduate student, and three faculty instructors coordinated and directed the team in an optimal blending of engineering, molecular, and developmental biology skill sets. The students presented two posters, including one at the Zebrafish meetings in Madison, Wisconsin (June 2008).

Production of hepatocyte-like cells from human amnion

Cells isolated from the placenta have been the subject of intense investigation because many of the cells express characteristics of multipotent or even pluripotent stem cells. Cells from the placental tissues such as amnion and chorion have been reported to display multilineage differentiation and surface marker and gene expression patterns consistent with embryonic stem (ES) and mesenchymal stem cells, respectively. We have reported that epithelial cells isolated from term placenta contain cells that express surface markers such as the stage-specific embryonic antigens (SSEA) and a gene expression profile that is similar to ES cells. When subjected to specific differentiation protocols, amniotic epithelial cells display markers of differentiation to cardiomyocytes, neurons, pancreatic cells and hepatocytes. If specific and efficient methods could be developed to induce differentiation of these cells to hepatocytes, the amnion may become a useful source of cells for hepatocyte transplants. Cells isolated from amnion also have some unique properties as compared to some other stem cell sources in that they are isolated from a tissue that is normally discarded following birth, they are quite plentiful and easily isolated and they do not produce tumors when transplanted. Cells isolated from the amnion may be a uniquely useful and noncontroversial stem cell source.

Dynamic determinations: patterning the cell behaviours that close the amphibian blastopore

We review the dynamic patterns of cell behaviours in the marginal zone of amphibians with a focus on how the progressive nature and the geometry of these behaviours drive blastopore closure. Mediolateral cell intercalation behaviour and epithelial-mesenchymal transition are used in different combinations in several species of amphibian to generate a conserved pattern of circumblastoporal hoop stresses. Although these cell behaviours are quite different and involve different germ layers and tissue organization, they are expressed in similar patterns. They are expressed progressively along presumptive lateral-medial and anterior-posterior axes of the body plan in highly ordered geometries of functional significance in the context of the biomechanics of blastopore closure, thereby accounting for the production of similar patterns of circumblastoporal forces. It is not the nature of the cell behaviour alone, but the context, the biomechanical connectivity and spatial and temporal pattern of its expression that determine specificity of morphogenic output during gastrulation and blastopore closure. Understanding the patterning of these dynamic features of cell behaviour is important and will require analysis of signalling at much greater spatial and temporal resolution than that has been typical in the analysis of patterning tissue differentiation.

The role of the Spemann organizer in anterior-posterior patterning of the trunk

The formation of the vertebrate body axis during gastrulation strongly depends on a dorsal signaling centre, the Spemann organizer as it is called in amphibians. This organizer affects embryonic development by self-differentiation, regulation of morphogenesis and secretion of inducing signals. Whereas many molecular signals and mechanisms of the organizer have been clarified, its function in anterior-posterior pattern formation remains unclear. We dissected the organizer functions by generally blocking organizer formation and then restoring a single function. In experiments using a dominant inhibitory BMP receptor construct (tBr) we find evidence that neural activation by antagonism of the BMP pathway is the organizer function that enables the establishment of a detailed anterior-posterior pattern along the trunk. Conversely, the exclusive inhibition of neural activation by expressing a constitutive active BMP receptor (hAlk-6) in the ectoderm prohibits the establishment of an anterior-posterior pattern, even though the organizer itself is still intact. Thus, apart from the formerly described separation into a head and a trunk/tail organizer, the organizer does not deliver positional information for anterior-posterior patterning. Rather, by inducing neurectoderm, it makes ectodermal cells competent to receive patterning signals from the non-organizer mesoderm and thereby enable the formation of a complete and stable AP pattern along the trunk.

Xenopus hairy2b specifies anterior prechordal mesoderm identity within Spemann's organizer

Spemann's organizer is a region of the gastrula stage embryo that contains future anterior endodermal and dorsal mesodermal tissues. During gastrulation, the dorsal mesoderm is divided into the prechordal mesoderm and the chordamesoderm. However, little is known regarding how this division is established. We analyzed the role of the anterior prechordal mesoderm-specific gene Xhairy2b in the regionalization of the organizer. We found that mesoderm-inducing transforming growth factor-beta signaling induced Xhairy2b expression. On the other hand, the ectopic expression of Xhairy2b induced the expression of organizer-specific genes and resulted in the formation of a secondary dorsal axis lacking head and notochord structures. We also showed that Xhairy2b down-regulated the expression of ventral mesodermal, anterior endodermal, and chordamesodermal genes. In Xhairy2b-depleted embryos, defects in the specification of anterior prechordal mesoderm identity were observed as the border between the prechordal mesoderm and the chordamesoderm was anteriorly shifted. These results suggest that Xhairy2b establishes the identity of the anterior prechordal mesoderm within Spemann's organizer by inhibiting the formation of neighboring tissues.

21st century neontology and the comparative development of the vertebrate skull

Classic neontology (comparative embryology and anatomy), through the application of the concept of homology, has demonstrated that the development of the gnathostome (jawed vertebrate) skull is characterized both by a fidelity to the gnathostome bauplan and the exquisite elaboration of final structural design. Just as homology is an old concept amended for modern purposes, so are many of the questions regarding the development of the skull. With due deference to Geoffroy-St. Hilaire, Cuvier, Owen, Lankester et al., we are still asking: How are bauplan fidelity and elaboration of design maintained, coordinated, and modified to generate the amazing diversity seen in cranial morphologies? What establishes and maintains pattern in the skull? Are there universal developmental mechanisms underlying gnathostome autapomorphic structural traits? Can we detect and identify the etiologies of heterotopic (change in the topology of a developmental event), heterochronic (change in the timing of a developmental event), and heterofacient (change in the active capacetence, or the elaboration of capacity, of a developmental event) changes in craniofacial development within and between taxa? To address whether jaws are all made in a like manner (and if not, then how not), one needs a starting point for the sake of comparison. To this end, we present here a "hinge and caps" model that places the articulation, and subsequently the polarity and modularity, of the upper and lower jaws in the context of cranial neural crest competence to respond to positionally located epithelial signals. This model expands on an evolving model of polarity within the mandibular arch and seeks to explain a developmental patterning system that apparently keeps gnathostome jaws in functional registration yet tractable to potential changes in functional demands over time. It relies upon a system for the establishment of positional information where pattern and placement of the "hinge" is driven by factors common to the junction of the maxillary and mandibular branches of the first arch and of the "caps" by the signals emanating from the distal-most first arch midline and the lamboidal junction (where the maxillary branch meets the frontonasal processes). In this particular model, the functional registration of jaws is achieved by the integration of "hinge" and "caps" signaling, with the "caps" sharing at some critical level a developmental history that potentiates their own coordination. We examine the evidential foundation for this model in mice, examine the robustness with which it can be applied to other taxa, and examine potential proximate sources of the signaling centers. Lastly, as developmental biologists have long held that the anterior-most mesendoderm (anterior archenteron roof or prechordal plate) is in some way integral to the normal formation of the head, including the cranial skeletal midlines, we review evidence that the seminal patterning influences on the early anterior ectoderm extend well beyond the neural plate and are just as important to establishing pattern within the cephalic ectoderm, in particular for the "caps" that will yield medial signaling centers known to coordinate jaw development.

BMP antagonism by Spemann's organizer regulates rostral–caudal fate of mesoderm

Recent revisions to the Xenopus fate map challenge the interpretation of previous maps and current models of amphibian axial patterning (Lane, M.C., Smith, W.C., 1999. The origins of primitive blood in Xenopus: implications for axial patterning. Development 126 (3), 423-434.; Lane, M.C., Sheets, M.D., 2000. Designation of the anterior/posterior axis in pregastrula Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 225, 37-58). We determined the rostralmost contributions to both dorsal and ventral mesoderm concomitantly from marginal zone progenitors in stage 6 embryos. Data reveal an unequivocal rostral-to-caudal progression of both dorsal and ventral mesoderm across the pre-gastrula axis historically called the dorsal-ventral axis, and a dorsal-to-ventral progression from animal-to-vegetal in the marginal zone. These findings support the proposed revisions to the fate and axis orientation maps. Most importantly, these results raise questions about the role of the organizer grafts and organizer-derived BMP antagonists in the "induction" of secondary axes. We re-examine both phenomena, and find that organizer grafts and BMP antagonists evoke caudal-to-rostral mesodermal fate transformations, and not ventral-to-dorsal transformations as currently believed. We demonstrate that BMP antagonism evokes a second axis because it stimulates precocious mediolateral intercalation of caudal, dorsal mesoderm. The implications of these findings for models of organizer function in vertebrate axial patterning are discussed.

The involvement of Frodo in TCF-dependent signaling and neural tissue development

Frodo is a novel conserved regulator of Wnt signaling that has been identified by its association with Dishevelled, an intracellular component of Wnt signal transduction. To understand further how Frodo functions, we have analyzed its role in neural development using specific morpholino antisense oligonucleotides. We show that Frodo and the closely related Dapper synergistically regulate head development and morphogenesis. Both genes were cell-autonomously required for neural tissue formation, as defined by the pan-neural markers sox2 and nrp1. By contrast,β-catenin was not required for pan-neural marker expression, but was involved in the control of the anteroposterior patterning. In the mesoderm,Frodo and Dapper were essential for the expression of the organizer genes chordin, cerberus and Xnr3, but they were not necessary for the expression of siamois and goosecoid,established targets of β-catenin signaling. Embryos depleted of either gene showed a decreased transcriptional response to TCF3-VP16, aβ-catenin-independent transcriptional activator. Whereas the C terminus of Frodo binds Dishevelled, we demonstrate that the conserved N-terminal domain associates with TCF3. Based on these observations, we propose that Frodo and Dapper link Dsh and TCF to regulate Wnt target genes in a pathway parallel to that of β-catenin.

Gastrula organiser and embryonic patterning in the mouse

Embryonic patterning of the mouse during gastrulation and early organogenesis engenders the specification of anterior versus posterior structures and body laterality by the interaction of signalling and modulating activities. A group of cells in the mouse gastrula, characterised by the expression of a repertoire of "organiser" genes, acts as a source and the conduit for allocation of the axial mesoderm, floor plate and definitive endoderm. The organiser and its derivatives provide the antagonistic activity that modulates WNT and TGFbeta signalling. Recent findings show that the organiser activity is augmented by morphogenetic activity of the extraembryonic and embryonic endoderm, suggesting embryonic patterning is not solely the function of the organiser.

Timed interactions between the Hox expressing non-organiser mesoderm and the Spemann organiser generate positional information during vertebrate gastrulation

We report a novel developmental mechanism. Anterior-posterior positional information for the vertebrate trunk is generated by sequential interactions between a timer in the early non-organiser mesoderm and the organiser. The timer is characterised by temporally colinear activation of a series of Hox genes in the early ventral and lateral mesoderm (i.e., the non-organiser mesoderm) of the Xenopus gastrula. This early Hox gene expression is transient, unless it is stabilised by signals from the Spemann organiser. The non-organiser mesoderm and the Spemann organiser undergo timed interactions during gastrulation which lead to the formation of an anterior-posterior axis and stable Hox gene expression. When separated from each other, neither non-organiser mesoderm nor the Spemann organiser is able to induce anterior-posterior pattern formation of the trunk. We present a model describing that convergence and extension continually bring new cells from the non-organiser mesoderm within the range of organiser signals and thereby create patterned axial structures. In doing so, the age of the non-organiser mesoderm, but not the age of the organiser, defines positional values along the anterior-posterior axis. We postulate that the temporal information from the non-organiser mesoderm is linked to mesodermal Hox expression.

Isolation and characterization of a novel human thioredoxin-like gene hTLP19 encoding a secretory protein

A novel human gene, named as hTLP19, was isolated and characterized as secretory protein by combining bioinformatics tools with experiments. The hTLP19 encodes 172 amino acid residues with signal peptide in its N-terminal and a thioredoxin (Trx) domain that is homologous with some genes in Mus musculus, Xenopus laevis, etc. Moreover, the result from insulin reduction assay indicated that the hTLP19 protein has Trx enzymatic activity. By comparing full-length cDNA with human genomic DNA, the hTLP19 gene might have seven coding exons spanning 35 kb of genomic DNA on the human chromosome 1p32.3. Northern blot analysis showed that human hTLP19 is expressed widely in many tissues with 1.6 kb band and extra 1.2 kb band in placenta. Subcellular localization and immunoblotting assays indicated that hTLP19 might be secreted out of cell through trans-Golgi network (TGN).

Atrophin 2 recruits histone deacetylase and is required for the function of multiple signaling centers during mouse embryogenesis

Atrophins are evolutionarily conserved proteins that are thought to act as transcriptional co-repressors. Mammalian genomes contain two atrophin genes. Dominant polyglutamine-expanded alleles of atrophin 1 have been identified as the cause of dentatorubralpallidoluysian atrophy, an adult-onset human neurodegenerative disease with similarity to Huntington's. In a screen for recessive mutations that disrupt patterning of the early mouse embryo, we identified a line named openmind carrying a mutation in atrophin 2. openmind homozygous embryos exhibit a variety of patterning defects that first appear at E8.0. Defects include a specific failure in ventralization of the anterior neural plate, loss of heart looping and irregular partitioning of somites. In mutant embryos, Shh expression fails to initiate along the anterior midline at E8.0, and Fgf8 is delocalized from the anterior neural ridge at E8.5, revealing a crucial role for atrophin 2 in the formation and function of these two signaling centers. Atrophin 2 is also required for normal organization of the apical ectodermal ridge, a signaling center that directs limb pattern. Elevated expression of atrophin 2 in neurons suggests it may interact with atrophin 1 in neuronal development or function. We further show that atrophin 2 associates with histone deacetylase 1 in mouse embryos, providing a biochemical link between Atr2 and a chromatin-modifying enzyme. Based on our results, and on those of others, we propose that atrophin proteins act as transcriptional co-repressors during embryonic development.

Rethinking axial patterning in amphibians

Recent revisions in the Xenopus laevis fate map led to the designation of the rostral/caudal axis and reassignment of the dorsal/ventral axis (Lane and Smith [1999] Development 126:423-434; Lane and Sheets [2000] Dev. Biol. 225:37-58). It is unprecedented to reassign primary embryonic axes after many years of research in a model system. In this review, we use insights about vertebrate development from anatomy and comparative embryology, as well as knowledge about gastrulation in frogs, to reexamine several traditional amphibian fate maps. We show that four extant maps contain information on the missing rostral/caudal axis. These maps support the revised map as well as the designation of the rostral/caudal axis and reassignment of the dorsal/ventral axes. To illustrate why it is important for researchers to use the revised map and nomenclature when thinking about frog and fish embryos, we present an example of alternative interpretations of "dorsalized" zebrafish mutations.

Anteroposterior patterning in Xenopus embryos: egg fragment assay system reveals a synergy of dorsalizing and posteriorizing embryonic domains

Two distinct types of axis lacking embryos resulted from partial deletion of the vegetal part of early one-cell-stage embryos. When the deleted volume was 20-40% (relative surface area), the embryos underwent ventral-type gastrulation and formed ventral mesodermal tissues. When the deleted volume was more than 60%, the embryo did not gastrulate nor make mesodermal structures (M. Sakai, 1996, Development 122, 2207-2214). We have designated these two types of embryos as "gastrulating nonaxial embryos (GNEs)" and "permanent blastula-type embryos (PBEs)," respectively. Using these embryos as recipients, a series of Einsteck transplantation experiments were carried out to investigate mechanisms controlling anteroposterior patterning during early Xenopus development. GNEs receiving dorsal marginal zone (DMZ) transplants (GNE/DMZs) elongated and formed posteriorized phenotypes, which had muscle cells, melanocytes, and tail fins. In contrast, PBE/DMZs did not elongate but formed cement glands and brain-like structures showing strong anteriorization. Simultaneous transplantation of the cells from various regions of normal embryos with the DMZ into PBEs revealed that the entire vegetal half of normal embryos, except for the DMZ, showed posteriorizing activity. These results strongly suggest that anteroposterior patterning in Xenopus is not achieved solely by the dorsal marginal zone (the Spemann organizer), but instead by a synergistic mechanism of the dorsalizing domain (DMZ) and the posteriorizing domain (the entire vegetal half except for the DMZ).

Revisions to the Xenopus gastrula fate map: implications for mesoderm induction and patterning

A revised fate map of the gastrula Xenopus embryo predicts the existence of patterning mechanisms that operate within the animal/vegetal axis of the mesoderm-forming marginal zone. We review here molecular and embryologic data that demonstrate that such mechanisms are present and that they operate independently of the Spemann organizer. Evidence suggests that polarized fibroblast growth factor activity in the animal/vegetal axis patterns this axis. We present a model of mesoderm induction and patterning that integrates the new data on Spemann organizer-independent animal/vegetal patterning with data on other inductive pathways known to act on the gastrula marginal zone.

Morphogen gradients, positional information, and Xenopus: interplay of theory and experiment

The idea of morphogen gradients has long been an important one in developmental biology. Studies with amphibians and with Xenopus in particular have made significant contributions to demonstrating the existence, identity, and mechanisms of action of morphogens. Mesoderm induction and patterning by activin, nodals, bone morphogenetic proteins, and fibroblast growth factors have been analyzed thoroughly and reveal recurrent and combinatorial roles for these protein growth factor morphogens and their antagonists. The dynamics of nodal-type signaling and the intersection of VegT and beta-catenin intracellular gradients reveal detailed steps in early long-range patterning. Interpretation of gradients requires sophisticated mechanisms for sharpening thresholds, and the activin-Xbra-Gsc system provides an example of this. The understanding of growth factor signal transduction has elucidated growth factor morphogen action and provided tools for dissecting their direct long-range action and distribution. The physical mechanisms of morphogen gradient establishment are the focus of new interest at both the experimental and theoretical level. General themes and emerging trends in morphogen gradient studies are discussed.

Regional specification of the head and trunk-tail organizers of a urodele (Cynops pyrrhogaster) embryo is patterned during gastrulation

The dorsal marginal zone (DMZ) of an amphibian early gastrula is thought to consist of at least two distinct domains: the future head and trunk-tail organizers. We studied the mechanism by which the organizing activities of the lower half of the DMZ (LDMZ) of the urodelean (Cynops pyrrhogaster) embryo are changed. The uninvoluted LDMZ induces the notochord and then organizes the trunk-tail structures, whereas after cultivation in vitro or suramin treatment, the same LDMZ loses the notochord-inducing ability and organizes the head structures. A cell-lineage experiment indicated that the change in the organizing activity of the LDMZ was reflected in the transformation of the inductive ability: from notochord-inducing to neural-inducing activity. Using RT-PCR, we showed that the LDMZ expressed gsc, lim-1, chordin, and noggin, but not the mesoderm marker bra. In the sandwich assay, the LDMZ induced bra expression in the animal cap ectoderm, but the inductive activity was inhibited by cultivation or suramin treatment. The present study indicates that the change in the organizing activity of the LDMZ from trunk-tail to head is coupled with the loss of notochord-inducing activity. Based on these results, we suggest that this change is essential for the specification of the head and trunk-tail organizers during gastrulation.

Gbx2 interacts with Otx2 and patterns the anterior-posterior axis during gastrulation in Xenopus

Anterior-posterior patterning of the embryo requires the activity of multiple homeobox genes among them Hox, caudal (Cdx, Xcad) and Otx2. During early gastrulation, Otx2 and Xcad2 establish a cross-regulatory network, which is an early event in the anterior-posterior patterning of the embryo. As gastrulation proceeds and the embryo elongates, a new domain forms, which expresses neither, Otx2 nor Xcad2 genes. Early transcription of the Xenopus Gbx2 homologue, Xgbx2a, is spatially restricted between Otx2 and Xcad2. When overexpressed, Otx2 and Xcad2 repress Xgbx2a transcription, suggesting their role in setting the early Xgbx2a expression domain. Homeobox genes have been shown to play crucial roles in the specification of the vertebrate brain. The border between the transcription domains of Otx2 and Gbx2 is the earliest known marker of the region where the midbrain/hindbrain boundary (MHB) organizer will develop. Xgbx2a is a negative regulator of Otx2 and a weak positive regulator of Xcad2. Using obligatory activator and repressor versions of Xgbx2a, we demonstrate that, during early embryogenesis, Xgbx2a acts as a transcriptional repressor. In addition, taking advantage of hormone-inducible versions of Xgbx2a and its antimorph, we show that the ability of Xgbx2a to induce head malformations is restricted to gastrula stages and correlates with its ability to repress Otx2 during the same developmental stages. We therefore suggest that the earliest known step of the MHB formation, the establishment of Otx2/Gbx2 boundary, takes place via mutual inhibitory interactions between these two genes and this process begins as early as at midgastrulation.

Intrinsic differences between the superficial and deep layers of the Xenopus ectoderm control primary neuronal differentiation

In Xenopus, primary neurons differentiate early, in the deep layer of the neuroectoderm. In contrast, the neural precursors of the superficial layer continue to proliferate. We report that superficial layer precursors differ from deep layer precursors in that they are refractory to the neuronal-promoting activity of bHLH genes, dominant-negative X-Delta-1, FGF-8, or signals from the organizer. In this system, neuronal differentiation is guided by an early established, intrinsic, cell-autonomous difference in the competence of the precursor cells to differentiate. This difference may be controlled in part by ESR6e, a bHLH gene of the Enhancer-of-split family, which is expressed in the superficial layer of the late blastula and when expressed ectopically suppresses primary neurogenesis in the deep layer.

Mechanisms of mesendoderm internalization in the Xenopus gastrula: lessons from the ventral side

Two main processes are involved in driving ventral mesendoderm internalization in the Xenopus gastrula. First, vegetal rotation, an active movement of the vegetal cell mass, initiates gastrulation by rolling the peripheral blastocoel floor against the blastocoel roof. In this way, the leading edge of the internalized mesendoderm is established, that remains separated from the blastocoel roof by Brachet's cleft. Second, in a process of active involution, blastopore lip cells translocate on arc-like trails around the tip of Brachet's cleft. Hereby the lower, Xbra-negative part of the lip moves toward the interior, to contribute mainly to endoderm. In contrast, the upper, Xbra-expressing part moves toward the blastocoel roof-apposed surface of the involuted mesoderm, and eventually becomes inserted into this surface. Vegetal rotation and active mesoderm surface insertion persist over much of gastrulation ventrally. Both processes are also active dorsally. In fact, internalization processes generally spread from dorsal to ventral, though at different rates, which suggests that they are independently controlled. Ventrally and laterally, mesoderm occurs not only in the marginal zone, but also in the adjacent blastocoel roof. Such blastocoel roof mesoderm shares properties with the remaining, ectodermal roof, that are related to its function as substratum for mesendoderm migration. It repels involuted mesoderm, thus contributing to separation of cell layers, and it assembles a fibronectin matrix. These properties change as the blastocoel roof mesoderm moves into the blastopore lip during gastrulation.

Specification of pharyngeal endoderm is dependent on early signals from axial mesoderm

The development of taste buds is an autonomous property of the pharyngeal endoderm, and this inherent capacity is acquired by the time gastrulation is complete. These results are surprising, given the general view that taste bud development is nerve dependent, and occurs at the end of embryogenesis. The pharyngeal endoderm sits at the dorsal lip of the blastopore at the onset of gastrulation, and because this taste bud-bearing endoderm is specified to make taste buds by the end of gastrulation, signals that this tissue encounters during gastrulation might be responsible for its specification. To test this idea, tissue contacts during gastrulation were manipulated systematically in axolotl embryos, and the subsequent ability of the pharyngeal endoderm to generate taste buds was assessed. Disruption of both putative planar and vertical signals from neurectoderm failed to prevent the differentiation of taste buds in endoderm. However, manipulations of contact between presumptive pharyngeal endoderm and axial mesoderm during gastrulation indicate that signals from axial mesoderm (the notochord and prechordal mesoderm) specify the pharyngeal endoderm, conferring upon the endoderm the ability to autonomously differentiate taste buds. These findings further emphasize that despite the late differentiation of taste buds, the tissue-intrinsic mechanisms that generate these chemoreceptive organs are set in motion very early in embryonic development.

Siamois functions in the early blastula to induce Spemann's organiser

In Xenopus, the Spemann organiser is defined as a dorsal territory in the early gastrula that initiates development of the embryonic axis. It has been shown that the early zygotic transcription factor Siamois is essential for Spemann's organiser formation. By the onset of gastrulation, the organiser is patterned into a vegetal head organiser, which induces anterior structures upon transplantation, and a more animal trunk organiser, which induces a posterior neuraxis. However, it is unclear when these distinct organiser domains are initially specified. To shed light on this question, we analysed the temporal activity of Siamois, as this factor induces both head and trunk development, when ectopically expressed via mRNA injection. In this study, we expressed Siamois ectopically at different time points and analysed the extent of axial development. Using a hormone-inducible version of Siamois, we found evidence for a tight window of competence during which ventral cells can respond to Siamois by commencing both the head and the trunk genetic programmes. The competence to form Spemann's organiser was lost 2 h before gastrulation, although partial axis formation could still occur following delayed activation of Siamois. We demonstrate that this late response to Siamois involves a new role for this gene, which can indirectly repress ventral gene expression, in the absence of known organiser genes.

Role of Goosecoid, Xnot and Wnt antagonists in the maintenance of the notochord genetic programme in Xenopus gastrulae

The Xenopus trunk organiser recruits neighbouring tissues into secondary trunk axial and paraxial structures and itself differentiates into notochord. The inductive properties of the trunk organiser are thought to be mediated by the secretion of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) antagonists. Ectopic repression of BMP signals on the ventral side is sufficient to mimic the inductive properties of the trunk organiser. Resultant secondary trunks contain somite and neural tube, but no notochord.

We show that inhibition of BMP signalling is sufficient for the initiation of the trunk organiser genetic programme at the onset of gastrulation. During late gastrulation, however, this programme is lost, due to an invasion of secreted Wnts from neighbouring tissues. Maintenance of this programme requires co-repression of BMP and Wnt signalling within the presumptive notochord region. To shed light on the molecular cascade that leads to the repression of the Wnt pathway, we looked for individual organiser genes whose overexpression could complement the inhibition of BMP signalling to promote notochord formation in the secondary trunks. Two genes, gsc and Xnot, were thus identified and shown to act in different ways. Xnot acts as a transcriptional repressor within the mesodermal region. Gsc acts in deeper vegetal cells, where it regulates Frzb expression to maintain Xnot expression in the neighbouring notochord territory.

These results suggest that, during gastrulation, the necessary repression of Wnt/β-catenin signalling in notochord precursors is achieved by the action of secreted inhibitors, such as Frzb, emitted by gsc-expressing dorsal vegetal cells.

The organizer of the mouse gastrula is composed of a dynamic population of progenitor cells for the axial mesoderm

An organizer population has been identified in the anterior end of the primitive streak of the mid-streak stage embryo, by the expression of Hnf3β, GsclacZ and Chrd, and the ability of these cells to induce a second neural axis in the host embryo. This cell population can therefore be regarded as the mid-gastrula organizer and, together with the early-gastrula organizer and the node, constitute the organizer of the mouse embryo at successive stages of development. The profile of genetic activity and the tissue contribution by cells in the organizer change during gastrulation, suggesting that the organizer may be populated by a succession of cell populations with different fates. Fine mapping of the epiblast in the posterior region of the early-streak stage embryo reveals that although the early-gastrula organizer contains cells that give rise to the axial mesoderm, the bulk of the progenitors of the head process and the notochord are localized outside the early gastrula organizer. In the mid-gastrula organizer, early gastrula organizer derived cells that are fated for the prechordal mesoderm are joined by the progenitors of the head process that are recruited from the epiblast previously anterior to the early gastrula organizer. Cells that are fated for the head process move anteriorly from the mid-gastrula organizer in a tight column along the midline of the embryo. Other mid-gastrula organizer cells join the expanding mesodermal layer and colonize the cranial and heart mesoderm. Progenitors of the trunk notochord that are localized in the anterior primitive streak of the mid-streak stage embryo are later incorporated into the node. The gastrula organizer is therefore composed of a constantly changing population of cells that are allocated to different parts of the axial mesoderm.

The FGFR pathway is required for the trunk-inducing functions of Spemann's organizer

Xenopus laevis embryogenesis is controlled by the inducing activities of Spemann's organizer. These inducing activities are separated into two distinct suborganizers: a trunk organizer and a head organizer. The trunk organizer induces the formation of posterior structures by emitting signals and directing morphogenesis. Here, we report that the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling pathway, also known to regulate posterior development, performs critical functions within the cells of Spemann's organizer. Specifically, the FGFR pathway was required in the organizer cells in order for those cells to induce the formation of somitic muscle and the pronephros. Since the organizer influences the differentiation of these tissues by emitting signals that pattern the mesodermal germ layer, our data indicate that the FGFR regulates the production of these signals. In addition, the FGFR pathway was required for the expression of chordin, an organizer-specific protein required for the trunk-inducing activities of Spemann's organizer. Significantly, the FGFR pathway had a minimal effect on the function of the head organizer. We propose that the FGFR pathway is a defining molecular component that distinguishes the trunk organizer from the head organizer by controlling the expression of organizer-specific genes required to induce the formation of posterior structures and somitic muscle in neighboring cells. The implications of our findings for the evolutionarily conserved role of the FGFR pathway in the functions of Spemann's organizer and other vertebrate-signaling centers are discussed.

Dickkopf1 is required for embryonic head induction and limb morphogenesis in the mouse

Dickkopf1 (Dkk1) is a secreted protein that acts as a Wnt inhibitor and, together with BMP inhibitors, is able to induce the formation of ectopic heads in Xenopus. Here, we show that Dkk1 null mutant embryos lack head structures anterior of the midbrain. Analysis of chimeric embryos implicates the requirement of Dkk1 in anterior axial mesendoderm but not in anterior visceral endoderm for head induction. In addition, mutant embryos show duplications and fusions of limb digits. Characterization of the limb phenotype strongly suggests a role for Dkk1 both in cell proliferation and in programmed cell death. Our data provide direct genetic evidence for the requirement of secreted Wnt antagonists during embryonic patterning and implicate Dkk1 as an essential inducer during anterior specification as well as a regulator during distal limb patterning.

Goosecoid promotes head organizer activity by direct repression of Xwnt8 in Spemann’s organizer

Formation of the vertebrate body plan is controlled by discrete head and trunk organizers that establish the anteroposterior pattern of the body axis. The Goosecoid (Gsc) homeodomain protein is expressed in all vertebrate organizers and has been implicated in the activity of Spemann’s organizer in Xenopus. The role of Gsc in organizer function was examined by fusing defined transcriptional regulatory domains to the Gsc homeodomain. Like native Gsc, ventral injection of an Engrailed repressor fusion (Eng-Gsc) induced a partial axis, while a VP16 activator fusion (VP16-Gsc) did not, indicating that Gsc functions as a transcriptional repressor in axis induction. Dorsal injection of VP16-Gsc resulted in loss of head structures anterior to the hindbrain, while axial structures were unaffected, suggesting a requirement for Gsc function in head formation. The anterior truncation caused by VP16-Gsc was fully rescued by Frzb, a secreted Wnt inhibitor, indicating that activation of ectopic Wnt signaling was responsible, at least in part, for the anterior defects. Supporting this idea, Xwnt8 expression was activated by VP16-Gsc in animal explants and the dorsal marginal zone, and repressed by Gsc in Activin-treated animal explants and the ventral marginal zone. Furthermore, expression of Gsc throughout the marginal zone inhibited trunk formation, identical to the effects of Frzb and other Xwnt8 inhibitors. A region of the Xwnt8 promoter containing four consensus homeodomain-binding sites was identified and this region mediated repression by Gsc and activation by VP16-Gsc, consistent with direct transcriptional regulation of Xwnt8 by Gsc. Therefore, Gsc promotes head organizer activity by direct repression of Xwnt8 in Spemann’s organizer and this activity is essential for anterior development.

Patterning and lineage specification in the amphibian embryo

Xenopus has been widely used to study early embryogenesis because the embryos allow for efficient functional assays of gene products by the overexpression of RNA. The first asymmetry of the embryo is initiated during oogenesis and is manifested by the darkly pigmented animal hemisphere and lightly pigmented vegetal hemisphere. Upon fertilization a second asymmetry, the dorsal-ventral asymmetry, is established, with the sperm entry site defining the prospective ventral region. During the cleavage stage, a vegetal cortical cytoplasm (VCC)/beta-catenin signaling pathway is differentially activated on the prospective dorsal side of the embryo. The overlapping of the VCC/beta-catenin and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) pathways in the dorsal vegetal quadrant specifies dorsal-vental axis formation by regulating formation of the Spemann organizer, including the anterior endomesoderm. The organizer initiates gastrulation to form a triploblastic embryo in which the mesoderm layer is located between the ectoderm layer and the endoderm layer. The interplay between maternal and zygotic TGF-beta s and the T-box transcription factors in the vegetal hemisphere initiates the specification of germ-layer lineages. TGF-beta signaling originating from the vegetal region induces mesoderm in the equatorial region, and initiates endoderm differentiation directly in the vegetal region. The ectoderm develops from the animal region, which does not come into contact with the vegetal TGF-beta signals. A large number of the downstream components and transcriptional targets of early developmental pathways have been identified and characterized. This review gives an overview of recent advances in the understanding of the functional roles and interactions of the molecular players important for axis determination and germ-layer specification during early Xenopus embryogenesis.

Neural patterning in the vertebrate embryo

The embryonic central nervous system (CNS) is patterned along its antero-posterior, dorsal-ventral, and left-right axes. Along the dorsal-ventral axis, cell fate determination occurs during and following neural tube closure and involves the action of two opposing signaling pathways: SHH ventrally from the notochord and BMP/GDF dorsally from the boundary of neural and nonneural ectoderm and later from the roof plate. In addition, Wnt and retinoic acid signaling have been shown to act in dorsal-ventral patterning; however, their roles are understood in less detail. Along the antero-posterior axis, signals divide the neural tube into four major divisions: forebrain, midbrain, hindbrain, and spinal cord, and these differences can be detected soon after the formation of the neural plate. The FGF, Wnt, and retinoic acid signaling pathways have been implicated in the caudalization of neural tissue. Boundaries of Hox gene expression are observed along the anteroposterior axis and have been suggested to be involved in establishing different identities in the hindbrain and spinal cord. Complex gene expression patterns in the brain suggest the development of neuromeres dividing the brain into different regions that are elaborated further during development. Patterning along the left-right axis occurs concurrently with antero-posterior and dorsal-ventral patterning during gastrulation. A leading candidate for initiating asymmetry is activin, which acts through Nodal and Lefty before any morphological differences are observed. The big challenge will be understanding how these diverse signaling pathways interact both temporally and spatially to generate the complex adult nervous system.

The role of Xenopus dickkopf1 in prechordal plate specification and neural patterning

Dickkopf1 (dkk1) encodes a secreted WNT inhibitor expressed in Spemann's organizer, which has been implicated in head induction in Xenopus. Here we have analyzed the role of dkk1 in endomesoderm specification and neural patterning by gain- and loss-of-function approaches. We find that dkk1, unlike other WNT inhibitors, is able to induce functional prechordal plate, which explains its ability to induce secondary heads with bilateral eyes. This may be due to differential WNT inhibition since dkk1, unlike frzb, inhibits Wnt3a signalling. Injection of inhibitory antiDkk1 antibodies reveals that dkk1 is not only sufficient but also required for prechordal plate formation but not for notochord formation. In the neural plate dkk1 is required for anteroposterior and dorsoventral patterning between mes- and telencephalon, where dkk1 promotes anterior and ventral fates. Both the requirement of anterior explants for dkk1 function and their ability to respond to dkk1 terminate at late gastrula stage. Xenopus embryos posteriorized with bFGF, BMP4 and Smads are rescued by dkk1. dkk1 does not interfere with the ability of bFGF to induce its immediate early target gene Xbra, indicating that its effect is indirect. In contrast, there is cross-talk between BMP and WNT signalling, since induction of BMP target genes is sensitive to WNT inhibitors until the early gastrula stage. Embryos treated with retinoic acid (RA) are not rescued by dkk1 and RA affects the central nervous system (CNS) more posterior than dkk1, suggesting that WNTs and retinoids may act to pattern anterior and posterior CNS, respectively, during gastrulation.

Vertebrate anteroposterior patterning: the Xenopus neurectoderm as a paradigm

This review discusses formation of the vertebrate anteroposterior (AP) axis, focusing on the dorsal ectoderm, which gives rise to the nervous system, using the frog Xenopus as a model. After summarizing classical models of AP neural patterning, we describe recent molecular studies that are encouraging re-examination of these models. Such studies have shown that AP ectodermal patterning occurs by the onset of gastrulation, much earlier than previously thought. The identity of tissues that determine AP pattern is discussed, and the definition of the Organizer is reconsidered. The activity of factors secreted by inducing tissues in early patterning decisions is assessed and formulated into a revised model for Xenopus AP neural patterning. Finally, AP ectodermal patterning in Xenopus dorsal ectoderm is compared to that of other germ layers, and to other vertebrates.

Amphioxus goosecoid and the evolution of the head organizer and prechordal plate

The organizer is a central feature of vertebrate embryogenesis and is functionally subdivided into the head organizer that gives rise primarily to the prechordal plate and induces forebrain structures, and the trunk/tail organizer that gives rise primarily to the notochord and induces more posterior structures. Goosecoid(gsc) encodes a homeodomain-containing transcription factor that is expressed in the vertebrate head organizer and prechordal plate, and can induce a secondary axis when expressed ectopically. To investigate the evolution of the vertebrate head organizer and prechordal plate, we have cloned and characterized a gsc homolog from the cephalochordate amphioxus. Amphioxus, it is important to note, lacks a prechordal plate in that the notochord extends to the extreme anterior end of the animal, and lacks elaborate differentiation of its forebrain. Gsc expression in amphioxus is initially localized during gastrulation to the mesendodermal layer of the dorsal lip of the blastopore. However, gsc expression in amphioxus is not maintained in anterior axial mesoderm, as is the case with the vertebrate prechordal plate. Rather, gsc is expressed in the dorsal axial mesoderm of the blastopore lip throughout gastrulation, appearing transiently in the presumptive notochord that underlies all regions of the amphioxus brain. The similarities in gsc expression in amphioxus and vertebrates suggest that a primitive version of the head organizer evolved prior to the origin of the vertebrates. The differences in gsc expression can be interpreted either as the loss of the prechordal plate domain in the cephalochordate lineage, or the gain of a distinct gsc-expressing prechordal plate that plays a role in forebrain induction in the vertebrate lineage.