1
|
Ruiz S, Lee S, Dalboni da Rocha JL, Ramos-Murguialday A, Pasqualotto E, Soares E, García E, Fetz E, Birbaumer N, Sitaram R. Motor Intentions Decoded from fMRI Signals. Brain Sci 2024; 14:643. [PMID: 39061384 PMCID: PMC11274965 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14070643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Motor intention is a high-level brain function related to planning for movement. Although studies have shown that motor intentions can be decoded from brain signals before movement execution, it is unclear whether intentions relating to mental imagery of movement can be decoded. Here, we investigated whether differences in spatial and temporal patterns of brain activation were elicited by intentions to perform different types of motor imagery and whether the patterns could be used by a multivariate pattern classifier to detect such differential intentions. The results showed that it is possible to decode intentions before the onset of different types of motor imagery from functional MR signals obtained from fronto-parietal brain regions, such as the premotor cortex and posterior parietal cortex, while controlling for eye movements and for muscular activity of the hands. These results highlight the critical role played by the aforementioned brain regions in covert motor intentions. Moreover, they have substantial implications for rehabilitating patients with motor disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Ruiz
- Psychiatry Department, Interventional Psychiatric Unit, Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Medicine School, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320165, Chile;
- Laboratory for Brain—Machine Interfaces and Neuromodulation, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320165, Chile
| | | | | | - Ander Ramos-Murguialday
- Institute of Medical and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- TECNALIA Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), 20009 San Sebastian, Spain
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tubingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany
- Athenea Neuroclinics, 20014 San Sebastian, Spain
| | | | - Ernesto Soares
- Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal;
| | | | - Eberhard Fetz
- Departments of Physiology and Biophysics and DXARTS, Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
| | - Niels Birbaumer
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (DNS), Universita degli Studi di Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy;
| | - Ranganatha Sitaram
- Psychiatry Department, Interventional Psychiatric Unit, Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Medicine School, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320165, Chile;
- Laboratory for Brain—Machine Interfaces and Neuromodulation, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320165, Chile
- Institute of Medical and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lv X, Funahashi S, Li C, Wu J. Variational relevance evaluation of individual fMRI data enables deconstruction of task-dependent neural dynamics. Commun Biol 2023; 6:491. [PMID: 37147471 PMCID: PMC10163018 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04804-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In neuroimaging research, univariate analysis has always been used to localize "representations" at the microscale, whereas network approaches have been applied to characterize transregional "operations". How are representations and operations linked through dynamic interactions? We developed the variational relevance evaluation (VRE) method to analyze individual task fMRI data, which selects informative voxels during model training to localize the "representation", and quantifies the dynamic contributions of single voxels across the whole-brain to different cognitive functions to characterize the "operation". Using 15 individual fMRI data files for higher visual area localizers, we evaluated the characterization of selected voxel positions of VRE and revealed different object-selective regions functioning in similar dynamics. Using another 15 individual fMRI data files for memory retrieval after offline learning, we found similar task-related regions working in different neural dynamics for tasks with diverse familiarities. VRE demonstrates a promising horizon in individual fMRI research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Lv
- School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Shintaro Funahashi
- Advanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Chunlin Li
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Fundamental Research on Biomechanics in Clinical Application, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| | - Jinglong Wu
- School of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
- Researh Center for Medical Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Science, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tenzer ML, Lisinski JM, LaConte SM. Decoding the Brain's Surface to Track Deeper Activity. FRONTIERS IN NEUROIMAGING 2022; 1:815778. [PMID: 37555135 PMCID: PMC10406232 DOI: 10.3389/fnimg.2022.815778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
Neural activity can be readily and non-invasively recorded from the scalp using electromagnetic and optical signals, but unfortunately all scalp-based techniques have depth-dependent sensitivities. We hypothesize, though, that the cortex's connectivity with the rest of the brain could serve to construct proxy signals of deeper brain activity. For example, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-derived models that link surface connectivity to deeper regions could subsequently extend the depth capabilities of other modalities. Thus, as a first step toward this goal, this study examines whether or not surface-limited support vector regression of resting-state fMRI can indeed track deeper regions and distributed networks in independent data. Our results demonstrate that depth-limited fMRI signals can in fact be calibrated to report ongoing activity of deeper brain structures. Although much future work remains to be done, the present study suggests that scalp recordings have the potential to ultimately overcome their intrinsic physical limitations by utilizing the multivariate information exchanged between the surface and the rest of the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark L. Tenzer
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA, United States
| | - Jonathan M. Lisinski
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA, United States
| | - Stephen M. LaConte
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang Y, Jin C, Yin Z, Wang H, Ji M, Dong M, Liang J. Visual experience modulates whole-brain connectivity dynamics: A resting-state fMRI study using the model of radiologists. Hum Brain Mapp 2021; 42:4538-4554. [PMID: 34156138 PMCID: PMC8410580 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Visual expertise refers to proficiency in visual recognition. It is attributed to accumulated visual experience in a specific domain and manifests in widespread neural activities that extend well beyond the visual cortex to multiple high‐level brain areas. An extensive body of studies has centered on the neural mechanisms underlying a distinctive domain of visual expertise, while few studies elucidated how visual experience modulates resting‐state whole‐brain connectivity dynamics. The current study bridged this gap by modeling the subtle alterations in interregional spontaneous connectivity patterns with a group of superior radiological interns. Functional connectivity analysis was based on functional brain segmentation, which was derived from a data‐driven clustering approach to discriminate subtle changes in connectivity dynamics. Our results showed there was radiographic visual experience accompanied with integration within brain circuits supporting visual processing and decision making, integration across brain circuits supporting high‐order functions, and segregation between high‐order and low‐order brain functions. Also, most of these alterations were significantly correlated with individual nodule identification performance. Our results implied that visual expertise is a controlled, interactive process that develops from reciprocal interactions between the visual system and multiple top‐down factors, including semantic knowledge, top‐down attentional control, and task relevance, which may enhance participants' local brain functional integration to promote their acquisition of specific visual information and modulate the activity of some regions for lower‐order visual feature processing to filter out nonrelevant visual details. The current findings may provide new ideas for understanding the central mechanism underlying the formation of visual expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Wang
- School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Shaanxi, China
| | - Chenwang Jin
- Department of Medical Imaging, First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zhongliang Yin
- Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Shaanxi, China
| | - Hongmei Wang
- Department of Medical Imaging, First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi, China
| | - Ming Ji
- School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Shaanxi, China
| | - Minghao Dong
- Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jimin Liang
- School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Botvinik-Nezer R, Holzmeister F, Camerer CF, Dreber A, Huber J, Johannesson M, Kirchler M, Iwanir R, Mumford JA, Adcock RA, Avesani P, Baczkowski BM, Bajracharya A, Bakst L, Ball S, Barilari M, Bault N, Beaton D, Beitner J, Benoit RG, Berkers RMWJ, Bhanji JP, Biswal BB, Bobadilla-Suarez S, Bortolini T, Bottenhorn KL, Bowring A, Braem S, Brooks HR, Brudner EG, Calderon CB, Camilleri JA, Castrellon JJ, Cecchetti L, Cieslik EC, Cole ZJ, Collignon O, Cox RW, Cunningham WA, Czoschke S, Dadi K, Davis CP, Luca AD, Delgado MR, Demetriou L, Dennison JB, Di X, Dickie EW, Dobryakova E, Donnat CL, Dukart J, Duncan NW, Durnez J, Eed A, Eickhoff SB, Erhart A, Fontanesi L, Fricke GM, Fu S, Galván A, Gau R, Genon S, Glatard T, Glerean E, Goeman JJ, Golowin SAE, González-García C, Gorgolewski KJ, Grady CL, Green MA, Guassi Moreira JF, Guest O, Hakimi S, Hamilton JP, Hancock R, Handjaras G, Harry BB, Hawco C, Herholz P, Herman G, Heunis S, Hoffstaedter F, Hogeveen J, Holmes S, Hu CP, Huettel SA, Hughes ME, Iacovella V, Iordan AD, Isager PM, Isik AI, Jahn A, Johnson MR, Johnstone T, Joseph MJE, Juliano AC, Kable JW, Kassinopoulos M, Koba C, Kong XZ, Koscik TR, Kucukboyaci NE, Kuhl BA, Kupek S, Laird AR, Lamm C, Langner R, Lauharatanahirun N, Lee H, Lee S, Leemans A, Leo A, Lesage E, Li F, Li MYC, Lim PC, Lintz EN, Liphardt SW, Losecaat Vermeer AB, Love BC, Mack ML, Malpica N, Marins T, Maumet C, McDonald K, McGuire JT, Melero H, Méndez Leal AS, Meyer B, Meyer KN, Mihai G, Mitsis GD, Moll J, Nielson DM, Nilsonne G, Notter MP, Olivetti E, Onicas AI, Papale P, Patil KR, Peelle JE, Pérez A, Pischedda D, Poline JB, Prystauka Y, Ray S, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Reynolds RC, Ricciardi E, Rieck JR, Rodriguez-Thompson AM, Romyn A, Salo T, Samanez-Larkin GR, Sanz-Morales E, Schlichting ML, Schultz DH, Shen Q, Sheridan MA, Silvers JA, Skagerlund K, Smith A, Smith DV, Sokol-Hessner P, Steinkamp SR, Tashjian SM, Thirion B, Thorp JN, Tinghög G, Tisdall L, Tompson SH, Toro-Serey C, Torre Tresols JJ, Tozzi L, Truong V, Turella L, van 't Veer AE, Verguts T, Vettel JM, Vijayarajah S, Vo K, Wall MB, Weeda WD, Weis S, White DJ, Wisniewski D, Xifra-Porxas A, Yearling EA, Yoon S, Yuan R, Yuen KSL, Zhang L, Zhang X, Zosky JE, Nichols TE, Poldrack RA, Schonberg T. Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams. Nature 2020; 582:84-88. [PMID: 32483374 PMCID: PMC7771346 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2314-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 492] [Impact Index Per Article: 98.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Data analysis workflows in many scientific domains have become increasingly complex and flexible. Here we assess the effect of this flexibility on the results of functional magnetic resonance imaging by asking 70 independent teams to analyse the same dataset, testing the same 9 ex-ante hypotheses1. The flexibility of analytical approaches is exemplified by the fact that no two teams chose identical workflows to analyse the data. This flexibility resulted in sizeable variation in the results of hypothesis tests, even for teams whose statistical maps were highly correlated at intermediate stages of the analysis pipeline. Variation in reported results was related to several aspects of analysis methodology. Notably, a meta-analytical approach that aggregated information across teams yielded a significant consensus in activated regions. Furthermore, prediction markets of researchers in the field revealed an overestimation of the likelihood of significant findings, even by researchers with direct knowledge of the dataset2-5. Our findings show that analytical flexibility can have substantial effects on scientific conclusions, and identify factors that may be related to variability in the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging. The results emphasize the importance of validating and sharing complex analysis workflows, and demonstrate the need for performing and reporting multiple analyses of the same data. Potential approaches that could be used to mitigate issues related to analytical variability are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rotem Botvinik-Nezer
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Neurobiology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Felix Holzmeister
- Department of Banking and Finance, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Colin F Camerer
- HSS and CNS, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Anna Dreber
- Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Economics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Juergen Huber
- Department of Banking and Finance, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Magnus Johannesson
- Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael Kirchler
- Department of Banking and Finance, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Roni Iwanir
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Neurobiology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jeanette A Mumford
- Center for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - R Alison Adcock
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paolo Avesani
- Neuroinformatics Laboratory, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Blazej M Baczkowski
- Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Aahana Bajracharya
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Leah Bakst
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sheryl Ball
- Department of Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
- School of Neuroscience, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Marco Barilari
- Crossmodal Perception and Plasticity Laboratory, Institutes for Research in Psychology (IPSY) and Neurosciences (IoNS), UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Nadège Bault
- School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Derek Beaton
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia Beitner
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Roland G Benoit
- Max Planck Research Group: Adaptive Memory, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ruud M W J Berkers
- Max Planck Research Group: Adaptive Memory, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jamil P Bhanji
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Bharat B Biswal
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
- School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | | | - Tiago Bortolini
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Alexander Bowring
- Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Senne Braem
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hayley R Brooks
- Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Emily G Brudner
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ, USA
| | | | - Julia A Camilleri
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jaime J Castrellon
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Luca Cecchetti
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Edna C Cieslik
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Zachary J Cole
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Olivier Collignon
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
- Crossmodal Perception and Plasticity Laboratory, Institutes for Research in Psychology (IPSY) and Neurosciences (IoNS), UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Robert W Cox
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Stefan Czoschke
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Charles P Davis
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Alberto De Luca
- PROVIDI Lab, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lysia Demetriou
- Section of Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Xin Di
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
- School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Erin W Dickie
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ekaterina Dobryakova
- Center for Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Kessler Foundation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Claire L Donnat
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Juergen Dukart
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Niall W Duncan
- Graduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain and Consciousness Research Centre, TMU-ShuangHo Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Joke Durnez
- Department of Psychology and Stanford Center for Reproducible Neuroscience, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Amr Eed
- Instituto de Neurociencias, CSIC-UMH, Alicante, Spain
| | - Simon B Eickhoff
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andrew Erhart
- Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Laura Fontanesi
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - G Matthew Fricke
- Computer Science Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Shiguang Fu
- School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Neuromanagement, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Adriana Galván
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Remi Gau
- Crossmodal Perception and Plasticity Laboratory, Institutes for Research in Psychology (IPSY) and Neurosciences (IoNS), UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Sarah Genon
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tristan Glatard
- Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Enrico Glerean
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| | - Jelle J Goeman
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sergej A E Golowin
- Graduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | - Cheryl L Grady
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mikella A Green
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - João F Guassi Moreira
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Olivia Guest
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- Research Centre on Interactive Media, Smart Systems and Emerging Technologies - RISE, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Shabnam Hakimi
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - J Paul Hamilton
- Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Roeland Hancock
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Giacomo Handjaras
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Bronson B Harry
- The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Colin Hawco
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peer Herholz
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gabrielle Herman
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephan Heunis
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, The Netherlands
| | - Felix Hoffstaedter
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jeremy Hogeveen
- Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Susan Holmes
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chuan-Peng Hu
- Leibniz-Institut für Resilienzforschung (LIR), Mainz, Germany
| | - Scott A Huettel
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Matthew E Hughes
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vittorio Iacovella
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | | | - Peder M Isager
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ayse I Isik
- Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andrew Jahn
- fMRI Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Matthew R Johnson
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Tom Johnstone
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael J E Joseph
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony C Juliano
- Center for Neuropsychology and Neuroscience Research, Kessler Foundation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Joseph W Kable
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- MindCORE, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michalis Kassinopoulos
- Graduate Program in Biological and Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Cemal Koba
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Xiang-Zhen Kong
- Language and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Timothy R Koscik
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Nuri Erkut Kucukboyaci
- Center for Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Kessler Foundation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Brice A Kuhl
- Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
| | - Sebastian Kupek
- Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Angela R Laird
- Department of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Claus Lamm
- Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Langner
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Nina Lauharatanahirun
- US CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hongmi Lee
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sangil Lee
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander Leemans
- PROVIDI Lab, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Leo
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Elise Lesage
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Flora Li
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA
- Economics Experimental Lab, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, China
| | - Monica Y C Li
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Phui Cheng Lim
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Evan N Lintz
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | | | - Annabel B Losecaat Vermeer
- Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bradley C Love
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - Michael L Mack
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Norberto Malpica
- Laboratorio de Análisis de Imagen Médica y Biometría (LAIMBIO), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Theo Marins
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Camille Maumet
- Inria, Univ Rennes, CNRS, Inserm, IRISA UMR 6074, Empenn ERL U 1228, Rennes, France
| | - Kelsey McDonald
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joseph T McGuire
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Helena Melero
- Laboratorio de Análisis de Imagen Médica y Biometría (LAIMBIO), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
- Departamento de Psicobiología, División de Psicología, CES Cardenal Cisneros, Madrid, Spain
- Northeastern University Biomedical Imaging Center, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adriana S Méndez Leal
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin Meyer
- Leibniz-Institut für Resilienzforschung (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neurosciences (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kristin N Meyer
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Glad Mihai
- Max Planck Research Group: Neural Mechanisms of Human Communication, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
- Chair of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Georgios D Mitsis
- Department of Bioengineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jorge Moll
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Dylan M Nielson
- Data Science and Sharing Team, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Gustav Nilsonne
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael P Notter
- The Laboratory for Investigative Neurophysiology (The LINE), Department of Radiology, University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emanuele Olivetti
- Neuroinformatics Laboratory, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Adrian I Onicas
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Paolo Papale
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
- Department of Vision and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kaustubh R Patil
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jonathan E Peelle
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alexandre Pérez
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Doris Pischedda
- Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience and Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging and Clinic for Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence Science of Intelligence, Technische Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- NeuroMI - Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milan, Italy
| | - Jean-Baptiste Poline
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Henry H. Wheeler, Jr. Brain Imaging Center, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Yanina Prystauka
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Shruti Ray
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
| | | | - Richard C Reynolds
- Scientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Emiliano Ricciardi
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Jenny R Rieck
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anais M Rodriguez-Thompson
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Anthony Romyn
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Taylor Salo
- Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Gregory R Samanez-Larkin
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Emilio Sanz-Morales
- Laboratorio de Análisis de Imagen Médica y Biometría (LAIMBIO), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Douglas H Schultz
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Qiang Shen
- School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Neuromanagement, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Margaret A Sheridan
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer A Silvers
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kenny Skagerlund
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Alec Smith
- Department of Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
- School of Neuroscience, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - David V Smith
- Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Simon R Steinkamp
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience (INM-3), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Sarah M Tashjian
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - John N Thorp
- Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gustav Tinghög
- Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Loreen Tisdall
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Center for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Steven H Tompson
- US CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
| | - Claudio Toro-Serey
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Leonardo Tozzi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Vuong Truong
- Graduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain and Consciousness Research Centre, TMU-ShuangHo Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Luca Turella
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Anna E van 't Veer
- Methodology and Statistics Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Verguts
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jean M Vettel
- US Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD, USA
- University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sagana Vijayarajah
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Khoi Vo
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Matthew B Wall
- Invicro, London, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Wouter D Weeda
- Methodology and Statistics Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne Weis
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - David J White
- Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Wisniewski
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Alba Xifra-Porxas
- Graduate Program in Biological and Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emily A Yearling
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Sangsuk Yoon
- Department of Management and Marketing, School of Business, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH, USA
| | - Rui Yuan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kenneth S L Yuen
- Leibniz-Institut für Resilienzforschung (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neurosciences (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Xu Zhang
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Joshua E Zosky
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Thomas E Nichols
- Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | | | - Tom Schonberg
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
- Department of Neurobiology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Plachti A, Eickhoff SB, Hoffstaedter F, Patil KR, Laird AR, Fox PT, Amunts K, Genon S. Multimodal Parcellations and Extensive Behavioral Profiling Tackling the Hippocampus Gradient. Cereb Cortex 2019; 29:4595-4612. [PMID: 30721944 PMCID: PMC6917521 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhy336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Revised: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The hippocampus displays a complex organization and function that is perturbed in many neuropathologies. Histological work revealed a complex arrangement of subfields along the medial-lateral and the ventral-dorsal dimension, which contrasts with the anterior-posterior functional differentiation. The variety of maps has raised the need for an integrative multimodal view. We applied connectivity-based parcellation to 1) intrinsic connectivity 2) task-based connectivity, and 3) structural covariance, as complementary windows into structural and functional differentiation of the hippocampus. Strikingly, while functional properties (i.e., intrinsic and task-based) revealed similar partitions dominated by an anterior-posterior organization, structural covariance exhibited a hybrid pattern reflecting both functional and cytoarchitectonic subdivision. Capitalizing on the consistency of functional parcellations, we defined robust functional maps at different levels of partitions, which are openly available for the scientific community. Our functional maps demonstrated a head-body and tail partition, subdivided along the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral axis. Behavioral profiling of these fine partitions based on activation data indicated an emotion-cognition gradient along the anterior-posterior axis and additionally suggested a self-world-centric gradient supporting the role of the hippocampus in the construction of abstract representations for spatial navigation and episodic memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Plachti
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1, INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Simon B Eickhoff
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1, INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Felix Hoffstaedter
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1, INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Kaustubh R Patil
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1, INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Angela R Laird
- Department of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Peter T Fox
- Research Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Katrin Amunts
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1, INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- C. & O. Vogt Institute for Brain Research, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf. Germany
| | - Sarah Genon
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1, INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- GIGA-CRC In vivo Imaging, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van den Boom MA, Vansteensel MJ, Koppeschaar MI, Raemaekers MAH, Ramsey NF. Towards an intuitive communication-BCI: decoding visually imagined characters from the early visual cortex using high-field fMRI. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2019; 5. [PMID: 32983573 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab302c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces aim to provide people with paralysis with the possibility to use their neural signals to control devices. For communication, most BCIs are based on the selection of letters from a (digital) letter board to spell words and sentences. Visual mental imagery of letters could offer a new, fast and intuitive way to spell in a BCI-communication solution. Here we provide a proof of concept for the decoding of visually imagined characters from the early visual cortex using 7 Tesla functional MRI. Sixteen healthy participants visually imagined three different characters for 3, 5 and 7 s in a slow event-related design. Using single-trial classification, we were able to decode the characters with an average accuracy of 54%, which is significantly above chance level (33%). Furthermore, the imagined characters were classifiable shortly after cue onset and remained classifiable with prolonged imagery. These properties, combined with the cortical location of the early visual cortex and its decodable activity, encourage further research on intracranial interfacing using surface electrodes to bring us closer to such a visual imagery based BCI communication solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max A van den Boom
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mariska J Vansteensel
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Melissa I Koppeschaar
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs A H Raemaekers
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nick F Ramsey
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Garcia-Garcia M, Nikolaidis A, Bellec P, Craddock RC, Cheung B, Castellanos FX, Milham MP. Detecting stable individual differences in the functional organization of the human basal ganglia. Neuroimage 2017; 170:68-82. [PMID: 28739120 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2016] [Revised: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 07/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Moving from group level to individual level functional parcellation maps is a critical step for developing a rich understanding of the links between individual variation in functional network architecture and cognitive and clinical phenotypes. Still, the identification of functional units in the brain based on intrinsic functional connectivity and its dynamic variations between and within subjects remains challenging. Recently, the bootstrap analysis of stable clusters (BASC) framework was developed to quantify the stability of functional brain networks both across and within subjects. This multi-level approach utilizes bootstrap resampling for both individual and group-level clustering to delineate functional units based on their consistency across and within subjects, while providing a measure of their stability. Here, we optimized the BASC framework for functional parcellation of the basal ganglia by investigating a variety of clustering algorithms and similarity measures. Reproducibility and test-retest reliability were computed to validate this analytic framework as a tool to describe inter-individual differences in the stability of functional networks. The functional parcellation revealed by stable clusters replicated previous divisions found in the basal ganglia based on intrinsic functional connectivity. While we found moderate to high reproducibility, test-retest reliability was high at the boundaries of the functional units as well as within their cores. This is interesting because the boundaries between functional networks have been shown to explain most individual phenotypic variability. The current study provides evidence for the consistency of the parcellation of the basal ganglia, and provides the first group level parcellation built from individual-level cluster solutions. These novel results demonstrate the utility of BASC for quantifying inter-individual differences in the functional organization of brain regions, and encourage usage in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Garcia-Garcia
- Phyllis Green and Randolph Cowen Institute for Pediatric Neuroscience, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aki Nikolaidis
- Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pierre Bellec
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - R Cameron Craddock
- Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA; Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA
| | - Brian Cheung
- Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Francisco X Castellanos
- Phyllis Green and Randolph Cowen Institute for Pediatric Neuroscience, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA
| | - Michael P Milham
- Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA; Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Optimizing fMRI preprocessing pipelines for block-design tasks as a function of age. Neuroimage 2017; 154:240-254. [PMID: 28216431 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2016] [Revised: 01/04/2017] [Accepted: 02/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) is a powerful neuroimaging tool, which is often hampered by significant noise confounds. There is evidence that our ability to detect activations in task fMRI is highly dependent on the preprocessing steps used to control noise and artifact. However, the vast majority of studies examining preprocessing pipelines in fMRI have focused on young adults. Given the widespread use of fMRI for characterizing the neurobiology of aging, it is critical to examine how the impact of preprocessing choices varies as a function of age. In this study, we employ the NPAIRS cross-validation framework, which optimizes pipelines based on metrics of prediction accuracy (P) and spatial reproducibility (R), to compare the effects of pipeline optimization between young (21-33 years) and older (61-82 years) cohorts, for three different block-design contrasts. Motion is shown to be a greater issue in the older cohort, and we introduce new statistical approaches to control for potential biases due to head motion during pipeline optimization. In comparison, data-driven methods of physiological noise correction show comparable benefits for both young and old cohorts. Using our optimization framework, we demonstrate that the optimal pipelines tend to be highly similar across age cohorts. In addition, there is a comparable, significant benefit of pipeline optimization across age cohorts, for (P, R) metrics and independent validation measures of activation overlap (both between-subject, within-session and within-subject, between-session). The choice of task contrast consistently shows a greater impact than the age cohort, for (P, R) metrics and activation overlap. Finally, adaptive pipeline optimization per task run shows improved sensitivity to age-related changes in brain activity, particularly for weaker, more complex cognitive contrasts. The current study provides the first detailed examination of preprocessing pipelines across age cohorts, demonstrating a significant benefit of adaptive pipeline optimization across age groups.
Collapse
|
10
|
Shah YS, Hernandez-Garcia L, Jahanian H, Peltier SJ. Support vector machine classification of arterial volume-weighted arterial spin tagging images. Brain Behav 2016; 6:e00549. [PMID: 28031993 PMCID: PMC5167003 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2015] [Revised: 06/01/2016] [Accepted: 06/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In recent years, machine-learning techniques have gained growing popularity in medical image analysis. Temporal brain-state classification is one of the major applications of machine-learning techniques in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) brain data. This article explores the use of support vector machine (SVM) classification technique with motor-visual activation paradigm to perform brain-state classification into activation and rest with an emphasis on different acquisition techniques. METHODS Images were acquired using a recently developed variant of traditional pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling technique called arterial volume-weighted arterial spin tagging (AVAST). The classification scheme is also performed on images acquired using blood oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) and traditional perfusion-weighted arterial spin labeling (ASL) techniques for comparison. RESULTS The AVAST technique outperforms traditional pseudocontinuous ASL, achieving classification accuracy comparable to that of BOLD contrast images. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that AVAST has superior signal-to-noise ratio and improved temporal resolution as compared with traditional perfusion-weighted ASL and reduced sensitivity to scanner drift as compared with BOLD. Owing to these characteristics, AVAST lends itself as an ideal choice for dynamic fMRI and real-time neurofeedback experiments with sustained activation periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yash S Shah
- Functional MRI Laboratory Biomedical Engineering University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA
| | - Luis Hernandez-Garcia
- Functional MRI Laboratory Biomedical Engineering University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA
| | | | - Scott J Peltier
- Functional MRI Laboratory Biomedical Engineering University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Varoquaux G, Raamana PR, Engemann DA, Hoyos-Idrobo A, Schwartz Y, Thirion B. Assessing and tuning brain decoders: Cross-validation, caveats, and guidelines. Neuroimage 2016; 145:166-179. [PMID: 27989847 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 413] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2015] [Revised: 09/19/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Decoding, i.e. prediction from brain images or signals, calls for empirical evaluation of its predictive power. Such evaluation is achieved via cross-validation, a method also used to tune decoders' hyper-parameters. This paper is a review on cross-validation procedures for decoding in neuroimaging. It includes a didactic overview of the relevant theoretical considerations. Practical aspects are highlighted with an extensive empirical study of the common decoders in within- and across-subject predictions, on multiple datasets -anatomical and functional MRI and MEG- and simulations. Theory and experiments outline that the popular "leave-one-out" strategy leads to unstable and biased estimates, and a repeated random splits method should be preferred. Experiments outline the large error bars of cross-validation in neuroimaging settings: typical confidence intervals of 10%. Nested cross-validation can tune decoders' parameters while avoiding circularity bias. However we find that it can be favorable to use sane defaults, in particular for non-sparse decoders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaël Varoquaux
- Parietal project-team, INRIA Saclay-ile de France, France; CEA/Neurospin bât 145, 91191 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
| | - Pradeep Reddy Raamana
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada M6A 2E1; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A1
| | - Denis A Engemann
- CEA/Neurospin bât 145, 91191 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France; Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, INSERM, Université Paris-Sud and Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; Neuropsychology & Neuroimaging team INSERM UMRS 975, Brain and Spine Institute (ICM), Paris
| | - Andrés Hoyos-Idrobo
- Parietal project-team, INRIA Saclay-ile de France, France; CEA/Neurospin bât 145, 91191 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
| | - Yannick Schwartz
- Parietal project-team, INRIA Saclay-ile de France, France; CEA/Neurospin bât 145, 91191 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
| | - Bertrand Thirion
- Parietal project-team, INRIA Saclay-ile de France, France; CEA/Neurospin bât 145, 91191 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rana M, Varan AQ, Davoudi A, Cohen RA, Sitaram R, Ebner NC. Real-Time fMRI in Neuroscience Research and Its Use in Studying the Aging Brain. Front Aging Neurosci 2016; 8:239. [PMID: 27803662 PMCID: PMC5067937 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Cognitive decline is a major concern in the aging population. It is normative to experience some deterioration in cognitive abilities with advanced age such as related to memory performance, attention distraction to interference, task switching, and processing speed. However, intact cognitive functioning in old age is important for leading an independent day-to-day life. Thus, studying ways to counteract or delay the onset of cognitive decline in aging is crucial. The literature offers various explanations for the decline in cognitive performance in aging; among those are age-related gray and white matter atrophy, synaptic degeneration, blood flow reduction, neurochemical alterations, and change in connectivity patterns with advanced age. An emerging literature on neurofeedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) reports exciting results supporting the benefits of volitional modulation of brain activity on cognition and behavior. Neurofeedback studies based on real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI) have shown behavioral changes in schizophrenia and behavioral benefits in nicotine addiction. This article integrates research on cognitive and brain aging with evidence of brain and behavioral modification due to rtfMRI neurofeedback. We offer a state-of-the-art description of the rtfMRI technique with an eye towards its application in aging. We present preliminary results of a feasibility study exploring the possibility of using rtfMRI to train older adults to volitionally control brain activity. Based on these first findings, we discuss possible implementations of rtfMRI neurofeedback as a novel technique to study and alleviate cognitive decline in healthy and pathological aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit Rana
- Department of Psychiatry and Division of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiago, Chile; Laboratory for Brain-Machine Interfaces and Neuromodulation, Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiago, Chile
| | - Andrew Q Varan
- Department of Psychology, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Anis Davoudi
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ronald A Cohen
- Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Institute on Aging, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, College of Medicine, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ranganatha Sitaram
- Department of Psychiatry and Division of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiago, Chile; Laboratory for Brain-Machine Interfaces and Neuromodulation, Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiago, Chile; Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Schools of Engineering, Biology and Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiago, Chile
| | - Natalie C Ebner
- Department of Psychology, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Institute on Aging, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, College of Medicine, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stevens MTR, Clarke DB, Stroink G, Beyea SD, D'Arcy RC. Improving fMRI reliability in presurgical mapping for brain tumours. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016; 87:267-74. [PMID: 25814491 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-310307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2015] [Accepted: 02/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Functional MRI (fMRI) is becoming increasingly integrated into clinical practice for presurgical mapping. Current efforts are focused on validating data quality, with reliability being a major factor. In this paper, we demonstrate the utility of a recently developed approach that uses receiver operating characteristic-reliability (ROC-r) to: (1) identify reliable versus unreliable data sets; (2) automatically select processing options to enhance data quality; and (3) automatically select individualised thresholds for activation maps. METHODS Presurgical fMRI was conducted in 16 patients undergoing surgical treatment for brain tumours. Within-session test-retest fMRI was conducted, and ROC-reliability of the patient group was compared to a previous healthy control cohort. Individually optimised preprocessing pipelines were determined to improve reliability. Spatial correspondence was assessed by comparing the fMRI results to intraoperative cortical stimulation mapping, in terms of the distance to the nearest active fMRI voxel. RESULTS The average ROC-r reliability for the patients was 0.58±0.03, as compared to 0.72±0.02 in healthy controls. For the patient group, this increased significantly to 0.65±0.02 by adopting optimised preprocessing pipelines. Co-localisation of the fMRI maps with cortical stimulation was significantly better for more reliable versus less reliable data sets (8.3±0.9 vs 29±3 mm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated ROC-r analysis for identifying reliable fMRI data sets, choosing optimal postprocessing pipelines, and selecting patient-specific thresholds. Data sets with higher reliability also showed closer spatial correspondence to cortical stimulation. ROC-r can thus identify poor fMRI data at time of scanning, allowing for repeat scans when necessary. ROC-r analysis provides optimised and automated fMRI processing for improved presurgical mapping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Tynan R Stevens
- Department of Physics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Biomedical Translational Imaging Centre, IWK Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - David B Clarke
- Division of Neurosurgery, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Division of Surgery, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Gerhard Stroink
- Department of Physics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Steven D Beyea
- Department of Physics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Biomedical Translational Imaging Centre, IWK Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Ryan Cn D'Arcy
- Department of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Torgerson CM, Quinn C, Dinov I, Liu Z, Petrosyan P, Pelphrey K, Haselgrove C, Kennedy DN, Toga AW, Van Horn JD. Interacting with the National Database for Autism Research (NDAR) via the LONI Pipeline workflow environment. Brain Imaging Behav 2016; 9:89-103. [PMID: 25666423 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-015-9354-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Under the umbrella of the National Database for Clinical Trials (NDCT) related to mental illnesses, the National Database for Autism Research (NDAR) seeks to gather, curate, and make openly available neuroimaging data from NIH-funded studies of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). NDAR has recently made its database accessible through the LONI Pipeline workflow design and execution environment to enable large-scale analyses of cortical architecture and function via local, cluster, or "cloud"-based computing resources. This presents a unique opportunity to overcome many of the customary limitations to fostering biomedical neuroimaging as a science of discovery. Providing open access to primary neuroimaging data, workflow methods, and high-performance computing will increase uniformity in data collection protocols, encourage greater reliability of published data, results replication, and broaden the range of researchers now able to perform larger studies than ever before. To illustrate the use of NDAR and LONI Pipeline for performing several commonly performed neuroimaging processing steps and analyses, this paper presents example workflows useful for ASD neuroimaging researchers seeking to begin using this valuable combination of online data and computational resources. We discuss the utility of such database and workflow processing interactivity as a motivation for the sharing of additional primary data in ASD research and elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carinna M Torgerson
- Laboratory of Neuro Imaging and The Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, 2001 North Soto Street - SSB1-Room 102, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chen JE, Glover GH. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods. Neuropsychol Rev 2015; 25:289-313. [PMID: 26248581 PMCID: PMC4565730 DOI: 10.1007/s11065-015-9294-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2015] [Accepted: 07/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Since its inception in 1992, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) has become an indispensible tool for studying cognition in both the healthy and dysfunctional brain. FMRI monitors changes in the oxygenation of brain tissue resulting from altered metabolism consequent to a task-based evoked neural response or from spontaneous fluctuations in neural activity in the absence of conscious mentation (the "resting state"). Task-based studies have revealed neural correlates of a large number of important cognitive processes, while fMRI studies performed in the resting state have demonstrated brain-wide networks that result from brain regions with synchronized, apparently spontaneous activity. In this article, we review the methods used to acquire and analyze fMRI signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyuan E Chen
- Department of Radiology, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Churchill NW, Spring R, Afshin-Pour B, Dong F, Strother SC. An Automated, Adaptive Framework for Optimizing Preprocessing Pipelines in Task-Based Functional MRI. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0131520. [PMID: 26161667 PMCID: PMC4498698 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2014] [Accepted: 06/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BOLD fMRI is sensitive to blood-oxygenation changes correlated with brain function; however, it is limited by relatively weak signal and significant noise confounds. Many preprocessing algorithms have been developed to control noise and improve signal detection in fMRI. Although the chosen set of preprocessing and analysis steps (the “pipeline”) significantly affects signal detection, pipelines are rarely quantitatively validated in the neuroimaging literature, due to complex preprocessing interactions. This paper outlines and validates an adaptive resampling framework for evaluating and optimizing preprocessing choices by optimizing data-driven metrics of task prediction and spatial reproducibility. Compared to standard “fixed” preprocessing pipelines, this optimization approach significantly improves independent validation measures of within-subject test-retest, and between-subject activation overlap, and behavioural prediction accuracy. We demonstrate that preprocessing choices function as implicit model regularizers, and that improvements due to pipeline optimization generalize across a range of simple to complex experimental tasks and analysis models. Results are shown for brief scanning sessions (<3 minutes each), demonstrating that with pipeline optimization, it is possible to obtain reliable results and brain-behaviour correlations in relatively small datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan W. Churchill
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Robyn Spring
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Babak Afshin-Pour
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fan Dong
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen C. Strother
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Afshin-Pour B, Shams SM, Strother S. A Hybrid LDA+gCCA Model for fMRI Data Classification and Visualization. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2015; 34:1031-1041. [PMID: 25438304 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2014.2374074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Linear predictive models are applied to functional MRI (fMRI) data to estimate boundaries that predict experimental task states for scans. These boundaries are visualized as statistical parametric maps (SPMs) and range from low to high spatial reproducibility across subjects (e.g., Strother , 2004; LaConte , 2003). Such inter-subject pattern reproducibility is an essential characteristic of interpretable SPMs that generalize across subjects. Therefore, we introduce a flexible hybrid model that optimizes reproducibility by simultaneously enhancing the prediction power and reproducibility. This hybrid model is formed by a weighted summation of the optimization functions of a linear discriminate analysis (LDA) model and a generalized canonical correlation (gCCA) model (Afshin-Pour , 2012). LDA preserves the model's ability to discriminate the fMRI scans of multiple brain states while gCCA finds a linear combination for each subject's scans such that the estimated boundary map is reproducible. The hybrid model is implemented in a split-half resampling framework (Strother , 2010) which provides reproducibility (r) and prediction (p) quality metrics. Then the model was compared with LDA, and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB). For simulated fMRI data, the hybrid model outperforms the other two techniques in terms of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, particularly for detecting less predictable but spatially reproducible networks. These techniques were applied to real fMRI data to estimate the maps for two task contrasts. Our results indicate that compared to LDA and GNB, the hybrid model can provide maps with large increases in reproducibility for small reductions in prediction, which are jointly closer to the ideal performance point of (p=1, r=1).
Collapse
|
18
|
Craddock RC, Tungaraza RL, Milham MP. Connectomics and new approaches for analyzing human brain functional connectivity. Gigascience 2015; 4:13. [PMID: 25810900 PMCID: PMC4373299 DOI: 10.1186/s13742-015-0045-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2014] [Accepted: 01/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Estimating the functional interactions between brain regions and mapping those connections to corresponding inter-individual differences in cognitive, behavioral and psychiatric domains are central pursuits for understanding the human connectome. The number and complexity of functional interactions within the connectome and the large amounts of data required to study them position functional connectivity research as a “big data” problem. Maximizing the degree to which knowledge about human brain function can be extracted from the connectome will require developing a new generation of neuroimaging analysis algorithms and tools. This review describes several outstanding problems in brain functional connectomics with the goal of engaging researchers from a broad spectrum of data sciences to help solve these problems. Additionally it provides information about open science resources consisting of raw and preprocessed data to help interested researchers get started.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Cameron Craddock
- Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd, Orangeburg, 10962 New York USA ; Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, 445 Park Ave, New York, 10022 New York USA
| | - Rosalia L Tungaraza
- Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd, Orangeburg, 10962 New York USA
| | - Michael P Milham
- Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd, Orangeburg, 10962 New York USA ; Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, 445 Park Ave, New York, 10022 New York USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee D, Jang C, Park HJ. Multivariate detrending of fMRI signal drifts for real-time multiclass pattern classification. Neuroimage 2015; 108:203-13. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2014] [Revised: 12/18/2014] [Accepted: 12/24/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
20
|
An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics. Sci Data 2014; 1:140049. [PMID: 25977800 PMCID: PMC4421932 DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2014.49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 252] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2014] [Accepted: 10/14/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Efforts to identify meaningful functional imaging-based biomarkers are limited by the ability to reliably characterize inter-individual differences in human brain function. Although a growing number of connectomics-based measures are reported to have moderate to high test-retest reliability, the variability in data acquisition, experimental designs, and analytic methods precludes the ability to generalize results. The Consortium for Reliability and Reproducibility (CoRR) is working to address this challenge and establish test-retest reliability as a minimum standard for methods development in functional connectomics. Specifically, CoRR has aggregated 1,629 typical individuals’ resting state fMRI (rfMRI) data (5,093 rfMRI scans) from 18 international sites, and is openly sharing them via the International Data-sharing Neuroimaging Initiative (INDI). To allow researchers to generate various estimates of reliability and reproducibility, a variety of data acquisition procedures and experimental designs are included. Similarly, to enable users to assess the impact of commonly encountered artifacts (for example, motion) on characterizations of inter-individual variation, datasets of varying quality are included.
Collapse
|
21
|
Karaman M, Nencka AS, Bruce IP, Rowe DB. Quantification of the statistical effects of spatiotemporal processing of nontask FMRI data. Brain Connect 2014; 4:649-61. [PMID: 25132113 DOI: 10.1089/brain.2014.0278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Nontask functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become one of the most popular noninvasive areas of brain mapping research for neuroscientists. In nontask fMRI, various sources of "noise" corrupt the measured blood oxygenation level-dependent signal. Many studies have aimed to attenuate the noise in reconstructed voxel measurements through spatial and temporal processing operations. While these solutions make the data more "appealing," many commonly used processing operations induce artificial correlations in the acquired data. As such, it becomes increasingly more difficult to derive the true underlying covariance structure once the data have been processed. As the goal of nontask fMRI studies is to determine, utilize, and analyze the true covariance structure of acquired data, such processing can lead to inaccurate and misleading conclusions drawn from the data if they are unaccounted for in the final connectivity analysis. In this article, we develop a framework that represents the spatiotemporal processing and reconstruction operations as linear operators, providing a means of precisely quantifying the correlations induced or modified by such processing rather than by performing lengthy Monte Carlo simulations. A framework of this kind allows one to appropriately model the statistical properties of the processed data, optimize the data processing pipeline, characterize excessive processing, and draw more accurate functional connectivity conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muge Karaman
- 1 Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, Marquette University , Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yang X, Kang H, Newton AT, Landman BA. Evaluation of statistical inference on empirical resting state fMRI. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2014; 61:1091-9. [PMID: 24658234 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2013.2294013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Modern statistical inference techniques may be able to improve the sensitivity and specificity of resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) connectivity analysis through more realistic assumptions. In simulation, the advantages of such methods are readily demonstrable. However, quantitative empirical validation remains elusive in vivo as the true connectivity patterns are unknown and noise distributions are challenging to characterize, especially in ultra-high field (e.g., 7T fMRI). Though the physiological characteristics of the fMRI signal are difficult to replicate in controlled phantom studies, it is critical that the performance of statistical techniques be evaluated. The SIMulation EXtrapolation (SIMEX) method has enabled estimation of bias with asymptotically consistent estimators on empirical finite sample data by adding simulated noise . To avoid the requirement of accurate estimation of noise structure, the proposed quantitative evaluation approach leverages the theoretical core of SIMEX to study the properties of inference methods in the face of diminishing data (in contrast to increasing noise). The performance of ordinary and robust inference methods in simulation and empirical rs-fMRI are compared using the proposed quantitative evaluation approach. This study provides a simple, but powerful method for comparing a proxy for inference accuracy using empirical data.
Collapse
|
23
|
Churchill NW, Yourganov G, Strother SC. Comparing within-subject classification and regularization methods in fMRI for large and small sample sizes. Hum Brain Mapp 2014; 35:4499-517. [PMID: 24639383 PMCID: PMC6869036 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2013] [Revised: 12/03/2013] [Accepted: 01/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, a variety of multivariate classifier models have been applied to fMRI, with different modeling assumptions. When classifying high-dimensional fMRI data, we must also regularize to improve model stability, and the interactions between classifier and regularization techniques are still being investigated. Classifiers are usually compared on large, multisubject fMRI datasets. However, it is unclear how classifier/regularizer models perform for within-subject analyses, as a function of signal strength and sample size. We compare four standard classifiers: Linear and Quadratic Discriminants, Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machines. Classification was performed on data in the linear kernel (covariance) feature space, and classifiers are tuned with four commonly-used regularizers: Principal Component and Independent Component Analysis, and penalization of kernel features using L₁ and L₂ norms. We evaluated prediction accuracy (P) and spatial reproducibility (R) of all classifier/regularizer combinations on single-subject analyses, over a range of three different block task contrasts and sample sizes for a BOLD fMRI experiment. We show that the classifier model has a small impact on signal detection, compared to the choice of regularizer. PCA maximizes reproducibility and global SNR, whereas Lp -norms tend to maximize prediction. ICA produces low reproducibility, and prediction accuracy is classifier-dependent. However, trade-offs in (P,R) depend partly on the optimization criterion, and PCA-based models are able to explore the widest range of (P,R) values. These trends are consistent across task contrasts and data sizes (training samples range from 6 to 96 scans). In addition, the trends in classifier performance are consistent for ROI-based classifier analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan W. Churchill
- Rotman Research InstituteBaycrest HospitalTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of Medical BiophysicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Grigori Yourganov
- Rotman Research InstituteBaycrest HospitalTorontoOntarioCanada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Stephen C. Strother
- Rotman Research InstituteBaycrest HospitalTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of Medical BiophysicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Thirion B, Varoquaux G, Dohmatob E, Poline JB. Which fMRI clustering gives good brain parcellations? Front Neurosci 2014; 8:167. [PMID: 25071425 PMCID: PMC4076743 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2014] [Accepted: 05/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Analysis and interpretation of neuroimaging data often require one to divide the brain into a number of regions, or parcels, with homogeneous characteristics, be these regions defined in the brain volume or on the cortical surface. While predefined brain atlases do not adapt to the signal in the individual subject images, parcellation approaches use brain activity (e.g., found in some functional contrasts of interest) and clustering techniques to define regions with some degree of signal homogeneity. In this work, we address the question of which clustering technique is appropriate and how to optimize the corresponding model. We use two principled criteria: goodness of fit (accuracy), and reproducibility of the parcellation across bootstrap samples. We study these criteria on both simulated and two task-based functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging datasets for the Ward, spectral and k-means clustering algorithms. We show that in general Ward’s clustering performs better than alternative methods with regard to reproducibility and accuracy and that the two criteria diverge regarding the preferred models (reproducibility leading to more conservative solutions), thus deferring the practical decision to a higher level alternative, namely the choice of a trade-off between accuracy and stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Thirion
- Parietal Project-Team, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et Automatique Palaiseau, France ; Commissariat à l'énergie Atomique et Aux Énergies Alternatives, DSV, Neurospin, I2 BM Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Gaël Varoquaux
- Parietal Project-Team, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et Automatique Palaiseau, France ; Commissariat à l'énergie Atomique et Aux Énergies Alternatives, DSV, Neurospin, I2 BM Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Elvis Dohmatob
- Parietal Project-Team, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et Automatique Palaiseau, France ; Commissariat à l'énergie Atomique et Aux Énergies Alternatives, DSV, Neurospin, I2 BM Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Poline
- Commissariat à l'énergie Atomique et Aux Énergies Alternatives, DSV, Neurospin, I2 BM Gif-sur-Yvette, France ; Henry H. Wheeler Jr. Brain Imaging Center, University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yourganov G, Schmah T, Churchill NW, Berman MG, Grady CL, Strother SC. Pattern classification of fMRI data: applications for analysis of spatially distributed cortical networks. Neuroimage 2014; 96:117-32. [PMID: 24705202 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2013] [Revised: 03/01/2014] [Accepted: 03/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The field of fMRI data analysis is rapidly growing in sophistication, particularly in the domain of multivariate pattern classification. However, the interaction between the properties of the analytical model and the parameters of the BOLD signal (e.g. signal magnitude, temporal variance and functional connectivity) is still an open problem. We addressed this problem by evaluating a set of pattern classification algorithms on simulated and experimental block-design fMRI data. The set of classifiers consisted of linear and quadratic discriminants, linear support vector machine, and linear and nonlinear Gaussian naive Bayes classifiers. For linear discriminant, we used two methods of regularization: principal component analysis, and ridge regularization. The classifiers were used (1) to classify the volumes according to the behavioral task that was performed by the subject, and (2) to construct spatial maps that indicated the relative contribution of each voxel to classification. Our evaluation metrics were: (1) accuracy of out-of-sample classification and (2) reproducibility of spatial maps. In simulated data sets, we performed an additional evaluation of spatial maps with ROC analysis. We varied the magnitude, temporal variance and connectivity of simulated fMRI signal and identified the optimal classifier for each simulated environment. Overall, the best performers were linear and quadratic discriminants (operating on principal components of the data matrix) and, in some rare situations, a nonlinear Gaussian naïve Bayes classifier. The results from the simulated data were supported by within-subject analysis of experimental fMRI data, collected in a study of aging. This is the first study that systematically characterizes interactions between analysis model and signal parameters (such as magnitude, variance and correlation) on the performance of pattern classifiers for fMRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grigori Yourganov
- Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
| | - Tanya Schmah
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nathan W Churchill
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marc G Berman
- Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Cheryl L Grady
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen C Strother
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schrouff J, Rosa MJ, Rondina JM, Marquand AF, Chu C, Ashburner J, Phillips C, Richiardi J, Mourão-Miranda J. PRoNTo: pattern recognition for neuroimaging toolbox. Neuroinformatics 2014; 11:319-37. [PMID: 23417655 PMCID: PMC3722452 DOI: 10.1007/s12021-013-9178-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 326] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
In the past years, mass univariate statistical analyses of neuroimaging data have been complemented by the use of multivariate pattern analyses, especially based on machine learning models. While these allow an increased sensitivity for the detection of spatially distributed effects compared to univariate techniques, they lack an established and accessible software framework. The goal of this work was to build a toolbox comprising all the necessary functionalities for multivariate analyses of neuroimaging data, based on machine learning models. The “Pattern Recognition for Neuroimaging Toolbox” (PRoNTo) is open-source, cross-platform, MATLAB-based and SPM compatible, therefore being suitable for both cognitive and clinical neuroscience research. In addition, it is designed to facilitate novel contributions from developers, aiming to improve the interaction between the neuroimaging and machine learning communities. Here, we introduce PRoNTo by presenting examples of possible research questions that can be addressed with the machine learning framework implemented in PRoNTo, and cannot be easily investigated with mass univariate statistical analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Schrouff
- Cyclotron Research Centre, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - M. J. Rosa
- Department of Computer Science, Centre for Computational Statistics and Machine Learning, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT London, UK
| | - J. M. Rondina
- Department of Computer Science, Centre for Computational Statistics and Machine Learning, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT London, UK
- Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - A. F. Marquand
- Department of Neuroimaging, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - C. Chu
- Section on Functional Imaging Methods, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, USA
| | - J. Ashburner
- Wellcome Trust Centre for NeuroImaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - C. Phillips
- Cyclotron Research Centre, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - J. Richiardi
- Functional Imaging in Neuropsychiatric Disorders Lab, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
- Laboratory for Neurology & Imaging of Cognition, Departments of Neurosciences and Clinical Neurology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - J. Mourão-Miranda
- Department of Computer Science, Centre for Computational Statistics and Machine Learning, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT London, UK
- Department of Neuroimaging, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ruiz S, Buyukturkoglu K, Rana M, Birbaumer N, Sitaram R. Real-time fMRI brain computer interfaces: Self-regulation of single brain regions to networks. Biol Psychol 2014; 95:4-20. [PMID: 23643926 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2012] [Revised: 04/17/2013] [Accepted: 04/18/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
28
|
Kay KN, Rokem A, Winawer J, Dougherty RF, Wandell BA. GLMdenoise: a fast, automated technique for denoising task-based fMRI data. Front Neurosci 2013; 7:247. [PMID: 24381539 PMCID: PMC3865440 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2013] [Accepted: 12/01/2013] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), researchers seek to measure fMRI signals related to a given task or condition. In many circumstances, measuring this signal of interest is limited by noise. In this study, we present GLMdenoise, a technique that improves signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by entering noise regressors into a general linear model (GLM) analysis of fMRI data. The noise regressors are derived by conducting an initial model fit to determine voxels unrelated to the experimental paradigm, performing principal components analysis (PCA) on the time-series of these voxels, and using cross-validation to select the optimal number of principal components to use as noise regressors. Due to the use of data resampling, GLMdenoise requires and is best suited for datasets involving multiple runs (where conditions repeat across runs). We show that GLMdenoise consistently improves cross-validation accuracy of GLM estimates on a variety of event-related experimental datasets and is accompanied by substantial gains in SNR. To promote practical application of methods, we provide MATLAB code implementing GLMdenoise. Furthermore, to help compare GLMdenoise to other denoising methods, we present the Denoise Benchmark (DNB), a public database and architecture for evaluating denoising methods. The DNB consists of the datasets described in this paper, a code framework that enables automatic evaluation of a denoising method, and implementations of several denoising methods, including GLMdenoise, the use of motion parameters as noise regressors, ICA-based denoising, and RETROICOR/RVHRCOR. Using the DNB, we find that GLMdenoise performs best out of all of the denoising methods we tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendrick N Kay
- Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ariel Rokem
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Robert F Dougherty
- Center for Cognitive and Neurobiological Imaging, Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Brian A Wandell
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Learning and comparing functional connectomes across subjects. Neuroimage 2013; 80:405-15. [PMID: 23583357 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2013] [Revised: 03/26/2013] [Accepted: 04/01/2013] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
|
30
|
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can convert mental states into signals to drive real-world devices, but it is not known if a given covert task is the same when performed with and without BCI-based control. Using a BCI likely involves additional cognitive processes, such as multitasking, attention, and conflict monitoring. In addition, it is challenging to measure the quality of covert task performance. We used whole-brain classifier-based real-time functional MRI to address these issues, because the method provides both classifier-based maps to examine the neural requirements of BCI and classification accuracy to quantify the quality of task performance. Subjects performed a covert counting task at fast and slow rates to control a visual interface. Compared with the same task when viewing but not controlling the interface, we observed that being in control of a BCI improved task classification of fast and slow counting states. Additional BCI control increased subjects' whole-brain signal-to-noise ratio compared with the absence of control. The neural pattern for control consisted of a positive network comprised of dorsal parietal and frontal regions and the anterior insula of the right hemisphere as well as an expansive negative network of regions. These findings suggest that real-time functional MRI can serve as a platform for exploring information processing and frontoparietal and insula network-based regulation of whole-brain task signal-to-noise ratio.
Collapse
|
31
|
Churchill NW, Strother SC. PHYCAA+: an optimized, adaptive procedure for measuring and controlling physiological noise in BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 2013; 82:306-25. [PMID: 23727534 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2013] [Revised: 05/16/2013] [Accepted: 05/23/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of physiological noise in functional MRI can greatly limit the sensitivity and accuracy of BOLD signal measurements, and produce significant false positives. There are two main types of physiological confounds: (1) high-variance signal in non-neuronal tissues of the brain including vascular tracts, sinuses and ventricles, and (2) physiological noise components which extend into gray matter tissue. These physiological effects may also be partially coupled with stimuli (and thus the BOLD response). To address these issues, we have developed PHYCAA+, a significantly improved version of the PHYCAA algorithm (Churchill et al., 2011) that (1) down-weights the variance of voxels in probable non-neuronal tissue, and (2) identifies the multivariate physiological noise subspace in gray matter that is linked to non-neuronal tissue. This model estimates physiological noise directly from EPI data, without requiring external measures of heartbeat and respiration, or manual selection of physiological components. The PHYCAA+ model significantly improves the prediction accuracy and reproducibility of single-subject analyses, compared to PHYCAA and a number of commonly-used physiological correction algorithms. Individual subject denoising with PHYCAA+ is independently validated by showing that it consistently increased between-subject activation overlap, and minimized false-positive signal in non gray-matter loci. The results are demonstrated for both block and fast single-event task designs, applied to standard univariate and adaptive multivariate analysis models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan W Churchill
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Craddock RC, Milham MP, LaConte SM. Predicting intrinsic brain activity. Neuroimage 2013; 82:127-36. [PMID: 23707580 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2012] [Revised: 05/09/2013] [Accepted: 05/15/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Multivariate supervised learning methods exhibit a remarkable ability to decode externally driven sensory, behavioral, and cognitive states from functional neuroimaging data. Although they are typically applied to task-based analyses, supervised learning methods are equally applicable to intrinsic effective and functional connectivity analyses. The obtained models of connectivity incorporate the multivariate interactions between all brain regions simultaneously, which will result in a more accurate representation of the connectome than the ones available with standard bivariate methods. Additionally the models can be applied to decode or predict the time series of intrinsic brain activity of a region from an independent dataset. The obtained prediction accuracy provides a measure of the integration between a brain region and other regions in its network, as well as a method for evaluating acquisition and preprocessing pipelines for resting state fMRI data. This article describes a method for learning multivariate models of connectivity. The method is applied in the non-parametric prediction accuracy, influence, and reproducibility-resampling (NPAIRS) framework, to study the regional variation of prediction accuracy and reproducibility (Strother et al., 2002). The resulting spatial distribution of these metrics is consistent with the functional hierarchy proposed by Mesulam (1998). Additionally we illustrate the utility of the multivariate regression connectivity modeling method for optimizing experimental parameters and assessing the quality of functional neuroimaging data.
Collapse
|
33
|
Where one hand meets the other: limb-specific and action-dependent movement plans decoded from preparatory signals in single human frontoparietal brain areas. J Neurosci 2013; 33:1991-2008. [PMID: 23365237 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0541-12.2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Planning object-directed hand actions requires successful integration of the movement goal with the acting limb. Exactly where and how this sensorimotor integration occurs in the brain has been studied extensively with neurophysiological recordings in nonhuman primates, yet to date, because of limitations of non-invasive methodologies, the ability to examine the same types of planning-related signals in humans has been challenging. Here we show, using a multivoxel pattern analysis of functional MRI (fMRI) data, that the preparatory activity patterns in several frontoparietal brain regions can be used to predict both the limb used and hand action performed in an upcoming movement. Participants performed an event-related delayed movement task whereby they planned and executed grasp or reach actions with either their left or right hand toward a single target object. We found that, although the majority of frontoparietal areas represented hand actions (grasping vs reaching) for the contralateral limb, several areas additionally coded hand actions for the ipsilateral limb. Notable among these were subregions within the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), dorsal premotor cortex (PMd), ventral premotor cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, presupplementary motor area, and motor cortex, a region more traditionally implicated in contralateral movement generation. Additional analyses suggest that hand actions are represented independently of the intended limb in PPC and PMd. In addition to providing a unique mapping of limb-specific and action-dependent intention-related signals across the human cortical motor system, these findings uncover a much stronger representation of the ipsilateral limb than expected from previous fMRI findings.
Collapse
|
34
|
Enhancing reproducibility of fMRI statistical maps using generalized canonical correlation analysis in NPAIRS framework. Neuroimage 2012; 60:1970-81. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2010] [Revised: 01/20/2012] [Accepted: 01/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
35
|
Barry RL, Strother SC, Gore JC. Complex and magnitude-only preprocessing of 2D and 3D BOLD fMRI data at 7 T. Magn Reson Med 2012; 67:867-71. [PMID: 21748797 PMCID: PMC3193895 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2011] [Revised: 06/01/2011] [Accepted: 06/07/2011] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
A challenge to ultra high field functional magnetic resonance imaging is the predominance of noise associated with physiological processes unrelated to tasks of interest. This degradation in data quality may be partially reversed using a series of preprocessing algorithms designed to retrospectively estimate and remove the effects of these noise sources. However, such algorithms are routinely validated only in isolation, and thus consideration of their efficacies within realistic preprocessing pipelines and on different data sets is often overlooked. We investigate the application of eight possible combinations of three pseudo-complementary preprocessing algorithms - phase regression, Stockwell transform filtering, and retrospective image correction - to suppress physiological noise in 2D and 3D functional data at 7 T. The performance of each preprocessing pipeline was evaluated using data-driven metrics of reproducibility and prediction. The optimal preprocessing pipeline for both 2D and 3D functional data included phase regression, Stockwell transform filtering, and retrospective image correction. This result supports the hypothesis that a complex preprocessing pipeline is preferable to a magnitude-only pipeline, and suggests that functional magnetic resonance imaging studies should retain complex images and externally monitor subjects' respiratory and cardiac cycles so that these supplementary data may be used to retrospectively reduce noise and enhance overall data quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Barry
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Churchill NW, Yourganov G, Oder A, Tam F, Graham SJ, Strother SC. Optimizing preprocessing and analysis pipelines for single-subject fMRI: 2. Interactions with ICA, PCA, task contrast and inter-subject heterogeneity. PLoS One 2012; 7:e31147. [PMID: 22383999 PMCID: PMC3288007 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2011] [Accepted: 01/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
A variety of preprocessing techniques are available to correct subject-dependant artifacts in fMRI, caused by head motion and physiological noise. Although it has been established that the chosen preprocessing steps (or "pipeline") may significantly affect fMRI results, it is not well understood how preprocessing choices interact with other parts of the fMRI experimental design. In this study, we examine how two experimental factors interact with preprocessing: between-subject heterogeneity, and strength of task contrast. Two levels of cognitive contrast were examined in an fMRI adaptation of the Trail-Making Test, with data from young, healthy adults. The importance of standard preprocessing with motion correction, physiological noise correction, motion parameter regression and temporal detrending were examined for the two task contrasts. We also tested subspace estimation using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Independent Component Analysis (ICA). Results were obtained for Penalized Discriminant Analysis, and model performance quantified with reproducibility (R) and prediction metrics (P). Simulation methods were also used to test for potential biases from individual-subject optimization. Our results demonstrate that (1) individual pipeline optimization is not significantly more biased than fixed preprocessing. In addition, (2) when applying a fixed pipeline across all subjects, the task contrast significantly affects pipeline performance; in particular, the effects of PCA and ICA models vary with contrast, and are not by themselves optimal preprocessing steps. Also, (3) selecting the optimal pipeline for each subject improves within-subject (P,R) and between-subject overlap, with the weaker cognitive contrast being more sensitive to pipeline optimization. These results demonstrate that sensitivity of fMRI results is influenced not only by preprocessing choices, but also by interactions with other experimental design factors. This paper outlines a quantitative procedure to denoise data that would otherwise be discarded due to artifact; this is particularly relevant for weak signal contrasts in single-subject, small-sample and clinical datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan W Churchill
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rasmussen PM, Abrahamsen TJ, Madsen KH, Hansen LK. Nonlinear denoising and analysis of neuroimages with kernel principal component analysis and pre-image estimation. Neuroimage 2012; 60:1807-18. [PMID: 22305952 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2011] [Revised: 01/15/2012] [Accepted: 01/18/2012] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigate the use of kernel principal component analysis (PCA) and the inverse problem known as pre-image estimation in neuroimaging: i) We explore kernel PCA and pre-image estimation as a means for image denoising as part of the image preprocessing pipeline. Evaluation of the denoising procedure is performed within a data-driven split-half evaluation framework. ii) We introduce manifold navigation for exploration of a nonlinear data manifold, and illustrate how pre-image estimation can be used to generate brain maps in the continuum between experimentally defined brain states/classes. We base these illustrations on two fMRI BOLD data sets - one from a simple finger tapping experiment and the other from an experiment on object recognition in the ventral temporal lobe.
Collapse
|
38
|
Decoding effector-dependent and effector-independent movement intentions from human parieto-frontal brain activity. J Neurosci 2012; 31:17149-68. [PMID: 22114283 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1058-11.2011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Our present understanding of the neural mechanisms and sensorimotor transformations that govern the planning of arm and eye movements predominantly come from invasive parieto-frontal neural recordings in nonhuman primates. While functional MRI (fMRI) has motivated investigations on much of these same issues in humans, the highly distributed and multiplexed organization of parieto-frontal neurons necessarily constrain the types of intention-related signals that can be detected with traditional fMRI analysis techniques. Here we employed multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA), a multivariate technique sensitive to spatially distributed fMRI patterns, to provide a more detailed understanding of how hand and eye movement plans are coded in human parieto-frontal cortex. Subjects performed an event-related delayed movement task requiring that a reach or saccade be planned and executed toward one of two spatial target positions. We show with MVPA that, even in the absence of signal amplitude differences, the fMRI spatial activity patterns preceding movement onset are predictive of upcoming reaches and saccades and their intended directions. Within certain parieto-frontal regions we show that these predictive activity patterns reflect a similar spatial target representation for the hand and eye. Within some of the same regions, we further demonstrate that these preparatory spatial signals can be discriminated from nonspatial, effector-specific signals. In contrast to the largely graded effector- and direction-related planning responses found with fMRI subtraction methods, these results reveal considerable consensus with the parieto-frontal network organization suggested from primate neurophysiology and specifically show how predictive spatial and nonspatial movement information coexists within single human parieto-frontal areas.
Collapse
|
39
|
Decoding action intentions from preparatory brain activity in human parieto-frontal networks. J Neurosci 2011; 31:9599-610. [PMID: 21715625 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0080-11.2011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 200] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
How and where in the human brain high-level sensorimotor processes such as intentions and decisions are coded remain important yet essentially unanswered questions. This is in part because, to date, decoding intended actions from brain signals has been primarily constrained to invasive neural recordings in nonhuman primates. Here we demonstrate using functional MRI (fMRI) pattern recognition techniques that we can also decode movement intentions from human brain signals, specifically object-directed grasp and reach movements, moments before their initiation. Subjects performed an event-related delayed movement task toward a single centrally located object (consisting of a small cube attached atop a larger cube). For each trial, after visual presentation of the object, one of three hand movements was instructed: grasp the top cube, grasp the bottom cube, or reach to touch the side of the object (without preshaping the hand). We found that, despite an absence of fMRI signal amplitude differences between the planned movements, the spatial activity patterns in multiple parietal and premotor brain areas accurately predicted upcoming grasp and reach movements. Furthermore, the patterns of activity in a subset of these areas additionally predicted which of the two cubes were to be grasped. These findings offer new insights into the detailed movement information contained in human preparatory brain activity and advance our present understanding of sensorimotor planning processes through a unique description of parieto-frontal regions according to the specific types of hand movements they can predict.
Collapse
|
40
|
Afshin-Pour B, Soltanian-Zadeh H, Hossein-Zadeh GA, Grady CL, Strother SC. A mutual information-based metric for evaluation of fMRI data-processing approaches. Hum Brain Mapp 2011; 32:699-715. [PMID: 20533565 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
We propose a novel approach for evaluating the performance of activation detection in real (experimental) datasets using a new mutual information (MI)-based metric and compare its sensitivity to several existing performance metrics in both simulated and real datasets. The proposed approach is based on measuring the approximate MI between the fMRI time-series of a validation dataset and a calculated activation map (thresholded label map or continuous map) from an independent training dataset. The MI metric is used to measure the amount of information preserved during the extraction of an activation map from experimentally related fMRI time-series. The processing method that preserves maximal information between the maps and related time-series is proposed to be superior. The results on simulation datasets for multiple analysis models are consistent with the results of ROC curves, but are shown to have lower information content than for real datasets, limiting their generalizability. In real datasets for group analyses using the general linear model (GLM; FSL4 and SPM5), we show that MI values are (1) larger for groups of 15 versus 10 subjects and (2) more sensitive measures than reproducibility (for continuous maps) or Jaccard overlap metrics (for thresholded maps). We also show that (1) for an increasing fraction of nominally active voxels, both MI and false discovery rate (FDR) increase, and (2) at a fixed FDR, GLM using FSL4 tends to extract more voxels and more information than SPM5 using the default processing techniques in each package.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babak Afshin-Pour
- Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Langs G, Menze BH, Lashkari D, Golland P. Detecting stable distributed patterns of brain activation using Gini contrast. Neuroimage 2011; 56:497-507. [PMID: 20709176 PMCID: PMC3960973 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2009] [Revised: 07/15/2010] [Accepted: 07/30/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The relationship between spatially distributed fMRI patterns and experimental stimuli or tasks offers insights into cognitive processes beyond those traceable from individual local activations. The multivariate properties of the fMRI signals allow us to infer interactions among individual regions and to detect distributed activations of multiple areas. Detection of task-specific multivariate activity in fMRI data is an important open problem that has drawn much interest recently. In this paper, we study and demonstrate the benefits of random forest classifiers and the associated Gini importance measure for selecting voxel subsets that form a multivariate neural response. The Gini importance measure quantifies the predictive power of a particular feature when considered as part of the entire pattern. The measure is based on a random sampling of fMRI time points and voxels. As a consequence the resulting voxel score, or Gini contrast, is highly reproducible and reliably includes all informative features. The method does not rely on a priori assumptions about the signal distribution, a specific statistical or functional model or regularization. Instead, it uses the predictive power of features to characterize their relevance for encoding task information. The Gini contrast offers an additional advantage of directly quantifying the task-relevant information in a multiclass setting, rather than reducing the problem to several binary classification subproblems. In a multicategory visual fMRI study, the proposed method identified informative regions not detected by the univariate criteria, such as the t-test or the F-test. Including these additional regions in the feature set improves the accuracy of multicategory classification. Moreover, we demonstrate higher classification accuracy and stability of the detected spatial patterns across runs than the traditional methods such as the recursive feature elimination used in conjunction with support vector machines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Langs
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
| | - Bjoern H. Menze
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
| | - Danial Lashkari
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
| | - Polina Golland
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
LaConte SM. Decoding fMRI brain states in real-time. Neuroimage 2011; 56:440-54. [PMID: 20600972 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2009] [Revised: 06/14/2010] [Accepted: 06/18/2010] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
43
|
Sitaram R, Lee S, Ruiz S, Rana M, Veit R, Birbaumer N. Real-time support vector classification and feedback of multiple emotional brain states. Neuroimage 2011; 56:753-65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2010] [Revised: 07/31/2010] [Accepted: 08/03/2010] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
44
|
Gershman SJ, Blei DM, Pereira F, Norman KA. A topographic latent source model for fMRI data. Neuroimage 2011; 57:89-100. [PMID: 21549204 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2010] [Revised: 04/07/2011] [Accepted: 04/20/2011] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
We describe and evaluate a new statistical generative model of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. The model, topographic latent source analysis (TLSA), assumes that fMRI images are generated by a covariate-dependent superposition of latent sources. These sources are defined in terms of basis functions over space. The number of parameters in the model does not depend on the number of voxels, enabling a parsimonious description of activity patterns that avoids many of the pitfalls of traditional voxel-based approaches. We develop a multi-subject extension where latent sources at the subject-level are perturbations of a group-level template. We evaluate TLSA according to prediction, reconstruction and reproducibility. We show that it compares favorably to a Naive Bayes model while using fewer parameters. We also describe a hypothesis testing framework that can be used to identify significant latent sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Gershman
- Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA; Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
| | - David M Blei
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, 35 Olden Street, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
| | - Francisco Pereira
- Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA; Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
| | - Kenneth A Norman
- Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA; Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Barry RL, Strother SC, Gatenby JC, Gore JC. Data-driven optimization and evaluation of 2D EPI and 3D PRESTO for BOLD fMRI at 7 Tesla: I. Focal coverage. Neuroimage 2011; 55:1034-43. [PMID: 21232613 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2010] [Revised: 12/08/2010] [Accepted: 12/15/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is commonly performed using 2D single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI). However, single-shot EPI at 7 Tesla (T) often suffers from significant geometric distortions (due to low bandwidth (BW) in the phase-encode (PE) direction) and amplified physiological noise. Recent studies have suggested that 3D multi-shot sequences such as PRESTO may offer comparable BOLD contrast-to-noise ratio with increased volume coverage and decreased geometric distortions. Thus, a four-way group-level comparison was performed between 2D and 3D acquisition sequences at two in-plane resolutions. The quality of fMRI data was evaluated via metrics of prediction and reproducibility using NPAIRS (Non-parametric Prediction, Activation, Influence and Reproducibility re-Sampling). Group activation maps were optimized for each acquisition strategy by selecting the number of principal components that jointly maximized prediction and reproducibility, and showed good agreement in sensitivity and specificity for positive BOLD changes. High-resolution EPI exhibited the highest z-scores of the four acquisition sequences; however, it suffered from the lowest BW in the PE direction (resulting in the worst geometric distortions) and limited spatial coverage, and also caused some subject discomfort through peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS). In comparison, PRESTO also had high z-scores (higher than EPI for a matched in-plane resolution), the highest BW in the PE direction (producing images with superior geometric fidelity), the potential for whole-brain coverage, and no reported PNS. This study provides evidence to support the use of 3D multi-shot acquisition sequences in lieu of single-shot EPI for ultra high field BOLD fMRI at 7T.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Barry
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN 37232-2310, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Yourganov G, Chen X, Lukic AS, Grady CL, Small SL, Wernick MN, Strother SC. Dimensionality estimation for optimal detection of functional networks in BOLD fMRI data. Neuroimage 2010; 56:531-43. [PMID: 20858546 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2009] [Revised: 09/10/2010] [Accepted: 09/14/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Estimation of the intrinsic dimensionality of fMRI data is an important part of data analysis that helps to separate the signal of interest from noise. We have studied multiple methods of dimensionality estimation proposed in the literature and used these estimates to select a subset of principal components that was subsequently processed by linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Using simulated multivariate Gaussian data, we show that the dimensionality that optimizes signal detection (in terms of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) metric) goes through a transition from many dimensions to a single dimension as a function of the signal-to-noise ratio. This transition happens when the loci of activation are organized into a spatial network and the variance of the networked, task-related signals is high enough for the signal to be easily detected in the data. We show that reproducibility of activation maps is a metric that captures this switch in intrinsic dimensionality. Except for reproducibility, all of the methods of dimensionality estimation we considered failed to capture this transition: optimization of Bayesian evidence, minimum description length, supervised and unsupervised LDA prediction, and Stein's unbiased risk estimator. This failure results in sub-optimal ROC performance of LDA in the presence of a spatially distributed network, and may have caused LDA to underperform in many of the reported comparisons in the literature. Using real fMRI data sets, including multi-subject group and within-subject longitudinal analysis we demonstrate the existence of these dimensionality transitions in real data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grigori Yourganov
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Etzel JA, Valchev N, Keysers C. The impact of certain methodological choices on multivariate analysis of fMRI data with support vector machines. Neuroimage 2010; 54:1159-67. [PMID: 20817107 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2010] [Revised: 07/26/2010] [Accepted: 08/19/2010] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Multivoxel pattern analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data is continuing to increase in popularity. Like all fMRI analyses, these analyses require extensive data processing and methodological choices, but the impact of these decisions on the final results is not always known. This study explores the impact of four methodological choices on analysis outcomes and introduces the technique of partitioning on random runs for characterizing temporal dependencies and evaluating partitioning methods. The analyses were performed on two fMRI data sets, which were repeatedly analyzed with support vector machines, varying the method of temporal compression, smoothing, voxel-wise detrending, and partitioning into training and testing sets. Smoothing sometimes slightly increased classification accuracy. Partitioning other than on the runs increased classification accuracy, and the random runs technique allowed us to attribute this improvement to the increased amount of training data, rather than to bias. The impact of the temporal compression and detrending methods varied so strongly with data set that general recommendations could not be drawn. These interactions suggest that, rather than searching for a universally superior set of methodological choices, researchers must carefully consider each choice in the context of each experiment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joset A Etzel
- BCN NeuroImaging Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Chu C, Ni Y, Tan G, Saunders CJ, Ashburner J. Kernel regression for fMRI pattern prediction. Neuroimage 2010; 56:662-73. [PMID: 20348000 PMCID: PMC3084459 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2009] [Revised: 02/17/2010] [Accepted: 03/19/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper introduces two kernel-based regression schemes to decode or predict brain states from functional brain scans as part of the Pittsburgh Brain Activity Interpretation Competition (PBAIC) 2007, in which our team was awarded first place. Our procedure involved image realignment, spatial smoothing, detrending of low-frequency drifts, and application of multivariate linear and non-linear kernel regression methods: namely kernel ridge regression (KRR) and relevance vector regression (RVR). RVR is based on a Bayesian framework, which automatically determines a sparse solution through maximization of marginal likelihood. KRR is the dual-form formulation of ridge regression, which solves regression problems with high dimensional data in a computationally efficient way. Feature selection based on prior knowledge about human brain function was also used. Post-processing by constrained deconvolution and re-convolution was used to furnish the prediction. This paper also contains a detailed description of how prior knowledge was used to fine tune predictions of specific “feature ratings,” which we believe is one of the key factors in our prediction accuracy. The impact of pre-processing was also evaluated, demonstrating that different pre-processing may lead to significantly different accuracies. Although the original work was aimed at the PBAIC, many techniques described in this paper can be generally applied to any fMRI decoding works to increase the prediction accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlton Chu
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lu C, Chen C, Ning N, Ding G, Guo T, Peng D, Yang Y, Li K, Lin C. The neural substrates for atypical planning and execution of word production in stuttering. Exp Neurol 2009; 221:146-56. [PMID: 19879262 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2009] [Revised: 09/24/2009] [Accepted: 10/23/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Using an fMRI-based classification approach and the structural equation modeling (SEM) method, this study examined the neural bases of atypical planning and execution processes involved in stuttering. Twelve stuttering speakers and 12 controls were asked to name pictures under different conditions (single-syllable, multi-syllable, or repeated-syllable) in the scanner. The contrasts between conditions provided information about planning and execution processes. The classification analysis showed that, as compared to non-stuttering controls, stuttering speakers' atypical planning of speech was evident in their neural activities in the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and right putamen and their atypical execution of speech was evident in their activations in the right cerebellum and insula, left premotor area (PMA), and angular gyrus (AG). SEM results further revealed two parallel neural circuits-the basal ganglia-IFG/PMA circuit and the cerebellum-PMA circuit-that were involved in atypical planning and execution processes of stuttering, respectively. The AG appeared to be involved in the interface of atypical planning and execution in stuttering. These results are discussed in terms of their implications to the theories about stuttering and to clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunming Lu
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, P.R. China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Barry RL, Williams JM, Klassen LM, Gallivan JP, Culham JC, Menon RS. Evaluation of preprocessing steps to compensate for magnetic field distortions due to body movements in BOLD fMRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 28:235-44. [PMID: 19695810 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2009.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2009] [Revised: 06/26/2009] [Accepted: 07/04/2009] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is currently the dominant technique for non-invasive investigation of brain functions. One of the challenges with BOLD fMRI, particularly at high fields, is compensation for the effects of spatiotemporally varying magnetic field inhomogeneities (DeltaB(0)) caused by normal subject respiration and, in some studies, movement of the subject during the scan to perform tasks related to the functional paradigm. The presence of DeltaB(0) during data acquisition distorts reconstructed images and introduces extraneous fluctuations in the fMRI time series that decrease the BOLD contrast-to-noise ratio. Optimization of the fMRI data-processing pipeline to compensate for geometric distortions is of paramount importance to ensure high quality of fMRI data. To investigate DeltaB(0) caused by subject movement, echo-planar imaging scans were collected with and without concurrent motion of a phantom arm. The phantom arm was constructed and moved by the experimenter to emulate forearm motions while subjects remained still and observed a visual stimulation paradigm. These data were then subjected to eight different combinations of preprocessing steps. The best preprocessing pipeline included navigator correction, a complex phase regressor and spatial smoothing. The synergy between navigator correction and phase regression reduced geometric distortions better than either step in isolation and preconditioned the data to make them more amenable to the benefits of spatial smoothing. The combination of these steps provided a 10% increase in t-statistics compared to only navigator correction and spatial smoothing and reduced the noise and false activations in regions where no legitimate effects would occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Barry
- Centre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|