Costs and benefits of intraoperative MR-guided brain tumor resection

Clinical Validation of Stimulated Raman Histology for Rapid Intraoperative Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Tumors

Stimulated Raman histology (SRH) is an ex vivo optical imaging method that enables microscopic examination of fresh tissue intraoperatively. The conventional intraoperative method uses frozen section analysis, which is labor and time intensive, introduces artifacts that limit diagnostic accuracy, and consumes tissue. SRH imaging allows rapid microscopic imaging of fresh tissue, avoids tissue loss, and enables remote telepathology review. This improves access to expert neuropathology consultation in both low- and high-resource practices. We clinically validated SRH by performing a blinded, retrospective two-arm telepathology study to clinically validate SRH for telepathology at our institution. Using surgical specimens from 47 subjects, we generated a data set composed of 47 SRH images and 47 matched whole slide images (WSIs) of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue stained with hematoxylin and eosin, with associated intraoperative clinicoradiologic information and structured diagnostic questions. We compared diagnostic concordance between WSI and SRH-rendered diagnoses. Also, we compared the 1-year median turnaround time (TAT) of intraoperative conventional neuropathology frozen sections with prospectively rendered SRH-telepathology TAT. All SRH images were of sufficient quality for diagnostic review. A review of SRH images showed high accuracy in distinguishing glial from nonglial tumors (96.5% SRH vs 98% WSIs) and predicting final diagnosis (85.9% SRH vs 93.1% WSIs). SRH-based diagnosis and WSI-permanent section diagnosis had high concordance (κ = 0.76). The median TAT for prospectively SRH-rendered diagnosis was 3.7 minutes, approximately 10-fold shorter than the median frozen section TAT (31 minutes). The SRH-imaging procedure did not affect ancillary studies. SRH generates diagnostic virtual histologic images with accuracy comparable to conventional hematoxylin and eosin-based methods in a rapid manner. Our study represents the largest and most rigorous clinical validation of SRH to date. It supports the feasibility of implementing SRH as a rapid method for intraoperative diagnosis complementary to conventional pathology laboratory methods.

Advances in the intraoperative delineation of malignant glioma margin

Surgery plays a critical role in the treatment of malignant glioma. However, due to the infiltrative growth and brain shift, it is difficult for neurosurgeons to distinguish malignant glioma margins with the naked eye and with preoperative examinations. Therefore, several technologies were developed to determine precise tumor margins intraoperatively. Here, we introduced four intraoperative technologies to delineate malignant glioma margin, namely, magnetic resonance imaging, fluorescence-guided surgery, Raman histology, and mass spectrometry. By tracing their detecting principles and developments, we reviewed their advantages and disadvantages respectively and imagined future trends.

Low-field MRI: Clinical promise and challenges

Modern MRI scanners have trended toward higher field strengths to maximize signal and resolution while minimizing scan time. However, high-field devices remain expensive to install and operate, making them scarce outside of high-income countries and major population centers. Low-field strength scanners have drawn renewed academic, industry, and philanthropic interest due to advantages that could dramatically increase imaging access, including lower cost and portability. Nevertheless, low-field MRI still faces inherent limitations in image quality that come with decreased signal. In this article, we review advantages and disadvantages of low-field MRI scanners, describe hardware and software innovations that accentuate advantages and mitigate disadvantages, and consider clinical applications for a new generation of low-field devices. In our review, we explore how these devices are being or could be used for high acuity brain imaging, outpatient neuroimaging, MRI-guided procedures, pediatric imaging, and musculoskeletal imaging. Challenges for their successful clinical translation include selecting and validating appropriate use cases, integrating with standards of care in high resource settings, expanding options with actionable information in low resource settings, and facilitating health care providers and clinical practice in new ways. By embracing both the promise and challenges of low-field MRI, clinicians and researchers have an opportunity to transform medical care for patients around the world. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 6.

MRI-guided endovascular intervention: current methods and future potential

INTRODUCTION

Image-guided endovascular interventions, performed using the insertion and navigation of catheters through the vasculature, have been increasing in number over the years, as minimally invasive procedures continue to replace invasive surgical procedures. Such endovascular interventions are almost exclusively performed under x-ray fluoroscopy, which has the best spatial and temporal resolution of all clinical imaging modalities. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers unique advantages and could be an attractive alternative to conventional x-ray guidance, but also brings with it distinctive challenges.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the benefits and limitations of MRI-guided endovascular interventions are addressed, systems and devices for guiding such interventions are summarized, and clinical applications are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

MRI-guided endovascular interventions are still relatively new to the interventional radiology field, since significant technical hurdles remain to justify significant costs and demonstrate safety, design, and robustness. Clinical applications of MRI-guided interventions are promising but their full potential may not be realized until proper tools designed to function in the MRI environment are available. Translational research and further preclinical studies are needed before MRI-guided interventions will be practical in a clinical interventional setting.

Development of a New Image-Guided Neuronavigation System: Mixed-Reality Projection Mapping Is Accurate and Feasible

BACKGROUND

Image-guided systems improve the safety, functional outcome, and overall survival of neurosurgery but require extensive equipment.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an image-guided surgery system that combines the brain surface photographic texture (BSP-T) captured during surgery with 3-dimensional computer graphics (3DCG) using projection mapping.

METHODS

Patients who underwent initial surgery with brain tumors were prospectively enrolled. The texture of the 3DCG (3DCG-T) was obtained from 3DCG under similar conditions as those when capturing the brain surface photographs. The position and orientation at the time of 3DCG-T acquisition were used as the reference. The correct position and orientation of the BSP-T were obtained by aligning the BSP-T with the 3DCG-T using normalized mutual information. The BSP-T was combined with and displayed on the 3DCG using projection mapping. This mixed-reality projection mapping (MRPM) was used prospectively in 15 patients (mean age 46.6 yr, 6 males). The difference between the centerlines of surface blood vessels on the BSP-T and 3DCG constituted the target registration error (TRE) and was measured in 16 fields of the craniotomy area. We also measured the time required for image processing.

RESULTS

The TRE was measured at 158 locations in the 15 patients, with an average of 1.19 ± 0.14 mm (mean ± standard error). The average image processing time was 16.58 min.

CONCLUSION

Our MRPM method does not require extensive equipment while presenting information of patients' anatomy together with medical images in the same coordinate system. It has the potential to improve patient safety.

Creation of an Automated Fluorescence Guided Tumor Ablation System

OBJECTIVE

Create a device that improves the identification and extent of resection at the interface between healthy and tumor tissue; ultimately, using this device would improve surgical outcomes for patients and increase survival.

METHODS

We have created a contactless tumor removal system that utilizes endogenous fluorescence feedback to inform a laser ablation system to execute autonomous removal of phantom tumor tissue.

RESULTS

This completely non-contact surgical system is capable of resecting the tumor boundary of a tissue phantom with an average root mean square error (RMSE) of approximately 1.55 mm and an average max error of approximately 2.15 mm. There is no difference in the performance of the system when changing the size of the internal tumor from 7.5-12.5 mm in diameter.

DISCUSSION

Future research steps include creating a more intelligent spectral search strategy to increase the density of points around the resection boundary, and to develop a more sophisticated classifier to predict pathologic diagnosis and tissue subtypes located regionally around the tumor boundaries. We envision this device being used to resect the boundaries of tumors identified by exogenously delivered tumor-labeling fluorophores, such as fluorescein or 5-ALA, in addition to approaches relying on autofluorescence of endogenous fluorophores.

Intraoperative low-field magnetic resonance imaging-guided tumor resection in glioma surgery: Pros and cons

BACKGROUNDIntraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for identifying residual tumors during surgery. It can improve the resection rate; however, complications related to prolonged operating time may be increased. We assessed the advantages and disadvantages of using low-field intraoperative MRI and compared them with non-use of iMRI during glioma surgery.METHODSThe study included 22 consecutive patients who underwent total tumor resection at Shinshu University Hospital between September 2017 and October 2020. Patients were divided into two groups (before and after introducing 0.4-T low-field open intraoperative MRI at the hospital). Patient demographics, gross total resection (GTR) rate, postoperative neurological deficits, need for reoperation, and operating time were compared between the groups.RESULTSNo significant differences were observed in patient demographics. While GTR of the tumor was achieved in 8/11 cases (73%) with intraoperative MRI, 2/11 cases (18%) of the control group achieved GTR (p=0.033). Seven patients had transient neurological deficits: 3 in the intraoperative MRI group and 4 in the control group, without significant differences between groups. There was no unintended reoperation in the intraoperative MRI group, except for one case in the control group. Mean operating time (465.8 vs. 483.6 minutes for the intraoperative MRI and control groups, respectively) did not differ.CONCLUSIONSLow-field intraoperative MRI improves the GTR rate and reduces unintentional reoperation incidence compared to the conventional technique. Our findings showed no operating time prolongation in the MRI group despite intraoperative imaging, which considered that intraoperative MRI helped reduce decision-making time and procedural hesitation during surgery.

Intraoperative MRI for Brain Tumors

INTRODUCTION

The use of intraoperative imaging has been a critical tool in the neurosurgeon's armamentarium and is of particular benefit during tumor surgery. This article summarizes the history of its development, implementation, clinical experience and future directions.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature focusing on the development and clinical experience with intraoperative MRI. Utilizing the authors' personal experience as well as evidence from the literature, we present an overview of the utility of MRI during neurosurgery.

RESULTS

In the 1990s, the first description of using a low field MRI in the operating room was published describing the additional benefit provided by improved resolution of MRI as compared to ultrasound. Since then, implementation has varied in magnetic field strength and in configuration from floor mounted to ceiling mounted units as well as those that are accessible to the operating room for use during surgery and via an outpatient entrance to use for diagnostic imaging. The experience shows utility of this technique for increasing extent of resection for low and high grade tumors as well as preventing injury to important structures while incorporating techniques such as intraoperative monitoring.

CONCLUSION

This article reviews the history of intraoperative MRI and presents a review of the literature revealing the successful implementation of this technology and benefits noted for the patient and the surgeon.

Intraoperative imaging technology to maximise extent of resection for glioma: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have identified the prognostic relevance of extent of resection in the management of glioma. Different intraoperative technologies have emerged in recent years with unknown comparative efficacy in optimising extent of resection. One previous Cochrane Review provided low- to very low-certainty evidence in single trial analyses and synthesis of results was not possible. The role of intraoperative technology in maximising extent of resection remains uncertain. Due to the multiple complementary technologies available, this research question is amenable to a network meta-analysis methodological approach.

OBJECTIVES

To establish the comparative effectiveness and risk profile of specific intraoperative imaging technologies using a network meta-analysis and to identify cost analyses and economic evaluations as part of a brief economic commentary.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2020, Issue 5), MEDLINE via Ovid to May week 2 2020, and Embase via Ovid to 2020 week 20. We performed backward searching of all identified studies. We handsearched two journals, Neuro-oncology and the Journal of Neuro-oncology from 1990 to 2019 including all conference abstracts. Finally, we contacted recognised experts in neuro-oncology to identify any additional eligible studies and acquire information on ongoing randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs evaluating people of all ages with presumed new or recurrent glial tumours (of any location or histology) from clinical examination and imaging (computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or both). Additional imaging modalities (e.g. positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance spectroscopy) were not mandatory. Interventions included fluorescence-guided surgery, intraoperative ultrasound, neuronavigation (with or without additional image processing, e.g. tractography), and intraoperative MRI.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the search results for relevance, undertook critical appraisal according to known guidelines, and extracted data using a prespecified pro forma.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified four RCTs, using different intraoperative imaging technologies: intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) (2 trials, with 58 and 14 participants); fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) (1 trial, 322 participants); and neuronavigation (1 trial, 45 participants). We identified one ongoing trial assessing iMRI with a planned sample size of 304 participants for which results are expected to be published around winter 2020. We identified no published trials for intraoperative ultrasound. Network meta-analyses or traditional meta-analyses were not appropriate due to absence of homogeneous trials across imaging technologies. Of the included trials, there was notable heterogeneity in tumour location and imaging technologies utilised in control arms. There were significant concerns regarding risk of bias in all the included studies. One trial of iMRI found increased extent of resection (risk ratio (RR) for incomplete resection was 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.96; 49 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and one trial of 5-ALA (RR for incomplete resection was 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.71; 270 participants; low-certainty evidence). The other trial assessing iMRI was stopped early after an unplanned interim analysis including 14 participants; therefore, the trial provided very low-quality evidence. The trial of neuronavigation provided insufficient data to evaluate the effects on extent of resection. Reporting of adverse events was incomplete and suggestive of significant reporting bias (very low-certainty evidence). Overall, the proportion of reported events was low in most trials and, therefore, issues with power to detect differences in outcomes that may or may not have been present. Survival outcomes were not adequately reported, although one trial reported no evidence of improvement in overall survival with 5-ALA (hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.07; 270 participants; low-certainty evidence). Data for quality of life were only available for one study and there was significant attrition bias (very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative imaging technologies, specifically 5-ALA and iMRI, may be of benefit in maximising extent of resection in participants with high-grade glioma. However, this is based on low- to very low-certainty evidence. Therefore, the short- and long-term neurological effects are uncertain. Effects of image-guided surgery on overall survival, progression-free survival, and quality of life are unclear. Network and traditional meta-analyses were not possible due to the identified high risk of bias, heterogeneity, and small trials included in this review. A brief economic commentary found limited economic evidence for the equivocal use of iMRI compared with conventional surgery. In terms of costs, one non-systematic review of economic studies suggested that, compared with standard surgery, use of image-guided surgery has an uncertain effect on costs and that 5-ALA was more costly. Further research, including completion of ongoing trials of ultrasound-guided surgery, is needed.

Identification of tumor residuals in pituitary adenoma surgery with intraoperative MRI: do we need gadolinium?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution T2w intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) for detecting pituitary adenoma remnants compared to contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images.

METHODS

42 patients underwent iMRI-guided resection of large pituitary macroadenomas and fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this retrospective analysis. Intraoperative and postoperative imaging evaluation of tumor residuals and localization were assessed by two experienced neuroradiologists in a blinded fashion. The diagnostic accuracy of T2w and contrast-enhanced T1w images were evaluated.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy for detecting tumor residuals of high-resolution T2w images showed highly significant association to contrast-enhanced T1w images (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, identification rate of tumor remnants in different compartments, e.g., cavernous sinus, was comparable. In total, coronal T2w images provided a diagnostic sensitivity of 97.7% and specificity of 100% compared to the gold standard of contrast-enhanced T1w images. The postoperatively expected extent of resection proved to be true in 97.6% according to MRI 3 months after resection.

CONCLUSIONS

High-resolution T2w intraoperative MR images provide excellent diagnostic accuracy for detecting tumor remnants in macroadenoma surgery with highly significant association compared to T1w images with gadolinium. The routine-use and need of gadolinium in these patients should be questioned critically in each case in the future.

The interventional magnetic resonance imaging suite: Experience in the design, development, and implementation in a pre-existing radiology space and review of concepts

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI) has led to significant advancements in neurosurgery with improved accuracy, assessment of the extent of resection, less invasive surgical alternatives, and real-time confirmation of targeting as well delivery of therapies. The costs associated with developing ioMRI units in the surgical suite have been obstacles to the expansion of their use. More recently, the development of hybrid interventional MRI (iMRI) units has become a viable alternative. The process of designing, developing, and implementing operations for these units requires the careful integration of environmental, technical, and safety elements of both surgical and MR practices. There is a paucity of published literature providing guidance for institutions looking to develop a hybrid iMRI unit, especially with a limited footprint in the radiology department.

METHODS

The experience of designing, developing, and implementing an iMRI in a preexisting space for neurosurgical procedures at a single institution in light of available options and the literature is described.

RESULTS

The development of the unit was accomplished through the engagement of a multidisciplinary team of stakeholders who utilized existing guidelines and recommendations and their own professional experience to address issues including physical layout, equipment selection, operations planning, infection control, and oversight/review, among others.

CONCLUSION

Successful creation of an iMRI program requires multidisciplinary collaboration in integrating surgical and MR practice. The authors' aim is that the experience described in this article will serve as an example for facilities or neurosurgical departments looking to navigate the same process.

Evaluation of pediatric glioma outcomes using intraoperative MRI: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

The use of intraoperative MRI (iMRI) during treatment of gliomas may increase extent of resection (EOR), decrease need for early reoperation, and increase progression-free and overall survival, but has not been fully validated, particularly in the pediatric population.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of iMRI to identify residual tumor in pediatric patients with glioma and determine the effect of iMRI on decisions for resection, complication rates, and other outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a multicenter database of pediatric patients (age ≤ 18 years) who underwent resection of pathologically confirmed gliomas.

RESULTS

We identified 314 patients (mean age 9.7 ± 4.6 years) with mean follow-up of 48.3 ± 33.6 months (range 0.03-182.07 months) who underwent surgery with iMRI. There were 201 (64.0%) WHO grade I tumors, 57 (18.2%) grade II, 24 (7.6%) grade III, 9 (2.9%) grade IV, and 23 (7.3%) not classified. Among 280 patients who underwent resection using iMRI, 131 (46.8%) had some residual tumor and underwent additional resection after the first iMRI. Of the 33 tissue specimens sent for pathological analysis after iMRI, 29 (87.9%) showed positive tumor pathology. Gross total resection was identified in 156 patients (55.7%), but this was limited by 69 (24.6%) patients with unknown EOR.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of the largest multicenter database of pediatric gliomas resected using iMRI demonstrated additional tumor resection in a substantial portion of cases. However, determining the impact of iMRI on EOR and outcomes remains challenging because iMRI use varies among providers nationally. Continued refinement of iMRI techniques for use in pediatric patients with glioma may improve outcomes.

Clinical application of 3.0 T intraoperative magnetic resonance combined with multimodal neuronavigation in resection of cerebral eloquent area glioma

Glioma is the most common tumor among central nervous system tumors; surgical intervention presents difficulties. This is especially the case for gliomas in so-called "eloquent areas," as surgical resection threatens vital structures adjacent to the tumor. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) combined with multimodal neuronavigation may prove beneficial during surgery. This study explored the applicability of 3.0 T high field iMRI combined with multimodal neuronavigation in the resection of gliomas in eloquent brain areas.We reviewed 40 patients with a glioma located in the eloquent brains areas who underwent treatment in the Neurosurgery Department of Peking University International Hospital between December 2015 and August 2017. The experimental group included 20 patients treated using iMRI assistance technology (iMRI group). The remaining 20 patients underwent treatment by conventional neuronavigation (non-iMRI group). Tumor resection degree, preoperative and postoperative ability of daily living scale (Barthel index), infection rate, and operative time were compared between the 2 groups.No difference in infection rate was observed between the 2 groups. However, compared with the non-iMRI group, the iMRI group had a higher resection rate (96.55 ± 4.03% vs 87.70 ± 10.98%, P = .002), postoperative Barthel index (90.75 ± 12.90 vs 9.25 ± 16.41, P = .018), as well as a longer operation time (355.85 ± 61.40 vs 302.45 ± 64.09, P = .011).The use of iMRI technology can achieve a relatively higher resection rate among cases of gliomas in eloquent brain areas, with less incidence of postoperative neurological deficits. Although the operative time using iMRI was longer than that taken to perform conventional navigation surgery, the surgical infection rate in these 2 procedures showed no significant difference.

Intraoperative imaging technology to maximise extent of resection for glioma

BACKGROUND

Extent of resection is considered to be a prognostic factor in neuro-oncology. Intraoperative imaging technologies are designed to help achieve this goal. It is not clear whether any of these sometimes very expensive tools (or their combination) should be recommended as standard care for people with brain tumours. We set out to determine if intraoperative imaging technology offers any advantage in terms of extent of resection over standard surgery and if any one technology was more effective than another.

OBJECTIVES

To establish the overall effectiveness and safety of intraoperative imaging technology in resection of glioma. To supplement this review of effects, we also wished to identify cost analyses and economic evaluations as part of a Brief Economic Commentary (BEC).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 7, 2017), MEDLINE (1946 to June, week 4, 2017), and Embase (1980 to 2017, week 27). We searched the reference lists of all identified studies. We handsearched two journals, the Journal of Neuro-Oncology and Neuro-oncology, from 1991 to 2017, including all conference abstracts. We contacted neuro-oncologists, trial authors, and manufacturers regarding ongoing and unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials evaluating people of all ages with presumed new or recurrent glial tumours (of any location or histology) from clinical examination and imaging (computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or both). Additional imaging modalities (e.g. positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance spectroscopy) were not mandatory. Interventions included intraoperative MRI (iMRI), fluorescence-guided surgery, ultrasound, and neuronavigation (with or without additional image processing, e.g. tractography).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the search results for relevance, undertook critical appraisal according to known guidelines, and extracted data using a prespecified pro forma.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified four randomised controlled trials, using different intraoperative imaging technologies: iMRI (2 trials including 58 and 14 participants, respectively); fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) (1 trial, 322 participants); and neuronavigation (1 trial, 45 participants). We identified one ongoing trial assessing iMRI with a planned sample size of 304 participants for which results are expected to be published around autumn 2018. We identified no trials for ultrasound.Meta-analysis was not appropriate due to differences in the tumours included (eloquent versus non-eloquent locations) and variations in the image guidance tools used in the control arms (usually selective utilisation of neuronavigation). There were significant concerns regarding risk of bias in all the included studies. All studies included people with high-grade glioma only.Extent of resection was increased in one trial of iMRI (risk ratio (RR) of incomplete resection 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.96; 1 study, 49 participants; very low-quality evidence) and in the trial of 5-ALA (RR of incomplete resection 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.71; 1 study, 270 participants; low-quality evidence). The other trial assessing iMRI was stopped early after an unplanned interim analysis including 14 participants, therefore the trial provides very low-quality evidence. The trial of neuronavigation provided insufficient data to evaluate the effects on extent of resection.Reporting of adverse events was incomplete and suggestive of significant reporting bias (very low-quality evidence). Overall, reported events were low in most trials. There was no clear evidence of improvement in overall survival with 5-ALA (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.07; 1 study, 270 participants; low-quality evidence). Progression-free survival data were not available in an appropriate format for analysis. Data for quality of life were only available for one study and suffered from significant attrition bias (very low-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Intra-operative imaging technologies, specifically iMRI and 5-ALA, may be of benefit in maximising extent of resection in participants with high grade glioma. However, this is based on low to very low quality evidence, and is therefore very uncertain. The short- and long-term neurological effects are uncertain. Effects of image-guided surgery on overall survival, progression-free survival, and quality of life are unclear. A brief economic commentary found limited economic evidence for the equivocal use of iMRI compared with conventional surgery. In terms of costs, a non-systematic review of economic studies suggested that compared with standard surgery use of image-guided surgery has an uncertain effect on costs and that 5-aminolevulinic acid was more costly. Further research, including studies of ultrasound-guided surgery, is needed.

Limited Evaluation of Image Quality Produced by a Portable Head CT Scanner (CereTom) in a Neurosurgery Centre

INTRODUCTION

Computed tomography (CT) is the preferred diagnostic toolkit for head and brain imaging of head injury. A recent development is the invention of a portable CT scanner that can be beneficial from a clinical point of view.

AIM

To compare the quality of CT brain images produced by a fixed CT scanner and a portable CT scanner (CereTom).

METHODS

This work was a single-centre retrospective study of CT brain images from 112 neurosurgical patients. Hounsfield units (HUs) of the images from CereTom were measured for air, water and bone. Three assessors independently evaluated the images from the fixed CT scanner and CereTom. Streak artefacts, visualisation of lesions and grey-white matter differentiation were evaluated at three different levels (centrum semiovale, basal ganglia and middle cerebellar peduncles). Each evaluation was scored 1 (poor), 2 (average) or 3 (good) and summed up to form an ordinal reading of 3 to 9.

RESULTS

HUs for air, water and bone from CereTom were within the recommended value by the American College of Radiology (ACR). Streak artefact evaluation scores for the fixed CT scanner was 8.54 versus 7.46 (Z = -5.67) for CereTom at the centrum semiovale, 8.38 (SD = 1.12) versus 7.32 (SD = 1.63) at the basal ganglia and 8.21 (SD = 1.30) versus 6.97 (SD = 2.77) at the middle cerebellar peduncles. Grey-white matter differentiation showed scores of 8.27 (SD = 1.04) versus 7.21 (SD = 1.41) at the centrum semiovale, 8.26 (SD = 1.07) versus 7.00 (SD = 1.47) at the basal ganglia and 8.38 (SD = 1.11) versus 6.74 (SD = 1.55) at the middle cerebellar peduncles. Visualisation of lesions showed scores of 8.86 versus 8.21 (Z = -4.24) at the centrum semiovale, 8.93 versus 8.18 (Z = -5.32) at the basal ganglia and 8.79 versus 8.06 (Z = -4.93) at the middle cerebellar peduncles. All results were significant with P-value < 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the study showed a significant difference in image quality produced by the fixed CT scanner and CereTom, with the latter being more inferior than the former. However, HUs of the images produced by CereTom do fulfil the recommendation of the ACR.

Resective surgery for focal cortical dysplasia in children: a comparative analysis of the utility of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI)

PURPOSE

Seizure freedom following resection of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) correlates with complete resection of the dysplastic cortical tissue. However, difficulty with intraoperative identification of the lesion may limit the ability to achieve the surgical objective of complete extirpation of these lesions. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) may aid in FCD resections. The objective of this study is to compare rates of postoperative seizure freedom, completeness of resection, and need for reoperation in patients undergoing iMRI-assisted FCD resection versus conventional surgical techniques.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pediatric subjects who underwent surgical resection of FCD at Children's National Medical Center between March 2005 and April 2015.

RESULTS

At the time of the last postoperative follow-up, 11 of the 12 patients (92 %) in the iMRI resection group were seizure free (Engel Class I), compared to 14 of the 42 patients (33 %) in the control resection group (p = 0.0005). All 12 of the iMRI patients (100 %) achieved complete resection, compared to 24 of 42 patients (57 %) in the control group (p = 0.01). One (8 %) patient from the iMRI-assisted resection group has required reoperation, compared to 17 (40 %) patients in the control resection group.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the utilization of iMRI during surgery for resection of FCD results in improved postoperative seizure freedom, completeness of lesion resection, and reduction in the need for reoperation.

Application of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in large invasive pituitary adenoma surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical application value of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) in large invasive pituitary adenoma surgery.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients with large pituitary adenoma underwent microscopic tumor resection under the assistance of an iMRI system; 26 cases received surgery through the nasal-transsphenoidal approach, and the remaining four cases received surgery through the pterion approach. iMRI was performed one or two times depending on the need of the surgeon. If a residual tumor was found, further resection was conducted under iMRI guidance.

RESULTS

iMRI revealed residual tumors in 12 cases, among which nine cases received further resection. Of these nine cases, iMRI rescanning confirmed complete resection in six cases, and subtotal resection in the remaining three. Overall, 24 cases of tumor were totally resected, and six cases were subtotally resected. The total resection rate of tumors increased from 60% to 80%.

CONCLUSION

iMRI can effectively determine the resection extent of pituitary adenomas. In addition, it provides an objective basis for real-time judgment of surgical outcome, subsequently improving surgical accuracy and safety, and increasing the total tumor resection rate.

The status of contemporary image-guided modalities in oncologic surgery

OBJECTIVE

To review the current trends in optical imaging to guide oncologic surgery.

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of therapy for patients with early stage solid malignancies and more than half of all patients with cancer undergo surgery each year. The technical ability of the surgeon to obtain clear surgical margins at the initial resection remains crucial to improve overall survival and long-term morbidity. Current resection techniques are largely based on subjective and subtle changes associated with tissue distortion by invasive cancer. As a result, positive surgical margins occur in a significant portion of tumor resections, which is directly correlated with a poor outcome.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of studies evaluating optical imaging techniques is performed.

RESULTS

A variety of cancer imaging techniques have been adapted or developed for intraoperative surgical guidance that have been shown to improve functional and oncologic outcomes in randomized clinical trials. There are also a large number of novel, cancer-specific contrast agents that are in early stage clinical trials and preclinical development that demonstrate significant promise to improve real-time detection of subclinical cancer in the operative setting.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been an explosion of intraoperative imaging techniques that will become more widespread in the next decade.

Combined high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopy increase extent of resection and progression-free survival for pituitary adenomas

PURPOSE

The clinical benefit of combined intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) and endoscopy for transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection has not been completely characterized. This study assessed the impact of microscopy, endoscopy, and/or iMRI on progression-free survival, extent of resection status (gross-, near-, and sub-total resection), and operative complications.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses were performed on 446 transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgeries at a single institution between 1998 and 2012. Multivariate analyses were used to control for baseline characteristics, differences during extent of resection status, and progression-free survival analysis.

RESULTS

Additional surgery was performed after iMRI in 56/156 cases (35.9%), which led to increased extent of resection status in 15/156 cases (9.6%). Multivariate ordinal logistic regression revealed no increase in extent of resection status following iMRI or endoscopy alone; however, combining these modalities increased extent of resection status (odds ratio 2.05, 95% CI 1.21-3.46) compared to conventional transsphenoidal microsurgery. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that reduced extent of resection status shortened progression-free survival for near- versus gross-total resection [hazard ratio (HR) 2.87, 95% CI 1.24-6.65] and sub- versus near-total resection (HR 2.10; 95% CI 1.00-4.40). Complication comparisons between microscopy, endoscopy, and iMRI revealed increased perioperative deaths for endoscopy versus microscopy (4/209 and 0/237, respectively), but this difference was non-significant considering multiple post hoc comparisons (Fisher exact, p = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined use of endoscopy and iMRI increased pituitary adenoma extent of resection status compared to conventional transsphenoidal microsurgery, and increased extent of resection status was associated with longer progression-free survival. Treatment modality combination did not significantly impact complication rate.

A controllable susceptibility marker for passive device tracking

PURPOSE

To design and demonstrate a new susceptibility-based tracking device with an artifact that can be mechanically turned on and off, thus permitting tracking and imaging at the device tip with limited artifact.

METHODS

The magnetic susceptibilities of readily obtainable grades of titanium and graphite were measured. Using numerical optimization, layer thicknesses for three concentric cylinders were found where the field from the graphite layer maximally cancelled the fields from titanium layers. The tracking elements were fabricated for an outer diameter of 3 mm and attached to a catheter to show feasibility of detection in phantoms and in vivo.

RESULTS

The device was successfully integrated into a 9F catheter, and its use with conventional guidewires under fluoroscopy was demonstrated by guiding the catheter through the bifurcation into the carotid artery. MR images including the catheter tip were acquired with the device in both the "on" and "off" positions.

CONCLUSION

A new passive tracking device with a susceptibility effect that can be enabled and disabled by sliding one of the components was designed, fabricated, and demonstrated in phantoms and in vivo. The device may also be integrated into many different interventional MR devices such as needles, ultrasound transducers for prostate biopsy, or any catheter-based devices.

Feasibility of anaesthetic provision for paediatric patients undergoing off-site intraoperative MRI-guided neurosurgery: the Singapore experience from 2009 to 2012

The benefits of using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) for neurosurgery have been recognised. However, iMRI facilities are not available in all hospitals. For example, in Singapore iMRI is currently available only at the Singapore General Hospital, an adult hospital without facilities for intensive care management of patients less than 12 years of age. KK Women's and Children's Hospital is a dedicated children's hospital situated 6.3 km away from this facility. In order to obtain iMRI services for our paediatric patients, transport to Singapore General Hospital is required, with return to our hospital for postoperative management. Since July 2009 we have managed nine paediatric patients in this manner: three children with arteriovenous malformations and six children with brain tumours. There was no morbidity or mortality that could be attributed to the transport of patients either to or from Singapore General Hospital. Our experience suggests that with adequate planning and preparation, providing anaesthetic care and transporting children for off-site iMRI-guided neurosurgery is feasible and safe for selected children.

Economic evaluation of pediatric cancer treatment: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

Although there is a growing national focus on health care cost containment and accountability in resource utilization, childhood cancer therapy costs continue to increase without proportionate survival improvements. Economic evaluations (EEs) such as cost and/or cost effectiveness analysis may identify areas to improve resource efficiency. This review aims to identify and characterize the EE studies performed in this field.

METHODS

We performed a structured literature search of the Medline, PubMed, and the National Health Service EE databases from 2000 to 2011. Concepts for the search included "cost analyses," "child," and "cancer." Studies were limited to original research, comparison of 2 or more treatments using monetary units, English language, and originating from economically developed countries. Identified studies were assessed by the Drummond checklist and characterized by the therapy studied, data sources, and research perspectives.

RESULTS

Forty studies met inclusion criteria. Eleven studied chemotherapy, surgery, or radiation. Twenty-nine studied supportive measures such as growth factor support or treatment of infection. The median Drummond score was 6 of 10 (range, 2-9). Only 15 (36%) included treatment outcomes when comparing costs. Methodological limitations were common.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide variety of topics and methodological limitations made comparisons between studies difficult. Strategies for increasing the generalizability of future EE studies are presented. Substantial opportunity exists for EE research in childhood cancer.

Clinical and economic outcomes of low-field intraoperative MRI-guided tumor resection neurosurgery

PURPOSE

To compare low-field (0.15 T) intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI)-guided tumor resection with both conventional magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI)-guided tumor resection and high-field (1.5 T) iMRI-guided resection from the clinical and economic point of view.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared 65 iMRI patients with 65 cMRI patients in terms of hospital length of stay, repeat resection rate, repeat resection interval, complication rate, cost to the patient, cost to the hospital, and cost effectiveness. In addition, we compared our low-field results with previously published high-field results.

RESULTS

The complication rate was lower for iMRI vs. cMRI in patients presenting for their initial tumor resection (45 vs. 57 complications, P = 0.048). The iMRI repeat resection interval was longer for this cohort (20.1 vs. 6.7 months, P = 0.020). iMRI was more cost-effective than cMRI for patients who had repeat resections ($10,690/RFY vs. $76,874/RFY, P < 0.001). We found no other clinical or economic differences between iMRI- and cMRI-guided tumor resection surgeries. Overall, we did not find the advantages to low-field iMRI that have been reported for high-field iMRI.

CONCLUSION

There is no adequate justification for the widespread installation of low-field iMRI in its current development state.

Intraoperative MRI-guided resection of glioblastoma multiforme: a systematic review

We did a systematic review to address the added value of intraoperative MRI (iMRI)-guided resection of glioblastoma multiforme compared with conventional neuronavigation-guided resection, with respect to extent of tumour resection (EOTR), quality of life, and survival. 12 non-randomised cohort studies matched all selection criteria and were used for qualitative synthesis. Most of the studies included descriptive statistics of patient populations of mixed pathology, and iMRI systems of varying field strengths between 0·15 and 1·5 Tesla. Most studies provided information on EOTR, but did not always mention how iMRI affected the surgical strategy. Only a few studies included information on quality of life or survival for subpopulations with glioblastoma multiforme or high-grade glioma. Several limitations and sources of bias were apparent, which affected the conclusions drawn and might have led to overestimation of the added value of iMRI-guided surgery for resection of glioblastoma multiforme. Based on the available literature, there is, at best, level 2 evidence that iMRI-guided surgery is more effective than conventional neuronavigation-guided surgery in increasing EOTR, enhancing quality of life, or prolonging survival after resection of glioblastoma multiforme.

Intraoperative acquisition of fMRI and DTI

Multimodal functional navigation enables removing a tumor close to eloquent brain areas with low postoperative deficits, whereas additional intraoperative imaging ensures that the maximum extent of the resection can be achieved and updates the image data compensating for the effects of brain shift. Intraoperative imaging beyond standard anatomic imaging, that is, intraoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and especially intraoperative diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), add further safety for complex tumor resections. This article discusses the acquisition of intraoperative fMRI, DTI, and imaging.

Volumetric measurement for comparison of the accuracy between intraoperative CT and postoperative MR imaging in pituitary adenoma surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To improve the resection rate of unexpected residual pituitary tumor under image guidance, iCT provides a less time-consuming and more convenient approach of promising the safety of the trans-sphenoidal surgery. However, iCT was thought to have worse image quality than MR imaging. This study was designed to determine the predictive concordance of iCT with standard postoperative high-strength MR imaging for the detection of residual tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February to December 2009, 33 patients with pituitary macroadenomas were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients received endoscopic trans-sphenoidal surgery for tumor removal and underwent iCT before the surgery finished. If an accessible tumor remnant was suspected and resectable, the surgery was continued. To assess the accuracy of intraoperative evaluation of tumor resection, the intraoperative findings were compared with MR imaging findings obtained 2 to 3 months after surgery by individually calculating the residual tumor volume.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the comparison between iCT and postoperative MR imaging findings (P > .05), and the predictive rates were also high (R(2) value >0.9). The GTR rate in the case of the noninvasive and fresh cases was 89% (17/19). The overall GTR rate was 58% (19/33), the second-look rate was 21% (7/33), and only one-fourth of the recurrent cases reached GTR.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of resection in trans-sphenoidal surgery can be reliably assessed by iCT. Compared with postoperative MR imaging findings, the findings in this study provided quantitative evidence that iCT not only holds significant promise for maximizing the extent of tumor resection but also eliminates the unnecessary blind surgical manipulation, thus increasing the safety of the procedure.

Multimodal navigation integrated with imaging

Intraoperative high-field MRI in combination and close integration with microscope-based navigation serving as a common interface for the presentation of multimodal data in the surgical field seems to be one of the most promising surgical setups allowing avoiding unwanted tumor remnants while preserving neurological function. Multimodal navigation integrates standard anatomical, structural, functional, and metabolic data. Navigation achieves visualizing the initial extent of a lesion with the concomitant identification of neighboring eloquent brain structures, as well as, providing a tool for a direct correlation of histology and multimodal data. With the help of intraoperative imaging navigation data can be updated, so that brain shift can be compensated for and initially missed tumor remnants can be localized reliably.

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging

Neurosurgeons have become reliant on image-guidance to perform safe and successful surgery both time-efficiently and cost-effectively. Neuronavigation typically involves either rigid (frame-based) or skull-mounted (frameless) stereotactic guidance derived from computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that is obtained days or immediately before the planned surgical procedure. These systems do not accommodate for brain shift that is unavoidable once the cranium is opened and cerebrospinal fluid is lost. Intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) systems ranging in strength from 0.12 to 3 Tesla (T) have been developed in part because they afford neurosurgeons the opportunity to accommodate for brain shift during surgery. Other distinct advantages of ioMRI include the excellent soft tissue discrimination, the ability to view the surgical site in three dimensions, and the ability to "see" tumor beyond the surface visualization of the surgeon's eye, either with or without a surgical microscope. The enhanced ability to view the tumor being biopsied or resected allows the surgeon to choose a safe surgical corridor that avoids critical structures, maximizes the extent of the tumor resection, and confirms that an intraoperative hemorrhage has not resulted from surgery. Although all ioMRI systems allow for basic T1- and T2-weighted imaging, only high-field (>1.5 T) MRI systems are capable of MR spectroscopy (MRS), MR angiography (MRA), MR venography (MRV), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and brain activation studies. By identifying vascular structures with MRA and MRV, it may be possible to prevent their inadvertent injury during surgery. Biopsying those areas of elevated phosphocholine on MRS may improve the diagnostic yield for brain biopsy. Mapping out eloquent brain function may influence the surgical path to a tumor being resected or biopsied. The optimal field strength for an ioMRI-guided surgical system and the best configuration for that system are as yet undecided.

The predictive value of low–field strength magnetic resonance imaging for intraoperative residual tumor detection

Object

Neurosurgeons have been utilizing intraoperative MR (iMR) imaging to evaluate the extent of tumor resection since the 1990s. A low–field strength (0.12 T) MR imaging unit (PoleStar N20, Medtronic) is a practical and relatively inexpensive iMR imaging system that has found increased use in neurosurgery. The gold standard for postoperative detection of residual tumor has been high-strength MR imaging performed within 48 hours of resection. The object of this study was to determine the predictive concordance of low-strength iMR imaging with standard high-strength MR imaging for detection of residual tumor.

Methods

The authors retrospectively evaluated the MR images from 74 intracranial tumor resections, comparing the intraoperative images obtained using a 0.12-T iMR imaging unit to the immediate postoperative images obtained using a standard 1.5-T MR imaging unit within 48 hours after surgery.

Results

The sensitivity of low-field MR imaging for detection of residual tumor was 0.74 (95% CI 0.58–0.86), and its specificity was 0.97 (95% CI 0.83–1). When only glial tumors (42 of the 74 lesions) were analyzed, the sensitivity was 0.82 (95% CI 0.59–0.94) and the specificity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.73–1).

Conclusions

These data could assist the neurosurgeon who has to decide intraoperatively whether the observed iMR images show residual tumor or not.

Racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in the treatment of brain tumors

Disparities in American health care based on socially-defined patient characteristics such as race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position are well-documented. We review differences and disparities in incidence, pathobiology, processes and outcomes of care, and survival based on social factors for brain tumors of all histologies. In the US, black patients have lower incidences of most brain tumor types and lower-income patients have lower incidences of low grade glioma, meningioma and acoustic neuroma; ascertainment bias may contribute to these findings. Pathogenetic differences between malignant gliomas in patients of different races have been demonstrated, but their clinical significance is unclear. Patients in disadvantaged groups are less often treated by high-volume providers. Mortality and morbidity of initial treatment are higher for brain tumor patients in disadvantaged groups, and they present with markers of more severe disease. Long term survival differences between malignant glioma patients of different races have not yet been shown. Clinical trial enrollment appears to be lower among brain tumor patients from disadvantaged groups. We propose future research both to better define disparities and to alleviate them.

Usefulness of Intraoperative Ultra Low-field Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Glioma Surgery

Objective:

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness of a mobile, intraoperative 0.15-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner in glioma surgery.

Methods:

We analyzed our prospectively collected database of patients with glial tumors who underwent tumor resection with the use of an intraoperative ultra low-field MRI scanner (PoleStar N-20; Odin Medical Technologies, Yokneam, Israel/Medtronic, Louisville, CO). Sixty-three patients with World Health Organization Grade II to IV tumors were included in the study. All patients were subjected to postoperative 1.5-T imaging to confirm the extent of resection.

Results:

Intraoperative image quality was sufficient for navigation and resection control in both high-and low-grade tumors. Primarily enhancing tumors were best detected on T1-weighted imaging, whereas fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences proved best for nonenhancing tumors. Intraoperative resection control led to further tumor resection in 12 (28.6%) of 42 patients with contrast-enhancing tumors and in 10(47.6%) of 21 patients with noncontrast-enhancing tumors. In contrast-enhancing tumors, further resection led to an increased rate of complete tumor resection (71.2 versus 52.4%), and the surgical goal of gross total removal or subtotal resection was achieved in all cases (100.0%). In patients with noncontrast-enhancing tumors, the surgical goal was achieved in 19 (90.5%) of 21 cases, as intraoperative MRI findings were inconsistent with postoperative high-field imaging in 2 cases.

Conclusion:

The use of the PoleStar N-20 intraoperative ultra low-field MRI scanner helps to evaluate the extent of resection in glioma surgery. Further tumor resection after intraoperative scanning leads to an increased rate of complete tumor resection, especially in patients with contrast-enhancing tumors. However, in noncontrast-enhancing tumors, the intraoperative visualization of a complete resection seems less specific, when compared with postoperative 1.5-T MRI.

How to overcome the limitations to determine the resection margin of pituitary tumours with low-field intra-operative MRI during trans-sphenoidal surgery: usefulness of Gadolinium-soaked cotton pledgets

OBJECTIVE

Intra-operative MRI (iMRI) is used as an immediate intra-operative quality control, allowing surgeons to extend resections in situations involving residual tumour remnants. Despite these advantages, low-field iMRI has some limitations with regards to image quality and artefacts. The aim of this study is to report our experience with bone wax and Gadolinium-soaked cotton pledgets in obtaining precise tumour resection margins using low-field iMRI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study group included 63 consecutive patients who underwent endonasal trans-sphenoidal surgery with use of intra-operative low-field iMRI (0.15 T, PoleStar N20, Medtronic Navigation, Louisville, CO, U.S.A.). The indications for intra-operative MRI use included a suprasellar or retrosellar extension (n = 23), cavernous sinus invasion (n = 21), a tumour located in the vicinity of critical anatomic structures (such as the internal carotid artery, n = 10), recurrent or revision procedures (n = 5), and pre-operative imaging revealing unusual anatomy (n = 4).

RESULTS

Overall, among the 51 patients with intended complete tumour removal, iMRI revealed definite tumour remnants or suspicious findings in 13 patients (25.5%), leading to an extended resection and allowing completion of the resection in 10 patients. There was an increased rate of complete tumour removal from 74.5% (38 out of 51) to 94.1% (48 out of 51). The iMRI scan for complete tumour removal was more efficient in the group receiving Gadolinium-soaked cotton pledgets (85.2-100%) than in the group receiving bone wax or the conventional method (62.5-87.5%). The results of iMRI and the estimation by the surgeon concerning the extent of resection revealed a discrepancy in five patients (15.6%) in the Gadolinium-soaked cotton pledgets application group, and in 14 (45.2%) of the bone wax application group.

CONCLUSIONS

More valuable information for determining the resection margin can be obtained with the use of contrast-soaked cottonoid packing in the tumour resection cavity during iMRI scanning. We believe that the use of this simple method reduces the false-positive results and also overcomes the disadvantages of low-field iMRI.

MR-guided biopsy: a review of current techniques and applications

Biopsy has become a cornerstone of modern medicine and most modern biopsies are performed percutaneously using image guidance, typically computed tomography or ultrasound. MR-guided biopsy offers many advantages over these more traditional modalities, and the recent development of interventional MR imaging techniques has made MR-guided percutaneous biopsies and aspirations a clinical reality. As the field of MR-guided procedures continues to expand and to attract more attention from radiologists, it is important to understand the concepts, techniques, applications, advantages, and limitations of MR-guided biopsy/percutaneous procedures. Radiologists should also recognize the need for their significant involvement in the technical aspects of MR-guided procedures, since several user-defined parameters can alter device visualization in the MR imaging environment and affect procedure safety. This article reviews the prerequisites, systems, and applications of MR-guided biopsy.

Non-rigid alignment of pre-operative MRI, fMRI, and DT-MRI with intra-operative MRI for enhanced visualization and navigation in image-guided neurosurgery

OBJECTIVE

The usefulness of neurosurgical navigation with current visualizations is seriously compromised by brain shift, which inevitably occurs during the course of the operation, significantly degrading the precise alignment between the pre-operative MR data and the intra-operative shape of the brain. Our objectives were (i) to evaluate the feasibility of non-rigid registration that compensates for the brain deformations within the time constraints imposed by neurosurgery, and (ii) to create augmented reality visualizations of critical structural and functional brain regions during neurosurgery using pre-operatively acquired fMRI and DT-MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eleven consecutive patients with supratentorial gliomas were included in our study. All underwent surgery at our intra-operative MR imaging-guided therapy facility and have tumors in eloquent brain areas (e.g. precentral gyrus and cortico-spinal tract). Functional MRI and DT-MRI, together with MPRAGE and T2w structural MRI were acquired at 3 T prior to surgery. SPGR and T2w images were acquired with a 0.5 T magnet during each procedure. Quantitative assessment of the alignment accuracy was carried out and compared with current state-of-the-art systems based only on rigid registration.

RESULTS

Alignment between pre-operative and intra-operative datasets was successfully carried out during surgery for all patients. Overall, the mean residual displacement remaining after non-rigid registration was 1.82 mm. There is a statistically significant improvement in alignment accuracy utilizing our non-rigid registration in comparison to the currently used technology (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to achieve intra-operative rigid and non-rigid registration of (1) pre-operative structural MRI with intra-operative T1w MRI; (2) pre-operative fMRI with intra-operative T1w MRI, and (3) pre-operative DT-MRI with intra-operative T1w MRI. The registration algorithms as implemented were sufficiently robust and rapid to meet the hard real-time constraints of intra-operative surgical decision making. The validation experiments demonstrate that we can accurately compensate for the deformation of the brain and thus can construct an augmented reality visualization to aid the surgeon.

Intraoperative High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Transsphenoidal Surgery of Hormonally Inactivepituitary Macroadenomas

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of intraoperative, high-field (1.5 T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the results of transsphenoidal surgery of hormonally inactive pituitary macroadenomas.

METHODS

One hundred six patients (tumor size, 29.9 +/- 10.1 mm; minimum, 11.3 mm; maximum, 57.2 mm) with hormonally inactive pituitary macroadenoma were investigated by intraoperative high-field MRI during transsphenoidal surgery. If intraoperative imaging depicted an accessible tumor remnant, resection was continued.

RESULTS

Among the 85 patients in whom complete tumor removal was intended preoperatively, intraoperative imaging revealed definite tumor remnants or suspicious findings in 36 (42%) patients. Imaging led to an extended resection in 29 (34%) patients of this group. Among them, resection could be completed in 21. This increased the rate of complete tumor removal from 58% (49 out of 85) to 82% (70 out of 85). In the group of patients with intended partial removal (n = 21), resection was extended in 38% (eight out of 21) because of intraoperative imaging. Comparison with scanning 3 months after surgery did not reveal any false-negative findings of intraoperative MRI; in six cases, intraoperative MRI was suspicious for some minor remnant that could not be reproduced in the postoperative control.

CONCLUSION

The extent of resection in transsphenoidal surgery can be reliably assessed using intraoperative high-field MRI. In addition to the suprasellar compartment, intra- and parasellar structures are also visualized in great detail. Intraoperative imaging acts as an immediate intraoperative quality control, allowing one to not only increase the extent of resection, but to also increase the percentage of complete removals.

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided neurosurgery at 3-T

OBJECTIVE

Between 1997 and 2004, more than 700 neurosurgical procedures were performed in a 1.5-T magnetic resonance-guided therapy suite. During this period, the concept of high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was validated, as was a new surgical guidance tool, the Navigus (Image-guided Neurologics, Melbourne, FL), and its methodology, prospective stereotaxy. Clinical protocols were refined to optimize surgical techniques. That implementation, the "Minnesota suite," has recently been revised, and a new suite with a 3-T MRI scanner has been developed.

METHODS

On the basis of experience at the initial 1.5-T suite, a new suite was designed to house a 3-T MRI scanner with wide surgical access at the rear of the scanner (opposite the patient couch). Use of electrocautery, a fiberoptic headlamp, a power drill, and MRI-compatible neurosurgical cutlery was anticipated by inclusion of waveguides and radiofrequency filter panels that penetrate the MRI suite's radiofrequency shield. An MRI-compatible head holder was adapted for use on the scanner table. A few items exhibiting limited ferromagnetism were used within the magnetic field, taking strict precautions.

RESULTS

During the initial procedures (all magnetic resonance-guided neurobiopsies), the new suite functioned as anticipated. Although metallic artifact related to titanium needles is more challenging at 3 T than at 1.5 T, it can be contained even at 3 T. Similar to 1.5 T, such artifact is best contained when the device is oriented along B0, the main magnetic field. Surgical needles, disposable scalpels, and disposable razors, despite being minimally ferromagnetic, were easily controlled by the surgeon.

CONCLUSION

An intraoperative magnetic resonance-guided neurosurgical theater has been developed with a 3-T MRI scanner. Intraoperative imaging is feasible at this field strength, and concerns regarding specific absorption rate can be allayed. Infection control procedures can be designed to permit neurosurgery within this environment. Despite the increase in magnetic field strength, safety can be maintained.

Cranial surgery with an expanded compact intraoperative magnetic resonance imager

✓In this article the authors report the implementation of an expanded compact intraoperative magnetic resonance (iMR) imager that is designed to overcome significant limitations of an earlier unit.

The PoleStar N20 iMR imager has a stronger magnetic field than its predecessor (0.15 tesla compared with 0.12 tesla), a wider gap between magnet poles, and an ergonomically improved gantry design. The additional time needed in the operating room (OR) for use of iMR imaging and the number of sessions per patient were recorded. Stereotactic accuracy of the integrated navigational tool was assessed using a water-covered phantom.

Of the 55 patients who have undergone surgery in the PoleStar N20 device, diagnoses included glioma in 13, meningioma in 12, pituitary adenoma in nine, other skull base lesions in seven, and miscellaneous other diagnoses. The extra time required for use of the system averaged 1.1 hours (range 0.5–2 hours). Imaging sessions averaged 2.3 per surgery (range one–six sessions).

Measurement of stereotactic accuracy revealed that T1-weighted images were the most accurate. Thinner slices yielded measurably greater accuracy, although this was of questionable clinical significance (all sequences ≤ 4 mm had a mean error of ≤ 1.8 mm). The position of the phantom in the center compared with the periphery of the magnetic field did not affect accuracy (mean error 0.9 mm for each).

The PoleStar N20 appears to make intraoperative neuroimaging with a low-field-strength magnet much more practical than it was with the first-generation device. Greater ease of positioning resulted in a decrease in added time in the OR and encouraged a larger number of imaging sessions.

Intraoperative MR Imaging

With the rapid evolution of technologic advances in neurosurgery, it is no surprise that the use of MR imaging to guide the performance of safe and effective surgical procedures is at the forefront of development. This article highlights the current capabilities of intraoperative MR-guided surgery for a variety of neurosurgical procedures and traces the evolution of the field to its present level of technical sophistication. The costs of intraoperative MR imaging and its future directions are discussed.

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging at 0.12 T: is it enough?

Low magnetic field strength MRI provides the anatomic information needed for intracranial procedures in which intraoperative imaging is needed. Stereotactic accuracy is proven. The distinct advantage of this technologic approach is that it allows the neurosurgical team to operate an iMRI system with minimal disruption to the OR routine. Technical improvements are likely to increase the power and versatility of low field strength iMRI. Logic dictates that ergonomics and economics will make this the iMRI technique desired by most neurosurgeons.

Interventional and intraoperative MR: review and update of techniques and clinical experience

The concept of interventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is based on the integration of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, favored by the combination of the excellent morphological and functional imaging characteristics of MRI. The spectrum of MRI-assisted interventions ranges from biopsies and intraoperative guidance to thermal ablation modalities and vascular interventions. The most relevant recently published experimental and clinical results are discussed. In the future, interventional MRI is expected to play an important role in interventional radiology, minimal invasive therapy and guidance of surgical procedures. However, the associated high costs require a careful evaluation of its potentials in order to ensure cost-effective medical care.