The regulation of glucose-induced insulin secretion by pre-stimulus glucose level and tolbutamide in normal man

Assessment of Insulin Secretion and Insulin Resistance in Human

The impaired insulin secretion and increased insulin resistance (or decreased insulin sensitivity) play a major role in the pathogenesis of all types of diabetes mellitus (DM). It is very important to assess the pancreatic β-cell function and insulin resistance/ sensitivity to determine the type of DM and to plan an optimal management and prevention strategy for DM. So far, various methods and indices have been developed to assess the β-cell function and insulin resistance/sensitivity based on static, dynamic test and calculation of their results. In fact, since the metabolism of glucose and insulin is made through a complex process related with various stimuli in several tissues, it is difficult to fully reflect the real physiology. In order to solve the theoretical and practical difficulties, research on new index is still in progress. Also, it is important to select the appropriate method and index for the purpose of use and clinical situation. This review summarized a variety of traditional methods and indices to evaluate pancreatic β-cell function and insulin resistance/sensitivity and introduced novel indices.

Glucose-induced insulin secretion in isolated human islets: Does it truly reflect β-cell function in vivo?

BACKGROUND

Diabetes always involves variable degrees of β-cell demise and malfunction leading to insufficient insulin secretion. Besides clinical investigations, many research projects used rodent islets to study various facets of β-cell pathophysiology. Their important contributions laid the foundations of steadily increasing numbers of experimental studies resorting to isolated human islets.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

This review, based on an analysis of data published over 60 years of clinical investigations and results of more recent studies in isolated islets, addresses a question of translational nature. Does the information obtained in vitro with human islets fit with our knowledge of insulin secretion in man? The aims are not to discuss specificities of pathways controlling secretion but to compare qualitative and quantitative features of glucose-induced insulin secretion in isolated human islets and in living human subjects.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

Much of the information gathered in vitro can reliably be translated to the in vivo situation. There is a fairly good, though not complete, qualitative and quantitative coherence between insulin secretion rates measured in vivo and in vitro during stimulation with physiological glucose concentrations, but the concordance fades out under extreme conditions. Perplexing discrepancies also exist between insulin secretion in subjects with Type 2 diabetes and their islets studied in vitro, in particular concerning the kinetics. Future projects should ascertain that the experimental conditions are close to physiological and do not alter the function of normal and diabetic islets.

Impact of a mild decrease in fasting plasma glucose on β-cell function in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes

Restoring euglycaemia for weeks or months improves insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We tested whether mild decrements in fasting glucose (FPG) acutely affect β-cell function and insulin sensitivity. Thirteen normotolerant (NGT) and 10 T2D patients volunteered in pairs. In an isoglycemic test (Iso), after 100 min of stabilization, an incremental glucose infusion over 3 h was applied to raise plasma glucose to >22 mmol/l, followed by an arginine challenge; in a subisoglycemic test (Sub), a glucose infusion matching the plasma glucose time course of Iso was preceded by an insulin infusion period (100 min) aimed at maintaining a mild FPG reduction while avoiding hypoglycaemia. β-Cell function was assessed by mathematical modeling, whereas the acute insulin response (AIR) to arginine was determined from C-peptide levels. In the Sub, FPG was lowered by 17% in NGT and 31% in T2D patients. On the glucose ramp, total insulin release was lower in Sub than in Iso in both groups [from 106 (43) to 75 (39) nmol/m(-2) in NGT and from 71 (63) to 64 (41) nmol/m(-2) in T2D, P = 0.001]. In the Sub, β-cell glucose sensitivity was significantly (P = 0.008) reduced in NGT [from 50 (31) to 43 (21) pmol·min(-1)·m(-2)·mM(-1)] but not in T2D [19 (20) to 20 (20) pmol·min(-1)·m(-2)·mM(-1)]. Likewise, AIR was lowered in NGT [8.9 (4.6) to 7.1 (4.4) nmol/l, P = 0.048] but not in T2D [4.7 (3.3) to 5.3 (3.2) nmol/l]. Insulin sensitivity improved in NGT but only marginally in T2D. Prestimulatory glucose levels acutely influence both β-cell function and insulin sensitivity differentially in nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic individuals.

Dynamics of glucose-induced insulin secretion in normal human islets

The biphasic pattern of glucose-induced insulin secretion is altered in type 2 diabetes. Impairment of the first phase is an early sign of β-cell dysfunction, but the underlying mechanisms are still unknown. Their identification through in vitro comparisons of islets from diabetic and control subjects requires characterization and quantification of the dynamics of insulin secretion by normal islets. When perifused normal human islets were stimulated with 15 mmol/l glucose (G15), the proinsulin/insulin ratio in secretory products rapidly and reversibly decreased (∼50%) and did not reaugment with time. Switching from prestimulatory G3 to G6-G30 induced biphasic insulin secretion with flat but sustained (2 h) second phases. Stimulation index reached 6.7- and 3.6-fold for the first and second phases induced by G10. Concentration dependency was similar for both phases, with half-maximal and maximal responses at G6.5 and G15, respectively. First-phase response to G15-G30 was diminished by short (30-60 min) prestimulation in G6 (vs. G3) and abolished by prestimulation in G8, whereas the second phase was unaffected. After 1-2 days of culture in G8 (instead of G5), islets were virtually unresponsive to G15. In both settings, a brief return to G3-G5 or transient omission of CaCl2 restored biphasic insulin secretion. Strikingly, tolbutamide and arginine evoked immediate insulin secretion in islets refractory to glucose. In conclusion, we quantitatively characterized the dynamics of glucose-induced insulin secretion in normal human islets and showed that slight elevation of prestimulatory glucose reversibly impairs the first phase, which supports the view that the similar impairment in type 2 diabetic patients might partially be a secondary phenomenon.

Assessment of β-cell function in human patients

This review focuses on the methods accessing β-cell function. β-cell failure is the critical step in the development of type 2 diabetes. Therefore, assessment of β-cell function is an important part of the evaluation and treatment of diabetic patients. However, it is not easy because of complex interaction between multiple tissues. Several parameters should be considered, such as glucose level and insulin sensitivity of diverse insulin target tissues to assess β-cell function. To overcome these difficulties, several invasive or non-invasive methods have been developed to assess β-cell function for clinical or research purposes.

In vivo and in vitro glucose-induced biphasic insulin secretion in the mouse: pattern and role of cytoplasmic Ca2+ and amplification signals in beta-cells

The mechanisms underlying biphasic insulin secretion have not been completely elucidated. We compared the pattern of plasma insulin changes during hyperglycemic clamps in mice to that of glucose-induced insulin secretion and cytosolic calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](c)) changes in perifused mouse islets. Anesthetized mice were infused with glucose to clamp blood glucose at 8.5 (baseline), 11.1, 16.7, or 30 mmol/l. A first-phase insulin response consistently peaked at 1 min, and a slowly ascending second phase occurred at 16.7 and 30 mmol/l glucose. Glucose-induced insulin secretion in vivo is thus biphasic, with a similarly increasing second phase in the mouse as in humans. In vitro, square-wave stimulation from a baseline of 3 mmol/l glucose induced similar biphasic insulin secretion and [Ca(2+)](c) increases, with sustained and flat second phases. The glucose dependency (3-30 mmol/l) of both changes was sigmoidal with, however, a shift to the right of the relation for insulin secretion compared with that for [Ca(2+)](c). The maximum [Ca(2+)](c) increase was achieved by glucose concentrations, causing half-maximum insulin secretion. Because this was true for both phases, we propose that contrary to current concepts, amplifying signals are also implicated in first-phase glucose-induced insulin secretion. To mimic in vivo conditions, islets were stimulated with high glucose after being initially perifused with 8.5 instead of 3.0 mmol/l glucose. First-phase insulin secretion induced by glucose at 11.1, 16.7, and 30 mmol/l was decreased by approximately 50%, an inhibition that could not be explained by commensurate decreases in [Ca(2+)](c) or in the pool of readily releasable granules. Also unexpected was the gradually ascending pattern of the second phase, now similar to that in vivo. These observations indicated that variations in prestimulatory glucose can secondarily affect the magnitude and pattern of subsequent glucose-induced insulin secretion.

Impact of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 polymorphisms on tolbutamide kinetics and the insulin and glucose response in healthy volunteers

Tolbutamide is known to be metabolized by cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9), and the effects of the CYP2C9 amino acid polymorphisms *2 (Arg144Cys) and *3 (Ile359Leu) could be important for drug treatment with tolbutamide and for use of tolbutamide as a CYP2C9 test drug. Tolbutamide pharmacokinetics and plasma insulin and glucose concentrations were studied in 23 healthy volunteers with all six combinations of the CYP2C9 alleles *1, *2 and *3, including two subjects with the combined CYP2C9*1/*1 and CYP2C19*2/*2 genotype. Volunteers received a single oral dose of 500 mg tolbutamide, followed by 75 g oral glucose at 1, 4.5 and 8 h after tolbutamide administration. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a computer program for regression analysis of nonlinear mixed effects models. The mean oral clearances of tolbutamide were 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.05), 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.93), 0.75 (95% CI 0.69-0.81), 0.56 (95% CI 0.51-0.61), 0.45 (95% CI 0.41-0.49) and 0.15 (95% CI 0.14-0.16) l/h in carriers of CYP2C9 genotypes 1/*1, *1/*2, *2/*2, *1/*3, *2/*3 and *3/*3, respectively. Tolbutamide pharmacokinetics in carriers of the functionally deficient CYP2C19*2/*2 genotype were not different from those in the CYP2C19 highly active genotype. Elimination in the six CYP2C9 genotype groups could be expressed as the linear combination of three constants (0.05, 0.04, 0.01 h(-1), which were specific to the respective CYP2C9 alleles *1, *2 and *3, thus indicating a co-dominant mode of inheritance. Insulin and glucose concentration-time curves did not change with differing CYP2C9 genotypes. Tolbutamide was confirmed as a substrate of the genetically polymorphic enzyme CYP2C9. The pronounced differences in pharmacokinetics due to the amino acid variants did not significantly affect plasma insulin and glucose concentrations in healthy volunteers.

Effect of acute hyperglycemia on insulin secretion in humans

First-phase insulin response to intravenous glucose is impaired both in type 2 diabetic patients and in subjects at risk for the disease. Hyperglycemia can modify beta-cell response by either inhibiting or potentiating both first- and second-phase insulin release. In normal subjects, the effect of acute hyperglycemia on insulin secretion is controversial. We measured (in 13 healthy volunteers) insulin secretion (by deconvolution of plasma C-peptide concentrations) during three consecutive 30-min hyperglycemic steps (2.8, 2.8, and 5.6 mmol/l), followed by an intravenous arginine bolus. First-phase insulin secretion in response to the first hyperglycemic step (456 +/- 83 pmol.min(-1).m(-2)) was significantly larger than that in response to the second step (311 +/- 37 pmol.min(-1).m(-2), P < 0.01); the subsequent increase in glycemia failed to stimulate first-phase secretion any further (377 +/- 60 pmol.min(-1).m(-2), NS vs. the previous value). This inhibition was also evident when insulin release rates were corrected for the respective increments (absolute or percentage) in plasma glucose levels and was not due to beta-cell exhaustion because the arginine bolus still elicited a large peak of insulin secretion (4,790 +/- 2,330 pmol.min(-1).m(-2)). In contrast, second-phase insulin secretion was related to the prevailing glucose levels across the three hyperglycemic steps in a direct quasilinear manner. We conclude that first-phase insulin secretion is inhibited by short-term modest hyperglycemia, whereas the second-phase insulin secretion increases linearly with hyperglycemia.

A novel mechanism of glipizide sulfonylurea action: decreased metabolic clearance rate of insulin

To examine whether sulfonylureas inhibit the metabolic clearance rate (MCR) of insulin, 19 healthy young subjects participated in two experiments. In the first protocol (n = 10), a 3-h oral glucose load was performed with and without 2 mg of glipizide given 30 min before glucose ingestion. The total insulin response was 60% greater with than without glipizide (5.9 +/- 0.6 vs 3.7 +/- 0.5 microU/ml; P < 0.001). However, the total C-peptide responses were virtually identical (4.7 +/- 0.5 vs 4.8 +/- 0.4 nmol/l) in both studies. In the second protocol (n = 9), the MCR of insulin was measured during 4-h euglycemic insulin clamps performed with and without glipizide. In the study with glipizide, the subjects ingested 5 mg of glipizide at 120 min. The steady-state plasma insulin concentration during the 4th h, i.e., 1-2 h after glipizide ingestion, was significantly higher than during the 2nd h, i.e., before glipizide ingestion (99 +/- 22 vs 78 +/- 17 microU/ml; P < 0.01). In addition, glucose uptake during the 4th h was greater (8.0 +/- 1.6 vs 6.4 +/- 1.5 mg/kg.min) and the MCR of insulin was reduced (503 +/- 126 vs 621 +/- 176 ml/m2.min; P < 0.01). We conclude that glipizide augments plasma insulin levels both by enhancing its secretion and by decreasing the MCR of insulin.

Role of reduced suppression of glucose production and diminished early insulin release in impaired glucose tolerance

BACKGROUND

Insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion both occur in non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM), but their relative importance is unclear. Hyperglycemia itself has adverse effects on tissue insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion that make it difficult to distinguish between primary and secondary abnormalities. To avoid this problem we studied subjects with postprandial glucose intolerance but not sustained hyperglycemia.

METHODS

We compared the rate of systemic appearance and disappearance of glucose, the output of endogenous hepatic glucose, splanchnic and muscle uptake of glucose, and plasma insulin and glucagon responses after the ingestion of 1 g of glucose per kilogram of body weight in 15 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (8 of them nonobese and 7 obese) and in 16 normal subjects (9 nonobese and 7 obese) who were matched for age and weight.

RESULTS

After glucose ingestion the mean (+/- SE) rate of total systemic appearance of glucose was significantly higher in both the nonobese subjects (455 +/- 12 mmol per five hours) and the obese subjects (486 +/- 17 mmol per five hours) with impaired glucose tolerance than in the respective normal subjects (411 +/- 11 and 436 +/- 7 mmol per five hours). This difference was fully accounted for by the reduced suppression of endogenous hepatic glucose in the subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (a reduction of about 28 percent, vs. 48 percent in the normal subjects; P less than 0.01). Despite late hyperinsulinemia, at 30 minutes the subjects with impaired glucose tolerance had smaller increases in plasma insulin and smaller reductions in plasma glucagon (both P less than 0.01). Molar ratios of plasma insulin to plasma glucagon levels correlated inversely (r = -0.62, P less than 0.001) with the rates of systemic glucose appearance; the latter correlated positively (r = 0.72, P less than 0.0001) with peak plasma glucose concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired glucose tolerance, the precursor of NIDDM, results primarily from reduced suppression of hepatic glucose output due to abnormal pancreatic islet-cell function. The late hyperinsulinemia may be the consequence of an inadequate early beta-cell response rather than of insulin resistance.

Diet only or diet and sulfonylureas in mild type II diabetes (NIDDM)? Pathophysiologic and therapeutic implications

Plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide responses to a test meal were studied in 7 nonobese patients with type II diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) treated with diet alone and after 6 months of gliclazide therapy, as well as in 6 matched controls. The glycemic levels were significantly higher (p less than 0.05) in patients under diet alone than in controls and after gliclazide treatment (peak: 12.8 +/- 1.0; 7.9 +/- 0.4 and 10.0 +/- 0.5 mmol/l, respectively; means +/- SEM). Diet and gliclazide treated patients showed a reduced B-cell response during the first hour after the meal as indicated by insulin and C-peptide values and areas (insulin areas 0-60 min: controls 57.9 +/- 10.9; p less than 0.01 vs diet alone 14.2 +/- 2.7 and vs gliclazide 22.1 +/- 2.8 microU/ml/min). The hypoinsulinemic phase lasted from 20 to 60 min before gliclazide, and from 20 to 45 min after gliclazide. The first significant C-peptide increase, detected at 10 min in controls and at 30 min under diet alone, was advanced to 15 min after gliclazide treatment.

IN CONCLUSION

patients with mild, diet-treated NIDDM show a sluggish and attenuated B-cell response to a physiologic challenge (test meal); this secretory impairment is present even after a complete post-prandial glycemic normalization, supporting the idea of a persistent defect. Nevertheless, the slight improvement observed in insulin secretion after gliclazide treatment may be promoting, at least partially, the normalization of prandial hyperglycemia. The benefits of this normalization in diabetic patients previously controlled by diet only await further investigation.

The relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of oral hypoglycaemic drugs

Oral hypoglycaemic drugs have widely differing pharmacokinetic properties. Possible pharmacodynamic benefits include greater efficacy and fewer adverse effects. In general, it has not been possible to demonstrate unequivocal differences in clinical efficacy between the sulphonylureas during long term use, although there are clear differences in potency. These differences have been emphasised to the extent that the term 'second-generation' has been used for the most potent sulphonylureas, but there is little to suggest that potency is of any therapeutic significance. Trials to study differences in efficacy have rarely been of acceptable design. They have often used fixed doses of drugs, begging the question of whether true potency ratios have been established for chronic treatment. They have rarely involved substantial numbers of patients in double-blind crossover studies with a suitable washout period. Trials which show that there is a clear relationship between drug concentrations in blood and drug effects (whether therapeutic effects or adverse effects such as severe hypoglycaemia) are generally lacking. Qualitative and semiquantitative analysis of adverse effects supports the concept that drugs with a long half-life (e.g. chlorpropamide), renally excreted active metabolites (e.g. acetohexamide) or unusual properties (e.g. glibenclamide, which accumulates progressively in islet tissue) are more likely to cause prolonged hypoglycaemia, which may be fatal. The major adverse effect of treatment with biguanides is lactic acidosis, and this probably occurs more commonly in patients treated with phenformin than those treated with metformin because of pharmacogenetic variation in phenformin metabolism. The available evidence therefore favours the use of drugs with a short elimination half-life which are extensively metabolised and which have no active metabolites.

The effect of glucose, tolbutamide, and arginine on C-peptide release during remission in type I diabetes mellitus

The insulin secretory capacity was examined in diabetic children at the time of partial clinical remission during which their condition could be managed with low insulin therapy (less than 0.5 U insulin/kg body weight) and no urinary glucose excretion. The extent of the residual beta cell function in 26 children was assessed either by an i.v. arginine test, a combined i.v. glucose-i.v. arginine test, a combined i.v. tolbutamide-i.v. arginine test, or a combined oral glucose-i.v. arginine test determining the C-peptide response by calculating the area under the curve above baseline levels. Two of the children were tested repeatedly. Under the above conditions i.v. glucose and i.v. tolbutamide did not release C-peptide in diabetic children. In contrast, C-peptide secretion during arginine infusion following i.v. glucose or i.v. tolbutamide was significantly enhanced compared to the C-peptide secretion observed during arginine infusion alone. The C-peptide response to oral glucose was sluggish with no effect on the following arginine infusion. The results indicate that during remission in juvenile onset diabetes i.v. glucose and i.v. tolbutamide without themselves being an appropriate signal for C-peptide release amplify the response to a subsequent arginine infusion under appropriate conditions.