Effect of protein intake on glycaemic control and renal function in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus

Consumption of red, white, and processed meat and odds of developing kidney damage and diabetic nephropathy (DN) in women: a case control study

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the most prevalent and severe complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We aimed to investigate the associations between red, processed, and white meat consumption and the odds of developing kidney damage and DN in women. We enrolled 105 eligible women with DN and 105 controls (30-65 years). A validated and reliable food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to evaluate the consumption of red, processed, and white meat. Biochemical variables and anthropometric measurements were assessed for all patients using pre-defined protocols. Binary logistic regression was conducted to examine possible associations. The results of the present study showed that there was a direct significant association between high consumption of red meat and processed meats and odds of microalbuminuria (red meat 2.30, 95% CI 1.25, 4.22; P-value = 0.007, processed meat: OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.18, 3.95; P-value = 0.01), severe albuminuria (red meat OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.38, 7.46; P-value = 0.007, processed meat: OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.01, 5.49; P-value = 0.04), BUN levels (red meat: OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.10, 5.93; P-value = 0.02, processed meat: OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.04, 5.62; P-value = 0.03), and DN (red meat 2.53, 95% CI 1.45, 4.42; P-value = 0.001, processed meat: OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.27, 3.85; P-value = 0.005). In summary, our study suggests that higher consumption of red and processed meat sources may be associated with microalbuminuria, severe albuminuria, higher BUN level, and higher odds of DN.

Impact of low-protein diet on cardiovascular risk factors and kidney function in diabetic nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

AIM

To assess the efficacy of low-protein diets (LPD) on cardiovascular risk factors and kidney function in diabetic nephropathy (DN) based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic search was undertaken in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS and Embase databases from inception until January 2022 without using time or language restrictions. RCTs which reported the effects of LPD on cardiovascular risk factors and kidney function in DN were considered.

RESULTS

The results of the present study showed that a LPD significantly reduces urinary urea (WMD: -244.49 g/day, 95 % CI: -418.83, -70.16, P = 0.006) and HbA1c (WMD: -0.20, 95 % CI: -0.39, -0.01, P = 0.036) levels. However, the results did not show neither significant nor beneficial effect on other renal function and cardiovascular risk factors. Furthermore, the results of subgroup analysis showed LPD caused a further decrease in HbA1c during the follow-up period of ≤ 24 weeks, protein intake less than 0.8 g/kg/d and in individuals younger than 50 years. Albuminuria also showed a greater reduction in people under the age of 50 with type 1 diabetes (DMT1) following a LPD.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study showed that LPD significantly reduces urinary urea and HbA1c.

Silk Fibroin Promotes the Regeneration of Pancreatic β-Cells in the C57BL/KsJ-Leprdb/db Mouse

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disease, and its progression leads to serious complications. Although various novel therapeutic approaches for diabetes mellitus have developed in the last three decades, its prevalence has been rising more rapidly worldwide. Silk-related materials have been used as anti-diabetic remedies in Oriental medicine and many studies have shown the effects of silk fibroin (SF) in both in vitro and in vivo models. In our previous works, we reported that hydrolyzed SF improved the survival of HIT-T15 cells under high glucose conditions and ameliorated diabetic dyslipidemia in a mouse model. However, we could not provide a precise molecular mechanism. To further evaluate the functions of hydrolyzed SF on the pancreatic β-cell, we investigated the effects of hydrolyzed SF on the pancreatic β-cell proliferation and regeneration in the mouse model. Hydrolyzed SF induced the expression of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and reduced the apoptotic cell population in the pancreatic islets. Hydrolyzed SF treatment not only induced the expression of transcription factors involved in the pancreatic β-cell regeneration in RT-PCR results but also increased neurogenin3 and Neuro D protein levels in the pancreas of those in the group treated with hydrolyzed SF. In line with this, hydrolyzed SF treatment generated insulin mRNA expressing small cell colonies in the pancreas. Therefore, our results suggest that the administration of hydrolyzed SF increases the pancreatic β-cell proliferation and regeneration in C57BL/KsJ-Leprdb/db mice.

High-Protein Diets for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review

Diet has the potential to be a powerful and cost-effective tool for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). High-protein diets have shown promise for this purpose. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate whether high-protein diets improve glycemic outcomes in people with T2D. We conducted a systematic search of literature published prior to 1 February 2018 to find clinical studies of high-protein diet patterns for treatment of T2D in human participants. A high-protein diet was defined as a diet with protein content greater than that of a typical diet in the United States (>16% of total energy as protein). Studies were excluded if weight loss >5% occurred or if no glycemic outcomes were measured. A total of 21 independent articles met our criteria and were included. Most tested diets had a protein content of around 30% of total energy. Many studies supported the use of high-protein diets for patients with T2D, but were limited by small size (n = 8-32) and short duration (1-24 wk). Randomized controlled trials tended to be larger (n = 12-419) and longer (6 wk-2 y), and had mixed results, with many trials showing no difference between a high-protein diet and control. Many randomized controlled trials were limited by low compliance and high dropout rates >15%. There were no consistent beneficial or detrimental effects of high-protein diets on renal or cardiovascular outcomes. Evidence was insufficient to recommend 1 type of protein (plant or animal) over the other. Our review suggests that interventions to improve compliance with diet change over the long term may be equally important as specific macronutrient recommendations for treatment of T2D.

Insulin and glucose-lowering agents for treating people with diabetes and chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is the commonest cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Both conditions commonly co-exist. Glucometabolic changes and concurrent dialysis in diabetes and CKD make glucose-lowering challenging, increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia. Glucose-lowering agents have been mainly studied in people with near-normal kidney function. It is important to characterise existing knowledge of glucose-lowering agents in CKD to guide treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy and safety of insulin and other pharmacological interventions for lowering glucose levels in people with diabetes and CKD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 12 February 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs looking at head-to-head comparisons of active regimens of glucose-lowering therapy or active regimen compared with placebo/standard care in people with diabetes and CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) were eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias, and quality of data and performed data extraction. Continuous outcomes were expressed as post-treatment mean differences (MD). Adverse events were expressed as post-treatment absolute risk differences (RD). Dichotomous clinical outcomes were presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-four studies (128 records, 13,036 participants) were included. Nine studies compared sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors to placebo; 13 studies compared dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors to placebo; 2 studies compared glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists to placebo; 8 studies compared glitazones to no glitazone treatment; 1 study compared glinide to no glinide treatment; and 4 studies compared different types, doses or modes of administration of insulin. In addition, 2 studies compared sitagliptin to glipizide; and 1 study compared each of sitagliptin to insulin, glitazars to pioglitazone, vildagliptin to sitagliptin, linagliptin to voglibose, and albiglutide to sitagliptin. Most studies had a high risk of bias due to funding and attrition bias, and an unclear risk of detection bias.Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors probably reduce HbA1c (7 studies, 1092 participants: MD -0.29%, -0.38 to -0.19 (-3.2 mmol/mol, -4.2 to -2.2); I2 = 0%), fasting blood glucose (FBG) (5 studies, 855 participants: MD -0.48 mmol/L, -0.78 to -0.19; I2 = 0%), systolic blood pressure (BP) (7 studies, 1198 participants: MD -4.68 mmHg, -6.69 to -2.68; I2 = 40%), diastolic BP (6 studies, 1142 participants: MD -1.72 mmHg, -2.77 to -0.66; I2 = 0%), heart failure (3 studies, 2519 participants: RR 0.59, 0.41 to 0.87; I2 = 0%), and hyperkalaemia (4 studies, 2788 participants: RR 0.58, 0.42 to 0.81; I2 = 0%); but probably increase genital infections (7 studies, 3086 participants: RR 2.50, 1.52 to 4.11; I2 = 0%), and creatinine (4 studies, 848 participants: MD 3.82 μmol/L, 1.45 to 6.19; I2 = 16%) (all effects of moderate certainty evidence). SGLT2 inhibitors may reduce weight (5 studies, 1029 participants: MD -1.41 kg, -1.8 to -1.02; I2 = 28%) and albuminuria (MD -8.14 mg/mmol creatinine, -14.51 to -1.77; I2 = 11%; low certainty evidence). SGLT2 inhibitors may have little or no effect on the risk of cardiovascular death, hypoglycaemia, acute kidney injury (AKI), and urinary tract infection (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether SGLT2 inhibitors have any effect on death, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), hypovolaemia, fractures, diabetic ketoacidosis, or discontinuation due to adverse effects (very low certainty evidence).Compared to placebo, DPP-4 inhibitors may reduce HbA1c (7 studies, 867 participants: MD -0.62%, -0.85 to -0.39 (-6.8 mmol/mol, -9.3 to -4.3); I2 = 59%) but may have little or no effect on FBG (low certainty evidence). DPP-4 inhibitors probably have little or no effect on cardiovascular death (2 studies, 5897 participants: RR 0.93, 0.77 to 1.11; I2 = 0%) and weight (2 studies, 210 participants: MD 0.16 kg, -0.58 to 0.90; I2 = 29%; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, DPP-4 inhibitors may have little or no effect on heart failure, upper respiratory tract infections, and liver impairment (low certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, it is uncertain whether DPP-4 inhibitors have any effect on eGFR, hypoglycaemia, pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, or discontinuation due to adverse effects (very low certainty evidence).Compared to placebo, GLP-1 agonists probably reduce HbA1c (7 studies, 867 participants: MD -0.53%, -1.01 to -0.06 (-5.8 mmol/mol, -11.0 to -0.7); I2 = 41%; moderate certainty evidence) and may reduce weight (low certainty evidence). GLP-1 agonists may have little or no effect on eGFR, hypoglycaemia, or discontinuation due to adverse effects (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether GLP-1 agonists reduce FBG, increase gastrointestinal symptoms, or affect the risk of pancreatitis (very low certainty evidence).Compared to placebo, it is uncertain whether glitazones have any effect on HbA1c, FBG, death, weight, and risk of hypoglycaemia (very low certainty evidence).Compared to glipizide, sitagliptin probably reduces hypoglycaemia (2 studies, 551 participants: RR 0.40, 0.23 to 0.69; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to glipizide, sitagliptin may have had little or no effect on HbA1c, FBG, weight, and eGFR (low certainty evidence). Compared to glipizide, it is uncertain if sitagliptin has any effect on death or discontinuation due to adverse effects (very low certainty).For types, dosages or modes of administration of insulin and other head-to-head comparisons only individual studies were available so no conclusions could be made.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering agents in diabetes and CKD is limited. SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists are probably efficacious for glucose-lowering and DPP-4 inhibitors may be efficacious for glucose-lowering. Additionally, SGLT2 inhibitors probably reduce BP, heart failure, and hyperkalaemia but increase genital infections, and slightly increase creatinine. The safety profile for GLP-1 agonists is uncertain. No further conclusions could be made for the other classes of glucose-lowering agents including insulin. More high quality studies are required to help guide therapeutic choice for glucose-lowering in diabetes and CKD.

Protein content in diabetes nutrition plan

Medical nutrition therapy plays a major role in diabetes management. Macronutrient composition has been debated for a long time. However, there is increasing evidence that a modest increase in dietary protein intake above the current recommendation is a valid option toward better diabetes control, weight reduction, and improvement in blood pressure, lipid profile, and markers of inflammation. Increasing the absolute protein intake to 1.5-2 g/kg (or 20-30% of total caloric intake) during weight reduction has been suggested for overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes and normal kidney function. Increased protein intake does not increase plasma glucose, but increases the insulin response and results in a significant reduction in hemoglobin A(1c). In addition, a higher dietary protein intake reduces hunger, improves satiety, increases thermogenesis, and limits lean muscle mass loss during weight reduction using a reduced calorie diet and increased physical activity. It is preferable to calculate protein intake for patients with diabetes as grams per kilogram of body weight and not as a fixed percentage of total energy intake to avoid protein malnutrition when a hypocaloric diet is used. The relationship between protein intake as grams per kilogram of body weight and albumin excretion rate is very weak, except in hypertensive patients and particularly in those with uncontrolled diabetes. A protein intake of 0.8-1 g/kg should be recommended only for patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Other patients with diabetes should not reduce protein intake to less than 1 g/kg of body weight. This review discusses the effects of different amounts of protein intake in a diabetes meal plan. It particular, it discusses the effects of protein intake on renal function, the effects of protein content on diabetes control, and the effects of increased dietary protein on body weight.

The effects of dietary patterns on urinary albumin excretion: results of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Trial

BACKGROUND

Dietary studies designed to decrease the urinary albumin excretion rate (AER) typically reduce protein by increasing lower protein plant foods and decreasing higher protein animal products.

STUDY DESIGN

We evaluated AER while increasing protein intake in the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Trial (randomized, parallel group, 8 week controlled feeding).

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

378 individuals without diabetes with prehypertension or stage I hypertension.

INTERVENTION

The DASH diet, 18% energy from protein, emphasizes, among other features, low-fat dairy products; and the fruit/vegetable (FV) and control diets, each with 15% energy from protein.

OUTCOME

AER.

MEASUREMENTS

We measured AER by using immunoassay and covariates at baseline and after 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Baseline AER had a geometric mean value of 4.0 +/- 0.2 (SE) mg/24 h. In 285 participants with baseline AER less than 7 mg/24 h, AER was unchanged by diet treatment (geometric mean, 2.5 +/- 0.2 mg/24 h in the control diet, 3.0 +/- 0.2 mg/24 h in the FV diet, and 2.8 +/- 0.2 mg/24 h in the DASH diet). Conversely, in 93 participants with baseline AER of 7 mg/24 h or greater, end-of-feeding AER was lower in the FV diet (6.6 +/- 1.0 mg/24 h) than in the control (11.4 +/- 1.8 mg/24 h; P = 0.01) or DASH diets (11.7 +/- 1.6 mg/24 h; P = 0.005). The DASH and control diets were not different (P = 0.9).

LIMITATIONS

Long-term AER change not studied.

CONCLUSIONS

The decrease in AER after 8 weeks occurred in only those with high-normal baseline AER in the FV diet, in a pattern distinct from the blood pressure decrease. The DASH diet did not increase AER despite a 3% increase in energy from protein.

A randomized trial of low-protein diet in type 1 and in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with incipient and overt nephropathy

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of a low-protein diet in the secondary prevention of diabetic nephropathy is not established in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. To determine whether a low-protein diet slows the decrease in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and decreases the albumin excretion rate (AER) in diabetic patients with incipient and overt nephropathy, we performed a 2-year prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of a low-protein diet (0.8 g/kg/day) with a usual-protein diet.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

The study was conducted in a University hospital and included 63 type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients with either incipient or overt nephropathy and mild renal failure (prestudy GFR, 80 +/- 20 mL/min). The primary outcome measures were decreased in GFR and 24-hour AER.

RESULTS

In the low-protein-diet group, patients were younger (52 +/- 12 versus 63 +/- 9 years old) and more often were type 2 diabetic. During the follow-up period, according to dietary records the low-protein-diet group consumed 16% +/- 3% of total caloric intakes as compared with 19% +/- 4% in the usual-protein-diet group (P < .02), but 24-hour urinary urea excretions did not differ between the two groups. The 2-year GFR decrease was 7 +/- 11 mL/min in the low-protein-diet group and 5 +/- 15 mL/min in the usual-protein-diet group (P = not significant). AER did not increase significantly in the two diet groups during the follow-up period. Blood pressure and glycemic control were similar in the two groups all along the study. The decrease in GFR and AER were also similar in 6 compliant patients according to dietary records and to 24-hour urinary urea excretions from the low-protein-diet group and in 12 patients from the usual-protein-diet group.

CONCLUSIONS

A 2-year low-protein diet did not alter the course of GFR or of AER in diabetic patients with incipient or overt nephropathy receiving renin-angiotensin blockers with strict blood pressure control.

[The role of the diet as a risk factor for the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy]

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of kidney disease in patients starting renal replacement therapy, and affects up to 40% of type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. Diet seems to play an important role in the development of the disease. There are evidences supporting the concept that not only the amount but also the origin of dietary protein are associated with DN. Few studies analyzed the role of dietary lipids. A low-protein diet slows down the decline of renal function and ameliorates the DN prognosis and death in patients with type 1 diabetes with micro- and macroalbuminuria. Studies in type 2 diabetic patients are scanty but short-term studies suggest that this approach decreases albuminuria. However, the use of low-protein diet for long periods is compromised by poor compliance and its long-term safety is not firmly established. Enthusiastic results come up when comparing the effect of different sources of animal protein on renal function and lipid profile in patients with DN, which may represent an alternative strategy for low-protein diet on medical nutritional therapy in patients with DN and in cardiovascular risk factors and endothelial function.

An increase in dietary protein improves the blood glucose response in persons with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

In single-meal studies, dietary protein does not result in an increase in glucose concentrations in persons with or without type 2 diabetes, even though the resulting amino acids can be used for gluconeogenesis.

OBJECTIVE

The metabolic effects of a high-protein diet were compared with those of the prototypical healthy (control) diet, which is currently recommended by several scientific organizations.

DESIGN

The metabolic effects of both diets, consumed for 5 wk each (separated by a 2-5-wk washout period), were studied in 12 subjects with untreated type 2 diabetes. The ratio of protein to carbohydrate to fat was 30:40:30 in the high-protein diet and 15:55:30 in the control diet. The subjects remained weight-stable during the study.

RESULTS

With the fasting glucose concentration used as a baseline from which to determine the area under the curve, the high-protein diet resulted in a 40% decrease in the mean 24-h integrated glucose area response. Glycated hemoglobin decreased 0.8% and 0.3% after 5 wk of the high-protein and control diets, respectively; the difference was significant (P < 0.05). The rate of change over time was also significantly greater after the high-protein diet than after the control diet (P < 0.001). Fasting triacylglycerol was significantly lower after the high-protein diet than after the control diet. Insulin, C-peptide, and free fatty acid concentrations were not significantly different after the 2 diets.

CONCLUSION

A high-protein diet lowers blood glucose postprandially in persons with type 2 diabetes and improves overall glucose control. However, longer-term studies are necessary to determine the total magnitude of response, possible adverse effects, and the long-term acceptability of the diet.

Nutrition therapy for diabetic nephropathy

Human observational studies report no association between protein intakes less than 20% of energy intake and the development of renal disease. With protein intakes greater than 20% of energy intake there is an association between protein with increased albumin excretion rate. Once albuminuria is present, intervention studies suggest a beneficial effect on renal function with a reduction of protein to 0.8 to 1.0 g/kg/d with microalbuminuria and to 0.8 g/kg/d with macroalbuminuria. Restriction of sodium to 2400 mg/d or possibly for some to 2000 mg/d assists in the control of hypertension. In macroalbuminuria, there may be additional benefits in lowering phosphorus intake to 500 to 1000 mg/d. There is no strong evidence to suggest benefit from vegetable or plant proteins over animal protein, but there is evidence for benefit on renal function, glucose, lipids, and blood pressure from weight-maintaining diets meeting guidelines for a healthy diet.

Animal versus plant protein meals in individuals with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria: effects on renal, glycemic, and lipid parameters

OBJECTIVE

To determine, for individuals with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria, the effects of 6 weeks of meals containing plant-based protein (PP) versus meals with predominantly animal-based protein (AP) on renal function and secondarily on glycemia, lipid levels, and blood pressure.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In a randomized crossover trial, we compared 6 weeks of meals containing only PP with meals containing primarily AP (60% animal, 40% plant) in 17 subjects with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria treated with diet and/or oral antidiabetic agents. Protein content was equivalent to the average American diet, and calories provided weight maintenance. Nutrients were equivalent between the two diets. Meals were prepared and packaged by a metabolic kitchen staff and were sent home weekly. At the beginning and end of each 6-week period, subjects were studied for 36 h on a metabolic unit.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between diets for glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, albumin excretion rate, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglyceride area under the curve (AUC), glucose and insulin AUC, HbA(1c,) blood pressure, or serum amino acids. For both diets, at the end of the treatment periods as compared with baseline, total cholesterol was significantly lower (PP and AP: from 4.75 to 4.34 mmol/l, P < 0.01), HbA(1c) had significantly improved (PP: from 8.1 to 7.5%, P < 0.01; AP: from 7.9 to 7.4%, P < 0.01), and diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower (PP: from 83 to 80 mmHg, P < 0.02; AP: from 82 to 78, P < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear advantage for the recommendation of diets containing only PP rather than diets containing protein that is primarily animal-based for individuals with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. There are, however, potential lipid, glycemic, and blood pressure benefits for following a carefully constructed, weight-maintaining, healthy diet, regardless of protein source.

Effect of a chicken-based diet on renal function and lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized crossover trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of replacing red meat with chicken in the usual diet and the effect of a low-protein diet on glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER), and lipid levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A randomized, crossover, controlled trial was conducted with 28 patients with type 2 diabetes (seven women; mean age 58.1 years): 15 patients were normoalbuminuric (UAER <20 microg/min), and 13 patients were microalbuminuric (UAER 20-200 microg/min). A chicken-based diet (red meat replaced with chicken) and a low-protein diet were compared with the patients' usual diet. Patients followed each diet for 4 weeks with a 4-week washout period between. GFR ((51)Cr-EDTA single-injection technique), 24-h UAER (immunoturbidimetry), apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides were measured after each diet.

RESULTS

Normoalbuminuric and microalbuminuric patients with diabetes were analyzed separately. In normoalbuminuric patients, GFR after the chicken (101.3 +/- 22.9 ml x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2)) and low-protein diets (93.8 +/- 20.5 ml x min(-1) x m(-2)) was lower than after the usual diet (113.4 +/- 31.4 ml x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2); P < 0.05). In microalbuminuric patients, apolipoprotein B levels were lower after the chicken (113.5 +/- 36.0 mg/dl) and low-protein diets (103.5 +/- 40.1 mg/dl) than after the usual diet (134.3 +/- 30.7 mg/dl; P < 0.05). Only the chicken diet reduced UAER (median 34.3 microg/min) compared with the low-protein (median 52.3 microg/min) and usual (median 63.8 microg/min) diets (P < 0.05). Glycemic control and blood pressure did not change after the diets.

CONCLUSIONS

A normoproteic diet with chicken as the only source of meat may represent an alternative strategy for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

Determinants of albuminuria in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

This study sought to identify determinants of albuminuria in people with Type 2 diabetes. In 335 primary care patients, we assessed albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) in two 24-h urine samples, and its cross-sectional associations with protein and alcohol intake, cigarette smoking, body weight and height, glycosuria, blood pressure, hypoglycaemic and antihypertensive treatment, gender, age, age at diagnosis, diabetes duration, family history of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, ethnic origin, and education. The prevalence of micro- or macro-albuminuria (ACR> or =2.0 mg/mmol) was 33%. Among these patients, compared to those with normo-albuminuria, there were more men, protein intake (g/kg) estimated from urinary urea as well as systolic blood pressure and glycosuria were higher, there were more smokers, men were shorter, and a family history of diabetes was less prevalent (all P<0.05). In linear and logistic regression (n=270) albuminuria was independently associated (P<0.05 unless indicated otherwise) with systolic blood pressure (OR(10 mmHg)=1.32), smoking (OR(ex/never)=2.36, OR(current/never)=4.89), glycosuria (OR(> or =7/<1 g/l)=2.41), gender (OR(men/women)=2.50), age in men (OR(10 year)=1.60) (P<0.10) and, inversely, in women (OR(10 year)=0.63) (P>0.10). On aggregation, the modifiable determinants systolic blood pressure, smoking and glycosuria explained 12% of the variation in albuminuria. These factors thus are, although to a moderate extent only, potential determinants of albuminuria. We also observed an independent, inverse association with body height (OR(0.10 m)=0.47). This is in line with the hypothesis that development in utero or during early life influences kidney function in later life.

Higher incidence of diabetic nephropathy in type 2 than in type 1 diabetes in early-onset diabetes in Japan

BACKGROUND

Whether the type of diabetes, race, and year and age of diagnosis affect the incidence of diabetic vascular complications is unknown. That both type 1 and type 2 diabetes occur in the young Japanese population prompted us to investigate whether the type of diabetes and the year of diagnosis are related to the incidence of nephropathy.

METHODS

Of the 17,256 diabetic patients who visited the outpatient clinic at our diabetes center between 1965 and 1990, 1578 (9.1%) had early-onset diabetes (diagnosed before the age of 30); of these, 620 (39%) had type 1, and 958 (61%) had type 2 diabetes. The incidence of nephropathy was analyzed in the patients according to postpubertal duration and year of diagnosis.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of nephropathy after 30 years of postpubertal diabetes was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in type 2 diabetic patients (44.4%, 95% CI, 37.0 to 51.8%) than in type 1 diabetic patients (20.2%, 95% CI, 14.9 to 25.8%). The incidence of nephropathy among type 1 diabetic patients has declined during the past two decades, whereas it has not among type 2 diabetic patients. The rate ratio for type 2 diabetic patients diagnosed between 1980 and 1984 relative to type 1 diabetic patients diagnosed in the same period was 2.74 (95% CI, 1. 17 to 6.41).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of nephropathy has declined in Japanese patients with type 1 but not in those with type 2 diabetes. In young Japanese patients, because of the higher incidence of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes and the higher prevalence of type 2 than type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes is likely the major cause of diabetic nephropathy.

Effects of oral administration of L-arginine on renal function in patients with heart failure

OBJECTIVES

Although the beneficial effects of L-arginine on systemic haemodynamics have been reported in patients with heart failure, its effect on renal function has not been examined. We evaluated the effects of oral administration of L-arginine on renal haemodynamics, sodium and water handling, and various hormonal factors in patients with chronic heart failure.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A double-blind crossover trial was performed in 17 patients with chronic congestive heart failure (NYHA II-III, 56 +/- 12 years of age) who were randomly assigned to receive oral L-arginine (15 g/day) and placebo or placebo and arginine sequentially for 5 days each. Twenty-four hour creatinine clearance (Ccr), and 24-h urinary cyclic guanosine 5-monophosphate (GMP) excretion were determined. Saline loading was performed on day 5 of each treatment Renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and urinary sodium excretion rate (UNa) were assessed before and after saline loading.

RESULTS

Twenty-four hour GMP excretion (1.4 +/- 1.1 versus 0.8 +/- 0.5 micromol/day, P < 0.01) and Ccr (150 +/- 43 versus 125 +/- 42 ml/min, P < 0.05) were higher and plasma endothelin level (2.5 +/- 0.6 versus 3.1 +/- 0.8 pg/ml, P < 0.05) was lower with L-arginine treatment compared to placebo treatment In addition, the relative increase of UNa and GFR after saline loading were significantly higher in L-arginine treatment (UNa, 47 +/- 12%; GFR, 44 +/- 31%) than in placebo treatment (UNa, 34 +/- 9%; GFR, 22 +/- 29%) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral administration of L-arginine has beneficial effects on glomerular filtration rate, natriuresis, and plasma endothelin level in patients with chronic congestive heart failure.

Renal disease and hypertension in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Recent epidemiologic data demonstrate a dramatic increase in the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), thus dispelling the mistaken belief that renal prognosis is benign in NIDDM. Currently, the leading cause of ESRD in the United States, Japan, and in most industrialized Europe is NIDDM, accounting for nearly 90% of all cases of diabetes. In addition to profound economic costs, patients with NIDDM and diabetic nephropathy have a dramatically increased morbidity and premature mortality. NIDDM-related nephropathy varies widely among racial and ethnic groups, genders and lifestyles; and gender may interact with race to affect the disease progression. While the course of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) progresses through well-defined stages, the natural history of NIDDM is less well characterized. NIDDM patients with coronary heart disease have a higher urinary albumin excretion rate at the time of diagnosis and follow-up. This greater risk may also be associated with hypertension and hyperlipidemia, and genes involved in blood pressure are obvious candidate genes for diabetic nephropathy. Hyperglycemia appears to be an important factor in the development of proteinuria in NIDDM, but its role and the influence of diet are not yet clear. Tobacco smoking can also be deleterious to the diabetic patient, and is also associated with disease progression. Maintaining euglycemia, stopping smoking and controlling blood pressure may prevent or slow the progression of NIDDM-related nephropathy and reduce extrarenal injury. Treatment recommendations include early screening for hyperlipidemia, appropriate exercise and a healthy diet. Cornerstones of management should also include: (1) educating the medical community and more widely disseminating data supporting the value of early treatment of microalbuminuria; (2) developing a comprehensive, multidisciplinary team approach that involves physicians, nurses, diabetes educators and behavioral therapists; and (3) intensifying research in this field.

Nephropathy and hypertension in diabetes

The treatment of the patient with diabetes, with or without hypertension, is complex and challenging. Hyperglycemic treatment should ideally not only control blood glucose, but also prevent the chronic complications and associated metabolic derangements that can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Hypertensive treatment should not only decrease blood pressure, but also reduce the risk of macrovascular and microvascular disease. The use of antihypertensive agents that improve insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, glycemic control, and nephropathy is preferred whenever possible. The real key to success in the care of the hypertensive diabetic patient is adequate screening and appropriate, early treatment. Currently, there is ample evidence to support the use of intensive management with the goal of near-normalization of blood glucose levels in most patients with diabetes. Similarly, aggressive treatment of hypertension is the current standard. Accomplishing these goals helps to prevent the development of chronic diabetic complications, including nephropathy. ESRD need not be the inevitable outcome for individuals with early diabetic nephropathy. Interventions currently available that are targeted at the known modifiable risk factors underlying the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy offer the best hope for reducing the incidence and severity of this complication. Prevention of the complications of diabetes, including nephropathy, must be the goal for the future on behalf of all those who now have diabetes.

Role of Glycemic Control and Protein Restriction in Clinical Management of Diabetic Kidney Disease

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of control of blood glucose levels and restriction of dietary protein in the management of diabetic nephropathy.

METHODS

We summarize the results of pertinent published studies of glycemic control and modification of protein intake to provide information about strategies that potentially could benefit patients with diabetes and renal dysfunction.

RESULTS

Considerable evidence is available to support the contention that improved glycemic control may have beneficial effects on the development and progression of diabetic renal disease. Maximal benefits of improved glycemia occur when instituted before the onset of macroalbuminuria. Once overt diabetic nephropathy is established, improved glycemic control may not be beneficial. Current evidence indicates that a glycosylated hemoglobin level of less than 8.1% should be the glycemic goal. At this level, the risk of developing micro-albuminuria is substantially reduced, and the risk of hypoglycemia is minimized. Most studies have been conducted in type I diabetes, and the results have been extrapolated to type II diabetes. Whether improved glycemic control will be equally beneficial in the nephropathy of type II diabetes has yet to be determined. Although some scientific evidence supports dietary protein restriction in patients with diabetic nephropathy, the extent of restriction needed for optimal benefits and minimal side effects remains to be determined. On the basis of current information, patients with both types of diabetes who have evidence of nephropathy should have protein limited to the recommended dietary allowance for adults (0.8 g/kg of body weight per day or approximately 10% of total daily caloric intake), and protein should be derived primarily from vegetable and lean animal sources.

CONCLUSION

End-stage renal disease is not inevitable in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Normalization of glucose levels and modification of protein intake can favorably influence the course of diabetes-related kidney disease.

Diabetic nephropathy in type II diabetes

The incidence of end-stage renal failure in patients with type II diabetes has dramatically increased in recent years, both in the United States and, with some delay, in some European countries. These epidemiologic observations have thoroughly dispelled the mistaken belief that renal prognosis was benign in type II diabetes. Recent interest has focused on the early stages of nephropathy in type II diabetes. With respect to renal hemodynamics, renal morphology, and progression of established diabetic nephropathy, there are no substantial differences between types I and type II diabetes. There is good evidence that preventive measures are effective, ie, glycemic control, blood pressure control, protein restriction, and discontinuation of smoking. The high prevalence of the disease (which in principle is preventable) calls for intense efforts to (1) educate the medical community, (2) substantially improve patient education and medical care, and (3) intensify research in this field.

Nutritional therapy for diabetes mellitus

Dietary therapy affects diabetes management in the dog and cat directly through control of blood glucose and indirectly through control of obesity and lipid abnormalities. Caloric intake, the feeding schedule, food form, macronutrient composition of the diet, and the presence of any concurrent problems must all be considered when planning the dietary regime. Generally, the healthy diabetic dog or cat should be fed a diet with increased fiber and moderate carbohydrate in a quantity sufficient to attain and maintain optimal body weight; whenever possible, the daily food allotment should be divided into multiple small meals that are fed through the day and evening when the physiologic effects of administered insulin are present. Once established, the dietary regime should be kept constant from day to day. Following these guidelines will help minimize postprandial hyperglycemia and may lead to a decreased exogenous insulin requirement. However, if a concurrent disorder has dietary requirements that conflict with those for the diabetic pet, nutritional management of the other disorder should usually take precedence.

Type II diabetic nephropathy in perspective

The magnitude of type II diabetic nephropathy dilemma is observable in the growing number of diabetic patients with end-stage renal lesion receiving various modalities of treatment. Progressive glomerulopathy associated with proteinuria and hypertension is strongly causative of renal failure and mortality in diabetic patients. Besides hypertension, diabetes exceeds all other glomerulopathies in causing end-stage renal failure. Alterations in glomerular structure and function observed in diabetic patients are implicated in the development and progression of renal derangement. Diabetic glomerulosclerosis, an aggregate of structural and functional perturbations of the kidney, is indicated by alterations in the accumulation of extracellular matrix components, The pathology, epidemiology, risk factors, and other dependent variables may throw some light in the pathogenetic mechanisms and the prevention, treatment, and management modalities of type II diabetic nephropathy.