An analysis of chlorpromazine-induced suppression of the avoidance response

Dopamine D2 receptors in the expression and extinction of contextual and cued conditioned fear in rats

Dopamine seems to mediate fear conditioning through its action on D2 receptors in the mesolimbic pathway. Systemic and local injections of dopaminergic agents showed that D2 receptors are preferentially involved in the expression, rather than in the acquisition, of conditioned fear. To further examine this issue, we evaluated the effects of systemic administration of the dopamine D2-like receptor antagonists sulpiride and haloperidol on the expression and extinction of contextual and cued conditioned fear in rats. Rats were trained to a context-CS or a light-CS using footshocks as unconditioned stimuli. After 24 h, rats received injections of sulpiride or haloperidol and were exposed to the context-CS or light-CS for evaluation of freezing expression (test session). After another 24 h, rats were re-exposed to the context-CS or light-CS, to evaluate the extinction recall (retest session). Motor performance was assessed with the open-field and catalepsy tests. Sulpiride, but not haloperidol, significantly reduced the expression of contextual and cued conditioned fear without affecting extinction recall. In contrast, haloperidol, but not sulpiride, had cataleptic and motor-impairing effects. The results reinforce the importance of D2 receptors in fear conditioning and suggest that dopaminergic mechanisms mediated by D2 receptors are mainly involved in the expression rather than in the extinction of conditioned freezing.

Influence of aversive stimulation on haloperidol-induced catalepsy in rats

Catalepsy - an immobile state in which individuals fail to change imposed postures - can be induced by haloperidol. In rats, the pattern of haloperidol-induced catalepsy is very similar to that observed in Parkinson's disease (PD). As some PD symptoms seem to depend on the patient's emotional state, and as anxiety disorders are common in PD, it is possible that the central mechanisms regulating emotional and cataleptic states interplay. Previously, we showed that haloperidol impaired contextual-induced alarm calls in rats, without affecting footshock-evoked calls. Here, we evaluated the influence of distinct aversive stimulations on the haloperidol-induced catalepsy. First, male Wistar rats were subjected to catalepsy tests to establish a baseline state after haloperidol or saline administration. Next, distinct cohorts were exposed to open-field; elevated plus-maze; open-arm confinement; inescapable footshocks; contextual conditioned fear; or corticosterone administration. Subsequently, catalepsy tests were performed again. Haloperidol-induced catalepsy was verified in all drug-treated animals. Exposure to open-field, elevated plus-maze, open-arm confinement, footshocks, or administration of corticosterone had no significant effect on haloperidol-induced catalepsy. Contextual conditioned fear, which is supposed to promote a more intense fear, increased catalepsy over time. Our findings suggest that only specific defensive circuitries modulate the nigrostriatal system mediating the haloperidol-induced cataleptic state.

Understanding the role of dopamine in conditioned and unconditioned fear

Pharmacological and molecular imaging studies in anxiety disorders have primarily focused on the serotonin system. In the meantime, dopamine has been known as the neurotransmitter of reward for 60 years, particularly for its action in the nervous terminals of the mesocorticolimbic system. Interest in the mediation by dopamine of the well-known brain aversion system has grown recently, particularly given recent evidence obtained on the role of D2 dopamine receptors in unconditioned fear. However, it has been established that excitation of the mesocorticolimbic pathway, originating from dopaminergic (DA) neurons from the ventral tegmental area (VTA), is relevant for the development of anxiety. Among the forebrain regions innervated by this pathway, the amygdala is an essential component of the neural circuitry of conditioned fear. Current findings indicate that the dopamine D2 receptor-signaling pathway connecting the VTA to the basolateral amygdala modulates fear and anxiety, whereas neural circuits in the midbrain tectum underlie the expression of innate fear. The A13 nucleus of the zona incerta is proposed as the origin of these DA neurons projecting to caudal structures of the brain aversion system. In this article we review data obtained in studies showing that DA receptor-mediated mechanisms on ascending or descending DA pathways play opposing roles in fear/anxiety processes. Dopamine appears to mediate conditioned fear by acting at rostral levels of the brain and regulate unconditioned fear at the midbrain level.

Regulation of striatal dopamine responsiveness by Notch/RBP-J signaling

Dopamine signaling is essential for reward learning and fear-related learning, and thought to be involved in neuropsychiatric diseases. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of dopamine responsiveness is unclear. Here we show the critical roles of Notch/RBP-J signaling in the regulation of dopamine responsiveness in the striatum. Notch/RBP-J signaling regulates various neural cell fate specification, and neuronal functions in the adult central nervous system. Conditional deletion of RBP-J specifically in neuronal cells causes enhanced response to apomorphine, a non-selective dopamine agonist, and SKF38393, a D1 agonist, and impaired dopamine-dependent instrumental avoidance learning, which is corrected by SCH23390, a D1 antagonist. RBP-J deficiency drastically reduced dopamine release in the striatum and caused a subtle decrease in the number of dopaminergic neurons. Lentivirus-mediated gene transfer experiments showed that RBP-J deficiency in the striatum was sufficient for these deficits. These findings demonstrated that Notch/RBP-J signaling regulates dopamine responsiveness in the striatum, which may explain the mechanism whereby Notch/RBP-J signaling affects an individual's susceptibility to neuropsychiatric disease.

Risperidone induces long-lasting changes in the conditioned avoidance response and accumbal gene expression selectively in animals treated as adolescents

Adolescence is a period of dynamic remodeling and maturation in the brain. Exposure to psychotropic drugs during adolescence can potentially alter neural maturation in the adolescent brain subsequently altering neural function at maturity. In this regard, antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are important given a notable global increase in prescription of these APDs to adolescents for a variety of behavioural symptoms and conditions over the past twenty years. However, there is a paucity of data on the long-term consequences of APDs on the adolescent brain. In this preclinical study, we have examined whether the adolescent brain is more susceptible than the adult brain to long-term neural changes induced by risperidone, which is the APD most frequently prescribed to adolescents. Rats were chronically treated (21 days) with 1.3 mg/kg/day risperidone or vehicle either as adolescents (postnatal day (PND) 36-56)) or adults (PND80-100). Behaviour was assessed using the well-described suppression of the conditioned avoidance response (CAR) by APDs. We examined CAR after all animals had reached maturity (PND127). We show that mature rats treated with risperidone as adolescents had increased CAR suppression compared to adults when rechallenged with this same drug. In the nucleus accumbens, significant downregulation of serotonergic 5HT2A receptors and catechol-o-methyl transferase mRNA levels was observed only in the adolescent treated animals. Impaired 5HT2A receptor signaling may explain the increased CAR suppression observed in rats treated with risperidone as adolescents. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), however, did not detect any risperidone-induced long-term brain structural change at maturity. These findings confirm that APD administration during adolescence may produce long-term behavioural and neurochemical alterations.

The barrier choice paradigm: haloperidol reduces sensitivity to reinforcement

The standard choice situation was modified by placing a 76 cm high barrier between two levers. To travel between levers, rats had to climb the barrier. Four doses of haloperidol were assessed for effects on motor and motivational systems. The drug impeded the rats' ability to climb the barrier. Residence and travel times increased, and changeover rates decreased. Pressing the levers was not entirely suppressed by haloperidol. The slope of the matching law decreased with increasing doses of haloperidol, showing reductions in the rats' sensitivity to reinforcement. The notion that neuroleptics impair the initiation or execution of complex motor acts and disrupt food-locomotion activity, is supported by these results.

Requirement of dopamine signaling in the amygdala and striatum for learning and maintenance of a conditioned avoidance response

Two-way active avoidance (2WAA) involves learning Pavlovian (association of a sound cue with a foot shock) and instrumental (shock avoidance) contingencies. To identify regions where dopamine (DA) is involved in mediating 2WAA, we restored DA signaling in specific brain areas of dopamine-deficient (DD) mice by local reactivation of conditionally inactivated Th genes using viral gene therapy. Among all targeted areas--prefrontal cortex (PFC), amygdala, ventral striatum, dorsal striatum, and whole striatum--only restoration of DA signaling to both the whole striatum together with the amygdala enabled DD mice to acquire 2WAA. However, after prolonged overtraining during which DD mice had DA synthesis systemically reconstituted pharmacologically with L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-Dopa), DA signaling in the striatum alone was sufficient to maintain 2WAA, whereas DA signaling in the PFC together with the amygdala was insufficient to maintain 2WAA. Our results indicate that learning 2WAA requires DA signaling in both the amygdala and the entire striatum; however, after sufficient training, DA signaling in the striatum alone can maintain the learned avoidance behavior.

Neuroleptics and operant behavior: The anhedonia hypothesis

Neuroleptic drugs disrupt the learning and performance of operant habits motivated by a variety of positive reinforcers, including food, water, brain stimulation, intravenous opiates, stimulants, and barbiturates. This disruption has been demonstrated in several kinds of experiments with doses that do not significantly limit normal response capacity. With continuous reinforcement neuroleptics gradually cause responding to cease, as in extinction or satiation. This pattern is not due to satiation, however, because it also occurs with nonsatiating reinforcement (such as saccharin or brain stimulation). Repeated tests with neuroleptics result in earlier and earlier response cessation reminiscent of the kind of decreased resistance to extinction caused by repeated tests without the expected reward. Indeed, withholding reward can have the same effect on responding under later neuroleptic treatment as prior experience with neuroleptics themselves; this suggests that there is a transfer of learning (really unlearning) from nonreward to neuroleptic conditions. These tests under continuous reinforcement schedules suggest that neuroleptics blunt the ability of reinforcers to sustain responding at doses which largely spare the ability of the animal to initiate responding. Animals trained under partial reinforcement, however, do not respond as well during neuroleptic testing as animals trained under continuous reinforcement. Thus, neuroleptics can also impair responding (though not response capacity) that is normally sustained by environmental stimuli (and associated expectancies) in the absence of the primary reinforcer. Neuroleptics also blunt the euphoric impact of amphetamine in humans. These data suggest that the most subtle and interesting effect of neuroleptics is a selective attenuation of motivational arousal which is (a) critical for goal-directed behavior, (b) normally induced by reinforcers and associated environmental stimuli, and (c) normally accompanied by the subjective experience of pleasure. Because these drugs are used to treat schizophrenia and because they cause parkinsonian-like side effects, this action has implications for a better understanding of human pathology as well as normal motivational processes.

From dopamine to salience to psychosis--linking biology, pharmacology and phenomenology of psychosis

How does an excess in a neurochemical lead someone to being paranoid about the intentions of their neighbour? And why does blocking a dopamine receptor improve this symptom? In this article we present a heuristic framework which attempts to link the biology, phenomenology and pharmacology of psychosis. Focussing on dopamine's role in reward prediction and motivational salience we propose that psychosis arises from an aberrant assignment of novelty and salience to objects and associations. Antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and decrease dopamine transmission, which leads to the attenuation of aberrant novelty and salience. This 'salience' framework accounts for existing data and questions several current assumptions about the speed of onset phenomenological effects of antipsychotics and their behavioral effects in animal models. We review new data to show that in contrast to the prevailing idea of a "delayed onset" of antipsychotic action, the improvement is evident in the first few days. Antipsychotics do not eradicate symptoms, but create a state of "detachment" from them. And the actions of antipsychotics in the conditioned avoidance response model, one of the best established animal models for identifying antipsychotic action, are consistent with the idea that they dampen aberrant as well as normal motivational salience. The article discusses the caveats, limitations as well as the clinical implications of the salience framework.

A Computational Model of the Functional Role of the Ventral-Striatal D2 Receptor in the Expression of Previously Acquired Behaviors

The functional role of dopamine has attracted a great deal of interest ever since it was empirically discovered that dopamine-blocking drugs could be used to treat psychosis. Specifically, the D2 receptor and its expression in the ventral striatum have emerged as pivotal in our understanding of the complex role of the neuromodulator in schizophrenia, reward, and motivation. Our departure from the ubiquitous temporal difference (TD) model of dopamine neuron firing allows us to account for a range of experimental evidence suggesting that ventral striatal dopamine D2 receptor manipulation selectively modulates motivated behavior for distal versus proximal outcomes. Whether an internal model or the TD approach (or a mixture) is better suited to a comprehensive exposition of tonic and phasic dopamine will have important implications for our understanding of reward, motivation, schizophrenia, and impulsivity. We also use the model to help unite some of the leading cognitive hypotheses of dopamine function under a computational umbrella. We have used the model ourselves to stimulate and focus new rounds of experimental research.

Evaluation of the motor initiation hypothesis of APD-induced conditioned avoidance decreases

Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) selectively disrupt conditioned avoidance responding (CAR)--a feature that distinguishes them from all other psychotropics. It is thought that this effect reflects their effect on motor initiation; however, this conclusion is questionable because most studies it relies on have often examined avoidance responding under APD treatment, and tested animals with preshock stimuli followed by the footshock. APD-induced CAR effects are confounded by APDs' motor effects and by the presence of footshock. The objective of this study was to evaluate the motor initiation hypothesis by testing animals without drug and under extinction conditions. In Experiment 1, we administered haloperidol, clozapine or chlordiazepoxide (an anxiolytic as a pharmacological control) during the acquisition phase of CAR, but tested animals 2 days later. The APD-induced CAR disruption was present even in the absence of the drug and footshock. In Experiment 2, we first trained rats to a learning criterion, and then subjected them to 4 days of CAR extinction training under drug or vehicle. In the subsequent CAR extinction tests, the rats previously treated with APDs still showed significantly lower avoidance responses. In both experiments, the effects of haloperidol and clozapine were distinct from those of chlordiazepoxide. These data suggest that APD-induced CAR decreases cannot be explained as the unconditioned motor impairment effects of APDs, but probably reflect a dopamine-blockade-mediated change in incentive motivation.

A model of antipsychotic action in conditioned avoidance: a computational approach

The selective ability of antipsychotic drugs (APDs) to attenuate conditioned avoidance responding (CAR) has been recognized for over 50 years. However, most efforts to account for this finding have been either neurochemically oriented (focusing on the neuromodulator dopamine) or behavioral, with little effort invested in uniting the two within a computational model. In this paper we propose a computational model, based on concepts from formal reinforcement learning theory, which accounts for the basic finding that noncataleptic doses of APDs disrupt avoidance without disrupting escape. The model formally separates out sensory, motor, and reward processes, and makes novel predictions pertaining to the dose- and time-dependent effects of APDs on response latencies--predictions which we verified in experimental studies using four different APDs (haloperidol, chlorpromazine, risperidone, and clozapine). The APD action in this model is most consistent with an effect on 'expected future reward'--an idea closely linked to motivational drives and consistent with several leading theories of dopamine action.

Low-dose clozapine pretreatment partially prevents haloperidol-induced deficits in conditioned active avoidance

The effectiveness of neuroleptics in disrupting conditioned active avoidance has led to the widespread use of this test as an index of antipsychotic efficacy, whereas the tendency for these drugs to induce catalepsy is believed to reflect their propensity to cause extrapyramidal motor side-effects. Although the typical neuroleptic haloperidol produces catalepsy as well as profound deficits in conditioned active avoidance, the atypical neuroleptic clozapine does not induce catalepsy and is less effective than haloperidol in disrupting active avoidance. Furthermore, clozapine pretreatment prevents haloperidol-induced catalepsy. We investigated whether clozapine pretreatment might also reduce the disruptive effects of haloperidol on two-way active avoidance. We assessed the avoidance acquisition of the following drug treatment groups in which all animals received two injections prior to testing: vehicle + vehicle, vehicle + haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.), clozapine (2.5, 5.0 or 10 mg/kg, i.p.) + haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.), or clozapine (2.5, 5.0 or 10 mg/kg, i.p.) + vehicle. Haloperidol-pretreated animals showed markedly impaired active avoidance, deficits which were improved by 2.5 and 5 mg/kg but not by 10 mg/kg clozapine pretreatment. These data suggest that the disruptive effects of haloperidol on conditioned active avoidance partially mirror its capacity to induce catalepsy and extrapyramidal motor symptoms. Furthermore, this study indicates that clozapine may be effective in reducing motor side-effects caused by typical neuroleptics.

The conditioned avoidance response test re-evaluated: is it a sensitive test for the detection of potentially atypical antipsychotics?

The present review discusses the history and paradigm of the conditioned avoidance response (CAR) in rats for the detection of potential antipsychotic activity of drugs. In addition, the role of dopamine (DA) D2, serotonin (5-HT)2A/2C, alpha1, 5-HT1A, DA D4, muscarinic and glutamate receptors in the suppression of CAR induced by various classes of drugs is evaluated. Finally, data investigating brain sites of action for the mediation of CAR behavior is discussed. It is concluded that the CAR test, originally found to be sensitive for the detection of antipsychotic drugs with high affinity as antagonists for brain dopamine receptors, is also sensitive for the detection of potentially antipsychotic compounds acting primarily via neurotransmitter receptors other than the DA D2 receptor. Furthermore, the review confirms the importance of the nucleus accumbens(shell) in the mediation of effects on CAR produced by traditional, as well as atypical antipsychotic drugs.

Attenuation by nimodipine of amitriptyline-induced avoidance impairment in mice

The effects of the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker nimodipine on avoidance impairment induced by the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline were assessed during shuttle-box training and in previously trained mice of the DBA/2 strain. Nimodipine (0, 0.5, 1, 2.5, or 5 mg/kg) had no effect alone, but attenuated the avoidance impairment induced by 5 mg/kg amitriptyline on avoidance acquisition, as well as on a previously learned avoidance response. The avoidance improving action of the calcium channel blocker was less evident in mice receiving a larger dose (7.5 mg/kg) of the antidepressant drug. The effect of nimodipine did not appear to be specifically related to the avoidance impairment induced by amitriptyline, because the calcium antagonist also attenuated the avoidance impairing action of the neuroleptic chlorpromazine. The avoidance impairment induced by amitriptyline and chlorpromazine, and the related ameliorating action of nimodipine, seem imputable to drug effects on the performance of the avoidance response, rather than to interferences with learning processes. The results suggest that, in the case of concomitant administration, nimodipine could alleviate adverse side effects of tricyclic antidepressant, i.e., psychomotor disturbances.

Enhancement of antipsychoticlike properties of raclopride in rats using the selective serotonin2A receptor antagonist MDL 100,907

BACKGROUND

Selective suppression of conditioned avoidance response (CAR) is a standard animal screening test for predicting antipsychotic effect. Ability to suppress CAR is presumed to be due to antagonism at dopamine receptors, a property shared by all known antipsychotics.

METHODS

Using CAR behavior, in a conventional shuttle-box paradigm, as an index for antipsychotic efficacy, the effects of the selective serotonin2A receptor antagonist MDL 100,907 alone, and in combination with the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist raclopride, were studied in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. Nonparametric procedures were employed for statistical evaluation.

RESULTS

MDL 100,907 (0.1-1.5 mg/kg, SC) alone did not suppress CAR in a manner predictive of antipsychotic activity; however, in the presence of an ED50 (0.14 mg/kg, SC) dose of raclopride, MDL 100,907 enhanced and prolonged the suppression of CAR. In the presence of a subthreshold (0.05 mg/kg, SC) dose of raclopride, MDL 100,907 induced a suppression of CAR.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that treatment with a selective serotonin2A receptor antagonist alone may not produce a robust antipsychotic effect; however, a selective serotonin2A receptor antagonist in the presence of a minimal dopamine D2 receptor blocking action could potentially be an adjunctive therapy resulting in improved antipsychotic efficacy and fewer extrapyramidal symptoms.

Prevention of amitriptyline-induced avoidance impairment by tacrine in mice

The effects of two cognition enhancers on avoidance impairment induced by the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline were assessed during shuttle-box avoidance acquisition and in previously trained mice of the DBA/2 strain. The nootropic agent piracetam (50, 100 or 200 mg/kg, i.p.) had slight or no effect in mice receiving amitriptyline (5 or 10 mg/kg, i.p.). Conversely, the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor tacrine (0.5, 1, 2 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) prevented the avoidance impairment induced by 5 mg/kg amitriptyline on shuttle-box avoidance acquisition as well as on a previously learned avoidance response. The avoidance disrupting action produced by 10 mg/kg of the antidepressant drug was not affected by the anticholinesterase drug. The preventing action of tacrine seems specifically related to the avoidance impairment induced by amitriptyline, since the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor did not reduce, but enhanced the avoidance impairing action of the neuroleptic chlorpromazine. Taken together, the results indicate that amitriptyline-induced avoidance impairment, and the related preventing action of tacrine, may be ascribed to drug effects on the performance of the avoidance response, rather than to interferences with learning processes.

Behavioral functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine: empirical and conceptual problems with the anhedonia hypothesis

Nucleus accumbens (DA) has been implicated in a number of different behavioral functions, but most commonly it is said to be involved in "reward" or "reinforcement". In the present article, the putative reinforcement functions of accumbens DA are summarized in a manner described as the "General Anhedonia Model". According to this model, the DA innervation of the nucleus accumbens is conceived of as a crucial link in the "reward system", which evolved to mediate the reinforcing effects of natural stimuli such as food. The reward system is said to be activated by natural reinforcing stimuli, and this activation mediates the reinforcing effects of these natural stimuli. According to this view, other stimuli such as brain stimulation and drugs can activate this system, which leads to these stimuli being reinforcing as well. Interference with DA systems is said to blunt the reinforcing effects of these rewarding stimuli, leading to "extinction". This general model of the behavioral functions of accumbens DA is utilized widely as a theoretical framework for integrating research findings. Nevertheless, there are several difficulties with the General Anhedonia Model. Several studies have observed substantial differences between the effects of extinction and the effects of DA antagonism or accumbens DA depletions. Studies involving aversive conditions indicate that DA antagonists and accumbens DA depletions can interfere with avoidance behavior, and also have demonstrated that accumbens DA release is increased by stressful or aversive stimuli. Although accumbens DA is important for drug abuse phenomena, particularly stimulant self-administration, studies that involve other reinforcers are more problematic. A large body of evidence indicates that low doses of dopamine antagonists, or depletions of accumbens DA, do not impair fundamental aspects of food motivation such as chow consumption and simple instrumental responses for food. This is particularly important, in view of the fact that many behavioral researchers consider the regulation of food motivation to be a fundamental aspect of food reinforcement. Finally, studies employing cost/benefit analyses are reviewed, and in these studies considerable evidence indicates that accumbens DA is involved in the allocation of responses in relation to various reinforcers. Nucleus accumbens DA participates in the function of enabling organisms to overcome response costs, or obstacles, in order to obtain access to stimuli such as food. In summary, nucleus accumbens DA is not seen as directly mediating food reinforcement, but instead is seen as a higher order sensorimotor integrator that is involved in modulating response output in relation to motivational factors and response constraints. Interfering with accumbens DA appears to partially dissociate the process of primary reinforcement from processes regulating instrumental response initiation, maintenance and selection.

Impairments of movement initiation and execution induced by a blockade of dopamine D1 or D2 receptors are reversed by a blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors

The effects of a dopamine D1 or D2 receptor blockade on initiation and execution of movements were examined using a simple reaction time task for rats. The task demands stimulus-triggered rapid initiation of locomotion to get a food reward. Time and force parameters of the transition from stance to gait were recorded allowing a detailed and separate analysis of the initiation and initial execution of locomotor initiation. Systemic administration of the preferential dopamine D2 antagonist haloperidol (0.1; 0.15 mg/kg, i.p.) caused a delayed movement initiation, as indicated by an increase in reaction time. In addition, movement execution was slowed, as measured by an increase in movement time, a decrease in the rate of development and in the maximum of the accelerative force component. Systemic administration of the selective dopamine D1 antagonist 7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SCH-23390) (0.15 mg/kg, i.p.) induced a similar pattern of impairments as haloperidol. Dizocilpine, an antagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate subtype of glutamate receptors in a dose which was largely ineffective when given alone (0.08 mg/kg, i.p.) reversed impairments of movement initiation and execution that were induced by the high dose of dopamine D1 or D2 antagonists (0.15 mg/kg, i.p., respectively). It is concluded that dopamine D1 and D2 receptors are both involved in movement initiation and execution processes, which control the onset and speed of a conditioned movement, as shown here for locomotor initiation of rats. According to our results, the processes related to movement initiation and execution may be mediated by separate neuronal mechanisms, as there were no correlations between impairments of movement initiation and execution, regardless of the treatment animals received. The reversal of SCH 23390- and haloperidol-induced impairments by dizocilpine suggests a functionally antagonistic involvement of dopamine D1/D2 and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the control of movement initiation and execution. The results further imply that neuroleptics blocking dopamine D1 receptors probably induce similar extrapyramidal side effects as classical neuroleptics blocking dopamine D2 receptors.

Active and passive avoidance learning in rats neonatally treated with intraventricular 6-hydroxydopamine

To clarify the behavioral characteristics of rats neonatally treated with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), their performance on 4 aversive learning tasks, 3 active (shuttle, one-way, and rearing) avoidance tasks and one passive (step-through) avoidance task, was examined. On days 2 and 4 after birth, each rat of F344/Du strain received bilateral intraventricular injections of 6-OHDA (35 micrograms x 2) or vehicle solution following desmethylimipramine (20 mg/kg, s.c.) pretreatment. From day 90, each rat was trained in one of the 4 avoidance tasks. 6-OHDA-treated rats showed significantly less avoidance responses in the shuttle and the one-way avoidance tasks, but their performance on the rearing and the step-through passive avoidance tasks was not significantly different from that of control rats. The differential impairment of avoidance suggests that 6-OHDA treatment does not cause a general learning deficit, but facilitates rearing and/or jumping responses in aversive situations, which results in inappropriate escape responses.

The role of dopamine in drug abuse viewed from the perspective of its role in motivation

Drugs of abuse share with conventional reinforcers the activation of specific neural pathways in the CNS that are the substrate of their motivational properties. Dopamine is recognized as the transmitter of one such neural pathway, being involved in at least three major aspects of motivation: modulation of motivational state, acquisition (incentive learning) and expression of incentive properties by motivational stimuli. Drugs of abuse of different pharmacological classes stimulate in the low dose range dopamine transmission particularly in the ventral striatum. Apart from psychostimulants, the evidence that stimulation of dopamine transmission by drugs of abuse provides the primary motivational stimulus for drug self-administration is either unconvincing or negative. However, stimulation of dopamine transmission is essential for the activational properties of drugs of abuse and might be instrumental for the acquisition of responding to drug-related incentive stimuli (incentive learning). Dopamine is involved in the induction and in the expression of behavioural sensitization by repeated exposure to various drugs of abuse. Sensitization to the dopamine-stimulant properties of specific drug classes leading to facilitation of incentive learning of drug-related stimuli might account for the strong control over behaviour exerted by these stimuli in the addiction state. Withdrawal from drugs of abuse results in a reduction in basal dopamine transmission in vivo and in reduced responding for conventional reinforcers. Although these changes are likely to be the expression of a state of dependence of the dopamine system their contribution to the motivational state of drug addiction is unclear.

Effects of dopamine depletions in the medial prefrontal cortex on active avoidance and escape in the rat

Dopamine systems have been implicated in the performance of avoidance behavior, and the dopaminergic innervation of medial prefrontal cortex is known to be responsive to stressful stimuli. In the present investigation, injections of 6-hydroxydopamine were used to produce moderate depletions of dopamine in the medial prefrontal cortex of rats trained to perform an active avoidance/escape task. In this task, 0.5 mA shock was presented for 5 s every 30 s, and the rat could escape shock presentation, or avoid the shock for 30 s, by pressing a lever. Depletion of dopamine in the medial prefrontal cortex did not affect total number of responses, and did not impair avoidance responding (i.e. responding when the shock was off), and in fact dopamine-depleted animals tended to make slightly more avoidance responses than control animals. Prefrontal dopamine depletions did result in a significant decrease in the number of escape responses (i.e. responding to terminate shock when the shock was on). Moreover, dopamine depletions significantly decreased response efficiency, which is an index of the reduction of shock time produced per lever pressing response. Previous work has indicated that dopamine antagonists and accumbens dopamine depletions have dramatic effects on avoidance behavior; thus, the present results indicate that prefrontal cortex dopamine depletions do not mimic the effects of interference with subcortical dopamine systems. The selective effects of dopamine depletions on escape behavior in the present study suggest that rats with medial prefrontal dopamine depletions have an impairment in the ability to respond appropriately to the direct presentation of footshock.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reversal of chlorpromazine-induced avoidance depression by the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, dizocilpine, in mice

The non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist MK-801 (dizocilpine) was tested, alone or in combination with chlorpromazine, in mice previously trained in the shuttlebox. The lowest doses of dizocilpine (0.02 and 0.04 mg kg-1) attenuated the disrupting action of the neuroleptic (1.5 mg kg-1) on avoidance-performance, while avoidance depression induced by 1.5 and 2 mg kg-1 chlorpromazine was completely or almost completely reversed by 0.08 mg kg-1 NMDA antagonist. The highest dose (0.16 mg kg-1) of dizocilpine did not ameliorate avoidance-performance of mice receiving 2 mg kg-1 chlorpromazine, perhaps because of ataxic effects produced by the drug combination, at these doses. The results support suggestions for a potential use of NMDA antagonists in the treatment of extrapyramidal side-effects of neuroleptics.

The involvement of nucleus accumbens dopamine in appetitive and aversive motivation

In recent years, considerable emphasis has been placed upon the putative role of nucleus accumbens dopamine systems in appetitive motivation and positive reinforcement. However, considerable evidence indicates that brain dopamine in general, and nucleus accumbens dopamine in particular, is involved in aspects of aversive motivation. Administration of dopamine antagonists or localized interference with nucleus accumbens dopamine systems has been shown to disrupt active avoidance behavior. In addition, accumbens dopamine release and metabolism is activated by a wide variety of stressful conditions. A review of the literature indicates that there are substantial similarities between the characteristics of dopaminergic involvement in appetitive and aversive motivation. There is conflicting evidence about the role of dopamine in emotion, and little evidence to suggest that the profound and consistent changes in instrumental behavior produced by interference with DA systems are due to direct dopaminergic mediation of positive affective responses such as hedonia. It is suggested that nucleus accumbens dopamine is involved in aspects of sensorimotor functions that are involved in both appetitive and aversive motivation.

Effects of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs on two-way active avoidance. Relationship to DA receptor blocking profile

The dose-dependent and time-dependent effects of the novel antipsychotic compound remoxipride, as well as the reference compounds chlorpromazine, clozapine, haloperidol, pimozide and sulpiride upon the retention of two-way active avoidance (conditioned avoidance responses, CARs) were studied in male rats. The dose-dependent effects of remoxipride as well as haloperidol and chlorpromazine on the acquisition of CARs were also studied. The acquisition and retention of CARs were tested in shuttleboxes using a 1.0-mA shock intensity and a 10-stone signal (1000 Hz). All the compounds studied, including remoxipride, caused a dose-dependent impairment of acquisition and retention of CARs. The effect of remoxipride on CAR acquisition correlated with remoxipride's effectiveness to block the hyperactivity induced by the dopamine (DA) agonist apomorphine. Unlike chlorpromazine and haloperidol, the potency of remoxipride and clozapine for antagonising CAR retention was found at dose levels much lower than those producing cataleptic effects or blocking apomorphine-induced stereotypies. Based on the DA receptor blocking profile and the relative effectiveness to block CAR it is concluded that the mechanism(s) by which clozapine and remoxipride affect CAR differ from typical neuroleptic drugs. This difference may reflect an action upon different subtypes of functionally coupled DA D2 receptors.

Dopamine transmission increases in the nucleus accumbens of male rats during their first exposure to sexually receptive female rats

In vivo microdialysis was used to monitor extracellular concentrations of dopamine (DA), and its metabolites dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA), in the nucleus accumbens of sexually naive male rats during their first exposure to sexually receptive or nonreceptive females. DA, DOPAC, and HVA increased progressively and significantly in males that copulated to ejaculation with receptive females. In contrast, DA, DOPAC, and HVA did not increase significantly in males exposed to non-receptive females, despite several attempts by these males to mount the non-receptive females. These results indicate that DA is released unconditionally in the nucleus accumbens of male rats by exposure to sexually receptive female rats, and that copulation with intromission, but not mounting alone, leads to further increases in DA release.

Responses of rat striatal neurons during performance of a lever-release version of the conditioned avoidance response task

Neural activity was recorded from 218 sites in the striatum (caudate-putamen and nucleus accumbens) of rats trained on a lever-release version of the conditioned avoidance response (CAR) task, in which an auditory signal elicits a short-latency, forelimb withdrawal. > 80% of these recording sites showed task-related activity, including neurons that responded to the auditory stimulus (signal-related cells), the lever-release (response-related cells), or both of these events (signal/response-related cells). Histological analysis revealed a predominance of signal-related neurons in medial striatum, whereas lateral recording sites mainly showed response-related activity. Haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg s.c.), a widely used neuroleptic that impairs CAR performance, significantly attenuated task-related neural activity without altering the latency of the neural response or spontaneous firing rate. Collectively, these results, which demonstrate the usefulness of the lever-release CAR paradigm for assessing striatal function, suggest that the sensory and motor aspects of the CAR task are processed by different striatal regions. Moreover, haloperidol appears to disrupt the striatal processing of both sensory and motor information.

Dopamine functions in appetitive and defensive behaviours

The data reviewed here are compatible with the hypothesis that telencephalic dopamine activity is elicited by motivationally significant stimuli which in turn creates a neural state in which animals are more prepared to respond to significant stimuli in the environment. This analysis may be viewed as extensions of both the sensorimotor hypothesis, which depicts dopamine as potentiating the ability of stimuli to elicit responses (Clody and Carlton, 1980; Marshall et al., 1974; White, 1986) and of the incentive motivational hypothesis, which emphasizes the importance of dopamine in responding to stimuli that serve as signals of biologically significant events (Blackburn et al., 1989a; Crow, 1973; Mogenson and Phillips, 1976). In addition, we have sought to emphasize that not all responses are equally dependent upon the integrity of forebrain dopamine activity. Some responses, such as ingestion of standard foods by hungry animals, copulation, and escape, are relatively impervious to dopamine disruption. Further, once other behaviours, such as avoidance or appetitive operant responses, have been acquired, they can be maintained at an initially high rate despite perturbation of dopamine systems, although performance deteriorates with repeated testing. This analysis has emerged from the joint consideration of how both appetitive and defensive behaviours are influenced by dopamine antagonists, along with an examination of dopamine release during sequences of behaviour. The data reviewed suggest that dopamine is involved in fundamental psychological processes through which environmental stimuli come to exert control over certain aspects of behaviour. In the future, as knowledge in this field advances, there will have to be an integration of the literature on dopamine and motivation with the literature on dopamine and motor systems. We expect that dopamine release will be seen as a mechanism by which important environmental cues, of innate or learned significance, lead to a general enhancement of motor skeletal responses directed towards distal cues. We conclude with a caveat: Caution must be exercised when attempting to infer a general role of any neurotransmitter in motivated behaviour based on the study of a limited number of motivational systems. Although neurotransmitter pathways may figure prominently in the control of certain behaviours, it is incorrect to think of neurotransmitters as having a single role in behaviour. However, when comparative analyses reveal a common thread among different motivational systems, as is becoming apparent for the general role of mesotelencephalic dopamine pathways in behaviour, then the goal of generating coherent and comprehensive theory concerning a neurotransmitter's function in behaviour will begin to be realised.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)