Characterization of tamoxifen stimulated MCF-7 tumor variants grown in athymic mice

Therapeutic resistance to anti-oestrogen therapy in breast cancer

The hormone receptor oestrogen receptor-α (ER) orchestrates physiological mammary gland development, breast carcinogenesis and the progression of breast tumours into lethal, treatment-refractory systemic disease. Selective antagonism of ER signalling has been one of the most successful therapeutic approaches in oncology, benefiting patients as both a cancer preventative measure and a cancer treatment strategy. However, resistance to anti-oestrogen therapy is a major clinical challenge. Over the past decade, we have gained an understanding of how breast cancers evolve under the pressure of anti-oestrogen therapy. This is best depicted by the case of oestrogen-independent mutations in the gene encoding ER (ESR1), which are virtually absent in primary breast cancer but highly prevalent (20-40%) in anti-oestrogen-treated metastatic disease. These and other findings highlight the 'evolvability' of ER+ breast cancer and the need to understand molecular processes by which this evolution occurs. Recent development and approval of next-generation ER antagonists to target ESR1-mutant breast cancer underscores the clinical importance of this evolvability and sets a new paradigm for the treatment of ER+ breast cancers.

Estrogen Receptor and the Unfolded Protein Response: Double-Edged Swords in Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

Estrogen receptor α (ERα) is a target for the treatment of ER-positive breast cancer patients. Paradoxically, it is also the initial site for estrogen (E₂) to induce apoptosis in endocrine-resistant breast cancer. How ERα exhibits distinct functions, in different contexts, is the focus of numerous investigations. Compelling evidence demonstrated that unfolded protein response (UPR) is closely correlated with ER-positive breast cancer. Treatment with antiestrogens initially induces mild UPR through ERα with activation of three sensors of UPR-PRK-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), inositol-requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6)-in the endoplasmic reticulum. Subsequently, these sensors interact with stress-associated transcription factors such as c-MYC, nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α), leading to acquired endocrine resistance. Paradoxically, E₂ further activates sustained secondary UPR via ERα to induce apoptosis in endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Specifically, PERK plays a key role in inducing apoptosis, whereas IRE1α and ATF6 are involved in endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated degradation after E₂ treatment. Furthermore, persistent activation of PERK deteriorates stress responses in mitochondria and triggers of NF-κB/tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) axis, ultimately determining cell fate to apoptosis. The discovery of E₂-induced apoptosis has clinical relevance for treatment of endocrine-resistant breast cancer. All of these findings demonstrate that ERα and associated UPR are double-edged swords in therapy for ER-positive breast cancer, depending on the duration and intensity of UPR stress. Herein, we address the mechanistic progress on how UPR leads to endocrine resistance and commits E₂ to inducing apoptosis in endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

Estrogen Receptor Complex to Trigger or Delay Estrogen-Induced Apoptosis in Long-Term Estrogen Deprived Breast Cancer

Antiestrogen therapy of breast cancer has been a "gold standard" of treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer for decades. Resistance to antiestrogen therapy may develop, however, a vulnerability in long-term estrogen deprived (LTED) breast cancer cells was discovered. LTED breast cancer cells may undergo estrogen-induced apoptosis within a week of treatment with estrogen in vitro. This phenomenon has been also validated in vivo and in the clinic. The molecular ER-mediated mechanism of action of estrogen-induced apoptosis was deciphered, however, the relationship between the structure of estrogenic ligands and the activity of the ER in LTED breast cancer cells remained a mystery until recently. In this review we provide an overview of the structure-activity relationship of various estrogens with different chemical structures and the modulation of estrogen-induced apoptosis in LTED breast cancer cells resistant to antihormone therapy. We provide analysis of evidence gathered over more than a decade of structure-activity relationship studies by our group on the role of the change in the conformation of the estrogen receptor and the biological activities of different classes of estrogens and the receptor as well in LTED breast cancer.

Turning scientific serendipity into discoveries in breast cancer research and treatment: a tale of PhD students and a 50-year roaming tamoxifen team

PURPOSE

This retrospective, about a single "mobile" laboratory in six locations on two continents, is intended as a case study in discovery for trainees and junior faculty in the medical sciences. Your knowledge of your topic is necessary to expect the unexpected.

HISTORICAL METHOD

In 1972, there was no tamoxifen, only ICI 46, 474, a non-steroidal anti-estrogen with little chance of clinical development. No one would ever be foolish enough to predict that the medicine, 20 years later, would achieve legendary status as the first targeted treatment for breast cancer, and millions of women would benefit from long-term adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. The secret of tamoxifen's success was a translational research strategy proposed in the mid 1970's. This strategy was to treat only patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer and deploy 5 or more years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy to prevent recurrence. Additionally, tamoxifen prevented mammary cancer in animals. Could the medicine prevent breast cancer in women?

RESULTS

Tamoxifen and the failed breast cancer drug raloxifene became the first selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs): a new drug group, discovered at the University of Wisconsin, Comprehensive Cancer Center. Serendipity can play a fundamental role in discovery, but there must be a rigorous preparation for the investigator to appreciate the possibility of a pending discovery. This article follows the unanticipated discoveries when PhD students "get the wrong answer." The secret of success of my six Tamoxifen Teams was their technical excellence to create models, to decipher mechanisms, that drove the development of new medicines. Discoveries are listed that either changed women's health or allowed an understanding of originally opaque mechanisms of action of potential therapies. These advances in women's health were supported entirely by government-sponsored peer-reviewed funding and major philanthropy from the Lynn Sage Breast Cancer Foundation, the Avon Foundation, and the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation. The resulting lives saved or extended, families aided in a time of crisis and the injection of billions of dollars into national economies by drug development, is proof of the value of Federal or philanthropic investment into unencumbered research aimed at saving millions of lives.

The SERM Saga, Something from Nothing: American Cancer Society/SSO Basic Science Lecture

BACKGROUND

The discovery of nonsteroidal antiestrogens created a new group of medicines looking for an application; however, at the time, cytotoxic chemotherapy was the modality of choice to treat all cancers. Antiestrogens were orphan drugs until 1971, with the passing of the National Cancer Act. This enabled laboratory innovations to aid patient care.

METHODS

This article traces the strategic application of tamoxifen to treat breast cancer by targeting the estrogen receptor (ER), deploying long-term adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, and becoming the first chemopreventive for any cancer. Laboratory discoveries from the University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center (UWCCC) are described that address a broad range of biological issues with tamoxifen. These translated to improvements in clinical care.

RESULTS

Tamoxifen was studied extensively at UWCCC in the 1980s for the development of acquired resistance to long-term therapy. Additionally, the long-term metabolism of tamoxifen and regulation of growth factors were also studied. A concern with tamoxifen use for chemoprevention was that an antiestrogen would increase bone loss and atherosclerosis. Laboratory studies with tamoxifen and keoxifene (subsequently named raloxifene) demonstrated that 'nonsteroidal antiestrogens' maintained bone density, and this translated into successful clinical trials with tamoxifen at UWCCC. However, tamoxifen also increased endometrial cancer growth; this discovery in the laboratory translated into changes in clinical care. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) were born at UWCCC.

CONCLUSIONS

There are now five US FDA-approved SERMs, all with discovery origins at UWCCC. Women's health was revolutionized as SERMs have the ability to treat multiple diseases by switching target sites around a woman's body on or off.

Estrogen Receptor Covalent Antagonists: The Best Is Yet to Come

The development of tamoxifen and subsequent estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) antagonists represents a tremendous therapeutic breakthrough in the treatment of breast cancer. Despite the ability of ERα antagonists to increase survival rates, resistance to these therapies is an all-too-common occurrence. The majority of resistant tumors, including those with hotspot mutations in the ligand-binding domain of ERα, remain dependent on ERα signaling, indicating that either a more potent or novel class of antagonist could have clinical benefit. With this thought in mind, we developed a novel ERα antagonist that exhibits enhanced potency due to its ability to covalently target a unique cysteine in ER. This review describes the design of this antagonist, H3B-5942, and discusses opportunities for future improvements, which could reduce the risk of escape mutations to this therapeutic modality.

Cellular Uptake Kinetics of Neutral and Charged Chemicals in in Vitro Assays Measured by Fluorescence Microscopy

Cellular uptake kinetics are key for understanding time-dependent chemical exposure in in vitro cell assays. Slow cellular uptake kinetics in relation to the total exposure time can considerably reduce the biologically effective dose. In this study, fluorescence microscopy combined with automated image analysis was applied for time-resolved quantification of cellular uptake of 10 neutral, anionic, cationic, and zwitterionic fluorophores in two reporter gene assays. The chemical fluorescence in the medium remained relatively constant during the 24-h assay duration, emphasizing that the proteins and lipids in the fetal bovine serum (FBS) supplemented to the assay medium represent a large reservoir of reversibly bound chemicals with the potential to compensate for chemical depletion by cell uptake, growth, and sorption to well materials. Hence FBS plays a role in stabilizing the cellular dose in a similar way as polymer-based passive dosing, here we term this process as serum-mediated passive dosing (SMPD). Neutral chemicals accumulated in the cells up to 12 times faster than charged chemicals. Increasing medium FBS concentrations accelerated uptake due to FBS-facilitated transport but led to lower cellular concentrations as a result of increased sorption to medium proteins and lipids. In vitro cell exposure results from the interaction of several extra- and intracellular processes, leading to variable and time-dependent exposure between different chemicals and assay setups. The medium FBS plays a crucial role for the thermodynamic equilibria as well as for the cellular uptake kinetics, hence influencing exposure. However, quantification of cellular exposure by an area under the curve (AUC) analysis illustrated that, for the evaluated bioassay setup, current in vitro exposure models that assume instantaneous equilibrium between medium and cells still reflect a realistic exposure because the AUC was typically reduced less than 20% compared to the cellular dose that would result from instantaneous equilibrium.

Structural underpinnings of oestrogen receptor mutations in endocrine therapy resistance

Oestrogen receptor-α (ERα), a key driver of breast cancer, normally requires oestrogen for activation. Mutations that constitutively activate ERα without the need for hormone binding are frequently found in endocrine-therapy-resistant breast cancer metastases and are associated with poor patient outcomes. The location of these mutations in the ER ligand-binding domain and their impact on receptor conformation suggest that they subvert distinct mechanisms that normally maintain the low basal state of wild-type ERα in the absence of hormone. Such mutations provide opportunities to probe fundamental issues underlying ligand-mediated control of ERα activity. Instructive contrasts between these ERα mutations and those that arise in the androgen receptor (AR) during anti-androgen treatment of prostate cancer highlight differences in how activation functions in ERs and AR control receptor activity, how hormonal pressures (deprivation versus antagonism) drive the selection of phenotypically different mutants, how altered protein conformations can reduce antagonist potency and how altered ligand-receptor contacts can invert the response that a receptor has to an agonist ligand versus an antagonist ligand. A deeper understanding of how ligand regulation of receptor conformation is linked to receptor function offers a conceptual framework for developing new anti-oestrogens that might be more effective in preventing and treating breast cancer.

Hormone-Targeted Therapy and Resistance

It has been 40 years since the US Food and Drug Administration approved the estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist tamoxifen for the treatment of ER-positive breast cancer, ushering in the era of targeted therapy coupled with a companion diagnostic. The prostate cancer field quickly followed suit with the approval of the androgen receptor (AR) antagonist bicalutamide. In the years since, there has been sustained scientific interest in understanding these hormone-dependent signaling pathways and in drug discovery efforts to identify novel hormone-directed therapeutic agents. Recently, there have been breakthrough discoveries relating to mechanisms that enable reactivation of ER and AR signaling in the presence of antihormonal agents and that enable loss of hormone dependency, providing multiple routes of acquired resistance to hormone therapy. This review discusses parallels between breast and prostate cancer, including their pathobiologies, existing therapeutic modalities, acquired resistance to such therapeutics, and novel therapies being developed to target distinct states of resistance.

Flexible small molecular anti-estrogens with N,N-dialkylated-2,5-diethoxy-4-morpholinoaniline scaffold targets multiple estrogen receptor conformations

Estrogen mediates various cellular processes including cell proliferation, differentiation, growth and mammary gland function. Estrogen Receptors (ERs) are expressed in 70% of breast cancers. Consequently, estrogen mediated ER signaling plays a critical role in breast cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. ERs are ligand-triggered transcription factors. However, in the absence of a cognate estrogenic ligand, ERs can be activated by a variety of other extracellular signals. Tamoxifen, an anti-estrogen that selectively targets ER, induces substantial regression of breast tumors and an increase in disease-free survival. Tamoxifen mimics estrogen effects in other tissues thereby providing some beneficial effects including reduced risk of osteoporosis. However, breast cancers that initially respond well to tamoxifen tend to develop resistance and resume growth despite the continued presence of the antagonist. Library of compounds with substituted morpholinoaniline scaffold, a set of structurally divergent potential ER antagonists that fit the tamoxifen pharmacophore, were designed to target ER Ligand Binding Domain (LBD) and to recruit co-regulator proteins including BRCA1 over a range of conformational changes. Two of the lead compounds in the library, BR46 and BR47, were found to inhibit estrogen induced cell proliferation and cell viability. Discovery of novel lead molecules targeting ligand binding pockets of hER has provided structural clues toward the development of new breed of small molecule therapeutics for tamoxifen-resistant breast cancers and would complement already existent anti-estrogen therapy.

Estrogen receptor mutations found in breast cancer metastases integrated with the molecular pharmacology of selective ER modulators

The consistent reports of mutations at Asp538 and Tyr537 in helix 12 of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of estrogen receptors (ERs) from antihormone-resistant breast cancer metastases constitute an important advance. The mutant amino acids interact with an anchor amino acid, Asp351, to close the LBD, thereby creating a ligand-free constitutively activated ER. Amino acids Asp 538, Tyr 537, and Asp 351 are known to play a role in either the turnover of ER, the antiestrogenic activity of the ER complex, or the estrogen-like actions of selective ER modulators. A unifying mechanism of action for these amino acids to enhance ER gene activation and growth response is presented. There is a range of mutations described in metastases vs low to zero in primary disease, so the new knowledge is of clinical relevance, thereby confirming an additional mechanism of acquired resistance to antihormone therapy through cell population selection pressure and enrichment during treatment. Circulating tumor cells containing ER mutations can be cultured ex vivo, and tumor tissues can be grown as patient-derived xenografts to add a new dimension for testing drug susceptibility for future drug discovery.

Linking estrogen-induced apoptosis with decreases in mortality following long-term adjuvant tamoxifen therapy

The impressive first results of the Adjuvant Tamoxifen: Longer Against Shorter (ATLAS) and the adjuvant Tamoxifen To offer more (aTTom) trials both demonstrate that 10 years of tamoxifen is superior to five years of treatment. Tamoxifen is a nonsteroidal antiestrogen that blocks estrogen-stimulated tumor growth. Paradoxically, mortality decreases dramatically only in the decade after long-term tamoxifen is stopped. It is proposed that the evolution and clonal selection of micrometastases that acquire tamoxifen resistance now become increasingly vulnerable to endogenous estrogen-induced apoptosis. Laboratory and clinical studies confirm the concept, and supporting clinical evidence from the estrogen-alone trial in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), demonstrate that long-term estrogen-deprived women given exogenous physiologic estrogen have a decreased incidence of breast cancer and decreased mortality. It is proposed that a natural process of apoptosis is recruited to execute the long-term survival benefit of stopping ten years of adjuvant tamoxifen, but only after clonal selection of vulnerable breast cancer cells in an estrogen-deprived environment.

Acquired resistance to selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) in clinical practice (tamoxifen & raloxifene) by selection pressure in breast cancer cell populations

Tamoxifen, a pioneering selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), has long been a therapeutic choice for all stages of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. The clinical application of long-term adjuvant antihormone therapy for the breast cancer has significantly improved breast cancer survival. However, acquired resistance to SERM remains a significant challenge in breast cancer treatment. The evolution of acquired resistance to SERMs treatment was primarily discovered using MCF-7 tumors transplanted in athymic mice to mimic years of adjuvant treatment in patients. Acquired resistance to tamoxifen is unique because the growth of resistant tumors is dependent on SERMs. It appears that acquired resistance to SERM is initially able to utilize either E2 or a SERM as the growth stimulus in the SERM-resistant breast tumors. Mechanistic studies reveal that SERMs continuously suppress nuclear ER-target genes even during resistance, whereas they function as agonists to activate multiple membrane-associated molecules to promote cell growth. Laboratory observations in vivo further show that three phases of acquired SERM-resistance exists, depending on the length of SERMs exposure. Tumors with Phase I resistance are stimulated by both SERMs and estrogen. Tumors with Phase II resistance are stimulated by SERMs, but are inhibited by estrogen due to apoptosis. The laboratory models suggest a new treatment strategy, in which limited-duration, low-dose estrogen can be used to purge Phase II-resistant breast cancer cells. This discovery provides an invaluable insight into the evolution of drug resistance to SERMs, and this knowledge is now being used to justify clinical trials of estrogen therapy following long-term antihormone therapy. All of these results suggest that cell populations that have acquired resistance are in constant evolution depending upon selection pressure. The limited availability of growth stimuli in any new environment enhances population plasticity in the trial and error search for survival.

Effects of Tamoxifen and oestrogen on histology and radiographic density in high and low mammographic density human breast tissues maintained in murine tissue engineering chambers

Mammographic density (MD) is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. It is altered by exogenous endocrine treatments, including hormone replacement therapy and Tamoxifen. Such agents also modify breast cancer (BC) risk. However, the biomolecular basis of how systemic endocrine therapy modifies MD and MD-associated BC risk is poorly understood. This study aims to determine whether our xenograft biochamber model can be used to study the effectiveness of therapies aimed at modulating MD, by examine the effects of Tamoxifen and oestrogen on histologic and radiographic changes in high and low MD tissues maintained within the biochamber model. High and low MD human tissues were precisely sampled under radiographic guidance from prophylactic mastectomy fresh specimens of high-risk women, then inserted into separate vascularized murine biochambers. The murine hosts were concurrently implanted with Tamoxifen, oestrogen or placebo pellets, and the high and low MD biochamber tissues maintained in the murine host environment for 3 months, before the high and low MD biochamber tissues were harvested for histologic and radiographic analyses. The radiographic density of high MD tissue maintained in murine biochambers was decreased in Tamoxifen-treated mice compared to oestrogen-treated mice (p = 0.02). Tamoxifen treatment of high MD tissue in SCID mice led to a decrease in stromal (p = 0.009), and an increase in adipose (p = 0.023) percent areas, compared to placebo-treated mice. No histologic or radiographic differences were observed in low MD biochamber tissue with any treatment. High MD biochamber tissues maintained in mice implanted with Tamoxifen, oestrogen or placebo pellets had dynamic and measurable histologic compositional and radiographic changes. This further validates the dynamic nature of the MD xenograft model, and suggests the biochamber model may be useful for assessing the underlying molecular pathways of Tamoxifen-reduced MD, and in testing of other pharmacologic interventions in a preclinical model of high MD.

Emergence of constitutively active estrogen receptor-α mutations in pretreated advanced estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

PURPOSE

We undertook this study to determine the prevalence of estrogen receptor (ER) α (ESR1) mutations throughout the natural history of hormone-dependent breast cancer and to delineate the functional roles of the most commonly detected alterations.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We studied a total of 249 tumor specimens from 208 patients. The specimens include 134 ER-positive (ER(+)/HER2(-)) and, as controls, 115 ER-negative (ER(-)) tumors. The ER(+) samples consist of 58 primary breast cancers and 76 metastatic samples. All tumors were sequenced to high unique coverage using next-generation sequencing targeting the coding sequence of the estrogen receptor and an additional 182 cancer-related genes.

RESULTS

Recurring somatic mutations in codons 537 and 538 within the ligand-binding domain of ER were detected in ER(+) metastatic disease. Overall, the frequency of these mutations was 12% [9/76; 95% confidence interval (CI), 6%-21%] in metastatic tumors and in a subgroup of patients who received an average of 7 lines of treatment the frequency was 20% (5/25; 95% CI, 7%-41%). These mutations were not detected in primary or treatment-naïve ER(+) cancer or in any stage of ER(-) disease. Functional studies in cell line models demonstrate that these mutations render estrogen receptor constitutive activity and confer partial resistance to currently available endocrine treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we show evidence for the temporal selection of functional ESR1 mutations as potential drivers of endocrine resistance during the progression of ER(+) breast cancer.

Development of resistance to targeted therapies transforms the clinically associated molecular profile subtype of breast tumor xenografts

The effectiveness of therapies targeting specific pathways in breast cancer, such as the estrogen receptor or HER2, is limited because many tumors manifest resistance, either de novo or acquired, during the course of treatment. To investigate molecular mechanisms of resistance, we used two xenograft models of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, one with and one without HER2 overexpression (MCF7/HER2-18 and MCF7 wt, respectively). Mice with established tumors were assigned to the following treatment groups: estrogen supplementation (E2), estrogen deprivation (ED), ED plus tamoxifen (Tam), all with or without the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib (G). Another group received ED plus the antiestrogen fulvestrant (MCF7 wt only). Tumors with acquired or de novo resistance to these endocrine therapies were profiled for gene expression and compared with tumors in the E2 control group. One class of genes underexpressed in endocrine-resistant tumors (relative to E2-treated tumors) were estrogen inducible in vitro and associated with ER+ human breast cancers (luminal subtype). Another class of genes overexpressed in tumors with acquired resistance in both models represented transcriptional targets of HER2 signaling and was associated with ER-/HER2+ human cancers (ERBB2+ subtype). A third class of genes overexpressed in MCF7/HER2-18 tumors exhibiting de novo resistance to tamoxifen was associated with ER+ human cancers but not with estrogen-regulated genes. Thus, in response to various endocrine therapy regimens, these xenograft breast tumors shut down classic estrogen signaling and activate alternative pathways such as HER2 that contribute to treatment resistance. Over time, the molecular phenotype of breast cancer can change.

Tamoxifen-stimulated growth of breast cancer due to p21 loss

Tamoxifen is widely used for the treatment of hormonally responsive breast cancers. However, some resistant breast cancers develop a growth proliferative response to this drug, as evidenced by tumor regression upon its withdrawal. To elucidate the molecular mediators of this paradox, tissue samples from a patient with tamoxifen-stimulated breast cancer were analyzed. These studies revealed that loss of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 was associated with a tamoxifen growth-inducing phenotype. Immortalized human breast epithelial cells with somatic deletion of the p21 gene were then generated and displayed a growth proliferative response to tamoxifen, whereas p21 wild-type cells demonstrated growth inhibition upon tamoxifen exposure. Mutational and biochemical analyses revealed that loss of p21's cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitory property results in hyperphosphorylation of estrogen receptor-alpha, with subsequent increased gene expression of estrogen receptor-regulated genes. These data reveal a previously uncharacterized molecular mechanism of tamoxifen resistance and have potential clinical implications for the management of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancers.

New insights into the metabolism of tamoxifen and its role in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer

The metabolism of tamoxifen is being redefined in the light of several important pharmacological observations. Recent studies have identified 4-hydroxy N-desmethyltamoxifen (endoxifen) as an important metabolite of tamoxifen necessary for antitumor actions. The metabolite is formed through the enzymatic product of CYP2D6 which also interacts with specific selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) used to prevent the hot flashes observed in up to 45% of patients taking tamoxifen. Additionally, the finding that enzyme variants of CYP2D6 do not promote the metabolism of tamoxifen to endoxifen means that significant numbers of women might not receive optimal benefit from tamoxifen treatment. Clearly these are particularly important issues not only for breast cancer treatment but also for selecting premenopausal women, at high risk for breast cancer, as candidates for chemoprevention using tamoxifen.

Can the combination of flaxseed and its lignans with soy and its isoflavones reduce the growth stimulatory effect of soy and its isoflavones on established breast cancer?

Consumption of phytoestrogen (PE)-rich foods (i. e., soy and flaxseed (FS)) is increasing because of their suggested health benefits. However, recent studies raise concern over the safety of soy and its isoflavones, particularly genistein (GEN), for postmenopausal breast cancer (BC), due to their potential stimulatory effects on human breast tissue and on the growth of existing tumors in rodents. FS, rich in PE lignans, which is metabolized to the mammalian lignans enterolactone (ENL) and enterodiol (END), has consistently been shown to have tumor inhibitory effects in a human clinical trial as well as rodent BC models. Using the preclinical athymic mouse postmenopausal BC model, combining FS with soy protein or GEN with END and ENL, was found to negate the tumor stimulatory effects of soy protein or GEN alone. The mechanism may be related to the modulation of estrogen receptor and MAPK signaling pathways. If these studies can be confirmed in clinical trials, then consumption of combined soy and FS, or their PEs, may reduce the tumor growth stimulatory effect of soy or GEN. This may indicate that if soy is consumed with lignan-rich foods, it may continue to induce its other beneficial health effects, without inducing adverse effect on postmenopausal BC.

Emerging principles for the development of resistance to antihormonal therapy: implications for the clinical utility of fulvestrant

We seek to evaluate the clinical consequences of resistance to antihormonal therapy by studying analogous animal xenograft models. Two approaches were taken: (1) MCF-7 tumors were serially transplanted into selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM)-treated immunocompromised mice to mimic 5 years of SERM treatment. The studies in vivo were designed to replicate the development of acquired resistance to SERMs over years of clinical exposure. (2) MCF-7 cells were cultured long-term under SERM-treated or estrogen withdrawn conditions (to mimic aromatase inhibitors), and then injected into mice to generate endocrine-resistant xenografts. These tumor models have allowed us to define Phase I and Phase II antihormonal resistance according to their responses to E(2) and fulvestrant. Phase I SERM-resistant tumors were growth stimulated in response to estradiol (E(2)), but paradoxically, Phase II SERM and estrogen withdrawn-resistant tumors were growth inhibited by E(2). Fulvestrant did not support growth of Phases I and II SERM-resistant tumors, but did allow growth of Phase II estrogen withdrawn-resistant tumors. Importantly, fulvestrant plus E(2) in Phase II antihormone-resistant tumors reversed the E(2)-induced inhibition and instead resulted in growth stimulation. These data have important clinical implications. Based on these and prior laboratory findings, we propose a clinical strategy for optimal third-line therapy: patients who have responded to and then failed at least two antihormonal treatments may respond favorably to short-term low-dose estrogen due to E(2)-induced apoptosis, followed by treatment with fulvestrant plus an aromatase inhibitor to maintain low tumor burden and avoid a negative interaction between physiologic E(2) and fulvestrant.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs): mechanisms of anticarcinogenesis and drug resistance

Despite the beneficial effects of estrogens in women's health, there is a plethora of evidence that suggest an important role for these hormones, particularly 17beta-estradiol (E(2)), in the development and progression of breast cancer. Most estrogenic responses are mediated by estrogen receptors (ERs), either ERalpha or ERbeta, which are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are ER ligands that in some tissues (i.e. bone and cardiovascular system) act like estrogens but block estrogen action in others. Tamoxifen is the first SERM that has been successfully tested for the prevention of breast cancer in high-risk women and is currently approved for the endocrine treatment of all stages of ER-positive breast cancer. Raloxifene, a newer SERM originally developed for osteoporosis, also appears to have preventive effect on breast cancer incidence. Numerous studies have examined the molecular mechanisms for the tissue selective action of SERMs, and collectively they indicate that different ER ligands induce distinct conformational changes in the receptor that influence its ability to interact with coregulatory proteins (i.e. coactivators and corepressors) critical for the regulation of target gene transcription. The relative expression of coactivators and corepressors, and the nature of the ER and its target gene promoter also affect SERM biocharacter. This review summarizes the therapeutic application of SERMs in medicine; particularly breast cancer, and highlights the emerging understanding of the mechanism of action of SERMs in select target tissues, and the inevitable development of resistance.

Estrogen or antiprogestin treatment induces complete regression of pulmonary and axillary metastases in an experimental model of breast cancer progression

In this paper we demonstrate, using the C7-2-HI metastatic transplantable ductal mammary tumor, that endocrine therapy can induce complete regression of spontaneous lymph node and lung metastases in a mouse model of breast cancer progression. This tumor expresses high levels of estrogen and progesterone receptors and shows a high incidence of early axillary lymph nodes and lung metastases; using this model we had previously shown complete tumor regression of subcutaneous implants. Interestingly, although the metastases showed a more differentiated histology as compared with the primary growth, they underwent complete regression when treated with estrogens or antiprogestins. This phenomenon was associated with sustained cytostasis and apoptosis accompanied by increases in p21 and p27 expression and early tissue remodeling. These results highlight the essential role of PR in regulating cell proliferation in this model as well as its possible use as therapeutic target.

Estrogen receptor mutations in human disease

As early as the 1800s, the actions of estrogen have been implicated in the development and progression of breast cancer. The estrogen receptor (ER) was identified in the late 1950s and purified a few years later. However, it was not until the 1980s that the first ER was molecularly cloned, and in the mid 1990s, a second ER was cloned. These two related receptors are now called ERalpha and ERbeta, respectively. Since their discovery, much research has focused on identifying alterations within the coding sequence of these receptors in clinical samples. As a result, a large number of naturally occurring splice variants of both ERalpha and ERbeta have been identified in normal epithelium and diseased or cancerous tissues. In contrast, only a few point mutations have been identified in human patient samples from a variety of disease states, including breast cancer, endometrial cancer, and psychiatric diseases. To elucidate the mechanism of action for these variant isoforms or mutant receptors, experimental mutagenesis has been used to analyze the function of distinct amino acid residues in the ERs. This review will focus on ERalpha and ERbeta alterations in breast cancer.

Estrogenic effects of toremifene and tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer patients

Intrinsic estrogenicities of the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) toremifene 60 mg daily or 200 mg daily and tamoxifen 20 mg daily (TOR60, TOR200 and TAM20) were compared in a randomized clinical study in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. The study was open label in three parallel groups. Variables for analysis were serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), estradiol (E2), antithrombin III (AT III), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) and vaginal cytology. Clinical efficacy and safety have been reported earlier. A total of 648 patients were randomized (221 to TOR60, 212 to TOR200 and 215 to TAM20). Sera were available for the analysis from 148, 165 and 156 and for vaginal cytology from 98, 93 and 86 patients, respectively. All treatment regimens showed tissue-specific and dose-dependent estrogen agonist effect. In the primary measure of in vivo estrogenicity, effect on hypothalamus-pituitary-axis, all three treatment regimens decreased serum FSH (p < 0.001). TOR200 was more potent than the two other treatments (p < 0.05), but surprisingly, TAM20 was more estrogenic than TOR60 (p < 0.001). As could be expected in postmenopausal women, the treatments had no effect on mean serum E2 concentrations and decrease of serum LH was similar to that of FSH. Estrogenic effect on the liver was seen as dose-dependent increase of SHBG with statistically significant differences between the treatment groups (p < 0.001). Trends of transient ASAT elevations in TOR200 group (p = 0.07) and in all treatment groups AT III decrease (p = 0.1) were seen in the beginning of the treatment. TOR60 or TAM20 did not have an effect on mean ASAT values, and AT III decreased in TAM20 group more than in the two other groups (p = 0.1 compared to TOR60 and p < 0.05 compared to TOR200). Estrogenic effects on vaginal superficial cells were higher in TOR60 and TOR200 groups when compared to TAM20 (p < 0.05). Toremifene and tamoxifen had tissue-specific and partially dose-dependent estrogenic effects in hypothalamus-pituitary-axis, in the liver and in the vaginal epithelium of postmenopausal women. In some tissues tamoxifen 20 may be more estrogenic than toremifene 60 mg/day.

Full activation of estrogen receptor alpha activation function-1 induces proliferation of breast cancer cells

The effects of estrogen and anti-estrogen are mediated through the estrogen receptors (ER) alpha and beta, which function as ligand-induced transcriptional factors. Recently, one of the phthalate esters, n-butylbenzyl phthalate (BBP), has been shown to induce estrogen receptor-mediated responses. By using the truncated types of ER mutants, we revealed that activation function-1 (AF-1) activity was necessary for the BBP-dependent transactivation function of ERalpha. AF-1 is also known to be responsible for the partial agonistic activity of tamoxifen. Whereas tamoxifen exhibits an anti-estrogenic effect on proliferation of the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line, BBP showed an estrogenic effect on MCF-7 to stimulate proliferation. In vivo and in vitro binding assays revealed that whereas 4-hydroxytamoxifen (OHT) induced binding of ERalpha to both an AF-1 coactivator complex (p68/p72 and p300) and corepressor complexes (N-CoR/SMRT), BBP selectively enhanced the binding to the AF-1 coactivators. We also showed that the transcriptional activity of OHT-bound ERalpha was modulated by the ratio between the AF-1 coactivator and corepressor complexes. Expression of a dominant-negative type of N-CoR inhibited the interaction between OHT-bound ERalpha and N-CoR/SMRT and enhanced the transcriptional activity of OHT-bound ERalpha. Furthermore, the cell growth of MCF-7 stably expressing the dominant-negative type of N-CoR was enhanced by the addition of OHT. These results indicated that fully activated AF-1 induces the stimulation of breast cancer growth and that the ratio between AF-1 coactivators and corepressors plays a key role to prevent proliferation of tumor by tamoxifen.

Structure-function relationships of the raloxifene-estrogen receptor-alpha complex for regulating transforming growth factor-alpha expression in breast cancer cells

Amino acid Asp-351 in the ligand binding domain of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) plays an important role in regulating the estrogen-like activity of selective estrogen receptor modulator-ERalpha complexes. 4-Hydroxytamoxifen is a full agonist at a transforming growth factor alpha target gene in situ in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells stably transfected with the wild-type ERalpha. In contrast, raloxifene (Ral), which is also a selective estrogen receptor modulator, is a complete antiestrogen in this system. Because D351G ERalpha allosterically silences activation function-1 activity in the 4-hydroxytamoxifen-ERalpha complex with the complete loss of estrogen-like activity, we examined the converse interaction of amino acid 351 and the piperidine ring of the antiestrogen side chain of raloxifene to enhance estrogen-like action. MDA-MB-231 cells were either transiently or stably transfected with Asp-351 (the wild type), D351E, D351Y, or D351F ERalpha expression vectors. Profound differences in the agonist and antagonist actions of Ralcenter dotERalpha complexes were noted only in stable transfectants. The agonist activity of the Ralcenter dotERalpha complex was enhanced with D351E and D351Y ERalpha, but raloxifene lost its agonist activity with D351F ERalpha. The distance between the piperidine nitrogen of raloxifene and the negative charge of amino acid 351 was critical for estrogen-like actions. The role of the piperidine ring in neutralizing Asp-351 was addressed using compound R1h, a raloxifene derivative replacing the nitrogen on its piperidine ring with a carbon to form cyclohexane. The derivative was a potent agonist with wild type ERalpha. These results support the concept that the side chain of raloxifene shields and neutralizes the Asp-351 to produce an antiestrogenic ERalpha complex. Alteration of either the side chain or its relationship with the negative charge at amino acid 351 controls the estrogen-like action at activating function 2b of the selective estrogen receptor modulator ERalpha complex.

The tamoxifen-responsive estrogen receptor alpha mutant D351Y shows reduced tamoxifen-dependent interaction with corepressor complexes

The effects of estrogen and anti-estrogen are mediated through the estrogen receptors ERalpha and beta, which function as ligand-induced transcriptional factors. The nonsteroidal anti-estrogen tamoxifen is the most commonly used endocrine in the treatment of all stages of breast cancer in both pre- and postmenopausal women. Several lines of evidence have indicated that tamoxifen promotes association between ERalpha and corepressors N-CoR or silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT). Our results indicate that N-CoR/SMRT recognize and interact with helices H3 and H5 of the ERalpha ligand-binding domain in a 4-hydroxy tamoxifen-dependent manner. The mutant ERalpha(D351Y), derived from a tamoxifen-stimulated tumor and containing an amino acid substitution at position 351 within H3, showed reduced interaction with N-CoR/SMRT and high tamoxifen-induced activation function-1 (AF-1) activity. While the estradiol-dependent transcriptional activity of ERalpha(D351Y) was almost equal to that of wild-type ERalpha, the mutant exhibited higher levels of transcriptional activity in the presence of both E2 and 4-hydroxy tamoxifen compared with wild-type ERalpha. These results may explain the observation that the growth of tumor cells expressing ERalpha(D351Y) can be stimulated by tamoxifen, E2, or both.

Control of the estrogen-like actions of the tamoxifen-estrogen receptor complex by the surface amino acid at position 351

Tamoxifen is a valuable therapeutic agent with applications in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. However, the development of drug resistance limits the usefulness of tamoxifen therapy. One form of drug resistance in breast cancer is tamoxifen-stimulated growth. We have addressed a mechanism how the tamoxifen-estrogen receptor (ER) complex can convert from being a blocking to stimulatory signal in breast cancer. We have described an effective assay system to study the action of antiestrogen-ER complex through the activation of transforming growth factor alpha gene in situ. The MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were stably transfected with cDNAs for wtER (D351), mutant Asp351Tyr ER (D351Y) and mutant Asp351Gly ER (D351G). The D351Y ER can enhance the estrogenic properties of 4OHT and change the pharmacology of raloxifene by converting it from antiestrogen to estrogen. We hypothesized that alterations in the charge of amino acid (aa) 351, and changes in the interaction with the side chain of an antiestrogen, are critical for the subsequent estrogenicity of the complex. Our goal was (1) to modulate the estrogenicity of the antiestrogen-ER complex by different aa substitutions at position 351 and (2) to examine the role of alterations in the side chain of antiestrogens on the estrogenicity of the complex. Substitution of tyrosine for aspartate at aa351 results in increased estrogenicity for a series of tamoxifen derivatives-ER complexes and the conversion of EM 652-ER and GW 7604-ER complexes from antiestrogenic to estrogen-like. Substitution of glycine for aspartate at aa 351 results in the conversion of 4OHT-ER complex from estrogen-like to antiestrogenic. We propose that the side chain of antiestrogens either neutralizes or displaces the charge at aspartate 351 thereby removing a charged site for the opportunistic binding of a novel coactivator. If no charge is present (D351G) then no coactivator can bind and the complex with any antiestrogen is not estrogen-like. However, if the charge is extended beyond the reach of an antiestrogen side chain (D351Y), then the coactivators bind and compounds are estrogen-like. The establishment of a relationship between the structure of the antiestrogen-ER complex and its function will enhance the development of novel compounds with unique biological activities and potentially avoid premature drug resistance.

Thoughts on tamoxifen resistant breast cancer. Are coregulators the answer or just a red herring?

The antiestrogen tamoxifen is an effective treatment for estrogen receptor positive breast cancers, slowing tumor growth and preventing disease recurrence, with relatively few side effects. However, many patients who initially respond to treatment, later become resistant to treatment. Tamoxifen has both agonist and antagonist activities, which are manifested in a tissue-specific pattern. Development of tamoxifen resistance can be characterized by an increase in the partial agonist properties of the antiestrogen in the breast, resulting in loss of growth inhibition and even inappropriate tumor stimulation. Nuclear receptor function is modulated by transcriptional coregulators, which either enhance or repress receptor activity. Using a mixed antagonist-biased two-hybrid screening strategy, we identified two such proteins: the human homolog of the nuclear receptor corepressor, N-CoR, and a novel coactivator, L7/SPA (Switch Protein for Antagonists). In transcriptional studies N-CoR suppressed the agonist properties of tamoxifen and RU486, while L7/SPA increased agonist effects. We speculated that the relative level of these coactivators and corepressors might determine the balance of agonist and antagonist properties of mixed antagonists such as tamoxifen. Using quantitative RT-PCR we therefore measured the levels of transcripts encoding these coregulators, as well as the corepressor SMRT, and the coactivator SRC-1, in a small cohort of tamoxifen resistant and sensitive breast tumors. The results suggest that tumor sensitivity to mixed antagonists may be governed by a complex set of transcription factors, which we are only now beginning to understand.

Nuclear receptor conformation, coregulators, and tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer

The development of tamoxifen resistance and consequent disease progression are common occurrences in breast cancers, often despite the continuing expression of estrogen receptors (ER). Tamoxifen is a mixed antagonist, having both agonist and antagonist properties. We have suggested that the development of tamoxifen resistance is associated with an increase in its agonist-like properties, resulting in loss of antagonist effects or even inappropriate tumor stimulation. Nuclear receptor function is influenced by a family of transcriptional coregulators, that either enhance or suppress transcriptional activity. Using a mixed antagonist-biased two-hybrid screening strategy, we identified two such proteins: the human homolog of the nuclear receptor corepressor, N-CoR, and a novel coactivator, L7/SPA (Switch Protein for Antagonists). In transcriptional studies, N-CoR suppressed the agonist properties of tamoxifen and RU486, and L7/SPA increased agonist effects. We speculated that the relative levels of these coactivators and corepressors may determine the balance of agonist and antagonist properties of mixed antagonists, such as tamoxifen. Using quantitative RT-PCR, we, therefore, measured the levels of transcripts encoding these coregulators, as well as the corepressor SMRT, and the coactivator SRC-1, in a small cohort of tamoxifen-resistant and sensitive breast tumors. The results suggest that tumor sensitivity to mixed antagonists may be governed by a complex set of transcription factors, which we are only now beginning to understand.

Effects of angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 on tamoxifen-stimulated MCF-7 breast tumors in nude mice

The antitumor effect of TNP-470, antiangiogenic drug, was analyzed in the tamoxifen-stimulated MT-2 tumors inoculated in the athymic nude mice. TNP-470 was injected subcutaneously at a dose of 30 mg/kg body weight twice a week to mice which were randomized into three treatments: control (sham treatment), tamoxifen alone, and tamoxifen plus TNP-470. TNP-470 inhibited the growth of the tamoxifen-stimulated MT2 tumors without any major side effects or significant weight loss compared with tamoxifen-treated mice alone. The mean tumor area of the mice treated with tamoxifen plus TNP-470 was reduced 50% to those treated with tamoxifen alone. TNP-470 was shown to inhibit tumor neovascularization and to increase incidence of apoptosis in tumor cells. TNP-470 did not affect tamoxifen metabolism of the mice. In conclusion, TNP-470 could be evaluated clinically in patients with tamoxifen failure.

Aspartate 351 of estrogen receptor alpha is not crucial for the antagonist activity of antiestrogens

The antagonist activity of antiestrogens is due to the presence of a long carbon side chain at positions 7alpha or 11beta or equivalent on their steroid or steroid-like skeletons. These side chains establish hydrophobic interactions with amino acids of the estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) ligand binding domain. In addition, a hydrogen bond formed between amino acid Asp-351 and the tertiary amine present at the end of the side chain of partial antiestrogens is considered to be crucial for their antiestrogenicity. Here, we have investigated the role of Asp-351 in antiestrogen action in transiently transfected HeLa and MDA-MB-231 cells. Our results indicate that disruption of the negative charge at position 351 does not increase the agonist activity of partial antiestrogens and thus that the hydrogen bond with the antiestrogen side chain is not determinant in positioning the side chain in an antagonist position. The negative charge at position 351 was not required for transcriptional activity in the presence of hormone, but its presence was necessary for basal activity of the wild-type receptor and constitutive activities of mutants L536P and Y537A, suggesting a role of Asp-351 in stabilizing the active conformation of ERalpha. This stabilizing role of Asp-351 could be due to interaction of Asp-351 with the amide group of the peptide bond between Leu-539 and Leu-540 in helix 12 observed in the active conformation of the ERalpha ligand binding domain.

Development and characterization of a tamoxifen-resistant breast carcinoma xenograft

A human tamoxifen-resistant mammary carcinoma, MaCa 3366/TAM, originating from a sensitive parental xenograft 3366 was successfully established by treatment of tumour-bearing nude mice with 1-50 mg kg(-1) tamoxifen for 3 years during routine passaging. Both tumours did not differ significantly in OR- and PR-positivity, however, when compared with the sensitive tumour line, the mean OR content of the TAM-resistant subline is slightly lower. An OR-upregulation following withdrawal of oestradiol treatment was observed in the parental tumours but not in the resistant xenografts. Following long-term treatment with tamoxifen, the histological pattern of the breast carcinoma changed. The more differentiated structures being apparent after treatment with 17beta-oestradiol in the original 3366 tumour were not induced in the resistant line. Tamoxifen failed to induce a tumour growth inhibition in comparison to the tamoxifen-sensitive line. The pure anti-oestrogen, ICI 182 780, revealed cross-resistance. Sequence analysis of the hormone-binding domain of the OR of both lines showed no differences, suggesting that either mutations in other regions of the OR are involved in the TAM-resistance phenotype or that mechanisms outside of this protein induced this phenotype. Oestrogen and anti-oestrogen regulate pS2 and cathepsin D expression in 3366 tumours as in the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. The resistant 3366/TAM tumours have lost this regulation. The established breast cancer xenografts 3366 and 3366/TAM offer the possibility of investigating mechanisms of anti-oestrogen resistance in an in vivo situation. They can be used to test novel approaches to prevent, or to overcome, this resistance in a clinically related manner.

Estrogen receptor transcription and transactivation: Estrogen receptor alpha and estrogen receptor beta: regulation by selective estrogen receptor modulators and importance in breast cancer

Estrogens display intriguing tissue-selective action that is of great biomedical importance in the development of optimal therapeutics for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer, for menopausal hormone replacement, and for fertility regulation. Certain compounds that act through the estrogen receptor (ER), now referred to as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), can demonstrate remarkable differences in activity in the various estrogen target tissues, functioning as agonists in some tissues but as antagonists in others. Recent advances elucidating the tripartite nature of the biochemical and molecular actions of estrogens provide a good basis for understanding these tissue-selective actions. As discussed in this thematic review, the development of optimal SERMs should now be viewed in the context of two estrogen receptor subtypes, ERalpha and ERbeta, that have differing affinities and responsiveness to various SERMs, and differing tissue distribution and effectiveness at various gene regulatory sites. Cellular, biochemical, and structural approaches have also shown that the nature of the ligand affects the conformation assumed by the ER-ligand complex, thereby regulating its state of phosphorylation and the recruitment of different coregulator proteins. Growth factors and protein kinases that control the phosphorylation state of the complex also regulate the bioactivity of the ER. These interactions and changes determine the magnitude of the transcriptional response and the potency of different SERMs. As these critical components are becoming increasingly well defined, they provide a sound basis for the development of novel SERMs with optimal profiles of tissue selectivity as medical therapeutic agents.

Antiestrogen stimulated human endometrial cancer growth: laboratory and clinical considerations

The new antiestrogen toremifene (TOR) is currently on the market for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. TOR is known to exhibit a similar efficacy profile as tamoxifen (TAM) in the treatment of advanced breast cancer and there are studies to suggest that the beneficial side effects of TAM on bone and blood lipids are also achieved with TOR. However, the data concerning the action of TOR on the endometrium is sorely lacking. In light of the estrogenic effect of TAM on the uterus and the 2-3-fold increased incidence in endometrial carcinoma detected in patients receiving TAM therapy, it is imperative to investigate the effect of TOR on endometrial carcinoma. We compared the actions of TAM and TOR on the EnCa101 human endometrial tumor model and find that both antiestrogens have similar growth stimulatory effects. To investigate a potential mechanism of antiestrogen-stimulated endometrial tumor growth, we have examined known activators of the AP-1 signal transduction pathway, the protein kinase C (PKC) family of isozymes, in the EnCa101 human endometrial tumor model. We find that increased PKC isozyme expression correlates with hormone-independent breast cancer as well as antiestrogen-stimulated endometrial cancer.

The role of estrogen receptor mutations in tamoxifen-stimulated breast cancer

During the past 20 years, the hormonal therapy of choice for the treatment of breast cancer has been the antiestrogen, tamoxifen. The use of tamoxifen has been proved to produce a favorable response and survival advantage in patients whose tumors are classified as estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/progesterone receptor-positive (PR+). Additionally, tamoxifen is the only drug known to reduce the incidence of contralateral disease. This drug produces relatively few harmful side effects, while exhibiting several beneficial effects such as maintaining bone density and reducing the incidence of myocardial infarction in the postmenopausal woman. However, tumors eventually acquire a tamoxifen-resistant or tamoxifen-stimulated phenotype, resulting in disease recurrence. Several mechanisms have been proposed to account for tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer, in the hope of developing a more effective first-line or perhaps second-line treatment strategy. One popular theory is the occurrence of a mutation in the estrogen receptor, the drug target. A plethora of studies have reported the detection of estrogen receptor mRNA splice variants, and it has been suggested that the accumulation of these variant mRNAs are responsible for the development of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer. In this review, several questions will be posed to address the suitability of both laboratory and clinical evidence to support this hypothesis. Although there is adequate data generated in the laboratory, there is, as yet, no compelling evidence to suggest that mutation of the estrogen receptor is the molecular mechanism producing tamoxifen-stimulated growth in human breast and endometrial cancer.

Estrogenic activity is increased for an antiestrogen by a natural mutation of the estrogen receptor

The estrogen receptor (ER) functions as a ligand-activated transcription factor which mediates the actions of estrogens and antiestrogens in target tissues. Other investigators have shown that artificial point mutations in the transcriptional activation domain AF-2 of the ligand binding domain (LBD) of the ER can increase the estrogenic properties of antiestrogens, determined by transcriptional activation of estrogen-responsive reporter constructs cotransfected into cells. Although these data provide valuable information about ER function there is no evidence that these mutations occur naturally. We have taken a different approach and examined the naturally occurring codon 351 asp --> tyr mutation in the LBD of ER to stimulate the expression of an endogenous target gene. This approach avoids dependence on artificial reporter constructs and their idealized estrogen response elements (EREs). In this report we describe the regulation of transforming growth factor alpha (TGF alpha) mRNA by estradiol and the antiestrogens keoxifene and ICI 182,780 in our stable transfectants of ER-negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, which express either the wild-type (S30 cells) or codon 351 asp --> tyr mutant ER (BC-2 cells). The mutant receptor was identified in a tamoxifen-stimulated human breast tumor. Our results demonstrate, for the first time, that a naturally occurring mutation in the ER changes the pharmacology of the antiestrogen keoxifene by increasing estrogenic activity, and that keoxifene exhibits a gene-specific estrogen-like effect with mutant ER but not with wild-type ER. The pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780 maintained complete antagonistic activities in both ER transfectants, demonstrating that its action is unaffected by the mutation.

An analysis of tamoxifen-stimulated human carcinomas for mutations in the AF-2 region of the estrogen receptor

The estrogen receptor (ER) contains two transcriptional activation domains: AF-1 and AF-2. AF-2 is dependent on a highly species-conserved region of the ER. It has been shown that site-directed point mutations of conserved hydrophobic amino acids within this region reduce estrogen-dependent transcriptional activation. In addition, when these mutated ERs are transfected into HeLa cells, both tamoxifen and ICI 164,384 become strong agonists. The implication is that mutations in this region could account for the tamoxifen-stimulated tumors seen clinically. We performed single stranded conformational polymorphism (SSCP) analysis spanning the entire ER along with DNA sequencing of the AF-2 region of the ER isolated from two different tamoxifen-stimulated breast cancers, MCF-7/TAM and MCF-7/MT2, and a tamoxifen-stimulated endometrial cancer, EnCa 101. In addition, a tamoxifen-stimulated endometrial carcinoma cell line, the Ishikawa cell line, was also studied. There were no mutations found by SSCP analysis and sequencing of all four AF-2 regions also revealed no mutations. Mutations within the AF-2 region of the human ER do not appear to account for the growth of human breast and endometrial carcinomas that are used as reproducible laboratory models of tamoxifen-stimulated growth observed clinically.

Genetic mechanisms of estrogen-independence in breast cancer

Endocrine therapy is effective in the treatment of breast cancer. Adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen reduces tumor recurrence and achieves increased survival. In metastatic disease, tamoxifen treatment accomplishes objective responses in +/- 50% of the patients with estrogen receptor-positive primary tumors. However, the response duration is limited due to the inevitable development of metastases resistant to tamoxifen. The mechanisms leading to tamoxifen resistance are largely unknown. We have set out to identify genetic pathways in the tumor cells causing failure of tamoxifen therapy. We selected an estrogen-dependent human breast cancer cell line (ZR-75-1) and demonstrated that genetic and epigenetic alterations can change the hormone-response phenotype of these cells. Subsequently, we applied insertional mutagenesis with defective retroviruses to these ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells. Integration of a retrovirus in the cellular DNA alters the genome structure and may modify the expression of genes in its surroundings. As a result of the altered gene expression, the biological phenotype of the infected cell may be changed. The infected ZR-75-1 cells were subjected to tamoxifen selection and a panel of tamoxifen-resistant cell lines has been established. Screening for a common integration site for the retrovirus has provided, so far, compelling evidence for the involvement of at least one genetic locus (BCAR 1) in breast cancer antiestrogen resistance in vitro.

Increasing the number of tandem estrogen response elements increases the estrogenic activity of a tamoxifen analogue

There have been several reports of women who have tumor relapse while on tamoxifen therapy, followed by tumor regression after tamoxifen withdrawal. In such apparently tamoxifen-stimulated tumors, there is likely a genetic change which increases the estrogenicity of tamoxifen. In this study, we determine if increasing the number of estrogen response elements (EREs) in the promoter region of a reporter gene can alter the agonistic activity of fixed-ring 4-hydroxytamoxifen. We show that increasing the number of EREs in the promotor region increases the transcriptional response of the reporter plasmid to estradiol. We also find that while fixed-ring 4-hydroxytamoxifen is unable to stimulate transcription when one ERE is present, transcriptional activation can occur with multiple EREs. These results demonstrate that ERE amplification could explain the agonistic properties of tamoxifen, and suggests a novel mechanism to explain tamoxifen-stimulated breast cancer growth.

The biological action of cDNAs from mutated estrogen receptors transfected into breast cancer cells

While tamoxifen may inhibit breast cancer proliferation, mutations in the estrogen receptor could potentially result in breast cancer cells which can circumvent the tamoxifen blockade. Previously, we identified a mutation at codon 351 in the estrogen receptor from a tamoxifen-stimulated human breast cancer. This receptor was stably transfected into the estrogen receptor-negative human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 (clone 10A). Clones were compared to stably transfected cell lines containing either the wild type or codon 400 mutant estrogen receptor to study the effect of either estradiol or the tamoxifen analogue, fixed-ring 4-hydroxytamoxifen ((fr)4-OH TAM), on cell growth and reporter gene activation. (fr)4-OH TAM reduced the growth rate in cell lines containing mutant estrogen receptors, while the cell line containing the wild type estrogen receptor is minimally influenced by (fr)4-OH TAM. We then needed to show that the ligand-estrogen receptor interaction resulted in estrogen receptor activation. As a ligand-dependent transcription factor, estrogen receptor activation is measured by its ability to stimulate reporter gene (luciferase) transcription when bound to an estrogenic ligand. We found that the wild type estrogen receptor is activated by estradiol but not by the tamoxifen analogue, while the codon 351 estrogen receptor is activated by both (fr)4-OH TAM and estradiol.

The estrogen receptor from a tamoxifen stimulated MCF-7 tumor variant contains a point mutation in the ligand binding domain

The nonsteroidal antiestrogen tamoxifen (TAM) is the most commonly used endocrine treatment for all stages of breast cancer in both pre- and postmenopausal women. However, the development of resistance to the drug is common, as most patients treated with TAM eventually experience a recurrence of tumor growth. One of the potential mechanisms of treatment failure is the acquisition by the tumor of the ability to respond to TAM as a stimulatory rather than inhibitory ligand. We (Gottardis and Jordan, Cancer Res 48:5183-5187, 1988; Wolf et al., J Natl Cancer Inst 85:806-812, 1993) and others (Osborne et al., Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23: 1189-1196, 1987; Osborne et al., J Natl Cancer Inst 83: 1477-1482, 1991) have extensively described the reproducible development of TAM stimulated growth in a laboratory model system using MCF-7 human breast cancer cells grown as solid tumors in athymic mice. In this paper we report on the isolation of an estrogen receptor (ER) from a TAM stimulated tumor (MCF-7/MT2) which contains a point mutation that causes a tyrosine for aspartate substitution at amino acid 351 in the ligand binding domain. The mutant appears to the major form of ER expressed by this tumor. We also report that only wild type ER was detected in three other TAM stimulated MCF-7 tumor variants, suggesting that multiple mechanisms are possible for the development of TAM stimulated growth. The implications of these findings are discussed.