Controlled trial of antimycobacterial therapy in Crohn's disease. Clofazimine versus placebo

Antibiotics for inflammatory bowel disease: Current status

There is abundant literature reporting about the use of antibiotics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but their role in the management of IBD is not entirely clear. Diverse infectious organisms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease. Also, infections are believed to be a trigger for flares of ulcerative colitis. The benefit of the routine use of antibiotics in IBD is equivocal. However, there are certain situations, where antibiotics have a clear role and evidence of benefit: perianal fistula, intra-abdominal abscesses in Crohn's disease, acute pouchitis and infection-related flares. However, there is a lack of supportive evidence for the routine use of antibiotics in all disease-related flares. Evidence indicates a lack of benefit of intravenous antibiotics in acute severe ulcerative colitis and only limited benefit in active ulcerative colitis. Limited evidence suggests the role of a combination of oral antibiotics in pediatric ulcerative colitis. Certain targeted antibiotic regimens have been used in IBD. In ulcerative colitis, limited evidence suggests the benefit of the use of an antibiotic cocktail directed against Fusobacterium varium. Therapy directed against Escherichia coli does not seem to have a benefit in inflammatory Crohn's disease. In Crohn's disease, antimycobacterial therapy may result in symptomatic improvement but no durable benefit. Antitubercular therapy (ATT), on the contrary, may result in fibrotic transformation, suggesting a need to avoid misdiagnosis and limit the duration of ATT in Crohn's disease. This review assesses the published literature with respect to antibiotic use and provides guidance to clinicians in appropriate antibiotic use in various situations in the setting of IBD.

Distinct inflammatory Th17 subsets emerge in autoimmunity and infection

Th17 cells play a critical role in both tissue homeostasis and inflammation during clearance of infections as well as autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. Despite numerous efforts to distinguish the homeostatic and inflammatory roles of Th17 cells, the mechanism underlying the divergent functions of inflammatory Th17 cells remains poorly understood. In this study, we demonstrate that the inflammatory Th17 cells involved in autoimmune colitis and those activated during colitogenic infection are distinguishable populations characterized by their differential responses to the pharmacological molecule, clofazimine (CLF). Unlike existing Th17 inhibitors, CLF selectively inhibits proautoimmune Th17 cells while preserving the functional state of infection-elicited Th17 cells partially by reducing the enzyme ALDH1L2. Overall, our study identifies two distinct subsets within the inflammatory Th17 compartment with distinct regulatory mechanisms. Furthermore, we highlight the feasibility to develop disease-promoting Th17 selective inhibitor for treating autoimmune diseases.

ECCO Topical Review: Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic disease with variable degrees of extent, severity, and activity. A proportion of patients will have disease that is refractory to licensed therapies, resulting in significant impairment in quality of life. The treatment of these patients involves a systematic approach by the entire multidisciplinary team, with particular consideration given to medical options including unlicensed therapies, surgical interventions, and dietetic and psychological support. The purpose of this review is to guide clinicians through this process and provide an accurate summary of the available evidence for different strategies.

Antitubercular Therapy Given to Differentiate Crohn's Disease From Intestinal Tuberculosis Predisposes to Stricture Formation

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Treatment trial with antitubercular therapy [ATT] is a common strategy in tuberculosis-endemic countries in case of a diagnostic dilemma between intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease [CD]. Our aim was to determine the long-term clinical course of patients who received ATT before an eventual diagnosis of CD was made.

METHODS

We performed retrospective comparison between CD patients who received ≥6 months of ATT vs those who did not receive ATT. Outcomes assessed were change in disease behaviour during follow-up, requirement of surgery and medication use.

RESULTS

In all, 760 patients with CD were screened for the study and, after propensity matching for location and behaviour of disease, 79 patients in each group were compared. Progression from inflammatory [B1] to stricturing/fistulising [B2/B3] phenotype was increased among CD patients who received ATT [B1, B2, B3: 73.4%, 26.6%, 0% at baseline vs: 41.8%, 51.9%, 6.3% at follow-up, respectively] as compared with those who did not receive ATT [B1, B2, B3: 73.4%, 26.6%, 0% at baseline vs: 72.2%, 27.8%, 0% at follow-up, respectively] with an odds ratio of 11.05[3.17-38.56]. The usage of 5-aminosalocylates, steroids, immunosuppressants and anti-tumour necrosis factor was similar between both the groups. On survival analysis, CD patients who received ATT had a lower probability of remaining free of surgery [45%] than those who did not [76%] at 14 years of follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.22, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-7.12, p = 0.004].

CONCLUSIONS

Crohn's disease patients diagnosed after a trial with antitubercular therapy had an unfavourable long-term disease course with higher rate of stricture formation and less chance of remaining free of surgery.

Life-long antimicrobial therapy: where is the evidence?

The decision to prescribe long-term or 'life-long' antibiotics in patients requires careful consideration by the treating clinician. While several guidelines exist to help assist in this decision, the long-term consequences are yet to be well studied. In this review, we aim to provide a summary of the available evidence for patient populations where long-term antibiotic therapy is currently recommended in clinical practice. We will also discuss the pitfalls of this approach, including medication adverse effects, economic cost and any possible contribution to the emerging epidemic of microbial resistance.

Antibiotics and probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease: when to use them?

Antibiotics and probiotics are often used as adjunctive therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. However, data are limited and randomised controlled trials are too inconsistent to provide generalised recommendations for their use in all patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. Antibiotics are best used in the management of infectious complications and fistulas in Crohn's disease and, perhaps, in reducing the intensity of inflammation in luminal disease. Ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and rifaximin have been most widely used and studied. On the other hand, there appears to be a limited role for antibiotics in ulcerative colitis (UC). Probiotics are most effective in pouchitis, and may have a role in the initial therapy and maintenance of remission in mild UC; the probiotic cocktail VSL#3 has been the most widely studied. There is scant evidence of efficacy for probiotics in Crohn's disease.

Antimicrobial treatment with the fixed-dose antibiotic combination RHB-104 for Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Crohn's disease: pharmacological and clinical implications

INTRODUCTION

Crohn's disease (CD) is an inflammatory bowel disease of unknown etiology. However, increasing evidence suggests Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) as a putative causative agent: 1) MAP is the etiological agent of Johne's disease, a granulomatous enteritis affecting ruminants, which shares clinical and pathological features with CD; 2) MAP has been detected in tissues and blood samples from CD patients; 3) case reports have documented a favorable therapeutic response to anti-MAP antibiotics. Area covered: This review provides an appraisal of current information on MAP characteristics, diagnostic methodologies and emerging drug treatments. The authors focus on RHB-104, a novel oral formulation containing a fixed-dose combination of clarithromycin, clofazimine and rifabutin, endowed with synergistic inhibitory activity on MAP strains isolated from CD patients. Expert opinion: Based on encouraging in vitro data, RHB-104 has entered recently the clinical phase of its development, and is being investigated in a randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial aimed at evaluating its efficacy and safety in CD. Provided that the overall clinical development will support the suitability of RHB-104 for inducing disease remission in CD patients with documented MAP infection, this novel antibiotic combination will likely take a relevant position in the therapeutic armamentarium for CD management.

Antibiotics in inflammatory bowel diseases: do we know what we're doing?

Despite the revolution in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment over the past two decades with the advent of biological therapies, there remains a substantial proportion of patients with inadequate or unsustained response to existent therapies. The overwhelming focus of IBD therapeutics has been targeting mucosal immunity, however with the developing evidence base pointing to the role of gut microbes in the inflammatory process, renewed focus should be placed on the impact of manipulating the microbiome in IBD management. This review provides an overview of the evidence implicating bacteria in the pathogenesis of gut inflammation in IBD and provides an overview of the evidence of antibiotics in IBD treatment. We also suggest a potential role of antibiotics in clinical practice based on available evidence and clinical experience.

Antibiotics in IBD: Still a Role in the Biological Era?

Despite compelling evidence pointing to a critical role of gut microflora in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pathogenesis, the role of antibiotics in clinical practice remains limited, largely due to heterogeneous trials with often conflicting evidence. In this review, we revisit previous randomized controlled trials and high-quality uncontrolled studies in an effort to better elucidate the role of antibiotics in contemporary treatment algorithms. The most established role of antibiotics is in perianal Crohn's disease (CD), utilizing ciprofloxacin with or without metronidazole often as an adjunct to biological therapy. Evidence also points to a likely modest role of various antibiotic classes in mild to moderate luminal CD, including ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, azithromycin, and rifaximin. The benefit of metronidazole in preventing postoperative recurrence in CD is well reported; however, the long-term benefit of this intervention remains uncertain. The use of antibiotics in ulcerative colitis (UC) is even more controversial, but studies using broad-spectrum oral antibiotic cocktails have reported a possible role in acute severe colitis and chronic persistent UC. Similarly, the role of oral vancomycin and gentamicin in very early-onset IBD has interesting preliminary results. Adverse events of antibiotics, the resulting alterations in the microbiome with its associated unknown long-term sequela, and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains must be carefully balanced. Therefore, although antibiotics may be underused in the treatment of IBD, their integration into clinical practice must be approached judiciously and individually.

Review article: the gut microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease-avenues for microbial management

BACKGROUND

The concept of an altered collective gut microbiota rather than identification of a single culprit is possibly the most significant development in inflammatory bowel disease research. We have entered the "omics" era, which now allows us to undertake large-scale/high-throughput microbiota analysis which may well define how we approach diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the future, with a strong steer towards personalised therapeutics.

AIM

To assess current epidemiological, experimental and clinical evidence of the current status of knowledge relating to the gut microbiome, and its role in IBD, with emphasis on reviewing the evidence relating to microbial therapeutics and future microbiome modulating therapeutics.

METHODS

A Medline search including items 'intestinal microbiota/microbiome', 'inflammatory bowel disease', 'ulcerative colitis', 'Crohn's disease', 'faecal microbial transplantation', 'dietary manipulation' was performed.

RESULTS

Disease remission and relapse are associated with microbial changes in both mucosal and luminal samples. In particular, a loss of species richness in Crohn's disease has been widely observed. Existing therapeutic approaches broadly fall into 3 categories, namely: accession, reduction or indirect modulation of the microbiome. In terms of microbial therapeutics, faecal microbial transplantation appears to hold the most promise; however, differences in study design/methodology mean it is currently challenging to elegantly translate results into clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing approaches to modulate the gut microbiome are relatively unrefined. Looking forward, the future of microbiome-modulating therapeutics looks bright with several novel strategies/technologies on the horizon. Taken collectively, it is clear that ignoring the microbiome in IBD is not an option.

Endoscopic and clinical responses to anti-tubercular therapy can differentiate intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Differentiation between intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease is difficult and may require therapeutic trial with anti-tubercular therapy in tuberculosis-endemic regions.

AIM

To evaluate the role of therapeutic trial with anti-tubercular therapy in patients with diagnostic confusion between intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease.

METHODS

We performed retrospective-comparative (n = 288: 131 patients who received anti-tubercular therapy before being diagnosed as Crohn's disease and 157 intestinal tuberculosis patients) and prospective-validation study (n = 55 patients with diagnostic confusion of intestinal tuberculosis/Crohn's disease). Outcomes assessed were global symptomatic response and endoscopic mucosal healing.

RESULTS

In the derivation cohort, among those eventually diagnosed as Crohn's disease, global symptomatic response with anti-tubercular therapy was seen in 38% at 3 months and in 37% who completed 6 months of anti-tubercular therapy. Ninety-four per cent of intestinal tuberculosis patients showed global symptomatic response by 3 months. Endoscopic mucosal healing was seen in only 5% of patients with Crohn's disease compared with 100% of intestinal tuberculosis patients. In the validation cohort, all the patients with intestinal tuberculosis had symptomatic response and endoscopic mucosal healing after 6 months of anti-tubercular therapy. Among the patients with an eventual diagnosis of Crohn's disease, symptomatic response was seen in 64% at 2 months and in 31% who completed 6 months of anti-tubercular therapy, none had mucosal healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Disproportionately lower mucosal healing rate despite an overall symptom response with 6 months of anti-tubercular therapy in patients with Crohn's disease suggests a need for repeat colonoscopy for diagnosing Crohn's disease. Patients with intestinal tuberculosis showing significant symptomatic response after 2-3 months of anti-tubercular therapy, suggest that symptom persistence after a therapeutic trial of 3 months of anti-tubercular therapy may indicate the diagnosis of Crohn's disease.

Anti-tuberculous therapy for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

There have been a number of studies with conflicting results which have examined the effect of anti-tuberculous therapy in Crohn's disease. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the use of anti-tuberculous therapy for the maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of anti-tuberculous therapy for the maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn's disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane LIbrary, and the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Register from inception to June 22, 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-tuberculous therapy compared to placebo or another active therapy in patients with quiescent Crohn's disease were considered for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous outcomes.. The primary outcome was relapse. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, withdrawals due to adverse events and serious adverse events. All data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The overall quality of the evidence supporting the primary and secondary outcomes was evaluated using the GRADE criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

Four placebo-controlled RCTs including 206 participants were included. Three trials included an 8 to 16 week induction phase with tapering corticosteroids (prednisone, prednisolone or methylprednisolone) as induction therapy. Anti-tuberculous therapy included monotherapy with clofazimine, combination therapy with clofazimine, rifampin, ethambutol, and dapsone or combination therapy with clarithromycin, rifabutin and clofazimine. All of the studies were rated as unclear risk of bias for allocation concealment, three were rated as unclear risk of bias for random sequence generation and two were rated as unclear risk of bias for blinding or participants and personnel. There was a statistically significant difference in relapse rates favoring anti-tuberculous therapy over placebo. Thirty-nine per cent (44/112) of patients in the anti-tuberculous therapy group relapsed at 9 months to 2 years compared to 67% (63/94) of placebo patients (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75, I(2) = 47%). A GRADE analysis indicates that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was very low due to unknown risk of bias and sparse data. Adverse events occurred more frequently in the anti-tuberculous therapy group (37/159) compared to the placebo group (14/163) with a pooled RR of 2.57 (95% CI 1.45 to 4.55; N=322; studies=4, I(2)=64%). A GRADE analysis indicates that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was very low due to unknown risk of bias, unexplained heterogeneity and sparse data. There was no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events. Nine per cent (14/159) of anti-tuberculous therapy patients withdrew due to adverse events compared to 7% (11/163) of placebo patients (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.77, I(2) = 0%). Common adverse events included increased skin pigmentation and rashes. No serious adverse events were reported in any of the included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-tuberculous therapy may provide a benefit over placebo for the prevention of relapse in participants with Crohn's disease in remission. However, this result is very uncertain due to unclear study quality and the small numbers of patients assessed. Further studies are needed to provide better quality evidence for the use of anti-tuberculous therapy for maintaining remission in people with quiescent Crohn's disease.

Engineering the Microbiome: a Novel Approach to Immunotherapy for Allergic and Immune Diseases

The incidence of immune disorders is growing parallel with practices associated with westernization, such as dietary changes, increased use of antibiotics, or elevated rates of Cesarean section. These practices can significantly impact the gut microbiota, the collection of bacteria residing in the human gastrointestinal tract, and subsequently disrupt the delicate balance existing between commensal flora and host immune responses. Restoring this balance by modifying the microbiota has thus emerged as a promising therapeutic approach. Here, we discuss the interaction between gut commensals and immunity, along with the potential of different interventions on the microbiota as treatment for inflammatory and allergic diseases.

Targeting the Microbiome in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Critical Evaluation of Current Concepts and Moving to New Horizons

Microorganisms present in the intestine possess proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory activities which may modulate inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The concepts followed by researchers in trying to target the microbiota in IBD were to decrease pathogens or pathobionts, or only the microbial load, and more recently, to favor growth and persistence of favorable microorganisms. We review, here, those concepts and critically analyze the clinical data (especially randomized controlled trials) obtained using antibiotics and probiotics. We eventually present and criticize the rational and data obtained so far following new research strategies including the use of new probiotics, genetically modified organisms and fecal transplantation.

The Influence of the Gut Microbiome on Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome and Gastrointestinal Disease

There is a fine balance in the mutual relationship between the intestinal microbiota and its mammalian host. It is thought that disruptions in this fine balance contribute/account for the pathogenesis of many diseases. Recently, the significance of the relationship between gut microbiota and its mammalian host in the pathogenesis of obesity and the metabolic syndrome has been demonstrated. Emerging data has linked intestinal dysbiosis to several gastrointestinal diseases including inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and gastrointestinal malignancy. This article is intended to review the role of gut microbiota maintenance/alterations of gut microbiota as a significant factor as a significant factor discriminating between health and common diseases. Based on current available data, the role of microbial manipulation in disease management remains to be further defined and a focus for further clinical investigation.

The involvement of gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis: potential for therapy

Over the past recent years, a great number of studies have been directed toward the evaluation of the human host-gut microbiota interaction, with the goal to progress the understanding of the etiology of several complex diseases. Alterations in the intestinal microbiota associated with inflammatory bowel disease are well supported by literature data and have been widely accepted by the research community. The concomitant implementation of high-throughput sequencing techniques to analyze and characterize the composition of the intestinal microbiota has reinforced the view that inflammatory bowel disease results from altered interactions between gut microbes and the mucosal immune system and has raised the possibility that some form of modulation of the intestinal microbiota may constitute a potential therapeutic basis for the disease. The aim of this review is to describe the changes of gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease, focusing the attention on its involvement in the pathogenesis of the disease, and to review and discuss the therapeutic potential to modify the intestinal microbial population with antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation.

Probiotics and antibiotics in IBD

The involvement of the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of IBD is supported by many findings and is thus now commonly acknowledged. The imbalance in the composition of the microbiota (dysbiosis) observed in IBD patients is one of the strongest arguments and provides the rationale for a therapeutic manipulation of the gut microbiota. The tools available to achieve this goal include fecal microbiota transplantation, but antibiotics and probiotics have been the most used one until now. Although antibiotics have shown some efficacy in inducing remission in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), as well as preventing postoperative relapse in CD, they are not currently recommended for the treatment of IBD except for septic complications, notably because of long-term tolerance and ecological issues. Some probiotics have been shown to be as good as 5-aminosalicylic acid to maintain remission in mild-to-moderate UC, but have been disappointing until now in CD in all tested indications. In pouchitis, antibiotics and probiotics have shown efficacy for inducing and maintaining remission, respectively. Targeting the gut microbiota in IBD is an attractive strategy. Current efforts to better understand the host-microbiota interactions in physiological as well as disease settings might lead to the development of rational-based treatments.

Reasonable selection and application of antibiotics in the treatment of Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is one of the two major forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although the etiology of CD is unclear, many experimental and clinical observations support the potential role for intestinal microflora in the pathogenesis of CD. Manipulation of the luminal content using antibiotics may therefore represent a potentially effective therapeutic option. Some randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of these drugs in treating the perianal disease, inducing and maintaining of CD remission and decreasing CD recurrence rates in operated patients. But, the use of antibacterial therapy for CD is also controversial, even this approach is frequently and successfully adopted in clinical practice. Fairly narrow indications for antibiotics are suggested by current management guidelines. Large studies are required to better define the role of antibacterial agents and combination regimens in CD. Broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as metronidazole, fluoroquinolones and rifaximin, are widely used to treat CD, and their effects have been recognized. Because of the lack of adequate theoretical support and adverse drug reactions, the reasonable application of antibiotics to treat CD is still a clinical problem.

Antibiotics and inflammatory bowel diseases

Inflammatory bowel diseases are characterized by an altered composition of gut microbiota (dysbiosis) that may contribute to their development. Antibiotics can alter the bacterial flora, and a link between antibiotic use and onset of Crohn's disease (CD), but not ulcerative colitis, has been reported. The hypothesis that Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) could be an etiologic agent of CD has not been confirmed by a large study on patients treated by an association of antibiotics active against MAP. The observations supporting a role of intestinal microbiota in CD pathogenesis provide the rationale for a therapeutic manipulation of the intestinal flora through the employment of antibiotics. However, current data do not strongly support a therapeutic benefit from antibiotics, and there is still controversy regarding their use as primary therapy for treatment of acute flares of CD, and for postoperative recurrence prevention. Nevertheless, clinical practice and some studies suggest that a subgroup of patients with colonic involvement, early disease, and abnormal laboratory test of inflammation may respond better to antibiotic treatment. Since their long-term use is frequently complicated by a high rate of side effects, the use of antibiotics that work locally appears to be promising.

Microbial manipulation as primary therapy for Crohn's disease

While antimicrobials are clinically effective in preventing post-operative recurrence, the role for antibiotics in primary therapy for Crohn’s disease (CD) remains unclear. The recent multicenter phase 2 trial by Prantera et al received wide attention because it demonstrated an increase in the week 12 remission rate in patients with moderately active CD treated with rifaximin and renewed interest in microbial manipulation as primary therapy for CD. In this commentary, we discuss aspects of durability, immune cell polarization, and safety of microbial manipulation as primary therapy for CD.

Crohn's disease and the mycobacterioses: a quarter century later. Causation or simple association?

It has been more than 25 years since Mycobacterium paratuberculosis was first proposed as an etiologic agent in Crohn's disease based on the isolation of this organism from several patients. Since that time, a great deal of information has been accumulated that clearly establishes an association between M. paratuberculosis and Crohn's disease. However, data are conflicting and difficult to interpret and the field has become divided into committed advocates and confirmed skeptics. This review is an attempt to provide a thorough and objective summary of current knowledge from both basic and clinical research from the views and interpretations of both the antagonists and proponents. The reader is left to draw his or her own conclusions related to the validity of the issues and claims made by the opposing views and data interpretations. Whether M. paratuberculosis is a causative agent in some cases or simply represents an incidental association remains a controversial topic, but current evidence suggests that the notion should not be so readily dismissed. Remaining questions that need to be addressed in defining the role of M. paratuberculosis in Crohn's disease and future implications are discussed.

Antibiotic therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The etiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is unknown but may relate to an unidentified bacterial pathogen or an immunological reaction to gut microbiota. Antibiotics have therefore been proposed as a therapy for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) to induce remission in active disease to prevent relapse. Current data are conflicting and we therefore conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating antibiotics in IBD. Only parallel group RCTs were considered eligible. Studies with adult patients receiving any dose of therapy for at least 7 days and up to 16 weeks for active disease, or at least 6 months of follow-up for preventing relapse in quiescent disease were analyzed. We included any antibiotics alone or in combination using predefined definitions of remission and relapse. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and extracted data. The primary outcome was remission or relapse using an intention-to-treat methodology. The data were summarized using relative risk (RR) and pooled using a random effects model. For active CD, there were 10 RCTs involving 1,160 patients. There was a statistically significant effect of antibiotics being superior to placebo (RR of active CD not in remission=0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.73-0.99, P=0.03). There was moderate heterogeneity between results (I(2)=48%) and a diverse number of antibiotics were tested (anti-tuberculosis therapy, macrolides, fluroquinolones, 5-nitroimidazoles, and rifaximin) either alone or in combination. Rifamycin derivatives either alone or in combination with other antibiotics appeared to have a significant effect at inducing remission in active CD. In perianal CD fistula there were three trials evaluating 123 patients using either ciprofloxacin or metronidazole. There was a statistically significant effect in reducing fistula drainage (RR=0.8; 95% CI=0.66-0.98) with no heterogeneity (I(2)=0%) and an number needed to treat 5 (95% CI=3-20). For quiescent CD, there were 3 RCTs involving 186 patients treated with different antibiotics combinations (all including antimycobacterials) vs. placebo. There was a statistically significant effect in favor of antibiotics vs. placebo (RR of relapse=0.62; 95% CI=0.46-0.84), with no heterogeneity (I(2)=0%). In active UC, there were 9 RCTs with 662 patients and there was a statistically significant benefit for antibiotics inducing remission (RR of UC not in remission=0.64; 95% CI=0.43-0.96). There was moderate heterogeneity (I(2)=69%) and antibiotics used were all different single or combination drugs. Antibiotic therapy may induce remission in active CD and UC, although the diverse number of antibiotics tested means the data are difficult to interpret. This systematic review is a mandate for further trials of antibiotic therapy in IBD.

Intestinal bacteria and inflammatory bowel disease

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are the two principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Animal studies show that bacteria are involved in the etiology of IBD, and much is now known about the inflammatory processes associated with CD and UC, as well as the underlying genetic, environmental, and lifestyle issues that can affect an individual's predisposition to these diseases. However, while a number of candidate microorganisms have been put forward as causative factors in IBD, the primary etiologic agents are unknown. This review discusses the potential role of luminal and mucosal microbial communities in the etiology of IBD, and outlines studies that have been made using a variety of biotherapeutic therapies, involving the use of antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics.

Management of Crohn's disease in adults

Guidelines for clinical practice are intended to suggest preferable approaches to particular medical problems as established by interpretation and collation of scientifically valid research, derived from extensive review of published literature. When data that will withstand objective scrutiny are not available, a recommendation may be made based on a consensus of experts. Guidelines are intended to apply to the clinical situation for all physicians without regard to specialty. Guidelines are intended to be flexible, not necessarily indicating the only acceptable approach, and should be distinguished from standards of care that are inflexible and rarely violated. Given the wide range of choices in any health-care problem, the physician should select the course best suited to the individual patient and the clinical situation presented. These guidelines are developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology and its Practice Parameters Committee. Expert opinion is solicited from the outset for the document. The quality of evidence upon which a specific recommendation is based is as follows: Grade A: Homogeneous evidence from multiple well-designed randomized (therapeutic) or cohort (descriptive) controlled trials, each involving a number of participants to be of sufficient statistical power. Grade B: Evidence from at least one large well-designed clinical trial with or without randomization, from cohort or case-control analytic studies, or well-designed meta-analysis. Grade C: Evidence based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees. The Committee reviews guidelines in depth, with participation from experienced clinicians and others in related fields. The final recommendations are based on the data available at the time of the production of the document and may be updated with pertinent scientific developments at a later time.

Clofazimine inhibits human Kv1.3 potassium channel by perturbing calcium oscillation in T lymphocytes

The Kv1.3 potassium channel plays an essential role in effector memory T cells and has been implicated in several important autoimmune diseases including multiple sclerosis, psoriasis and type 1 diabetes. A number of potent small molecule inhibitors of Kv1.3 channel have been reported, some of which were found to be effective in various animal models of autoimmune diseases. We report herein the identification of clofazimine, a known anti-mycobacterial drug, as a novel inhibitor of human Kv1.3. Clofazimine was initially identified as an inhibitor of intracellular T cell receptor-mediated signaling leading to the transcriptional activation of human interleukin-2 gene in T cells from a screen of the Johns Hopkins Drug Library. A systematic mechanistic deconvolution revealed that clofazimine selectively blocked the Kv1.3 channel activity, perturbing the oscillation frequency of the calcium-release activated calcium channel, which in turn led to the inhibition of the calcineurin-NFAT signaling pathway. These effects of clofazimine provide the first line of experimental evidence in support of a causal relationship between Kv1.3 and calcium oscillation in human T cells. Furthermore, clofazimine was found to be effective in blocking human T cell-mediated skin graft rejection in an animal model in vivo. Together, these results suggest that clofazimine is a promising immunomodulatory drug candidate for treating a variety of autoimmune disorders.

Two-year combination antibiotic therapy with clarithromycin, rifabutin, and clofazimine for Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis has been proposed as a cause of Crohn's disease. We report a prospective, parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of 2 years of clarithromycin, rifabutin, and clofazimine in active Crohn's disease, with a further year of follow-up.

METHODS

Two hundred thirteen patients were randomized to clarithromycin 750 mg/day, rifabutin 450 mg/day, clofazimine 50 mg/day or placebo, in addition to a 16-week tapering course of prednisolone. Those in remission (Crohn's Disease Activity Index <or=150) at week 16 continued their study medications in the maintenance phase of the trial. Primary end points were the proportion of patients experiencing at least 1 relapse at 12, 24, and 36 months.

RESULTS

At week 16, there were significantly more subjects in remission in the antibiotic arm (66%) than the placebo arm (50%; P=.02). Of 122 subjects entering the maintenance phase, 39% taking antibiotics experienced at least 1 relapse between weeks 16 and 52, compared with 56% taking placebo (P=.054). At week 104, the figures were 26% and 43%, respectively (P=.14). During the following year, 59% of the antibiotic group and 50% of the placebo group relapsed (P=.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Using combination antibiotic therapy with clarithromycin, rifabutin, and clofazimine for up to 2 years, we did not find evidence of a sustained benefit. This finding does not support a significant role for Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease in the majority of patients. Short-term improvement was seen when this combination was added to corticosteroids, most likely because of nonspecific antibacterial effects.

Use of antibiotics in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

An increasing amount of evidence suggests that enteric flora may have a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients with IBD appear to have an altered composition of luminal bacteria that may provide the stimulus for the chronic inflammation characterizing IBD. The suspected role of bacteria in the pathogenesis of IBD provides the rationale for using agents, such as antibiotics, that alter the intestinal flora. However, there remains much uncertainty about the optimal use of antibiotics in the treatment of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and pouchitis. This article reviews the literature and presents a clinical model for the use of antibiotics in IBD.

Antibacterial and antimycobacterial treatment for inflammatory bowel disease

A variety of medicines have been used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Antibacterial therapy has demonstrated promise by both improving symptoms and causing disease remission. The mechanism is unknown, but may be related to either eliminating a key pathogen, decreasing the number of bacterial secretory products or defective particles, a direct immunomodulating effect, or reducing secondary bacterial invasion. Historically, a large number of bacterial species have been suspected as being major contributors to the etiology of inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Many trials of antibacterial agents have been carried out in inflammatory bowel disease. Recently, treatments have focused on Gram-negative anaerobes and mycobacteria. The present paper briefly reviews antimicrobial and antimycobacterial treatments in inflammatory bowel disease.

Is Crohn's disease caused by a mycobacterium? Comparisons with leprosy, tuberculosis, and Johne's disease

Although Crohn's disease is considered to be autoimmune in origin, there is increasing evidence that it may have an infectious cause. The most plausible candidate is Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP). Intriguingly, Koch's postulates may have been fulfilled for MAP and Crohn's disease, even though they still have not been met for Mycobacterium leprae and leprosy. In animals MAP causes Johne's disease, a chronic wasting intestinal diarrhoeal disease evocative of Crohn's disease. Johne's disease occurs in wild and domesticated animals, including dairy herds. Viable MAP is found in human and cow milk, and is not reliably killed by standard pasteurisation. MAP is ubiquitous in the environment including in potable water. Since cell-wall-deficient MAP usually cannot be identified by Ziehl-Neelsen staining, identification of MAP in human beings requires culture or detection of MAP DNA or RNA. If infectious in origin, Crohn's disease should be curable with appropriate antibiotics. Many studies that argue against a causative role for MAP in Crohn's disease have used antibiotics that are inactive against MAP. However, trials that include macrolide antibiotics indicate that a cure for Crohn's disease is possible. The necessary length of therapy remains to be determined. Mycobacterial diseases have protean clinical manifestations, as does Crohn's disease. The necessity of stratifying Crohn's disease into two clinical manifestations (perforating and non-perforating) when interpreting the results of antibiotic therapy is discussed. Rational studies to evaluate appropriate therapies to cure Crohn's disease are proposed.

Manipulation of the bacterial flora in inflammatory bowel disease

In this chapter we summarize the clinical and experimental data which indicate that bacteria, especially from the endogenous microflora, play a role in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and pouchitis. We review the clinical trials, focusing on randomized controlled trials which used antibiotics or probiotics to treat situations of IBD or prevent recurrence, and we discuss the future of this approach.

Microbial factors in inflammatory bowel disease

An unsolved puzzle in IBD research is whether germs, genes, or a combination of the two with excessive immune responses to gut-associated bacteria explains the pathogenesis of UC and CD. Whatever the answer, there is little doubt that microbial factors are involved intimately in IBD pathogenesis. Although a long search has failed to confirm a direct pathogenic role for a specific infectious agent, compelling evidence suggests that commensal enteric bacteria and their products provide a local environmental trigger that initiates and perpetuates IBD, reactivates quiescent disease, results in the frequent septic complications of CD, and contributes to the development of several extraintesinal manifestations. The most compelling evidence for involvement of the enteric flora in the pathogenesis of IBD has been generated from studies of animal models, which collectively support the view that IBD is due to genetically determined dysregulation of the mucosal immune response to luminal antigens derived from the normal bacterial flora. Although removing or dampening the dominant antigenic stimuli with antibiotics or probiotics is conceptually superior to the current array of immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory agents that nonspecifically block the inflammatory cascade, more definitive, rigorously designed, controlled trials of treatments directed at the microflora are needed. Future research investigating mechanisms of tolerance to luminal bacteria and an understanding of how probiotics can manipulate the intestinal flora beneficially will bring clinicians closer to identifying potential therapeutic targets and unraveling the bacterial connection to IBD pathogenesis.

Treatment of severe Crohn's disease using antimycobacterial triple therapy--approaching a cure?

BACKGROUND

Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis is probably the best candidate for a microbial cause of Crohn's disease although arguments to the contrary can be equally convincing. Growing evidence suggests that prolonged antimycobacterial combination therapy can improve Crohn's disease in some patients.

AIM

To report long-term observations in patients with severe Crohn's disease treated with triple macrolide-based antimycobacterial therapy.

PATIENTS

A series of 12 patients (7 male, 5 female; aged 15-42 years) with severe, obstructive or penetrating Crohn's disease were recruited.

METHODS

Patients failing maximal therapy were commenced prospectively on a combination of rifabutin (450 mg/d), clarithromycin (750 mg/d) and clofazimine (2 mg/kg/d). Progress was monitored through colonoscopy, histology, clinical response and Harvey-Bradshaw activity index.

RESULTS

Follow-up data were available for up to 54 months of therapy Six out of 12 patients experienced a full response to the antiMycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis combination achieving complete clinical, colonoscopic and histologic remission of Crohn's disease. Four of these patients were able to cease treatment after 24-46 months, 3 of whom remained in total remission without treatment for up to 26 months and one patient relapsed after six months off treatment. A partial response to the anti-Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis combination was seen in 2 patients showing complete clinical remission with mild histologic inflammation. Return to normal of terminal ileal strictures occurred in 5 patients. Harvey-Bradshaw activity index in patients showing a full or partial response to therapy fell from an initial 13.4 +/- 1. 91 to 0. 5 +/- 0. 47 [n = 8, p < 0. 001) after 52-54 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Reversal of severe Crohn's disease has been achieved in 6/12 patients using prolonged combination anti-Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis therapy alone. Three patients remain in long-term remission with no detectable Crohn's disease off all therapy These results support a causal role for Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Crohn's disease while also suggesting that a cure may become possible.

Recent advances in inflammatory bowel disease

The last decade has seen tremendous advances in our knowledge, which has led to genuine improvements in our understanding of the pathogenesis and management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The combined power of cellular and molecular biology has begun to unveil the enigmas of IBD, and, consequently, substantial gains have been made in the treatment of IBD. Refinements in drug formulation have provided the ability to target distinct sites of delivery, while enhancing the safety and efficacy of older agents. Simultaneous progress in biotechnology has fostered the development of new agents that strategically target pivotal processes in disease pathogenesis. This article addresses our current understanding of the pathogenesis of IBD, including the latest developments in animal models and covers agents currently used in the treatment of IBD as well as emerging therapies.

A meta-analysis of antimycobacterial therapy for Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVE

Various therapies have been studied for the treatment of Crohn's disease, including antimycobacterial therapy. Meta-analysis was used to evaluate the effect of antimycobacterial therapy in patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Randomized, controlled trials comparing antimycobacterial therapy with placebo were identified. Key outcome data were abstracted and the results were pooled to yield odds ratios for maintenance of remission in treated versus control groups.

RESULTS

A total of eight randomized trials were identified. Six trials were fully published and were included in the primary analysis. Two trials used antimycobacterial therapy in combination with corticosteroids to induce remission in patients with active Crohn's disease, followed by maintenance therapy with antimycobacterial agents. In these trials, control patients received corticosteroids to induce remission but no antimycobacterial therapy. Pooling of these trials yielded an odds ratio of maintenance of remission in treatment versus control of 3.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-8.24) in favor of antimycobacterial therapy. The remaining four trials used antimycobacterial therapy combined with standard therapy in patients with Crohn's disease. In these trials, control patients received standard therapy alone. Pooling of these trials yielded an odds ratio of maintenance of remission in treatment versus control of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.39-1.21) in favor of standard therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that antimycobacterial therapy is effective in maintaining remission in patients with Crohn's disease after a course of corticosteroids combined with antimycobacterial therapy to induce remission. Treatment of Crohn's disease with antimycobacterial therapy does not seem to be effective without a course of corticosteroids to induce remission. Because of the small number of studies included in this meta-analysis, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Anti-tuberculous therapy for maintaining remission of Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of anti-tuberculous therapy for the maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn's disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Trials Register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and MEDLINE from 1966 to 1998 (supplemented by a manual search of Index Medicus from 1966 to 1994). We also searched for abstracts in Gut, Gastroenterology, and The American Journal of Gastroenterology from 1990 to 1996. Date of most recent search: August 1998.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials of anti-tuberculous therapy in patients with Crohn's disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data on the number of patients maintaining remission for each treatment group were abstracted. These data were pooled to yield Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios and numbers needed to treat for maintenance of remission in treated versus control groups.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of seven randomized trials which included 355 patients were identified. Two trials used anti-tuberculous therapy (clofazimine or clofazimine, rafmpin, ethambutol, and dapsone) in combination with corticosteroids to induce remission. Maintenance therapy consisted of the anti-tuberculous agents without corticosteroids. Control patients received corticosteroids to induce remission but no anti-tuberculous therapy. The analysis of all seven trials yielded an odds ratio for maintenance of remission of 1.36 (95% CI 0.87-2. 13). Removing the two studies that were published as abstracts did not significantly affect this result: the pooled odds ratio was 1.14 (95% CI 0.71-1.83). The two trials reported as abstracts were excluded from subgroup analyses because they did not include any information on adjunct therapy. Subgroup analysis of the two trials which used steroids to induce remission yielded an odds ratio for maintenance of remission of 3.37 (95% CI 1.38-8.24). The number needed to treat was three. However, these two trials included only 89 patients, and the results should be interpreted with caution. The remaining three trials compared the combination of anti-tuberculous therapy and 'standard therapy' with 'standard therapy alone'. The pooled odds ratio was 0.70 (95% CI 0.39-1.25).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Anti-tuberculous therapy may be effective in maintaining remission in patients with Crohn's disease when remission has been induced with corticosteroids combined with anti-tuberculous therapy. However, the results which support this conclusion come from a subgroup of only two trials with small numbers of patients and should be interpreted with caution. Use of this therapy cannot be recommended on the basis of this evidence.

Lack of support for a common etiology in Johne's disease of animals and Crohn's disease in humans

The superficial similarity of Johne's disease to Crohn's disease led to the hypothesis that, like the former. Crohn's disease was caused by Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Detailed pathologic comparisons, however, reveal little similarity between these two entities, including the lack of important extraintestinal manifestations. Attempts to recover M. paratuberculosis by culture have only rarely succeeded and the significance of spheroplasts that appear more frequently on culture is seriously in question. Five immunocytochemistry studies have failed to find mycobacterial antigens in diseased tissues and the five most recent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) attempts to find genomic evidence of M. paratuberculosis were uniformly negative. Numerous serologic studies failed to demonstrate antibody to M. paratuberculosis and attempts to show cell-mediated immunity were also unrewarding. Inoculation of numerous experimental animals with Crohn's disease tissue has failed to induce Johne's disease, and inoculation of various animal species with M. paratuberculosis has equally failed to result in Crohn's disease. Controlled studies of the treatment of Crohn's disease with antimycobacterial agents have generally resulted in no improvement, and most studies that have shown a positive response are either uncontrolled or include broad-spectrum antibiotics that may be acting on pathogens other than mycobacteria. Finally, although Johne's disease is common in farm animals, and infected animals shed M. paratuberculosis in large numbers, no record of zoonotic transmission has been recorded.

Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: an update

What have epidemiologic studies on IBD taught so far? Consistent findings are as follows: A high incidence of both CD and UC in industrialized countries and an increase in these areas of the incidence of CD during the years 1960-80 followed by a plateau phase, and a more stable pattern in UC during the same period have been found. A greater number of mild cases have probably been diagnosed recently. This also helps to explain the differences in severity and survival between community and referral centre groups. The male to female ratio is greater than 1 in UC, and this is the opposite in CD. Mortality of IBD has decreased during the past decades. As young people are especially prone to develop IBD, most of those affected will have their disease for many years. In developing IBD, genetic influences are of importance. However, epidemiologic studies strongly point to possible interactions between genetically determined features and environmental or other factors. Of these exogenic factors smoking is the most consistent, being of negative influence in CD and protective in UC. Diet and oral contraceptives may influence disease expression, and perinatal events such as viral infections may alter adult susceptibility. The question remains open whether UC and CD are one diseases entity. Similarities in the epidemiologic features of UC and CD support the idea of IBD being one disease. Other findings suggest dividing UC and CD into further subgroups: in CD it has been suggested that fibrostenotic, penetrating, and inflammatory behaviour should be considered different disease entities; in UC some groups consider ulcerative proctitis a disease entity on its own, separating it from the proximally extending colitis. In therapeutic trials this approach has proved to be of importance, and it is not inconceivable that in subgroups, with regard to aetiopathogenetic mechanisms, different factors have to be looked for.

Inflammatory bowel disease. The case for an infectious etiology

The infectious hypothesis for IBD is certainly not new. The evidence for an infectious agent is tantalizing but not yet convincing. A failure to demonstrate a specific agent in the inflammatory process could mean that many different organisms are involved, or several organisms that, by themselves, do not cause disease interact. All candidate organisms proposed thus far are compatible with either hypothesis. Nevertheless, interaction between an agent(s) in a host modified by immunologic and genetic factors is still an attractive hypothesis for the cause of these illnesses.