High prevalence of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and squamous-cell carcinoma in men who have sex with men as seen in a surgical practice

Global trends in anal cancer incidence and mortality

OBJECTIVE

Anal cancer is a rare disease, affecting more frequently women than men, mainly related to human papillomavirus infection (HPV). Rising incidence and mortality have been reported over the past four decades in different countries.

METHODS

To provide an up-to-date overview of recent trends in mortality from anal cancer, we analysed death certification data provided by the WHO in selected countries worldwide over the period from 1994 to 2020. We also analysed incidence derived from Cancer Incidence in Five Continents from 1990 to 2012 for all histologies as well as for anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

RESULTS

The highest age-standardised mortality rates around 2020 were registered in Central and Eastern Europe, such as Slovakia (0.9/100 000 men and 0.40/100 000 women), in the UK (0.24/100 000 men and 0.35/100 000 women), and Denmark (0.33/100 000 for both sexes), while the lowest ones were in the Philippines, Mexico, and Japan, with rates below 0.10/100 000 in both sexes. Upwards trends in mortality were reported in most countries for both sexes. Similarly, incidence patterns were upward or stable in most countries considered for both sexes. In 2008-2012, Germany showed the highest incidence rates (1.65/100 000 men and 2.16/100 000 women).

CONCLUSION

Attention towards vaccination against HPV, increased awareness of risk factors, mainly related to sexual behaviours and advancements in early diagnosis and management are required to control anal cancer incidence and mortality.

A Qualitative Study of Barriers to Anal Cancer Screenings in US Veterans Living with HIV

People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at high risk for anal cancer. Anal cancer screenings are recommended annually for US veterans with HIV. Screenings can identify treatable precursor lesions and prevent cancer development. In a previous study, we found screening rate to be only 15%. Semistructured interviews were conducted with Veterans Affairs (VA) providers who treat veterans living with HIV. Participants described their experiences with anal cancer screenings. Researchers developed a codebook based on Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and coded data using thematic analysis to identify barriers to anal cancer screenings. Twenty-three interviews were conducted with VA providers representing 10 regions. Barriers identified corresponded with five targetable TDF domains: Knowledge, Skills, Environmental Context/Resources, Professional Roles/Identities, and Social Influence. Many providers lacked knowledge of screening protocols. Knowledgeable providers often lacked needed resources, including swabs, clinic space, reliable pathology, access to high-resolution anoscopy, or leadership support to implement a screening program. Providers mentioned competing priorities in the care of veterans with HIV infection and lack of skilled/trained personnel to perform the tests. It was often unclear which provider specialty should "own" screening responsibilities. Additional factors included patient discomfort with screening exams. Anal cancer screening protocols are recommended but not widely adopted in VA. There is a critical need to address barriers to anal cancer screenings in veterans. The TDF domains identified align with five intervention domains to target, including education, training, resource/environment, delineation of provider roles, and improved counseling efforts. Targeting these barriers may help improve the uptake of anal cancer screenings within VA.

Prevalence of High-Grade Anal Dysplasia and Anal Cancer in Veterans Living With HIV and CD4/CD8 Ratio as a Marker For Increased Risk: A Regional Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The Department of Veterans Affairs cares for the largest population of patients with HIV of any healthcare system in the United States. Screening for anal dysplasia/cancer is recommended for all veterans with HIV. Exams are invasive, burdensome, and resource intensive. We currently lack markers of disease to tailor screening.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence of advanced anal disease (high-grade dysplasia and anal cancer) and to determine whether CD4/CD8 ratio correlates with risk.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective regional cohort study of veterans with HIV.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at eight medical centers between 2001 and 2019.

PATIENTS

Patients with advanced disease were compared with patients with nonadvanced anal pathology.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Logistic regression modeling was used to estimate adjusted odds of disease as a function of CD4/CD8. Lowest (nadir) CD4/CD8 and nearest CD4/CD8 ratio in each cohort were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 2267 veterans were included. Fifteen percent had anal pathology (112 with advanced disease (37 cancer and 75 high-grade), 222 with nonadvanced disease). Nadir and nearest ratio were lower in patients with advanced disease versus nonadvanced (0.24 vs 0.45 (p < 0.001) and 0.50 vs 0.88 (p < 0.001)). In adjusted models, a 1-unit increase in nadir or nearest ratio conferred decreased risk of advanced disease (OR = 0.19 (95% CI, 0.07-0.53); p < 0.001; OR = 0.22 (95% CI, 0.12-0.43); p < 0.001). Using a minimum sensitivity analysis, a cutoff nadir ratio of 0.42 or nearest ratio of 0.76 could be used to risk stratify.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective analysis with a low screening rate.

CONCLUSIONS

In a regional cohort of veterans with HIV, 15% were formally assessed for anal dysplasia. Advanced anal disease was present in 33% of those screened, 5% of the HIV-positive population. A strong predictor of advanced disease in this cohort is the CD4/CD8 ratio, which is a promising marker to stratify screening practices. Risk stratification using CD4/CD8 has the potential to decrease burdensome invasive examinations for low-risk patients and to intensify examinations for those at high risk. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B528.

PREVALENCIA DE DISPLASIA ANAL DE ALTO GRADO Y CNCER ANAL EN VETERANOS QUE VIVEN CON EL VIH Y LA RELACIN CD / CD COMO MARCADOR DE MAYOR RIESGO UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE REGIONAL RETROSPECTIVE

ANTECEDENTES:El Departamento de Asuntos de Veteranos atiende a la población más grande de pacientes con el virus de inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) de cualquier sistema de salud en los Estados Unidos. Se recomienda la detección de displasia / cáncer anal para todos los veteranos con VIH. Los exámenes son invasivos, onerosos y requieren muchos recursos. Actualmente carecemos de marcadores de enfermedad para adaptar la detección.OBJETIVO:Establecer la prevalencia de enfermedad anal avanzada (displasia de alto grado y cáncer anal) y determinar si la relación CD4 / CD8 se correlaciona con el riesgo.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte regional retrospectivo de veteranos con VIH.AJUSTE:Ocho centros médicos entre 2001-2019.PACIENTES:Se comparó a pacientes con enfermedad avanzada con pacientes con patología anal no avanzada.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se utilizó un modelo de regresión logística para estimar las probabilidades ajustadas de enfermedad en función de CD4 / CD8. Se evaluó la relación CD4 / CD8 más baja (nadir) y la relación CD4 / CD8 más cercana en cada cohorte.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 2267 veteranos. El 15% tenía patología anal (112 enfermedad avanzada (37 cáncer, 75 de alto grado), 222 enfermedad no avanzada). El nadir y el cociente más cercano fueron menores en los pacientes con enfermedad avanzada frente a los no avanzados (0,24 frente a 0,45 (p <0,001) y 0,50 frente a 0,88 (p <0,001)), respectivamente. En modelos ajustados, el aumento de una unidad en el nadir o el cociente más cercano confirió una disminución del riesgo de enfermedad avanzada (OR 0,19 (IC del 95%: 0,07, 0,53, p <0,001)) y (OR 0,22 (IC del 95%: 0,12, 0,43, p <0,001))), respectivamente. Utilizando un análisis de sensibilidad mínima, se podría utilizar un cociente del nadir de corte de 0,42 o el cociente más cercano de 0,76 para estratificar el riesgo.LIMITACIONES:Análisis retrospectivo con una tasa de detección baja.CONCLUSIONES:En una cohorte regional de veteranos con VIH, el 15% fueron evaluados formalmente por displasia anal. La enfermedad anal avanzada estuvo presente en el 33% de los examinados, el 5% de la población VIH +. Un fuerte predictor de enfermedad avanzada en esta cohorte es la relación CD4 / CD8, que es un marcador prometedor para estratificar las prácticas de detección. La estratificación del riesgo usando CD4 / CD8 tiene el potencial de disminuir los exámenes invasivos onerosos para los pacientes de bajo riesgo e intensificar los exámenes para los de alto riesgo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B528.

Anal Dysplasia Among Patients With Multiple Human Papillomavirus Anal Lesions: Mosaic or Homogeneity?

Purpose

Anal dysplasia is caused by chronic infection with the human papillomavirus and exposes to the risk of anal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of dysplasia anal grade among patients operated on for multiple anal condylomas with no macroscopic differences.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study of patients operated on for multiple anal condylomas including a mapping of dysplasia by performing systematically for each patient one biopsy on visible lesion from each of the 4 quadrants on anal margin and in anal canal. All biopsies were read independently by 2 different pathologists.

Results

Among 72 patients, 60 were men and 48 were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected with a median age of 37.5 years. The proportion of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) was higher in the anal canal (41.7%) compared to the margin (20.8%) (P = 0.004). HSIL frequency did not differ according to the quadrant (anterior, posterior, right, and left) of the 2 areas. HSIL on anal canal was not associated with HSIL on anal margin and vice versa (P = 0.390). Neither age nor sex was associated to HSIL but HIV positivity increased the risk of HSIL on the anal margin (P = 0.010).

Conclusion

Anal dysplasia is heterogeneously distributed in the anal canal as well as between anal canal and anal margin. The diagnostic of the grade of dysplasia for a person should require multiple biopsies on the canal and anal margin.

HIV-Infected Patients With Anal Cancer Precursors: Clinicopathological Characteristics and Human Papillomavirus Subtype Distribution

BACKGROUND

People living with HIV have high rates of anal human papillomavirus infection and anal precancer/cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to: 1) determine human papillomavirus subtype distribution among people living with HIV with anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; 2) compare the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions by human papillomavirus 16 status; and 3) investigate high-risk human papillomavirus negative anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cases.

DESIGN

In this retrospective study, 700 people living with HIV who have biopsy-proven anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were reviewed for demographics, cytological diagnoses, and human papillomavirus testing results for human papillomavirus 16, 18, and 12 other high-risk types. For human papillomavirus-negative subjects, corresponding biopsies were genotyped by using real-time polymerase chain reaction.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in a large urban HIV clinic system and major referral center for anal cancer screening.

PATIENTS

Median age was 46 years (range, 20-76). Ninety-one percent of the patients were men who have sex with men.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the association between demographic variables and human papillomavirus 16 status.

RESULTS

Anal cytology was unsatisfactory (5%), benign (13%), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (35%), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (36%), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (11%). Human papillomavirus cotesting results were negative (n = 38, 5%), human papillomavirus 16 (n = 303, 43%), human papillomavirus 18 (n = 78, 11%), or exclusively non-16/18 types (n = 281, 40%). Human papillomavirus 16 positivity was associated with ≥3 high-grade lesions and ≥ low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology (p < 0.001). Age, race/ethnicity, sex, smoking, CD4+ T-cell count, and HIV viral load did not differ by status of human papillomavirus 16 (p > 0.05). For human papillomavirus-negative cases, human papillomavirus genotyping of biopsies was positive for high-risk (n = 14, 36%) or possibly carcinogenic types (n = 12, 32%), or negative (n = 12, 32%).

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective data analysis, and it pooled the results for 12 high-risk human papillomavirus types rather than individual types.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly all people living with HIV and anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions test positive for high-risk human papillomavirus on anal swabs; negative results may be due to sampling error, L1-based polymerase chain reaction assay, or human papillomavirus types not captured by standard clinical assays. Patients who have human papillomavirus 16-positive anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions are indistinguishable from others based on demographic and clinical characteristics, underscoring the potential role of human papillomavirus testing for anal cancer screening. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B208. PACIENTES PORTADORES DE VIH CON PRECURSORES DE CÁNCER DE ANO: CARACTERÍSTICAS CLINICOPATOLÓGICAS Y DISTRIBUCIÓN DEL SUBTIPO VPH: Los pacientes portadores de VIH tienen altas tasas de infección por VPH y alto riesgo de desarrolar lesiones precáncerosas / cáncerosas del ano.(1) Determinar la distribución del subtipo de VPH entre las personas portadoras de VIH con lesiones intraepiteliales escamosas anales de alto grado. (2) Comparar las características clinicopatológicas de pacientes con lesiones intraepiteliales escamosas anales de alto grado del subtipo VPH 16. (3) Investigar casos de lesiones intraepiteliales escamosas anales de alto grado negativas para el VPH de alto riesgo.Estudio retrospectivo sobre 700 personas portadoras de VIH con lesiones intraepiteliales escamosas anales de alto grado confirmadas por biopsia. Los datos fueron revisados para determinar información demográfica, diagnósticos citológicos y resultados de tipización en el VPH subtipos 16 y 18, y otros 12 tipos de alto riesgo. Para los individuos negativos al VPH, se analizó el genotipo en las biopsias correspondientes mediante test de PCR en tiempo real.Extenso sistema de clinicas urbanas tratando VIH y un importante centro de referencia para la detección del cáncer analla mediana de edad poblacional fue de 46 años (rango, 20-76). 91% eran hombres que tenían sexo con hombres.Asociación entre las variables demográficas y el estado del VPH subtipo16.la citología anal fue insatisfactoria (5%), benigna (13%), células escamosas atípicas de importancia indeterminada (35%), lesión intraepitelial escamosa de bajo grado (36%) y lesiones intraepiteliales escamosas de alto grado (11%). Los resultados de la prueba conjunta del VPH fueron negativos (n = 38, 5%), el virus del VPH subtipo 16 (n = 303, 43%), el VPH subtipo 18 (n = 78, 11%) o los subtipos exclusivamente no 16/18 (n = 281, 40%). La positividad del VPH subtipo 16 se encotraba asociado con ≥3 lesiones de alto grado y ≥ células escamosas atípicas en la prueba de citología de indeterminada importancia (p < 0.001). La edad, la raza / etnia, el sexo, el tabaquismo, el recuento de células T CD4 + y la carga viral del VIH no difirieron según el estado del VPH subtipo 16 (p > 0.05). Para los casos negativos al VPH, el genotipo del virus del papiloma humano de las biopsias fue positivo para los tipos de alto riesgo (n = 14, 36%) o posiblemente carcinogénicos (n = 12, 32%), o negativo (n = 12, 32%).Análisis de datos retrospectivos, con resultados agrupados para 12 tipos de VPH de alto riesgo en lugar de tipos individuales.Casi todas las personas portadoras de VIH con lesiones intraepiteliales escamosas anales de alto grado dan positivo para el VPH de alto riesgo al muestreo de hisopos anales; Los resultados negativos pueden deberse a un error en el muestreo y al análisis de PCR basado en L1 o subtipos de VPH no obtenidos en los ensayos clínicos estándar. Los pacientes con lesiones intraepiteliales escamosas anales de alto grado positivas para el VPH subtipo 16 no son identificables de los demás, en función de las características demográficas y clínicas, lo que minimiza el rol potencial de la prueba del VPH en la detección del cáncer anal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B208. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).

Implementation of and Early Outcomes From Anal Cancer Screening at a Community-Engaged Health Care Facility Providing Care to Nigerian Men Who Have Sex With Men

PURPOSE

Anal cancer risk is substantially higher among HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) as compared with other reproductive-age adults, but screening is rare across sub-Saharan Africa. We report the use of high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) as a first-line screening tool and the resulting early outcomes among MSM in Abuja, Nigeria.

METHODS

From August 2016 to August 2017, 424 MSM enrolled in an anal cancer screening substudy of TRUST/RV368, a combined HIV prevention and treatment cohort. HRA-directed biopsies were diagnosed by histology, and ablative treatment was offered for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). HRA proficiency was assessed by evaluating the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) over time and the proportion biopsied. Prevalence estimates of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and HSIL with 95% CIs were calculated. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify those at the highest risk of SIL.

RESULTS

Median age was 25 years (interquartile range [IQR], 22-29), median time since sexual debut was 8 years (IQR, 4-12), and 59% (95% CI, 54.2% to 63.6%) were HIV infected. Rate of detection of any SIL stabilized after 200 screenings, and less than 20% had two or more biopsies. Preliminary prevalence estimates of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and HSIL were 50.0% (95% CI, 44.7% to 55.3%) and 6.3% (95% CI, 4.0% to 9.3%). HIV infection, at least 8 years since anal coital debut, concurrency, and external warts were independently statistically associated with SIL.

CONCLUSION

Proficiency with HRA increased with experience over time. However, HSIL detection rates were low, potentially affected by obstructed views from internal warts and low biopsy rates, highlighting the need for ongoing evaluation and mentoring to validate this finding. HRA is a feasible first-line screening tool at an MSM-friendly health care facility. Years since anal coital debut and external warts could prioritize screening.

Investigating epidemiologic trends and the geographic distribution of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma throughout Canada

Background

Anal cancer is a rare disease, constituting 0.5% of new cancer cases in the United States. The most common subtype is squamous cell carcinoma (scc). Studies in several developed nations have reported on an increasing incidence of anal cancer in recent decades, and various risk factors pertaining to the pathogenesis of the disease have been identified, including infection with the human papillomavirus, tobacco use, and immunosuppression. The epidemiology and distribution of anal scc throughout Canada remain poorly understood, however.

Methods

Using 3 population-based cancer registries, a retrospective analysis of demographic data across Canada for 1992-2010 was performed. The incidence and mortality for anal scc was examined at the levels of provinces, cities, and the forward sortation area (FSA) component (first 3 characters) of postal codes.

Results

During 1992-2010, 3720 individuals were diagnosed with anal scc in Canada; 64% were women. The overall national incidence rate was 6.3 cases per million population per year, with an average age at diagnosis of 60.4 years. The incidence increased over time, with significantly higher incidence rates documented in British Columbia and Nova Scotia (9.3 cases per million population each). Closer examination revealed clustering of cases in various urban centres and self-identified lgbtq communities in Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver.

Discussion

This study provides, for the first time, a comprehensive analysis of the burden of anal scc in Canada, identifying susceptible populations and shedding light onto novel avenues of research to lower the incidence of anal cancer throughout the country.

Testing for Human Papillomavirus Strains 16 and 18 Helps Predict the Presence of Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

BACKGROUND

More than 90% of anal cancers are caused by human papillomavirus, and human papillomavirus strains 16 and 18 are the most oncogenic. Anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions are cancer precursors. Treating these high-grade intraepithelial lesions likely reduces the risk of cancer, but cytology is an imperfect screening test.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether human papillomavirus 16 and/or 18 testing better predicts the presence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

DESIGN

In this retrospective study, 894 consecutive patients underwent anal dysplasia screening with digital anorectal examination, anal cytology, high-risk human papillomavirus testing, and high-resolution anoscopy with biopsy. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each test and for a novel screening protocol. The absolute and relative risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions for all of the cytology/human papillomavirus combinations were also calculated.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a single practice specializing in anal dysplasia.

PATIENTS

Ninety-two percent of participants were men who have sex with men. Forty-four percent were HIV-positive individuals who were well controlled on antiretroviral therapy. The median age was 50 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The presence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions as a function of human papillomavirus and the cytology results were measured.

RESULTS

High-risk human papillomavirus testing alone demonstrated better sensitivity (96% vs 89%; p = 0.03) and negative predictive value (99% vs 96%; p = 0.008) over cytology. Human papillomavirus 16/18 testing increased specificity (48% to 71%; p < 0.0001) and positive predictive value (24% to 37%; p = 0.003) over testing for all of the high-risk strains. For each cytology category, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were more prevalent when human papillomavirus 16/18 was detected. Benign cytology with 16/18 had a 31-fold increased risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

LIMITATIONS

This study was conducted in a single private practice specializing in anal dysplasia screening with a mostly male population, and results might not be generalizable.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing of high-risk human papillomavirus strains 16/18 improves specificity and positive predictive value over cytology for anal dysplasia screening. Patients testing positive for strains 16/18 are at a high risk for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and should undergo high-resolution anoscopy regardless of the cytology result. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A654.

Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Men: A Study of 100 Cases With Emphasis on Cytohistologic Correlation

OBJECTIVES

Anorectal cytology (ARC) is a widely used screening tool for anal cancer in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected men who have sex with men (MSM). Its diagnostic accuracy needs to be improved, especially for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs).

METHODS

Using 100 HIV+ MSM with biopsy-proven anal HSILs, we correlated histologic/cytologic findings.

RESULTS

Upon review, HSIL cells were present in 58 cytology samples and absent in 42. Positive samples were higher in cellularity and contained transformation zones ( P  < .05). Cytology was able to predict HSILs in 36%, 48%, 68%, and 78% of patients with one, two, three, and four or more high-grade lesions. HSIL cells were identified in all cytology samples initially reported as HSILs or atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL and in 34 samples reported as low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or less. Notably, among this last category, 15 (44%) were keratinized-type HSILs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings should improve the ARC detection rate for anal HSILs, helping to implement ARC as the primary screening tool for anal cancer.

Are colon and rectal surgeons ready to screen for anal dysplasia? Results of a survey on attitudes and practice

BACKGROUND

Colorectal surgeons are ideal referral sources to screen for and treat high-grade anal dysplasia (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL]) and anal cancer. Anal cytology and high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) using acetic acid and magnification are optimal methods for screening. We endeavored to determine US colorectal surgeons' attitudes and practices regarding HSIL screening.

METHODS

An Internet-based survey with questions related to clinician demographics and attitudes and practices regarding anal dysplasia was sent to US members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.

RESULTS

Of 1655 requests, 290 (18%) eligible participants responded. Most were white (83%), male (76%), board-certified colorectal surgeons (89%), and graduating medical school after 1990 (54%), almost all treated patients at risk for anal cancer and had read research on HSIL. Approximately one-third of respondents had performed anal cytology, and one-third had performed HRA. When evaluating patients for HSIL in surgery, only 31% use acetic acid with magnification. Of 99 participants who perform HRA, 46% were formally trained, 83% primarily do HRA primarily in the operating room, and 82% use acetic acid with magnification. Knowledge of HSIL risk factors was not associated with screening. Women, more recent graduates, and surgeons with higher percentages of HIV-infected patients were more likely to screen. Screening barriers included no training (52%), not a priority (23%), lack of evidence (21%), and cost (8%).

CONCLUSIONS

American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons members responding to the survey by and large do not screen for anal dysplasia. Those that do are often not formally trained and use inadequate technique.

Anal condyloma treatment and recurrence in HIV-negative men who have sex with men

BACKGROUND

Men who have sex with men have increased prevalence of both human papillomavirus and anogenital condyloma.

OBJECTIVE

Risk factors for multiple treatment and recurrence of anal condyloma were examined.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study of HIV-negative men who have sex with men who were treated for anal condyloma.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in a private surgical practice.

PATIENTS

The patients were HIV-negative men who have sex with men, aged 18 years or older.

INTERVENTION(S)

Ablation with electrocautery or CO2 laser was performed, as well as excision and topical imiquimod condyloma treatment adjuvant.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary clearance, defined as 4 months of condyloma-free survival posttreatment, and recurrence, defined as any anal condyloma diagnosis after primary clearance.

RESULTS

Of 231 participants, 207 achieved primary clearance (median age, 32.0 years) and were followed (median, 18.2 months) after primary treatment. Most had intra-anal and perianal condyloma (56%), were treated with electrocautery ablation (79.2%), and required 1 treatment (range, 1-6) for clearance. There were 57 recurrences (median, 12 months). One-third each had minimal, moderate, or extensive disease. Forty-six percent of patients received imiquimod posttreatment adjuvant. High-grade dysplasia was found in 31% at presentation and 43% during follow-up. Factors associated with requiring multiple treatments for clearance were participants having moderate disease (adjusted odds ratio, 6.0 (1.7-21.4)) and receiving imiquimod adjuvant (adjusted odds ratio, 4.7 (2.0-10.6)). No single factor predicted recurrence, but those with moderate disease experienced recurrences significantly sooner (median, 25 months of follow-up).

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective chart review, it was limited to a single practice, and it excluded those who did not achieve primary clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Most men who have sex with men have intra-anal and perianal condyloma and concomitant high-grade dysplasia is common. Most achieved clearance with 1 treatment. Having both intra-anal and perianal condyloma, increased severity of disease, and imiquimod adjuvant were significant predictors of requiring multiple treatments for clearance. No identified risk factors proved a significant predictor of recurrence.

Evaluation of Langerhans cells counts comparing HIV-positive and negative anal squamous cell-carcinoma patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the differences in Langerhans cells (LCs) populations between HIV-positive and negative anal squamous cell carcinomas patients.

METHODS

Twenty five patients (14 HIV-positive and 11 HIV-negative) were evaluated. Paraffin-block transversal thin sections from biopsies of anal squamous cell carcinomas (ASCC) were stained using the anti-CD1A antibody that identifies activated LCs. LCs counts were performed using histometry at 20 different sites, at baseline in the ASCC cases. These were then compared with LCs counts in anal canal specimens from HIV-negative and positive patients without ASCC (controls groups).

RESULTS

In patients with ASCC, the LC count was greater among HIV-negative individuals than among HIV-positive individuals (p<0.05). The LC count was greater in the control HIV-negative group than in HIV-positive patients with ASCC (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

There was a lower amount of activated LCs in HIV-positive patients with anal squamous cell carcinomas than in HIV-negative patients, thereby suggesting worsening of the immune response.

Epidemiology, natural history and risk factors for anal intraepithelial neoplasia

Studies conducted in HIV-seropositive individuals have enhanced our understanding of the natural history of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) and of factors predictive of progression to high-grade AIN, the immediate precursor to anal cancer. AIN is frequently detected in HIV-seropositive individuals. Factors that increase the risk for AIN include HIV infection, low current or nadir blood CD4+ cell counts, receptive anal intercourse, oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, persistent anal HPV infection, multiple HPV type infections and high anal HPV viral load. This review confirms the importance of high-grade AIN in HIV-seropositive individuals and HIV-seronegative men having sex with men.

Use of highly active antiretroviral therapy is associated with lower prevalence of anal intraepithelial neoplastic lesions and lower prevalence of human papillomavirus in HIV-infected men who have sex with men

BACKGROUND

The incidence of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) and anal cancer is increased in HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM). Persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is an important etiologic agent.

METHODS

In this study, a group of 250 HIV-positive MSM was included to determine the prevalence of AIN and to investigate the role of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), high-risk HPV, and other risk factors possibly associated with this prevalence.

RESULTS

Among patients included, 108 (43.2%) had lesions suspicious for AIN. Histologic analyses showed AIN 1 in 24 patients (22.2%), AIN 2 in 6 patients (5.6%), and AIN 3 in 10 patients (9.3%). In multivariable analyses, the use of HAART was associated with the absence of AIN (P = 0.045). In MSM without HAART, HPV infection was detected significantly more often compared with those who used HAART (P = 0.010). AIN was associated with HPV types 16 and 6.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cross-sectional study in 250 HIV-positive MSM, the use of HAART was associated with lower prevalence of AIN and a significantly lower prevalence of HPV. This association between the prevalence of AIN and the absence of HAART may contribute to the current debate on when to start HAART in HIV-infected individuals.

Photodynamic therapy with systemic meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin in the treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 3

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Anal cancer and preneoplastic anal lesions (anal intraepithelial neoplasia, AIN) rising especially in men having sex with men (MSM). There are no widely accepted treatment standards for AIN. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) using the systemic sensitizer meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) has the potential to treat the anal area even when the exact borders of the preneoplastic anal lesion cannot easily be visualized.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective intervention study, 15 HIV-positive MSM with AIN 3 were treated in 25 PDT-sessions using mTHPC intravenously administered at drug doses of 0.075-0.15 mg ml(-1) and illumination at 48  hours. The illumination was performed using a custom made applicator using either red light (652 nm) to a measured intended fluence of 10 and 20 J cm(-2) and green light (532 nm) to a measured intended fluence of 105, 210, and 340 J cm(-2) . Red and green illuminations were performed at a (green) equivalent fluence rate of 105 mW cm(-2) .

RESULTS

Initial complete response was seen in 7/25 (28%) of treatments and another 4/25 (16%) initial partial responses. After an average 8 months, recurrences were detected in 7/11 (64%) of sessions that initially showed response. A total 4/25 (16%) showed persistent complete response 6-15 months after green light illumination. Red light illuminations caused more significant side effects combined with no persistent complete response. Reported side effects were intense pain, bloody and purulent rectal discharge, and anal stricture formation, in one patient.

CONCLUSION

The results show that the use of systemic mTHPC is partially effective for the treatment of AIN 3.

Prevalence of and risk factors for anal human papillomavirus infection among young healthy women in Costa Rica

BACKGROUND

Anal cancer is caused by human papillomavirus (HPV), yet little is known about anal HPV infection among healthy young women.

METHODS

A total of 2017 sexually active women in the control arm of an HPV-16/18 vaccine trial had a single anal specimen collected by a clinician at the 4-year study visit. Samples were tested for HPV by SPF(10) PCR/DEIA/LiPA(25), version 1.

RESULTS

A total of 4% of women had HPV-16, 22% had oncogenic HPV, and 31% had any HPV detected in an anal specimen. The prevalence of anal HPV was higher among women who reported anal intercourse, compared with those who did not (43.4% vs 28.4%; P< .001). Among women who reported anal intercourse, cervical HPV (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.3 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.4-8.2]), number of sex partners (aOR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.1-4.6] for ≥ 4 partners), and number of anal intercourse partners (aOR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.1-3.3] for ≥ 2 partners) were independent risk factors for anal HPV detection. Among women who reported no anal intercourse, cervical HPV (aOR, 4.7 [95% CI, 3.7-5.9]), number of sex partners (aOR, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.7-3.4] for ≥ 4 partners), and report of anal fissures (aOR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.1-4.8]) were associated with an increased odds of anal HPV detection.

CONCLUSION

Anal HPV is common among young women, even those who report no anal sex, and was associated with cervical HPV infection. Anal fissures in women who report never having had anal intercourse may facilitate HPV exposure.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT00128661.

Electrocautery ablation of high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-negative and HIV-positive men who have sex with men

BACKGROUND

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) incidence has been rising over the past decade, most dramatically in HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM). We aimed to identify a novel in-office approach for ablating high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN), the believed precursor lesion to ASCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records from a New York City surgical practice, identifying patients with HGAIN treated with electrocautery ablation (ECA) and followed for at least 5 months with high-resolution anoscopy, biopsies, and/or cytology. We sought to determine HGAIN recurrence and progression to ASCC after ECA.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-two MSM, 132 HIV positive and 100 HIV negative, with median follow-up of 19.0 and 17.5 months, respectively, met inclusion criterion. In HIV-negative and HIV-positive MSM, the probability of curing a lesion after first ECA was 85% and 75%, respectively. Over follow-up, 53% of HIV-negative and 61% of HIV-positive patients recurred. After first and second ECA, HIV-positive MSM were 1.28 times (P = 0.16) and 2.34 times (P = 0.009) more likely to recur than HIV-negative MSM. The majority of recurrence was due to development of additional lesions at untreated sites (metachronous recurrence). One patient (0.4%) developed ASCC. At last visit, 83% of HIV-negative and 69% of HIV-positive patients were HGAIN free.

CONCLUSIONS

ECA is an effective treatment for HGAIN, with fewer patients progressing to ASCC than predicted with expectant management. HIV-positive patients are significantly more likely to recur than HIV-negative patients.

Evaluation of the hybrid capture 2 assay for detecting anal high-grade dysplasia

Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA Test® is FDA approved and is a proven aid in detecting HPV infections of the cervix and as an aid in diagnosing, with cytology, cervical disease. A prospective feasibility study was conducted to determine if HC2 testing has utility when screening for high-grade anal dysplasia (AIN2+). We enrolled 298 patients (45% HIV+) who had AIN2+ screening with cytology, histology and HC2 testing for two specimens: a swab into liquid-based cytology medium and either a swab or a brush collection in specimen transport medium (STM). High-resolution anoscopy was performed on all patients with biopsy of AIN2+ suspicious lesions. Cytology was benign (42%), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (30%), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (18%), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (1%), ASCUS possibly high-grade dysplasia (1.7%) and nondiagnostic (7%) and 36% had AIN2+ histology. Sensitivity and specificity for predicting AIN2+ histology for any abnormal cytology were 77 and 52%, whereas HC2 sensitivity and specificity were 91 and 40% (p = 0.005 for sensitivity), respectively. There was no significant difference in HC2 sensitivity or specificity between brush and swab or STM and residual cells from cytology. AIN2+ was found in 20% of patients with benign cytology. Only nine AIN2+ specimens were HC2-. This prospective study indicates that HC2 may be useful when screening for anal dysplasia; however, a larger study is recommended.

Prevention of recurrent high-grade anal neoplasia with quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccination of men who have sex with men: a nonconcurrent cohort study

BACKGROUND

Most squamous cell anal cancers and precancerous lesions are attributed to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. By preventing HPV infection, quadrivalent HPV vaccine (qHPV) reduces risk of anal cancer/precancerous lesions in young men who have sex with men (MSM) without history of anal cancer/precancerous lesions. In our practice, many persons with history of precancerous anal lesions or high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN) have been vaccinated electively. We determined whether qHPV is effective at preventing recurrence of HGAIN.

METHODS

This nonconcurrent cohort study evaluated 202 patients with a history of previously treated HGAIN. Eighty-eight patients were vaccinated, and 114 patients were unvaccinated. We determined the recurrence rate of histologic HGAIN in vaccinated versus unvaccinated patients.

RESULTS

During 340.4 person-years follow-up, 12 (13.6%) vaccinated patients and 35 (30.7%) unvaccinated patients developed recurrent HGAIN. Multivariable hazards ratio (HR) analysis showed testing positive for oncogenic HPV genotypes within 8 months before study entry was associated with increased risk of recurrent HGAIN at 2 years after study entry (HR 4.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-10.40; P = .004), and qHPV was associated with decreased risk of recurrent HGAIN (HR .50; 95% CI, .26-.98; P = .04). Among patients infected with oncogenic HPV, qHPV was associated with decreased risk of recurrent HGAIN at 2 years after study entry (HR .47; 95% CI, .22-1.00; P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

qHPV significantly reduces HGAIN recurrence among MSM and may be an effective posttreatment adjuvant form of therapy. A randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm these results.

[Japanese HIV-infected men who have sex with men screened for anal intraepithelial neoplasia]

The prevalence of and the risk factors for abnormal anal cytology among Japanese men who have sex with men (MSM) who have human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection have not been fully investigated up to now. We conducted a nested case-control study of 81 HIV-infected Japanese MSM treated with antiretroviral therapy at a sexuality minority affirmative clinic between April 2010 and March 2011. Results showed that 41 (50.6%) of the 81 had normal anal cytology, 13 (16.0%) atypical squamous cells, 24 (29.6%) low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and 3 (3.7%) high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. No carcinoma cases were seen. Multivariate analysis showed abnormal anal cytology to be associated with a history of genital condyloma (OR 4.19, p = .021). We concluded that abnormal anal cytology was common among HIV-infected Japanese MSM. Effective screening and management should be planned for precancerous anal lesions.

Long-term follow-up of infrared coagulator ablation of anal high-grade dysplasia in men who have sex with men

BACKGROUND

We previously reported on infrared coagulator ablation of anal high-grade intraepithelial squamous lesions in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) with a median follow-up of 1.5 years.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine high-grade intraepithelial squamous lesion recurrence rates after long-term follow-up for infrared coagulator ablation, and whether patients progressed to invasive cancer.

DESIGN

: This study investigated a retrospective cohort.

SETTING

This study was set in an office-based practice.

PATIENTS

The patients evaluated were MSM who underwent at least 1 infrared coagulator anal high-grade intraepithelial squamous lesion ablation between 1999 and 2005 with at least 1-year additional follow-up.

INTERVENTION

Infrared coagulator ablation had been performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

The primary outcomes measured were high-grade intraepithelial squamous lesion recurrence and progression to anal squamous-cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

Ninety-six MSM were included (44 HIV-positive) with a median follow-up of 48 and 69 months in HIV-negative and HIV-positive MSM. Thiry-five percent of HIV-positive and 31% of HIV-negative subjects from the original cohort were lost to follow-up. In HIV-negative MSM, 32 (62%) had a recurrence in a mean of 14 months. Recurrence rates after the second and third treatments were 48% and 57%. In HIV-positive MSM, 40 (91%) had a recurrence in a mean of 17 months. Recurrence rates after the second, third, and fourth infrared coagulator ablations were 63%, 85%, and 47%. After the first ablation, HIV-positive MSM were 1.9 times more likely to have a recurrence than HIV-negative MSM (P = .009). One year after the first ablation, 61% of HIV-positive MSM had recurrent high-grade intraepithelial squamous lesions in comparison with 38% of HIV-negative MSM. One year after the second ablation, 49% of HIV-positive MSM had recurrent high-grade intraepithelial squamous lesions in comparison with 28% of HIV-negative MSM. In HIV-negative and HIV-positive MSM, the probability of curing an individual lesion after first ablation was 80% and 67%. Most recurrence was due to the development of metachronous lesions occurring in 82% and 52% of HIV-positive and HIV-negative subjects after their first infrared coagulator treatment. The mean number of recurrent lesions for both HIV-positive and HIV-negative MSM was never >2. No MSM developed squamous-cell carcinoma, and there were no serious adverse events. At last visit, 82% of HIV-positive MSM and 90% of HIV-negative MSM were high-grade intraepithelial squamous lesion free.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective, observational study with significant loss to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Infrared coagulator ablation is an effective treatment for high-grade intraepithelial squamous lesions, and no patients progressed to cancer. HIV-positive patients are significantly more likely to have a recurrence, and recurrence occurred more rapidly in these patients. Continued follow-up is important.

Estimation of HIV Seroprevalence in Colorectal Hospitals by Questionnaire Survey in Korea, 2002-2007

Objectives

The incidence of anal disease is higher among persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection than among the general population. We surveyed the status of seroprevalence in colorectal hospitals in Korea.

Methods

The survey was conducted in colorectal hospitals in Korea from November to December 2008. The questionnaire was comprised of six topics about the status of HIV testing in colorectal hospitals. We gathered the data by website (http://hivqa.nih.go.kr/risk) or fax.

Results

Among 774 colorectal hospitals contacted, 109 (14%) hospitals participated in the survey. Among these, 48 hospitals (44%) performed HIV tests in their own hospitals and 11 (23%) took HIV testing by rapid method. The main reason for recommending an HIV test was surgical operation (54%) followed by endoscope (11%) and health checkup (9%). The annual number of HIV tests increased from 58,647 (at 21 hospitals) in 2002 to 246,709 (at 58 hospitals) in 2007. HIV seroprevalence was >3.0 per 10,000 individuals during 2002–2005, decreased to 2.2 per 10,000 individuals in 2006 and rose to 2.8 per 10,000 individuals in 2007.

Conclusions

HIV seroprevalence of colorectal hospitals was more than twice that of general hospitals in Korea. HIV surveillance systems based on colorectal hospitals for HIV/AIDS transmission prevention by early HIV diagnosis are needed.

The changing picture of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia in men who have sex with men: the effects of 10 years of experience performing high-resolution anoscopy

BACKGROUND

Ten years ago, we published findings from anal dysplasia screening in a metropolitan surgical practice where the majority of men who have sex with men had biopsy-proven high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the effect of 10 years of experience in anal dysplasia screening on the prevalence of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review was performed of all anal cytology results of 1189 men who have sex with men screened in a 1-year period, with subsequent high-resolution anoscopy and biopsy as necessary.

PATIENTS

The patients studied were men who have sex with men.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The main outcome measure was biopsy-proven high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

RESULTS

: There were 315 (37.2%) biopsy-verified instances of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia. Regression analysis determined that age, HIV status, infection by high-risk human papillomavirus, and abnormal cytology results were significant predictors of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia. In a 1-year period, the number of men who have sex with men screened was nearly 7 times greater than in the 2-year period studied 10 years earlier.

LIMITATIONS

We did not separately analyze patients who had previously been treated for high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Severity of cytology and infection with high-risk human papillomavirus are the most significant predictors of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia, underscoring the importance of anal dysplasia screening. Our ability to identify high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia has improved with 10 years of experience performing high-resolution anoscopy.

Prevalence of anal intraepithelial neoplasia defined by anal cytology screening and high-resolution anoscopy in a primary care population of HIV-infected men and women

BACKGROUND

Prevalence of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia, the human papillomavirus-associated putative anal cancer precursor, is high in HIV-infected men who have sex with men, but less is known about its prevalence in other HIV-infected subgroups. Similarly, the prevalence of abnormal cytology, used as a screen, is not well-defined in these subgroups.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of abnormal cytology and anal intraepithelial neoplasia in a primary care HIV-infected population.

DESIGN

This investigation was designed as a cross-sectional study.

SETTING

This study took place at a Ryan White-funded clinic.

PATIENTS

Included in the study were all (n = 779) HIV-infected patients receiving primary care services between March 2006 and March 2008.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were anal cytology and high-resolution anoscopy results.

RESULTS

The prevalence of abnormal cytology was 43%: 62% in men who reported receptive anal intercourse, 39% in women who reported receptive anal intercourse, and 25% in all others (P trend <.0001). High-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia prevalence was 27%: 44% in men who reported receptive anal intercourse, 26% in women who reported receptive anal intercourse, and 10% in all others (P trend <.0001). Two patients had squamous-cell cancer. Independent predictors of dysplasia were CD4 at screening, receptive anal intercourse, sexual orientation, and history of human papillomavirus disease. Anal cytology and histology findings were not well correlated.

LIMITATIONS

The study population may not be representative of the general HIV-infected population, there were differences between screened and unscreened patients and between patients with abnormal cytology who had high-resolution anoscopy and those who did not, only patients with abnormal cytology had high-resolution anoscopy, and there were possible misclassification errors and uncontrolled possible confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

High-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia is relatively common in HIV-infected patients regardless of sexual practice. Although risk increases with receptive anal intercourse, patient-provided information on this sexual practice should not be used as a determining factor for screening. Strategies to prevent anal cancer are necessary for all HIV-infected patients.

Predictors of anal dysplasia in men who have sex with men with benign cytology

PURPOSE

Anal cytology is used to screen patients for anal dysplasia. Anal pap smears are collected without direct visualization of the canal, whereas cervical cytology is obtained with direct visualization. Current screening guidelines dictate that patients with abnormal cytology are to be evaluated with high-resolution anoscopy, and patients with benign anal cytology forgo high-resolution anoscopy. We routinely perform standard anoscopy after cytology collection. We endeavored to determine whether our standard procedure would reveal findings supporting high-resolution anoscopy even with benign cytology.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all anal cytology results from January 2008 to March 2009, identifying the patients with benign results who had undergone high-resolution anoscopy. Records were analyzed to determine the indication for high-resolution anoscopy and biopsy results.

RESULTS

We identified 2084 patients with anal cytology results, including 613 (29%) patients who had benign results and 169 (28%) patients who had undergone high-resolution anoscopy. The main reasons for high-resolution anoscopy were high risk of recurrent dysplasia based on prior high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with cytology done concurrently in 77 (46%), and abnormal anoscopy findings thought to be indicative of dysplasia (plaque or nodule suspicious of dysplasia, internal or external condyloma, dysplastic appearing fissure) in 92 (54%). Of subjects with abnormal anoscopy findings indicative of dysplasia, 25 (27%) had high-grade and 39 (42%) had low-grade dysplasia. Of those undergoing cytology and high-resolution anoscopy simultaneously, 14 (18%) had high-grade and 12 (16%) had low-grade dysplasia. In total, 90 (53%) of those with benign cytology who had high-resolution anoscopy had abnormal pathology, and 39 (23%) had high-grade dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Men having sex with men can have significant dysplasia with benign cytology. Standard anoscopy identifies findings indicative of dysplasia that, if present, should lead to high-resolution anoscopy even with benign cytology. Standard anoscopy should become an integral part of anal dysplasia screening. Prior recent history of high-grade dysplasia should lead to high-resolution anoscopy even with benign cytology.

Audit of paired anal cytology and histopathology outcomes in patients referred to a public sexual health clinic

BACKGROUND

The level of agreement between anal cytology and histopathology is not clear with only a few studies evaluating the reliability of anal specimen reporting. Australian data in relation to this are limited.

METHODS

The results of paired anal cytology and histopathology specimens received between 2002 and 2008 from patients who were referred within the sexual health clinic were retrieved from the anatomical pathology database. A total of 248 paired samples from 154 (21 females, 133 males) participants were extracted. Concurrent high risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV) DNA assay and HIV status for the study group were also collected. Data were tabulated according to reported grade of squamous abnormality based on the Bethesda system. Using the biopsy result as the gold standard the specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for cytology were calculated and the association between grade of abnormality, HIV status and hrHPV infection estimated.

RESULTS

Concordance between cytology and histology showed that in 204 (85%) paired samples both tests were categorised as abnormal (Kappa statistic 0.73, P = 0.013). The cytology result showed a sensitivity of 96%, specificity 14%, PPV 89% and NPV 31% when compared with histopathology. HrHPV assay was positive in 192 (80%) samples. High-grade squamous abnormalities were reported in biopsy specimens from 60% (n = 42/67) of HIV-positive subjects and 25% (n = 22/87) of HIV-negative subjects. HIV-positive individuals were more likely to be hrHPV positive, odds ratio (OR) 6.21 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.69 to 14.34], when compared with HIV-negative subjects.

CONCLUSION

Anal cytology is highly sensitive for the detection of abnormal squamous cells. While cytology has low specificity for predicting the grade of abnormality compared with biopsy outcome, its application as a screening method in asymptomatic at risk populations warrants further study.

Human papillomavirus genotype distribution in anal cancer in France: the EDiTH V study

Anal cancer is a rare cancer but its incidence is increasing. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection seems to be associated with the occurrence of most cases. The genotype-specific prevalence of HPV in anal cancer was estimated to assess the potential benefit of HPV vaccination in France. Anal cancer histological specimens were retrospectively recruited in 2008 from 16 French centres and centrally tested for HPV genotyping using the INNO-LiPA assay allowing the detection of 28 genotypes. Results were analyzed according to age, gender, HIV status when available and histological diagnosis. A total of 366 anal cancer cases were analyzed among which 62% were females. Mean age at diagnosis was 54.8 years in males and 66.4 years in females (p < 0.001). HPV was found in 96.7% of cases, 72% being infected by a single HPV type. Presence of at least one high-risk genotype was observed in 91% of cases (96% in females and 83% in males; p < 0.001). HPV16 was by far the most prevalent genotype (75%), followed by HPV18, HPV52, HPV33, and HPV51 (4-6%). HPV16/18 alone or in association were found in 78% of all cases. HIV-positive cases had a higher proportion of multiple HPV infection than HIV-negative cases and a slightly different HPV type distribution with an under-representation of HPV16 and an over-representation of other types. Our results indicate that anal cancer rarely occurs in the absence of HPV and emphasize the predominant role of HPV16. The potential benefit of HPV vaccine on the occurrence of anal cancer should be further evaluated.

HIV- positive anal cancer: an update for the clinician

Anal cancer used to be a rare cancer traditionally associated with elderly women. There are approximately 5260 cases per year in the U.S. (1). The onslaught of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) virus has led to a change in anal cancer demographics. Anal cancer is on the rise in the U.S and the number of anal cases documented has quadrupled in the past 20 yrs correlating with the rise of the HIV epidemic. The incidence of anal cancer is 40 to 80 fold higher in the HIV positive (HIV+) population when compared to the general population (2). With the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HIV+ patients are living longer as less are progressing to AIDS. As a consequence non AIDS defining cancers such as anal cancer are on the rise. Factors implicated in the etiology of anal cancer in HIV+ patients include (Human papillomavirus) HPV virus status, sexual habits, and a history of smoking. HPV 16 and receptive anal intercourse (RAI) increase the risk of anal cancer by 33% over the general population. In the general population, the rate of anal cancer is approximately 0.9 cases per 100,000. In patients with a history of RAI, the rate approaches 35 cases per 100,000 which is equivalent to the prevalence of cervical cancer (3). Smokers are eight times more likely to develop anal cancer. There has been much discussion about tailoring treatment decisions in HIV+ patients with anal cancer. This review focuses on squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal which comprise 80 to 90% of all anal cancers diagnosed and highlight key issues in the management of HIV+ anal cancer patients including recent clinical trials.

Frequency of occult high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cancer within anal condylomata in men who have sex with men

Human papillomavirus causes anal condylomata, high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia, and anal squamous cell cancer. We found high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or squamous cell cancer in 75 (47%) of 159 HIV-seropositive men who have sex with men (MSM) and in 42 (26%) of 160 HIV-seronegative MSM with anal condylomata meriting surgery (P<.001, determined by use of the chi(2) test). Anal condylomata in MSM often harbor high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and squamous cell cancer.

Detection of oncogenic human papillomavirus impacts anal screening guidelines in men who have sex with men

PURPOSE

It has been shown that testing for oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV+) improves the sensitivity of cytologic diagnosis of atypical cells of undetermined significance in the cervix and anus, reducing the number of patients requiring colposcopy or high-resolution anoscopy. Some recommend that men who have sex with men with any abnormal cytology undergo high-resolution anoscopy. We endeavored to determine whether HPV testing could predict future high-grade dysplasia (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions) and modify screening internals.

METHODS

This investigation was conducted via a retrospective chart review of subjects with atypical cells of undetermined significance anal cytology, high-resolution anoscopy, and HPV testing. Records were abstracted for prior and subsequent screenings.

RESULTS

Four hundred men who have sex with men (285 HIV-) underwent 2224 screenings. Of 224 subjects monitored for >2 years, the hazard ratio for developing high-grade dysplasia was 77% less for men who have sex with men who never had oncogenic HPV (HPV-) vs those who stayed HPV+ (P < .013). The hazard ratio for high-grade dysplasia in those who were HPV- vs those who became HPV- was not different. Risk of high-grade dysplasia was 28% within 6 months of becoming HPV+. The 3-year high-grade dysplasia risk was 15% and 54% for HPV- vs HPV+ subjects (P = .0006). Frequency of high-grade dysplasia in subjects who remained HPV- with predominantly atypical cells of undetermined significance cytology for 1, 2, or 3 years was 2%, 0% and 0% and was 17%, 0%, and 0% in HIV+ subjects. Kaplan-Meier analysis for HIV- subjects with HPV- predominantly atypical cells of undetermined significance cytology for 1 year showed <5% incidence of high-grade dysplasia at 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Change in HPV status can predict the risk of high-grade dysplasia. Subjects with predominantly HPV- atypical cells of undetermined significance cytology for 2 years have a decreased risk of high-grade dysplasia. HPV testing when screening for anal dysplasia could alter screening parameters.

Screening and management of anal dysplasia and anal cancer in HIV-infected patients: a guide for practice

People living with HIV infection have a significantly higher rate of anal cancer as compared with that of uninfected people. It is believed that high-grade anal dysplasia secondary to human papillomavirus infection is a precursor to anal cancer. Considering this, screening and treatment of high-grade anal dysplasia is a possible means of preventing the development of anal cancer. No national or international guidelines exist to guide practice for screening and management of anal dysplasia. On the basis of a review of research and expert recommendations, a guide to practice for screening and management of anal dysplasia and anal cancer is made for clinicians.

A randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study to determine the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an HPV-16 therapeutic vaccine in HIV-positive participants with oncogenic HPV infection of the anus

OBJECTIVE

Study aimed to assess safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of novel therapeutic HPV-16 E6E7 ISCOMATRIX vaccine for treatment of human papilloma virus (HPV)-related anal intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-infected men who have sex with men with moderate immunosuppression.

DESIGN

Randomized, multicenter, blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating study investigating 3 different doses of vaccine and different dose schedule. Primary objective to determine safety and tolerability, including clinical status, maintenance of virological control, and CD4 cell count for more than 252 days.

RESULTS

Thirty-five men who have sex with men enrolled; median age 47 years; current CD4 count 627 cells per milliliter; nadir CD4 count 154 cells per milliliter; 94% current antiretrovirals; 100% high-risk HPV types; 69% abnormal anal cytology; and 34% anal intraepithelial neoplasia 1-3 on high-resolution anoscopy. No dose-limiting toxicities or serious adverse events in HPV-16 vaccine recipients. Most HPV-16 vaccine recipients reported moderate/severe short-term injection site reactions and systemic reactions including headache, myalgia, and fatigue. CD4 cell counts remained stable. Five participants had transiently detectable viral loads. Ninety-six percent of vaccine recipients had at least a 4-fold increase in HPV-16 antibody from prevaccination levels. Seventy-one percent had at least a 3-fold increase in interferon-gamma responses to E6E7 peptides.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel therapeutic HPV-16 E6E7 ISCOMATRIX vaccine seemed safe and reasonably well tolerated. The therapeutic vaccine induces strong and durable antibody responses and moderate interferon-gamma levels that fell to prevaccination levels by week 24.

Screening anal dysplasia in HIV-infected patients: is there an agreement between anal pap smear and high-resolution anoscopy-guided biopsy?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the agreement between anal Pap smear and high-resolution anoscopy-guided biopsy in diagnosing anal dysplasia in HIV-infected patients.

METHODS

We conducted cross-sectional analysis of HIV-infected patients receiving anal dysplasia screening as part of routine care. Agreement between measures was estimated by weighted kappa statistics, using a three-tiered cytologic and histologic grading system (normal, low-grade dysplasia, and high-grade dysplasia). Estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated using a two-tiered cytologic and histologic grading system ("without dysplasia" and "with dysplasia of any grade"). Estimates were also calculated for the detection of high-grade dysplasia.

RESULTS

During a one-year period, 222 patients underwent 330 anal Pap smears followed by high-resolution anoscopy-guided biopsies. There were 311 satisfactory Pap smears with concurrent biopsies. Considering histology the standard, the frequency of anal dysplasia was 46%. Kappa agreement between anal Pap smear and biopsy was 0.20. For detection of anal dysplasia of any grade, anal Pap smear showed sensitivity of 61%, specificity of 60%, positive predictive value of 56%, and negative predictive value of 64%. For high-grade dysplasia, anal Pap smear showed sensitivity of 16% and specificity of 97%.

CONCLUSION

Anal Pap smears alone were not sensitive enough to rule out anal dysplasia. We recommend that high-resolution anoscopy-guided biopsy be incorporated as a complementary screening test for anal dysplasia in high-risk patients. Following baseline high-resolution anoscopy, these individuals could be followed with serial anal cytology to dictate the need for future high-resolution anoscopy-guided biopsies.

Sensibilidade e especificidade da citologia anal com escova no diagnóstico das lesões clínicas provocadas pelo papilomavírus humano, comparando uma com duas coletas

OBJETIVO: comparar os resultados da coleta única com duas amostras para avaliar se haverá melhora da sensibilidade e especificidade do exame. MÉTODO: Foram 112 doentes masculinos HIV-positivo com doença anal pregressa ou atual pelo Papilomavírus humano (HPV). As lesões HPV induzidas foram observadas em 58 deles. Colhemos material do canal anal utilizando duas escovas (cytobrush) Comparamos estatisticamente os resultados da primeira amostra com a soma das duas coletas. RESULTADOS: dos 58 doentes com lesões clínicas, a primeira amostra confirmou a doença em 40 (69%) e a soma das duas coletas revelou lesões em 51 (88%). Os resultados mostraram sensibilidade de 69% com a primeira coleta e 88% quando somadas as duas amostras. Essa diferença foi confirmada estatisticamente. A especificidade foi menor para as duas amostras, porém sem diferença estatística. CONCLUSÃO: Concluímos que a sensibilidade foi maior e a especificidade foi semelhante quando os resultados foram obtidos com a somação das duas amostras da citologia anal.

Prevalence and type distribution of human papillomavirus in carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of the vulva, vagina and anus: a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis investigated human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence in vulvar, vaginal and anal intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN, VAIN, AIN) grades 1-3 and carcinoma from 93 studies conducted in 4 continents and using PCR assays. Overall HPV prevalence was 67.8%, 85.3% and 40.4% among 90 VIN1, 1,061 VIN2/3 and 1,873 vulvar carcinomas; 100%, 90.1% and 69.9% among 107 VAIN1, 191 VAIN2/3 and 136 vaginal carcinomas; and 91.5%, 93.9% and 84.3% among 671 AIN1, 609 AIN2/3 and 955 anal carcinomas, respectively. HPV16 was found more frequently (>75%) and HPV18 less frequently (<10%) in HPV-positive vulvar, vaginal and anal carcinomas than in cervical carcinoma. HPV6 and 11 were common in VIN1 and AIN1, but not in VAIN1. HPV prevalence in vulvar carcinoma varied most by histological type (69.4% in warty-basaloid and 13.2% in keratinized type) and was also higher in women 60 years or younger and in studies carried out in North America. HPV prevalence in anal carcinoma was higher among women (90.8%) than men (74.9%), but no difference by gender emerged in North America. The majority of AIN2/3 derived from studies of HIV-positive individuals and/or men who have sex with men. Among AIN2/3, HIV infection was associated with higher HPV prevalence, more multiple-type infections and a relative under-representation of HPV16. In conclusion, approximately 40% of vulvar, 60% of vaginal and 80% of anal carcinoma may be avoided by prophylactic vaccines against HPV16/18. This proportion would be similar for the corresponding high-grade lesions of the vagina and anus, but higher for VIN2/3 (75%) than for vulvar carcinoma.

Abdominal perineal resection improves survival for nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the anal canal

BACKGROUND

There remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal treatment for patients with curable adenocarcinoma of the anal canal (AAC). We sought to determine the role of definitive surgical resection and radiation in a large cohort of patients with AAC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry to identify all patients with nonmetastatic AAC from 1988 to 2004 and analyzed clinical factors, treatment modalities, and overall survival in this cohort. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to compare 5-year overall survival based on treatment groups: abdominal perineal resection (APR) only, APR and external beam radiation (APR and EBR), and EBR only. We performed a Cox regression analysis to determine factors predictive of outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients were identified with nonmetastatic AAC. Of these, 30 patients were treated with an APR only, 42 patients with an APR and EBR, and 93 patients with EBR only. The 5-year survival for APR only, APR and EBR, and EBR only was 58%, 50%, and 30%, respectively. The difference in survival was statistically significant (APR vs. EBR, P = .02; APR and EBR vs. EBR, P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis completed on 86 patients in this cohort confirmed that factors accounting for the survival differences included age (P = 0.004), nodal stage (P = 0.001), and treatment groups (P = 0.03). The hazard ratio between EBR only compared with APR only was 2.78.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive surgical treatment in the form of an APR with or without EBR is associated with improved survival in patients with AAC.

Performance characteristics of anal cytology and human papillomavirus testing in patients with high-resolution anoscopy-guided biopsy of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia

PURPOSE

High-resolution anoscopy is colposcopy of the anus after applying 3 percent acetic acid. High-resolution anoscopy with biopsy was used as the standard for detecting high-grade anal neoplasia and was compared to detection of high-grade anal neoplasia by anal cytology, human papillomavirus testing, or the combination.

METHODS

A total of 125 men who have sex with men (MSM) were enrolled from a group of MSM identified by random digit dialing: HIV-negative = 85, HIV-positive = 35, and unknown status = 5. A specimen was taken for anal cytology and human papillomavirus testing, followed by high-resolution anoscopy with biopsy of any lesions.

RESULTS

Ninety-one percent of HIV-positive and 57 percent of HIV-negative MSM had anal human papillomavirus infection. In HIV-positive men the sensitivity of abnormal cytology to detect high-grade anal neoplasia was 87 percent, and in HIV-negative MSM it was 55 percent. Among HIV-negative men, 9 of 20 cases of high-grade anal neoplasia would have been missed because cytology was negative, but the addition of human papillomavirus positivity increased sensitivity for the combination to 90 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitivity and specificity of anal cytology and human papillomavirus testing are different in HIV-positive and HIV-negative MSM for detecting high-grade anal neoplasia when patients have high-resolution anoscopy-guided biopsy of lesions. The optimum use of human papillomavirus testing has yet to be defined. High-resolution anoscopy is an effective tool for diagnosing high-grade anal neoplasia.

Detection of oncogenic human papillomavirus and other predictors of anal high-grade dysplasia in men who have sex with men with abnormal cytology

PURPOSE

The incidence of anal high-grade dysplasia in men who have sex with men is increasing. Anal cytology that shows atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance is common, nonspecific, and rarely predicts high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. We want to know whether Hybrid-Capture II(R) testing for oncogenic human papillomavirus (human papillomavirus+) in men who have sex with men with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance is beneficial and whether other predictors of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion exist.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of men who have sex with men undergoing anal screening with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cytology, Hybrid-Capture(R) II testing, and biopsy. Records were analyzed for all screenings.

RESULTS

A total of 597 men who have sex with men enrolled and had 1,015 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cytology results: 185 (18.2 percent) had high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and 156 (84 percent) were human papillomavirus+. The rates for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 84, 53, 29, and 94 percent, respectively. Of 390 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology results, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion was found in 141 and 127 (90 percent) were human papillomavirus+. Those with previous high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or human immunodeficiency virus had increased risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (hazard ratio = 2.2 and hazard ratio = 1.95, respectively). Age was not a factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid-Capture II(R) testing is useful in men who have sex with men with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Referring only those with oncogenic human papillomavirus for biopsy reduces the number requiring this by almost half but some high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions are missed. History of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and human immunodeficiency virus are predictors of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion while screening intervals might be lengthened absent oncogenic human papillomavirus or in those free of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion for long periods.

Hybrid Capture II detection of oncogenic human papillomavirus: a useful tool when evaluating men who have sex with men with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on anal cytology

PURPOSE

In the cervix and anus, patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance often do not have high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. In women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, Hybrid-Capture II testing for oncogenic high-risk human papillomavirus is performed and those without high-risk human papillomavirus often are observed. We endeavored to determine whether Hybrid-Capture II testing would be beneficial in men who have sex with men with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of men who have sex with men with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance who had high-resolution anoscopy and Hybrid-Capture II.

RESULTS

A total of 290 men were identified (mean age, 42 years), and 212 (73 percent) were HIV-negative. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were found in 50 (17 percent): 23 (10 percent) who were HIV-negative and 27 (35 percent) who were HIV-positive men. High-risk human papillomavirus was found in 138 (48 percent); 91 (43 percent) of HIV-negative and 47 (60 percent) of HIV-positive men. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of atypical cells of undetermined significance cytology combined with Hybrid-Capture II were 84, 60, 30, and 95 percent, respectively. There was no significant difference between all men vs. those who were HIV-positive or HIV-negative except for the positive predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid-Capture II testing for high-risk human papillomavirus in men who have sex with men with atypical cells of undetermined significance and referring only those with high-risk human papillomavirus reduces the number who require high-resolution anoscopy by more than half. Five percent with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions would be missed.

High-resolution anoscopy targeted surgical destruction of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a ten-year experience

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine whether high-resolution anoscopy and targeted surgical destruction of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions is effective in controlling high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions while preserving normal tissues.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 246 patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions treated with high-resolution anoscopy-targeted surgical destruction from 1996 to 2006, with at least one follow-up at a minimum two months with physical examination, high-resolution anoscopy, cytology, and biopsy when indicated.

RESULTS

Lesions were extensive in 197 patients (81 percent); 207 (84 percent) were men, and 194 (79 percent) were immunocompromised (HIV or other). Persistent disease occurred in 46 patients (18.7 percent), requiring planned staged therapy; 10 required surgery. Recurrent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions occurred in 114 patients (57 percent) at an average 19 (range, 3-92) months; 26 of these required surgery. All other patients were retreated in-office with high-resolution anoscopy-directed therapies. Complications were seen in nine patients (4 percent). Despite treatment, three patients progressed to invasive cancer (1.2 percent). At their last visit, 192 patients (78 percent) had no evidence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

High-resolution anoscopy-targeted destruction combined with office-based surveillance and therapy is effective in controlling high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and is superior to reports of expectant management or traditional mapping procedures.

High resolution anoscopy in the planned staged treatment of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-negative patients

Anal dysplasia (low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, LSIL; high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, HSIL) is a challenging disease for the surgeon. We reviewed 42 patients that underwent high-resolution anoscopy (HRA)-targeted surgical therapy of anal dysplasia in the past 10 years. Patients were followed up in the Anal Neoplasia Clinic with physical examination, cytology, HRA, and biopsy if indicated. Patients with disease amenable to local therapy were treated with office-based HRA-directed therapies. There were 30 men (mean age 39 years, range 21-63) and 12 women (mean age 50 years, range 31-71) included in the study. HSIL was present in 33, with four undergoing planned staged treatment due to circumferential disease. HSIL recurred in 45%, and most were re-treated successfully in-office. Progression to HSIL was seen in one patient with LSIL and to squamous cell carcinoma in one patient with HSIL despite therapy. No patients with LSIL had dysplasia at last follow-up. Minor complications occurred in three patients. HRA-targeted surgical therapy coupled with surveillance and re-treatment with office-based therapies offered an effective method in controlling anal dysplasia in the immunocompetent patient. Morbidity is minimal, and our progression to cancer rate is low (2.4%).

Anal canal carcinoma: experience from a single Korean institution

PURPOSE

The clinical features, treatment modality approaches in clinical practice, and prognostic factors for anal canal carcinoma patients were retrospectively analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between October 1994 and December 2005, 50 patients with anal canal cancer were treated at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

RESULTS

After a median follow up of 37.8 months (range, 6.6-136.1 months), the 5-year and 10-year survival rates for the 38 patients with early and locally advanced squamous and cloacogenic carcinoma (squamous cell carcinoma and cloacogenic carcinoma) were 74.8% and 66.5%, respectively. The 5-year survival and disease-free survival rates (DFS) of the 31 patients who received chemoradiation therapy (CRT) were 83.6% and 74.3%, respectively. The overall and DFS could not be determined for the adenocarcinoma group due to the small number of cases (n=8). Univariate analysis showed that tumor size (p=0.04) and inguinal node status (p=0.04) significantly influenced patient survival in patients with squamous cell and cloacogenic carcinomas. Furthermore, univariate analysis also showed that, inguinal node status influenced patient survival in the adenocarcinoma group. Multivariate analysis showed that inguinal node metastasis is a single independent prognostic variable for survival (p=0.04) in patients with squamous cell and cloacogenic carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

Combined CRT has been adopted as standard treatment with outcomes that are comparable to those reported in randomized clinical trials. Due to the rarity and complexity of anal canal carcinoma, interdepartmental cooperation is required for disease treatment. Thus, proper treatment of patients should incorporate a team-approach and should be available to as many patients as possible.

Perianal squamous cell carcinoma with high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia in an HIV-positive patient using highly active antiretroviral therapy: case report

CONTEXT

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has turned human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection into a chronic condition, and this has led to increased incidence of anal dysplasia among HIV-positive patients. Routine anal evaluation including the anal canal and perianal area is recommended for this population, especially for patients infected by oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) types.

CASE REPORT

A 54-year-old homosexual HIV-positive man presented with a six-year history of recurrent perianal and anal warts. He had previously undergone incomplete surgical excision and fulguration in another institution on two occasions. He had been using HAART over the past two years. He presented some condylomatous spreading lesions occupying part of the anal canal and the perianal skin, and also a well-demarcated slightly painful perianal plaque of dimensions 1.0 x 1.0 cm. Both anal canal Pap smears and biopsies guided by high-resolution anoscopy revealed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Biopsies of the border of the perianal plaque also revealed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. HPV DNA testing of the anus detected the presence of HPV-16 type. The patient underwent local full-thickness excision of the lesion. Histological analysis on the excised tissue revealed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with one focus of microinvasive squamous cell cancer measuring 1 mm. No lymph vessel or perineural invasion was detected. The patient showed pathological evidence of recurrent anal and perianal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions at the sixth-month follow-up and required further ablation of those lesions. However no invasive squamous cell carcinoma recurrence has been detected so far.