Comparison of the behavioural effects of an adenosine A1/A2-receptor antagonist, CGS 15943A, and an A1-selective antagonist, DPCPX

Adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptor interaction controls fatigue resistance

Introduction: Caffeine and the selective A2A receptor antagonist SCH58261 both have ergogenic properties, effectively reducing fatigue and enhancing exercise capacity. This study investigates in male Swiss mice the interaction between adenosine A2A receptors and dopamine D2 receptors controlling central fatigue, with a focus on the striatum where these receptors are most abundant. Methods: We employed DPCPX and SCH58261 to antagonize A1 and A2A receptors, caffeine as a non-competitive antagonist for both receptors, and haloperidol as a D2 receptor antagonist; all compounds were tested upon systemic application and caffeine and SCH58261 were also directly applied in the striatum. Behavioral assessments using the open field, grip strength, and treadmill tests allowed estimating the effect of treatments on fatigue. Results and discussion: The results suggested a complex interplay between the dopamine and adenosine systems. While systemic DPCPX had little effect on motor performance or fatigue, the application of either caffeine or SCH58261 was ergogenic, and these effects were attenuated by haloperidol. The intra-striatal administration of caffeine or SCH58261 was also ergogenic, but these effects were unaffected by haloperidol. These findings confirm a role of striatal A2A receptors in the control of central fatigue but suggest that the D2 receptor-mediated control of the ergogenic effects of caffeine and of A2A receptor antagonists might occur outside the striatum. This prompts the need of additional efforts to unveil the role of different brain regions in the control of fatigue.

Orchestration of Dopamine Neuron Population Activity in the Ventral Tegmental Area by Caffeine: Comparison With Amphetamine

BACKGROUND

Among psychostimulants, the dopamine transporter ligands amphetamine and cocaine display the highest addictive potential; the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine is most widely consumed but less addictive. Psychostimulant actions of amphetamine were correlated with its ability to orchestrate ventral tegmental dopamine neuron activity with contrasting shifts in firing after single vs repeated administration. Whether caffeine might impinge on dopamine neuron activity has remained elusive.

METHODS

Population activity of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons was determined by single-unit extracellular recordings and set in relation to mouse behavior in locomotion and conditioned place preference experiments, respectively.

RESULTS

A single dose of caffeine reduced population activity as did amphetamine and the selective adenosine A2A antagonist KW-6002, but not the A1 antagonist DPCPX. Repeated administration of KW-6002 or amphetamine led to drug-conditioned place preference and to unaltered or even enhanced population activity. Recurrent injection of caffeine or DPCPX, in contrast, failed to cause conditioned place preference and persistently reduced population activity. Subsequent to repetitive drug administration, re-exposure to amphetamine or KW-6002, but not to caffeine or DPCPX, was able to reduce population activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Behavioral sensitization to amphetamine is attributed to persistent activation of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons via the ventral hippocampus. Accordingly, a switch from acute A2A receptor-mediated reduction of dopamine neuron population activity to enduring A1 receptor-mediated suppression is correlated with tolerance rather than sensitization in response to repeated caffeine intake.

Transient Astrocytic Gq Signaling Underlies Remote Memory Enhancement

Astrocytes elicit transient Ca2+ elevations induced by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), yet their role in vivo remains unknown. To address this, transgenic mice with astrocytic expression of the optogenetic Gq-type GPCR, Optoα1AR, were established, in which transient Ca2+ elevations similar to those in wild type mice were induced by brief blue light illumination. Activation of cortical astrocytes resulted in an adenosine A1 receptor-dependent inhibition of neuronal activity. Moreover, sensory stimulation with astrocytic activation induced long-term depression of sensory evoked response. At the behavioral level, repeated astrocytic activation in the anterior cortex gradually affected novel open field exploratory behavior, and remote memory was enhanced in a novel object recognition task. These effects were blocked by A1 receptor antagonism. Together, we demonstrate that GPCR-triggered Ca2+ elevation in cortical astrocytes has causal impacts on neuronal activity and behavior.

Role of nitric oxide in the behavioral and neurochemical effects of IB-MECA in zebrafish

RATIONALE

The adenosine A3 receptor and the nitric oxide (NO) pathway regulate the function and localization of serotonin transporters (SERTs). These transporters regulate extracellular serotonin levels, which are correlated with defensive behavior.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to understand the role of the A3AR on anxiety and arousal models in zebrafish, and whether this role is mediated by the nitrergic modulation of serotonin uptake.

METHODS

The effects of IB-MECA (0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg) were assessed in a series of behavioral tasks in adult zebrafish, as well as on extracellular serotonin levels in vivo and serotonin uptake in brain homogenates. Finally, the interaction between IB-MECA and drugs blocking voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCCs), NO synthase, and SERT was analyzed.

RESULTS

At the lowest dose, IB-MECA decreased bottom dwelling and scototaxis, while at the highest dose, it also decreased shoaling, startle probability, and melanophore responses. These effects were accompanied by an increase in brain extracellular serotonin levels. IB-MECA also concentration-dependently increased serotonin uptake in vitro. The effects of IB-MECA on extracellular 5-HT, scototaxis, and geotaxis were blocked by L-NAME, while only the effects on 5-HT and scototaxis were blocked by verapamil. In vitro, the increase in 5-HT uptake was dependent on VDCCs and NO. Finally, fluoxetine blocked the effect of IB-MECA on scototaxis, but not geotaxis.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the effect of IB-MECA on scototaxis are mediated by a VDCC-NO-SERT pathway. While NO seems to mediate the effects of IB-MECA on geotaxis, neither VDCCs nor SERT seems to be involved in this process.

The role of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in the caffeine effect on MDMA-induced DA and 5-HT release in the mouse striatum

3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, “ecstasy”) popular as a designer drug is often used with caffeine to gain a stronger stimulant effect. MDMA induces 5-HT and DA release by interaction with monoamine transporters. Co-administration of caffeine and MDMA may aggravate MDMA-induced toxic effects on DA and 5-HT terminals. In the present study, we determined whether caffeine influences DA and 5-HT release induced by MDMA. We also tried to find out if adenosine A1 and A2A receptors play a role in the effect of caffeine by investigating the effect of the selective adenosine A1 and A2A receptor antagonists, DPCPX and KW 6002 on DA and 5-HT release induced by MDMA. Mice were treated with caffeine (10 mg/kg) and MDMA (20 or 40 mg/kg) alone or in combination. DA and 5-HT release in the mouse striatum was measured using in vivo microdialysis. Caffeine exacerbated the effect of MDMA on DA and 5-HT release. DPCPX or KW 6002 co-administered with MDMA had similar influence as caffeine, but KW 6002 was more potent than caffeine or DPCPX. To exclude the contribution of MAO inhibition by caffeine in the caffeine effect on MDMA-induced increase in DA and 5-HT, we also tested the effect of the nonxanthine adenosine receptor antagonist CGS 15943A lacking properties of MAO activity modification. Our findings indicate that adenosine A1 and A2A receptor blockade may account for the caffeine-induced exacerbation of the MDMA effect on DA and 5-HT release and may aggravate MDMA toxicity.

A2A receptor antagonists do not induce dyskinesias in drug-naive or L-dopa sensitized rats

L-dopa, the precursor to dopamine, is currently the gold standard treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, chronic exposure is associated with L-dopa-induced dyskinesias (LIDs), a serious side effect characterized by involuntary movements. Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists have been studied as a novel non-dopaminergic PD treatment. Because A2A receptor antagonists do not act on dopamine receptors, it has been hypothesized that they will not induce dyskinesias characteristic of L-dopa. To test this hypothesis in a rodent model, the A2A receptor antagonists SCH 412348 (3 mg/kg), vipadenant (10 mg/kg), caffeine (30 mg/kg), or istradefylline (3 mg/kg) were chronically (19-22 days) administered to Sprague Dawley rats, and dyskinetic behaviors were scored across this chronic dosing paradigm. Unlike L-dopa, there was no evidence of dyskinetic activity resulting from any of the four A2A receptor antagonists tested. When delivered to animals previously sensitized with L-dopa (6 mg/kg), SCH 412348, vipadenant, caffeine or istradefylline treatment produced no dyskinesias. When administered in combination with L-dopa (6 mg/kg), SCH 412348 (3 mg/kg) neither exacerbated nor prevented the induction of LIDs over the course of 19 days of treatment. Collectively, our data indicate that A2A receptor antagonists are likely to have a reduced dyskinetic liability relative to L-dopa but do not block dyskinesias when coadministered with L-dopa. Clinical studies are required to fully understand the dyskinesia profiles of A2A receptor antagonists.

Adenosine A1, but not A2, receptor blockade increases anxiety and arousal in Zebrafish

Adenosinergic systems have been implicated in anxiety-like states, as caffeine can induce a state of anxiety in human beings. Caffeine is an antagonist at A(1) and A(2) adenosine receptors but it remains unclear whether anxiety is mediated by one or both of these. As the adenosinergic system is rather conserved, we opted to pursue these questions using zebrafish, a widely used model organism in genetics and developmental biology. Zebrafish adenosine 1. 2A.1 and 2A.2 receptors conserve histidine residues in TM6 and TM7 that are responsible for affinity in bovine A1 receptor. We investigated the effects of caffeine, PACPX (an A(1) receptor antagonist) and 1,3-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX) (an A(2) receptor antagonist) on anxiety-like behaviour and locomotor activity of zebrafish in the scototaxis test as well as evaluated the effects of these drugs on pigment aggregation. Caffeine increased anxiety at the dose of 100 mg/kg, while locomotion at the dose of 10 mg/kg was increased. Both doses of 10 and 100 mg/kg induced pigment aggregation. PACPX, on the other hand, increased anxiety at a dose of 6 mg/kg and induced pigment aggregation at the doses of 0.6 and 6 mg/kg, but did not produce a locomotor effect. DMPX, in turn, increased locomotion at the dose of 6 mg/kg but did not produce any effect on pigment aggregation or anxiety-like behaviour. These results indicate that blockade of A(1)-R, but not A(2)-R, induces anxiety and autonomic arousal, while the blockade of A(2)-R induces hyperlocomotion. Thus, as in rodents, caffeine's anxiogenic and arousing effects are probably mediated by A(1) receptors in zebrafish and its locomotor activating effect is probably mediated by A(2) receptors.

Adenosine A1 and A2A receptors are not upstream of caffeine's dopamine D2 receptor-dependent aversive effects and dopamine-independent rewarding effects

Caffeine is widely consumed throughout the world, but little is known about the mechanisms underlying its rewarding and aversive properties. We show that pharmacological antagonism of dopamine not only blocks conditioned place aversion to caffeine, but also reveals dopamine blockade-induced conditioned place preferences. These aversive effects are mediated by the dopamine D(2) receptor, as knockout mice showed conditioned place preferences in response to doses of caffeine that C57Bl/6 mice found aversive. Furthermore, these aversive responses appear to be centrally mediated, as a quaternary analog of caffeine failed to produce conditioned place aversion. Although the adenosine A(2A) receptor is important for caffeine's physiological effects, this receptor seems only to modulate the appetitive and aversive effects of caffeine. A(2A) receptor knockout mice showed stronger dopamine-dependent aversive responses to caffeine than did C57Bl/6 mice, which partially obscured the dopamine-independent and A(2A) receptor-independent preferences. Additionally, the A(1) receptor, alone or in combination with the A(2A) receptor, does not seem to be important for caffeine's rewarding or aversive effects. Finally, excitotoxic lesions of the tegmental pedunculopontine nucleus revealed that this brain region is not involved in dopamine blockade-induced caffeine reward. These data provide surprising new information on the mechanism of action of caffeine, indicating that adenosine receptors do not mediate caffeine's appetitive and aversive effects. We show that caffeine has an atypical reward mechanism, independent of the dopaminergic system and the tegmental pedunculopontine nucleus, and provide additional evidence in support of a role for the dopaminergic system in aversive learning.

Caffeine and a selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist induce reward and sensitization behavior associated with increased phospho-Thr75-DARPP-32 in mice

RATIONALE

Caffeine, an antagonist of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor, is the most widely used psychoactive substance in the world. Evidence indicates that caffeine interacts with the neuronal systems involved in drug reinforcing. Although adenosine A(1) and/or A(2A) receptor have been found to play important roles in the locomotor stimulation and probably reinforcing effect of caffeine, the relative contribution of the A(1) and/or A(2A) receptors to the acute and chronic motor activation and reinforcing effects of caffeine has not been completely investigated.

OBJECTIVE

The roles of adenosine A(1) and/or A(2A) receptor and the association of phospho-Thr75-dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of molecular weight 32 kDa (DARPP-32) in the motor activation and reinforcing effects of caffeine, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), a selective A(1) antagonist, and 5-amino-7-(beta-phenylethyl)-2-(8-furyl) pyrazolol [4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolol [1,5-c] pyrimidine (SCH58261), a selective A(2A) receptor antagonist were examined.

METHODS

Locomotor stimulation and behavioral sensitization of caffeine, DPCPX, and SCH58261 were studied in C57BL/6 male mice following acute and chronic administration. Conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm was used to evaluate the drug-seeking potential of these compounds. Furthermore, the expression of phospho-Thr75-DARPP-32 in striatal membrane from behaviorally sensitized mice was analyzed by Western blot.

RESULTS

Caffeine and SCH58261 but not DPCPX induced CPP and locomotor sensitization in C57BL/6 mice. The locomotor sensitization after chronic treatment was associated with increased DARPP-32 phosphorylation at Thr75 in the striatum.

CONCLUSION

Caffeine-induced reinforcing effect and behavioral sensitization are mediated by antagonism at adenosine A(2A) receptor. These effects are associated with phosphorylation of DARPP-32 at Thr75 in the striatum.

Brain adenosine A2A receptor occupancy by a novel A1/A2A receptor antagonist, ASP5854, in rhesus monkeys: relationship to anticataleptic effect

The purpose of the present study was to measure adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) occupancy in the brain by a novel adenosine A(1)/A(2A) antagonist, 5-[5-amino-3-(4fluorophenyl)pyrazin-2-yl]-1-isopropylpyridine-2(1H)-one (ASP5854), and to determine the degree of receptor occupancy necessary to inhibit haloperidol-induced catalepsy in rhesus monkeys.

METHODS

A(2A)R occupancy by ASP5854 (0.001-0.1 mg/kg) was examined in the striatum using an A(2A)R-specific radiotracer, (11)C-SCH442416, and PET in conscious rhesus monkeys. A(2A)R occupancy was monitored after a single intravenous administration of ASP5854 in 3 animals, and a dynamic PET scan was performed at 1, 4, and 8 h after an intravenous bolus injection of the tracer for approximately 740 MBq. Catalepsy was induced by haloperidol (0.03 mg/kg, intramuscularly) and examined for incidence and duration.

RESULTS

ASP5854 dose-dependently increased A(2A)R occupancy in the striatum and showed long-lasting occupancy even after the reduction of plasma concentration. Haloperidol induced severe catalepsy at 40 min after intramuscular injection. The incidence and duration of cataleptic posture were dose-dependently reduced by ASP5854 at 1 h after oral administration, and the minimum ED(50) value was 0.1 mg/kg. Administration of a dose of 0.1 mg/kg yielded a plasma concentration of 97 +/- 16.3 ng/mL, which corresponded to 85%-90% of A(2A)R occupancy.

CONCLUSION

These results showed that ASP5854 antagonized A(2A)R in the striatum, and the dissociation from A(2A)R was relatively slow. In addition, more than 85% A(2A)R occupancy by ASP5854 resulted in an inhibition of haloperidol-induced catalepsy. Thus, such a pharmacodynamic study directly demonstrates both the kinetics of a drug in the brain and the relationship between dose-dependent receptor occupancy and plasma level.

Safety pharmacology assessment of central nervous system function in juvenile and adult rats: effects of pharmacological reference compounds

INTRODUCTION

Recent EU/US pediatric legislation and FDA/EMEA guidelines recognize the potential differences in safety profiles of drugs in adults versus young patients. Hence safety studies are recommended to investigate key functional domains of e.g. the developing CNS.

METHODS

Selected psychoactive stimulants (caffeine, d-amphetamine, scopolamine) and depressants (baclofen, diazepam, haloperidol, chlorpromazine, imipramine, morphine) were characterized upon single administration with regard to behavioural parameters, locomotor activity, body temperature, pro-/anti-convulsive activity (pentylenetetrazole, PTZ), and nocifensive responses (hotplate) in neonatal (2 weeks), juvenile (4 weeks) and adult rats (8-9 weeks).

RESULTS

In vehicle-treated rats, behavioural patterns matured with age, locomotor activity and handling-induced rise in body temperature were enhanced, whereas PTZ convulsion threshold dose and nocifensive response latency decreased. Single test compound treatment elicited behavioural effects characteristic for psychoactive drugs with stimulating and depressing properties regardless of age. However, incidence of certain behaviours, and magnitude of effects on locomotor activity and body temperature varied with age and became generally more pronounced in adult rats. Pro-/anti-convulsive effects and delayed nocifensive responses did not differ between juvenile and adult rats.

CONCLUSION

CNS effects of selected psychoactive reference compounds were qualitatively similar, but quantitatively different in neonatal, juvenile and adult rats.

The type 1 equilibrative nucleoside transporter regulates anxiety-like behavior in mice

Activation of adenosine receptors in the brain reduces anxiety-like behavior in animals and humans. Because nucleoside transporters regulate adenosine levels, we used mice lacking the type 1 equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT1) to investigate whether ENT1 contributes to anxiety-like behavior. The ENT1 null mice spent more time in the center of an open field compared with wild-type littermates. In the elevated plus maze, ENT1 null mice entered more frequently into and spent more time exploring the open arms. The ENT1 null mice also spent more time exploring the light side of a light-dark box compared with wild-type mice. Microinjection of an ENT1-specific antagonist, nitrobenzylthioinosine (nitrobenzylmercaptopurine riboside), into the amygdala of C57BL/6J mice reduced anxiety-like behavior in the open field and elevated plus maze. These findings show that amygdala ENT1 modulates anxiety-like behavior. The ENT1 may be a drug target for the treatment of anxiety disorders.

Neotic preferences in laboratory rodents: Issues, assessment and substrates

Neotic preference refers to the extent to which animals prefer stimuli of differing novelty value. Degree of novelty is determined by within- and between-trials habituation and amount of temporal (novelty) and spatial change (complexity) in stimulation which in turn will determine the amount of curiosity-based approach (neophilia) or fear-based avoidance (neophobia) of novel stimuli. Tests of genuine neotic preferences enable direct assessments of responsiveness to temporal and spatial changes and include measurements of novel versus familiar locations (such as novelty-related location preferences), responsiveness to stimulus complexity (such as object exploration) and learning for exploratory rewards (such as light-contingent bar-pressing). Effects of brain lesions and peripherally administered drugs have implicated several brain areas and neurotransmitters that subserve memory, fear and reward in neotic preferences namely the hippocampus and ACh (memory), the amygdala, GABA and 5-HT (fear), and the mesolimbic DA reward system. However, more attention should be paid to the complexity of interactions between different brain and neurotransmitter systems and improvements in methodology before conclusions should be drawn about the neurobiological basis of neotic preferences.

Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists improve deficits in initiation of movement and sensory motor integration in the unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine rat model of Parkinson's disease

Evidence obtained in rodent and primate models of Parkinson's disease (PD) and preliminary clinical trials, indicates that adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists might represent a promising nondopaminergic therapeutic tool for the treatment of PD. Those studies demonstrated the ability of adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists to potentiate l-dopa-mediated motor improvement, whereas very little is known about counteraction of specific motor deficits and on the effects of these compounds when administered alone. To this aim we evaluated the effects of different adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists on initiation of movement deficits, gait impairment and sensory-motor deficits, induced in rats by a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesion of dopaminergic nigrostriatal neurons. The following tests were used: (1) initiation time of stepping; (2) adjusting step (stepping with forelimb was measured as the forelimb was dragged laterally); (3) vibrissae-elicited forelimb placing (as index of sensory-motor integration deficits). Acute administration of the A(2A) receptor antagonists SCH 58261 (5 mg/kg i.p.) and ST 1535 (20 mg/kg i.p.) similarly to l-dopa (6 mg/kg i.p.) counteracted the impairments in the initiation time of stepping test, in the adjusting step and in the vibrissae-elicited forelimb placing induced by the lesion. The intensity of the effect was l-dopa > SCH 58261 > ST 1535. The results provide the first evidence that blockade of A(2A) receptors is effective in antagonizing specific motor deficit induced by DA neuron degeneration, such as initiation of movement and sensory-motor integration deficits, even without l-dopa combined administration.

Combination of adenosine A1 and A2A receptor blocking agents induces caffeine-like locomotor stimulation in mice

The spontaneous locomotor activity of C57BL/6J mice was examined, using an automated detection system based on infra-red beams, after administration of caffeine (3-30 mg/kg, i.p.), the adenosine A(2A) receptor selective antagonist SCH 58261 (0.312-2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) and the A(1) selective antagonist DPCPX (1.25-5 mg/kg, i.p.). SCH 58261 failed to influence motor activity in mice habituated to the test environment. DPCPX produced a small increase in motility and locomotion (significant at the dose of 5.0 mg/kg), much weaker than that produced by caffeine. Combined administration of DPCPX (1.2 mg/kg, i.p.) and SCH 58261 (1.2 mg/kg, i.p.) produced stimulation of motility and locomotion comparable with the effect of caffeine (15 mg/kg, i.p.). In contrast to motility and locomotion, rearing counts were not significantly influenced by DPCPX, SCH 58261, their combination, or by caffeine. Caffeine (15 mg/kg, i.p.) caused an increase in NGFI-A mRNA (an immediate early gene was chosen as an index of neuronal activation) in the piriform cortex 4 h after injection. This effect was reproduced by the combination of A(1) and A(2A) receptor antagonist. It is hypothesised that the stimulatory effect of low doses of caffeine in C57BL/6J mice is due to concomitant blockade of both A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors.

New therapies for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists

The development of non-dopaminergic therapies for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) has attracted much interest in recent years. Among new different classes of drugs, adenosine A2A receptor antagonists have emerged as best candidates. The present review will provide an updated summary of the results reported in literature concerning the effects of adenosine A2A antagonists in rodent and primate models of PD. These results show that A2A receptor antagonists improve motor deficits without inducing dyskinesia and counteract parkinsonian tremor. In progress clinical trials have shown that a low dose of L-DOPA plus KW-6002 produced symptomatic relief no different from that produced by an optimal dose of L-DOPA alone, whereas dyskinesias were reduced rendering this class of compounds particularly attractive.

Caffeine and the dopaminergic system

Caffeine is the most widely consumed psychostimulant substance, being self-administered throughout a wide range of conditions and present in numerous dietary products. Due to its widespread use and low abuse potential, caffeine is considered an atypical drug of abuse. The main mechanism of action of caffeine occurs via the blockade of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors. Adenosine is a modulator of CNS neurotransmission and its modulation of dopamine transmission through A2A receptors has been implicated in the effects of caffeine. This review provides an updated summary of the results reported in the literature concerning the behavioural pharmacology of caffeine and the neurochemical mechanisms underlying the psychostimulant effects elicited by caffeine. The review focuses on the effects of caffeine mediated by adenosine A2A receptors and on the influence that pre-exposure to caffeine may exert on the effects of classical drugs of abuse.

New adenosine A2A receptor antagonists: Actions on Parkinson's disease models

The 8-substituted 9-ethyladenine derivatives: 8-bromo-9-ethyladenine (ANR 82), 8-ethoxy- 9-ethyladenine (ANR 94), and 8-furyl-9-ethyladenine (ANR 152) have been characterized in vitro as adenosine receptor antagonists. Adenosine is deeply involved in the control of motor behaviour and substantial evidences indicate that adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists improve motor deficits in animal models of Parkinson's disease. On this basis, the efficacy of ANR 82, ANR 94, and ANR 152 in rat models of Parkinson's disease was evaluated. All compounds tested reversed the catalepsy induced by haloperidol. However, in unilaterally 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats, only ANR 94 and ANR 152 potentiated l-dihydroxy-phenylalanine (l-DOPA) effect on turning behaviour and induced contralateral turning behaviour in rats sensitised to l-DOPA. Taken together the results of this study indicate that some 8-substituted 9-ethyladenine derivatives ameliorate motor deficits in rat models of Parkinson's disease, suggesting a potential therapeutic role of these compounds.

Subchronic caffeine exposure induces sensitization to caffeine and cross-sensitization to amphetamine ipsilateral turning behavior independent from dopamine release

We have recently shown that repeated exposure to caffeine sensitizes rats to the motor activating effects of dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptor agonists. In order to study the role of dopamine in this effect, sensitization to caffeine and cross-sensitization between caffeine and amphetamine was evaluated by studying turning behavior and in vivo striatal dopamine release in unilaterally 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. Administration of caffeine (15 mg/kg) for 2 weeks, on alternate days, induced a significant increase in ipsilateral turning behavior during the course of treatment, indicating that sensitization to caffeine took place in the intact striatum. Caffeine modestly increased dopamine release in the intact dorsa-lateral striatum and no significant difference between the first (+38%) and the last (+51%) injection was observed. Amphetamine (2 mg/kg) induced a significantly higher ipsilateral turning behavior in caffeine-sensitized rats than in vehicle-pretreated rats, however, a similar increase in dopamine release (+900 and +800%) was observed in the two groups. The results are the first demonstration that caffeine pre-exposure sensitizes the motor-stimulant effects of caffeine itself and of amphetamine. Sensitized ipsilateral turning after caffeine and amphetamine are not correlated to modification in striatal dopamine release, rather, postsynaptic modifications in dopamine and adenosine receptor interaction might be involved in the sensitization phenomena observed.

The adenosine receptor antagonist CGS15943 reinstates cocaine-seeking behavior and maintains self-administration in baboons

RATIONALE

Caffeine and the adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor antagonist CGS15943 produce many behavioral effects that are similar to those produced by classic stimulant drugs (e.g. cocaine and amphetamines).

OBJECTIVES

The current study evaluated whether CGS15943 would maintain self-administration and reinstate extinguished lever responding previously maintained by cocaine (i.e. cocaine-seeking) or by food (i.e. food-seeking). Reinstatement with CGS15943 was compared to cocaine, caffeine, and alprazolam.

METHODS

Up to 30 injections of 0.032 mg/kg cocaine or 30 deliveries of 1-g food pellets were available under a fixed ratio (FR10) schedule of reinforcement during daily 2-h sessions. For reinstatement tests, lever responses were extinguished by substituting saline for cocaine or by removing pellets from the mechanical feeder. After extinction of lever responding, acute "priming" doses (mg/kg, IV) of cocaine (0.1-3.2), the adenosine receptor antagonists caffeine (0.1-1.8) and CGS15943 (0.032-0.32) or the benzodiazepine receptor agonist alprazolam (0.1-1.8 mg/kg) were administered. The intravenous reinforcing effects of CGS15943 were also evaluated; each dose of CGS15943 (0.001-0.032 mg/kg) was substituted for cocaine for at least 10 days and until self-injection was relatively stable.

RESULTS

Cocaine, caffeine and CGS15943, dose-dependently increased cocaine-seeking, where as alprazolam did not. Cocaine, caffeine and CGS15943 did not increase food-seeking. CGS15943 reinstated cocaine-seeking at rates that were comparable to those produced by cocaine. Pretreatment with the adenosine A(2) agonist CGS21680 decreased CGS15943-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking. In self-injection testing, CGS15943 was self-administered at levels greater than vehicle. An inverted U-shaped dose-effect function was obtained with peak mean rates maintained by 0.01 mg/kg CGS15943.

CONCLUSIONS

The adenosine antagonist CGS15943 reinstated cocaine-seeking and functioned as an intravenous reinforcer. The finding that CGS21680 produced a rightward shift in the CGS15943 reinstatement dose-effect curve supports a role of adenosine mechanisms in the reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior.

The neurobiology and control of anxious states

Fear is an adaptive component of the acute "stress" response to potentially-dangerous (external and internal) stimuli which threaten to perturb homeostasis. However, when disproportional in intensity, chronic and/or irreversible, or not associated with any genuine risk, it may be symptomatic of a debilitating anxious state: for example, social phobia, panic attacks or generalized anxiety disorder. In view of the importance of guaranteeing an appropriate emotional response to aversive events, it is not surprising that a diversity of mechanisms are involved in the induction and inhibition of anxious states. Apart from conventional neurotransmitters, such as monoamines, gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA) and glutamate, many other modulators have been implicated, including: adenosine, cannabinoids, numerous neuropeptides, hormones, neurotrophins, cytokines and several cellular mediators. Accordingly, though benzodiazepines (which reinforce transmission at GABA(A) receptors), serotonin (5-HT)(1A) receptor agonists and 5-HT reuptake inhibitors are currently the principle drugs employed in the management of anxiety disorders, there is considerable scope for the development of alternative therapies. In addition to cellular, anatomical and neurochemical strategies, behavioral models are indispensable for the characterization of anxious states and their modulation. Amongst diverse paradigms, conflict procedures--in which subjects experience opposing impulses of desire and fear--are of especial conceptual and therapeutic pertinence. For example, in the Vogel Conflict Test (VCT), the ability of drugs to release punishment-suppressed drinking behavior is evaluated. In reviewing the neurobiology of anxious states, the present article focuses in particular upon: the multifarious and complex roles of individual modulators, often as a function of the specific receptor type and neuronal substrate involved in their actions; novel targets for the management of anxiety disorders; the influence of neurotransmitters and other agents upon performance in the VCT; data acquired from complementary pharmacological and genetic strategies and, finally, several open questions likely to orientate future experimental- and clinical-research. In view of the recent proliferation of mechanisms implicated in the pathogenesis, modulation and, potentially, treatment of anxiety disorders, this is an opportune moment to survey their functional and pathophysiological significance, and to assess their influence upon performance in the VCT and other models of potential anxiolytic properties.

Modification of adenosine extracellular levels and adenosine A(2A) receptor mRNA by dopamine denervation

Adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists have been proposed as an effective therapy in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. To explore the possibility that dopamine denervation may produce modifications in adenosine A(2A) transmission, we measured the extracellular concentration of adenosine and adenosine A(2A) receptor mRNA in the striatum of rats infused unilaterally with 6-hydroxydopamine in the medial forebrain bundle. Fifteen days after 6-hydroxydopamine infusion, extracellular adenosine levels, measured by in vivo microdialysis, were significantly lower (-35%) in the dopamine-denervated striatum. At the time of the decrease in adenosine levels, an increase in striatal adenosine A(2A) receptor mRNA levels (+20%), measured by in situ hybridization, was observed. Modifications in adenosine A(2A) transmission, following nigrostriatal dopamine neuron degeneration, establish a potential neural basis for the effectiveness of adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Differential regulation of GAD67, enkephalin and dynorphin mRNAs by chronic-intermittent L-dopa and A2A receptor blockade plus L-dopa in dopamine-denervated rats

Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists have been proposed as an effective therapy in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. In the present study, we compared the modifications on striatal glutamate decarboxylase (GAD67), enkephalin, and dynorphin mRNA levels produced by a chronic-intermittent administration of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenyl-alanine (L-dopa) (6 mg/kg) with those produced by the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist SCH 58261 (5 mg/kg) plus L-dopa (3 mg/kg) in unilaterally 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-lesioned rats. As previously reported, L-dopa (6 mg/kg) and SCH 58261 (5 mg/kg) plus L-dopa (3 mg/kg) produced the same degree of turning behavior after the first administration. However, while L-dopa (6 mg/kg) induced a sensitized turning behavior response during the course of the treatment, which indicated a dyskinetic potential, SCH 58261 (5 mg/kg) plus L-dopa (3 mg/kg) produced a stable turning behavior response, which was predictive of absence of dyskinetic side effects. Unilateral 6-OHDA lesion produced an elevation in striatal GAD67 and enkephalin mRNA levels and to a decrease in dynorphin mRNA levels. Chronic-intermittent L-dopa (6 mg/kg) treatment increased the striatal levels of GAD67, dynorphin, and enkephalin mRNA in the lesioned side as compared to the vehicle treatment. Chronic-intermittent SCH 58261 (5 mg/kg) plus L-dopa (3 mg/kg) as well as L-dopa (3 mg/kg) or SCH 58261 (5 mg/kg) alone did not produce any significant modification in GAD67, dynorphin, or enkephalin mRNA levels in the lesioned striatum as compared to the striatum of vehicle-treated rats. The results show that combined SCH 58261 plus L-dopa did not produce long-term changes in markers of striatal efferent neurons activity and suggest that the lack of modifications in GAD67 and dynorphin mRNA after SCH 58261 plus L-dopa might correlate with the lack of turning behavior sensitization which predicts drug dyskinetic potential.

Caffeinated clues and the promise of adenosine A(2A) antagonists in PD

Large prospective epidemiologic studies have linked the consumption of coffee and other caffeinated beverages to a reduced risk of subsequently developing PD. Caffeine as well as more specific antagonists of the adenosine A(2A) receptor have also now been found to attenuate neurotoxicity in a mouse model of PD. The convergence of these epidemiologic and laboratory data supports the possibility that caffeine may reduce the risk of developing PD. However, a neuroprotective effect of caffeine in PD remains unproven; current evidence does not provide a rational basis for recommending caffeine consumption to modify the risk or progression of PD. In addition to possessing neuroprotective potential, caffeine and other A(2A) antagonists have long been known to acutely reverse motor deficits in a variety of PD models. This symptomatic antiparkinsonian benefit of blocking A(2A) receptors, coupled with their remarkably restricted expression in the basal ganglia, have made A(2A) antagonists attractive targets for drug development. Now, with the prospect of a neuroprotective bonus, the novel therapeutic potential of A(2A) antagonists appears all the more promising just as they are entering clinical trials for PD.

Caffeine's neuroprotection against 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine toxicity shows no tolerance to chronic caffeine administration in mice

We investigated the effect of chronic daily caffeine treatment on caffeine's neuroprotection against 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced dopaminergic toxicity. Mice received either caffeine (20 mg/kg) or saline daily for 9 days. Caffeine-induced locomotion tolerance developed within 3 days of treatment and persisted for the duration of the experiment. On day 10, mice were treated with MPTP (20 mg/kg, x4). Caffeine (20 mg/kg) or saline was administered 10 min before each MPTP dose. Acute pretreatment with caffeine attenuated MPTP-induced loss of striatal dopamine and dopamine transporter binding sites, and this attenuation was identical in mice pretreated chronically with caffeine or with saline. Thus, in contrast to the locomotor stimulant effect of caffeine, its neuroprotectant effect did not show tolerance to prior caffeine exposure. These data raise the possibility that caffeine may induce neuroprotection and locomotion by distinct mechanisms.

Adenosine A(2a) receptor antagonists: potential therapeutic and neuroprotective effects in Parkinson's disease

The most effective treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) is, at present, the dopamine precursor L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), however a number of disadvantages such as a loss of drug efficacy and severe side-effects (psychoses, dyskinesias and on-off phenomena) limit long-term effective utilisation of this drug. Recent experimental studies in which selective antagonists of adenosine A(2A) receptors were used, have shown an improvement in motor disabilities in animal models of PD. The A(2A) antagonist [7-(2-phenylethyl)-5-amino-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-(4,3-e)-1,2,4-triazolo(1,5-c) pyrimidine] (SCH 58261) potentiated the contralateral turning behavior induced by a threshold dose of L-DOPA or direct dopamine receptor agonists in unilaterally 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesioned rats, an effect accompanied by an increase in Fos-like-immunoreactivity in neurons of the lesioned striatum. Likewise, other A(2A) receptor antagonists such as (3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine) (DMPX), [E-8-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)-1,3-dipropyl-7-methylxanthine] (KF 17837) and [E-1,3-diethyl-8(3,4-dimethoxystyryl-7-methyl-3,7-dihydro-1H-purine-2,6-dione] (KW 6002) antagonized catalepsy induced by haloperidol or reserpine in the rat, whereas in non-human primate models of PD, KW 6002 reduced the rigidity and improved the disability score of MPTP-treated marmosets and cynomolgus monkeys. Moreover, in contrast to L-DOPA, selective A(2A) receptor antagonists administered chronically did not produce dyskinesias and did not evoke tolerance in 6-OHDA and MPTP models of PD. An additional therapeutic potential of adenosine A(2A) antagonists emerged from studies showing neuroprotective properties of these compounds in animal models of cerebral ischemia and excitotoxicity, as well as in the MPTP model of PD. Adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists by reversing motor impairments in animal models of PD and by contrasting cell degeneration are some of the most promising compounds for the treatment of PD.

Motor stimulant effects of the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist SCH 58261 do not develop tolerance after repeated treatments in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats

Several evidences indicate that the selective blockade of adenosine A2A receptors counteracts the motor activity impairment in experimental models of Parkinson's disease. In the present study, the effects of the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist, SCH 58261 (5-amino-7-beta-phenylethyl)-2-(8-furyl)pyrazolo(4,3-e)-1,2,4-triazolo(1,5-c)pyrimidine, were assessed following a repeated treatment schedule in the contralateral turning behavior rat model of Parkinson's disease. Unilateral lesions of the nigrostriatal pathway were induced by injecting 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA in medial forebrain bundle. Repeated administration of SCH 58261 was performed either alone (7 and 14 days repeated SCH 58261) or together with L-dopa (19 days repeated SCH 58261 plus L-dopa or L-dopa alone). After a 7- and 14-day repeated administration schedule, SCH 58261 (5 mg/kg) maintained its ability to potentiate the contralateral turning behavior induced by a subthreshold dose of L-dopa (2 mg/kg i.p.), showing no tolerance to its stimulant effects. SCH 58261 (5 mg/kg) plus L-dopa (3 mg/kg) or L-dopa (6 mg/kg) alone induced, at these dosages, the same number of contralateral turnings after the first administration. While chronic intermittent SCH 58261 plus L-dopa did not lead to a modified turning behavior during treatment, L-dopa alone produced a progressive increase in turning behavior intensity and duration. These results provide evidence that SCH 58261 retains its ability to potentiate L-dopa effects in a validated rat model of Parkinson's disease even after repeated treatments. Moreover, these results suggest that adenosine A2A blockade prevents the appearance of motor response alterations in L-dopa-treated rats, supporting the concept that A2A receptor antagonists have a therapeutic potential for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Cross-sensitization between the motor activating effects of bromocriptine and caffeine: role of adenosine A(2A) receptors

The acute motor response to caffeine was studied in rats repeatedly treated with vehicle or the dopamine D(2) agonist bromocriptine either in a novel cage or in the home cage. Rats receiving bromocriptine (5 mg/kg i.p.) in a novel cage were sensitized to the motor stimulating effects of bromocriptine itself and showed cross-sensitization to the acute administration of low (10 mg/kg s.c. ) but not high (25 mg/kg s.c.) doses of caffeine, no matter if the novel cage was identical or different from the test cage. In contrast, caffeine (10 mg/kg i.p.) administered to rats which had received bromocriptine (5 mg/kg i.p.) in the home cage and which showed no sign of a sensitized response to bromocriptine, failed to show an increased locomotor and stereotyped response as compared to vehicle pretreated rats. Similarly to caffeine, the selective adenosine A(2A) antagonist SCH 58261 (3 mg/kg i.p.) showed an increased motor response in bromocriptine sensitized rats. The sensitized response to caffeine or SCH 58261 did not appear to be due to an higher basal motor activity of bromocriptine sensitized rats since acute administration of vehicle induced a similar motor response in bromocriptine and vehicle pretreated rats. Dopamine D(2) and adenosine A(2A) receptors are colocalized in striatal efferent neurons where they control in an opposite direction motor behavior. The results of the present study showed that changes in the sensitivity of D(2) receptors influenced the sensitivity of the adenosine antagonist caffeine through an action on A(2A) receptors. D(2) and A(2A) receptors, therefore, not only acutely interact in the mediation of motor behavior but long-term modification of the D(2) receptors, such as sensitization, affected the response of adenosine A(2A) receptors.

SCH 58261 and ZM 241385 differentially prevent the motor effects of CGS 21680 in mice: evidence for a functional 'atypical' adenosine A(2A) receptor

The acute motor effects elicited by drugs acting upon adenosine A(2A) receptors, namely the highly selective agonist CGS 21680 or the antagonists SCH 58261 and ZM 241385, were investigated in mice. CGS 21680 dose-dependently (0.1-2.5 mg/kg i.p.) decreased horizontal and vertical motor activities. The depressant effect of CGS 21680 (0. 5 mg/kg i.p.) was maintained in mice pretreated by the adenosine receptor antagonist 8-(p-sulfophenyl)-theophylline (10-30 mg/kg i.p. ), which poorly penetrates the blood-brain barrier, but was completely lost in adenosine A(2A) receptor knockout mice. Thus, the adenosine A(2A) receptor is critically involved in motor activity. SCH 58261 (1-10 mg/kg i.p.) increased locomotion and rearing with a quick onset, but for a shorter period in mice habituated to the environment than in mice unfamiliar to it. ZM 241385 (7.5-60 mg/kg i. p.) stimulated horizontal and vertical activities with a slow onset at the two highest tested doses, similarly in naive and in habituated mice. The increase in locomotion elicited by ZM 241385 (15-30 mg/kg i.p. and 10-20 nM i.c.v.) was retained in mice treated by CGS 21680 (0.5 mg/kg i.p.) but that elicited by SCH 58261 (1-3-10 mg/kg i.p. and 10-20 nM i.c.v.) partially subsided. In conclusion, both 'striatal-like'/'SCH 58261-sensitive' adenosine A(2A) receptors and 'ZM 241385-sensitive'/'atypical' CGS 21680 binding sites may mediate CGS 21680-induced motor effects. Moreover, our results suggest that 'atypical' CGS 21680 binding sites could be adenosine A(2A) receptors with a peculiar pharmacological profile.

The stimulant effects of caffeine on locomotor behaviour in mice are mediated through its blockade of adenosine A(2A) receptors

1. The locomotor stimulatory effects induced by caffeine (1,3, 7-trimethylxanthine) in rodents have been attributed to antagonism of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors. Little is known about its locomotor depressant effects seen when acutely administered at high doses. The roles of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors in these activities were investigated using a Digiscan actimeter in experiments carried out in mice. Besides caffeine, the A(2A) antagonist SCH 58261 (5-amino-7-(beta-phenylethyl)-2-(8-furyl)pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2, 4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine), the A(1) antagonist DPCPX (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine), the A(1) agonist CPA (N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine) and A(2A) receptor knockout mice were used. 2. Caffeine had a biphasic effect on locomotion of wild-type mice not habituated to the open field, stimulating locomotion at 6.25 - 25 mg kg(-1) i.p. doses, while depressing it at 100 mg kg(-1). In sharp contrast, caffeine dose-dependently decreased locomotion in A(2A) receptor knockout mice over the whole range of tested doses. 3. The depressant effects induced by high doses of caffeine were lost in control CD1 mice habituated to the open field. 4. The A(1) agonist CPA depressed locomotion at 0.3 - 1 mg kg(-1) i.p. doses. 5. The A(1) antagonist DPCPX decreased locomotion of A(2A) receptor knockouts and CD1 mice at 5 mg kg(-1) i.p. and 25 mg kg(-1) i.p. respectively. 6. DPCPX (0.2 - 1 mg kg(-1) i.p.) left unaltered or even reduced the stimulant effect of SCH 58261 (1 - 3 mg kg(-1) i.p.) on CD1 mice. 7. These results suggest therefore that the stimulant effect of low doses of caffeine is mediated by A(2A) receptor blockade while the depressant effect seen at higher doses under some conditions is explained by A(1) receptor blockade.

Central adenosine A(2A) receptors: an overview

Recent advances in molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology and behavioral pharmacology together with the development of more selective ligands to the various adenosine receptors have increased our understanding of the functioning of central adenosine A(2A) receptors. The A(2A) receptor is one of four adenosine receptors found in the brain. Its expression is highest in striatum, nucleus accumbens and olfactory tubercles, although it also occurs in neurons and microglia in most other brain regions. The receptor has seven transmembrane domains and couples via Gs to adenyl cyclase stimulation. Antagonistic interactions between A(2A) receptors and dopamine D(2) receptors have been described, as stimulation of the A(2A) receptor leads to a reduction in the affinity of D(2) receptors for D(2) receptor agonists. The A(2A) receptor is thought to play a role in a number of physiological responses and pathological conditions. Indeed, A(2A) receptor antagonists may be useful for the treatment of acute and chronic neurodegenerative disorders such as cerebral ischemia or Parkinson's disease. A(2A) receptor agonists may treat certain types of seizures or sleep disorders. This review discusses the characteristics, distribution, pharmacochemical properties and regulation of central A(2A) receptors, as well as A(2A) receptor-mediated behavioural responses and their potential role in various neuropsychiatric disorders.

Caffeine-mediated induction of c-fos, zif-268 and arc expression through A1 receptors in the striatum: different interactions with the dopaminergic system

Adenosine and the adenosine receptor antagonist, caffeine, modulate locomotor activity and striatal neuropeptide expression through interactions with the dopaminergic system by mechanisms which remain partially undetermined. We addressed this question by using quantitative immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization, combined with retrograde tracing of striatal neurons, to characterize the mechanism(s) leading to the striatal increase in the immediate early genes (IEG), c-fos, zif-268 and arc, following a single injection of caffeine or the A1 antagonist, 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX). Caffeine and DPCPX induced c-fos, zif-268 and arc expression, both at mRNA and protein levels, in large proportions of striatonigral and striatopallidal neurons. The involvement of dopamine systems was evaluated by manipulations of the dopaminergic transmission. Quinpirole, a D2 agonist, almost completely blocked the caffeine-induced IEG increase in both striatopallidal and striatonigral neurons. Conversely, the lesion of the nigrostriatal pathway and the D1 antagonist SCH23390 abolished the caffeine effects in striatonigral neurons but had no or slight effect, respectively, on its action in striatopallidal neurons. These observations demonstrate that caffeine- and DPCPX-mediated IEG inductions involved different mechanisms in striatonigral and striatopallidal neurons through blockade of A1 receptors. Immediate early gene inductions result from a stimulation of dopamine release in striatonigral neurons and from activation of glutamate release and probably also acetylcholine release in striatopallidal neurons. These results also support the idea that, besides A2A receptors, adenosine acting at the A1 receptor plays pivotal functions in the basal ganglia physiology and that blockade of these receptors by specific or nonspecific antagonists, DPCPX and caffeine, may influence a broad range of neuronal functions in the striatum.

Antagonism of adenosine A2A receptors underlies the behavioural activating effect of caffeine and is associated with reduced expression of messenger RNA for NGFI-A and NGFI-B in caudate-putamen and nucleus accumbens

Caffeine, the most widely consumed of all psychostimulant drugs, exerts its action by antagonizing adenosine receptors. To study the arousing properties of caffeine, we injected rats intraperitoneally with vehicle, caffeine (7.5, 15 or 30mg/kg), the selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist, SCH 58261 (3.75 mg/kg) or the selective adenosine A1 receptor selective antagonist DPCPX (7.5 mg/kg). In a behavioural test it was found that administration of caffeine and SCH 58261 significantly increased locomotion and rearing, whereas DPCPX did not alter locomotion and reduced rearing. After the behavioural session the rats were killed, their brains were cut at several levels along a rostrocaudal axis and in situ hybridization against NGFI-A messenger RNA and NGFI-B messenger RNA was performed. A reduction of NGFI-A messenger RNA was found in several subregions of both caudate putamen and nucleus accumbens in caffeine-treated animals. Similarly, animals that had received SCH 58261 showed significant decreases of NGFI-A messenger RNA in the rostral part of caudate putamen and in the shell part of nucleus accumbens. By contrast, DPCPX treatment caused an increase in the expression of NGFI-A messenger RNA and a smaller increase in NGFI-B messenger RNA in the lateral parts of caudate putamen. In addition, it was found that caffeine, but not SCH 58261 or DPCPX, elevated the expression of NGFI-A and NGFI-B messenger RNA in the cerebral cortex, especially in its parietal part. Thus, these results provide evidence that endogenous adenosine, via adenosine A2A receptors, causes a tonic activation of striatopallidal neurons. By blocking this adenosine effect, caffeine causes behavioural activation.

Endogenous adenosine facilitates neurotransmission via A2A adenosine receptors in the rat superior colliculus in vivo

The concentration of endogenous adenosine in the cerebrospinal fluid increased 2-3-fold of the original level in the area of rat superior colliculus after the intraperitoneal administration of an adenosine deaminase inhibitor, EHNA (erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenosine, 10 mg/kg). Potentials evoked in the superior colliculus by optic tract stimulation were also facilitated by 120-160% of their initial amplitudes. A selective A1 adenosine receptor antagonist, DPCPX (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine), failed to reduce such EHNA-induced facilitation. However, a selective A2A adenosine receptor antagonist, KF17837 (8(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)-1,3-dipropyl-7-methylxanthine) completely eliminated the facilitatory effects of EHNA. Northern blot analysis demonstrated abundant expression of A1 adenosine receptor mRNA in the superior colliculus. RT-PCR analysis was able to detect the concomitant expression of A2A adenosine receptor mRNA, but at levels lower than one-tenth of the striatal expression. In the superior colliculus, A2A adenosine receptors function predominantly on the facilitatory effects of adenosine, irrespective of the ubiquitous expression of A1 adenosine receptors.

Alkylxanthine adenosine antagonists and epileptiform activity in rat hippocampal slices in vitro

Despite its potent proconvulsant effects in vitro, the adenosine A1 receptor antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX) does not induce seizures when administered in vivo. This contrasts with the effects of less selective adenosine antagonists such as theophylline or cyclopentlytheophylline, and led us to reexamine the nature of DPCPX-induced epileptiform activity. In the present study, we report that proconvulsant effects of bath-applied DPCPX in rat hippocampal slices are only observed after a preceding stimulus such as NMDA receptor activation or brief tetanic stimulation. While this may be due to the absence of a basal "purinergic tone", the relatively high interstitial concentrations of adenosine present in the slice suggest that access of the drug to A1 receptors may instead be prevented by tightly coupled endogenous adenosine, with the ternary adenosine-A1 receptor-G protein complex stabilised in the high-affinity conformation by a coupling cofactor. This implies that a substantial percentage of adenosine A1 receptors are inactive under physiological conditions, but that access of adenosine A1 receptor antagonists may be facilitated under pathological conditions. Once induced, DPCPX-evoked spiking persists for long periods of time. A "kindling" effect of A1 receptor blockade is unlikely, since persistent spiking is not usually observed with less selective A1 antagonists even after prolonged application. Alternatively, endogenous adenosine released during increased neuronal activity may activate A2 receptors during selective A1 blockade. The most important factor determining the duration of DPCPX-induced spiking, however, may be a persistence of the drug in the tissue and subsequent access to the A1 receptor via a membrane-delineated pathway, since DPCPX-induced spiking could be shown to decrease markedly after a transient superfusion of theophylline. This hypothesis, which implies that the apparent affinity of adenosine antagonists for the A1 receptor is in part a function of their membrane partitioning coefficient, is supported by a close correlation between alkylxanthine logP values obtained from the literature and their Ki value at A1 receptors, but not at the enzyme phosphodiesterase, whose xanthine binding site is presented to the cytosol. The implications for the therapeutic value of purinergic drugs are discussed.

A2 adenosine receptors: their presence and neuromodulatory role in the central nervous system

1. Adenosine is an endogenous neuromodulator that exerts its depressant effect on neurons by acting on the A1 adenosine receptor subtype. Excitatory actions of adenosine, mediated by the activation of the A2 adenosine receptor subtype, have also been shown in the central nervous system. 2. Adenosine A2a receptors are highly localized in the striatum, as demonstrated by the binding assay of the A2a selective agonist, CGS2680, and by analysis of the A2 receptor mRNA localization with in situ hybridization histochemistry. However, adenosine A2a, receptors, albeit at lower levels, are also localized in other brain regions, such as the cortex and the hippocampus. 3. In the striatum, adenosine A2a, receptors are implicated in the control of motor activity. Evidences exists of an antagonistic interaction between adenosine A2a and dopamine D2 receptors. 4. Utilizing selective agonists and antagonists for adenosine A2a receptors, their role in the modulation of the release of several neurotransmitters (acetylcholine, dopamine, glutamate, GABA) has been extensively studied in the brain (striatum, cortex, hippocampus). Controversial results have been obtained and, because the overall effect of endogenous adenosine in the brain is that of an inhibitory tonus, the physiological meaning of the excitatory A2 receptor remains to be clarified.

Effects of purine analogues on spontaneous alternation in mice

The Y-maze was used to examine the effects of purines acting at A1 and A2 adenosine receptors upon spontaneous alternation, a model of working memory, in mice. In support of previous work, scopolamine produced a loss of spontaneous alternation behaviour to the 0.5 chance level. The A1 receptor selective agonist N6- cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) did not change spontaneous alternation behaviour alone, but it prevented the decrease of spontaneous alternation scores produced by scopolamine. The A1 receptor selective antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (CPX) blocked the effect of CPA in combination with scopolamine but had no effect alone. The A2 receptor selective agonist (N6-[2-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(2- methylphenyl)ethyl] adenosine (DPMA), and the A2 receptor selective antagonist 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX) had no effect of alternation behaviour alone and did not modify the effect of scopolamine. The results indicate the ability of A1 but not A2 receptor activation to modify working memory deficits induced by scopolamine, but suggest that endogenous adenosine does not normally participate in working memory processes.

Anxiolytic activity of adenosine receptor activation in mice

1. Purine analogues have been examined for anxiolytic- and anxiogenic-like activity in mice, by use of the elevated plus-maze. 2. The selective A1 receptor agonist, N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) had marked anxiolytic-like activity at 10 and 50 microg kg(-1), with no effect on locomotor performance at these doses. 3. The A1 selective adenosine receptor antagonist, 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (CPX) had no significant effect on anxiety-related measures or locomotor behaviour, but blocked the anxiolytic-like activity of CPA. The hydrophilic xanthine, 8-(p-sulphophenyl) theophylline did not prevent anxiolysis by CPA. 4. Caffeine had anxiogenic-like activity at 30 mg kg(-1) which was prevented by CPA at 50 micro kg(-1). 5. The A2 receptor agonist, N6-[2-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2(2-methylphenyl)-ethyl]adenosine (DPMA) had no effect on anxiety behaviour but depressed locomotor activity at the highest dose tested of 1 mg kg(-1). The A2 receptor antagonist, 1,3-dimethyl-l-propargylxanthine (DMPX) had no effect on anxiety-related measures or locomotion and did not modify the anxiolytic-like activity of CPA. 6. Administration of DPMA in combination with anxiolytic doses of CPA prevented the anxiolytic-like activity of the latter. 7. The results suggest that the selective activation of central A1 adenosine receptors induces anxiolytic-like behaviour, while the activation of A2 sites causes locomotor depression and reduces the effects of A1 receptor activation. The absence of any effect of CPX alone suggests that the receptors involved in modulating behaviour in the elevated plus-maze in mice are not activated tonically by endogenous adenosine.

Effect of different xanthines and phosphodiesterase inhibitors on c-fos expression in rat striatum

It has previously been shown that caffeine, in a dose-dependent manner, increases the expression of the protooncogene c-fos in the rat brain, predominantly in the caudate-putamen and tuberculum olfactorium. In this study we examined the effect of related xanthines and of selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors on c-fos expression. The effect of caffeine (75 mg kg-1) was mimicked by 3-isobutyl-1-methyl xanthine (IBMX) (25 mg kg-1) and theophylline (100 mg kg-1) but not by 8-p-sulfophenyltheophylline (10 mg kg-1), enprofylline, theobromine or paraxanthine (each at 100 mg kg-1). Moreover, the cyclic AMP-selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors rolipram (10 or 20 mg kg-1) and SQ 20,006 (25 mg kg-1) and the cyclic GMP-selective phosphodiesterase inhibitor zaprinast (10 mg kg-1) failed to induce c-fos in striatum, but caused a clear-cut induction in the overlying cerebral cortex. Thus, c-fos is induced in rat striatum following administration of caffeine and other xanthines that (provided they enter the brain) block adenosine receptors, suggesting an involvement of central adenosine receptors. Inhibition of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase does not appear to play any important role in c-fos induction by the xanthines.

Behavioural effects of adenosine locally applied into ventral hippocampus of adult male rats

The possible effects of Adenosine (AD), locally applied into the ventral Hippocampus (HPCv) on the expression of general motor activity and some stereotyped behaviours were studied in adult male rats. Locomotion display was recorded in a hole-board equipped with automatic infrared animal activity detectors. Stereotyped behaviours were measured by direct inspection by two observers. Animals were implanted with microinjection cannulae into the HPCv and 72 h later they were injected with saline, or increasing doses of AD. In one experiment rats were microinjected once with saline or Adenosine and general motor activity and exploration were examined. In other experiment, rats were injected into the HPCv twice with saline, the AD-receptors antagonist 1,3-dipropil-methyl-xanthine (DMX) or AD and only stereotyped behaviours were examined. Results of Experiment 1 showed that the 40 nMol dose of AD was significantly effective to inhibit by about 30% several motor activities such as vertical, horizontal and ambulatory behaviours. Results of Experiment 2, showed that grooming was not modified by AD but the dose of 10 nMol increased the time of immobility by about 3 times over controls. DMX was able to block completely the AD effects on immobility. The present results suggest that in the rat AD might modulate the hippocampal-mediated expression of some motor and stereotyped behaviours induced by unknown environments.

Effects of selective adenosine A1 and A2 receptor agonists and antagonists on local rates of energy metabolism in the rat brain

The quantitative [14C]2-deoxyglucose autoradiographic technique was applied to the measurement of the cerebral metabolic effects of adenosine A1 and A2 receptor agonists and antagonists in adult rats. The adenosine A1 receptor agonist and antagonist, 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA) and 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) as well as the adenosine A2 receptor agonist, 2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenylethylamino]-5'-ethylcarboxamidoadenosin e (CGS 21680), were injected at the dose of 0.01 mg/kg. The adenosine A2 receptor antagonist, 3,7-dimethyl-1-proparglyxanthine (DMPX) was injected at the dose of 0.3 mg/kg. These doses were chosen in accordance with the known affinity of the drugs for their respective receptor and to avoid peripheral effects. The adenosine A1 receptor agonist, CCPA, induced decreases in glucose utilization in three brain areas, the globus pallidus and two hypothalamic nuclei. The adenosine A2 receptor agonist, CGS 21680, induced more general depressant effects on energy metabolism which were significant in 17 brain areas, such as cerebral cortex, hippocampal and white matter regions plus motor and limbic structures. The adenosine A2 receptor antagonist, DMPX, decreased glucose utilization in the globus pallidus while increasing energy metabolism in the cochlear nucleus. The adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, DPCPX, depressed glucose utilization in the globus pallidus and dentate gyrus, and increased rates of energy metabolism in six regions, mainly hypothalamic, thalamic areas and in the cochlear nucleus. There was a mismatch between cerebral metabolic consequences of adenosine A1 and A2 receptor agonists and the localization of corresponding adenosine receptors. The metabolic effects of the adenosine A2 receptor agonist and antagonist were consistent with the known involvement of that type of receptor in the control of locomotion and its effects on neuronal firing in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex. The effects of the adenosine A1 receptor agonist were very discrete and mostly related to the transient decrease in blood pressure induced by the drug. The increases in glucose utilization induced in limbic regions by the adenosine A1 receptor antagonist are probably linked to the regulation by adenosine of arousal and cardiorespiratory function. These results are in good agreement with the neuroregulatory function of the adenosine system as previously shown by other methods.

Effects of caffeine or diphenhydramine on visual vigilance

The effects of two drugs having opposite effects on the central nervous system were investigated using a newly developed visual vigilance task. Twenty-four male volunteers (median age = 20) performed the task on three separate occasions; after consuming placebo, caffeine (200 mg), or diphenhydramine (25 mg), in a double-blind, Latin Square design. At least 2 days intervened between drug administrations. Caffeine use was restricted for 10 h and smoking for 3 h before drug administration. When compared with placebo, caffeine significantly increased the number of correct responses and decreased response times, whereas diphenhydramine decreased the number of correct responses and increased response times. Low habitual consumers of caffeine (< 100 mg/day) and non-smokers had more correct responses than did high habitual caffeine consumers (> 100 mg/day) and smokers, but only in the placebo condition. Non-smokers had faster response times than smokers only in the placebo condition. Both caffeine and diphenhydramine altered certain aspects of mood.

CGS 15943, an adenosine A2 receptor antagonist, reduces cerebral ischemic injury in the Mongolian gerbil

The adenosine A2 receptor antagonist CGS 15943 (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) was tested for cerebroprotective activity in a gerbil stroke model. CGS 15943 markedly reduced stroke injury assessed by locomotor activity monitoring and by histopathological measurement of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cell injury. It is proposed that a previously demonstrated reduction in the ischemia/reperfusion-evoked release of excitotoxic amino acids following CGS 15943 administration could account for its cerebroprotective actions.

Adenosinergic modulation of the EEG and locomotor effects of the A2 agonist, CGS 21680

The present study in rats was designed to identify the respective roles of A1 and A2 adenosine receptor activation in the anticonvulsant and behavioral actions of adenosine. Intracaudate injections of the highly selective A2 agonist, CGS 21680, did not affect caudate seizures. However, seizure threshold was increased in the presence of CGS 21680 after blockade of the A1 receptor with CPX, or following activation of the A1 receptor with R-PIA or NECA. Additionally, CGS 21680 led to a dose-related inhibition of locomotor activity when injected into the caudate. These results implicate the involvement of the A2 adenosine receptor in the locomotor depressant actions of adenosine and also suggest possible A2 anticonvulsant effects may depend upon the activation of the A1 receptor.

The diuretic action of 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine, a selective A1 adenosine receptor antagonist

1. The diuretic effect of the selective A1 adenosine receptor antagonist, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (CPX), was investigated in anaesthetized rats. 2. CPX (0.1 mg kg-1, i.v.) produced significant increases in urine flow, and the excretion rate and fractional excretion of both sodium and chloride. By contrast, CPX administration did not result in any significant change in the excretion of potassium. 3. The diuretic effect of CPX was accompanied by a transient increase in inulin clearance although p-amino-hippurate clearance was unaffected, indicating the CPX induced a temporary elevation of glomerular filtration rate but no change in renal blood flow. 4. The fractional excretion of lithium (a marker of delivery of fluid out of the proximal tubule) was also significantly increased by CPX. However, other measures of tubular function derived from lithium clearance indicated that there were no changes in the handling of sodium or water in the distal regions of the nephron. 5. CPX did not significantly alter the relationship between either free water reabsorption or free water clearance and the distal delivery of sodium, which suggests that CPX does not affect the renal concentration/dilution mechanism. 6. The results of this study show that the diuresis and increased excretion of sodium and chloride induced by CPX (0.1 mg kg-1) in the rat, occurs with only transient elevation in glomerular filtration rate and no change in renal blood flow. The primary reason for the diuresis appears to be inhibition of sodium reabsorption in the proximal tubule. Furthermore, the results provide evidence that production and release of endogenous adenosine modifies renal excretory function via stimulation of the A1 receptor subtype.