Does self-monitoring of blood glucose improve outcome in type 2 diabetes? The Fremantle Diabetes Study

A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Data Linkage Publications on Diabetes in Australia

Aims

Our study aimed to identify the common themes, knowledge gaps and to evaluate the quality of data linkage research on diabetes in Australia.

Methods

This systematic review was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (the PRISMA Statement). Six biomedical databases and the Australian Population Health Research Network (PHRN) website were searched. A narrative synthesis was conducted to comprehensively identify the common themes and knowledge gaps. The guidelines for studies involving data linkage were used to appraise methodological quality of included studies.

Results

After screening and hand-searching, 118 studies were included in the final analysis. Data linkage publications confirmed negative health outcomes in people with diabetes, reported risk factors for diabetes and its complications, and found an inverse association between primary care use and hospitalization. Linked data were used to validate data sources and diabetes instruments. There were limited publications investigating healthcare expenditure and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in people with diabetes. Regarding methodological assessment, important information about the linkage performed was under-reported in included studies.

Conclusions

In the future, more up to date data linkage research addressing costs of diabetes and its complications in a contemporary Australian setting, as well as research assessing ADRs of recently approved antidiabetic medications, are required.

[App-based self-monitoring in type 2 diabetes]

BACKGROUND

The success of self-monitoring in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus has already been verified in several studies. To date there are a multitude of smartphone apps which support diabetic patients in systematically recording and analyzing relevant health data; however, most of these smartphone apps are primarily developed for a young target group.

OBJECTIVE

As part of this study we examined to what extent a smartphone app for self-monitoring is used by older diabetic patients.

METHODS

In this study 36 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus older than 60 years were included. After a comprehensive training course the participants used the application for 3 months. Reminders for medication, physical activity and diet could be set and recorded health data, such as weight or blood sugar, could be entered into the app. After 3 months the data were analyzed concerning usage behavior and impact on overall health.

RESULTS

Data analysis revealed intensive usage of the smartphone app (90 % on a daily basis). Furthermore, according to the patients, after the study period significant improvements in medication adherence and psychological well-being were recorded [t[35] = -2.24, p < 0.05). Additional motivational elements did not influence the usage behavior by older adults.

CONCLUSION

Until now only a small proportion of older adults used smartphone health apps, despite the ubiquitous availability. These apps have to be tailored to the requirements of older adults so that the market will be opened up to them. Using self-monitoring apps can help older adults to structure their daily routine despite their disease.

Assessment of Knowledge of Self Blood Glucose Monitoring and Extent of Self Titration of Anti-Diabetic Drugs among Diabetes Mellitus Patients - A Cross Sectional, Community Based Study

INTRODUCTION

Self blood glucose monitoring is an important context of self care in the management of diabetes mellitus. All the guidelines must be followed while performing self blood glucose monitoring and tracking of values is essential to facilitate the physician while titrating the drugs and /or doses of anti diabetes medication. Self titration by patients following self monitoring must be discouraged.

AIM

To assess the knowledge and practice of self blood glucose monitoring among diabetes patients and extent of self titration of anti diabetes medicines among diabetes patients based on self blood glucose monitoring.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This pilot, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted using a validated questionnaire among adult male and female diabetes patients performing self blood glucose monitoring at home. Diabetes patients with complications and juvenile diabetes patients were excluded.

RESULTS

Out of 153 patients surveyed, only 37 (24.1%) (20 males, 17 females) patients were aware and have been following self blood glucose monitoring appropriately. About 116 (75.8%) (64 males, 52 females) of patients were devoid of adequate knowledge and did not practice self blood glucose monitoring in a proper way. Ninety eight (64.05%) accepted that they self titrate their anti diabetic medicines based on self monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Self monitoring of blood glucose should be encouraged and patients should be taught importance of following correct steps and tracking of self monitoring by physician or diabetes educator.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY 2016 OUTPATIENT GLUCOSE MONITORING CONSENSUS STATEMENT

This document represents the official position of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology. Where there were no randomized controlled trials or specific U.S. FDA labeling for issues in clinical practice, the participating clinical experts utilized their judgment and experience. Every effort was made to achieve consensus among the committee members. Position statements are meant to provide guidance, but they are not to be considered prescriptive for any individual patient and cannot replace the judgment of a clinician.

Association between glycemic control and birthweight with glycated albumin in Chinese women with gestational diabetes mellitus

Aims/Introduction

To assess glycated albumin (GA) as a potential glycemic index in managing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Materials and Methods

Eligible pregnant women were divided into the GDM group with abnormal result on a 75‐g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and the control (normal) group. GA measurements, Pearson's correlation analysis, multiple logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were obtained at the follow‐up examination of participants in the two groups.

Results

A total of 2,118 women were assigned to the GDM group (n = 639) and control group (n = 1,479). The mean level of serum GA in GDM group was significantly greater than that in the control group at both 24–28 and 36–38 weeks of gestation (P < 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for GA defining good glycemic control in GDM was 0.874 (95% confidence interval 0.811–0.938). The cut‐off point for the GA levels derived from the receiver operating characteristic curve was 11.60%, which had sensitivity and specificity for detecting a poor glycemic status of 75.93% and 86.36%, respectively. The risk of birthweight ≥3,500 g and macrosomia increased significantly with GA levels ≥13.00% at 24–28 weeks and ≥12.00% at 36–38 weeks of gestation.

Conclusions

GA might be an appropriate and conveniently measured index that can detect poor glycemic control and predict birthweights in GDM women.

The impact of policies to reduce blood glucose test strip utilization and costs in Canada

OBJECTIVES

Several strategies have been proposed to manage the utilization of blood glucose test strips (BGTS) in Canada; however their potential impacts on utilization and costs of publically funded test strips are unknown.

METHODS

We investigated the impact of three potential policies that would restrict the number of test strips reimbursed by the public drug plans in Ontario and British Columbia (BC), and incorporated negotiated price reductions. These policies were based on recommendations from the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, a briefing document by the Canadian Diabetes Association, and a new policy introduced by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. BGTS utilization rates were assessed in two cross-sectional analyses among adults aged 18 years or older in BC and 65 or older in Ontario who received publicly-funded BGTS between January 2004 and December 2012. We modeled the 5-year utilization and cost implications of the three policies using time-series analysis.

RESULTS

In 2012, there were 317,130 test strip recipients in Ontario and 136,659 recipients in BC, at a cost of $104.4 million and $22.6 million respectively. Under the scenarios of reduced BGTS quantities, 5-year cost savings ranged between $98.8 million (18.2% reduction) and $224.1 million (41.4% reduction) in Ontario and between $23.1 million (19.2% reduction) and $51.1 million (42.4% reduction) in BC. Price reductions of 15% resulted in annual savings of $14.4 million (13.7% reduction) in Ontario and $3.4 million (14.1% reduction) in BC.

CONCLUSIONS

Policies that align with evidence and expert guidance could impart substantial cost savings in multiple jurisdictions despite different public drug plans.

Practical approaches for self-monitoring of blood glucose: an Asia-Pacific perspective

Comprehensive glycemic control is necessary to improve outcomes and avoid complications in individuals with diabetes. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is a key enabler of glycemic assessment, providing real-time information that complements HbA1c monitoring and supports treatment optimization. However, SMBG is under-utilized by patients and physicians within the Asia-Pacific region, because of barriers such as the cost of monitoring supplies, lack of diabetes self-management skills, or concerns about the reliability of blood glucose readings. Practice recommendations in international and regional guidelines vary widely, and may not be detailed or specific enough to guide SMBG use effectively. This contributes to uncertainty among patients and physicians about how best to utilize this tool: when and how often to test, and what action(s) to take in response to high or low readings. In developing a practical SMBG regimen, the first step is to determine the recommended SMBG frequency and intensity needed to support the chosen treatment regimen. If there are practical obstacles to monitoring, such as affordability or access, physicians should identify the most important aspects of glycemic control to target for individual patients, and modify monitoring patterns accordingly. This consensus paper proposes a selection of structured, flexible SMBG patterns that can be tailored to the clinical, educational, behavioral, and financial requirements of individuals with diabetes.

Consensus guidelines for glycemic monitoring in type 1/type 2 & GDM

Stringent monitoring of blood glucose in diabetes plays an important role as the treatment of the disease itself. Blood glucose monitoring (BGM) strategies such as measurement of Hb1Ac, Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) plays a vital role in achieving the important goal of preventing long term complications of diabetes. Although the use of BGM is recommended by various international guidelines in T1DM and T2DM, there is no consensus on the utility of BGM in India. So, there is a need to develop a guidance for uniform monitoring mechanism among the care givers taking into account the variations and challenges that are unique to Indian population. A committee was established that comprised of physicians, researchers and other healthcare professionals having expertise in diabetes treatment to oversee the formulation of guidelines on different monitoring and treatment aspects of diabetes. Extensive literature searches were conducted to identify and analyze the evidence available on BGM. An initial draft of BGM guidelines was presented to core members who discussed the subject matter and presented their opinion. This was then taken to wider expert audience to invite their comments that were incorporated in the initial draft. The first compilation was presented at a conference attended by nearly 200 experts. Again, their opinion was sought and the next version was prepared which was sent to core committee members for the final inputs. The Indian consensus guideline on BGM using Hb1Ac, SMBG and CGM as the primary tools was then finalized.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose in diabetes: from evidence to clinical reality in Central and Eastern Europe--recommendations from the international Central-Eastern European expert group

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is universally considered to be an integral part of type 1 diabetes management and crucial for optimizing the safety and efficacy of complex insulin regimens. This extends to type 2 diabetes patients on intensive insulin therapy, and there is also a growing body of evidence suggesting that structured SMBG is beneficial for all type 2 diabetes patients, regardless of therapy. However, access to SMBG can be limited in many countries in Central and Eastern Europe. A consensus group of diabetes experts from 10 countries in this region (with overlapping historical, political, and social environments)--Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Ukraine--was formed to discuss the role of SMBG across the spectrum of patients with diabetes. The group considered SMBG to be an essential tool that should be accessible to all patients with diabetes, including those with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. The current article summarizes the evidence put forward by the consensus group and provides their recommendations for the appropriate use of SMBG as part of individualized patient management. The ultimate goal of these evidence-based recommendations is to help patients and providers in Central and Eastern Europe to make optimal use of SMBG in order to maximize the efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering therapies, to prevent complications, and to empower the patient to play a more active role in the management of their diabetes.

The association between patient-reported self-management behavior, intermediate clinical outcomes, and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the KORA-A study

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the impact of diabetes self-management behavior (SMB) on long-term outcomes. We aimed to examine the association among patient-reported SMB, intermediate clinical outcomes, and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were collected from 340 patients with type 2 diabetes of the KORA-A study (1997/1998) who were recruited from two previous population-based surveys (n = 161) and a myocardial infarction registry (n = 179) in southern Germany. Based on previous methodological work, a high level of SMB was defined as being compliant with at least four of six different self-care dimensions, comprising physical exercise, foot care, blood glucose self-monitoring, weight monitoring, having a diet plan, and keeping a diabetes diary. The vital status of the participants was observed until 2009. Multivariable linear, logistic, and Cox regression models were applied to assess the association with intermediate clinical outcomes at baseline and to predict mortality over the follow-up period, adjusted for sociodemographic, behavioral, and disease-related factors.

RESULTS

In the cross-sectional perspective, a high level of SMB was weakly associated with a lower glycated hemoglobin A1c level (-0.44% [-4.8 mmol/mol] [95% CI -0.88 to 0.00]), but not with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, or the presence of microalbuminuria, peripheral arterial disease, or polyneuropathy. During a mean follow-up time of 11.6 years, 189 patients died. SMB was a preventive factor for all-cause (hazard ratio 0.61 [95% CI 0.40-0.91]) and cardiovascular mortality (0.65 [95% CI 0.41-1.03]).

CONCLUSIONS

Although measuring SMB is difficult and the used operationalization might be limited, our results give some indication that a high level of SMB is associated with prolonged life expectancy in patients with type 2 diabetes and highlight the potential impact of the patients' active contribution on the long-term trajectory of the disease. We assume that the used proxy for SMB is associated with unmeasured, but important, dimensions of health behavior.

Self-care behaviour, treatment satisfaction and quality of life in people on intensive insulin treatment

AIM

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify self-care behaviours and their relationships with treatment satisfaction and quality of life in people attending a structured educational programme for patients on intensive insulin therapy.

METHODS

A sample of 104 people with diabetes (62 with type-1; 42 with type 2) was recruited from the National Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetology in Ľubochňa over six months. The majority of respondents were women (62.5%); had multiple daily injections of insulin (73%); diabetic late complications (68%) and had not previously participated in the structured educational programmes in the specialized diabetes centre (64.4%). Self-management behaviour data were collected by means of structured interviews with patients as well as during clinic visits. For measuring quality of life, the Audit Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life questionnaire and for measuring satisfaction with their treatment regimen, the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version was used.

RESULTS

General satisfaction with the treatment was significantly higher in people with diabetes, who implemented regular self-monitoring of the concentration of glucose in plasma (SMPG). We also demonstrated low adherence in the frequency of SMPG. 17% of respondents in our study performed daily SMPG. However, 52% respondents reported adaptation of insulin dosage in relation to factors such as carbohydrate intake, glycaemia values or degree of physical activity. Differences in quality of life due to performing the regular self-monitoring of glycaemia, adjustments of insulin doses in specific situations as well as carbohydrate counting were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Performing the regular self-monitoring of glycaemia was associated only with higher treatment satisfaction. No significant improvement in quality of life was seen in people performing the regular self-monitoring of glycaemia, adjustments of insulin doses in specific situations or carbohydrate counting.

The role of blood glucose monitoring in non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes: what is the evidence?

Over the past few decades, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) has been recognized as a core component of effective diabetes self-management among insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients. Given the costly nature of current T2DM care, especially as the worldwide prevalence of T2DM continues to increase rapidly, it is critical to determine whether resources devoted to SMBG in non-insulin treated T2DM patients are also justified and being applied effectively. We review the conflicting evidence on the use of SMBG in insulin-naïve T2DM patients.

Improvement of HbA(1c) and stable weight loss 2 years after an outpatient treatment and teaching program for patients with type 2 diabetes without insulin therapy based on urine glucose self-monitoring

Objective

Long-term outcomes after participation in a structured diabetes treatment and teaching program (DTTP) for patients with diabetes without insulin use, primarily based upon postprandial urine glucose self-monitoring (UGSM).

Methods

A total of 126 patients took part in the DTTP in a university outpatient department in 2004–2005. We re-evaluated 119 (94.4%) at baseline and at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. Hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) was DCCT adjusted.

Results

HbA_1c decreased significantly 6 months after education from 7.33% (±1.59%) to 6.89% (±0.98%; P = 0.001 versus baseline) and was maintained for up to 12 months (7.02% ± 1.07%; P = 0.017 versus baseline) as well as up to 24 months (6.96% ± 1.06%; P = 0.005 versus baseline). Weight decreased from 92.5 kg at baseline to 90.3 kg at 24 months (P = 0.014). A total of 36.5% of patients not on insulin therapy preferred UGSM, whereas 23.5% preferred blood glucose monitoring, at 24 months. Glucose control was similar in both groups at 24 months (HbA_1c UGSM 7.03 versus blood glucose monitoring 6.97%; P = 0.807).

Conclusion

Participation in the DTTP resulted in long-term behavior modification. HbA_1c of patients without insulin met the target 24 months after the DTTP, irrespective of the type of glucose self-monitoring.

The relationship between self-monitoring of blood glucose results and glycated haemoglobin in type 2 diabetes: the fremantle diabetes study

The benefits of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in type 2 diabetes remain contentious. If SMBG data do not accurately reflect HbA(1c), attempts to modify lifestyle/pharmacotherapy will be ineffective. We aimed to determine how well SMBG correlates with HbA(1c) and fasting serum glucose (FSG). Community-based type 2 patients using SMBG provided their highest and lowest pre- and post-prandial glucose results in the week before detailed assessment. The ability of average pre- and post-prandial SMBG to predict HbA(1c)>7.0% was determined by linear regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Of 1286 patients with known SMBG status, 70% reported using SMBG. Pre-prandial SMBG data were obtained from 554 participants and post-prandial SMBG data from 418. The mean SMBG result and HbA(1c) correlated significantly (pre-prandial r(s)=0.55, post-prandial r(s)=0.47; P<0.001). Areas under the ROC curve (95% confidence limits) were 0.78 (0.74-0.83) and 0.74 (0.69-0.78) for pre- and post-prandial SMBG (P<0.04). The optimal cut-point was 6.5 mmol/L for pre-prandial SMBG (sensitivity 79.3%, specificity 64.4%). Mean pre-prandial SMBG results correlated with FSG (r(s)=0.64, P<0.001) but were on average 1.4 mmol/L lower, consistent with known whole blood vs. plasma differences. Since SMBG values reflect prevailing glycaemia, refinements in their interpretation and application may improve SMBG effectiveness.

Cost effectiveness of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for patients with type 2 diabetes and not on insulin: impact of modelling assumptions on recent Canadian findings

BACKGROUND

Canadian patients, healthcare providers and payers share interest in assessing the value of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for individuals with type 2 diabetes but not on insulin. Using the UKPDS (UK Prospective Diabetes Study) model, the Canadian Optimal Prescribing and Utilization Service (COMPUS) conducted an SMBG cost-effectiveness analysis. Based on the results, COMPUS does not recommend routine strip use for most adults with type 2 diabetes who are not on insulin. Cost-effectiveness studies require many assumptions regarding cohort, clinical effect, complication costs, etc. The COMPUS evaluation included several conservative assumptions that negatively impacted SMBG cost effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

Current objectives were to (i) review key, impactful COMPUS assumptions; (ii) illustrate how alternative inputs can lead to more favourable results for SMBG cost effectiveness; and (iii) provide recommendations for assessing its long-term value.

METHODS

A summary of COMPUS methods and results was followed by a review of assumptions (for trial-based glycosylated haemoglobin [HbA(1c)] effect, patient characteristics, costs, simulation pathway) and their potential impact. The UKPDS model was used for a 40-year cost-effectiveness analysis of SMBG (1.29 strips per day) versus no SMBG in the Canadian payer setting. COMPUS assumptions for patient characteristics (e.g. HbA(1c) 8.4%), SMBG HbA(1c) advantage (-0.25%) and costs were retained. As with the COMPUS analysis, UKPDS HbA(1c) decay curves were incorporated into SMBG and no-SMBG pathways. An important difference was that SMBG HbA(1c) benefits in the current study could extend beyond the initial simulation period. Sensitivity analyses examined SMBG HbA(1c) advantage, adherence, complication history and cost inputs. Outcomes (discounted at 5%) included QALYs, complication rates, total costs (year 2008 values) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

The base-case ICER was $Can63 664 per QALY gained; approximately 56% of the COMPUS base-case ICER. SMBG was associated with modest risk reductions (0.10-0.70%) for six of seven complications. Assuming an SMBG advantage of -0.30% decreased the current base-case ICER by over $Can10 000 per QALY gained. With adherence of 66% and 87%, ICERs were (respectively) $Can39 231 and $Can54 349 per QALY gained. Incorporating a more representative complication history and 15% complication cost increase resulted in an ICER of $Can49 743 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

These results underscore the importance of modelling assumptions regarding the duration of HbA(1c) effect. The current study shares several COMPUS limitations relating to the UKPDS model being designed for newly diagnosed patients, and to randomized controlled trial monitoring rates. Neither study explicitly examined the impact of varying the duration of initial HbA(1c) effects, or of medication or other treatment changes. Because the COMPUS research will potentially influence clinical practice and reimbursement policy in Canada, understanding the impact of assumptions on cost-effectiveness results seems especially important. Demonstrating that COMPUS ICERs were greatly reduced through variations in a small number of inputs may encourage additional clinical research designed to measure SMBG effects within the context of optimal disease management. It may also encourage additional economic evaluations that incorporate lessons learned and best practices for assessing the overall value of SMBG for type 2 diabetes in insulin-naive patients.

Consensus report: the current role of self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes

The Coalition for Clinical Research--Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Scientific Board convened a meeting in San Francisco, CA, July 20-21, 2011, to discuss the current practice of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in non-insulin-treated (NIT) type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Twelve physician panel members from academia, practice, and government attended this meeting. These experts came from the United States, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. In addition, three consultants from Australia, Germany, and the United States contributed to the group's final report. This coalition was organized by Diabetes Technology Society. Self-monitoring of blood glucose was studied from eight perspectives related to patients with NIT T2DM: (1) epidemiological studies; (2) randomized controlled trials (RCT)s and meta-analyses; (3) targets, timing, and frequency of SMBG use; (4) incidence and role of SMBG in preventing hypoglycemia with single-drug regimens and combination regimens consisting of antihyperglycemic agents other than secretagogues and insulin; (5) comparison of SMBG with continuous glucose monitoring; (6) technological capabilities and limitations of SMBG; (7) barriers to appropriate use of SMBG; and (8) methods and end points for appropriate future clinical trials. The panel emphasized recent studies, which reflect the current approach for applying this intervention. Among the participants there was consensus that: SMBG is an established practice for patients with NIT T2DM, and to be most effective, it should be performed in a structured format where information obtained from this measurement is used to guide treatment; New, high-quality efficacy data from RCTs have demonstrated efficacy of SMBG in NIT T2DM in trials reported since 2008; Both patients and health care professionals require education on how to respond to the data for SMBG to be effective; and Additional well-defined studies are needed to assess the benefits and costs of SMBG with end points not limited to hemoglobin A1c.

Self-Care and Health Outcomes of Diabetes Mellitus

Studies show that self-care improves diabetes mellitus (DM) outcomes; however, previous studies have focused on self-care maintenance, and little is known about self-care management. The objective of this study is to examine the influence of DM self-care maintenance and management on number of hospitalizations and hospitalization days. A cohort design with secondary analysis of data from the Health and Retirement Study 2002-2004 was used. Data from 726 adults with DM were analyzed with logistic regression and negative binomial regression adjusting for covariates. Self-care maintenance and management were significant determinants of hospitalization outcomes. Establishing a goal for HbA1c (self-care management) and eating ≥2 snacks or desserts per day (self-care maintenance) were associated with a decrease in hospitalizations (IRR = 0.860, p = .001; IRR = 0.914, p = .043, respectively). DM self-care maintenance and management influence health outcomes but in different ways. These data provide evidence that both elements are needed in the education of patients about DM.

Monitoring in diabetes self-management: issues and recommendations for improvement

The American Association of Diabetes Educators hosted a Monitoring Symposium during which 18 invited participants considered pre-set questions regarding how diabetes education can more effectively address barriers to monitoring for people with diabetes and related conditions. This report provides a summary of the moderated discussion and highlights the key points that apply to diabetes educators and other providers involved with diabetes care. The participating thought leaders reviewed findings from published literature and participated in a moderated discussion with the aim of providing practical advice for health care practitioners regarding monitoring for people with diabetes so that the overall health of this population can be enhanced. The discussants also defined monitoring for diabetes as including that done by the clinician or laboratory, as well as self-monitoring. The discussion was distilled into key points that apply to diabetes educators and other providers involved with diabetes care. Participants developed specific recommendations for a self-monitoring behavior and monitoring framework. People with diabetes benefit from instruction and guidance about self-monitoring and decision making that is based on monitored results and informed interactions with providers. Importantly, collaboration among the entire diabetes care community is needed to ensure that monitoring is performed and utilized to its fullest advantage. Going forward, it will be critical to mitigate barriers to diabetes self-management and training and to identify linkages and partnerships to address barriers to self-monitoring.

Immortal time bias and survival in patients who self-monitor blood glucose in the Retrolective Study: self-monitoring of Blood Glucose and Outcome in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (ROSSO)

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

In the February 2006 issue of Diabetologia, the observational Retrolective Study: Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose and Outcome in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (ROSSO) reported a 51% reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes who performed self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). However, these impressive benefits conflict with results from observational studies and randomised controlled trials. We aimed to show that these findings are caused by a flawed design that introduced immortal time bias.

METHODS

We illustrate the bias in the ROSSO study and demonstrate that it is large enough to completely explain the apparently protective effect of SMBG on all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

In the ROSSO study, patients were classified as exposed to SMBG for their whole follow-up time if they performed self-monitoring for at least 1 year during the study period. Thus, the time between cohort entry and the date after 1 year self-monitoring was performed is unavoidably 'immortal' for patients with SMBG. Patients had to survive at least 1 year to be classified as exposed to this intervention and were artificially 'protected' from death. Based on published information, the total amount of misclassified immortal person-time in the SMBG group is at least 5,082 of 9,248 person-years at risk (55%). After re-classification of immortal person-time as unexposed, the unadjusted relative risk changed from 0.59 to 1.95.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

The apparently protective effect of SMBG on all-cause mortality observed in the ROSSO study is completely explained by immortal time bias.

The prevalence of self-monitoring of blood glucose and costs of glucometer strips in a nationwide cohort

OBJECTIVE

This study used nationwide data to determine the prevalence of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) among all non-institutionalized persons living in Norway and to estimate the prevalence of SMBG among diabetes patients, the frequency and cost of SMBG, and the use of different glucometers.

METHODS

This retrospective, descriptive study is based on data of sales of glucometer strips to non-institutionalized persons in Norway in 2008. The data included gender, age group, month of purchase, sales place, type of strips, number of packages dispensed, and cost of strips. Additionally, statistics on sales of insulin and oral antidiabetes medications were obtained from the Norwegian Prescription Database.

RESULTS

A total of 96,999 persons purchased strips, a prevalence of 2%. Approximately 70% of diabetes patients practiced SMBG. An average patient used 1.7 strips per day, and younger patients purchased more strips than older patients. Fewer than 50% of patients performed glucose measurements daily. One percent of patients used more than 10 strips daily and was accountable for 8% of total costs. Most patients used only one type of strips, but the number of strips purchased increased with the number of different strips. The average annual cost of strips was 446 euro per person.

CONCLUSIONS

Two percent of all non-institutionalized inhabitants and an estimated 70% of patients using diabetes medication purchased SMBG strips. A small percentage of the patients incurred a substantial proportion of the costs. This, along with the fact that over half of the patients monitor less than once per day, calls for tighter follow-up of diabetes patients.

The value of episodic, intensive blood glucose monitoring in non-insulin treated persons with Type 2 Diabetes: design of the Structured Testing Program (STeP) study, a cluster-randomised, clinical trial [NCT00674986]

BACKGROUND

The value and utility of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in non-insulin treated T2DM has yet to be clearly determined. Findings from studies in this population have been inconsistent, due mainly to design differences and limitations, including the prescribed frequency and timing of SMBG, role of the patient and physician in responding to SMBG results, inclusion criteria that may contribute to untoward floor effects, subject compliance, and cross-arm contamination. We have designed an SMBG intervention study that attempts to address these issues.

METHODS/DESIGN

The Structured Testing Program (STeP) study is a 12-month, cluster-randomised, multi-centre clinical trial to evaluate whether poorly controlled (HbA1c >or= 7.5%), non-insulin treated T2DM patients will benefit from a comprehensive, integrated physician/patient intervention using structured SMBG in US primary care practices. Thirty-four practices will be recruited and randomly assigned to an active control group (ACG) that receives enhanced usual care or to an enhanced usual care group plus structured SMBG (STG). A total of 504 patients will be enrolled; eligible patients at each site will be randomly selected using a defined protocol. Anticipated attrition of 20% will yield a sample size of at least 204 per arm, which will provide a 90% power to detect a difference of at least 0.5% in change from baseline in HbA1c values, assuming a common standard deviation of 1.5%. Differences in timing and degree of treatment intensification, cost effectiveness, and changes in patient self-management behaviours, mood, and quality of life (QOL) over time will also be assessed. Analysis of change in HbA1c and other dependent variables over time will be performed using both intent-to-treat and per protocol analyses. Trial results will be available in 2010.

DISCUSSION

The intervention and trial design builds upon previous research by emphasizing appropriate and collaborative use of SMBG by both patients and physicians. Utilization of per protocol and intent-to-treat analyses facilitates a comprehensive assessment of the intervention. Use of practice site cluster-randomisation reduces the potential for intervention contamination, and inclusion criteria (HbA1c >or= 7.5%) reduces the possibility of floor effects. Inclusion of multiple dependent variables allows us to assess the broader impact of the intervention, including changes in patient and physician attitudes and behaviours.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials NCT00674986.

Efficacy of self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus managed without insulin: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels is commonly performed by patients with diabetes mellitus. However, there is debate surrounding the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of this practice among patients with type 2 diabetes managed without insulin. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of self-monitoring versus no self-monitoring, and the optimal frequency of self-monitoring, in this population.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies published in English from January 1990 to March 2009. Additional citations were obtained through searches of the Internet and conference proceedings, and from stakeholder feedback. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and performed an assessment of the methodologic quality of the studies. Key outcomes of interest were hemoglobin A1c (HbA(₁c)) concentration, hypoglycemia, quality of life, long-term complications of diabetes and death. Where appropriate, we pooled data using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 1624 citations through the literature search and selected 25 articles for inclusion. We observed a statistically significant improvement in the HbA(₁c) concentration across RCTs that compared self-monitoring of blood glucose levels with no self-monitoring among patients taking oral antidiabetes drug therapy (weighted mean difference --0.25%, 95% confidence interval -0.36% to -0.15%). Subgroup analysis indicated that results from RCTs that provided patients with education on how to interpret and apply self-monitoring test results were similar to those from RCTs that did not. On the basis of limited evidence, self-monitoring of blood glucose levels did not demonstrate consistent benefits in terms of quality of life, patient satisfaction, prevention of hypoglycemia or long-term complications of diabetes, or reduction of mortality. There was insufficient evidence pertaining to the optimal frequency of self-monitoring.

INTERPRETATION

Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels was associated with a modest, statistically significant reduction in hemoglobin A1c concentrations, regardless of whether patients were provided with education on how to interpret and use the test results. Further studies are required to determine whether self-monitoring reduces the risk of long-term complications of diabetes and to identify patients most likely to benefit from self-monitoring.

Impact of self-measurement of blood glucose on complications of type 2 diabetes: economic analysis from a Czech perspective

OBJECTIVE

A growing body of evidence indicates that self-measurement of blood glucose (SMBG) also has beneficial effects in people with type 2 diabetes, irrespective of the type of therapy. The objective of this analysis was to determine the economic impact of SMBG by comparing the cost share of self-monitoring and the direct costs of diabetes-related complications in users and non-users.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A matched-pair analysis based on the cohorts of a large retrospective study of patients with type 2 diabetes (ROSSO) was conducted. The average annual direct costs of diabetes monitoring, treatment-related services, complications and follow-up costs of the disease for SMBG users versus non-users were calculated from the perspective of the Czech statutory health insurance system. Univariate sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the main cost drivers. Limitations of this study are: (1) differences in medical facilities/practice between Germany and the Czech Republic, (2) causal relationship between SMBG and health outcomes is missing, (3) ROSSO underestimated the number of test strips used, (4) Czech cost data are scarce.

RESULTS

In patients treated with oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD) only, total annual costs in Czech koruna (CZK) were CZK 16 476 for SMBG users and CZK 19 440 for non-users. In patients treated with OAD + insulin, total annual costs were CZK 32 590 and CZK 48 600, respectively. The main cost drivers were stroke and myocardial infarction in patients treated with OAD only, and stroke, dialysis and myocardial infarction in patients treated with OAD + insulin.

CONCLUSION

Cost analysis indicated that SMBG provides a rapid return on initial investment. By increasing the number of patients using SMBG, the statutory health insurance system in the Czech Republic may save several million CZK annually.

Blood glucose test strips: options to reduce usage

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests that, despite widespread use, self-monitoring of blood glucose levels has little clinical benefit in many patients with diabetes. The impact of more focused public-payer policies for the use of blood glucose test strips may be substantial.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of annual prescription claims for test strips between 1997 and 2008 for patients in Ontario aged 65 and older with diabetes. Patients were stratified into 1 of 4 hierarchical groups according to the most intensive glucose-lowering treatment received during each calendar year. Test strip use was calculated annually for each group over the study period, and the effects of 5 hypothetical policy scenarios of more selective test strip use were assessed.

RESULTS

Test strip use increased by almost 250% from 1997 to 2008, with 52.6% (n = 263,513) of included patients receiving a prescription during 2008. Almost half of these patients were at low risk for drug-induced hypoglycemia. In 2008, over 117 million test strips were dispensed in Ontario; however, more focused policy scenarios could have reduced this number by between 9.5 million and 74.5 million test strips.

INTERPRETATION

Many people who self-monitor their blood glucose are at relatively low risk for drug-induced hypoglycemia. The economic benefits associated with more selective testing could be redirected to more effective interventions for patients with diabetes.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for type 2 diabetes patients treated with oral anti-diabetes drugs and with a recent history of monitoring: cost-effectiveness in the US

OBJECTIVE

Stakeholders in the US and elsewhere are interested in country-specific and cohort-specific information with which to assess the long-term value of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on oral anti-diabetes drugs (OADs). This study modeled the cost-effectiveness of SMBG at frequencies of once, twice, or three times per day for this population, and included those who had used SMBG in the prior year.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Based on clinical findings of a longitudinal Kaiser Permanente study, a validated model was used to project 40-year clinical and economic outcomes for SMBG at (averages of) once, twice, or three times per day versus no SMBG. Baseline HbA1c (7.6%), age and gender represented the Kaiser study 'prevalent' SMBG users cohort. Unit costs came primarily from a 2003 published article; inflated to US$2006. Outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum, with sensitivity analyses on discount rates and time horizons. Analyses were conducted from a third-party payer perspective in the US, including only direct costs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes were differences in total costs, cumulative incidence of complications, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

For patients using SMBG once, twice, or three times per day, relative risks over 40 years were lower for 14 of 16 complications and slightly higher for 2 complications. Compared to 'no SMBG,' QALYs increased with SMBG frequency: 0.047, 0.116, and 0.132 QALYs for SMBG once, twice, and three times per day, respectively. Some increased costs with SMBG were offset by reductions in costs for several diabetes-related complications. Corresponding ICERs were $26,206, $18,572 and $25,436/QALY gained. Results were most sensitive to time horizon, with SMBG not cost-effective over a 5-year simulation period.

CONCLUSIONS

Study limitations include the use of relatively short-term observational data, unknown levels of patient adherence, and assumptions regarding the duration of clinical effects. Results showed that compared to no SMBG, base case ICERs for each of the three SMBG frequencies examined were below $30,000, and that a portion of the increased costs associated with SMBG were offset by reductions in complication costs, and by modest increases in QALYs. Results add to the literature addressing the cost-effectiveness of SMBG as a component of care for T2DM patients on OADs, and in particular those with monitoring experience within the previous year.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in patients with type 2 diabetes on oral anti-diabetes drugs: cost-effectiveness in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain

OBJECTIVE

Stakeholders in Europe remain interested in assessments of country-specific value of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral anti-diabetes drugs (OADs). This study used the IMS-CORE Diabetes Model to project the long-term (40-year) cost-effectiveness of SMBG at once, twice, or three times per day (vs. no SMBG) for this population from national reimbursement system perspectives in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain.

METHODS

SMBG input costs (strips, lancets, meters, nurse training) were supplied by LifeScan in 2007 euro values and applied as appropriate for each country's reimbursement policy. Cohort characteristics and assumed Hb(A1c) effects came from a US Kaiser Permanente longitudinal analysis of new SMBG users. Country-specific estimations for use of screening programs and several concomitant medications, as well as mortality rates were used. Country-specific complication costs from published sources were inflated to 2007 euro. Base case outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum for France, Germany, and Italy; 6% for Spain. Sensitivity analyses varied time horizon and discount rates for each country. They also included a -0.036 dis-utility for SMBG in year 1.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes included total direct costs, gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) over 40 years.

RESULTS

ICERs were largest in France (with meter costs included), and in Italy (with highest reimbursed costs for strips/lancets). ICERs for SMBG once, twice, and three times per day were 12,114 euros, 6282 euros, and 7958 euros (respectively) in France; and 12,694 euros, 11,934 euros, and 15,368 euros in Italy. ICERs for SMBG once or twice per day were <2000 euros in Germany and <4000 euros in Spain. ICERs for SMBG three times per day were <6000 euros/QALY in both countries. Results were most sensitive to the 5-year time horizon, although ICERs for SMBG once per day were below 50,000 euros/QALY in all countries but Italy (ICER = 77,064 euros). Five-year ICERs for SMBG twice per day were below 40,000 euros/QALY for all four countries, and those for SMBG three times per day were below 45,000 euros/QALY. With the SMBG dis-utility, ICERs increased modestly (321 euros- 2264 euros/QALY) in all scenarios except SMBG once per day in France (9578 euros increase) and Italy (5979 euros increase). Study limitations include the use of relatively short-term data from a single US observational study for SMBG clinical effects, unknown levels of patient adherence, and assumptions regarding the duration of clinical effects.

CONCLUSIONS

With cost assumptions reflecting current reimbursement levels in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain, SMBG was found to be cost-effective across a 40-year time horizon, with all base case ICERs <16,000/QALY. This study adds to the literature on the country-specific, long-term value of SMBG for type 2 diabetes patients treated with OADs. Under current model assumptions, variations in cost-effectiveness results stemmed primarily from payer reimbursement practices for SMBG within each country.

Are type 2 diabetes patients who self-monitor blood glucose special? The role of confounders in the observational ROSSO study

BACKGROUND

In the German multicenter, retrospective cohort study (ROSSO), those patients with type 2 diabetes who performed self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) had a better long-term clinical outcome. We analyzed whether confounders accounted for the lower rate of clinical events in the SMBG cohort.

METHODS

ROSSO followed 3268 persons from diagnosis of type 2 diabetes for a mean of 6.5 years. Data were retrieved from patient files of randomly contacted primary care practices.

RESULTS

In total, more than 60 potential confounders were documented, including nondisease-associated parameters such as patient's health insurance, marital status, habitation, and characteristics of diabetes centers. There were only modest differences for these parameters between groups with versus without SMBG, and multiple adjustments did not weaken the association of SMBG use with better outcome (odds ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.81, p < .001). This was also true for subgroups of patients defined by type of antidiabetes treatment. Propensity score analysis confirmed the association of SMBG use with outcome. Using key baseline parameters, 813 matching pairs of patients were identified. The analysis again showed a better long-term outcome in the SMBG group (hazard ratio 0.67 p = .004).

CONCLUSION

An influence of nonrecognized confounders on better outcome in the SMBG group is rendered improbable by similar results obtained with adjustments for disease-associated or disease-independent parameters, by the analysis of patient subgroups, by propensity score analysis and by performing a matched-pair analysis. The higher flexibility in pharmacological antidiabetes treatment regimens in the SMBG cohort suggests a different attitude of treating physicians and patients in association with SMBG.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose as part of the integral care of type 2 diabetes

Results from landmark diabetes studies have established A1C as the gold standard for assessing long-term glycemic control. However, A1C does not provide "real-time" information about individual hyperglycemic or hypoglycemic excursions. Real-time information provided by self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) represents an important adjunct to A1C, because it can differentiate fasting, preprandial, and postprandial hyperglycemia; detect glycemic excursions; identify hypoglycemia; and provide immediate feedback about the effect of food choices, physical activity, and medication on glycemic control. The importance of SMBG is widely appreciated and recommended as a core component of management in patients with type 1 or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, as well as in diabetic pregnancy, for both women with pregestational type 1 and gestational diabetes. Nevertheless, SMBG in management of non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients continues to be debated. Results from clinical trials are inconclusive, and reviews fail to reach an agreement, mainly because of methodological problems. Carefully designed large-scale studies on diverse patient populations with type 2 diabetes with the follow-up period to investigate long-term effects of SMBG in patients with type 2 diabetes should be carried out to clarify how to make the best use of SMBG, in which patients, and under what conditions.

Accuracy of self-monitored blood glucose in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

The prevalence and predictors of inaccurate self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) diaries in type 2 diabetes are not well defined.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of adults with type 2 diabetes in a diabetes clinic at a large urban public hospital. We collected copies of SMBG diaries and downloaded data from their glucose meters if patients brought them to their clinic appointment. Trained interviewers used standard tests to assess literacy, depression, and cognitive function. The main outcome measure was accuracy of the glucose diary assessed by comparing reported values to meter memory readings and to results of hemoglobin A(1c).

RESULTS

Blood glucose self-monitoring was either missing or misleading for 48% (55 of 115) because (1) patients brought neither meter nor the SMBG diary (n = 26) or (2) the diary was inaccurate (n = 29). An inaccurate glucose diary (by comparison with meter readings) was predicted by normotension (odd ratio 5.6, P = 0.02) and one measure of cognitive impairment, slow Digit Symbol Coding (odds ratio 2.2, P = 0.02). A patient's self-assessment of his or her diary's accuracy was unreliable (sensitivity 63%, specificity 56%).

CONCLUSIONS

SMBG diaries are frequently either not accurate or not brought to clinic visit. Some inaccuracy might be due to cognitive impairment. To achieve maximum benefit from glucose self-monitoring, glucose meter memory analysis is crucial before making therapy adjustments based on SMBG.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose in diabetes: is it worth it?

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is advocated as a valuable aid in the management of diabetes. The volume and cost of monitoring continues to increase. SMBG has a number of theoretical advantages/disadvantages which might impact on treatment, outcome and wellbeing. Investigating and quantifying the effect of self-monitoring in a condition where self-management plays a central role poses major methodological difficulties because of the need to minimize confounding factors. Despite the absence of definitive evidence, some situations where monitoring is generally accepted to be beneficial include patients on insulin, during pregnancy, in patients with hypoglycaemia unawareness and while driving. An area of controversy is the role of monitoring in non-insulin-requiring type-2 diabetes where observational and controlled studies give conflicting results. The available evidence does not support the general use of monitoring by all patients with type-2 diabetes, although further research is needed to identify specific subgroups of patients or specific situations where monitoring might be useful. The best use of SMBG in patients with type-2 diabetes might be for those receiving insulin and those on sulphonylurea drugs. The impact of monitoring on patient wellbeing must also be considered, with some studies suggesting adverse psychological effects. Given the large increase in the prevalence of type-2 diabetes, it will be important to define the role of SMBG so that resources can be used appropriately. Presently, the widespread use of SMBG (particularly in type-2 diabetes patients) is a good example of self-monitoring that was adopted in advance of robust evidence of its clinical efficacy.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 1 diabetes patients with insufficient metabolic control: focused self-monitoring of blood glucose intervention can lower glycated hemoglobin A1C

OBJECTIVE

Little attention has been given and few studies have been published focusing on how to optimize self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) use to monitor daily therapy for persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus. This study was designed to evaluate the effect on glycated hemoglobin (A1C) of a structured intervention focused on SMBG in type 1 diabetes patients with insufficient metabolic control (A1C ≥8%) using a randomized clinical trial design.

METHOD

One hundred fifty-nine outpatients with type 1 diabetes on multiple injection therapy with insulin and A1C ≥8% were recruited and randomized to one group receiving a focused, structured 9-month SMBG intervention (n=59) and another group receiving regular care based on guidelines (n=64).

RESULTS

Glycated hemoglobin values (mean % ± standard deviation) at study start was similar: 8.65 ± 0.10 in the intervention group and 8.61 ± 0.09 in the control group. The two groups were comparable (age, gender, body mass index, complication rate, and treatment modality) at study start and had mean diabetes duration and SMBG experience of 19 and 20 years, respectively. At study end, there was decrease in A1C in the intervention group (p<.05), and the A1C was 0.6% lower compared with the control group (p<.05). No increase in the number of minor or major hypoglycemia episodes was observed in the intervention group during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple, structured, focused SMBG intervention improved metabolic control in patients with longstanding diabetes type 1 and A1C ≥8%. The intervention was based on general recommendations, realistic in format, and can be applied in a regular outpatient setting.

A review of glycated albumin as an intermediate glycation index for controlling diabetes

INTRODUCTION

This article reviews glycated albumin (GA) as a potential intermediate-term glycation index to fill the gap between self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and hemoglobin A1c testing in diabetes management. The introduction gives an assessment of available short-, medium-, and long-term glycemic indicators. METHODOLOGIES AND UTILITY: Methods of GA measurement are summarized, and the variance of normal and diabetic GA values are discussed. Greatest uniformity in GA measurement is generally associated with immunoassay and the newer affinity chromatography methodologies utilized by reference laboratories. Utility of GA measurement includes its value as a marker for glycation, its substantial relationship to diabetes complications such as nephropathy and coronary artery disease, and as an unambiguous indicator of glycemic control in diabetes patients undergoing hemodialysis. Studies support the utility of GA in detecting short-term changes in glycemic control, and GA testing has been strongly recommended for gestational diabetes.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results of a survey with mailings to over 3500 diabetes care professionals primarily in the United States are outlined and analyzed (margin of error: +/-6.5%, 95% confidence). Respondents strongly supported the need for a test for intermediate glycemic control as well as the utility of a rapid GA test as a monthly glycemic indicator.

CONCLUSIONS

Such a test, as yet unavailable, could increase compliance and enhance empowerment among diabetes patients. It also has the potential to reduce the number of recommended SMBG tests, which may result in significant health care cost savings.

Diabetes care - insulin delivery in a changing world

Controlling blood glucose levels within acceptable limits is crucial to the long-term health of patients with type 2 diabetes, and patient involvement is a vital element in achieving this goal. The benefits of patient education and chronic disease management tools cannot be underestimated as many patients will require initiation of insulin therapy to achieve glycemic targets. The wide choice of insulin formulations and the ever-expanding range of delivery methods now available make insulin administration easier, less painful, more discreet, and more accurate than ever before, thus providing important tools to overcome barriers to insulin initiation and improve achievement of glycemic goals. In addition, exciting developments in technology for self-monitoring of blood glucose have increased the potential for optimal glycemic control. This review discusses how these approaches can help patients manage their diabetes.