Adherence to oral bisphosphonates and the risk of subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures among female medicare beneficiaries

Operative Management of Atypical Femur Fractures

VIDEO AVAILABLE AT

https://ota.org/education/ota-online-resources/video-library-procedures-techniques/operative-management-atypical#/+/0/score,date_na_dt/desc/.

The Korean hip fracture registry study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the Korean Hip Fracture Registry (KHFR) Study is to establish a nationwide, hospital-based prospective cohort study of adults with hip fracture to explore the incidence and risk factors of second osteoporotic fractures for a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) model.

METHODS

The KHFR, a prospective multicenter longitudinal study, was launched in 2014. Sixteen centers recruited participants who were treated for hip fracture. The inclusion criteria were patients, who were treated for proximal femur fracture due to low-energy trauma and aged 50 or more at the time of injury. Until 2018, 5,841 patients were enrolled in this study. Follow-up surveys were conducted annually to determine occurrence of second osteoporotic fracture, and 4,803 participants completed at least one follow-up survey.

DISCUSSION

KHFR is a unique resource of individual level on osteoporotic hip fracture with radiological, medical, and laboratory information including DXA (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry), bone turnover marker, body composition, and hand grip strength for future analyses for FLS model. Modifiable factors for mortality after hip surgery is planned to be identified with nutritional assessment and multi-disciplinary interventions from hospitalization to follow-ups. The proportions of femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric fractures were 517 (42.0%), 730 (53.6%), and 60 (4.4%), respectively, from 2014 to 2016, which was similar in other studies. Radiologic definition of atypical subtrochanteric fracture was adopted and 17 (1.2%) fractures among 1,361 proximal femoral fractures were identified. Internal fixation showed higher reoperation rate compared to arthroplasty in unstable intertrochanteric fractures (6.1% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.046) with no significant difference in mortality. The KHFR plans to identify outcomes and risk factors associated with second fracture by conducting a 10-year cohort study, with a follow-up every year, using 5,841 baseline participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Present study was registered on Internet-based Clinical Research and Trial management system (iCReaT) as multicenter prospective observational cohort study (Project number: C160022, Date of registration: 22th, Apr, 2016).

Impact of subtrochanteric fractures in the geriatric population: better pre-fracture condition but poorer outcome than pertrochanteric fractures: evidence from the Spanish Hip Fracture Registry

Background

Clinical management in orthogeriatric units and outcome indicators are similar for extracapsular fragility hip fractures, without discriminating between subtrochanteric and pertrochanteric fractures.

Hypothesis

Geriatric patients, 75 years or older, with subtrochanteric fractures have worse clinical and functional outcomes than those with pertrochanteric fractures.

Materials and methods

Retrospective observational study of data prospectively collected by the Spanish Hip Fracture Registry including patients 75 years or older, admitted for extracapsular hip fractures from January 2017 to June 2019. Demographic and baseline status, pre-operative, post-operative and 30-day follow-up data were included.

Results

A total of 13,939 patients with extracapsular hip fractures were registered: 12,199 (87.5%) pertrochanteric and 1740 (12.5%) subtrochanteric. At admission, patients with subtrochanteric fractures were younger (86.5 ± 5.8 versus 87.1 ± 5.6 years old), had better pre-fracture mobility (3.7 ± 2.7 versus 3.9 ± 2.8) (1-to-10 scale, 1 being independent) and were more likely to be living at home; those with pertrochanteric fractures had worse cognitive function (Pfeiffer 3.3 ± 3.3 versus 3.8 ± 3.5). The subtrochanteric fracture group showed worse post-fracture mobility (7.3 ± 2.7 versus 6.7 ± 2.7) and greater deterioration of mobility (3.7 ± 3.0 versus 2.9 ± 2.7). Among individuals living at home at baseline, those with subtrochanteric fractures were more likely to remain in an assisted facility at 30-day follow-up. In-hospital mortality during acute admission was higher for the subtrochanteric group (5.6% versus 4.5%) (p = 0.028). To our knowledge, this is the first paper highlighting the differences between these two fracture groups in the geriatric population.

Conclusions

Subtrochanteric fractures in the older population are a different and worse entity, with greater morbimortality and functional decline than pertrochanteric fractures. Despite being younger and fitter at admission, older patients with subtrochanteric fractures have a higher risk of remaining non-weight bearing and undergoing re-operation and institutionalization. Orthogeriatric units should be aware of this and manage subtrochanteric fractures accordingly.

Level of evidence: IV.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10195-022-00637-8.

Fracture Risk Following an Atypical Femoral Fracture

Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) occurring during the course of osteoporosis treatment usually lead to discontinuation of anti-resorptive (AR) drugs. However, the risk of fracture after an AFF is unknown. We conducted a follow-up study of patients with AFF matched 1:3 for age and gender with patients with a peripheral major osteoporotic fracture (pMOF), in the setting of a fracture liaison service, to investigate the incidence of subsequent low-trauma fractures. Fifty-five patients with AFF (95% women, age [mean ± standard deviation] 75 ± 10 years, 89% exposed to AR drugs), followed for 6.2 ± 3.7 years, were compared to 165 matched controls with a pMOF (hip 85%) followed for 4.3 ± 2.6 years. During the follow-up, 38% of patients in the AFF group and 16% in the pMOF group received AR therapies. Continuation of AR drugs after an AFF was associated with contralateral AFF in 27% of subjects. The risks of new low-trauma, major osteoporotic and imminent (within 2 years) fractures, were similar between the two groups: incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) of subsequent fracture following AFF relative to pMOF, 1.30 (95% CI, 0.82-2.04), 1.28 (95% CI, 0.74-2.15), and 1.11 (95% CI, 0.54-2.15), respectively. Moreover, the risk of sustaining multiple fractures per participant was significantly increased among patients with AFF compared to pMOF (hazard ratio 1.48 [95% CI, 1.00-2.19]; p = 0.049). When taking mortality into account, the risk of subsequent fractures tended to be higher in the AFF group (sub-hazard ratio 1.42 [95% CI, 0.95-2.12]). In conclusion, patients who sustained an AFF are at high risk of subsequent fragility fractures, at least equal or even greater to the risk observed after a pMOF. However, continuation of AR drugs increases the risk of contralateral AFF. Therefore, optimal modalities for secondary fracture prevention after AFF require further evaluation. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

The role of medications in successful aging

Successful aging includes good health and low levels of disability. To that end, primary prevention is far better than managing subsequent organ damage. When medication is needed to prevent or manage disease, the preferred choice should be associated with the greatest benefits and fewest adverse effects. Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in postmenopausal women worldwide. Considering disease-adjusted life years, other leading causes are chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, dementias, hearing loss, cancers of the breast, lung and bowel, osteoporosis, fractures and falls, depression, osteoarthritis, refractive errors of the eye and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. This review explores the global prevalence of these diseases in women aged 50 years and older, and medications commonly used for them, and contrasts the effects of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) with others. When initiated early, there is good evidence for MHT benefit in all-cause mortality and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and osteoporosis; fair evidence for benefit in dementias, depression and osteoarthritis; limited evidence for benefit in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hearing loss, non-diabetic chronic kidney disease and colorectal cancer; null effects on lung cancer and refractive errors; and varied effects on breast cancer and stroke. Relative benefits and adverse effects of other medications warrant consideration.

The Role of Novel Bone Forming Agents in the Treatment of Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a growing epidemic that leads to significant morbidity and mortality among the elderly population due to associated fractures that lead to disabilities and reduced quality of life. Bisphosphonates are well-established as a first-line and cost-effective treatment for osteoporosis. Unfortunately, clinicians are often uncertain as to how to select treatments when bisphosphonates are ineffective as initial treatment or contraindicated. Romosozumab and abaloparatide are 2 alternative agents that have been recently FDA approved for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high risk for fracture or patients who have failed or are intolerant to other osteoporosis therapies. Currently, the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) has no formal recommendations in regard to these 2 novel agents. The purpose of this review is to help guide pharmacists on how to ensure appropriate utilization of these 2 novel bone-forming agents as potential alternatives to bisphosphonate therapy by providing evidence-based recommendations according to the current literature and key counseling points.

Hip and Subtrochanteric or Femoral Shaft Fractures after Bisphosphonate Use in Korean Women, Using Korean National Sample Cohort

BACKGROUND

Concern about bisphosphonate-associated subtrochanteric and femoral shaft (ST/FS) fractures has been raised. However, its real risk is still debatable, because there is no study to estimate risk and benefit of bisphosphonate. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of typical hip fractures and ST/FS fractures among bisphosphonate users using nationwide database.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort. We evaluated occurrence of the ST/FS and femoral neck and intertrochanteric (FN/IT) fractures among female bisphosphonate new users. Incidence rate of ST/FS and FN/IT fractures were compared between long-term users (≥ 1 year) and short-term users (< 1 year). Number needed to harm (NNH) for ST/FS and number needed to treat (NNT) for typical hip fracture were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 46,420 bisphosphonate users, we identified 14,689 long-term users and 21,840 short-term users. During the study period, 61 long-term users and 36 short-term users had ST/FS fractures, while 204 long-term users and 511 short-term users had FN/IT fractures. The long-term user showed higher incidence rate of ST/FS fractures (67.1/100,000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 50.3-83.9) comparing with 31.2/100,000 person-years (95% CI, 21.0-41.4) in the short-term users. The incidence rate of FN/IT fractures was 225.5/100,000 person-years (95% CI, 194.6-256.5) in the long-term users and 448.6/100,000 person-years (95% CI, 409.7-487.5) in the short-term users. The NNH for ST/FS was 400, while the NNT for typical hip fracture was 105.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested that physicians keep the significant benefit of bisphosphonate to prevent typical hip fracture in mind, even the concerns about bisphosphonate-associated ST/FS fractures.

Incidence of atypical femoral fractures in the treatment of bone metastasis: An alert report

•

Oncologic use of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) has been dramatically increasing.

•

Long-term BMA use is a risk factor for atypical femoral fracture (AFF).

•

We reviewed 721 patients with bone metastasis in a Japanese university hospital.

•

The incidence of critical AFF (n = 5) was 0.9% among 529 BMA-exposed patients.

•

The incidence was 6.6% when limited to breast cancer patients alone.

Background

As the life expectancy of cancer-bearing patients has increased, more patients with bone metastasis are receiving long-term treatment with bone-modifying agents (BMAs; e.g., zoledronate and denosumab), which are a risk factor for developing atypical femoral fracture (AFF). In this study, we surveyed the risk of iatrogenic AFF using a clinical database on treatment of bone metastasis in the past 10 years.

Methods

From April 2011 through October 2019, 721 patients with bone metastasis (436 men, 285 women; mean age, 65.7 ± 12.4 years) were registered under the bone metastasis consultation system, which has been run by orthopaedic surgeons since 2011, at a university hospital in Japan. We retrospectively reviewed the database to identify patients who had received BMAs for treatment of bone metastasis, and we investigated the incidence of critical skeletal-related events (including AFF) which required surgical interventions by orthopaedic surgeons.

Results

BMAs were administered to 529 patients (73.4%). Orthopaedic surgery for the treatment of skeletal-related events was performed in 36 patients (5.0%): femur, 13 (1.8%); others, 23 (3.2%). Eight AFFs in 5 patients (breast cancer, n = 4; prostate cancer, n = 1), who all had prior exposure to zoledronate or denosumab before onset of AFF, were treated with internal fixation using intramedullary nailing. In 192 patients with no BMA exposure, critical (surgically treated) AFF was not detected. In summary, the incidence of critical AFF was 0.9% among 529 patients who received BMAs for treatment of bone metastasis, and the incidence was 6.6% when limited to breast cancer patients (4 of 61).

Conclusion

In treatment of bone metastasis using BMAs, especially for breast cancer patients, attention should be paid to the risk of developing AFFs. Routine radiographic screening for AFF might be necessary in patients with prolonged BMA use for bone metastasis, even if asymptomatic. This report alerts all physicians and surgeons involved in the management of cancer patients, especially those with bone metastasis, regarding the risk of AFF following BMA use.

The health and economic burden of osteoporotic fractures in Singapore and the potential impact of increasing treatment rates through more pharmacological options

PURPOSE

This study aims to estimate the health and economic burden of osteoporosis in Singapore from 2017 to 2035, and to quantify the impact of increasing the treatment rate of osteoporosis.

METHODS

Population forecast data of women and men aged 50 and above in Singapore from 2017 to 2035 was used along with prevalence rates of osteoporosis to project the osteoporosis population over time. The population projections by sex and age group were used along with osteoporotic fracture incidence rates by fracture type (hip, vertebral, other), and average direct and indirect costs per case to forecast the number of fractures, the total direct health care costs, and the total indirect costs due to fractures in Singapore. Data on treatment rates and effects were used to model the health and economic impact of increasing treatment rate of osteoporosis, using different hypothetical levels.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2035, the incidence of osteoporotic fractures is projected to increase from 15,267 to 24,104 (a 57.9% increase) F 10,717 to 17,225 (a 60.7% increase) and M 4550 to 6878 (a 51.2% increase). The total economic burden (including direct costs and indirect costs to society) associated with these fractures is estimated at S$183.5 million in 2017 and is forecasted to grow to S$289.6 million by 2035. However, increasing the treatment rate for osteoporosis could avert up to 29,096 fractures over the forecast period (2017-2035), generating cumulative total cost savings of up to S$330.6 million.

CONCLUSION

Efforts to improve the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis are necessary to reduce the growing clinical, economic, and societal burden of fractures in Singapore.

The association between medication non-adherence and adverse health outcomes in ageing populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesise the evidence relating to medication non-adherence and its association with health outcomes in people aged ≥50 years.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched up to February 2019 for observational studies that measured medication (non-)adherence as a predictor of the following health outcomes in adults aged ≥50 years: healthcare utilisation (hospitalisation, emergency department visits, outpatient visits and general practitioner visits), mortality, adverse clinical events and quality of life. Screening and quality assessment using validated criteria were completed by 2 reviewers independently. Random effects models were used to generate pooled estimates of association using adjusted study results. The full methodological approach was published on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42017077264).

RESULTS

Sixty-six studies were identified for qualitative synthesis, with 11 of these studies eligible for meta-analyses. A meta-analysis including 3 studies measuring medication non-adherence in adults aged ≥55 years showed a significant association with all-cause hospitalisation (adjusted odds ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12, 1.21). A meta-analysis including 2 studies showed that medication non-adherence was not significantly associated with an emergency department visit (adjusted odds ratio 1.05, 95% CI 0.90, 1.22). Good adherence was associated with a 21% reduction in long-term mortality risk in comparison to medication non-adherence (adjusted hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.63, 0.98).

CONCLUSION

Medication non-adherence may be significantly associated with all-cause hospitalisation and mortality in older people. Medication adherence should be monitored and addressed in this cohort to minimise hospitalisation, improve clinical outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

Localization of Atypical Femoral Fracture on Straight and Bowed Femurs

Background

To elucidate the effect of anterolateral bowing on the fracture height of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs), we separated the AFFs into 2 groups according to the presence of anterolateral femoral bowing (straight group and bowing group) and analyzed the fracture height. The aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical and radiological features of AFFs in the straight group and bowing group, and to determine which factors were associated with the fracture height of AFFs in the total cohort and each subgroup.

Methods

Ninety-nine patients with AFFs were included in this study (43 patients in the bowing group and 56 patients in the straight group). Clinical and radiological characteristics were compared between the groups. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine the effect of factors on fracture height.

Results

Patients in the straight group were younger, heavier, and taller, and had a higher bone mineral density, smaller anterior and lateral bowing angles, and more proximal fracture height than those in the bowing group. Multivariable analysis showed that the presence of anterolateral bowing itself and height were associated with fracture height in the total cohort. In the subgroup analysis, the lateral bowing angle in the straight group and the estimated apex height in the bowing group were associated with fracture height. The lateral bowing angle was not significantly associated with fracture height in the total cohort and the bowing group.

Conclusions

The presence of anterolateral bowing and the level of the apex of the bowed femur were important factors for the fracture height of AFFs.

Real-world persistence and adherence with oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This study examined patient adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis in real-world settings.

METHODS

A systematic review was completed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database NHS EED) databases were searched for studies published in English language up to April 2018. Prospective and retrospective observational studies that used prescription claim databases or hospital medical records to examine patient adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonate treatment among adults with osteoporosis were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of included studies.

RESULTS

The search yielded 540 published studies, of which 89 were deemed relevant and were included in this review. The mean age of patients included within the studies ranged between 53 to 80.8 years, and the follow-up varied from 3 months to 14 years. The mean persistence of oral bisphosphonates for 6 months, 1 year and 2 years ranged from 34.8% to 71.3%, 17.7% to 74.8% and 12.9% to 72.0%, respectively. The mean medication possession ratio ranged from 28.2% to 84.5%, 23% to 50%, 27.2% to 46% over 1 year, 2 years and 3 years, respectively. All studies included scored between 6 to 8 out of 9 on the NOS. The determinants of adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates included geographic residence, marital status, tobacco use, educational status, income, hospitalisation, medication type and dosing frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

While a number of studies reported high levels of persistence and adherence, the findings of this review suggest that patient persistence and adherence with oral bisphosphonates medications was poor and reduced notably over time. Overall, adherence was suboptimal. To maximise adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates, it is important to consider possible determinants, including characteristics of the patients.

Atypical Femur Fractures: Review of Epidemiology, Relationship to Bisphosphonates, Prevention, and Clinical Management

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are highly effective in treating osteoporosis and reducing hip, vertebral, and other fractures by as much as 50% to 70%. However, since 2006, atypical femur fractures (AFFs) emerged as potential side effects of BPs and other treatments. These fractures have unusual radiologic features and occur with little trauma. Public concern has led to a >50% decrease in BP usage. AFFs are rare: for each AFF, >1200 fractures, including 135 hip fractures, are prevented. Case definition criteria were updated by the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research in 2014. Many epidemiologic studies have been reported, and although methodologically challenging, generally support a BP-AFF association. However, the magnitude of the association between BPs and AFFs is uncertain: estimates of relative risk for AFFs among BP users vs nonusers range from 1 to 65 with a meta-analysis estimate of 1.7. Although mechanistic studies have proposed several hypotheses explaining how BPs might decrease bone strength, AFF pathogenesis remains uncertain and cannot explain the paradox of efficacy of reduction of common fractures while increasing risk for rare fractures at one site. There are several consistent risk factors, including Asian race (in North America), femoral bowing, and glucocorticoid use, whereas others remain unclear. Consensus is emerging about strategies to prevent AFFs in BP users (including drug holidays after 5 years' use in some patients). In conclusion, AFFs can be devastating, but even under the most pessimistic assumptions, the benefit/risk ratio is highly positive for BPs, particularly during 3 to 5 years of use. As understanding of AFFs increases, it is becoming increasingly possible to maximize BP benefits while minimizing AFF risk.

Bisphosphonates Use and Risk of Subtrochanteric and Diaphyseal Femur Fractures in Korea: Results from the National Claim Registry

Although Asian with bisphosphonate has been considered to have higher risk of subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femur (ST/DF) fractures, the occurrence of those fractures has been still unclear in Asia. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence rate of ST/DF fractures among bisphosphonate users from nationwide database in South Korea. Using national health insurance claim database, we only included the bisphosphonate users who took bisphosphonate for the first time in 2008 and evaluated the incidence rate of ST/DF fracture from 2008 to 2013. Non-user controls were matched to bisphosphonate users by propensity score matching with age and gender. Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios of ST/DF fracture with and without adjustment for comorbidity. A total of 682 ST/DF fractures were observed among 348,311 bisphosphonate users. The incidence rate of ST/DF fracture among bisphosphonate users (37.75/100,000 person years, 95% CI 35.02-40.70) was higher compared with non-users (24.41/100,000 person years, 95% CI 22.31-26.71). The risk of ST/DF fracture was greater in bisphosphonate users compared with non-users (hazard ratio 1.541, 1.370-1.734; p < 0.001). The incidence rate of ST/DF fracture after bisphosphonate use could be determined in Korean patients, which can provide basal information for further studies on risk and benefit of continuing bisphosphonate.

Critical differences between subtrochanteric and diaphyseal atypical femoral fractures: analyses of 51 cases at a single institution in Korean population

There still remains controversy on the pathomechanism of atypical femoral fracture (AFF). The angle of lateral bowing and bone mineral density showed significant differences between subtrochanteric and diaphyseal atypical fracture groups. In addition to the use of bisphosphonate, mechanical factors might play important roles in the occurrence of AFFs.

INTRODUCTION

Although AFF could be divided into subtrochanteric and diaphyseal fracture according to the location of fractures, there is a lack of evidence regarding differences between two fractures and etiology of the occurrence. The aim of study is to determine differences between atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal fracture in Korean population.

METHODS

Between February 2010 and March 2015, 51 AFFs in 40 patients were included in this study. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed. The AFF patients satisfied all the diagnostic criteria of the 2014 revised edition of the ASMBR. To analyze the differences according to the location of fracture, the AFFs were divided into subtrochanteric (n = 16) and diaphyseal (n = 35) fracture groups. The following factors were compared between two groups: patients' demographics, underlying diseases, laboratory findings (serum-25(OH) VitD3, osteocalcin, c-telopeptide, ALP, Ca, and P), bone mineral density (BMD), duration of bisphosphonate (BP) usage, and lateral bowing of the femur at time of the fracture.

RESULTS

All AFFs happened in female patients (mean age, 73.8 years) who have received bisphosphonate treatments except three patients. The mean duration of bisphosphonate usage was 95.3 months. Between the two groups, demographic data (age, height, weight, and BMI), underlying diseases, laboratory findings, hip BMD, and duration of BP treatment were comparable to each other (p > 0.05). However, the subtrochanteric fracture group showed higher FNSBA (femoral neck shaft bowing angle, p < 0.001) and spine BMD (p = 0.014) compared to the diaphyseal fracture group.

CONCLUSIONS

Angle of lateral bowing (FNSBA) and spine BMD showed significant differences between subtrochanteric and diaphyseal atypical fracture groups. According to our results, femoral bowing and spine BMD may play important roles in the AFF locations.

Osteoporosis: A Review of Treatment Options

Approximately 10 million men and women in the U.S. have osteoporosis,1 a metabolic bone disease characterized by low bone density and deterioration of bone architecture that increase the risk of fractures.2 Osteoporosis-related fractures can increase pain, disability, nursing home placement, total health care costs, and mortality.3 The diagnosis of osteoporosis is primarily determined by measuring bone mineral density (BMD) using noninvasive dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis medications include bisphosphonates, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand inhibitors, estrogen agonists/antagonists, parathyroid hormone analogues, and calcitonin.3-6 Emerging therapies utilizing novel mechanisms include a cathepsin K inhibitor and a monoclonal antibody against sclerostin.7,8 While professional organizations have compiled recommendations for the management of osteoporosis in various populations, a consensus has yet to develop as to which is the gold standard; therefore, economic evaluations have been increasingly important to help guide decision-makers. A review of cost-effectiveness literature on the efficacy of oral bisphosphonates has shown alendronate and risedronate to be most cost-effective in women with low BMD without previous fractures.9 Guidelines are inconsistent as to the place in therapy of denosumab (Prolia, Amgen). In economic analyses evaluating treatment of postmenopausal women, denosumab outperformed risedronate and ibandronate; its efficacy was comparable to generic alendronate, but it cost more.10 With regard to older men with osteoporosis, denosumab was also found to be cost-effective when compared with bisphosphonates and teriparatide (Forteo, Lilly).11.

Incidence Rate of Atypical Femoral Fracture after Bisphosphonates Treatment in Korea

BACKGROUND

Atypical femoral fracture (AFF) has been high-lightened, because it was associated with the long-term use of bisphosphonate. Comparing western countries, the incidence rate of AFF was unclear in East Asian patients. Our purposes were to estimate the incidence rate of radiologically defined AFF in Korea, and to determine the association between occurrence of AFF and long-term use of bisphosphonate.

METHODS

We conducted a hospital-based, retrospective cohort study in patients aged ≥ 45 years, who took bisphosphonate. The occurrence of AFF was estimated by using incidence rate, and the age-adjusted incidence rate to U.S. 2010 Census data. The association between occurrence of AFF and the duration of bisphosphonate use was examined. The cumulative probability of AFF was plotted per each duration of bisphosphonate use.

RESULTS

Among 10,338 individuals who took bisphosphonate, 13 patients with AFF following use of bisphosphonate were identified. The incidence rate was 85.9/100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.2-146.9), and age-adjusted incidence rate was 72.7/100,000 person-years (95% CI, 29.1-175.8). In Poisson regression analysis, higher body mass index (BMI) was associated with an increased risk of AFF (relative risk, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.004-1.359). The cumulative probability of AFF increased abruptly when the duration of bisphosphonate use was 4 years or more.

CONCLUSION

Among Korean patients, the incidence rate of AFF was on a par with those of western countries, and this can provide basic information to conduct further studies by evaluating risk and benefit of continuing bisphosphonate.

Atypical subtrochanteric fractures in Korean hip fracture study

In Korean, atypical subtrochanteric fractures (ASF) were rare. Higher BMI and use of bisphosphonate were significant risk factors of ASF.

INTRODUCTION

Recently, ASF have been reported to increase among patients on bisphosphonate. However, the incidence of ASF and the association between ASF and bisphosphonate use have not been well defined in Asian population. Our purposes are (1) to estimate the proportion of ASF among Korean patients with proximal femur fracture and (2) to determine the associated risk factors of ASF in the Korean patients.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter (16 academic hospitals), prospective Korean hip fracture study on hip fracture in a cohort of patients aged 50 years or older from South Korea between July 2014 and May 2016. As a part of Korean hip fracture study, primary analysis examined the proportion of ASF among proximal femur fracture. To identify ASF, according to the definition by ASBMR task force, all radiographs of subtrochanteric fracture were reviewed. Associated risk factors for occurrence of ASF were also evaluated by using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 1361 patients with proximal femoral fractures due to low-energy trauma, 17 fractures (1.2%) were identified as ASF. Higher BMI and use of bisphosphonate before injury were independent risk factors of ASF.

CONCLUSION

In Korean, ASF were rare. Higher BMI and use of bisphosphonate were significant risk factors of ASF.

Bisphosphonate Use and the Risk of Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty in Osteoporotic Patients with Osteoarthritis: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

The use of bisphosphonates has been reported to have potential beneficial effects on knee osteoarthritis, but existing studies have limitations. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of bisphosphonate use with the risk of undergoing total knee arthroplasty and with the consumption of pain medication among osteoporotic patients with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

We identified patients who were newly diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis among a cohort of patients with osteoporosis from 2009 to 2012 in the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. We further categorized these patients into 2 groups: those who were treated with bisphosphonates (bisphosphonate users) and those who were not treated with any anti-osteoporosis drug (nonusers). Bisphosphonate treatment adherence was calculated by the medication possession ratio (MPR) as the proportion of days of bisphosphonate treatment within a fixed duration; an MPR of ≥80% was considered high adherence. The primary and secondary outcomes of interest were undergoing total knee arthroplasty and the use of pain medication, respectively. Analyses using Cox proportional hazard models with propensity-score adjustment were performed to estimate the association between bisphosphonate use and the risk of undergoing total knee arthroplasty. The incremental change in the mean accumulated defined daily doses of pain medications among both bisphosphonate users and nonusers was calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 16,276 bisphosphonate users and 123,791 nonusers of any anti-osteoporosis drug among the patients with osteoporosis who were newly diagnosed with osteoarthritis. Bisphosphonate use was significantly associated with a decreased risk of total knee arthroplasty (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 0.83; p < 0.001). In patients with a follow-up period of ≥24 months and an MPR of ≥80%, the effect size was significantly greater (adjusted HR, 0.66; p = 0.048). Over the 5 years of follow-up, we found a significantly greater decrease in the use of pain medication among bisphosphonate users than among nonusers (p < 0.001; Chow test).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with osteoporosis and osteoarthritis, bisphosphonate use was associated with a significantly lower risk of total knee arthroplasty, especially in patients with high adherence and longer treatment duration. A lower consumption of pain medication was also found for bisphosphonate users among the patients with osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Retrospective review of patients with atypical bisphosphonate related proximal femoral fractures

INTRODUCTION

Patients may be at an increased risk of atypical proximal femoral fractures with prolonged bisphosphonate use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients who sustained a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur in our department between April 2009 and March 2014. The radiographs were reviewed for features of atypical femoral fractures as described by the American Society of Bone Mineral Research.

RESULTS

185 patients were coded according to the National Hip Fracture Database as having sustained a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur. Of these, 26 patients had radiographic findings consistent with an atypical subtrochanteric fracture. 5 patients were excluded as their histology confirmed malignancy. 12 patients were taking bisphosphonates on admission. All 12 patients were females taking alendronic acid on admission, who sustained the fracture as the result of minimal or no trauma and underwent long gamma nail fixation. The mean age was 71.6 years (range 62-79 years). The mean length of time on bisphosphonates prior to admission was 8.33 years (range 3-25 years). 9/12 patients had pre-existing symptoms for between 5days and 2 years prior to admission. 1 patient sustained a broken gamma nail 14 weeks post-operatively requiring revision. The mean time to discharge from theatre was 16days (range 5-57days). The mean time to radiological union in the patients in whom there was evidence was 24 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small group of patients, management of this fracture pattern can be complex with the potential for delayed or non-union and prodromal symptoms are common.

Bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis: a review of skeletal safety concerns

The use of bisphosphonates in treatment of osteoporosis declined significantly over the past decade. There is currently great concern, among patients and physicians, about two potential skeletal adverse effects associated with bisphosphonates- jaw osteonecrosis and atypical femur fractures. This has become a major public health issue since untreated osteoporosis carries a significant burden in terms of fracture-related morbidity and mortality, and bisphosphonates, considered first-line therapy for osteoporosis, have established efficacy in fracture and mortality reduction. Areas covered: In this review we discuss current literature on osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures in patients with osteoporosis treated with bisphosphonates, including case definition, pathogenesis, epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, management and prevention. We conducted a literature search using PubMed and PubMed Central, using the search terms 'bisphosphonates', 'osteonecrosis of the jaw', and 'atypical fractures'. We selected relevant articles including meta-analyses, clinical trials, observational studies, and major society guidelines published between 2010 and 2016, to be included in this review. A few articles published prior to 2010 were also included as references. Expert commentary: The rare skeletal side effects of bisphosphonates should not preclude their use in patients with osteoporosis and high fracture risk, as benefits significantly outweigh the risks.

Risk of hip, subtrochanteric, and femoral shaft fractures among mid and long term users of alendronate: nationwide cohort and nested case-control study

OBJECTIVES

 To determine the skeletal safety and efficacy of long term (≥10 years) alendronate use in patients with osteoporosis.

DESIGN

 Open register based cohort study containing two nested case control studies.

SETTING

 Nationwide study of population of Denmark.

PARTICIPANTS

 61 990 men and women aged 50-94 at the start of treatment, who had not previously taken alendronate, 1996-2007.

INTERVENTIONS

 Treatment with alendronate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

 Incident fracture of the subtrochanteric femur or femoral shaft (ST/FS) or the hip. Non-fracture controls from the cohort were matched to fracture cases by sex, year of birth, and year of initiation of alendronate treatment. Conditional logistic regression models were fitted to calculate odds ratios with and without adjustment for comorbidity and comedications. Sensitivity analyses investigated subsequent treatment with other drugs for osteoporosis.

RESULTS

 1428 participants sustained a ST/FS (incidence rate 3.4/1000 person years, 95% confidence interval 3.2 to 3.6), and 6784 sustained a hip fracture (16.2/1000 person years, 15.8 to 16.6). The risk of ST/FS was lower with high adherence to treatment with alendronate (medication possession ratio (MPR, a proxy for compliance) >80%) compared with poor adherence (MPR <50%; odds ratio 0.88, 0.77 to 0.99; P=0.05). Multivariable adjustment attenuated this association (adjusted odds ratio 0.88, 0.77 to 1.01; P=0.08). The risk was no higher in long term users (≥10 dose years; 0.70, 0.44 to 1.11; P=0.13) or in current compared with past users (0.91, 0.79 to 1.06; P=0.22). Similarly, MPR >80% was associated with a decreased risk of hip fracture (0.73, 0.68 to 0.78; P<0.001) as was longer term cumulative use for 5-10 dose years (0.74, 0.67 to 0.83; P<0.001) or ≥10 dose years (0.74, 0.56 to 0.97; P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

 These findings support an acceptable balance between benefit and risk with treatment with alendronate in terms of fracture outcomes, even for over 10 years of continuous use.

Management of atypical femoral fracture: a scoping review and comprehensive algorithm

BACKGROUND

Atypical femoral fractures (AFF) are a rare type of femoral stress fracture recently described, potentially associated with prolonged bisphosphonate therapy. Evidence-based recommendations regarding diagnosis and management of these fractures are scarce. The purpose of this study is to propose an algorithm for the diagnosis and management of AFF.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search of the last ten years using the keywords "atypical femoral fractures" and identified further articles through an evaluation of the publications cited in these articles. Relevant studies were included by agreement between researchers, depending on their specialization. Pertinent points of debate were discussed based on the available literature, allowing for consensus regarding the proposed management algorithm.

RESULTS

Using a systematic approach we performed a scoping review that included a total of 137 articles.

CONCLUSIONS

A practical guide for diagnosis and management of AFF based on the current concepts is proposed. In spite of the impressive large volume of published literature available since AFF were initially identified, the level of evidence is mostly poor, in particular regarding treatment choice. Therefore, further studies are required.

The Association Between Long-Term Bisphosphonate Use and the Risk of Fracture Among Women Aged 50 or Older with Osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a prevalent disease, and bisphosphonates can effectively reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. However, the association between the length of the medication treatment and the risk of fractures remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between long-term bisphosphonate use (treatment duration ≥5 years) and the risk of fractures among women with osteoporosis aged 50 or older.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study by using the 2001-2011 National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. We included women who were 50 years or older, who had a diagnosis of osteoporosis, and who were newly initiating oral bisphosphonates between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2003. The index date was the date of the first dispensing of oral bisphosphonate during the enrollment period. Women were considered to be using bisphosphonates until they had a gap in supply of more than 3 months. We classified bisphosphonate use as long term (≥5 years) and regular (<5 years) based on its length of use. The dependent variable was the time to the first observed clinical fracture. Cox-proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the association between long-term bisphosphonate use and the risk of fractures.

RESULTS

The study included 1342 women with a mean age of 71 years. Of them, 83 (6.2%) were long-term bisphosphonate users. A total of 185 (13.8%) had a fracture. After adjustments, long-term bisphosphonate use was not associated with a lower risk of fractures than was regular bisphosphonate use (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.49, 95% CI: 0.91-2.45).

CONCLUSION

This study found no evidence of a lower risk of fractures to be associated with long-term bisphosphonate use among women aged 50 or older with osteoporosis in Taiwan. Orthopedists as well as other healthcare providers should be aware of the limited benefits of long-term bisphosphonate use.

Non-adherence with bisphosphonates among patients with osteoporosis: impact on fracture risk and healthcare cost‏

Osteoporosis-related fractures at the spine and hip have a substantial impact on mortality, morbidity, and quality of life in older adults worldwide. Adherence to bisphosphonates is essential for effective treatment and fracture prevention. Nevertheless, numerous studies from various populations and study designs clearly indicated that adherence and persistence are poor with more than 50% of patients discontinuing therapy within one year. This is primarily explained by mild adverse effects, dosing regimens, and costs. Studies have also shown that good adherence is associated with reduced osteoporosis-related and non-related healthcare costs as soon as 2 years from therapy initiation. Nonetheless, we found only little improvement in adherence rates over the years. In light of the importance of medication adherence and the limited success of previous programs, other than reducing dosing frequency, new directions should be explored to engage patients and care givers in order to improve adherence and prevent fractures.

A Review of Atypical Femoral Fractures From a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital: An Alarming Trend?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the experience of a single tertiary care teaching hospital with the association between use of bisphosphonates and atypical femoral fractures, and to identify potential risk factors and chronologic incidence.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary-care teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirty-two patients with a total of 43 fractures met inclusion criteria.

INTERVENTION

Treatment for atypical femur fractures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Radiographic assessments, duration of bisphosphonate therapy, prodromal symptoms, associated medications/comorbidities.

RESULTS

Thirty-one female patients and 1 male patient, with a total of 43 fractures, with an average age of 71.0 (47-92 years) ± 11.01 years at time of fracture, had an average duration of bisphosphonate therapy of 7.57 (1-12 years) ± 3.07 years. Prodromal thigh pain was reported in 20 of 43 fractures (46.5%). Eleven of the forty-three (25.5%) fractures occurred between 2001 and 2005. From 2006 to May 2011, however, 32/43 (74.5%) were reported. Beta-blockers, ACE/ARBs, and Statins (43.8%) were the most common concomitant medications, whereas Levothyroxine (21.8%), H-2 blockers (15.6%), and Glucocorticoids (12.5%) were less common.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increasing trend of atypical femur fractures in the current adult population. Bisphosphonate therapy beyond 7 years may place patients at increased risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Periprosthetic Atypical Femoral Fractures in Patients on Long-term Bisphosphonates: A Multicenter Retrospective Review

OBJECTIVES

To define the characteristics of periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures (PAFFs) in patients on long-term bisphosphonate treatment and to provide a guide to the diagnosis and long-term treatment of these patients based on the literature.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective review.

SETTING

Fifteen orthopaedic centers in the United States and Canada, including members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Patients on long-term bisphosphonates who presented with either periprosthetic fractures or femoral fractures, over a 10-year period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Time to union and complications.

RESULTS

Clinically significant differences were identified in time to union, mortality, and complications. There was a statistically significant difference in complications. Imaging review demonstrated identical features in both atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) and PAFFs.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest comparative case series reported on PAFFS and AFFs and provides compelling evidence that PAFFs in patients on long-term bisphosphonates are indeed a subset of periprosthetic fractures that exhibit atypical femoral fracture (AFF) characteristics. As such, these fractures pose serious diagnostic and management challenges to trauma and arthroplasty surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Osteoporotic Fracture Care: Are We Closer to Gold Standards?

This review summarizes symposium presentations from the OTA's Basic Science Focus Forum on care for osteoporotic fractures. The limitations of diaphyseal osteoporotic animal bone models are discussed, together with the potential benefits of using metaphyseal models to study osteoporotic fracture fixation constructs. Metaphyseal bone repair models provide better simulation of the most common osteoporotic fractures. Selection of an osteoporotic model for mechanical testing is also challenging. One should always thoroughly define the clinical problem to be addressed. The selected model should then be validated for behavior matched to known clinical behavior with known fixation configurations. The medical management of osteoporosis is directed at enhancing bone mass, improving bone quality, and lowering fracture risk. Medical strategies to achieve these goals are discussed. The medical strategy should include provision of an adequate calcium and vitamin D environment to facilitate well-mineralized bone and improve bone quality, prevent excessive bone resorption, and provide an anabolic stimulus to enhance bone formation. Atypical femur fractures continue to be a serious issue for the orthopaedic community. Risk factors, treatment modalities, and prevention strategies are discussed. A comprehensive strategy for the improved treatment of osteoporotic fractures must address both biological and mechanical issues and includes 4 specific approaches: (1) removal of inhibitors to bone healing; (2) introduction of bone healing stimulants; (3) modification of fracture fixation constructs; and (4) application of bone augmentation or substitutes. There is currently no optimal bone substitute. Substitutes should be chosen based on the most critical need when treating a particular fracture.

Trends in Media Reports, Oral Bisphosphonate Prescriptions, and Hip Fractures 1996-2012: An Ecological Analysis

Bisphosphonates are effective for the treatment of osteoporosis despite recent reports of safety concerns such as atypical femur fracture. We conducted an ecological analysis of relevant media reports, oral bisphosphonate use, and fracture outcomes in the United States. Trends in media reports and public interest of bisphosphonates were quantified using data from Google Trends. Data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) were used to estimate the trends in oral bisphosphonate use among patients aged 55 years and older and hospitalizations for intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures, respectively. These trends in the prevalence of oral bisphosphonate use and the age-adjusted incidence rate of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures were examined from 1996 to 2012. A series of spikes in Internet search activity for alendronate (Fosamax) occurred between 2006 and 2010 immediately following media reports of safety concerns. Oral bisphosphonate use declined by greater than 50% between 2008 and 2012 (p < 0.001) after increasing use for more than a decade. The decline was more common in patients with lower education levels. Intertrochanteric hip fractures declined from 1996 through 2006 (p < 0.001) and continued to decline from 2008 to 2012 (p < 0.05). Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal fractures showed a steady and significant increase from 2002 to 2011 (p < 0.05). However, the incidence decreased from a peak of 30.5 per 100,000 in 2011 to 26.7 per 100,000 in 2012. The plateauing and subsequent decline in oral bisphosphonate use since 2006 coincided with reports of safety concerns of bisphosphonates, despite the fact that U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) reports did not recommend any safety restrictions on their use. This decline in oral bisphosphonate use was followed by the decline in the incidence of subtrochanteric and diaphyseal fractures.

Atypical femoral fractures and bisphosphonate use: current evidence and clinical implications

Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by a low bone volume and deterioration of the bone quality, which increases the risk of low-energy fractures. Bisphosphonate (BP) treatment increases the bone mass and reduces the risk of fractures in patients with osteoporosis by suppressing bone resorption. In spite of its clinical benefits, the long-term use of BPs has been linked to the occurrence of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). Although the evidence had been controversial regarding the association between the occurrence of AFFs and BP use, more recent studies with radiographic adjudication have indicated the significant associations between them. However, the pathogenesis of AFFs is not completely understood. The most popular hypothesis has suggested that the suppression of bone turnover by BPs is responsible; however, some recent reports have implied the involvement of pathophysiological alterations of the bone quality and fracture repair process. In this review, we summarize and discuss the epidemiology, risk factors and pathology of AFFs.