Metal hypersensitivity and metal ion levels in patients with coated or uncoated total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled study

Prosthetic Metals: Release, Metabolism and Toxicity

The development of metallic joint prostheses has been ongoing for more than a century alongside advancements in hip and knee arthroplasty. Among the materials utilized, the Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) and Titanium-Aluminum-Vanadium (Ti-Al-V) alloys are predominant in joint prosthesis construction, predominantly due to their commendable biocompatibility, mechanical strength, and corrosion resistance. Nonetheless, over time, the physical wear, electrochemical corrosion, and inflammation induced by these alloys that occur post-implantation can cause the release of various metallic components. The released metals can then flow and metabolize in vivo, subsequently causing potential local or systemic harm. This review first details joint prosthesis development and acknowledges the release of prosthetic metals. Second, we outline the metallic concentration, biodistribution, and elimination pathways of the released prosthetic metals. Lastly, we discuss the possible organ, cellular, critical biomolecules, and significant signaling pathway toxicities and adverse effects that arise from exposure to these metals.

Cytotoxicity assessment of exfoliated MoS2 using primary human mast cells and the progenitor cell-derived mast cell line LAD2

Molybdenum disulfide is an emerging 2D material with several potential applications in medicine. Therefore, it is crucial to ascertain its biocompatibility. Mast cells are immune cells that are found in many organs and tissues in contact with the extracellular environment, and can be cultured from progenitor cells present in the bone marrow. Given the long period required for differentiation and proliferation of primary mast cells, human mast cell lines have emerged as a tractable model for biological and toxicological studies. Here, we compare two types of industrial MoS2 using CD34+-derived primary human mast cells and the LAD2 cell line. Minimal effects were observed on early-stage activation endpoints such as β-hexosaminidase release and expression of surface markers of mast cell activation. Transmission electron microscopy revealed limited uptake of the tested materials. Overall, MoS2 was found to be biocompatible, and the LAD2 cell line was validated as a useful in vitro model of mast cells.

Understanding immune-mediated cobalt/chromium allergy to orthopaedic implants: a meta-synthetic review

BACKGROUND

The frequency of primary joint replacement surgery continues to increase worldwide. While largely considered biologically inert entities, an increasing body of evidence continues to validate a not insignificant incidence of allergic reactions to such implants. Little previous work has explored genuinely immune-mediated reactivity in this context. In the absence of a contemporary published summary on the topic, this paper explored the current state of understanding of cobalt/chromium allergy and proposes a patient management algorithm whereby such immune reactions are clinically suggested.

METHODS

A structured, systematic literature review was performed by following PRISMA search principles to provide an updated review of this area.

RESULTS

Thirty-six topic-related articles were identified, the majority reflecting lower tiers of scientific evidence with a lack of homogeneous quantitative data to facilitate valid cohort comparisons. Largely, the available literature represented small case series' or expert opinions.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increasing clinical awareness and acknowledgement of true allergy to joint replacement components, this review highlighted that the evidence base underpinning the diagnosis and management of such patients is limited. Both patient-reported metal allergy or skin patch testing are grossly unreliable methods and show almost no correlation with true immune reactivity. Recent studies suggested a potential role for patient-specific in vitro cellular activation testing and/or targeted genetic testing when cobalt/chromium allergy is clinically suspected. However, while likely representing the contemporary "best available" approaches both can be costly undertakings, are not yet universally available, and still require broader validation in non-research settings before wider uptake can be championed.

"Adjacent Bed Effect" of Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients During the Perioperative Period

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthropathy is one of the most common degenerative joint diseases in the elderly, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most commonly used treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthropathy. Negative emotions such as anxiety have been extensively documented in knee osteoarthropathy patients.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the Emotional Contagion during hospitalization in patients undergoing TKA.

METHODS

Eligible subjects were divided into three case groups according to their anxiety states and bed arrangement. All subjects underwent a unilateral, cemented TKA under general anesthesia. Post-operative recovery outcomes including pain, pain behavior and physical function were recorded pre-operation, 1-day, 1 week, 2-weeks, 1-month and 3-months post-operation.

RESULTS

A total of 38 subjects were included in the final analysis. Subjects with anxiety had higher Visual Analogue Scale pain scores, PROMIS-Pain Behavior scores than subjects without anxiety in the Contagion Group preoperation (p ≤ .05). Non-anxiety subjects hospitalized in beds physically adjacent to anxiety subjects experienced more severe pain and poorer function (p ≤ .05). After discharge, all clinical outcomes gradually became lower than anxiety subjects in the Contagion Group, reaching levels similar to non-anxiety subjects in the No Contagion Group within 1 month (p>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that patients with anxiety may have an "Adjacent Bed Effect" on patients with TKA in the adjacent bed, which may be associated with poorer postoperative recovery, including pain and physical function. We speculate this phenomenon can be effectively avoided by the nursing team through accurately assessing psychological status and reasonable bed arrangements in the inpatient assessment phase.

No difference in patient reported outcome and inflammatory response after coated and uncoated total knee arthroplasty - a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Allergies against implant materials are still not fully understood. Despite controversies about its relevance, some patients need treatment with hypoallergenic implants. This study compared coated and standard total knee arthroplasty (TKA) regarding inflammatory response and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

76 patients without self-reported allergies against implant materials were included in a RCT and received a coated or standard TKA of the same cemented posterior-stabilized knee system. 73 patients completed the 3-year follow-up. Two patients died and there was one revision surgery. Serum levels of cytokines with a possible role in implant allergy were measured in patient`s serum (IL-1beta, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFN γ, TNF α) prior to, one and three years after surgery. Furthermore, PROMs including knee function (Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score) and health-related quality of life (QoL, EuroQuol questionnaire) were assessed. Additionally, 8 patients with patch-test proven skin allergy against implant materials who received the coated implant were assessed similarly and compared to a matched-pair group receiving the same implant.

RESULTS

There were no differences in function and QoL between the assessed groups at any follow-up. The majority of patients demonstrated no elevation of the measured blood cytokines. Cytokine patterns showed no differences between study groups at any follow-up. The allergy patients demonstrated slower functional improvement and minor differences in cytokine pattern. Yet these results were not significant. There were no differences in the matched-pair analysis.

CONCLUSION

We observed no relevant increase in serum cytokine levels in any group. The inflammatory response measured seems limited, even in allergy patients. Furthermore, there were no differences between coated and standard TKA in non-allergy patients in the 3-year Follow-Up period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered in the US National Institutes of Health's database ( http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov ) registry under NCT03424174 on 03/17/2016.

"Systematic review and meta-analysis of ceramic coated implants in total knee arthroplasty. Comparable mid-term results to uncoated implants."

BACKGROUND

Nitride-based ceramic coatings, such as titanium nitride (TiN) and titanium niobium nitride (TiNbN), have been introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to enhance the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of knee components, harden the metal surface and reduce CoCrMo exposure and metal ion release. However, the theoretical advantages of these ceramic coatings in TKA have yet to be fully elucidated. This systematic review aimed to provide clinical evidence on mid-term outcomes of ceramic-coated knee prostheses in comparison with uncoated standard CoCrMo knee prostheses in primary TKA. The hypothesis was that ceramic-coated implants can be used in primary TKA with no inferior outcomes compared to uncoated CoCrMo implants.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to find all clinical studies regarding primary TKA with ceramic-coated knee prostheses. MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from 1990 to October 2020 to identify relevant studies for the first qualitative analysis. Using PICOS eligibility criteria, a subgroup of the selected studies was used to perform a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included in this systematic review, of which six were included in the meta-analysis: 3 randomized controlled trials, 2 retrospective comparative studies and 1 prospective cross-sectional study. Pooled data overall included 321 coated TKAs vs. 359 uncoated TKAs and a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 2-10 years). No significant difference in the implant survival risk ratio with revision or reoperation due to any reason was found between coated and uncoated TKAs, even considering the RCT study subgroup with a risk ratio of 1.02 (P = 0.34). No significant differences were found for postoperative complications, clinical scores, or metal blood concentrations at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis support the statement that ceramic-coated TKAs are not inferior to uncoated TKAs, showing comparable survival rates, complication rates and clinical outcomes. There is strong evidence that ceramic-coated TKA does not improve the clinical results or survival rate in comparison with uncoated TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II,  Therapeutic.

A Novel Multilayer-Coating for Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants is Safe - 10-Year Results From a Randomized-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

This randomized-controlled trial was initiated to compare a new multilayer hypoallergenic coating system with the standard implant in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in terms of serum metal ion levels, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and implant survival.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients were randomized to receive a coated or standard TKA of the same knee system. Serum metal ion levels (ie, cobalt, chromium, molybdenum, and nickel) as well as knee function (Oxford Knee Score, OKS), quality of life (SF-36), and physical activity (UCLA activity scale) were assessed before surgery and until the 10 year follow-up. A total of 24 patients died and there was one revision in each group. This resulted in 85 patients who completed follow-up.

RESULTS

Both groups demonstrated equally good improvement in PROs after surgery and constant score values thereafter. The majority of patients had metal ion serum levels below detection limit. Only cobalt levels demonstrated a slight increase in the standard group at 5- and 10-year follow-up. However, all patients displayed values below 3 μg/L. The cumulative 10-year survival was 98% in both groups.

CONCLUSION

There were no problems with the new coating system. No relevant increase in metal ion serum levels were measured. A slight increase in cobalt serum levels in the standard TKA was noted, thus not reaching critical values. The new coating system demonstrated equally good PROs as the standard TKA. Excellent implant survival was observed in both groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Periarticular metal hypersensitivity complications of hip bearings containing cobalt-chromium

Hip joints with bearings composed of cobalt-chromium alloy (metal-on-metal bearings) have been one of the most widely used implants in joint replacement arthroplasty. Unfortunately, these implants can contribute to a complication called aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion (ALVAL), a type IV metal hypersensitivity response around the joint. Consistent with such bearings, increased metal debris can be found in the surrounding fluids and in remote tissues and organs, due to wear and corrosion. It is hypothesized that metal ions released from the prosthesis (including Co2+) can potentially form haptens with proteins such as serum albumin in synovial fluid that in turn elicit ALVAL. Generally, elevated cobalt and chromium levels in synovial fluids may indicate implant failure. However, such measurements cannot be used as a reliable tool to predict the onset of ALVAL. To detect ALVAL, some diagnostic tests, questionnaires and imaging techniques have been used clinically with some success, but a standardized approach is lacking. At present, guidelines for implant usage and patient management are ambiguous and inconsistent across health care authorities. To reduce and better manage the development of ALVAL, further research into the precise molecular mechanism(s) by which ALVAL develops is urgently needed. Identification of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for ALVAL is required, as are more standardized guidelines for surgery and patient management.

Poor Correlation Among Metal Hypersensitivity Testing Modalities and Inferior Patient-Reported Outcomes After Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties

Background

Metal allergy testing may influence clinical decision-making for patients undergoing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Limited data were found to examine the consistency of available testing modalities. This study compares different metal allergy test results and clinical outcomes after primary and revision TKAs in patients with and without metal hypersensitivity.

Methods

Primary (n = 28) and revision (n = 20) TKA patients receiving hypoallergenic implants for metal allergies diagnosed by skin patch testing (SPT), lymphocyte proliferation testing (LPT), or lymphocyte transformation testing (LTT) were retrospectively reviewed. The agreement between tests was assessed by percentage and kappa statistic within patients who used multiple testing modalities. Postoperative clinical outcomes of these patients were compared to those of patients without metal hypersensitivity matched by age (±5 years), body mass index (±5), gender, and follow-up duration (±2 years).

Results

SPT and LPT showed weak agreement for nickel and minimal agreement for cobalt. SPT and LTT showed minimal agreement for nickel; weak agreement for titanium, bone cement, vanadium, and zirconium; but strong agreement for chromium and cobalt. LPT and LTT agreement was weak. Compared to matched controls, metal hypersensitivity patients undergoing primary TKAs with hypoallergenic implants experienced less improvement in Knee Society Scores, Veterans RAND 12 physical component scores, and range of motion. Patients undergoing revision TKAs for multiple indications including metal hypersensitivity had worse clinical outcomes with significantly worse improvements in Knee Society functional scores compared to matched controls.

Conclusions

Metal allergy tests produce conflicting results. Hypersensitivity patients may experience inferior clinical outcomes even with hypoallergenic implants. Clinician awareness may influence the choice of testing and improve preoperative counseling of this patient population.

High early failure rate for a new unicondylar knee system

Background

This single-center retrospective study evaluated early failure rates for an unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) system with an anti-allergic surface.

Methods

We studied 87 consecutive joints received an UKA at a single center between 2017 and 2020. All patients received a fully cemented anti-allergic Univation-Aesculap partial knee replacement implant with a corundum blasting surface. All joints had precise indication of unicompartmental arthroplasty according to the current criteria of this procedure. The current series was restricted to patients undergoing medial cemented UKA. Medial compartment osteoarthritis was the main indication.

Results

We found early failure (aseptic loosening) was documented in 20 of the 87 joints (23%). The time to failure ranged from 7 weeks to 3 years, for an estimated 33% (15-46%) cumulative hazard rate for implant loosening over three years. No cases of periprosthetic joint infection were found. On average, the patients began complaining about first symptoms during the third month after surgery. In most cases (66.66%), the cement remained fixed to the bone.

Conclusions

Based on these early results, the manufacturer of this implant stopped all further distribution. Continued efforts should be made to understand the clinical and radiographic outcomes of alternative and anti-allergic surface coatings in knee arthroplasty.

Lymphocyte transformation test reveals low prevalence of true metal hypersensitivity among pre-operative total knee arthroplasty patients

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of metal hypersensitivity, and identify pre-operative factors which could predict susceptibility to hypersensitivity reactions among patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The present study used a testing method consistent with the recognised biological response to metals.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional analysis of 220 patients was conducted. All patients received a testing protocol using lymphocyte transformation test to evaluate reactivity to possible contents of orthopaedic implants. Test response is interpreted as stimulation index (SI) values. A comprehensive questionnaire was used to evaluate prior exposure. Patients were categorised according to SI values and the odds ratios (OR) were calculated as comparative effect measure for each predetermined prior exposure factor.

RESULTS

The prevalence of metal sensitivity response was 28% (n = 61) among patients with susceptibility to at least one agent (SI = 2 to 4.9), and 3.2% (n = 7) among patients with true hypersensitivity (SI ≥ 5). The population-weighted prevalence, adjusted for sampling weights of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis, was SI ≥ 5 = 4.7% (95% CI 0.4-11.8%) and SI ≥ 2 = 35.2% (95% CI 24.8-48.6%). Stimulation index levels of response to materials were markedly varied with the highest being aluminium. Female sex, smoking history, cutaneous reaction to jewellery, occupational exposure, and dental procedures were among factors shown to increase the odds of having higher reactivity response to tested metals. Nevertheless, patients with well-functioning prior contralateral TKA did not appear at greater risk of having either sensitivity or susceptibility with odds ratio (OR) = 0.2 (95% CI 0.01-3.2), p: NS and OR = 0.6 (95% CI 0.3-1.2), p: NS, respectively. Prior positive patch test was neither predictor of susceptibility to hypersensitivity OR = 1.2 (95% CI 0.6-2.6) p: NS nor predictor of true hypersensitivity OR = 0.7 (95% CI 0.08-6.1), p: NS.

CONCLUSION

Among patients scheduled for primary TKA with no prior clinical features of metal allergy the prevalence of true hypersensitivity to at least one metal is just over 3%. Patients are likely to encounter a material to which they have pre-existing susceptibility to hypersensitivity. With certain prior exposure factors, there was increased susceptibility to metal hypersensitivity reaction evoking an acquired condition.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cross-sectional study.

The effect of Nickel hypersensitivity on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty and the value of skin patch testing: a systematic review

Background

To assess the Nickel sensitizing potential of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), explore the relationship between hypersensitivity and clinical outcomes, and evaluate the utility of skin patch testing pre- and/or postoperatively.

Materials and methods

A literature search was performed through EMBASE, Medline and PubMed databases. Articles were screened independently by two investigators. The level of evidence of studies was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Criteria and the quality evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies and Cochrane risk-of-bias tools.

Results

Twenty studies met the eligibility criteria, reporting on 1354 knee arthroplasties. Studies included patients undergoing primary or revision TKA, pre- and/or postoperatively, and used patch testing to identify Nickel hypersensitivity. Prevalence of Nickel hypersensitivity ranged from 0% to 87.5%. One study compared the prevalence of Nickel hypersensitivity in the same patient group before and after surgery and noted newly positive patch test reactions in three patients (4.2%). Three studies reported lower prevalence of Nickel hypersensitivity in postoperative patients compared to preoperative ones. Seven studies suggested that hypersensitivity might cause adverse clinical outcomes, but six did not support any relationship. Seven studies recommended preoperative patch testing in patients with history of metal allergy, and nine concluded that testing may be valuable postoperatively.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing TKA with no prior history of metal hypersensitivity do not seem to be at an increased risk of developing Nickel hypersensitivity, and there is conflicting evidence that patients with pre-existing hypersensitivity are more likely to experience adverse outcomes. Patch testing remains the most commonly used method for diagnosing hypersensitivity, and evidence suggests preoperative testing in patients with history of metal allergy to aid prosthesis selection, and postoperatively in patients with suspected hypersensitivity once common causes of implant failure have been excluded, since revision with hypoallergenic implants may alleviate symptoms.

Beneficial effect of a zirconium-nitride-coated implant in total knee arthroplasty revision for suspected metal hypersensitivity

INTRODUCTION

Revision of total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) for suspicion of metal hypersensitivity (MHS) may require hypoallergenic implants. Results for coated implants have not been reported. The aim of the present study was to assess short-term results and survival of rTKA for MHS using a multilayer implant coating.

HYPOTHESIS

Multilayer implant coating improves functional results in rTKA, with survival comparable to primary coated implants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective observational study included 28 patients (30 knees) undergoing rTKA for MHS using a coated implant between May 2011 and November 2016. Exclusion criteria comprised implant malpositioning and history of infection in the affected knee. Clinical and radiological results were assessed on the International Knee Society (IKS) and SF-36 functional scores and Ewald radiological score. Survival was calculated on Kaplan-Meier estimation.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 3.8 years. Mean IKS score increased by 40.2 points (40%) [range, 28.1-52.3] (p<0.05). Mean range of motion increased by 17° [range, 9.5-24.5°] (p<0.05). Mean physical and mental SF-36 components were respectively 44.7 and 46.1. Survivorship was 93%.

DISCUSSION

There was significant functional improvement after rTKA for MHS. There were no short-term complications related to the zirconium nitrate coating. However, studies with longer follow-up will be needed for confirmation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Increased inflammatory response is associated with less favorable functional results 5 years after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Allergy against implant materials is discussed controversially and still not fully understood. Despite these controversies, a relevant number of patients receive hypoallergenic knee implants. The aim of this study was to compare a new coating system with the standard implant in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Additionally, the influence of proinflammatory cytokines on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was investigated.

METHODS

120 patients without known metal allergy and without previous metal implants were included. The patients were randomized to receive a coated or standard TKA of the same knee system. 105 patients completed the 5 year follow-up. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including knee function (Oxford Knee Score, OKS), quality of life (SF36) and UCLA activity scale were assessed. Additionally, several cytokines with a possible role in implant allergy were measured in patient`s serum (IL-1beta, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IP-10, IFN γ, TNF α). Group comparison was performed using Mann-Whitney U test for continuous values and chi-square test for categorical values.

RESULTS

There were no differences in PROMs between both groups at any follow-up. The majority of patients demonstrated no elevation of the measured blood cytokines. The blood cytokine pattern after 5 years demonstrated no differences between study groups. There was a significant association between elevated IL-8 values and worse results in the overall OKS (p = 0.041), the OKS function component (p = 0.004), the UCLA activity scale (p = 0.007) and the physical component of SF36 (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There were no problems with the new coating during mid-term follow-up and no differences in PROMs between coated and standard TKA. Patients with an increased inflammatory response demonstrated worse functional results, regardless of the implant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered in the US National Institutes of Health's database ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ) registry under NCT00862511.

Site-specific cancer risk following cobalt exposure via orthopedic implants or in occupational settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis

In 2020, the European Commission up-classified metal cobalt as Class 1B Carcinogen (presumed to have carcinogenic potential) based primarily on data from rodent inhalation carcinogenicity studies. This up-classification requires an assessment under the Medical Device Regulations of cobalt cancer risk from medical devices. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate site-specific cancer risks with cobalt exposure from either total joint replacement (TJR) or occupational exposure (OC). Results were stratified by exposure type (OC or TJR), exposure level (metal-on-metal (MoM) or non-MoM), follow-up duration (latency period: <5, 5-10 or >10 years), and cancer incidence or mortality (detection bias assessment). From 30 studies (653,104 subjects, average 14.5 years follow-up), the association between TJR/OC and cancer risk was null for 22 of 27 cancer sites, negative for 3 sites, and positive for prostate cancer and myeloma. Significant heterogeneity and large estimate ranges were observed for many cancer sites. No significant increase in estimates was observed by exposure level or follow-up duration. The current evidence, including weak associations, heterogeneity across studies and no increased association with exposure level or follow-up duration, is insufficient to conclude that there exists an increased risk for people exposed to cobalt in TJR/OC of developing site-specific cancers.

Metal wear debris generation in primary total knee arthroplasty: is it an issue?

More durable total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are needed, due to the rising life expectancy, the higher activity levels of patients and the growing concerns about aseptic loosening being caused by metal hypersensitivity. In response, different hypoallergenic metal coatings have been developed for TKAs. However, possible adverse effects of these different metals (cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, zirconium, titanium and tantalum) have been neglected. The aim was to summarize the local and systemic adverse effects (including metal hypersensitivity), survival ratios, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the plasma metal ion concentrations of the different TKA coatings. A literature search on PubMed and EMBASE was performed. In total, 15 studies were found eligible. Common adverse effects of TKA were infection, loosening, pain, instability and hyper- coagulation disorders. Serious adverse effects related to TKA implants were not reported. The survival ratios and patient-reported outcome measures seem to confirm these good results. In contrast with chromium and cobalt, no significant differences were reported in the nickel, molybdenum and titanium concentrations. No significant differences between the hypoallergenic and standard TKA implants were found in terms of adverse effects, survival ratios and PROMs. A causal relationship between the common adverse effects and the different metals is unlikely. Due to the heterogeneity of the TKA implants used, no firm conclusions could be made. Further research with longer follow-up studies are needed to find possible adverse effects and differences. Thus far, the hypoallergenic implants seem to perform equal to the standard implants.

Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty : a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach

Aims

Metal allergy in knee arthroplasty patients is a controversial topic. We aimed to conduct a scoping review to clarify the management of metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Studies were identified by searching electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase, from their inception to November 2020, for studies evaluating TKA patients with metal hypersensitivity/allergy. All studies reporting on diagnosing or managing metal hypersensitivity in TKA were included. Data were extracted and summarized based on study design, study population, interventions and outcomes. A practical guide is then formulated based on the available evidence.

Results

We included 38 heterogeneous studies (two randomized controlled trials, six comparative studies, 19 case series, and 11 case reports). The evidence indicates that metal hypersensitivity is a rare complication with some histopathological features leading to pain and dissatisfaction with no reliable screening tests preoperatively. Hypoallergenic implants are viable alternatives for patients with self-reported/confirmed metal hypersensitivity if declared preoperatively; however, concerns remain over their long-term outcomes with ceramic implants outperforming titanium nitride-coated implants and informed consent is paramount. For patients presenting with painful TKA, metal hypersensitivity is a diagnosis of exclusion where patch skin testing, lymphocyte transformation test, and synovial biopsies are useful adjuncts before revision surgery is undertaken to hypoallergenic implants with shared decision-making and informed consent.

Conclusion

Using the limited available evidence in the literature, we provide a practical approach to metal hypersensitivity in TKA patients. Future national/registry-based studies are needed to identify the scale of metal hypersensitivity, agreed diagnostic criteria, and management strategies.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):785–795.

Influence of Psychological Distress in Patients with Hypoallergenic Total Knee Arthroplasty. Treatment Algorithm for Patients with Metal Allergy and Knee Osteoarthritis

The outcome in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depends on multiples factors, among them is the psychological condition. In addition, up 15 to 30% of the patients that undergo TKA show little or no improvement after surgery, which implies the diagnosis of a painful TKA is a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon, who must rule out a possible metal allergy (MA). It is considered an exclusion diagnosis. Due to the complex relationship between psychological condition and MA, and according to the worse results in patients treated with a hypoallergenic TKA, we asked: (1). What degree of psychological distress (PD) is present in patients who have a hypoallergenic TKA, and how does it influence the results of quality of life (QoL) and functional capacity. (2). Can we develop a new algorithm for patients with a possible MA that improves the outcomes? A pragmatic clinical study was carried out that included patients who underwent hypoallergenic TKA during three consecutive years. Quality of life and functional capacity were measured with (Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) WOMAC index, the Short Form 12 questionnaire (SF-12) questionnaire, and the The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire essentially consists of two pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) (Euro-QoL-5D L-VAS (EQ5D)), in all patients. To assess PD, a Psychological Distress Score was developed. SPSS software was performed to statistical analysis, and Student´s test for independent variables with a p < 0.005 as statistically significant. A total of 72 anallergic TKAs in 64 patients were treated during this period; 31.3% of these patients showed features of PD before the surgery. According with the severity of the PD, 60% were classified as severe, 10% as moderate and 30% as mild. Patients with PD had statistically significant worse results on the final WOMAC, SF-12, and EQ5D questionnaires. The final scores of the physical subscale of the SF-12 and EQ5D showed better results in patients diagnosed by psychiatrist. Up to one third of the patients with hypoallergenic TKAs have PD, and their results are clearly inferior to those patients with MA without PD. When PD was diagnosed according with Psychological Distress Score, patients should be carefully assessed in order to determine if a specialist referral is recommended. According with our results, PD should be assessed either by the PCP or by us. If the PD is confirmed, a psychiatry referral is then requested for better preoperative management and treatment. We believe that this approach would lead to better TKA outcomes.

Decrease of Quality of Life, Functional Assessment and Associated Psychological Distress in Patients with Hypoallergenic Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the final treatment for knee osteoarthritis, and 15-30% of patients show little or no improvement. This high percentage is related to aspects of the surgical technique, the selected implant, and specific patient characteristics. The aim of this study was to analyze whether there are differences in quality of life (QoL) and functional capacity among patients undergoing TKA with conventional implants compared to those treated with hypoallergenic oxinium implants. A pragmatic clinical study was carried out that included patients who underwent TKA between January 2013 and December 2015. During this period, 245 knees in 228 patients were treated. Eleven patients were excluded, leaving a sample of 161 conventionally treated knees, 72 knees treated with hypoallergenic implants, and one patient who received both implant types. In all patients, QoL and functional capacity were measured with the WOMAC index, the SF-12 questionnaire, and the Euro-Qol-5D L-VAS. We also assessed the psychological distress of each patient and related the findings to the functional results. The differences in QoL were tested using ANCOVA and propensity score matching (PSM) models adjusted for sex, age, weight, psychiatric history and associated complications. Patients who underwent TKA using conventional prostheses had significantly better scores on the total WOMAC index and in the pain domain (p < 0.05) than those who received hypoallergenic prostheses, but no significant differences were observed for the other domains in the ANCOVA. In contrast, with the PSM, we also found statistically significant differences in the difficulty domain of the WOMAC. Significant differences were found for the SF-12 mental health questionnaire results (p = 0.038), but the same did not occur for the physical health domain in the ANCOVA and PSM. We also found statistically significant differences in the Euro-Qol-5D index results (p = 0.041), but not in the VAS scale scores for the same questionnaire in the ANCOVA, and we did not find significant differences in either with the PSM. Patients with metal allergies and those who present psychological distress had WOMAC, SF-12, and Euro-Qol-5D results that were statistically significantly worse than those of patients who received conventional implants. Patients who underwent hypoallergic TKA had lower scores on the QoL and functional capacity scales than patients who received conventional Cr-Co implants. Additionally, patients with psychological distress had worse results on the questionnaires, and those with a metal allergy had even lower scores; the differences were statistically significant.

The Biomaterials of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Their Features, Function, and Effect on Outcomes

The materials that are used in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) implants have been carefully chosen in an attempt to minimize hardware-related complications. The 2 main metal alloys used in TSA implants are Ti-6Al-4V (titanium-aluminum-vanadium) and CoCrMo (cobalt-chromium-molybdenum). Ti alloys are softer than CoCr alloys, making them less wear-resistant and more susceptible to damage, but they have improved osseointegration and osteoconduction properties. Although controversial, metal allergy may be a concern in patients undergoing TSA and may lead to local tissue reaction and aseptic loosening. Numerous modifications to polyethylene, including cross-linking, minimizing oxidation, and vitamin E impregnation, have been developed to minimize wear and reduce complications. Alternative bearing surfaces such as ceramic and pyrolytic carbon, which have strong track records in other fields, represent promising possibilities to enhance the strength and the durability of TSA prostheses.

The effect of patient-reported metal allergies on the outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although literature exists regarding hip and knee arthroplasty outcomes in patients with skin allergy to metals, there is minimal information about skin allergy implications on shoulder arthroplasty outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the results, complications, and failure rate among patients with a self-reported metal allergy undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

Fifty-two shoulder arthroplasties were performed at our Institution in 43 patients with self-reported metal allergies. Forty primary and 12 revision shoulder arthroplasties were performed using anatomic (30) and reverse (22) components. Retrospective chart review was performed to determine metal allergy history, implant composition, pain, motion, and complications. Radiographs were reviewed to determine mechanical failure rates. Average follow-up time was 65 months.

RESULTS

Allergies reported included nickel (37), cobalt chrome (4), copper (2), zinc (1), titanium (1), gold (1), and nonspecific metal allergy (8); 8 patients reported multiple metal allergies. All components implanted in patients with nickel allergies contained nickel. At most recent follow-up, pain was rated as none or mild in 88% of shoulders. Active elevation improved from 80° to 141° and external rotation from 24° to 52°. Two revisions were performed for glenoid loosening (3.8%); both were revision cases with substantial glenoid bone loss. One patient with mild pain had a radiographically loose glenoid component 12 years after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Results from this study suggest that shoulder arthroplasty in patients with self-reported metal allergy provides satisfactory pain relief and improved range of motion with low revision rates.

Metal Ion Release after Hip and Knee Arthroplasty - Causes, Biological Effects and Diagnostics

All metal implants in human bodies corrode which results in metal ions release. This is not necessarily a problem and represents for most patients no hazard. However, if a critical metal ion concentration is exceeded, local or rarely systemic problems can occur. This article summarizes the mechanisms of metal ion release and its clinical consequences. Several situations can result in increased metal ion release: metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties with increased wear, increased micromotion at taper interfaces, direct metal-metal contact (polyethylene wear, impingement), erroneously used metal heads after ceramic head fracture. Possible problems are in most cases located close to the concerned joint. Furthermore, there are reports about toxic damage to several organs. Most of these reports refer to erroneously used metal heads in revisions after a broken ceramic head. There is currently no evidence of carcinogenic or teratogenic effects of implants but data is not sufficient to exclude possible effects. Cobalt and chromium blood levels (favorably in whole blood) should be measured in patients with suspected elevated metal ions. According to current knowledge levels below 2 µg/l seem to be uncritical, levels between 2 and 7 µg/l are considered borderline with unknown biological consequences and levels above 7 µg/l indicate a local problem which should be further diagnosed. Metal ion levels always need to be interpreted together with clinical symptoms and imaging results.

Allergy in total knee replacement surgery: Is it a real problem?

Total knee arthroplasty is a common procedure, with extremely good clinical results. Despite this success, it produces 20% unsatisfactory results. Among the causes of these failures is metal hypersensitivity. Metal sensitization is higher in patients with a knee arthroplasty than in the general population and is even higher in patients undergoing revision surgery. However, a clear correlation between metal sensitization and symptomatic knee after surgery has not been ascertained. Surely, patients with a clear history of metal allergy must be carefully examined through dermatological and laboratory testing before surgery. There is no globally accepted diagnostic algorithm or laboratory test to diagnose metal hypersensitivity or metal reactions. The patch test is the most common test to determine metal hypersensitivity, though presenting some limitations. Several laboratory assays have been developed, with a higher sensitivity compared to patch testing, yet their clinical availability is not widespread, due to high costs and technical complexity. Symptoms of a reaction to metal implants present across a wide spectrum, ranging from pain and cutaneous dermatitis to aseptic loosening of the arthroplasty. However, although cutaneous and systemic hypersensitivity reactions to metals have arisen, thereby increasing concern after joint arthroplasties, allergies against implant materials remain quite rare and not a well-known problem. The aim of the following paper is to provide an overview on diagnosis and management of metal hypersensitivity in patients who undergo a total knee arthroplasty in order clarify its real importance.

Similar outcome during short-term follow-up after coated and uncoated total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

Patients with known hypersensitivity to metals often require hypoallergenic TKA implants. Coating of a standard implant is a common solution, and although in vitro tests have demonstrated reduction of polyethylene wear for these coatings, it is still unknown whether these implants have any clinical benefit. This study was initiated to investigate metal ion concentrations, knee function and patient-reported outcome (PRO) after coated and uncoated TKA.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-two (122) patients were randomized to receive a coated or a standard TKA and, after exclusions, 59 patients were included in each group. Knee function and PRO were assessed with validated scores up to 3 years after surgery. Metal ion concentrations in blood samples were determined for chromium, cobalt, molybdenum and nickel, preoperatively and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Chromium concentrations in patient plasma increased from a median of 0.25 to 1.30 µg/l in the standard TKA group, and from 0.25 to 0.75 µg/l in the coated TKA group (p = 0.012). Thirteen patients (3 coated, 10 standard TKA) had chromium concentrations above 2 µg/l. The concentrations of cobalt, molybdenum and nickel did not change. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) demonstrated a substantial improvement after TKA, without any differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The increase in chromium concentration in the standard group needs further investigation. If surgeons use coated implants, they can be confident that these implants perform as well as standard implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Metal hypersensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implant complications-A retrospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity to metals as a cause of implant-related complications has been a subject of controversy. Projections indicate an increase in the frequency of joint replacements of between 300% and 600% by the year 2030; therefore, this issue is of considerable interest.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate sensitization to implant materials in patients with implant-related complications, to identify allergens, and to clarify whether hypersensitivity is a relevant cause.

METHODS

Patients with implant-related complications or a positive history of contact allergy and planned total joint replacements referred for allergological investigation between 2004 and 2017 were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

In total, 311 patients were included. A positive patch test reaction to a metal was seen in 64.4% of preoperative patients and in 54.6% of patients with implant-related complications. Common alloy metals such as cobalt, chromium and titanium gave positive reactions in up to 2.9% of patients with implant-related complications. None of the patients with skin changes had a positive patch test reaction to an implant metal.

CONCLUSION

Other factors, such as the type of replaced joint and mechanical stress, seem to be more relevant for implant-related complications. Sensitization to metals or other materials seems to rarely play a role, and is overestimated.

Biological effects of metal degradation in hip arthroplasties

Metals and metal alloys are the most used materials in orthopedic implants. The focus is on total hip arthroplasty (THA) that, though well tolerated, may be associated with local and remote adverse effects in the medium-long term. This review aims to summarize data on the biological consequences of the metal implant degradation that have been attributed predominantly to metal-on-metal (MoM) THA. Local responses to metals consist of a broad clinical spectrum ranging from small asymptomatic tissue lesions to severe destruction of bone and soft tissues, which are designated as metallosis, adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD), aseptic lymphocytic vasculitis associated lesion (ALVAL), and pseudotumors. In addition, the dissemination of metal particles and ions throughout the body has been associated with systemic adverse effects, including organ toxicity, cancerogenesis, teratogenicity, and immunotoxicity. As proved by the multitude of studies in this field, metal degradation may increase safety issues associated with THA, especially with MoM hip systems. Data collection regarding local, systemic and long-term effects plays an essential role to better define any safety risks and to generate scientifically based recommendations.

Assessment of Corrosion, Fretting, and Material Loss of Retrieved Modular Total Knee Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Modular junctions in total hip arthroplasties have been associated with fretting, corrosion, and debris release. The purpose of this study is to analyze damage severity in total knee arthroplasties of a single design by qualitative visual assessment and quantitative material loss measurements to evaluate implant performance and patient impact via material loss.

METHODS

Twenty-two modular knee retrievals of the same manufacturer were identified from an institutional review board-approved database. Junction designs included tapers with an axial screw and tapers with a radial screw. Constructs consisted of 2 metal alloys: CoCr and Ti6Al4V. Components were qualitatively scored and quantitatively measured for corrosion and fretting. Negative values represent adhered material. Statistical differences were analyzed using sign tests. Correlations were tested with a Spearman rank order test (P < .05).

RESULTS

The median volumetric material loss and the maximum linear depth for the total population were -0.23 mm³ and 5.84 μm, respectively. CoCr components in mixed metal junctions had higher maximum linear depth (P = .007) than corresponding Ti components. Fretting scores of Ti6Al4V alloy components in mixed metal junctions were statistically higher than the remaining groups. Taper angle did not correlate with material loss.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that CoCr components in mixed metal junctions are more vulnerable to corrosion than other components, suggesting preferential corrosion when interfacing with Ti6Al4V. Overall, although corrosion was noted in this series, material loss was low, and none were revised for clinical metal-related reaction. This suggests the clinical impact from corrosion in total knee arthroplasty is low.

Hypersensitivity to Orthopedic Implants: A Review of the Literature

Awareness of rare etiologies for implant failure is becoming increasingly important. In addition to the overall increase in joint arthroplasties, revision surgeries are projected to increase dramatically in the coming years, with volume increasing up to seven-fold between 2005 and 2030. The literature regarding the relationship between metal allergy and implant failure is controversial. It has proven difficult to determine whether sensitization is a cause or a consequence of implant failure. Testing patients with functional implants is not a clinically useful approach, as the rate of hypersensitivity is higher in implant recipients than in the general population, regardless of the status of the implant. As a result of the ineffectiveness of preoperative patch testing for predicting adverse outcomes, as well as the high cost of implementing such patch testing as standard procedure, most orthopedists and dermatologists agree that an alternative prosthesis should only be considered for patients with a history of allergy to a metal in the standard implant. In patients with a failed implant requiring revision surgery, hypersensitivity to an implant component should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Because a metal allergy to implant components is currently not commonly considered in the differential for joint failure in the orthopedic literature, there should be improved communication and collaboration between orthopedists and dermatologists when evaluating joint replacement patients with a presentation suggestive of allergy.

[Adverse reactions to metal orthopedic implants after knee arthroplasty]

Based on several clinical examples, the range of adverse or hypersensitive reactions to metal implants especially after total knee replacement are presented. In general, we found the patients to generally be women who present with pain, swelling, and local or generalized eczema. Some also present with early aseptic loosening mainly in the first 4 years after implantation. For these patients, a detailed allergy-specific history should be taken and a patch test should be performed; if necessary, blood ion levels should be evaluated to exclude cobaltism. Before revision surgery and exchange of the implant we always perform arthroscopic inspection to obtain biopsies for microbiology and histopathology. Using the Consensus Classification a good evaluation for planning revision with the different implant options is possible.

Allergy in Total Knee Replacement. Does It Exist?: Review Article

BACKGROUND

There is little data on whether preexisting allergies to implant materials and bone cement have an impact on the outcome of TKA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

This review article analyzes the current literature to evaluate the prevalence and importance of metal and cement allergies for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed using the following search criteria: "knee," "arthroplasty," and "allergy" as well as "knee," "arthroplasty," and "hypersensitivity."

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen articles were identified on PubMed, Seventy articles could be excluded by reviewing the title and abstract leaving 46 articles to be included for this review. The majority of the studies cited patch testing as the gold standard for screening and diagnosis of hypersensitivity following TKA. There is consensus that patients with self-reported allergies against metals or bone cement and positive patch test should be treated with hypoallergenic materials or cementless TKA. Treatment options include the following: coated titanium or cobalt-chromium implants, ceramic, or zirconium oxide implants.

CONCLUSION

Allergies against implant materials and bone cement are rare. Patch testing is recommended for patients with self-reported allergies. The use of special implants is recommended for patients with a confirmed allergy.

Metallosis in shoulder arthroplasty: an integrative review of literature

Shoulder arthroplasty has gained popularity as an efficient means of achieving pain relief and improved function in a variety of complex shoulder disorders. Despite promising reports, given the increasing number of shoulder arthroplasty procedures, various causes that may contribute to failure of a well-functioning arthroplasty are being increasingly recognized. One such disastrous condition is metallosis, a subject which has not been much talked off with reference to shoulder arthroplasty. This article besides reviewing the existing literature intends to discuss the possible causes that contribute to metallosis and devise a protocol for its timely diagnosis and management.

[The Berlin diagnostic algorithm for painful knee TKA]

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20% of patients are unsatisfied with their postoperative results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Main causes for revision surgery are periprosthetic infection, aseptic loosing, instability and malalignment. In rare cases secondary progression of osteoarthritis of the patella, periprosthetic fractures, extensor mechanism insufficiency, polyethylene wear and arthrofibrosis can cause the necessity for a reintervention. Identifying the reason for a painful knee arthroplasty can be very difficult, but is a prerequisite for a successful therapy.

AIM

The aim of this article is to provide an efficient analysis of the painful TKA by using a reproducible algorithm.

DISCUSSION

Basic building blocks are the medical history with the core issues of pain character and the time curve of pain concerning surgery. This is followed by the basic diagnostics, including clinical, radiological, and infectiological investigations. Unique failures like periprosthetic infection or aseptic loosening can thereby be diagnosed in the majority of cases. If the cause of pain is not clearly attributable using the basic diagnostics tool, further infectiological investigation or diagnostic imaging are necessary. If the findings are inconsistent, uncommon causes of symptoms, such as extra-articular pathologies, causalgia or arthrofibrosis, have to be considered. In cases of ongoing unexplained pain, a revision is not indicated. These patients should be re-evaluated after a period of time.

Fretting and Corrosion in Modular Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis

Tribocorrosion in taper junctions of retrieved anatomic shoulder arthroplasty implants was evaluated. A comparison of the tribocorrosion between cobalt-chromium and titanium alloy stems was conducted and the observations were correlated with the individual's clinical data. Adverse effects caused by metal debris and subsequent elevated serum metal ion levels are frequently reported in total hip arthroplasty. In total shoulder arthroplasty, to date only a small number of retrieval analyses are available and even fewer address the issue of tribocorrosion at the taper junctions. A total of 36 retrieved hemiarthroplasties and total shoulder arthroplasties were assessed using the modified Goldberg score. The prevalence of fretting and corrosion was confirmed in this cohort. Titanium stems seem to be more susceptible to damage caused by tribocorrosion than cobalt-chromium stems. Furthermore, stemless designs offered less tribocorrosion at the taper junction than stemmed designs. A weak correlation between time to revision and increased levels of tribocorrosion was seen. Whether or not tribocorrosion can lead to adverse clinical reactions and causes failure of shoulder arthroplasties remains to be examined.

Midterm Results After Coated and Uncoated TKA: A Randomized Controlled Study

Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who have hypersensitivity to metals usually receive hypoallergenic TKA implants. Coating of a standard implant is a common solution. Although in vitro tests have demonstrated reduction in polyethylene wear for these coatings, it is unknown whether these costly implants have a clinical benefit for patients. One hundred twenty patients undergoing TKA were randomly assigned to receive a novel 7-layer-coating implant or a standard TKA implant. One revision occurred in the standard group, resulting in a calculated 5-year survival of 100% in the coated group and 98.1% in the standard group. The Oxford Knee Score improved substantially in both groups from a mean of 21.6 points preoperatively in the coated group and 21.9 points in the standard group to 39.2 points and 39.2 points, respectively. The current authors observed no adverse effects with the new coating during midterm follow-up. However, longer follow-up time is needed to evaluate possible advantages of this coating. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(3):S13-S17.].

Allergic reactions in arthroplasty: myth or serious problem?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of sensitisation to chromium, cobalt, nickel, or a cement component in patients who received endoprosthetic surgery at our institution. Also, we aimed to assess the portion related to allergic reactions in endoprosthetic revisions and to follow-up those patients after allergic reaction related revisions.

METHODS

We selected patients with a pre-operative known sensitisation to chromium, cobalt, nickel, or a cement component for a post-operative allergic reaction. All patients who received revision surgery because of a potential allergic reaction were followed up post revision surgery.

RESULTS

Eight hundred fifty-five patients were pre-operative known to have a sensitisation to chromium, cobalt, nickel, or a cement component. Six hundred eighty-two patients (79.8 %) received a primary arthroplasty, and 173 patients (20.2 %) received a revision surgery. Seventeen patients (2.0 %) were revised because of allergic reactions. Allergic reactions were the cause for approximately 0.2 % of all endoprosthetic revisions and for 9.8 % of revisions in patients with sensitisation to one of the reviewed components. Potential allergens were strictly avoided in the replaced prosthesis. Outcome scores improved post-operatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The allergic patient should be thoroughly informed about potential reactions resulting from implant choice. Our study can serve as risk assessments by quantifying the incidence of allergic reactions due to endoprosthetic treatment.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Failure Induced by Metal Hypersensitivity

Patient: Female, 70

Final Diagnosis: Metal hypersensitivity

Symptoms: Joint pain • swelling • instability

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Revision total knee arthroplasty

Specialty: Orthopedics and Traumatology

Shoulder arthroplasty in the patient with metal hypersensitivity

The in vivo effects of metal hypersensitivity remain a topic of much debate. At the core of this debate is the possible, although still hotly contested, link between metal hypersensitivity and poorly functioning or failing implants. There are multiple studies on this topic in the hip and knee arthroplasty literature, but the applicability of this experience to shoulder arthroplasty remains unclear. Although how often metal hypersensitivity affects shoulder arthroplasty patients remains uncertain, a multitude of case reports have implicated metallic implants as a source of local and systemic allergic reactions. We recommend a cautious approach to patients with a history of metal hypersensitivity, including a careful evaluation of suspected metal hypersensitivities in all patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. If available, we recommend a metallic implant with low to no nickel content in patients with metal hypersensitivity. Given the large and increasing, number of total shoulder arthroplasty procedures and the high percentage of the population having a known or suspected metal hypersensitivity, this review is intended to guide and educate the shoulder surgeon in the evaluation and treatment of this patient population and to point out the areas where evidence-based recommendations are lacking.

No clinical benefit of titanium nitride coating in cementless mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Titanium nitride (TiN) coating of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) implants has shown to improve the biomechanical properties of the implant surface and to reduce adhesive wear in vitro. It is yet unknown whether TiN coating of total knee prosthesis (TKP) affects the postoperative clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

In a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial, 101 patients received an uncemented mobile-bearing CoCrMo TKP, either TiN coated or uncoated. Primary outcome measure visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, and secondary outcome measures Knee Society Score (KSS), revision rate and adverse events, range of motion of the knee as well as knee circumference and knee skin temperature were assessed 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 5 years postoperative. Repeated measures analysis was used to evaluate the postoperative outcome measures over time.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the two groups in VAS score, KSS, revision rate, range of motion of the knee, knee circumference and knee skin temperature. There were no adverse events that could be related to the TiN coating.

CONCLUSIONS

TiN-coated TKP does not influence the postoperative outcome of uncemented mobile-bearing TKA regarding postoperative pain, revision rate, range of motion, swelling and temperature of the knee. Therefore, TiN coating of CoCrMo TKP has no clinical benefit on the outcome of cementless mobile-bearing TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level I.

Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: a narrative review

Anterior knee pain is one of the most common causes of persistent problems after implantation of a total knee replacement. It can occur in patients with or without patellar resurfacing. As a result of the surgical procedure itself many changes can occur which may affect the delicate interplay of the joint partners in the patello-femoral joint. Functional causes of anterior knee pain can be distinguished from mechanical causes. The functional causes concern disorders of inter- and intramuscular coordination, which can be attributed to preoperative osteoarthritis. Research about anterior knee pain has shown that not only the thigh muscles but also the hip and trunk stabilising muscles may be responsible for the development of a dynamic valgus malalignment. Dynamic valgus may be a causative factor for patellar maltracking. The mechanical causes of patello-femoral problems after knee replacement can be distinguished according to whether they increase instability in the joint, increase joint pressure or whether they affect the muscular lever arms. These causes include offset errors, oversizing, rotational errors of femoral or tibial component, instability, maltracking and chondrolysis, patella baja and aseptic loosening. In these cases, reoperation or revision is often necessary.