The standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on guidelines

Groove pancreatitis: From enigma to future directions-A comprehensive review

Groove pancreatitis (GP) is a rare and clinically distinct form of chronic pancreatitis affecting the pancreaticoduodenal groove comprising the head of the pancreas, duodenum, and the common bile duct. It is more prevalent in individuals in their 4-5th decade of life and disproportionately affects men compared with women. Excessive alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, pancreatic ductal stones, pancreatic divisum, annular pancreas, ectopic pancreas, duodenal wall thickening, and peptic ulcers are significant risk factors implicated in the development of GP. The usual presenting symptoms include severe abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, weight loss, and jaundice. Establishing a diagnosis of GP is often challenging due to significant clinical and radiological overlap with numerous benign and malignant conditions affecting the same anatomical location. This can lead to a delay in initiation of treatment leading to increasing morbidity, mortality, and complication rates. Promising research in artificial intelligence (AI) has garnered immense interest in recent years. Due to its widespread application in diagnostic imaging with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity, AI has the potential of becoming a vital tool in differentiating GP from pancreatic malignancies, thereby preventing a missed or delayed diagnosis. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of GP, covering the etiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, radiological and endoscopic evaluation, management strategies, and future directions. This article also aims to increase awareness about this lesser known and often-misdiagnosed clinical entity amongst clinicians to ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Utilization of neoadjuvant therapy for localized gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors and the association with survival

BACKGROUND

For gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), neoadjuvant imatinib is most often reserved for tumors near the gastroesophageal junction, multivisceral involvement, or limited metastatic disease. Whether localized gastric GISTs benefit from neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains unknown. We sought to examine factors associated with NAT utilization for localized gastric GISTs and evaluate implications on survival.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database identified patients with localized gastric GISTs treated with NAT (2010-2020), excluding tumors extending beyond the gastric wall, located in the cardia, or with metastatic disease. Multivariable logistic regression assessed characteristics of NAT use. After 1:1 propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression assessed overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 7203 patients, 762 (10.6%) received NAT followed by resection. On multivariable analysis, increasing tumor size was associated with NAT use (<2.0 cm vs 2.0-5.0 cm [odds ratio {OR}, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.19-3.47; P = .010] vs >5 cm [OR, 16.87; 95% CI, 10.02-28.40; P < .001]). After propensity score matching, 1506 patients remained. Median OS for NAT was 46.0 months vs 43.0 months for resection (P = .059), which was independently predictive of improved survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; P = .041). Subgroup analysis by tumor size showed no survival differences for tumors <2.0 cm or from 2.0 to 5.0 cm. Median OS was higher for tumors > 5.0 cm treated with NAT (NAT, 45.4 months [IQR, 29.5-65.9] vs upfront resection, 42.3 months [IQR 26.9-62.8]) and associated with improved survival on multivariable analysis (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99; P = .040).

CONCLUSION

Although patients who received NAT had improved survival, this was primarily due to tumors >5.0 cm. Expanding NAT selection criteria to include localized gastric GISTs >5.0 cm may improve outcomes and warrants investigation through clinical trials.

Efficacy of real-time artificial intelligence-aid endoscopic ultrasonography diagnostic system in discriminating gastrointestinal stromal tumors and leiomyomas: a multicenter diagnostic study

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent the most prevalent type of subepithelial lesions (SELs) with malignant potential. Current imaging tools struggle to differentiate GISTs from leiomyomas. This study aimed to create and assess a real-time artificial intelligence (AI) system using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) images to differentiate between GISTs and leiomyomas.

Methods

The AI system underwent development and evaluation using EUS images from 5 endoscopic centers in China between January 2020 and August 2023. EUS images of 1101 participants with SELs were retrospectively collected for AI system development. A cohort of 241 participants with SELs was recruited for external AI system evaluation. Another cohort of 59 participants with SELs was prospectively enrolled to assess the real-time clinical application of the AI system. The AI system's performance was compared to that of endoscopists. This study is registered with Chictr.org.cn, Number ChiCT2000035787.

Findings

The AI system displayed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.948 (95% CI: 0.921-0.969) for discriminating GISTs and leiomyomas. The AI system's accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) reached 91.7% (95% CI 87.5%-94.6%), 90.3% (95% CI 83.4%-94.5%), 93.0% (95% CI 87.2%-96.3%), 91.9% (95% CI 85.3%-95.7%), and 91.5% (95% CI 85.5%-95.2%), respectively. Moreover, the AI system exhibited excellent performance in diagnosing ≤20 mm SELs (ACC 93.5%, 95% CI 0.900-0.969). In a prospective real-time clinical application trial, the AI system achieved an AUC of 0.865 (95% CI 0.764-0.966) and 0.864 (95% CI 0.762-0.966) for GISTs and leiomyomas diagnosis, respectively, markedly surpassing endoscopists [AUC 0.698 (95% CI 0.562-0.834) for GISTs and AUC 0.695 (95% CI 0.546-0.825) for leiomyomas].

Interpretation

We successfully developed a real-time AI-assisted EUS diagnostic system. The incorporation of the real-time AI system during EUS examinations can assist endoscopists in rapidly and accurately differentiating various types of SELs in clinical practice, facilitating improved diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making.

Funding

Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Shanghai Municipality, Science and Technology Commission Foundation of the Xuhui District, the Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University and the Research Funds of Shanghai Sixth people's Hospital.

Adjuvant imatinib in high-risk resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Merely delaying the inevitable?

INTRODUCTION

Patients with high-risk resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) receiving adjuvant imatinib have improved recurrence-free survival (RFS), however whether a complete cytocidal effect exists is unknown. We investigated this using a normalized recurrence timeline measured from end of oncologic treatment (EOOT), defined as the later of resection or end of adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with resected high-risk GIST at our cancer center from 2003 to 2018. RFS (measured from resection and EOOT), overall survival (OS), and time to imatinib resistance (TTIR) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. The performance of the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) GIST nomogram was assessed.

RESULTS

We identified 86 patients with high-risk GIST with a median 106 months of postsurgical follow-up. One-third (n = 29; 34%) did not receive adjuvant imatinib, while 57 (66%) did for a median of 3 years. The MSK nomogram-predicted 5-year RFS for patients receiving adjuvant imatinib was similar to those who did not (29% vs. 31%, p = 0.64). When RFS was measured from EOOT, the MSK-predicted RFS was independently associated with EOOT RFS (hazard ratio 0.22, p = 0.02), while adjuvant imatinib receipt and duration were not. Neither receipt nor duration of adjuvant imatinib were associated with TTIR or OS (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with adjuvant imatinib delays, but does not clearly impact ultimate recurrence, TTIR, or OS, suggesting many patients with high-risk GIST may receive adjuvant imatinib unnecessarily. Additional studies are needed to establish the benefit of adjuvant therapy versus initiating therapy at first radiographic recurrence.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia in the Last Decade

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are a significant subset of mesenchymal tumors primarily found in the gastrointestinal tract, impacting diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Understanding their epidemiology is crucial for improving patient care and advancing treatment strategies.

METHODOLOGY

Our study at a Saudi tertiary hospital analyzed 50 patients with GIST, focusing on demographics, tumor locations, and risk assessments. We examined predictors of tumor size, including mitosis frequency, and assessed the impact of anatomical location and risk on clinical outcomes using RStudio software (Posit, Boston, MA).

RESULTS

Among 50 patients with GIST, 36 (72.0%) were male with a median age of 60.5 years, and most tumors (33, 66.0%) were in the stomach. Risk assessments categorized tumors as follows: 20 (40.0%) low risk, 12 (24.0%) high risk, 7 (14.0%) moderate risk, 7 (14.0%) very low risk, and 4 (8.0%) no risk. Most tumors were low-grade (41, 82.0%) and nonmetastatic (47, 94.0%), predominantly spindle cell type (37, 74.0%). Tumor size varied significantly across risk categories: high-risk tumors averaged 10.3 cm versus 0.5 cm for no risk and 3.5 cm for very low risk (P < 0.001). Mitosis frequency differed significantly by risk category and tumor grade (P < 0.001). Tumor grade varied notably with risk categories and morphologic types, especially high-grade tumors in high-risk groups (8, 66.7%) and epithelioid tumors (2, 100%). Multivariable analysis identified predictors of tumor size: anatomical location (extra-GI, intra-abdominal; beta = 7.08, P = 0.011) and risk assessment (low risk, beta = 6.91, P = 0.001; moderate risk, beta = 11.2, P < 0.001; high risk, beta = 8.93, P < 0.001). Liver metastasis did not differ significantly across gender, anatomical location, risk assessment, or tumor grade.

CONCLUSIONS

In Saudi Arabia, GISTs predominantly affect males and are primarily located in the stomach. Our findings highlight significant variations in tumor size and grade based on risk assessments and anatomical location. Most GISTs were low-grade, nonmetastatic, and spindle cell type, emphasizing the need for enhanced research to improve diagnostics, tailor treatments, and optimize outcomes in the region.

Preoperative CT-based radiomics and deep learning model for predicting risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are clinically heterogeneous with various malignant potential in different individuals. It is crucial to explore a reliable method for preoperative risk stratification of gastric GISTs noninvasively.

PURPOSE

To establish and evaluate a machine learning model using the combination of computed tomography (CT) morphology, radiomics, and deep learning features to predict the risk stratification of primary gastric GISTs preoperatively.

METHODS

The 193 gastric GISTs lesions were randomly divided into training set, validation set, and test set in a ratio of 6:2:2. The qualitative and quantitative CT morphological features were assessed by two radiologists. The tumors were segmented manually, and then radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics and the deep learning features were extracted using pre-trained Resnet50 from arterial phase and venous phase CT images, respectively. Pearson correlation analysis and recursive feature elimination were used for feature selection. Support vector machines were employed to build a classifier for predicting the risk stratification of GISTs. This study compared the performance of models using different pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to extract deep features for classification, as well as the performance of modeling features from single-phase and dual-phase images. The arterial phase, venous phase and dual-phase machine learning models were built, respectively, and the morphological features were added to the dual-phase machine learning model to construct a combined model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the efficacy of each model. The clinical application value of the combined model was determined through the decision curve analysis (DCA) and the net reclassification index (NRI) was analyzed.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) of the dual-phase machine learning model was 0.876, which was higher than that of the arterial phase model or venous phase model (0.813, 0.838, respectively). The combined model had best predictive performance than the above models with an AUC of 0.941 (95% CI: 0.887-0.974) (p = 0.012, Delong test). DCA demonstrated that the combined model had good clinical application value with an NRI of 0.575 (95% CI: 0.357-0.891).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we established a combined model that incorporated dual-phase morphology, radiomics, and deep learning characteristics, which can be used to predict the preoperative risk stratification of gastric GISTs.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) Mimicking Primary Ovarian Tumors or Metastasizing to the Ovaries: A Systematic Literature Review

Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are a rare neoplasm, sometimes mimicking primary ovarian tumors (OTs) and/or metastasizing to the ovaries (M-OT). We performed a systematic literature review (SLR) of OTs and M-OTs, investigating differences in recurrence-free and overall survival. Methods: Our SLR was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, searching in Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception until 21 April 2024. Results: Overall, 59 OTs (Group 1) and 21 M-OTs (Group 2) were retrieved. The absence of residual disease after surgery was achieved significantly in a higher percentage of patients with Group 1 GISTs (91.5%) compared with Group 2 GISTs (57.1%). Chemotherapy was more frequently administered to Group 2 patients (33% vs. 0%). Recurrence and deaths for disease were significantly more frequent in Group 2 than Group 1 cases (54.5% vs. 6.8%, and 37.5% vs. 9.8%, respectively). Conclusions: GISTs can rarely mimic primary ovarian cancers or even more rarely metastasize to the ovaries. Group 1 GISTs occurred in younger women, were not associated with elevated tumor markers, and had a better prognosis. In contrast, Group 2 GISTs occurred in older women, may exhibit elevated tumor markers, and presented a worse prognosis. However, no significant statistical difference for survival between the two studied groups was detected. Computed tomography scans can define the size of GISTs, which correlate to stage and prognostic risk classes. The gold standard treatment is complete surgical resection, which was achieved in almost all cases of Group 1 GISTs and in half of Group 2. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry are essential for the final diagnosis and guide chemotherapy treatment.

An incidentally found mass on the remnant stomach after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Incidentally found masses are a widely discussed area of medicine, and there are conflicting opinions as to how to deal with these findings, particularly in the stomach-which has limited documentation in the literature. Here we present a middle-aged female who was found to have an incidentally found mass on her remnant stomach 10 years after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 66-year-old female who is 10 years post-op from a RYGB. After a bout of self-resolving diarrheal illness prompted a computed tomography (CT) scan in the emergency department, she was diagnosed with a 9-cm mass on her remnant stomach that after resection was found to be a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with the PDGRRA p.D842V gene mutation.

CONCLUSION

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) outlines guidelines for the workup of abdominal masses. While endoscopic ultrasound is a common step in diagnosis of gastric masses, for a patient who has had a RYGB, access to the remnant stomach, which is no longer a part of the alimentary tract, is not possible. Thus, this patient's mass was surgically resected. Given the low risk of recurrence, her future care consists of follow-up with medical oncology in accordance with the NCCN guidelines.

English version of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) issued by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) have been published in accordance with the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2014 and 2017. A specialized team independent of the working group for the revision performed a systematic review. Since GIST is a rare type of tumor, clinical evidence is not sufficient to answer several clinical and background questions. Thus, in these guidelines, we considered that consensus among the experts who manage GIST, the balance between benefits and harms, patients' wishes, medical economic perspective, etc. are important considerations in addition to the evidence. Although guidelines for the treatment of GIST have also been published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), there are some differences between the treatments proposed in those guidelines and the treatments in the present guidelines because of the differences in health insurance systems among countries.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Originating from the Muscularis Propria

BACKGROUND

The role of endoscopic resection (ER) in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has not been fully elucidated.

AIMS

The purpose of this work was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of ER in patients with GISTs originating from the muscularis propria (MP).

METHODS

A total of 233 consecutive patients with gastric GISTs originating from the MP layer, who underwent ER between February 2012 and May 2023, were included in this study. Clinical characteristics, tumor features, and outcomes were recorded and compared between patients who underwent en bloc resection and piecemeal resection.

RESULTS

Among the 233 patients, the median size of GISTs was 12 mm (range 5-60 mm). Risk assessment categorized 190 patients as very low risk, 26 as low risk, 10 as moderate risk, and 7 as high risk. The procedures performed included endoscopic submucosal excavation (127 cases), endoscopic full-thickness resection (103 cases), and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (3 cases). The complete and R0 resection rate was 93.1%. Complications occurred in 4.7% of cases (perioperative perforations 1.7%, perioperative bleeding 1.3%, both 0.9%), resulting in conversion to surgery in 1.3% of cases. Risk factors associated with piecemeal resection were tumor size [odds ratio (OR) 0.402, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.207-0.783; P = 0.007] and shape (OR 0.045, 95% CI 0.009-0.235; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ER is proven to be an effective and reasonably safe approach for gastric GISTs originating from the MP. Notably, larger tumor size and irregular shape are identified as risk factors for piecemeal resection during ER procedures.

An Extragastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Arising From the Omentum in a Young Hispanic Male

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are neoplasms arising from the bowel wall, most often in the jejunoileum of the small intestine, but rarely from extragastrointestinal locations. GISTs most often occur in patients older than 40 years of age and can present with a multitude of gastrointestinal symptoms. We present a rare case of an extragastrointestinal stromal tumor (EGIST) causing abdominal pain and melena in a 34-year-old Hispanic male. The patient presented with diffuse abdominal pain, melena, and severe anemia. Computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a large mass abutting the small bowel. The patient was taken to surgery where the mass, which appeared to be deriving from the omentum and invading the adjacent small bowel, was completely excised and found to be a spindle cell GIST. Excision margins were determined to be negative, and the patient was started on a tyrosine kinase inhibitor for maintenance therapy. The patient continues to follow up on an outpatient basis for surveillance. This case represents the rare disease entity EGIST presenting outside the typical demographics of the disease in a young patient with no identified previous genetic syndromes. Gross examination of the mass in this case was also atypical given the appearance that the mass was rooted in the omentum and invading the small bowel which would suggest the primary tumor site was extragastrointestinal. This case demonstrates the need to build a differential diagnosis that includes GIST and the ability to successfully treat this disease if it is identified early in the clinical course.

Improved nationwide survival of sarcoma patients with a network of reference centers

BACKGROUND

We investigated the impact of the implementation of a network of reference centers for sarcomas (NETSARC) on the care and survival of sarcoma patients in France since 2010.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs), funded by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) since 2010. Its aims are to improve the quality of diagnosis and care of sarcoma patients. Patients' characteristics, treatments, and outcomes are collected in a nationwide database. The objective of this analysis was to compare the survival of patients in three periods: 2010-2012 (non-exhaustive), 2013-2015, and 2016-2020.

RESULTS

A total of 43 975 patients with sarcomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), or connective tissue tumors of intermediate malignancy were included in the NETSARC+ database since 2010 (n = 9266 before 2013, n = 12 274 between 2013 and 2015, n = 22 435 in 2016-2020). Median age was 56 years, 50.5% were women, and 13.2% had metastasis at diagnosis. Overall survival was significantly superior in the period 2016-2020 versus 2013-2015 versus 2010-2012 for the entire population, for patients >18 years of age, and for both metastatic and non-metastatic patients in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.0001). Over the three periods, we observed a significantly improved compliance to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) nationwide: the proportion of patients biopsied before surgery increased from 62.9% to 72.6%; the percentage of patients presented to NETSARC MDTBs before first surgery increased from 31.7% to 44.4% (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with R0 resection on first surgery increased (from 36.1% to 46.6%), while R2 resection rate decreased (from 10.9% to 7.9%), with a better compliance and improvement in NETSARC centers.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of the national reference network for sarcoma was associated with an improvement of overall survival and compliance to guidelines nationwide in sarcoma patients. Referral to expert networks for sarcoma patients should be encouraged, though a better compliance to CPGs can still be achieved.

Technical outcomes and postprocedural courses of mucosal incision-assisted biopsy for possible gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A series of 48 cases (with video)

Objective

Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB) has been introduced as an alternative to endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for tissue sampling of subepithelial lesions. However, there have been few reports on MIAB, and the evidence is lacking, particularly in small lesions. In this case series, we investigated the technical outcomes and postprocedural influences of MIAB for gastric subepithelial lesions 10 mm or greater in size.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed cases with the intraluminal growth type of possible gastrointestinal stromal tumors, in which MIAB was performed at a single institution between October 2020 and August 2022. Technical success, adverse events, and clinical courses following the procedure were evaluated.

Results

In 48 MIAB cases with a median tumor diameter of 16 mm, the success rate of tissue sampling and the diagnostic rate were 96% and 92%, respectively. Two biopsies were considered sufficient for making the definitive diagnosis. Postoperative bleeding occurred in one case (2%). In 24 cases, surgery has performed a median of two months after MIAB, and no unfavorable findings caused by MIAB were seen intraoperatively. Finally, 23 cases were histologically diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and no patients who underwent MIAB experienced recurrence or metastasis during a median observation period of 13 months.

Conclusions

The data indicated that MIAB appears feasible, safe, and useful for histological diagnosis of gastric intraluminal growth types of possible gastrointestinal stromal tumors, even those of a small size. Postprocedural clinical effects were considered negligible.

Gastric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a case report

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) of the stomach is an uncommon mesenchymal neoplasm. We present a case of gastric submucosal tumor (SMT) where the final diagnosis was IMT.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 69-year-old man presented with a 24-mm SMT on the posterior wall of the middle third of the stomach that was detected by screening upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed that the tumor was well-enhanced. Although endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biopsy was performed, the histological diagnosis was not confirmed preoperatively. Since the tumor was clinically suspected to be a gastrointestinal stromal tumor, we performed gastric wedge resection by laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery. Pathologically, proliferative spindle cells with a positive reaction for smooth muscle actin, negativity for c-kit, desmin, s-100, CD34, STAT-6, β-catenin and anaplastic lymphoma kinase 1 were identified. Hence, the tumor was finally diagnosed as an IMT originating from the stomach.

CONCLUSIONS

When an SMT of the stomach is identified, the possibility of gastric IMT should be considered.

Results of the interim analysis of a prospective, multicenter, observational study of small subepithelial lesions in the stomach

OBJECTIVES

Long-term outcomes of gastric subepithelial lesions have not been elucidated. To reveal the natural history, we initiated a prospective, 10-year follow-up of patients with small (≤20 mm) gastric subepithelial lesions in September 2014. Here, we report the results of an interim analysis of a prospective observational study.

METHODS

In total, 567 patients with 610 lesions were prospectively registered between September 2014 and August 2016. The location, size, morphology, and number of subepithelial lesions were recorded on a web-based case report form. This study has been conducted as an Academic Committee Working Group of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

RESULTS

The endoscopic follow-up period was 4.60 ± 1.73 years (mean ± standard deviation), and survival data were investigated for 5.28 ± 1.68 years. This interim analysis revealed that the estimated cumulative incidence of a size increase ≥5 mm, after accounting for patients' death and resection of the tumor as competing risk events, was 4.5% at 5 years. In addition, the estimated cumulative incidence of lesion size increase ≥5 mm or resection of lesions was 7.9% at 5 years, and that of size increase ≥10 mm or resection of lesions was 4.5% at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that approximately one in 13 patients with small (≤20 mm) gastric subepithelial lesions may require resection or further investigation for increased tumor size (≥5 mm) within 5 years.

A Successful Central Gastrectomy and Gastro-Gastric Anastomosis for a Large Gastric GIST

PURPOSE

Partial gastrectomy is always the preferred technique for GIST resection. Central gastrectomy is a practical technique that can be employed in many situations during the resection of both subepithelial stromal tumors and gastric tumors.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 53-year-old Egyptian female patient with a 15 × 19 cm large fungating gastric GIST managed by central gastrectomy. Central gastrectomy and gastro-gastric anastomosis were performed with negative resection margins, and the patient received post-operative imatinib, achieving disease control throughout an 8-month post-operative follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Central gastrectomy is an effective method of partial gastrectomy that can be considered in GIST resection; however, more studies are needed to evaluate the efficiency of central gastrectomy in terms of long-term follow-up and terms of R0 respectability in gastric cancer.

Utility and costs of surveillance imaging for low- and very low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence on the optimal surveillance approach in patients with low- and very low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors, resulting in inconsistent and arbitrary approaches to surveillance in this population. In this study, we reviewed our institutional approach to surveillance in patients with low- and very low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors and the costs associated with detecting recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adult patients treated for low- and very low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors at our institution from 2010 to 2019. Data collected included patient and tumor characteristics, surgical management, and postoperative follow-up. Surveillance-related expenses were calculated using estimates of average costs obtained from our institution. A cost analysis was performed to evaluate estimated yearly costs based on the surveillance strategy used.

RESULTS

There were 60 patients included. The mean age at diagnosis was 63.9 (±12.5) years. The primary tumor was typically in the stomach (73%; n = 44). Computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast was the most common surveillance modality (total = 226 scans). No recurrences were identified. Median follow-up duration was 49.0 (interquartile range = 19.5-61.5) months. The mean number of surveillance images per patient was 4 (±2.6). Surveillance imaging was obtained more frequently than just annually in 83% (n = 50) of patients, with an estimated yearly cost of $2,840.77 (interquartile range = $2,273.62-$3,895.92) and no detection of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

In this study population, patients with low- and very low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors underwent frequent imaging studies for surveillance with little yield and at substantial cost. Further multi-institutional studies on practice patterns and outcomes of surveillance are warranted to better inform standardized surveillance recommendations.

Endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective study from a large tertiary hospital in China

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

With the continuous development of endoscopic technology, endoscopic resection (ER) has gradually become an optional method for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, studies with a large sample or a long follow-up are lacking. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ER for gastric GISTs in the real-world setting with more than 300 enrolled patients and a follow-up period longer than 45 months.

METHODS

From January 2013 to February 2023, 409 patients with a pathological diagnosis of GISTs after ER were retrospectively enrolled in this study. After excluding 86 patients with non-gastric GISTs, we assessed 323 patients with gastric GISTs. The main outcome measures were en bloc resection, complete resection, residual disease, recurrence, and complications.

RESULTS

There were 194 (60.06%) females and 129 (39.94%) males, and the median age of the included patients was 58 years (51, 63). The median tumor size was 15.0 (10.0, 20.0) mm. According to the modified NIH criteria, 246 (75.85%) patients were classified as very low risk, 62 (19.20%) were classified as low risk, 12 (3.72%) were classified as moderate risk, and 3 (0.93%) were classified as high risk. A total of 287 (88.85%) patients achieved en bloc resection, and 287 (88.85%) also achieved complete resection. Only one patient showed residual and no recurrent lesions were noted during the follow-up. Regarding complications, three patients had complications, with a complication rate of 0.93%, and no severe complications requiring surgical intervention occurred.

CONCLUSION

ER is an appropriate alternative method for the treatment of gastric GISTs, with an en bloc resection rate of 88.85% and a complication rate of 0.93%. No recurrence was noted during follow-up, even for GISTs with piecemeal resection.

KIT mutations and expression: current knowledge and new insights for overcoming IM resistance in GIST

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common sarcoma located in gastrointestinal tract and derived from the interstitial cell of Cajal (ICC) lineage. Both ICC and GIST cells highly rely on KIT signal pathway. Clinically, about 80-90% of treatment-naive GIST patients harbor primary KIT mutations, and special KIT-targeted TKI, imatinib (IM) showing dramatic efficacy but resistance invariably occur, 90% of them was due to the second resistance mutations emerging within the KIT gene. Although there are multiple variants of KIT mutant which did not show complete uniform biologic characteristics, most of them have high KIT expression level. Notably, the high expression level of KIT gene is not correlated to its gene amplification. Recently, accumulating evidences strongly indicated that the gene coding, epigenetic regulation, and pre- or post- protein translation of KIT mutants in GIST were quite different from that of wild type (WT) KIT. In this review, we elucidate the biologic mechanism of KIT variants and update the underlying mechanism of the expression of KIT gene, which are exclusively regulated in GIST, providing a promising yet evidence-based therapeutic landscape and possible target for the conquer of IM resistance. Video Abstract.

Recurrent Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor With Chondroid Differentiation After Imatinib Therapy: An Unusual Case and Literature Review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor in the gastrointestinal tract and is most commonly seen in the stomach. The standard treatment for patients with advanced GISTs include both surgical resection and imatinib therapy. There have been cases that document the alterations of patients' GIST histomorphology both with primary GIST prior to imatinib therapy and with recurrent GIST after imatinib therapy. However, there has been no documented case of a patient who has recurrent GIST with chondroid differentiation at the primary site after imatinib therapy. In this article, we report an incidental finding of a 58-year-old patient who had two treatments of imatinib therapy prior to surgical resection of her recurrent GIST in her stomach. We also explore through a mini-literature review the various cases of GIST with chondroid differentiation that have been reported to compare the histomorphology, immunophenotype, and patient demographic of these cases. This article is significant for reporting a rare finding of GIST after imatinib therapy and highlights the various presentations that GIST could acquire after imatinib therapy that exclude another malignant process, such as chondrosarcoma.

From Black Stools to Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST): A Case Report and Literature Review on This Unsuspected Danger

This case report presents the clinical details of a 42-year-old female without previous medical issues who presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) characterized by melanotic stools. Initial examination revealed mild anemia and subsequent endoscopy identified a 4 cm submucosal gastric mass displaying recent bleeding indicators. Subsequent surgical pathology confirmed a high-grade gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of grade 2 with a heightened risk of recurrence. The significance of this case lies in underscoring the necessity of considering GIST in the differential diagnosis of UGIB, particularly among middle-aged individuals with no identifiable risk factors such as recent or chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, peptic ulcer disease, or alarm symptoms. Early detection and prompt surgical intervention assume paramount importance in enhancing patient outcomes. While complete resection stands as the cornerstone of treatment, adjuvant imatinib therapy is recommended for high-risk patients to mitigate the risk of recurrence.

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumor after bilateral breast cancer with type 1 neurofibromatosis: a case report

BACKGROUND

Young women with NF1 are at a high risk of developing breast cancer. Although they are at risk for abdominal tumors, such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors and neuroendocrine tumors, follow-up strategies for other tumors after breast cancer have not yet been established. Here, we present a case of duodenal neuroendocrine tumor found during follow-up after bilateral mastectomy for breast cancer with type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF1), for which pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and lymphadenectomy were performed.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 46-year-old woman with NF1 was referred to our hospital for treatment of a duodenal submucosal tumor. Her previous operative history included bilateral mastectomy for breast cancer: right total mastectomy and left partial mastectomy performed 9 and 5 years ago, respectively. Her daughter was confirmed to have NF1, but her parents were unclear. Although she had no recurrence or symptoms during the follow-up for her breast cancer, she wished to undergo 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for systemic screening. FDG-PET demonstrated FDG accumulation in the duodenal tumor with a maximum standardized uptake value of 5.78. Endoscopy revealed a 20-mm-diameter tumor in the second duodenal portion, and endoscopic biopsy suggested a NET G1. We performed PD and lymphadenectomy for complete. She was doing well without recurrence and was followed up with PET tomography-computed tomography.

CONCLUSIONS

Early detection of gastrointestinal tumors is difficult, because most of them are asymptomatic. Gastrointestinal screening is important for patients with NF1, and PD with lymphadenectomy is feasible for managing duodenal neuroendocrine tumors, depending on their size.

NTRK2 expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors with a special emphasis on the clinicopathological and prognostic impacts

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are typically characterized by activating mutations of the KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). Recently, the neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion was reported in a small subset of wild-type GIST. We examined trk IHC and NTRK gene expressions in GIST. Pan-trk immunohistochemistry (IHC) was positive in 25 (all 16 duodenal and 9 out of 16 small intestinal GISTs) of 139 cases, and all pan-trk positive cases showed diffuse and strong expression of c-kit. Interestingly, all of these cases showed only trkB but not trkA/trkC expression. Cap analysis of gene expression (CAGE) analysis identified increased number of genes whose promoters were activated in pan-trk/trkB positive GISTs. Imbalanced expression of NTRK2, which suggests the presence of NTRK2 fusion, was not observed in any of trkB positive GISTs, despite higher mRNA expression. TrkB expression was found in duodenal GISTs and more than half of small intestinal GISTs, and this subset of cases showed poor prognosis. However, there was not clear difference in clinical outcomes according to the trkB expression status in small intestinal GISTs. These findings may provide a possible hypothesis for trkB overexpression contributing to the tumorigenesis and aggressive clinical outcome in GISTs of duodenal origin.

Clinical significance of dual-energy dual-layer CT parameters in differentiating small-sized gastrointestinal stromal tumors from leiomyomas

PURPOSE

Small gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) can generally have nonspecific CT findings similar to those with benign submucosal tumors of the stomach. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential dual-layer dual-energy CT (dlDECT) parameters to differentiate small-sized (≤ 4 cm) GISTs from leiomyomas of the stomach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 26 SMTs ≤ 4 cm in diameter with pathological confirmation of either GIST (n = 17) or leiomyoma (n = 9) from May 2018 to January 2022. All patients received contrast-enhanced CT. The normalized iodine concentration (NIC) and spectral slope (λHU) were compared between GIST and leiomyoma. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and the areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated to estimate the diagnostic performance of these markers for differentiating GISTs from leiomyomas.

RESULTS

NIC was significantly higher in GIST than in leiomyoma in the portal (P = 0.0019) and delayed phases (P = 0.0011). λHU was significantly higher in GIST than in leiomyoma in the portal (P = 0.0006) and delayed phases (P = 0.0009). AUC of the ROC curves using NIC to differentiate between GIST and leiomyoma were 0.875 and 0.895 in the portal and delayed phase; using λHU, they were 0.918 and 0.902 in the portal and delayed phase.

CONCLUSION

dlDECT parameters including NIC and λHU show promise as indicators for differentiating small-sized GISTs from leiomyomas.

A radiation-related second primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the bladder

A 69-year-old man underwent 78 Gy/39 Fr of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Seven years after radiotherapy, a nonpapillary bladder tumor was identified. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor was performed, and the pathological diagnosis was spindle cell sarcoma. Immunostaining revealed KIT-, DOG1++, CD34-, Actin++, Cytokeratin-, Desmin-, S100 protein-, and Vimentin++. No tumor recurrence was observed until 17 months after tumor resection. DOG1 is strongly and specifically expressed in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. This was a rare case of bladder gastrointestinal stromal tumor as a radiation-related second primary tumor.

Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers

Background/Aims

The accuracy of endosonographers in diagnosing gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is influenced by experience and subjectivity. Artificial intelligence (AI) has achieved remarkable development in this field. This study aimed to develop an AI-based EUS diagnostic model for the diagnosis of SELs, and evaluated its efficacy with external validation.

Methods

We developed the EUS-AI model with ResNeSt50 using EUS images from two hospitals to predict the histopathology of the gastric SELs originating from muscularis propria. The diagnostic performance of the model was also validated using EUS images obtained from four other hospitals.

Results

A total of 2,057 images from 367 patients (375 SELs) were chosen to build the models, and 914 images from 106 patients (108 SELs) were chosen for external validation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the model for differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and non-GISTs in the external validation sets by images were 82.01%, 68.22%, 86.77%, 59.86%, and 78.12%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in the external validation set by tumors were 83.75%, 71.43%, 89.33%, 60.61%, and 80.56%, respectively. The EUS-AI model showed better performance (especially specificity) than some endosonographers. The model helped improve the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of certain endosonographers.

Conclusions

We developed an EUS-AI model to classify gastric SELs originating from muscularis propria into GISTs and non-GISTs with good accuracy. The model may help improve the diagnostic performance of endosonographers. Further work is required to develop a multi-modal EUS-AI system.

Long-term outcome after surgical resection of non-high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumours without adjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is the most common intra-abdominal sarcoma. Risk classification systems, commonly the modified National Institutes of Health consensus criteria, identify tumour properties relating to patient outcomes. However, owing to limited long-term evidence, most guidelines recommend up to 10-year follow-up for all risk groups except very low-risk GIST.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentre study included patients who had complete resection of primary, non-metastatic GIST from three Scandinavian sarcoma centres: Gothenburg (2004-2020), Stockholm (2000-2019), and Oslo (2000-2017). Medical records were reviewed for clinical details regarding diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, and recurrence-free and disease-specific survival evaluated.

RESULTS

The total cohort consisted of 1213 patients with GIST. High-risk patients and those treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors were excluded. The remaining 649 patients were included in the present analysis: 118 with very low-, 381 with low-, and 150 with intermediate-risk GISTs. Five-year recurrence-free survival rates were 100, 98.5, and 100 per cent for the intermediate-, low-, and very low-risk groups respectively (P = 0.246). Disease-specific survival rates 10 years after surgery were 100, 98.4, and 100 per cent for the intermediate-, low-, and very low-risk groups respectively (P = 0.262).

CONCLUSION

Patients with completely resected non-high-risk GISTs have an excellent long-term outcome, irrespective of risk group. Follow-up programmes to detect disease recurrences in these patients are probably not indicated.

Survival analysis of extragastrointestinal stromal tumors based on the SEER database: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms that originate outside the gastrointestinal tract. However, the population-level survival analysis of EGIST remains poorly grasped. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the survival of EGIST patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with GIST and EGIST between 2000 and 2019 were identified through utilization of the SEER database. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation methodology. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard models were employed to assess the influence of demographic and clinical characteristics on both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 13,330 patients were enrolled in the study, comprising 12,627 diagnosed with GIST and 703 with EGIST. EGIST patients demonstrated significantly poorer OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.732, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.522-1.970, P < 0.001] and CSS (HR 2.167, 95% CI 1.821-2.577, P < 0.001) compared to GIST patients. The mean 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS rates for EGIST patients were 78.3%, 61.9%, 50.5%, and 32.5%, respectively, with corresponding mean CSS rates of 84.3%, 70.8%, 61.3%, and 46.5%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified age, race, sex, grade, size, and surgical type as independent risk factors for OS in EGIST patients, while age, sex, year of diagnosis, grade, surgical type, and radiation therapy were identified as independent risk factors for CSS. Patients with EGIST who underwent surgical treatment exhibited significantly higher 5-year OS rates (49.0% vs. 39.9%, P = 0.035) and CSS rates (63.9% vs. 53.0%, P = 0.028) compared to those who did not undergo surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

EGIST patients have a poorer prognosis compared to GIST patients; however, surgical treatment has been shown to improve the prognosis.

Re-appraisal of the universal definition of tumor rupture among patients with high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Aim

Tumor rupture has been indicated as a risk factor for recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The universal definition of tumor rupture was proposed. This study evaluated whether the universal definition was more accurate in identification of GISTs with high recurrent risk than subjective judgment.

Methods

The study included 507 patients with high-risk GISTs who underwent complete resection between December 2012 and December 2015. We conducted a questionnaire survey in participating institutes to re-diagnose tumor rupture based on the universal definition according to their surgical and pathological findings. We compared the clinical outcomes of tumor rupture based on the definition to those based on the surgeon's judgment and clarified the clinical importance of the rupture.

Results

Sixty-four patients were initially registered to have tumor rupture by surgeon's judgment, and it became 90 patients who had tumor rupture after reevaluation. Although there were significant differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between no rupture and rupture for both initial registration and reevaluation (p = 0.002, <0.001, respectively), a significant difference in overall survival was only observed after reevaluation (p = 0.011). Tumor rupture was significantly associated with large tumor size, mixed cell type in histology, R1 resection, frequent adjuvant therapy and recurrence, but not with location, mitosis, and genotype. Adjuvant therapy more than 3 years improved RFS of patients with tumor rupture.

Conclusion

This study suggested that tumor rupture based on the universal definition more accurately identified GISTs with poor prognostic outcomes than the subjective judgment.

The prognostic role of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with a primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a long-term follow-up study

Background

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is one of the common symptoms of GI stromal tumor (GIST). Although several studies have highlighted its prognostic role, conclusions have been inconsistent. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis of GIST patients with GI bleeding.

Methods

Primary GIST patients who underwent complete resection and did not receive adjuvant imatinib therapy from January 2003 to December 2008 were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate recurrence-free survival (RFS), and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to reduce confounders. A systematic review of the published articles in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Collaboration, and Medline databases was also conducted, and the inclusion criteria were determined using PICOS (patients, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and study design) principles.

Results

In total, 84 patients presenting with GI bleeding and 90 patients without GI bleeding were enrolled in this study. The median time of follow-up was 140 months (range, 10-196 months), and 38 patients developed tumor recurrence/metastasis. For all patients, the multivariate analysis indicated that tumor location [hazard ratio (HR) =3.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.78-6.82, P<0.001], tumor size (HR =1.91, 95% CI: 1.05-3.47, P=0.035), mitotic index (MI; HR =5.69, 95% CI: 2.77-11.67, P<0.001), and age (HR =2.68, 95% CI: 1.49-4.82, P=0.001) were the independent prognostic factors for poor RFS. However, GI bleeding was not associated with RFS (HR =1.21, 95% CI: 0.68-2.14, P=0.518). After PSM, 45 patients from each group were included, and it was found that GI bleeding was still not the independent prognostic factor (HR =1.23, 95% CI: 0.51-2.97, P=0.642). Moreover, the pooled results of our study and six previously reported studies showed that GI bleeding was not the independent prognostic factor (HR =1.45, 95% CI: 0.73-2.86, P=0.287).

Conclusions

In this study, tumor location, tumor size, MI, and age were independent prognostic factors in primary GIST patients who underwent radical resection. However, GI bleeding was not associated with worse RFS.

Case Report: Multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors along with numerous cutaneous neurofibromas: a case description and literature analysis

Multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) combined with cutaneous multiple neurofibromas are clinically rare. This paper presents a case of multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the jejunum of a 68-year-old mother, along with her daughter who also had coexisting cutaneous multiple neurofibromas. The mother had been experiencing repeated melena for over 2 years and had previously been diagnosed with multiple small intestinal masses at other hospitals. Additionally, her 42-year-old daughter was admitted to our department due to recurrent abdominal pain caused by cholecystolithiasis. The mother and daughter both exhibited multiple nodular masses of varying sizes on their skin, including the truncus, limbs, and face, which were diagnosed as neurofibromas. The mother underwent a partial excision of the jejunum and a lateral jejunojejunal anastomosis side-to-side, as well as excision of skin lesions in our department. The final diagnosis of wild-type GISTs associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) was confirmed through postoperative pathology, immunohistochemistry, and genetic testing results. During preoperative gastrointestinal endoscopy and intraoperative laparoscopic exploration of the gastrointestinal tract, no obvious tumors were found in her daughter. A combination of patient observations and a review of relevant literature in the field suggests that when patients present with gastrointestinal symptoms and multiple irregular painless swellings in the skin, it is important to consider the possibility of an association with NF1 and GIST. Additionally, obtaining a detailed family history can save time and improve the diagnosis of patients with both NF1 and GIST. We recommend that even if there are no gastrointestinal manifestations of GISTs in the offspring of newly mutated NF1 patients, regular review of gastroenteroscopy, imaging examination, and long-term follow-up after middle age are still crucial for the early diagnosis and treatment of NF1-related GISTs.

Rare rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor case: A case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare tumors of the gastrointestinal tract accounting for less than 1% of all gut tumors. GISTs occurring in the rectum are extremely rare, and these usually present at an advanced stage compared with other sites.

CASE SUMMARY

A 60-year-old male who presented with features of sensations of rectal tenesmus was referred to our department with a mass in the lower rectum that was detected during a routine checkup. Colonoscopy, transrectal ultrasound, perianal magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonic contrast were used to diagnose the rectum GIST, and then the patient underwent complete transanal resection using the ultrasonic scalpel. The patient was discharged ten days after the operation and was defined as low risk. Therefore, he had no need to receive subsequent adjuvant therapies, and he had not suffered any anal dysfunction or had any evidence of recurrence at follow up.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection with histologically negative margins is the standard curative treatment for rectal GISTs. Appropriate surgical techniques based on the location, size, and resectability of the tumor should attract great attention from clinicians.

Impact of Tumor Size and Management on Survival in Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Society guidelines remain inconsistent on the role of endoscopic and radiographic surveillance as an alternative to surgical resection of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Herein, we aimed to assess survival among patients with gastric GISTs undergoing observation versus surgical resection, stratified by tumor size.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for gastric GISTs < 2 cm diagnosed from 2010-2017. Patients were stratified by management strategy-observation vs surgical resection. The primary outcome, overall survival (OS), was examined with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazard methods. Subgroup analyses were conducted on tumors < 1 cm and 1-2 cm in size.

RESULTS

Altogether, 1208 patients were identified: 439 (36.3%) undergoing observation and 769 (63.7%) receiving surgical resection. In the overall cohort, patients undergoing surgical resection demonstrated improved survival (93.6 vs. 88.8% 5-year OS, p=0.02). In multivariable analysis, upfront surgical resection was not associated with a reduction in mortality; however, there was a significant interaction with tumor size. For patients with tumors < 1 cm, there was no difference in survival based on management strategy. However, resection of tumors 1-2 cm was associated with improved survival relative to surveillance.

CONCLUSIONS

While surgical resection and surveillance were associated with similar survival for patients with gastric GISTs < 1 cm, this NCDB analysis suggests that patients with tumor size ≥ 1 cm may benefit from upfront surgical resection. Prospective studies comparing these two approaches and their impact on recurrence-free and disease-specific survival are needed to better align consensus guidelines and recommendations.

Giant exophytic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) causing gastric outlet obstruction: case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors, mostly located within the stomach. About 30% of GISTs are incidentally diagnosed and as they become symptomatic may be associated with bleeding, bowel obstruction or spontaneous rupture.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a middle-aged patient diagnosed with a giant gastric GIST, which presented for intermittent gastric outlet obstruction symptoms, and emphasize the major imagistic, histopathological, and therapeutic challenges that may be encountered. There are only several cases of gastric exophytic gastric GIST provoking intermittent gastric outlet obstruction. Tumor resection should be adapted to every patient's status, focused on en bloc extraction, with preservation of invaded organs as much as possible.

Radiomics in gastrointestinal stromal tumours: an up-to-date review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours are rare mesenchymal neoplasms originating from the Cajal cells and represent the most common sarcomas in the gastroenteric tract. Symptoms may be absent or non-specific, ranging from fatigue and weight loss to acute abdomen. Nowadays endoscopy, echoendoscopy, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography are the main methods for diagnosis. Because of their rarity, these neoplasms may not be included immediately in the differential diagnosis of a solitary abdominal mass. Radiomics is an emerging technique that can extract medical imaging information, not visible to the human eye, transforming it into quantitative data. The purpose of this review is to demonstrate how radiomics can improve the already known imaging techniques by providing useful tools for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of these tumours.

A CT-based nomogram established for differentiating gastrointestinal heterotopic pancreas from gastrointestinal stromal tumor: compared with a machine-learning model

OBJECTIVE

To identify CT features and establish a nomogram, compared with a machine learning-based model for distinguishing gastrointestinal heterotopic pancreas (HP) from gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 148 patients with pathologically confirmed HP (n = 48) and GIST (n = 100) in the stomach or small intestine that were less than 3 cm in size. Clinical information and CT characteristics were collected. A nomogram on account of lasso regression and multivariate logistic regression, and a RandomForest (RF) model based on significant variables in univariate analyses were established. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, mean area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were carried out to evaluate and compare the diagnostic ability of models.

RESULTS

The nomogram identified five CT features as independent predictors of HP diagnosis: age, location, LD/SD ratio, duct-like structure, and HU lesion/pancreas A. Five features were included in RF model and ranked according to their relevance to the differential diagnosis: LD/SD ratio, HU lesion/pancreas A, location, peritumoral hypodensity line and age. The nomogram and RF model yielded AUC of 0.951 (95% CI: 0.842-0.993) and 0.894 (95% CI: 0.766-0.966), respectively. The DeLong test found no statistically significant difference in diagnostic performance (p > 0.05), but DCA revealed that the nomogram surpassed the RF model in clinical usefulness.

CONCLUSION

Two diagnostic prediction models based on a nomogram as well as RF method were reliable and easy-to-use for distinguishing between HP and GIST, which might also assist treatment planning.

Concurrence of Adenomyoepithelioma of the Breast and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of the Stomach: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) of the breast and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare benign (primarily) tumors observed in the breast and gastrointestinal tract, respectively. The coexistence of both of these rare tumors is extremely rare; therefore, the author describes the clinical presentation and pathophysiological findings of such a unique case in this study. A 56-year-old female patient with no medical history presented with a substantial right breast lump, severe nausea, and vomiting, and suffered from iron deficiency anemia. Radiological observation and a right breast excisional biopsy diagnosed the patient with AME associated with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Endoscopy and a CT scan of the stomach revealed the existence of GIST. This is the first reported case of concurrence of a huge mass of AME and GIST in a patient. Histological and immunohistochemistry tests using p63, SMA, calponin, and Ki67 markers for the breast tumor and DOG-1, CD34, and CD117 markers for the gastric tumor revealed the non-invasive benign state. The patient had a right breast mastectomy with a negative resection margin. AME of the breast and GIST pose diagnostic challenges due to their erratic morphological characteristics and can cause misinterpretation drawn solely from radiological tests. Effective and accurate diagnostics require assessing the histological and immunohistochemistry findings of the tumor to identify the invasiveness of the neoplasm and the associated risk levels. This report, thus, creates awareness among clinicians and pathologists for the consideration of such possibilities and, therefore, conducts the necessary diagnostics and prophylactic treatments.

Transgastric endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for diagnosing gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the jejunum

Watch a video of this article.

From KIT-mutated into wild-type: dedifferentiation of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in adolescent patient-a case report

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, usually found in elderly adults. It is infrequent among pediatric patients and usually differs from adult-type disease in terms of histopathology and molecular features.

Case Description

We describe the management of the disease in a 10-year-old female patient diagnosed with a GIST of the stomach. In total, she has undergone successively total tumor resection, unsuccessful imatinib treatment and subtotal gastric resection at relapse. The first genetic test from primary tumor confirmed KIT mutations in exons 13 and 17, while the repeated genetic screening using tumor sample from subtotal gastric resection revealed no KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA) genes mutations. Such dedifferentiation from adult type (thus KIT-mutated) into wild-type (without KIT or PDGFRA mutation) has not been reported so far to the best of our knowledge. Currently, the patient is observed, and no further pharmacological nor surgical treatment has been administered.

Conclusions

The case underlines the importance of genetic profiling combined with non-standard diagnostics (both histopathological and radiological) due to the treatment efficacy prediction. We moreover emphasize the necessity to create worldwide standards on the diagnostics and treatment of GIST in pediatric patients that would include options of targeted therapies.

Endoscopic ultrasound artificial intelligence-assisted for prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Subepithelial lesions (SELs) are gastrointestinal tumors with heterogeneous malignant potential. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the leading method for evaluation, but without histopathological analysis, precise differentiation of SEL risk is limited. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising aid for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal lesions in the absence of histopathology.

AIM

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted EUS in diagnosing SELs, especially lesions originating from the muscularis propria layer.

METHODS

Electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched. Patients of any sex and > 18 years, with SELs assessed by EUS AI-assisted, with previous histopathological diagnosis, and presented sufficient data values which were extracted to construct a 2 × 2 table. The reference standard was histopathology. The primary outcome was the accuracy of AI for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Secondary outcomes were AI-assisted EUS diagnosis for GIST vs gastrointestinal leiomyoma (GIL), the diagnostic performance of experienced endoscopists for GIST, and GIST vs GIL. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated. The corresponding summary receiver operating characteristic curve and post-test probability were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Eight retrospective studies with a total of 2355 patients and 44154 images were included in this meta-analysis. The AI-assisted EUS for GIST diagnosis showed a sensitivity of 92% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.95; P < 0.01), specificity of 80% (95%CI: 0.75-0.85; P < 0.01), and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.949. For diagnosis of GIST vs GIL by AI-assisted EUS, specificity was 90% (95%CI: 0.88-0.95; P = 0.02) and AUC of 0.966. The experienced endoscopists' values were sensitivity of 72% (95%CI: 0.67-0.76; P < 0.01), specificity of 70% (95%CI: 0.64-0.76; P < 0.01), and AUC of 0.777 for GIST. Evaluating GIST vs GIL, the experts achieved a sensitivity of 73% (95%CI: 0.65-0.80; P < 0.01) and an AUC of 0.819.

CONCLUSION

AI-assisted EUS has high diagnostic accuracy for fourth-layer SELs, especially for GIST, demonstrating superiority compared to experienced endoscopists' and improving their diagnostic performance in the absence of invasive procedures.

Endoscopic resection for the treatment of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A retrospective study from a large tertiary hospital in China

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Few studies on endoscopic resection (ER) for the treatment of non-gastric gastrointestinal (GI) stromal tumors (GISTs) have been conducted, and most have been case reports or case series. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ER for non-gastric GISTs.

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2022, 329 patients who were diagnosed with GISTs underwent ER. After excluding 302 patients with gastric GISTs, we retrospectively assessed the data of 27 patients with non-gastric GISTs. The main outcome measures were en bloc resection, complete resection, residual disease, recurrence, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 15(55.6%) females and 12(44.4%) males with a mean age of 53.8 ± 11.0 years were assessed. There were 19 (70.4%) GISTs in the esophagus, 2 (7.4%) in the duodenum, 3 (11.1%) in the colon and 3 (11.1%) in the rectum. The median tumor size was 12.0 mm (range 4.0-35.0 mm). Most of the GISTs (20, 74.1%) were very low risk, and the remaining 7(25.9%) were low risk. Both en bloc resection and complete resection were achieved in 25(92.6%) patients. Piecemeal resection mainly resulted from a larger tumor size, an irregular shape, and an extraluminal growth pattern. No residual disease or recurrence was noted during the follow-up period. The median operation time was 23 min (range 2-125 min). After excluding the operation time of EER, the operation time was prolonged to 37 min (range 12-125 min). Only one patient experienced mild abdominal pain, leading to a complication rate of 3.7%. No severe complications requiring for surgical interventions occurred.

CONCLUSION

ER was an effective and safe method for non-gastric GISTs in selected cases. GISTs of a small size and regular shape with an intraluminal growth pattern require complete resection.

Machine learning for predicting the risk stratification of 1-5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on CT

BACKGROUD

To predict the malignancy of 1-5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) by machine learning (ML) on CT images using three models - Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT) and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT).

METHODS

231 patients from Center 1 were randomly assigned into the training cohort (n = 161) and the internal validation cohort (n = 70) in a 7:3 ratio. The other 78 patients from Center 2 served as the external test cohort. Scikit-learn software was used to build three classifiers. The performance of the three models were evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the curve (AUC). Diagnostic differences between ML models and radiologists were compared in the external test cohort. Important features of LR and GBDT were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

GBDT outperformed LR and DT with the largest AUC values (0.981 and 0.815) in the training and internal validation cohorts and the greatest accuracy (0.923, 0.833 and 0.844) across all three cohorts. However, LR was found to have the largest AUC value (0.910) in the external test cohort. DT yielded the worst accuracy (0.790 and 0.727) and AUC values (0.803 and 0.700) in both the internal validation cohort and the external test cohort. GBDT and LR performed better than radiologists. Long diameter was demonstrated to be the same and most important CT feature for GBDT and LR.

CONCLUSIONS

ML classifiers, especially GBDT and LR with high accuracy and strong robustness, were considered to be promising in risk classification of 1-5 cm gastric GISTs based on CT. Long diameter was found the most important feature for risk stratification.

Laparoscopic gastric wedge resection and spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy performed on a 6-cm gastric desmoid tumour with pancreatic invasion

Desmoid tumours are rare tumours originating from fibroblasts, and are characterised by local infiltration and no metastasis. When complete resection is possible, surgical resection is considered a first-line treatment. In the case of large desmoid tumours, it is mainly performed by laparotomy, not laparoscopy. We report a case of a 43-year-old female patient presenting with a hypodense mass of approximately 5 cm in the posterior wall of the gastric antrum on computed tomography. There was no history of familial adenomatous polyposis, trauma or abdominal surgery. The patient underwent laparoscopic gastric wedge resection and spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy without peri-operative complications. Pathological analysis revealed a desmoid tumour, which originated from the stomach and invaded the pancreas. Despite the large size and the locally infiltrative characteristics of these tumours, laparoscopic surgery can be an optimal treatment option due to its advantages.

A vanished gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor

BACKGROUND

Local resection is the standard treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a minimally invasive surgery used to resect GISTs. Herein, we report an extremely rare case of a gastric GIST that grossly vanished during LECS.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 50-year-old Japanese female was referred to our hospital after an abnormality was detected during an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at her annual health checkup. Based on EGD, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and computer tomography (CT) findings, the patient was diagnosed with a 50-mm submucosal tumor (SMT) with intraluminal growth on the anterior wall of the lesser curvature of the upper body of the stomach. We routinely use LECS to treat the intraluminal growth type of GISTs. During the intraoperative endoscopy, the intraluminal submucosal tumor, which was detected preoperatively, had vanished. A red-white scar was observed in the regressed tumor region. LECS was performed by resecting at a distance away from the scar tissue and closing the gastric wall with intracavitary sutures. In the evaluation from the tumor section view of the original resected specimen, a 22 × 14 × 8 mm lobular neoplasm was observed that was predominantly located in the gastric submucosa to the muscularis propia. Pathological findings confirmed the diagnosis of GIST with intermediate risk indicated by the Fletcher classification. The patient continued postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with imatinib and no recurrence was detected over 12 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

LECS was performed on the vanished gastric GIST, providing the best surgical treatment and leading to an accurate diagnosis and optimal postoperative care.

Effects of connection-based physician-patient relationships on perceptions of outcome: A vignette experiment

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of media reports of medical outcomes and connection-based medicine on trust in physicians. In "connection-based medicine," people use personal connections to obtain better medical resources.

METHODS

Vignette experiments were used to investigate attitudes toward physicians among 230 cancer patients and their families (Sample 1) and a cross-validated sample of 280 employees from various industries (Sample 2).

RESULTS

For both samples, negative media reports were associated with lower trust in physicians; when the reports were positive, the participants generally perceived physicians as more competent and trustworthy. However, with negative reports, patients and families perceived connection-based physicians as less right and professional than non-connection-based physicians; the public (represented by the employee sample) perceived connection-based physicians as less right than non-connection-based physicians and negative outcomes to be caused more by connection-based physicians than non-connection-based physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical reports can influence the perception of a physician's traits, which are important for trust. Positive reports promote evaluation of Rightness, Attribution, and Professionalism, whereas negative results may elicit the opposite effect, especially for connection-based physicians.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Positive media images of physicians can help facilitate trust. Connection-based medical treatment should be reduced to improve access to medical resources in China.

Prognostic analysis of 2-5 cm diameter gastric stromal tumors with exogenous or endogenous growth

BACKGROUND

There has been limited research on the prognosis differences in patients with gastric stromal tumor invasion of the plasma membrane surface. This study intended to investigate whether there is a difference in prognosis in patients with endogenous or exogenous 2-5 cm diameter GISTs.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological and follow-up data of gastric stromal tumor patients, all of whom underwent surgical resection for primary GIST at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from December 2010 to February 2022. We classified patients based on tumor growth patterns and then investigated the association between tumor growth patterns and clinical outcomes. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan‒Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 496 gastric stromal tumor patients were enrolled in this study, among which 276 patients had tumors of 2-5 cm in diameter. Of these 276 patients, 193 had exogenous tumors, and 83 had endogenous tumors. Tumor growth patterns were significantly related to age, rupture status, resection style, tumor site, tumor size, and intraoperative bleeding. According to Kaplan‒Meier curve analysis, the tumor growth pattern among patients with 2-5 cm diameter tumors was significantly correlated with worse progression-free survival (PFS). Ultimately, multivariate analyses identified the Ki-67 index (P = 0.008), surgical history (P = 0.031), and resection style (P = 0.045) as independent prognostic markers for PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although gastric stromal tumors with a diameter of 2-5 cm are classified as low risk, the prognosis is lower for exogenous tumors than for endogenous tumors, and exogenous gastric stromal tumors have a risk of recurrence. Consequently, clinicians should be vigilant regarding the prognosis of patients with this type of tumor.

Acute abdomen secondary to perforated jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumor and imatinib-related isolated pericardial effusion in a 50-year-old female patient: A case report and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract; occurring most often in the stomach and to a lesser extent in the jejunum. The majority of the tumors express activating mutations in either c-KIT or PDGFRA tyrosine kinases, which respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Jejunal GIST is considered to be extremely rare and challenging to diagnose due to its non-specific presentation. As a result, patients usually present at an advance stage of the disease, making the prognosis poor and difficult to manage.

CASE PRESENTATION

In the present study, we report a 50-year-old female who was diagnosed with metastatic jejunal GIST. She was commenced on Imatinib (TKI) and shortly after she presented to the emergency department with an acute abdomen. A CT scan of the abdomen revealed ischemic changes in the jejunal loops and pneumoperitoneum. The patient required emergency laparotomy due to perforated GIST, and creation of pericardial window due to hemodynamic instability possibly secondary TKI-related isolated pericardial effusion.

CONCLUSION

Jejunal GIST is rare and usually presents as emergency due to obstruction, hemorrhage or rarely perforation. Although, systemic therapy with TKI is the principal treatment for advance disease, Jejunal GIST should be removed surgically. It is surgically challenging due to the anatomical complexity of the tumor. Surgeons treating such patients must be cautious for TKI side effects.

Hypovolemic Shock Revealing a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare neoplasms that originate in the gastrointestinal tract. Due to the nonspecific symptoms, they are often underdiagnosed. Patients typically present with abdominal pain, weight loss, asthenia, or a sensation of a "ball in the stomach." Hypovolemic shock is a rare mode of presentation. The biopsy is often inconclusive, and immunohistochemistry plays a crucial role in diagnosis. Surgery is the treatment of choice for stromal tumors with hemorrhage. Here, we present two cases of patients admitted in critical condition with hypovolemic shock. Laboratory results revealed profound anemia. Upper gastrointestinal exploration demonstrated a tumor in both cases, with normal biopsy findings in one case. However, after partial gastrectomy, pathology results revealed GIST with an immunohistochemistry profile in favor. The mode of presentation in our cases is notable, as hypovolemic shock without apparent external bleeding is an unusual presentation. Therefore, physicians should consider GIST a possible diagnosis when presented with a patient in hypovolemic shock, even without externalized bleeding.

Endoscopic resection of a gastric GI stromal tumor using the helix-snaring technique

Video 1Endoscopic resection of a gastric GI stromal tumor using the helix-snaring technique.