1
|
Morgan MHC, Herbst JH, Fortson BL, Shortt JW, Willis LA, Lokey C, Smith Slep AM, Lorber MF, Huber-Krum S. Evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Essentials for Parenting Toddlers and Preschoolers on parent behavioral outcomes. CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT 2024; 154:106928. [PMID: 39032355 DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's web-based behavioral parent training (BPT) program, Essentials for Parenting Toddlers and Preschoolers (EfP), uses a psychoeducational approach to promote positive parenting and address common parenting challenges. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of EfP on parenting behavior and whether implementation format impacted behavioral outcomes. METHODS A sample of 200 parents of 2- to 4-year-old children were recruited via Internet advertising. Using a repeated single subject, multiple baseline design, parents were randomly assigned to guided navigation (GN; n = 100) or unguided navigation (UN; n = 100) study conditions. Parents were provided secure access to the EfP website and completed 18 weekly surveys. Latent growth curve modeling was used to determine intervention effectiveness on behavioral outcomes. RESULTS Latent growth curve modeling indicated both GN and UN study conditions significantly increased use of praise (β = 0.19, p = 0.038) and commands and consequences (β = 0.17, p < 0.001), and decreased corporal punishment use (β = -0.01, p = 0.017) and attitudes promoting corporal punishment (β = -0.01, p < 0.001) over the study period. The UN condition exhibited a significant initial decrease in time-out use that increased over time to match the GN condition. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of EfP in promoting non-violent parenting behavior and increasing positive parenting techniques. The format of EfP implementation made no difference in parenting behaviors over time. Digital BPT programs like EfP provide access to evidence-informed parenting resources and can enhance positive parenting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Harbert C Morgan
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey H Herbst
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Beverly L Fortson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America; Department of Defense, Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office, Alexandria, VA, United States of America
| | - Joann Wu Shortt
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Leigh A Willis
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Colby Lokey
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | | | | | - Sarah Huber-Krum
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Reproductive Health, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Crealey GE, Hickey G, McGilloway S. A cost-effectiveness analysis of a universal, preventative-focused, parent and infant programme. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:176. [PMID: 38331766 PMCID: PMC10851506 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10492-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study assessed whether a relatively newly developed Parent and Infant (PIN) parenting support programme was cost-effective when compared to services as usual (SAU). METHODS The cost-effectiveness of the PIN programme versus SAU was assessed from an Irish health and social care perspective over a 24-month timeframe and within the context of a non-randomised, controlled before-and-after trial. In total, 163 parent-infant dyads were included in the study (86 intervention, 77 control). The primary outcome measure for the economic evaluation was the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC). RESULTS The average cost of the PIN programme was €647 per dyad. The mean (SE) cost (including programme costs) was €7,027 (SE €1,345) compared to €4,811 (SE €593) in the control arm, generating a (non-significant) mean cost difference of €2,216 (bootstrap 95% CI -€665 to €5,096; p = 0.14). The mean incremental cost-effectiveness of the PIN service was €614 per PSOC unit gained (bootstrap 95% CI €54 to €1,481). The probability that the PIN programme was cost-effective, was 87% at a willingness-to-pay of €1,000 per one unit change in the PSOC. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the PIN programme was cost-effective at a relatively low willingness-to-pay threshold when compared to SAU. This study addresses a significant knowledge gap in the field of early intervention by providing important real world evidence on the implementation costs and cost-effectiveness of a universal early years parenting programme. The challenges involved in assessing the cost-effectiveness of preventative interventions for very young children and their parents are also discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN17488830 (Date of registration: 27/11/15). This trial was retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gráinne Hickey
- Barnardos Ireland, Christchurch Sq., Dublin 8, Dublin, D08DT63, Ireland
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University, Maynooth, W23 F2H6, Co. Kildare, Ireland
| | - Sinead McGilloway
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University, Maynooth, W23 F2H6, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sampaio F, Nystrand C, Feldman I, Mihalopoulos C. Evidence for investing in parenting interventions aiming to improve child health: a systematic review of economic evaluations. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2024; 33:323-355. [PMID: 35304645 PMCID: PMC10869412 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-022-01969-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
A comprehensive review of the economic evidence on parenting interventions targeting different aspects of child health is lacking to support decision-making. The aim of this review is to provide an up to date synthesis of the available health economic evidence for parenting interventions aiming to improve child health. A systematic review was conducted with articles identified through Econlit, Medline, PsychINFO, and ERIC databases. Only full economic evaluations comparing two or more options, considering both costs and outcomes were included. We assessed the quality of the studies using the Drummond checklist. We identified 44 studies of varying quality that met inclusion criteria; 22 targeting externalizing behaviors, five targeting internalizing problems, and five targeting other mental health problems including autism and alcohol abuse. The remaining studies targeted child abuse (n = 5), obesity (n = 3), and general health (n = 4). Studies varied considerably and many suffered from methodological limitations, such as limited costing perspectives, challenges with outcome measurement and short-time horizons. Parenting interventions showed good value for money in particular for preventing child externalizing and internalizing behaviors. For the prevention of child abuse, some programs had the potential of being cost-saving over the longer-term. Interventions were not cost-effective for the treatment of autism and obesity. Future research should include a broader spectrum of societal costs and quality-of-life impacts on both children and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipa Sampaio
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, BMC, Husargatan 3 (Entry A11), 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Camilla Nystrand
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, BMC, Husargatan 3 (Entry A11), 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Inna Feldman
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, BMC, Husargatan 3 (Entry A11), 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yu-Lefler HF, Hsu YJ, Sen A, Marsteller J. Service Utilization for Parent Management of Early Childhood Behavior Problems in a Private Outpatient Behavioral Clinic: The Impact of Out-of-Pocket Cost, Travel Distance, and Initial Treatment Progress. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2023; 50:834-847. [PMID: 37382741 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-023-01282-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Poorly-managed early childhood disruptive behavior disorders (DBDs) have costly psychological and societal burdens. While parent management training (PMT) is recommended to effectively manage DBDs, appointment adherence is poor. Past studies on influential factors of PMT appointment adherence focused on parental factors. Less well studied are social drivers relative to early treatment gains. This study investigated how financial and time cost relative to early gains influence PMT appointment adherence for early childhood DBDs in a clinic of a large behavioral health pediatric hospital from 2016 to 2018. Using information obtained from the clinic's data repository, claims records, public census and geospatial data, we assessed how owed unpaid charges, travel distance from home to clinic, and initial behavioral progress influences total and consistent attendance of appointments for commercially- and publicly-insured (Medicaid and Tricare) patients, controlling for demographic, service, and clinical differences. We further assessed how social deprivation interacted with unpaid charges to influence appointment adherence for commercially-insured patients. Commercially-insured patients had poorer appointment adherence with longer travel distances, or having unpaid charges and greater social deprivation; they also attended fewer total appointments with faster behavioral progress. Comparatively, publicly-insured patients were not affected by travel distance and had higher consistent attendance with faster behavioral progress. Longer travel distance and difficulty paying service costs while living in greater social deprivation are barriers to care for commercially-insured patients. Targeted intervention may be needed for this specific subgroup to attend and stay engaged in treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Fan Yu-Lefler
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Behavioral Psychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, 707 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
- Bureau of Primary Health Care, Health Resources and Services Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA.
| | - Yea-Jen Hsu
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Aditi Sen
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Health Care Cost Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jill Marsteller
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harris A, Jordan N, Carroll AJ, Graham AK, Wilson C, Wilson FA, Berkel C, Smith JD. A budget impact analysis of cost to implement a whole child health focused, family-based intervention in primary care for children with elevated BMI. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:59. [PMID: 37277878 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00429-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the cost of implementing evidence-based interventions (EBIs) is a key determinant of adoption, lack of cost information is widespread. We previously evaluated the cost of preparing to implement Family Check-Up 4 Health (FCU4Health), an individually tailored, evidence-based parenting program that takes a whole child approach, with effects on both behavioral health and health behavior outcomes, in primary care settings. This study estimates the cost of implementation, including preparation. METHODS We assessed the cost of FCU4Health across the preparation and implementation phases spanning 32 months and 1 week (October 1, 2016-June 13, 2019) in a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. This family-level randomized controlled trial took place in Arizona with n = 113 predominantly low-income, Latino families with children ages > 5.5 to < 13 years. Using electronic cost capture and time-based activity-driven methods, budget impact analysis from the perspective of a future FCU4Health adopting entity-namely, ambulatory pediatric care clinicians-was used to estimate the cost of implementation. Labor costs were based on 2021 Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment Statistics, NIH-directed salary cap levels or known salaries, plus fringe benefits at a standard rate of 30%. Non-labor costs were based on actual amounts spent from receipts and invoices. RESULTS The cost of FCU4Health implementation to 113 families was $268,886 ($2380 per family). Actual per family cost varied widely, as individual tailoring resulted in families receiving a range of 1-15 sessions. The estimated cost of replicating implementation for future sites ranged from $37,636-$72,372 ($333-$641 per family). Using our previously reported preparation costs (i.e., $174,489; $1544 per family), with estimated replication costs of $18,524-$21,836 ($164-$193 per family), the total cost of delivering FCU4Health was $443,375 ($3924 per family), with total estimated replication costs of $56,160-$94,208 ($497-$834 per family). CONCLUSIONS This study provides a baseline for costs associated with implementation of an individually tailored parenting program. Results provide critical information for decision makers and a model for future economic analysis and can be used to inform optimization thresholds for implementation and, when necessary, benchmarks for program adaptation to promote scale-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was prospectively registered on January 6, 2017, at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03013309).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Harris
- Health Sciences Integrated PhD Program, Center for Education in Health Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Neil Jordan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Allison J Carroll
- Center for Prevention Implementation Methodology, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Andrea K Graham
- Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Fernando A Wilson
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah Intermountain Healthcare, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, College of Social and Behavioral Science Department of Economics, Matheson Center for Health Care Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Cady Berkel
- Population Health & Integrated Behavioral Health, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Justin D Smith
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah Intermountain Healthcare, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Singh Y. Old enough to offend but not to buy a hamster: the argument for raising the minimum age of criminal responsibility. PSYCHIATRY, PSYCHOLOGY, AND LAW : AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND ASSOCIATION OF PSYCHIATRY, PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW 2023; 30:51-67. [PMID: 36687760 PMCID: PMC9848384 DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2022.2134229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The minimum age of criminal responsibility in Australia is 10 years. The topic of raising the age of criminal responsibility remains a fraught and challenging field of both study and thought. Despite overwhelming evidence to support an increase in the minimum age of criminal responsibility, there remains a resolute opposition in the majority of States in Australia that this age should be raised. However, the grounds for reconsidering the current position are indeed compelling. This paper expounds the persuasive arguments for raising the minimum age of criminal responsibility by examining the current scientific evidence and opinion. Considerations are explored and the relevant literature examined using the author's framework that decisions should be just, scientific, not racist, humane, cost-effective and generally not ludicrous. Principles for an alternative approach to criminalisation and for managing the harmful behaviour of children are then offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolisha Singh
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cox E, Walker S, Blower S, Sampaio F, Bywater T, Richardson G. The cost-effectiveness of a proportionate parenting programme for primary caregivers and their child: an economic evaluation using evidence from the E-SEE Trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:814. [PMID: 35739551 PMCID: PMC9219217 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08220-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Behavioural and mental disorders have become a public health crisis; averting mental ill-health in early years can achieve significant longer-term health benefits and cost savings. This study assesses whether the Enhancing Social-Emotional Health and Wellbeing in the Early Years (E-SEE-Steps)-a proportionate universal delivery model comprising the Incredible Babies book (IY-B) and the Incredible Years Infant (IY-I) and Toddler (IY-T) parenting programmes is cost-effective compared to services as usual (SAU) for the primary caregiver, child and dyad. METHODS Using UK data for 339 primary caregivers from the E-SEE trial, we conducted a within-trial economic evaluation assessing the cost-effectiveness of E-SEE Steps. Health outcomes were expressed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and costs in UK pounds sterling (2018-19). Missing data were populated via multiple imputation and costs and QALYs discounted at 3.5% per annum. Cost-effectiveness results were conducted for primary caregivers, children and dyad using econometric modelling to control for patient co-variables. Uncertainty was explored through scenario and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS The average cost of E-SEE Steps intervention was £458.50 per dyad. E-SEE Steps was associated with modest gains in primary caregiver HRQoL but minor decrements in child HRQoL compared to SAU. For primary caregivers, E-SEE Steps was more effective (0.034 QALYs) and more costly (£446) compared to SAU, with a corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £13,011 per QALY. In children, E-SEE Steps was strictly dominated with poorer outcomes (-0.005 QALYs) and greater costs (£178) relative to SAU. QALY gains in primary caregivers exceeded those QALY losses found in children, meaning E-SEE Steps was more effective (0.031 QALYs) and costly (£621) for the dyad (ICER: £20,062 per QALY). All scenario analyses found E-SEE Steps cost-effective for the dyad at a £30,000 per QALY threshold. Sensitivity analyses found significant cost reductions from expansions in programme delivery and attendance. CONCLUSIONS E-SEE Steps achieved modest health gains in primary caregivers but small negative effects on children and was more costly than SAU. E-SEE Steps appears cost-effective for the dyad, but the results should be interpreted with caution given the potential detrimental impact on children. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN11079129 ; Pre participant trial enrolment, 11/05/2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Cox
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
| | - Simon Walker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sarah Blower
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Filipa Sampaio
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Tracey Bywater
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rissanen E, Kuvaja-Köllner V, Elonheimo H, Sillanmäki L, Sourander A, Kankaanpää E. The long-term cost of childhood conduct problems: Finnish Nationwide 1981 Birth Cohort Study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2022; 63:683-692. [PMID: 34402045 DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Commonly recognized childhood conduct problems often lead to costly problems in adulthood. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term cumulative cost of childhood conduct problems until the age of 30. The costs included inpatient care, nervous system medicine purchases, and criminal offences. METHODS The study used population-based nationwide 1981 birth cohort data. Families and teachers assessed the conduct problems of the eight-year-olds based on Rutter questionnaires. We grouped 5,011 children into low-level of conduct problems (52%), intermediate-level of conduct problems (37%), and high-level of conduct problems (11%) groups, based on combined conduct symptoms scores. The analysis included the cohort data with the Care Register for Health Care, the Drug Prescription Register, and the Finnish Police Register. The cost valuation of service use applied national unit costs in 2016 prices. We used Wilcoxon rank-sum test to test the differences between groups and gender. RESULTS During 1989-2011, average cumulative costs of the high-level (€44,348, p < .001) and the intermediate-level (€19,405, p < .001) of conduct problems groups were higher than the low-level of conduct problems group's (€10,547) costs. In all three groups, the boys' costs were higher than girls' costs. CONCLUSIONS The costs associated with conduct problems in childhood are substantial, showing a clear need for cost-effective interventions. Implementation decisions of interventions benefit from long-term cost-effectiveness modelling studies. Costing studies, like this, provide cost and cost offset information for modelling studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Rissanen
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Virpi Kuvaja-Köllner
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | - Lauri Sillanmäki
- Research Centre for Child Psychiatry, Department of Child Psychiatry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.,INVEST Research Flagship Center, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - André Sourander
- Research Centre for Child Psychiatry, Department of Child Psychiatry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Eila Kankaanpää
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Skarda I, Asaria M, Cookson R. Evaluating childhood policy impacts on lifetime health, wellbeing and inequality: Lifecourse distributional economic evaluation. Soc Sci Med 2022; 302:114960. [PMID: 35477060 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We introduce and illustrate a new framework for distributional economic evaluation of childhood policies that takes a broad and long view of the impacts on health, wellbeing and inequality from a cross-sectoral whole-lifetime perspective. Total lifetime benefits and public cost savings are estimated using lifecourse microsimulation of diverse health, social and economic outcomes for each individual in a general population birth cohort from birth to death. Cost-effectiveness analysis, policy targeting analysis and distributional analysis of inequality impacts are then conducted using an index of lifetime wellbeing that allow comparisons of both value-for-money (efficiency) and distributional impact (equity) from a cross-sectoral lifetime perspective. We illustrate how this framework can be applied in practice by re-evaluating a training programme in England for parents of children at risk of conduct disorder. Our illustration uses a simple index of lifetime wellbeing based on health-related quality of life and consumption, but other indices could be used based on other kinds of outcomes data such as life satisfaction or multidimensional quality of life. We create the detailed underpinning data needed to apply the framework by using a previously published meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to estimate the short-term effects and a previously published lifecourse microsimulation model to extrapolate the long-term effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ieva Skarda
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - Miqdad Asaria
- Department of Health Policy, Cowdray House, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK
| | - Richard Cookson
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bywater T, Berry V, Blower S, Bursnall M, Cox E, Mason-Jones A, McGilloway S, McKendrick K, Mitchell S, Pickett K, Richardson G, Solaiman K, Teare MD, Walker S, Whittaker K. A proportionate, universal parenting programme to enhance social-emotional well-being in infants and toddlers in England: the E-SEE Steps RCT. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH 2022. [DOI: 10.3310/bcfv2964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Mental disorders have become a public health crisis. Early prevention is key. Parenting programmes are effective for children aged ≥ 3 years; however, there is a lack of evidence of their effectiveness for children aged ≤ 2 years.
Objectives
To establish if the model named Enhancing Social–Emotional Health and Well-being in the Early Years (E-SEE) Steps can (1) enhance child social emotional well-being and establish whether or not it is cost-effective at 20 months of age when compared with services as usual; and (2) be delivered as a proportionate universal model with fidelity.
Design
A pragmatic two-arm randomised controlled trial and economic appraisal, with an embedded process evaluation to examine the outcomes, implementation and cost-effectiveness of the intervention, and intervention uptake, compared with services as usual. The study had an external pilot phase (which was originally planned as an internal pilot).
Setting
The intervention was delivered in community settings by early years children’s services and/or public health staff in four sites.
Participants
A total of 341 parents of infants aged ≤ 8 weeks were randomised in a ratio of 5 : 1 (intervention, n = 285; control, n = 56). The target sample was 606 parents.
Intervention
Two Incredible Years® parenting programmes (i.e. infant and toddler) delivered in a proportionate universal model with three levels [one universal (book) and two targeted group-based parenting programmes].
Main outcome measures
Child social and emotional well-being (primary outcome) was assessed using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social and Emotional, 2nd edition, at 2, 9 and 18 months after randomisation. Parent depression (secondary key outcome) was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items. Both questionnaires were eligibility screeners for targeted groups.
Results
The primary outcome analysis provided no evidence that the E-SEE Steps model was effective in enhancing child social and emotional well-being. The adjusted mean difference was 3.02 on the original Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social and Emotional, 2nd edition, in favour of the control [95% confidence interval –0.03 to 6.08; p = 0.052; N = 321 (intervention, n = 268; control, n = 53)]. Analysis of the key secondary outcome (i.e. parent depression levels as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items) provided weak evidence on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items in favour of the intervention (adjusted mean difference –0.61, 95% confidence interval –1.34 to 0.12; p = 0.1). Other secondary outcomes did not differ between arms. The economic analysis showed that the E-SEE Steps model was associated with higher costs and was marginally more effective (0.031 quality-adjusted life-years gained from E-SEE Steps compared with SAU, 95% confidence interval –0.008 to 0.071) than services as usual, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately £20,062 per quality-adjusted life-year compared with services as usual. Overall take-up of the targeted parenting programmes was low. Sites, although enthusiastic, identified barriers to delivering the intervention.
Limitations
The target sample size was not met and the study was not powered to explore the effectiveness of each level of intervention. Most parents in the sample were well educated and, therefore, the results are unlikely to be generalisable, particularly to those at greatest risk of poor social and emotional well-being.
Conclusions
The E-SEE Steps proportionate universal model did not enhance child social and emotional well-being, but generated non-significant improvements in parent health outcomes, resulting in considerable uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. The primary and key secondary outcome gave inconsistent signals. Although, with system changes, increased resources and adaptations to the intervention, the model could be implemented, evidence for positive outcomes from the E-SEE Steps model is poor.
Future work
The universal-level E-SEE Step data (i.e. the Incredible Years book) from the external pilot will be pooled with the main trial data for further exploration up to follow-up 1, which is the time point at which most change was seen.
Trial registration
This trial is registered as ISRCTN11079129.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 10, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracey Bywater
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Vashti Berry
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Sarah Blower
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Edward Cox
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Sinéad McGilloway
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
| | | | - Siobhan Mitchell
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Kate Pickett
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - M Dawn Teare
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, Sheffield, UK
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Simon Walker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Karen Whittaker
- School of Nursing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Davin M, Lavaine E. The role of health at birth and parental investment in early child development: evidence from the French ELFE cohort. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2021; 22:1217-1237. [PMID: 34241718 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01332-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
This paper combines a theoretical and an empirical approach to address how health at birth affects child development. Using a simple theoretical model in which parents invest in their children, we identify the mechanisms through which better health at birth can improve child development. We also emphasise how parental socioeconomic status can shape the effects of health at birth. We perform an empirical analysis on a French cohort of children born in 2011, using a unique dataset ELFE. We identify the effect of birth weight and gestational age on child development at 1 year. The results indicate that only gestational age positively affects early development. We find no empirical evidence for the existence of a severity effect, according to which the adverse effects of poor health at birth are higher for children in low-income families or with poorly educated mothers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Davin
- CEE-M, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, SupAgro, Montpellier, France
- CEE-M, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, SupAgro, Montpellier, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tesson S, Butow PN, Marshall K, Fonagy P, Kasparian NA. Parent-child bonding and attachment during pregnancy and early childhood following congenital heart disease diagnosis. Health Psychol Rev 2021; 16:378-411. [PMID: 33955329 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1927136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Diagnosis and treatment of congenital heart disease (CHD) can present challenges to the developing parent-child relationship due to periods of infant hospitalization and intensive medical care, parent-infant separations, child neurodevelopmental delay and feeding problems, and significant parent and child distress and trauma. Yet, the ways in which CHD may affect the parent-child relationship are not well-understood. We systematically reviewed the evidence on parental bonding, parent-child interaction, and child attachment following CHD diagnosis, according to a pre-registered protocol (CRD42019135687). Six electronic databases were searched for English-language studies comparing a cardiac sample (i.e., expectant parents or parents and their child aged 0-5 years with CHD) with a healthy comparison group on relational outcomes. Of 22 unique studies, most used parent-report measures (73%) and yielded mixed results for parental bonding and parent-child interaction quality. Observational results also varied, although most studies (4 of 6) found difficulties in parent-child interaction on one or more affective or behavioural domains (e.g., lower maternal sensitivity, lower infant responsiveness). Research on parental-fetal bonding, father-child relationships, and child attachment behaviour was lacking. Stronger evidence is needed to determine the nature, prevalence, and predictors of relational disruptions following CHD diagnosis, and to inform targeted screening, prevention, and early intervention programs for at-risk dyads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Tesson
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Heart Centre for Children, The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, Australia
| | - Phyllis N Butow
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kate Marshall
- Heart Centre for Children, The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, Australia.,Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter Fonagy
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nadine A Kasparian
- Heart Centre for Children, The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, Australia.,Cincinnati Children's Center for Heart Disease and Mental Health, Heart Institute and the Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hare MM, Graziano PA. The Cost-Effectiveness of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: Examining Standard, Intensive, and Group Adaptations. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2021; 48:499-513. [PMID: 32935144 PMCID: PMC7960556 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-020-01083-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
This study examined the cost-effectiveness of standard parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT) and three adaptations: intensive-PCIT (I-PCIT), small group PCIT, and large group PCIT. This study used cost-effectiveness analyses to calculate average cost-effectiveness ratios, which represents the average cost for one family to change one standard deviation on each outcome measure: externalizing behavior problems, positive parenting skills, negative parenting skills, child compliance, and parenting stress. While it had the lowest initial set up cost, results indicated that standard PCIT was the least cost-effective option in reducing child disruptive behaviors and in increasing child compliance. Large group PCIT was the most cost-effective in increasing positive parenting skills and child compliance and in reducing negative parenting skills and parenting stress. I-PCIT was the most cost-effective in reducing child disruptive behaviors and the second most cost-effective option in increasing positive parenting skills and child compliance and in decreasing negative parenting. As large group and I-PCIT were the most cost-effective in different domains, both could be recommended to parents as treatment options. Future research should confirm our cost-effective results within community settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan M Hare
- Department of Psychology, Center for Children and Families, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th St., Miami, FL, 33199, USA
| | - Paulo A Graziano
- Department of Psychology, Center for Children and Families, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th St., Miami, FL, 33199, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Economic Return on Investment of Parent Training Programmes for the Prevention of Child Externalising Behaviour Problems. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2021; 47:300-315. [PMID: 31630323 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-019-00984-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Economic models to inform decision-making are gaining popularity, especially for preventive interventions. However, there are few estimates of the long-term returns to parenting interventions used to prevent mental health problems in children. Using data from a randomised controlled trial evaluating five indicated parenting interventions for parents of children aged 5-12, we modeled the economic returns resulting from reduced costs in the health care and education sector, and increased long-term productivity in a Swedish setting. Analyses done on the original trial population, and on various sized local community populations indicated positive benefit-cost ratios. Even smaller local authorities would financially break-even, thus interventions were of good value-for-money. Benefit-cost analyses of such interventions may improve the basis for resource allocation within local decision-making.
Collapse
|
15
|
van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. Problematic cost-utility analysis of interventions for behavior problems in children and adolescents. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev 2020; 2020:89-102. [PMID: 32909695 PMCID: PMC7590126 DOI: 10.1002/cad.20360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Cost–utility analyses are slowly becoming part of randomized control trials evaluating physical and mental health treatments and (preventive) interventions in child and adolescent development. The British National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, for example, insists on the use of gains in Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) to compute the “value for money” of interventions. But what counts as a gain in quality of life? For one of the most widely used instruments, the EuroQol 5 Dimensions scale (EQ‐5D), QALYs are estimated by healthy individuals who provide utility scores for specific health states, assuming that the best life is a life without self‐experienced problems in five domains: mobility, self‐care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The worst imaginable outcome is defined as “a lot of problems” in each of these five domains. The impact of the individual's problems on the social network is not weighted, and important social–developmental domains (externalizing problems, social competence) are missing. Current cost–utility computations based on EQ‐5D favor physical health over mental health, and they rely on adult weights for child and adolescent quality of life. Thus, a level playing field is absent, and developmental expertise is sorely missing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marinus H van IJzendoorn
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Khavjou O, Forehand R. Helping the Noncompliant Child: An Updated Assessment of Program Costs and Cost-Effectiveness. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW 2020; 114:105050. [PMID: 32742049 PMCID: PMC7394389 DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Behavior disorders (BD) in children can lead to delinquency, antisocial behavior, and mental disorders in adulthood. Evidence-based behavioral parent training (BPT) programs have been developed to treat early-onset BDs, yet cost analyses of BPT are deficient. We provide updated estimates of cost and cost-effectiveness of Helping the Noncompliant Child (HNC), a mastery-based BPT, delivered to low-income families. The cost of research-specific activities was $1,152 per family. HNC program delivery costs were $293 per family from a payer perspective, including the cost of therapist time ($275 per family) and non-labor resources, such as supplies and toys ($18 per family). It costs an average of $6 to improve the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory intensity score by each additional point or $171 to improve it by one standard deviation. The cost of delivering the HNC program appears to compare favorably with the costs of similar BPT programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Khavjou
- Corresponding author: Olga Khavjou, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Rd, Durham, NC 27709, tel: 919-541-6689,
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Arundell LL, Greenwood H, Baldwin H, Kotas E, Smith S, Trojanowska K, Cooper C. Advancing mental health equality: a mapping review of interventions, economic evaluations and barriers and facilitators. Syst Rev 2020; 9:115. [PMID: 32456670 PMCID: PMC7251669 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01333-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This work aimed to identify studies of interventions seeking to address mental health inequalities, studies assessing the economic impact of such interventions and factors which act as barriers and those that can facilitate interventions to address inequalities in mental health care. METHODS A systematic mapping method was chosen. Studies were included if they: (1) focused on a population with: (a) mental health disorders, (b) protected or other characteristics putting them at risk of experiencing mental health inequalities; (2) addressed an intervention focused on addressing mental health inequalities; and (3) met criteria for one or more of three research questions: (i) primary research studies (any study design) or systematic reviews reporting effectiveness findings for an intervention or interventions, (ii) studies reporting economic evaluation findings, (iii) primary research studies (any study design) or systematic reviews identifying or describing, potential barriers or facilitators to interventions. A bibliographic search of MEDLINE, HMIC, ASSIA, Social Policy & Practice, Sociological Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts and PsycINFO spanned January 2008 to December 2018. Study selection was performed according to inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and tabulated to map studies and summarise published research on mental health inequalities. A visual representation of the mapping review (a mapping diagram) is included. RESULTS Overall, 128 studies met inclusion criteria: 115 primary studies and 13 systematic reviews. Of those, 94 looked at interventions, 6 at cost-effectiveness and 36 at barriers and facilitators. An existing taxonomy of disparities interventions was used and modified to categorise interventions by type and strategy. Most of the identified interventions focused on addressing socioeconomic factors, race disparities and age-related issues. The most frequently used intervention strategy was providing psychological support. Barriers and associated facilitators were categorised into groups including (not limited to) access to care, communication issues and financial constraints. CONCLUSIONS The mapping review was useful in assessing the spread of literature and identifying highly researched areas versus prominent gaps. The findings are useful for clinicians, commissioners and service providers seeking to understand strategies to support the advancement of mental health equality for different populations and could be used to inform further research and support local decision-making. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura-Louise Arundell
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB UK
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH), Royal College of Psychiatrists, 21 Prescot Street, London, E1 8BB UK
| | - Helen Greenwood
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH), Royal College of Psychiatrists, 21 Prescot Street, London, E1 8BB UK
| | - Helen Baldwin
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH), Royal College of Psychiatrists, 21 Prescot Street, London, E1 8BB UK
| | - Eleanor Kotas
- York Economics Consortium, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Shubulade Smith
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH), Royal College of Psychiatrists, 21 Prescot Street, London, E1 8BB UK
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK
| | - Kasia Trojanowska
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH), Royal College of Psychiatrists, 21 Prescot Street, London, E1 8BB UK
| | - Chris Cooper
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB UK
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nystrand C, Feldman I, Enebrink P, Sampaio F. Cost-effectiveness analysis of parenting interventions for the prevention of behaviour problems in children. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0225503. [PMID: 31790442 PMCID: PMC6886776 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Behavior problems are common among children and place a high disease and financial burden on individuals and society. Parenting interventions are commonly used to prevent such problems, but little is known about their possible longer-term economic benefits. This study modelled the longer-term cost-effectiveness of five parenting interventions delivered in a Swedish context: Comet, Connect, the Incredible Years (IY), COPE, bibliotherapy, and a waitlist control, for the prevention of persistent behavior problems. METHODS A decision analytic model was developed and used to forecast the cost per averted disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) by each parenting intervention and the waitlist control, for children aged 5-12 years. Age-specific cohorts were modelled until the age of 18. Educational and health care sector costs related to behavior problems were included. Active interventions were compared to the waitlist control as well as to each other. RESULTS Intervention costs ranged between US$ 14 (bibliotherapy) to US$ 1,300 (IY) per child, with effects of up to 0.23 averted DALYs per child (IY). All parenting interventions were cost-effective at a threshold of US$ 15,000 per DALY in relation to the waitlist control. COPE and bibliotherapy strongly dominated the other options, and an additional US$ 2,629 would have to be invested in COPE to avert one extra DALY, in comparison to bibliotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Parenting interventions are cost-effective in the longer run in comparison to a waitlist control. Bibliotherapy or COPE are the most efficient options when comparing interventions to one another. Optimal decision for investment should to be based on budget considerations and priority settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Nystrand
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- * E-mail:
| | - Inna Feldman
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Pia Enebrink
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Filipa Sampaio
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gridley N, Blower S, Dunn A, Bywater T, Bryant M. Psychometric Properties of Child (0-5 Years) Outcome Measures as used in Randomized Controlled Trials of Parent Programs: A Systematic Review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2019; 22:388-405. [PMID: 30806864 PMCID: PMC6669186 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-019-00277-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
This systematic review is one of the three which sought to identify measures commonly implemented in parenting program research, and to assess the level of psychometric evidence available for their use with this age group. This review focuses specifically on measures of child social-emotional and behavioral outcomes. Two separate searches of the same databases were conducted; firstly to identify eligible instruments, and secondly to identify studies reporting on the psychometric properties of the identified measures. Five commercial platforms hosting 19 electronic databases were searched from their inception to conducted search dates. Twenty-four measures were identified from Search 1: a systematic search of randomized controlled trial evaluations of parenting programs. For Search 2, inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied to 21,329 articles that described the development and/or validation of the 24 measures identified in Search 1. Thirty articles met the inclusion criteria. resulting in 11 parent report questionnaires and three developmental assessment measures for review. Data were extracted and synthesized to describe the methodological quality of each article using the COSMIN checklist alongside the overall quality rating of the psychometric property reported for each measure. Measure reliability was categorized into four domains (internal consistency, test-re-test, inter-rater, and intra-rater). Measure validity was categorized into four domains (content, structural, convergent/divergent, and discriminant). Results indicated that supporting evidence for included measures is weak. Further work is required to improve the evidence base for those measures designed to assess children's social-emotional and behavioral development in this age group. PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42016039600.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Gridley
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
- Carnegie School of Education, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Blower
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - Abby Dunn
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Tracey Bywater
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Maria Bryant
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lees D, Frampton CM, Merry SN. Efficacy of a Home Visiting Enhancement for High-Risk Families Attending Parent Management Programs: A Randomized Superiority Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2019; 76:241-248. [PMID: 30673062 PMCID: PMC6439828 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Antisocial behavior and adult criminality often have origins in childhood and are best addressed early in the child's life using evidence-based parenting programs. However, families with additional risk factors do not always make sufficient changes while attending such programs; these families may benefit from additional support. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of adding a 10-session, structured home parent support (HPS) intervention to enhance outcomes for high-risk families attending the Incredible Years Parent (IYP) program. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized clinical superiority trial of 126 parents of children aged 3 to 7 years with conduct problems compared the IYP program plus HPS with treatment as usual of the IYP program alone. Child behavior measures were collected before and after treatment and at the 6-month follow-up. Recruitment from 19 IYP groups began February 13, 2013, and follow-up data collection was completed June 4, 2015. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat design with last observation carried forward. Statistical analysis took place from May 20, 2015, to March 31, 2016. INTERVENTION Parents were randomly assigned to receive IYP program plus HPS or IYP alone. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measure was the posttreatment change in Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory Total Problem Scale (ECBI-P) score. Secondary outcomes included maintenance of change on the ECBI-P score, ECBI Intensity Scale score, and Social Competence Scale score at the 6-month follow-up; percentage of child behavior scores in the clinical range after treatment; retention; and attendance. RESULTS A total of 126 parents (112 women and 14 men; mean [SD] age, 34.7 [8.4] years) were included; 63 parents were randomly assigned to each intervention group. Analysis of variance using intention to treat showed no significant difference between groups after treatment (P = .62). At follow-up, there was a medium effect (d = 0.63) showing a significant benefit from IYP plus HPS of 3.6 (95% CI, 0.8-6.5) on the ECBI-P score (F1,124 = 6.3; P = .01). Families receiving the IYP plus HPS intervention had significantly fewer children with child behavior scores in the clinical range after treatment (9 of 51 [17.6%]) compared with families receiving the IYP program alone (18 of 45 [40.0%]), and this status was maintained at follow-up. The HPS intervention had better retention than the IYP program (dropout, 7 [5.6%] vs 16 [12.7%]) as well as better attendance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, the IYP plus HPS intervention significantly improved outcomes for the most vulnerable families at 6 months. This study demonstrated that the HPS intervention is an effective addition to the IYP program to improve engagement and implementation of IYP program strategies and enhance child behavior outcomes for the most vulnerable families. TRIAL REGISTRATION http://anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12612000878875.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianne Lees
- Child Mental Health Service, Tauranga Hospital Bay of Plenty District Health Board, Tauranga, New Zealand
| | - Christopher M. Frampton
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Otago University, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Sally N. Merry
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bywater T, Berry V, Blower SL, Cohen J, Gridley N, Kiernan K, Mandefield L, Mason-Jones A, McGilloway S, McKendrick K, Pickett K, Richardson G, Teare MD, Tracey L, Walker S, Whittaker K, Wright J. Enhancing Social-Emotional Health and Wellbeing in the Early Years (E-SEE): a study protocol of a community-based randomised controlled trial with process and economic evaluations of the incredible years infant and toddler parenting programmes, delivered in a proportionate universal model. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e026906. [PMID: 30573493 PMCID: PMC6303737 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Behavioural and mental disorders have become a public health crisis and by 2020 may surpass physical illness as a major cause of disability. Early prevention is key. Two Incredible Years (IY) parent programmes that aim to enhance child well-being and development, IY Infant and IY Toddler, will be delivered and evaluated in a proportionate universal intervention model called Enhancing Social-Emotional Health and Wellbeing in the Early Years (E-SEE) Steps. The main research question is: Does E-SEE Steps enhance child social emotional well-being at 20 months when compared with services as usual? METHODS AND ANALYSIS E-SEE Steps will be delivered in community settings by Early Years Children's Services and/or Public Health staff across local authorities. Parents of children aged 8 weeks or less, identified by health visitors, children's centre staff or self-referral, are eligible for participation in the trial. The randomisation allocation ratio is 5:1 (intervention to control). All intervention parents will receive an Incredible Years Infant book (universal level), and may be offered the Infant and/or Toddler group-based programme/s-based on parent depression scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire or child social emotional well-being scores on the Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social Emotional, Second Edition (ASQ:SE-2). Control group parents will receive services as usual. A process and economic evaluation are included. The primary outcome for the study is social emotional well-being, assessed at 20 months, using the ASQ:SE-2. Intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses will be conducted. Clustering and hierarchical effects will be accounted for using linear mixed models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approvals have been obtained from the University of York Education Ethics Committee (ref: FC15/03, 10 August 2015) and UK NHS REC 5 (ref: 15/WA/0178, 22 May 2015. The current protocol is Version 9, 26 February 2018. The sponsor of the trial is the University of York. Dissemination of findings will be via peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and public events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN11079129; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracey Bywater
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Vashti Berry
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | | | - Judith Cohen
- Hull Health Trials Unit, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Nicole Gridley
- Carnegie School of Education, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Kathleen Kiernan
- Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, York, UK
| | - Laura Mandefield
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Sinead McGilloway
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland
| | - Kirsty McKendrick
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kate Pickett
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - M Dawn Teare
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Louise Tracey
- Department of Education, University of York, York, UK
| | - Simon Walker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Karen Whittaker
- School of Nursing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Jessica Wright
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
A Universal Early Parenting Education Intervention in Community-Based Primary Care Settings: Development and Installation Challenges. EDUCATION SCIENCES 2018. [DOI: 10.3390/educsci8040178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Prevention and early intervention programmes, which aim to educate and support parents and young children in the earliest stages of the family lifecycle, have become an increasingly popular policy strategy for tackling intergenerational disadvantage and developmental inequality. Evidence-based, joined-up services are recommended as best practice for achieving optimal outcomes for parents and their children; however, there are persistent challenges to the development, adoption and installation of these kinds of initiatives in community-based primary health care settings. In this paper, we present a description of the design and installation of a multi-stakeholder early parenting education and intervention service model called the Parent and Infant (PIN) programme. This new programme is delivered collaboratively on a universal, area-wide basis through routine primary care services and combines standardised parent-training with other group-based supports designed to educate parents, strengthen parenting skills and wellbeing and enhance developmental outcomes in children aged 0–2 years. The programme design was informed by local needs analysis and piloting to establish an in-depth understanding of the local context. The findings demonstrate that a hospitable environment is central to establishing interagency parenting education and supports. Partnership, relationship-building and strategic leadership are vital to building commitment and buy-in for this kind of innovation and programme implementation. A graduated approach to implementation which provides training/education and coaching as well as organisational and administrative supports for practice change, are also important in creating an environment conducive to collaboration. Further research into the impact, implementation and cost-effectiveness of the PIN programme will help to build an understanding of what works for parents and infants, as well as identifying lessons for the development and implementation of other similar complex prevention and intervention programmes elsewhere. This kind of research coupled with the establishment of effective partnerships involving service providers, parents, researchers and policy makers, is necessary to meeting the challenge of improving family education and enhancing the capacity of family services to help promote positive outcomes for children.
Collapse
|
23
|
Roberts R, McCrory E, Joffe H, De Lima N, Viding E. Living with conduct problem youth: family functioning and parental perceptions of their child. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2018; 27:595-604. [PMID: 29204740 PMCID: PMC5945745 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-017-1088-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Parenting children with conduct problems (CP) is challenging, yet very little is known about the impact of the child's behaviour on family functioning or how parents of children with CP perceive their child. The aim of this research was to examine whether families with children with CP and high vs. low levels of callous-unemotional traits (HCU vs. LCU) experience differences in family functioning and parental perceptions. One hundred and one parents/caregivers of boys aged 11-16 [Typically developing (TD) n = 31; CP/HCU n = 35; CP/LCU n = 35] completed the McMaster Family Assessment Device, measuring multiple domains of family functioning. Parents/caregivers also completed a written statement describing their child, used for qualitative analysis. Families with CP/HCU children had poorer affective involvement than TD (p = 0.00; d = - 1.17) and CP/LCU (p = 0.03; d = - 0.62) families. Families with CP/HCU children showed significantly poorer general family functioning (p = 0.04; d = - 0.63) and more poorly defined family roles (p = 0.005; d = - 0.82) than families with TD children. Qualitative analyses indicated that parents/caregivers of CP/HCU children characterised them as having a dichotomous personality and being superficially charming. CP/LCU children were characterised as cheeky and endearing, with parents reporting good rapport. Families with CP/HCU children presented with specific difficulties in affective involvement and parents described challenges which were in line with the child's specific presentation of lack of empathy and shallow affect. These findings may be used to help clinicians identify targets for family interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Roberts
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.
| | - Eamon McCrory
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP UK
| | - Helene Joffe
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP UK
| | - Nicole De Lima
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT UK
| | - Essi Viding
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bee P, Pedley R, Rithalia A, Richardson G, Pryjmachuk S, Kirk S, Bower P. Self-care support for children and adolescents with long-term conditions: the REfOCUS evidence synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundSelf-care support (e.g. education, training, peer/professional support) is intended to enhance the self-care capacities of children and young people, while simultaneously reducing the financial burden facing health-care systems.ObjectivesTo determine which models of self-care support for long-term conditions (LTCs) are associated with significant reductions in health utilisation and costs without compromising outcomes for children and young people.DesignSystematic review with meta-analysis.PopulationChildren and young people aged 0–18 years with a long-term physical or mental health condition (e.g. asthma, depression).InterventionSelf-care support in health, social care, educational or community settings.ComparatorUsual care.OutcomesGeneric/health-related quality of life (QoL)/subjective health symptoms and health service utilisation/costs.DesignRandomised/non-randomised trials, controlled before-and-after studies, and interrupted time series designs.Data sourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ISI Web of Science, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, The Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment database, Paediatric Economic Database Evaluation, IDEAS, reference scanning, targeted author searches and forward citation searching. All databases were searched from inception to March 2015.MethodsWe conducted meta-analyses, simultaneously plotting QoL and health utilisation effects. We conducted subgroup analyses for evidence quality, age, LTC and intervention (setting, target, delivery format, intensity).ResultsNinety-seven studies reporting 114 interventions were included. Thirty-seven studies reported adequate allocation concealment. Fourteen were UK studies. The vast majority of included studies recruited children and young people with asthma (n = 66, 68%). Four per cent of studies evaluated ‘pure’ self-care support (delivered through health technology without additional contact), 23% evaluated facilitated self-care support (≤ 2 hours’/four sessions’ contact), 65% were intensively facilitated (≥ 2 hours’/four sessions’ contact) and 8% were case management (≥ 2 hours’ support with multidisciplinary input). Self-care support was associated with statistically significant, minimal benefits for QoL [effect size (ES) –0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) –0.23 to –0.11], but lacked clear benefit for hospital admissions (ES –0.05, 95% CI –0.12 to 0.03). This finding endured across intervention intensities and LTCs. Statistically significant, minimal reductions in emergency use were observed (ES –0.11, 95% CI –0.17 to –0.04). The total cost analysis was limited by the small number of data. Subgroup analyses revealed statistically significant, minimal reductions in emergency use for children aged ≤ 13 years (ES –0.10, 95% CI –0.17 to –0.04), children and young people with asthma (ES –0.12, 95% CI –0.18 to –0.06) and children and young people receiving ≥ 2 hours per four sessions of support (ES –0.10, 95% CI –0.17 to –0.03). Preliminary evidence suggested that interventions that include the child or young person, and deliver some content individually, may optimise QoL effects. Face-to-face delivery may help to maximise emergency department effects. Caution is required in interpreting these findings.LimitationsIdentification of optimal models of self-care support is challenged by the size and nature of evidence available. The emphasis on meta-analysis meant that a minority of studies with incomplete but potentially relevant data were excluded.ConclusionsSelf-care support is associated with positive but minimal effects on children and young people’s QoL, and minimal, but potentially important, reductions in emergency use. On current evidence, we cannot reliably conclude that self-care support significantly reduces health-care costs.Future workResearch is needed to explore the short- and longer-term effects of self-care support across a wider range of LTCs.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014015452.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penny Bee
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Pedley
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Amber Rithalia
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Steven Pryjmachuk
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Susan Kirk
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gardner F, Leijten P, Mann J, Landau S, Harris V, Beecham J, Bonin EM, Hutchings J, Scott S. Could scale-up of parenting programmes improve child disruptive behaviour and reduce social inequalities? Using individual participant data meta-analysis to establish for whom programmes are effective and cost-effective. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH 2017. [DOI: 10.3310/phr05100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundChild disruptive behavioural problems are a large and costly public health problem. The Incredible Years®(IY) parenting programme has been disseminated across the UK to prevent this problem and shown to be effective in several trials. It is vital for policy to know for which families IY is most effective, to be sure that it helps reduce, rather than widen, socioeconomic inequalities. Individual trials lack power and generalisability to examine differential effects; conventional meta-analysis lacks information about within-trial variability in effects.ObjectivesTo overcome these limitations by pooling individual-level data from the IY parenting trials in Europe to examine to what extent it benefits socially disadvantaged families. Secondary objectives examine (1) additional moderators of effects on child behaviour, (2) wider health benefits and potential harms and (3) costs, cost-effectiveness and potential long-term savings.DesignIndividual participant data meta-analysis of 14 randomised trials of the IY parenting intervention.SettingsUK (eight trials), the Netherlands, Ireland, Norway, Sweden and Portugal.ParticipantsData were from 1799 families, with children aged 2–10 years (mean 5.1 years; 63% boys).InterventionsIY Basic parenting programme.Main outcome measuresPrimary outcome was disruptive child behaviour, determined by the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory Intensity scale (ECBI-I). Secondary outcomes included self-reported parenting practices, parenting stress, mental health, children’s attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and emotional symptoms.ResultsThere were no differential effects of IY on disruptive behaviour in families with different levels of social/socioeconomic disadvantage or differential effects for ethnic minority families, families with different parenting styles, or for children with comorbid ADHD or emotional problems or of different ages. Some moderators were found: intervention effects were strongest in children with more severe baseline disruptive behaviour, in boys, and in children with parents who were more depressed. Wider health benefits included reduced child ADHD symptoms, greater parental use of praise, and reduced harsh and inconsistent discipline. The intervention did not improve parental depression, stress, self-efficacy or children’s emotional problems. Economic data were available for five UK and Ireland trials (maximumn = 608). The average cost per person of the IY intervention was £2414. The probability that the IY intervention is considered cost-effective is 99% at a willingness to pay of £145 per 1-point improvement on the ECBI-I. Estimated longer-term savings over 20 years range from £1000 to £8400 per child, probably offsetting the cost of the intervention.LimitationsLimitations include a focus on one parenting programme; the need to make assumptions in harmonising data; and the fact that data addressed equalities in the effectiveness of, not access to, the intervention.ConclusionsThere is no evidence that the benefits of the IY parenting intervention are reduced in disadvantaged or minority families; benefits are greater in the most distressed families, including parents who are depressed. Thus, the intervention is unlikely to widen socioeconomic inequalities in disruptive behaviour and may have effects in narrowing inequalities due to parent depression. It was as likely to be effective for older as for younger children. It has wider benefits for ADHD and parenting and is likely to be considered to be cost-effective. Researchers/funders should encourage data sharing to test equity and other moderator questions for other interventions; further research is needed on enhancing equality of access to interventions.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Gardner
- Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Centre for Evidence-based Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Patty Leijten
- Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Centre for Evidence-based Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Joanna Mann
- Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Centre for Evidence-based Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sabine Landau
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Victoria Harris
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Beecham
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Eva-Maria Bonin
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | - Stephen Scott
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Duncan KM, MacGillivray S, Renfrew MJ. Costs and savings of parenting interventions: results of a systematic review. Child Care Health Dev 2017; 43:797-811. [PMID: 28557011 DOI: 10.1111/cch.12473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Revised: 03/24/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review of economic evaluations of universal preventative or targeted treatment parenting interventions that aim to enhance parent-infant interaction is primarily intended to inform decision makers who have to make difficult spending decisions, especially at a time of reduced spending allocations. A synthesis of available costs and savings about parenting interventions that set out to enhance parent-infant interaction is presented. This topic is important specifically in view of the UK Governments' emphasis on the equalities agenda and the early years. The benefits of positive early life experiences, which include good parent-infant interaction, are far reaching and may be positively correlated with improved educational, health and well-being outcomes and reduced criminality. METHODS A literature search was undertaken using on-line indexing databases between 2004 and 2014 that included the search terms 'parent', 'infant', 'interaction', 'cost benefit analysis' and their synonyms. RESULTS Despite existing economic studies generally focusing upon targeted short-run outcomes, significant savings were observed in the included studies. Parenting interventions could save the health service around £2.5k per family over 25 years and could save the criminal justice system over £145k per person over the life course. In light of the escalating costs of remedial services, these potential savings may provide the UK and other governments with a robust incentive to invest in early years parenting interventions. CONCLUSIONS Parenting interventions can be economically efficient and return savings on investment. Moreover, and one might argue as a moral imperative of democratic societies, population health can be improved and health inequalities reduced. An important debate is needed about early years policy, to include acknowledgement of the differences between UK and international healthcare systems and the potential savings from the synergistic and spin-off effects of early years interventions to inform decision-making to fund and implement appropriate action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Duncan
- Lecturer in Adult Nursing and Interprofessional Education, University of West London, London, UK
| | - S MacGillivray
- Lead of the Evidence, Synthesis Training and Research Group, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - M J Renfrew
- Professor of Mother and Infant Health, Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lynch FL, Dickerson JF, Pears KC, Fisher PA. Cost Effectiveness of a School Readiness Intervention for Foster Children. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW 2017; 81:63-71. [PMID: 29276324 PMCID: PMC5737933 DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many young children in foster care suffer from emotional and behavior problems due to neglect and abuse. These problems can lead to difficulties in school, and functioning in school is linked to long-term health and development. Early intervention to reduce emotional and behavioral issues can help children successfully transition to school, which can improve long-term outcomes. However, communities need information on relative costs and benefits associated with programs to make informed choices. The objective of this study was to assess cost effectiveness, over 12 months, of the Kids in Transition to School (KITS) intervention compared to usual services available to children in a foster care control group (FCC). METHOD Randomized controlled trial of 192 children in foster care entering kindergarten who were randomized to KITS (n = 102) or FCC (n = 90). KITS includes school readiness groups and parent training over 4 months. Main outcomes were days free from internalizing symptoms (IFD), days free from externalizing behavior (EFD), intervention costs, public agency costs, and incremental cost effectiveness. RESULTS KITS significantly increased IFD and EFD compared to FCC. Average total cost of the intervention was $932 per family. The intervention did not significantly impact usual services. Average incremental cost effectiveness was $64 per IFD and $63 per EFD. CONCLUSIONS The cost of KITS is comparable to, or less than, similar programs, and the intervention is likely to provide significant emotional and behavioral benefits and improvements in school readiness for young children in foster care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances L Lynch
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland
| | - John F Dickerson
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Worldwide, children are often not meeting their developmental potential owing to malnutrition, infection, lack of stimulation, and toxic stress. Children with disabilities are more likely to experience poverty, neglect, and abuse, and are less likely to have adequate access to education and medical care. Early childhood developmental stimulation can improve language, learning, and future participation in communities. Therapeutic supports and endeavors to reduce stigma for people of all abilities strengthen communities and allow for human thriving.
Collapse
|
29
|
Monto S, Penttilä R, Kärri T, Puolakka K, Valpas A, Talonpoika AM. Improving data collection processes for routine evaluation of treatment cost-effectiveness. HEALTH INF MANAG J 2016; 45:45-52. [DOI: 10.1177/1833358316639451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The healthcare system in Finland has begun routine collection of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) information for patients in hospitals to support more systematic cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). This article describes the systematic collection of HRQoL survey data, and addresses challenges in the implementation of patient surveys and acquisition of cost data in the case hospital. Challenges include problems with incomplete data and undefined management processes. In order to support CEA of hospital treatments, improvements are sought from the process management literature and in the observation of healthcare professionals. The article has been written from an information system and process management perspective, concluding that process ownership, automation of data collection and better staff training are keys to generating more reliable data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sari Monto
- LUT School of Business and Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Riku Penttilä
- LUT School of Business and Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Timo Kärri
- LUT School of Business and Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Kari Puolakka
- South Karelia Central Hospital, South Karelia Social and Health Care District, Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Antti Valpas
- South Karelia Central Hospital, South Karelia Social and Health Care District, Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Anna-Maria Talonpoika
- LUT School of Business and Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ulfsdotter M, Lindberg L, Månsdotter A. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Swedish Universal Parenting Program All Children in Focus. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0145201. [PMID: 26681349 PMCID: PMC4683000 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2015] [Accepted: 12/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There are few health economic evaluations of parenting programs with quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) as the outcome measure. The objective of this study was, therefore, to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of the universal parenting program All Children in Focus (ABC). The goals were to estimate the costs of program implementation, investigate the health effects of the program, and examine its cost-effectiveness. METHODS A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted. Costs included setup costs and operating costs. A parent proxy Visual Analog Scale was used to measure QALYs in children, whereas the General Health Questionnaire-12 was used for parents. A societal perspective was adopted, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated. To account for uncertainty in the estimate, the probability of cost-effectiveness was investigated, and sensitivity analyses were used to account for the uncertainty in cost data. RESULTS The cost was € 326.3 per parent, of which € 53.7 represented setup costs under the assumption that group leaders on average run 10 groups, and € 272.6 was the operating costs. For health effects, the QALY gain was 0.0042 per child and 0.0027 per parent. These gains resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the base case of € 47 290 per gained QALY. The sensitivity analyses resulted in ratios from € 41 739 to € 55 072. With the common Swedish threshold value of € 55 000 per QALY, the probability of the ABC program being cost-effective was 50.8 percent. CONCLUSION Our analysis of the ABC program demonstrates cost-effectiveness ratios below or just above the QALY threshold in Sweden. However, due to great uncertainty about the data, the health economic rationale for implementation should be further studied considering a longer time perspective, effects on siblings, and validated measuring techniques, before full scale implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malin Ulfsdotter
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- * E-mail:
| | - Lene Lindberg
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Månsdotter
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Niec LN, Acevedo-Polakovich ID, Abbenante-Honold E, Christian AS, Barnett ML, Aguilar G, Peer SO. Working together to solve disparities: Latina/o parents' contributions to the adaptation of a preventive intervention for childhood conduct problems. Psychol Serv 2015; 11:410-20. [PMID: 25383995 DOI: 10.1037/a0036200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Left untreated, conduct problems can have significant and long-lasting negative effects on children's development. Despite the existence of many effective interventions, U.S. Latina/o children are less likely to access or receive evidence-based services. Seeking to build the foundation to address these service disparities, the current study used a Community-Based Participatory Research approach to examine U.S. Latina/o parents' perceptions of the need for interventions to prevent childhood disruptive behaviors in their community in general, and of an existing evidence-based intervention-parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT)-in particular. Results suggest that parents recognize a need for prevention resources in their community and value most of the core features of PCIT. Nevertheless, important directions for potential adaptation and expansion of PCIT into a prevention approach were identified. Results point to several goals for future study with the potential to ameliorate the unmet mental health needs experienced by U.S. Latina/o families with young children at risk for developing conduct problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa N Niec
- Center for Children, Families and Communities, Central Michigan University
| | | | | | | | - Miya L Barnett
- Center for Children, Families and Communities, Central Michigan University
| | | | - Samuel O Peer
- Center for Children, Families and Communities, Central Michigan University
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sampaio F, Sarkadi A, Salari R, Zethraeus N, Feldman I. Cost and effects of a universal parenting programme delivered to parents of preschoolers. Eur J Public Health 2015; 25:1035-42. [PMID: 26063699 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parenting programmes are effective in improving child behaviour and parental well-being, but long follow-up studies of universally offered programmes are scarce. METHODS A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess the costs and effects of Triple P levels 2-3 on child externalizing behaviours and parental mental health. The programme was offered universally to parents of preschoolers (self-selection allowed). Preschools were randomized to Triple P or a waitlist control. Health outcomes were reduction in externalizing behaviours measured on the Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory-22 and improvement in parental mental health measured on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales collected at baseline, 6-, 12- and 18-month follow-up. Child outcomes were based on 355 children aged 3-5 years (child sample) and parental outcomes on 759 parents (parental sample) with baseline data. Costs were collected from a municipality perspective, including 312 children and 488 parents with baseline data in the intervention preschools. RESULTS Sixty-seven (29%) parents attended the intervention. Triple P showed no significant improvement in child externalizing behaviours or parental mental health at either of the follow-up points. Triple P had an average yearly total cost of 3007 Swedish Krona (SEK) (€323) per child or 1922 SEK (€207) per parent. Running Triple P cost 227 SEK (€24) per child or 145 SEK (€16) per parent yearly. CONCLUSION Offering low intensity levels of Triple P with 29% attendance may not be a reasonable use of public resources, as no evidence of improvement in child externalizing behaviours or parental mental health was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipa Sampaio
- 1 Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Sarkadi
- 1 Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Raziye Salari
- 1 Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 2 Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Stockholm Brain Institute, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Niklas Zethraeus
- 3 Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Inna Feldman
- 1 Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Honeycutt AA, Khavjou OA, Jones DJ, Cuellar J, Forehand RL. Helping the Noncompliant Child: An Assessment of Program Costs and Cost-Effectiveness. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES 2015; 24:499-504. [PMID: 25642124 PMCID: PMC4308978 DOI: 10.1007/s10826-013-9862-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Disruptive behavior disorders (DBD) in children can lead to delinquency in adolescence and antisocial behavior in adulthood. Several evidence-based behavioral parent training (BPT) programs have been created to treat early onset DBD. This paper focuses on one such program, Helping the Noncompliant Child (HNC), and provides detailed cost estimates from a recently completed pilot study for the HNC program. The study also assesses the average cost-effectiveness of the HNC program by combining program cost estimates with data on improvements in child participants' disruptive behavior. The cost and effectiveness estimates are based on implementation of HNC with low-income families. Investigators developed a Microsoft Excel-based costing instrument to collect data from therapists on their time spent delivering the HNC program. The instrument was designed using an activity-based costing approach, where each therapist reported program time by family, by date, and for each skill that the family was working to master. Combining labor and non-labor costs, it is estimated that delivering the HNC program costs an average of $501 per family from a payer perspective. It also costs an average of $13 to improve the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory intensity score by 1 point for children whose families participated in the HNC pilot program. The cost of delivering the HNC program appears to compare favorably with the costs of similar BPT programs. These cost estimates are the first to be collected systematically and prospectively for HNC. Program managers may use these estimates to plan for the resources needed to fully implement HNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda A. Honeycutt
- RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Olga A. Khavjou
- RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Deborah J. Jones
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 3270, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Jessica Cuellar
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 3270, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Stevens M, Harris L, Ellis M, Day C, Beecham J. Investigating changes in use of services by high-need families following the Helping Families Programme, an innovative parenting intervention for children with severe and persistent conduct problems. Child Adolesc Ment Health 2014; 19:185-191. [PMID: 32878371 DOI: 10.1111/camh.12035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interventions aimed at high-need families have difficulty demonstrating short-term impact on child behaviour. Measuring impact on use of services could provide short-term indication of longer term benefits. METHOD During a feasibility pilot study we collected data on service use and attitudes to services from a small sample of parents from high-need families, before and after receiving the Helping Families Programme. RESULTS Respondents provided a range of opinions on a variety of social and community services received. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrates the potential of short-term changes in enhanced service use data for building hypotheses of longer term change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Stevens
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK
| | - Lucy Harris
- Centre for Parent and Child Support, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service Research Unit, Kings College, Institute of Psychiatry, Michael Rutter Centre, London, UK
| | - Megan Ellis
- Centre for Parent and Child Support, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service Research Unit, Kings College, Institute of Psychiatry, Michael Rutter Centre, London, UK
| | - Crispin Day
- Centre for Parent and Child Support, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service Research Unit, Kings College, Institute of Psychiatry, Michael Rutter Centre, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Beecham
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Reducing child conduct disordered behaviour and improving parent mental health in disadvantaged families: a 12-month follow-up and cost analysis of a parenting intervention. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2014; 23:783-94. [PMID: 25183424 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-013-0499-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2013] [Accepted: 11/17/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The effectiveness of the Incredible Years Basic parent programme (IYBP) in reducing child conduct problems and improving parent competencies and mental health was examined in a 12-month follow-up. Pre- to post-intervention service use and related costs were also analysed. A total of 103 families and their children (aged 32-88 months), who previously participated in a randomised controlled trial of the IYBP, took part in a 12-month follow-up assessment. Child and parent behaviour and well-being were measured using psychometric and observational measures. An intention-to-treat analysis was carried out using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA. Pairwise comparisons were subsequently conducted to determine whether treatment outcomes were sustained 1 year post-baseline assessment. Results indicate that post-intervention improvements in child conduct problems, parenting behaviour and parental mental health were maintained. Service use and associated costs continued to decline. The results indicate that parent-focused interventions, implemented in the early years, can result in improvements in child and parent behaviour and well-being 12 months later. A reduced reliance on formal services is also indicated.
Collapse
|
36
|
Batura N, Hill Z, Haghparast-Bidgoli H, Lingam R, Colbourn T, Kim S, Sikander S, Pulkki-Brannstrom AM, Rahman A, Kirkwood B, Skordis-Worrall J. Highlighting the evidence gap: how cost-effective are interventions to improve early childhood nutrition and development? Health Policy Plan 2014; 30:813-21. [PMID: 24963156 PMCID: PMC4451167 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czu055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
There is growing evidence of the effectiveness of early childhood interventions to improve the growth and development of children. Although, historically, nutrition and stimulation interventions may have been delivered separately, they are increasingly being tested as a package of early childhood interventions that synergistically improve outcomes over the life course. However, implementation at scale is seldom possible without first considering the relative cost and cost-effectiveness of these interventions. An evidence gap in this area may deter large-scale implementation, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. We conduct a literature review to establish what is known about the cost-effectiveness of early childhood nutrition and development interventions. A set of predefined search terms and exclusion criteria standardized the search across five databases. The search identified 15 relevant articles. Of these, nine were from studies set in high-income countries and six in low- and middle-income countries. The articles either calculated the cost-effectiveness of nutrition-specific interventions (n = 8) aimed at improving child growth, or parenting interventions (stimulation) to improve early childhood development (n = 7). No articles estimated the cost-effectiveness of combined interventions. Comparing results within nutrition or stimulation interventions, or between nutrition and stimulation interventions was largely prevented by the variety of outcome measures used in these analyses. This article highlights the need for further evidence relevant to low- and middle-income countries. To facilitate comparison of cost-effectiveness between studies, and between contexts where appropriate, a move towards a common outcome measure such as the cost per disability-adjusted life years averted is advocated. Finally, given the increasing number of combined nutrition and stimulation interventions being tested, there is a significant need for evidence of cost-effectiveness for combined programmes. This too would be facilitated by the use of a common outcome measure able to pool the impact of both nutrition and stimulation activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Batura
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK, Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeä University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Child Mental Health Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK, Department of Population Health and Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Health Economics and Systems Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK and Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa
| | - Zelee Hill
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK, Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeä University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Child Mental Health Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK, Department of Population Health and Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Health Economics and Systems Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK and Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa
| | - Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK, Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeä University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Child Mental Health Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK, Department of Population Health and Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Health Economics and Systems Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK and Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa
| | - Raghu Lingam
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK, Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeä University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Child Mental Health Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK, Department of Population Health and Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Health Economics and Systems Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK and Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa
| | - Timothy Colbourn
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK, Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeä University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Child Mental Health Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK, Department of Population Health and Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Health Economics and Systems Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK and Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa
| | - Sungwook Kim
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK, Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeä University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Child Mental Health Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK, Department of Population Health and Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Health Economics and Systems Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK and Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa
| | - Siham Sikander
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK, Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeä University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Child Mental Health Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK, Department of Population Health and Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Health Economics and Systems Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK and Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa
| | - Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brannstrom
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK, Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeä University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Child Mental Health Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK, Department of Population Health and Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Health Economics and Systems Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK and Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa Institute for Global Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK, Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeä University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Child Mental Health Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK, Department of Population Health and Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Health Economics and Systems Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK and Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa
| | - Atif Rahman
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK, Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeä University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Child Mental Health Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK, Department of Population Health and Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Health Economics and Systems Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK and Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa
| | - Betty Kirkwood
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK, Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeä University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Child Mental Health Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK, Department of Population Health and Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Health Economics and Systems Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK and Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa
| | - Jolene Skordis-Worrall
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK, Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeä University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Child Mental Health Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK, Department of Population Health and Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Health Economics and Systems Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK and Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa Institute for Global Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK, Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeä University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Child Mental Health Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK, Department of Population Health and Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Health Economics and Systems Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK and Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa Institute for Global Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK, Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK, Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeä University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Child Mental Health Unit, Unive
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fernandes Azevedo A, Seabra-Santos MJ, Gaspar MF, Homem T. A parent-based intervention programme involving preschoolers with AD/HD behaviours: are children's and mothers' effects sustained over time? Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2014; 23:437-50. [PMID: 23999733 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-013-0470-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2013] [Accepted: 08/18/2013] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
To evaluate the 12-month efficacy of a parent-based intervention programme on children's and mothers' outcomes in a sample of Portuguese preschoolers displaying early hyperactive and inattentive behaviours (AD/HD behaviours), 52 preschool children whose mothers had received the Incredible Years basic parent training (IY) were followed from baseline to 12 months of follow-up. Reported and observational measures were used. Effects were found in the children's reported AD/HD behaviours at home and at school after 12 months. Large effect sizes were also found in mothers' variables: a decrease in self-reported dysfunctional parenting practices and an improved sense of competence and observed positive parenting. However, the improvements in coaching skills that have been observed after 6 months of follow-up decreased over time. No other significant differences were found between 6 and 12 months follow-up, with small effect sizes indicating that the significant post-intervention changes in child and parenting measures were maintained. After 12 months of follow-up, there was a clinically important reduction of over 30 % in reported AD/HD behaviours in 59 % of children. The sustained effects observed both for children and their mothers suggest long-term benefits of IY. Therefore, efforts should be made by Portuguese policy makers and professionals to deliver IY as an early preventive intervention for children displaying early AD/HD behaviours.
Collapse
|
38
|
Furlong M, McGilloway S, Bywater T, Hutchings J, Smith SM, Donnelly M. Cochrane review: behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for early-onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years (Review). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014; 8:318-692. [PMID: 23877886 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early-onset child conduct problems are common and costly. A large number of studies and some previous reviews have focused on behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting interventions, but methodological limitations are commonplace and evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these programmes has been unclear. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for improving child conduct problems, parental mental health and parenting skills. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases between 23 and 31 January 2011: CENTRAL (2011, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1950 to current), EMBASE (1980 to current), CINAHL (1982 to current), PsycINFO (1872 to current), Social Science Citation Index (1956 to current), ASSIA (1987 to current), ERIC (1966 to current), Sociological Abstracts (1963 to current), Academic Search Premier (1970 to current), Econlit (1969 to current), PEDE (1980 to current), Dissertations and Theses Abstracts (1980 to present), NHS EED (searched 31 January 2011), HEED (searched 31 January 2011), DARE (searched 31 January 2011), HTA (searched 31 January 2011), mRCT (searched 29 January 2011). We searched the following parent training websites on 31 January 2011: Triple P Library, Incredible Years Library and Parent Management Training. We also searched the reference lists of studies and reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies if: (1) they involved randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-randomised controlled trials of behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting interventions for parents of children aged 3 to 12 years with conduct problems, and (2) incorporated an intervention group versus a waiting list, no treatment or standard treatment control group. We only included studies that used at least one standardised instrument to measure child conduct problems. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias in the trials and the methodological quality of health economic studies. Two authors also independently extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. MAIN RESULTS This review includes 13 trials (10 RCTs and three quasi-randomised trials), as well as two economic evaluations based on two of the trials. Overall, there were 1078 participants (646 in the intervention group; 432 in the control group). The results indicate that parent training produced a statistically significant reduction in child conduct problems, whether assessed by parents (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.72 to -0.34) or independently assessed (SMD -0.44; 95% CI -0.77 to -0.11). The intervention led to statistically significant improvements in parental mental health (SMD -0.36; 95% CI -0.52 to -0.20) and positive parenting skills, based on both parent reports (SMD -0.53; 95% CI -0.90 to -0.16) and independent reports (SMD -0.47; 95% CI -0.65 to -0.29). Parent training also produced a statistically significant reduction in negative or harsh parenting practices according to both parent reports (SMD -0.77; 95% CI -0.96 to -0.59) and independent assessments (SMD -0.42; 95% CI -0.67 to -0.16). Moreover, the intervention demonstrated evidence of cost-effectiveness. When compared to a waiting list control group, there was a cost of approximately $2500 (GBP 1712; EUR 2217) per family to bring the average child with clinical levels of conduct problems into the non-clinical range. These costs of programme delivery are modest when compared with the long-term health, social, educational and legal costs associated with childhood conduct problems. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting interventions are effective and cost-effective for improving child conduct problems, parental mental health and parenting skills in the short term. The cost of programme delivery was modest when compared with the long-term health, social, educational and legal costs associated with childhood conduct problems. Further research is needed on the long-term assessment of outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairead Furlong
- Department of Psychology, John Hume Building, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Ireland. Mairead.M.Furlong@nuim
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Charles JM, Edwards RT, Bywater T, Hutchings J. Micro-costing in public health economics: steps towards a standardized framework, using the incredible years toddler parenting program as a worked example. PREVENTION SCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH 2014; 14:377-89. [PMID: 23306596 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-012-0302-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Complex interventions, such as parenting programs, are rarely evaluated from a public sector, multi-agency perspective. An exception is the Incredible Years (IY) Basic Parenting Program; which has a growing clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence base for preventing or reducing children's conduct problems. The aim of this paper was to provide a micro-costing framework for use by future researchers, by micro-costing the 12-session IY Toddler Parenting Program from a public sector, multi-agency perspective. This micro-costing was undertaken as part of a community-based randomized controlled trial of the program in disadvantaged Flying Start areas in Wales, U.K. Program delivery costs were collected by group leader cost diaries. Training and supervision costs were recorded. Sensitivity analysis assessed the effects of a London cost weighting and group size. Costs were reported in 2008/2009 pounds sterling. Direct program initial set-up costs were £3305.73; recurrent delivery costs for the program based on eight parents attending a group were £752.63 per child, falling to £633.61 based on 10 parents. Under research contexts (with weekly supervision) delivery costs were £1509.28 per child based on eight parents, falling to £1238.94 per child based on 10 parents. When applying a London weighting, overall program costs increased in all contexts. Costs at a micro-level must be accurately calculated to conduct meaningful cost-effectiveness/cost-benefit analysis. A standardized framework for assessing costs is needed; this paper outlines a suggested framework. In prevention science it is important for decision makers to be aware of intervention costs in order to allocate scarce resources effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Charles
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Institute of Medical and Social Care Research, Bangor University, Dean Street Building, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 1UT, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Giannakopoulos G, Agapidaki E, Dimitrakaki C, Oikonomidou D, Petanidou D, Tsermidou L, Kolaitis G, Tountas Y, Papadopoulou K. Early childhood educators' perceptions of preschoolers' mental health problems: a qualitative analysis. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2014; 13:1. [PMID: 24386965 PMCID: PMC3882325 DOI: 10.1186/1744-859x-13-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2013] [Accepted: 12/26/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early childhood education services create potentially optimal opportunities to identify and respond effectively to preschoolers' mental health problems. However, little is known about the knowledge, skills and competencies of early childhood educators in the area of mental health. The present study aimed to contribute to this field through conducting focus group interviews with professionals from public early childhood education centres in Greece. METHODS Thirty-four educators attended five focus group meetings, with each group consisting of five to nine participants and two discussion facilitators. A thematic analysis was conducted using line-by-line open coding. Constructed codes from the wording used by the participants in the interviews were created, and constant comparisons for developing themes as well as seeking data not conforming to each theme were used independently by two researchers. At the end of this process, no new information was being provided and there was repetition in each of the categories. RESULTS The analysis identified three themes in the data: risk factors for preschoolers' mental health problems, signs of preschoolers' mental health problems and practices of helping preschoolers with mental health problems. Results suggested that early childhood educators had satisfactory awareness of many preschoolers' mental health issues, although they showed a rather limited understanding in some domains. Moreover, they seemed to deliver inadequate practices in responding effectively to children's and families' mental health problems. CONCLUSIONS Best practice training in working with preschoolers, families and mental health services seems essential for helping young children receive the best level of support through early identification and intervention services for possible mental health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Giannakopoulos
- Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Center for Health Services Research, Athens University Medical School, Athens 11527, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Charles JM, Bywater TJ, Edwards RT, Hutchings J, Zou L. Parental depression and child conduct problems: evaluation of parental service use and associated costs after attending the Incredible Years Basic Parenting Programme. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13:523. [PMID: 24350571 PMCID: PMC3893379 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2013] [Accepted: 12/05/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is co-morbidity between parental depression and childhood conduct disorder. The Incredible Years (IY) parenting programmes reduce both conduct disorder in children and depression in their parents. Recent U.K. and Ireland trials of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IY parenting programmes have assessed children's health and social care service use, but little is known about the programme's impact on parental service use. This paper explores whether an above clinical cut-off score on the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI II) is associated with high or low parental health and social care service use in high-risk families receiving the IY Basic Programme. METHODS This is a secondary analysis of a subsample (N = 119) from the first U.K. community-based randomised controlled trial of the 12-week IY Basic Programme (N = 153). Parents with children at risk of developing conduct disorder were randomised to receive the programme or to a waiting-list control group. BDI II total and BDI II clinical depression cut-off scores were compared to frequencies and costs of parents' service use, at baseline, six, twelve and eighteen months post-baseline for the intervention group and at baseline and six months post-baseline for the control group. RESULTS Intervention group parents who scored above the clinical cut-off on the BDI II at baseline used more health and social care services than those who scored below at baseline, six and eighteen months. Significant reductions in service use frequencies were found for the intervention group only. CONCLUSION Parents with higher levels or depression used more health and social care service and parenting programmes have been shown to reduce parental depression and also health and social service use. However, further exploration of depressed parents' service use and the cost implications for publically funded health and social care services is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Charles
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), Institute of Medical and Social Care Research, Bangor University, Dean Street Building, LL57 1UT Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Edginton E. ‘Between the woods and frozen lake’: a child psychotherapist’s experiences of developing a grant application for an RCT feasibility study. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOTHERAPY 2013. [DOI: 10.1080/0075417x.2013.846575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
43
|
Jones DJ, Forehand R, Cuellar J, Parent J, Honeycutt A, Khavjou O, Gonzalez M, Anton M, Newey GA. Technology-enhanced program for child disruptive behavior disorders: development and pilot randomized control trial. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL FOR THE SOCIETY OF CLINICAL CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, DIVISION 53 2013; 43:88-101. [PMID: 23924046 PMCID: PMC3871925 DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2013.822308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Early onset disruptive behavior disorders are overrepresented in low-income families; yet these families are less likely to engage in behavioral parent training (BPT) than other groups. This project aimed to develop and pilot test a technology-enhanced version of one evidence-based BPT program, Helping the Noncompliant Child (HNC). The aim was to increase engagement of low-income families and, in turn, child behavior outcomes, with potential cost-savings associated with greater treatment efficiency. Low-income families of 3- to 8-year-old children with clinically significant disruptive behaviors were randomized to and completed standard HNC (n = 8) or Technology-Enhanced HNC (TE-HNC; n = 7). On average, caregivers were 37 years old; 87% were female, and 80% worked at least part-time. More than half (53%) of the youth were boys; the average age of the sample was 5.67 years. All families received the standard HNC program; however, TE-HNC also included the following smartphone enhancements: (a) skills video series, (b) brief daily surveys, (c) text message reminders, (d) video recording home practice, and (e) midweek video calls. TE-HNC yielded larger effect sizes than HNC for all engagement outcomes. Both groups yielded clinically significant improvements in disruptive behavior; however, findings suggest that the greater program engagement associated with TE-HNC boosted child treatment outcome. Further evidence for the boost afforded by the technology is revealed in family responses to postassessment interviews. Finally, cost analysis suggests that TE-HNC families also required fewer sessions than HNC families to complete the program, an efficiency that did not compromise family satisfaction. TE-HNC shows promise as an innovative approach to engaging low-income families in BPT with potential cost-savings and, therefore, merits further investigation on a larger scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah J. Jones
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Psychology, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Rex Forehand
- Department of Psychology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Jessica Cuellar
- Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Justin Parent
- Department of Psychology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | | | | | - Michelle Gonzalez
- Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Margaret Anton
- Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Simkiss DE, Snooks HA, Stallard N, Kimani PK, Sewell B, Fitzsimmons D, Anthony R, Winstanley S, Wilson L, Phillips CJ, Stewart-Brown S. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a universal parenting skills programme in deprived communities: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2013; 3:bmjopen-2013-002851. [PMID: 23906953 PMCID: PMC3733301 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness and cost utility of a universally provided early years parenting programme. DESIGN Multicentre randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING Early years centres in four deprived areas of South Wales. PARTICIPANTS Families with children aged between 2 and 4 years. 286 families were recruited and randomly allocated to the intervention or waiting list control. INTERVENTION The Family Links Nurturing Programme (FLNP), a 10-week course with weekly 2 h facilitated group sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Negative and supportive parenting, child and parental well-being and costs assessed before the intervention, following the course (3 months) and at 9 months using standardised measures. RESULTS There were no significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes between trial arms at 3 or 9 months. With '+' indicating improvement, difference in change in negative parenting score at 9 months was +0.90 (95%CI -1.90 to 3.69); in supportive parenting, +0.17 (95%CI -0.61 to 0.94); and 12 of the 17 secondary outcomes showed a non-significant positive effect in the FLNP arm. Based on changes in parental well-being (SF-12), the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was estimated to be £34 913 (range 21 485-46 578) over 5 years and £18 954 (range 11 664-25 287) over 10 years. Probability of cost per QALY gained below £30 000 was 47% at 5 years and 57% at 10 years. Attendance was low: 34% of intervention families attended no sessions (n=48); only 47% completed the course (n=68). Also, 19% of control families attended a parenting programme before 9-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Our trial has not found evidence of clinical or cost utility for the FLNP in a universal setting. However, low levels of exposure and contamination mean that uncertainty remains. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13919732.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D E Simkiss
- Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - H A Snooks
- Centre for Health Information, Research and Evaluation, Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK
| | - N Stallard
- Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - P K Kimani
- Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - B Sewell
- Swansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Singleton Park, SA2 8PP, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK
| | - D Fitzsimmons
- Swansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Singleton Park, SA2 8PP, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK
| | - R Anthony
- Centre for Health Information, Research and Evaluation, Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK
| | - S Winstanley
- Centre for Health Information, Research and Evaluation, Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK
| | - L Wilson
- Centre for Health Information, Research and Evaluation, Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK
| | - C J Phillips
- Swansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Singleton Park, SA2 8PP, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK
| | - S Stewart-Brown
- Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lohse T, Lutz PF, Thomann C. Redistributional consequences of early childhood intervention. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2013; 14:373-381. [PMID: 22358455 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-012-0381-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2011] [Accepted: 01/19/2012] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Recently, early investment in the human capital of children from socially disadvantaged environments has attracted a great deal of attention. Programs of such early intervention, aimed at children's health and well-being, are spreading considerably in the US and are currently being tested in several European countries. In a discrete version of the Mirrlees model with a parents' and a children's generation, we model the intra-generational and the inter-generational redistributional consequences of such intervention programs. It turns out that the parents' generation loses whenever such intervention programs are implemented. Furthermore, the rich part of the children's generation always benefits. Despite the expectation that early intervention puts the poor descendants in a better position, our analysis reveals that the poor among the children's generation may even be worse off, if the effect of early intervention on their productivity is not large enough.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Lohse
- Berlin School of Economics and Law, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Jones DJ, Forehand R, Cuellar J, Kincaid C, Parent J, Fenton N, Goodrum N. Harnessing innovative technologies to advance children's mental health: behavioral parent training as an example. Clin Psychol Rev 2013; 33:241-52. [PMID: 23313761 PMCID: PMC3566281 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2011] [Revised: 11/15/2012] [Accepted: 11/22/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Disruptive behaviors of childhood are among the most common reasons for referral of children to mental health professionals. Behavioral parent training (BPT) is the most efficacious intervention for these problem behaviors, yet BPT is substantially underutilized beyond university research and clinic settings. With the aim of addressing this research-to-practice gap, this article highlights the considerable, but largely unrealized, potential for technology to overcome the two most pressing challenges hindering the diffusion of BPT: (1). The dearth of BPT training and supervision opportunities for therapists who work with families of children with disruptive behaviors; and (2). The failure to engage and retain families in BPT services when services are available. To this end, this review presents a theoretical framework to guide technological innovations in BPT and highlights examples of how technology is currently being harnessed to overcome these challenges. This review also discusses recommendations for using technology as a delivery vehicle to further advance the field of BPT and the potential implications of technological innovations in BPT for other areas of children's mental health are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah J Jones
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Psychology, CB #3270 Davie Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wuang YP, Ho GS, Su CY. Occupational therapy home program for children with intellectual disabilities: a randomized, controlled trial. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2013; 34:528-537. [PMID: 23085502 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2012] [Accepted: 09/11/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a proposed occupational therapy home program (OTHP) for children with intellectual disabilities (ID). Children with ID were randomly and equally assigned to OTHP or to no OTHP groups. The primary outcome measures were Canadian Occupational Performance, Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition, and The Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment scores at 10 and 20 weeks. The 20-week OTHP produced significant difference in fine motor function, activity participation, and parent satisfaction with performance, compared to those of no OTHP. Pediatricians can advise families to implement 20 weeks of OTHP with an average 15 min per session to facilitate functional changes of children with ID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yee-Pay Wuang
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Furlong M, McGilloway S, Bywater T, Hutchings J, Smith SM, Donnelly M. Behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for early-onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012:CD008225. [PMID: 22336837 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008225.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early-onset child conduct problems are common and costly. A large number of studies and some previous reviews have focused on behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting interventions, but methodological limitations are commonplace and evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these programmes has been unclear. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for improving child conduct problems, parental mental health and parenting skills. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases between 23 and 31 January 2011: CENTRAL (2011, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1950 to current), EMBASE (1980 to current), CINAHL (1982 to current), PsycINFO (1872 to current), Social Science Citation Index (1956 to current), ASSIA (1987 to current), ERIC (1966 to current), Sociological Abstracts (1963 to current), Academic Search Premier (1970 to current), Econlit (1969 to current), PEDE (1980 to current), Dissertations and Theses Abstracts (1980 to present), NHS EED (searched 31 January 2011), HEED (searched 31 January 2011), DARE (searched 31 January 2011), HTA (searched 31 January 2011), mRCT (searched 29 January 2011). We searched the following parent training websites on 31 January 2011: Triple P Library, Incredible Years Library and Parent Management Training. We also searched the reference lists of studies and reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies if: (1) they involved randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-randomised controlled trials of behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting interventions for parents of children aged 3 to 12 years with conduct problems, and (2) incorporated an intervention group versus a waiting list, no treatment or standard treatment control group. We only included studies that used at least one standardised instrument to measure child conduct problems. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias in the trials and the methodological quality of health economic studies. Two authors also independently extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. MAIN RESULTS This review includes 13 trials (10 RCTs and three quasi-randomised trials), as well as two economic evaluations based on two of the trials. Overall, there were 1078 participants (646 in the intervention group; 432 in the control group). The results indicate that parent training produced a statistically significant reduction in child conduct problems, whether assessed by parents (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.72 to -0.34) or independently assessed (SMD -0.44; 95% CI -0.77 to -0.11). The intervention led to statistically significant improvements in parental mental health (SMD -0.36; 95% CI -0.52 to -0.20) and positive parenting skills, based on both parent reports (SMD -0.53; 95% CI -0.90 to -0.16) and independent reports (SMD -0.47; 95% CI -0.65 to -0.29). Parent training also produced a statistically significant reduction in negative or harsh parenting practices according to both parent reports (SMD -0.77; 95% CI -0.96 to -0.59) and independent assessments (SMD -0.42; 95% CI -0.67 to -0.16). Moreover, the intervention demonstrated evidence of cost-effectiveness. When compared to a waiting list control group, there was a cost of approximately $2500 (GBP 1712; EUR 2217) per family to bring the average child with clinical levels of conduct problems into the non-clinical range. These costs of programme delivery are modest when compared with the long-term health, social, educational and legal costs associated with childhood conduct problems. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting interventions are effective and cost-effective for improving child conduct problems, parental mental health and parenting skills in the short term. The cost of programme delivery was modest when compared with the long-term health, social, educational and legal costs associated with childhood conduct problems. Further research is needed on the long-term assessment of outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairead Furlong
- Department of Psychology, John Hume Building, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Maynooth, Ireland.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|