Ivabradine in Cardiovascular Disease Management Revisited: a Review

Assessment of safety profile of ivabradine in real-world scenario using FDA adverse event reporting system database

BACKGROUND

Ivabradine is primarily indicated for patients with sinus rhythm and a heart rate ≥ 75 beats/min, who have NYHA class II-IV chronic heart failure with systolic dysfunction. There is currently a lack of large-scale, real-world studies concerning its drug adverse reactions.

RESEARCH DESIGN & METHODS

This research assesses the side effects of ivabradine by analyzing reports of adverse events (AEs) from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. To evaluate the importance of these AEs, four sequential analytic strategies were utilized.

RESULTS

In total, 2,701 ivabradine-related AE reports were identified in the FAERS database. We identified 26 ivabradine-induced AEs, each with more than 20 reports, including some significant AEs not mentioned on the product label. The timing of AEs was also analyzed, with the majority of AEs occurring within the first month of ivabradine use. Gender-specific analysis indicates that female have a higher risk of AEs, such as off-label use, tachycardia, drug effectiveness for unapproved indications, and rash compared to male.

CONCLUSION

This study provides important information for maximizing the usage of ivabradine, increasing its efficacy, and reducing any possible negative effects. The actual clinical use of the medication will be greatly aided by this knowledge.

Ivabradine Approved and Other Uses in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Heart rate (HR) stands as a prognostic indicator of cardiovascular disease and a modifiable risk factor in heart failure (HF). Medication intolerance can curtail the application of conventional HR-lowering β-blockers to the optimum target dose. Ivabradine (IVA), a specific negative-chronotropic agent, selectively inhibits I f current in pacemaker cells of the sinoatrial node without depressing myocardial contractility or comprising hemodynamics. This review summarized ivabradine's clinical labeled and off-label uses and mechanism of action focusing on the clinical outcomes. PubMed was searched up to January 2024 using the main keywords of IVA, coronary artery disease (CAD), HF, postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), and tachyarrhythmia. To comprehensively review IVA's clinical indications, mechanisms, and therapeutic effects, all studies investigating treatment with IVA in humans were included, comprising different types of studies such as randomized controlled trials and longitudinal prospective observational studies. After screening, 141 studies were included in our review. A large number of reviewed articles were allocated to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and CAD, suggesting IVA as an alternative to β-blockers in case of contraindications or intolerance. The beneficial effects of IVA as premedication for coronary computed tomography angiography, HR lowering in POTS, and inappropriate sinus tachycardia constituted most studies among off-label uses. The promising results have been reported on the efficacy of IVA in controlling HR, especially in patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia or POTS. Owing to the unique mechanism of action, IVA has the potential to be used more frequently in future clinical practice.

Beyond quadruple therapy: the potential roles for ivabradine, vericiguat, and omecamtiv mecarbil in the therapeutic armamentarium

Quadruple therapy is effective for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, providing significant clinical benefits, including reduced mortality. Clinicians are now in an era focused on how to initiate and titrate quadrable therapy in the early phase of the disease trajectory, including during heart failure hospitalization. However, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction still face a significant "residual risk" of mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Despite the effective implementation of quadruple therapy, high mortality and rehospitalization rates persist in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and many patients cannot maximize therapy due to side effects such as hypotension and renal dysfunction. In this context, ivabradine, vericiguat, and omecamtiv mecarbil may have adjunct roles in addition to quadruple therapy (note that omecamtiv mecarbil is not currently approved for clinical use). However, the contemporary use of ivabradine and vericiguat is relatively low globally, likely due in part to the under-recognition of the role of these therapies as well as costs. This review offers clinicians a straightforward guide for bedside evaluation of potential candidates for these medications. Quadruple therapy, with strong evidence to reduce mortality, should always be prioritized for implementation. As second-line therapies, ivabradine could be considered for patients who cannot achieve optimal heart rate control (≥ 70 bpm at rest) despite maximally tolerated beta-blocker dosing. Vericiguat could be considered for high-risk patients who have recently experienced worsening heart failure events despite being on quadrable therapy, but they should not have N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels exceeding 8000 pg/mL. In the future, omecamtiv mecarbil may be considered for severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III to IV, ejection fraction ≤ 30%, and heart failure hospitalization within 6 months) when current quadrable therapy is limited, although this is still hypothesis-generating and requires further investigation before its approval.

A Comprehensive Review of Cardiovascular Disease Management: Cardiac Biomarkers, Imaging Modalities, Pharmacotherapy, Surgical Interventions, and Herbal Remedies

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) continue to be a major global health concern, representing a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. This review provides a comprehensive examination of CVDs, encompassing their pathophysiology, diagnostic biomarkers, advanced imaging techniques, pharmacological treatments, surgical interventions, and the emerging role of herbal remedies. The review covers various cardiovascular conditions such as coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis, peripheral artery disease, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cardiomyopathy, rheumatic heart disease, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, cerebrovascular diseases, and congenital heart defects. The review presents a wide range of cardiac biomarkers such as troponins, C-reactive protein, CKMB, BNP, NT-proBNP, galectin, adiponectin, IL-6, TNF-α, miRNAs, and oxylipins. Advanced molecular imaging techniques, including chest X-ray, ECG, ultrasound, CT, SPECT, PET, and MRI, have significantly enhanced our ability to visualize myocardial perfusion, plaque characterization, and cardiac function. Various synthetic drugs including statins, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, antihypertensives, anticoagulants, and antiarrhythmics are fundamental in managing CVDs. Nonetheless, their side effects such as hepatic dysfunction, renal impairment, and bleeding risks necessitate careful monitoring and personalized treatment strategies. In addition to conventional therapies, herbal remedies have garnered attention for their potential cardiovascular benefits. Plant extracts and their bioactive compounds, such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, saponins, and alkaloids, offer promising cardioprotective effects and enhanced cardiovascular health. This review underscores the value of combining traditional and modern therapeutic approaches to improve cardiovascular outcomes. This review serves as a vital resource for researchers by integrating a broad spectrum of information on CVDs, diagnostic tools, imaging techniques, pharmacological treatments and their side effects, and the potential of herbal remedies.

Physiological effects of ivabradine in heart failure and beyond

Ivabradine is a pharmacologic agent that inhibits the funny current responsible for determining heart rate in the sinoatrial node. Ivabradine's clinical potential has been investigated in the context of heart failure since it is associated with reduced myocardial oxygen demand, enhanced diastolic filling, stroke volume, and coronary perfusion time; however, it is yet to demonstrate definitive mortality benefit. Alternative effects of ivabradine include modulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, sympathetic activation, and endothelial function. Here, we review key clinical trials informing the clinical use of ivabradine and explore opportunities for leveraging its potential pleiotropic effects in other diseases, including treatment of hyperadrenergic states and mitigating complications of COVID-19 infection.

Analysis of risk factors for complications in echocardiography-guided percutaneous intramyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND

The feasibility of percutaneous intramyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation (PIMSRA) for the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) has been previously reported. However, limited investigation has been conducted regarding the complications associated with this procedure.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze the risk factors affecting the occurrence of complications during PIMSRA, such as pericardial effusion, ventricular premature beats, and interventricular septal perforation. In this study, the optimal cut-off values for these risk factors are also explored, and corresponding strategies for prevention are proposed.

METHODS

A total of 101 patients diagnosed with HOCM who underwent the PIMSRA procedure from 2021 to 2022 were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were classified into subgroups with or without complications based on procedural records. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors for complications during the PIMSRA procedure.

RESULTS

There were 48 patients with complications and 53 patients without complications. The heart rate at the start of the procedure and the maximum left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) were independent risk factors related to PIMSRA complications. The optimal cut-off values for predicting complication occurrence were a heart rate > 49 bpm at the start of the procedure (OR: 3.79, 95% CI: 1.64-8.78, p = 0.002) and a maximum LVOTG > 92 mmHg (OR: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.15-5.75, p = 0.022), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of PIMSRA complications is primarily associated with the heart rate at the start of the procedure and the maximum LVOTG. It is recommended to establish a comprehensive control plan to minimize the risk of complications during PIMSRA procedures.

Effects of Ivabradine on Myocardial Perfusion in Chronic Angina: A Prospective, Preliminary, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study

INTRODUCTION

Ivabradine reduces heart rate (HR), episodes of angina, and nitrate consumption, and increases exercise capacity in patients with chronic angina (CA). In this exploratory study, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) was used to evaluate changes in the percentage of myocardial ischemia after ivabradine therapy in patients with CA.

METHODS

This prospective, open-label, single-arm study included patients with CA receiving maximum tolerated doses of beta blockers, who had a resting HR ≥ 70 bpm and had experienced ischemia according to MPS during an exercise test at baseline. Participants received ivabradine 5 mg twice daily (titrated according to HR) concomitant with beta blockers. A second MPS was performed after 3 months, without interruption of treatment with beta blockers or ivabradine. The primary outcome was change in the percentage of myocardial ischemia from baseline to 3 months. Time to ischemia during the exercise test, the proportion of patients presenting angina during the exercise test, and health status, assessed using the seven-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 (SAQ-7), were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (3 females) with a mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age of 62.2 ± 6.5 years were included in the study, of whom 55% had diabetes, 70% had previous myocardial revascularization, and 45% had previous myocardial infarction. The percentage of patients with myocardial ischemia significantly decreased from baseline to 3 months after initiation of treatment with ivabradine (- 2.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.3 to - 5.5; p = 0.031). Mean time to appearance of ischemia increased from 403 ± 176 s at baseline to 466 ± 136 s at 3 months after initiation of ivabradine (Δ62 s; 95% CI 18-106 s; p = 0.008), and the proportion of patients experiencing angina during the exercise test decreased from 40% at baseline to 5% also at 3 months (p = 0.016). Mean resting HR decreased from 76 ± 7 bpm at baseline to 55 ± 8 bpm at 3 months (p < 0.001). The mean SAQ-7 summary score improved from 69 ± 21 at baseline to 83 ± 12 at 3 months (p = 0.001). No serious adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSION

Ivabradine added to beta blockers was associated with a reduction in detectable myocardial ischemia by MPS in patients with CA. Infographic available for this article.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial has been retrospectively registered with the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (REBEC) under the following number RBR-5fysqrh (date of registration: 30 November 2023).

Pacemaker Channels and the Chronotropic Response in Health and Disease

Loss or dysregulation of the normally precise control of heart rate via the autonomic nervous system plays a critical role during the development and progression of cardiovascular disease-including ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and arrhythmias. While the clinical significance of regulating changes in heart rate, known as the chronotropic effect, is undeniable, the mechanisms controlling these changes remain not fully understood. Heart rate acceleration and deceleration are mediated by increasing or decreasing the spontaneous firing rate of pacemaker cells in the sinoatrial node. During the transition from rest to activity, sympathetic neurons stimulate these cells by activating β-adrenergic receptors and increasing intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate. The same signal transduction pathway is targeted by positive chronotropic drugs such as norepinephrine and dobutamine, which are used in the treatment of cardiogenic shock and severe heart failure. The cyclic adenosine monophosphate-sensitive hyperpolarization-activated current (If) in pacemaker cells is passed by hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channels and is critical for generating the autonomous heartbeat. In addition, this current has been suggested to play a central role in the chronotropic effect. Recent studies demonstrate that cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent regulation of HCN4 (hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channel isoform 4) acts to stabilize the heart rate, particularly during rapid rate transitions induced by the autonomic nervous system. The mechanism is based on creating a balance between firing and recently discovered nonfiring pacemaker cells in the sinoatrial node. In this way, hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channels may protect the heart from sinoatrial node dysfunction, secondary arrhythmia of the atria, and potentially fatal tachyarrhythmia of the ventricles. Here, we review the latest findings on sinoatrial node automaticity and discuss the physiological and pathophysiological role of HCN pacemaker channels in the chronotropic response and beyond.

Optimal Medical Therapy for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Focus on Anti-anginal Therapy

Chronic coronary disease (CCD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The most common symptom of CCD is exertional angina pectoris, a discomfort in the chest that commonly occurs during activities of daily life. Patients are dismayed by recurring episodes of angina and seek medical help in preventing or minimizing episodes. Angina occurs when the coronary arteries are unable to supply sufficient blood flow to the cardiac muscle to meet the metabolic needs of the left ventricular myocardium. While lifestyle changes and aggressive risk factor modification play a critical role in the management of CCD, management of angina usually requires pharmacologic therapy. Medications such as beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, nitrates, ranolazine, and others ultimately work to improve the mismatch between myocardial blood flow and metabolic demand. This manuscript briefly describes the pathophysiologic basis for symptoms of angina, and how currently available anti-anginal therapies contribute to preventing or minimize the occurrence of angina.

Ivabradine in Septic Shock: A Narrative Review

In patients with septic shock, compensatory tachycardia initially serves to maintain adequate cardiac output and tissue oxygenation but may persist despite appropriate fluid and vasopressor resuscitation. This sustained elevation in heart rate and altered heart rate variability, indicative of autonomic dysfunction, is a well-established independent predictor of adverse outcomes in critical illness. Elevated heart rate exacerbates myocardial oxygen demand, reduces ventricular filling time, compromises coronary perfusion during diastole, and impairs the isovolumetric relaxation phase of the cardiac cycle, contributing to ventricular-arterial decoupling. This also leads to increased ventricular and atrial filling pressures, with a heightened risk of arrhythmias. Ivabradine, a highly selective inhibitor of the sinoatrial node's pacemaker current (If or "funny" current), mitigates heart rate by modulating diastolic depolarization slope without affecting contractility. By exerting a selective chronotropic effect devoid of negative inotropic properties, ivabradine shows potential for improving hemodynamics in septic shock patients with cardiac dysfunction. This review evaluates the plausible mechanisms and existing evidence regarding the utility of ivabradine in managing patients with septic shock.

The clinical value of β-blockers in patients with stable angina

Stable angina, one manifestation of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), is characterised by intermittent episodes of insufficient blood supply to the myocardium, provoking symptoms of myocardial ischaemia, particularly chest pain. These attacks usually occur during exercise or stress. Anti-ischaemic drugs are the mainstay of pharmacologic management of CCS with symptoms of angina. β-blockers reduce heart rate and myocardial contractility, thus reducing myocardial oxygen consumption. These drugs have been shown to ameliorate the frequency of anginal attacks and to improve exercise capacity in these patients. Current management guidelines include β-blockers as a first-line management option for most patients with CCS and symptoms of myocardial ischaemia, alongside dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCB). The presence of comorbid angina and heart failure is a strong indication for starting with a β-blocker. β-blockers are also useful in the management of angina symptoms accompanied by a high heart rate, hypertension (with or without a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system [RAS] blocker or CCB), or microvascular angina (with a RAS blocker and a statin). A β-blocker is not suitable for a patient with low heart rate (<50 bpm), although use of a β-blocker may be supported by a pacemaker if the β-blocker is strongly indicated) and should be used at a low dose only in patients with low blood pressure.

Beta-blocker management in patients admitted for acute heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a review and expert consensus opinion

The role of the beta-adrenergic signaling pathway in heart failure (HF) is pivotal. Early blockade of this pathway with beta-blocker (BB) therapy is recommended as the first-line medication for patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Conversely, in patients with severe acute HF (AHF), including those with resolved cardiogenic shock (CS), BB initiation can be hazardous. There are very few data on the management of BB in these situations. The present expert consensus aims to review all published data on the use of BB in patients with severe decompensated AHF, with or without hemodynamic compromise, and proposes an expert-recommended practical algorithm for the prescription and monitoring of BB therapy in critical settings.

Effects of Ivabradine on Right Ventricular Systolic Function in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Cor Pulmonale

Cor pulmonale is a clinical syndrome associated with pulmonary hypertension, frequently complicated by congestive heart failure, commonly caused by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Most patients with cor pulmonale have tachycardia. However, heart rate (HR) reduction represents a primary treatment goal to improve the survival and quality of life in these patients. Ivabradine can selectively slow HR at rest and during exercise. In this prospective study, we tested the hemodynamic effects, invasively determined using right-sided cardiac catheterization, of reducing HR with ivabradine. We selected 18 patients (13 men [72.2%], mean age 67 ± 10 years) with COPD and cor pulmonale, presenting with sinus tachycardia. All patients performed clinical evaluation, electrocardiogram, spirometry, echocardiogram, 6-minute walking distance, and right-sided cardiac catheterization within 1 month of enrollment. All tests were repeated after 6 months of ivabradine treatment (median assumed dose 11.9 mg/die). We noticed a significant decrease of HR (from 98 ± 7 to 77 ± 8 beats/min, p = 0.0001), with a concomitant reduction of the congestion index (from 25.9 ± 5.1 to 19.4 ± 5.7 mm Hg, p = 0.001), and the consequent improvement of the right ventricular systolic performance (right ventricular stroke volume augmented from 56.7 ± 7.9 to 75.2 ± 8.6 ml/beat, p = 0.0001). This allows an improvement in clinical status and exercise tolerance (Borg scale score decreased from 5.2 ± 1.4 to 4.1 ± 1.3, p = 0.01 and the 6-minute walking distance increased to 252 ± 65 to 377 ± 59 m, p = 0.001). In conclusion, HR reduction significantly improves hemodynamic and clinical status of patients with tachycardia affected by COPD and cor pulmonale.

Label-free green estimation of atenolol and ivabradine hydrochloride in pharmaceutical and biological matrices by synchronous spectrofluorimetry

In this work, a label-free, rapid, and sensitive synchronous spectrofluorometric method was implemented to assay atenolol (ATL) and ivabradine hydrochloride (IVB) in pharmaceutical and biological matrices. Simultaneous determination of ATL and IVB by conventional spectrofluorometry cannot be implemented because of the clear overlap of the emmision spectra of ATL and IVB. To overcome this problem, synchronous fluorescence measurements at a constant wavelength difference (Δλ) combined with mathematical derivatization of the zero order spectra were perforemed. The results indicated a good resolution between emission spectra of the studied drugs when the first-order derivative of the synchronous fluorescence scans at Δλ = 40 nm was conducted using ethanol as the optimum solvent which is less hazardous than other organic solvents such as methanol and acetonitrile, keeping the method safe and green. The amplitudes of the first derivative synchronous fluorescent scans of ATL and IVB in ethanol were monitored at 286 and 270 nm to simultaneously estimate ATL and IVB, respectively. Method optimisation was conducted by assessing different solvents, buffer pHs, and surfactants. The optimum results were obtained when ethanol was utilized as a solvent without using any other additives. The developed method was linear over concentration ranges of 10.0-250.0 ng mL^-1 for IVB and 100.0-800.0 ng mL^-1 for ATL with detection limits of 3.07 and 26.49 ng mL^-1 for IVB and ATL, respectively. The method was utilized to assay the studied drugs in their dosages and in human urine samples with acceptable % recoveries and RSD values. The greenness of the method was implemented by three approaches involving the recently reported metric (AGREE) which ensured the eco-freindship and safety of the method.

Ivabradine monotherapy in pediatric patients with focal atrial tachycardia: a single-center study

This study investigated the efficacy of ivabradine monotherapy in pediatric patients with focal atrial tachycardia (FAT). We prospectively enrolled 12 pediatric patients (7.5 ± 4.5 years; six girls) with FAT who were resistant to conventional antiarrhythmics and received ivabradine as monotherapy. Patients were classified as having tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC) if they had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of < 50% and a left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVDD) z-score of > 2 due to tachycardia. Oral ivabradine was initiated at 0.1 mg/kg every 12 h, increased to 0.2 mg/kg every 12 h if no restoration of stable sinus rhythm was observed after two doses, and discontinued after 48 h if neither rhythm nor heart rate control was observed. Of these patients, six (50%) had incessant atrial tachycardia, and 6 had frequent short episodes of FAT. Six patients were diagnosed with TIC, and their mean LVEF and mean LVDD z-score were 36.2 ± 8.7% (range, 27-48%) and 4.2 ± 1.7 (range, 2.2-7.3), respectively. Finally, six patients achieved either rhythm (n = 3) or heart rate control (n = 3) within 48 h of ivabradine monotherapy. One patient achieved rhythm/heart rate control with ivabradine at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg every 12 h, while the others achieved rhythm/heart rate control at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg every 12 h. Five patients received ivabradine monotherapy for chronic therapy, one (20%) of whom had FAT breakthrough 1 month after discharge, and metoprolol was added. Neither FAT recurrence nor adverse effect (with or without beta-blocker) was observed during a median follow-up of 5 months.

CONCLUSION

Ivabradine is well-tolerated and may provide early heart rate control in pediatric FAT and can be considered early, especially in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction. Further investigations are deserved to confirm the optimal dose and long-term efficacy in this population.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Focal atrial tachycardia (FAT) is the most common arrhythmia associated with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC) in children, and the efficacy of conventional antiarrhythmic medications in the treatment of FAT is poor. • Ivabradine is currently the only selective hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) inhibitor, which can effectively low HR without negative effect on blood pressure or inotropy.

WHAT IS NEW

• Ivabradine (0.1-0.2 mg/kg every 12 h) can effectively suppress focal atrial tachycardia in 50% of pediatric patients. • Ivabradine provides early control of heart rate and hemodynamic stabilization in children with severe left ventricular dysfunction due to atrial tachycardia within 48 h.

Therapeutic Use and Molecular Aspects of Ivabradine in Cardiac Remodeling: A Review

Cardiac remodeling can cause ventricular dysfunction and progress to heart failure, a cardiovascular disease that claims many lives globally. Ivabradine, a funny channel (I_f) inhibitor, is used in patients with chronic heart failure as an adjunct to other heart failure medications. This review aims to gather updated information regarding the therapeutic use and mechanism of action of ivabradine in heart failure. The drug reduces elevated resting heart rate, which is linked to increased morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. Its use is associated with improved cardiac function, structure, and quality of life in the patients. Ivabradine exerts several pleiotropic effects, including an antiremodeling property, which are independent of its principal heart-rate-reducing effects. Its suppressive effects on cardiac remodeling have been demonstrated in animal models of cardiac remodeling and heart failure. It reduces myocardial fibrosis, apoptosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress as well as increases autophagy in the animals. It also modulates myocardial calcium homeostasis, neurohumoral systems, and energy metabolism. However, its role in improving heart failure remains unclear. Therefore, elucidating its molecular mechanisms is imperative and would aid in the design of future studies.

Angina in 2022: Current Perspectives

Angina is the main symptom of ischemic heart disease; mirroring a mismatch between oxygen supply and demand. Epicardial coronary stenoses are only responsible for nearly half of the patients presenting with angina; whereas in several cases; symptoms may underlie coronary vasomotor disorders; such as microvascular dysfunction or epicardial spasm. Various medications have been proven to improve the prognosis and quality of life; representing the treatment of choice in stable angina and leaving revascularization only in particular coronary anatomies or poorly controlled symptoms despite optimal medical therapy. Antianginal medications aim to reduce the oxygen supply-demand mismatch and are generally effective in improving symptoms; quality of life; effort tolerance and time to ischemia onset and may improve prognosis in selected populations. Since antianginal medications have different mechanisms of action and side effects; their use should be tailored according to patient history and potential drug-drug interactions. Angina with non-obstructed coronary arteries patients should be phenotyped with invasive assessment and treated accordingly. Patients with refractory angina represent a higher-risk population in which some therapeutic options are available to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life; but robust data from large randomized controlled trials are still lacking.

Linked biaromatic compounds as cardioprotective agents

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are widespread in the modern world, and their number is constantly growing. For a long time, CVDs have been the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Drugs for the treatment of CVD have been developed almost since the beginning of the 20th century, and a large number of effective cardioprotective agents of various classes have been created. Nevertheless, the need for the design and development of new safe drugs for the treatment of CVD remains. Literature data indicate that a huge number of cardioprotective agents of various generations and mechanisms correspond to a single generalized pharmacophore model containing two aromatic nuclei linked by a linear linker. In this regard, we put forward a concept for the design of a new generation of cardioprotective agents with a multitarget mechanism of action within the indicated pharmacophore model. This review is devoted to a generalization of the currently known compounds with cardioprotective properties and corresponding to the pharmacophore model of biaromatic compounds linked by a linear linker. Particular attention is paid to the history of the creation of these drugs, approaches to their design, and analysis of the structure-action relationship within each class.

The Role of Ivabradine in Managing Symptomatic Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes: A Clinically Oriented Approach

Angina is a significant contributor to disability and impairment in quality of life in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). An elevated heart rate (HR) may trigger myocardial ischemia by increasing oxygen consumption and decreasing the diastolic time, compromising the coronary flow. HR-lowering strategies offer symptom control and prevent cardiovascular events in subgroups of patients with CCS. However, the best therapeutic approach to achieve the desired HR in patients with CCS can be challenging based on efficacy and tolerability. Guidelines usually propose β-blockers and/or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCB) for angina patients with elevated HR. Nonetheless, there is no clear evidence of greater antianginal efficacy of this strategy versus an alternative HR-lowering agent. Ivabradine reduces the HR by blocking the I_f current in the sinoatrial node without affecting myocardial contractility or vascular tone. The magnitude of the HR reduction by ivabradine is proportional to the initial HR, which decreases the risk of significant bradycardia. Ivabradine increases the diastolic time and the coronary flow reserve to a greater extent than β-blockers and favors collateralization, improving the regional blood flow. We present two clinical cases of patients with symptomatic CCS in whom HR control with ivabradine was fundamental for symptom control and improvement in left ventricular (LV) function. An earlier combination of ivabradine plus β-blockers would have provided more rapid symptom control and improved LV function in the first case. In the second case, the primary mechanism responsible for angina was most likely a coronary vasomotor abnormality, in which the use of β-blockers aggravated the discomfort. The combination of a dihydropyridine CCB plus ivabradine was highly influential in symptom control. Due to its effects beyond HR reduction and good tolerability, ivabradine should be considered an essential ally in managing patients with angina and high HR with or without LV dysfunction.