1
|
Sweileh WM. Analysis and mapping the research landscape on patient-centred care in the context of chronic disease management. J Eval Clin Pract 2024; 30:638-650. [PMID: 38567707 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE Patient-centred care has emerged as a transformative approach in managing chronic diseases, aiming to actively involve patients in their healthcare decisions. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES This study was conducted to analyse and map the research landscape on patient-centred care in the context of chronic disease management. METHODS This study used Scopus to retrieve the relevant articles. The analysis focused on the growth pattern, highly cited articles, randomised clinical trials, patients and providers perspectives, facilitators and barriers, frequent author keywords, emerging topics, and prolific countries and journals in the field. RESULTS In total, 926 research articles met the inclusion criteria. There was a notable increase in the number of publications over time. Cancer had the highest number of articles (n = 379, 40.9%), followed by diabetes mellitus, and mental health and psychiatric conditions. Studies on patient-centred care in diabetic patients received the highest number of citations. The results identified 52 randomised controlled trials that covered four major themes: patient-centred care for diabetes management, shared decision-making in mental health and primary care, shared decision-making in cancer care, and economic evaluation and cost-effectiveness. The study identified 51 studies that examined the impact of tools such as computer-based systems, decision aids, smartphone apps, and online tools to improve patient-centred outcomes. A map of author keywords showed that renal dialysis, HIV, and atrial fibrillation were the most recent topics in the field. Researchers from the United States contributed to more than half of the retrieved publications. The top active journals included "Patient Education and Counselling" and "Health Expectations". CONCLUSION This study provides valuable insights into the research landscape of patient-centred care within the context of chronic diseases. The current study provided a comprehensive overview of the research landscape on patient-centred care, which can empower patients by raising their awareness about clinical experiences and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waleed M Sweileh
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology/Toxicology, Division of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thomas EC, Simmons MB, Mathai C, Salzer MS. Peer-Facilitated Decision Making in Mental Health: Promises, Pitfalls, and Recommendations for Research and Practice. Psychiatr Serv 2023; 74:401-406. [PMID: 36164774 PMCID: PMC10405208 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Recognition has grown that peer support workers serve an important role in facilitating decision making about treatment and recovery among people with mental health conditions. This article provides examples of peer-facilitated decision support interventions in the literature, discusses promises and potential pitfalls associated with peers serving in decision support roles, and offers recommendations for research and practice. Examples were selected from the literature on decision support interventions for people with serious mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression. Promises, pitfalls, and recommendations were informed by this research and by the literature on lived experience perspectives, the helper-therapy principle, and reported barriers to and facilitators of peers assisting with decision making. According to the included studies, peers may facilitate decision making in several ways (e.g., by asking service users about their goals or preferences, assisting them with using decision support tools, sharing stories, and facilitating access to information and resources). Peer-facilitated decision support may be associated with positive decision making and health outcomes for service users and peer support workers. However, providers need to carefully consider barriers to implementation of this support, such as inadequate resourcing, poor integration, and compromising of peer support values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C. Thomas
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University
| | - Magenta B. Simmons
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chacku Mathai
- Chacku Mathai Consulting LLC
- OnTrackNY and Center for Practice Innovations, Columbia University
| | - Mark S. Salzer
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
User Perspectives on Professional Support and Service Use During Psychiatric Medication Discontinuation. Community Ment Health J 2022; 58:1416-1424. [PMID: 35020115 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-021-00933-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Psychiatric medication discontinuation is common and can have negative impacts. Until recently, most research on discontinuation happened in an adherence/compliance framework. There is now recognition that discontinuation may be a desired goal for many individuals. The purpose of the present paper is to describe the results of a pioneering survey to explore professional support to service users during medication discontinuation to inform clinical practice and guide future research. Survey responses from 250 service users were summarized with regard to their use of prescriber and psychotherapy services during the process of discontinuing psychiatric medication. Only 65% of respondents reported seeing a prescriber and less than 50% reported seeing a psychotherapist while attempting to discontinue psychiatric medication. Combined with respondents' answers describing the decision-making process and support received from these services, this paper identifies gaps in service and the need to improve providers' ability to support individuals while they discontinue psychiatric medication.
Collapse
|
4
|
Eliacin J, Carter J, Bass E, Flanagan M, Salyers MP, McGuire A. Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057300. [PMID: 35636799 PMCID: PMC9152945 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the understanding and practice of shared decision-making (SDM) within the context of recovery-oriented care across Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units. DESIGN VHA inpatient mental health units were scored on the Recovery-Oriented Acute Inpatient Scale (RAIN). Scores on the RAIN item for medication SDM were used to rank each site from lowest to highest. The top 7 and bottom 8 sites (n=15) were selected for additional analyses using a mixed-methods approach, involving qualitative interviews, observation notes and quantitative data. SETTING 34 VHA inpatient mental health units located in every geographical region of the USA. PARTICIPANTS 55 treatment team members. RESULTS Our results identified an overarching theme of 'power-sharing' that describes participants' conceptualisation and practice of medication decision-making. Three levels of power sharing emerged from both interview and observational data: (1) No power sharing: patients are excluded from treatment decisions; (2) Limited power sharing: patients are informed of treatment decisions but have limited influence on the decision-making process; and (3) Shared-power: patients and providers work collaboratively and contribute to medication decisions. Comparing interview to observational data, only observational data indicating those themes differentiate top from bottom scoring sites on the RAIN SDM item scores. All but one top scoring sites indicated shared power medication decision processes, whereas bottom sites reflected mostly no power sharing. Additionally, our findings highlight three key factors that facilitate the implementation of SDM: inclusion of veteran in treatment teams, patient education and respect for patient autonomy. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of SDM appears feasible in acute inpatient mental health units. Although most participants were well informed about SDM, that knowledge did not always translate into practice, which supports the need for ongoing implementation support for SDM. Additional contextual factors underscore the value of patients' self-determination as a guiding principle for SDM, highlighting the role of a supporting, empowering and autonomy-generating environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanne Eliacin
- Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jessica Carter
- Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Emily Bass
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Mindy Flanagan
- Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Michelle P Salyers
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Alan McGuire
- Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Embregts PJCM, Ahaus K, Minkman M, Nies H, Meurs P. A sector-wide response to national policy on client-centred care and support: a document analysis of the development of a range of instruments to assess clients' experiences in the care and support for people with (intellectual) disabilities. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1307. [PMID: 34863165 PMCID: PMC8645069 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07341-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Client-centred care serves as the foundation for healthcare policy. Indeed, various instruments for assessing clients’ experiences of care and support are increasingly used to provide insights into the quality, and client-centred nature, of the care and support provided, which, in turn, aids the development of subsequent improvements. The unique characteristics of care and support for people with intellectual disabilities (ID), such as the need for both lifelong and life-wide care and support across all aspects of clients’ lives, led to an initiative within Dutch ID care to jointly develop a range of instruments to assess the experiences of clients receiving ID care and support. Individual clients’ experiences and suggestions for improvement, which are embedded in clients’ care plan cycles, constitute the foundation of this Range of Instruments. This paper provides a unique, bottom-up, exhaustive account of the process of developing the Range of instruments used to assess the experiences of clients in the field of Dutch ID care. Methods Relevant documents at three levels (i.e. 1) national documents, such as policy papers and governmental reports, 2) documents and reports from the Dutch Association of Healthcare Providers for People with Disabilities (VGN) along with minutes from the meetings of the expert Committee who assessed the instruments, and 3) correspondence between the Committee and developers as well as the forms used in the assessment process for each instrument) were qualitatively analysed by two researchers who had no affiliation with the development of the Range of instruments used to assess clients’ experiences in ID care and support. All of the documents were inductively coded using a thematic analytical approach. Informants who were either currently or previously involved in the development of these instruments were asked to provide clarification over the documents themselves and to explain the context in which they were produced. Results The development of the range of instruments can be classified into four phases, namely: 1) supporting the bottom-up development of initiatives to assess clients’ experiences, 2) focusing on learning and further development, 3) stimulating exchange between the developers and users of the instruments and the Committee responsible for assessing them, and 4) further development in response to the changing times and new landscape. Conclusions The range of instruments were found to be appropriate for a variety of clients in ID care and support, specifically in terms of assessing their individual experiences and gaining insight into their suggestions for improvement, and effective in terms of collaboratively improving the quality of ID care and support. In so doing, these instruments potentially provide an avenue through which clients’ experiences can be embedded in the process of ID care and support. Other specific features in the development of these instruments, namely their incremental adoption, ongoing evaluation and strong practice orientation, were also found to be suitable for other care contexts’ attempts to respond to the top-down policy objectives of client-centeredness and translating outcomes into direct care practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petri J C M Embregts
- Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Postbus 90153, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| | - Kees Ahaus
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mirella Minkman
- Tilburg University/TIAS Business school, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,Vilans, national Center of Expertise for Long term Care in The Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Nies
- Vilans, national Center of Expertise for Long term Care in The Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Vrije Universiteit, Department of Organization Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline Meurs
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Saad A, Bruno D, Camara B, D'Agostino J, Bolea-Alamanac B. Self-directed Technology-Based Therapeutic Methods for Adult Patients Receiving Mental Health Services: Systematic Review. JMIR Ment Health 2021; 8:e27404. [PMID: 34842556 PMCID: PMC8665378 DOI: 10.2196/27404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technological interventions used to treat illnesses and promote health are grouped under the umbrella term of digital therapeutics. The use of digital therapeutics is becoming increasingly common in mental health. Although many technologies are currently being implemented, research supporting their usability, efficacy, and risk requires further examination, especially for those interventions that can be used without support. OBJECTIVE This review aims to identify the evidence-based, self-directed, technology-based methods of care that can be used in adult patients after they are discharged from mental health services. The interventions reviewed are automated with no human input required (either at the patient's or at the technology's end), so the patients can implement them without any support. METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) guidelines in 3 databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and OVID. The inclusion criteria were self-directed, automated, and technology-based interventions related to mental health, primarily for adults, having a solid evaluation process. The interventions had to be self-directed, in that the participants could use the technology without any external guidance. RESULTS We identified 36 papers that met the inclusion criteria: 26 randomized controlled trials, 9 nonrandomized controlled trial quantitative studies, and 1 qualitative study. The technologies used included websites, automated text messaging, phone apps, videos, computer software, and integrated voice response. There were 22 studies focused on internet-based cognitive behavioral therapies as a therapeutic paradigm compared with the waitlist, web-based human-delivered therapy, and other interventions. Among these studies, 14 used paradigms other than the internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy. Of the 8 studies comparing guided and unguided digital care, 3 showed no differences, 3 favored guided interventions, and 2 favored unguided interventions. The research also showed that dropout rates were as high as 80%, citing potential problems with the acceptability of the suggested technologies. CONCLUSIONS There is limited research on the efficacy and suitability of self-directed technology-based care options for mental health. Digital technologies have the potential to bridge the gap between ambulatory care and independent living. However, these interventions may need to be developed collaboratively with the users to encourage their acceptability and to avoid high dropout rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Saad
- Department of Psychiatry, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Deanna Bruno
- Department of Psychiatry, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bettina Camara
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Blanca Bolea-Alamanac
- Department of Psychiatry, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thomas EC, Ben-David S, Treichler E, Roth S, Dixon L, Salzer M, Zisman-Ilani Y. A Systematic Review of Shared Decision-Making Interventions for Service Users With Serious Mental Illnesses: State of the Science and Future Directions. Psychiatr Serv 2021; 72:1288-1300. [PMID: 34369801 PMCID: PMC8570969 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Shared decision making (SDM) is a health communication model that may be particularly appealing to service users with serious mental illnesses, who often want to be involved in making decisions about their mental health care. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe and evaluate participant, intervention, methodological, and outcome characteristics of SDM intervention studies conducted within this population. METHODS Systematic searches of the literature through April 2020 were conducted and supplemented by hand searching of reference lists of identified studies. A total of 53 independent studies of SDM interventions that were conducted with service users with serious mental illnesses and that included a quantitative or qualitative measure of the intervention were included in the review. Data were independently extracted by at least two authors. RESULTS Most studies were conducted with middle-age, male, White individuals from Western countries. Interventions fell into the following categories: decision support tools only, multicomponent interventions involving decision support tools, multicomponent interventions not involving decision support tools, and shared care planning and preference elicitation interventions. Most studies were randomized controlled trials with sufficient sample sizes. Outcomes assessed were diverse, spanning decision-making constructs, clinical and functional, treatment engagement or adherence, and other constructs. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest important future directions for research, including the need to evaluate the impact of SDM in special populations (e.g., young adults and racial-ethnic minority groups); to expand interventions to a broader array of decisions, users, and contexts; and to establish consensus measures to assess intervention effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Emily Treichler
- VA Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), San Diego, CA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ashoorian DM, Davidson RM. Shared decision making for psychiatric medication management: a summary of its uptake, barriers and facilitators. Int J Clin Pharm 2021; 43:759-763. [PMID: 33515136 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-021-01240-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The model of shared decision making with mental health patients and clinicians (doctors and pharmacists) harnesses the benefits of patients becoming partners in their own recovery through improved communication and greater self-advocacy. Shared decision making in mental health services is an emerging model of care which has not been well investigated, however it is seen as the way forward to achieving improved health outcomes for non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapy. Successful implementation of this model requires supporting the process through provision of information and training, use of decision aids, coaching in communication skills and inclusion of family and carers in the decision making process. This summary examines the application of the shared decision making model for psychiatric medication management, including barriers and facilitators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deena M Ashoorian
- Pharmacy Division/ School of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
| | - Rowan M Davidson
- Pharmacy Division/ School of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Marrero RJ, Fumero A, de Miguel A, Peñate W. Psychological factors involved in psychopharmacological medication adherence in mental health patients: A systematic review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:2116-2131. [PMID: 32402489 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychopharmacological medication adherence is essential for psychiatric patients' treatment and well-being. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to identify psychological factors related to health control that have been linked to psychopharmacological medication adherence in psychiatric patients. METHODS A literature search was performed through the databases Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies published before October 15th, 2019. Articles published in peer-reviewed journals that analyzed the psychological factors of health belief and health control involved in psychopharmacological medication adherence in a psychiatric population were included. RESULTS The search identified 124 potentially relevant papers, 29 of which met the eligibility criteria. The final sample was 222 adolescents, most with a diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and 6139 adults diagnosed especially with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, or depressive disorder. Results suggested that medication adherence is associated with health beliefs and psychological variables, such as self-efficacy and locus of control. Family support was also positively related to medication adherence. CONCLUSION Psychopharmacological medication adherence requires a consideration of multicausality, which depends on sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological factors. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS These findings should be considered in the development and implementation of psychological interventions focused on self-control and family support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosario J Marrero
- Dept. of Clinical Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology, Universidad de La Laguna Campus de Guajara, 38200, Tenerife, Spain.
| | - Ascensión Fumero
- Dept. of Clinical Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology, Universidad de La Laguna Campus de Guajara, 38200, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Adelia de Miguel
- Dept. of Clinical Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology, Universidad de La Laguna Campus de Guajara, 38200, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Wenceslao Peñate
- Dept. of Clinical Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology, Universidad de La Laguna Campus de Guajara, 38200, Tenerife, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aoki Y. Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness: A concept analysis. Jpn J Nurs Sci 2020; 17:e12365. [PMID: 32761783 PMCID: PMC7590107 DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness has increasingly attracted attention. However, this concept has not been comprehensively clarified. This review aimed to clarify a concept of shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness such as schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder, and propose an adequate definition. METHODS Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis was used. MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL were searched for articles written in English and published between 2010 and November 2019. The search terms were "psychiatr*" or "mental" or "schizophren*" or "depression" or "bipolar disorder", combined with "shared decision making". In total, 70 articles met the inclusion criteria. An inductive approach was used to identify themes and sub-themes related to shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness. Surrogate terms and a definition of the concept were also described. RESULTS Four key attributes were identified: user-professional relationship, communication process, user-friendly visualization, and broader stakeholder approach. Communication process was the densest attribute, which consisted of five phases: goal sharing, information sharing, deliberation, mutual agreement, and follow-up. The antecedents as prominent predisposing factors were long-term complex illness, power imbalance, global trend, users' desire, concerns, and stigma. The consequences included decision-related outcomes, users' changes, professionals' changes, and enhanced relationship. CONCLUSIONS Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness is a communication process, involving both user-friendly visualization techniques and broader stakeholders. The process may overcome traditional power imbalance and encourage changes among both users and professionals that could enhance the dyadic relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yumi Aoki
- Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, Graduate School of NursingSt. Luke's International UniversityTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Finnerty M, Austin E, Chen Q, Layman D, Kealey E, Ng-Mak D, Rajagopalan K, Hoagwood K. Implementation and Use of a Client-Facing Web-Based Shared Decision-Making System (MyCHOIS-CommonGround) in Two Specialty Mental Health Clinics. Community Ment Health J 2019; 55:641-650. [PMID: 30317442 PMCID: PMC6447505 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-018-0341-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Electronic shared-decision making programs may provide an assistive technology to support physician-patient communication. This mixed methods study examined use of a web-based shared decision-making program (MyCHOIS-CommonGround) by individuals receiving specialty mental health services, and identified qualitative factors influencing adoption during the first 18 months of implementation in two Medicaid mental health clinics. T-tests and χ2 analyses were conducted to assess differences in patient use between sites. Approximately 80% of patients in both clinics created a MyCHOIS-CommonGround user profile, but marked differences emerged between clinics in patients completing shared decision-making reports (79% vs. 28%, χ2(1) = 109.92, p < .01) and average number of reports (7.20 vs. 3.60, t = - 3.64, p < .01). Results suggest high penetration of computer-based programs in specialty mental health services is possible, but clinic implementation factors can influence patient use including leadership commitment, peer staff funding to support the program, and implementation strategy, most notably integration of the program within routine clinical workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Finnerty
- New York State Office of Mental Health, 330 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
- New York University Langone Medical Center, One Park Ave, 7th Floor, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Elizabeth Austin
- New York State Office of Mental Health, 330 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10001, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th Street, Box 354808, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Qingxian Chen
- New York State Office of Mental Health, 75 New Scotland Ave, CDPC Unit R, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Deborah Layman
- New York State Office of Mental Health, 330 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10001, USA
| | - Edith Kealey
- New York State Office of Mental Health, 330 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10001, USA
- NYC Department of Social Services, 150 Greenwich St., 42nd Floor, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daisy Ng-Mak
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., 84 Waterford Drive, Marlborough, MA, 01752, USA
| | | | - Kimberly Hoagwood
- New York University Langone Medical Center, One Park Ave, 7th Floor, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zisman-Ilani Y, Roe D, Elwyn G, Kupermintz H, Patya N, Peleg I, Karnieli-Miller O. Shared Decision Making for Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Before Discharge from Psychiatric Hospitals. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2019; 34:631-637. [PMID: 29393685 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1431018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Shared decision making (SDM) is an effective health communication model designed to facilitate patient engagement in treatment decision making. In mental health, SDM has been applied and evaluated for medications decision making but less for its contribution to personal recovery and rehabilitation in psychiatric settings. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the effect of SDM in choosing community psychiatric rehabilitation services before discharge from psychiatric hospitalization. A pre-post non-randomized design with two consecutive inpatient cohorts, SDM intervention (N = 51) and standard care (N = 50), was applied in two psychiatric hospitals in Israel. Participants in the intervention cohort reported greater engagement and knowledge after choosing rehabilitation services and greater services use at 6-to-12-month follow-up than those receiving standard care. No difference was found for rehospitalization rate. Two significant interaction effects indicated greater improvement in personal recovery over time for the SDM cohort. SDM can be applied to psychiatric rehabilitation decision making and can help promote personal recovery as part of the discharge process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaara Zisman-Ilani
- a Department of Rehabilitation Sciences , College of Public Health, Temple University
| | - David Roe
- b Department of Community Mental Health, Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences , University of Haifa
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- c The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel Medical School, Dartmouth College
| | - Haggai Kupermintz
- d Department of Learning, Instruction, and Teaching, Faculty of Education , University of Haifa
| | - Noa Patya
- e Shalvata Mental Health Center , Hod HaSharon
| | | | - Orit Karnieli-Miller
- g Department of Medical Education, Sackler Faculty of Medicine , Tel Aviv University
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang K, Varma DS, Prosperi M. A systematic review of the effectiveness of mobile apps for monitoring and management of mental health symptoms or disorders. J Psychiatr Res 2018; 107:73-78. [PMID: 30347316 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Revised: 09/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are a growing number of mobile apps available for monitoring and management of mental health symptoms or disorders. However, clinically validated evidence for most of them is unclear; their benefits to patients on long term use are thus debatable. OBJECTIVE This updated review aimed to systematically appraise the available research evidence of the efficacy and acceptability of mobile apps for mental health in all ages. METHODS A comprehensive literature search (May 2013 to December 2017) in PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted. Abstracts were included if they described mental health apps (targeting depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, psychosis, post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD), substance use disorders, sleep disorders, and suicidal behaviors) delivered on mobile devices for all ages. RESULTS In total, 1501 abstracts were identified. Of these, 17 publications describing 16 apps targeting anxiety/stress, alcohol disorder, sleep disorder, depression, suicidal behaviors, and PTSD met the inclusion criteria. Five studies randomized individuals to trial conditions, and 14 apps were proven to have clinically validated evidence in reducing mental health symptoms or disorder. CONCLUSIONS Mental health apps have potentials in improving the monitoring and management of mental health symptoms or disorders. However, majority of the apps that are currently available lack clinically validated evidence of their efficacy. Given the number and pace at which mobile Health (mHealth) apps are being released, further robust research is warranted to develop and test evidence-based programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Wang
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Deepthi S Varma
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mattia Prosperi
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Patients Decision Aid System Based on FHIR Profiles. J Med Syst 2018; 42:166. [PMID: 30066031 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-018-1016-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Patients are becoming more and more involved in clinical decision-making process. Several factors support this process. Advances in omics allows individualization of diagnosis and treatment. Patient awareness and easy availability of data on the Internet allows patients to become informed decision makers when it comes even to disease management. Mass media emphasize the issue of medical errors, making patients demanding for quality in medical care. In some healthcare settings, patents face a problem of interpreting medical data and making decisions on treatment tactics without having a doctor, who could potentially support them. Delegating this task to a Patient Decision Aide system can add automatically generated recommendations to result reports without adding significant workload on the doctors, increase patients' motivation and support their decisions. We have implemented a patient decision aid system based on the productions rules, which: Collects data from available sources; Automatically analyses and interprets laboratory test results; Recommends running additional tests for a more precise diagnostic; Delivers automatically generated reports to doctors and patients in a natural language. To achieve semantic interoperability with other systems we have implemented a FHIR engine. The knowledge base has been organized as a graph structure. The application is structured as a set of lightly coupled services, which implement the logic of the decision support system. In total, we have modelled 365 nodes of test components, 5084 nodes of inference rules, 49932 connections and 3072 blocks of text for medical certificates. The findings of the research provide a deep understanding of how the semantically interoperable clinical decision support systems are implemented. Advances in notification the patients with the elements of patient decision aid is important for clinical data management, and for patients' empowerment and protection. We suppose that the system empowering patients in such way can play a meaningful role in helping patients to make informed decisions during the process of diagnostics and treatment.
Collapse
|
15
|
Zisman-Ilani Y, Shern D, Deegan P, Kreyenbuhl J, Dixon L, Drake R, Torrey W, Mishra M, Gorbenko K, Elwyn G. Continue, adjust, or stop antipsychotic medication: developing and user testing an encounter decision aid for people with first-episode and long-term psychosis. BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18:142. [PMID: 29788933 PMCID: PMC5963160 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-018-1707-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2017] [Accepted: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with psychosis struggle with decisions about their use of antipsychotics. They often want to reduce the dose or stop, while facing uncertainty regarding the effects these decisions will have on their treatment and recovery. They may also fear raising this issue with clinicians. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a shared decision making (SDM) tool to support patients and clinicians in making decisions about antipsychotics. METHODS A diverse editorial research team developed an Encounter Decision Aid (EDA) for patients and clinicians to use as part of the psychiatric consultation. The EDA was tested using 24 semistructured interviews with participants representing six stakeholder groups: patients with first-episode psychosis, patients with long-term psychosis, family members, psychiatrists, mental health counselors, and administrators. We used inductive and deductive coding of interview transcripts to identify points to revise within three domains: general impression and purpose of the EDA; suggested changes to the content, wording, and appearance; and usability and potential contribution to the psychiatric consultation. RESULTS An EDA was developed in an iterative process that yielded evidence-based answers to five frequently asked questions about antipsychotic medications. Patients with long-term psychosis and mental health counselors suggested more changes and revisions than patients with first-episode psychosis and psychiatrists. Family members suggested more revisions to the answers about potential risks of stopping or adjusting antipsychotics than other respondents. CONCLUSIONS The EDA was perceived as potentially useful and feasible in psychiatric routine care, especially if presented during the consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaara Zisman-Ilani
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1700 North Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
| | - David Shern
- Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA
| | | | - Julie Kreyenbuhl
- The Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
- VA Capitol Healthcare Network (VISN 5), Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Lisa Dixon
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY USA
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
| | - Robert Drake
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH USA
| | - William Torrey
- Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH USA
| | - Manish Mishra
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH USA
| | - Ksenia Gorbenko
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY USA
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Paudel S, Sharma N, Joshi A, Randall M. Development of a Shared Decision Making Model in a Community Mental Health Center. Community Ment Health J 2018; 54:1-6. [PMID: 28378300 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-017-0134-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2016] [Accepted: 03/25/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Shared Decision Making (SDM) is an essential component of recovery oriented treatment for clients with severe and persistent mental illnesses. SDM has been found to be effective in improving outcome of treatment of non-psychiatric ailments, and studies of SDM in community mental health settings are limited. We designed and implemented a low tech SDM program in a non-academic community mental health center and evaluated the outcome on decisional certainty and satisfaction with services. The results suggest that SDM can be effectively integrated with evidence based psychiatric rehabilitation practices utilizing already existing resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shreedhar Paudel
- Department of Psychiatry, Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, MA, USA.
| | - Neeta Sharma
- Department of Psychiatry, Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, MA, USA
| | | | - Melinda Randall
- Department of Psychiatry, Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, MA, USA.,Community Services Division, Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services, Pittsfield, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Harris K, Brooks H, Lythgoe G, Bee P, Lovell K, Drake RJ. Exploring service users', carers' and professionals' perspectives and experiences of current antipsychotic prescribing: A qualitative study. Chronic Illn 2017; 13:275-287. [PMID: 29119866 DOI: 10.1177/1742395317694223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Shared decision-making is the pinnacle of patient-centred care; mental health stakeholders value shared decision-making but find it difficult to enact. The objective was to compare and synthesise mental health stakeholder views on antipsychotic prescribing in one NHS Trust, to understand potential reasons for the difficult enactment of shared decision-making in practice. Methods We conducted 12 interviews and 5 focus groups with 33 mental health stakeholders, after obtaining their informed consent. They shared their experiences in and perceptions of antipsychotic prescribing and were recruited from Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust. Results Stakeholders agreed that successful shared decision-making demands a collaborative approach. We elucidated a striking divergence in views of the decision-making process and understanding of collaboration. Nurses, consultants and the pharmacist seemed most satisfied with the amount of collaboration but most pessimistic about the scope for it. Carers and most service users did not feel that there was any collaboration. Discussion Comparison of perspectives demonstrated the complexity of shared decision-making which is not addressed in current operational definitions or policy or nursing practice initiatives. The findings have the potential to progress initiatives in the mental health field from those that emphasise the need for shared decision-making to those that develop tools to promote shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamelia Harris
- 1 School of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen Brooks
- 2 School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Garry Lythgoe
- 2 School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Penny Bee
- 2 School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- 2 School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard J Drake
- 3 Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,4 Manchester Mental Health & Social Care NHS Trust, North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Quaglini S, Sacchi L, Lanzola G, Viani N. Personalization and Patient Involvement in Decision Support Systems: Current Trends. Yearb Med Inform 2017; 10:106-18. [PMID: 26293857 DOI: 10.15265/iy-2015-015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This survey aims at highlighting the latest trends (2012-2014) on the development, use, and evaluation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) based decision support systems (DSSs) in medicine, with a particular focus on patient-centered and personalized care. METHODS We considered papers published on scientific journals, by querying PubMed and Web of ScienceTM. Included studies focused on the implementation or evaluation of ICT-based tools used in clinical practice. A separate search was performed on computerized physician order entry systems (CPOEs), since they are increasingly embedding patient-tailored decision support. RESULTS We found 73 papers on DSSs (53 on specific ICT tools) and 72 papers on CPOEs. Although decision support through the delivery of recommendations is frequent (28/53 papers), our review highlighted also DSSs only based on efficient information presentation (25/53). Patient participation in making decisions is still limited (9/53), and mostly focused on risk communication. The most represented medical area is cancer (12%). Policy makers are beginning to be included among stakeholders (6/73), but integration with hospital information systems is still low. Concerning knowledge representation/management issues, we identified a trend towards building inference engines on top of standard data models. Most of the tools (57%) underwent a formal assessment study, even if half of them aimed at evaluating usability and not effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS Overall, we have noticed interesting evolutions of medical DSSs to improve communication with the patient, consider the economic and organizational impact, and use standard models for knowledge representation. However, systems focusing on patient-centered care still do not seem to be available at large.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Quaglini
- Silvana Quaglini, Department of Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 5, 27100 Pavia, Italy, Tel: +39 0382 985058, Fax: +39 0382 985060, E-mail:
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brooks H, Harris K, Bee P, Lovell K, Rogers A, Drake R. Exploring the potential implementation of a tool to enhance shared decision making (SDM) in mental health services in the United Kingdom: a qualitative exploration of the views of service users, carers and professionals. Int J Ment Health Syst 2017; 11:42. [PMID: 28670338 PMCID: PMC5490161 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-017-0149-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As a response to evidence that mental health service users and carers expect greater involvement in decisions about antipsychotic medication choice and prescribing, shared decision-making (SDM) has increasingly come to be viewed as an essential element of person-centred care and practice. However, this aspiration has yet to be realised in practice, as service users and carers continue to feel alienated from healthcare services. Existing understanding of the factors affecting the use of tools to support SDM is limited to inter-individual influences and wider factors affecting potential implementation are underexplored. AIM To explore the potential use of a tool designed to enhance collaborative antipsychotic prescribing from the perspectives of secondary care mental health service users, carers and professionals. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study (semi-structured interviews and focus groups) using a convenience sample of 33 participants (10 mental health service users, 10 carers and 13 professionals) involved in antipsychotic prescribing in one Trust in the North of England. Participants were asked about the potential implementation of a tool to support SDM within secondary mental health services. Framework analysis incorporating the use of constant comparative method was used to analyse the data. RESULTS The study identified a divergence in the views of service users and professionals, including a previously undocumented tendency for stakeholder groups to blame each other for potential implementation failure. This dissonance was shaped by meso and macro level influences relating to paternalism, legislative frameworks, accountability and lack of resources. Participants did not identify any macro level (policy or structural) facilitators to the use of the tool highlighting the negative impact of mental health contexts. Our study indicated that inter-individual factors are likely to be most important to implementation, given their potential to transcend meso and macro level barriers. CONCLUSIONS Consideration of the meso and macro level influences identified areas for potential intervention, including challenging professionals' and service users' perceptions of each other, rebalancing the notion of accountability within services and introducing new means for service user feedback on the quality of SDM. Multi-level strategies for facilitating the implementation of tools to support SDM are also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Brooks
- Mental Health Research Group, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| | - Kamelia Harris
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| | - Penny Bee
- Mental Health Research Group, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- Mental Health Research Group, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| | - Anne Rogers
- NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Richard Drake
- Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Room 3.315 Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gammon D, Strand M, Eng LS, Børøsund E, Varsi C, Ruland C. Shifting Practices Toward Recovery-Oriented Care Through an E-Recovery Portal in Community Mental Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e145. [PMID: 28465277 PMCID: PMC5434256 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Revised: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mental health care is shifting from a primary focus on symptom reduction toward personal recovery-oriented care, especially for persons with long-term mental health care needs. Web-based portals may facilitate this shift, but little is known about how such tools are used or the role they may play in personal recovery. Objective The aim was to illustrate uses and experiences with the secure e-recovery portal “ReConnect” as an adjunct to ongoing community mental health care and explore its potential role in shifting practices toward recovery. Methods ReConnect was introduced into two Norwegian mental health care communities and used for 6 months. The aim was to support personal recovery and collaboration between service users and health care providers. Among inclusion criteria for participation were long-term care needs and at least one provider willing to interact with service users through ReConnect. The portal was designed to support ongoing collaboration as each service user-provider dyad/team found appropriate and consisted of (1) a toolbox of resources for articulating and working with recovery processes, such as status/goals/activities relative to life domains (eg, employment, social network, health), medications, network map, and exercises (eg, sleep hygiene, mindfulness); (2) messaging with providers who had partial access to toolbox content; and (3) a peer support forum. Quantitative data (ie, system log, questionnaires) were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data (eg, focus groups, forum postings) are presented relative to four recovery-oriented practice domains: personally defined recovery, promoting citizenship, working relationships, and organizational commitment. Results Fifty-six participants (29 service users and 27 providers) made up 29 service user-provider dyads. Service users reported having 11 different mental health diagnoses, with a median 2 (range 1-7) diagnoses each. The 27 providers represented nine different professional backgrounds. The forum was the most frequently used module with 1870 visits and 542 postings. Service users’ control over toolbox resources (eg, defining and working toward personal goals), coupled with peer support, activated service users in their personal recovery processes and in community engagement. Some providers (30%, 8/27) did not interact with service users through ReConnect. Dyads that used the portal resources did so in highly diverse ways, and participants reported needing more than 6 months to discover and adapt optimal uses relative to their individual and collaborative needs. Conclusions Regardless of providers’ portal use, service users’ control over toolbox resources, coupled with peer support, offered an empowering common frame of reference that represented a shift toward recovery-oriented practices within communities. Although service users’ autonomous use of the portal can eventually influence providers in the direction of recovery practices, a fundamental shift is unlikely without broader organizational commitments aligned with recovery principles (eg, quantified goals for service user involvement in care plans).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deede Gammon
- Center for Shared Decision-Making and Collaborative Care Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Monica Strand
- Center for Shared Decision-Making and Collaborative Care Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Psychiatry Blakstad, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Asker, Norway.,University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lillian Sofie Eng
- Center for Shared Decision-Making and Collaborative Care Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elin Børøsund
- Center for Shared Decision-Making and Collaborative Care Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Varsi
- Center for Shared Decision-Making and Collaborative Care Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cornelia Ruland
- Center for Shared Decision-Making and Collaborative Care Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Strand M, Gammon D, Ruland CM. Transitions from biomedical to recovery-oriented practices in mental health: a scoping review to explore the role of Internet-based interventions. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:257. [PMID: 28388907 PMCID: PMC5385090 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2176-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Internet is transforming mental health care services by increasing access to, and potentially improving the quality of, care. Internet-based interventions in mental health can potentially play a role in transitions from biomedical to recovery-oriented research and practices, but an overview of what this may entail, current work, and issues that need addressing, is lacking. The objective of this study is to describe Internet-based recovery-oriented interventions (referred to as e-recovery) and current research, and to identify gaps and issues relevant to advancing recovery research and practices through opportunities provided by the Internet. Methods Five iterative stages of a scoping review framework were followed in searching and analyzing the literature. A recovery framework with four domains and 16 themes was used to deductively code intervention characteristics according to their support for recovery-oriented practices. Only Internet-based interventions used in conjunction with ongoing care were included. Results Twenty studies describing six e-recovery interventions were identified and originated in Australia, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway and USA. The domain supporting personal recovery was most clearly reflected in interventions, whereas the last three domains, i.e., promoting citizenship, organizational commitment and working relationship were less evident. Support for the formulation and follow-up of personal goals and preferences, and in accessing peer-support, were the characteristics shared by most interventions. Three of the six studies that employed a comparison group used randomization, and none presented definitive findings. None used recovery-oriented frameworks or specific recovery outcome measures. Four of the interventions were specific to a diagnosis. Conclusion Research about how technologies might aid in illuminating and shaping recovery processes is in its formative stages. We recommend that future e-recovery research and innovation attend to four dimensions: evidence-supported interventions, new knowledge about personal recovery, values-based approaches and Internet as a facilitator for organizational transformation. The incremental changes facilitated by e-recovery may help propel a shift in mental health care toward recovery-oriented practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Strand
- Centre for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway. .,Department of Psychiatry Blakstad, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Asker, Norway. .,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Deede Gammon
- Centre for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway.,Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, University Hospital in North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Cornelia M Ruland
- Centre for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Salyers MP, Fukui S, Bonfils KA, Firmin RL, Luther L, Goscha R, Rapp CA, Holter MC. Consumer Outcomes After Implementing CommonGround as an Approach to Shared Decision Making. Psychiatr Serv 2017; 68:299-302. [PMID: 27903137 PMCID: PMC5658777 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors examined consumer outcomes before and after implementing CommonGround, a computer-based shared decision-making program. METHODS Consumers with severe mental illness (N=167) were interviewed prior to implementation and 12 and 18 months later to assess changes in active treatment involvement, symptoms, and recovery-related attitudes. Providers also rated consumers on level of treatment involvement. RESULTS Most consumers used CommonGround at least once (67%), but few used the program regularly. Mixed-effects regression analyses showed improvement in self-reported symptoms and recovery attitudes. Self-reported treatment involvement did not change; however, for a subset of consumers with the same providers over time (N=83), the providers rated consumers as more active in treatment. CONCLUSIONS This study adds to the growing literature on tools to support shared decision making, showing the potential benefits of CommonGround for improving recovery outcomes. More work is needed to better engage consumers in CommonGround and to test the approach with more rigorous methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle P Salyers
- Dr. Salyers, Ms. Bonfils, Ms. Firmin, and Ms. Luther are with the Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis (e-mail: ). Dr. Fukui, Dr. Goscha, and Dr. Rapp are with the School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, Lawrence, where Dr. Holter was affiliated when this work was done
| | - Sadaaki Fukui
- Dr. Salyers, Ms. Bonfils, Ms. Firmin, and Ms. Luther are with the Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis (e-mail: ). Dr. Fukui, Dr. Goscha, and Dr. Rapp are with the School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, Lawrence, where Dr. Holter was affiliated when this work was done
| | - Kelsey A Bonfils
- Dr. Salyers, Ms. Bonfils, Ms. Firmin, and Ms. Luther are with the Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis (e-mail: ). Dr. Fukui, Dr. Goscha, and Dr. Rapp are with the School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, Lawrence, where Dr. Holter was affiliated when this work was done
| | - Ruth L Firmin
- Dr. Salyers, Ms. Bonfils, Ms. Firmin, and Ms. Luther are with the Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis (e-mail: ). Dr. Fukui, Dr. Goscha, and Dr. Rapp are with the School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, Lawrence, where Dr. Holter was affiliated when this work was done
| | - Lauren Luther
- Dr. Salyers, Ms. Bonfils, Ms. Firmin, and Ms. Luther are with the Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis (e-mail: ). Dr. Fukui, Dr. Goscha, and Dr. Rapp are with the School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, Lawrence, where Dr. Holter was affiliated when this work was done
| | - Rick Goscha
- Dr. Salyers, Ms. Bonfils, Ms. Firmin, and Ms. Luther are with the Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis (e-mail: ). Dr. Fukui, Dr. Goscha, and Dr. Rapp are with the School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, Lawrence, where Dr. Holter was affiliated when this work was done
| | - Charles A Rapp
- Dr. Salyers, Ms. Bonfils, Ms. Firmin, and Ms. Luther are with the Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis (e-mail: ). Dr. Fukui, Dr. Goscha, and Dr. Rapp are with the School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, Lawrence, where Dr. Holter was affiliated when this work was done
| | - Mark C Holter
- Dr. Salyers, Ms. Bonfils, Ms. Firmin, and Ms. Luther are with the Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis (e-mail: ). Dr. Fukui, Dr. Goscha, and Dr. Rapp are with the School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, Lawrence, where Dr. Holter was affiliated when this work was done
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hamann J, Holzhüter F, Stecher L, Heres S. Shared decision making PLUS - a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS). BMC Psychiatry 2017; 17:78. [PMID: 28231777 PMCID: PMC5324213 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1240-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 02/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision making (SDM) is a model of how doctors and patients interact with each other. It aims at changing the traditional power asymmetry between doctors and patients by strengthening the exchange of information and the decisional position of the patient. Although SDM is generally welcomed by mental health patients as well as by mental health professionals its implementation in routine care, especially in the more acute settings, is still lacking. SDM-PLUS has been developed as an approach that addresses both patients and mental health professionals and aims at implementing SDM even for the very acutely ill patients. METHODS The SDM-PLUS study will be performed as a matched-pair cluster-randomized trial in acute psychiatric wards. On wards allocated to the intervention group personnel will receive communication training (addressing how to implement SDM for various scenarios) and patients will receive a group intervention addressing patient skills for SDM. Wards allocated to the control condition will continue treatment as usual. A total sample size of 276 patients suffering from schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder on 12 wards is planned. The main outcome parameter will be patients' perceived involvement in decision making during the inpatient stay measured with the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire. Secondary objectives include the therapeutic relationship and long term outcomes such as medication adherence and rehospitalization rates. In addition, process measures and qualitative data will be obtained to allow for the analysis of potential barriers and facilitators of SDM-PLUS. The primary analysis will be a comparison of SDM-Q-9 sum scores 3 weeks after study inclusion (or discharge, if earlier) between the intervention and control groups. To assess the effect of the intervention on this continuous primary outcome, a random effects linear regression model will be fitted with ward (cluster) as a random effect term and intervention group as a fixed effect. DISCUSSION This will be the first trial examining the SDM-PLUS approach for patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in very acute mental health inpatient settings. Within the trial a complex intervention will be implemented that addresses both patients and health care staff to yield maximum effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00010880 . Registered 09 August 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Hamann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Fabian Holzhüter
- 0000000123222966grid.6936.aKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Lynne Stecher
- 0000 0004 0477 2438grid.15474.33Institut für Medizinische Statistik und Epidemiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Heres
- 0000000123222966grid.6936.aKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Training patients with schizophrenia to share decisions with their psychiatrists: a randomized-controlled trial. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2017; 52:175-182. [PMID: 28040825 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-016-1327-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many patients with schizophrenia have a desire for shared decision-making (SDM). However, in clinical practice SDM often does not take place. One cause might be that many patients behave passively in the medical encounter, therefore not facilitating SDM. It was the aim of the study to evaluate the effects of a patient directed SDM-training on patients' communicative behavior in the consultation, their attitudes towards decision-making and their long-term adherence. METHODS Randomized-controlled trial comparing a five-session SDM-training for inpatients with schizophrenia with five sessions of non-specific group training. The SDM-training sessions included motivational (e.g. prospects of participation, patient rights) and behavioral aspects (e.g. role plays) and addressed important aspects of the patient-doctor interaction such as question asking or giving feedback. RESULTS N = 264 patients were recruited in four psychiatric hospitals in Germany. The SDM-training yielded no group differences regarding the main outcome measure (treatment adherence) at 6 and 12 months after discharge. However, there were short-term effects on patients' participation preferences, their wish to take over more responsibility for medical decisions and (according to their psychiatrists' estimate) their behavior in psychiatric consultations. CONCLUSIONS While there was no effect regarding treatment adherence, the shared decision-making training for inpatients with schizophrenia has been shown to increase patients' active behavior in psychiatric consultations during their inpatient treatment. When implemented it should be combined with complementary SDM interventions (decision support tools and communication training for professionals) to yield maximum effects.
Collapse
|
25
|
Daly R, Bunn F, Goodman C. Shared decision-making for people living with dementia in extended care settings: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012955. [PMID: 27807088 PMCID: PMC5129130 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately 450 000 people in the UK are living in care homes, 70% of whom are thought to have dementia or significant memory problems. This means that they may need support with day-to-day decisions about their health and care. Shared decision-making interventions can have a positive impact on patient outcomes. They recognise an individual's rights to make decisions about their care or treatment and support person-centred approaches to care delivery. METHODS A systematic review of studies designed to assess, implement, measure and/or explore shared decision-making with cognitively impaired adults in (or transferrable to) an extended care setting, with a view to answering the research question: How can people living with dementia and cognitive impairment be included in day-to-day decisions about their health and care in extended care settings? The systematic review will be started in May 2016. Studies are excluded that focus on advance decision-making. The search strategy is limited to a 20-year timeframe and English language and includes electronic databases; CINAHL, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, NICE Evidence, OpenGrey, Autism Data, Google Scholar, Scopus and MedicinesComplete. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval not required. Planned dissemination routes for protocol and systematic review through conference presentations, peer-reviewed journals and research networks including the East of England CLAHRC, INTERDEM, and the National Care Homes Research and Development Forum. DISCUSSION The review will explore how shared decision-making is characterised and constructed in extended care settings for people living with cognitive impairment and their staff and family carers, in relation to their preferences and desires, the roles people play, facilitators, barriers, risk and benefits. The findings will inform an intervention study facilitating shared decision-making for people living with dementia in care homes and have the potential to inform future policy and practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42016035919.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Daly
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care (CRIPACC), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Frances Bunn
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care (CRIPACC), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care (CRIPACC), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fukui S, Salyers MP, Rapp C, Goscha R, Young L, Mabry A. Supporting shared decision making beyond consumer-prescriber interactions: Initial development of the CommonGround fidelity scale. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION 2016; 19:252-267. [PMID: 28090194 DOI: 10.1080/15487768.2016.1197864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Shared decision-making has become a central tenet of recovery-oriented, person-centered mental health care, yet the practice is not always transferred to the routine psychiatric visit. Supporting the practice at the system level, beyond the interactions of consumers and medication prescribers, is needed for successful adoption of shared decision-making. CommonGround is a systemic approach, intended to be part of a larger integration of shared decision-making tools and practices at the system level. We discuss the organizational components that CommonGround uses to facilitate shared decision-making, and we present a fidelity scale to assess how well the system is being implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadaaki Fukui
- Director of Research, Center for Mental Health Research and Innovation, University of Kansas School of Social Welfare, 1315 Wakarusa Dr., Lawrence, KS 66049, U.S.A; TEL: 785-864-5874; FAX: 785-864-5277
| | - Michelle P Salyers
- Professor of Psychology and Director of the Clinical Psychology Program, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI); Co-Director of the ACT Center of Indiana, U.S.A. TEL: 317-274-2904
| | - Charlie Rapp
- Research Professor, Center for Mental Health Research and Innovation, University of Kansas School of Social Welfare, 1315 Wakarusa Dr., Lawrence, KS 66049, U.S.A TEL: 843-388-7842
| | - Rick Goscha
- Director, Center for Mental Health Research and Innovation, University of Kansas School of Social Welfare, 1315 Wakarusa Dr., Lawrence, KS 66049, U.S.A, Tel: 785-864-0149
| | - Leslie Young
- Project Manager, Center for Mental Health Research and Innovation, University of Kansas School of Social Welfare, 1315 Wakarusa Dr., Lawrence, KS 66049, U.S.A, Tel: 785-864-9005
| | - Ally Mabry
- EBP Coordinator, Center for Mental Health Research and Innovation, University of Kansas School of Social Welfare, 1315 Wakarusa Dr., Lawrence, KS 66049, U.S.A, Tel: 785-864-8037
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hamann J, Kohl S, McCabe R, Bühner M, Mendel R, Albus M, Bernd J. What can patients do to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative study of patients with depression or schizophrenia and psychiatrists. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2016; 51:617-25. [PMID: 26155899 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-015-1089-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2015] [Accepted: 06/29/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient involvement in decision making is endorsed by patients and professionals. While research has recently been conducted on how professionals can promote shared decision making (SDM), little is known about how patients can also facilitate SDM. METHODS Seven focus groups were conducted: 3 with psychiatrists and 4 with patients with schizophrenia or depression. The focus groups were transcribed and independently coded line by line by 2 researchers. Data were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS Seven themes related to patient attitudes and behaviors were identified: honesty and openness with one's psychiatrist and oneself, trust in one's psychiatrist and patience with the treatment, respect and politeness, informing the psychiatrist and giving feedback, engagement/active participation during the consultation, gathering information/preparing for the consultation and implementing decisions. Barriers (e.g., avolition, lack of decisional capacity, powerlessness during involuntary treatment) and facilitators of active patient behavior were also identified. CONCLUSIONS There are various ways in which patients can facilitate SDM/play a more active role in decision making, with patients emphasizing being open and honest and psychiatrists emphasizing being active in the consultation. Interventions to increase active patient behavior may enhance SDM in mental health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Hamann
- Psychiatric Department, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
| | - S Kohl
- Psychiatric Department, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - R McCabe
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - M Bühner
- Department for Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - R Mendel
- Psychiatric Department, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - M Albus
- Isar Amper Klinikum München Ost, kbo, Haar, Germany
| | - J Bernd
- Isar Amper Klinikum München Ost, kbo, Haar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bartelink C, van Yperen TA, ten Berge IJ. Deciding on child maltreatment: A literature review on methods that improve decision-making. CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT 2015; 49:142-53. [PMID: 26190191 DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2014] [Revised: 06/19/2015] [Accepted: 07/01/2015] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Assessment and decision-making in child maltreatment cases is difficult. Practitioners face many uncertainties and obstacles during their assessment and decision-making process. Research exhibits shortcomings in this decision-making process. The purpose of this literature review is to identify and discuss methods to overcome these shortcomings. We conducted a systematic review of the published literature on decision-making using PsychINFO and MEDLINE from 2000 through May 2014. We included reviews and quantitative research studies that investigated methods aimed at improving professional decision-making on child abuse and neglect in child welfare and child protection. Although many researchers have published articles on decision-making including ideas and theories to improve professional decision-making, empirical research on these improvements is scarce. Available studies have shown promising results. Structured decision-making has created a greater child-centred and holistic approach that takes the child's family and environment into account, which has made practitioners work more systematically and improved the analysis of complex situations. However, this approach has not improved inter-rater agreement on decisions made. Shared decision-making may improve the participation of parents and children and the quality of decisions by taking client treatment preferences into account in addition to scientific evidence and clinical experience. A number of interesting developments appear in recent research literature; however, child welfare and child protection must find additional inspiration from other areas, e.g., mental health services, because research on decision-making processes in child welfare and child protection is still rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cora Bartelink
- Netherlands Youth Institute, Catharijnesingel 47, Postbox 19221, 3501 DE Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tom A van Yperen
- Netherlands Youth Institute, Catharijnesingel 47, Postbox 19221, 3501 DE Utrecht, The Netherlands; University of Groningen, Department of Pedagogy & Educational Sciences, Grote Rozenstraat 38, 9712 TJ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid J ten Berge
- Netherlands Youth Institute, Catharijnesingel 47, Postbox 19221, 3501 DE Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dahlqvist Jönsson P, Schön UK, Rosenberg D, Sandlund M, Svedberg P. Service users' experiences of participation in decision making in mental health services. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2015; 22:688-97. [PMID: 26148016 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
ACCESSIBLE SUMMARY Despite the potential positive impact of shared decision making on service users knowledge and experience of decisional conflict, there is a lack of qualitative research on how participation in decision making is promoted from the perspective of psychiatric service users. This study highlights the desire of users to participate more actively in decision making and demonstrates that persons with SMI struggle to be seen as competent and equal partners in decision-making situations. Those interviewed did not feel that their strengths, abilities and needs were being recognized, which resulted in a feeling of being omitted from involvement in decision-making situations. The service users describe some essential conditions that could work to promote participation in decision making. These included having personal support, having access to knowledge, being involved in a dialogue and clarity about responsibilities. Mental health nurses can play an essential role for developing and implementing shared decision making as a tool to promote recovery-oriented mental health services. ABSTRACT Service user participation in decision making is considered an essential component of recovery-oriented mental health services. Despite the potential of shared decision making to impact service users knowledge and positively influence their experience of decisional conflict, there is a lack of qualitative research on how participation in decision making is promoted from the perspective of psychiatric service users. In order to develop concrete methods that facilitate shared decision making, there is a need for increased knowledge regarding the users' own perspective. The aim of this study was to explore users' experiences of participation in decisions in mental health services in Sweden, and the kinds of support that may promote participation. Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) was utilized to analyse group and individual interviews with 20 users with experience of serious mental illness. The core category that emerged in the analysis described a 'struggle to be perceived as a competent and equal person' while three related categories including being the underdog, being controlled and being omitted described the difficulties of participating in decisions. The data analysis resulted in a model that describes internal and external conditions that influence the promotion of participation in decision making. The findings offer new insights from a user perspective and these can be utilized to develop and investigate concrete methods in order to promote user's participation in decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Dahlqvist Jönsson
- Department of Research, Development and Education (FoUU), Region of Halland, Sweden.,School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Sweden
| | - U-K Schön
- School of Health and Social Work, Dalarna University, Sweden
| | - D Rosenberg
- Department of Social Work, Umeå University, Sweden
| | - M Sandlund
- Department of Social Work, Umeå University, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science, Umeå University, Sweden
| | - P Svedberg
- School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Martin L, Perlman C, Bieling P. Using the RAI-MH to support shared decision-making in mental healthcare. Healthc Manage Forum 2015; 28:163-6. [PMID: 26015490 DOI: 10.1177/0840470415581231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Persons with mental illness often struggle to meaningfully participate in decisions about their services. This study engaged persons with mental illness to understand how health information could empower them. Participants reported wanting information on diagnoses, medications, symptoms, and strengths as well as clinician notes and rationale. The Resident Assessment Instrument for Mental Health contains this information and is mandated in in-patient psychiatry. Its findings could be summarized and shared with individuals to promote and facilitate shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Martin
- Department of Health Sciences, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Christopher Perlman
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Bieling
- Mood Disorders Service, Centre for Mountain Health Services, St. Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Clarke E, Puschner B, Jordan H, Williams P, Konrad J, Kawohl W, Bär A, Rössler W, Del Vecchio V, Sampogna G, Nagy M, Süveges A, Krogsgaard Bording M, Slade M. Empowerment and satisfaction in a multinational study of routine clinical practice. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2015; 131:369-78. [PMID: 25471821 DOI: 10.1111/acps.12365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Decision-making between mental health clinicians and patients is under-researched. We tested whether mental health patients are more satisfied with a decision made (i) using their preferred decision-making style and (ii) with a clinician with the same decision-making style preference. METHOD As part of the CEDAR Study (ISRCTN75841675), a convenience sample of 445 patients with severe mental illness from six European countries were assessed for desired clinical decision-making style (rated by patients and paired clinicians), decision-specific experienced style and satisfaction. RESULTS Patients who experienced more involvement in decision-making than they desired rated higher satisfaction (OR=2.47, P=0.005, 95% CI 1.32-4.63). Decisions made with clinicians whose decision-making style preference was for more active involvement than the patient preference were rated with higher satisfaction (OR=3.17, P=0.003, 95% CI 1.48-6.82). CONCLUSION More active involvement in decision-making than the patient stated as desired was associated with higher satisfaction. A clinical orientation towards empowering, rather than shared, decision-making may maximise satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Clarke
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bonfils KA, Fukui S, Adams EL, Hedrick HM, Salyers MP. Why are you here again? Concordance between consumers and providers about the primary concern in recurring psychiatric visits. Psychiatry Res 2014; 220:541-8. [PMID: 25130783 PMCID: PMC4254049 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.07.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2014] [Revised: 05/07/2014] [Accepted: 07/24/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Patient-centered care has become increasingly important over the last decade, both in physical and mental health care. In support of patient-centered care, providers need to understand consumers׳ primary concerns during treatment visits. The current study explored what primary concerns were brought to recurring psychiatric visits for a sample of adults with severe mental illness (N=164), whether these concerns were concordant with those recognized by providers, and which factors predicted concordance. We identified 17 types of primary concerns, most commonly medications and symptoms, with only 50% of visits showing evidence of at least partial agreement between consumers and providers. Contrary to expectations, consumer demographics, activation, trust, and perceptions of patient-centeredness were not predictive, while greater preferences for autonomy predicted poorer agreement. Our findings highlight the need for interventions to promote a shared understanding of primary concerns in recurring psychiatric visits. Further attention is needed to ensure the provision of patient-centered care such that consumer concerns are acknowledged and addressed within recurring psychiatric visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey A. Bonfils
- Psychology Department, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA,ACT Center of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Sadaaki Fukui
- The University of Kansas School of Social Welfare Center for Mental Health Research and Innovation, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Erin L. Adams
- Psychology Department, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA,ACT Center of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Heidi M. Hedrick
- Psychology Department, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA,ACT Center of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Michelle P. Salyers
- Psychology Department, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA,ACT Center of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Shared decision-making (SDM) is a model of how doctors and patients make medical decisions, which is seen as very applicable to mental health. This review addresses the following issues: Do patients and professionals see the need for SDM? Does SDM actually take place for patients with schizophrenia? What are facilitators and barriers of SDM in schizophrenia treatment? What are the outcomes of SDM? RECENT FINDINGS Publications in the last 18 months showed the following: Both patients and providers acknowledge the desirability of SDM. SDM occurs less often in mental health than desired by patients and less frequently compared with general practice. SDM in mental health is complex, takes time and involves more than just two participants; patients' lack of decisional capacity is seen as the major barrier. There are only a few interventional studies measuring the outcome of SDM; existing research constantly shows positive, but small effects. SUMMARY SDM is highly accepted and wanted in the treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders, but more research is needed regarding how SDM can be implemented in regular care. Healthcare professionals need more training in how to deal with difficult decisional situations.
Collapse
|
34
|
Lessons from community mental health to drive implementation in health care systems for people with long-term conditions. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2014; 11:4714-28. [PMID: 24785742 PMCID: PMC4053874 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110504714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2014] [Revised: 04/08/2014] [Accepted: 04/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
This paper aims to identify which lessons learned from the evidence and the experiences accruing from the transformation in mental health services in recent decades may have relevance for the future development of healthcare for people with long-term physical conditions. First, nine principles are discussed which we first identified to guide mental health service organisation, and all of which can be potentially applied to long term care as well (autonomy, continuity, effectiveness, accessibility, comprehensiveness, equity, accountability, co-ordination, and efficiency). Second, we have outlined innovative operational aspects of service user participation, many of which were first initiated and consolidated in the mental health field, and some of which are now also being implemented in long term care (including case management, and crisis plans). We conclude that long term conditions, whether mental or physical, deserve a long-term commitment from the relevant health services, and indeed where continuity and co-ordination are properly funded implemented, this can ensure that the symptomatic course is more stable, quality of life is enhanced, and the clinical outcomes are more favourable. Innovations such as self-management for long-term conditions (intended to promote autonomy and empowerment) need to be subjected to the same level of rigorous scientific scrutiny as any other treatment or service interventions.
Collapse
|
35
|
Gammon D, Strand M, Eng LS. Service users' perspectives in the design of an online tool for assisted self-help in mental health: a case study of implications. Int J Ment Health Syst 2014; 8:2. [PMID: 24405765 PMCID: PMC3896741 DOI: 10.1186/1752-4458-8-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2013] [Accepted: 01/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The involvement of persons with lived experiences of mental illness and service use is increasingly viewed as key to improving the relevance and utility of mental health research and service innovation. Guided by the principles of Community-Based Participatory Research we developed an online tool for assisted self-help in mental health. The resulting tool, PsyConnect, is ready for testing in two communities starting 2014. This case study reports from the design phase which entailed clarifying very basic questions: Who is the primary target group? What are the aims? What functions are priorities? Roles and responsibilities? What types of evidence can legitimize tool design decisions? Here we highlight the views of service users as a basis for discussing implications of user involvement for service design and research. CASE DESCRIPTION PsyConnect has become a tool for those who expect to need assistance over long periods of time regardless of their specific condition(s). The aim is to support service users in gaining greater overview and control, legitimacy, and sense of continuity in relationships. It has a personalized "my control panel" which depicts status → process → goals. Functionality includes support for: mapping life domains; medication overview; crisis management; coping exercises; secure messaging; and social support. While the types of evidence that can legitimize design decisions are scattered and indirectly relevant, recent trends in recovery research will be used to guide further refinements. DISCUSSION PsyConnect has undoubtedly become something other than it would have been without careful attention to the views of service users. The tool invites a proactive approach that is likely to challenge treatment cultures that are reactive, disorder-focused and consultation-based. Service user representatives will need to play central roles in training peers and clinicians in order to increase the likelihood of tool usage in line with intentions. Similarly, their influence on tool design has implications for choice of methods for evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Starting down the path of service user involvement in intervention design fosters commitment to follow through in the remaining implementation and research phases. While this can be time-consuming and less meriting for researchers, it is probably vital to increasing the likelihood of success of person-centered service innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deede Gammon
- Norwegian Center for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, University Hospital of North-Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Nonadherence to appropriately prescribed medication for psychiatric disorders prevents patients from realizing the full benefits of their treatment and negatively impacts on individuals, their families and the healthcare system. Understanding and reducing nonadherence is therefore a key challenge to quality care for patients with psychiatric disorders. This review highlights findings regarding the prevalence and consequence of nonadherence, barriers to adherence and new intervention methods from 2012 onwards. RECENT FINDINGS Recent research has highlighted that nonadherence is a global challenge for psychiatry and has linked nonadherence to poorer outcomes, including hospital admissions, suicide and mortality. Optimizing medication regimens can reduce nonadherence; however, often a complex interplay of factors affects individuals' motivation and ability to follow their prescription. Psychiatrists can enable patients to develop an accurate model of their illness and treatment and facilitate adherence. However, nonadherence is often a hidden issue within consultations. Novel interventions using new technologies and tailoring techniques may have the potential to reduce nonadherence. SUMMARY Nonadherence remains a significant challenge for patients with psychiatric disorders, physicians and healthcare systems. New developments demonstrate the importance of developing tailored interventions to enable patients to overcome perceptual and practical barriers to adherence.
Collapse
|