Potential anti-inflammatory effects of proton pump inhibitors: a review and discussion of the clinical implications

Effects of proton pump inhibitors on inflammatory bowel disease: An updated review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is believed to be caused by various factors, including abnormalities in disease susceptibility genes, environmental factors, immune factors, and intestinal bacteria. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the primary drugs used to treat acid-related diseases. They are also commonly prescribed to patients with IBD. Recent studies have suggested a potential association between the use of certain medications, such as PPIs, and the occurrence and progression of IBD. In this review, we summarize the potential impact of PPIs on IBD and analyze the underlying mechanisms. Our findings may provide insights for conducting further investigations into the effects of PPIs on IBD and serve as an important reminder for physicians to exercise caution when prescribing PPIs to patients with IBD.

Use of proton pump inhibitors improves outcomes in mild acute pancreatitis: A nationwide cohort study

Previous studies showed a potential anti-inflammatory effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) as well as possible inhibition of pancreatic secretion. This presents the question of their possible use in acute pancreatitis (AP). Current clinical evidence does not address the role of PPI and the present review for possible therapeutic use and safety is lacking. Therefore, our study aims to address the role of PPI in the management of AP and their association with the different outcomes of AP. We queried the Diamond Network through TriNetX-Research Network. This network included 92 healthcare organizations. Patients with mild AP with Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) score of Zero regardless of etiology were divided into 2 cohorts; 1st cohort included patients on PPI, and 2nd cohort included patients not on any PPI. Patients with BISAP score equal to or more than 1 or on PPI prior to the study date were excluded. Two well-matched cohorts were created using 1:1 propensity-scored matching model between cohorts. We compared the incidence of intensive care unit admission, mortality, and other associated complications. A total of 431,571 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 32.9% (n = 142,062) were on PPI, and 67% (n = 289,509) were not on any PPI. After propensity matching, the sample included 115,630 patients on PPI vs 115,630 patients not on PPI. The PPI group had a lower rate of mortality (3.7% vs 4.4%, P < .001), a lower rate of intensive care unit admission (3.9% vs 5.5%, P < .001), a lower rate of necrotizing pancreatitis (1.1% vs 1.9%, P < .001), a lower rate of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (3.6% vs 4.9%, P < .001), a lower rate of respiratory failure (2.8% vs 4.2%, P < .001), and a lower rate of acute kidney injury (6.9% vs 10.1%, P < .001). There was no statistical difference in the rate of Clostridium difficile infection between the 2 cohorts (0.9% vs 0.8%, P = .5). The use of PPI in mild AP with a BISAP-score of zero is associated with reduced pancreatitis-related complications and improved mortality. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

The association between drugs and repeated treatment with budesonide in patients with microscopic colitis: a retrospective observational study

Background

Smoking and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and statins have been associated with microscopic colitis (MC).

Objectives

We investigated whether these factors were associated with repeated budesonide treatments in patients diagnosed with MC.

Design

Retrospective observational study.

Methods

All patients with a histologically verified diagnosis of MC at our clinic between the years 2006 and 2022 were identified. Baseline factors and drugs prescribed before and after diagnosis were registered. The influence of risk factors on the odds of having a prescription of oral budesonide and the odds of having a second course of budesonide was studied.

Results

Patients with MC (n = 183) with a mean age of 62.3 years [standard deviation (SD): 13.3 years] were followed for a median of 5 years (25th-75th percentile 4-10 years) after diagnosis. In all, 138 patients (75%) had at least one prescription of budesonide after diagnosis, and 90 patients (49%) had at least one clinical relapse treated with budesonide. Patients who had been prescribed NSAIDs within 1 year before clinical relapse had higher odds for clinical relapse [odds ratio (OR): 3.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-12.9] but there was no increased risk for clinical relapse for the use of ASA (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.39-2.90), PPIs (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.45-2.63), SSRI (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.82-2.44), or statins (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.35-1.99). No association was seen between being a smoker and/or being prescribed NSAID, ASA, PPI, SSRI, and statins at baseline and the odds of having a prescription of oral budesonide within 1 year after diagnosis.

Conclusion

The risk of being prescribed a second course of budesonide is associated with receiving a prescription of NSAIDs but not with the use of ASA, PPIs, SSRIs, and statins.

Proton pump inhibitors in esophageal atresia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is frequent and prolonged in esophageal atresia (EA) pediatric patients requiring routine use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). However, there are still controversies on the prophylactic use of PPIs and the efficacy of PPIs on GERD and EA complications in this special condition. The aim of the study is to assess the prophylactic use of PPIs in pediatric patients with EA and its complications. We, therefore, performed a systematic review including all reports on the subject from 1980 to 2022. We conducted meta-analysis of the pooled proportion of PPI-and no PPI groups using random effect model, meta-regression, and estimate heterogeneity by heterogeneity index I2 . Thirty-eight reports on the topic met the criteria selection, representing a cumulative 6044 patients with EA. Prophylactic PPI prescription during the first year of life does not appear to prevent GERD persistence at follow-up and is not associated with a significantly reduced rate of antireflux surgical procedures (ARP). PPIs improve peptic esophagitis and induce remission of eosinophilic esophagitis at a rate of 50%. Their effect on other GERD outcomes is uncertain. Evidence suggests that PPIs do not prevent anastomotic stricture, Barrett's esophagus, or respiratory complications. PPI use in EA can improve peptic and eosinophilic esophagitis but is ineffective on the other EA complications. Side effects of PPIs in EA are almost unknown.

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine type 2-receptor blockers (H2Bs) are commonly used for stress ulcer prophylaxis among patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Recent studies suggest an increased mortality associated with PPIs compared to H2Bs, but these studies poorly represent patients with cardiovascular disease or acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes related to stress ulcer prophylaxis with PPIs compared to H2Bs in patients with AMI requiring IMV.

Methods

We queried the Vizient Clinical Data Base for adults aged ≥18 years admitted between October 2015 and December 2019 with a primary diagnosis of AMI and requiring IMV. Using multivariable logistic regression, we assessed for the association between stress ulcer prophylaxis and in-hospital mortality.

Results

Including 11,252 patients with AMI requiring IMV, 66.7% (n = 7,504) received PPIs and 33.3% (n = 3,748) received H2Bs. Age, sex, and the proportion of patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or cardiogenic shock were similar between groups (all, P > 0.05). Compared to PPIs, patients receiving H2Bs had a lower mortality (41.5% vs 43.5%, P = 0.047), which was not statistically significant after multivariate adjustment (odds ratio 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.89-1.06, P = 0.49). In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, H2Bs use was associated with fewer ventilator days, less ventilator-associated pneumonia, and lower hospitalization cost but similar Clostridium difficile infections.

Conclusions

Among patients with AMI requiring IMV in this observation cohort study, there was no difference in mortality among patients receiving H2Bs vs PPIs for stress ulcer prophylaxis despite fewer ventilator days and lower ventilator-associated pneumonia in those receiving H2Bs.

PPIs therapy has a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of advanced SCLC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors has emerged as a first-line therapeutic strategy for advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which can stimulate T-cell activation, thereby preventing tumor avoidance of immunologic surveillance, whereas, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can play an important role in regulating immune function. This study assessed whether the concomitantly use of PPIs affected outcomes of immunotherapy in advanced SCLC.

METHODS

Data from advanced SCLC patients who firstly treated with PD-L1 inhibitors between July 2018 and February 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. The impact of concomitant medications (especially PPIs) on objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 208 patients, 101 received immunotherapy concomitant PPIs. The median PFS of patients receiving PPIs (6.6 months) were significantly shorter than those without PPIs (10.6 months), and so was OS. There was associated with a 74.9% increased risk of progression and 58.3% increased risk of death. Both first-line and post-first-line immunotherapy, patients treated PPIs had poorer PFS.

CONCLUSION

PPIs therapy has a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of advanced SCLC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors.

Risk factors and outcome associated with coinfection with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumanii: a descriptive analysis

Background

Nearly 30% of patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) were previously shown to be coinfected with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) or Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Infections caused by multiple carbapenem-resistant pathogens present significant challenge to infection control and therapeutic management. The study objective was to identify risk factors for acquisition of multiple carbapenem-resistant pathogens and associated outcomes.

Methods

A descriptive analysis of adults infected with either CRKP alone or coinfected with CRPA or CRAB was performed. Patient groups were compared on demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcome.

Results

86 patients with CRKP monoinfection and 60 patients with coinfections were evaluated. Respiratory tract was the predominant infection site for coinfected patients involving mostly CRPA whereas urinary tract was the primary site for CRKP-only group. More coinfected patients were severely debilitated, had prior carbapenem exposure (37% vs 13%, p<0.001) and history of pneumonia in the past year (67% vs 41%, p<0.01). More coinfected patients required direct ICU admission (45% vs 27%, p=0.02) and had prolonged length of stay (median 15 vs 10 days, p<0.01) than the CRKP-only group but mortality rates (18% vs 16%) were similar.

Conclusions

CRKP coinfection with another carbapenem-resistant pathogen adds significant morbidity and healthcare burden overall. Empiric therapy with reliable activity against both CRKP and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa may be prudent for at risk patients with pneumonia.

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study to Analyze the Effects of SUP Cessation

INTRODUCTION

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is an important complication among critically ill adults, especially those having cardiac surgery as management is complicated by the requirement for antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy. As a result, stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) has become routine practice in many centers, utilizing either proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor blockers (H2RBs). Recent evidence from the PEPTIC trial indicated an increase in mortality risk among cardiac surgery patients receiving PPIs compared to H2RBs. Considering these findings, alongside practical difficulties surrounding the transition to H2RBs as a prophylactic agent in New Zealand, Wellington Hospital intensive care unit elected to discontinue routine PPI use for SUP in cardiac surgery patients. A retrospective study was conducted to assess patient outcomes following the discontinuation of routine SUP.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery at Wellington Hospital between February/2018 and January/2022, and divided patients into cohorts before and after the discontinuation of routine use of SUP on the 31st of January 2020. The primary outcomes were the rate of UGIB, oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) and 180-day postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes included rates of postoperative Clostridium difficile enteritis, pneumonia, deep sternal wound infection, and length of stay of the index admission.

RESULTS

The rate of UGIB statistically significantly increased since the cessation of routine SUP in January 2020 (2.4% vs 5.4%, P-value = .004). This finding was mirrored with the increased rates of OGD (1.9% vs 4.0%, P-value = .005). There were no significant changes in 180-day mortality, hospital length of stay, or any of the postoperative infective complications analyzed, pneumonia, deep sternal wound infection, or C difficile enteritis.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests an association between routine use of SUP and reduced rates of clinically significant UGIB and OGD requirements in cardiac surgery patients without increasing risk of infective complications or postoperative mortality.

Mixed Esophageal Disease (MED): A New Concept

We define mixed esophageal disease (MED) as a disorder of esophageal structure and/or function that produces variable signs or symptoms, simulating-fully or in part other well-defined esophageal conditions, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophageal motility disorders, or even neoplasia. The central premise of the MED concept is that of an overlap syndrome that incorporates selected clinical, endoscopic, imaging, and functional features that alter the patient's quality of life and affect natural history, prognosis, and management. In this article, we highlight MED scenarios frequently encountered in medico-surgical practices worldwide, posing new diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. These, in turn, emphasize the need for better understanding and management, aiming towards improved outcomes and prognosis. Since MED has variable and sometimes time-evolving clinical phenotypes, it deserves proper recognition, definition, and collaborative, multidisciplinary approach, be it pharmacologic, endoscopic, or surgical, to optimize therapeutic outcomes, while minimizing iatrogenic complications. In this regard, it is best to define MED early in the process, preferably by teams of clinicians with expertise in managing esophageal diseases. MED is complex enough that is increasingly becoming the subject of virtual, multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional meetings.

New Ideas for the Prevention and Treatment of Preeclampsia and Their Molecular Inspirations

Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy-specific disorder affecting 4-10% of all expectant women. It greatly increases the risk of maternal and foetal death. Although the main symptoms generally appear after week 20 of gestation, scientific studies indicate that the mechanism underpinning PE is initiated at the beginning of gestation. It is known that the pathomechanism of preeclampsia is strongly related to inflammation and oxidative stress, which influence placentation and provoke endothelial dysfunction in the mother. However, as of yet, no "key players" regulating all these processes have been discovered. This might be why current therapeutic strategies intended for prevention or treatment are not fully effective, and the only effective method to stop the disease is the premature induction of delivery, mostly by caesarean section. Therefore, there is a need for further research into new pharmacological strategies for the treatment and prevention of preeclampsia. This review presents new preventive methods and therapies for PE not yet recommended by obstetrical and gynaecological societies. As many of these therapies are in preclinical studies or under evaluation in clinical trials, this paper reports the molecular targets of the tested agents or methods.

Non-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases: a narrative review

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders are a group of rare diseases characterized by the infiltration of eosinophils in the gastrointestinal wall in a greater amount than in homeostatic conditions. 'Non-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders' is the umbrella term for all eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders outside of the well known eosinophilic esophagitis. This includes eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic enteritis and eosinophilic colitis. The clinical presentation is atypical and not very different for the three disorders. The depth of infiltration has a bigger influence on the presenting symptoms than the disease location. Although the frequency of diagnosis and research in this subject is increasing over time, non-esophageal eosinophilic disorders are rare and high quality evidence is limited to date. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of the latest insights in the pathophysiology, diagnostic approach and available treatment options. Transcriptome studies have found the pathogenesis to be T helper type 2 driven. Various laboratory findings can be used to trigger raised suspicion and investigation with endoscopy. As the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa is normal in most cases, multiple biopsies in each segment are needed to quantify the amount of eosinophils in the tissue. Eosinophilic cut-offs for diagnosis are a controversial topic and a consensus is still lacking. A recently developed tissue based diagnostic platform which measures differentially expressed genes might be available in the future to classify patients with intermediate eosinophilic tissue levels under the cut-off. For the treatment, corticosteroids are still the cornerstone of treatment but promising research suggests a role of biologicals, such as Lirentelimab (anti-siglec 8) in particular.

Morphine use induces gastric microbial dysbiosis driving gastric inflammation through TLR2 signalling which is attenuated by proton pump inhibition

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Opioids are the standard drug for pain management; however, their effects on gastric dysfunction are relatively understudied. Opioid users have a higher incidence of gastric pathology leading to increased hospitalization. Herein, we investigated the consequences of morphine use on gastric pathology and the underlying mechanisms. We further investigated the therapeutic benefit of proton pump inhibition to overcome morphine-mediated gastric inflammation.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Mice were implanted with 25 mg slow-release morphine and placebo pellets. Gastric microbiome analyses were performed. Gastric damage was assayed. Gastric pH was measured. Germ-free and TLR2KO mice were used to investigate the mechanisms. Gastroprotective studies were performed with the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) omeprazole.

KEY RESULTS

Chronic morphine treatment alters gastric microbial composition and induces preferential expansion of pathogenic bacterial communities such as Streptococcus and Pseudomonas. Morphine causes disruption of the gastric mucosal layer, increases apoptosis, and elevates inflammatory cytokines. Moreover, morphine-mediated gastric pathology was significantly attenuated in germ-free mice, and reconstitution of morphine gastric microbiome in germ-free mice resulted gastric inflammation. In addition, morphine-mediated gastric inflammation was attenuated in TLR2KO mice. Morphine causes a decrease in gastric pH, which contributes to gastric dysbiosis leads to gastric inflammation. Omeprazole treatment inhibits gastric acidity, rescuing morphine-induced gastric dysbiosis and preventing inflammation.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

This study attributes morphine-induced gastric acidity as a driver of gastric dysbiosis and pathology and proposes the therapeutic use of PPI as an inexpensive approach for the clinical management of morphine-associated pathophysiology.

Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy Increases the Risk of Infection in Patients with Incident Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Infection is one of the most common causes of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are not only widely used in patients with CKD but also represent a known risk factor for infection in the general population. Here, we investigated associations between PPIs and infection events in patients with incident hemodialysis.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 485 consecutive patients with CKD who started hemodialysis at our hospital between January 2013 and December 2019. We analyzed associations between infection events and long-term (≥6 months) PPI use before and after propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 485 patients, PPIs were administered to 177 patients (36.5%). During 24 months of follow-up, infection events occurred in 53 patients (29.9%) with PPIs and 40 patients (13.0%) without PPIs (p < 0.001). Patients with PPIs had a significantly higher cumulative incidence rate of infection events than those without PPIs (hazard ratio [HR] 2.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-3.32; p < 0.001). Even after propensity score-matched analysis (132 patients matched in each), the rate of infection events was higher for patients with PPIs (28.8% vs. 12.1%, HR 2.88, 95% CI: 1.61-5.16; p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained for severe infection events in both unmatched (14.1% vs. 4.5%, HR 2.97, 95% CI: 1.47-6.00; p = 0.002) and propensity score-matched analyses (14.4% vs. 3.8%, HR 4.54, 95% CI: 1.85-11.13; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with incident hemodialysis, long-term PPI use increases the risk of infection. Clinicians should be wary of unnecessarily prolonging PPI therapy.

Association between clinical use of lansoprazole and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pharmacoepidemiological cohort study

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are common and widely used for gastrointestinal-related disorders. Lansoprazole is one of PPIs with potential benefits of anti-inflammation, reduced oxidative stress, and anti-diabetes. The aims of this study are to determine whether lansoprazole imparts differential risk of type 2 diabetes as compared with other PPIs.

METHODS

A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Patients who received lansoprazole more than 90 days and without records of use of other PPIs between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2005 (the exposure period) were considered as the exposed cohort (n = 1668). In comparison, patients who received other PPIs more than 90 days and without use of lansoprazole in the exposure period were treated as the comparison cohort (n = 3336).The primary outcome was the new-onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The association between use of lansoprazole and the risk of T2DM was determined by hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) derived from multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

The lansoprazole cohort showed a significantly reduced risk of T2DM with an adjusted HR of 0.65 (95% CI 0.56-0.76). Interestingly, the inverse association between use of lansoprazole and risk of T2DM was observed in both genders and in various age groups.

CONCLUSION

The present study findings suggest that lansoprazole was associated with a reduced risk of T2DM compared with other PPIs. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical implications of the present study.

Proton pump inhibitor-induced gut dysbiosis and immunomodulation: current knowledge and potential restoration by probiotics

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most commonly prescribed drugs for the treatment of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), ulcers associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease (PUD), Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), non-ulcer dyspepsia, and Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. The drugs have the effect of inhibiting acid production in the stomach. According to research, PPIs can affect the composition of gut microbiota and modulate the immune response. Recently, there has been a problem with the over-prescription of such drugs. Although PPIs do not have many side effects, their long-term use can contribute to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) or C. difficile and other intestinal infections. Probiotic supplementation during PPIs therapy may provide some hope in the reduction of emerging therapy side effects. This review aims to present the most important effects of long-term PPI use and provides critical insights into the role of probiotic intervention in PPI therapy.

No evidence for the benefit of PPIs in the treatment of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Although current guidelines do not recommend the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the standard of care of acute pancreatitis (AP), they are often prescribed in clinical practice, mainly for ulcer stress prophylaxis. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we evaluated the association between the use of PPIs in the management of AP and various clinical outcomes. We conducted the systematic research in six databases without restrictions on January 24th, 2022. We investigated adult patient with AP, who were treated with PPI compared to conventional therapy. The pooled odds ratios, mean differences, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated with random effect model. We included six RCTs and three cohort studies, consisting of 28,834 patients. We found a significant decrease in the rate of pancreatic pseudocyst formation in patients who received PPI treatment. PPI use was associated with a higher risk of GI bleeding, however this finding could be due to the patients' comorbid conditions. We found no significant difference in the rates of 7-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and acute respiratory distress syndrome between the groups. The available data on this topic are limited; therefore, further well designed RCTs are needed to evaluate the potential benefits and adverse effects of PPIs in AP.

Drug-drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors in cancer patients: an underrecognized cause of treatment failure

New concepts and drugs have revolutionized medical treatment for cancers. These drugs, which are very expensive and usually well tolerated, have dramatically improved cancer prognosis. We must use them wisely for patients to fully benefit. Gastric acid antisecretory drugs and particularly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) revolutionized the treatment of gastroduodenal ulcers and severe gastroesophageal reflux, but are frequently overused for symptomatic treatment of epigastric pain or heartburn. Long-term acid suppression may alter the efficacy of many anticancer drugs, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), by either decreasing gastric acid secretion and thus drug absorption, or by modifying the gut microbiome that modulates the response to ICIs. Oncologists thus need to pay particular attention to the concomitant use of PPIs and anticancer drugs. These interactions translate into major clinical impacts, with demonstrated loss of efficacy for some TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib, pazopanib), and conflicting results with many other oral drugs, including capecitabine and CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Furthermore, the profound changes in the gut microbiome due to using PPIs have shown that the benefit of using ICIs may be suppressed in patients treated with PPIs. As the use of PPIs is not essential, we must apply the precautionary principle. The first sentence of a recent Comment in Nature was "Every day, millions of people are taking medications that will not help them". We fear that every day millions of cancer patients are taking medications that harm them. While this may well be only association and not causation, there is enough to make us pause until we reach a clear answer. All these data should encourage medical oncologists to refrain from prescribing PPIs, explaining to patients the risks of interaction in order to prevent inappropriate prescription by another physician.

Effect of Antacid Use on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Solid Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The influence of antacids use on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy remains unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) on ICI efficacy in advanced solid cancer patients. A systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science was performed to retrieve studies investigating the effect of antacid use on ICI efficacy. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and immune-related adverse events were measured using hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs). Thirty studies enrolling 16,147 advanced cancer patients receiving ICI treatment were included. The pooled analysis indicated that PPI use was associated with shorter OS (HR=1.40, 95% CI, 1.25-1.57) and PFS (HR=1.34, 95% CI, 1.19-1.52) in advanced cancer patients treated with ICIs. PPI use did not show effect on ORR or immune-related adverse event of advanced cancer patients receiving ICI treatment. OS, PFS, and ORR did not differ between H2RA users and non-H2RA users. In subgroup analyses, PPI use was associated with shorter OS and PFS in NSCLC and urothelial carcinoma patients and in patients treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 or anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 monotherapy. In addition, ICI efficacy was different in the antacid exposure time frame subgroups. In conclusion, PPI use has a negative effect on OS and PFS among advanced cancer patients receiving ICI treatment. PPIs should be cautiously administered among advanced cancer patients treated with ICI. The safety of H2RAs and the influence of H2RAs on ICI efficacy need further investigation.

Combination of esomeprazole and pirfenidone enhances antifibrotic efficacy in vitro and in a mouse model of TGFβ-induced lung fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal lung disease of unknown etiology. Currently, pirfenidone and nintedanib are the only FDA-approved drugs for the treatment of IPF and are now the standard of care. This is a significant step in slowing down the progression of the disease. However, the drugs are unable to stop or reverse established fibrosis. Several retrospective clinical studies indicate that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; FDA-approved to treat gastroesophageal reflux) are associated with favorable outcomes in patients with IPF, and emerging preclinical studies report that PPIs possess antifibrotic activity. In this study, we evaluated the antifibrotic efficacy of the PPI esomeprazole when combined with pirfenidone in vitro and in vivo. In cell culture studies of IPF lung fibroblasts, we assessed the effect of the combination on several fibrosis-related biological processes including TGFβ-induced cell proliferation, cell migration, cell contraction, and collagen production. In an in vivo study, we used mouse model of TGFβ-induced lung fibrosis to evaluate the antifibrotic efficacy of esomeprazole/pirfenidone combination. We also performed computational studies to understand the molecular mechanisms by which esomeprazole and/or pirfenidone regulate lung fibrosis. We found that esomeprazole significantly enhanced the anti-proliferative effect of pirfenidone and favorably modulated TGFβ-induced cell migration and contraction of collagen gels. We also found that the combination significantly suppressed collagen production in response to TGFβ in comparison to pirfenidone monotherapy. In addition, our animal study demonstrated that the combination therapy effectively inhibited the differentiation of lung fibroblasts into alpha smooth muscle actin (αSMA)-expressing myofibroblasts to attenuate the progression of lung fibrosis. Finally, our bioinformatics study of cells treated with esomeprazole or pirfenidone revealed that the drugs target several extracellular matrix (ECM) related pathways with esomeprazole preferentially targeting collagen family members while pirfenidone targets the keratins. In conclusion, our cell biological, computational, and in vivo studies show that the PPI esomeprazole enhances the antifibrotic efficacy of pirfenidone through complementary molecular mechanisms. This data supports the initiation of prospective clinical studies aimed at repurposing PPIs for the treatment of IPF and other fibrotic lung diseases where pirfenidone is prescribed.

Re-thinking the possible interaction between proton pump inhibitors and capecitabine

Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPI) rank within the top ten most prescribed medications in Europe and USA. A high frequency of PPI use has been reported amongst patients undergoing chemotherapy, to mitigate treatment-induced gastritis or gastro-oesophageal reflux. Several recent, mostly retrospective, observational studies have reported inferior survival outcomes among patients on capecitabine who concomitantly use PPI. Whilst this association is yet to be definitively established, given the prominence of capecitabine as an anti-cancer treatment with multiple indications, these reports have raised concern within the oncological community and drug regulatory bodies worldwide. Currently, the leading mechanism of interaction postulated in these reports has focussed on the pH altering effects of PPI and how this could diminish capecitabine absorption, leading to a decrease in its bioavailability. In this discourse, we endeavour to summarise plausible pharmacokinetic interactions between PPI and capecitabine. We provide a basis for our argument against the currently proposed mechanism of interaction. We also highlight the long-term effects of PPI on health outcomes, and how PPI use itself could lead to poorer outcomes, independent of capecitabine.

Long-term efficacy of proton pump inhibitors as a treatment modality for eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a first-line treatment for EoE, but data are limited concerning response durability. We aimed to determine long-term outcomes in EoE patients responsive to PPI-therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of newly diagnosed adults with EoE who had initial histologic response (<15 eosinophils per high-power-field) to PPI-only therapy. We extracted data regarding their subsequent clinical course and outcomes. We compared findings between the initial PPI-response endoscopy and the final endoscopy, and assessed factors associated with loss of PPI response.

RESULTS

Of 138 EoE patients with initial histologic response to PPI, 50 had long-term endoscopic follow-up, 40 had clinical follow-up, 10 changed treatments, and 38 had no long-term follow-up. Of those with endoscopic follow-up, mean follow-up-time was 3.6 ± 2.9 years; 30 and 32 patients (60%; 64%) maintained histologic and symptom responses, respectively. However, fibrotic endoscopic findings of EoE were unchanged. Younger age (aOR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11) and dilation prior to PPI treatment (aOR 0.21, 95% CI: 0.05-0.83) were the only factors associated with long-term loss of PPI response.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term histologic and clinical response rates for PPI therapy were 60% and 64%, respectively. Younger age and dilation at baseline were associated with histologic loss of response. These data can inform long-term EoE treatment selection.

Do proton pump inhibitors affect the biomechanical efficiency of implant?- a systematic review

Purpose

This systematic review was executed to determine the influence of proton pump inhibitors on biomechanical efficiency of dental implants.

Materials and methods

The comprehensive online literature search was conducted on digital database of Pubmed, Cochrane database and EBSCO host, Web of Science and Scopus from 2010 to 2021(Dec).The studies included in our research comprised of randomized controlled trials and animal studies. Literature review, Letter to the editor, short communication and studies not related to the dental implants were excluded. A total of 6 studies were finalized and included in the systemic review.

Result

The proton pump inhibitors have a negative influence on the bone metabolism and adversely affect the Osseointegration of the dental implants. Further they reduce the biomechanical efficiency of dental implant which ultimately results in their failure.

Conclusion

Proton pump inhibitors are a risk factor for dental implant survival. This conclusion has been drawn from the limited research available. Hence well designed prospective randomized controlled trials should be carried out on a large population including the users and non-users, to more thoroughly elucidate the effect of proton pump inhibitor on osseointegration process of dental implants.

Epidemiology and prevention of oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) develops from columnar metaplasia of the distal oesophagus, Barrett's oesophagus (BO), secondary to chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). In the present review, the stepwise development of GORD, BO and OAC is presented and the evidence of OAC prevention, including treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). PPIs are the main treatment of GORD and BO, with some evidence of prevention of OAC in these patients. However, as about 40% of OAC patient do not report a history of GORD and fewer than 15% of OAC cases are detected in individuals during BO surveillance, prevention of OAC is limited by PPI use in GORD and BO patients.

Opioid Use in Murine Model Results in Severe Gastric Pathology that May Be Attenuated by Proton Pump Inhibition

Opioids are the gold standard for chronic and acute pain management; however, their consequence on gastric function is relatively understudied. Opioid users have a higher incidence of gastric dysfunction, worse quality of life, increased hospitalizations, and increased use of antiemetic and pain modulator medications. The current study shows that morphine treatment in the murine model results in greater disruption of gastric epithelial cell morphology, increased gastric cell apoptosis, elevated inflammatory cytokines, and matrix metallopeptidase-9 secretion. Morphine treatment also increases gastric acid secretion and causes delays in gastric emptying. Moreover, morphine treatment causes an increase in systemic IL-6 level, which plays an important role in morphine-induced delayed gastric emptying and gastric damage. IL-6 knockout mice show a significant level of reduction in morphine-induced gastric delaying, acid retention, and gastric damage. Thus, morphine-mediated gastric damage is a consequence of the accumulation of acid in the stomach due to increased gastric acid secretion and delayed gastric emptying. Treatment with a proton pump inhibitor resulted in a significant reduction in morphine-induced gastric inflammation, gastric delaying, and improved morphine tolerance. Hence, these studies attribute morphine-mediated induction in gastric acidity and inflammatory cytokines as drivers for morphine-associated gastric pathology and show the therapeutic use of proton pump inhibitors as an inexpensive approach for clinical management of morphine-associated pathophysiology and analgesic tolerance.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Esophageal Atresia: Is It Really a New Disease?

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated esophageal disease. Symptoms are related to mucosal eosinophilic-predominant inflammation that leads to esophageal dysfunction. Recent data suggest that esophageal atresia (EA) patients may have an increased incidence of EoE compared to the general population. As EoE symptoms may be confused with EA-related symptoms, they may significantly worsen morbidity in this specific group of patients. We investigated specific characteristics of patients with AE and EoE compared to those with EoE only. We conducted an observational retrospective monocentric study including all patients diagnosed with EoE from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2021. For each patient, demographic, clinical and histopathological data were collected and then compared between the two cohorts (EA-EoE vs. EoE only). During the study period, 62 patients were included: 17 children were in the follow-up because of EA (18.1% of 94 EA patients screened in that period), while the other 45 presented EoE only. The demographic and clinical features of EA-EoE patients demonstrate a lower prevalence of allergic subjects (23.5% vs. 80%, p < 0.05), a lower age of presentation (3.1 vs. 12.2 years, p < 0.05), non-specific symptoms and a higher resolution rate with PPI therapy (64.7% vs. 17.8%, p < 0.05) compared to EoE-only patients. Our data confirm that EA patients are at high risk for developing EoE. As symptoms may overlap with the EA spectrum, early recognition of EoE may prevent patients from receiving unnecessary invasive therapeutic interventions and from developing complications from untreated EoE.

Associations Between Asthma Diagnosis/Asthma Exacerbation and Previous Proton-Pump Inhibitor use: A Nested Case-Control Study Using a National Health Screening Cohort

Background: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) block acid secretion from gastric parietal cells; however, recent studies have reported that PPIs have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties in various cells. Newer PPIs are stronger inhibitors of acid secretion; however, the anti-inflammatory effects of these drugs have not been assessed. We evaluated anti-inflammatory effect of PPIs on the development of asthma/asthma exacerbation (AE) in a national health screening cohort.

Methods: This case-control study comprised 64,809 participants with asthma who were 1:1 matched with controls from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the effect of previous PPI use on an asthma diagnosis in all participants. Unconditional logistic regression was used to assess the effect of PPI use on AE in participants with asthma. These relationships were estimated in a subgroup analysis according to PPI generation.

Results: Overall, PPI use increased the risk of asthma diagnosis [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.23–1.35, p < 0.001]. Use of the first-generation PPIs was associated with asthma (aOR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.18–1.52, p < 0.001), while use of second-generation PPIs was not (aOR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.82–1.15, p = 0.748). In contrast, overall PPI use decreased the risk of AE in participants with asthma (aOR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.75–0.84, p < 0.001), although this effect was observed only for second-generation PPIs (aOR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65–0.89, p = 0.001).

Conclusion: PPI use increased the risk for subsequent asthma diagnosis. However, this effect was confined to first-generation PPIs. Second-generation PPIs decreased the risk of AE.

Identification of novel and potential PPARγ stimulators as repurposed drugs for MCAO associated brain degeneration

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARγ) has been shown to have therapeutic promise in the treatment of ischemic stroke and is supported by several studies. To identify possible PPARγ activators, the current study used an in silico technique in conjunction with molecular simulations and in vivo validation. FDA-approved drugs were evaluated using molecular docking to determine their affinity for PPARγ. The findings of molecular simulations support the repurposing of rabeprazole and ethambutol for the treatment of ischemic stroke. Adult Sprague Dawley rats were subjected to transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (t-MCAO). Five groups were made as a sham-operated, t-MCAO group, rabeprazole +t-MCAO, ethambutol +t-MCAO, and pioglitazone +t-MCAO. The neuroprotective effects of these drugs were evaluated using the neurological deficit score and the infarct area. The inflammatory mediators and signaling transduction proteins were quantified using Western blotting, ELISA, and immunohistochemistry. The repurposed drugs mitigated cerebral ischemic injury by PPARγ mediated downregulation of nods like receptor protein 3 inflammasomes (NLRP3), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (p-NF-kB), and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (p-JNK). Our data demonstrated that rabeprazole and ethambutol have neuroprotective potential via modulating the cytoprotective stress response, increasing cellular survival, and balancing homeostatic processes, and so may be suitable for future research in stroke therapy.

Thinking inside the box: Current insights into targeting orbital tissue remodeling and inflammation in thyroid eye disease

Thyroid eye disease (TED) is an autoimmune disorder that manifests in the orbit. In TED, the connective tissue behind the eye becomes inflamed and remodels with increased fat accumulation and/or increased muscle and scar tissue. As orbital tissue expands, patients develop edema, exophthalmos, diplopia, and optic neuropathy. In severe cases vision loss may occur secondary to corneal scarring from exposure or optic nerve compression. Currently there is no cure for TED, and treatments are limited. A major breakthrough in TED therapy occurred with the FDA approval of teprotumumab, a monoclonal insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) blocking antibody. Yet, teprotumumab therapy has limitations, including cost, infusion method of drug delivery, variable response, and relapse. We describe approaches to target orbital fibroblasts and the complex pathophysiology that underlies tissue remodeling and inflammation driving TED. Further advances in the elucidation of the mechanisms of TED may lead to prophylaxis based upon early biomarkers as well as lead to more convenient, less expensive therapies.

Stress ulcer prophylaxis for critically ill children: routine use needs to be re-examined

INTRODUCTION

Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is commonly used in Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs). However, strong evidence for this practice is lacking and there is a dire need for paediatric randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our aim was to assess the usefulness of SUP with omeprazole in critically ill children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a randomized, controlled open-label trial, including 144 children admitted into a PICU with a paediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score of less than 16. We randomly allocated patients to SUP with omeprazole or no SUP. The primary outcome was development of upper gastrointestinal bleeding or nosocomial infection.

RESULTS

The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding was 27.1%, but clinically significant bleeding developed in only 5.6% of patients. We did not find a significant difference in the incidence of bleeding between the prophylaxis and control groups (27.8% vs 26.4%; P = .85). We also did not find a significant difference between the groups in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (9.6% vs 8.3%; P = .77). The incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) was higher in the prophylaxis group compared to the control group (30.6% vs 12.5%; P = .014). None of the patients developed Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. We did not find significant differences in mortality, length of PICU stay or duration of mechanical ventilation. Mechanical ventilation was an independent predictor of bleeding (OR, 6.4; 95%CI, 2.73-14.9).

CONCLUSION

In PICU patients with mild to moderate organ dysfunction, omeprazole does not seem to be useful for prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding while at the same time increasing the risk of CLABSI. Thus, we recommend restricting SUP to mechanically ventilated children.

The impact of proton pump inhibitors in liver diseases and the effects on the liver

In this systematic and comprehensive overview, we aimed to evaluate the impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on chronic liver diseases, especially on cirrhosis. A manual and comprehensive search of the PubMed database was conducted to obtain relevant literatures. PPIs altered the composition and function of the intestinal microflora and might lead to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and bacterial translocation, which were associated with adverse effects in liver diseases. They might increase the risk of hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, infections, and are related to an increased mortality in cirrhosis. PPIs might lead to an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, although the mechanism is unknown, and the results are controversial. PPIs also had an impact on the direct-acting antiviral regimen in patients with chronic hepatitis C. They were associated with an increased risk of liver abscess and increased mortality. Additionally, PPIs might lead to metabolic risk events, such as liver steatosis and weight gain. PPIs are associated with several adverse outcomes in liver diseases. Cautious use of PPIs is recommended and clinicians should be aware of the indications for their use in patients with liver diseases.

Repurposing Multiple-Molecule Drugs for COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Non-Viral Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome via a Systems Biology Approach and a DNN-DTI Model Based on Five Drug Design Specifications

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic is currently raging around the world at a rapid speed. Among COVID-19 patients, SARS-CoV-2-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the main contribution to the high ratio of morbidity and mortality. However, clinical manifestations between SARS-CoV-2-associated ARDS and non-SARS-CoV-2-associated ARDS are quite common, and their therapeutic treatments are limited because the intricated pathophysiology having been not fully understood. In this study, to investigate the pathogenic mechanism of SARS-CoV-2-associated ARDS and non-SARS-CoV-2-associated ARDS, first, we constructed a candidate host-pathogen interspecies genome-wide genetic and epigenetic network (HPI-GWGEN) via database mining. With the help of host-pathogen RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data, real HPI-GWGEN of COVID-19-associated ARDS and non-viral ARDS were obtained by system modeling, system identification, and Akaike information criterion (AIC) model order selection method to delete the false positives in candidate HPI-GWGEN. For the convenience of mitigation, the principal network projection (PNP) approach is utilized to extract core HPI-GWGEN, and then the corresponding core signaling pathways of COVID-19-associated ARDS and non-viral ARDS are annotated via their core HPI-GWGEN by KEGG pathways. In order to design multiple-molecule drugs of COVID-19-associated ARDS and non-viral ARDS, we identified essential biomarkers as drug targets of pathogenesis by comparing the core signal pathways between COVID-19-associated ARDS and non-viral ARDS. The deep neural network of the drug–target interaction (DNN-DTI) model could be trained by drug–target interaction databases in advance to predict candidate drugs for the identified biomarkers. We further narrowed down these predicted drug candidates to repurpose potential multiple-molecule drugs by the filters of drug design specifications, including regulation ability, sensitivity, excretion, toxicity, and drug-likeness. Taken together, we not only enlighten the etiologic mechanisms under COVID-19-associated ARDS and non-viral ARDS but also provide novel therapeutic options for COVID-19-associated ARDS and non-viral ARDS.

Evidence-based treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis: insights for the clinician

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation. Left untreated, EoE progresses to fibrous remodeling and stricture formation that impairs quality of life. Therefore, EoE requires either repeated treatments or maintenance therapy. Current guidelines recommend swallowed topical corticosteroids (STCs), proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), or dietary intervention as initial options to induce and maintain long-term disease remission. Impractical exclusive elemental diets and suboptimal allergy testing-directed food avoidance paved the way for empirical elimination diets. These are moderately effective and highly reproducible in inducing EoE remission and allow for identification of specific food triggers. Step-up strategies, including two- and four-food rather than six-food elimination diets, should be considered as initial approaches for dietary treatment in patients of all ages, as they reduce the need for endoscopic procedures, shorten diagnostic processing time, and avoid unnecessary restrictions. Formulations of STC originally designed for asthma therapy are suboptimal for EoE treatment, with new effervescent orodispersible tablets and viscose formulations designed to coat the esophageal mucosa providing increased effectiveness at reduced doses. The anti-inflammatory effects of PPI in EoE are independent from gastric acid secretion inhibition; despite evidence from observational research, PPIs are the most commonly prescribed first-line therapy for EoE due to their accessibility, low cost, and safety profile. Double doses of PPI only induce remission in half of EoE patients, irrespective of the drug used or patients' age. Inflammatory rather than stricturing EoE phenotype and treatment duration up to 12 weeks increase chances of achieving EoE remission. Most responders effectively maintain long-term remission with standard PPI doses. Finally, endoscopic dilation should be considered in patients with reduced esophageal caliber or persistent dysphagia despite histological remission. This article provides a state-of-the-art review and updated discussion of current therapies and newly developed options for EoE.

Proton pump inhibitors may reduce the risk of high-grade dysplasia and/or esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is an important risk factor for high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and/or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on the chemoprevention of HGD and/or EAC arising from BE remains controversial.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Risk ratios (RRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled by a random-effect model. Heterogeneity and its potential source were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies with 26,291 BE patients were included. Meta-analysis of eight cohort studies showed that PPIs can significantly reduce the risk of HGD and/or EAC in BE patients (RR = 0.46; P < 0.001), but meta-analysis of six case-control studies showed no significant benefit of PPIs (OR = 0.64; P = 0.334). Heterogeneity was significant among both cohort and case-control studies, which might be attributed to the information sources of PPIs. There was no significant protective effect of high-dose PPIs on HGD and/or EAC in one RCT (RR = 0.84; P = 0.21), meta-analysis of two cohort studies (RR = 0.61; P = 0.28), or meta-analysis of two case-control studies (OR = 0.32; P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Chemoprevention of HGD and/or EAC by PPIs may be considered in BE patients. However, there might not be further preventive effect of high-dose PPIs.

Proton pump inhibitor use and hearing loss in patients with type 2 diabetes: evidence from a hospital-based case-control study and a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and risk of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) or tinnitus in patients with type 2 diabetes using hospital- and population-based data.

METHODS

For the case-control study using the Asan biomedical research environment (ABLE) database, the characteristics between cases and sex-, age-, and index-year-matched controls were compared by the chi-squared test. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs). For the cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort, the hazard ratios (HRs) for SNHL or tinnitus associated with PPI use were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

The case-control study included 1,379 cases and 5,512 matched controls. After adjustment, PPI use was associated with an increased risk of SNHL or tinnitus (OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.30-1.99). The ORs were higher for current or recent use of PPI and high average daily dose. In the cohort study including 17,233 pairs of PPI users and non-users after propensity score matching, the risk of SNHL or tinnitus increased in PPI users compared with non-users (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.40-1.61). In the stratified analyses, risks remained significant, and the magnitude of association was relatively high in those of younger age, patients without gastroesophageal reflux disease, and patients not receiving histamine 2 receptor blockers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that PPI use is associated with an increased risk of SNHL or tinnitus. Given the widespread use of PPIs, the potential ototoxic effects of PPIs remain an important concern.

Survival outcomes of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer concomitantly receiving proton pump inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors

Recent evidence suggests that gut microbiota dysbiosis adversely affects the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Our objective was to investigate the association between concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and ICIs, and poor prognosis in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a cohort study using a completely enumerated lung cancer cohort from a nationwide healthcare database in South Korea. We identified 2963 patients treated with ICIs as second-line or later therapy for stage ≥IIIB NSCLC. PPI use was ascertained within 30-days before and on the date of ICI initiation, and nonuse was defined as no prescription of PPIs during this period. Using national vital statistics in South Korea, we assessed the risk of all-cause mortality associated with concomitant PPI use through a propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazard model. Among 1646 patients included after 1:1 propensity score-matching, concomitant PPI use was associated with a 28% increased risk of all-cause mortality, compared to nonuse (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.28; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 1.13-1.46). We observed an increased risk when we restricted the analysis to new users of PPI (adjusted HR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.25-2.17). Subgroup analysis showed that PPI use was associated with high mortality risk among patients with viral hepatitis (adjusted HR = 2.72; 95% CI = 1.54-4.78; P_interaction  = .048). Our study indicates that PPI use is associated with poor prognosis in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Further prospective studies are required to determine the risk-benefit balance of concomitant use of PPIs and ICIs.

Effect of anti-reflux therapy on pulmonary function in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Current guideline conditionally recommends regular use of anti-reflux medication in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, the effect of anti-reflux therapy in this group remains controversial. We systematically reviewed literatures to evaluate whether anti-reflux therapy could ameliorate pulmonary function in IPF.

Methods

We performed electronic search in PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) to identify original articles published in English language. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies regarding anti-reflux therapy on pulmonary function in IPF. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted. In quantitative analysis, the inverse-variance method with fixed-effect model was used to analyze pooled data.

Results

Fifteen studies (2 RCTs and 13 observational studies) including 3,891 patients with IPF were included. Pooled analysis suggested that anti-reflux therapy did not improve forced vital capacity (FVC)% predicted [mean difference (MD) =0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.22 to 1.98, P=0.12, I² =0%, 8 studies, n=3,076], diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) % predicted (MD =0.75, 95% CI: −0.13 to 1.62, P=0.10, I² =0%, 8 studies, n=3,073), and FVC decline (MD =0.02, 95% CI: −0.01 to 0.04, P=0.29, I² =17%, 5 studies, n=1,586) in IPF.

Discussion

Anti-reflux therapy may not ameliorate pulmonary function in IPF. However, adequately powered studies are warranted to validate the present findings.

Association between proton pump inhibitors and periodontal disease severity

Objectives

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed for the management of acid‐related gastrointestinal disorders. PPIs modulate osteoclast function, reduce gastric acid secretion, and are associated with the establishment of a more diverse gastrointestinal microbiota. Periodontitis is characterized by microbe‐associated host‐mediated inflammation that results in loss of periodontal attachment. The aim of this study was to assess whether a relationship exists between PPIs and periodontal disease.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis was performed using patient records from a faculty periodontal practice. The proportion of elevated probing depths was used to measure periodontitis severity. Statistical analysis was performed using independent sample t‐tests, and Chi‐square tests of independence.

Results

Records from 1093 patients were initially assessed. Fourteen percent of teeth were associated with ≥6 mm probing depths among PPI users, in contrast to 24% for patients not using PPIs (P = 0.030). Similarly, 27% of teeth exhibited ≥5 mm probing depths among PPI users versus 40% for non‐PPI users (P = 0.039).

Conclusions

The results suggest that PPIs are associated with a reduced proportion of elevated probing depths. Future prospective studies are indicated to elucidate possible mechanisms through which PPIs might affect, and potentially be used in the treatment of, periodontitis.

Bioresponsive nanomedicines based on dynamic covalent bonds

Trends in the development of modern medicine necessitate the efficient delivery of therapeutics to achieve the desired treatment outcomes through precise spatiotemporal accumulation of therapeutics at the disease site. Bioresponsive nanomedicine is a promising platform for this purpose. Dynamic covalent bonds (DCBs) have attracted much attention in studies of the fabrication of bioresponsive nanomedicines with an abundance of combinations of therapeutic modules and carrier function units. DCB-based nanomedicines could be designed to maintain biological friendly synthesis and site-specific release for optimal therapeutic effects, allowing the complex to retain an integrated structure before accumulating at the disease site, but disassembling into individual active components without compromising function in the targeted organs or tissues. In this review, we focus on responsive nanomedicines containing dynamic chemical bonds that can be cleaved by various specific stimuli, enabling achievement of targeted drug release for optimal therapy in various diseases.

Protective and therapeutic effects of the flavonoid "pinocembrin" in indomethacin-induced acute gastric ulcer in rats: impact of anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic mechanisms

Peptic ulcer including gastric and duodenal ulcers is a common gastro-intestinal disorder worldwide, associated with a significant mortality due to bleeding and perforation. Numerous efforts are being exerted to look for natural drugs that lack the potential side effects but still keep beneficial effects for treatment and/or prevention of gastric ulcer. Pinocembrin (PINO) is a natural flavonoid retaining anti-microbial, anti-oxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities. The present study was conducted to investigate the protective and therapeutic effects of PINO against indomethacin (INDO)-induced gastric ulcer in rats and the possible underlying mechanisms. PINO (25 and 50 mg/kg) promoted mucus secretion, decreased ulcer index, and inhibited histopathological changes induced by INDO. Further investigation of possible mechanisms showed that PINO significantly attenuated INDO-induced oxidative and inflammatory responses in both doses when administrated before or after ulcer induction. PINO downregulated mRNA expression level of p38-mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38-MAPK) which subsequently inhibited NF-κB activation and inflammatory cytokine release including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1beta (IL-1β). Additionally, PINO inhibited apoptotic activity which was confirmed by downregulation of caspase-3 transcription. The current results demonstrated the promising therapeutic activity of PINO against INDO-induced gastric ulcer due to-at least partly-its anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic effects.

Omeprazole induces vascular remodeling by mechanisms involving xanthine oxidoreductase and matrix metalloproteinase activation

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are commonly used drugs that may increase the cardiovascular risk by mechanisms not entirely known. We examined whether the PPI omeprazole promotes vascular oxidative stress mediated by xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) leading to activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and vascular remodeling. We studied Wistar rats treated with omeprazole (or vehicle) combined with the XOR inhibitor allopurinol (or vehicle) for four weeks. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) measured by tail-cuff plethysmography was not affected by treatments. Omeprazole treatment increased the aortic cross-sectional area and media/lumen ratio by 25% (P < 0.05). Omeprazole treatment decreased gastric pH and induced vascular remodeling accompanied by impaired endothelium-dependent aortic responses (assessed with isolated aortic ring preparation) to acetylcholine (P < 0.05). Omeprazole increased vascular active MMP-2 expression and activity assessed by gel zymography and in situ zymography, respectively (P < 0.05). Moreover, omeprazole enhanced vascular oxidative stress assessed in situ with the fluorescent dye DHE and with the lucigenin chemiluminescence assay (both P < 0.05). All these biochemical changes caused by omeprazole were associated with increased vascular XOR activity (but not XOR expression assessed by Western blot) and treatment with allopurinol fully prevented them (all P < 0.05). Importantly, treatment with allopurinol prevented the vascular dysfunction and remodeling caused by omeprazole. Our results suggest that the long-term use of omeprazole induces vascular dysfunction and remodeling by promoting XOR-derived reactive oxygen species formation and MMP activation. These findings provide evidence of a new mechanism that may underlie the unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes observed with PPI therapy. Clinical studies are warranted to validate our findings.

Esomeprazole attenuates inflammatory and fibrotic response in lung cells through the MAPK/Nrf2/HO1 pathway

Introduction

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an orphan disease characterized by progressive loss of lung function resulting in shortness of breath and often death within 3–4 years of diagnosis. Repetitive lung injury in susceptible individuals is believed to promote chronic oxidative stress, inflammation, and uncontrolled collagen deposition. Several preclinical and retrospective clinical studies in IPF have reported beneficial outcomes associated with the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) such as esomeprazole. Accordingly, we sought to investigate molecular mechanism(s) by which PPIs favorably regulate the disease process.

Methods

We stimulated oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory and profibrotic phenotypes in primary human lung epithelial cells and fibroblasts upon treatment with bleomycin or transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) and assessed the effect of a prototype PPI, esomeprazole, in regulating these processes.

Results

Our study shows that esomeprazole controls pro-inflammatory and profibrotic molecules through nuclear translocation of the transcription factor nuclear factor-like 2 (Nrf2) and induction of the cytoprotective molecule heme oxygenase 1 (HO1). Genetic deletion of Nrf2 or pharmacological inhibition of HO1 impaired esomeprazole-mediated regulation of proinflammatory and profibrotic molecules. Additional studies indicate that activation of Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) pathway is involved in the process. Our experimental data was corroborated by bioinformatics studies of an NIH chemical library which hosts gene expression profiles of IPF lung fibroblasts treated with over 20,000 compounds including esomeprazole. Intriguingly, we found 45 genes that are upregulated in IPF but downregulated by esomeprazole. Pathway analysis showed that these genes are enriched for profibrotic processes. Unbiased high throughput RNA-seq study supported antifibrotic effect of esomeprazole and revealed several novel targets.

Conclusions

Taken together, PPIs may play antifibrotic role in IPF through direct regulation of the MAPK/Nrf2/HO1 pathway to favorably influence the disease process in IPF.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12950-021-00284-6.

Are proton pump inhibitors associated with implant failure and peri-implantitis?

OBJECTIVE

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may be linked to implant failure by affecting bone metabolism and osseointegration. This study evaluated how PPIs influence long-term implant failure and peri-implantitis in PPI users and nonusers.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients treated at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center between 2006 and 2013. The primary predictor variable was PPI use. Outcome variables were long-term implant failure and the presence of peri-implantitis. Data gathered included demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, implant location, and dimensions. Multivariate regression models measured independent factor associations. The final study cohort contained 933 implants placed in 284 patients. A total of 323 (32.6%) implants were placed in patients with ongoing PPI use. PPI users were less likely to smoke (22.1% vs 31.9%; P < .01) and use illicit drugs (5.0% vs 9.7%; P = .01) and more likely to have undergone prior bone grafting (18.3% vs 12.9%; P = .03).

RESULTS

PPI use lost significance after controlling for confounding factors and was not an independent predictor of implant failure (odds ratio [OR], 0.801; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.15; P = .24) or peri-implantitis (OR, 0.801; 95% CI, 0.56-1.15; P = .24).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found no independent associations between PPI use and implant failure or peri-implantitis. Contrary to published literature, PPIs may not influence implant health.

Inflammatory microRNAs in gastric mucosa are modulated by Helicobacter pylori infection and proton-pump inhibitors but not by aspirin or NSAIDs

Gastric carcinogenesis is associated with alterations of microRNAs (miRNAs) and reversal of these alterations may be a crucial element in cancer prevention. Here we evaluate the influence of H. pylori eradication, low-dose aspirin (LDA), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) on modification of inflammatory mucosal miRNAs miR-155 and miR-223 in Helicobacter pylori-infected and non-infected subjects. The study was performed in two parts: 1) interventional study in 20 healthy subjects with and without H. pylori infection or following eradication (each n = 10) where LDA (100 mg) was given daily for 7 days; 2) prospective case-control observational study (n = 188). MiR-155 and miR-223 expression was strongly linked to H. pylori-infection and in short-term view showed a trend for reversal after eradication. Daily LDA as well as regular NSAIDs showed no influence on miRNAs expression both in healthy subjects and patients, while regular PPI intake was associated with lower miR-155 expression in antrum of patients with chronic gastritis independent of density of neutrophils and mononuclear infiltrate. In summary, PPI but not LDA or NSAIDs were associated with modification of inflammatory miRNAs miR-155 and miR-223 in an H. pylori dependent manner. The functional role of inflammatory miR-155 and miR-223 in understanding of H. pylori-related diseases needs further evaluation.

Lansoprazole a Proton Pump Inhibitor Prevents IBD by Reduction of Oxidative Stress and NO Levels in the Rat

The inflammatory disease’s increased prevalence leads to a major concern around the world. Still, there is a lack of effective and successful therapy in the reversal of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) symptoms. Whereas, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and muddled defense capacity of antioxidants in IBD subjects reported several times. Many proton pump inhibitors have been reported previously for their anti-inflammatory effect. The present study is aimed to assess the ameliorative effect of lansoprazole in experimentally induced IBD in rats. Thirty-six female Sprague Dawley rats were divided equally into six groups based on their body weight. Lansoprazole (1, 5, and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) and 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA, 100 mg/kg, p.o.) served as standard control respectively, given for 18 days once a day. On the 11th day of the study, colitis was induced by intrarectal instillation of 2, 4-Dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (DNBS), and treatment was continued for the next 7 days. Administration of lansoprazole (at 5 and 10 mg/kg) significantly reduced DAI (Disease Activation Index) and CMDI (Colon Macroscopic Damage Index); which further justifies a reduction in colon inflammation grades, as well as histopathological changes, and reflected by the stalling of body weight. The anti-inflammatory effects were indicated by lowered MPO (myeloperoxidase) and SOD (superoxide dismutase) in colon tissue as well as restores colonic NO (nitric oxide) level. The study shows lansoprazole improved DAI and CMDI scores, reduction of neutrophil infiltration, and an improved antioxidant status indicating an anti-ulcerative effect in DNBS-induced experimental colitis that is comparable with 5-ASA treatment.

[Stress ulcer prophylaxis for critically ill children: Routine use needs to be re-examined]

INTRODUCTION

Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is commonly used in Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs). However, strong evidence for this practice is lacking and there is a dire need for paediatric randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our aim was to assess the usefulness of SUP with omeprazole in critically ill children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a randomized, controlled open-label trial, including 144 children admitted into a PICU with a paediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score of less than 16. We randomly allocated patients to SUP with omeprazole or no SUP. The primary outcome was development of upper gastrointestinal bleeding or nosocomial infection.

RESULTS

The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding was 27.1%, but clinically significant bleeding developed in only 5.6% of patients. We did not find a significant difference in the incidence of bleeding between the prophylaxis and control groups (27.8 vs. 26.4%; p = 0.85). We also did not find a significant difference between the group in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (9.6 vs. 8.3%; p = 0.77). The incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) was higher in the prophylaxis group compared to the control group (30.6% vs. 12.5%; p = 0.014). None of the patients developed Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. We did not find significant differences in mortality, length of PICU stay or duration of mechanical ventilation. Mechanical ventilation was an independent predictor of bleeding (OR 6.4; 95% CI, 2.73-14.9).

CONCLUSION

In PICU patients with mild to moderate organ dysfunction, omeprazole does not seem to be useful for prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding while at the same time increasing the risk of CLABSI. Thus, we recommend restricting SUP to mechanically ventilated children.

Do proton pump inhibitors prevent Barrett's esophagus progression to high-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma? An updated meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Previous research on the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and the risk of progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in Barrett's Esophagus (BE) patients has generated inconsistent findings. This meta-analysis was performed to clarify the association.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search strategy to select relevant studies up to September 2020. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I-squared statistic. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated through either fixed-effects or random-effects model. Duration-response was also performed to assess the gain effects of different PPI intake duration. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analyses, and tests for publication bias or other small-study effects were conducted.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with 155,769 subjects were included. The PPI use was associated with the reduced risk of BE progression to HGD/EAC (OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.32-0.71). In the duration-response analysis, the estimated OR for decreased risk of HGD/EAC with PPI intake duration of 12 months was 0.81 (95% CI = 0.71-0.91). Sensitivity analysis suggested the results of this meta-analysis were stable. No publication bias was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

PPI use is associated with a decreased risk of HGD/EAC in patients with BE. For further investigation, that more well-designed studies are still needed to elucidate the protective effect of PPI usage on BE patients to prevent HGD/EAC.