Mitigating the Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic on Rural Low-Income Families

Diagnosing, managing, and studying long-COVID syndromes in children and adolescents in rural and underserved populations

The COVID-19 pandemic has arguably had its greatest impact in rural and other historically hard-to-reach populations. Families in rural and underserved communities experienced COVID-19 infections at a higher rate than did their peers in other groups and experienced disproportionate morbidity and mortality. Without careful design and implementation of resources, children in these areas are also at risk of being disproportionately affected by long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infections, such as "long COVID" syndromes. Increased frequency and severity of COVID-19 infections, decreased access to health care and supporting services, environmental and social structure factors that exacerbate post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, and increased baseline frequency of health disorders that may complicate post-COVID issues, such as higher rates of obesity, asthma, diabetes, and mental health disorders, all place children and adolescents in under-resourced areas at significant risk. Unfortunately, children and adolescents in these areas have been historically under-represented in clinical research. Not only are fewer studies published with participants in rural and underserved communities, but these studies more often exhibit lower quality, with fewer randomized controlled trials and multicenter studies. This gap not only deprives people in rural and underserved areas of the country of access to cutting-edge therapy, but it also risks "evidence-based" solutions that are not generalizable because they cannot be implemented in the areas disproportionately affected by many health conditions such as long COVID. These factors significantly impede our ability to provide appropriate medical care for underserved communities. This review will discuss the impact of COVID-19 in rural and underserved communities and the factors that must be considered in designing evidence-based long-COVID solutions for children and adolescents in these areas.

Impacts of COVID-19 on mothers' and newborns' health outcomes in regional Canada: A cross-sectional analysis

Background

COVID-19 infection and pandemic-related stressors (e.g., socioeconomic challenges, isolation) resulted in significant concerns for the health of mothers and their newborns during the perinatal period. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to compare the health outcomes of pregnant mothers and their newborns one year prior to and one year into the pandemic period in Alberta, Canada. Secondary objectives included investigating: 1) predictors of admission to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and to compare NICU-admitted newborn health outcomes between the two time periods; 2) hospital utilization between the two time periods; and 3) the health outcomes of mothers and their newborns following infection with COVID-19.

Methods

This analytical cross-sectional study used a large administrative dataset (n = 32,107) obtained from provincial regional hospitals and homebirths in Alberta, Canada, from April 15, 2019, to April 14, 2021. Descriptive statistics characterized the samples. Chi-squares and two-sample t-tests statistically compared samples. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictor variables.

Results

General characteristics, pregnancy and labor complications, and infant outcomes were similar for the two time periods. Preterm birth and low birthweight predicted NICU admission. During the pandemic, prevalence of hospital visits and rehospitalization after discharge decreased for all infants and hospital visits after discharge decreased for NICU-admitted neonates. The odds of hospital revisits and rehospitalization after discharge were higher among newborns with COVID-19 at birth.

Conclusions

Most of the findings are contextualized on pandemic-related stressors (rather than COVID-19 infection) and are briefly compared with other countries. Hospitals in Alberta appeared to adapt well to COVID-19 since health conditions were comparable between the two time periods and COVID-19 infection among mothers or newborns resulted in few observable impacts. Further investigation is required to determine causal reasons for changes in hospital utilization during the pandemic and greater birthweight among pandemic-born infants.

We are all in this together: Rurality, Social cohesion, and COVID-19 prevention behaviors

BACKGROUND

Social cohesion refers to an individual's sense of belonging to their community and correlates with health outcomes. Rural communities tend to have higher social cohesion than urban communities. Social cohesion is relatively understudied as a factor impacting COVID-19 prevention behaviors. This study explores the associations between social cohesion, rurality, and COVID-19 prevention behaviors.

METHODS

Participants completed a questionnaire assessing rurality; social cohesion (subscales of (1) attraction to neighborhood, (2) acts of neighboring, and (3) sense of community); COVID-19 behaviors; and demographics. Chi-square tests were used to characterize participant demographics and COVID-19 behaviors. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze the relationship between COVID-19 outcomes and rurality, social cohesion, and demographics.

RESULTS

Most participants (n = 2,926) were non-Hispanic White (78.2%) and married (60.4%); 36.9% were rural. Rural participants were less likely than urban participants to practice social distancing (78.7% vs 90.6%, P<.001) or stay home when sick (87.7% vs 93.5%, P<.001). Social distancing was more common among participants with higher "attraction to neighborhood" scores (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26-3.47) but was less common among participants with higher "acts of neighboring" scores (aOR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.40-0.88). Staying home when sick was also more common among participants with higher scores on "attraction to neighborhood" (aOR = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.15-3.91), and less common among participants with higher scores on "acts of neighboring" (aOR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.33-0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to maximize COVID-19 behavioral prevention, particularly among rural communities, should emphasize the importance of protecting the health of one's neighbors and how to support one's neighbors without face-to-face interactions.

Differences in a Chain Supermarket's Sales to SNAP Shoppers Before and Since the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVE

This study 1) compares grocery sales to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) shoppers in rural and urban grocery stores and 2) estimates changes in sales to SNAP shoppers in North Carolina (NC) since the pandemic.

DESIGN

Weekly transaction data among loyalty shoppers at a large grocery chain across NC from October 2019 to December 2020 (n = 32; 182 store weeks) to assess nutritional outcomes.

SETTING

North Carolina large chain grocery stores.

PARTICIPANTS

Large chain grocery store/SNAP shoppers.

INTERVENTION

Rural/urban status of the stores and COVID-19 pandemic onset.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Share of total calories sold from fruits, vegetables, nuts, and legumes (FVNL) with and without additives, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), less healthful foods (LHF), and processed meats (PM).

ANALYSIS

Multivariate random effects models with robust standard errors to examine the association of rural/urban status before and since coronavirus disease 2019 with the share of calories sold to SNAP shoppers from each food category. We controlled for county-level factors (eg, sociodemographic composition, food environment) and store-level factors.

RESULTS

We did not find significant rural-urban differences in the composition of sales to SNAP shoppers in adjusted models. There was a significant decrease in the mean share of total calories from sugar-sweetened beverages (-0.43%) and less healthful food (-1.32%) and an increase in the share from processed meats (0.09%) compared with before the pandemic (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Urban-rural definitions are insufficient to understand nuances in food environments, and more support is needed to ensure healthy food access.

A Qualitative Study to Compare Barriers to Improving Food Security among Households with Young Children in the U.S. as Perceived by Different Types of Stakeholders before and during COVID-19

This qualitative study aimed to determine the perceived barriers of different community stakeholders’ to providing resources for improving food security in households with young children in the U.S. Community stakeholders working with low-income families with children 0–3 years of age in Florida were recruited to represent healthcare (n = 7), community/policy development (n = 6), emergency food assistance (n = 6), early childhood education (n = 7), and nutrition education (n = 6) sectors. In 2020, one-on-one interviews were conducted with each stakeholder in via Zoom, using an interview script based on the PRECEDE–PROCEED model and questions to capture the impacts of COVID-19. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a deductive thematic approach. A cross-tab qualitative analysis was used to compare data across categories of stakeholders. Healthcare professionals and nutrition educators indicated stigma, community/policy development stakeholders indicated a lack of time, emergency food assistance personnel indicated a limited access to food, and early childhood professionals indicated a lack of transportation as the main barriers to food security prior to COVID-19. COVID-19 impacts included the fear of virus exposure, new restrictions, lack of volunteers, and a lack of interest in virtual programming as barriers to food security. As perceived barriers may vary with respect to providing resources to improve food security in families with young children and the COVID-19 impacts persist, coordinated policy, systems, and environmental changes are needed.

Exploring the lived experiences of women with children during COVID-19: Maternal stress and coping mechanisms

This paper presents the results of a qualitative study of mothers' lived experiences during the COVID-19 lockdown in the United States. An analysis of open-ended interviews with 44 mothers who had children ages zero-to-five identified two main themes: (1) increased stress among mothers; and (2) resilience through the use of coping mechanisms. The findings indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic has led to higher stress among mothers due to issues of work-family life balance, family and children's needs, decision-making about getting sick, concerns for children's development, and lack of clarity from government officials. Mothers described using a variety of problem-focused and emotion-focused methods to cope with this stress. The lived experiences of mothers during the pandemic highlights the need for innovations in childcare modalities, paid leave policies to relieve stress, and strengthening whole family processes and resilience through the use of coping mechanisms.

"I Think That's the Most Beneficial Change That WIC Has Made in a Really Long Time": Perceptions and Awareness of an Increase in the WIC Cash Value Benefit

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Cash Value Benefit (CVB) for fruits and vegetables increased by roughly USD 25/month/person. We sought to understand WIC participant perceptions of this change and barriers and facilitators to using the CVB. We conducted 10 virtual focus groups (5 rural, 5 urban/suburban) with WIC participants (n = 55) in North Carolina in March 2022. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed. We open-coded the content and used thematic analysis to uncover consistencies within and between sampled groups. Participants expressed favorable perceptions of the CVB increase and stated the pre-pandemic CVB amount was insufficient. Barriers to using the increased CVB were identifying WIC-approved fruits and vegetables in stores and insufficient supply of fruits and vegetables. Barriers were more pronounced in rural groups. Facilitators of CVB use were existing household preferences for fruits and vegetables and the variety of products that can be purchased with CVB relative to other components of the WIC food package. Participants felt the CVB increase allowed their families to eat a wider variety of fruits and vegetables. The CVB increase may improve fruit and vegetable intake, particularly if made permanent, but barriers to CVB and WIC benefit use may limit the potential impact.

The Social and Economic Impact of Covid-19 on Family Functioning and Well-Being: Where do we go from here?

A growing body of research demonstrates that COVID-19 has had a profound impact on family functioning and well-being in a range of countries. The fear and uncertainty of the health risks, in addition to the stress from ensuing restrictions and constraints on everyday life caused major disruptions, impacting the financial, emotional, and physical well-being of adults and children alike. In this report, we summarize the current literature on the impact of COVID-19 disruption to family functioning and economic well-being as a context for this special issue. Our findings indicate that while the pandemic may have caused a reallocation of intra-familial tasks, a large gender disparity remains regarding the proportion of domestic work and childcare. The pandemic disproportionally impacted lower-income families, families from ethnic minority and vulnerable groups, and women. Finally, the financial impacts of the emergence in Spring of 2020 have strained family relationships, although the effects depend to a large extent on quality of the relationships and family well-being before COVID-19. To address the long-term bidirectional effects of the pandemic on family well-being and the well-being of the global economy calls for research that crosses disciplinary divides.