1
|
Schaa KL, Biesecker BB. Where is the "counseling" in prenatal genetic counseling? PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 124:108278. [PMID: 38593481 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prenatal genetic testing is routinely offered to all pregnant patients in the United States and is variably offered to certain pregnant populations globally [1]. To achieve value-based, informed decision-making, we argue for a shift away from the predominant "teaching" model of genetic counseling practice that prioritizes information and counselor dominance, toward a "counseling" model of practice that prioritizes the patient's narrative, values and beliefs. DISCUSSION Since prenatal testing began, genetic counseling has aimed to facilitate informed decision-making. Many patients are not familiar with the conditions which can be screened for prenatally or the quality of life of affected children. This lack of understanding can leave expectant parents unprepared to make informed decisions about prenatal testing. As the number of prenatal genetic tests expands, genetic counselors and all healthcare providers who discuss prenatal testing face a growing amount of information that is not feasible to explain to patients in a routine appointment. Research demonstrates that the common approach to genetic counseling, including in the prenatal setting, is the provision of biomedical information. Yet, genetic counseling outcome studies suggest that attending to the relational aspects of genetic counseling are associated with more positive patient outcomes, including enhanced knowledge, informed decision-making and greater patient satisfaction [2,3]. Through case vignettes, we illustrate the application of a counseling model of practice using Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling (ACGC) practice-based competencies in the domain of "Interpersonal, Psychosocial and Counseling Skills" [4]. Finally, we propose changes across the genetic counseling profession to move clinical practice toward a more relational model of care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS A counseling model of genetic counseling practice leads to more positive patient outcomes [2,3]. Genetic counselors and other prenatal healthcare providers can leverage existing counseling and communication skills to support clients in value-based, informed decision-making in prenatal genetic counseling practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendra L Schaa
- University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Iowa City, USA.
| | - Barbara B Biesecker
- National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH/JHU Genetic Counseling Training Program, Bethesda, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anuk D, Tuncer SB, Özkan M, Yazıcı H. Factors associated with psychological distress during genetic counseling in high-risk women with breast cancer in Turkey. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:359. [PMID: 38753118 PMCID: PMC11098913 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08573-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to shed light on the rather neglected area of research of psychological distress in women facing genetic counselling in Turkey, where few institutions providing such counselling exist. METHODS 105 breast cancer patients presenting for genetic testing completed a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire as well as validated structured questionnaires including the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S/T) and the Health Motivation Sub-dimension of Champion's Health Belief Model Scale. RESULTS 69.5% of the participants had lost a family member from cancer; 80% said the term "cancer" elicited negative thoughts (e.g., death, fear, and incurable disease). 62.9% and 37.1% attributed cancer to stress or sorrow, and genetic susceptibility, respectively. There was a negative association between health motivation and BDI scores (r:-0.433, p < 0.001). Married individuals had higher BDI and STAI-S scores (p = 0.001, p = 0.01 respectively), as well as lower STAI-T scores (p = 0.006). BDI, STAI-S and STAI-T scores were higher in those refusing genetic testing (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.003 respectively) and those with metastases (p = 0.03, p = 0.01, p = 0.03 respectively). Furthermore, individuals with low health motivation were more likely to exhibit high BDI scores (p < 0.001) and low STAI-T scores (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION Common perceptions and beliefs about cancer and genetic testing during genetic counselling were found to have a negative impact on distress in high-risk women with breast cancer. The negative relationship between psychological distress and health motivation may reduce patients' compliance with genetic counselling recommendations. A comprehensive psychological evaluation should be considered as an important part of genetic counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilek Anuk
- Division of Psychosocial Oncology and Education, Department of Preventive Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Seref Bugra Tuncer
- Division of Cancer Genetics, Department of Basic Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mine Özkan
- Division of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hülya Yazıcı
- Department of Medical Biology, İstanbul Arel University, 34010, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cormack M, Irving KB, Cunningham F, Fennell AP. Mainstreaming genomic testing: pre-test counselling and informed consent. Med J Aust 2024; 220:403-406. [PMID: 38479398 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.52254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kathryn B Irving
- Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martin SC, Scott AM, Stone AM. Women's Metaphors About BRCA Gene Testing and How They Can Inform Health Communication Theory and Practice. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2024; 39:603-615. [PMID: 36775863 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2178051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Genetic testing can detect whether an individual carries a harmful variant in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 (Breast Cancer 1 or 2) gene which, if present, drastically increases a woman's risk for breast and ovarian cancer. The experience of BRCA gene testing can be an emotionally laden process yielding significant uncertainty. In this study, we examined women's experiences of BRCA gene testing by exploring how participants communicatively framed and made sense of this process through the use of metaphors. Comparing uncertain and unfamiliar experiences to familiar references through metaphor can help people in challenging health-related situations with sense-making and communicating complex emotions. Furthermore, metaphors can be employed as a therapeutic tool by health care professionals, but their use has not often been studied regarding experiences of genetic testing, including BRCA gene testing. We conducted in-depth interviews with 42 women who have undergone BRCA gene testing (regardless of results), and analyzed data using constant comparative techniques. Eight categories of metaphors that women used surrounding BRCA gene testing were evident in the data, including those related to (a) knowledge is power; (b) gambling; (c) a journey; (d) a rollercoaster; (e) battle, disaster, or wreckage; (f) Pandora's box or a can of worms; (g) doom and gloom; and (h) the release or placing of a weight. Results enhance our understanding of women's experiences related to the uncertainty-inducing process of BRCA gene testing and lead to valuable theoretical implications and practical recommendations, including regarding the potential use of metaphors in patient-provider communication about BRCA genetic risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Summer C Martin
- Department of Human Communication Studies, California State University, Fullerton
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sweet K, Reiter PL, Schnell PM, Senter L, Shane-Carson KP, Aeilts A, Cooper J, Spears C, Brown J, Toland AE, Agnese DM, Katz ML. Genetic counseling and testing for females at elevated risk for breast cancer: Protocol for the randomized controlled trial of the Know Your Risk intervention. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 133:107323. [PMID: 37661005 PMCID: PMC10591709 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic counseling and testing have an important role in the care of patients at elevated risk for breast cancer. However, conventional pre- and post-test genetic counseling is labor and time intensive, less accessible for patients living outside major urban centers, and impractical on a large scale. A patient-driven approach to genetic counseling and testing may increase access, improve patients' experiences, affect efficiency of clinical practice, and help meet workforce demand. The objective of this 2-arm randomized controlled trial is to determine the efficacy of Know Your Risk (KYR), a genetic counseling patient preference intervention. METHODS Females (n = 1000) at elevated risk (>20% lifetime) for breast cancer will be randomized to the KYR intervention or conventional genetic counseling. The study will provide comprehensive assessment of breast cancer risk by multigene panel testing and validated polygenic risk score. Primary outcome is adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for a clinical encounter every 6-12 months and an annual mammogram (breast MRI if recommended) determined by medical record review. Secondary outcomes include adherence to other recommended cancer screening tests determined by medical record review and changes in breast cancer knowledge, perception of risk, post-test/counseling distress, and satisfaction with counseling by completion of three surveys during the study. Study aims will be evaluated for non-inferiority of the KYR intervention compared to conventional genetic counseling. CONCLUSION If efficacious, the KYR intervention has the potential to improve patients' experience and may change how genetic counseling is delivered, inform best practices, and reduce workforce burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.govNCT05325151.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Sweet
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Paul L Reiter
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Patrick M Schnell
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kate P Shane-Carson
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Amber Aeilts
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Julia Cooper
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Christina Spears
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan Brown
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Division of Bioethics, Department of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Amanda E Toland
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Doreen M Agnese
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mira L Katz
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Arbelo E, Protonotarios A, Gimeno JR, Arbustini E, Barriales-Villa R, Basso C, Bezzina CR, Biagini E, Blom NA, de Boer RA, De Winter T, Elliott PM, Flather M, Garcia-Pavia P, Haugaa KH, Ingles J, Jurcut RO, Klaassen S, Limongelli G, Loeys B, Mogensen J, Olivotto I, Pantazis A, Sharma S, Van Tintelen JP, Ware JS, Kaski JP. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J 2023; 44:3503-3626. [PMID: 37622657 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 339] [Impact Index Per Article: 339.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
|
7
|
Frijstein MM, Hamers SL, van Driel WJ, Bleiker EMA, van der Kolk L, Sijstermans R, Lok CAR. Effects of a pre-visit online information tool about genetic counselling for ovarian cancer patients, a randomized controlled trial. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 113:107786. [PMID: 37148840 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the Netherlands, patients with ovarian cancer are offered genetic testing. Pre-test preparation may help counseling patients. The aim of this study was to determine if use of a web-based intervention, leads to more effective genetic counseling of ovarian cancer patients. METHODS Between 2016 and 2018, 127 ovarian cancer patients referred for genetic counseling in our hospital participated in this trial. 104 Patients were analyzed. All patients filled out questionnaires pre- and post-counseling. The intervention group also completed a questionnaire after visiting an online tool. Length of consultation, patients' satisfaction, knowledge, anxiety, depression and distress were compared before and after counselling. RESULTS The intervention group had the same level of knowledge compared to the counseling group, but at an earlier point in time. They were satisfied with the intervention (86%) and better prepared for counseling (66%). The intervention did not lead to shorter consultations. No differences in levels of anxiety, depression, distress and satisfaction were observed. CONCLUSION Although consultation length was unaffected, the improvements in knowledge after online education and patients satisfaction indicates that this tool can be an effective addition to genetic counseling. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Use of an educational tool may lead to a more effective, personalized way of genetic counselling and enables shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M Frijstein
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S L Hamers
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W J van Driel
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L van der Kolk
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Sijstermans
- Division of Informatics and Automatisation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C A R Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Driver MN, Kuo SIC, Dick DM. Returning complex genetic risk information to promote better health-related behaviors: a commentary of the literature and suggested next steps. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:115-119. [PMID: 36125098 PMCID: PMC9972341 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibac071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies aim to identify genetic variants that are associated with a disease phenotype in order to enhance precision medicine efforts. Despite the excitement surrounding the promise of precision medicine and interest among the public in accessing personalized genetic information, there has been little effort dedicated to understanding how complex genetic risk information could be incorporated into clinical practice to inform prevention, screening, and treatment. In this article, we briefly summarize the literature on the impact of receiving genetic risk information on health-related behavior, discuss the limitations of these studies, and outline the challenges that will need to be overcome, along with suggested next steps for future studies, to understand the true promise of precision medicine. The current literature demonstrates that there is no consistent or strong evidence that receiving complex genetic risk information, such as polygenic risk scores, has an impact on behavior; however, there are a number of limitations that may impact the failure to find significant effects associated with receiving genetic feedback. Behavior change is a complex process and simply providing genetic risk information without incorporating a theoretical perspective on behavior change diminishes the potential impact of receiving genetic risk information on actual behavior change. Future studies and interventions which return genetic feedback should be designed using theoretical frameworks of behavior change models to improve the impact of receiving personalized genetic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan N Driver
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Sally I-Chun Kuo
- Department of Psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Danielle M Dick
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sitaula A, Veach PM, MacFarlane IM, Lee W, Redlinger-Grosse K. Genetic counselors' response types to prenatal patient deferring or attributing religious/spiritual statements: An exploratory study of US genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 2023; 32:197-212. [PMID: 36128752 PMCID: PMC10087964 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Research shows religiosity and spirituality (R/S) influence genetic counseling patients' and families' risk perception, decision-making, and coping. No published studies have examined how genetic counselors respond to patient-initiated R/S statements. This exploratory study examined genetic counselors' response types and reasons for their responses to two prenatal patient's R/S statements. Genetic counselors (n = 225) recruited through a National Society of Genetic Counselors eblast completed a survey containing two hypothetical scenarios regarding a prenatal patient's receipt of a trisomy 18 diagnosis. Scenarios were identical except for the last patient statement: "God makes everything possible…we leave things in his hands" (a deferring statement) or "I feel like God is punishing me for something I did" (an attributing statement). Imagining they were the counselor, participants wrote a response to each scenario and provided reasons for their response. Responses were analyzed using the Helping Skills Verbal Response System. MANOVA and chi-square tests, examining differences in response type based on patient statement (deferring or attributing), participant comfort with R/S, and years of experience, yielded a significant multivariate effect for scenario (p < 0.001). Responses to the deferring statement scenario contained a greater proportion of content statements (p < 0.001), closed questions (p < 0.001), and information-giving (p < 0.001). Responses to the attributing statement scenario contained a greater proportion of open questions (p = 0.05), influencing statements (p < 0.001), and affective statements (p = 0.006). Neither comfort with R/S nor genetic counseling experience significantly affected response type. Thematic analysis of reasons for responses yielded nine themes. Most prevalent were exploration (of the patient's statement), validation, correction (of patient's beliefs), and reassurance. The findings reflect stylistic differences in how and why genetic counselors respond to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Sitaula
- Invision Sally Jobe, Greenwood Village, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Ian M MacFarlane
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Whiwon Lee
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Krista Redlinger-Grosse
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Katz ML, Senter L, Reiter PL, Emerson B, Ennis AC, Shane-Carson KP, Aeilts A, Cassingham HR, Schnell PM, Agnese DM, Toland AE, Sweet K. Development of a web-based, theory-guided narrative intervention for women at elevated risk for breast cancer. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 106:163-169. [PMID: 36333195 PMCID: PMC10395484 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.10.348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the development of a web-based, theory-guided narrative intervention that replaces conventional pre-test genetic counseling for women at elevated breast cancer risk. METHODS We used an iterative process that was guided by health behavior theory and feedback from multiple stakeholder groups including: 1) content input from genetic experts; 2) study team input; 3) review of video storyboards, video example, study logo, recruitment materials, post-test patient preference counseling survey, and additional study surveys; 4) video series development; and 5) intervention review and finalization of study-related materials. RESULTS The intervention is patient-centered providing convenience and an opportunity for an individual's preferences for post-test counseling delivery. The intervention's efficacy is being determined in a randomized controlled trial compared to conventional genetic counseling for adherence to recommended guidelines and changes in knowledge, perception of breast cancer risk, breast cancer-specific worry, and satisfaction with counseling. CONCLUSION If efficacious, the intervention may improve the delivery of the genetic testing and counseling process, inform best practices, and reduce the genetic counseling workforce burden. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The developed intervention has the potential to improve the genetic testing and counseling experience for women at elevated risk for breast cancer, inform best practices, and reduce genetic counseling workforce burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mira L Katz
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Paul L Reiter
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Brent Emerson
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Alysha C Ennis
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kate P Shane-Carson
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Amber Aeilts
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Hayley R Cassingham
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Patrick M Schnell
- Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Doreen M Agnese
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Amanda E Toland
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kevin Sweet
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Woof VG, Howell A, McWilliams L, Gareth Evans D, French DP. How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:1916-1924. [PMID: 36002751 PMCID: PMC9681857 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01944-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
This review aimed to synthesise qualitative research on how women notified that they are at increased risk of breast cancer view their risk. Five electronic databases were systematically reviewed for qualitative research investigating how women who have received an increased breast cancer risk estimate appraise their risk status. Fourteen records reporting 12 studies were included and critically appraised. Data were thematically synthesised. Four analytical themes were generated. Women appraise their risk of breast cancer through comparison with their risk of other familial diseases. Clinically derived risk estimates were understood in relation to pre-conceived risk appraisals, with incongruences met with surprise. Family history is relied upon strongly, with women exploring similarities and differences in attributes between themselves and affected relatives to gauge the likelihood of diagnosis. Women at increased risk reported living under a cloud of inevitability or uncertainty regarding diagnosis, resulting in concerns about risk management. Women hold stable appraisals of their breast cancer risk which appear to be mainly formed through their experiences of breast cancer in the family. Healthcare professionals should explore women's personal risk appraisals prior to providing clinically derived risk estimates in order to address misconceptions, reduce concerns about inevitability and increase perceived control over risk reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria G. Woof
- grid.5379.80000000121662407University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- grid.5379.80000000121662407University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK ,grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9QZ UK
| | - Lorna McWilliams
- grid.5379.80000000121662407University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- grid.5379.80000000121662407University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK ,grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9QZ UK
| | - David P. French
- grid.5379.80000000121662407University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li W, Scherr CL, Fenter RB, Watson KL, Wicklund CA. Exploring a brief medical improvisational performing arts intervention for genetic counseling graduate students. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:1193-1205. [PMID: 35617028 PMCID: PMC9795887 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Psychosocial counseling is the foundation of genetic counseling. Genetic counseling students are required to receive in-depth training on psychosocial counseling techniques. In other medical disciplines, "medical improv," an educational method derived from improvisational theatre, has been used to allow trainees to practice clinical skills without also having to focus on medical knowledge they've not yet mastered. The present study aims to investigate the acceptability of medical improv as an educational tool for genetic counseling students. Fourteen genetic counseling students and new genetic counselors completed a 2-hr medical improv workshop and participated in follow-up interviews to discuss the workshop. Participants' responses to the intervention were positive, with 92.9% of participants responding that they would recommend medical improv training to other genetic counseling students. Participants described the medical improv workshop as helping build psychosocial skills in a safe environment, which may facilitate the use of more advanced counseling skills in clinical situations. By training students to practice psychosocial skills and building students' confidence, medical improv may help genetic counseling students and genetic counselors be more effective in challenging clinical situations, and to feel more comfortable in experimenting with new ideas and psychosocial techniques in their clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weilong Li
- Graduate Program in Genetic CounselingNorthwestern UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA
- Physician Assistant Studies ProgramSalus UniversityElkins ParkPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Courtney L. Scherr
- Department of Communication StudiesNorthwestern UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | | | - Katie L. Watson
- Departments of Medical Social SciencesMedical Education and Obstetrics & GynecologyFeinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chańska W. The principle of nondirectiveness in genetic counseling. Different meanings and various postulates of normative nature. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2022; 25:383-393. [PMID: 35429313 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-022-10085-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The article aims at organizing multifaceted discourse on the concept of nondirectiveness in the practice of genetic counseling. The analysis of areas where nondirectiveness was invoked and discussed reveals the problematic confusion of different meanings of the term that often leads to false conclusions about the relations between the professional standards and the practice of genetic counseling. The article offers clear and comprehensive description of different approaches to nondirectiveness and various ideas associated with the term. Normative consequences of various meanings attributed to nondirectiveness are explored. The article concludes by presenting important but unsolved problems regarding both theory (the meaning of nondirectiveness and its operational definition) and practice of genetic counseling (the scope and content of the norm of nondirective counseling).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weronika Chańska
- Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Michałowskiego 12, 31-126, Kraków, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cancer patients' understandings of genetic variants of uncertain significance in clinical care. J Community Genet 2022; 13:381-388. [PMID: 35616809 PMCID: PMC9134724 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00594-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) pose a growing challenge for patient communication and care in precision genomic medicine. To better understand patient perspectives of VUSs, we draw on qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 22 cancer patients and individuals with cancer family history who received a VUS result. The majority of patients did not recall receiving VUS results and those who remembered expressed few worries, while respondents who were tested because of a family history of cancer were more concerned about the VUS results. Personal characteristics, medical condition, family history, expectations prior to testing, and motivations for pursuing testing influence the ways patients came to terms with the uncertainty of the VUS result. We conclude by discussing the relevance of the findings to the debate on the responsibility of the patient in checking back for VUS reclassification and to implications for genetic counseling that emphasizes tailoring the pre- and post-test discussion of VUS as appropriate to the patients’ informational as well as emotional needs.
Collapse
|
15
|
Brédart A, Kop JL, Tüchler A, De Pauw A, Cano A, Dick J, Rhiem K, Devilee P, Schmutzler R, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Dolbeault S. Assessment of psychosocial difficulties by genetic clinicians and distress in women at high risk of breast cancer: a prospective study. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:1067-1075. [PMID: 35399119 PMCID: PMC9437045 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01096-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
We examined how often genetic clinicians correctly identify psychosocial difficulties in women at high breast cancer risk and explored effects of this assessment and the genetic test result on counselees’ distress. A prospective observational study of counselee–clinician dyads was performed in three French, German and Spanish genetic clinics, involving 709 counselees (participation rate, 83.4%) and 31 clinicians (participation rate, 100%). Counselee–clinician agreement in perceived psychosocial difficulties was measured after the pre-test genetic consultation. Multivariate mixed linear models accounting for clinicians were tested. Predicted distress levels were assessed after the pre- (T1) and post-test result disclosure consultations (T2). Depending on the difficulty domain, clinicians adequately assessed the presence or absence of difficulties in 51% (“familial issues”) to 59% (“emotions”) of counselees. When counselees’ and clinicians’ perceptions disagreed, difficulties were generally underestimated by clinicians. Counselees’ distress levels remained stable from T1 to T2, irrespective of clinicians’ appraisal adequacy, and the genetic test result disclosure. Psychological referral need were found in 20–42% of counselees, more frequently observed for difficulties in the “emotions” domain. Our findings suggest that the genetic test result is a suboptimal indicator for psychological referral. Instead, clinicians should focus on emotions expressed by counselees to appraise their needs for psychological support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Brédart
- Institut Curie, Supportive Care Department, Psycho-oncology Unit, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris Cedex 05, France. .,Psychopathology and Health Process Laboratory UR4057, Psychology Institute, Paris University, 71 Avenue Edouard Vaillant, 92774, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
| | - Jean-Luc Kop
- Université de Lorraine, 2LPN, 3 Place Godefroy de Bouillon, 54015, Nancy Cedex, France
| | - Anja Tüchler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Antoine De Pauw
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, INSERM U830, Paris University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Alejandra Cano
- University Autónoma of Barcelona, Clinical and Health Psychology Department, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julia Dick
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Devilee
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, S4-P, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, INSERM U830, Paris University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Sylvie Dolbeault
- Institut Curie, Supportive Care Department, Psycho-oncology Unit, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris Cedex 05, France.,CESP, University Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 94807, Villejuif Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zierhut H, Jamal L, Riordan S, Wilson P, Carey M, Babu D. National Society of Genetic Counselors' Board of Directors response to Myers et al. 'A report of the AGCPD task force to evaluate associations between select admissions requirements, demographics, and performance on ABGC certification examination'. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:319-323. [PMID: 35263009 PMCID: PMC9311064 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Zierhut
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, & Development, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Leila Jamal
- Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sara Riordan
- Unified Patient Network, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patrick Wilson
- College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Meghan Carey
- National Society of Genetic Counselors, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Deepti Babu
- Integrity Content Consulting, St. Albert, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang Y, Yi S, Trace CB, Williams-Brown MY. Understanding the Information Needs of Patients With Ovarian Cancer Regarding Genetic Testing to Inform Intervention Design: Interview Study. JMIR Cancer 2022; 8:e31263. [PMID: 35133282 PMCID: PMC8864522 DOI: 10.2196/31263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Experts in gynecological cancer care recommend that all patients with invasive or high-grade ovarian cancer (OC) undergo genetic testing. However, even patients who intend to take or have taken genetic tests have many unaddressed information needs regarding genetic testing. Existing genetic counseling falls short of adequately addressing this challenge. Objective This study aims to investigate the genetic testing–related information needs of patients with OC to inform the design of interactive technology-based interventions that can enhance communication of genetic testing information to patients. Methods We interviewed 20 patients with OC who had taken genetic tests and gathered genetic testing–related messages from an active OC web-based community. The interview transcripts and web-based community messages were analyzed using the qualitative content analysis method. Results Data analyses produced a comprehensive taxonomy of the genetic testing–related information needs of patients with OC, which included five major topic clusters: knowledge of genetic testing as a medical test, genetic testing process, genetic testing implications for patients, implications for family members, and medical terminology. Findings indicated that patients wanted to receive information that was relevant, understandable, concise, usable, appropriate, sympathetic, and available when needed. They also preferred various channels to receive information, including internet-based technologies, print, and conversations with health care providers. Conclusions Patients with OC need a range of information to address the uncertainties and challenges that they encounter while taking genetic tests. Their preferences for channels to receive information vary widely. A multichannel information delivery solution that combines both provider-led and peer-to-peer education models is needed to supplement existing genetic counseling to effectively meet the genetic testing–related information needs of patients with OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Zhang
- School of Information, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Center for Health Communication, Moody College of Communication and Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Siqi Yi
- School of Information, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Ciaran B Trace
- School of Information, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Center for Health Communication, Moody College of Communication and Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Marian Yvette Williams-Brown
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Department of Oncology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zale A, Zierhut H, Dean M, Berry DK, Racobaldo M, Cragun D. Revising the FOCUS framework through a qualitative study assessing self-reported counseling skills of genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:868-886. [PMID: 35132718 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Frameworks have been developed to help conceptualize clinical genetic counseling (GC), and observational studies have helped understand the process and content of GC sessions. However, additional research is needed to identify GC skills (behaviors or strategies) that practicing genetic counselors report consciously using to meet certain GC goals and determine what common terminology, if any, is being used to describe the various skills. Nineteen practicing genetic counselors in prenatal, pediatric, or cancer specialties were interviewed to elicit how they achieve session goals. Interview recordings were transcribed, coded thematically, and categorized using process categories from the communication strategy domain of the Framework for Outcomes in Clinical Communication Services (FOCUS). Reported skills largely fit within FOCUS, though findings prompted minor modifications of several FOCUS process categories and consolidation of the categories from 13 into 10. Although genetic counselor respondents reported a broad range of strategies and behaviors, they rarely had terms for skills they described. Results reveal concrete examples of GC skills, provide evidence for refinement of FOCUS, and highlight the need for establishing common terminology to describe these skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Zale
- Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Heather Zierhut
- Department of Genetics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Marleah Dean
- Department of Communication, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.,H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Darcy K Berry
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Melissa Racobaldo
- Division of Genetics and Metabolism, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Deborah Cragun
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Murray B, Tichnell C, Burch AE, Calkins H, James CA. Strength of the genetic counselor: patient relationship is associated with extent of increased empowerment in patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. J Genet Couns 2021; 31:388-397. [PMID: 34672408 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Genetic testing and genetic counseling (GC) are increasingly recommended in the cardiovascular setting, with multiple guidelines recommending GC for patients with or at risk for inherited cardiovascular conditions. There are scant data, however, describing patient outcomes to guide evidence-based care. No studies have quantified the influence of the strength of the genetic counselor:patient relationship on outcomes. Individuals referred for first time GC at the Johns Hopkins Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy (ACM) center were surveyed prior to their visit and immediately after, before any genetic test results ordered at the session had been returned. Outcomes and measures were selected based on the Reciprocal Engagement Model of GC and include empowerment assessed by the Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale (GCOS), anxiety assessed by the Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ), and genetic counselor:patient therapeutic alliance assessed by the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-SR). Response rate was 59% (120/203). 54 (45%) of patients had genetic testing ordered prior to their GC visit. There was a significant increase in GCOS score (mean 15.7 points) within 4 weeks post-GC session (p<.0001) with no significant difference in GCOS change between patients who had genetic testing ordered previously and those attending pre-test counseling (17.4 ± 18.2 versus. 14.1 ± 16 [p=.35]). Average CAQ score was high at baseline (1.67 ± 0.68), and there was a significant inverse relationship between pre-GC CAQ score and extent of increase in GCOS score (p=.008) post-GC. Controlling for baseline anxiety, there was a strong positive relationship between the WAI-SR score and GCOS change (B = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.43, 1.17, p<.001). These results demonstrate a significant increase in empowerment after GC in ACM patients and that this outcome is not reliant on the ordering of a genetic test but instead sensitive to the quality of the genetic counselor:patient relationship. Genetic counselors can strive to further improve empowerment by focusing on reducing pre-visit anxiety and alliance building with the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittney Murray
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Crystal Tichnell
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ashley E Burch
- Department of Health Services and Information Management, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cynthia A James
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Franiuk M, Molinari E, Battistuzzi L, Razzaboni E, De Matteis E, Turchetti D, Godino L, Chiorri C, Varesco L. Development and Validation of an Italian Adaptation of the Psychosocial Aspects of Hereditary Cancer Questionnaire. Front Psychol 2021; 12:697300. [PMID: 34354641 PMCID: PMC8329440 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Individuals that attend cancer genetic counseling may experience test-related psychosocial problems that deserve clinical attention. In order to provide a reliable and valid first-line screening tool for these issues, Eijzenga and coworkers developed the Psychosocial Aspects of Hereditary Cancer (PAHC) questionnaire. The aim of this work was to develop an Italian adaptation of the PAHC (I-PACH). This prospective multicenter observational study included three stages: (1) development of a provisional version of the I-PAHC; (2) pilot studies aimed at testing item readability and revising the questionnaire; and (3) a main study aimed at testing the reliability and validity of the final version of the I-PAHC with the administration of a battery comprising measures of depression, anxiety, worry, stress, and life problems to 271 counselees from four cancer genetic clinics. Adapting the original PAHC to the Italian context involved adding two further domains and expanding the emotions domain to include positive emotions. While most of the items were found to be easy to understand and score, some required revision to improve comprehensibility; others were considered irrelevant or redundant and therefore deleted. The final version showed adequate reliability and validity. The I-PAHC provides comprehensive content coverage of cancer genetic-specific psychosocial problems, is well accepted by counselees, and can be considered a sound assessment tool for psychosocial issues related to cancer genetic counseling and risk assessment in Italy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzena Franiuk
- Unit of Hereditary Cancer, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Elena Molinari
- UOSD Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute, Genova, Italy
| | - Linda Battistuzzi
- Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and Systems Engineering, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | | | - Daniela Turchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Center for Studies on Hereditary Cancer and U.O. Genetica Medica, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lea Godino
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Center for Studies on Hereditary Cancer and U.O. Genetica Medica, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Chiorri
- Department of Educational Sciences, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Liliana Varesco
- Unit of Hereditary Cancer, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gregory G, Das Gupta K, Meiser B, Barlow-Stewart K, Geelan-Small P, Kaur R, Scheepers-Joynt M, McInerny S, Taylor S, Antill Y, Salmon L, Smyth C, Young MA, James PA, Yanes T. Polygenic risk in familial breast cancer: Changing the dynamics of communicating genetic risk. J Genet Couns 2021; 31:120-129. [PMID: 34223688 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Hereditary breast cancer is associated with known genetic changes: either variants that affect function in a few rare genes or an ever-increasing number of common genomic risk variants, which combine to produce a cumulative effect, known as a polygenic risk (PR) score. While the clinical validity and utility of PR scores are still being determined, the communication of PR is a new challenge for genetic health professionals. This study investigated how PR scores are discussed in the familial cancer clinic compared with a previous study assessing the communication of monogenic risk (MR) for breast cancer. Sixty-five PR consultations between genetic health professionals and women at familial risk of breast cancer were audiotaped, transcribed, and coded using a methodology adapted from the MR study. Analysis of consultations shows that while there were similarities in communicating MR and PR, the complexity and novelty of the polygenic information influenced the style of counseling used by genetic health professionals toward a teaching model of genetic counseling, rather than a patient-centered approach. In particular, compared to MR consultations, in PR consultations significantly fewer counselees (a) were asked about their reasons for attending genetic counseling; or (b) had their information preferences, decision-making style, medical knowledge, understanding, or concerns checked. In conclusion, it is anticipated that PR scores will become part of standard clinical practice. Thus, it will be important for all genetic health professionals to be appropriately educated so that they can tailor their communication to meet patient needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Gregory
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kuheli Das Gupta
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kristine Barlow-Stewart
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Geelan-Small
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rajneesh Kaur
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maatje Scheepers-Joynt
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne VIC, Australia
| | - Simone McInerny
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne VIC, Australia
| | - Shelby Taylor
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne VIC, Australia
| | - Yoland Antill
- Familial Cancer Clinic, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lucinda Salmon
- Clinical Genetics Service, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Courtney Smyth
- Familial Cancer Clinic, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul A James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tatiane Yanes
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Dermatology Research Centre, Diamantina Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Martin L, Gitsels-van der Wal JT, Hitzert M, Henrichs J. Clients' perspectives on the quality of counseling for prenatal anomaly screening. A comparison between 2011 and 2019. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:1796-1805. [PMID: 33388195 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There have been substantial medical developments in prenatal anomaly and aneuploidy screening. However, the quality of counseling about these tests tends to lag behind. Additional quality requirements were therefore implemented in the Netherlands in 2017 to optimize this counseling. We compared clients' counseling preferences and experiences before and after implementation of these requirements. METHODS We used the validated 57-item QUOTEprenatal questionnaire, to measure clients' counseling preferences and experiences before and after counseling in 20 obstetric organizations throughout the Netherlands. Clients' preferences and experiences were compared between pregnant women and partners, nulliparous versus multiparous clients and between results of a Dutch survey in 2011 and the current one. RESULTS Sixty-five counselors and 649 clients (353 pregnant women and 296 partners) participated in this study. Compared to 2011, slightly more clients considered the three QUOTEprenatal components of counseling (client-counselor relationship, health education, and decision-making support) to be either important or very important, especially decision-making support. More clients than in 2011 perceived their needs as being well addressed, with the lowest percentages for decision-making support. CONCLUSION Quality requirements seem to benefit the quality of counseling, as perceived by clients. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Counselors should consider tailoring their decision-making support more to clients' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Martin
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Marit Hitzert
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Population Screening, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Jens Henrichs
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Stiles MK, Wilde AAM, Abrams DJ, Ackerman MJ, Albert CM, Behr ER, Chugh SS, Cornel MC, Gardner K, Ingles J, James CA, Juang JMJ, Kääb S, Kaufman ES, Krahn AD, Lubitz SA, MacLeod H, Morillo CA, Nademanee K, Probst V, Saarel EV, Sacilotto L, Semsarian C, Sheppard MN, Shimizu W, Skinner JR, Tfelt-Hansen J, Wang DW. 2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families. J Arrhythm 2021; 37:481-534. [PMID: 34141003 PMCID: PMC8207384 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
This international multidisciplinary document intends to provide clinicians with evidence-based practical patient-centered recommendations for evaluating patients and decedents with (aborted) sudden cardiac arrest and their families. The document includes a framework for the investigation of the family allowing steps to be taken, should an inherited condition be found, to minimize further events in affected relatives. Integral to the process is counseling of the patients and families, not only because of the emotionally charged subject, but because finding (or not finding) the cause of the arrest may influence management of family members. The formation of multidisciplinary teams is essential to provide a complete service to the patients and their families, and the varied expertise of the writing committee was formulated to reflect this need. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence. The recommendations were opened for public comment and reviewed by the relevant scientific and clinical document committees of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); the document underwent external review and endorsement by the partner and collaborating societies. While the recommendations are for optimal care, it is recognized that not all resources will be available to all clinicians. Nevertheless, this document articulates the evaluation that the clinician should aspire to provide for patients with sudden cardiac arrest, decedents with sudden unexplained death, and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin K Stiles
- Waikato Clinical School Faculty of Medicine and Health Science The University of Auckland Hamilton New Zealand
| | - Arthur A M Wilde
- Heart Center Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology Amsterdam University Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Elijah R Behr
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute St George's University of London, and St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | | | - Martina C Cornel
- Amsterdam University Medical Center Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Clinical Genetics Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | | | - Jodie Ingles
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | | | - Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang
- Cardiovascular Center and Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine Taipei Taiwan
| | - Stefan Kääb
- Department of Medicine I University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany
| | | | | | | | - Heather MacLeod
- Data Coordinating Center for the Sudden Death in the Young Case Registry Okemos MI USA
| | | | - Koonlawee Nademanee
- Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine, and Pacific Rim Electrophysiology Research Institute at Bumrungrad Hospital Bangkok Thailand
| | | | - Elizabeth V Saarel
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Cardiology at Case Western Reserve University Cleveland OH USA
- St Luke's Medical Center Boise ID USA
| | - Luciana Sacilotto
- Heart Institute University of São Paulo Medical School São Paulo Brazil
| | - Christopher Semsarian
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Mary N Sheppard
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute St George's University of London, and St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Wataru Shimizu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan
| | | | - Jacob Tfelt-Hansen
- Department of Forensic Medicine Faculty of Medical Sciences Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Dao Wu Wang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Meiser B, Kaur R, Morrow A, Peate M, Wong WKT, McPike E, Cops E, Nichols C, Austin R, Fine M, Thrupp L, Ward R, Macrae F, Hiller JE, Trainer AH, Mitchell G. Impact of national guidelines on use of BRCA1/2 germline testing, risk management advice given to women with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants and uptake of advice. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2021; 19:24. [PMID: 33836815 PMCID: PMC8035714 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-021-00180-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This nationwide study assessed the impact of nationally agreed cancer genetics guidelines on use of BRCA1/2 germline testing, risk management advice given by health professionals to women with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants and uptake of such advice by patients. Methods Clinic files of 883 women who had initial proband screens for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants at 12 familial cancer clinics between July 2008–July 2009 (i.e. before guideline release), July 2010–July 2011 and July 2012–July 2013 (both after guideline release) were audited to determine reason given for genetic testing. Separately, the clinic files of 599 female carriers without a personal history of breast/ovarian cancer who underwent BRCA1/2 predictive genetic testing and received their results pre- and post-guideline were audited to ascertain the risk management advice given by health professionals. Carriers included in this audit were invited to participate in a telephone interview to assess uptake of advice, and 329 agreed to participate. Results There were no significant changes in the percentages of tested patients meeting at least one published indication for genetic testing - 79, 77 and 78% of files met criteria before guideline, and two-, and four-years post-guideline, respectively (χ = 0.25, p = 0.88). Rates of documentation of post-test risk management advice as per guidelines increased significantly from pre- to post-guideline for 6/9 risk management strategies. The strategies with the highest compliance amongst carriers or awareness post-release of guidelines were annual magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography in women 30–50 years (97%) and annual mammography in women > 50 years (92%). Of women aged over 40 years, 41% had a risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy. Amongst women aged > 40 years, 75% had a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Amongst women who had not had a risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy, only 6% took risk-reducing medication. Fear of side-effects was cited as the main reasons for not taking these medicines by 73% of women. Conclusions Guidelines did not change the percentages of tested patients meeting genetic testing criteria but improved documentation of risk management advice by health professionals. Effective approaches to enhance compliance with guidelines are needed to improve risk management and quality of care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13053-021-00180-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| | - Rajneesh Kaur
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - April Morrow
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Oncology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - W K Tim Wong
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.,School of Social Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Emily McPike
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Elisa Cops
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cassandra Nichols
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Rachel Austin
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Miriam Fine
- Adult Genetics Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide and School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Letitia Thrupp
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Robyn Ward
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Finlay Macrae
- Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Janet E Hiller
- Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.,School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Alison H Trainer
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gillian Mitchell
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brown C, Head KJ, Hartsock J, Burns K, Wilson TE, Prucka S. Exploring parents' perceptions of the value of pediatric genetic counseling patient letters: A qualitative study presenting lessons learned. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:1168-1180. [PMID: 33723917 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Genetic counseling patient letters are a valuable supplement to genetic counseling practice. As the demand for genetic services increases, improving efficiency in daily tasks such as letter writing could improve genetic counselor workflow. Additionally, understanding the value recipients place on the content of these letters prior to creating efficiencies is essential toward ensuring that the utility of these letters is not lost. To better understand parents' perceptions of the letter's value in the pediatric genetic counseling setting, we employed a qualitative design involving thirteen parents of children who received a patient letter following their diagnosis. Parents participated in a semi-structured focus group, interview, or phone interview, and the data were analyzed using thematic analysis. In addition to gathering perceptions of their child's letter, we sought to learn preferences for letter length, formatting, and level of detail by asking for verbal and written feedback on three different letter formats created for a fictional patient. We used self-determination theory (SDT) framework to create the sample letters, which states that an individual's experience of autonomy, competence, and relatedness can impact their ability to engage in activities. This includes caring for a child with special medical needs. While the findings from this work reinforced the importance of written communication for patients as seen in previous research, this work uncovered three major themes about the letter's value: (a) elements such as readability and content impact parent feelings of autonomy and improve competence moving forward with their child's care; (b) parents value written acknowledgment of the emotional impact of the diagnosis; and (c) parents use the letter as a tool to communicate their child's diagnosis with others. These results can be used for creating comprehensible patient letters that support autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Brown
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Katharine J Head
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jane Hartsock
- Department of Medical Humanities and Health Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Katelyn Burns
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Theodore E Wilson
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Sandra Prucka
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Erby LH, Wisniewski T, Lewis KL, Hernandez C, Biesecker LG, Biesecker BB. Adaptation of the working alliance inventory for the assessment of the therapeutic alliance in genetic counseling. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:11-21. [PMID: 33554391 PMCID: PMC10150706 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The concept of therapeutic alliance is central to genetic counseling as the mechanism through which the outcomes of empowerment and effective coping are likely to be achieved. To date, there have been no published systematic assessments of the therapeutic relationship in genetic counseling. We adapted a previously validated measure of the therapeutic alliance to genetic counseling and assessed its reliability and validity. Participants were enrolled in a clinical genomic study where they were randomized to receive education about carrier results via a Web platform or via a genetic counselor and then further randomized to receive genetic counseling (without additional education) or not. We rated the therapeutic alliance from audio recordings of 120 genetic counseling sessions. We modified the observer version of the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-O), initially designed to assess therapeutic relationships in psychotherapy. We examined internal consistency reliability by calculating Cronbach's alpha and inter-rater reliability through both percent agreement and Gwet's alternative agreement coefficient (AC). Regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship of WAI-O scores with session length and with the designation of the session as one in which prior education was delivered by the genetic counselor or not. The adapted scale had high-reliability characteristics with agreement of 88%-93%, Gwet's AC of 0.84-0.90, and Cronbach's alpha of 0.89-0.93 for the three WAI-O subscales (bonds, goals, and tasks). Although there was no difference in alliance based on whether prior education was provided by the genetic counselor, the total WAI-O score significantly increased with increasing session length (beta =0.667, p<.001), providing preliminary evidence of construct validity. The WAI-O that we have adapted can be used reliably with two independent raters to assess the therapeutic alliance in studies of genetic counseling. The initial evidence for construct validity is promising and should be reassessed in future genetic counseling studies using the WAI-O.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori H Erby
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Tyler Wisniewski
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Katie L Lewis
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christian Hernandez
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Leslie G Biesecker
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Barbara B Biesecker
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.,RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zayts-Spence O, Fung JLF, Chung BHY. 'Do language and culture really matter?': A trans-disciplinary investigation of cultural diversity in genetic counseling in Hong Kong. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:75-84. [PMID: 33527561 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
In this paper, we present evidence that in counseling culturally diverse patients, differences in spoken language and cultural beliefs of the patients and genetic counseling professionals do not necessarily impede successful counseling. We also highlight sociocultural factors, including socioeconomic background and genetic literacy, that may impact communication in multicultural/ multilingual contexts or when languages other than English are used. While genetic counseling is not short of insights and practical guidelines on sociocultural and language issues, and increasingly, research that employs interviews and surveys, empirical research that draws on authentic interactional data (in the form of video- and audio-recorded interactions and their transcripts) is limited. Our goal here is to assess how needs are communicated among a diverse population using an innovative empirical approach that builds on the analysis of transcribed interactions as the primary data and optimizes trans-disciplinary expertise in linguistics, genetics and genetic counseling. We present data from 42 genetic counseling encounters addressing Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome (SADS) in Hong Kong. We demonstrate the value of the situated analysis of genetic counseling, which focuses on those junctures in the interaction where participants orient to their different linguistic and/or cultural backgrounds as relevant to the ongoing interaction. We further show that participants draw on various interactional resources to negotiate and resolve possible differences or misunderstandings. We highlight the advantages of incorporating authentic (i.e., non-simulated) data into the training of genetic counselors to increase cultural awareness and to provide communication tools (i.e., interactional strategies) they can draw on in their counseling practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jasmine L F Fung
- Department of Paediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Brian H Y Chung
- Department of Paediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Biesecker BB, Lillie SE, Amendola LM, Donohue KE, East KM, Foreman AKM, Gilmore MJ, Greve V, Liangolou B, O'Daniel JM, Odgis JA, Rego S, Rolf B, Scollon S, Suckiel SA, Zepp J, Joseph G. A review and definition of 'usual care' in genetic counseling trials to standardize use in research. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:42-50. [PMID: 33278053 PMCID: PMC7882019 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
The descriptor 'usual care' refers to standard or routine care. Yet, no formal definition exists. The need to define what constitutes usual care arises in clinical research. Often one arm in a trial represents usual care in comparison with a novel intervention. Accordingly, usual care in genetic counseling research appears predominantly in randomized controlled trials. Recent standards for reporting genetic counseling research call for standardization, but do not address usual care. We (1) inventoried all seven studies in the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Consortium (CSER) about how genetic counseling was conceptualized, conducted, and whether a usual care arm was involved; (2) conducted a review of published randomized control trials in genetic counseling, comparing how researchers describe usual care groups; and (3) reviewed existing professionally endorsed definitions and practice descriptions of genetic counseling. We found wide variation in the content and delivery of usual care. Descriptions frequently detailed the content of usual care, most often noting assessment of genetic risk factors, collecting family histories, and offering testing. A minority included addressing psychological concerns or the risks versus benefits of testing. Descriptions of how care was delivered were vague except for mode and type of clinician, which varied. This significant variation, beyond differences expected among subspecialties, reduces the validity and generalizability of genetic counseling research. Ideally, research reflects clinical practice so that evidence generated can be used to improve clinical outcomes. To address this objective, we propose a definition of usual care in genetic counseling research that merges common elements from the National Society of Genetic Counselors' practice definition, the Reciprocal Engagement Model, and the Accreditation Council for Genetic Counselors' practice-based competencies. Promoting consistent execution of usual care in the design of genetic counseling trials can lead to more consistency in representing clinical care and facilitate the generation of evidence to improve it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara B Biesecker
- Genomics, Bioinformatics and Translation, RTI International, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sarah E Lillie
- Center for Communication Science, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Laura M Amendola
- Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katherine E Donohue
- Institute for Genomic Health, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kelly M East
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA
| | | | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente - Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Veronica Greve
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA
| | | | | | - Jacqueline A Odgis
- Institute for Genomic Health, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shannon Rego
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bradley Rolf
- Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sarah Scollon
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sabrina A Suckiel
- Institute for Genomic Health, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamilyn Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente - Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Stiles MK, Wilde AAM, Abrams DJ, Ackerman MJ, Albert CM, Behr ER, Chugh SS, Cornel MC, Gardner K, Ingles J, James CA, Jimmy Juang JM, Kääb S, Kaufman ES, Krahn AD, Lubitz SA, MacLeod H, Morillo CA, Nademanee K, Probst V, Saarel EV, Sacilotto L, Semsarian C, Sheppard MN, Shimizu W, Skinner JR, Tfelt-Hansen J, Wang DW. 2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families. Heart Rhythm 2021; 18:e1-e50. [PMID: 33091602 PMCID: PMC8194370 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This international multidisciplinary document intends to provide clinicians with evidence-based practical patient-centered recommendations for evaluating patients and decedents with (aborted) sudden cardiac arrest and their families. The document includes a framework for the investigation of the family allowing steps to be taken, should an inherited condition be found, to minimize further events in affected relatives. Integral to the process is counseling of the patients and families, not only because of the emotionally charged subject, but because finding (or not finding) the cause of the arrest may influence management of family members. The formation of multidisciplinary teams is essential to provide a complete service to the patients and their families, and the varied expertise of the writing committee was formulated to reflect this need. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence. The recommendations were opened for public comment and reviewed by the relevant scientific and clinical document committees of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); the document underwent external review and endorsement by the partner and collaborating societies. While the recommendations are for optimal care, it is recognized that not all resources will be available to all clinicians. Nevertheless, this document articulates the evaluation that the clinician should aspire to provide for patients with sudden cardiac arrest, decedents with sudden unexplained death, and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin K Stiles
- Waikato Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, The University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Arthur A M Wilde
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Elijah R Behr
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute, St George's, University of London, and St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sumeet S Chugh
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jodie Ingles
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang
- Cardiovascular Center and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Stefan Kääb
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Andrew D Krahn
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Heather MacLeod
- Data Coordinating Center for the Sudden Death in the Young Case Registry, Okemos, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Koonlawee Nademanee
- Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Medicine, and Pacific Rim Electrophysiology Research Institute at Bumrungrad Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Elizabeth V Saarel
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Cardiology at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, and St Luke's Medical Center, Boise, Idaho, USA
| | - Luciana Sacilotto
- Heart Institute, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Christopher Semsarian
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mary N Sheppard
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute, St George's, University of London, and St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wataru Shimizu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jonathan R Skinner
- Cardiac Inherited Disease Group, Starship Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jacob Tfelt-Hansen
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dao Wu Wang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Redlinger-Grosse K, MacFarlane IM, Cragun D, Zierhut H. A Delphi study to prioritize genetic counseling outcomes: What matters most. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:676-692. [PMID: 33179357 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Research on genetic counseling outcomes has examined a range of metrics many that differ in quality and extent of psychometric assessment and in some cases fail to encompass potential benefits of genetic counseling for patients. Although a variety of possible outcomes have been explored, selecting the most important or relevant outcomes and identifying well-validated measures remain challenging. An online, modified Delphi method was used to prioritize genetic counseling outcomes from the viewpoint of individuals from four stakeholder groups - clinical genetic counselors, outcome researchers, genetic counseling training directors, and genetic counseling consumers/advocates. A survey of 181 genetic counseling outcomes were rated based on perceived importance and then sorted and categorized using the Framework for Outcomes of Clinical Communication Services in Genetic Counseling (FOCUS-GC) framework. Three of the FOCUS-GC domains (Process, Patient Care Experience, and Patient Changes) were assessed as most important, while none of the most highly rated outcomes fell into the domains of Patient Health or Family Changes. The majority of outcomes deemed most important by stakeholder groups were within the process domain. When looking at the proportion of outcomes that overlapped with the consumer group, clinical genetic counselors had the highest degree of similarity with consumers when looking at the high relative importance band outcomes (61.1% overlap), followed by training directors (58.3%), and outcome researchers (41.7%). Variability in importance according to stakeholder groups was an important consideration and prioritizing outcomes was challenging given that the majority of outcomes were rated as important. Working to bridge the realities of clinical care and fundamental differences in the viewpoints and priorities of genetic counseling research directions is an area for future exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Deborah Cragun
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Heather Zierhut
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Aldridge CE, Osiovich H, Hal Siden H, Elliott AM. Rapid genome-wide sequencing in a neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective qualitative exploration of parental experiences. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:616-629. [PMID: 33131147 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Genome-wide sequencing (GWS) is increasingly being used in neonatal intensive care units. While studies have explored its clinical utility, little is known about parental experiences with this testing post-return of results. We conducted a qualitative study, using an interpretive description framework and thematic analysis, to gain further insight into parents' perceptions of the value and utility of GWS for their infant. We sought to explore whether parents' perceptions differ if their child received a diagnosis or not, and whether their child is living or deceased. Semi-structured, telephone interviews were conducted with parents of infants who had rapid exome sequencing while in the neonatal intensive care unit at BC Women's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada. Interviews addressed perceived benefits and harms of GWS and included an evaluation of decisional regret. Parents of 27 probands were approached and 14 (52%; 13 mothers and 1 father) participated in interviews. On average, 26 months had elapsed from the time of results to the interview. Six themes were identified. Firstly, parents had a positive regard for GWS. The results of GWS helped provide context for their child's admission to the NICU, and all parents experienced relief following receiving the results. A diagnosis by GWS enabled parents to picture the future, form connections with other parents, and coordinate their child's care. Lastly, some parents experienced discomfort with the concept of a genetic diagnosis, and interestingly felt lack of a genomic diagnosis indicated a reduced severity of their infant's condition. Decisional regret post-results was found to be low. Our results highlight how parents cope with the results of GWS and suggest that a genetic counselor can have an important role in helping families understand and adjust to these results in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin E Aldridge
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Horacio Osiovich
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Harold Hal Siden
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Alison M Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Medendorp NM, van Maarschalkerweerd PEA, Murugesu L, Daams JG, Smets EMA, Hillen MA. The impact of communicating uncertain test results in cancer genetic counseling: A systematic mixed studies review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:1692-1708. [PMID: 32278626 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cancer genetic counseling increasingly involves discussing uncertain test results, for example because multiple genes are sequenced simultaneously. This review was performed to provide insight into how counselors' communication of uncertain test results during genetic counseling for cancer affects counselors and counselees. METHODS A systematic mixed studies review was undertaken to review research on the effects of communicating uncertain test results. Four databases were searched using a PICO search strategy. Study findings of articles meeting the inclusion criteria were synthesized narratively. RESULTS Twenty-four articles were included. Uncertain test results encompassed either an inconclusive test result or a variant of unknown significance (VUS). Counselees involved almost exclusively women at risk of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer. None of the articles reported effects on counselor outcomes. Counselee outcomes were categorized as cognitive, affective or behavioral. Interpretation of a VUS was overall reported as difficult, and counselees' distress and worry were repeatedly found to decrease over time after the discussion of any uncertain test result. For most other outcomes, findings were sparse and/or inconsistent. CONCLUSION Evidence on effects on counselee outcomes is scant and inconsistent. Future studies are warranted to provide insight into how counselees and counselors are affected. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinical practice could benefit from guidelines on how to address uncertain test results during pre- and posttest genetic consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niki M Medendorp
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Laxsini Murugesu
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost G Daams
- Medical Library, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marij A Hillen
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Schupmann W, Jamal L, Berkman BE. Re-examining the Ethics of Genetic Counselling in the Genomic Era. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2020; 17:325-335. [PMID: 32557217 PMCID: PMC10084396 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-020-09983-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Respect for patient autonomy has served as the dominant ethical principle of genetic counselling, but as we move into a genomic era, it is time to actively re-examine the role that this principle plays in genetic counselling practice. In this paper, we argue that the field of genetic counselling should move away from its emphasis on patient autonomy and toward the incorporation of a more balanced set of principles that allows counsellors to offer clear guidance about how best to obtain or use genetic information. We begin with a brief history of how respect for patient autonomy gained such emphasis in the field and how it has taken on various manifestations over time, including the problematic concept of nondirectiveness. After acknowledging the field's preliminary move away from nondirectiveness, we turn to a series of arguments about why the continued dominance of patient autonomy has become untenable given the arrival of the genomic era. To conclude, we describe how a more complete set of bioethical principles can be adapted and used by genetic counsellors to strengthen their practice without undermining patient autonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Will Schupmann
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr., Bldg. 10/Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
| | - Leila Jamal
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, 10 Center Dr., Bldg. 10/Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Benjamin E Berkman
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health; Bioethics Core, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 10 Center Dr., Bldg. 10/Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Prinds C, der Wal JGV, Crombag N, Martin L. Counselling for prenatal anomaly screening-A plea for integration of existential life questions. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:1657-1661. [PMID: 32268986 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
The availability in many countries of new prenatal anomaly screening methods, such as the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT), and the potential broadening of testing for genetic conditions, creates an ongoing debate about the accompanying existential dilemmas at both societal level and for individual new parents. In many countries, the main goal of counselling for prenatal anomaly screening is to facilitate the reproductive decision-making process of future parents. Therefore, counsellors share information to enable a woman and her partner to think about the pros and cons of participating in screening, try to clarify possible moral dilemmas, and dwell on existential life questions. In line with the CanMEDS framework, healthcare professionals must combine the role of communicator (providing health education) with that of professional (by recognising and responding to existential life questions while facilitating decision-making). This is not easy but it is essential for providing balanced counselling. At present, counselling tends to be sufficient regarding health education, whereas guidance in decision-making, including attention for existential life questions and philosophy of life, offers room for improvement. In this paper, we suggest slowing down and turning the traditional prenatal counselling encounter upside down by starting as a counselling professional instead of a healthcare information sharing communicator and thus making the story of the woman and her partner, within their societal context, the starting point and the basis of the counselling encounter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Prinds
- University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Clinical Research, Odense C, Denmark; University College South Denmark, Haderslev, Denmark.
| | | | - Neeltje Crombag
- University of Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Biomedical Sciences, Belgium
| | - Linda Martin
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Biesecker B. Genetic Counseling and the Central Tenets of Practice. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2020; 10:cshperspect.a038968. [PMID: 31570379 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Genetic counseling is a profession growing and evolving at an extraordinary rate. This growth is driven by an explosion in what we know, as a result of progress in science, technology, and bioinformatics, and an explosion in what we do not know, as we strive to understand the impact of genomic information on the lives of our patients and clients. Genetic counselors work in an increasing number of subspecialties and diversity of settings. But although the field has evolved, it has maintained a remarkably unchanged core of shared values and beliefs. The heart of genetic counseling practice is the therapeutic relationship, with its dual role of providing information and facilitating assimilation of that information to personalize health-related decision-making and foster successful adaptation. Genetic counseling aims to communicate cutting-edge genomic science within an empathic understanding of the client/patient's concerns and needs. In pursuit of these goals, further assessment of genetic counseling's effectiveness is needed to facilitate evidence-based practices and to scale counseling resources.
Collapse
|
36
|
Reuter C, Chun N, Pariani M, Hanson-Kahn A. Understanding variants of uncertain significance in the era of multigene panels: Through the eyes of the patient. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:878-886. [PMID: 31050105 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) are often disclosed to patients despite ambiguous association with disease risk and lack of clinical actionability. It is important to understand how patients understand a VUS result, but few studies have assessed this. Our qualitative study explored patient recall, reaction to, and interpretation of a VUS in the context of multigene panels. We conducted 11 semi-structured phone interviews with adults who had a VUS identified on multigene panel testing in a hereditary oncology clinic, with questions focusing on the VUS result, personal and family history, and motivations for and expectations of genetic testing. Transcripts were coded iteratively, using both deductive and inductive codes. Overall, participants usually recalled that they had a VUS, despite variation in the vocabulary used. Participants responded both emotionally and intellectually to receiving information about having a VUS, which was often a result of their expectations and motivations prior to testing. Overall, participants understood the lack of clinical significance of a VUS, yet often interpreted the etiologic significance of a VUS within the context of the personal and family history. Our study provides insight into a process by which patients translate uncertain genetic testing results into a construct that fits within their current belief framework and which may be facilitated by a genetic counselor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Reuter
- Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.,Stanford Center for Undiagnosed Diseases, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Nicolette Chun
- Cancer Genetics and Genomics, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California
| | - Mitchel Pariani
- Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Andrea Hanson-Kahn
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Abstract
New genetic testing technologies such as microarrays and whole exome sequencing mean the diagnostic potential for a child with a development disorder is greatly increased over traditional testing techniques. With this increased potential comes increased expectations from families and professionals about the answers a diagnosis will provide. However, limitations remain and a proportion of individuals will continue to remain undiagnosed. In addition, some individuals will receive novel or very rare diagnoses about which very little is known in terms of prognosis and effective treatments. In this paper, I present an argument for why these families would benefit from additional Genetic Counsellor support and how Clinical Genetics services in the UK could provide this support. I acknowledge that resources are limited, but as demands on services increase and interactions with families become shorter, I argue that this kind of service should be prioritised, for the benefit of these families.
Collapse
|
39
|
Smedley RM, Coulson NS. Genetic testing for Huntington’s disease: A thematic analysis of online support community messages. J Health Psychol 2019; 26:580-594. [DOI: 10.1177/1359105319826340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Huntington’s disease is a fatal late-onset genetic illness that causes motor, cognitive and psychiatric disorders. Individuals considering genetic testing may benefit from online social support. This study investigates how genetic testing is discussed within health forums. A total of 337 messages written by 58 individuals were analysed using deductive thematic analysis. Discussions examined three themes: deciding to be tested (enquiring about symptoms and starting a new family), preparing for the test (information seeking and attending appointments) and receiving the results (positive and negative results). Forums can reduce the uncertainty of ambiguous symptoms and provide ongoing personalised support before, during and after a genetic test.
Collapse
|
40
|
Communication about genetic testing with breast and ovarian cancer patients: a scoping review. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 27:511-524. [PMID: 30573802 PMCID: PMC6460583 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0310-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2018] [Revised: 10/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic testing of patients with cancer is increasingly offered to guide management, resulting in a growing need for oncology health professionals to communicate genetics information and facilitate informed decision-making in a short time frame. This scoping review aimed to map and synthesise what is known about health professionals’ communication about genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer with cancer patients. Four databases were systematically searched using a recognised scoping review method. Areas and types of research were mapped and a narrative synthesis of the findings was undertaken. Twenty-nine papers from 25 studies were included. Studies were identified about (i) information needs, (ii) process and content of genetic counselling, (iii) cognitive and emotional impact, including risk perception and recall, understanding and interpretation of genetic test results, and anxiety and distress, (iv) patients’ experiences, (v) communication shortly after diagnosis and (vi) alternatives to face-to-face genetic counselling. Patients’ need for cancer-focused, personalised information is not always met by genetic counselling. Genetic counselling tends to focus on biomedical information at the expense of psychological support. For most patients, knowledge is increased and anxiety is not raised by pre-test communication. However, some patients experience anxiety and distress when results are disclosed, particularly those tested shortly after diagnosis who are unprepared or unsupported. For many patients, pre-test communication by methods other than face-to-face genetic counselling is acceptable. Research is needed to identify patients who may benefit from genetic counselling and support and to investigate communication about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer by oncology health professionals.
Collapse
|
41
|
Joseph G, Lee R, Pasick RJ, Guerra C, Schillinger D, Rubin S. Effective communication in the era of precision medicine: A pilot intervention with low health literacy patients to improve genetic counseling communication. Eur J Med Genet 2018; 62:357-367. [PMID: 30553023 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Effective communication, where all parties share a common understanding, is necessary to realize the promise of Genomic Medicine. It is especially salient given the imperative to increase the participation of diverse populations in genomics research and to expand the reach of clinical genomics. We have previously shown that cancer genetic counseling is suboptimal for patients with limited health literacy. To address this finding, we implemented a pilot study to improve verbal communication between genetic counselors and their patients of limited health literacy that consisted of: i) curriculum development and delivery of a Genetic Counselors (GC) communication workshop; ii) two-month post-workshop interviews with GC participants (n = 9); iii) observations/audio recordings of counseling sessions involving 24 patients and two GC workshop participants; iv) post-counseling interviews with patients (n = 9). The 4.5-h workshop presented evidenced-based principles and strategies for effective communication with limited health literacy patients (e.g. use of plain language and teach-back), and offered specific techniques and exercises to practice adoption of such practices in the genetic counseling context. GCs expressed appreciation for the opportunity to refine their skills; however, they reported that some strategies were challenging given their professional training and communication habits. For example, GCs were concerned that use of plain language could undermine efforts to obtain informed consent and provide scientifically accurate information. Observations and patient interviews after the workshop revealed that GCs were able to employ the communication strategies with positive effects, with patients indicating sufficient understanding of the genetic test and its implications as well as satisfaction with the counselors' communication. While derived from research on communication with those of limited health literacy, the communication approaches taught in the GC workshop could benefit most patients, given the high rates of low health literacy in many countries, and the many factors beyond health literacy that can contribute to reduced comprehension in health care environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galen Joseph
- Department of Anthropology, History & Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
| | - Robin Lee
- Cancer Genetics & Prevention Program, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Rena J Pasick
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, United States; Department of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Claudia Guerra
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Dean Schillinger
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Sara Rubin
- Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Medendorp NM, Hillen MA, Murugesu L, Aalfs CM, Stiggelbout AM, Smets EMA. Uncertainty in consultations about genetic testing for cancer: an explorative observational study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:2083-2089. [PMID: 30082116 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Revised: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Persons seeking cancer genetic counseling mainly aim to obtain information and certainty about their medical situation. However, the information that counselees receive often involves many uncertainties. To develop strategies to enable optimal communication about uncertainties, the spectrum of uncertainty expressed within cancer genetic counseling needs to be established. This study aimed to gain insight into the uncertainties verbally expressed by counselors and counselees. METHODS Twenty-five consultations were audiotaped, transcribed and qualitatively analyzed. A coding scheme identifying all uncertainties was developed parallel to the coding of the transcripts. RESULTS Several uncertainties were identified varying in their source (i.e. the cause of uncertainty) and the issues involved (i.e. the topic to which uncertainty pertained). The main sources of uncertainty were the unpredictability of the future and a lack of knowledge. Counselees also expressed uncertainty related to the amount and complexity of the information. Counselors expressed uncertainties mainly related to scientific issues, whereas counselees' uncertainty mainly related to personal and practical issues. CONCLUSION A wide range of uncertainties was expressed by both groups. Counselors differ from counselees in the degree and types of uncertainty they express. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Counselors should address scientific uncertainties during genetic counseling to increase awareness and understanding in counselees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niki M Medendorp
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marij A Hillen
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laxsini Murugesu
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cora M Aalfs
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne M Stiggelbout
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sturm AC, Schmidlen T, Scheinfeldt L, Hovick S, McElroy JP, Toland AE, Roberts JS, Sweet K. Early Outcome Data Assessing Utility of a Post-Test Genomic Counseling Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Precision Health. J Pers Med 2018; 8:jpm8030025. [PMID: 30046027 PMCID: PMC6164140 DOI: 10.3390/jpm8030025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Revised: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Information on patients’ preferences is essential to guide the development of more efficient genomic counseling service delivery models. We examined patient preferences in the context of use of a post-test genomic counseling framework on patients (n = 44) with chronic disease receiving online test reports for eight different diseases and one drug-response result. We also explored patients’ disease risk awareness, recall of test report information, and confidence in knowing what to do with their test results. Prior to the post-test genomic counseling session, all participants viewed at least one test report; 81.6% of available test reports were reviewed in total. Participants requested more phone (36) than in-person counseling sessions (8), and phone sessions were shorter (mean 29.1 min; range 12–75 min) than in-person sessions (mean 52.8 min; range 23–85 min). A total of 182 test reports were discussed over the course of 44 counseling sessions (mean 4.13, range 1–9). Thirty-six (81.8%) participants requested assessment for additional medical/family history concerns. In exploring patient experiences of disease risk awareness and recall, no significant differences were identified in comparison to those of participants (n = 199) that had received in-person post-test genomic counseling in a parent study randomized controlled trial (RCT). In summary, a novel post-test genomic counseling framework allowed for a tailored approach to counseling based on the participants’ predetermined choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy C Sturm
- Division of Human Genetics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43221, USA.
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17821, USA.
| | - Tara Schmidlen
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17821, USA.
- Coriell Institute for Medical Research, 403 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
| | - Laura Scheinfeldt
- Coriell Institute for Medical Research, 403 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
| | - Shelly Hovick
- School of Communication, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43214, USA.
| | - Joseph P McElroy
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43221, USA.
| | - Amanda E Toland
- Division of Human Genetics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43221, USA.
| | - J Scott Roberts
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | - Kevin Sweet
- Division of Human Genetics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43221, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Cheng JKY, Guerra C, Pasick RJ, Schillinger D, Luce J, Joseph G. Cancer genetic counseling communication with low-income Chinese immigrants. J Community Genet 2018; 9:263-276. [PMID: 29197036 PMCID: PMC6002298 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0350-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
As genetics and genomics become part of mainstream medicine, these advances have the potential to either reduce or exacerbate health disparities. Relatively, little research has explored the quality of genetic counseling communication experienced by limited English proficiency patients, especially Chinese Americans. We observed and audio recorded genetic counseling appointments (n = 40) of low-income, limited English-proficient Chinese patients (n = 25) and conducted post-visit interviews (n = 17) using stimulated recall to examine patient understanding of the communication. Standard techniques based in grounded theory, including iterative data review and multiple coders, were used to analyze observation fieldnotes and interview transcripts and to identify these themes: (1) strong beliefs in environmental causes of cancer and skepticism about genetic causes, (2) willingness to undergo genetic testing despite skepticism of hereditary cause of cancer, (3) misunderstanding of key information needed to make informed decisions about testing and screening/prevention options, (4) variable quality of medical interpretation, and (5) selective family communication about cancer and genetic counseling and testing. Together, these themes describe substantial gaps in communication and identify the need for genetic counseling techniques and skills that enable counselors to communicate more effectively across language, literacy, and culture. Understanding the mechanisms of inheritance and the implications of genetic test results can be challenging for anyone, and it is exceptionally daunting for those who have limited English proficiency and/or low literacy. For Chinese immigrant patients to reap the full benefits of genetic counseling and testing, effective communication is essential. Research on interventions to improve communication is needed to ensure that disparities do not widen as genomic medicine reaches a more diverse population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice Ka Yan Cheng
- Department of Anthropology, History & Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Claudia Guerra
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rena J Pasick
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dean Schillinger
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Judith Luce
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Anthropology, History & Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ormond KE, Laurino MY, Barlow-Stewart K, Wessels TM, Macaulay S, Austin J, Middleton A. Genetic counseling globally: Where are we now? AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS 2018; 178:98-107. [PMID: 29575600 PMCID: PMC5947883 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The genetic counseling profession is continuing to develop globally, with countries in various stages of development. In some, the profession has been in existence for decades and is increasingly recognized as an important provider of allied health, while in others it is just beginning. In this article, we describe the current global landscape of the genetic counseling specialty field's professional development. Using examples of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, South Africa, and various countries in Asia, we highlight the following: (a) status of genetic counseling training programs, (b) availability of credentialing through government and professional bodies (certification, registration, and licensure), and potential for international reciprocity, (c) scope of clinical practice, and (d) health‐care system disparities and cultural differences impacting on practice. The successful global implementation of precision medicine will require both an increased awareness of the importance of the profession of “genetic counselor” and flexibility in how genetic counselors are incorporated into each country's health‐care market. In turn, this will require more collaboration within and across nations, along with continuing engagement of existing genetic counseling professional societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Mercy Ygoña Laurino
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.,Cancer Prevention Programs, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Tina-Marié Wessels
- Division Human Genetics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Shelley Macaulay
- Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand & the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Jehannine Austin
- Departments of Psychiatry and Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anna Middleton
- Society and Ethics Research, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.,Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors, United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.,Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Baty BJ. Genetic counseling: Growth of the profession and the professional. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bonnie J. Baty
- Department of Pediatrics, SOM 2C454University of Utah Health Sciences CenterSalt Lake City Utah
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Silver J, Caleshu C, Casson-Parkin S, Ormond K. Mindfulness Among Genetic Counselors Is Associated with Increased Empathy and Work Engagement and Decreased Burnout and Compassion Fatigue. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:1175-1186. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0236-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
48
|
Hoskovec JM, Stevens BK. Genetic Counseling Overview for the Obstetrician-Gynecologist. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2018; 45:1-12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
49
|
Slomp C, Morris E, Inglis A, Lehman A, Austin J. Patient outcomes of genetic counseling: Assessing the impact of different approaches to family history collection. Clin Genet 2018; 93:830-836. [DOI: 10.1111/cge.13176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Revised: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C. Slomp
- Department of Psychiatry; University of British Columbia; Vancouver Canada
| | - E. Morris
- Department of Psychiatry; University of British Columbia; Vancouver Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics; University of British Columbia; Vancouver Canada
| | - A. Inglis
- Department of Psychiatry; University of British Columbia; Vancouver Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics; University of British Columbia; Vancouver Canada
| | - A. Lehman
- Department of Medical Genetics; University of British Columbia; Vancouver Canada
| | - J. Austin
- Department of Psychiatry; University of British Columbia; Vancouver Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics; University of British Columbia; Vancouver Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Patient-Centered Care in Breast Cancer Genetic Clinics. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2018; 15:ijerph15020319. [PMID: 29439543 PMCID: PMC5858388 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15020319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Revised: 02/01/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
With advances in breast cancer (BC) gene panel testing, risk counseling has become increasingly complex, potentially leading to unmet psychosocial needs. We assessed psychosocial needs and correlates in women initiating testing for high genetic BC risk in clinics in France and Germany, and compared these results with data from a literature review. Among the 442 counselees consecutively approached, 212 (83%) in France and 180 (97%) in Germany, mostly BC patients (81% and 92%, respectively), returned the ‘Psychosocial Assessment in Hereditary Cancer’ questionnaire. Based on the Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) BC risk estimation model, the mean BC lifetime risk estimates were 19% and 18% in France and Germany, respectively. In both countries, the most prevalent needs clustered around the “living with cancer” and “children-related issues” domains. In multivariate analyses, a higher number of psychosocial needs were significantly associated with younger age (b = −0.05), higher anxiety (b = 0.78), and having children (b = 1.51), but not with country, educational level, marital status, depression, or loss of a family member due to hereditary cancer. These results are in line with the literature review data. However, this review identified only seven studies that quantitatively addressed psychosocial needs in the BC genetic counseling setting. Current data lack understandings of how cancer risk counseling affects psychosocial needs, and improves patient-centered care in that setting.
Collapse
|