1
|
van den Heuvel SF, van Eeren H, Hoeks SE, Panasewicz A, Jonker P, Ismail SY, van Busschbach JJ, Stolker RJ, Korstanje JWH. Patient knowledge in anaesthesia: Psychometric development of the RAKQ-The Rotterdam anaesthesia Knowledge questionnaire. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0299052. [PMID: 38995908 PMCID: PMC11244777 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The transition from in-person to digital preoperative patient education requires effective methods for evaluating patients' understanding of the perioperative process, risks, and instructions to ensure informed consent. A knowledge questionnaire covering different anaesthesia techniques and instructions could fulfil this need. We constructed a set of items covering common anaesthesia techniques requiring informed consent and developed the Rotterdam Anaesthesia Knowledge Questionnaire (RAKQ) using a structured approach and Item Response Theory. A team of anaesthetists and educational experts developed the initial set of 60 multiple-choice items, ensuring content and face validity. Next, based on exploratory factor analysis, we identified seven domains: General Anaesthesia-I (regarding what to expect), General Anaesthesia-II (regarding the risks), Spinal Anaesthesia, Epidural Anaesthesia, Regional Anaesthesia, Procedural sedation and analgesia, and Generic Items. This itemset was filled out by 577 patients in the Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, and Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. Based on factor loadings (≥0.25) and considering clinical relevance this initial item set was reduced to 50 items, distributed over the seven domains. Each domain was processed to produce a separate questionnaire. Through an iterative process of item selection to ensure that the questionnaires met the criteria for Item Response Theory modelling, 40 items remained in the definitive set of seven questionnaires. Finally, we developed an Item Response Theory model for each questionnaire and evaluated its reliability. 1-PL and 2-PL models were chosen based on best model fit. No item misfit (S-χ2, p<0.001 = misfit) was detected in the final models. The newly developed RAKQ allows practitioners to assess their patients' knowledge before consultation to better address knowledge gaps during consultation. Moreover, they can decide whether the level of knowledge is sufficient to obtain digital informed consent without face-to-face education. Researchers can use the RAKQ to compare new methods of patient education with traditional methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander F van den Heuvel
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester van Eeren
- Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne E Hoeks
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Panasewicz
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Jonker
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sohal Y Ismail
- Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan J van Busschbach
- Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Stolker
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Wiebe H Korstanje
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li D, Huang Y, Wu F, Huang Q, Liu Y, Yao J, Shen N, Wang Y, Yu L, Yuan C, Zhang W. Simplified Chinese version of the PROMIS Pediatric-25 profile: A validation study among cancer children. J Pediatr Nurs 2024; 75:e1-e9. [PMID: 38212174 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pediatric cancer is a significant health concern in China, and evaluating the impact of cancer and its treatment on the well-being of young patients is essential for both clinical care and research purposes. This study aimed to psychometrically validate the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric-25 Profile (PROMIS-Pediatric-25) among Chinese children with cancer. DESIGN AND METHODS We enrolled a group of 114 children living with cancer between the ages of 8 and 17. Each participant completed questionnaires that covered sociodemographic and clinical information and the PROMIS-Pediatric-25. The floor and ceiling effect was examined. Cronbach's alpha and split-half coefficient were examined to determine the reliability. Factor structure was explored by factor analysis. Three assumptions of Rasch model-based item response theory (IRT) were assessed. Differential item functioning (DIF) was investigated concerning factors of gender, diagnosis, and treatment stage. RESULTS The floor or ceiling effects were detected for six domains. The reliability was found to be excellent. Furthermore, the factor structure of these six domains was validated. Our analysis confirmed that the assumptions required for IRT were met with acceptable unidimensionality, local independence, and good monotonicity. Additionally, we observed measurement equivalence, with outstanding levels of DIF across factors such as gender, diagnosis, and treatment stage. CONCLUSION PROMIS-Pediatric 25 is a highly reliable and valid instrument for evaluating key domains of health-related quality of life in Chinese pediatric cancer patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATION Nursing practice could engage the PROMIS-Pediatric 25 for accurate and quick children symptom and function assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danyu Li
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yueshi Huang
- Department of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fulei Wu
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingmei Huang
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Juan Yao
- Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Nanping Shen
- Shanghai Children's Medical Center Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yingwen Wang
- Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ling Yu
- Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Wen Zhang
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fujimori T, Nagamoto Y, Takenaka S, Kaito T, Kanie Y, Ukon Y, Furuya M, Matsumoto T, Okuda S, Iwasaki M, Okada S. Development of patient-reported outcome for adult spinal deformity: validation study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:1286. [PMID: 38218883 PMCID: PMC10787822 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51783-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a complex condition that combines scoliosis, kyphosis, pain, and postoperative range of motion limitation. The lack of a scale that can successfully capture this complex condition is a clinical challenge. We aimed to develop a disease-specific scale for ASD. The study included 106 patients (mean age; 68 years, 89 women) with ASD. We selected 29 questions that could be useful in assessing ASD and asked the patients to answer them. The factor analysis found two factors: the main symptom and the collateral symptom. The main symptom consisted of 10 questions and assessed activity of daily living (ADL), pain, and appearance. The collateral symptom consisted of five questions to assess ADL due to range of motion limitation. Cronbach's alpha was 0.90 and 0.84, respectively. The Spearman's correlation coefficient between the change of main symptom and satisfaction was 0.48 (p < 0.001). The effect size of Cohen's d for comparison between preoperative and postoperative scores was 1.09 in the main symptom and 0.65 in the collateral symptom. In conclusion, we have developed a validated disease-specific scale for ASD that can simultaneously evaluate the benefits and limitations of ASD surgery with enough responsiveness in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahito Fujimori
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
| | - Yukitaka Nagamoto
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shota Takenaka
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Takashi Kaito
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yuya Kanie
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Ukon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Masayuki Furuya
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomiya Matsumoto
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shinya Okuda
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
| | - Motoki Iwasaki
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka, Japan
| | - Seiji Okada
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Terwee CB, Roorda LD. Country-specific reference values for PROMIS ® pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values. Ann Med 2023; 55:1-11. [PMID: 36426680 PMCID: PMC9704075 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2149849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) is commonly used across medical conditions. To facilitate interpretation of scores across countries, we calculated Dutch reference values for PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Pain Behavior (PROMIS-PB), Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-APSRA), and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-SSRA), as compared to US reference values. PATIENTS AND METHODS A panel completed full PROMIS-PF (n=1310), PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PB (n=1052), and PROMIS-APSRA and PROMIS-SSRA (n=1002) item banks and reported their level of health per domain (no, mild, moderate, severe limitations). T-scores were calculated by sample and subgroups (age, gender, self-reported level of domain). Distribution-based and anchor-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were determined. RESULTS Mean T-scores were close to the US mean of 50 for PROMIS-PF (49.8) and PROMIS-APSRA (50.6), lower for PROMIS-SSRA (47.5) and higher for PROMIS-PI (54.9) and PROMIS-PB (52.0). Distribution-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were comparable to US recommended cut-off values (except for PROMIS-PI) but participants reported limitations 'earlier' than suggested thresholds. CONCLUSION Dutch reference values were close to US reference values for some PROMIS domains but not all. We recommend country-specific reference values to facilitate worldwide PROMIS use.KEY MESSAGESPROMIS offers universally applicable IRT-based efficient and patient-friendly measures to assess commonly relevant patient-reported outcomes across medical conditions.To support the use of PROMIS in daily clinical practice and research across the world, country-specific general population reference values should be obtained.More research is necessary to obtain reliable and valid cut-off values for what constitutes mild, moderate and severe scores from the patients' perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leo D Roorda
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center
- Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jin X, Liang W, Zhang L, Cao S, Yang L, Xie F. Economic and Humanistic Burden of Osteoarthritis: An Updated Systematic Review of Large Sample Studies. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:1453-1467. [PMID: 37462839 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01296-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A previous systematic literature review demonstrated a significant economic and humanistic burden on patients with osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to systematically review and update the burden of OA reported by large sample studies since 2016. METHODS We searched Medline (via Ovid) and Embase using the updated search strategy based on the previous review. Those studies with a sample size ≥ 1000 and measuring the cost (direct or indirect) or health-related quality of life (HRQL) of OA were included. Pairs of reviewers worked independently and in duplicate. An arbitrator was consulted to resolve discrepancies between reviewers. The Kappa value was calculated to examine the agreement between reviewers. All costs were converted to 2021 US dollars according to inflation rates and exchange rates. RESULTS A total of 1230 studies were screened by title and abstract and 159 by full text, and 54 studies were included in the review. The Kappa value for the full-text screening was 0.71. Total annual OA-related direct costs ranged from US$326 in Japan to US$19,530 in the US. Total annual all-cause direct costs varied from US$173 in Italy to US$41,433 in the US. The annual indirect costs ranged from US$736 in the US to US$18,884 in the Netherlands. Thirty-four studies reported HRQL, with EQ-5D (13, 38%) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) (6, 18%) being the most frequently used instruments. The EQ-VAS and utility scores ranged from 41.5 to 81.7 and 0.3 to 0.9, respectively. The ranges of WOMAC pain (range 0-20, higher score for worse health), stiffness (range 0-8), and physical functioning (range 0-68) were 2.0-3.0, 1.0-5.0, and 5.8-42.8, respectively. CONCLUSION Since 2016, the ranges of direct costs of OA became wider, while the HRQL of patients remained poor. More countries outside the US have published OA-related disease burden using registry databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuejing Jin
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 11, Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
| | - Wanxian Liang
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 11, Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
| | - Lining Zhang
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 11, Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
| | - Shihuan Cao
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 11, Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
| | - Lujia Yang
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 11, Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Xie
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (formerly Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics), Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Obbarius A, Klapproth CP, Liegl G, Christmann PM, Schneider U, Fischer F, Rose M. Measuring PROMIS pain interference in German patients with chronic conditions: calibration, validation, and cross-cultural use of item parameters. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:2839-2852. [PMID: 37268754 PMCID: PMC10473994 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03446-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To calibrate the item parameters of the German PROMIS® Pain interference (PROMIS PI) items using an item-response theory (IRT) model and investigate psychometric properties of the item bank. METHODS Forty items of the PROMIS PI item bank were collected in a convenience sample of 660 patients, which were recruited during inpatient rheumatological treatment or outpatient psychosomatic medicine visits in Germany. Unidimensionality, monotonicity, and local independence were tested as required for IRT analyses. Unidimensionality was examined using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Unidimensional and bifactor graded-response IRT models were fitted to the data. Bifactor indices were used to investigate whether multidimensionality would lead to biased scores. To evaluate convergent and discriminant validity, the item bank was correlated with legacy pain instruments. Potential differential item functioning (DIF) was examined for gender, age, and subsample. To investigate whether U.S. item parameters may be used to derive T-scores in German patients, T-scores based on previously published U.S. and newly estimated German item parameters were compared with each other after adjusting for sample specific differences. RESULTS All items were sufficiently unidimensional, locally independent, and monotonic. Whereas the fit of the unidimensional IRT model was not acceptable, a bifactor IRT model demonstrated acceptable fit. Explained common variance and Omega hierarchical suggested that using the unidimensional model would not lead to biased scores. One item demonstrated DIF between subsamples. High correlations with legacy pain instruments supported construct validity of the item bank. T-scores based on U.S. and German item parameters were similar suggesting that U.S. parameters could be used in German samples. CONCLUSION The German PROMIS PI item bank proved to be a clinically valid and precise instrument for assessing pain interference in patients with chronic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Obbarius
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Dornsife Center for Self-Report Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
| | - Christoph Paul Klapproth
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gregor Liegl
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paula M Christmann
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Udo Schneider
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Fischer
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Rose
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Outcomes Measurement Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Teuwen MMH, Knaapen IRE, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Schoones JW, van den Ende CHM, van Weely SFE, Gademan MGJ. The use of PROMIS measures in clinical studies in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:2731-2749. [PMID: 37103773 PMCID: PMC10474175 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03422-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures is widely advocated, little is known on their use in patients with inflammatory arthritis. We systematically describe the use and outcomes of PROMIS measures in clinical studies involving people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Through a systematic search of nine electronic databases, clinical studies including patients with RA or axSpA and reporting the use of PROMIS measure were selected. Study characteristics, details of PROMIS measures and their outcomes, if available, were extracted. RESULTS In total, 29 studies described in 40 articles met the inclusion criteria, of which 25 studies included RA patients, three studies included axSpA patients and one study included both RA and axSpA patients. The use of two general PROMIS measures (PROMIS Global Health, PROMIS-29) and 13 different domain-specific PROMIS measures was reported, of which the PROMIS Pain Interference (n = 17), Physical Function (n = 14), Fatigue (n = 13), and Depression (n = 12) measures were most frequently used. Twenty-one studies reported their results in terms of T-scores. Most T-scores were worse than the general population mean, indicating impairments of health status. Eight studies did not report actual data but rather measurement properties of the PROMIS measures. CONCLUSION There was considerable variety regarding the different PROMIS measures used, with the PROMIS Pain interference, Physical function, Fatigue, and Depression measures being the most frequently used. In order to facilitate the comparisons across studies, more standardization of the selection of PROMIS measures is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M H Teuwen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - I R E Knaapen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T P M Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J W Schoones
- Directorate of Research Policy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C H M van den Ende
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - S F E van Weely
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M G J Gademan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li D, Zong X, Huang Q, Wu F, Huang Y, Ge Y, Zhang W, Yuan C. Validation of the simplified Chinese version of PROMIS Parent Proxy-25 Profile in parents of children with cancer. J Pediatr Nurs 2023; 72:e19-e26. [PMID: 37331836 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the psychometric properties of the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Parent Proxy-25 Profile (PROMIS-25) in a sample of Chinese parents of children with cancer. DESIGN AND METHODS A cross-sectional sample (N = 148) of parents with children aged 5-17 years living with cancer was recruited. Each participant completed sociodemographic and clinical questionnaires and PROMIS-25. The flooring and ceiling effects were calculated. Reliability was determined by the Cronbach's alpha and split-half coefficient. Factor structure was examined by factor analysis. Model fit and graphical plots were assessed to test the assumptions of Rasch model-based item response theory (IRT). Differential item functioning (DIF) was assessed in terms of gender, age, and treatment stage. RESULTS PROMIS-25 demonstrated some flooring and ceiling effect, excellent reliability (Cronbach's α > 0.7 for all six domains), and the six-domain factor structure was supported. The IRT assumptions were met in terms of unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity, and measurement equivalence with acceptable DIF in terms of gender, age, diagnosis, and treatment stage. CONCLUSION PROMIS-25 is a highly reliable and valid instrument for evaluating children with cancer that assesses important health-related quality of life domains of child cancer. PRACTICE IMPLICATION Chinese parents of children with cancer and healthcare providers could use PROMIS-25 to assess the symptoms of children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danyu Li
- Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xuqian Zong
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingmei Huang
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fulei Wu
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yueshi Huang
- Department of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Youhong Ge
- Department of Hematology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen Zhang
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang W, Singh SP, Clement A, Calfee RP, Bijsterbosch JD, Cheng AL. Improvements in Physical Function and Pain Interference and Changes in Mental Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Care. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2320520. [PMID: 37378984 PMCID: PMC10308248 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.20520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Among patients seeking care for musculoskeletal conditions, there is mixed evidence regarding whether traditional, structure-based care is associated with improvement in patients' mental health. Objective To determine whether improvements in physical function and pain interference are associated with meaningful improvements in anxiety and depression symptoms among patients seeking musculoskeletal care. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included adult patients treated by an orthopedic department of a tertiary care US academic medical center from June 22, 2015, to February 9, 2022. Eligible participants presented between 4 and 6 times during the study period for 1 or more musculoskeletal conditions and completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures as standard care at each visit. Exposure PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference scores. Main Outcomes and Measures Linear mixed effects models were used to determine whether improvements in PROMIS Anxiety and PROMIS Depression scores were associated with improved PROMIS Physical Function or Pain Interference scores after controlling for age, gender, race, and PROMIS Depression (for the anxiety model) or PROMIS Anxiety (for the depression model). Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as 3.0 points or more for PROMIS Anxiety and 3.2 points or more for PROMIS Depression. Results Among 11 236 patients (mean [SD] age, 57 [16] years), 7218 (64.2%) were women; 120 (1.1%) were Asian, 1288 (11.5%) were Black, and 9706 (86.4%) were White. Improvements in physical function (β = -0.14; 95% CI, -0.15 to -0.13; P < .001) and pain interference (β = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.26; P < .001) were each associated with improved anxiety symptoms. To reach a clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms, an improvement of 21 PROMIS points or more (95% CI, 20-23 points) on Physical Function or 12 points or more (95% CI, 12-12 points) on Pain Interference would be required. Improvements in physical function (β = -0.05; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.04; P < .001) and pain interference (β = 0.04; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.05; P < .001) were not associated with meaningfully improved depression symptoms. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, substantial improvements in physical function and pain interference were required for association with any clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms, and were not associated with any meaningful improvement in depression symptoms. Patients seeking musculoskeletal care clinicians providing treatment cannot assume that addressing physical health will result in improved symptoms of depression or potentially even sufficiently improved symptoms of anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhang
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Som P. Singh
- University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City
| | - Amdiel Clement
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Ryan P. Calfee
- Division of Hand and Wrist, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Janine D. Bijsterbosch
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Abby L. Cheng
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schuller W, Terwee CB, Terluin B, Rohrich DC, Ostelo RWJG, de Vet HCW. Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the PROMIS Pain Interference Item Bank in Patients Presented in Musculoskeletal Practice. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:530-539. [PMID: 36336326 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
We evaluated the responsiveness of the Patient Reported Outcome Information System Pain Interference item bank in patients with musculoskeletal pain by testing predefined hypotheses about the relationship between the change scores on the item bank, change scores on legacy instruments and Global Ratings of Change (GRoC), and we estimated Minimal Important Change (MIC). Patients answered the full Dutch-Flemish V1.1 item bank. From the responses we derived scores for the standard 8-item short form (SF8a) and a CAT-score was simulated. Correlations between the change scores on the item bank, GRoC and legacy instruments were calculated, together with Effect Sizes, Standardized Response Means, and Area Under the Curve. GRoC were used as an anchor for estimating the MIC with (adjusted) predictive modeling. Of 1,677 patients answering baseline questionnaires 960 completed follow-up questionnaires at 3 months. The item bank correlated moderately high with the GRoC (Spearman's rho 0.63) and with the legacy instruments (Pearson's R ranging from .45 to .68). It showed a high ES (.97) and Standardized Response Means (.71), and could distinguish well between improved and not improved patients based on the GRoC (Area Under the Curve .77). Comparable results were found for the derived SF8a and CAT-scores. The MIC was estimated to be 3.2 (CI 2.6-3.7) T-score points. PERSPECTIVE: Our study supports the responsiveness of the PROMIS-PI item bank in patients with musculoskeletal complaints. Almost all predefined hypotheses were met (94%). The PROMIS-PI item bank correlated well with several legacy instruments which supports generic use of the item bank. MIC for PROMIS-PI was estimated to be 3.2 T-score points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter Schuller
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Methodology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Spine Clinic, Zaandam, The Netherlands.
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Methodology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berend Terluin
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit, General Practice, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne C Rohrich
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond W J G Ostelo
- Department of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit & Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henrica C W de Vet
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Methodology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang W, Singh SP, Clement A, Calfee RP, Bijsterbosch JD, Cheng AL. Relationships between improvement in physical function, pain interference, and mental health in musculoskeletal patients. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.02.12.23285824. [PMID: 36824736 PMCID: PMC9949185 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.12.23285824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
Importance Among patients seeking care for musculoskeletal conditions, there is mixed evidence regarding whether traditional, structure-based care is associated with improvement in patients' mental health. Objective To determine whether improvements in physical function and pain interference are associated with meaningful improvements in anxiety and depression symptoms among patients seeking musculoskeletal care. Design Retrospective cohort study from June 22, 2015 to February 9, 2022. Setting Orthopedic department of a tertiary care US academic medical center. Participants Consecutive sample of adult patients who presented to the musculoskeletal clinic 4 to 6 times during the study period and completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures as standard care at each visit. Exposure PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference scores. Main Outcomes and Measures Linear mixed effects models were used to determine whether: 1) PROMIS Anxiety and 2) PROMIS Depression scores improved as a function of improved PROMIS Physical Function or Pain Interference scores, after controlling for age, gender, race, and PROMIS Depression (for the Anxiety model) and PROMIS Anxiety (for the Depression model). Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as ≥3.0 points for PROMIS Anxiety and ≥3.2 points for PROMIS Depression. Results Among 11,236 patients (mean [SD] age 57 [16] years), 9,706 (86%) were White, and 7,218 (64%) were women. Improvements in physical function (β=-0.14 [95% CI -0.15- -0.13], p<0.001) and pain interference (β=0.26 [0.25-0.26], p<0.001) were each associated with improved anxiety symptoms. To reach a clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms, an improvement of ≥21 [20-23] PROMIS points on Physical Function or ≥12 [12-12] points on Pain Interference would be required. Improvements in physical function (β=-0.05 [- 0.06- -0.04], p<0.001) and pain interference (β=0.04 [0.04-0.05], p<0.001) were not associated with meaningfully improved depression symptoms. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, substantial improvements in physical function and pain interference were required for association with any clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms and were not associated with any meaningful improvement in depression symptoms. Among patients seeking musculoskeletal care, musculoskeletal clinicians and patients cannot assume that addressing physical health will result in improved symptoms of depression or potentially even sufficiently improved symptoms of anxiety. Key Points Question: Among patients seeking musculoskeletal care, are improvements in physical function and pain interference associated with meaningful changes in symptoms of anxiety and depression?Findings: In this large cohort study, improvement by ≥2.3 population-level standard deviations (SD) on PROMIS Physical Function or ≥1.2 SD on PROMIS Pain Interference were required for any association with meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms. Improvements in physical function and pain interference were not associated with meaningfully improved depression symptoms.Meaning: Musculoskeletal clinicians and patients cannot assume that exclusively addressing the physical aspect of a musculoskeletal condition will improve symptoms of depression or potentially even anxiety.
Collapse
|
12
|
Orbai AM, Coates LC, Deodhar A, Helliwell PS, Ritchlin CT, Leibowitz E, Kollmeier AP, Hsia EC, Xu XL, Sheng S, Jiang Y, Liu Y, Han C. Meaningful Improvement in General Health Outcomes with Guselkumab Treatment for Psoriatic Arthritis: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 Results from a Phase 3 Study. THE PATIENT 2022; 15:657-668. [PMID: 35768650 PMCID: PMC9584870 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00588-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Phase 3 DISCOVER-1 study of guselkumab is the first randomized controlled trial to use Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures to assess the effects of treatment on general health outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS Patients (N = 381) with active PsA were randomized 1:1:1 to guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab 100 mg at Week 0, Week 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W); or placebo with Week 24 crossover to guselkumab Q4W. The PROMIS-29 Profile contains four items for each of seven domains (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and social participation) and one pain-intensity item. Raw domain scores are converted to standardized T-scores, with norms based on a US general population mean of 50 (1 standard deviation (SD) = 10). T-score changes of ≥ 5 are considered clinically meaningful. Least-squares mean PROMIS-29 T-score changes from baseline to Week 24 and Week 52 were summarized for the guselkumab and placebo groups; nominal p-values comparing results between guselkumab and placebo were calculated at Week 24 using a mixed model for repeated measures. The proportions of patients who achieved clinically meaningful improvement in PROMIS-29 T-scores were also summarized at Week 24 and Week 52; nominal p-values comparing results between guselkumab and placebo were calculated at Week 24 using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS In the DISCOVER-1 patient population, mean PROMIS-29 T-scores at baseline were ~ 1 SD worse for physical function and pain interference and were numerically worse for social participation, fatigue, and sleep disturbance compared with the US general population. At Week 24, mean PROMIS-29 T-scores improved in guselkumab-treated patients, approaching US population norms; T-scores continued to improve through Week 52. Significantly higher proportions of patients in both guselkumab treatment arms (31-52% across domains) had clinically meaningful improvements in pain interference, fatigue, physical function, sleep, and social participation at Week 24 versus placebo (all nominal p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION In patients with active PsA, guselkumab treatment provided clinically meaningful reductions in fatigue and pain and improvement in physical function and social participation, as measured by the PROMIS-29 Profile. These improvements were maintained through 1 year. CLINICALTRIALS GOV: Registration number, NCT03162796; Submission date 19 May 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana-Maria Orbai
- Psoriatic Arthritis Program, Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center, Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue Baltimore, MFL Center Tower Suite 4100, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
| | - Laura C Coates
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Atul Deodhar
- Division of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Philip S Helliwell
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Christopher T Ritchlin
- Department of Medicine, Allergy/Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Alexa P Kollmeier
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Hsia
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
- University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Xie L Xu
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Shihong Sheng
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Yusang Jiang
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
- Cytel, Inc., Chesterbrook, PA, USA
| | - Yan Liu
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Chenglong Han
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Elsman EBM, Roorda LD, Smidt N, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. Measurement properties of the Dutch PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile in people with and without chronic conditions. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:3447-3458. [PMID: 35751760 PMCID: PMC9587921 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03171-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the structural validity, internal consistency, measurement invariance, and construct validity of the Dutch PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile, including seven physical (e.g., pain, physical function), mental (e.g., depression, anxiety), and social (e.g., role functioning) domains of health, in a Dutch general population sample including subsamples with and without chronic diseases. METHODS The PROMIS-29 was completed by 63,602 participants from the Lifelines cohort study. Structural validity of the PROMIS-29, including unidimensionality of each domain and the physical and mental health summary scores, was evaluated using factor analyses (criteria: CFI ≥ 0.95, TLI ≥ 0.95, RMSEA ≤ 0.06, SRMR ≤ 0.08). Internal consistency, measurement invariance (no differential item functioning (DIF) for age, gender, administration mode, educational level, ethnicity, chronic diseases), and construct validity (hypotheses on known-groups validity and correlations between domains) were assessed per domain. RESULTS The factor structure of the seven domains was supported (CFI = 0.994, TLI = 0.993, RMSEA = 0.046, SRMR = 0.031) as was unidimensionality of each domain, both in the entire sample and the subsamples. Model fit of the physical and mental health summary scores reached the criteria, and scoring coefficients were obtained. Cronbach's alpha for the seven PROMIS-29 domains ranged from 0.75 to 0.96 in the complete sample. No DIF was detected. Of the predefined hypotheses, 78% could be confirmed. CONCLUSION Sufficient structural validity, internal consistency and measurement invariance were found, both in the entire sample and in subsamples with and without chronic diseases. Requirements for sufficient evidence for construct validity were (almost) met for most subscales. Future studies should investigate test-retest reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness of the PROMIS-29.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen B M Elsman
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leo D Roorda
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nynke Smidt
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Henrica C W de Vet
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Knauer J, Terhorst Y, Philippi P, Kallinger S, Eiler S, Kilian R, Waldmann T, Moshagen M, Bader M, Baumeister H. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a web-based routine assessment with integrated recommendations for action for depression and anxiety (RehaCAT+): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial for patients with elevated depressive symptoms in rehabilitation facilities. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061259. [PMID: 35738644 PMCID: PMC9226881 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The integration of a web-based computer-adaptive patient-reported outcome test (CAT) platform with persuasive design optimised features including recommendations for action into routine healthcare could provide a promising way to translate reliable diagnostic results into action. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of such a platform for depression and anxiety (RehaCAT+) compared with the standard diagnostic system (RehaCAT) in cardiological and orthopaedic health clinics in routine care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A two-arm, pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial will be conducted. Twelve participating rehabilitation clinics in Germany will be randomly assigned to a control (RehaCAT) or experimental group (RehaCAT+) in a 1:1 design. A total sample of 1848 participants will be recruited across all clinics. The primary outcome, depression severity at 12 months follow-up (T3), will be assessed using the CAT Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Emotional Distress-Depression Item set. Secondary outcomes are depression at discharge (T1) and 6 months follow-up (T2) as well as anxiety, satisfaction with participation in social roles and activities, pain impairment, fatigue, sleep, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, physical functioning, alcohol, personality and health economic-specific general quality of life and socioeconomic cost and benefits at T1-3. User behaviour, acceptance, facilitating and hindering factors will be assessed with semistructured qualitative interviews. Additionally, a smart sensing substudy will be conducted, with daily ecological momentary assessments and passive collection of smartphone usage variables. Data analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle with additional per-protocol analyses. Cost-effectiveness analyses will be conducted from a societal perspective and the perspective of the statutory pension insurance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study will be conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee of Ulm University, has approved the study (on 24 February 2021 ref. 509/20). Written informed consent will be obtained for all participants. Results will be published via peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER DRKS00027447.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Knauer
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Yannik Terhorst
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Paula Philippi
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Selina Kallinger
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Sandro Eiler
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Reinhold Kilian
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tamara Waldmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Morten Moshagen
- Department of Psychological Research Methods, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Martina Bader
- Department of Psychological Research Methods, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Harald Baumeister
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Differential item functioning to validate setting of delivery compatibility in PROMIS-global health. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:2189-2200. [PMID: 35050447 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03084-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) such as PROMIS are increasingly utilized in healthcare to assess patient perception and functional status, but the effect of delivery setting remains to be fully investigated. To our knowledge, no current study establishes the absence of differential item functioning (DIF) across delivery setting for these PROMIS- Global Health (PROMIS-GH) measures among orthopedic patients. We sought to investigate the correlation of PROMIS-GH scores across in-clinic versus remote delivery by evaluating DIF within the Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH) items. We hypothesize that the setting of delivery of the GPH and GMH domains of PROMIS-GH will not impact the results of the measure, allowing direct comparison between the two delivery settings. METHODS Five thousand and seven hundred and eighty-five complete PROMIS-Global Health measures were analyzed retrospectively using the 'Lordif' package on the R platform. DIF was measured for GPH and GMH domains across setting of response (in-clinic vs remote) during the pre-operative period, immediate post-operative period, and 1-year post-operative period using Monte Carlo estimation. McFadden pseudo-R2 thresholds (> 0.02) were used to assess the magnitude of DIF for individual PROMIS items. RESULTS No GPH or GMH items contained in the PROMIS-GH instrument yielded DIF across in-clinic vs remote delivery setting during the pre-operative, immediate post-operative, or 1-year post-operative window. CONCLUSION The GPH and GMH domains within the PROMIS-GH instrument may be delivered in the clinic or remotely with comparable accuracy. This cross-delivery setting validation analysis may aid to improve the quality of patient care by allowing mixed platform PROMIS-GH data tailored to individual patient circumstance.
Collapse
|
16
|
Geraedts ACM, Mulay S, Terwee CB, Vahl AC, Verhagen HJM, Ünlü Ç, Ubbink DT, Koelemay MJW, Balm R. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Yearly Imaging Surveillance in Patients Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 82:221-227. [PMID: 34902477 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about the impact of standardized imaging surveillance on anxiety levels and well-being of patients after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). We hypothesize that patient anxiety levels increase just before receiving the imaging results compared with standard anxiety levels. METHODS Prospective cohort study from November 2018 to May 2020 including post-EVAR patients visiting the outpatient clinics of 4 Dutch hospitals for imaging follow-up. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was used. Patients completed the PROMIS Anxiety v1.0 Short Form (SF) 4a, PROMIS-Global Health Scale v1.2, and PROMIS-Physical Function v1.2 SF8b at 2 time points: prior to the result of the imaging study (T1: pre-visit) and 6-8 months later (T2: reference measurement). Mean T-scores at T1 were compared to T2, and T2 to the general 65+ Dutch population. RESULTS Altogether 342 invited patients were eligible, 214 completed the first questionnaire, 189 returned 2 completed questionnaires and 128 patients did not participate. Out of 214 respondents, 195 were male (91.1%) and the mean (standard deviation) age was 75.2 (7.0) years. There were no significant differences between T1 and T2 in anxiety levels (0.48; 95% confidence interval[CI] -0.42-1.38), global mental health (0.27; 95% CI -0.79-0.84), global physical health (0.10; 95% CI -0.38-1.18) and physical function (0.53; 95% CI -0.26-1.32). Compared with the 65+ Dutch population, at T2 patients experienced more anxiety (3.8; 95% CI 2.96-5.54), had worse global physical health (-3.2; 95% CI -4.38 - -2.02) and physical function (-2.4; 95% CI -4.00 - -0.80). Global mental health was similar (-1.0; 95% CI -2.21 - 0.21). CONCLUSIONS Post-EVAR patients do not experience more anxiety just before receiving surveillance imaging results than outside this period, but do suffer from more anxiety and worse physical outcomes than the 65+ Dutch population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C M Geraedts
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - S Mulay
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A C Vahl
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J M Verhagen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ç Ünlü
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Noordwest Hospital, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - D T Ubbink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J W Koelemay
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Balm
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jildeh TR, Castle JP, Abbas MJ, Dash ME, Akioyamen NO, Okoroha KR. Age Significantly Affects Response Rate to Outcomes Questionnaires Using Mobile Messaging Software. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2021; 3:e1349-e1358. [PMID: 34712973 PMCID: PMC8527269 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the demographic factors that influence time to respond (TTR), time to completion (TTC), and response rate when using a text messaging-based system and to determine the feasibility and applicability of mobile messaging-based services for collection of patient-reported outcomes among orthopaedic sports medicine patients. Methods On the day of surgery, patient mobile phone number was collected and the automated mobile messaging service (MOSIO, Seattle, WA) messaged patients for 10 ``days postoperatively. Patient visual analog scale (VAS) scores were collected 3 times daily, side effects were asked each evening, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) Short Form was collected on postoperative day 3 and 7. Results A total of 177 patients were enrolled in the study. The overall response rate to the survey questions was 75.0%. For all patients, the average TTR of questions was 35.09 ± 12.57 minutes. The TTC was 2.75 ± 3.56 minutes for PROMIS-PI, 3.51 ± 1.26 minutes for VAS, and 3.80 ± 6.87 for side-effect questions. When patients were stratified into age groups, the youngest group, 16 to 32 years, had the greatest response rate of 85.2% and patients in the 49 to 59 years group had the lowest response rate of 68.4% and 69.1%, respectively (P < .001). There was no significant difference in the TTR or TTC for VAS, PROMIS-PI, or side-effect questions when patients were stratified by age or sex groups (P > .05). Conclusions Collectively, all age groups successfully achieved a mean response rate of 75%; however, significantly lower response rates were observed for patients >49 years old. Differences in age and sex did not impact the overall TTR or TTC for VAS, PROMIS-PI, or side-effect questions. Mobile-based applications present as an emerging opportunity to track postoperative outcome scores and reduce clinic survey load. Level of Evidence Case series, level of evidence IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toufic R Jildeh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Joshua P Castle
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Muhammad J Abbas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Miriam E Dash
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Noel O Akioyamen
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Kelechi R Okoroha
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pellicciari L, Chiarotto A, Giusti E, Crins MHP, Roorda LD, Terwee CB. Psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scale v1.2: global health (PROMIS-GH) in a Dutch general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19:226. [PMID: 34579721 PMCID: PMC8477486 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01855-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the psychometric properties of the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Scale v1.2 – Global Health (PROMIS-GH). Methods The PROMIS-GH (also referred to as PROMIS-10) was administered to 4370 persons from the Dutch general population. Unidimensionality (CFI ≥ 0.95; TLI ≥ 0.95; RMSEA ≤ 0.06; SRMR ≤ 0.08), local independence (residual correlations < 0.20), monotonicity (H > 0.30), model fit with the Graded Response Model (GRM, p < 0.001), internal consistency (alpha > 0.75), precision (total score information across the latent trait), measurement invariance (no Differential Item Functioning [DIF]), and cross-cultural validity (no DIF for language, Dutch vs. United States English) of its subscales, composed of four items each, Global Mental Health (GMH) and Global Physical Health (GPH), were assessed. Results Confirmatory factor analyses, on both subscales, revealed slight departures from unidimensionality for GMH (CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.22; SRMR = 0.04) and GPH (CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.12; SRMR = 0.03). Local independence, monotonicity, GRM model fit, internal consistency, precision and cross-cultural validity were supported. However, Global10 (emotional problems) showed misfit on the GMH subscale, while Global08 (fatigue) presented DIF for age. Conclusion The psychometric properties of the PROMIS-GH in the Dutch population were considered acceptable. Sufficient local independence, monotonicity, GRM fit, internal consistency, measurement invariance and cross-cultural validity were found. If future studies find similar results, structural validity of the GMH could be enhanced by improving or replacing Global10 (emotional problems). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-021-01855-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessandro Chiarotto
- Department of Health Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, , University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emanuele Giusti
- Psychology Research Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy
| | - Martine H P Crins
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center
- Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Zuyderland MC Department of Quality and Safety, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leo D Roorda
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center
- Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, de Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Terwee CB, Zuidgeest M, Vonkeman HE, Cella D, Haverman L, Roorda LD. Common patient-reported outcomes across ICHOM Standard Sets: the potential contribution of PROMIS®. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:259. [PMID: 34488730 PMCID: PMC8420145 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01624-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) develops condition-specific Standard Sets of outcomes to be measured in clinical practice for value-based healthcare evaluation. Standard Sets are developed by different working groups, which is inefficient and may lead to inconsistencies in selected PROs and PROMs. We aimed to identify common PROs across ICHOM Standard Sets and examined to what extend these PROs can be measured with a generic set of PROMs: the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). METHODS We extracted all PROs and recommended PROMs from 39 ICHOM Standard Sets. Similar PROs were categorized into unique PRO concepts. We examined which of these PRO concepts can be measured with PROMIS. RESULTS A total of 307 PROs were identified in 39 ICHOM Standard Sets and 114 unique PROMs are recommended for measuring these PROs. The 307 PROs could be categorized into 22 unique PRO concepts. More than half (17/22) of these PRO concepts (covering about 75% of the PROs and 75% of the PROMs) can be measured with a PROMIS measure. CONCLUSION Considerable overlap was found in PROs across ICHOM Standard Sets, and large differences in terminology used and PROMs recommended, even for the same PROs. We recommend a more universal and standardized approach to the selection of PROs and PROMs. Such an approach, focusing on a set of core PROs for all patients, measured with a system like PROMIS, may provide more opportunities for patient-centered care and facilitate the uptake of Standard Sets in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Lotte Haverman
- Psychosocial Department, Emma Children's Hospital Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leo D Roorda
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Purpose The aims of this cross-sectional study were to explore reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement System®—Profile 57 (PROMIS-57) questionnaire in a general population sample, n = 408, and to examine Item Response properties and factor structure.
Methods Reliability measures were obtained from factor analysis and item response theory (IRT) methods. Correlations between PROMIS-57 and RAND-36-item health survey (RAND36) were examined for concurrent and discriminant validity. Factor structure and IRT assumptions were examined with factor analysis methods. IRT Item and model fit and graphic plots were inspected, and differential item functioning (DIF) for language, age, gender, and education level were examined.
Results PROMIS-57 demonstrated excellent reliability and satisfactory concurrent and discriminant validity. Factor structure of seven domains was supported. IRT assumptions were met for unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity, and invariance with no DIF of consequence for language or age groups. Estimated common variance (ECV) per domain and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model fit supported unidimensionality for all seven domains. The GRM IRT Model demonstrates acceptable model fit. Conclusions The psychometric properties and factor structure of Norwegian PROMIS-57 were satisfactory. Hence, the 57-item questionnaire along with PROMIS-29, and the corresponding 8 and 4 item short forms for physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, social participation ability and pain interference, are considered suitable for use in research and clinical care in Norwegian populations. Further studies on longitudinal reliability and sensitivity in patient populations and for Norwegian item calibration and/or reference scores are needed. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-02906-1.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cai T, Huang Q, Wu F, Yuan C. Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS social function short forms in Chinese patients with breast cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19:149. [PMID: 34006304 PMCID: PMC8130437 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01788-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnosis of breast cancer and the subsequent treatment undermine patients' participation in social activities. This study aimed to carry out a cross-cultural adaption and analysis of the construct validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the PROMIS social function short forms in patients with breast cancer. METHODS This study utilized a cross-sectional research design, and was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000035439). After a standardized cross-cultural adaption process, a psychometric evaluation was performed of the Chinese version of the PROMIS social function short forms. Using convenience sampling, eligible patients with breast cancer from tertiary hospitals in China were enrolled from January 2019 to July 2020. Participants completed the sociodemographic information questionnaire, the PROMIS social function short forms, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast, the PROMIS emotional support short form and the PROMIS anxiety short form. RESULTS Data were collected from a sample of 633 patients whose mean age was 48.1 years. The measures showed an absence of floor and ceiling effects. Regarding construct validity, the results of confirmatory factor analysis supported the original two-factor structure of the PROMIS social function short forms. In addition, the measures were found to have acceptable known-group validity, measurement invariance, and convergent and discriminate validity. Regarding reliability, the Cronbach's α was high for all items (> 0.70). CONCLUSION The Chinese version of the PROMIS social function short forms was demonstrated to be a valid and reliable measure for the assessment of social function in Chinese patients with breast cancer. Additional psychometric evaluation is needed to draw firm conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Cai
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032 China
| | - Qingmei Huang
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032 China
| | - Fulei Wu
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032 China
| | - Changrong Yuan
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032 China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gregory JJ, Werth PM, Reilly CA, Jevsevar DS. Cross-specialty PROMIS-global health differential item functioning. Qual Life Res 2021; 30:2339-2348. [PMID: 33725333 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02812-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the functioning of the PROMIS-Global Health (PROMIS-GH) across clinical setting, patient age, and medical complexity by evaluating differential item functioning (DIF) within the Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH) domains. To our knowledge, no study demonstrates lack of differential item functioning (DIF) for PROMIS-GH across these populations. We hypothesize that the PROMIS-GH domains of GMH and GPH will perform similarly when compared across these populations. METHODS Seven thousand nine hundred and seventy four complete PROMIS Global Health measures were retrospectively analyzed using the 'Lordif' package on the R platform. DIF was investigated for both GMH and GPH across clinical environment (Orthopedic Surgery, Family Medicine, & Internal Medicine), age group (≤ 53, > 53-66, > 66), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI:0, CCI:1, CCI:2 +) using quasi Monte Carlo estimation. To assess the significance of DIF, Wald tests were used with the Benjamini & Hochberg procedure. RESULTS No items contained in the GMH or GPH demonstrated DIF across age groups, medical complexity, or clinical environment. CONCLUSION Items assessing the domains of GMH and GPH within the PROMIS-GH function comparably across treatment setting, age category, and medical comorbidities. The PROMIS-Global Health holds potential to facilitate interdisciplinary patient care and patient optimization prior to surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J Gregory
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA.
| | - Paul M Werth
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA
- Department of Orthopaedics, Geisel School of Medicine At Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| | - Clifford A Reilly
- The Robert Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA
| | - David S Jevsevar
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA
- Department of Orthopaedics, Geisel School of Medicine At Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Thackeray A, Hanmer J, Yu L, McCracken P, Marcus R. Linking AM-PAC Mobility and Daily Activity to the PROMIS Physical Function Metric. Phys Ther 2021; 101:6158914. [PMID: 33693902 PMCID: PMC8340629 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to link Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Mobility and Daily Activity scales to the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) allowing for a common metric across scales. METHODS Cross-sectional study of patients 18 years and older presenting to 1 of 8 outpatient rehabilitation clinics in southwestern Pennsylvania. Patients completed one survey with questions from the AM-PAC Daily Activity and Mobility short forms, and the PROMIS PF item bank. Using item response theory, 2 rounds of fixed-parameter calibration were performed. In the first, the AM-PAC Daily Activity and Mobility items were calibrated with 27 fixed item parameters from the PROMIS PF. Second, the AM-PAC Daily Activity items were calibrated with 11 PROMIS Upper Extremity fixed item parameters. This process uses the construct of physical function and equates AM-PAC items on the same underlying measurement scale for the PROMIS PF. RESULTS Both scales measured a wide range of functioning and demonstrated good calibration. Data were appropriate for a fixed-parameter item response theory-based crosswalk. AM-PAC Daily Activity and Mobility raw scores were mapped onto the PROMIS PF metric. AM-PAC Daily Activity scores were also mapped onto the PROMIS PF Upper Extremity metric. CONCLUSION Question items from the AM-PAC Daily Activity, AM-PAC Mobility, and PROMIS PF similarly measure the construct of physical function. This consistency allows for a crosswalk of AM-PAC scores onto the PROMIS PF metric. IMPACT Crosswalk tables developed in this study allow for converting scores from the AM-PAC Daily Activity and Mobility scales to the PROMIS PF metric. This will facilitate monitoring of longitudinal change in function over time and across settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Thackeray
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA,Address all correspondence to Dr Thackeray at:
| | - Janel Hanmer
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lan Yu
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Polly McCracken
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robin Marcus
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abma IL, Butje BJD, Ten Klooster PM, van der Wees PJ. Measurement properties of the Dutch-Flemish patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) physical function item bank and instruments: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19:62. [PMID: 33627157 PMCID: PMC7905571 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01647-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limitations in physical functioning are a big concern especially for patients with chronic or musculoskeletal diseases. Therefore, physical functioning is often used as a core outcome of treatments. The generic patient-reported outcomes information system (PROMIS) physical function (PF) item bank has shown potential to measure PF with better precision, interpretability and lower respondent burden compared with traditional patient-reported outcome measures. This study provides an overview of the current evidence on the quality of the measurement properties of the translated Dutch-Flemish PROMIS-PF item bank and its subdomains, and their derived short forms and computer adaptive tests (CATs). METHODS PubMed was searched up to June 17th 2020 for validation studies of Dutch-Flemish PROMIS-PF in Dutch and Flemish adults. Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted using the COSMIN Risk of bias checklist. The COSMIN criteria for good measurement properties were used to judge the results of the studies, which were adjusted and added to where needed for this review, in the context of IRT instruments and item banks. The quality of evidence was summarized for each measurement property based on the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS Eleven studies were included, evaluating the PROMIS-PF item bank, the Upper Extremity (UE) subdomain, and/or their derived short forms and CATs in different clinical populations. There is evidence for sufficient structural validity, measurement precision, construct validity, and cross-cultural validity of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS-PF item bank. The upper extremity subdomain item bank shows high quality evidence for structural validity and measurement precision. Content validity of these item banks has not been thoroughly demonstrated in a Dutch-Flemish population. Furthermore, the derived instruments have far less robust evidence: there are fewer validation studies available and none examined their performance as stand-alone administered instruments. CONCLUSIONS The first studies into the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS-PF item bank and the UE subdomain show promising results, with especially high quality evidence for sufficient structural validity and measurement precision. However, more studies, and with higher methodological quality, are needed to study the instruments derived from these item banks. These studies should also evaluate content validity, reliability and responsiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inger L Abma
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Geert Grooteplein 21 (route 114), P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Bas J D Butje
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Geert Grooteplein 21 (route 114), P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health, and Technology, Centre for eHealth and Well-Being Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Philip J van der Wees
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Geert Grooteplein 21 (route 114), P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Crins MHP, Terwee CB, Westhovens R, van Schaardenburg D, Smits N, Joly J, Verschueren P, Van der Elst K, Dekker J, Boers M, Roorda LD. First Validation of the Full PROMIS Pain Interference and Pain Behavior Item Banks in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72:1550-1559. [PMID: 31562795 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pain interference and pain behavior are highly relevant outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a universally applicable set of item banks measuring patient-reported health, and if applied as computerized adaptive tests (CATs), more efficiently and precisely than current instruments. The objective was to study the psychometric properties of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS pain interference (PROMIS-PI) and the PROMIS pain behavior (PROMIS-PB) item banks in patients with RA. METHODS A total of 2,029 patients with RA completed the full PROMIS-PI (version 1.1, 40 items), and 1,554 patients completed the full PROMIS-PB (version 1.1, 39 items). The following psychometric properties were studied: unidimensionality, local dependence, monotonicity and graded response model (GRM) fit, cross-cultural validity (differential item functioning [DIF] for language [Dutch versus Flemish]), other forms of measurement invariance, construct validity, reliability, and floor and ceiling effects. RESULTS The PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PB banks were sufficiently unidimensional (Omega-hierarchical [Omega-H] 0.99, 0.95, and explained common variance 0.95, 0.78, respectively), had negligible local dependence (0.3-1.4% of item pairs), good monotonicity (H 0.75, 0.46), and a good GRM model fit (no misfitting items). Furthermore, both item banks showed good cross-cultural validity (no DIF for language), measurement invariance (no DIF for age, sex, administration mode, and disease activity), good construct validity (all hypotheses met), high reliability (>0.90 in the range of patients with RA), and an absence of floor and ceiling effects (0% minimum or maximum score, respectively). CONCLUSION Both PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PB banks showed good psychometric properties in patients with RA and can be used as CATs in research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine H P Crins
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Dirkjan van Schaardenburg
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, and Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels Smits
- University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Joly
- KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Joost Dekker
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Boers
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, and VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leo D Roorda
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
McHugh M, Droy E, Muscatelli S, Gagnier JJ. Measures of Adult Knee Function. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72 Suppl 10:219-249. [DOI: 10.1002/acr.24235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
27
|
Liegl G, Rose M, Knebel F, Stengel A, Buttgereit F, Obbarius A, Fischer HF, Nolte S. Using subdomain-specific item sets affected PROMIS physical function scores differently in cardiology and rheumatology patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 127:151-160. [PMID: 32781113 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) item bank has been developed to standardize patient-reported PF across medical fields. However, evidence of scoring equivalence across cardiology and rheumatology patients is still missing. Therefore, this study aims to investigate both (1) the extent of disease-related differential item functioning (DIF) and (2) the impact of the disease group on using subdomain-specific item sets for generating PROMIS PF scores in cardiology and rheumatology patients. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Ordinal regression was used to evaluate DIF between cardiology (n = 201) and rheumatology (n = 200) inpatients. To explore the disease-specific impact of PF subdomains on scoring, we compared scores derived from the full item bank with scores derived from subdomain-specific item sets for each disease group. RESULTS DIF was detected in 18 items, predominately from the upper extremity subdomain. When upper extremity items were used, cardiology patients reached systematically higher scores than using the full item bank. Rheumatology patients scored substantially higher when mobility items were used. CONCLUSION Applying the PROMIS PF metric to disease-specific item sets including items from differing subdomains may lead to biased comparisons of PF levels across disease groups. Disease-specific item parameters should be provided for items showing DIF, and subdomain-related content balancing is recommended for scoring the generic PROMIS PF construct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor Liegl
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Matthias Rose
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Knebel
- Clinic for Cardiology and Angiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Clinic for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Frank Buttgereit
- Clinic for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Obbarius
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - H Felix Fischer
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sandra Nolte
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Population Health Strategic Research Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yiu Y, Baylor CR, Bamer AM, Shelly S, Klein AM, Garrett CG, Pitman MJ. Validation of the Communicative Participation Item Bank as an Outcome Measure for Spasmodic Dysphonia. Laryngoscope 2020; 131:859-864. [PMID: 32710809 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Current patient-reported outcome measures do not adequately capture the impact of spasmodic dysphonia (SD) on communication in daily life situations. The aim of this study was to validate the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB), which specifically measures a disease's impact on daily conversational situations, as an outcome measure for SD. STUDY DESIGN Multi-institutional prospective cohort study. METHODS A prospective study was conducted with administration of the 46-question CPIB and the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) to 190 participants with SD before (time 1) and 6 weeks after (time 2) botulinum toxin injection. Differential item function (DIF) analyses were performed to examine potential item bias. Paired t-tests were used to assess change in each of the CPIB and VHI-10 scores after treatment. Pearson correlations were calculated between the CPIB and VHI-10. RESULTS DIF analyses revealed no clinically meaningful difference between the item parameters generated for this SD sample and the original CPIB calibration sample. There were statistically significant changes between the pre-treatment and post-treatment time points for both the CPIB and VHI-10. Correlations between the CPIB and VHI were moderate-high. CONCLUSIONS The CPIB item bank, General Short Form, and scoring parameters can be used with people with SD for valid and reliable measurement of the impact of communication disorders on communication in everyday life. The CPIB is sensitive to changes with intervention, proving useful for clinical and research purposes to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 2, prospective observational research with an experimental design (ie, cohort study). Laryngoscope, 131:859-864, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Yiu
- Texas Voice Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Carolyn R Baylor
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - Alyssa M Bamer
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - Sandeep Shelly
- Emory Voice Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A
| | - Adam M Klein
- Emory Voice Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A
| | - C Gaelyn Garrett
- Vanderbilt Voice Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, U.S.A
| | - Michael J Pitman
- The Center for Voice and Swallowing, Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Katz P, Kannowski CL, Sun L, Michaud K. Estimation of Minimally Important Differences and Patient Acceptable Symptom State Scores for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference Short Form in Rheumatoid Arthritis. ACR Open Rheumatol 2020; 2:320-329. [PMID: 32386128 PMCID: PMC7301876 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Studies have supported the validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) scale in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here, we characterize minimally important differences (MIDs) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) values. METHODS PROMIS PI scores were collected in four periods at 6-month intervals from patients with RA (n > 3200 per period). Both anchor- and distribution-based methods estimated MIDs. Anchors were pain comparisons, pain interference, and general health. Time responses for each anchor-response group (four administrations, each with three change periods) were averaged. The mean changes of the "somewhat worse" and "somewhat better" groups were used as estimates for MID for worsening and improvement, respectively. Distribution-based MID analyses used standardized error of measurement (SEM) and SD. PASS was estimated with the question "If your health was to remain for the rest of your life as it has been in the past 48 hours, would this be acceptable?" MIDs and PASS values were also estimated by baseline pain levels. RESULTS Anchor-based methods yielded estimates of 1.65 to 1.84 for worsening and -1.29 to -1.73 for improvement. The SEM estimate was 1.84. The PASS estimate for the entire group was 41.6. Substantial differences in MIDs and PASS were noted among baseline pain groups. CONCLUSION The best estimate of a group-level MID was approximately 2 points, similar to MIDs suggested in other conditions. The PASS value for the entire group was almost an SD better than the population mean. Results should enhance use of PROMIS PI in RA by facilitating interpretation of scores and changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Luna Sun
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Kaleb Michaud
- FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas, and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Translation, cross-cultural and construct validity of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS® upper extremity item bank v2.0. Qual Life Res 2020; 29:1123-1135. [PMID: 31894506 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02388-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a Dutch-Flemish translation of the PROMIS® upper extremity (PROMIS-UE) item bank v2.0, and to investigate its cross-cultural and construct validity as well as its floor and ceiling effects in patients with musculoskeletal UE disorders. METHODS State of the art translation methodology was used to develop the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS-UE item bank v2.0. The item bank and four legacy instruments were administered to 205 Dutch patients with musculoskeletal UE disorders visiting an orthopedic outpatient clinic. The validity of cross-cultural comparisons between English and Dutch patients was evaluated by studying differential item functioning (DIF) for language (Dutch vs. English) with ordinal logistic regression models and McFadden's pseudo R2-change of ≥ 2% as critical value. Construct validity was assessed by formulating a priori hypotheses and calculating correlations with legacy instruments. Floor/ceiling effects were evaluated by determining the proportion of patients who achieved the lowest/highest possible raw score. RESULTS Eight items showed DIF for language, but their impact on the test score was negligible. The item bank correlated, as hypothesized, moderately with the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS pain intensity item (Pearson's r = - 0.43) and strongly with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, Subscale Disability/Symptoms (Spearman's ρ = - 0.87), the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (ρ = - 0.86), and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Subscale Activities of Daily Living (ρ = 0.87). No patients achieved the lowest or highest possible raw score. CONCLUSIONS A Dutch-Flemish PROMIS-UE item bank v2.0 has been developed that showed sufficient cross-cultural and construct validity as well as absence of floor and ceiling effects.
Collapse
|
31
|
Kalkers NF, Galan I, Kerbrat A, Tacchino A, Kamm CP, O'Connell K, McGuigan C, Edan G, Montalban X, Uitdehaag BM, Mokkink LB. Differential item functioning of the Arm function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (AMSQ) by language, a study in six countries. Mult Scler 2019; 27:90-96. [PMID: 31845614 DOI: 10.1177/1352458519895450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Arm function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (AMSQ) has been developed as a self-reported measure of arm and hand functioning for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The AMSQ was originally developed in Dutch and to date translated into five languages (i.e. English, German, Spanish, French, and Italian). OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate differential item functioning (DIF) of the AMSQ in these languages. METHODS We performed DIF analyses, using "language" as the polytomous group variable. To detect DIF, logistic regression and item response theory principles were applied. Multiple logistic regression models were evaluated. We used a pseudo R2 value of 0.02 or more as the DIF threshold. RESULTS A total of 1733 male and female patients with all subtypes of MS were included. The DIF analysis for the whole dataset showed no uniform or non-uniform DIF on any of the 31 items. All R2 values were below 0.02. CONCLUSION The AMSQ is validated in six languages. All items have the same meaning to MS patients in Dutch, English, German, Spanish, French, and Italian. This validation study enables use of the AMSQ in international studies, for monitoring treatment response and disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nynke F Kalkers
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Department of Neurology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid Galan
- Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anne Kerbrat
- Department of Neurology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Andrea Tacchino
- Scientific Research Area, Italian MS Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy
| | - Christian P Kamm
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Center, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland/Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Karen O'Connell
- Department of Neurology, St. Vincent's University Hospital and University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Chris McGuigan
- Department of Neurology, St Vincent's University Hospital and University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gilles Edan
- Department of Neurology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain/Department of Neurology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bernard Mj Uitdehaag
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lidwine B Mokkink
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Livermore AT, Anderson LA, Anderson MB, Erickson JA, Peters CL. Correction of mildly dysplastic hips with periacetabular osteotomy demonstrates promising outcomes, achievement of correction goals, and excellent five-year survivorship. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B:16-22. [PMID: 31146564 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.101b6.bjj-2018-1487.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiological measurements, and total hip arthroplasty (THA)-free survival in patients who underwent periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for mild, moderate, or severe developmental dysplasia of the hip. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective study involving 336 patients (420 hips) who underwent PAO by a single surgeon at an academic centre. After exclusions, 124 patients (149 hips) were included. The preoperative lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) was used to classify the severity of dysplasia: 18° to 25° was considered mild (n = 20), 10° to 17° moderate (n = 66), and < 10° severe (n = 63). There was no difference in patient characteristics between the groups (all, p > 0.05). Pre- and postoperative radiological measurements were made. The National Institute of Health's Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) outcome measures (physical function computerized adaptive test (PF CAT), Global Physical and Mental Health Scores) were collected. Failure was defined as conversion to THA or PF CAT scores < 40, and was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. The mean follow-up was five years (2 to 10) ending in either failure or the latest contact with the patient. RESULTS There was no significant difference in PROMs for moderate (p = 0.167) or severe (p = 0.708) groups compared with the mild dysplasia group. The numerical pain scores were between 2 and 3 units in all groups at the final follow-up (all, p > 0.05). There was no significant difference (all, p > 0.05) in the proportion of patients achieving target correction for the LCEA between groups. The mean correction was 12° in the mild, 15° in the moderate (p = 0.135), and 23° in the severe group (p < 0.001). Failure-free survival at five years was 100% for mild, 79% for moderate, and 92% for severely dysplastic hips (p = 0.225). CONCLUSION Although requiring less correction than hips with moderate or severe dysplasia, we found PAO for mild dysplasia to be associated with promising PROMs, consistent with that of the general United States population, and excellent survivorship at five years. Future studies should compare these results with the outcome after arthroscopy of the hip in patients with mild dysplasia. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):16-22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A T Livermore
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - L A Anderson
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - M B Anderson
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - J A Erickson
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - C L Peters
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Schuller W, Terwee CB, Klausch T, Roorda LD, Rohrich DC, Ostelo RW, Terluin B, de Vet HCW. Psychometric properties of the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Behavior item bank in patients with musculoskeletal complaints. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2019; 20:1328-1337. [PMID: 31078728 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2018] [Revised: 04/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
We studied the psychometric properties of the 39-item v1.1 Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Behavior item bank in a sample of 1,602 patients with musculoskeletal complaints. We evaluated the assumptions of the underlying item response theory (IRT) model (unidimensionality and local dependency with confirmatory factor analyses), and monotonicity with scalability coefficients). We studied the IRT model fit of all items and estimated the item parameters of the IRT model. Differential item functioning (DIF) was studied for age and gender, and DIF for language was studied as a measure of cross-cultural validity. Confirmatory factor analyses showed suboptimal fit of a unidimensional model, but a bifactor model showed low risk of bias when a unidimensional model was assumed (Omega H = .92, explained common variance of .70). Fifteen item pairs (2%) were locally dependent. Five items showed poor scalability. All items fitted the IRT model; slope parameters ranged from .60 to 2.00, and threshold parameters from -2.05 to 6.80. One item showed DIF for age, 1 item DIF for gender, and 5 items showed DIF for language, but the impact on total scores was low. Our study shows limitations of the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Behavior item bank when used in a primary care population with musculoskeletal complaints. PERSPECTIVE: We studied the psychometric properties of the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Behavior item bank in a large primary care population of patients with musculoskeletal complaints. It showed that the Pain Behavior item bank has limitations when used in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter Schuller
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Spine Clinic, Zaandam, the Netherlands.
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas Klausch
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leo D Roorda
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daphne C Rohrich
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Raymond W Ostelo
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; VU University, Department of Health Science of the Faculty of Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Berend Terluin
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henrica C W de Vet
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Patient versus proxy response on global health scales: no meaningful DIFference. Qual Life Res 2019; 28:1585-1594. [PMID: 30759300 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02130-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Assessment of outcomes from a proxy is often substituted for the patient's self-report when the patient is unable or unwilling to report their status. Research has indicated that proxies over-report symptoms on the patient's behalf. This study aimed to quantify the extent of proxy-introduced bias on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health (PROMIS GH) scale for mental (GMH) and physical (GPH) scores. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included incident stroke patients seen in a cerebrovascular clinic who completed PROMIS GH between 10/12/15 and 6/6/18. Differential item functioning (DIF) evaluated measurement invariance of patient versus proxy responses. DIF impact was assessed by comparing the initial score to the DIF-adjusted score. Subgroup analyses evaluated DIF within strata of stroke severity, measured by modified Rankin Scale (≤ 1, 2, 3+), and time since stroke (≤ 30, 31-90, > 90 days). RESULTS Of 1351 stroke patients (age 60.5 ± 14.9, 45.1% female), proxy help completing PROMIS GH was required by 406 patients (30.1%). Proxies indicated significantly worse response to all items. No items for GMH or GPH were identified as having meaningful DIF. In subgroup analyses, no DIF was found by severity or 31-90 days post-stroke. In patients within 30 and > 90 days of stroke, DIF was detected for 2 items. Accounting for DIF had negligible effects on scores. CONCLUSIONS Our findings revealed the overestimation of symptoms by proxies is a real difference and not the result of measurement non-invariance. PROMIS GH items do not perform differently or have spuriously inflated severity estimates when administered to proxies instead of patients.
Collapse
|