1
|
Zhang H, Huo X, Ren L, Lu J, Li J, Zheng X, Liu J, Ma W, Yuan J, Diao X, Wu C, Zhang X, Wang J, Zhao W, Hu S. Design and rationale of the Comprehensive intelligent Hypertension managEment SyStem (CHESS) evaluation study: A cluster randomized controlled trial for hypertension management in primary care. Am Heart J 2024; 273:90-101. [PMID: 38575049 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypertension management in China is suboptimal with high prevalence and low control rate due to various barriers, including lack of self-management awareness of patients and inadequate capacity of physicians. Digital therapeutic interventions including mobile health and computational device algorithms such as clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are scalable with the potential to improve blood pressure (BP) management and strengthen the healthcare system in resource-constrained areas, yet their effectiveness remains to be tested. The aim of this report is to describe the protocol of the Comprehensive intelligent Hypertension managEment SyStem (CHESS) evaluation study assessing the effect of a multifaceted hypertension management system for supporting patients and physicians on BP lowering in primary care settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS The CHESS evaluation study is a parallel-group, cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in primary care settings in China. Forty-one primary care sites from 3 counties of China are randomly assigned to either the usual care or the intervention group with the implementation of the CHESS system, more than 1,600 patients aged 35 to 80 years with uncontrolled hypertension and access to a smartphone by themselves or relatives are recruited into the study and followed up for 12 months. In the intervention group, participants receive patient-tailored reminders and alerts via messages or intelligent voice calls triggered by uploaded home blood pressure monitoring data and participants' characteristics, while physicians receive guideline-based prescription instructions according to updated individual data from each visit, and administrators receive auto-renewed feedback of hypertension management performance from the data analysis platform. The multiple components of the CHESS system can work synergistically and have undergone rigorous development and pilot evaluation using a theory-informed approach. The primary outcome is the mean change in 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP from baseline to 12 months. DISCUSSION The CHESS trial will provide evidence and novel insight into the effectiveness and feasibility of an implementation strategy using a comprehensive digital BP management system for reducing hypertension burden in primary care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov, NCT05605418.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haibo Zhang
- National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiqian Huo
- National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lixin Ren
- National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiapeng Lu
- National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Li
- National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Zheng
- National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiamin Liu
- National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjun Ma
- Hypertension Center of Fuwai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Yuan
- Information Centre, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaolin Diao
- Information Centre, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chaoqun Wu
- National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyan Zhang
- National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Wang
- National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Zhao
- National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shengshou Hu
- National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dolin RH, Shenvi E, Alvarez C, Barrows RC, Boxwala A, Lee B, Nathanson BH, Kleyner Y, Hagemann R, Hongsermeier T, Kapusnik-Uner J, Lakdawala A, Shalaby J. PillHarmonics: An Orchestrated Pharmacogenetics Medication Clinical Decision Support Service. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15:378-387. [PMID: 38388174 PMCID: PMC11098593 DOI: 10.1055/a-2274-6763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pharmacogenetics (PGx) is increasingly important in individualizing therapeutic management plans, but is often implemented apart from other types of medication clinical decision support (CDS). The lack of integration of PGx into existing CDS may result in incomplete interaction information, which may pose patient safety concerns. We sought to develop a cloud-based orchestrated medication CDS service that integrates PGx with a broad set of drug screening alerts and evaluate it through a clinician utility study. METHODS We developed the PillHarmonics service for implementation per the CDS Hooks protocol, algorithmically integrating a wide range of drug interaction knowledge using cloud-based screening services from First Databank (drug-drug/allergy/condition), PharmGKB (drug-gene), and locally curated content (drug-renal/hepatic/race). We performed a user study, presenting 13 clinicians and pharmacists with a prototype of the system's usage in synthetic patient scenarios. We collected feedback via a standard questionnaire and structured interview. RESULTS Clinician assessment of PillHarmonics via the Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire shows significant evidence of perceived utility. Thematic analysis of structured interviews revealed that aggregated knowledge, concise actionable summaries, and information accessibility were highly valued, and that clinicians would use the service in their practice. CONCLUSION Medication safety and optimizing efficacy of therapy regimens remain significant issues. A comprehensive medication CDS system that leverages patient clinical and genomic data to perform a wide range of interaction checking and presents a concise and holistic view of medication knowledge back to the clinician is feasible and perceived as highly valuable for more informed decision-making. Such a system can potentially address many of the challenges identified with current medication-related CDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edna Shenvi
- Elimu Informatics, El Cerrito, California, United States
| | - Carla Alvarez
- Elimu Informatics, El Cerrito, California, United States
| | | | - Aziz Boxwala
- Elimu Informatics, El Cerrito, California, United States
| | - Benson Lee
- College of Pharmacy, Touro University California, Vallejo, California, United States
| | | | - Yelena Kleyner
- Elimu Informatics, El Cerrito, California, United States
| | - Rachel Hagemann
- Independent Contractor, San Francisco, California, United States
| | | | | | | | - James Shalaby
- Elimu Informatics, El Cerrito, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jarjour M, Ducharme A. Optimization of GDMT for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: can physiological and biological barriers explain the gaps in adherence to heart failure guidelines? Drugs Context 2023; 12:2023-5-6. [PMID: 38021409 PMCID: PMC10664772 DOI: 10.7573/dic.2023-5-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Heart failure is a growing epidemic with high mortality rates and recurrent hospital admissions that creates a burden on affected individuals, their caregivers and the whole healthcare system. Throughout the years, many randomized trials have established the effectiveness of several pharmacological therapies and electrophysiological devices to reduce hospitalizations and improve quality of life and survival, mostly for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). These studies led to the publication of national societies' recommendations to guide clinicians in the management of HFrEF. Yet, many reports have shown significant care gaps in adherence to these recommendations in clinical practice, highlighting suboptimal use and/or dosing of evidence-based therapies. Adherence to guidelines has been shown to be associated with the best prognosis in HFrEF, with patients presenting with intolerances or contraindications having the highest risk of events; however, it remains unclear whether this association is causal or merely a marker of more advanced disease. Furthermore, individual characteristics may limit the possibility of reaching the targeted dosage of specific agents. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of clinicians' adherence to heart failure guidelines in a specialized real-life setting, particularly regarding use and optimization of guideline-derived medical therapies, as well as the implementation of more recent agents such as sacubitril/valsartan and SGLT2 inhibitors. We seek potential explanations for suboptimal treatment and its impact on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyne Jarjour
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute and University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Anique Ducharme
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute and University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lauffenburger JC, Khatib R, Siddiqi A, Albert MA, Keller PA, Samal L, Glowacki N, Everett ME, Hanken K, Lee SG, Bhatkhande G, Haff N, Sears ES, Choudhry NK. Reducing ethnic and racial disparities by improving undertreatment, control, and engagement in blood pressure management with health information technology (REDUCE-BP) hybrid effectiveness-implementation pragmatic trial: Rationale and design. Am Heart J 2023; 255:12-21. [PMID: 36220355 PMCID: PMC9742137 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While racial/ethnic disparities in blood pressure control are documented, few interventions have successfully reduced these gaps. Under-prescribing, lack of treatment intensification, and suboptimal follow-up care are thought to be central contributors. Electronic health record (EHR) tools may help address these barriers and may be enhanced with behavioral science techniques. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of a multicomponent behaviorally-informed EHR-based intervention on blood pressure control. TRIAL DESIGN Reducing Ethnic and racial Disparities by improving Undertreatment, Control, and Engagement in Blood Pressure management with health information technology (REDUCE-BP) (NCT05030467) is a two-arm cluster-randomized hybrid type 1 pragmatic trial in a large multi-ethnic health care system. Twenty-four clinics (>350 primary care providers [PCPs] and >10,000 eligible patients) are assigned to either multi-component EHR-based intervention or usual care. Intervention clinic PCPs will receive several EHR tools designed to reduce disparities delivered at different points, including a: (1) dashboard of all patients visible upon logging on to the EHR displaying blood pressure control by race/ethnicity compared to their PCP peers and (2) set of tools in an individual patient's chart containing decision support to encourage treatment intensification, ordering home blood pressure measurement, interventions to address health-related social needs, default text for note documentation, and enhanced patient education materials. The primary outcome is patient-level change in systolic blood pressure over 12 months between arms; secondary outcomes include changes in disparities and other clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION REDUCE-BP will provide important insights into whether an EHR-based intervention designed using behavioral science can improve hypertension control and reduce disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie C Lauffenburger
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Rasha Khatib
- Advocate Aurora Research Institute, Advocate Aurora Health, Downers Grove, IL
| | - Alvia Siddiqi
- Enterprise Population Health, Advocate Aurora Health, Downers Grove, IL
| | - Michelle A Albert
- Center for the Study of Adversity and Cardiovascular Disease (NURTURE Center), Division of Cardiology of Medicine (Cardiology), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Lipika Samal
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nicole Glowacki
- Advocate Aurora Research Institute, Advocate Aurora Health, Downers Grove, IL
| | | | - Kaitlin Hanken
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Simin G Lee
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Gauri Bhatkhande
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nancy Haff
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ellen S Sears
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Niteesh K Choudhry
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aninanya GA, Williams JE, Williams A, Otupiri E, Howard N. Effects of computerized decision support on maternal and neonatal health-worker performance in the context of combined implementation with performance-based incentivisation in Upper East Region, Ghana: a qualitative study of professional perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1581. [PMID: 36567357 PMCID: PMC9791727 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08940-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computerized decision support systems (CDSS) and performance-based incentives (PBIs) can improve health-worker performance. However, there is minimal evidence on the combined effects of these interventions or perceived effects among maternal and child healthcare providers in low-resource settings. We thus aimed to explore the perceptions of maternal and child healthcare providers of CDSS support in the context of a combined CDSS-PBI intervention on performance in twelve primary care facilities in Ghana's Upper East Region. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study drawing on semi-structured key informant interviews with 24 nurses and midwives, 12 health facility managers, and 6 district-level staff familiar with the intervention. We analysed data thematically using deductive and inductive coding in NVivo 10 software. RESULTS Interviewees suggested the combined CDSS-PBI intervention improved their performance, through enhancing knowledge of maternal health issues, facilitating diagnoses and prescribing, prompting actions for complications, and improving management. Some interviewees reported improved morbidity and mortality. However, challenges described in patient care included CDSS software inflexibility (e.g. requiring administration of only one intermittent preventive malaria treatment to pregnant women), faulty electronic partograph leading to unnecessary referrals, increased workload for nurses and midwives who still had to complete facility forms, and power fluctuations affecting software. CONCLUSION Combining CDSS and PBI interventions has potential to improve maternal and child healthcare provision in low-income settings. However, user perspectives and context must be considered, along with allowance for revisions, when designing and implementing CDSS and PBIs interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gifty Apiung Aninanya
- grid.442305.40000 0004 0441 5393Department of Health Services Policy, Planning, Management and Economics, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Box TL 1350, Tamale, Ghana
| | - John E Williams
- grid.462788.7Dodowa Health Research Centre, PO Box DD1, Dodowa, Ghana
| | - Afua Williams
- grid.434994.70000 0001 0582 2706Ga North Municipal Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana
| | - Easmon Otupiri
- grid.9829.a0000000109466120Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Natasha Howard
- grid.4280.e0000 0001 2180 6431Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 12 Science Drive 2, Singapore , 117549 Singapore ,grid.8991.90000 0004 0425 469XDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hu S. Scalable hypertension management tools in communities based on novel technologies in China. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. WESTERN PACIFIC 2022; 29:100619. [PMID: 36605878 PMCID: PMC9808428 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
7
|
Dorr DA, Richardson JE, Bobo M, D'Autremont C, Rope R, Dunne MJ, Kassakian SZ, Samal L. Provider Perspectives on Patient- and Provider-Facing High Blood Pressure Clinical Decision Support. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13:1131-1140. [PMID: 35977714 PMCID: PMC9713301 DOI: 10.1055/a-1926-0199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypertension, persistent high blood pressures (HBP) leading to chronic physiologic changes, is a common condition that is a major predictor of heart attacks, strokes, and other conditions. Despite strong evidence, care teams and patients are inconsistently adherent to HBP guideline recommendations. Patient-facing clinical decision support (CDS) could help improve recommendation adherence but must also be acceptable to clinicians and patients. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to partly address the challenge of developing a patient-facing CDS application, we sought to understand provider variations and rationales related to HBP guideline recommendations and perceptions regarding patient role and use of digital tools. METHODS We engaged hypertension experts and primary care respondents to iteratively develop and implement a pilot survey and a final survey which presented five clinical cases that queried clinicians' attitudes related to actions; variations; prioritization; patient input; importance; and barriers for HBP diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment. Analysis of Likert's scale scores was descriptive with content analysis for free-text answers. RESULTS Fifteen hypertension experts and 14 providers took the pilot and final version of the surveys, respectively. The majority (>80%) of providers felt the recommendations were important, yet found them difficult to follow-up to 90% of the time. Perceptions of relative amounts of patient input and patient work for effective HBP management ranged from 22 to 100%. Stated reasons for variation included adverse effects of treatment, patient comorbidities, shared decision-making, and health care cost and access issues. Providers were generally positive toward patient use of electronic CDS applications but worried about access to health care, nuance of recommendations, and patient understanding of the tools. CONCLUSION At baseline, provider management of HBP is heterogeneous. Providers were accepting of patient-facing CDS but reported preferences for that CDS to capture the complexity and nuance of guideline recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A. Dorr
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Joshua E. Richardson
- Center for Health Informatics and Evidence Synthesis, RTI International, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Michelle Bobo
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Christopher D'Autremont
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Robert Rope
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - MJ Dunne
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Steven Z. Kassakian
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Lipika Samal
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Meisner JK, Yu S, Lowery R, Liang W, Schumacher KR, Burrows HL. Clinical Decision Support Tool for Elevated Pediatric Blood Pressures. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2022; 61:428-439. [PMID: 35383471 DOI: 10.1177/00099228221087804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Under-diagnosis of pediatric hypertension remains pervasive due to difficulty recognizing elevated systolic blood pressures (SBPs). We performed a retrospective review comparing recognition of and response to elevated SBPs ≥95th percentile before and after development of a clinical decision support tool (CDST) in an academic pediatric system. Of 44,351 encounters, 477 had elevated SBPs with documented recognition of an elevated SBP in 17.9% of encounters pre-CDST that increased to 33.7% post-CDST (P = .001). Post-CDST, 75.5% of elevated SBPs had repeat measurement, with 90.8% of initially elevated SBPs normalizing to <95th percentile. If repeat measurement was obtained and SBP remained elevated, documented recognition increased from 14.0 to 83.3% (P < .0001). These data support using the CDST is associated with increased identification of elevated SBPs in children with greatest improvements associated with repeat SBP measurement. This suggests targeted training and support systems at medical intake would be high yield for increasing recognition of elevated SBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua K Meisner
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sunkyung Yu
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ray Lowery
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Wen Liang
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kurt R Schumacher
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Heather L Burrows
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Despite considerable progress in tackling cardiovascular disease over the past 50 years, many gaps in the quality of care for cardiovascular disease remain. Multiple missed opportunities have been identified at every step in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease, such as failure to make risk factor modifications, failure to diagnose cardiovascular disease, and failure to use proper evidence based treatments. With the digital transformation of medicine and advances in health information technology, clinical decision support (CDS) tools offer promise to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of delivery of cardiovascular care. However, to date, the promise of CDS delivering scalable and sustained value for patient care in clinical practice has not been realized. This article reviews the evidence on key emerging questions around the development, implementation, and regulation of CDS with a focus on cardiovascular disease. It first reviews evidence on the effectiveness of CDS on healthcare process and clinical outcomes related to cardiovascular disease and design features associated with CDS effectiveness. It then reviews the barriers encountered during implementation of CDS in cardiovascular care, with a focus on unintended consequences and strategies to promote successful implementation. Finally, it reviews the legal and regulatory environment of CDS with specific examples for cardiovascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Lu
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Edward R Melnick
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Biostatistics (Health Informatics), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Blood Pressure Visit Intensification in Treatment (BP-Visit) Findings: a Pragmatic Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:32-39. [PMID: 34379277 PMCID: PMC8738829 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07016-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shortening time between office visits for patients with uncontrolled hypertension represents a potential strategy for improving blood pressure (BP). OBJECTIVE We evaluated the impact of multimodal strategies on time between visits and on improvement in systolic BP (SBP) among patients with uncontrolled hypertension. DESIGN We used a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial with three wedges involving 12 federally qualified health centers with three study periods: pre-intervention, intervention, and post-intervention. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients with diagnosed hypertension and two BPs ≥ 140/90 pre-randomization and at least one visit during post-randomization control period (N = 4277). INTERVENTION The core intervention included three, clinician hypertension group-based trainings, monthly clinician feedback reports, and monthly meetings with practice champions to facilitate implementation. MAIN MEASURES The main measures were change in time between visits when BP was not controlled and change in SBP. A secondary planned outcome was changed in BP control among all hypertension patients in the practices. KEY RESULTS Median follow-up times were 34, 32, and 32 days and the mean SBPs were 142.0, 139.5, and 139.8 mmHg, respectively. In adjusted analyses, the intervention did not improve time to the next visit compared with control periods, HR = 1.01 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.04). SBP was reduced by 1.13 mmHg (95% CI: -2.10, -0.16), but was not maintained during follow-up. Hypertension control (< 140/90) in the practices improved by 5% during intervention (95% CI: 2.6%, 7.3%) and was sustained post-intervention 5.4% (95% CI: 2.6%, 8.2%). CONCLUSIONS The intervention failed to shorten follow-up time for patients with uncontrolled BP and showed very small, statistically significant improvements in SBP that were not sustained. However, the intervention showed statistically and clinically relevant improvement in hypertension control suggesting that the intervention affected clinician decision-making regarding BP control apart from visit frequency. Future practice initiatives should consider hypertension control as a primary outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL www.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02164331.
Collapse
|
11
|
El Asmar ML, Dharmayat KI, Vallejo-Vaz AJ, Irwin R, Mastellos N. Effect of computerised, knowledge-based, clinical decision support systems on patient-reported and clinical outcomes of patients with chronic disease managed in primary care settings: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e054659. [PMID: 34937723 PMCID: PMC8705223 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Chronic diseases are the leading cause of disability globally. Most chronic disease management occurs in primary care with outcomes varying across primary care providers. Computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have been shown to positively affect clinician behaviour by improving adherence to clinical guidelines. This study provides a summary of the available evidence on the effect of CDSS embedded in electronic health records on patient-reported and clinical outcomes of adult patients with chronic disease managed in primary care. DESIGN AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Systematic review, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs, quasi-RCTs, interrupted time series and controlled before-and-after studies, assessing the effect of CDSS (vs usual care) on patient-reported or clinical outcomes of adult patients with selected common chronic diseases (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, myocardial ischaemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, arthritis and osteoporosis) managed in primary care. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, Health Management Information Consortium and trial register clinicaltrials.gov were searched from inception to 24 June 2020. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Screening, data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers independently. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used for quality appraisal. RESULTS From 5430 articles, 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were heterogeneous in population characteristics, intervention components and outcome measurements and focused on diabetes, asthma, hyperlipidaemia and hypertension. Most outcomes were clinical with one study reporting on patient-reported outcomes. Quality of the evidence was impacted by methodological biases of studies. CONCLUSIONS There is inconclusive evidence in support of CDSS. A firm inference on the intervention effect was not possible due to methodological biases and study heterogeneity. Further research is needed to provide evidence on the intervention effect and the interplay between healthcare setting features, CDSS characteristics and implementation processes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020218184.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kanika I Dharmayat
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial Centre for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Antonio J Vallejo-Vaz
- Imperial Centre for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention (ICCP), Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London. London, United Kingdom, London, UK
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
- Clinical Epidemiology and Vascular Risk, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBiS/Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/Universidad de Sevilla/CSIC, Seville, Spain
| | - Ryan Irwin
- Department of Primary Care Clinical Sciences, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nikolaos Mastellos
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dorr DA, D'Autremont C, Pizzimenti C, Weiskopf N, Rope R, Kassakian S, Richardson JE, McClure R, Eisenberg F. Assessing Data Adequacy for High Blood Pressure Clinical Decision Support: A Quantitative Analysis. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12:710-720. [PMID: 34348408 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study examines guideline-based high blood pressure (HBP) and hypertension recommendations and evaluates the suitability and adequacy of the data and logic required for a Fast Healthcare Interoperable Resources (FHIR)-based, patient-facing clinical decision support (CDS) HBP application. HBP is a major predictor of adverse health events, including stroke, myocardial infarction, and kidney disease. Multiple guidelines recommend interventions to lower blood pressure, but implementation requires patient-centered approaches, including patient-facing CDS tools. METHODS We defined concept sets needed to measure adherence to 71 recommendations drawn from eight HBP guidelines. We measured data quality for these concepts for two cohorts (HBP screening and HBP diagnosed) from electronic health record (EHR) data, including four use cases (screening, nonpharmacologic interventions, pharmacologic interventions, and adverse events) for CDS. RESULTS We identified 102,443 people with diagnosed and 58,990 with undiagnosed HBP. We found that 21/35 (60%) of required concept sets were unused or inaccurate, with only 259 (25.3%) of 1,101 codes used. Use cases showed high inclusion (0.9-11.2%), low exclusion (0-0.1%), and missing patient-specific context (up to 65.6%), leading to data in 2/4 use cases being insufficient for accurate alerting. DISCUSSION Data quality from the EHR required to implement recommendations for HBP is highly inconsistent, reflecting a fragmented health care system and incomplete implementation of standard terminologies and workflows. Although imperfect, data were deemed adequate for two test use cases. CONCLUSION Current data quality allows for further development of patient-facing FHIR HBP tools, but extensive validation and testing is required to assure precision and avoid unintended consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Dorr
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Christopher D'Autremont
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Christie Pizzimenti
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Nicole Weiskopf
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Robert Rope
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Steven Kassakian
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | | | - Rob McClure
- MD Partners, Lafayette, Colorado, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Veinot TC, Ancker JS, Bakken S. Health informatics and health equity: improving our reach and impact. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 26:689-695. [PMID: 31411692 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Health informatics studies the use of information technology to improve human health. As informaticists, we seek to reduce the gaps between current healthcare practices and our societal goals for better health and healthcare quality, safety, or cost. It is time to recognize health equity as one of these societal goals-a point underscored by this Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Special Focus Issue, "Health Informatics and Health Equity: Improving our Reach and Impact." This Special Issue highlights health informatics research that focuses on marginalized and underserved groups, health disparities, and health equity. In particular, this Special Issue intentionally showcases high-quality research and professional experiences that encompass a broad range of subdisciplines, methods, marginalized populations, and approaches to disparities. Building on this variety of submissions and other recent developments, we highlight contents of the Special Issue and offer an assessment of the state of research at the intersection of health informatics and health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany C Veinot
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jessica S Ancker
- Division of Health Informatics, Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Suzanne Bakken
- School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.,Data Science Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kwan JL, Lo L, Ferguson J, Goldberg H, Diaz-Martinez JP, Tomlinson G, Grimshaw JM, Shojania KG. Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2020; 370:m3216. [PMID: 32943437 PMCID: PMC7495041 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the improvements achieved with clinical decision support systems and examine the heterogeneity from pooling effects across diverse clinical settings and intervention targets. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Medline up to August 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES AND METHODS Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials reporting absolute improvements in the percentage of patients receiving care recommended by clinical decision support systems. Multilevel meta-analysis accounted for within study clustering. Meta-regression was used to assess the degree to which the features of clinical decision support systems and study characteristics reduced heterogeneity in effect sizes. Where reported, clinical endpoints were also captured. RESULTS In 108 studies (94 randomised, 14 quasi-randomised), reporting 122 trials that provided analysable data from 1 203 053 patients and 10 790 providers, clinical decision support systems increased the proportion of patients receiving desired care by 5.8% (95% confidence interval 4.0% to 7.6%). This pooled effect exhibited substantial heterogeneity (I2=76%), with the top quartile of reported improvements ranging from 10% to 62%. In 30 trials reporting clinical endpoints, clinical decision support systems increased the proportion of patients achieving guideline based targets (eg, blood pressure or lipid control) by a median of 0.3% (interquartile range -0.7% to 1.9%). Two study characteristics (low baseline adherence and paediatric settings) were associated with significantly larger effects. Inclusion of these covariates in the multivariable meta-regression, however, did not reduce heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS Most interventions with clinical decision support systems appear to achieve small to moderate improvements in targeted processes of care, a finding confirmed by the small changes in clinical endpoints found in studies that reported them. A minority of studies achieved substantial increases in the delivery of recommended care, but predictors of these more meaningful improvements remain undefined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice L Kwan
- Sinai Health System, Department of Medicine, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lisha Lo
- Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jacob Ferguson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hanna Goldberg
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Juan Pablo Diaz-Martinez
- Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network and Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - George Tomlinson
- Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network and Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kaveh G Shojania
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ye X, Zeng QT, Facelli JC, Brixner DI, Conway M, Bray BE. Predicting Optimal Hypertension Treatment Pathways Using Recurrent Neural Networks. Int J Med Inform 2020; 139:104122. [PMID: 32339929 PMCID: PMC10490557 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In ambulatory care settings, physicians largely rely on clinical guidelines and guideline-based clinical decision support (CDS) systems to make decisions on hypertension treatment. However, current clinical evidence, which is the knowledge base of clinical guidelines, is insufficient to support definitive optimal treatment. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study is to test the feasibility of using deep learning predictive models to identify optimal hypertension treatment pathways for individual patients, based on empirical data available from an electronic health record database. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study used data on 245,499 unique patients who were initially diagnosed with essential hypertension and received anti-hypertensive treatment from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2010 in ambulatory care settings. We used recurrent neural networks (RNN), including long short-term memory (LSTM) and bi-directional LSTM, to create risk-adapted models to predict the probability of reaching the BP control targets associated with different BP treatment regimens. The ratios for the training set, the validation set, and the test set were 6:2:2. The samples for each set were independently randomly drawn from individual years with corresponding proportions. RESULTS The LSTM models achieved high accuracy when predicting individual probability of reaching BP goals on different treatments: for systolic BP (<140 mmHg), diastolic BP (<90 mmHg), and both systolic BP and diastolic BP (<140/90 mmHg), F1-scores were 0.928, 0.960, and 0.913, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrated the potential of using predictive models to select optimal hypertension treatment pathways. Along with clinical guidelines and guideline-based CDS systems, the LSTM models could be used as a powerful decision-support tool to form risk-adapted, personalized strategies for hypertension treatment plans, especially for difficult-to-treat patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangyang Ye
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
| | - Qing T Zeng
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA; Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, The George Washington University, 2600 Virginia Ave., NW, First Floor, Washington DC, 20037, USA
| | - Julio C Facelli
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Diana I Brixner
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, The University of Utah, 30 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Mike Conway
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Bruce E Bray
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schroeder EB, Moore KR, Manson SM, Baldwin MA, Goodrich GK, Malone AS, Pieper LE, Xu S, Fort MP, Son‐Stone L, Johnson D, Steiner JF. A randomized clinical trial of an interactive voice response and text message intervention for individuals with hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2020; 22:1228-1238. [DOI: 10.1111/jch.13909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emily B. Schroeder
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research Aurora CO USA
- Department of Medicine University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora CO USA
- Parkview Health Fort Wayne IN USA
| | - Kelly R. Moore
- Centers for American Indian and Alaska Native Health University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora CO USA
| | - Spero M. Manson
- Centers for American Indian and Alaska Native Health University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora CO USA
| | - Megan A. Baldwin
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research Aurora CO USA
| | - Glenn K. Goodrich
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research Aurora CO USA
| | - Allen S. Malone
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research Aurora CO USA
| | - Lisa E. Pieper
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research Aurora CO USA
| | - Stanley Xu
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research Aurora CO USA
| | - Meredith P. Fort
- Centers for American Indian and Alaska Native Health University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora CO USA
| | | | - David Johnson
- First Nations Community HealthSource Albuquerque NM USA
| | - John F. Steiner
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research Aurora CO USA
- Department of Medicine University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora CO USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Coma E, Medina M, Méndez L, Hermosilla E, Iglesias M, Olmos C, Calero S. Effectiveness of electronic point-of-care reminders versus monthly feedback to improve adherence to 10 clinical recommendations in primary care: a cluster randomized clinical trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:245. [PMID: 31783854 PMCID: PMC6884876 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0976-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have analyzed the effectiveness of electronic reminder interventions to improve different clinical conditions, and most have reported a small to moderate effect. Few studies, however, have analyzed reminder systems targeting multiple conditions, and fewer still have compared electronic point-of-care reminders systems with other forms of feedback designed to improve delivery of care. METHODS We performed an unblinded cluster randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of an electronic point-of-care reminder system with that of a well-established system providing monthly feedback on adherence to clinical recommendations. The control group received monthly feedback only while the intervention group received monthly feedback in addition to on-screen point-of-care reminders for 10 clinical conditions. The study targeted all physicians and nurses at the 283 primary care centers managed by the Institut Català de la Salut (approximately 6600 professionals). RESULTS Following exclusions and randomization, 132 primary care centers (328,728 patients with reminders) were assigned to the intervention group while 137 centers (317,117 patients with reminders) were randomized to the control group. A 20.6% improvement (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.25-1.34) in reminder resolution rates was observed in the intervention group. Results varied according to the clinical condition. The most effective reminder was screening for diabetic retinopathy (OR 1.51, 95% CI:1.46-1.57) while the least effective reminders were measurement of glycated hemoglobin (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07-1.13) and smoking cessation encouragement (OR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.09-1.16). CONCLUSIONS Electronic point-of-care reminders were more effective than the existing monthly feedback system at resolving the 10 clinical situations. However, more studies are needed to investigate the variations of the effect observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN42391639, 08/10/2012. Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ermengol Coma
- Sistema d'Informació dels Serveis d'Atenció Primària (SISAP), Institut Català de la Salut. Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Manuel Medina
- Sistema d'Informació dels Serveis d'Atenció Primària (SISAP), Institut Català de la Salut. Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leonardo Méndez
- Sistema d'Informació dels Serveis d'Atenció Primària (SISAP), Institut Català de la Salut. Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduardo Hermosilla
- Sistema de Informació pel Desenvolupament d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (SIDIAP), Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manuel Iglesias
- Oficina Projecte ECAP, Centre de competència funcional, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Olmos
- Oficina Projecte ECAP, Centre de competència funcional, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sebastian Calero
- UGEAP Hospitalet Nord. DAP Delta. Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nanji KC, Seger DL, Slight SP, Amato MG, Beeler PE, Her QL, Dalleur O, Eguale T, Wong A, Silvers ER, Swerdloff M, Hussain ST, Maniam N, Fiskio JM, Dykes PC, Bates DW. Medication-related clinical decision support alert overrides in inpatients. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 25:476-481. [PMID: 29092059 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocx115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 09/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To define the types and numbers of inpatient clinical decision support alerts, measure the frequency with which they are overridden, and describe providers' reasons for overriding them and the appropriateness of those reasons. Materials and Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of medication-related clinical decision support alerts over a 3-year period at a 793-bed tertiary-care teaching institution. We measured the rate of alert overrides, the rate of overrides by alert type, the reasons cited for overrides, and the appropriateness of those reasons. Results Overall, 73.3% of patient allergy, drug-drug interaction, and duplicate drug alerts were overridden, though the rate of overrides varied by alert type (P < .0001). About 60% of overrides were appropriate, and that proportion also varied by alert type (P < .0001). Few overrides of renal- (2.2%) or age-based (26.4%) medication substitutions were appropriate, while most duplicate drug (98%), patient allergy (96.5%), and formulary substitution (82.5%) alerts were appropriate. Discussion Despite warnings of potential significant harm, certain categories of alert overrides were inappropriate >75% of the time. The vast majority of duplicate drug, patient allergy, and formulary substitution alerts were appropriate, suggesting that these categories of alerts might be good targets for refinement to reduce alert fatigue. Conclusion Almost three-quarters of alerts were overridden, and 40% of the overrides were not appropriate. Future research should optimize alert types and frequencies to increase their clinical relevance, reducing alert fatigue so that important alerts are not inappropriately overridden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen C Nanji
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Partners HealthCare Systems, Wellesley, MA, USA
| | - Diane L Seger
- Partners HealthCare Systems, Wellesley, MA, USA.,The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah P Slight
- The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.,Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Mary G Amato
- The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick E Beeler
- The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Qoua L Her
- The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olivia Dalleur
- The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Louvain Drug Research Institute and Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tewodros Eguale
- The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adrian Wong
- The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth R Silvers
- Partners HealthCare Systems, Wellesley, MA, USA.,The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael Swerdloff
- Partners HealthCare Systems, Wellesley, MA, USA.,The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Salman T Hussain
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nivethietha Maniam
- Partners HealthCare Systems, Wellesley, MA, USA.,The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julie M Fiskio
- The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patricia C Dykes
- The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David W Bates
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Partners HealthCare Systems, Wellesley, MA, USA.,The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kersting C, Weltermann B. Evaluating the Feasibility of a Software Prototype Supporting the Management of Multimorbid Seniors: Mixed Methods Study in General Practices. JMIR Hum Factors 2019; 6:e12695. [PMID: 31274115 PMCID: PMC6637727 DOI: 10.2196/12695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Longitudinal, patient-centered care represents a challenge for general practices. Decision support and reminder systems can offer targeted support. Objective The objective of this study was to follow a user-oriented, stepwise approach to develop an add-on for German electronic health record (EHR) systems, which aims to support longitudinal care management of multimorbid seniors, using a flag system displaying patient-centered information relevant for comprehensive health care management. This study evaluated the prototype’s feasibility from both a technical and users’ perspective. Methods The study was conducted with 18 general practitioners (GPs) and practice assistants (PAs) from 9 general practices using a mixed methods approach. In all practices, 1 GP and 1 PA tested the software each for 4 multimorbid seniors selected from the practice patient data. Technical feasibility was evaluated by documenting all technical problems. To evaluate the feasibility from the users’ perspective, participants’ responses during the software test were documented. In addition, they completed a self-administered questionnaire, including the validated System Usability Scale (SUS). Data were merged by transforming qualitative data into quantitative data. Analyses were performed using univariate statistics in IBM SPSS statistics. Results From a technical perspective, the new software was easy to install and worked without problems. Difficulties during the installation occurred in practices lacking a 64-bit system or a current version of Microsoft .NET. As EHRs used in German practices do not provide an interface to extract the data needed, additional software was required. Incomplete flags for some laboratory data occurred, although this function was implemented in our software as shown in previous tests. From the users’ perspective, the new add-on provided a better overview of relevant patient information, reminded more comprehensively about upcoming examinations, and better supported guideline-based care when compared with their individual practice strategies. A total of 14 out of 18 participants (78%) were interested in using the software long-term. Furthermore, 8 of 9 GPs were willing to pay 5 to 25 Euros (mean 14.75, SD 5.93) monthly for its use. The usability was rated as 75% (43%-95%). Conclusions The new EHR add-on was well accepted and achieved a good usability rating measured by the validated SUS. In perspective, the legally consolidated, standardized interface to German EHRs will facilitate the technical integration. In view of the high feasibility, we plan to study the software’s effectiveness in everyday primary care. Trial Registration German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00008777; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do? navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00008777
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Kersting
- Institute for General Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Birgitta Weltermann
- Institute for General Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Groenhof TKJ, Asselbergs FW, Groenwold RHH, Grobbee DE, Visseren FLJ, Bots ML. The effect of computerized decision support systems on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:108. [PMID: 31182084 PMCID: PMC6558725 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0824-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) is notoriously difficult because of multi-morbidity and the different phenotypes and severities of cardiovascular disease. Computerized decision support systems (CDSS) enable the clinician to integrate the latest scientific evidence and patient information into tailored strategies. The effect on cardiovascular risk factor management is yet to be confirmed. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effects of CDSS on CVRM, defined as the change in absolute values and attainment of treatment goals of systolic blood pressure (SBP), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and HbA1c. Also, CDSS characteristics related to more effective CVRM were identified. Eligible articles were methodologically appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We calculated mean differences, relative risks, and if appropriate (I2 < 70%), pooled the results using a random-effects model. Results Of the 14,335 studies identified, 22 were included. Four studies reported on SBP, 3 on LDL-c, 10 on CVRM in patients with type II diabetes and 5 on guideline adherence. The CDSSs varied considerably in technical performance and content. Heterogeneity of results was such that quantitative pooling was often not appropriate. Among CVRM patients, the results tended towards a beneficial effect of CDSS, but only LDL-c target attainment in diabetes patients reached statistical significance. Prompting, integration into the electronical health record, patient empowerment, and medication support were related to more effective CVRM. Conclusion We did not find a clear clinical benefit from CDSS in cardiovascular risk factor levels and target attainment. Some features of CDSS seem more promising than others. However, the variability in CDSS characteristics and heterogeneity of the results – emphasizing the immaturity of this research area - limit stronger conclusions. Clinical relevance of CDSS in CVRM might additionally be sought in the improvement of shared decision making and patient empowerment. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-019-0824-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Katrien J Groenhof
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Folkert W Asselbergs
- Department of Cardiology, Division Heart & Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Health Data Research UK and Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rolf H H Groenwold
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research and Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Diederick E Grobbee
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank L J Visseren
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel L Bots
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hardenbol AX, Knols B, Louws M, Meulendijk M, Askari M. Usability aspects of medication-related decision support systems in the outpatient setting: A systematic literature review. Health Informatics J 2018; 26:72-87. [DOI: 10.1177/1460458218813732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated the usability aspects of medication-related clinical decision support systems in the outpatient setting. Articles published between 2000 and 2016 in Scopus, PubMed and EMBASE were searched and classified into three usability aspects: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Satisfaction. Using Van Welie et al.’s usability model, we categorized usability aspects in terms of usage indicators and means. Out of the 1999 articles, 24 articles met the selection criteria of which the main focus was on reducing inappropriate medication, prescription rate and prescription errors. Evidence could mainly be found for Effectiveness and showed high rates of positive results in reducing medication errors. To date, the effects of Efficiency and Satisfaction of clinical decision support systems regarding medication prescription remain understudied. Usability aspects such as memorability, learnability, adaptability, shortcuts and consistency require more attention. Studies are needed for better insight into the user model and to design a knowledge/task model for clinical decision support systems regarding medication prescription.
Collapse
|
22
|
Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM, Blowey D, Carroll AE, Daniels SR, de Ferranti SD, Dionne JM, Falkner B, Flinn SK, Gidding SS, Goodwin C, Leu MG, Powers ME, Rea C, Samuels J, Simasek M, Thaker VV, Urbina EM. Clinical Practice Guideline for Screening and Management of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics 2017; 140:peds.2017-1904. [PMID: 28827377 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-1904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1857] [Impact Index Per Article: 265.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
These pediatric hypertension guidelines are an update to the 2004 "Fourth Report on the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents." Significant changes in these guidelines include (1) the replacement of the term "prehypertension" with the term "elevated blood pressure," (2) new normative pediatric blood pressure (BP) tables based on normal-weight children, (3) a simplified screening table for identifying BPs needing further evaluation, (4) a simplified BP classification in adolescents ≥13 years of age that aligns with the forthcoming American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology adult BP guidelines, (5) a more limited recommendation to perform screening BP measurements only at preventive care visits, (6) streamlined recommendations on the initial evaluation and management of abnormal BPs, (7) an expanded role for ambulatory BP monitoring in the diagnosis and management of pediatric hypertension, and (8) revised recommendations on when to perform echocardiography in the evaluation of newly diagnosed hypertensive pediatric patients (generally only before medication initiation), along with a revised definition of left ventricular hypertrophy. These guidelines include 30 Key Action Statements and 27 additional recommendations derived from a comprehensive review of almost 15 000 published articles between January 2004 and July 2016. Each Key Action Statement includes level of evidence, benefit-harm relationship, and strength of recommendation. This clinical practice guideline, endorsed by the American Heart Association, is intended to foster a patient- and family-centered approach to care, reduce unnecessary and costly medical interventions, improve patient diagnoses and outcomes, support implementation, and provide direction for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph T Flynn
- Dr. Robert O. Hickman Endowed Chair in Pediatric Nephrology, Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington;
| | - David C Kaelber
- Departments of Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, Case Western Reserve University and MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Carissa M Baker-Smith
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Douglas Blowey
- Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri-Kansas City and Children's Mercy Integrated Care Solutions, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Aaron E Carroll
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
| | - Stephen R Daniels
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado-Denver and Pediatrician in Chief, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sarah D de Ferranti
- Director, Preventive Cardiology Clinic, Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Janis M Dionne
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia and British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Bonita Falkner
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Susan K Flinn
- Consultant, American Academy of Pediatrics, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Samuel S Gidding
- Cardiology Division Head, Nemours Cardiac Center, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware
| | - Celeste Goodwin
- National Pediatric Blood Pressure Awareness Foundation, Prairieville, Louisiana
| | - Michael G Leu
- Departments of Pediatrics and Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, University of Washington Medicine and Information Technology Services, and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - Makia E Powers
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Morehouse College, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Corinna Rea
- Associate Director, General Academic Pediatric Fellowship, Staff Physician, Boston's Children's Hospital Primary Care at Longwood, Instructor, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joshua Samuels
- Departments of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Madeline Simasek
- Pediatric Education, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Shadyside Family Medicine Residency, Clinical Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, and School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Vidhu V Thaker
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; and
| | - Elaine M Urbina
- Preventive Cardiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
de Ramón-Fernández A, Ruiz-Fernández D, Marcos-Jorquera D, Gilart-Iglesias V, Vives-Boix V. Monitoring-Based Model for Personalizing the Clinical Process of Crohn's Disease. SENSORS 2017; 17:s17071570. [PMID: 28678162 PMCID: PMC5539866 DOI: 10.3390/s17071570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2017] [Revised: 06/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Crohn’s disease is a chronic pathology belonging to the group of inflammatory bowel diseases. Patients suffering from Crohn’s disease must be supervised by a medical specialist for the rest of their lives; furthermore, each patient has its own characteristics and is affected by the disease in a different way, so health recommendations and treatments cannot be generalized and should be individualized for a specific patient. To achieve this personalization in a cost-effective way using technology, we propose a model based on different information flows: control, personalization, and monitoring. As a result of the model and to perform a functional validation, an architecture based on services and a prototype of the system has been defined. In this prototype, a set of different devices and technologies to monitor variables from patients and their environment has been integrated. Artificial intelligence algorithms are also included to reduce the workload related to the review and analysis of the information gathered. Due to the continuous and automated monitoring of the Crohn’s patient, this proposal can help in the personalization of the Crohn’s disease clinical process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Víctor Vives-Boix
- Department of Computer Technology, University of Alicante, Alicante 03690, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kersting C, Weltermann B. Electronic reminders to facilitate longitudinal care: a mixed-methods study in general practices. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016; 16:148. [PMID: 27881130 PMCID: PMC5122020 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0387-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 11/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Longitudinal, patient-centered care represents a challenge for general practitioners (GPs), and in this context, reminder systems can offer targeted support. This study aimed to identify details of such reminders: (1) contents of care addressed, (2) their mode of display in the electronic health record (EHR), (3) their visual appearance, (4) personnel responsibilities for editing and applying reminders, and (5) use of reminders for patient recall. Methods This mixed-methods study comprised (1) a cross-sectional survey among 185 GP practices from a German university network, and (2) structured observations of reminder utilization in six practices based on a clinical vignette describing a multimorbid senior with 26 care needs. Descriptive statistics were performed for survey data. The practice observations were analyzed by portraying different types of reminders. Results Seventy-three of 185 practices completed the survey (39.5%): 98.6% reported using reminders in the EHR. Frequent care contents addressed were allergies/adverse drug events (95.8%), preventive measures (93.1%), participation in disease management programs (87.5%), chronic diseases (75.0%), and upcoming vaccinations (68.1%). Practice observations showed a variety of mainly self-configured reminders. In a patients’ EHR, information was displayed (1) compiled in a separate field, (2) scattered throughout the EHR, and/or (3) in a pop-up window. The visual appearance of electronic reminders varied: (1) colored fields with short text, (2) EHR entries and/or billing codes in pre-defined colors, (3) abbreviations within the treatment documentation, (4) symbols within the treatment documentation, (5) symbols linked to free text fields, and (6) traffic light schemes. Five practices self-designed reminders ‘as needed’; one practice applied an EHR-embedded, pre-defined reminder system. Practices used reminders for a mean of 13.3 of the 26 aspects of care detailed in the clinical vignette (range: 9–21; standard deviation (SD): 4.3). Practices needed 20–35 min (mean: 27.5; SD: 6.1) to retrieve the information requested. Conclusions Most GP practices use self-designed, visual reminders for some aspects of care, yet data-based, sophisticated solutions are needed to improve longitudinal care. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, unique identifying number: DRKS00008777 (date of registration: 06/19/2015). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0387-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Kersting
- Institute for General Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
| | - Birgitta Weltermann
- Institute for General Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Méndez Boo L, Coma E, Medina M, Hermosilla E, Iglesias M, Olmos C, Calero Muñoz S, Caro Mendivelso J. Effectiveness of computerized point-of-care reminders on adherence with multiple clinical recommendations by primary health care providers: protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. SPRINGERPLUS 2016; 5:1505. [PMID: 27652078 PMCID: PMC5014773 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-3124-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2015] [Accepted: 08/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To determine the effectiveness of reminders compared to no reminders in improving adherence to multiple clinical recommendations measured as the resolution of the clinical condition that motivated the reminder, in a primary care setting with a well-established feedback system. METHODS/DESIGN A 12-month, cluster-randomized, controlled clinical trial was designed (randomized by primary care team) to evaluate the impact of computerized reminders. All study participants will continue to receive the usual feedback from the electronic health records system. The control group (well-established feedback) will be compared with reminders and a well-established feedback system. The study will include all general practitioners (3425) and nurses (3262) providing primary care for a population aged 14 years or older in the 282 primary care teams reporting to the Catalan Institute of Health. Up to 10 clinical reminders are offered for each patient, recommending action related to at least one of nine clinical conditions: arterial hypertension, elevated cardiovascular risk, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular accident, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, smoking habit, and hepatitis C. The outcomes are the resolution of the clinical condition that motivated the reminder and the time elapsed between the first reminder message and implementation of the recommended action (months). Due to the obvious correlation between reminders about the same patient, the profile of patients assigned to a particular professional, and the professionals assigned to a particular centre, hierarchical modelling will be used to simultaneously estimate the effect of the study variables at these different levels of analysis. To estimate the impact of the intervention arm, an analysis of adherence to each type of reminder will be carried out, using multi-level logistical regression models at level of the primary care centre. Time to adherence will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons will be done using the log-rank test. DISCUSSION The results of this study could provide new evidence on the impact of computerized reminders at the point of care on adherence to clinical guidelines in primary care with an established feedback system. Trial registration ISRCTN42391639. October 8, 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Méndez Boo
- Sistemes d'Informació d'Atenció Primària (SISAP), Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain
| | - Ermengol Coma
- Sistemes d'Informació d'Atenció Primària (SISAP), Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain
| | - Manuel Medina
- Sistemes d'Informació d'Atenció Primària (SISAP), Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain
| | - Eduardo Hermosilla
- Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587, 08007 Barcelona, Catalonia Spain
| | - Manuel Iglesias
- Oficina Projecte ECAP, Centre de competència funcional, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain
| | - Carmen Olmos
- Oficina Projecte ECAP, Centre de competència funcional, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain
| | | | - Johanna Caro Mendivelso
- Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587, 08007 Barcelona, Catalonia Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Weltermann B, Kersting C. Feasibility study of a clinical decision support system for the management of multimorbid seniors in primary care: study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2016; 2:16. [PMID: 27965836 PMCID: PMC5154089 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-016-0057-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2015] [Accepted: 03/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Care for seniors is complex because patients often have more than one disease, one medication, and one physician. It is a key challenge for primary care physicians to structure the various aspects of each patient's care, to integrate each patient's preferences, and to maintain a long-term overview. This article describes the design for the development and feasibility testing of the clinical decision support system (CDSS) eCare*Seniors© which is electronic health record (EHR)-based allowing for a long-term, comprehensive, evidence-based, and patient preference-oriented management of multimorbid seniors. METHODS/DESIGN This mixed-methods study is designed in three steps. First, focus groups and practice observations will be conducted to develop criteria for software design from a physicians' and practice assistants' perspective. Second, based on these criteria, a CDSS prototype will be developed. Third, the prototype's feasibility will be tested by five primary care practices in the care of 30 multimorbid seniors. Primary outcome is the usability of the software measured by the validated system usability scale (SUS) after 3 months. Secondary outcomes are the (a) willingness to routinely use the CDSS, (b) degree of utilization of the CDSS, (c) acceptance of the CDSS, (d) willingness of the physicians to purchase the CDSS, and (e) willingness of the practice assistants to use the CDSS in the long term. These outcomes will be measured using semi-structured interviews and software usage data. If the SUS score reaches ≥70 %, feasibility testing will be judged successful. Otherwise, the CDSS prototype will be refined according to the users' needs and retested by the physicians and practice assistants until it is fully adapted to their requirements and reaches a usability score ≥70 %. DISCUSSION The study will support the development of a CDSS which is primary care-defined, user-friendly, easy-to-comprehend, workflow-oriented, and comprehensive. The software will assist physicians and practices in their long-term, individualized care for multimorbid seniors. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00008777.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgitta Weltermann
- Institute for General Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Christine Kersting
- Institute for General Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Utilization of a Pharmacy Clinical Surveillance System for Pharmacist Alerting and Communication at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center. J Med Syst 2015; 40:24. [PMID: 26547844 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-015-0398-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2015] [Accepted: 11/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this analysis is to describe the utilization metrics of a pharmacy clinical surveillance system (PCSS) at a tertiary, academic medical center.We performed a retrospective database analysis assessing rule-based alerts (RBA), interventions and pharmacist communication notes documented in the PCSS from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. Reports were generated on 92 unique RBAs sent to clinicians for evaluation. Metrics assessed included the number of RBAs that were triggered, clinically evaluated, intervened on by pharmacists, and therapeutic category of interventions. Pharmacy communication notes were also evaluated.A total of 399,979 RBAs were triggered through the PCSS. During that time, pharmacists documented a total of 17,733 interventions. The most common RBAs were related to lab abnormalities (132,487; 33 %) and anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy (126,425; 32.1 %). Interventions were most frequently related to RBAs regarding anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy (6412; 36 %) and antimicrobial therapy (3320; 19 %). Pharmacist communication was most commonly related to clarification of medication and lab orders, and therapeutic drug monitoring.Based on utilization metrics presented, the implementation of a PCSS has successfully generated RBAs to aid pharmacists in clinical practice and improved departmental documentation and communication. Further analysis is warranted to assess the impact of the RBAs, interventions, and communication notes on outcomes such as hospital cost and adverse drug events.
Collapse
|
28
|
Njie GJ, Proia KK, Thota AB, Finnie RKC, Hopkins DP, Banks SM, Callahan DB, Pronk NP, Rask KJ, Lackland DT, Kottke TE. Clinical Decision Support Systems and Prevention: A Community Guide Cardiovascular Disease Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med 2015; 49:784-795. [PMID: 26477805 PMCID: PMC5074080 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2014] [Revised: 04/15/2015] [Accepted: 04/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can help clinicians assess cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and manage CVD risk factors by providing tailored assessments and treatment recommendations based on individual patient data. The goal of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of CDSSs in improving screening for CVD risk factors, practices for CVD-related preventive care services such as clinical tests and prescribed treatments, and management of CVD risk factors. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION An existing systematic review (search period, January 1975-January 2011) of CDSSs for any condition was initially identified. Studies of CDSSs that focused on CVD prevention in that review were combined with studies identified through an updated search (January 2011-October 2012). Data analysis was conducted in 2013. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 45 studies qualified for inclusion in the review. Improvements were seen for recommended screening and other preventive care services completed by clinicians, recommended clinical tests completed by clinicians, and recommended treatments prescribed by clinicians (median increases of 3.8, 4.0, and 2.0 percentage points, respectively). Results were inconsistent for changes in CVD risk factors such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and hemoglobin A1C levels. CONCLUSIONS CDSSs are effective in improving clinician practices related to screening and other preventive care services, clinical tests, and treatments. However, more evidence is needed from implementation of CDSSs within the broad context of comprehensive service delivery aimed at reducing CVD risk and CVD-related morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gibril J Njie
- Community Guide Branch, Division of Public Health Information Dissemination, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Krista K Proia
- Community Guide Branch, Division of Public Health Information Dissemination, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Anilkrishna B Thota
- Community Guide Branch, Division of Public Health Information Dissemination, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ramona K C Finnie
- Community Guide Branch, Division of Public Health Information Dissemination, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - David P Hopkins
- Community Guide Branch, Division of Public Health Information Dissemination, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Starr M Banks
- Community Guide Branch, Division of Public Health Information Dissemination, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - David B Callahan
- Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Kimberly J Rask
- Georgia Medical Care Foundation, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Daniel T Lackland
- Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wright A, McCoy AB, Hickman TTT, Hilaire DS, Borbolla D, Bowes WA, Dixon WG, Dorr DA, Krall M, Malholtra S, Bates DW, Sittig DF. Problem list completeness in electronic health records: A multi-site study and assessment of success factors. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84:784-90. [PMID: 26228650 PMCID: PMC4549158 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2015] [Revised: 06/17/2015] [Accepted: 06/25/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess problem list completeness using an objective measure across a range of sites, and to identify success factors for problem list completeness. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health record data and interviews at ten healthcare organizations within the United States, United Kingdom, and Argentina who use a variety of electronic health record systems: four self-developed and six commercial. At each site, we assessed the proportion of patients who have diabetes recorded on their problem list out of all patients with a hemoglobin A1c elevation>=7.0%, which is diagnostic of diabetes. We then conducted interviews with informatics leaders at the four highest performing sites to determine factors associated with success. Finally, we surveyed all the sites about common practices implemented at the top performing sites to determine whether there was an association between problem list management practices and problem list completeness. RESULTS Problem list completeness across the ten sites ranged from 60.2% to 99.4%, with a mean of 78.2%. Financial incentives, problem-oriented charting, gap reporting, shared responsibility, links to billing codes, and organizational culture were identified as success factors at the four hospitals with problem list completeness at or near 90.0%. DISCUSSION Incomplete problem lists represent a global data integrity problem that could compromise quality of care and put patients at risk. There was a wide range of problem list completeness across the healthcare facilities. Nevertheless, some facilities have achieved high levels of problem list completeness, and it is important to better understand the factors that contribute to success to improve patient safety. CONCLUSION Problem list completeness varies substantially across healthcare facilities. In our review of EHR systems at ten healthcare facilities, we identified six success factors which may be useful for healthcare organizations seeking to improve the quality of their problem list documentation: financial incentives, problem oriented charting, gap reporting, shared responsibility, links to billing codes, and organizational culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Wright
- Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, United States.
| | - Allison B McCoy
- Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Watson A Bowes
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | | | - David A Dorr
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Michael Krall
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, United States
| | | | - David W Bates
- Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Dean F Sittig
- The University of Texas Health Science School of Biomedical Informatics at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Baer HJ, Wee CC, DeVito K, Orav EJ, Frolkis JP, Williams DH, Wright A, Bates DW. Design of a cluster-randomized trial of electronic health record-based tools to address overweight and obesity in primary care. Clin Trials 2015; 12:374-83. [PMID: 25810449 PMCID: PMC4863225 DOI: 10.1177/1740774515578132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary care providers often fail to identify patients who are overweight or obese or discuss weight management with them. Electronic health record-based tools may help providers with the assessment and management of overweight and obesity. PURPOSE We describe the design of a trial to examine the effectiveness of electronic health record-based tools for the assessment and management of overweight and obesity among adult primary care patients, as well as the challenges we encountered. METHODS We developed several new features within the electronic health record used by primary care practices affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, MA. These features included (1) reminders to measure height and weight, (2) an alert asking providers to add overweight or obesity to the problem list, (3) reminders with tailored management recommendations, and (4) a Weight Management screen. We then conducted a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial in 12 primary care practices. RESULTS We randomized 23 clinical teams ("clinics") within the practices to the intervention group (n = 11) or the control group (n = 12). The new features were activated only for clinics in the intervention group. The intervention was implemented in two phases: the height and weight reminders went live on 15 December 2011 (Phase 1), and all of the other features went live on 11 June 2012 (Phase 2). Study enrollment went from December 2011 through December 2012, and follow-up ended in December 2013. The primary outcomes were 6-month and 12-month weight change among adult patients with body mass index ≥25 who had a visit at one of the primary care clinics during Phase 2. Secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients with a recorded body mass index in the electronic health record, the proportion of patients with body mass index ≥25 who had a diagnosis of overweight or obesity on the electronic health record problem list, and the proportion of patients with body mass index ≥25 who had a follow-up appointment about their weight or were prescribed weight loss medication. LESSONS LEARNED We encountered challenges in our development of an intervention within the existing structure of an electronic health record. For example, although we decided to randomize clinics within primary care practices, this decision may have introduced contamination and led to some imbalance of patient characteristics between the intervention and control practices. Using the electronic health record as the primary data source reduced the cost of the study, but not all desired data were recorded for every participant. CONCLUSION Despite the challenges, this study should provide valuable information about the effectiveness of electronic health record-based tools for addressing overweight and obesity in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather J Baer
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christina C Wee
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katerina DeVito
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - E John Orav
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph P Frolkis
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deborah H Williams
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adam Wright
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David W Bates
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, USA Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mueller M, Purnell TS, Mensah GA, Cooper LA. Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in hypertension prevention and control: what will it take to translate research into practice and policy? Am J Hypertens 2015; 28:699-716. [PMID: 25498998 DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpu233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2014] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite available, effective therapies, racial and ethnic disparities in care and outcomes of hypertension persist. Several interventions have been tested to reduce disparities; however, their translation into practice and policy is hampered by knowledge gaps and limited collaboration among stakeholders. METHODS We characterized factors influencing disparities in blood pressure (BP) control by levels of an ecological model. We then conducted a literature search using PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL databases to identify interventions targeted toward reducing disparities in BP control, categorized them by the levels of the model at which they were primarily targeted, and summarized the evidence regarding their effectiveness. RESULTS We identified 39 interventions and several state and national policy initiatives targeted toward reducing racial and ethnic disparities in BP control, 5 of which are ongoing. Most had patient populations that were majority African-American. Of completed interventions, 27 demonstrated some improvement in BP control or related process measures, and 7 did not; of the 6 studies examining disparities, 3 reduced, 2 increased, and 1 had no effect on disparities. CONCLUSIONS Several effective interventions exist to improve BP in racial and ethnic minorities; however, evidence that they reduce disparities is limited, and many groups are understudied. To strengthen the evidence and translate it into practice and policy, we recommend rigorous evaluation of pragmatic, sustainable, multilevel interventions; institutional support for training implementation researchers and creating broad partnerships among payers, patients, providers, researchers, policymakers, and community-based organizations; and balance and alignment in the priorities and incentives of each stakeholder group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mueller
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - George A Mensah
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Lisa A Cooper
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Johns Hopkins Center to Eliminate Cardiovascular Health Disparities, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kerfoot BP, Turchin A, Breydo E, Gagnon D, Conlin PR. An online spaced-education game among clinicians improves their patients' time to blood pressure control: a randomized controlled trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2015; 7:468-74. [PMID: 24847084 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.113.000814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients with high blood pressure (BP) do not have antihypertensive medications appropriately intensified at clinician visits. We investigated whether an online spaced-education (SE) game among primary care clinicians can decrease time to BP target among their hypertensive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS A 2-arm randomized trial was conducted over 52 weeks among primary care clinicians at 8 hospitals. Educational content consisted of 32 validated multiple-choice questions with explanations on hypertension management. Providers were randomized into 2 groups: SE clinicians were enrolled in the game, whereas control clinicians received identical educational content in an online posting. SE game clinicians were e-mailed 1 question every 3 days. Adaptive game mechanics resent questions in 12 or 24 days if answered incorrectly or correctly, respectively. Clinicians retired questions by answering each correctly twice consecutively. Posting of relative performance among peers fostered competition. Primary outcome measure was time to BP target (<140/90 mm Hg). One hundred eleven clinicians enrolled. The SE game was completed by 87% of clinicians (48/55), whereas 84% of control clinicians (47/56) read the online posting. In multivariable analysis of 17 866 hypertensive periods among 14 336 patients, the hazard ratio for time to BP target in the SE game cohort was 1.043 (95% confidence interval, 1.007-1.081; P=0.018). The number of hypertensive episodes needed to treat to normalize one additional patient's BP was 67.8. The number of clinicians needed to teach to achieve this was 0.43. CONCLUSIONS An online SE game among clinicians generated a modest but significant reduction in the time to BP target among their hypertensive patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00904007.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Price Kerfoot
- From the Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA (B.P.K., D.G., P.R.C.); Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (B.P.K., A.T., P.R.C.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (A.T., E.B., P.R.C.); Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA (A.T.); Pharmacoepidemiology Research Group Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, Boston (D.G.); and Boston University School of Public Health, MA (D.G.).
| | - Alexander Turchin
- From the Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA (B.P.K., D.G., P.R.C.); Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (B.P.K., A.T., P.R.C.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (A.T., E.B., P.R.C.); Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA (A.T.); Pharmacoepidemiology Research Group Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, Boston (D.G.); and Boston University School of Public Health, MA (D.G.)
| | - Eugene Breydo
- From the Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA (B.P.K., D.G., P.R.C.); Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (B.P.K., A.T., P.R.C.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (A.T., E.B., P.R.C.); Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA (A.T.); Pharmacoepidemiology Research Group Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, Boston (D.G.); and Boston University School of Public Health, MA (D.G.)
| | - David Gagnon
- From the Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA (B.P.K., D.G., P.R.C.); Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (B.P.K., A.T., P.R.C.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (A.T., E.B., P.R.C.); Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA (A.T.); Pharmacoepidemiology Research Group Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, Boston (D.G.); and Boston University School of Public Health, MA (D.G.)
| | - Paul R Conlin
- From the Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA (B.P.K., D.G., P.R.C.); Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (B.P.K., A.T., P.R.C.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (A.T., E.B., P.R.C.); Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA (A.T.); Pharmacoepidemiology Research Group Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, Boston (D.G.); and Boston University School of Public Health, MA (D.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Anchala R, Kaptoge S, Pant H, Di Angelantonio E, Franco OH, Prabhakaran D. Evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a clinical decision support system in managing hypertension in resource constrained primary health care settings: results from a cluster randomized trial. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4:e001213. [PMID: 25559011 PMCID: PMC4330052 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.114.001213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Randomized control trials from the developed world report that clinical decision support systems (DSS) could provide an effective means to improve the management of hypertension (HTN). However, evidence from developing countries in this regard is rather limited, and there is a need to assess the impact of a clinical DSS on managing HTN in primary health care center (PHC) settings. Methods and Results We performed a cluster randomized trial to test the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of a clinical DSS among Indian adult hypertensive patients (between 35 and 64 years of age), wherein 16 PHC clusters from a district of Telangana state, India, were randomized to receive either a DSS or a chart‐based support (CBS) system. Each intervention arm had 8 PHC clusters, with a mean of 102 hypertensive patients per cluster (n=845 in DSS and 783 in CBS groups). Mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to 12 months was the primary endpoint. The mean difference in SBP change from baseline between the DSS and CBS at the 12th month of follow‐up, adjusted for age, sex, height, waist, body mass index, alcohol consumption, vegetable intake, pickle intake, and baseline differences in blood pressure, was −6.59 mm Hg (95% confidence interval: −12.18 to −1.42; P=0.021). The cost‐effective ratio for CBS and DSS groups was $96.01 and $36.57 per mm of SBP reduction, respectively. Conclusion Clinical DSS are effective and cost‐effective in the management of HTN in resource‐constrained PHC settings. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.ctri.nic.in. Unique identifier: CTRI/2012/03/002476.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raghupathy Anchala
- Public Health Foundation of India - Indian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, India (R.A., H.P.) Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom (R.A., S.K., E.D.A.)
| | - Stephen Kaptoge
- Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom (R.A., S.K., E.D.A.)
| | - Hira Pant
- Public Health Foundation of India - Indian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, India (R.A., H.P.)
| | - Emanuele Di Angelantonio
- Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom (R.A., S.K., E.D.A.)
| | - Oscar H Franco
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (O.H.F.)
| | - D Prabhakaran
- Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India (P.) Center for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India (P.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fathima M, Peiris D, Naik-Panvelkar P, Saini B, Armour CL. Effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support systems for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Pulm Med 2014; 14:189. [PMID: 25439006 PMCID: PMC4265443 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-14-189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2014] [Accepted: 11/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of computerized clinical decision support systems may improve the diagnosis and ongoing management of chronic diseases, which requires recurrent visits to multiple health professionals, disease and medication monitoring and modification of patient behavior. The aim of this review was to systematically review randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of computerized clinical decision systems (CCDSS) in the care of people with asthma and COPD. METHODS Randomized controlled trials published between 2003 and 2013 were searched using multiple electronic databases Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, IPA, Informit, PsychINFO, Compendex, and Cochrane Clinical Controlled Trials Register databases. To be included, RCTs had to evaluate the role of the CCDSSs for asthma and/or COPD in primary care. RESULTS Nineteen studies representing 16 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. The majority of the trials were conducted in patients with asthma. Study quality was generally high. Meta-analysis was not conducted because of methodological and clinical heterogeneity. The use of CCDSS improved asthma and COPD care in 14 of the 19 studies reviewed (74%). Nine of the nineteen studies showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in the primary outcomes measured. The majority of the studies evaluated health care process measures as their primary outcomes (10/19). CONCLUSION Evidence supports the effectiveness of CCDSS in the care of people with asthma. However there is very little information of its use in COPD care. Although there is considerable improvement in the health care process measures and clinical outcomes through the use of CCDSSs, its effects on user workload and efficiency, safety, costs of care, provider and patient satisfaction remain understudied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam Fathima
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Unverzagt S, Peinemann F, Oemler M, Braun K, Klement A. Meta-regression analyses to explain statistical heterogeneity in a systematic review of strategies for guideline implementation in primary health care. PLoS One 2014; 9:e110619. [PMID: 25343450 PMCID: PMC4208765 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2014] [Accepted: 09/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This study is an in-depth-analysis to explain statistical heterogeneity in a systematic review of implementation strategies to improve guideline adherence of primary care physicians in the treatment of patients with cardiovascular diseases. The systematic review included randomized controlled trials from a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, conference proceedings and registers of ongoing studies. Implementation strategies were shown to be effective with substantial heterogeneity of treatment effects across all investigated strategies. Primary aim of this study was to explain different effects of eligible trials and to identify methodological and clinical effect modifiers. Random effects meta-regression models were used to simultaneously assess the influence of multimodal implementation strategies and effect modifiers on physician adherence. Effect modifiers included the staff responsible for implementation, level of prevention and definition pf the primary outcome, unit of randomization, duration of follow-up and risk of bias. Six clinical and methodological factors were investigated as potential effect modifiers of the efficacy of different implementation strategies on guideline adherence in primary care practices on the basis of information from 75 eligible trials. Five effect modifiers were able to explain a substantial amount of statistical heterogeneity. Physician adherence was improved by 62% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 29 to 104%) or 29% (95% CI 5 to 60%) in trials where other non-medical professionals or nurses were included in the implementation process. Improvement of physician adherence was more successful in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases by around 30% (30%; 95% CI -2 to 71% and 31%; 95% CI 9 to 57%, respectively) compared to tertiary prevention. This study aimed to identify effect modifiers of implementation strategies on physician adherence. Especially the cooperation of different health professionals in primary care practices might increase efficacy and guideline implementation seems to be more difficult in tertiary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Unverzagt
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, University Halle/Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Frank Peinemann
- Children's Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Oemler
- Section of General Practice, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, University Halle/Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Kristin Braun
- Section of General Practice, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, University Halle/Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Andreas Klement
- Section of General Practice, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, University Halle/Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Riskin L, Koppel R, Riskin D. Re-examining health IT policy: what will it take to derive value from our investment? J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 22:459-64. [PMID: 25326600 DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite substantial investments in health information technology (HIT), the nation's goals of reducing cost and improving outcomes through HIT remain elusive. This period of transition, with new Office of National Coordinator for HIT leadership, upcoming Meaningful Use Stage III definitions, and increasing congressional oversight, is opportune to consider needed course corrections in HIT strategy. This article describes current problems and recommended changes in HIT policy, including approaches to usability, interoperability, and quality measurement. Recommendations refrain from interim measures, such as electronic health record adoption rates, and instead focus on measurable national value to benefit the economy, to reduce healthcare costs, and to improve clinical efficiency and care quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loren Riskin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford Hospital & Clinics, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ross Koppel
- Department of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel Riskin
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Proia KK, Thota AB, Njie GJ, Finnie RKC, Hopkins DP, Mukhtar Q, Pronk NP, Zeigler D, Kottke TE, Rask KJ, Lackland DT, Brooks JF, Braun LT, Cooksey T. Team-based care and improved blood pressure control: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2014; 47:86-99. [PMID: 24933494 PMCID: PMC4672378 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2013] [Revised: 02/17/2014] [Accepted: 03/12/2014] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Uncontrolled hypertension remains a widely prevalent cardiovascular risk factor in the U.S. team-based care, established by adding new staff or changing the roles of existing staff such as nurses and pharmacists to work with a primary care provider and the patient. Team-based care has the potential to improve the quality of hypertension management. The goal of this Community Guide systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of team-based care in improving blood pressure (BP) outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION An existing systematic review (search period, January 1980-July 2003) assessing team-based care for BP control was supplemented with a Community Guide update (January 2003-May 2012). For the Community Guide update, two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed quality of eligible studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-eight studies in the prior review (1980-2003) and an additional 52 studies from the Community Guide update (2003-2012) qualified for inclusion. Results from both bodies of evidence suggest that team-based care is effective in improving BP outcomes. From the update, the proportion of patients with controlled BP improved (median increase=12 percentage points); systolic BP decreased (median reduction=5.4 mmHg); and diastolic BP also decreased (median reduction=1.8 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS Team-based care increased the proportion of people with controlled BP and reduced both systolic and diastolic BP, especially when pharmacists and nurses were part of the team. Findings are applicable to a range of U.S. settings and population groups. Implementation of this multidisciplinary approach will require health system-level organizational changes and could be an important element of the medical home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista K Proia
- Community Guide Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC
| | - Anilkrishna B Thota
- Community Guide Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC.
| | - Gibril J Njie
- Community Guide Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC
| | - Ramona K C Finnie
- Community Guide Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC
| | - David P Hopkins
- Community Guide Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC
| | - Qaiser Mukhtar
- Community Guide Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC
| | | | | | | | - Kimberly J Rask
- Emory University, Georgia Medical Care Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Joy F Brooks
- South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control, Columbia
| | | | - Tonya Cooksey
- Community Guide Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Unverzagt S, Oemler M, Braun K, Klement A. Strategies for guideline implementation in primary care focusing on patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Fam Pract 2014; 31:247-66. [PMID: 24367069 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmt080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines should reduce inappropriate practice and improve the efficiency of treatment. Not only methodological quality but also acceptance and successful implementation in daily practice are crucial for the benefit on patients. Focusing on cardiovascular diseases (CVD), it is still unclear which implementation strategy can improve physician adherence to the recommendations of guidelines in primary care. METHODS We conducted a systematic review on randomized controlled trials about guideline implementation strategies on CVD. Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, conference proceedings and registers of ongoing studies were searched. RESULTS Eighty-four trials met our predefined inclusion criteria, of them 54 trials compared unimodal strategies and 30 multimodal strategies to usual care. Concerning unimodal strategies, 15 trials investigated provider reminder systems, 3 audit and feedback, 15 provider education, 4 patient education, 5 promotion of self-management and 14 organizational change. The strongest benefit of a unimodal implementation strategy was found due to organizational change (odds ratio 1.96; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.75), followed by patient education, provider education and provider reminder systems. Trials on the efficacy of audit and feedback and patient self-management showed differing results or small advantages in terms of physician adherence. Multimodal interventions showed almost similar effect measures and ranking of strategies. CONCLUSION The use of implementation strategies for the distribution of guidelines on CVD can be convincingly effective on physician adherence, regardless whether based on a unimodal or multimodal design. Three distinct strategies should be well considered in such an attempt: organizational changes in the primary care team, patient education and provider education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Unverzagt
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics and
| | - Matthias Oemler
- Section of General Practice, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, University Halle/Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Kristin Braun
- Section of General Practice, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, University Halle/Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Andreas Klement
- Section of General Practice, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, University Halle/Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ogedegbe G, Tobin JN, Fernandez S, Cassells A, Diaz-Gloster M, Khalida C, Pickering T, Schwartz JE. Counseling African Americans to Control Hypertension: cluster-randomized clinical trial main effects. Circulation 2014; 129:2044-51. [PMID: 24657991 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.113.006650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data are limited on the implementation of evidence-based multilevel interventions targeted at blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensive blacks who receive care in low-resource primary care practices. METHODS AND RESULTS Counseling African Americans to Control Hypertension is a cluster-randomized clinical trial in which 30 community health centers were randomly assigned to the intervention condition (IC) or usual care (UC). Patients at the IC sites received patient education, home BP monitoring, and monthly lifestyle counseling, whereas physicians attended monthly hypertension case rounds and received feedback on their patients' home BP readings and chart audits. Patients and physicians at the UC sites received printed patient education material and hypertension treatment guidelines, respectively. The primary outcome was BP control, and secondary outcomes were mean changes in systolic and diastolic BPs at 12 months, assessed with an automated BP device. A total of 1059 patients (mean age, 56 years; 28% men, 59% obese, and 36% with diabetes mellitus) were enrolled. The BP control rate was similar in both groups (IC=49.3% versus UC=44.5%; odds ratio, 1.21 [95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.63]; P=0.21). In prespecified subgroup analyses, the intervention was associated with greater BP control in patients without diabetes mellitus (IC=54.0% versus UC=44.7%; odds ratio, 1.45 [confidence interval, 1.02-2.06]); and small-sized community health centers (IC=51.1% versus UC=39.6%; odds ratio, 1.45 [confidence interval, 1.04-2.45]). CONCLUSIONS A practice-based, multicomponent intervention was no better than UC in improving BP control among hypertensive blacks. Future research on the implementation of behavioral modification strategies for hypertension control in low-resource settings should focus on the development of more efficient and tailored interventions in this high-risk population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00233220.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gbenga Ogedegbe
- From the Division of Health and Behavior and Center for Healthful Behavior Change, Department of Population Health, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (G.O., S.F.); Clinical Directors Network, New York, NY (J.N.T., A.C., M.D.-G., C.K.); Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY (J.N.T.); Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Rockefeller University, New York, NY (J.N.T.); Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (T.P., J.E.S.); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY (J.E.S.).
| | - Jonathan N Tobin
- From the Division of Health and Behavior and Center for Healthful Behavior Change, Department of Population Health, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (G.O., S.F.); Clinical Directors Network, New York, NY (J.N.T., A.C., M.D.-G., C.K.); Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY (J.N.T.); Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Rockefeller University, New York, NY (J.N.T.); Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (T.P., J.E.S.); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY (J.E.S.)
| | - Senaida Fernandez
- From the Division of Health and Behavior and Center for Healthful Behavior Change, Department of Population Health, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (G.O., S.F.); Clinical Directors Network, New York, NY (J.N.T., A.C., M.D.-G., C.K.); Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY (J.N.T.); Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Rockefeller University, New York, NY (J.N.T.); Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (T.P., J.E.S.); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY (J.E.S.)
| | - Andrea Cassells
- From the Division of Health and Behavior and Center for Healthful Behavior Change, Department of Population Health, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (G.O., S.F.); Clinical Directors Network, New York, NY (J.N.T., A.C., M.D.-G., C.K.); Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY (J.N.T.); Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Rockefeller University, New York, NY (J.N.T.); Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (T.P., J.E.S.); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY (J.E.S.)
| | - Marleny Diaz-Gloster
- From the Division of Health and Behavior and Center for Healthful Behavior Change, Department of Population Health, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (G.O., S.F.); Clinical Directors Network, New York, NY (J.N.T., A.C., M.D.-G., C.K.); Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY (J.N.T.); Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Rockefeller University, New York, NY (J.N.T.); Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (T.P., J.E.S.); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY (J.E.S.)
| | - Chamanara Khalida
- From the Division of Health and Behavior and Center for Healthful Behavior Change, Department of Population Health, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (G.O., S.F.); Clinical Directors Network, New York, NY (J.N.T., A.C., M.D.-G., C.K.); Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY (J.N.T.); Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Rockefeller University, New York, NY (J.N.T.); Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (T.P., J.E.S.); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY (J.E.S.)
| | - Thomas Pickering
- From the Division of Health and Behavior and Center for Healthful Behavior Change, Department of Population Health, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (G.O., S.F.); Clinical Directors Network, New York, NY (J.N.T., A.C., M.D.-G., C.K.); Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY (J.N.T.); Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Rockefeller University, New York, NY (J.N.T.); Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (T.P., J.E.S.); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY (J.E.S.)
| | - Joseph E Schwartz
- From the Division of Health and Behavior and Center for Healthful Behavior Change, Department of Population Health, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (G.O., S.F.); Clinical Directors Network, New York, NY (J.N.T., A.C., M.D.-G., C.K.); Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY (J.N.T.); Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Rockefeller University, New York, NY (J.N.T.); Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (T.P., J.E.S.); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY (J.E.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Nanji KC, Slight SP, Seger DL, Cho I, Fiskio JM, Redden LM, Volk LA, Bates DW. Overrides of medication-related clinical decision support alerts in outpatients. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 21:487-91. [PMID: 24166725 DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 150] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic prescribing is increasingly used, in part because of government incentives for its use. Many of its benefits come from clinical decision support (CDS), but often too many alerts are displayed, resulting in alert fatigue. OBJECTIVE To characterize the override rates for medication-related CDS alerts in the outpatient setting, the reasons cited for overrides at the time of prescribing, and the appropriateness of overrides. METHODS We measured CDS alert override rates and the coded reasons for overrides cited by providers at the time of prescribing. Our primary outcome was the rate of CDS alert overrides; our secondary outcomes were the rate of overrides by alert type, reasons cited for overrides at the time of prescribing, and override appropriateness for a subset of 600 alert overrides. Through detailed chart reviews of alert override cases, and selective literature review, we developed appropriateness criteria for each alert type, which were modified iteratively as necessary until consensus was reached on all criteria. RESULTS We reviewed 157,483 CDS alerts (7.9% alert rate) on 2,004,069 medication orders during the study period. 82,889 (52.6%) of alerts were overridden. The most common alerts were duplicate drug (33.1%), patient allergy (16.8%), and drug-drug interactions (15.8%). The most likely alerts to be overridden were formulary substitutions (85.0%), age-based recommendations (79.0%), renal recommendations (78.0%), and patient allergies (77.4%). An average of 53% of overrides were classified as appropriate, and rates of appropriateness varied by alert type (p<0.0001) from 12% for renal recommendations to 92% for patient allergies. DISCUSSION About half of CDS alerts were overridden by providers and about half of the overrides were classified as appropriate, but the likelihood of overriding an alert varied widely by alert type. Refinement of these alerts has the potential to improve the relevance of alerts and reduce alert fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen C Nanji
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Baer HJ, Cho I, Walmer RA, Bain PA, Bates DW. Using electronic health records to address overweight and obesity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2013; 45:494-500. [PMID: 24050426 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2013] [Revised: 04/12/2013] [Accepted: 05/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Overweight and obesity are problems of tremendous public health importance, but clinicians often fail to discuss weight management with their patients. Electronic health records (EHRs) have improved quality of care for some conditions and could be an effective mechanism for helping clinicians address overweight and obesity. This review sought to summarize current evidence on the use of EHRs for assessment and management of overweight and obesity. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The authors searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, INSPEC, IEEE Explore, and the ACM Digital Library from their inception through August 15, 2012; analyses were conducted between September 2012 and March 2013. Eligible studies had to involve a new feature or a change in an existing feature within an EHR related to the identification, evaluation, or management of overweight and obesity. Included in the review were RCTs and nonrandomized controlled trials, pre-post studies with a historical control group, and descriptive studies. One reviewer screened all of the titles and abstracts. Citations that were potentially eligible were independently reviewed by two reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Of the 1188 unique citations identified, 11 met the inclusion criteria. Seven of these studies were conducted in children and adolescents, and four were conducted in adults. Most of the studies were pre-post studies with a historical control group, and only three were RCTs. Most of the interventions included calculation, display, or plotting of BMI or BMI percentiles; fewer included other features. The majority of studies examined clinician performance outcomes; only two studies examined patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Few studies have examined whether EHR-based tools can help clinicians address overweight and obesity, and further studies are needed to examine the effects of EHR features on weight-related outcomes in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather J Baer
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital (Baer, Cho, Bates), Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School (Baer, Cho, Bates), Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard School of Public Health (Baer, Bates), Boston, Massachusetts.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Fox CH, Vest BM, Kahn LS, Dickinson LM, Fang H, Pace W, Kimminau K, Vassalotti J, Loskutova N, Peterson K. Improving evidence-based primary care for chronic kidney disease: study protocol for a cluster randomized control trial for translating evidence into practice (TRANSLATE CKD). Implement Sci 2013; 8:88. [PMID: 23927603 PMCID: PMC3751479 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2013] [Accepted: 07/17/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) are steadily increasing in prevalence in the United States. While there is reasonable evidence that specific activities can be implemented by primary care physicians (PCPs) to delay CKD progression and reduce mortality, CKD is under-recognized and undertreated in primary care offices, and PCPs are generally not familiar with treatment guidelines. The current study addresses the question of whether the facilitated TRANSLATE model compared to computer decision support (CDS) alone will lead to improved evidence-based care for CKD in primary care offices. METHODS/DESIGN This protocol consists of a cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT) followed by a process and cost analysis. Only practices providing ambulatory primary care as their principal function, located in non-hospital settings, employing at least one primary care physician, with a minimum of 2,000 patients seen in the prior year, are eligible. The intervention will occur at the cluster level and consists of providing CKD-specific CDS versus CKD-specific CDS plus practice facilitation for all elements of the TRANSLATE model. Patient-level data will be collected from each participating practice to examine adherence to guideline-concordant care, progression of CKD and all-cause mortality. Patients are considered to meet stage three CKD criteria if at least two consecutive estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements at least three months apart fall below 60 ml/min. The process evaluation (cluster level) will determine through qualitative methods the fidelity of the facilitated TRANSLATE program and find the challenges and enablers of the implementation process. The cost-effectiveness analysis will compare the benefit of the intervention of CDS alone against the intervention of CDS plus TRANSLATE (practice facilitation) in relationship to overall cost per quality adjusted years of life. DISCUSSION This study has three major innovations. First, this study adapts the TRANSLATE method, proven effective in diabetes care, to CKD. Second, we are creating a generalizable CDS specific to the Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines for CKD. Additionally, this study will evaluate the effects of CDS versus CDS with facilitation and answer key questions regarding the cost-effectiveness of a facilitated model for improving CKD outcomes. The study is testing virtual facilitation and Academic detailing making the findings generalizable to any area of the country. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered as NCT01767883 on clinicaltrials.gov
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chester H Fox
- Department of Family Medicine, State University of New York – University at Buffalo, 77 Goodell St, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
| | - Bonnie M Vest
- Department of Family Medicine, State University of New York – University at Buffalo, 77 Goodell St, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
| | - Linda S Kahn
- Department of Family Medicine, State University of New York – University at Buffalo, 77 Goodell St, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
| | - L Miriam Dickinson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Hai Fang
- Department of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Wilson Pace
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, USA
| | - Kim Kimminau
- American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas, USA
| | - Joseph Vassalotti
- Division of Nephrology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, USA
- National Kidney Foundation, New York, USA
| | - Natalia Loskutova
- American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, USA
| | - Kevin Peterson
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wong JM, Ho AL, Lin N, Zenonos GA, Martel CB, Frerichs K, Du R, Gormley WB. Radiation exposure in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a quality improvement target. J Neurosurg 2013; 119:215-20. [PMID: 23621604 DOI: 10.3171/2013.3.jns12253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT The care of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has improved dramatically over the last decades. These gains are the result of improved microsurgical, endovascular, and medical management techniques. This intensive management subjects patients to multiple radiographic studies and thus increased radiation exposure. As greater understanding of the risks of radiation exposure develops, physicians must be better equipped to balance the need for optimal SAH management with the minimization of patient exposure to radiation from imaging studies. The goal in the current study was to determine if there is an opportunity for a reduction in radiation dose without a change in the quality of treatment in patients with SAH. METHODS A retrospective chart review of all patients hospitalized for SAH at the Brigham and Women's Hospital in the period from January 1, 2009, to August 31, 2010, was performed. The authors calculated cumulative and imaging study-specific radiation doses, determined the time of day that imaging studies were performed, and surveyed neurosurgeons regarding issues surrounding imaging-related radiation exposure. RESULTS The data for 77 patients were analyzed. The mean cumulative radiation dose during hospitalization was 2.76 Gy per patient (range 0.46-8.32 Gy). The mean radiation exposure from each CT, CT angiography (CTA), and angiography study was 0.08, 0.29, and 0.77 Gy (ranges 0.02-0.40, 0.15-0.99, and 0.11-4.36 Gy, respectively). Subgroup analysis of the top quartile of patients in terms of total radiation dose revealed a mean cumulative radiation dose of 4.78 Gy (range 3.42-8.32 Gy), mean cumulative number of CT and CTA scans of 14, and mean CT or CTA scan per day of 0.5 (maximum 0.8). Seventeen percent of the noncontrast head CT studies were performed just prior to morning rounds, more than double the 8% expected rate at random. Thirty-four percent of the repeat noncontrast head CTs did not show any change between scans, as documented on radiology reports. When surveyed, a majority of neurosurgeons incorrectly estimated the radiation dose typically received from CT, CTA, and angiography studies, and 65% asserted that radiation exposure is "not important" or only "somewhat important" when considering whether to order an imaging study. CONCLUSIONS Study findings suggested that patients with SAH have significant imaging-related exposure to radiation. The authors believe it is possible to continue the current improved outcomes in SAH with a significant reduction in radiation exposure from imaging studies. This analysis highlights the significance of accurate assessment of radiation exposure as a quality improvement target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith M Wong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Arditi C, Rège-Walther M, Wyatt JC, Durieux P, Burnand B. Computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals; effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12:CD001175. [PMID: 23235578 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001175.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical practice does not always reflect best practice and evidence, partly because of unconscious acts of omission, information overload, or inaccessible information. Reminders may help clinicians overcome these problems by prompting the doctor to recall information that they already know or would be expected to know and by providing information or guidance in a more accessible and relevant format, at a particularly appropriate time. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of reminders automatically generated through a computerized system and delivered on paper to healthcare professionals on processes of care (related to healthcare professionals' practice) and outcomes of care (related to patients' health condition). SEARCH METHODS For this update the EPOC Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the following databases between June 11-19, 2012: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Cochrane Library (Economics, Methods, and Health Technology Assessment sections), Issue 6, 2012; MEDLINE, OVID (1946- ), Daily Update, and In-process; EMBASE, Ovid (1947- ); CINAHL, EbscoHost (1980- ); EPOC Specialised Register, Reference Manager, and INSPEC, Engineering Village. The authors reviewed reference lists of related reviews and studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included individual or cluster-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs) that evaluated the impact of computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals on processes and/or outcomes of care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Review authors working in pairs independently screened studies for eligibility and abstracted data. We contacted authors to obtain important missing information for studies that were published within the last 10 years. For each study, we extracted the primary outcome when it was defined or calculated the median effect size across all reported outcomes. We then calculated the median absolute improvement and interquartile range (IQR) in process adherence across included studies using the primary outcome or median outcome as representative outcome. MAIN RESULTS In the 32 included studies, computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals achieved moderate improvement in professional practices, with a median improvement of processes of care of 7.0% (IQR: 3.9% to 16.4%). Implementing reminders alone improved care by 11.2% (IQR 6.5% to 19.6%) compared with usual care, while implementing reminders in addition to another intervention improved care by 4.0% only (IQR 3.0% to 6.0%) compared with the other intervention. The quality of evidence for these comparisons was rated as moderate according to the GRADE approach. Two reminder features were associated with larger effect sizes: providing space on the reminder for provider to enter a response (median 13.7% versus 4.3% for no response, P value = 0.01) and providing an explanation of the content or advice on the reminder (median 12.0% versus 4.2% for no explanation, P value = 0.02). Median improvement in processes of care also differed according to the behaviour the reminder targeted: for instance, reminders to vaccinate improved processes of care by 13.1% (IQR 12.2% to 20.7%) compared with other targeted behaviours. In the only study that had sufficient power to detect a clinically significant effect on outcomes of care, reminders were not associated with significant improvements. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is moderate quality evidence that computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals achieve moderate improvement in process of care. Two characteristics emerged as significant predictors of improvement: providing space on the reminder for a response from the clinician and providing an explanation of the reminder's content or advice. The heterogeneity of the reminder interventions included in this review also suggests that reminders can improve care in various settings under various conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal Arditi
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Reuther LØ, Paulsen MS, Andersen M, Schultz-Larsen P, Christensen HR, Munck A, Larsen PV, Damsgaard J, Poulsen L, Hansen DG, Christensen B, Søndergaard J. Is a targeted intensive intervention effective for improvements in hypertension control? A randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract 2012; 29:626-32. [PMID: 22565110 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cms031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High blood pressure (BP) is one of the most important risk factors for stroke, and antihypertensive therapy significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, achieving a regulated BP in hypertensive patients is still a challenge. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of an intervention targeting GPs' management of hypertension. METHODS A cluster randomized trial comprising 124 practices and 2646 patients with hypertension. In the Capital Region of Denmark, the participating GPs were randomized to an intensive or to a moderately intensive intervention group or to a control group and in Region Zealand and Region of Southern Denmark, practices were randomized into a moderately intensive intervention and to a control group. The main outcome measures were change in proportion of patients with high BP and change in systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) from the first to the second registration. RESULTS The proportion of patients with high BP in 2007 was reduced in 2009 by ~9% points. The mean SBP was reduced significantly from 2007 to 2009 by 3.61 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): -4.26 to -2.96], and the DBP was reduced significantly by 1.99 mmHg (95% CI: -2.37 to -1.61). There was no additional impact in either of the intervention groups. CONCLUSION There was no impact of the moderate intervention and no additional impact of the intensive intervention on BP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lene Ørskov Reuther
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg Hospital, København NV, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Anchala R, Pinto MP, Shroufi A, Chowdhury R, Sanderson J, Johnson L, Blanco P, Prabhakaran D, Franco OH. The role of Decision Support System (DSS) in prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2012; 7:e47064. [PMID: 23071713 PMCID: PMC3468543 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2012] [Accepted: 09/07/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The potential role of DSS in CVD prevention remains unclear as only a few studies report on patient outcomes for cardiovascular disease. Methods and Results A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies was done using Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Amed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus databases; reference lists of relevant studies to 30 July 2011; and email contact with experts. The primary outcome was prevention of cardiovascular disorders (myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary heart disease, peripheral vascular disorders and heart failure) and management of hypertension owing to decision support systems, clinical decision supports systems, computerized decision support systems, clinical decision making tools and medical decision making (interventions). From 4116 references ten studies met our inclusion criteria (including 16,312 participants). Five papers reported outcomes on blood pressure management, one paper on heart failure, two papers each on stroke, and coronary heart disease. The pooled estimate for CDSS versus control group differences in SBP (mm of Hg) was - 0.99 (95% CI −3.02 to 1.04 mm of Hg; I2 = 0; p = 0.851). Conclusions DSS show an insignificant benefit in the management and control of hypertension (insignificant reduction of SBP). The paucity of well-designed studies on patient related outcomes is a major hindrance that restricts interpretation for evaluating the role of DSS in secondary prevention. Future studies on DSS should (1) evaluate both physician performance and patient outcome measures (2) integrate into the routine clinical workflow with a provision for decision support at the point of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raghupathy Anchala
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Wort’s Causeway, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Public Health Foundation of India, Indian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
- * E-mail:
| | - Maria P. Pinto
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Wort’s Causeway, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Amir Shroufi
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Wort’s Causeway, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rajiv Chowdhury
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Wort’s Causeway, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jean Sanderson
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Wort’s Causeway, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Johnson
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Wort’s Causeway, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Blanco
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Wort’s Causeway, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Oscar H. Franco
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Wort’s Causeway, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Examining the evidence of the impact of health information technology in primary care: an argument for participatory research with health professionals and patients. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81:654-61. [PMID: 22910233 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2011] [Revised: 05/13/2012] [Accepted: 07/18/2012] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Health information technology represents a promising avenue to improve health care delivery. How can we use lessons learnt from existing health information technologies in primary care to inform the optimal design of newer developments such as personal health records? METHODS The results of systematic literature reviews about the impact of different information systems on health outcomes in primary care are critically discussed in a narrative synthesis, with a focus on their implications for the development of personal health records. RESULTS Given the proliferation of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials, high quality evidence for health information technology in primary care is accumulating with mixed results. The heterogeneity of systems being compared and the quality of research can no longer account for these findings. One potential explanation may be that systems originally designed for acute care settings are being implemented in primary care. Early studies evaluating personal health records suggest that targeting patient outcomes directly and adapting systems to patients' needs may be part of the solution. CONCLUSION In order to develop personal health records for primary care, studies are needed that involve the users, namely patients and primary care health professionals, in the design and evaluation of these systems from their inception. Participatory research is a recommended methodological approach.
Collapse
|
48
|
Holt TA, Thorogood M, Griffiths F. Changing clinical practice through patient specific reminders available at the time of the clinical encounter: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27:974-84. [PMID: 22407585 PMCID: PMC3403145 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2025-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2011] [Revised: 10/25/2011] [Accepted: 02/03/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesise current evidence for the influence on clinical behaviour of patient-specific electronically generated reminders available at the time of the clinical encounter. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Cochrane library of systematic reviews; Science Citation Index Expanded; Social Sciences Citation Index; ASSIA; EMBASE; CINAHL; DARE; HMIC were searched for relevant articles. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS We included controlled trials of reminder interventions if the intervention was: directed at clinician behaviour; available during the clinical encounter; computer generated (including computer generated paper-based reminders); and generated by patient-specific (rather than condition specific or drug specific) data. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials published since 1970. A random effects model was used to derive a pooled odds ratio for adherence to recommended care or achievement of target outcome. Subgroups were examined based on area of care and study design. Odds ratios were derived for each sub-group. We examined the designs, settings and other features of reminders looking for factors associated with a consistent effect. RESULTS Altogether, 42 papers met the inclusion criteria. The studies were of variable quality and some were affected by unit of analysis errors due to a failure to account for clustering. An overall odds ratio of 1.79 [95% confidence interval 1.56, 2.05] in favour of reminders was derived. Heterogeneity was high and factors predicting effect size were difficult to identify. LIMITATIONS Methodological diversity added to statistical heterogeneity as an obstacle to meta-analysis. The quality of included studies was variable and in some reports procedural details were lacking. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS The analysis suggests a moderate effect of electronically generated, individually tailored reminders on clinician behaviour during the clinical encounter. Future research should concentrate on identifying the features of reminder interventions most likely to result in the target behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim A Holt
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, 2nd floor, 23-38 Hythe Bridge Street, Oxford, OX1 2ET, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Selby JV, Schmittdiel JA, Fireman B, Jaffe M, Ransom LJ, Dyer W, Uratsu CS, Reed ME, Kerr EA, Hsu J. Improving treatment intensification to reduce cardiovascular disease risk: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12:183. [PMID: 22747998 PMCID: PMC3438122 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2012] [Accepted: 07/02/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Blood pressure, lipid, and glycemic control are essential for reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Many health care systems have successfully shifted aspects of chronic disease management, including population-based outreach programs designed to address CVD risk factor control, to non-physicians. The purpose of this study is to evaluate provision of new information to non-physician outreach teams on need for treatment intensification in patients with increased CVD risk. Methods Cluster randomized trial (July 1-December 31, 2008) in Kaiser Permanente Northern California registry of members with diabetes mellitus, prior CVD diagnoses and/or chronic kidney disease who were high-priority for treatment intensification: blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg systolic, LDL-cholesterol ≥ 130 mg/dl, or hemoglobin A1c ≥ 9%; adherent to current medications; no recent treatment intensification). Randomization units were medical center-based outreach teams (4 intervention; 4 control). For intervention teams, priority flags for intensification were added monthly to the registry database with recommended next pharmacotherapeutic steps for each eligible patient. Control teams used the same database without this information. Outcomes included 3-month rates of treatment intensification and risk factor levels during follow-up. Results Baseline risk factor control rates were high (82-90%). In eligible patients, the intervention was associated with significantly greater 3-month intensification rates for blood pressure (34.1 vs. 30.6%) and LDL-cholesterol (28.0 vs 22.7%), but not A1c. No effects on risk factors were observed at 3 months or 12 months follow-up. Intervention teams initiated outreach for only 45-47% of high-priority patients, but also for 27-30% of lower-priority patients. Teams reported difficulties adapting prior outreach strategies to incorporate the new information. Conclusions Information enhancement did not improve risk factor control compared to existing outreach strategies at control centers. Familiarity with prior, relatively successful strategies likely reduced uptake of the innovation and its potential for success at intervention centers. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00517686
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe V Selby
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
McKibbon KA, Lokker C, Handler SM, Dolovich LR, Holbrook AM, O'Reilly D, Tamblyn R, Hemens BJ, Basu R, Troyan S, Roshanov PS. The effectiveness of integrated health information technologies across the phases of medication management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19:22-30. [PMID: 21852412 PMCID: PMC3240758 DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2011] [Accepted: 07/11/2011] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality funded an evidence report to address seven questions on multiple aspects of the effectiveness of medication management information technology (MMIT) and its components (prescribing, order communication, dispensing, administering, and monitoring). MATERIALS AND METHODS Medline and 11 other databases without language or date limitations to mid-2010. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing integrated MMIT were selected by two independent reviewers. Reviewers assessed study quality and extracted data. Senior staff checked accuracy. RESULTS Most of the 87 RCTs focused on clinical decision support and computerized provider order entry systems, were performed in hospitals and clinics, included primarily physicians and sometimes nurses but not other health professionals, and studied process changes related to prescribing and monitoring medication. Processes of care improved for prescribing and monitoring mostly in hospital settings, but the few studies measuring clinical outcomes showed small or no improvements. Studies were performed most frequently in the USA (n=63), Europe (n=16), and Canada (n=6). DISCUSSION Many studies had limited description of systems, installations, institutions, and targets of the intervention. Problems with methods and analyses were also found. Few studies addressed order communication, dispensing, or administering, non-physician prescribers or pharmacists and their MMIT tools, or patients and caregivers. Other study methods are also needed to completely understand the effects of MMIT. CONCLUSIONS Almost half of MMIT interventions improved the process of care, but few studies measured clinical outcomes. This large body of literature, although instructive, is not uniformly distributed across settings, people, medication phases, or outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Ann McKibbon
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|