1
|
Coronado GD, Nyongesa DB, Petrik AF, Thompson JH, Escaron AL, Pham T, Leo MC. The Reach of Calls and Text Messages for Mailed FIT Outreach in the PROMPT Stepped-Wedge Colorectal Cancer Screening Trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:525-533. [PMID: 38319289 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer screening participation. We assessed the reach and effectiveness of adding notifications to mailed FIT programs. METHODS We conducted secondary analyses of a stepped-wedge evaluation of an enhanced mailed FIT program (n = 15 clinics). Patients were stratified by prior FIT completion. Those with prior FIT were sent a text message (Group 1); those without were randomized 1:1 to receive a text message (Group 2) or live phone call (Group 3). All groups were sent automated phone call reminders. In stratified analysis, we measured reach and effectiveness (FIT completion within 6 months) and assessed patient-level associations using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS Patients (n = 16,934; 83% Latino; 72% completed prior FIT) were reached most often by text messages (78%), followed by live phone calls (71%), then automated phone calls (56%). FIT completion was higher in patients with prior FIT completion versus without [44% (Group 1) vs. 19% (Group 2 + Group 3); P < 0.01]. For patients without prior FIT, effectiveness was higher in those allocated to a live phone call [20% (Group 3) vs. 18% (Group 2) for text message; P = 0.04] and in those who personally answered the live call (28% vs. 9% no call completed; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Text messages reached the most patients, yet effectiveness was highest in those who personally answered the live phone call. IMPACT Despite the broad reach and low cost of text messages, personalized approaches may more successfully boost FIT completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria D Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | - Amanda F Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Anne L Escaron
- AltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tuan Pham
- AltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Montalvan-Sanchez EE, Beas R, Karkash A, Godoy A, Norwood DA, Dougherty M. Delays in Colorectal Cancer Screening for Latino Patients: The Role of Immigrant Healthcare in Stemming the Rising Global Incidence of Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology Res 2024; 17:41-51. [PMID: 38463144 PMCID: PMC10923253 DOI: 10.14740/gr1697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The significant global burden of colorectal cancer accentuates disparities in access to preventive healthcare in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) as well as large sections of underserved populations within high-income countries. The barriers to colorectal cancer screening in economically transitioning Latin America are multiple. At the same time, immigration from these countries to the USA continues to increase. This case highlights the delays in diagnosis experienced by a recent immigrant from a country with no established colorectal cancer screening program, to an immigrant population in the USA with similar poor screening coverage. We discuss common challenges faced by Latinos in their home countries and the USA, as well as strategies that could be implemented to improve screening coverage in US immigrant populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Renato Beas
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Ahmad Karkash
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Ambar Godoy
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Coury J, Coronado G, Currier JJ, Kenzie ES, Petrik AF, Badicke B, Myers E, Davis MM. Methods for scaling up an outreach intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in rural areas. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:6. [PMID: 38191536 PMCID: PMC10775579 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00540-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach and patient navigation are evidence-based practices shown to improve rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) and follow-up in various settings, yet these programs have not been broadly adopted by health systems and organizations that serve diverse populations. Reasons for low adoption rates are multifactorial, and little research explores approaches for scaling up a complex, multi-level CRC screening outreach intervention to advance equity in rural settings. METHODS SMARTER CRC, a National Cancer Institute Cancer Moonshot project, is a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a mailed FIT and patient navigation program involving 3 Medicaid health plans and 28 rural primary care practices in Oregon and Idaho followed by a national scale-up trial. The SMARTER CRC intervention combines mailed FIT outreach supported by clinics, health plans, and vendors and patient navigation for colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT result. We applied the framework from Perez and colleagues to identify the intervention's components (including functions and forms) and scale-up dissemination strategies and worked with a national advisory board to support scale-up to additional organizations. The team is recruiting health plans, primary care clinics, and regional and national organizations in the USA that serve a rural population. To teach organizations about the intervention, activities include Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) tele-mentoring learning collaboratives, a facilitation guide and other materials, a patient navigation workshop, webinars, and individualized technical assistance. Our primary outcome is program adoption (by component), measured 6 months after participation in an ECHO learning collaborative. We also assess engagement and adaptations (implemented and desired) to learn how the multicomponent intervention might be modified to best support broad scale-up. DISCUSSION Findings may inform approaches for adapting and scaling evidence-based approaches to promote CRC screening participation in underserved populations and settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04890054) and at the NCI's Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP no.: NCI-2021-01032) on May 11, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Coury
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | | | - Jessica J Currier
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Knight Cancer Institute, OHSU, Portland, USA
| | - Erin S Kenzie
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, OHSU, Portland, USA
| | | | - Brittany Badicke
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Emily Myers
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Melinda M Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, OHSU, Portland, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, OHSU, Portland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Edwardson N, Cartwright K, Sheche J, Pankratz VS, Kosich M, Kanda D, Leekity S, Mishra SI. Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Adults in Zuni Pueblo: Factors Associated with FOBT and Colonoscopy Utilization. J Community Health 2023; 48:565-575. [PMID: 36752868 PMCID: PMC9906599 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-023-01196-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Although strategies to mitigate barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have proven successful in some parts of the US, few of these strategies have been studied in rural, American Indian communities that may exhibit unique culturally driven attitudes toward and knowledge of colorectal cancer and experience increased barriers to healthcare access. In this study, we describe the results of a survey among CRC screen-eligible members of Zuni Pueblo (N = 218) on an array of questions regarding CRC screening behaviors, knowledge, satisfaction with and access to healthcare services, social support for CRC screening, perceptions toward FOBT, and preference for evidence-based interventions or strategies for improving CRC screening rates. Results from the multivariable model suggest age, having a regular healthcare provider, and harboring fewer negative perceptions toward FOBT are key drivers of ever completing CRC screening. Respondents reported strong support for Community Guide-recommended interventions and strategies for increasing CRC screening for nearly all proposed interventions. Results confirm the need for multilevel, multicomponent interventions, with a particular focus on improving Zuni Pueblo community members' access to a regular source of care, improving knowledge of CRC risk factor, and addressing negative perceptions toward CRC screening. These results provide critical, community-specific insight into better understanding the drivers of low guideline-adherent screening rates and inform local healthcare providers and community leaders of context-specific strategies to improve CRC screening in Zuni Pueblo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Edwardson
- School of Public Administration, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA.
| | - Kate Cartwright
- School of Public Administration, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
| | - Judith Sheche
- University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, USA
| | - V Shane Pankratz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, USA
| | - Mikaela Kosich
- Departments of Pediatrics and Family and Community Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center and University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
| | - Deborah Kanda
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, USA
| | - Samantha Leekity
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, USA
| | - Shiraz I Mishra
- Departments of Pediatrics and Family and Community Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center and University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scott RE, Chang P, Kluz N, Baykal-Caglar E, Agrawal D, Pignone M. Equitable Implementation of Mailed Stool Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening and Patient Navigation in a Safety Net Health System. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:1631-1637. [PMID: 36456842 PMCID: PMC10212848 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07952-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mailed stool testing programs increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in diverse settings, but whether uptake differs by key demographic characteristics is not well-studied and has health equity implications. OBJECTIVE To examine the uptake and equity of the first cycle of a mailed stool test program implemented over a 3-year period in a Central Texas Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) system. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study within a single-arm intervention. PARTICIPANTS Patients in an FQHC aged 50-75 at average CRC risk identified through electronic health records (EHR) as not being up to date with screening. INTERVENTIONS Mailed outreach in English/Spanish included an introductory letter, free-of-charge fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and lab requisition with postage-paid mailer, simple instructions, and a medical records update postcard. Patients were asked to complete the FIT or postcard reporting recent screening. One text and one letter reminded non-responders. A bilingual patient navigator guided those with positive FIT toward colonoscopy. MAIN MEASURES Proportions of patients completing mailed FIT in response to initial cycle of outreach and proportion of those with positive FIT completing colonoscopy; comparison of whether proportions varied by demographics and insurance status obtained from the EHR. KEY RESULTS Over 3 years, 33,606 patients received an initial cycle of outreach. Overall, 19.9% (n = 6672) completed at least one mailed FIT, 5.6% (n = 374) tested positive during that initial cycle, and 72.5% (n = 271 of 374) of those with positive FIT completed a colonoscopy. Hispanic/Latinx, Spanish-speaking, and uninsured patients were more likely to complete mailed FIT compared with white, English-speaking, and commercially insured patients. Spanish-speaking patients were more likely to complete colonoscopy after positive FIT compared with English-speaking patients. CONCLUSIONS Mailed FIT outreach with patient navigation implemented in an FQHC system was effective in equitably reaching patients not up to date for CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah E Scott
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Patrick Chang
- Department of Population Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
| | - Nicole Kluz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Eda Baykal-Caglar
- Department of Population Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
- CommUnityCare Health Centers, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Deepak Agrawal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Michael Pignone
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
- Department of Population Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee B, Keyes E, Rachocki C, Grimes B, Chen E, Vittinghoff E, Ladabaum U, Somsouk M. Increased Colorectal Cancer Screening Sustained with Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:1326-1333.e4. [PMID: 34280552 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Reports of mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach effectiveness over time are minimal. We aimed to better evaluate a mailed FIT program with longitudinal metrics. METHODS A total of 10,771 patients aged 50 to 75 years not up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening were randomized to intervention or usual care. The intervention arm received an advanced notification call and informational postcard prior to a mailed FIT. Usual care was at the discretion of the primary care provider. Patients were followed for up to 2.5 years. The primary outcome was the difference in cumulative proportion of completed FIT screening between arms. Screening was further examined with the proportion of time up-to-date, consistency of adherence, and frequency of abnormal FIT. RESULTS The cumulative proportion of FIT completion was higher in the outreach intervention (73.2% vs 55.1%; P < .001). The proportion of time covered by screening was higher in the intervention group (46.8% vs 27.3%; Δ19.6%; 95% confidence interval, 18.2%-20.9%). Patients assigned to FIT outreach were more likely to consistently complete FITs (2 completed of 2 offered) (50.1% vs 21.8%; P < .001). However, for patients who did not complete the FIT during the first cycle, only 17.1% completed a FIT during the second outreach cycle. The number and overall proportion of abnormal FIT was significantly higher in the outreach intervention (6.9% Outreach vs 4.1% Usual Care; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Organized mailed FIT outreach significantly increased colorectal cancer screening over multiple years in this safety-net health system. Although mailing was overall effective, the effect was modest in patients who did not complete FIT in first cycle of intervention. (ClincialTrials.gov, NCT02613260).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Briton Lee
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Erin Keyes
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Barbara Grimes
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ellen Chen
- San Francisco Health Network, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Ma Somsouk
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The risk of developing colorectal cancer in individuals aged 50-70 years and behavioral changes in high-risk individuals regarding a fecal occult blood test. JOURNAL OF SURGERY AND MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.28982/josam.868951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
8
|
Yoon JY, Kwak MS, Kim HI, Cha JM. Seasonal variations in the diagnosis of the top 10 cancers in Korea: A nationwide population-based study using a common data model. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36:3371-3380. [PMID: 34293206 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM A better understanding of seasonal variations in cancer diagnosis may be the first step toward optimal resource distribution in the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP). This study aimed to identify seasonal variations in the diagnosis of the top 10 major cancers in Korea. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study in participants aged ≥ 20 years between 2012 and 2016 from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment-National Patient Sample database, previously converted to a common data model. We assessed the overall seasonal variations in the 10 major cancers. RESULTS We analyzed the following top 10 cancers: stomach (n = 3435), colorectal (n = 5368), liver (n = 7605), pancreatic (n = 2946), gallbladder (n = 899), lung (n = 1598), prostate (n = 2897), thyroid (n = 1966), breast (n = 1313), and kidney (n = 668) cancers. All cancers showed similar seasonal variations in diagnosis, with a significant winter peak. A winter peak in diagnosis was observed for NCSP-covered cancers, such as stomach, colon, liver, and breast cancers, as well as other cancers not covered by the NCSP. The winter peak for cancer diagnosis was the highest for breast cancer (74.4%) followed by thyroid (51.0%) and stomach cancers, whereas it was the lowest for pancreatic cancer followed by prostate and colorectal cancers. CONCLUSIONS Significant seasonal variations were found in the diagnosis of the top 10 major cancers, with a winter peak, which may be explained by the participants' behavior pattern with respect to the NCSP. Our findings suggest that trading off of NCSP healthcare resources between winter and other seasons may be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Young Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Seob Kwak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ha Il Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Myung Cha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhu X, Parks PD, Weiser E, Jacobson DJ, Limburg PJ, Finney Rutten LJ. Barriers to utilization of three colorectal cancer screening options - Data from a national survey. Prev Med Rep 2021; 24:101508. [PMID: 34401220 PMCID: PMC8350367 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening continues to be underutilized in the United States. A better understanding of existing barriers is critical for improving uptake of, and adherence to, CRC screening. Using data from a population-based panel survey, we examined barriers to utilization of three commonly used screening options (FIT/gFOBT, mt-sDNA, and screening colonoscopy) and assessed differences by socio-demographic characteristics, healthcare access, and health status. Data were obtained from a questionnaire developed by the authors and implemented through a U.S. national panel survey conducted in November 2019. Among 5,097 invited panelists, 1,595 completed the survey (31.3%). Analyses were focused on individuals ages 50-75 at average risk for CRC. Results showed that among respondents who reported no prior CRC screening with FIT/gFOBT, mt-sDNA, or colonoscopy, the top barriers were lack of knowledge (FIT/gFOBT: 42.1%, mt-sDNA: 44.9%, colonoscopy: 34.7%), lack of provider recommendation (FIT/gFOBT: 32.1%, mt-sDNA: 27.3%, colonoscopy: 18.6%), and suboptimal access (FIT/gFOBT: 20.8%, mt-sDNA: 17.8%, colonoscopy: 26%). Among participants who had used one or two of the screening options, the top barriers to FIT/gFOBT and mt-sDNA were lack of provider recommendation (31.6% & 37.5%) and lack of knowledge (24.6% & 25.6%), while for colonoscopy top barriers were psychosocial barriers (31%) and lack of provider recommendation (22.7%). Differences by sex, race/ethnicity, income level, and health status were observed. Our research identified primary barriers to the utilization of three endorsed CRC screening options and differences by patient characteristics, highlighting the importance of improving CRC screening education and considering patient preferences in screening recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Zhu
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Philip D. Parks
- Exact Sciences Corporation, 441 Charmany Drive, Madison, WI 53719, USA
| | - Emily Weiser
- Exact Sciences Corporation, 441 Charmany Drive, Madison, WI 53719, USA
| | - Debra J. Jacobson
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Paul J. Limburg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Lila J. Finney Rutten
- Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Heidemann DL, Adhami A, Nair A, Haftka-George A, Zaidan M, Seshadri V, Tang A, Willens DE. Using a Frontline Staff Intervention to Improve Cervical Cancer Screening in a Large Academic Internal Medicine Clinic. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:2608-2614. [PMID: 33987788 PMCID: PMC8390589 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06865-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer is the third most common malignancy affecting women. Screening with Papanicolaou (Pap) tests effectively identifies precancerous lesions and early-stage cervical cancer. While the nationwide rate of cervical cancer screening (CCS) is 84%, our urban general internal medicine (GIM) clinic population had a CCS rate of 70% in 2016. OBJECTIVE To improve our clinic's CCS rate to match or exceed the national average within 18 months by identifying barriers and testing solutions. DESIGN A quality improvement project led by a multidisciplinary group of healthcare providers. PARTICIPANTS Our GIM clinic includes 16 attending physicians, 116 resident physicians, and 20 medical assistants (MAs) with an insured and underserved patient population. INTERVENTION Phase 1 lasted 9 months and implemented CCS patient outreach, patient financial incentives, and clinic staff education. Phase 2 lasted 9 months and involved a workflow change in which MAs identified candidates for CCS during patient check-in. Feedback spanned the entire study period. MAIN MEASURES Our primary outcome was the number of Pap tests completed per month during the 2 study phases. Our secondary outcome was the clinic population's CCS rate for all eligible clinic patients. KEY RESULTS After interventions, the average number of monthly Pap tests increased from 35 to 56 in phase 1 and to 75 in phase 2. Of 385 patients contacted in phase 1, 283 scheduled a Pap test and 115 (41%) completed it. Compared to baseline, both interventions improved cervical cancer screening (phase 1 relative risk, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.64-2.10; P < 0.001; phase 2 relative risk, 2.70; 95% CI, 2.40-3.02; P < 0.001). Our clinic's CCS rate improved from 70% to 75% after the 18-month intervention. CONCLUSIONS The rate of CCS increased by 5% after a systematic 2-phase organizational intervention that empowered MAs to remind, identify, and prepare candidates during check-in for CCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle L Heidemann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
| | - Angie Adhami
- Department of Primary Care, Dedicated Senior Medical Center, St. Petersburg, FL, USA
| | - Anupama Nair
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Alexis Haftka-George
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Mariam Zaidan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Vaidehi Seshadri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Amy Tang
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - David E Willens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kelsey EA, Njeru JW, Chaudhry R, Fischer KM, Schroeder DR, Croghan IT. Understanding User Acceptance of Clinical Decision Support Systems to Promote Increased Cancer Screening Rates in a Primary Care Practice. J Prim Care Community Health 2021; 11:2150132720958832. [PMID: 33016170 PMCID: PMC7543103 DOI: 10.1177/2150132720958832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Clinical decision support systems (CDDSs) in the electronic medical record (EMR) have been implemented in primary care settings to identify patients due for cancer screening tests, while functioning as a real time reminder system. There is little known about primary care providers (PCPs) perspective or user acceptance of CDSS. The purpose of this study was to investigate primary care provider perceptions of utilizing CDSS alerts in the EMR to promote increased screening rates for breast cancer, cervical cancer, and colorectal cancer. METHODS An electronic survey was administered to PCPs in a Midwest Health Institution community internal medicine practice from September 25, 2019 through November 27, 2019. RESULTS Among 37 participants (9 NP/Pas and 28 MD/DOs), the NP/PA group was more likely to agree that alerts were helpful (50%; P-value = .0335) and the number of alerts (89%; P = .0227) in the EMR was appropriate. The NP/PA group also was more likely to find alerts straightforward to use (78%, P = .0239). Both groups agreed about feeling comfortable using the health maintenance alerts (MD/DO = 79%; NP/PA = 100%). CONCLUSION CDSSs can promote and facilitate ordering of cancer screening tests. The use of technology can promptly identify patients due for a test and act as a reminder to the PCP. PCPs identify these alerts to be a beneficial tool in the EMR when they do not interrupt workflow and provide value to patient care. More work is needed to identify factors that could optimize alerts to be even more helpful, particularly to MD/DO groups.
Collapse
|
12
|
Holden CA, Frank O, Caruso J, Turnbull D, Reed RL, Miller CL, Olver I. From participation to diagnostic assessment: a systematic scoping review of the role of the primary healthcare sector in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program. Aust J Prim Health 2021; 26:191-206. [PMID: 32536362 DOI: 10.1071/py19181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Primary health care (PHC) plays a vital support role in organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs by encouraging patient participation and ensuring timely referral for diagnostic assessment follow up. A systematic scoping review of the current evidence was conducted to inform strategies that better engage the PHC sector in organised CRC screening programs. Articles published from 2005 to November 2019 were searched across five databases. Evidence was synthesised and interventions that specifically require PHC involvement were mapped to stages of the CRC screening pathway. Fifty-seven unique studies were identified in which patient, provider and system-level interventions align with defined stages of the CRC screening pathway: namely, identifying/reminding patients who have not responded to CRC screening (non-adherence) (n=46) and follow up of a positive screen referral (n=11). Self-management support initiatives (patient level) and improvement initiatives (system level) demonstrate consistent benefits along the CRC screening pathway. Interventions evaluated as part of a quality-improvement process tended to report effectiveness; however, the variation in reporting makes it difficult to determine which elements contributed to the overall study outcomes. To maximise the benefits of population-based screening programs, better integration into existing primary care services can be achieved through targeting preventive and quality care interventions along the entire screening pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol A Holden
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, PO Box 11060, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; and Corresponding author.
| | - Oliver Frank
- Discipline of General Practice, University of Adelaide, Helen Mayo North, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| | - Joanna Caruso
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, PO Box 11060, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Deborah Turnbull
- School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Level 7, Hughes Building, North Terrace Campus, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Richard L Reed
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Caroline L Miller
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, PO Box 11060, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; and School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, 57 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Ian Olver
- School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Level 7, Hughes Building, North Terrace Campus, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vernon SW, Del Junco DJ, Coan SP, Murphy CC, Walters ST, Friedman RH, Bastian LA, Fisher DA, Lairson DR, Myers RE. A stepped randomized trial to promote colorectal cancer screening in a nationwide sample of U.S. Veterans. Contemp Clin Trials 2021; 105:106392. [PMID: 33823295 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening (CRCS) facilitates early detection and lowers CRC mortality. OBJECTIVES To increase CRCS in a randomized trial of stepped interventions. Step 1 compared three modes of delivery of theory-informed minimal cue interventions. Step 2 was designed to more intensively engage those not completing CRCS after Step 1. METHODS Recruitment packets (60,332) were mailed to a random sample of individuals with a record of U.S. military service during the Vietnam-era. Respondents not up-to-date with CRCS were randomized to one of four Step 1 groups: automated telephone, telephone, letter, or survey-only control. Those not completing screening after Step 1 were randomized to one of three Step 2 groups: automated motivational interviewing (MI) call, counselor-delivered MI call, or Step 2 control. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses assessed CRCS on follow-up surveys mailed after each step. RESULTS After Step 1 (n = 1784), CRCS was higher in the letter, telephone, and automated telephone groups (by 1%, 5%, 7%) than in survey-only controls (43%), although differences were not statistically significant. After Step 2 (n = 516), there were nonsignificant increases in CRCS in the two intervention groups compared with the controls. CRCS following any combination of stepped interventions overall was 7% higher (P = 0.024) than in survey-only controls (55.6%). CONCLUSIONS In a nationwide study of Veterans, CRCS after each of two stepped interventions of varying modes of delivery did not differ significantly from that in controls. However, combined overall, the sequence of stepped interventions significantly increased CRCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally W Vernon
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States.
| | - Deborah J Del Junco
- Department of Surgery, Center for Translational Injury Research, The University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sharon P Coan
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Caitlin C Murphy
- Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Scott T Walters
- Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Ft. Worth, TX, United States
| | - Robert H Friedman
- Medical Information Systems Unit, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Lori A Bastian
- General Internal Medicine, VA Connecticut, West Haven, CT 06516 and Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, United States
| | | | - David R Lairson
- Department of Management Policy and Community Health, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ronald E Myers
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Housten AJ, Gunn CM, Paasche-Orlow MK, Basen-Engquist KM. Health Literacy Interventions in Cancer: a Systematic Review. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2021; 36:240-252. [PMID: 33155097 PMCID: PMC8005416 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01915-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Approximately one-third of adults in the United States (U.S.) have limited health literacy. Those with limited health literacy often have difficultly navigating the health care environment, including navigating care across the cancer continuum (e.g., prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment). Evidence-based interventions to assist adults with limited health literacy improve health outcomes; however, little is known about health literacy interventions in the context of cancer and their impact on cancer-specific health outcomes. The purpose of this review was to identify and characterize the literature on health literacy interventions across the cancer care continuum. Specifically, our aim was to review the strength of evidence, outcomes assessed, and intervention modalities within the existing literature reporting health literacy interventions in cancer. Our search yielded 1036 records (prevention/screening n = 174; diagnosis/treatment n = 862). Following deduplication and review for inclusion criteria, we analyzed 87 records of intervention studies reporting health literacy outcomes, including 45 pilot studies (prevention/screening n = 24; diagnosis/treatment n = 21) and 42 randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental trials (prevention/screening n = 31; diagnosis/treatment n = 11). This literature included 36 unique interventions (prevention/screening n = 28; diagnosis/treatment n = 8), mostly in the formative stages of intervention development, with few assessments of evidence-based interventions. These gaps in the literature necessitate further research in the development and implementation of evidence-based health literacy interventions to improve cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Housten
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave. Campus Box 8100, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - C M Gunn
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M K Paasche-Orlow
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - K M Basen-Engquist
- Department of Behavioral Science, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gruner LF, Amitay EL, Heisser T, Guo F, Niedermaier T, Gies A, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H. The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13071520. [PMID: 33806234 PMCID: PMC8037417 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary There is large heterogeneity in invitation schemes and participation rates in colorectal cancer screening programs offering fecal occult blood tests (nowadays mostly fecal immunochemical tests). It is unclear what the most effective invitation strategies are for fecal occult blood tests. In this systematic review, advance notification, mailed fecal occult blood test, and reminders had major, consistent, and complementary potential to increase participation in fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening. Our findings show that the effectiveness of invitations for fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening can be substantially increased across several settings by the implementation of comprehensive invitation strategies. Abstract Personal invitations for fecal occult blood tests (nowadays mostly fecal immunochemical tests) are increasingly used to raise their usage for colorectal cancer screening. However, there is a large heterogeneity in applied invitation schemes. We aimed to review evidence for the effectiveness of various invitation schemes. The main outcome was the fecal occult blood test usage rate. A systematic search was performed in Medline and Web of Science (up to 9 July 2020). Randomized controlled trials or cluster-randomized controlled trials were eligible, which reported on general invitations for fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening sent to the general population at average colorectal cancer risk. (PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020169409). Overall, 34 studies were included. Invitations with an attached, i.e., mailed fecal occult blood test consistently increased test usage by 4–19.7% points, compared to other methods of test provision. Likewise, the introduction of advance notification consistently led to a higher usage rate, with an increase of 3.3–10.8% points. Reminders showed positive but varying effects by method. With an increase of 8.5–15.8% points, letter or email reminders were more effective than reminders by phone call or text message (0.6–6.5% points). Inconsistent results were found for financial incentives ((−8.4)–20% points) and for added or changed invitation material ((−3.5)–11.8% points). With 3.5–24.7% points, the strongest increases in use were achieved by multifaceted invitation, implementing multiple components. Any invitation scheme was superior over no invitation. Advance notification, mailing of fecal occult blood test, and reminders were consistently shown to have major, complementary potential to increase participation in fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura F. Gruner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.F.G.); (E.L.A.); (T.H.); (F.G.); (T.N.); (M.H.)
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Efrat L. Amitay
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.F.G.); (E.L.A.); (T.H.); (F.G.); (T.N.); (M.H.)
| | - Thomas Heisser
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.F.G.); (E.L.A.); (T.H.); (F.G.); (T.N.); (M.H.)
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Feng Guo
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.F.G.); (E.L.A.); (T.H.); (F.G.); (T.N.); (M.H.)
| | - Tobias Niedermaier
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.F.G.); (E.L.A.); (T.H.); (F.G.); (T.N.); (M.H.)
| | - Anton Gies
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.F.G.); (E.L.A.); (T.H.); (F.G.); (T.N.); (M.H.)
| | - Hermann Brenner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.F.G.); (E.L.A.); (T.H.); (F.G.); (T.N.); (M.H.)
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-6221-421300; Fax: +49-6221-4213002
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Design of a study to implement population-based risk assessment for hereditary cancer genetic testing in primary care. Contemp Clin Trials 2020; 101:106257. [PMID: 33373667 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Identifying patients with high genetic risk for cancer has important clinical ramifications, but hereditary cancer risk is often not identified because of testing barriers at both the provider and patient level. It is unknown how to best implement appropriate genetic testing and follow-up care into an operating primary care clinic. Implementation studies to date have been conducted in high resourced facilities under optimal conditions, often not at the clinic level. This study aims to compare and evaluate two population-wide engagement strategies for identifying members of a primary care clinic's population with a family or personal history of cancer and offering high-risk individuals genetic testing for cancer susceptibility mutations. The two engagement strategies are: 1) point of care screening (POC), conducted when a patient is scheduled for an appointment and 2) direct patient engagement (DPE), where outreach provides the patient an opportunity to complete screening online on their own time. The study will identify changes, problems, and inefficiencies in clinical flow during and after the implementation of risk assessment and genomic testing for cancer risk across primary care clinics. It will also evaluate the effects of the two engagement strategies on patient, provider, and clinic leader outcomes, including perceptions of benefits, harms, and satisfaction with the engagement strategy and process of cancer risk assessment and genetic testing, across gender, racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and genetic literacy divides. Finally, the study will evaluate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of each engagement strategy.
Collapse
|
17
|
Rogers CR, Matthews P, Xu L, Boucher K, Riley C, Huntington M, Le Duc N, Okuyemi KS, Foster MJ. Interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake among African-American men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0238354. [PMID: 32936812 PMCID: PMC7494124 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND African-American men have the lowest 5-year survival rate in the U.S. for colorectal cancer (CRC) of any racial group, which may partly stem from low screening adherence. It is imperative to synthesize the literature evaluating the effectiveness of interventions on CRC screening uptake in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this systematic review and meta-analysis, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for U.S.-based interventions that: were published after 1998-January 2020; included African-American men; and evaluated CRC screening uptake explicitly. Checklist by Cochrane Collaboration and Joanna Brigg were utilized to assess risk of bias, and meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were employed to identify the most effective interventions. RESULTS Our final sample comprised 41 studies with 2 focused exclusively on African-American men. The most frequently adopted interventions were educational materials (39%), stool-based screening kits (14%), and patient navigation (11%). Most randomized controlled trials failed to provide details about the blinding of the participant recruitment method, allocation concealment method, and/or the outcome assessment. Due to high heterogeneity, meta-analysis was conducted among 17 eligible studies. Interventions utilizing stool-based kits or patient navigation were most effective at increasing CRC screening completion, with odds ratios of 9.60 (95% CI 2.89-31.82, p = 0.0002) and 2.84 (95% CI 1.23-6.49, p = 0.01). No evidence of publication bias was present for this study registered with the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019119510). CONCLUSIONS Additional research is warranted to uncover effective, affordable interventions focused on increasing CRC screening completion among African-American men. When designing and implementing future multicomponent interventions, employing 4 or fewer interventions types may reduce bias risk. Since only 5% of the interventions solely focused on African-American men, future theory-driven interventions should consider recruiting samples comprised solely of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles R. Rogers
- Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Phung Matthews
- Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Lei Xu
- Department of Health Education and Promotion, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States of America
| | - Kenneth Boucher
- Cancer Biostatistics Shared Resource, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Colin Riley
- Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Matthew Huntington
- Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Nathan Le Duc
- Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Kola S. Okuyemi
- Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Margaret J. Foster
- Medical Sciences Library, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Champion VL, Christy SM, Rakowski W, Lairson DR, Monahan PO, Gathirua-Mwangi WG, Stump TE, Biederman EB, Kettler CD, Rawl SM. An RCT to Increase Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening. Am J Prev Med 2020; 59:e69-e78. [PMID: 32690203 PMCID: PMC8867905 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adherence to breast and colorectal cancer screenings reduce mortality from these cancers, yet screening rates remain suboptimal. This 2 × 2 RCT compared 3 theory-based interventions to usual care to simultaneously increase breast and colon cancer screening in women who were nonadherent to both screenings at study entry. DESIGN RCT. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Women (n=692) who were nonadherent to both breast and colon cancer screenings and aged 51-75 years were recruited. Enrollment, intervention delivery, and data collection were completed between 2013 and 2017, and data analyzed in 2018. INTERVENTION The randomized intervention included the following 4 groups: 3 intervention arms (personally tailored messages using a web-based intervention, phone delivery by a trained navigator, or both) compared with usual care. Women at an average risk for colon cancer were allowed to select either colonoscopy or stool test as their preferred colon cancer screening. Mammography was promoted for breast cancer screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome data at 6 months included self-report and medical records for screening activity. RESULTS All intervention arms significantly increased receipt of either a mammogram or stool test compared with control (web: p<0.0249, phone: p<0.0001, web + phone: p<0.0001). When considering receipt of both mammogram and stool test, all intervention arms were significantly different from usual care (web: p<0.0249, phone: p<0.0003, web + phone: p<0.0001). In addition, women who were adherent to mammography had a 4.5 times greater odds of becoming adherent to colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS The tailored intervention simultaneously supporting both breast and colon cancer screenings significantly improved rates of obtaining one of the screenings and increased receipt of both tests. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study is registered with the clinical trials identifier NCT03279198 at www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria L Champion
- Department of Community and Health Systems, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana; Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
| | - Shannon M Christy
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - David R Lairson
- School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Patrick O Monahan
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Wambui G Gathirua-Mwangi
- Department of Community and Health Systems, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Timothy E Stump
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Psychology, Purdue School of Science, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Erika B Biederman
- Department of Community and Health Systems, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Carla D Kettler
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Susan M Rawl
- Department of Science of Nursing Care, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tsipa A, O'Connor DB, Branley-Bell D, Day F, Hall LH, Sykes-Muskett B, Wilding S, Taylor N, Conner M. Promoting colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of interventions to increase uptake. Health Psychol Rev 2020; 15:371-394. [PMID: 32401175 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1760726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a global public health concern. CRC screening is associated with significant reductions in CRC incidence and mortality, however, uptake is suboptimal. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials explored the effectiveness of interventions designed to increase screening uptake, plus the impact of various moderators. Data from 102 studies including 1.94 million participants were analysed. Results showed significant benefit of all interventions combined (OR, 1.49, 95% CI: 1.43, 1.56, p < 0.001). The effects were similar in studies using objective versus self-reported uptake measures and lower in studies judged to be at high risk of bias. Moderator analyses indicated significant effects for aspects of behaviour (effects lower for studies on non-endoscopic procedures), and intervention (effects higher for studies conducted in community settings, in healthcare systems that are not free, and that use reminders, health-professional providers, paper materials supplemented with in-person or phone contact, but avoid remote contact). Interventions that included behaviour change techniques targeting social support (unspecified or practical), instructions or demonstration of the behaviour, and that added objects to the environment produced stronger effects. The way in which findings can inform interventions to improve CRC screening uptake is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dawn Branley-Bell
- Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Fiona Day
- NHS Leeds West Clinical Commissioning Group, Leeds, UK
| | - Louise H Hall
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Sarah Wilding
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Conner
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Key KV, Adegboyega A, Bush H, Aleshire ME, Contreras OA, Hatcher J. #CRCFREE: Using Social Media to Reduce Colorectal Cancer Risk in Rural Adults. Am J Health Behav 2020; 44:353-363. [PMID: 32295683 DOI: 10.5993/ajhb.44.3.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: In this study, we pilot-tested #CRCFree, a Facebook-based intervention aimed at reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in rural Appalachian adults at risk for CRC. Methods: Participants were 56 rural Appalachian adults aged > 50 years. Daily #CRCFree Facebook posts addressed diet, physical activity, and CRC screening. Participants' sociodemographics, diet, body mass index, physical activity, and CRC screening status were measured pre- and post-intervention. The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) and the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) assessed dietary patterns. Facebook engagement was measured throughout the intervention. A post-intervention focus group evaluated intervention acceptability. Results: Participants were Caucasian, aged 58 ± 6 years, and predominantly female (66%). Post-intervention, HEI scores increased (49.9 ± 9.9 vs 58.6 ± 12.1, p = <.001), and DII scores decreased from baseline (2.8 ± 1.1 vs 1.6 ± 1.7, p = .002). There was no change in physical activity, BMI, or CRC screening status. Focus group participants found the intervention to be educational and motivating. Conclusions: These results provide preliminary evidence to support using Facebook to address CRC risk in this population. Participants were responsive to this intervention, and Facebook is a novel and accessible modality for health promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Voigts Key
- Kaitlin Voigts Key, Doctoral Candidate, University of Kentucky College of Nursing, Lexington, KY;,
| | - Adebola Adegboyega
- Adebola Adegboyega, Assistant Professor, University of Kentucky College of Nursing, Lexington, KY
| | - Heather Bush
- Heather Bush, Kate Spade & Co. Foundation Endowed Professor, Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky College of Public Health
| | - Mollie E. Aleshire
- Mollie E. Aleshire, DNP Program Director/Associate Professor, University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Nursing, Greensboro, NC
| | - Omar A. Contreras
- Omar A. Contreras, Program Director of Policy and Translational Research, Office of Community Outreach and Engagement, The University of Arizona Cancer Center
| | - Jennifer Hatcher
- Jennifer Hatcher, Professor, Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Associate Director for Community Outreach & Engagement, The University of Arizona Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nelson HD, Cantor A, Wagner J, Jungbauer R, Quiñones A, Stillman L, Kondo K. Achieving Health Equity in Preventive Services: A Systematic Review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172:258-271. [PMID: 31931527 DOI: 10.7326/m19-3199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disadvantaged populations in the United States experience disparities in the use of preventive health services. PURPOSE To examine effects of barriers that create health disparities in 10 recommended preventive services for adults, and to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce them. DATA SOURCES English-language searches of Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, and the Veterans Affairs Health Services database (1 January 1996 to 5 July 2019); reference lists. STUDY SELECTION Trials, observational studies with comparison groups, and systematic reviews of populations adversely affected by disparities that reported effects of barriers on use of any of the 10 selected preventive services or that reported the effectiveness of interventions to reduce disparities in use of a preventive service by improving intermediate or clinical outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION Dual extraction and assessment of study quality, strength of evidence, and evidence applicability. DATA SYNTHESIS No studies reported effects of provider-specific barriers on preventive service use. Eighteen studies reporting effects of patient barriers, such as insurance coverage or lack of a regular provider, on preventive service use had mixed and inconclusive findings. Studies of patient-provider interventions (n = 12), health information technologies (n = 11), and health system interventions (n = 88) indicated higher cancer screening rates with patient navigation; telephone calls, prompts, and other outreach methods; reminders involving lay health workers; patient education; risk assessment, counseling, and decision aids; screening checklists; community engagement; and provider training. Single studies showed that clinician-delivered and technology-assisted interventions improved rates of smoking cessation and weight loss, respectively. LIMITATION Insufficient or low strength of evidence and applicability for most interventions except patient navigation, telephone calls and prompts, and reminders involving lay health workers. CONCLUSION In populations adversely affected by disparities, patient navigation, telephone calls and prompts, and reminders involving lay health workers increase cancer screening. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Institutes of Health Office of Disease Prevention through an interagency agreement with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42018109263).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi D Nelson
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (H.D.N., A.C., J.W., R.J., L.S.)
| | - Amy Cantor
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (H.D.N., A.C., J.W., R.J., L.S.)
| | - Jesse Wagner
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (H.D.N., A.C., J.W., R.J., L.S.)
| | - Rebecca Jungbauer
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (H.D.N., A.C., J.W., R.J., L.S.)
| | - Ana Quiñones
- Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, Oregon (A.Q.)
| | - Lucy Stillman
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (H.D.N., A.C., J.W., R.J., L.S.)
| | - Karli Kondo
- Portland VA Health Care System and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (K.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
O'Connor EA, Vollmer WM, Petrik AF, Green BB, Coronado GD. Moderators of the effectiveness of an intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening through mailed fecal immunochemical test kits: results from a pragmatic randomized trial. Trials 2020; 21:91. [PMID: 31941527 PMCID: PMC6964086 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-4027-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates remain suboptimal, particularly in low-income and underserved populations. Mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) may overcome common barriers to screening; however, the effect of mailed FIT kits may differ across important subpopulations. The goal of the current study was to examine sociodemographic and health-related factors that moderate the effect of an intervention of automated direct mail of FIT kits at health clinics serving low-income populations. Methods This study is a secondary analysis of the Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority Populations (STOP CRC) study, a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial to increase uptake of CRC screening in patients seen at federally qualified health centers. The intervention involved tools embedded in the electronic medical records to enable participating clinics to mail FIT kits and related materials to eligible participants. We examined the rate of FIT completion by potential moderating characteristics using electronic health record data supplemented by the American Community Survey and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Geographic Variation datasets, linked via geocoding to patients’ addresses. All patients aged 50–75 seen in participating health clinics who were eligible for CRC screening were included. Results Although not always statistically significant, we saw a consistent pattern of increased FIT return rates among intervention participants compared to control participants across all subgroups studied, with incidence rate ratios (IRRs) generally ranging from 1.25 to 1.50. FIT completion in the intervention group ranged from 15 and 20% across subpopulations, typically three to six percentage points higher than the control group participants. The only moderator with a statistically significant interaction was race: persons of Asian descent showed a twofold response to the intervention (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] = 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.41 to 3.00). Conclusions Response to a mailed FIT intervention was generally consistent across a wide range of individual and neighborhood-level patient characteristics, including typically underserved patients and those in low-resource communities. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01742065. Registered on 5 December 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A O'Connor
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
| | - William M Vollmer
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Amanda F Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite, Seattle, WA, 1600, USA
| | - Gloria D Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Arnold CL, Rademaker AW, Morris JD, Ferguson LA, Wiltz G, Davis TC. Follow-up approaches to a health literacy intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in rural community clinics: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer 2019; 125:3615-3622. [PMID: 31355924 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Revised: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant disparities exist in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates among those of low socioeconomic status, with fewer years of education, lacking health insurance, or living in rural areas. METHODS A randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness of 2 follow-up approaches to a health literacy intervention to improve CRC screening: automated telephone call or personal call. Patients aged 50 to 75 years residing in 4 rural community clinics in Louisiana were given a structured interview that assessed demographic, health literacy and CRC screening barriers, knowledge, and attitudes. All were given health literacy-informed CRC education, a patient-friendly CRC screening pamphlet, simplified fecal immunochemical test (FIT) instructions, and a FIT kit, and a "teach-back" method was used to confirm understanding. Patients were randomized to 1 of 2 telephone follow-up arms. If they did not mail their FIT kit within 4 weeks, they received a reminder call and were called again at 8 weeks if the test still was not received. RESULTS A total of 620 patients were enrolled. Approximately 55% were female, 66% were African American, and 40% had limited literacy. The overall FIT completion rate was 68%: 69.2% in the automated telephone call arm and 67% in the personal call arm. Greater than one-half of the patients (range, 58%-60%) returned the FIT kit without receiving a telephone call. There was no difference noted with regard to the effectiveness of the follow-up calls; each increased the return rate by 9%. CONCLUSIONS Providing FIT kits and literacy-appropriate education at regularly scheduled clinic visits with a follow-up telephone call when needed was found to increase CRC screening among low-income, rural patients. The lower cost automated call was just as effective as the personal call.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connie L Arnold
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Alfred W Rademaker
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - James D Morris
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Laurie Anne Ferguson
- College of Nursing and Health, Loyola University New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Gary Wiltz
- Teche Action Clinic, Franklin, Louisiana
| | - Terry C Davis
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Witwer E, Baldwin LM, Cole A. Qualitative Assessment of Washington State Medicaid Health Plan Readiness to Implement Systems-Based Approaches to Colorectal Cancer Screening. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 2019; 56:46958019880743. [PMID: 31596155 PMCID: PMC6785922 DOI: 10.1177/0046958019880743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Implementation of population-based colorectal cancer screening programs by
Medicaid health plans could address colorectal cancer screening disparities. Our
objective is to identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of a
population-based colorectal cancer screening program by Washington State
Medicaid health plans. We conducted semi-structured interviews with leadership
from 2 statewide and 3 national Medicaid plans. We organized the interview
questions around the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
We analyzed interview transcripts, guided by directed content analysis, and
identified facilitators and barriers to Medicaid health plan implementation of
population-based colorectal cancer screening programs. Robust health plan (inner
setting) quality improvement infrastructures were facilitators. Lack of
statewide Medicaid policy incentives (external setting) to increase colorectal
cancer screening were barriers to potential implementation. Efforts to address
identified barriers through local and national policies and statewide data
sharing efforts may support Medicaid health plan implementation of
population-based colorectal cancer screening programs.
Collapse
|
25
|
Davis TC, Rademaker A, Morris J, Ferguson LA, Wiltz G, Arnold CL. Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening. J Rural Health 2019; 36:307-315. [PMID: 31523848 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) research using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has studied short-term screening results in predominantly urban areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 outreach strategies embedded in a health literacy intervention on repeat CRC screening in rural community clinics. METHODS A 2-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 rural clinics in Louisiana. During a regularly scheduled clinic visit, participants ages 50-75 received a FIT kit and brief educational intervention. Participants were randomized to receive an automated call or a personal call by a prevention counselor after 4 weeks and 8 weeks if FIT kits were not returned. In year 2, materials were mailed, and follow-up calls were conducted as in year 1. The primary outcome was repeat FIT-the return of the FIT kit in both years. PARTICIPANTS Of 568 eligible participants, 55% were female, 67% were African American, and 39% had low health literacy. FINDINGS Repeat FIT rates were 36.5% for those receiving the automated call and 33.6% for those receiving a personal call (P = .30). No annual FITs were returned in 30% of participants, while only 1 FIT was returned by 35% of participants (31% only year 1 and 4% only year 2). CONCLUSION Sustaining CRC screening with FIT is challenging in rural clinics. A lower cost automated call was just as effective as the personal call in promoting repeat annual screening. However, more intensive strategies are needed to improve long-term FIT screening among rural participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry C Davis
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Alfred Rademaker
- Department of Preventive Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - James Morris
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | | | - Gary Wiltz
- Teche Action Clinic, Franklin, Louisiana
| | - Connie L Arnold
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jager M, Demb J, Asghar A, Selby K, Mello EM, Heskett KM, Lieberman AJ, Geng Z, Bharti B, Singh S, Gupta S. Mailed Outreach Is Superior to Usual Care Alone for Colorectal Cancer Screening in the USA: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64:2489-2496. [PMID: 30915656 PMCID: PMC6706307 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05587-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Mailed outreach promoting colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with a stool blood test kit may increase participation, but magnitude and consistency of benefit of this intervention strategy is uncertain. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mailed outreach offering stool tests to usual care, clinic-based screening offers on CRC screening uptake in the USA. We performed a systematic literature search of five databases for RCTs of mailed outreach from January 1980 through June 2017. Primary outcome was screening completion, summarized using random-effects meta-analysis as pooled differences in proportion completing the screening and relative risk of achieving screening compared to control. Subgroup analyses by test type offered-fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT), the presence of telephone reminders, and the presence of predominant underserved/minority population within study were performed. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Seven RCTs which enrolled 12,501 subjects were included (n = 5703 assigned mailed outreach and n = 6798 usual care). Mailed outreach resulted in a 28% absolute (95% CI 25-30%; I2 = 47%) and a 2.8-fold relative (RR 2.65, 95% CI 2.03-3.45; I2 = 92%) increase in screening completion compared to usual care, with a number needed to invite estimated to be 3.6. Similar outcomes were observed across subgroups. Overall body of evidence was at moderate quality. Mailed outreach offering a gFOBT or FIT is associated with a large and consistent increase in CRC screening completion and should be considered for more widespread implementation for improving screening rates nationwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Jager
- San Diego State University, San Diego, USA
| | - Josh Demb
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA
| | - Ali Asghar
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA
| | - Kevin Selby
- Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, USA
| | | | | | | | - Zhuo Geng
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | | | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA
| | - Samir Gupta
- Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, San Diego, USA.
- Division of Gastroenterology, VA San Diego Healthcare System, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive MC 111D, San Diego, CA, 92161, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lieberman A, Gneezy A, Berry E, Miller S, Koch M, Ahn C, Balasubramanian BA, Argenbright KE, Gupta S. Financial Incentives to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Longitudinal Randomized Control Trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019; 28:1902-1908. [PMID: 31387970 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Revised: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial incentives may improve health behaviors. We tested the impact of offering financial incentives for mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) completion annually for 3 years. METHODS Patients, ages 50 to 64 years, not up-to-date with screening were randomized to receive either a mailed FIT outreach (n = 6,565), outreach plus $5 (n = 1,000), or $10 (n = 1,000) incentive for completion. Patients who completed the test were reinvited using the same incentive the following year, for 3 years. In year 4, patients who returned the kit in all preceding 3 years were reinvited without incentives. Primary outcome was FIT completion among patients offered any incentive versus outreach alone each year. Secondary outcomes were FIT completion for groups offered $5 versus outreach alone, $10 versus outreach alone, and $5 versus $10. RESULTS Year 1 FIT completion was 36.9% with incentives versus 36.2% outreach alone (P = 0.59) and was not statistically different for $10 (34.6%; P = 0.31) or $5 (39.2%; P = 0.070) versus outreach alone. Year 2 completion was 61.6% with incentives versus 60.8% outreach alone (P = 0.75) and not statistically different for $10 or $5 versus outreach alone. Year 3 completion was 79.4% with incentives versus 74.8% outreach alone (P = 0.080), and was higher for $10 (82.4%) versus outreach alone (P = 0.033), but not for $5 versus outreach alone. Completion was similar across conditions in year 4 (no incentives). CONCLUSIONS Offering small incentives did not increase FIT completion relative to standard outreach. IMPACT This was the first longitudinal study testing the impact of repeated financial incentives, and their withdrawal, on FIT completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicea Lieberman
- Rady School of Management, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Ayelet Gneezy
- Rady School of Management, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Emily Berry
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Moncrief Cancer Institute, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Stacie Miller
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Moncrief Cancer Institute, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Mark Koch
- Department of Family Medicine, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Chul Ahn
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Bijal A Balasubramanian
- Department of Epidemiology, Genetics, & Environmental Science, UT Health School of Public Health, Dallas, Texas
| | - Keith E Argenbright
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Moncrief Cancer Institute, Fort Worth, Texas.,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Samir Gupta
- San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California. .,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, and the Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zabih V, Kahane A, O'Neill NE, Ivers N, Nathan PC. Interventions to improve adherence to surveillance guidelines in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 2019; 13:713-729. [PMID: 31338733 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-019-00790-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many survivors of childhood cancer are at high risk of late effects of their cancer therapy, including cardiac toxicity and subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMN). Current North American guidelines recommend periodic surveillance for these late effects. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to estimate rates of adherence to recommended surveillance and summarize studies evaluating interventions intended to increase adherence. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for articles published between January 2000 and September 2018 that reported adherence to surveillance for cardiac toxicity and SMN (breast and colorectal cancer) and interventions implemented to improve completion of recommended testing. Risk of bias was assessed using relevant Cochrane checklists. Due to heterogeneity and overlapping study populations, we used narrative synthesis to summarize the findings. This review was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42018098878. RESULTS Thirteen studies met our inclusion criteria for assessing adherence to surveillance, while five assessed interventions to improve rates of surveillance. No studies met criteria for low risk of bias. Completion of recommended surveillance was lowest for colorectal cancer screening (11.5-30.0%) followed by cardiomyopathy (22.3-48.1%) and breast cancer (37.0-56.5%). Factors such as patient-provider communication, engagement with the health care system, and receipt of information were consistently reported to be associated with higher rates of surveillance. Of five randomized controlled trials aimed at improving surveillance, only two significantly increase completion of recommended testing-one for echocardiography and one for mammography. Both involved telephone outreach to encourage and facilitate these tests. CONCLUSION The majority of childhood cancer survivors at high risk of cardiac toxicity or SMN do not receive evidence-based surveillance. There is paucity of rigorous studies evaluating interventions to increase surveillance in this population. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Robust trials are needed to assess whether tailored interventions, designed based on unique characteristics and needs of each survivor population, could improve adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veda Zabih
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | | | | | - Noah Ivers
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Paul C Nathan
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Modica C, Lewis JH, Bay C. Colorectal Cancer: Applying the Value Transformation Framework to increase the percent of patients receiving screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers. Prev Med Rep 2019; 15:100894. [PMID: 31198660 PMCID: PMC6556543 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. and third-most common cancer in both men and women. Colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) rates remain low, particularly among vulnerable patients receiving care at federally qualified health centers. Through its Value Transformation Framework, the National Association of Community Health Centers provides a systematic approach to improving CRCS by transforming health center infrastructure, care delivery, and people systems—to improve health outcomes, patient and staff experiences, and lower costs (Quadruple Aim). Methods We combined the Value Transformation Framework, evidence-based CRCS interventions, and the Learning Community Model to drive system improvements and implement evidence-based practices. Multi-disciplinary teams at 8 health centers in Georgia and Iowa participated for 1-year with Primary Care Association support. Results Pre−/post- 1-year-intervention data showed, within health centers, raw percentage of eligible patients screened for CRC increased from 33.2% (13.5%–61.7%) in January 2017 to 46.5% (14.2%–81.5%) in December 2017, with an overall 13.3 percentage point average increase. This translates into an average increase of 3.3 (95% CI: 1.7, 5.0) eligible patients screened per month per health center over the year or 317 additional patients meeting CRCS guidelines. Specific interventions associated with higher CRCS rates included standing orders, sharing performance data, and electronic health record alerts. Conclusion Findings support a three-pronged approach for improving CRCS: The Value Transformation Framework's evidence-based recommendations, with actionable CRC interventions, offered in a learning community. These results guide methodological approaches to improving CRCS in health centers through a multi-level, multi-modality quality improvement and transformation approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Modica
- National Association of Community Health Centers, 7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1100W, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Joy H Lewis
- A.T. Still University, School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, 5850 E. Still Circle, Mesa, AZ 85206, United States of America
| | - Curt Bay
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Arizona School of Health Sciences, A.T. Still University, 5850 E. Still Circle, Mesa, AZ 85206, Mesa, AZ 85206, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Developing Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in a Latino-Based Community Health Center. J Am Board Fam Med 2019; 32:307-317. [PMID: 31068395 PMCID: PMC7254880 DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colon cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States, and screening rates are disproportionately low among Latinos. One factor thought to contribute to the low screening rate is the difficulty Latinos encounter in understanding health information, and therefore in taking appropriate health action. Therefore, we used Boot Camp Translation (BCT), a patient engagement approach, to engage Latino stakeholders (ie, patients, clinic staff) in refining the messages and format of colon cancer screening reminders for a clinic-based direct mail fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) program. METHODS Patient participants were Latino, ages 50 to 75 years, able to speak English or Spanish, and willing to participate in the in-person kickoff meeting and follow-up phone calls over a 3-month period. We held separate BCT sessions for English- and Spanish-speaking participants. As part of the in-person meetings, a bilingual colon cancer expert presented on colon health and screening messages and BCT facilitators led interactive sessions where participants reviewed materials and reminder messages in various modalities (eg, letter, text). Participants considered what information about colon cancer screening was important, the best methods to share these messages, and the timing and frequency with which these messages should be delivered to patients to encourage FIT completion. We used follow-up phone calls to iteratively refine materials developed based on key learnings from the in-person meeting. RESULTS Twenty-five adults participated in the in-person sessions (English [n = 12]; Spanish [n = 13]). Patient participants were primarily enrolled in Medicaid/uninsured (76%) and had annual household incomes less than $20,000 (67%). Key themes distilled from the sessions included increasing awareness that screening can prevent colon cancer, stressing the urgency of screening, emphasizing the motivating influence of family, and using personalized messages from the practice such as 'I' or 'we' statements in letters or automated phone call reminders delivered by humans. Participants in both sessions noted the importance of receiving an automated or live alert before a FIT kit is mailed and a reminder within 2 weeks of FIT kit mailing. DISCUSSION Using BCT, we successfully incorporated participant feedback to adapt culturally relevant health messages to promote FIT testing among Latino patients served by community clinics. Materials will be tested in the larger Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer Prevention (PROMPT) trial.
Collapse
|
31
|
Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study. J Am Board Fam Med 2019; 32:318-328. [PMID: 31068396 PMCID: PMC7331468 DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving uptake of colorectal cancer screening has the potential of saving thousands of lives. We compared the effectiveness of automated and live prompts and reminders as part of a mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach program. DESIGN AND METHODS Participants were 1767 adults aged 50 to 75 eyars who were not up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening recommendations at a participating community health center clinic. In addition to a mailed FIT kit, participants were randomized to receive (1) a text message prompt and 2 automated phone call reminders (automated condition); (2) up to 3 live call reminders (live condition); or (3) a text message prompt, 2 automated call reminders, and up to 3 live reminders (combined automated plus live condition). We assessed FIT completion rates in each group 6 months following randomization. KEY RESULTS Nearly one-third of participants completed an FIT within 6 months. Compared with adults allocated to the automated condition, FIT completion rates were higher in adults allocated to the live condition (32.3% vs 26.0%; adjusted difference, 6.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.1-11.4) and in adults allocated to the combined automated plus live condition (35.7% vs 26.0%; adjusted difference, 9.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 4.4-14.9). The number of kits needed to mail to achieve a completed FIT ranged from 2.8 in the combined automated plus live condition to 3.8 in the automated condition. CONCLUSIONS Among unscreened individuals in this population, live phone call reminders either alone or in combination with automated prompts and reminders outperformed automated approaches alone.
Collapse
|
32
|
Issaka RB, Avila P, Whitaker E, Bent S, Somsouk M. Population health interventions to improve colorectal cancer screening by fecal immunochemical tests: A systematic review. Prev Med 2019; 118:113-121. [PMID: 30367972 PMCID: PMC6322951 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2018] [Revised: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Despite clear evidence that colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces mortality, screening, including fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), is underutilized. We conducted a systematic review to determine the evidence of efficacy of interventions to improve FIT completion that could be scaled and utilized in population health management. We systematically searched publication databases for studies evaluating provider- or system-level interventions to improve CRC screening by FIT between 1 January 1996 and 13 December 2017 without language restrictions. Twenty articles describing 25 studies were included, 23 were randomized controlled trials with 1 quasi-experimental and 1 observational study. Ten studies discussed mailed FIT outreach, 4 pre-FIT patient reminders, 3 tailored patient messages, 2 post-FIT reminders, 2 paired FIT with influenza vaccinations, 2 provider alerts and 1 study each described the use of high-quality small media and patient financial incentives. Mailed FIT outreach was consistently effective with median improvement in CRC screening of 21.5% (interquartile range (IQR) 13.6%-29.0%). FIT paired with vaccinations led to a median 15.9% (IQR 15.6%-16.3%) improvement, while pre-FIT and post-FIT reminders demonstrated modest efficacy with median 4.1% (IQR 3.6%-6.7%) and 3.1% (IQR 2.9%-3.3%) improvement in CRC screening, respectively. More than half the studies were at high or unclear risk of bias; heterogeneous study designs and characteristics precluded meta-analysis. FIT-based CRC screening programs utilizing multilevel interventions (e.g. mailed FIT outreach, FIT paired with other preventative services, and provider alerts) have the potential to significantly increase screening participation. However, such programs must also follow-up patients with abnormal FIT results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel B Issaka
- Clinical Research & Public Health Sciences Divisions, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
| | - Patrick Avila
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Evans Whitaker
- University of California San Francisco Medical Library, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Stephen Bent
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Ma Somsouk
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America; Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dougherty MK, Brenner AT, Crockett SD, Gupta S, Wheeler SB, Coker-Schwimmer M, Cubillos L, Malo T, Reuland DS. Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2018; 178:1645-1658. [PMID: 30326005 PMCID: PMC6583619 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 212] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Colorectal cancer screening (CRC) is recommended by all major US medical organizations but remains underused. OBJECTIVE To identify interventions associated with increasing CRC screening rates and their effect sizes. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from January 1, 1996, to August 31, 2017. Key search terms included colorectal cancer and screening. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials of US-based interventions in clinical settings designed to improve CRC screening test completion in average-risk adults. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS At least 2 investigators independently extracted data and appraised each study's risk of bias. Where sufficient data were available, random-effects meta-analysis was used to obtain either a pooled risk ratio (RR) or risk difference (RD) for screening completion for each type of intervention. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was completion of CRC screening. Examination included interventions to increase completion of (1) initial CRC screening by any recommended modality, (2) colonoscopy after an abnormal initial screening test result, and (3) continued rounds of annual fecal blood tests (FBTs). RESULTS The main review included 73 randomized clinical trials comprising 366 766 patients at low or medium risk of bias. Interventions that were associated with increased CRC screening completion rates compared with usual care included FBT outreach (RR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.81-2.81; RD, 22%; 95% CI, 17%-27%), patient navigation (RR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.64-2.46; RD, 18%; 95% CI, 13%-23%), patient education (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.36; RD, 4%; 95% CI, 1%-6%), patient reminders (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02-1.41; RD, 3%; 95% CI, 0%-5%), clinician interventions of academic detailing (RD, 10%; 95% CI, 3%-17%), and clinician reminders (RD, 13%; 95% CI, 8%-19%). Combinations of interventions (clinician interventions or navigation added to FBT outreach) were associated with greater increases than single components (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09-1.29; RD, 7%; 95% CI, 3%-11%). Repeated mailed FBTs with navigation were associated with increased annual FBT completion (RR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.91-2.29; RD, 39%; 95% CI, 29%-49%). Patient navigation was not associated with colonoscopy completion after an initial abnormal screening test result (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.92-1.60; RD, 14%; 95% CI, 0%-29%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Fecal blood test outreach and patient navigation, particularly in the context of multicomponent interventions, were associated with increased CRC screening rates in US trials. Fecal blood test outreach should be incorporated into population-based screening programs. More research is needed on interventions to increase adherence to continued FBTs, follow-up of abnormal initial screening test results, and cost-effectiveness and other implementation barriers for more intensive interventions, such as navigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Dougherty
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Alison T Brenner
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Seth D Crockett
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Shivani Gupta
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.,Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Manny Coker-Schwimmer
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Laura Cubillos
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Teri Malo
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Daniel S Reuland
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.,Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Brenner A, Rhode J, Yang JY, Baker D, Drechsel R, Plescia M, Reuland DS, Wroth T, Wheeler S. Comparative effectiveness of mailed reminders with and without fecal immunochemical tests for Medicaid beneficiaries at a large county health department: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer 2018; 124:3346-3354. [PMID: 30004577 PMCID: PMC6446899 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2017] [Revised: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective but underused. Screening rates are lower among Medicaid beneficiaries versus other insured populations. No studies have examined mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based outreach programs for Medicaid beneficiaries. METHODS In a patient-level randomized controlled trial, a mailed CRC screening reminder plus FIT, sent from an urban health department to Medicaid beneficiaries, was compared with the same reminder without FIT. The reminder group could request FIT. Completed FIT kits were processed by the health department laboratory. Respondents were notified of normal results by mail. Abnormal results were given via phone by a patient navigator who provided counselling and assistance with follow-up care. The primary outcome was FIT return. RESULTS In all, 2144 beneficiaries at average CRC risk were identified, and there was no evidence of screening with Medicaid claims data. To the reminder+FIT group, 1071 were randomized, and 1073 were randomized to the reminder group; 307 (28.7%) in the reminder+FIT group and 347 (32.3%) in the reminder group were unreachable or ineligible (previous screening). The FIT return rate was significantly higher in the reminder+FIT group than the reminder group (21.1% vs 12.3%; difference, 8.8%; 95% confidence interval, 3.7%-13.9%; P < .01). Eighteen individuals (7.2%) who completed FIT tests had abnormal results, and 15 were eligible for follow-up colonoscopy; 66.7% (n = 10) completed follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS A health department-based, mailed FIT program targeting Medicaid beneficiaries was feasible. Including a FIT kit resulted in greater screening completion than a reminder letter alone. Further research is needed to understand the comparative cost-effectiveness of these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Brenner
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Division of General Medicine & Clinical Epidemiology, Chapel Hill, NC
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jewels Rhode
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Division of General Medicine & Clinical Epidemiology, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jeff Y Yang
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Dana Baker
- Community Care Partners of Greater Mecklenburg, Charlotte, NC
| | | | - Marcus Plescia
- Mecklenburg County Public Health Department, Charlotte, NC
| | - Daniel S Reuland
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Division of General Medicine & Clinical Epidemiology, Chapel Hill, NC
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Tom Wroth
- Community Care Network of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC
| | - Stephanie Wheeler
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Division of General Medicine & Clinical Epidemiology, Chapel Hill, NC
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Leal IM, Kao LS, Karanjawala B, Escamilla RJ, Ko TC, Millas SG. Understanding Patients' Experiences of Diagnosis and Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer in a Safety-Net Hospital System: A Qualitative Study. Dis Colon Rectum 2018. [PMID: 29521833 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Greater understanding of barriers to screening of colorectal cancer among lower socioeconomic, particularly Hispanic, patients is needed to improve disparities in care. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore patients' perceptions and experiences of care seeking for colorectal cancer to identify barriers to early diagnosis and treatment. DESIGN This explorative qualitative study was conducted as a focused ethnography of patients diagnosed with advanced-stage colorectal cancer. SETTINGS This study was conducted at an urban safety-net hospital. PARTICIPANTS Thirty lower-income, primarily minority, patients diagnosed with stage III and IV colorectal cancer without prior colorectal cancer screening were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes measured were participants' perceptions and experiences of colorectal cancer and barriers they faced in seeking diagnosis and treatment RESULTS:: Data analysis yielded 4 themes consistently influencing participants' decisions to seek diagnosis and treatment: 1) limited resources for accessing care (structural barriers, including economic, health care and health educational resources); 2) (mis)understanding of symptoms by patients; misdiagnosis of symptoms, by physicians; 3) beliefs about illness and health, such as relying on faith, or self-care when symptoms developed; and 4) reactions to illness, including maintenance of masculinity, confusing interactions with physicians, embarrassment, and fear. These 4 themes describe factors on the structural, health care system, provider and patient level, that interact to make engaging in prevention foreign among this population, thus limiting early detection and treatment of colorectal cancer. LIMITATIONS This study was limited by selection bias and the lack of generalizability. CONCLUSION Improving screening rates among lower-income populations requires addressing barriers across the multiple levels, structural, personal, health care system, that patients encounter in seeking care for colorectal cancer. Acknowledging the complex, multilevel influences impacting patient health care choices and behaviors allows for the development of culturally tailored interventions, and educational, financial, and community resources to decrease disparities in cancer screening and care and improve outcomes for these at-risk patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A473.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel M Leal
- Department of General Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Psychological, Health and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Lillian S Kao
- Department of General Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.,Center for Surgical Trials and Evidence-based Practice, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Burzeen Karanjawala
- Department of General Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard J Escamilla
- Department of General Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tien C Ko
- Department of General Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stefanos G Millas
- Department of General Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Davis MM, Freeman M, Shannon J, Coronado GD, Stange KC, Guise JM, Wheeler SB, Buckley DI. A systematic review of clinic and community intervention to increase fecal testing for colorectal cancer in rural and low-income populations in the United States - How, what and when? BMC Cancer 2018; 18:40. [PMID: 29304835 PMCID: PMC5756384 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3813-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interventions to improve fecal testing for colorectal cancer (CRC) exist, but are not yet routine practice. We conducted this systematic review to determine how implementation strategies and contextual factors influenced the uptake of interventions to increase Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT) and Fecal Occult Blood Testing (FOBT) for CRC in rural and low-income populations in the United States. METHODS We searched Medline and the Cochrane Library from January 1998 through July 2016, and Scopus and clinicaltrials.gov through March 2015, for original articles of interventions to increase fecal testing for CRC. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts, reviewed full-text articles, extracted data and performed quality assessments. A qualitative synthesis described the relationship between changes in fecal testing rates for CRC, intervention components, implementation strategies, and contextual factors. A technical expert panel of primary care professionals, health system leaders, and academicians guided this work. RESULTS Of 4218 citations initially identified, 27 unique studies reported in 29 publications met inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted in primary care (n = 20, 74.1%), community (n = 5, 18.5%), or both (n = 2, 7.4%) settings. All studies (n = 27, 100.0%) described multicomponent interventions. In clinic based studies, components that occurred most frequently among the highly effective/effective study arms were provision of kits by direct mail, use of a pre-addressed stamped envelope, client reminders, and provider ordered in-clinic distribution. Interventions were delivered by clinic staff/community members (n = 10, 37.0%), research staff (n = 6, 22.2%), both (n = 10, 37.0%), or it was unclear (n = 1, 3.7%). Over half of the studies lacked information on training or monitoring intervention fidelity (n = 15, 55.6%). CONCLUSIONS Studies to improve FIT/FOBT in rural and low-income populations utilized multicomponent interventions. The provision of kits through the mail, use of pre-addressed stamped envelopes, client reminders and in-clinic distribution appeared most frequently in the highly effective/effective clinic-based study arms. Few studies described contextual factors or implementation strategies. More robust application of guidelines to support reporting on methods to select, adapt and implement interventions can help end users determine not just which interventions work to improve CRC screening, but which interventions would work best in their setting given specific patient populations, clinical settings, and community characteristics. TRIAL REGISTRATION In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, our systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews, on April 16, 2015 (registration number CRD42015019557 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda M. Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network (ORPRN), Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code: L222, Portland, 97239 OR USA
- Department of Family Medicine & OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR USA
| | - Michele Freeman
- VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR USA
| | - Jackilen Shannon
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health and Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR USA
| | | | - Kurt C. Stange
- Center for Community Health Integration, Departments of Family Medicine & Community Health, Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, Sociology, and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - Jeanne-Marie Guise
- Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, and Emergency Medicine and the OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR USA
| | - Stephanie B. Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - David I. Buckley
- Departments of Family Medicine, Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sahin MK, Aker S, Arslan HN. Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Primary Care Setting in Turkey. J Community Health 2018; 42:101-108. [PMID: 27516067 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-016-0235-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common form of cancer in men worldwide and the second most common in women. The purpose of this study was to determine both barriers established by primary health care providers (PHCPs) and barriers perceived by them and to produce solutions for achieving the desired results. A four-part questionnaire was administered to family physicians (FPs) and family health personnels (FHPs) in Samsun, Turkey on 01-15 May, 2016. Sixty-six percent of PHCPs were contacted. Data were evaluated as numbers and percentages, and statistical significance was analyzed using the Chi square and t tests. 478 PHCPs participated; 49.4 % were FPs and 50.6 % FHPs. Of the participants, 86.6 % stated that they performed CRC screening on patients. The level of participants knowing that screening should start at age 50 and conclude at age 70 was 49.7 %. The level of subjects requesting the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) at the correct intervals was 29.7 %, but only 6.9 % recommended colonoscopy at the correct intervals. Additionally, 18.2 % of subjects knew that the test used is immunochemical FOBT, and 60.5 % reported not using reminders. PHCPs' low levels of knowledge, awareness and advice compatible with guidelines concerning CRC screening may represent an obstacle to such screening. Barriers perceived by PHCPs include patients' inability to access definite medical information, deficiencies in the reminder system and patients' lack of interest in CRC screening. Additions to the screening program will be useful in overcoming barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Kursat Sahin
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, 55138, Samsun, Turkey.
| | - Servet Aker
- Canik Community Health Center, Samsun Public Health Directorate, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Hatice Nilden Arslan
- Department of Non-Communicable Diseases, Samsun Public Health Directorate, Samsun, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Effect of Reminding Patients to Complete Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Automated and Live Approaches. J Gen Intern Med 2018; 33:72-78. [PMID: 29019046 PMCID: PMC5756165 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4184-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Revised: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 09/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends multi-component interventions, including patient reminders, to improve uptake of colorectal cancer screening. OBJECTIVE We sought to compare the effectiveness of different forms of reminders for a direct-mail fecal immunochemical test (FIT) program. DESIGN Patient-randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS 2772 adults aged 50-75, not up to date with colorectal cancer screening recommendations, with a clinic visit in the previous year at any of four participating health center clinics. INTERVENTION Participants were mailed an introductory letter and FIT. Those who did not complete their FIT within 3 weeks were randomized to receive (1) a reminder letter, (2) two automated phone calls, (3) two text messages, (4) a live phone call, (5) a reminder letter and a live phone call, (6) two automated phone calls and a live phone call, or (7) two text messages and a live phone call. Patients with a patient portal account were sent two email reminders, but were not randomized. MAIN MEASURES FIT return rates for each group, 6 months following randomization. KEY RESULTS A total of 255 (10%) participants returned their FIT within 3 weeks of the mailing. Among randomized participants (n = 2010), an additional 25.5% returned their FITs after reminders were delivered (estimated overall return rate = 32.7%). In intention-to-treat analysis, compared to the group allocated to receive a reminder letter, return rates were higher for the group assigned to receive the live phone call (OR = 1.51 [1.03-2.21]) and lower for the group assigned to receive text messages (OR = 0.66 [0.43-0.99]). Reminder effectiveness differed by language preference. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that FIT reminders that included a live call were more effective than reminders that relied solely on written communication (a text message or letter). TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov/ctc2/show/NCT01742065 .
Collapse
|
39
|
Copeland VC, Kim YJ, Eack SM. Effectiveness of Interventions for Breast Cancer Screening in African American Women: A Meta-Analysis. Health Serv Res 2017; 53 Suppl 1:3170-3188. [PMID: 29159815 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to report the results of a meta-analysis conducted on the effects of clinical trials in breast cancer screening for African American women between 1997 and 2017. DATA SOURCES Articles published in English and in the United States, between January 1997 and March 2017, were eligible for inclusion if they (1) conducted psychosocial, behavioral, or educational interventions designed to increase screening mammography rates in predominantly African American women of all ages; (2) utilized a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) design; and (3) reported quantitative screening rates following the intervention. STUDY DESIGN Randomized clinical trials on breast cancer screening in African American women, published between January 1997 and March 2017, were selected from database searches. DATA COLLECTION METHODS Data collected included effect size of screening versus comparison interventions, intervention characteristics, and a number of study characteristics to explore potential moderators. Search results yielded 327 articles, of which 14 met inclusion criteria and were included in analyses. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Findings indicated that screening interventions for African American women were significantly more likely to result in mammography than control (OR = 1.56 [95 percent CI = 1.27-1.93], p < .0001). Although no patient or study characteristics significantly moderated screening efficacy, the most effective interventions were those specifically tailored to meet the perceived risk of African American women. CONCLUSIONS Screening interventions are at least minimally effective for promoting mammography among African American women, but research in this area is limited to a small number of studies. More research is needed to enhance the efficacy of existing interventions and reduce the high morbidity and mortality rate of this underserved population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valire Carr Copeland
- School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.,Center on Race and Social Problems, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Yoo Jung Kim
- School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Shaun M Eack
- School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.,Center on Race and Social Problems, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening Using a Quality Improvement Approach in a Nurse-Managed Primary Care Clinic. J Healthc Qual 2017; 39:379-390. [PMID: 29045284 DOI: 10.1097/jhq.0000000000000107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
According to the American Cancer Society, 1 in 23 Americans will be diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) in their lifetime. Screening for CRC is an effective, yet underused preventive approach. This is especially true in rural areas, where only 35% of patients were found to be up to date on their screenings in 2014. Increasing CRC screening can produce positive patient outcomes by early recognition and removal of precancerous polyps. The purpose of this project was to use quality improvement (QI) interventions to increase CRC screening rates at a nurse-managed clinic in rural Indiana. Using Deming's Plan-Do-Study-Act QI model, multiple interventions were implemented which resulted in a 37% increase in the number of screenings ordered on eligible patients and an overall increase of 28% in the completion of the screenings. This project contributes to healthcare quality knowledge by also suggesting that the fundamental principles of encouraging staff feedback to gain buy-in, improving processes informed by patient data, and valuing frequent performance feedback to staff, strengthened this QI project and ensured adoption and sustainability of these results.
Collapse
|
41
|
Asgary R, Naderi R, Wisnivesky J. Opt-Out Patient Navigation to Improve Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Homeless Women. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2017; 26:999-1003. [DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ramin Asgary
- Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
- NYU Lutheran Family Health Center, Community Medicine Department, New York, New York
| | - Ramesh Naderi
- Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Juan Wisnivesky
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Feldman J, Davie S, Kiran T. Measuring and improving cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening rates in a multi-site urban practice in Toronto, Canada. BMJ QUALITY IMPROVEMENT REPORTS 2017; 6:u213991.w5531. [PMID: 28469908 PMCID: PMC5411724 DOI: 10.1136/bmjquality.u213991.w5531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Our Family Health Team is located in Toronto, Canada and provides care to over 35 000 patients. Like many practices in Canada, we took an opportunistic approach to cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening. We wanted to shift to a proactive, population-based approach but were unable to systematically identify patients overdue for screening or calculate baseline screening rates. Our initiative had two goals: (1) to develop a method for systematically identifying patients eligible for screening and whether they were overdue and (2) to increase screening rates for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer. Using external government data in combination with our practice's electronic medical record, we developed a process to identify patients eligible and overdue for cancer screening. After generating baseline data, we implemented an evidence-based, multifaceted intervention to improve cancer screening rates. We sent a personalized reminder letter to overdue patients, provided physicians with practice-level audit and feedback, and improved our electronic reminder function by updating charts with accurate data on the Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT). Following our initial intervention, we sought to maintain and further improve our screening rates by experimenting with alternative recall methods and collecting patient feedback. Screening rates significantly improved for all three cancers. Between March 2014 and December 2016, the cervical cancer screening rate increased from 60% to 71% (p<0.05), the breast cancer screening rate increased from 56% to 65% (p<0.05), and the overall colorectal screening rate increased from 59% to 70% (p<0.05). The increase in colorectal screening rates was largely due to an increase in FOBT screening from 18% to 25%, while colonoscopy screening remained relatively unchanged, shifting from 45% to 46%. We also found that patients living in low income neighbourhoods were less likely to be screened. Following our intervention, this equity gap narrowed modestly for breast and colorectal cancer but did not change for cervical cancer screening. Our future improvement efforts will be focused on reducing the gap in screening between patients living in low-income and high-income neighbourhoods while maintaining overall gains.
Collapse
|
43
|
Posadzki P, Mastellos N, Ryan R, Gunn LH, Felix LM, Pappas Y, Gagnon M, Julious SA, Xiang L, Oldenburg B, Car J. Automated telephone communication systems for preventive healthcare and management of long-term conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 12:CD009921. [PMID: 27960229 PMCID: PMC6463821 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009921.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Automated telephone communication systems (ATCS) can deliver voice messages and collect health-related information from patients using either their telephone's touch-tone keypad or voice recognition software. ATCS can supplement or replace telephone contact between health professionals and patients. There are four different types of ATCS: unidirectional (one-way, non-interactive voice communication), interactive voice response (IVR) systems, ATCS with additional functions such as access to an expert to request advice (ATCS Plus) and multimodal ATCS, where the calls are delivered as part of a multicomponent intervention. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of ATCS for preventing disease and managing long-term conditions on behavioural change, clinical, process, cognitive, patient-centred and adverse outcomes. SEARCH METHODS We searched 10 electronic databases (the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; Embase; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Global Health; WHOLIS; LILACS; Web of Science; and ASSIA); three grey literature sources (Dissertation Abstracts, Index to Theses, Australasian Digital Theses); and two trial registries (www.controlled-trials.com; www.clinicaltrials.gov) for papers published between 1980 and June 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised, cluster- and quasi-randomised trials, interrupted time series and controlled before-and-after studies comparing ATCS interventions, with any control or another ATCS type were eligible for inclusion. Studies in all settings, for all consumers/carers, in any preventive healthcare or long term condition management role were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods to select and extract data and to appraise eligible studies. MAIN RESULTS We included 132 trials (N = 4,669,689). Studies spanned across several clinical areas, assessing many comparisons based on evaluation of different ATCS types and variable comparison groups. Forty-one studies evaluated ATCS for delivering preventive healthcare, 84 for managing long-term conditions, and seven studies for appointment reminders. We downgraded our certainty in the evidence primarily because of the risk of bias for many outcomes. We judged the risk of bias arising from allocation processes to be low for just over half the studies and unclear for the remainder. We considered most studies to be at unclear risk of performance or detection bias due to blinding, while only 16% of studies were at low risk. We generally judged the risk of bias due to missing data and selective outcome reporting to be unclear.For preventive healthcare, ATCS (ATCS Plus, IVR, unidirectional) probably increase immunisation uptake in children (risk ratio (RR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18 to 1.32; 5 studies, N = 10,454; moderate certainty) and to a lesser extent in adolescents (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.11; 2 studies, N = 5725; moderate certainty). The effects of ATCS in adults are unclear (RR 2.18, 95% CI 0.53 to 9.02; 2 studies, N = 1743; very low certainty).For screening, multimodal ATCS increase uptake of screening for breast cancer (RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.55 to 3.04; 2 studies, N = 462; high certainty) and colorectal cancer (CRC) (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.55; 3 studies, N = 1013; high certainty) versus usual care. It may also increase osteoporosis screening. ATCS Plus interventions probably slightly increase cervical cancer screening (moderate certainty), but effects on osteoporosis screening are uncertain. IVR systems probably increase CRC screening at 6 months (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.48; 2 studies, N = 16,915; moderate certainty) but not at 9 to 12 months, with probably little or no effect of IVR (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.99, 1.11; 2 studies, 2599 participants; moderate certainty) or unidirectional ATCS on breast cancer screening.Appointment reminders delivered through IVR or unidirectional ATCS may improve attendance rates compared with no calls (low certainty). For long-term management, medication or laboratory test adherence provided the most general evidence across conditions (25 studies, data not combined). Multimodal ATCS versus usual care showed conflicting effects (positive and uncertain) on medication adherence. ATCS Plus probably slightly (versus control; moderate certainty) or probably (versus usual care; moderate certainty) improves medication adherence but may have little effect on adherence to tests (versus control). IVR probably slightly improves medication adherence versus control (moderate certainty). Compared with usual care, IVR probably improves test adherence and slightly increases medication adherence up to six months but has little or no effect at longer time points (moderate certainty). Unidirectional ATCS, compared with control, may have little effect or slightly improve medication adherence (low certainty). The evidence suggested little or no consistent effect of any ATCS type on clinical outcomes (blood pressure control, blood lipids, asthma control, therapeutic coverage) related to adherence, but only a small number of studies contributed clinical outcome data.The above results focus on areas with the most general findings across conditions. In condition-specific areas, the effects of ATCS varied, including by the type of ATCS intervention in use.Multimodal ATCS probably decrease both cancer pain and chronic pain as well as depression (moderate certainty), but other ATCS types were less effective. Depending on the type of intervention, ATCS may have small effects on outcomes for physical activity, weight management, alcohol consumption, and diabetes mellitus. ATCS have little or no effect on outcomes related to heart failure, hypertension, mental health or smoking cessation, and there is insufficient evidence to determine their effects for preventing alcohol/substance misuse or managing illicit drug addiction, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, HIV/AIDS, hypercholesterolaemia, obstructive sleep apnoea, spinal cord dysfunction or psychological stress in carers.Only four trials (3%) reported adverse events, and it was unclear whether these were related to the interventions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS ATCS interventions can change patients' health behaviours, improve clinical outcomes and increase healthcare uptake with positive effects in several important areas including immunisation, screening, appointment attendance, and adherence to medications or tests. The decision to integrate ATCS interventions in routine healthcare delivery should reflect variations in the certainty of the evidence available and the size of effects across different conditions, together with the varied nature of ATCS interventions assessed. Future research should investigate both the content of ATCS interventions and the mode of delivery; users' experiences, particularly with regard to acceptability; and clarify which ATCS types are most effective and cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Posadzki
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological UniversityCentre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS)3 Fusionopolis Link, #06‐13Nexus@one‐northSingaporeSingapore138543
| | - Nikolaos Mastellos
- Imperial College LondonGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public HealthSt Dunstans RoadLondonHammersmithUKW6 8RP
| | - Rebecca Ryan
- La Trobe UniversityCentre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public HealthBundooraVICAustralia3086
| | - Laura H Gunn
- Stetson UniversityPublic Health Program421 N Woodland BlvdDeLandFloridaUSA32723
| | - Lambert M Felix
- Edge Hill UniversityFaculty of Health and Social CareSt Helens RoadOrmskirkLancashireUKL39 4QP
| | - Yannis Pappas
- University of BedfordshireInstitute for Health ResearchPark SquareLutonBedfordUKLU1 3JU
| | - Marie‐Pierre Gagnon
- Traumatologie – Urgence – Soins IntensifsCentre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Axe Santé des populations ‐ Pratiques optimales en santé10 Rue de l'Espinay, D6‐727QuébecQCCanadaG1L 3L5
| | - Steven A Julious
- University of SheffieldMedical Statistics Group, School of Health and Related ResearchRegent Court, 30 Regent StreetSheffieldUKS1 4DA
| | - Liming Xiang
- Nanyang Technological UniversityDivision of Mathematical Sciences, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences21 Nanyang LinkSingaporeSingapore
| | - Brian Oldenburg
- University of MelbourneMelbourne School of Population and Global HealthMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Josip Car
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological UniversityCentre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS)3 Fusionopolis Link, #06‐13Nexus@one‐northSingaporeSingapore138543
- Imperial College LondonGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public HealthSt Dunstans RoadLondonHammersmithUKW6 8RP
- University of LjubljanaDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of MedicineLjubljanaSlovenia
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gupta S, Miller S, Koch M, Berry E, Anderson P, Pruitt SL, Borton E, Hughes AE, Carter E, Hernandez S, Pozos H, Halm EA, Gneezy A, Lieberman AJ, Sugg Skinner C, Argenbright K, Balasubramanian B. Financial Incentives for Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111:1630-1636. [PMID: 27481306 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2016] [Accepted: 06/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Offering financial incentives to promote or "nudge" participation in cancer screening programs, particularly among vulnerable populations who traditionally have lower rates of screening, has been suggested as a strategy to enhance screening uptake. However, effectiveness of such practices has not been established. Our aim was to determine whether offering small financial incentives would increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening completion in a low-income, uninsured population. METHODS We conducted a randomized, comparative effectiveness trial among primary care patients, aged 50-64 years, not up-to-date with CRC screening served by a large, safety net health system in Fort Worth, Texas. Patients were randomly assigned to mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach (n=6,565), outreach plus a $5 incentive (n=1,000), or outreach plus a $10 incentive (n=1,000). Outreach included reminder phone calls and navigation to promote diagnostic colonoscopy completion for patients with abnormal FIT. Primary outcome was FIT completion within 1 year, assessed using an intent-to-screen analysis. RESULTS FIT completion was 36.9% with vs. 36.2% without any financial incentive (P=0.60) and was also not statistically different for the $10 incentive (34.6%, P=0.32 vs. no incentive) or $5 incentive (39.2%, P=0.07 vs. no incentive) groups. Results did not differ substantially when stratified by age, sex, race/ethnicity, or neighborhood poverty rate. Median time to FIT return also did not differ across groups. CONCLUSIONS Financial incentives, in the amount of $5 or $10 offered in exchange for responding to mailed invitation to complete FIT, do not impact CRC screening completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Gupta
- San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, and the Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Stacie Miller
- Department of Family Medicine, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Mark Koch
- Department of Family Medicine, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Emily Berry
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Moncrief Cancer Institute, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Paula Anderson
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Sandi L Pruitt
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Eric Borton
- Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Amy E Hughes
- Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Elizabeth Carter
- Department of Family Medicine, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Sylvia Hernandez
- Department of Family Medicine, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Helen Pozos
- Department of Family Medicine, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Ethan A Halm
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ayelet Gneezy
- Rady School of Management, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Alicea J Lieberman
- Rady School of Management, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Celette Sugg Skinner
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Keith Argenbright
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Moncrief Cancer Institute, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Bijal Balasubramanian
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Genetics, & Environmental Science, University of Texas School of Public Health Dallas Regional Campus, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Peitzmeier SM, Khullar K, Potter J. Effectiveness of four outreach modalities to patients overdue for cervical cancer screening in the primary care setting: a randomized trial. Cancer Causes Control 2016; 27:1081-91. [DOI: 10.1007/s10552-016-0786-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
46
|
Davis TC, Arnold CL, Wolf MS, Bennett CL, Liu D, Rademaker A. Joint breast and colorectal cancer screenings in medically underserved women. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY AND SUPPORTIVE ONCOLOGY 2016; 13:47-54. [PMID: 26918252 DOI: 10.12788/jcso.0108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast and colon cancer screening in rural community clinics is underused. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alternative interventions designed to promote simultaneous screening for breast and colon cancer in community clinics. METHODS A 3-arm, quasi-experimental evaluation was conducted during May 2008-August 2011 in 8 federally qualified health clinics in predominately rural Louisiana. Baseline screening rates reported by the clinics was <10% for breast cancer (using mammography) and 1%-2% for colon cancer (using the fecal occult blood test [FOBT]). 744 women aged 50 years or older who were eligible for routine mammography and an FOBT were recruited. The combined screening efforts included: enhanced care; health literacy-informed education (education alone), or health literacy-informed education with nurse support (nurse support). RESULTS Postintervention screening rates for completing both tests were 28.1% with enhanced care, 23.7% with education alone, and 38.7% with nurse support. After adjusting for age, race, and literacy, patients who received nurse support were 2.21 times more likely to complete both screenings than were those who received the education alone (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-4.38; P = .023). The incremental cost per additional woman completing both screenings was $3,987 for education with nurse support over education alone, and $5,987 over enhanced care. LIMITATIONS There were differences between the 3 arms in sociodemographic characteristics, literacy, and previous screening history. Not all variables that were significantly different between arms were adjusted for, therefore adjustments for key variables (age, race, literacy) were made in statistical analyses. Other limitations related generalizability of results. CONCLUSIONS Although joint breast and colon cancer screening rates were increased substantially over existing baseline rates in all 3 arms, the completion rate for both tests was modest. Nurse support and telephone follow-up were most effective. However, it is not likely to be cost effective or affordable in clinics with limited resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry C Davis
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Balicer RD, Hoshen M, Cohen‐Stavi C, Shohat‐Spitzer S, Kay C, Bitterman H, Lieberman N, Jacobson O, Shadmi E. Sustained Reduction in Health Disparities Achieved through Targeted Quality Improvement: One-Year Follow-up on a Three-Year Intervention. Health Serv Res 2015; 50:1891-909. [PMID: 25787874 PMCID: PMC4693854 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess a quality improvement disparity reduction intervention and its sustainability. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING Electronic health records and Quality Index database of Clalit Health Services in Israel (2008-2012). STUDY DESIGN Interrupted time-series with pre-, during, and postintervention disparities measurement between 55 target clinics (serving approximately 400,000 mostly low socioeconomic, minority populations) and all other (126) clinics. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS Data on a Quality Indicator Disparity Scale (QUIDS-7) of 7 indicators, and on a 61-indicator scale (QUIDS-61). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The gap between intervention and nonintervention clinics for QUIDS-7 decreased by 66.7 percent and by 70.4 percent for QUIDS-61. Disparity reduction continued (18.2 percent) during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS Quality improvement can achieve significant reduction in disparities in a wide range of clinical domains, which can be sustained over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Moshe Hoshen
- Clalit Research InstituteChief Physician's Office in Clalit Health ServicesTel AvivIsrael
| | - Chandra Cohen‐Stavi
- Clalit Research InstituteChief Physician's Office in Clalit Health ServicesTel AvivIsrael
| | | | - Calanit Kay
- Community Health DivisionClalit Health ServicesTel AvivIsrael
| | - Haim Bitterman
- Clalit Research InstituteChief Physician's Office in Clalit Health ServicesTel AvivIsrael
- The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of MedicineTechnion Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
| | - Nicky Lieberman
- Community Health DivisionClalit Health ServicesTel AvivIsrael
| | - Orit Jacobson
- Community Health DivisionClalit Health ServicesTel AvivIsrael
| | - Efrat Shadmi
- Clalit Research InstituteChief Physician's Office in Clalit Health ServicesTel AvivIsrael
- Faculty of Social Welfare and Health SciencesUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rogers MC, Keswani RN. Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy: Can We Get Our Recommendations to Stick? Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60:2855-6. [PMID: 26088369 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3750-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda C Rogers
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 676 N St Clair, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Rajesh N Keswani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 676 N St Clair, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Fiscella K, Tobin JN, Carroll JK, He H, Ogedegbe G. Ethical oversight in quality improvement and quality improvement research: new approaches to promote a learning health care system. BMC Med Ethics 2015; 16:63. [PMID: 26383770 PMCID: PMC4574354 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0056-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2015] [Accepted: 09/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Institutional review boards (IRBs) distinguish health care quality improvement (QI) and health care quality improvement research (QIR) based primarily on the rigor of the methods used and the purported generalizability of the knowledge gained. Neither of these criteria holds up upon scrutiny. Rather, this apparently false dichotomy may foster under-protection of participants in QI projects and over-protection of participants within QIR. DISCUSSION Minimal risk projects should entail minimal oversight including waivers for informed consent for both QI and QIR projects. Minimizing the burdens of conducting QIR, while ensuring minimal safeguards for QI projects, is needed to restore this imbalance in oversight. Potentially, such ethical oversight could be provided by the integration of Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Ethical Committees, using a more integrated and streamlined approach such as a two-step process involving a screening review, followed by a review by committee trained in QIR. Standards for such ethical review and training in these standards, coupled with rapid review cycles, could facilitate an appropriate level of oversight within the context of creating and sustaining learning health care systems. We argue that QI and QIR are not reliably distinguishable. We advocate for approaches that improve protections for QI participants while minimizing over-protection for participants in QIR through reasonable ethical oversight that aligns risk to participants in both QI and QIR with the needs of a learning health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Fiscella
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.
- Family Medicine Research, 1381 South Ave, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA.
| | - Jonathan N Tobin
- Clinical Directors Network (CDN), New York, NY, USA.
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA.
- The Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational Science, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | - Hua He
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Gbenga Ogedegbe
- Department of Population Health, Center for Healthful Behavior Change, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Participant uptake of the fecal immunochemical test decreases with the two-sample regimen compared with one-sample FIT. Eur J Cancer Prev 2015; 23:516-23. [PMID: 25203483 PMCID: PMC4186737 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are recommended to screen average-risk adults for colorectal cancer (CRC). Little research has examined whether a two-sample FIT affects participant uptake, compared with a one-sample FIT. Examining participant uptake is important, as evidence suggests that a two-sample FIT may increase the sensitivity to detect CRC. OBJECTIVE This study had two objectives: (i) to evaluate FIT completion in a population that received either a one-sample FIT kit (1-FIT) or a two-sample FIT kit (2-FIT) and (ii) to understand whether uptake varies by age, sex, or receipt of prior CRC screening. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which 3081 participants who were aged between 50 and 75 years and were at an average risk for CRC, and who had requested FITs, randomly received 1-FIT (n=1540) or 2-FIT (n=1541) kits. FIT completion was defined as the completion and return of a one-sample test by the patients in the 1-FIT group or of both sample tests by those in the 2-FIT group. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine the independent effect of group type (2-FIT vs. 1-FIT) on the completion of the FIT, adjusting for age, sex, and receipt of prior CRC screening. RESULTS The 2-FIT group had lower test completion rates (hazard ratio=0.87; 95% confidence interval=0.78-0.97; P=0.01) after adjusting for age, sex, and receipt of prior CRC screening. Participant uptake did not vary by age, sex, or receipt of prior CRC screening. CONCLUSION This unique, rigorous randomized controlled trial found that the 2-FIT regimen decreases completion of FIT. Further research is needed to understand whether decreases in participant uptake are offset by increased gains in test sensitivity.
Collapse
|