Patients' Attitudes and Perceptions Regarding Social Needs Screening and Navigation: Multi-site Survey in a Large Integrated Health System

Understanding the Reasons Why Patients With Food Insecurity Decline Social Assistance at a Large Academic Medical Center

Introduction

Despite the recent expansions of clinical screening for food insecurity, research shows large discrepancies between the number of patients who report food insecurity and those who request assistance. In this qualitative study of patients with food insecurity who declined social assistance, the authors aimed to understand the patients' reasons for not seeking food-related assistance and explore their perspectives on addressing food insecurity with their healthcare provider.

Methods

At a large academic medical center in southeast Michigan, the authors conducted semistructured, in-depth interviews with 31 English-speaking adult primary care patients who had screened positive for food insecurity at a previous clinic encounter and subsequently declined assistance from a trained social worker. The interview guide explored patients' reasons for declining social assistance, perspectives on clinical screening for food insecurity and other social risk factors, and the extent to which they discussed their needs with their provider. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the constant comparative method to reveal emergent themes.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 48.2 years, and 71% were women. The most prominent reasons for patients with food insecurity not seeking social assistance were the belief that the potential resources would be redundant or not helpful and previous negative experiences with receiving food assistance. Several patients also did not remember or know that they had declined assistance. Most patients believed that healthcare providers should be knowledgeable about patients' food insecurity status to better inform care delivery. However, patients expressed discomfort, fear, or embarrassment in revealing this information and emphasized the importance of providers fostering a supportive and empathetic healthcare environment.

Conclusions

Strategies to connect patients with food assistance must target multiple levels, including improving assistance methods, increasing provider knowledge, and prioritizing patient comfort.

Patient and clinician acceptability of automated extraction of social drivers of health from clinical notes in primary care

OBJECTIVE

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based approaches for extracting Social Drivers of Health (SDoH) from clinical notes offer healthcare systems an efficient way to identify patients' social needs, yet we know little about the acceptability of this approach to patients and clinicians. We investigated patient and clinician acceptability through interviews.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We interviewed primary care patients experiencing social needs (n = 19) and clinicians (n = 14) about their acceptability of "SDoH autosuggest," an AI-based approach for extracting SDoH from clinical notes. We presented storyboards depicting the approach and asked participants to rate their acceptability and discuss their rationale.

RESULTS

Participants rated SDoH autosuggest moderately acceptable (mean = 3.9/5 patients; mean = 3.6/5 clinicians). Patients' ratings varied across domains, with substance use rated most and employment rated least acceptable. Both groups raised concern about information integrity, actionability, impact on clinical interactions and relationships, and privacy. In addition, patients raised concern about transparency, autonomy, and potential harm, whereas clinicians raised concern about usability.

DISCUSSION

Despite reporting moderate acceptability of the envisioned approach, patients and clinicians expressed multiple concerns about AI systems that extract SDoH. Participants emphasized the need for high-quality data, non-intrusive presentation methods, and clear communication strategies regarding sensitive social needs. Findings underscore the importance of engaging patients and clinicians to mitigate unintended consequences when integrating AI approaches into care.

CONCLUSION

Although AI approaches like SDoH autosuggest hold promise for efficiently identifying SDoH from clinical notes, they must also account for concerns of patients and clinicians to ensure these systems are acceptable and do not undermine trust.

Health-Related Social Needs Discussions in Primary Care Encounters in Safety-Net Clinics: A Qualitative Analysis

Importance

Health-related social needs (HRSN) influence health outcomes and health care utilization. Clinicians face challenges addressing HRSN due to limited skills, expertise, and time. Further insight is needed on how patients and clinicians navigate HRSN in clinical encounters.

Objective

This study examines outpatient primary care encounters predating widespread HRSN screening to identify how discussions on HRSN are initiated and addressed.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This qualitative analysis was conducted on transcripts of 97 audiotaped English-speaking patient encounters from 3 clinics in New York City within a municipal health care system from January 2011 through April 2015. Patients were eligible if they were older than 18 years, self-identified as Black or White, had a diagnosis of hypertension, and had at least one prior encounter with the participating clinician. Codes were developed from social needs domains addressed by the Accountable Health Communities HRSN Screening Tool. Codes were added for further social needs identified, whether a patient or clinician initiated the HRSN discussion, and how a social need was addressed, if at all. Encounters were analyzed between June 2023 and February 2024.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Characterization of the content and nature of HRSN discussions during clinical encounters within safety-net clinics.

Results

A total of 97 patients (55 [56.7%] women, 58 [59.8%] Black, mean [SD] age, 59.7 [10.6] years) had audiotaped encounters with 27 clinicians (18 [66.7%] women, 15 [55.6%] White, mean [SD] age, 36 [5.8] years). Physical activity (36% of encounters), financial strain (35%), mental health (34%), and substance use (28%) were the most discussed HRSN domains across the 97 encounters. Patients introduced financial strain most often (70% of the time), while clinicians led substance use (75%), physical activity (51%) and mental health (51%) discussions. Patients initiated conversations on employment (77%), food insecurity (62%), and housing instability (52%). Interventions included prescriptions, forms, counseling, and referrals. Domains frequently intervened on included health care navigation needs (85% of discussions), substance use (33%), and mental health (27%).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this qualitative study of HRSN discussions in primary care encounters, clinicians were more likely to initiate discussions on substance use, physical activity, and mental health, behaviors routinely assessed in primary care, but different from topics introduced by patients. Findings underscore the need for standardized screening to improve identification of domains less frequently addressed by clinicians. Additional interventions are also needed, including clinician training for how to address HRSN in resource-constrained settings and integration of other health care team members, to enhance HRSN identification and intervention.

Seeing the unseen: uncovering health-related social needs through universal screening at an academic ophthalmology practice

BACKGROUND

Health-related social needs (HRSN), or unmet conditions that are important to maintain health (such as finances and transportation), contribute to vision health disparities. The purpose of this study is to identify the unmet HRSN of ophthalmology clinic patients.

METHODS

This retrospective, cross-sectional study examined HRSN survey results from adult patients who checked in for a clinic visit at a tertiary academic eye centre from April 28, 2022, to March 31, 2023. Demographics and visual acuity were extracted from the electronic health record, and their reported HRSNs were evaluated using binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 1413 patients who completed the survey, 194 (13.7%) screened positive for at least one HRSN. The most frequently reported need was food insecurity (99/1303, 7.6%), followed by transportation (68/1340, 5.1%), housing instability (63/1305, 4.8%), financial insecurity (46/1293, 3.6%), and homelessness (10/1330, 0.8%). Patients with at least one reported HRSN were more likely to be Black compared to White (OR 4.03, 95% CI: 2.71-5.96), female compared to male (OR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.34-2.62), and younger than 65 years of age compared to 65 to 75 years (OR 2.35, 95% CI: 1.68-3.37) or older than 75 years (OR 4.62, 95% CI: 2.54-8.16). Presence of at least one HRSN was associated with visual impairment, with greater odds of best-corrected visual acuity worse than 20/40 in the group with HRSN compared to without HRSN (OR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.09-2.19).

CONCLUSION

Integrating a screening questionnaire in ophthalmology clinics can uncover unaddressed HRSN, enabling resource allocation to mitigate vision health disparities.

Participation in Clinic-Based Referral and Navigation Services Among Families With Social Needs

Importance

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are associated with health outcomes. Thus, providing referrals for unmet social needs within clinical settings may improve the health of children.

Objective

To examine the prevalence and demographic characteristics of pediatric families with unmet social needs and their association with families accepting help from a pediatric clinical practice.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study examined data from a comprehensive SDOH screening and referral program at a large academic pediatric practice in the US. Participants were caregivers of patients younger than 17 years and indicated at least 1 social need. Data were collected from April 16, 2018, through September 29, 2019, and analyzed from November 18, 2019, through December 17, 2019. The data review was finalized December 20, 2023.

Exposure

Screening for SDOH in primary care.

Main Outcome and Measures

The main outcome was interest in assistance among patient families with at least 1 social need. Factor analyses categorized social needs as basic needs, stress, challenges to economic mobility, and marginalization. χ2 Tests and multivariable Poisson regression were used to examine the associations between patient characteristics and caregiver interest in assistance.

Results

There were 758 caregivers (median [IQR] age, 34 [29-40] years; 614 mothers [81.0%]) reporting at least 1 unmet social need, such as food or utility insecurity or unemployment. The median age of children was 23 months (IQR, 4-70 months), and 163 (21.5%)were of Asian, Pacific Islander, or Native Hawaiian ; 213 (28.1%) of Black; 156 (20.6%) of Latino or Hispanic; 37 (4.9%) of White ; and 122 (16.1%) of other race and ethnicity. A total of 315 caregivers (41.6%) were not interested in assistance. Families with basic needs (adjusted prevalence ratio [PR], 5.56; 95% CI, 3.33-10.00), stress (adjusted PR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.43-2.17), challenges to economic mobility (adjusted PR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.67-2.86), or marginalization (adjusted PR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.15-1.72) were more likely to be interested in assistance. Additionally, Black race (adjusted PR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.49), other race and ethnicity (adjusted PR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.01-1.47), and inadequate social support (adjusted PR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.32-2.63) were associated with acceptance of referral services.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that the implementation of referral programs may help to achieve health equity, especially among marginalized populations, and improve the referral process for families who have social needs but are not interested in assistance.

Clinician Communication in Hospice: Constructions of Reality Throughout the End-of-Life Process

The current study examined qualitative data from hospice clinicians' perspectives on language, surrounding end-of-life (EOL), to understand challenges and opportunities for constructing a trajectory of communication leading towards a good death experience. Findings from two focus groups with nine clinicians' and 12 individual interviews, four of which were follow up interviews after the focus groups, were guided by framework analysis and revealed three themes, constructing language choices, roles and responsibilities, and socio-cultural considerations. We used the Opportunity Model for Presence during the End-of-Life Process (OMP-EOLP) to make sense of the findings and discuss implications for language use throughout the EOL process. We argue additional efforts should be made in recognizing the value of presence checks, re-constructing advance care planning, and utilizing different forms of media as an educational tool and connection mechanism for clinicians with patients and families to achieve a timely engagement of EOL conversations for all healthcare participants.

Patient-Portal Compared with Supplemental In-Office Tablet Screening for Health-Related Social Needs in Primary Care

BACKGROUND

Screening for health-related social needs (HRSN) has become more widespread but the best method of delivering the screening tool is not yet known.

OBJECTIVE

Describe HRSN screening completion rate, specifically portal-based and in-person tablet-based screening.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional retrospective observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults age 18 or older who had a non-acute primary care visit at one of three internal medicine primary care clinics at a large, urban, academic medical center between July 2022 and July 2023.

MAIN MEASURES

We identified the proportion of individuals who were screened using the HRSN questionnaire, whether screening was completed by patient-portal or tablet, as well as the degree of burden of HRSN. Using the electronic health record, we explored associations between sociodemographic characteristics and HRSN attributes.

KEY RESULTS

Our study included 24,597 patients, of whom 37% completed the HRSN questionnaire. A smaller proportion of Black/African American patients and those with Medicaid insurance completed the questionnaire, yet they comprised a greater percentage of those who screened positive for unmet HRSN (p ≤ 0.001). Most patients completed the questionnaire by patient-portal (86.1%) compared with in-office tablets (14.0%). A larger proportion of those who completed screening by tablet screened positive for HRSN. Of all patients screened, 21.8% were positive for an unmet HRSN and 11.5% had more than one unmet HRSN.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of patients are not being screened for HRSN and results illustrate disparities when screening patients for HRSN through portal-based compared with supplemental in-office tablet-based screening. Prevalence of unmet HRSN varied by demographics such as race and insurance status.

Unpacking patient perspectives on social needs screening: A mixed methods study in western Colorado primary care practices

OBJECTIVE

Explore factors influencing patient comfort with and perceived helpfulness of screening for health-related social needs.

METHODS

In a parallel secondary mixed-methods analysis of data from three primary care clinics, we used logistic regression to examine effects of practice- and patient-level factors on comfort with and perceived helpfulness of social needs screening. We applied narrative analysis to 20 patient interviews to further understand how patients' lived experiences influenced their perceptions of screening.

RESULTS

Among 511 patients, receiving an explanation about screening was associated with increased odds of comfort (OR 2.1, 95% CI [1.1-4.30]) and perceived helpfulness (OR 4.7 [2.8-7.8]). Those experiencing more needs were less likely to report comfort (3 + needs vs. 0: OR 0.2 [0.1-0.5]). Narratives elucidated how a history of stigmatizing experiences increased discomfort disclosing needs and captured how relationship quality with healthcare teams influenced perceptions of screening for patients with extensive needs.

CONCLUSION

Practice-level (screening explanation and therapeutic rapport) and patient-level factors (history and extent of needs) are key influences on comfort with and perceived helpfulness of screening.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Good communication about screening benefits all patients. Patients with extensive social needs may require additional sensitivity to their past experiences.

Barriers and facilitators to screen for and address social needs in primary care practices in Maryland: a qualitative study

Background

Social needs screening can help modify care delivery to meet patient needs and address non-medical barriers to optimal health. However, there is a need to understand how factors that exist at multiple levels of the healthcare ecosystem influence the collection of these data in primary care settings.

Methods

We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews involving healthcare providers and primary care clinic staff who represented 16 primary care practices. Interviews focused on barriers and facilitators to awareness of and assistance for patients' social needs in primary care settings in Maryland. The interviews were coded to abstract themes highlighting barriers and facilitators to conducting social needs screening. The themes were organized through an inductive approach using the socio-ecological model delineating individual-, clinic-, and system-level barriers and facilitators to identifying and addressing patients' social needs.

Results

We identified several individual barriers to awareness, including patient stigma about verbalizing social needs, provider frustration at eliciting needs they were unable to address, and provider unfamiliarity with community-based resources to address social needs. Clinic-level barriers to awareness included limited appointment times and connecting patients to appropriate community-based organizations. System-level barriers to awareness included navigating documentation challenges on the electronic health record.

Conclusions

Overcoming barriers to effective screening for social needs in primary care requires not only practice- and provider-level process change but also an alignment of community resources and advocacy of policies to redistribute community assets to address social needs.

Integration of social determinants of health information within the primary care electronic health record: a systematic review of patient perspectives and experiences

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are the non-medical factors that impact health. Although geographical measures of deprivation are used, individual measures of social risk could identify those most at risk and generate more personalised care and targeted referrals to community resources. We know SDOH are important to health care, but it is not yet known whether their collection via the electronic health record (EHR) is acceptable and useful from the patient perspective.

AIM

To synthesise relevant literature to explore patient perspectives on integrating information about SDOH into primary care EHRs, and the opportunities and challenges of its implementation in a general practice setting.

DESIGN & SETTING

Systematic review of primary care-based qualitative and mixed-method studies using thematic framework analysis.

METHOD

Key databases were searched for articles reporting patient perspectives of SDOH collection within the primary care EHR. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies written in English were included. A framework analysis was conducted to identify themes.

RESULTS

From 14 included studies, the following five main themes were identified: rationale for SDOH screening and the anticipated outcomes; impact of the provider-patient relationship on patient perceptions; data, which included privacy concerns; screening process and referral; and recommendations for future research.

CONCLUSION

Integration of information on SDOH into the EHR appears acceptable to patients. This review has added to the discussion of whether and how to implement SDOH screening and referral programmes into UK primary care systems.

Social Determinants Among Pregnant Clients With Perinatal Depression, Anxiety, Or Serious Mental Illness

To characterize co-occurring social determinants of health for clients experiencing perinatal anxiety and depression (perinatal mood and anxiety disorders) or serious mental illness (SMI) in a diverse population receiving prenatal care in a safety-net health system, we conducted a latent class analysis, using data from a social determinants screener in pregnancy for the health system's clients during 2017-20. The sample included clients with positive screens for depression or anxiety or SMI diagnoses. Prenatal clients with a positive screen for perinatal mood and anxiety disorders or SMI comprised 13-30 percent of classes, characterized by more than two co-occurring social determinants (for example, co-occurring socioeconomic and interpersonal factors). The study findings highlight the salience of social determinants among prenatal patients experiencing perinatal mood and anxiety disorder and SMI and suggest the necessity of consistent screening for both social determinants and perinatal mental health. Policies to address social determinants within and beyond health care settings are critical.

Caregiver Perceptions of Social Risk Screening in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: From the Multicenter SOCIAL-Tx Study

BACKGROUND

The social determinants of health contribute to adverse post-liver transplant outcomes. Identifying unmet social risks may enable transplant teams to improve long-term outcomes for at-risk children. However, providers may feel uncomfortable asking about household-level social risks in the posttransplant period because they might make their patients/families uncomfortable.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods analysis of caregiver participants (ie, parents/guardians of pediatric liver transplant recipients) in the Social and Contextual Impact on Children Undergoing Liver Transplantation study to assess their perceptions of provider-based social risk screening. Participants (N = 109) completed a 20-min social determinants of health questionnaire that included questions on the acceptability of being asked intimate social risk questions. A subset of participants (N = 37) engaged in an in-depth qualitative interview to share their perceptions of social risk screening.

RESULTS

Of 109 participants across 9 US transplant centers, 60% reported financial strain and 30% reported at least 1 material economic hardship (eg, food insecurity, housing instability). Overall, 65% of respondents reported it very or somewhat appropriate and 25% reported being neutral to being screened for social risks in a liver transplant setting. In qualitative analyses, participants reported trust in the providers and a clear understanding of the intention of the screening as prerequisites for liver transplant teams to perform social risk screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a small minority of caregivers found social risk screening unacceptable. Pediatric liver transplant programs should implement routine social risk screening and prioritize the patient and family voices when establishing a screening program to ensure successful implementation.

Raising patient voices in medical education: an assessment of patient perceived effect of social determinants of health conversations and the patient-physician relationship on quality of obstetric care, to inform the development of patient driven medical education curricula

Background

Conventional medical education lacks the lived experiences of patients which may authentically convey the social determinants of health (SDOH) and resulting health disparities. Videos of first-person patient narratives may prove a valuable education tool in this regard. The objective of this study is to investigate how patient demographics, satisfaction with care, and patient-physician relationships influence obstetric patient interest and willingness to contribute to a SDOH video curriculum by sharing their lived experiences through first-person narratives.

Methods

Study design included an anonymous, cross-sectional survey and an optional semi-structured telephone interview. Participants were 18 years old with a live-birth delivery <8 weeks prior to recruitment and received care during their pregnancy at Los Angeles General Medical Center (LAGMC). Variables surveyed included demographics, satisfaction with care, aspects of the patient-physician relationship, perceived utility, and personal interest in contributing to an educational SDOH video. A bivariate analysis was conducted to compare participants' characteristics and responses on interest in contributing and perceived helpfulness of first-person patient SDOH videos.

Results

72.43% of participants (N = 70) believed a patient's first-person video on SDOH would be "Helpful" in preparing physicians to provide competent medical care; however, 71.43% responded "No" to "Interest" in sharing with physicians their experiences with SDOH. English preference and being U.S. born were factors significantly associated with viewing first-person SDOH video as "Helpful" (P > 0.001). Major themes from telephone interviews reflected enthusiasm for first-person patient narratives and perceived benefits of using patient experiences to educate physicians on SDOH. However, participants cited barriers to disclosing SDOH including brief and strictly clinical interactions with physicians, lack of continuity of care, and fear of being judged by physicians.

Conclusion

While most participants recognized the utility of addressing social needs in medical education and reported satisfaction with their obstetricians and care, these factors did not uniformly translate into willingness to contribute first-person patient narratives. To improve the representation of patients from racial, ethnic, gender, linguistic, and sexual minorities into medical curricula, further research and strategies are needed to overcome the barriers discouraging patient disclosure of social needs to physicians.

Assessing the Feasibility of an Empathic Inquiry Approach to Social Needs Screening in 10 Federally Qualified Health Centers

OBJECTIVES

Despite an increasing emphasis from health care organizations on patients' social health, there is debate about how best to screen patients for social health needs in practice. Empathic Inquiry is a patient-centered approach to asking about patients' social needs that incorporates motivational interviewing and trauma-informed care techniques to increase patient experience of trustworthiness and safety with their care teams. The purpose of this brief report is to describe the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an Empathic Inquiry-informed approach to social needs screening in 10 federally qualified health centers.

METHODS

Clinical staff at community health centers implemented Empathic Inquiry as part of an 8-month learning collaborative. Patients completed surveys about their experience with Empathic Inquiry after screening conversations took place. Qualitative data on organizational implementation experience were collected monthly during 2018.

FINDINGS

Eight of 10 organizations completed the learning collaborative and implemented Empathic Inquiry in practice. Of 132 patient surveys received, patients agreed (64% strongly agree, 28% somewhat agree) that being screened for social needs strengthened their relationship with their care team and 83% strongly agreed the conversation was a good use of time. Most patients (54%) indicated social health screening was appropriate at every visit, and 27% answered once every 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The Empathic Inquiry approach to understanding patients' social needs was feasible for implementation in community settings. Patients said the conversations were worthwhile, built trust with their care teams, and should be conducted every 6 months or more frequently.

Patient Perspectives on Social Risk Screening and Documentation in a Dermatology Clinic

Importance

Providing person-centered dermatologic care includes consideration of social risk factors, such as housing instability and unreliable transportation, that may affect clinical management. Patients' perspectives on social risk screening and documentation in dermatology clinics have not yet been evaluated.

Objective

To understand patients' perspectives on social risk screening and documentation in a dermatology clinic.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This mixed-methods study used a survey and semistructured interviews and was conducted in a general dermatology clinic at a large urban public hospital. Patients at the clinic were eligible to complete the survey if they were 18 years or older; able to speak and read English, Spanish, or Cantonese; and comfortable using a computer tablet. Survey participants who preferred to use English were eligible for interviews. The survey included social risk screening questions, measures of acceptability, and questions on social risk factors associated with patient acceptability. Semistructured interviews were conducted to explore attitudes and beliefs about social risk screening and documentation. Survey and interview findings were integrated during data analysis through development of themes and joint display. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to April 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

There were 2 outcome measures of acceptability: appropriateness of screening in a dermatology clinic and comfort with documentation of social risk in the electronic health record (EHR).

Results

A total of 135 participants (including 73 males [54.1%]) answered both measures of acceptability in the survey. Of these participants, 116 (85.9%) reported that social risk screening in their dermatology clinic was very or somewhat appropriate and 85 (63.0%) reported being completely or somewhat comfortable with having their social risks documented in the EHR. Themes that were developed from surveys and interviews were the (1) role of interpersonal factors in willingness to disclose social risks, (2) implications of institutional trust for willingness to disclose and comfort with documentation, and (3) relevance of screening in a dermatology clinic.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this study showed that most participants found social risk screening to be appropriate in a dermatology clinic, although a smaller proportion of participants were comfortable with EHR documentation of their social risks. Optimizing patients' trust in their physicians and the medical system, while addressing privacy and discrimination concerns, may help facilitate disclosure of social risks.

Implementing a Social Needs Screening and Referral Program Among Veterans: Assessing Circumstances & Offering Resources for Needs (ACORN)

BACKGROUND

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system routinely screens Veterans for food insecurity, housing instability, and intimate partner violence, but does not systematically screen for other health-related social needs (HRSNs).

OBJECTIVES

To (1) develop a process for systematically identifying and addressing Veterans' HRSNs, (2) determine reported prevalence of HRSNs, and (3) assess the acceptability of HRSN screening among Veterans.

DESIGN

"Assessing Circumstances and Offering Resources for Needs" (ACORN) is a Veteran-tailored HRSN screening and referral quality improvement initiative. Veterans were screened via electronic tablet for nine HRSNs (food, housing, utilities, transportation, legal needs, social isolation, interpersonal violence, employment, and education) and provided geographically tailored resource guides for identified needs. Two-week follow-up interviews with a purposive sample of Veterans explored screening experiences.

PARTICIPANTS

Convenience sample of Veterans presenting for primary care at a VA urban women's health clinic and suburban community-based outpatient clinic (October 2019-May 2020).

MAIN MEASURES

Primary outcomes included prevalence of HRSNs, Veteran-reported acceptability of screening, and use of resources guides. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and rapid qualitative analysis.

KEY RESULTS

Of 268 Veterans screened, 50% reported one or more HRSNs. Social isolation was endorsed most frequently (29%), followed by educational needs (19%), interpersonal violence (12%), housing instability (9%), and utility concerns (7%). One in five Veterans reported at least one form of material hardship. In follow-up interviews (n = 15), Veterans found screening acceptable and felt VA should continue screening. No Veterans interviewed had contacted recommended resources at two-week follow-up, although several planned to use resource guides in the future.

CONCLUSION

In a VA HRSN screening and referral program, Veterans frequently reported HRSNs, felt screening was important, and thought VA should continue to screen for these needs. Screening for HRSNs is a critical step towards connecting patients with services, identifying gaps in service delivery, and informing future resource allocation.

Health-Related Social Needs: Which Patients Respond to Screening and Who Receives Resources?

BACKGROUND

Health systems are screening patients for health-related social needs (HRSN) but the optimal approach is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the variation in responding to an HRSN questionnaire delivered via patient portal, and whether referral to and resources provided by social workers differed by response status.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

Primary care patients with a visit between June 2020 and January 2022.

INTERVENTION

HRSN questionnaire MAIN MEASURES: We identified each patient's index visit (e.g., date of their first questionnaire response for responders or their first visit within the study period for non-responders). Through the EHR, we identified patients' demographic characteristics. We linked the area deprivation index (ADI) to each patient and grouped patients into quintiles. We used multilevel logistic regressions to identify characteristics associated with responding to the questionnaire and, for responders, reporting a need. We also determined if responder status was associated with receiving a social worker referral or receiving a resource. We included patient demographics and ADI quintile as fixed variables and practice site as a random variable.

KEY RESULTS

Our study included 386,997 patients, of which 51% completed at least one HRSN questionnaire question. Patients with Medicaid insurance (AOR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.61, 0.64) and those who lived in higher ADI neighborhoods had lower adjusted odds of responding (AOR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.78 comparing quintile 5 to quintile 1). Of responders, having Medicaid insurance (versus private) increased the adjusted odds of reporting each of the HRSN needs by two- to eightfold (p < 0.01). Patients who completed a questionnaire (versus non-responders) had similar adjusted odds of receiving a referral (AOR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.02) and receiving a resource from a SW (AOR: AOR: 1.18, 95%CI: 0.79, 1.77).

CONCLUSION

HRSN questionnaire responses may not accurately represent the needs of patients, especially when delivered solely via patient portal.

Screening for Health-Related Social Needs and Collaboration With External Partners Among US Hospitals

Importance

In recent years, hospitals and health systems have reported increasing rates of screening for patients' individual and community social needs, but few studies have explored the national landscape of screening and interventions directed at addressing health-related social needs (HRSNs) and social determinants of health (SDOH).

Objective

To evaluate the associations of hospital characteristics and area-level socioeconomic indicators to quantify the presence and intensity of hospitals' screening practices, interventions, and collaborative external partnerships that seek to measure and ameliorate patients' HRSNs and SDOH.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study used national data from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database for fiscal year 2020. General-service, acute-care, nonfederal hospitals were included in the study's final sample, representing nationally diverse hospital settings. Data were analyzed from July 2022 to February 2023.

Exposures

Organizational characteristics and area-level socioeconomic indicators.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The outcomes of interest were hospital-reported patient screening of and strategies to address 8 HRSNs and 14 external partnership types to address SDOH. Composite scores for screening practices and external partnership types were calculated, and ordinary least-square regression analyses tested associations of organizational characteristics with outcome measures.

Results

Of 2858 US hospital respondents (response rate, 67.0%), most hospitals (79.2%; 95% CI, 77.7%-80.7%) reported screening patients for at least 1 HRSN, with food insecurity or hunger needs (66.1%; 95% CI, 64.3%-67.8%) and interpersonal violence (66.4%; 95% CI, 64.7%-68.1%) being the most commonly screened social needs. Most hospitals (79.4%; 95% CI, 66.3%-69.7%) reported having strategies and programs to address patients' HRSNs; notably, most hospitals (52.8%; 95% CI, 51.0%-54.5%) had interventions for transportation barriers. Hospitals reported a mean of 4.03 (95% CI, 3.85-4.20) external partnership types to address SDOH and 5.69 (5.50-5.88) partnership types to address HRSNs, with local or state public health departments and health care practitioners outside of the health system being the most common. Hospitals with accountable care contracts (ACCs) and bundled payment programs (BPPs) reported higher screening practices (ACC: β = 1.03; SE = 0.13; BPP: β = 0.72; SE = 0.14), interventions (ACC: β = 1.45; SE = 0.12; BPP: β = 0.61; SE = 0.13), and external partnership types to address HRSNs (ACC: β = 2.07; SE = 0.23; BPP: β = 1.47; SE = 0.24) and SDOH (ACC: β = 2.64; SE = 0.20; BPP: β = 1.57; SE = 0.21). Compared with nonteaching, government-owned, and for-profit hospitals, teaching and nonprofit hospitals were also more likely to report more HRSN-directed activities. Patterns based on geographic and area-level socioeconomic indicators did not emerge.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cross-sectional study found that most US hospitals were screening patients for multiple HRSNs. Active participation in value-based care, teaching hospital status, and nonprofit status were the characteristics most consistently associated with greater overall screening activities and number of related partnership types. These results support previously posited associations about which types of hospitals were leading screening uptake and reinforce understanding of the role of hospital incentives in supporting health equity efforts.

Non-response Bias in Social Risk Factor Screening Among Adult Emergency Department Patients

Healthcare organizations increasingly use screening questionnaires to assess patients' social factors, but non-response may contribute to selection bias. This study assessed differences between respondents and those refusing participation in a social factor screening. We used a cross-sectional approach with logistic regression models to measure the association between subject characteristics and social factor screening questionnaire participation. The study subjects were patients from a mid-western state safety-net hospital's emergency department. Subjects' inclusion criteria were: (1) ≥ 18 years old, (2) spoke English or Spanish, and (3) able to complete a self-administered questionnaire. We classified subjects that consented and answered the screening questionnaire in full as respondents. All others were non-respondents. Using natural language processing, we linked all subjects' participation status to demographic characteristics, clinical data, an area-level deprivation measure, and social risk factors extracted from clinical notes. We found that nearly 6 out of every 10 subjects approached (59.9%), consented, and completed the questionnaire. Subjects with prior documentation of financial insecurity were 22% less likely to respond to the screening questionnaire (marginal effect = -22.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -41.16, -3.63; p = 0.019). No other factors were significantly associated with response. This study uniquely contributes to the growing social determinants of health literature by confirming that selection bias may exist within social factor screening practices and research studies.

Integrating community health workers within a pharmacy to address health-related social needs

BACKGROUND

Community pharmacies in the United States are beginning to serve as patient care service destinations addressing both clinical and health-related social needs (HRSN). Although there is support for integrating social determinant of health (SDoH) activities into community pharmacy practice, the literature remains sparse on optimal pharmacy roles and practice models.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of a community pharmacy HRSN screening and referral program adapted from a community health worker (CHW) model and evaluate participant perceptions and attitudes toward the program.

METHODS

This feasibility study was conducted from January 2022 to April 2022 at an independent pharmacy in Buffalo, NY. Collaborative relationships were developed with 3 community-based organizations including one experienced in implementing CHW programs. An HRSN screening and referral intervention was developed and implemented applying a CHW practice model. Pharmacy staff screened subjects for social needs and referred to an embedded CHW, who assessed and referred subjects to community resources with as-needed follow-up. Post intervention, subjects completed a survey regarding their program experience. Descriptive statistics were used to report demographics, screening form, and survey responses.

RESULTS

Eighty-six subjects completed screening and 21 (24.4%) an intervention and referral. Most participants utilized Medicaid (57%) and lived within a ZIP Code associated with the lowest estimated quartile for median household income (66%). Eighty-seven social needs were identified among the intervention subjects, with neighborhood and built environment (31%) and economic stability challenges (30%) being the most common SDoH domains. The CHW spent an average of 33 minutes per patient from initial case review through follow-up. All respondents had a positive perception of the program, and the majority agreed that community pharmacies should help patients with their social needs (70%).

CONCLUSIONS

This feasibility study demonstrated that embedding a CHW into a community pharmacy setting can successfully address HRSN and that participants have a positive perception toward these activities.

Screening Health-Related Social Needs in Hospitals: A Systematic Review of Health Care Professional and Patient Perspectives

Health outcomes are markedly influenced by health-related social needs (HRSN) such as food insecurity and housing instability. Under new Joint Commission requirements, hospitals have recently increased attention to HRSN to reduce health disparities. To evaluate prevailing attitudes and guide hospital efforts, the authors conducted a systematic review to describe patients' and health care providers' perceptions related to screening for and addressing patients' HRSN in US hospitals. Articles were identified through PubMed and by expert recommendations, and synthesized by relevance of findings and basic study characteristics. The review included 22 articles, which showed that most health care providers believed that unmet social needs impact health and that screening for HRSN should be a standard part of hospital care. Notable differences existed between perceived importance of HRSN and actual screening rates, however. Patients reported high receptiveness to screening in hospital encounters, but cautioned to avoid stigmatization and protect privacy when screening. Limited knowledge of resources available, lack of time, and lack of actual resources were the most frequently reported barriers to screening for HRSN. Hospital efforts to screen and address HRSN will likely be facilitated by stakeholders' positive perceptions, but common barriers to screening and referral will need to be addressed to effectively scale up efforts and impact health disparities.

The Social Determinants of Health and Their Impact on Dermatologic Health, Part 2: Taking Action to Address the Social Determinants of Health

The social determinants of health (SDoH) impact health and lead to health disparities in a variety of complex and intersecting ways. They are the nonmedical factors that must be addressed to improve health outcomes and achieve greater health equity. The SDoH contribute to dermatologic health disparities and decreasing these disparities requires multilevel action. Part 2 of this 2-part review offers a framework that dermatologists can use to help address the SDoH both at the point of care and in the health care system at large.

"Why Do They Want to Know?": A Qualitative Assessment of Caregiver Perspectives on Social Drivers of Health Screening in Pediatric Primary Care

OBJECTIVE

Despite strong evidence that social factors have a large influence on child health, systematic screening for social needs is not performed universally in pediatric primary care. This is due to multiple barriers, including concerns about acceptability to families. This study sought to assess family acceptability of social needs screening in pediatric primary care.

METHODS

Eight semi-structured focus groups were performed with English and Spanish-speaking caregivers of pediatric patients from a diverse academic medical center. Focus groups explored the acceptability of social domains including housing, education, finances, food access, and safety. Focus group transcripts were qualitatively analyzed to identify themes.

RESULTS

Four salient themes emerged: 1) the acceptability of social determinants of health screening questions was tied to participants' understanding of the connection between the topic and child health, 2) families preferred a warm handoff to community services, 3) families feared child protective services intervention as a result of sharing unmet social needs, and 4) positive provider rapport was an important factor in choosing to share social needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric primary care providers should feel comfortable implementing social needs screening when they can clearly explain the connection to child health. They should become knowledgeable about organizations and partners within their communities and feel empowered to connect patients to these resources.

Insights Into Patients' Perceptions of Health-Related Social Needs and the Role of the Adult Primary Care Clinic

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

While it is well established that unmet healthrelated social needs (HRSN) adversely affect health outcomes, there has been limited evaluation in adult primary care of patients' perceptions of how these needs impact their health and the role of the primary care provider (PCP). The objective of this study is to identify patients' perceptions of HRSN and how PCPs could help address them. Secondary objectives include exploring the impact of goal setting and a 1-time cash transfer (CT).

METHODS

This qualitative study used semi-structured baseline and follow-up interviews with patients in internal medicine clinics. Adult primary care patients were included if they screened positive as having 1 of 3 HRSN: financial resource strain, transportation needs, or food insecurity. All participants completed an initial interview about their HRSN and health, and were asked to set a 6-month health goal. At enrollment, participants were randomized to receive a $500 CT or a $50 participation reward. At 6-months, patients were interviewed again to investigate progress toward meeting their health goals, [when applicable] how the CT helped, and their beliefs about the role of PCPs in addressing HRSN.

RESULTS

We completed 30 initial and 25 follow-up interviews. Participants identified their HRSN, however most did not readily connect identified needs to health. Although participants were receptive to HRSN screening, they did not feel it was their PCP's responsibility to address these needs. Verbal goal-setting appeared to be a useful tool, and while the CTs were appreciated, patients often found them inadequate to address HRSN.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the importance of identifying the social conditions that shape patients' health, providers, and health systems have an opportunity to re-evaluate their role in helping patients address these barriers. Future studies could examine the effect of more frequent disbursement of CTs over time.

Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The District of Columbia (DC) has striking disparities in maternal and infant outcomes comparing Black to White women and babies. Social determinants of health (SDoH) are widely recognized as a significant contributor to these disparities in health outcomes. Screening for social risk factors and referral for appropriate services is a critical step in addressing social needs and reducing outcome disparities.

METHODS

We conducted interviews among employees (n = 18) and patients (n = 9) across three diverse, urban clinics within a healthcare system and one community-based organization involved in a five-year initiative to reduce maternal and infant disparities in DC. Interviews were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to understand current processes and organizational factors that contributed to or impeded delivery of social risk factor screening and referral for indicated needs.

RESULTS

We found that current processes for social risk factor screening and referral differed between and within clinics depending on the patient population. Key facilitators of successful screening included a supportive organizational culture and adaptability of more patient-centered screening processes. Key barriers to delivery included high patient volume and limited electronic health record capabilities to record results and track the status of internal and community referrals. Areas identified for improvement included additional social risk factor assessment training for new providers, patient-centered approaches to screening, improved tracking processes, and facilitation of connections to social services within clinical settings.

CONCLUSION

Despite proliferation of social risk factor screeners and recognition of their importance within health care settings, few studies detail implementation processes for social risk factor screening and referrals. Future studies should test implementation strategies for screening and referral services to address identified barriers to implementation.

Social Needs Assessment and Linkage to Community Health Workers in a Large Urban Hospital System

OBJECTIVES

Identifying social needs is a growing priority in primary care, but there is significant variation in how patients access services to meet such needs. This study identifies predictors of successful linkage with a community health worker (CHW) among patients with social needs seen in an outpatient setting.

METHODS

This study uses a cross-sectional analysis of social needs assessments administered in an urban health system between April 2018 and December 2019. Social needs included: food insecurity, housing quality, housing instability, healthcare cost, healthcare related transportation, utilities, care for dependents, legal assistance, safety, and getting along with household members. Patients with at least 1 social need and accepting help were included in the analysis. On contact with a CHW, patients were entered into a separate database. The primary outcome was successful "linkage," defined by having a positive social needs assessment in the medical record and a corresponding record in the CHW database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess predictors of linkage.

RESULTS

Among patients with at least 1 social need accepting help, 25% (758/3064) were linked to a CHW. Positive predictors included female gender (OR 1.28 [95% CI 1.01-1.63]), Spanish language preference compared to English (1.51 [1.14-1.03]), and having a food related need (1.35 [1.03-1.79]). Negative predictors included age 18 to 65 (0.34 [0.17-0.71] for age 18-24) and 0 to 5 (0.45 [0.24-0.78]) compared to over 65, non-Hispanic White race compared to Hispanic race (0.39 [0.18-0.84]), and having needs of getting along with household members (0.52 [0.38-0.71]) and safety (0.64 [0.42-0.98]).

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-five percent of patients who had at least 1 social need and were accepting help had a successful CHW linkage. Predictors of linkage suggest areas of further system-level improvements to screening and referral interventions to target at risk patients and communities.

Addressing Equity and Social Needs: The New Frontier of Patient Engagement Research

Patient engagement has been a focus of patient-centered care in recent years, encouraging health care organizations to increase efforts to facilitate a patient's ability to participate in health care. At the same time, a growing body of research has examined the impact that social determinants of health (SDOH) have on patient health outcomes. Additionally, health care equity is increasingly becoming a focus of many organizations as they work to ensure that all patients receive equitable care. These three domains - patient engagement, SDOH, and health care equity - can intersect in the implementation of social needs screenings among health care organizations. We present a case study on a two-phase social needs screening implementation project and describe how this process focuses on equity. As health care organizations seek to increase patient engagement, address SDOH, and improve health equity, we highlight the need to move away from a siloed approach and view these efforts as interrelated. By approaching efforts to address these challenges and barriers as the duty of all those involved in the patient care process, there may be larger strides made toward equitable health care.

Do patients want clinicians to ask about social needs and include this information in their medical record?

Background

Social needs screening in primary care may be valuable for addressing non-medical health-related factors, such as housing insecurity, that interfere with optimal medical care. Yet it is unclear if patients welcome such screening and how comfortable they are having this information included in electronic health records (EHR).

Objective

To assess patient attitudes toward inclusion of social needs information in the EHR and key correlates, such as sociodemographic status, self-rated health, and trust in health care.

Design, participants, and main measures

In a cross-sectional survey of patients attending a primary care clinic for annual or employment exams, 218/560 (38%) consented and completed a web survey or personal interview between 8/20/20-8/23/21. Patients provided social needs information using the Accountable Care Communities Screening Tool. For the primary outcome, patients were asked, “Would you be comfortable having these kinds of needs included in your health record (also known as your medical record or chart)?”

Analyses

Regression models were estimated to assess correlates of patient comfort with including social needs information in medical records.

Key results

The median age was 45, 68.8% were female, and 78% were white. Median income was $75,000 and 84% reported education beyond high school. 85% of patients reported they were very or somewhat comfortable with questions about social needs, including patients reporting social needs. Social need ranged from 5.5% (utilities) to 26.6% (housing), and nonwhite and gender-nonconforming patients reported greater need. 20% reported “some” or “complete” discomfort with social needs information included in the EHR. Adjusting for age, gender, race, education, trust, and self-rated health, each additional reported social need significantly increased discomfort with the EHR for documenting social needs.

Conclusions

People with greater social needs were more wary of having this information placed in the EHR. This is a concerning finding, since one rationale for collecting social need data is to use this information (presumably in the EHR) for addressing needs.

"It Made Me Feel like Things Are Starting to Change in Society:" A Qualitative Study to Foster Positive Patient Experiences during Phone-Based Social Needs Interventions

Many healthcare organizations are screening patients for health-related social needs (HRSN) to improve healthcare quality and outcomes. Due to both the COVID-19 pandemic and limited time during clinical visits, much of this screening is now happening by phone. To promote healing and avoid harm, it is vital to understand patient experiences and recommendations regarding these activities. We conducted a pragmatic qualitative study with patients who had participated in a HRSN intervention. We applied maximum variation sampling, completed recruitment and interviews by phone, and carried out an inductive reflexive thematic analysis. From August to November 2021 we interviewed 34 patients, developed 6 themes, and used these themes to create a framework for generating positive patient experiences during phone-based HRSN interventions. First, we found patients were likely to have initial skepticism or reservations about the intervention. Second, we identified 4 positive intervention components regarding patient experience: transparency and respect for patient autonomy; kind demeanor; genuine intention to help; and attentiveness and responsiveness to patients' situations. Finally, we found patients could be left with feelings of appreciation or hope, regardless of whether they connected with HRSN resources. Healthcare organizations can incorporate our framework into trainings for team members carrying out phone-based HRSN interventions.

Associated factors with patient-reported unmet food needs among emergency department adult patients - A social need perspective

Food insecurity is a complex problem affected by a number of factors from individual to societal. While individual-level demographic information and population-level social determinants of health (SDoH) are commonly used to identify patients at risk of food insecurity and to direct resources, a more comprehensive understanding of food insecurity requires integrating multi-level data. Our goal is to identify factors associated with food insecurity using patient, health system, and population level data. Between January 2019 and April 2020, we screened adult patients visiting an academic health sciences emergency department in Utah using a 10-item social needs screener. Patients' demographic data were linked to their screener responses. ZIP Code-level food-related SDoH such as accessibility to food providers, measured by geographic information systems methods, were assigned to patients. We then applied multilevel logistic regression modeling to identify factors associated with unmet food needs at two different levels-individual and ZIP Code. Unmet food needs were identified by asking patients if they felt there was not enough money for food in the last month, which grossly represents food insecurity. On a sample of 2,290 patients, 21.61% reported unmet food needs. Patient-reported housing, medical care, and utility needs along with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation and primary care provider utilization were highly associated with unmet food needs. Our efforts to identify the population at risk of food insecurity should be centered around patient-reported social needs. Our results suggest that addressing food insecurity in health care settings should include assessing social needs in primary care.

Engagement in a Social Needs Navigation Program and Health Care Utilization in Pediatric Primary Care

OBJECTIVE

Evidence for social needs interventions on resource linkage has grown over the past decade. Though social and economic needs predict health care utilization, few studies have assessed social needs interventions on these outcomes. The objective of this study was to examine the association between enrollment in a clinic-based social needs program on subsequent well-child visit (WCV) attendance and emergency department (ED) use in 2 primary care clinics.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients in 2 clinics referred to a social risk screening and navigation program between June and August 2018. We compared health care utilization over the subsequent 12 months for those who completed a full intake and received resource navigation (enrolled) to those referred (not enrolled). Logistic regression was used to assess the association between enrollment with WCV attendance and ED visits.

RESULTS

During the study period, of the 969 patients referred to the program, 761 were enrolled across the 2 clinics. At both sites, the majority of enrolled patients had high WCV attendance postintervention (Site A: 81.6%, Site B: 71.4%). High WCV attendance for nonenrolled but referred patients was significantly lower (Site A: 52.7%, Site B: 35.0%). Enrolled participants were significantly more likely to have high WCV attendance than nonenrolled patients, adjusting for preintervention utilization (Site A adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 5.83, Site B aOR : 4.20). There were no significant differences in ED use at either clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing families' social needs through resource linkage and navigation can improve WCV attendance.

Addressing Social Determinants of Vision Health

Social determinants of health encompass the quality of an individual’s social and physical environment and its effect on health outcomes. Disparities in these social and environmental factors have a significant role in vision health disparities and inequity in eye care. In this review, we discuss how disparities in visual impairment and eye care utilization are affected by each of the five core domains of social determinants of health, namely economic stability (income, employment, and food security), education (education level and health literacy), health care access (insurance and medical costs), neighborhood environment (housing conditions, home ownership, pollution, and crime), and social context (race and racism). Moreover, we describe a framework by which ophthalmologists can take action to address social determinants of vision health. These actionable strategies are guided by recommendations from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and have five complementary components to address social needs: awareness (screening for social needs), assistance (connecting patients with social care resources), adjustment (altering clinical care in recognition of social needs), alignment (understanding social assets and collaborating with community organizations), and advocacy (promoting policies to address social needs). Addressing social determinants of health is complex but achievable through collaborative strategies. Ophthalmologists have an important leadership role in addressing eye care disparities by taking action on underlying social determinants of vision health.

Global developments in social prescribing

Social prescribing is an approach that aims to improve health and well-being. It connects individuals to non-clinical services and supports that address social needs, such as those related to loneliness, housing instability and mental health. At the person level, social prescribing can give individuals the knowledge, skills, motivation and confidence to manage their own health and well-being. At the society level, it can facilitate greater collaboration across health, social, and community sectors to promote integrated care and move beyond the traditional biomedical model of health. While the term social prescribing was first popularised in the UK, this practice has become more prevalent and widely publicised internationally over the last decade. This paper aims to illuminate the ways social prescribing has been conceptualised and implemented across 17 countries in Europe, Asia, Australia and North America. We draw from the 'Beyond the Building Blocks' framework to describe the essential inputs for adopting social prescribing into policy and practice, related to service delivery; social determinants and household production of health; workforce; leadership and governance; financing, community organisations and societal partnerships; health technology; and information, learning and accountability. Cross-cutting lessons can inform country and regional efforts to tailor social prescribing models to best support local needs.

Patient views on emergency department screening and interventions related to housing

Objectives Emergency departments (EDs) serve as a health care "safety net" and may be uniquely suited to screening for and addressing patients' unmet social needs. We aimed to better understand patient perspectives on ED-based screening and interventions related to housing instability, as a step toward improving future efforts. Methods We present findings from a qualitative study using in-depth, one-on-one interviews with ED patients who had become homeless in the past 6 months. Qualitative interviewees were asked their thoughts on ED staff asking about and helping to address homelessness and housing issues. Interviews were professionally transcribed verbatim. Multiple coders identified interview text segments focused on ED-based housing screening and intervention, which were then independently analyzed thematically and discussed to reach consensus. Researchers also categorized each participant's overall opinion on ED housing screening and interventions as positive, neutral, or negative. Results Qualitative interviews were conducted with 31 patients. Four themes related to ED-based housing screening and interventions emerged: (1) patients generally welcome ED staff/providers asking about and assisting with their housing situation, with caveats around privacy and respect; (2) ED conversations about housing have potential benefits beyond addressing unmet housing needs; (3) patients may not consider the ED as a site to obtain help with housing; (4) patients' experiences navigating existing housing services can inform best approaches for the ED. Most participants expressed overall positive views of ED staff/providers asking patients about their housing situation. Conclusions Study participants generally felt positively about screening and interventions for housing in the ED. Insights from this study can inform future ED-based housing instability screening and interventions.

Patient perspectives of discussing social determinants of health with community pharmacists

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDOH) have a considerable impact on the lives and health outcomes of Black communities. Although the implementation of social needs screening in various clinical settings has been studied, the patient perspective of discussing SDOH with health care providers has not been thoroughly investigated. There is an opportunity for community pharmacists to help identify social risk factors and address social needs, particularly in minoritized communities.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this project were to (1) characterize the perspectives of Black patients regarding social risk discussions with community pharmacists and (2) to develop a framework for community pharmacists to engage in conversations with patients about social risk factors.

METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted using principles of grounded theory. Patient perspectives regarding discussions of 5 key determinants of health (economic stability, education, social and community context, health and health care, and neighborhood and built environment) were elicited through semistructured interviews. Data analysis included interpretation of interview transcripts from 14 Black adults living in medically underserved areas in Memphis, TN. Charmaz's approach to theory development was followed.

RESULTS

Three themes emerged to characterize the needs and expectations for patients in discussing social risk factors with community pharmacists. The themes of rationale, relationship, and resources were compiled to construct the newly developed Social Determinants of Health Patient Communication Framework. This framework describes the key factors that affected the patient receptiveness and willingness to discuss their social needs.

CONCLUSION

Although patients are open to sharing social issues with community pharmacists, they may be reluctant to discuss social factors if initial understanding, personal connection, or resources are not present. This proposed, novel framework is a step toward improving the assessment of SDOH for underserved Black patients within community pharmacies. This framework can also be used for future education of pharmacists and other health care providers.

Implementing Health Related Social Needs Screening in an Outpatient Clinic

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Health-related social needs (HRSN) screening efforts have reported high rates of identified social needs. Little is known if efforts to conduct HRSN screening in resource-constrained federally-qualified health centers (FQHC) successfully captures a representative patient population.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study extracted EMR data from 2016 to 2020 for 4731 screened patients from 7 affiliated clinics of a FQHC. Unscreened patients were pulled as a random sample from the study period. A multivariable logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic traits, chronic disease diagnoses and burden, and clinic visit type and frequency associated with being screened for HRSN.

RESULTS

BHC screened 4731 unique patients or <1% of the total clinic population. Screened patients had a median of 3.3 (±2.5) unmet HRSN. Medicaid patients had higher odds of being screened (aOR = 1.38, CI 1.19-1.61) relative to Medicare patients. The odds of being screened for social needs increased with more provider visits per year: compared to fewer than 1 visit per year, patients with 1 to 3 provider visits (aOR = 2.06, CI 1.73-2.32), 4 to 6 provider visits (aOR = 3.34, CI 2.89-3.87), and more than 6 provider visits (aOR = 5.16, CI 4.35-6.12) all had higher odds of social needs screening. Patients with a higher comorbid disease burden (>2 conditions, aOR = 2.80, CI 2.07-3.79) had higher odds of screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate an increased likelihood to screen patients who visit outpatient services more often and have a higher comorbid disease burden. To meet state-level Medicaid requirements, resource-constrained FQHCs that implement clinic wide HRSN screening may be well served to identify a priori strategies to ensure representative and equitable screening across the patient population.

Evaluation of a social determinants of health screening questionnaire and workflow pilot within an adult ambulatory clinic

BACKGROUND

There is increased recognition in clinical settings of the importance of documenting, understanding, and addressing patients' social determinants of health (SDOH) to improve health and address health inequities. This study evaluated a pilot of a standardized SDOH screening questionnaire and workflow in an ambulatory clinic within a large integrated health network in Northern California.

METHODS

The pilot screened for SDOH needs using an 11-question Epic-compatible paper questionnaire assessing eight SDOH and health behavior domains: financial resource, transportation, stress, depression, intimate partner violence, social connections, physical activity, and alcohol consumption. Eligible patients for the pilot receiving a Medicare wellness, adult annual, or new patient visits during a five-week period (February-March, 2020), and a comparison group from the same time period in 2019 were identified. Sociodemographic data (age, sex, race/ethnicity, and payment type), visit type, length of visit, and responses to SDOH questions were extracted from electronic health records, and a staff experience survey was administered. The evaluation was guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.

RESULTS

Two-hundred eighty-nine patients were eligible for SDOH screening. Responsiveness by domain ranged from 55 to 67%, except for depression. Half of patients had at least one identified social need, the most common being stress (33%), physical activity (22%), alcohol (12%), and social connections (6%). Physical activity needs were identified more in females (81% vs. 19% in males, p < .01) and at new patient/transfer visits (48% vs. 13% at Medicare wellness and 38% at adult wellness visits, p < .05). Average length of visit was 39.8 min, which was 1.7 min longer than that in 2019. Visit lengths were longer among patients 65+ (43.4 min) and patients having public insurance (43.6 min). Most staff agreed that collecting SDOH data was relevant and accepted the SDOH questionnaire and workflow but highlighted opportunities for improvement in training and connecting patients to resources.

CONCLUSION

Use of evidence-based SDOH screening questions and associated workflow was effective in gathering patient SDOH information and identifying social needs in an ambulatory setting. Future studies should use qualitative data to understand patient and staff experiences with collecting SDOH information in healthcare settings.

Primary care-based interventions to address the financial needs of patients experiencing poverty: a scoping review of the literature

BACKGROUND

It is broadly accepted that poverty is associated with poor health, and the health impact of poverty has been explored in numerous high-income country settings. There is a large and growing body of evidence of the role that primary care practitioners can play in identifying poverty as a health determinant, and in interventions to address it.

PURPOSE OF STUDY

This study maps the published peer-reviewed and grey literature on primary care setting interventions to address poverty in high-income countries in order to identify key concepts and gaps in the research. This scoping review seeks to map the tools in use to identify and address patients' economic needs; describe the key types of primary care-based interventions; and examine barriers and facilitators to successful implementation.

METHODS

Using a scoping review methodology, we searched five databases, the grey literature and the reference lists of relevant studies to identify studies on interventions to address the economic needs-related social determinants of health that occur in primary health care delivery settings, in high-income countries. Findings were synthesized narratively, and examined using thematic analysis, according to iteratively identified themes.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fourteen papers were included in the review and fell into two broad categories of description and evaluation: screening tools, and economic needs-specific interventions. Primary care-based interventions that aim to address patients' financial needs operate at all levels, from passive sociodemographic data collection upon patient registration, through referral to external services, to direct intervention in addressing patients' income needs.

CONCLUSION

Tools and processes to identify and address patients' economic social needs range from those tailored to individual health practices, or addressing one specific dimension of need, to wide-ranging protocols. Primary care-based interventions to address income needs operate at all levels, from passive sociodemographic data collection, through referral to external services, to direct intervention. Measuring success has proven challenging. The decision to undertake this work requires courage on the part of health care providers because it can be difficult, time-consuming and complex. However, it is often appreciated by patients, even when the scope of action available to health care providers is quite narrow.

Implementation of Health-Related Social Needs Screening at Michigan Health Centers: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE

Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) are leaders in screening for and addressing patient's health-related social needs but variation exists in screening practices. This variation is relatively unexplored, particularly the influences of organizational and state policies. We employed a qualitative descriptive approach to study social needs screening practices at Michigan FQHCs to characterize screening processes and identify drivers of variation in screening implementation.

METHODS

Site visits and semistructured interviews were conducted from October 2016 through March 2017, to explore implementation of social needs screening in clinical practice. Five FQHCs were selected through maximum variation sampling. Within each site, snowball sampling identified care team members highly knowledgeable about social needs screening. We conducted 4 to 5 interviews per site. Transcripts were analyzed using a thematic approach.

RESULTS

We interviewed 23 participants from 5 sites; these sites varied by geography, age distribution, and race/ethnicity. We identified 4 themes: (1) statewide initiatives and local leadership drove variation in screening practices; (2) as community health workers (CHWs) played an integral role in identifying patients' needs, their roles often shifted from that of screener to implementer; (3) social needs screening data was variably integrated into electronic health records and infrequently used for population health management; and (4) sites experienced barriers to social needs screening that limited the perceived impact and sustainability.

CONCLUSIONS

FQHCs placed value on the role of CHWs, on sustainable initiatives, and on funding to support continued social needs screening in primary care settings.

Screening for social determinants of health in community pharmacy: Identifying best practices, barriers, and strategies for success

The social determinants of health (SDOH) play a key role in patients' access to health care and medications. There exists an area of opportunity to leverage community pharmacists to make a large impact in identifying and incorporating an understanding of a patient's SDOH into their treatment plan. Community pharmacies are accessible and trusted avenues for health care interventions. With the advancement of appointment-based models as well as the increased training of support personnel, community pharmacies may be well suited for this public health task. However, there are major challenges such as paradigm shifts in workflow, reimbursement, and training that must be addressed to make this endeavor successful. This commentary explores the sparse literature related to community pharmacists conducting screening for social risk factors to identify best practices and barriers to implementation and outlines how screening for social needs aligns with the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process.

Food insecurity, participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and the degree to which patients anticipate help from clinics to find food in Los Angeles County

Healthcare clinics are uniquely positioned to screen for food insecurity and refer patients to food resources. This study examines this approach to address this social condition. A 2018 intercept survey of 1,103 adult patients recruited from across 11 clinic waiting rooms in Los Angeles County was conducted to describe the prevalence of food insecurity and whether Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation and the degree to which patients anticipated their clinics to help them locate food varied by socio-demographic factors. The prevalence of food insecurity was high for this low-income survey sample (63.4%); 72% of Spanish-speaking Latinx reported experiencing it. For those who experienced food insecurity, older age was associated with lower odds of SNAP participation. Spanish-speaking Latinx had higher odds of anticipating help from a clinic to find food relative to English-speaking Latinx (Adjusted Odds Ratio 1.88, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.18, 2.98). An exploratory analysis showed that common reasons for not enrolling in SNAP included older adults not knowing how to apply to the program and Spanish-speaking Latinx worrying about citizenship status as it relates to the eligibility process. Findings revealed disparities in the prevalence of food insecurity and SNAP participation among patients of Los Angeles' low income clinics. Information from this study can help inform low-income clinics' efforts to intervene on food insecurity in their patient population.

Association of Number of Doses With Hepatitis B Vaccine Series Completion in US Adults

IMPORTANCE

Receipt of hepatitis B virus vaccine is important to prevent infection. However, adherence to the hepatitis B vaccine series among adults at risk of infection has been low.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether recipients of a 2-dose hepatitis B vaccine with cytosine phosphoguanine adjuvant (HepB-CpG vaccine; Heplisav-B) are more likely to complete their series compared with recipients of a 3-dose vaccine with alum adjuvant (comparator vaccine; Engerix-B [HepB-alum]).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This nested cohort study was conducted from August 7 to December 31, 2018, at Kaiser Permanente Southern California, an integrated health care system with a diverse population of approximately 4.6 million members. Adults not receiving dialysis who received a first dose of a hepatitis B vaccine series in family practice or internal medicine departments of 15 Kaiser Permanente Southern California medical centers were followed up through electronic health records for up to 1 year after receipt of the first dose. Data were analyzed from March 16 to September 23, 2020.

EXPOSURES

Receipt of a first dose of the HepB-CpG vaccine (2-dose vaccine) vs receipt of a first dose of the HepB-alum vaccine (3-dose vaccine).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Series completion within the recommended vaccine schedule plus 3 months (primary outcome) and series completion within 1 year after receipt of the first dose (secondary outcome).

RESULTS

Of 4727 individuals who initiated the HepB-CpG vaccine series and 6161 individuals who initiated the HepB-alum vaccine series included in the study, 2876 (60.8%) and 3789 (61.5%), respectively, were ages 40 to 59 years, 2415 (51.1%) and 3113 (50.5%) were male, and 2364 (50.0%) and 2881 (46.8%) were Hispanic. The vaccine series was completed within the recommended schedule plus 3 months for 2111 (44.7%) individuals who initiated the HepB-CpG vaccine series and 1607 (26.1%) individuals who initiated the HepB-alum vaccine series, and within 1 year for 2858 (60.5%) and 1989 (32.3%) individuals, respectively. The individuals who initiated the HepB-CpG vaccine series were significantly more likely to complete the series (adjusted relative risk, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.68-1.87). Results were consistent across clinical and demographic strata.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, use of the HepB-CpG vaccine was associated with hepatitis B vaccine series completion, but tailored strategies to increase completion of hepatitis B vaccine series are warranted.

Assessment of Social Risk Factors and Interest in Receiving Health Care-Based Social Assistance Among Adult Patients and Adult Caregivers of Pediatric Patients

IMPORTANCE

Health care organizations are increasingly incorporating social risk screening into patient care. Studies have reported wide variations in patients' interest in receiving health care-based assistance for identified social risks. However, no study to date has examined the factors associated with patients' interest in receiving assistance, including whether interest in receiving assistance varies based on specific patient demographic characteristics. Targeted research on this topic could improve the success of health care-based programs that offer social care services.

OBJECTIVE

To identify participant characteristics associated with interest in receiving health care-based social risk assistance.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study was conducted in 7 primary care clinics and 4 emergency departments in 9 US states between July 2, 2018, and February 13, 2019. A convenience sample of adult patients and adult caregivers of pediatric patients completed a screening survey that measured social risk factors and participants' interest in receiving assistance for identified social risks. Participants were randomly selected to receive 1 of 2 versions of the survey, which differed based on the order in which questions about social risks and interest in receiving assistance were presented. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the associations between covariates and participants' interest in receiving assistance, stratified by social risk screening results. Data were analyzed from September 8, 2019, to July 30, 2020.

EXPOSURES

Social risk screening questions assessed risk factors comprising housing, food, transportation, utilities, and exposure to interpersonal violence. Additional questions assessed participants' interest in receiving assistance and their perspectives on health care-based social risk screening.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Participant interest in receiving health care-based social risk assistance.

RESULTS

A total of 1021 adult participants with complete survey responses were included in the analysis. Of those, 709 of 1004 participants (70.6%) were female, and 544 of 1007 participants (54.0%) were aged 18 to 44 years. Overall, 353 of 662 participants (53.3%) with positive screening results for 1 or more social risk factors were interested in receiving assistance, whereas 31 of 359 participants (8.6%) with negative screening results for all social risks were interested in receiving assistance. Participants with positive screening results for 1 or more social risk factors had a higher likelihood of being interested in receiving assistance if they answered the question about interest in receiving assistance before they answered the questions about social risk factors (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.05-2.07), had positive screening results for a higher number of social risk factors (aOR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.68-3.42), reported lower household income levels (aOR, 7.78; 95% CI, 2.96-20.44), or self-identified as having non-Hispanic Black ancestry (aOR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.37-3.60). Among those with negative screening results for all social risk factors, the interest in receiving assistance was higher if the participants reported lower household income levels (aOR, 12.38; 95% CI, 2.94-52.15), previous exposure to health care-based social risk screening (aOR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.47-3.74), higher perceived appropriateness of social risk screening (aOR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.08-12.55), or worse health status (aOR, 4.22; 95% CI, 1.09-16.31).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, multiple factors were associated with participants' interest in receiving social risk assistance. These findings may have implications for how and when social risk assistance is offered to patients. As the health care system's role in addressing social risk factors evolves, an understanding of patients' perspectives regarding screening and their interest in receiving assistance may be important to implementing patient-centered interventions.

Comparing the performance of two social risk screening tools in a vulnerable subpopulation

Background

Research shows the profound impact of social factors on health, lead many healths systems to incorporate social risk screening. To help healthcare systems select among various screening tools we compared two tools, the Your Current Life Situation (YCLS) and the Accountable Health Communities (AHC) Screening tools, on key psychometric properties.

Method

Kaiser Permanente Southern California subsidized exchange members (n = 1008) were randomly invited to complete a survey containing either the YCLS or the AHC tool, as well as other measures related to care experience and health. Healthcare use was measured through the electronic health record. Agreement between the AHC and YCLS was assessed using adjusted kappas for six domains (food - worry, food - pay, insecure housing, housing quality, transportation, utilities). To assess predictive validity, items on the AHC and YCLS were compared to self-rated health and receipt of a flu shot.

Results

Responders (n = 450) and non-responders (n = 558) significantly differed on sex, language, and depression (P < 0.05) but not anxiety, race/ethnicity, or healthcare use. Agreement between the AHC and YCLS tools was substantial on all items (kappas > 0.60) except for housing quality (kappa 0.52). Four out of six screening questions on the AHC tool and four out of seven on the YCLS tool were associated with self-rated health (P < 0.03). No social needs were associated with flu shot receipt except utilities on the AHC tool (P = 0.028).

Conclusion

In this sample, the AHC and YCLS tools are similar in their ability to screen for social risks. Differences observed likely stem from the timeframe and wording of the questions, which can be used to guide selection in healthcare systems.