1
|
Welfordsson P, Danielsson AK, Björck C, Grzymala-Lubanski B, Hambraeus K, Lidin M, Haugen Löfman I, Scheffel Birath C, Nilsson O, Braunschweig F, Wallhed Finn S. Feasibility of alcohol interventions in cardiology: a qualitative study of clinician perspectives in Sweden. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2024; 23:668-674. [PMID: 38445448 DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvae033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
AIMS This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing alcohol screening and brief interventions (SBI) in cardiology services. METHODS AND RESULTS This was a qualitative study. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 clinical cardiology staff (doctors, nurses, and assistant nurses) of varying experience levels and from various clinical settings (high-dependency unit, ward, and outpatient clinic), in three regions of Sweden. Reflexive thematic analysis was used, with deductive coding applying the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation (COM-B) theoretical framework. A total of 41 barriers and facilitators were identified, including 12 related to capability, 9 to opportunity, and 20 to motivation. Four themes were developed: (i) uncharted territory, where clinicians expressed a need to address alcohol use but lacked knowledge and a roadmap for implementing SBI; (ii) cardiology as a cardiovascular specialty, where tasks were prioritized according to established roles; (iii) alcohol stigma, where alcohol was reported to be a sensitive topic that staff avoid discussing with patients; and (iv) window of opportunity, where staff expressed potential for implementing SBI in routine cardiology care. CONCLUSION Findings suggest that opportunities exist for early identification and follow-up of hazardous alcohol use within routine cardiology care. Several barriers, including low knowledge, stigma, a lack of ownership, and a greater focus on other risk factors, must be addressed prior to the implementation of SBI in cardiology. To meet current clinical guidelines, there is a need to increase awareness and to improve pathways to addiction care. In addition, there may be a need for clinicians dedicated to alcohol interventions within cardiology services. REGISTRATION OSF (osf.io/hx3ts).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Welfordsson
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, 113 65 Solna, Sweden
| | | | - Caroline Björck
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala University, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden
- Centre for Research and Development, Region Gävleborg, 801 88 Gävle, Sweden
- Department of Caring Sciences, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden
| | - Bartosz Grzymala-Lubanski
- Centre for Research and Development, Region Gävleborg, 801 88 Gävle, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 907 37 Umeå, Sweden
- Department of Cardiology, Gävle Hospital, 801 88 Gävle, Sweden
| | | | - Matthias Lidin
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Center, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ida Haugen Löfman
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Center, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, 141 52 Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Olga Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Frieder Braunschweig
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Center, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, 141 52 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sara Wallhed Finn
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, 113 65 Solna, Sweden
- Centre for Dependency Disorders, 11435 Stockholm, Sweden
- Unit of Clinical Alcohol Research, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Incze MA, Huebler S, Szczotka K, Grant S, Kertesz SG, Gordon AJ. Expert Panel Consensus on the Effectiveness and Implementation of Models to Support Posthospitalization Care Transitions for People With Substance Use Disorders. J Addict Med 2024:01271255-990000000-00371. [PMID: 39221815 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hospitals are increasingly offering treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs) during medical admissions. However, there is a lack of consensus on the best approach to facilitating a successful transition to long-term medical and SUD care after hospitalization. We aimed to establish a hierarchy of existing SUD care transition models in 2 categories-effectiveness and implementation-using an expert consensus approach. METHODS We conducted a modified online Delphi study that convened 25 interdisciplinary clinicians with experience facilitating posthospitalization care transitions for patients with SUD. Panelists rated 10 prespecified posthospitalization care transition models according to 6 criteria concerning each model's anticipated effectiveness (eg, linkage to care, treatment retention) and implementation (eg, feasibility, acceptability). Ratings were made on a 9-point bidirectional scale. Group consensus was determined using the interpercentile range adjusted for symmetry. RESULTS After 3 rounds of the Delphi process (96% retention across all 3 rounds), consensus was reached on all 60 rating criteria. Interdisciplinary addiction consult teams (ACTs) and in-reach from partnering outpatient clinics were rated highest for effectiveness. Interdisciplinary ACTs and bridge clinics were rated highest for implementation. Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment; protocol implementation; and postdischarge outreach received the lowest ratings overall. Feasibility of implementation was perceived as the largest challenge for all highly rated models. CONCLUSIONS An expert consensus approach including diverse clinician stakeholders found that interdisciplinary ACT, in-reach from partnering outpatient clinics, and bridge clinics had the greatest potential to enhance posthospitalization care transitions for patients with SUD when considering both perceived effectiveness and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Incze
- From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT (MAI); Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA); Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT (MAI, SH, KS, AJG); Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT (SH, KS, AJG); University of Oregon, Eugene, OR (SG); and Birmingham Alabama Veterans Affairs Health Care System and University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL (SGK)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
McNeely J, Wang SS, Rostam Abadi Y, Barron C, Billings J, Tarpey T, Fernando J, Appleton N, Fawole A, Mazumdar M, Weinstein ZM, Kalyanaraman Marcello R, Dolle J, Cooke C, Siddiqui S, King C. Addiction Consultation Services for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Initiation and Engagement: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184:1106-1115. [PMID: 39073796 PMCID: PMC11287446 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.3422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
Importance Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are highly effective, but only 22% of individuals in the US with opioid use disorder receive them. Hospitalization potentially provides an opportunity to initiate MOUD and link patients to ongoing treatment. Objective To study the effectiveness of interprofessional hospital addiction consultation services in increasing MOUD treatment initiation and engagement. Design, Setting, and Participants This pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized implementation and effectiveness (hybrid type 1) trial was conducted in 6 public hospitals in New York, New York, and included 2315 adults with hospitalizations identified in Medicaid claims data between October 2017 and January 2021. Data analysis was conducted in December 2023. Hospitals were randomized to an intervention start date, and outcomes were compared during treatment as usual (TAU) and intervention conditions. Bayesian analysis accounted for the clustering of patients within hospitals and open cohort nature of the study. The addiction consultation service intervention was compared with TAU using posterior probabilities of model parameters from hierarchical logistic regression models that were adjusted for age, sex, and study period. Eligible participants had an admission or discharge diagnosis of opioid use disorder or opioid poisoning/adverse effects, were hospitalized at least 1 night in a medical/surgical inpatient unit, and were not receiving MOUD before hospitalization. Interventions Hospitals implemented an addiction consultation service that provided inpatient specialty care for substance use disorders. Consultation teams comprised a medical clinician, social worker or addiction counselor, and peer counselor. Main Outcomes and Measures The dual primary outcomes were (1) MOUD treatment initiation during the first 14 days after hospital discharge and (2) MOUD engagement for the 30 days following initiation. Results Of 2315 adults, 628 (27.1%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 47.0 (12.4) years. Initiation of MOUD was 11.0% in the Consult for Addiction Treatment and Care in Hospitals (CATCH) program vs 6.7% in TAU, engagement was 7.4% vs 5.3%, respectively, and continuation for 6 months was 3.2% vs 2.4%. Patients hospitalized during CATCH had 7.96 times higher odds of initiating MOUD (log-odds ratio, 2.07; 95% credible interval, 0.51-4.00) and 6.90 times higher odds of MOUD engagement (log-odds ratio, 1.93; 95% credible interval, 0.09-4.18). Conclusions This randomized clinical trial found that interprofessional addiction consultation services significantly increased postdischarge MOUD initiation and engagement among patients with opioid use disorder. However, the observed rates of MOUD initiation and engagement were still low; further efforts are still needed to improve hospital-based and community-based services for MOUD treatment. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03611335.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer McNeely
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Scarlett S. Wang
- New York University Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York
| | - Yasna Rostam Abadi
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Charles Barron
- Office of Behavioral Health, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, New York
| | - John Billings
- New York University Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York
| | - Thaddeus Tarpey
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Jasmine Fernando
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Noa Appleton
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Adetayo Fawole
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Medha Mazumdar
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Zoe M. Weinstein
- Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedesian School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Johanna Dolle
- Office of Population Health, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, New York
| | - Caroline Cooke
- Office of Population Health, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, New York
| | - Samira Siddiqui
- Office of Behavioral Health, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, New York
| | - Carla King
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
- Office of Behavioral Health, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Englander H. Opioid Use Disorder Medications After Hospitalization-Rethinking Engagement in Care. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184:1115-1116. [PMID: 39073833 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.3436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Honora Englander
- Section of Addiction Medicine in General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
- Service Universitaire d'Addictologie de Lyon, CH Le Vinatier, Bron, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kast KA, Le TDV, Stewart LS, Wiese AD, Reddy IA, Smith J, Marcovitz DE, Reese TJ. Impact of inpatient addiction psychiatry consultation on opioid use disorder outcomes. Am J Addict 2024; 33:543-550. [PMID: 38546154 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.13540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Addiction consultation services provide access to specialty addiction care during general hospital admission. This study assessed opioid use disorder (OUD) outcomes associated with addiction consultation. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of individuals with OUD admitted to an academic medical center between 2018 and 2023. The exposure was addiction consultation. Outcomes included initiating medication for OUD (MOUD), hospital length of stay, before-medically-advised (BMA) discharge, and 30- and 90-day postdischarge acute care utilization. RESULTS Of 26,766 admissions (10,501 patients) with OUD, 2826 addiction consultations were completed. Consultation cohort was more likely to be young, male, and White than controls. Consultation was associated with greater MOUD initiation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.41-5.82), fewer emergency department visits at 30 (aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.92) and 90 (aOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.89) days, and fewer hospitalizations at 30 (aOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.76) and 90 (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.76) days. Additionally, consultation patients were more likely to have a longer hospital stay and leave BMA. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE Addiction consultation was associated with increased MOUD initiation and reduced postdischarge acute care utilization. This is the largest study to date showing a significant association between addiction psychiatry consultation and improved OUD outcomes when compared to controls. The observed reduction in postdischarge acute care utilization remains even after adjusting for MOUD initiation. Disparities in access to addiction consultation warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristopher A Kast
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Thao D V Le
- School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Lisa S Stewart
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Andrew D Wiese
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - India A Reddy
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jonathan Smith
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - David E Marcovitz
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Thomas J Reese
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weiner SG, Little K, Yoo J, Flores DP, Hildebran C, Wright DA, Ritter GA, El Ibrahimi S. Opioid Overdose After Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Initiation Following Hospitalization or ED Visit. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2423954. [PMID: 39037812 PMCID: PMC11265135 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.23954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Hospitalizations related to opioid use disorder (OUD) represent an opportunity to initiate medication for OUD (MOUD). Objective To assess whether starting MOUD after a hospitalization or emergency department (ED) visit is associated with the odds of fatal and nonfatal opioid overdose at 6 and 12 months. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based cohort study used data from the Oregon Comprehensive Opioid Risk Registry, which links all payer claims data to other administrative health datasets, for individuals aged 18 years or older who had diagnosis codes related to OUD recorded at an index ED visit or hospitalization from January 2017 to December 2019. Data were analyzed between May 2023 and January 2024. Exposures Receipt of MOUD within the 7 days after an OUD-related hospital visit. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was fatal or nonfatal overdose at 6 and 12 months after discharge. Sample characteristics, including age, sex, insurance plan, number of comorbidities, and opioid-related overdose events, were stratified by receipt or nonreceipt of MOUD within 7 days after an OUD-related hospital visit. A logistic regression model was used to investigate the association between receipt of MOUD and having an opioid overdose event. Results The study included 22 235 patients (53.1% female; 25.0% aged 25-39 years) who had an OUD-related hospital visit during the study period. Overall, 1184 patients (5.3%) received MOUD within 7 days of their ED visit or hospitalization. Of these patients, 683 (57.7%) received buprenorphine, 463 (39.1%) received methadone, and 46 (3.9%) received long-acting injectable naltrexone. Patients who received MOUD within 7 days after discharge had lower adjusted odds of fatal or nonfatal overdose at 6 months compared with those who did not (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.97). At 12 months, there was no difference in adjusted odds of fatal or nonfatal overdose between these groups (AOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58-1.08). Patients had a lower risk of fatal or nonfatal overdose at 6 months associated with buprenorphine use (AOR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.95) but not with methadone use (AOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.28-1.17). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of individuals with an OUD-related hospital visit, initiation of MOUD was associated with reduced odds of opioid-related overdose at 6 months. Hospitals should consider implementing programs and protocols to offer initiation of MOUD to patients with OUD who present for care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott G. Weiner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Jiah Yoo
- Comagine Health, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | | | | | - Sanae El Ibrahimi
- Comagine Health, Portland, Oregon
- School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Incze MA, Huebler S, Grant S, Gordon AJ. Using the Delphi Process to Prioritize an Agenda for Care Transition Research for Patients With Substance Use Disorders. SUBSTANCE USE & ADDICTION JOURNAL 2024; 45:523-528. [PMID: 38622904 DOI: 10.1177/29767342241246762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
Medical hospitalizations are increasingly recognized as important opportunities to engage individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) and offer treatment. While a growing number of hospitals have instituted interventions to support the provision of SUD care during medical admissions, post-hospitalization transitions of care remain a challenge for patients and clinicians and an understudied area of SUD care. Evidence is lacking on the most effective and feasible models of care to improve post-hospitalization care transitions for people with SUD. In the absence of strong empirical evidence to guide practice and policy, consensus-based research methods such as the Delphi process can play an important role in efficiently prioritizing existing models of care for future study and implementation. We conducted a Delphi study that convened a group of 25 national interdisciplinary experts with direct clinical experience facilitating post-hospitalization care transitions for people with SUD. Our panelists rated 10 existing care transition models according to anticipated effectiveness and facility of implementation based on the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework. Qualitative data on each care model were also gathered through comments and an online moderated discussion board. Our results help establish a hierarchy of SUD care transition models to inform future study and program development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Incze
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Program of Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sophia Huebler
- Program of Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Adam J Gordon
- Program of Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Incze MA, Huebler S, Chen D, Stofko A, Wu C, Baylis JD, Wells C, Babbel D. Hospitalists' Attitudes and Experiences With Posthospitalization Care Transitions for Patients With Substance Use Disorders: A Cross-sectional Analysis. J Addict Med 2024; 18:425-431. [PMID: 38498626 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical hospitalizations are relatively common among individuals who have substance use disorders (SUDs) and represent opportunities for patient engagement and treatment. Posthospitalization transitions of care are an important element of providing full-spectrum inpatient SUD care; however, little is known about clinicians' experiences with postdischarge care transitions. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study surveying hospital-based medical clinicians (ie, "hospitalists") across 2 large health systems in the state of Utah to assess current practices, barriers, facilitators, and perceptions toward posthospitalization care transitions for patients with SUDs. We used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to identify the most impactful barriers and facilitators among all respondents. We used logistic regression models to explore the influence of hospitalists' attitudes toward providing SUD care on perceived barriers and facilitators. RESULTS The survey was distributed to 429 individuals across 15 hospitals. Eighty-two hospitalists responded to the survey (response rate, 21.4%). Most respondents frequently cared for hospitalized patients with SUDs (n = 63, 77%) and prescribed medications for SUDs (n = 44, 56%). Four respondents (5%) felt that patients received adequate support during care transitions. Lack of social support ( P < 0.001) and social factors such as lack of transportation ( P < 0.001) were perceived as the largest barriers to successful care transitions. Conversely, a partnering outpatient clinic/clinician ( P < 0.001) and outpatient-based care coordination ( P < 0.001) were perceived as the strongest facilitators. Respondents' attitudes toward people with SUDs had a modest effect on perceived barriers and facilitators. CONCLUSIONS Hospitalists perceived increased outpatient SUD treatment infrastructure and transitional care supports as most important in facilitating posthospitalization care transitions for patients with SUDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Incze
- From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT (MAI, DC, DB); Program of Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT (MAI, SH, JDB); Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT (CW); Intermountain Health Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (SH); Division of Hospital Medicine, Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, UT (AS, CW)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Englander H, Chappuy M, Krawczyck N, Bratberg J, Potee R, Jauffret-Roustide M, Rolland B. Comparing methadone policy and practice in France and the US: Implications for US policy reform. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2024; 129:104487. [PMID: 38878588 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024]
Abstract
Despite being among the most effective treatments for opioid use disorder, methadone is largely unavailable in the United States, due primarily to federal and other policies that limit its availability and regulate clinical decisions about doses, visit frequency, and drug testing. There is unprecedented momentum to change decades-old US methadone policies. Yet uncertainty remains as to whether reforms will be adopted and how policies will be implemented. France has among the best methadone access and lowest overdose death rates worldwide. 87 % of French people with opioid use disorder receive methadone or buprenorphine, versus an estimated 13-20 % in the US. France's opioid-related overdose rates are far lower than the US. This article compares French and US systems, including current and proposed US policies, and underscores potential implications for US policymakers. In France, methadone can be initiated in specialty addiction settings and hospitals, with subsequent handoff to primary care. Methadone can be dispensed in community pharmacies and filled like other opioids, without requirements for supervised dosing. Decisions about visit frequency, medication doses, and drug testing are governed by clinical best practices and patient-clinician shared decision-making. In the US, methadone for opioid use disorder is regulated unlike any other medication (including methadone for pain) and is governed by strict federal controls, including from law enforcement and healthcare. With few exceptions, methadone for opioid use disorder is only available in Opioid Treatment Programs. US clinicians cannot prescribe methadone for opioid use disorder. Federal rules determine minimum visit frequency, initial dose limits, and other conditions of treatment, which states may further limit. Policies assert strong influence on patient experience, treatment access, and health outcomes. Despite being less restrictive than the US, the French model includes limits designed to avoid or minimize potential harms. French policies have important implications for potential US reforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honora Englander
- Section of Addiction Medicine in General Internal Medicine and the Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Service Universitaire d'Addictologie de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Bron, France.
| | - Mathieu Chappuy
- Service Universitaire d'Addictologie de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Bron, France; Centre de Soins d'Accompagnement et de Prévention en Addictologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Service Pharmaceutique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Noa Krawczyck
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York NY, USA
| | - Jef Bratberg
- University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, Kingston, RI, USA
| | - Ruth Potee
- Behavioral Health Network, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Marie Jauffret-Roustide
- Centre d'étude des Mouvements Sociaux (Inserm U1276/CNRS UMR8044/EHESS), Paris, France; British Columbia Center on Substance Use (BCCSU), Vancouver, Canada; Baldy Center on Law and Social Policy, Buffalo University, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin Rolland
- Service Universitaire d'Addictologie de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Bron, France; Centre de Soins d'Accompagnement et de Prévention en Addictologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu P, Chan B, Sokolski E, Patten A, Englander H. Piloting a Hospital-Based Rapid Methadone Initiation Protocol for Fentanyl. J Addict Med 2024; 18:458-462. [PMID: 38832695 PMCID: PMC11290994 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Treating acute opioid withdrawal and offering medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) is critical. Hospitalization offers a unique opportunity to rapidly initiate methadone for OUD; however, little clinical guidance exists. This report describes our experience during the first 9 months following introduction of a hospital-based rapid methadone initiation protocol. METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review of hospitalized patients with OUD seen by our interprofessional addiction medicine consult service at an urban academic center between December 2022 and August 2023. We identified patients who initiated methadone using the rapid methadone initiation protocol, which includes dose recommendations (maximum 60 mg day 1, 70 mg day 2, 80 mg day 3, 100 mg days 4-7) and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria (end organ failure, arrhythmia, concurrent benzodiazepine or alcohol use, age >65). RESULTS There were 171 patients that received methadone for OUD during the study period. Of those, 25 patients (15%) received rapid methadone initiation. The average total daily dose of methadone on days 1-7 was 53.0 mg, 69.2 mg, 75.4 mg, 79.5 mg, 87.1 mg, 92.2 mg, and 96.6 mg, respectively. There were no adverse events requiring holding a dose of scheduled methadone, naloxone administration, or transfer to higher level of care. CONCLUSIONS A rapid methadone initiation protocol for OUD can be implemented in the inpatient setting. Patients up-titrated their methadone doses quicker than with traditional induction methods, and there were no serious adverse events. Appropriate patient selection may be important to avoid harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Liu
- Section of Addiction Medicine in Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Brian Chan
- Section of Addiction Medicine in Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Central City Concern, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Eleasa Sokolski
- Section of Addiction Medicine in Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Alisa Patten
- Section of Addiction Medicine in Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Honora Englander
- Section of Addiction Medicine in Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Englander H, Thakrar AP, Bagley SM, Rolley T, Dong K, Hyshka E. Caring for Hospitalized Adults With Opioid Use Disorder in the Era of Fentanyl: A Review. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184:691-701. [PMID: 38683591 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Importance The rise of fentanyl and other high-potency synthetic opioids across US and Canada has been associated with increasing hospitalizations and unprecedented overdose deaths. Hospitalization is a critical touchpoint to engage patients and offer life-saving opioid use disorder (OUD) care when admitted for OUD or other medical conditions. Observations Clinical best practices include managing acute withdrawal and pain, initiating medication for OUD, integrating harm reduction principles and practices, addressing in-hospital substance use, and supporting hospital-to-community care transitions. Fentanyl complicates hospital OUD care. Fentanyl's high potency intensifies pain, withdrawal, and cravings and increases the risk for overdose and other harms. Fentanyl's unique pharmacology has rendered traditional techniques for managing opioid withdrawal and initiating buprenorphine and methadone inadequate for some patients, necessitating novel strategies. Further, co-use of opioids with stimulants drugs is common, and the opioid supply is unpredictable and can be contaminated with benzodiazepines, xylazine, and other substances. To address these challenges, clinicians are increasingly relying on emerging practices, such as low-dose buprenorphine initiation with opioid continuation, rapid methadone titration, and the use of alternative opioid agonists. Hospitals must also reconsider conventional approaches to in-hospital substance use and expand clinicians' understanding and embrace of harm reduction, which is a philosophy and set of practical strategies that supports people who use drugs to be safer and healthier without judgment, coercion, or discrimination. Hospital-to-community care transitions should ensure uninterrupted access to OUD care after discharge, which requires special consideration and coordination. Finally, improving hospital-based addiction care requires dedicated infrastructure and expertise. Preparing hospitals across the US and Canada to deliver OUD best practices requires investments in clinical champions, staff education, leadership commitment, community partnerships, quality metrics, and financing. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this review indicate that fentanyl creates increased urgency and new challenges for hospital OUD care. Hospital clinicians and systems have a central role in addressing the current drug crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honora Englander
- Section of Addiction Medicine in General Internal Medicine and the Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| | - Ashish P Thakrar
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Sarah M Bagley
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Kathryn Dong
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Elaine Hyshka
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Franz B, Cronin CE, Lindenfeld Z, Pagan JA, Lai AY, Krawczyk N, Rivera BD, Chang JE. Rural-urban disparities in the availability of hospital-based screening, medications for opioid use disorder, and addiction consult services. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 160:209280. [PMID: 38142042 PMCID: PMC11060933 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hospitals are an ideal setting to stage opioid-related interventions with patients who are hospitalized due to overdose or other substance use-related complications. Transitional opioid programs-which initiate care and provide linkages upon discharge, such as screening, initiation of medications for opioid use disorder, and addiction consult services-have become the gold standard, but implementation has been uneven. The purpose of this study was to assess disparities in the availability of hospital-based transitional opioid programs, across rural and urban hospital settings in the United States. METHODS Using hospital administrative data paired with county-level demographic data, we conducted bivariate and regression analyses to assess rural-urban differences in the availability of transitional opioid services including screening, addiction consult services, and MOUD in U.S general medical centers, controlling for hospital- and community-level factors. Our sample included 2846 general medical hospitals that completed the 2021 American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey of Hospitals. Our primary outcomes were five self-reported measures: whether the hospital provided screening in the ED; provided screening in the inpatient setting; whether the hospital provided addiction consult services in the ED; provided addiction consult services in the inpatient setting; and whether the hospital provided medications for opioid use disorder. RESULTS Rural hospitals did not have lower odds of screening for OUD or other SUDs than urban hospitals, but both micropolitan rural counties and noncore rural counties had significantly lower odds of having addiction consult services in either the ED (OR: 0.74, 95 % CI: 0.58, 0.95; OR: 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.50, 0.91) or inpatient setting (OR: 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.59, 0.97; OR: 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.50, 0.93), respectively, or of offering MOUD (OR: 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.52, 0.90; OR: 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.37, 0.74). CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that evidence-based interventions, such as medications for opioid use disorder and addiction consult services, are less often available in rural hospitals, which may contribute to rural-urban disparities in health outcomes secondary to OUD. A priority for population health improvement should be developing implementation strategies to support rural hospital adoption of transitional opioid programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berkeley Franz
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Appalachian Institute to Advance Health Equity Science (ADVANCE), United States of America.
| | - Cory E Cronin
- Ohio University College of Social and Public Health, Appalachian Institute to Advance Health Equity Science (ADVANCE), United States of America
| | - Zoe Lindenfeld
- New York University College of Global Public Health, United States of America
| | - Jose A Pagan
- New York University College of Global Public Health, United States of America
| | - Alden Yuanhong Lai
- New York University College of Global Public Health, United States of America
| | - Noa Krawczyk
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, United States of America
| | - Bianca D Rivera
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, United States of America
| | - Ji E Chang
- New York University College of Global Public Health, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fielman S, McNeely J, Fitzpatrick A, Kerensky T, Tomanovich M, Walley AY, Kosakowski S, King C, Appleton N, Weinstein ZM. A Clinical Guide to Support the Implementation of Addiction Consult Services and the Value of Teaching and Technical Assistance. J Addict Med 2024; 18:215-217. [PMID: 38498619 PMCID: PMC11150093 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT People with substance use disorders (SUDs) are increasingly admitted to general hospitals; however, many hospital systems lack both formal structures and skilled staff to provide high-quality care for inpatients with SUDs. Inpatient addiction consult services (ACSs), which are increasingly being implemented around the country, are an evidence-based strategy to add focused care for people with SUDs into the general medical setting. In 2018, New York City Health + Hospitals (H + H) launched an ACS program called Consult for Addiction Care and Treatment in Hospitals in six hospitals, supported by a team of addiction consult experts to deliver teaching and technical assistance (TTA) for the Consult for Addiction Care and Treatment in Hospitals ACSs. This commentary describes the TTA, which included site visits, introductory educational lectures, case conferences, ad hoc support, implementation assistance, and the creation of an addiction care guide. Similar TTA services could be used in the future when hospitals or systems want to launch novel clinical programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Fielman
- Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer McNeely
- Department of Population Health, Section on Alcohol, Tobacco and Drug Use, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy Fitzpatrick
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Todd Kerensky
- Instructor of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary Tomanovich
- Grayken Center for Addiction, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander Y. Walley
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Kosakowski
- Clinical Addiction Research and Evaluation Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carla King
- Department of Population Health, Section on Alcohol, Tobacco and Drug Use, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Noa Appleton
- Department of Population Health, Section on Alcohol, Tobacco and Drug Use, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zoe M. Weinstein
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bart G, Korthuis PT, Donohue JM, Hagedorn HJ, Gustafson DH, Bazzi AR, Enns E, McNeely J, Ghitza UE, Magane KM, Baukol P, Vena A, Harris J, Voronca D, Saitz R. Exemplar Hospital initiation trial to Enhance Treatment Engagement (EXHIT ENTRE): protocol for CTN-0098B a randomized implementation study to support hospitals in caring for patients with opioid use disorder. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2024; 19:29. [PMID: 38600571 PMCID: PMC11007900 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-024-00455-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitalizations involving opioid use disorder (OUD) are increasing. Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) reduce mortality and acute care utilization. Hospitalization is a reachable moment for initiating MOUD and arranging for ongoing MOUD engagement following hospital discharge. Despite existing quality metrics for MOUD initiation and engagement, few hospitals provide hospital based opioid treatment (HBOT). This protocol describes a cluster-randomized hybrid type-2 implementation study comparing low-intensity and high-intensity implementation support strategies to help community hospitals implement HBOT. METHODS Four state implementation hubs with expertise in initiating HBOT programs will provide implementation support to 24 community hospitals (6 hospitals/hub) interested in starting HBOT. Community hospitals will be randomized to 24-months of either a low-intensity intervention (distribution of an HBOT best-practice manual, a lecture series based on the manual, referral to publicly available resources, and on-demand technical assistance) or a high-intensity intervention (the low-intensity intervention plus funding for a hospital HBOT champion and regular practice facilitation sessions with an expert hub). The primary efficacy outcome, adapted from the National Committee on Quality Assurance, is the proportion of patients engaged in MOUD 34-days following hospital discharge. Secondary and exploratory outcomes include acute care utilization, non-fatal overdose, death, MOUD engagement at various time points, hospital length of stay, and discharges against medical advice. Primary, secondary, and exploratory outcomes will be derived from state Medicaid data. Implementation outcomes, barriers, and facilitators are assessed via longitudinal surveys, qualitative interviews, practice facilitation contact logs, and HBOT sustainability metrics. We hypothesize that the proportion of patients receiving care at hospitals randomized to the high-intensity arm will have greater MOUD engagement following hospital discharge. DISCUSSION Initiation of MOUD during hospitalization improves MOUD engagement post hospitalization. Few studies, however, have tested different implementation strategies on HBOT uptake, outcome, and sustainability and only one to date has tested implementation of a specific type of HBOT (addiction consultation services). This cluster-randomized study comparing different intensities of HBOT implementation support will inform hospitals and policymakers in identifying effective strategies for promoting HBOT dissemination and adoption in community hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04921787.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin Bart
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare and University of Minnesota, 701 Park Avenue, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA.
| | - P Todd Korthuis
- Department of Medicine, Addiction Medicine Section, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, 97239-3098, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Julie M Donohue
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA
| | - Hildi J Hagedorn
- Center for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, University of Minnesota, 1 Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Dave H Gustafson
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin, 1513 University Ave., Madison, WI, 53706, USA
| | - Angela R Bazzi
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California, San Diego; La Jolla, CA, USA
- Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Suite 431, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Eva Enns
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55408, USA
| | - Jennifer McNeely
- Department of Population Health, Section on Alcohol, Tobacco and Drug Use, NYU School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, 17th floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, NYU School of Medicine, 462 1st Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Udi E Ghitza
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Center for the Clinical Trials Network (CCTN), Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Kara M Magane
- Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Suite 431, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Paulette Baukol
- Berman Center for Outcomes & Clinical Research, 701 Park Ave, Ste. PP7.700, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA
| | - Ashley Vena
- The Emmes Company, LLC, 401 N. Washington St. #700, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Jacklyn Harris
- The Emmes Company, LLC, 401 N. Washington St. #700, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Delia Voronca
- The Emmes Company, LLC, 401 N. Washington St. #700, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
- Currently: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, 777 Old Saw Mill River Rd, Tarrytown, Deceased, NY, 10591-6707, USA
| | - Richard Saitz
- Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Suite 431, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Goff A, Lujan-Bear S, Titus H, Englander H. Integrating Hospital-Based Harm Reduction Care-Harnessing the Nursing Model. SUBSTANCE USE & ADDICTION JOURNAL 2024; 45:307-313. [PMID: 38258867 DOI: 10.1177/29767342231219577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Hospitals are risk environments for people who use drugs, and most hospitals are unprepared to deliver substance use disorder (SUD) care, including harm reduction (HR) interventions. HR philosophy clashes with traditional hospital hierarchy and norms, and staff may resist HR interventions due to stigma, fear of enabling substance use, legal and safety concerns. Nurses are central to hospital culture and care and could promote and deliver HR care. Our US hospital has an inter-professional addiction consult service (ACS) that includes medical providers, social workers, and peers. We developed and launched a hospital-based registered nurse-(RN) led HR intervention, including distributing safe-use supplies (eg, syringes). We describe model development and early experience, using an Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework. ACS experiences and community HR interventions informed our exploration phase. In the preparation phase we secured funding from Medicaid payers for a 2-year pilot, including full-time RN salary and HR supplies. We elicited buy-in from hospital executive leaders, partly by partnering with nurse champions who described unmet patient care and staff education needs. We consulted hospital lawyers and developed an institution-wide media campaign targeting staff, including in-person booths distributing naloxone and materials promoting international overdose awareness day (eg, "#EndOverdose" buttons). We collaborated with local and national experts to develop the intervention, which includes RN bedside HR education and staff trainings. The Implementation was from September 2022 to March 2023. We trained 459 staff (over 15 trainings) and conducted 209 patient encounters. Generally, patients and staff embraced the HR RN role, including previously controversial safe-use supply distribution. Sustainment efforts include engaging stakeholders in continuous improvement and evaluation efforts. A nurse-led hospital-based HR intervention can expand patient services, support staff, and bridge HR and medical models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia Goff
- Section of Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Susannah Lujan-Bear
- Section of Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Hope Titus
- Section of Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Honora Englander
- Section of Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Incze MA, Kelley AT, James H, Nolan S, Stofko A, Fordham C, Gordon AJ. Post-hospitalization Care Transition Strategies for Patients with Substance Use Disorders: A Narrative Review and Taxonomy. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:837-846. [PMID: 38413539 PMCID: PMC11043281 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08670-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
Hospitalizations represent important opportunities to engage individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) in treatment. For those who engage with SUD treatment in the hospital setting, tailored supports during post-discharge transitions to longitudinal care settings may improve care linkages, retention, and treatment outcomes. We updated a recent systematic review search on post-hospitalization SUD care transitions through a structured review of published literature from January 2020 through June 2023. We then added novel sources including a gray literature search and key informant interviews to develop a taxonomy of post-hospitalization care transition models for patients with SUD. Our updated literature search generated 956 abstracts not included in the original systematic review. We selected and reviewed 89 full-text articles, which yielded six new references added to 26 relevant articles from the original review. Our search of five gray literature sources yielded four additional references. Using a thematic analysis approach, we extracted themes from semi-structured interviews with 10 key informants. From these results, we constructed a taxonomy consisting of 10 unique SUD care transition models in three overarching domains (inpatient-focused, transitional, outpatient-focused). These models include (1) training and protocol implementation; (2) screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment; (3) hospital-based interdisciplinary consult team; (4) continuity-enhanced interdisciplinary consult team; (5) peer navigation; (6) transitional care management; (7) outpatient in-reach; (8) post-discharge outreach; (9) incentivizing follow-up; and (10) bridge clinic. For each model, we describe design, scope, approach, and implementation strategies. Our taxonomy highlights emerging models of post-hospitalization care transitions for patients with SUD. An established taxonomy provides a framework for future research, implementation efforts, and policy in this understudied, but critically important, aspect of SUD care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Incze
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Greater Intermountain Node, National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trial Network, Program of Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), , Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - A Taylor Kelley
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Greater Intermountain Node, National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trial Network, Program of Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), , Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Informatics, Decision Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Vulnerable Veteran Patient-Aligned Care Team, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Hannah James
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Seonaid Nolan
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrea Stofko
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Greater Intermountain Node, National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trial Network, Program of Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), , Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Cole Fordham
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Greater Intermountain Node, National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trial Network, Program of Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), , Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Adam J Gordon
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Greater Intermountain Node, National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trial Network, Program of Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), , Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Informatics, Decision Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Vulnerable Veteran Patient-Aligned Care Team, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stern SJ, D’Orazio JL, Work BD, Calcaterra SL, Thakrar AP. Point/counterpoint: Should full agonist opioid medications be offered to hospitalized patients for management of opioid withdrawal? J Hosp Med 2024; 19:339-343. [PMID: 38030816 PMCID: PMC10987259 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sam J. Stern
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Center for Urban Bioethics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joseph L. D’Orazio
- Cooper Center for Healing, Camden, New Jersey, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Toxicology and Addiction Medicine, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Brian D. Work
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Prevention Point Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Susan L. Calcaterra
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Ashish P. Thakrar
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shearer RD, Hernandez E, Beebe TJ, Virnig BA, Bart G, Winkelman TNA, Bazzi AR, Shippee ND. Providers' Experiences and Perspectives in Treating Patients With Co-Occurring Opioid and Stimulant Use Disorders in the Hospital. SUBSTANCE USE & ADDICTION JOURNAL 2024; 45:250-259. [PMID: 38258816 PMCID: PMC11151687 DOI: 10.1177/29767342231221060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The overdose crisis is increasingly characterized by opioid and stimulant co-use. Despite effective pharmacologic treatment for both opioid use disorder (OUD) and contingency management for stimulant use disorders, most individuals with these co-occurring conditions are not engaged in treatment. Hospitalization is an important opportunity to engage patients and initiate treatment, however existing hospital addiction care is not tailored for patients with co-use and may not meet the needs of this population. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with hospital providers about their experiences and perspectives treating patients with opioid and stimulant co-use. We used directed content analysis to identify common experiences and opportunities to improve hospital-based treatment for patients with co-use. RESULTS From qualitative interviews with 20 providers, we identified 4 themes describing how co-use complicated hospital-based substance use treatment: (1) patients' unstable circumstances impacting the treatment plan, (2) co-occurring withdrawals are difficult to identify and treat, (3) providers holding more stigmatizing views of patients with co-use, and (4) stimulant use is often "ignored" in the treatment plans. Participants also described a range of potential opportunities to improve hospital-based treatment of co-use that fall into 3 categories: (1) provider practice changes, (2) healthcare system changes, and (3) development and validation of clinical tools and treatment approaches. CONCLUSIONS We identified unique challenges providing hospital addiction medicine care to patients who use both opioids and stimulants. These findings inform the development, implementation, and testing of hospital-based interventions for patients with co-use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riley D Shearer
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Health, Homelessness, and Criminal Justice Lab, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Edith Hernandez
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Timothy J Beebe
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Beth A Virnig
- College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL, USA
| | - Gavin Bart
- Division of Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Tyler N A Winkelman
- Health, Homelessness, and Criminal Justice Lab, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Angela R Bazzi
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Nathan D Shippee
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bowman LA, Berger O, Nesbit S, Stoller KB, Buresh M, Stewart R. Operationalizing the new DEA exception: A novel process for dispensing of methadone for opioid use disorder at discharge from acute care settings. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2024; 81:204-218. [PMID: 38091380 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxad288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe one strategy for dispensing of methadone at emergency department (ED) and hospital discharge implemented within 2 urban academic medical centers. SUMMARY Expanding access to medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) is a national priority. ED visits and hospitalizations offer an opportunity to initiate or continue these lifesaving medications, including methadone and buprenorphine. However, federal regulations governing methadone treatment and significant gaps in treatment availability have made continuing methadone upon ED or hospital discharge challenging. To address this issue, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) granted an exception allowing hospitals, clinics, and EDs to dispense a 72-hour supply of methadone while continued treatment is arranged. Though this exception addresses a critical unmet need, guidance for operationalizing this service is limited. To facilitate expanded patient access to methadone on ED or hospital discharge at 2 Baltimore hospitals, key stakeholders within the parent health system were identified, and a workgroup was formed. Processes were established for requesting, approving, preparing, and dispensing the methadone supply using an electronic health record order set. Multidisciplinary educational materials were created to support end users of the workflow. In the first 3 months of implementation, 42 requests were entered, of which 36 were approved, resulting in 79 dispensed methadone doses. CONCLUSION This project demonstrates feasibility of methadone dispensing at hospital and ED discharge. Further work is needed to evaluate impact on patient outcomes, such as hospital and ED utilization, length of stay, linkage to treatment, and retention in treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay A Bowman
- Department of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Olivia Berger
- Department of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Suzanne Nesbit
- Department of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kenneth B Stoller
- Johns Hopkins Broadway Center for Addiction, Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Megan Buresh
- Bayview Medical Center Addiction Consult Service, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rosalyn Stewart
- Johns Hopkins Hospital Addiction Consult Service, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Krawczyk N, Rivera BD, Chang JE, Lindenfeld Z, Franz B. Initiatives to Support the Transition of Patients With Substance Use Disorders From Acute Care to Community-based Services Among a National Sample of Nonprofit Hospitals. J Addict Med 2024; 18:115-121. [PMID: 38015653 PMCID: PMC10939963 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitals are a key touchpoint to reach patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) and link them with ongoing community-based services. Although there are many acute care interventions to initiate SUD treatment in hospital settings, less is known about what services are offered to transition patients to ongoing care after discharge. In this study, we explore what SUD care transition strategies are offered across nonprofit US hospitals. METHODS We analyzed administrative documents from a national sample of US hospitals that indicated SUD as a top 5 significant community need in their Community Health Needs Assessment reports (2019-2021). Data were coded and categorized based on the nature of described services. We used data on hospitals and characteristics of surrounding counties to identify factors associated with hospitals' endorsement of transition interventions for SUD. RESULTS Of 613 included hospitals, 313 prioritized SUD as a significant community need. Fifty-three of these hospitals (17%) offered acute care interventions to support patients' transition to community-based SUD services. Most (68%) of the 53 hospitals described transition strategies without further detail, 23% described scheduling appointments before discharge, and 11% described discussing treatment options before discharge. No hospital characteristics were associated with offering transition interventions, but such hospitals were more likely to be in the Northeast, in counties with higher median income, and states that expanded Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS Despite high need, most US hospitals are not offering interventions to link patients with SUD from acute to community care. Efforts to increase acute care interventions for SUD should identify and implement best practices to support care continuity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noa Krawczyk
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine
| | - Bianca D. Rivera
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine
| | - Ji E. Chang
- Department of Public Health Policy and Management, New York University School of Global Public Health
| | - Zoe Lindenfeld
- Department of Public Health Policy and Management, New York University School of Global Public Health
| | - Berkeley Franz
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine; Appalachian Institute to Advance Health Equity Science (ADVANCE)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kontos N, Rao V. Clinical harm reduction in substance use: An ethics-oriented primer and critique for hospital-based providers. J Eval Clin Pract 2024; 30:260-267. [PMID: 38018023 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES Substance use-targeted harm reduction (HR) has successfully expanded from public health into clinical settings. Hospital-based providers are in positions to encounter, precipitate and/or mediate ethically fraught situations that can arise around clinical HR-informed interventions. We examine why these situations occur and how they might be better addressed. METHOD Literature focused on principles, ethics, and clinical implementation of HR are reviewed to identify core elements of this approach. Next, ethical vulnerabilities within those elements are identified and critiqued. A more productive discourse for acknowledging, voicing and addressing ethical dilemmas in HR is sought. RESULTS Public health orientation and humane concern for substance users, along with a strong anti-stigmatization mission and occasional aversion to a rigid medical model and 'establishment' contributed to HR's successes but can also frame any dissent over its methods as being stigma-fuelled. Practically distilled concepts from moral philosophy and the medical humanities can inform good faith discussions based on common-ground concern for patients. CONCLUSION HR's use in the general hospital and other clinical settings is a positive development, but one that brings with it new ethical demands. Broader knowledge of the principles of HR, of the application of those principles to the hospital setting, and of common-ground concepts from outside of HR could help facilitate productive ethical engagement around substance-using patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Kontos
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vinod Rao
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shearer RD, Shippee ND, Virnig BA, Beebe TJ, Winkelman TN. Characteristics and co-morbidities associated with hospital discharges for opioid and methamphetamine co-use, United States 2016-2019. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE REPORTS 2024; 10:100219. [PMID: 38356919 PMCID: PMC10864835 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Introduction The US overdose crisis is increasingly characterized by opioid and methamphetamine co-use. Hospitalization is an important opportunity to engage patients in substance use treatment. Understanding characteristics of co-use-related hospital stays can inform the development of services to better support this growing patient population. Methods We used 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample data to conduct a cross sectional analysis of hospitalizations involving use of opioids, methamphetamine, or both. We used bivariate analysis to compare patient demographics. We then used multinomial logistic regressions to compare the proportion of hospital stays which indicated co-morbid diagnosis. To account for correlated data, we used generalized linear models to compare outcomes in hospital mortality, patient-directed discharge, and length of stay. Results Co-use-related stays had a higher proportion of co-morbid mental health (60.7%; 95% CI: 59.9-61.4%) and infectious diseases (41.5%; 95% CI: 40.8-42.2%), than opioid- or methamphetamine-related stays. Co-use-related stays increased between 2016 and 2019 and were associated with a higher proportion of patient directed discharge (10.7%; 95% CI: 10.4-11.0%) and longer length of stay (6.3 days; 95% CI: 6.2-6.4 days) compared to opioid (8.1%; 95% CI: 7.9-8.3% and 5.8 days; 95% CI: 5.8-5.9 days) and methamphetamine-related stays (6.5%; 95% CI: 6.3-6.6% and 5.5 days; 95% CI: 5.4-5.5 days). Conclusion Patients discharged with co-use differ from patients with opioid or methamphetamine use alone, representing a range of challenges and opportunities. In addition to offering treatment for both substance use disorders, hospital-based services that address co-occurring conditions may better support patients with co-use through targeted and tailored approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riley D. Shearer
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St SE, Mayo Building B681, Minneapolis, MN, 55455 USA
- Health, Homelessness, and Criminal Justice Lab, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, 701 Park Ave., Suite PP7.700, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA
| | - Nathan D. Shippee
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St SE, Mayo Building B681, Minneapolis, MN, 55455 USA
| | - Beth A. Virnig
- College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainsville, FL, 32611, USA
| | - Timothy J. Beebe
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St SE, Mayo Building B681, Minneapolis, MN, 55455 USA
| | - Tyler N.A. Winkelman
- Health, Homelessness, and Criminal Justice Lab, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, 701 Park Ave., Suite PP7.700, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, 716 S 7th St, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Thakarar K, Appa A, Abdul Mutakabbir JC, Goff A, Brown J, Tuell C, Fairfield K, Wurcel A. Frame Shift: Focusing on Harm Reduction and Shared Decision Making for People Who Use Drugs Hospitalized With Infections. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 78:e12-e26. [PMID: 38018174 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kinna Thakarar
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Interdisciplinary Population & Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, Maine, USA
- Department of Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA
| | - Ayesha Appa
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine at San Francisco General Hospital, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jacinda C Abdul Mutakabbir
- Division of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
- Division of the Black Diaspora and African American Studies, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Amelia Goff
- Section of Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jessica Brown
- Department of Care Management, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Kathleen Fairfield
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Interdisciplinary Population & Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, Maine, USA
- Department of Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA
| | - Alysse Wurcel
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Moriates C, Boulton A, Walker B, Holliman R, Christian N, Weems J, Humphry E, Young S, Bottner R, Potter J. Hospital-based opioid treatment: Expanding and sustaining the model in Texas. J Hosp Med 2023; 18:1109-1112. [PMID: 37876117 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
This Brief Report includes follow-up data about the sustainability and expansion of the Buprenorphine Team (B-Team), a hospital-based opioid treatment (HBOT) program. Between September 2018 and January 2023, the B-Team started 398 patients with opioid-use disorder (OUD) on buprenorphine therapy and coordinated outpatient care for 353 patients before discharge. Two-hundred and forty-nine of these patients were scheduled for follow-up at our partner addiction treatment clinic. Retention rates at our partner clinic remain relatively high: 73 patients (36% of eligible patients) continued to attend appointments between 6 and 12 months, and 40 of 180 patients (22%) who have been discharged from the hospital for at least 1 year continued to attend appointments. This model has been adopted at three additional Texas hospitals, resulting in rapid growth: 1037 patients were started on buprenorphine across these four sites during 2021-2022. Our longitudinal results support HBOT as an effective model for treating patients with OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Moriates
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Alanna Boulton
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Blair Walker
- Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Rachel Holliman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Nicholaus Christian
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - John Weems
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
- CommUnityCare, Austin, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Richard Bottner
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
- Colorado Hospital Association, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sokolski E, Buchheit BM, Desai S, Englander H. It's Time to Train Residents in Addiction Medicine. J Grad Med Educ 2023; 15:632-637. [PMID: 38045952 PMCID: PMC10686659 DOI: 10.4300/jgme-d-23-00317.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eleasa Sokolski
- Eleasa Sokolski, MD, is Assistant Professor of Medicine and Psychiatry, Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Bradley M. Buchheit
- Bradley M. Buchheit, MD, MS, is Assistant Professor of Medicine and Family Medicine, Program Director, Oregon Health & Science University Addiction Medicine Fellowship Program, and Medical Director, Harm Reduction and BRidges to Care (HRBR) Clinic, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Sima Desai
- Sima Desai, MD, MACP, FRCP, is Professor of Medicine Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Program Director, Oregon Health & Science University Internal Medicine Residency Program, and Vice Chair of Education, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA; and
| | - Honora Englander
- Honora Englander, MD, is Professor of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, and Director/PI Improving Addiction Care Team (IMPACT), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Krawczyk N, Rivera BD, Chang JE, Grivel M, Chen YH, Nagappala S, Englander H, McNeely J. Strategies to support substance use disorder care transitions from acute-care to community-based settings: a scoping review and typology. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2023; 18:67. [PMID: 37919755 PMCID: PMC10621088 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-023-00422-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute-care interventions that identify patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), initiate treatment, and link patients to community-based services, have proliferated in recent years. Yet, much is unknown about the specific strategies being used to support continuity of care from emergency department (ED) or inpatient hospital settings to community-based SUD treatment. In this scoping review, we synthesize the existing literature on patient transition interventions, and form an initial typology of reported strategies. METHODS We searched Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO for peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2021 that studied interventions linking patients with SUD from ED or inpatient hospital settings to community-based SUD services. Eligible articles measured at least one post-discharge treatment outcome and included a description of the strategy used to promote linkage to community care. Detailed information was extracted on the components of the transition strategies and a thematic coding process was used to categorize strategies into a typology based on shared characteristics. Facilitators and barriers to transitions of care were synthesized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS Forty-five articles met inclusion criteria. 62% included ED interventions and 44% inpatient interventions. The majority focused on patients with opioid (71%) or alcohol (31%) use disorder. The transition strategies reported across studies were heterogeneous and often not well described. An initial typology of ten transition strategies, including five pre- and five post-discharge transition strategies is proposed. The most common strategy was scheduling an appointment with a community-based treatment provider prior to discharge. A range of facilitators and barriers were described, which can inform efforts to improve hospital-to-community transitions of care. CONCLUSIONS Strategies to support transitions from acute-care to community-based SUD services, although critical for ensuring continuity of care, vary greatly across interventions and are inconsistently measured and described. More research is needed to classify SUD care transition strategies, understand their components, and explore which lead to the best patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noa Krawczyk
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Ave, Room 5-53, New York, USA.
| | - Bianca D Rivera
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Ji E Chang
- Department of Public Health Policy and Management, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Margaux Grivel
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Yu-Heng Chen
- Department of Criminal Justice, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19102, USA
| | | | - Honora Englander
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Jennifer McNeely
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Singh-Tan S, Torres-Lockhart K, Jakubowski A, Lu T, Starrels J, De Lima P, Arnsten J, Nahvi S, Southern W. Addiction Consult Service and Inpatient Outcomes Among Patients with Alcohol Use Disorder. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:3216-3223. [PMID: 37100986 PMCID: PMC10132408 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08202-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is the most prevalent substance use disorder, but evidence-based medications to treat AUD (MAUD), including naltrexone and acamprosate, are substantially underutilized. Hospitalization provides an opportunity to start MAUD for patients who may not otherwise seek treatment. Addiction consultation services (ACSs) have been increasingly utilized to ensure appropriate treatment. There is little research examining the effect of an ACS on health outcomes among patients with AUD. OBJECTIVE To determine the association between an ACS consultation and provision of MAUD during admission and MAUD at discharge among admissions with AUD. DESIGN Retrospective study comparing admissions which received an ACS consult and propensity score-matched historical control admissions. Subjects A total of 215 admissions with a primary or secondary diagnosis of AUD who received an ACS consult and 215 matched historical control admissions. Intervention ACS consultation from a multidisciplinary team offering withdrawal management, substance use disorder treatment, patient-centered counseling, discharge planning, and linkage to outpatient care for patients with substance use disorders, including AUD. Main Measures Primary outcomes were initiation of new MAUD during admission and new MAUD at discharge. Secondary outcomes were patient-directed discharge, time to 7- and 30-day readmission, and time to 7- and 30-day post-discharge ER visit. Key Results Among 430 admissions with AUD, those that received an ACS consultation were significantly more likely to receive new inpatient MAUD (33.0% vs 0.9%; OR 52.5 [CI 12.6-218.6]) and significantly more likely to receive new MAUD at discharge (41.4% vs 1.9%; OR 37.3 [13.3-104.6]), compared with historical controls. ACS was not significantly associated with patient-directed discharge, time to readmission, or time to post-discharge ER visit. CONCLUSIONS ACS was associated with a large increase in provision of new inpatient MAUD and new MAUD at discharge when compared to propensity-matched historical controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumeet Singh-Tan
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.
| | - Kristine Torres-Lockhart
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
| | - Andrea Jakubowski
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
| | - Tiffany Lu
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
| | - Joanna Starrels
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
| | - Patricia De Lima
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
| | - Julia Arnsten
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
| | - Shadi Nahvi
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
| | - William Southern
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Steel TL, Bhatraju EP, Hills-Dunlap K. Critical care for patients with substance use disorders. Curr Opin Crit Care 2023; 29:484-492. [PMID: 37641506 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000001080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To examine the impact of substance use disorders (SUDs) on critical illness and the role of critical care providers in treating SUDs. We discuss emerging evidence supporting hospital-based addiction treatment and highlight the clinical and research innovations needed to elevate the standards of care for patients with SUDs in the intensive care unit (ICU) amidst staggering individual and public health consequences. RECENT FINDINGS Despite the rapid increase of SUDs in recent years, with growing implications for critical care, dedicated studies focused on ICU patients with SUDs remain scant. Available data demonstrate SUDs are major risk factors for the development and severity of critical illness and are associated with poor outcomes. ICU patients with SUDs experience mutually reinforcing effects of substance withdrawal and pain, which amplify risks and consequences of delirium, and complicate management of comorbid conditions. Hospital-based addiction treatment can dramatically improve the health outcomes of hospitalized patients with SUDs and should begin in the ICU. SUMMARY SUDs have a significant impact on critical illness and post-ICU outcomes. High-quality cohort and treatment studies designed specifically for ICU patients with SUDs are needed to define best practices and improve health outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa L Steel
- Harborview Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine
| | - Elenore P Bhatraju
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kelsey Hills-Dunlap
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Division of Pulmonary Sciences & Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rosenthal ES, Brokus C, Sun J, Carpenter JE, Catalanotti J, Eaton EF, Steck AR, Kuo I, Burkholder GA, Akselrod H, McGonigle K, Moran T, Mai W, Notis M, Del Rio C, Greenberg A, Saag MS, Kottilil S, Masur H, Kattakuzhy S. Undertreatment of opioid use disorder in patients hospitalized with injection drug use-associated infections. AIDS 2023; 37:1799-1809. [PMID: 37352497 PMCID: PMC10481931 DOI: 10.1097/qad.0000000000003629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) initiation and addiction consultation and outcomes for patients hospitalized with infectious complications of injecting opioids. METHOD This was a retrospective cohort study performed at four academic medical centers in the United States. The participants were patients who had been hospitalized with infectious complications of injecting opioids in 2018. Three hundred and twenty-two patients were included and their individual patient records were manually reviewed to identify inpatient receipt of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), initiation of MOUD, and addiction consultation. The main outcomes of interest were premature discharge, MOUD on discharge, linkage to outpatient MOUD, one-year readmission and death. RESULTS Three hundred and twenty-two patients were predominately male (59%), white (66%), and median age 38 years, with 36% unstably housed, and 30% uninsured. One hundred and forty-five (45%) patients received MOUD during hospitalization, including only 65 (28%) patients not on baseline MOUD. Discharge was premature for 64 (20%) patients. In the year following discharge, 27 (9%) patients were linked to MOUD, and 159 (50%) patients had at least one readmission. Being on MOUD during hospitalization was significantly associated with higher odds of planned discharge [odds ratio (OR) 3.87, P < 0.0001], MOUD on discharge (OR 129.7, P < 0.0001), and linkage to outpatient MOUD (OR 1.25, P < 0.0001), however, was not associated with readmission. Study limitations were the retrospective nature of the study, so post-discharge data are likely underestimated. CONCLUSION There was dramatic undertreatment with MOUD from inpatient admission to outpatient linkage, and high rates of premature discharge and readmission. Engagement in addiction care during hospitalization is a critical first step in improving the care continuum for individuals with opioid use disorder; however, additional interventions may be needed to impact long-term outcomes like readmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elana S. Rosenthal
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
| | - Christopher Brokus
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
| | - Junfeng Sun
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Joseph E. Carpenter
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jillian Catalanotti
- The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC
| | - Ellen F. Eaton
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Alaina R. Steck
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Irene Kuo
- Department of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington DC
| | - Greer A. Burkholder
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Hana Akselrod
- The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC
| | - Keanan McGonigle
- The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC
| | - Timothy Moran
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - William Mai
- The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC
| | - Melissa Notis
- The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC
| | - Carlos Del Rio
- Rollins School of Public Health and Emory School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Alan Greenberg
- Department of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington DC
| | - Michael S. Saag
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Shyamasundaran Kottilil
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
| | - Henry Masur
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sarah Kattakuzhy
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Becker TD, Eschliman EL, Thakrar AP, Yang LH. A conceptual framework for how structural changes in emerging acute substance use service models can reduce stigma of medications for opioid use disorder. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1184951. [PMID: 37829763 PMCID: PMC10565357 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1184951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Stigma toward people taking medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is prevalent, harmful to the health and well-being of this population, and impedes MOUD treatment resource provision, help-seeking, and engagement in care. In recent years, clinicians have implemented new models of MOUD-based treatment in parts of the United States that integrate buprenorphine initiation into emergency departments and other acute general medical settings, with post-discharge linkage to office-based treatment. These service models increase access to MOUD and they have potential to mitigate stigma toward opioid use and MOUD. However, the empirical literature connecting these emerging service delivery models to stigma outcomes remains underdeveloped. This paper aims to bridge the stigma and health service literatures via a conceptual model delineating how elements of emerging MOUD service models can reduce stigma and increase behavior in pursuit of life goals. Specifically, we outline how new approaches to three key processes can counter structural, public, and self-stigma for this population: (1) community outreach with peer-to-peer influence, (2) clinical evaluation and induction of MOUD in acute care settings, and (3) transition to outpatient maintenance care and early recovery. Emerging service models that target these three processes can, in turn, foster patient empowerment and pursuit of life goals. There is great potential to increase the well-being of people who use opioids by reducing stigma against MOUD via these structural changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D. Becker
- Department of Psychiatry, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States
| | - Evan L. Eschliman
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ashish P. Thakrar
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Lawrence H. Yang
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Huxley-Reicher Z, Puglisi LB, Tetrault JM, Weimer MB, Stellini M, Bhandary-Alexander J, Thomas KA, Donroe JH. Response to substance use during hospitalization: A survey study of current and ideal policies and practices. J Hosp Med 2023; 18:829-834. [PMID: 37475186 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
People may use nonprescribed substances during an acute hospitalization. Hospital policies and responses can be stigmatizing, involve law enforcement, and lead to worse patient outcomes, including patient-directed discharge. In the United States, there is currently little data on hospital policies that address the use of substances during hospitalization. In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed clinicians at US hospitals with Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited addiction medicine fellowships about their current practices and policies and what they would include in an ideal policy. We had 77 responses from 55 out of 86 ACGME-addiction medicine fellowships (63.9%). Respondents identified policies at 21.8% of the institutions surveyed. Current responses to inpatient substance use vary, though most do not match what clinicians identify as an ideal response. Our results suggest that the use of nonprescribed substances during a hospitalization may be common, but a majority of hospitals likely do not have patient-centered policies to address this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zina Huxley-Reicher
- Yale Primary Care Residency Program, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lisa B Puglisi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale School of Medicine, Program in Addiction Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Justice at Yale School of Medicine, SEICHE Center for Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jeanette M Tetrault
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale School of Medicine, Program in Addiction Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Melissa B Weimer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale School of Medicine, Program in Addiction Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Meg Stellini
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia-Policy Lab, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Kathryn A Thomas
- Justice at Yale School of Medicine, SEICHE Center for Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Justice Collaboratory at Yale Law School, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Joseph H Donroe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale School of Medicine, Program in Addiction Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Goel A, Lamba W. Nothing About Us Without Us: A Solution to Iatrogenic Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality in People Who Use Drugs. Anesth Analg 2023; 137:470-473. [PMID: 37590792 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Akash Goel
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wiplove Lamba
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Alrawashdeh M, Rhee C, Klompas M, Larochelle MR, Poland RE, Guy JS, Kimmel SD. Association of Early Opioid Withdrawal Treatment Strategy and Patient-Directed Discharge Among Hospitalized Patients with Opioid Use Disorder. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:2289-2297. [PMID: 36788169 PMCID: PMC10406767 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08059-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical hospitalizations for people with opioid use disorder (OUD) frequently result in patient-directed discharges (PDD), often due to untreated pain and withdrawal. OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between early opioid withdrawal management strategies and PDD. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using three datasets representing 362 US hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients hospitalized between 2009 and 2015 with OUD (as identified using ICD-9-CM codes or inpatient buprenorphine administration) and no PDD on the day of admission. INTERVENTIONS Opioid withdrawal management strategies were classified based on day-of-admission receipt of any of the following treatments: (1) medications for OUD (MOUD) including methadone or buprenorphine, (2) other opioid analgesics, (3) adjunctive symptomatic medications without opioids (e.g., clonidine), and (4) no withdrawal treatment. MAIN MEASURES PDD was assessed as the main outcome and hospital length of stay as a secondary outcome. KEY RESULTS Of 6,715,286 hospitalizations, 127,158 (1.9%) patients had OUD and no PDD on the day of admission, of whom 7166 (5.6%) had a later PDD and 91,051 (71.6%) patients received some early opioid withdrawal treatment (22.3% MOUD; 43.4% opioid analgesics; 5.9% adjunctive medications). Compared to no withdrawal treatment, MOUD was associated with a lower risk of PDD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.73, 95%CI 0.68-0.8, p < .001), adjunctive treatment alone was associated with higher risk (aOR = 1.13, 95%CI: 1.01-1.26, p = .031), and treatment with opioid analgesics alone was associated with similar risk (aOR 0.95, 95%CI: 0.89-1.02, p = .148). Among those with PDD, both MOUD (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] = 1.24, 95%CI: 1.17-1.3, p < .001) and opioid analgesic treatments (aIRR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.34-1.45, p < .001) were associated with longer hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS MOUD was associated with decreased risk of PDD but was utilized in < 1 in 4 patients. Efforts are needed to ensure all patients with OUD have access to effective opioid withdrawal management to improve the likelihood they receive recommended hospital care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Alrawashdeh
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
- Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
| | - Chanu Rhee
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael Klompas
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marc R Larochelle
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Russell E Poland
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- HCA Healthcare, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Simeon D Kimmel
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chang JE, Franz B, Pagán JA, Lindenfeld Z, Cronin CE. Substance Use Disorder Program Availability in Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals in the US. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2331243. [PMID: 37639270 PMCID: PMC10463097 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) are ideal sites to deliver addiction treatment to patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), but the availability of these services within SNHs nationwide remains unknown. Objective To examine differences in the delivery of different SUD programs in SNHs vs non-SNHs across the US and to determine whether these differences are increased in certain types of SNHs depending on ownership. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional analysis used data from the 2021 American Hospital Association Annual Survey of Hospitals to examine the associations of safety-net status and ownership with the availability of SUD services at acute care hospitals in the US. Data analysis was performed from January to March 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures This study used 2 survey questions from the American Hospital Association survey to determine the delivery of 5 hospital-based SUD services: screening, consultation, inpatient treatment services, outpatient treatment services, and medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Results A total of 2846 hospitals were included: 409 were SNHs and 2437 were non-SNHs. The lowest proportion of hospitals reported offering inpatient treatment services (791 hospitals [27%]), followed by MOUD (1055 hospitals [37%]), and outpatient treatment services (1087 hospitals [38%]). The majority of hospitals reported offering consultation (1704 hospitals [60%]) and screening (2240 hospitals [79%]). In multivariable models, SNHs were significantly less likely to offer SUD services across all 5 categories of services (screening odds ratio [OR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.48-0.76]; consultation OR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.47-0.83]; inpatient services OR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.97]; outpatient services OR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.59-0.99]; MOUD OR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.46-0.78]). With the exception of MOUD, public or for-profit SNHs did not differ significantly from their non-SNH counterparts. However, nonprofit SNHs were significantly less likely to offer all 5 SUD services compared with their non-SNH counterparts (screening OR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.41-0.66]; consultation OR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.44-0.73]; inpatient services OR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.33-0.61]; outpatient services OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.44-0.76]; MOUD OR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.46-0.79]). Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of SNHs and non-SNHs, SNHs had significantly lower odds of offering the full range of SUD services. These findings add to a growing body of research suggesting that SNHs may face additional barriers to offering SUD programs. Further research is needed to understand these barriers and to identify strategies that support the adoption of evidence-based SUD programs in SNH settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji E. Chang
- Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Berkeley Franz
- Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens
| | - José A. Pagán
- Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Zoe Lindenfeld
- Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Cory E. Cronin
- College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Balasanova AA, Eagen K, Marcovitz D. Rewriting the Hidden Curriculum via Addiction Consult Services: Meeting Patients Where They Are At. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:2194-2197. [PMID: 37037983 PMCID: PMC10361947 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08194-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
Addiction Consult Services (ACS) deliver evidence-based care for patients with substance use disorder (SUD) during the course of general hospital admissions. Stigma toward patients with SUD is a known phenomenon and is part of the "hidden curriculum" that permeates medical training and healthcare settings. ACS have the potential to rewrite the hidden curriculum around SUD and to teach medical students and other trainees how to compassionately care for this patient population. Here, the authors explore the role of stigma within the hidden curriculum of medical training and outline how ACS can successfully contribute to combatting this stigma. The authors highlight two institutions' approaches to educational initiatives that incorporate health professional trainees into ACS. The authors end by providing a vision of how expansion of ACS can promote interdisciplinary learning for healthcare providers amidst the changing landscape of SUD treatment in the USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alëna A Balasanova
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
| | - Kellene Eagen
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - David Marcovitz
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Krawczyk N, Rivera BD, Chang JE, Grivel M, Chen YH, Nagappala S, Englander H, McNeely J. Strategies to support substance use disorder care transitions from acute-care to community-based settings: A Scoping review and typology. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.04.24.23289042. [PMID: 37162840 PMCID: PMC10168484 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.24.23289042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Background Acute-care interventions that identify patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), initiate treatment, and link patients to community-based services, have proliferated in recent years. Yet, much is unknown about the specific strategies being used to support continuity of care from emergency department (ED) or inpatient hospital settings to community-based SUD treatment. In this scoping review, we synthesize the existing literature on patient transition interventions, and form an initial typology of reported strategies. Methods We searched Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO for peer-reviewed articles published between 2000-2021 that studied interventions linking SUD patients from ED or inpatient hospital settings to community-based SUD services. Eligible articles measured at least one post-discharge treatment outcome and included a description of the strategy used to promote linkage to community care. Detailed information was extracted on the components of the transition strategies and a thematic coding process was used to categorize strategies into a typology based on shared characteristics. Facilitators and barriers to transitions of care were synthesized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results Forty-five articles met inclusion criteria. 62% included ED interventions and 44% inpatient interventions. The majority focused on patients with opioid (71%) followed by alcohol (31%) use disorder. The transition strategies reported across studies were heterogeneous and often not well described. An initial typology of ten transition strategies, including five pre- and five post-discharge transition strategies is proposed. The most common strategy was scheduling an appointment with a community-based treatment provider prior to discharge. A range of facilitators and barriers were described, which can inform efforts to improve hospital-to-community transitions of care. Conclusions Strategies to support transitions from acute-care to community-based SUD services, although critical for ensuring continuity of care, vary greatly across interventions and are inconsistently measured and described. More research is needed to classify SUD care transition strategies, understand their components, and explore which lead to the best patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noa Krawczyk
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York NY 10065
| | - Bianca D. Rivera
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York NY 10065
| | - Ji E. Chang
- Department of Public Health Policy and Management, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York NY 10003
| | - Margaux Grivel
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York NY 10003
| | - Yu-Heng Chen
- Department of Criminal Justice, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19102
| | | | - Honora Englander
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239
| | - Jennifer McNeely
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York NY 10065
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Priest KC, Balasanova AA, Levander XA, Chan B, Blazes CK, Mahan J, Brown J, Mahoney S, Peng L, Mahoney S, Lundy T, Englander H. Caring for Hospitalized Adults with Methamphetamine Use Disorder: A Proposed Clinical Roadmap. Am J Med 2023; 136:507-509. [PMID: 36739062 PMCID: PMC10947159 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey C Priest
- School of Medicine, MD/PhD Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
| | - Alëna A Balasanova
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Ximena A Levander
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; IMPACT Team, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Brian Chan
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; IMPACT Team, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | | | - John Mahan
- Jackson County Health and Human Services, Medford, OR
| | - Jessica Brown
- IMPACT Team, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Stacey Mahoney
- IMPACT Team, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Harmony Academy Recovery High School, Lake Oswego, OR
| | - Linda Peng
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; IMPACT Team, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Sean Mahoney
- IMPACT Team, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Mental Health & Addiction Association of Oregon, Portland, OR
| | - Traci Lundy
- IMPACT Team, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Mental Health & Addiction Association of Oregon, Portland, OR
| | - Honora Englander
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; IMPACT Team, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bagley SM, Northup R, Wason K, Bratberg J, Gordon AJ, Oliva E. Examining Systems, Substance Use, and Disenfranchisement: Overview and Proceedings of the 2022 AMERSA Conference. Subst Abus 2023; 44:4-11. [PMID: 37226906 DOI: 10.1177/08897077231169569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Bagley
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Grayken Center for Addiction, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Kristin Wason
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Grayken Center for Addiction, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Bratberg
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Research, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| | - Adam J Gordon
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Vulnerable Veteran Innovative Patient-Aligned-Care-Team, Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bredenberg E, Tietbohl C, Dafoe A, Thurman L, Calcaterra S. Identifying factors that contribute to burnout and resilience among hospital-based addiction medicine providers: A qualitative study. J Subst Abuse Treat 2023; 144:108924. [PMID: 36327617 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Inpatient Addiction Consultation Services (ACS) fill an important need by connecting hospitalized patients with substance use disorders with resources for treatment; however, providers of these services may be at risk for burnout. In this qualitative study, we aimed to identify factors associated with burnout and, conversely, resilience among multidisciplinary providers working on ACS. METHODS We completed 26 semi-structured interviews with clinicians working on ACS, including physicians, social workers, and advanced practice providers. Twelve institutions across the country were represented. The study recruited participants via email solicitation to ACS directors and then via snowball sampling. We used an inductive, grounded theory approach to analyze data. RESULTS Providers described factors contributing to burnout and strategies for promoting resilience, and three main themes arose: (1) Systemic barriers contributed to provider burnout, (2) Engaging in meaningful work increased resilience, and (3) Team dynamics influenced perceptions of burnout and resilience. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that hospital-based addiction medicine work is intrinsically rewarding for many providers and that engaging with other addiction providers to debrief challenging encounters or engage in advocacy work can be protective against burnout. However, administrative and systemic factors are frequent sources of frustration for providers of ACS. Structured debriefings may help to mitigate burnout. Furthermore, training to enhance providers' ability to engage effectively in advocacy work within and between hospital systems has the potential to promote resilience and protect against burnout among ACS providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Bredenberg
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Caroline Tietbohl
- Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ashley Dafoe
- Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Lindsay Thurman
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Susan Calcaterra
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, CO, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wang J, Claman A, Singh S, Sidelnik SA, Arshed A. Best Practices in Substance Use Disorders to Achieve Treatment Equity in Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. Psychiatr Ann 2023. [DOI: 10.3928/00485713-20230103-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
41
|
Implementation of an integrated infectious disease and substance use disorder team for injection drug use-associated infections: a qualitative study. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2023; 18:8. [PMID: 36747268 PMCID: PMC9902242 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-023-00363-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitalizations for severe injection drug use-related infections (SIRIs) are characterized by high costs, frequent patient-directed discharge, and high readmission rates. Beyond the health system impacts, these admissions can be traumatizing to people who inject drugs (PWID), who often receive inadequate treatment for their substance use disorders (SUD). The Jackson SIRI team was developed as an integrated infectious disease/SUD treatment intervention for patients hospitalized at a public safety-net hospital in Miami, Florida in 2020. We conducted a qualitative study to identify patient- and clinician-level perceived implementation barriers and facilitators to the SIRI team intervention. METHODS Participants were patients with history of SIRIs (n = 7) and healthcare clinicians (n = 8) at one implementing hospital (Jackson Memorial Hospital). Semi-structured qualitative interviews were performed with a guide created using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interviews were transcribed, double coded, and categorized by study team members using CFIR constructs. RESULTS Implementation barriers to the SIRI team intervention identified by participants included: (1) complexity of the SIRI team intervention; (2) lack of resources for PWID experiencing homelessness, financial insecurity, and uninsured status; (3) clinician-level stigma and lack of knowledge around addiction and medications for opioid use disorder (OUD); and (4) concerns about underinvestment in the intervention. Implementation facilitators of the intervention included: (1) a non-judgmental, harm reduction-oriented approach; (2) the team's advocacy for PWID as a means of institutional culture change; (3) provision of close post-hospital follow-up that is often inaccessible for PWID; (4) strong communication with patients and their hospital physicians; and (5) addressing diverse needs such as housing, insurance, and psychological wellbeing. CONCLUSION Integration of infectious disease and SUD treatment is a promising approach to managing patients with SIRIs. Implementation success depends on institutional buy-in, holistic care beyond the medical domain, and an ethos rooted in harm reduction across multilevel (inner and outer) implementation contexts.
Collapse
|
42
|
Syros A, Rodriguez MG, Rennick AC, Dima GA, Gibstein AR, de la Parte L, Hermenau MG, Ciraldo KJ, Chueng TA, Tookes HE, Bartholomew TS, Serota DP. Availability of medications for opioid use disorder in outpatient and inpatient pharmacies in South Florida: a secret shopper survey. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2022; 17:63. [PMID: 36401298 PMCID: PMC9673453 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-022-00346-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the proven efficacy of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and recent reduction in barriers to prescribers, numerous obstacles exist for patients seeking MOUD. Prior studies have used telephone surveys to investigate pharmacy-related barriers to MOUD. We applied this methodology to evaluate inpatient and outpatient pharmacy barriers to MOUD in South Florida. Methods Randomly selected pharmacies in South Florida (Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties) were called using a standardized script with a “secret shopper” approach until 200 successful surveys had been completed. The primary outcome was the availability of any buprenorphine products. Second, a list of all 48 acute care hospitals within the aforementioned counties was compiled, and hospitals were contacted by telephone using a second structured script. Results A total of 1374 outpatient pharmacies and 48 inpatient pharmacies were identified. 378 randomly selected outpatient pharmacies were contacted to accrue 200 successful calls (53% success rate). All 48 inpatient pharmacies were contacted to successfully complete 25 inpatient surveys (52%). Of the 200 outpatient pharmacies contacted, 38% had any buprenorphine available. There was a significant difference in buprenorphine availability by county, with Miami-Dade having the least availability and Palm Beach having the most availability (27% vs. 47%, respectively; p = 0.04). Of the 38% with buprenorphine available, 82% had a sufficient supply for a two-week prescription of buprenorphine 8 mg twice daily. Of the pharmacies that did not have buprenorphine, 55% would be willing to order with a median estimated time to receive an order of 2 days (IQR 1.25–3 days). Of the 25 surveyed inpatient pharmacies, 88% reported having buprenorphine on inpatient formulary, and 55% of hospitals had at least one restriction on ordering of buprenorphine beyond federal regulations. Conclusions The results of this study highlight significant pharmacy-related barriers to comprehensive OUD treatment across the healthcare system including both acute care hospital pharmacies and outpatient community pharmacies. Despite efforts to increase the number of MOUD providers, there still remain downstream obstacles to MOUD access.
Collapse
|
43
|
Calcaterra SL, Bottner R, Martin M, Englander H, Weinstein ZM, Weimer MB, Lambert E, Ronan MV, Huerta S, Zaman T, Ullal M, Peterkin AF, Torres-Lockhart K, Buresh M, O’Brien MT, Snyder H, Herzig SJ. Management of opioid use disorder, opioid withdrawal, and opioid overdose prevention in hospitalized adults: A systematic review of existing guidelines. J Hosp Med 2022; 17:679-692. [PMID: 35880821 PMCID: PMC9474657 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.12908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitalizations related to the consequences of opioid use are rising. National guidelines directing in-hospital opioid use disorder (OUD) management do not exist. OUD treatment guidelines intended for other treatment settings could inform in-hospital OUD management. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the quality and content of existing guidelines for OUD treatment and management. DATA SOURCES OVID MEDLINE, PubMed, Ovid PsychINFO, EBSCOhost CINHAL, ERCI Guidelines Trust, websites of relevant societies and advocacy organizations, and selected international search engines. STUDY SELECTION Guidelines published between January 2010 to June 2020 addressing OUD treatment, opioid withdrawal management, opioid overdose prevention, and care transitions among adults. DATA EXTRACTION We assessed quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. DATA SYNTHESIS Nineteen guidelines met the selection criteria. Most recommendations were based on observational studies or expert consensus. Guidelines recommended the use of nonstigmatizing language among patients with OUD; to assess patients with unhealthy opioid use for OUD using the Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Diseases-5th Edition criteria; use of methadone or buprenorphine to treat OUD and opioid withdrawal; use of multimodal, nonopioid therapy, and when needed, short-acting opioid analgesics in addition to buprenorphine or methadone, for acute pain management; ensuring linkage to ongoing methadone or buprenorphine treatment; referring patients to psychosocial treatment; and ensuring access to naloxone for opioid overdose reversal. CONCLUSIONS Included guidelines were informed by studies with various levels of rigor and quality. Future research should systematically study buprenorphine and methadone initiation and titration among people using fentanyl and people with pain, especially during hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan L. Calcaterra
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Richard Bottner
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Marlene Martin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Honora Englander
- Section of Addiction Medicine and Division of Hospital Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Zoe M. Weinstein
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Section of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Addiction Research and Education (CARE) Unit, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Eugene Lambert
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA and Massachusetts General Hospital, Medicine, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Matthew V. Ronan
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA and Massachusetts General Hospital, Medicine, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, MA, USA
| | - Sergio Huerta
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, NM, USA
| | - Tauheed Zaman
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Monish Ullal
- Department of Internal Medicine at Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Alyssa F. Peterkin
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Section of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Addiction Research and Education (CARE) Unit, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Megan Buresh
- Division of Addiction Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Meghan T. O’Brien
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hannah Snyder
- Family Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Shoshana J. Herzig
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA and Massachusetts General Hospital, Medicine, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mosher H. Treating hospitalized people who have opioid use disorder: Coming to consensus. J Hosp Med 2022; 17:774-775. [PMID: 35934924 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.12928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary Mosher
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Affiliation(s)
- Honora Englander
- From the Section of Addiction Medicine in General Internal Medicine and the Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (H.E.); the Network for Public Health Law, Los Angeles (C.S.D.); and NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York (C.S.D.)
| | - Corey S Davis
- From the Section of Addiction Medicine in General Internal Medicine and the Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (H.E.); the Network for Public Health Law, Los Angeles (C.S.D.); and NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York (C.S.D.)
| |
Collapse
|