Der Nightmare Effects Questionnaire (NEQ): Pilotstudie zu ersten psychometrischen Kennwerten bei Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen

Nightmare Disorder

This article presents a comprehensive review of nightmare disorder, covering diagnosis, treatment approaches, guidelines, and considerations. It begins with an introduction, defining the disorder and addressing its prevalence and psychosocial implications. The article explores assessment tools for diagnosis and then delves into psychological and pharmacologic treatment modalities, examining their efficacy and side effects. Considerations for optimizing therapeutic outcomes are highlighted, including medication versus psychotherapy, co-morbidities, cultural implications, and the use of technology and service animals. The review concludes by offering key recommendations for effective treatment and clinical care for individuals with nightmare disorder.

Widening epidemiological data on the prevalence of child maltreatment: Validation of the German ICAST-R in a student sample and national household survey

BACKGROUND

A number of instruments for measuring child maltreatment (CM) prevalence have repeatedly been used across different countries. Although they hold the potential for providing benchmarks to tackle the gap of lacking comparability of CM prevalence across countries, contextual information about the adverse experiences such as perpetrator, chronicity, frequency, or severity are rarely covered. The ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool - Retrospective (ICAST-R) covers these important dimensions. The German version increases the number of available versions to 21 different languages. Spoken by about 120 million people, German is one of the 20 most prevalent languages around the world. Moreover, the ICAST-R is intended to be used with young adults. This study further aims at adding towards the gap of psychometrics in older age groups.

METHODS

Analyses are based on both a sample of German students (n = 333) and a nationally representative household survey (n = 2515). The validation process covered six steps: (1) Analyses of missing data on single items, (2) calculation of descriptive statistics to estimate the prevalence CM as well as subjective severity and main perpetrators. (3) Structural validity of the four conceptualized subtypes of CM (neglect, physical abuse, emotional abuse and sexual abuse) was tested using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Next (4), equivalence testing by multigroup confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA) on age groups was conducted within the representative sample; (5) reliability was tested by determining internal consistencies for each subscale via the McDonald's Omega, Kuder-Richardson 20 (KR-20), and Cronbach's alpha. Lastly (6), criterion validity was tested in regression models comparing depressive/anxious symptomatology for single victimization and polyvictimization.

RESULTS

The German ICAST-R yielded low missing values items in both samples. 16 % of the participants in the national household survey reported neglect, 20.3 % physical abuse, 22.2 % emotional abuse, and 8.6 % sexual abuse. Polyvictimization was prevalent with 20.6 % of subjects reporting >2 types of CM. Students in the pilot-survey reported much higher prevalence estimates than participants in the nationally representative sample. The types of CM subjectively rated as most harmful were emotional abuse and sexual abuse. In both samples, structural validity was similarly confirmed as CFA was reproducing the four conceptualized subtypes of CM with adequate fit (household survey: CFI 0.919, TLI 0.907, RMSEA 0.017, SRMR 0.046). Internal consistency achieved acceptable and comparable values for all three types of coefficients; criterion validity was established with a significant dose-response effect of CM experiences on both anxiety and depressive symptoms/diagnoses. Age dependent analyses on structural validity (MGCFA) and reliability in the household survey revealed potential weaknesses of items.

CONCLUSION

The German version of the ICAST-R both widens the possibility of international CM prevalence comparison and provides novel epidemiological data for Germany on subjective severity of CM and CM perpetrators. Even in the presence of a marked selection bias, the ICAST-R had similarly good psychometric properties in the student and nationally representative household sample. Except for issues with two items, equivalence testing was comparable across age groups.

The Nightmare Quality of Life Questionnaire

RATIONALE

Patient-centered outcomes are increasingly sought to evaluate social interactions and healthcare interventions in patients with sleep disorders. Yet, measures to assess quality of life (QoL) are lacking for those who experience nightmares.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to describe the development and validation of a new health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument for patients with nightmares.

METHODS

Attributes obtained from a focus group of patients (n = 113) with established nightmares were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis to elicit salient QoL themes for the new instrument. A validation cohort (n = 34) was used to determine the psychometric performance of the 16-item questionnaire including item-scaling, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability tested four weeks apart.

RESULTS

Four factors (sleep health, emotional and psychological well-being, social interaction, and motivation) explained 53.9% of the total variance. The Nightmare Quality of Life (NQoL) showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.85) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.89). Concurrent validity was evidenced by a strong correlation with the Nightmare Distress Questionnaire (r = 0.87; p < .001) and more modest associations with the Nightmare Frequency Questionnaire (r = , 0.69; p < .001), SF-36 (r = -0.68; p < .001), and PSQI (r = 0.45; p = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

The NQoL has demonstrable construct validity and reliability and represents a promising multi-dimensional instrument to assess outcome measures for quality of life in patients with nightmares.

Das Multidimensionale Düsseldorfer Trauminventar (MDTI)

Zusammenfassung. Vorgestellt wird die Entwicklung und testpsychologische Evaluation des Multidimensionalen Düsseldorfer Trauminventars (MDTI), eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung des Traumerlebens unabhängig vom Trauminhalt. Dazu wurde eine Vorläuferversion, das Düsseldorfer Trauminventar (DTI; 51 Items), einer Stichprobe aus N = 715 vorgelegt, welche über E-Mail-Verteiler an Universitäten, sozialen Netzwerke sowie Medizin- und Traumforen rekrutiert und zu einem digitalen Fragebogenformular weitergeleitet wurden. Die Stichprobe bestand aus n = 444 weiblichen (62 %) und n = 270 männlichen (38 %) Teilnehmenden. Ihr Alter lag zwischen 15 und 73 Jahren. Das mittlere Alter betrug M = 30.03 Jahre ( SD = 10.36). Die Items wurden einer Hauptkomponentenanalyse mit obliquer Rotation unterzogen, um anschließend die reliabelsten und validesten Items herauszufiltern. Die Faktorenanalyse ergab eine eindeutige 5-faktorielle Struktur des Fragebogens mit sehr guten Reliabilitäten der Subskalen. Die verbliebenen 27 Items bilden nun die 5 Skalen des als Multidimensionales Düsseldorfer Trauminventar (MDTI) bezeichneten Fragebogens: (1) Inkorporation von Tagesereignissen, (2) Angenehme Trauminhalte, (3) Traumerinnerung, (4) Aversive Trauminhalte und (5) Persönliche Bedeutsamkeit der Träume. Mit dem MDTI ist es möglich, das Traumerleben unabhängig vom Trauminhalt zu erfassen.

Can You Sleep? - Effect of Retrospective Recall of Child Maltreatment on Sleep Parameters and the Mediating Role of Psychological Distress Among Students of Two German Universities

PURPOSE

Child maltreatment may be linked with long-term sleeping disorders and limited coping with stress. Yet, the potential relationships are only marginally studied.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Based on a sample of young adults (n = 312) this study aims at exploring the effects of child maltreatment and the experience of threat to personal safety and life in childhood on sleep disturbances in early adulthood. Data were collected at the two study sites, Ulm University and Bielefeld University, by an online survey. For both risk factors, child maltreatment and the experience of threat to personal safety and life in childhood, a direct impact on sleep disturbances and an indirect path via psychological distress were tested using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM).

RESULTS

In these models, the direct path to sleep disturbances turned out to be significant for the experience of threat to personal safety and life (Path C: b = 0.18, p = 0.013), but not for child maltreatment (Path C: b = 0.05, p = 0.491). However, the current level of psychological distress was found to have a mediating effect on sleep disturbances for both risk factors, thereby confirming indirect significant effects.

CONCLUSION

Considering that the etiological pathway of child maltreatment on sleeping disturbances is mediated via psychological distress, this provides a venue to test in future research whether stress reduction interventions can reduce the negative consequences of child maltreatment on sleep disorders.

Bad dreams, bedtime anxiety, and trait anxiety in school-aged children

Background and objectives

Occasional nightmares (distressing dreams that awaking the sleeper) and bad dreams (distressing dreams that do not awaking the sleeper) are very common in children and adolescents. About 5% of children experience frequent nightmares (once a week or more often) and the question arises as to what factors contribute to significant nightmare distress which is basic for diagnosing a nightmare disorder.

Materials and methods

A sample of 624 school-aged children (10–16 years; mean age 12.45 ± 1.33 years) completed a dream questionnaire and an anxiety inventory.

Results

About 11% of the participants reported frequent bad dreams; 3.5% reported frequent bedtime anxieties due to bad dreams. Similar to the findings in adults, distress due to bad dreams was not only related to bad dream frequency but also to trait anxiety—controlling for the direct effect of trait anxiety on bad dream frequency, i.e., bad dream frequency and trait anxiety contributed independently to bedtime anxiety due to bad dreams. In the exploratory part, the cultural background of the children’s parents showed only minor effects on bad dreams.

Conclusion

Similar to nightmare studies in adults, bad dream frequency and trait anxiety contributed independently to bad dream distress. Based on the current diagnostic criteria of the nightmare disorder, it would be interesting to have the opportunity to treat children with significant distress due to nightmares or bad dreams and study the long-term benefit—given that many adult nightmare sufferers reported that their nightmares started in childhood.

Nightmare distress revisited: Cognitive appraisal of nightmares according to Lazarus' transactional model of stress

Aim of the current research was to newly conceptualize nightmare distress. The special focus was on the appraisal of nightmare distress while applying a theory-driven approach based on Lazarus' transactional model of stress. It was argued that individuals feel the more distressed the more they feel threatened and harmed by their nightmares (primary appraisal according to Lazarus) and the more they lack of adequate coping skills to deal with the stressor (secondary appraisal). Based on these assumptions, the questionnaire of Cognitive Appraisal of Nightmares (CAN) was challenged empirically in two studies of patients who have experienced distressing nightmares using explorative and confirmative factor analyses (N = 504 and N = 402). Items and scales showed good psychometric properties and plausible correlations. The CAN sum score was more distinct from nightmare frequency than the frequently used Nightmare Distress Questionnaire (NDQ), underpinning that frequency and distress are both different approaches to what patients suffer from. The NDQ was particularly associated with acted out behaviors after a nightmare, while the CAN was particularly associated with physiological and emotional consequences of a nightmare. In order to obtain a multifactorial and theory-driven picture about how individuals appraise their nightmares, the CAN may be convenient.

Psychometric evaluation of the Hamburg Nightmare Questionnaire (HNQ)

Background: Nightmares are a widespread phenomenon. In comparison to the general population, they occur in mentally ill and especially in traumatized individuals with an increased frequency. Despite the high prevalence, there is no short questionnaire in the German language that is able to characterize nightmares, to differentiate between different nightmare types and to assess their impact on daytime functioning. Objective: The Hamburg Nightmare Questionnaire (HNQ) has been developed as a short self-rating instrument to fill this gap. Method: Psychometric characteristics of the HNQ were evaluated in a sample of 707 German soldiers passing through the standard diagnostics of the Center for Mental Health at the German Armed Forces Hospital Hamburg. Results: The results of this study show satisfactory psychometric characteristics as a sound factorial structure and adequate internal consistency for the HNQ as well as initial indications of the construct validity of its subscales. Conclusions: The HNQ is a reliable and economic tool for the assessment of posttraumatic nightmares in clinical as well as research settings.

Aetiology and treatment of nightmare disorder: State of the art and future perspectives

This consensus paper provides an overview of the state of the art in research on the aetiology and treatment of nightmare disorder and outlines further perspectives on these issues. It presents a definition of nightmares and nightmare disorder followed by epidemiological findings, and then explains existing models of nightmare aetiology in traumatized and non‐traumatized individuals. Chronic nightmares develop through the interaction of elevated hyperarousal and impaired fear extinction. This interplay is assumed to be facilitated by trait affect distress elicited by traumatic experiences, early childhood adversity and trait susceptibility, as well as by elevated thought suppression and potentially sleep‐disordered breathing. Accordingly, different treatment options for nightmares focus on their meaning, on the chronic repetition of the nightmare or on maladaptive beliefs. Clinically, knowledge of healthcare providers about nightmare disorder and the delivery of evidence‐based interventions in the healthcare system is discussed. Based on these findings, we highlight some future perspectives and potential further developments of nightmare treatments and research into nightmare aetiology.