QT Interval Prolongation Associated With Cytotoxic and Targeted Cancer Therapeutics

Guarding the heart: How SGLT-2 inhibitors protect against chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity: SGLT-2 inhibitors and chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity

The introduction of chemotherapy agents has significantly transformed cancer treatment, with anthracyclines being one of the most commonly used drugs. While these agents have proven to be highly effective against various types of cancers, they come with complications, including neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and cardiotoxicity. Among these side effects, cardiotoxicity is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality, with anthracyclines being the primary culprit. Chemotherapy medications have various mechanisms that can lead to cardiac injury. Hence, numerous studies have been conducted to decrease the cardiotoxicity of these treatments. Combination therapy with beta-blockers, Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers have effectively reduced such outcomes. However, a definitive preventive strategy is yet to be established. Meanwhile, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors lower blood glucose levels in type 2 diabetes by reducing its re-absorption in the kidneys. They are thus considered potent drugs for glycemic control and reduction of cardiovascular risks. Recent studies have shown that SGLT-2 inhibitors are crucial in preventing chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. They enhance heart cell viability, prevent degenerative changes, stimulate autophagy, and reduce cell death. This drug class also reduces inflammation by inhibiting reactive oxygen species and inflammatory cytokine production. Moreover, it can not only reverse the harmful effects of anticancer agents on the heart structure but also enhance the effectiveness of chemotherapy by minimizing potential consequences on the heart. In conclusion, SGLT-2 inhibitors hold promise as a therapeutic strategy for protecting cancer patients from chemotherapy-induced heart damage and improving cardiovascular outcomes.

Mechanisms, prevalence and management of cardiac arrhythmias in cancer patients: a comprehensive review

Recently, prognosis and survival of cancer patients has improved due to progression and refinement of cancer therapies; however, cardiovascular sequelae in this population augmented and now represent the second cause of death in oncological patients. Initially, the main issue was represented by heart failure and coronary artery disease, but a growing body of evidence has now shed light on the increased arrhythmic risk of this population, atrial fibrillation being the most frequently encountered. Awareness of arrhythmic complications of cancer and its treatments may help oncologists and cardiologists to develop targeted approaches for the management of arrhythmias in this population. In this review, we provide an updated overview of the mechanisms triggering cardiac arrhythmias in cancer patients, their prevalence and management.

CDK4/6 inhibitors: basics, pros, and major cons in breast cancer treatment with specific regard to cardiotoxicity - a narrative review

Breast cancer is characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of breast cells, with a high incidence reported in 2020 to have affected over 2 million women. In recent years, the conventional methods of treating breast cancer have involved radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, the emergence of CDK4/6 inhibitors has shown potential as a promising cancer therapy. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) inhibitors are a class of molecules that impede the formation of an active kinase complex, thereby hindering its activity and consequently halting the progression of the cell cycle. It was discovered that they have a significant impact on impeding the progression of the cancer. This is evident with the Food and Drug Administration's approval of drugs such as palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in combination with specific endocrine therapies. In spite of enormous success in breast cancer treatment, certain obstacles have emerged, such as therapy resistance, side effects, and most of all, cardiotoxicity. Some of these drawbacks have been successfully overcome by dosage reduction, different combinations of the drugs, and the assessment of each patient's condition and suitability prior to treatment. Yet other drawbacks still require tenacious research, especially certain cases of cardiotoxicities. This article delves into the biological mechanisms of CDK4/6 in the cell cycle and cancer, as well as the clinical advantages and most common adverse events (AEs) associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. The primary objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of cardiotoxic AEs and elucidate the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the cardiotoxicity of CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Adverse effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer therapy: pathophysiology, mechanisms and clinical management

Since their invention in the early 2000s, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have gained prominence as the most effective pathway-directed anti-cancer agents. TKIs have shown significant utility in the treatment of multiple hematological malignancies and solid tumors, including chronic myelogenous leukemia, non-small cell lung cancers, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and HER2-positive breast cancers. Given their widespread applications, an increasing frequency of TKI-induced adverse effects has been reported. Although TKIs are known to affect multiple organs in the body including the lungs, liver, gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, thyroid, blood, and skin, cardiac involvement accounts for some of the most serious complications. The most frequently reported cardiovascular side effects range from hypertension, atrial fibrillation, reduced cardiac function, and heart failure to sudden death. The potential mechanisms of these side effects are unclear, leading to critical knowledge gaps in the development of effective therapy and treatment guidelines. There are limited data to infer the best clinical approaches for the early detection and therapeutic modulation of TKI-induced side effects, and universal consensus regarding various management guidelines is yet to be reached. In this state-of-the-art review, we examine multiple pre-clinical and clinical studies and curate evidence on the pathophysiology, mechanisms, and clinical management of these adverse reactions. We expect that this review will provide researchers and allied healthcare providers with the most up-to-date information on the pathophysiology, natural history, risk stratification, and management of emerging TKI-induced side effects in cancer patients.

Cardiotoxicities of Novel Therapies in Hematological Malignancies: Monoclonal Antibodies and Enzyme Inhibitors

Monoclonal antibodies (mAB) selectively target leukemia surface antigens and work by either blocking cell surface receptors or triggering the target cell's destruction. Similarly, enzyme inhibitors bind to complex molecular platforms and induce downstream mechanisms that trigger cell death. These are used in a variety of hematologic malignancies. Yet, they also elicit severe immune-mediated reactions as biological agents that require careful monitoring. Cardiovascular effects include cardiomyopathy, ventricular dysfunction, cardiac arrest, and acute coronary syndrome. While there have been scattered reviews of mAB and enzyme inhibitors, a consolidated resource regarding their cardiovascular risk profile is lacking. We provide general recommendations for initial screening and serial monitoring based on the literature.

Electrocardiographic abnormalities in childhood cancer survivors treated with cardiotoxic therapy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to assess the available literature on the prevalence and risk factors of electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities after cardiotoxic treatment in childhood cancer survivors (CCS).

METHODS

A literature search was performed within MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (1966-11/2020) and reference lists of relevant studies. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported ECG abnormalities ≥2 years after cancer diagnosis in ≥50 CCS treated with anthracyclines, RT involving the heart region and/or mitoxantrone. Information about population, treatment, outcome, and risk factors were extracted and risk of bias was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 934 identified publications, 10 studies were included. Outcome definitions, treatment regimens, follow-up period, and risk of bias varied. These ECG abnormalities and prevalences were reported: major (5%-23%) and minor (12%) abnormalities according to the Minnesota Code, rhythm abnormalities (0%-12%), conduction abnormalities (0.3%-7.1%), depolarization abnormalities (0%), and repolarization abnormalities (0%-65%). The reported risk factors of ECG abnormalities (two studies) are male sex, anthracyclines, RT involving the heart region, and hypertension, although results were not univocal between studies and abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple ECG abnormalities have been described in CCS ≥2 years from diagnosis, some of which can have important implications. Future research is needed to evaluate the exact long-term incidence and risk factors, and to investigate their clinical relevance and relation with cardiac dysfunction or future cardiac events. This could improve cardiac surveillance for CCS.

Thromboembolic Events in Patients with HER2-Negative, Hormone Receptor-Positive, Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Ribociclib Combined with Letrozole or Fulvestrant: A Real-World Data

Purpose

Patients and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Expanding the Clinical Use of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer from Metastatic Setting to Adjuvant Setting

More than two-thirds of patients with breast cancer present with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative disease at their initial diagnosis. HR-positive breast cancer’s growth depends on Cyclin D1, a direct transcriptional target of estrogen receptors (ER). The recent introduction of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib) has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer in both endocrine-sensitive and endocrine-resistant settings and in both pre-and post-menopausal women. Multiple large randomized clinical trials had demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and, more recently, in overall survival (OS). Adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) significantly reduces the risk of recurrence and death among patients with HR-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC). However, up to 20% of these patients will experience local, regional or distal recurrences in the first ten years. Such resistance to ET motivated researchers to try CDK4/6 inhibitors in EBC, both in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. While many clinical trials are still ongoing, at least one study and two meta-analyses had shown beneficial results, based on which the US Food and Drug Administration had recently approved the use of one of these agents, abemaciclib, in combination with ET for the adjuvant therapy of patients with high-risk EBC. In this paper, we review the recently published and ongoing landmark clinical trials attempting to expand the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, in combination with ET, in the adjuvant setting of EBC.

Potentially Hazardous Drug-Drug Interactions Associated With Oral Antineoplastic Agents Prescribed in Chinese Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital Settings: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Oral administration increases the risk of interactions, because most oral antineoplastic agents (OAAs) are taken on a daily basis. Interactions can increase exposure to antitumoral agents or cause treatment failure. Potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are commonly observed in patients with cancer, while the extent to which OAAs related hazardous DDIs remains unclear. Methods: We studied the contraindication patterns between oral antineoplastic agents and other medications among cancer patients in two tertiary care teaching hospitals in China. A total of 20 clinically significant hazardous DDI pairs that involved 30 OAAs were identified based on the predetermined criteria. Patient medications were checked for DDIs by using the US Food and Drug Administration approved labeling. Descriptive statistics and uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out. Results: In this study, 13,917 patients were included and a total of 297 DDIs were identified. The results revealed that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), dexamethasone and fluoroquinolones were the most often involved hazardous DDIs with OAAs. The most prevalent contraindication is the simultaneous use of certain molecular targeted agents and PPIs. In the result of the multivariate analysis, younger age (0-20 group), increasing number of drugs and patient treated with targeted therapy had a higher risk for DDIs. Conclusion: The prevalence of OAAs related hazardous DDIs appears to be low in the cancer patients. However, physicians and clinical pharmacologists should be aware of the potential hazardous DDIs when prescribing OAAs, especially certain pH-dependent molecular targeted agents and potential QTc prolonging drugs.

Cancer Chemotherapy-Induced Sinus Bradycardia: A Narrative Review of a Forgotten Adverse Effect of Cardiotoxicity

Cardiotoxicity is a common adverse effect of anticancer drugs (ACDs), including the so-called targeted drugs, and increases morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Attention has focused mainly on ACD-induced heart failure, myocardial ischemia, hypertension, thromboembolism, QT prolongation, and tachyarrhythmias. Yet, although an increasing number of ACDs can produce sinus bradycardia (SB), this proarrhythmic effect remains an underappreciated complication, probably because of its low incidence and severity since most patients are asymptomatic. However, SB merits our interest because its incidence increases with the aging of the population and cancer is an age-related disease and because SB represents a risk factor for QT prolongation. Indeed, several ACDs that produce SB also prolong the QT interval. We reviewed published reports on ACD-induced SB from January 1971 to November 2020 using the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Published reports from clinical trials, case reports, and recent reviews were considered. This review describes the associations between ACDs and SB, their clinical relevance, risk factors, and possible mechanisms of onset and treatment.

Defining cardiovascular toxicities of cancer therapies: an International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS) consensus statement

The discipline of Cardio-Oncology has seen tremendous growth over the past decade. It is devoted to the cardiovascular (CV) care of the cancer patient, especially to the mitigation and management of CV complications or toxicities of cancer therapies, which can have profound implications on prognosis. To that effect, many studies have assessed CV toxicities in patients undergoing various types of cancer therapies; however, direct comparisons have proven difficult due to lack of uniformity in CV toxicity endpoints. Similarly, in clinical practice, there can be substantial differences in the understanding of what constitutes CV toxicity, which can lead to significant variation in patient management and outcomes. This document addresses these issues and provides consensus definitions for the most commonly reported CV toxicities, including cardiomyopathy/heart failure and myocarditis, vascular toxicity, and hypertension, as well as arrhythmias and QTc prolongation. The current document reflects a harmonizing review of the current landscape in CV toxicities and the definitions used to define these. This consensus effort aims to provide a structure for definitions of CV toxicity in the clinic and for future research. It will be important to link the definitions outlined herein to outcomes in clinical practice and CV endpoints in clinical trials. It should facilitate communication across various disciplines to improve clinical outcomes for cancer patients with CV diseases.

Recognition, Prevention, and Management of Arrhythmias and Autonomic Disorders in Cardio-Oncology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

With the advent of novel cancer therapeutics and improved screening, more patients are surviving a cancer diagnosis or living longer with advanced disease. Many of these treatments have associated cardiovascular toxicities that can manifest in both an acute and a delayed fashion. Arrhythmias are an increasingly identified complication with unique management challenges in the cancer population. The purpose of this scientific statement is to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding arrhythmia identification and treatment in patients with cancer. Atrial tachyarrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, are most common, but ventricular arrhythmias, including those related to treatment-induced QT prolongation, and bradyarrhythmias can also occur. Despite increased recognition, dedicated prospective studies evaluating true incidence are lacking. Moreover, few studies have addressed appropriate prevention and treatment strategies. As such, this scientific statement serves to mobilize the cardio-oncology, electrophysiology, and oncology communities to develop clinical and scientific collaborations that will improve the care of patients with cancer who have arrhythmias.

Cardio-oncology Training in the COVID-19 Era

Cardio-oncology is a field dedicated to the prevention, diagnosis, and management of cardiovascular disease in cancer patients before, during, and after cancer therapy. It is an emerging field with limited opportunities for structured education and training. In the year 2021, we cannot define the requirements of cardio-oncology training without acknowledging the impact of the global coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. While this pandemic poses significant health risks to patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease as well as the providers who care for them, it also allows novel opportunities for the nascent field of cardio-oncology to readily adapt. In this article, we detail how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted all aspects of cardio-oncology training, how programs and trainees can adapt to these challenges, and how lessons learned from the COVID-19 era can continue to positively impact cardio-oncology training for the foreseeable future.

Clinical Approach to Cardiovascular Toxicity of Oral Antineoplastic Agents: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Precision medicine has ushered in a new era of targeted treatments for numerous malignancies, leading to improvements in overall survival. Unlike traditional chemotherapy, many molecular targeted antineoplastic agents are available in oral formulation, leading to enhanced patient convenience and a perception of reduced risk of adverse effects. Although oral antineoplastic agents are generally well-tolerated, cardiovascular toxicities are being reported with increasing frequency in part due to U.S. Food and Drug Administration and manufacturer recommended cardiac monitoring. Monitoring strategies have focused on left ventricular dysfunction, hypertension, and QT prolongation/arrhythmias. Given the rapid pace of development and availability of new oral antineoplastic agents, the purpose of this review is to provide clinicians with an up-to-date practical approach to monitoring and management of cardiovascular toxicities with the aim of improving overall outcomes for patients with cancer.

Measurement and Management of QT Interval Prolongation for General Physicians

One of the more challenging aspects of ECG interpretation is measurement and interpretation of the QT interval. This interval represents the time taken for the ventricles to completely repolarise after activation. Abnormal prolongation of the QT interval can lead to torsades de pointes, a form of potentially life-threatening polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Detection of a prolonged QT interval is essential as this can be a reversible problem, particularly in the context of the use of a variety of commonly prescribed medications in the hospital setting. Automated ECG printouts cannot be relied upon to diagnose QT interval prolongation; thus, the onus is on the clinician to identify it. This is a difficult task, as the normal QT interval is typically measured relative to the heart rate. Therefore, the QT interval often requires "correction" for the current heart rate, in order to correctly stratify the risk of torsades de pointes. A wealth of correctional formulae have been derived, but none has proven superior. We present an approach to the ECG in this context, and a step-by-step guide to manually measuring and correcting the QT interval, and an approach to management in common hospital-based clinical scenarios.