Novel Pharmacotherapies for Recurrent Pericarditis: Current Options in 2020

The efficacy of a single-dose anakinra injection during disease attack in pediatric familial Mediterranean fever

The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy of a single-dose anakinra during familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) attacks and its effect on the duration, severity, and frequency of attacks. The patients with FMF who had disease episode and received a single-dose anakinra during disease episode between December 2020 and May 2022 were included. Demographic characteristics, MEFV gene variants detected, concomitant medical conditions, demographics of recent and previous episodes, laboratory findings and length of hospital stay were recorded. A retrospective analysis of medical records revealed 79 attacks from 68 patients who met inclusion criteria. The patients had a median age of 13 (2.5-25) years. All patients reported that the average duration of their previous episodes lasted longer than 24 h. When the recovery time of attacks after subcutaneous anakinra application at the disease attack was examined, it was observed that 4 attacks (5.1%) ended in 10 min; 10 attacks (12.7%) in 10-30 min; 29 attacks (36.7%) in 30-60 min; 28 attacks (35.4%) in 1-4 h; 4 attacks (5.1%) in 24 h; and 4 attacks (5.1%) ended in more than 24 h. There was no patient who did not recover from their attack after a single dose of anakinra. Although the efficacy of a single-dose anakinra administration during FMF attacks in children needs to be confirmed by prospective studies, our results suggest that use of a single-dose anakinra during FMF attacks is effective in reduction of severity and duration of disease attacks.

Clinical Utility of Rilonacept for the Treatment of Recurrent Pericarditis: Design, Development, and Place in Therapy

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) has been traditionally regarded as a "nightmare" for both clinicians and patients. Until approximately a decade ago, available treatments were thin on the ground with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, glucocorticoids, colchicine, and classical immunosuppressants being the only options. The first important step in the tale of RP was the advent of colchicine in clinical practice, which has been shown to halve the rate of first and subsequent pericarditis recurrences. The second major breakthrough advance in this setting was the introduction of interleukin-1 inhibitors based on the recently unveiled autoinflammatory nature of pericarditis. At present, anti-interleukin-1 inhibitors available for clinical use in patients with refractory RP include anakinra and rilonacept, with the latter having obtained FDA approval for this indication. Apart from the remarkable efficacy and good safety profile which is a common feature of all anti-interleukin-1 compounds, rilonacept has the advantage of weekly administration (instead of daily compared to anakinra) which is important in terms of adherence to treatment and improved quality of life albeit at the expense of a higher cost. This review aims to summarize the available evidence on the role of rilonacept in the treatment of RP and the reduction of the recurrences risk.

Recurrent Pericarditis and Paradigm Shift in Cardiovascular Imaging and Targeted Therapeutics

Recurrent pericarditis poses a significant challenge to patients and clinicians given its high morbidity and health care burden. Since the last iteration of European Society of Cardiology Guidelines in 2015, further insights have been gained into the pathophysiology, multimodality imaging assessment, and treatment of this condition. The purpose of this review is to discuss each of these aspects and highlight the role of imaging-guided therapy and interleukin-1 inhibitors in autoinflammatory phenotypes that together have transformed the care of these patients. Although future investigations are needed to optimize diagnostic surveillance and timing of therapy, recent evidence points at an encouraging paradigm shift in the treatment of recurrent pericarditis.

Pericarditis Management in Individuals Contemplating Pregnancy, Currently Pregnant, or Breastfeeding

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pericarditis complicates pregnancy planning, pregnancy, or the postpartum period, and the management approach requires special considerations. Here, we aim to summarize the latest research, diagnostic, and treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Physiologic cardiovascular (CV) adaptations occurring during pregnancy complicate diagnosis, but for most patients, an electrocardiogram (ECG) and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) are sufficient to diagnosis pericarditis in the appropriate clinical context. Aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be used until 20 weeks gestation as needed. The use of colchicine is encouraged at any time point to reduce the risk of recurrence. Glucocorticoids may be used at the lowest possible dose for the least amount of time throughout pregnancy and breastfeeding. For incessant, recurrent, or refractory pericarditis, or when the above therapies are contraindicated, there may be a consideration of the use of IL-1 inhibition during pregnancy, recognizing the limited data in pregnant patients. Finally, we encourage the use of a multidisciplinary team approach including OB-GYN, cardiology, and rheumatology when available. The diagnosis and treatment of pericarditis in female patients of reproductive age require special considerations. Although highly effective treatment options are available, there is a need for greater data and larger international registries to improve treatment recommendations.

Pericardial Diseases in Pregnancy

Pericardial effusion is the most common manifestation of pericardial diseases during pregnancy. This effusion is benign, mild, or moderate, well tolerated, with spontaneous resolution after delivery; no specific treatment is required. Acute pericarditis is the second most common condition, usually requiring medical therapy during pregnancy. Cardiac tamponade and constrictive pericarditis are rare in pregnancy. Pre-pregnancy counselling is essential in women of childbearing age with recurrent pericarditis to plan pregnancy in a phase of disease quiescence and to review therapy. High-dose aspirin or nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as ibuprofen and indomethacin, can be used up to the 20th week of gestation. Low-dose prednisone (2.5-10 mg/d) can be administered throughout pregnancy. All of these medications, apart from high-dose aspirin, may be used during lactation. Colchicine is compatible with pregnancy and breastfeeding, and it can be continued throughout pregnancy to prevent recurrences. Appropriate follow-up with a multidisciplinary team with experience in the field is recommended throughout pregnancy to ensure good maternal and fetal outcomes.

Management of acute pericarditis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Provide an update on current management and most recent evidence in the treatment of pediatric pericarditis.

RECENT FINDINGS

While treatment of acute pericarditis has not significantly changed over the last decade, management of recurrent acute pericarditis, with increased attention to autoinflammation as a causal mechanism, has evolved substantially. This includes clinical trial evidence that newer medications targeting interleukin-1 receptors are effective in recurrent forms of pericarditis. In addition, advanced imaging utilizing cardiac magnetic resonance has emerged as a particularly effective way to detect ongoing pericardial inflammation in support of more difficult-to-treat patients.

SUMMARY

Recent advances in acute and recurrent pericarditis management have allowed for a more tailored approach to the individual patient. Yet, unresolved questions require further research.

Rilonacept and Anakinra in Recurrent Pericarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Interleukin 1 (IL-1) has been indicated as a mediator of recurrent pericarditis. Rilonacept, a soluble IL-1 receptor chimeric fusion protein neutralizing interleukin 1 alpha (IL-1α) and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), has demonstrated promising results in a phase II study in recurrent or refractory pericarditis. Anakinra is a recombinant inhibitor of the IL-1 receptor with a demonstrated reduction in the incidence of recurrent pericarditis. Definite pharmacological management of pericarditis is key to preventing recurrences, mostly treatment options for recurrent pericarditis refractory to conventional drugs. Here we critically discuss the existing therapy options for recurrent pericarditis, with a focus on new pharmacological approaches: rilonacept and anakinra. A systematic search was conducted across online databases such as PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, Scopus, and Embase to obtain clinical trials that assess the effectiveness of anti-interleukin 1 therapy such as anakinra and rilonacept in the management of recurrent pericarditis. Our study concluded that anti-interleukin 1 therapy significantly improved both the quality of life and the clinical outcomes of the study population. These outcomes were most prominent with the use of rilonacept and anakinra in the trial treatment. Rilonacept and anakinra are valuable options in case of recurrent pericarditis refractory to conventional drugs.

Autoimmune Pericarditis: Multimodality Imaging

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to understand the underlying mechanism that leads to pericarditis in systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases. The underlying mechanism plays a vital role in the appropriate management of patients. In addition, we will review the current landscape of available cardiac imaging modalities with emphasis on pericardial conditions as well as proposed treatment and management tailored toward pericardial autoimmune and autoinflammatory processes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Approximately 22% of all cases of pericarditis with a known etiology are caused by systemic autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and vasculitis. In recent years, there have been advancements of imaging modalities including cardiac MRI, cardiac CT scan, and PET scan and their respective nuances in regard to contrast use, technique, and views which clinicians may utilize to better understand the extent of a patient's pericardial pathology and the trajectory of his or her disease process. In this review, we will discuss systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases that involve the pericardium. We will also review different imaging modalities that are currently used to further characterize such conditions. Having a deeper understanding of such techniques will improve patient outcomes by helping clinicians tailor treatment plans according to the unique underlying condition.

Efficacy of Anakinra in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review

Inflammation of the pericardium is referred to as pericarditis, which can cause sharp chest pain and has a high chance of recurrence even after treatment. This review will explore anakinra, which is an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, as a potential new treatment for pericarditis. The systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines by searching PubMed and GoogleScholar from the years 2012 to 2022. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, thorough screening, and quality appraisal, a total of eleven studies were included in the review; eight case reports and three clinical trials. All studies showed that 100 mg/day of anakinra caused a remarkable improvement in patient outcomes. In addition, the pericarditis resolved quicker and had a lower chance of recurrence in comparison to conventional therapy.

Management of Idiopathic Viral Pericarditis in the Pediatric Population

Idiopathic (viral) pericarditis (IP) is one of the most common etiologies of acute and recurrent pericarditis in children. IP is associated with significant morbidity, and recurrence rates of IP are high and require treatment to decrease risk of recurrence and pericarditis-related chest pain. Despite significant morbidity, sparse guidance exists to comprehensively address management of IP in children. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the pharmacotherapy of IP in children, including clinical pearls for managing pediatric patients. Clinicians should consider using the combination of colchicine and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as first-line therapy, in order to reduce the risk of recurrence and foster symptom improvement in IP. Colchicine dosing may vary depending on patient age, weight, concomitant pharmacotherapies, and disease states. Choice of NSAID should be based on cost, tolerability, and adverse drug events (ADEs). Children should receive higher NSAID attack dosing for >1 week to ensure a reduction in high sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations and symptom relief. Corticosteroids should be considered last-line for treatment of IP in children, because they increase the risk of recurrence. Immunotherapies may be considered for children with multiple recurrences related to IP despite the use of NSAIDs, colchicine, and/or corticosteroids. Similar to adults, diligent monitoring should be implemented, to prevent drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, and/or ADEs in children.

Advances in Imaging and Targeted Therapies for Recurrent Pericarditis: A Review

Importance

Pericarditis is the most common form of pericardial disease. Recurrence of pericarditis affects 15% to 30% of patients after the initial episode of pericarditis. Up to 50% of patients with the first recurrence have additional recurrences. These patients often progress to have colchicine-resistant and corticosteroid-dependent disease. Rapidly evolving cardiac magnetic resonance imaging techniques and novel targeted therapies have paved the way for imaging-guided therapy for recurrent pericarditis. However, the optimal application of these recent advances remains unclear.

Observations

A search was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane databases for English-language studies, management guidelines, meta-analyses, and review articles published until April 2022 on recurrent pericarditis. Following the 2015 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases, new clinical trials and registry data have emerged that demonstrate the efficacy of interleukin-1 blockers in recurrent pericarditis. In addition, new observational data have come to light supporting the use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of such patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

Advances in imaging and targeted therapies have led to a paradigm shift in the management of recurrent pericarditis. This narrative review summarizes the established and emerging data on the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent pericarditis with special emphasis on the role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and interleukin-1 blockers in the current era of tailored therapy for recurrent pericarditis.

Acute Pericarditis: Update

Purpose of Review

Since 2015, when ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases were published, ongoing research has enhanced the current state of knowledge on acute pericarditis. This review is an update on the latest developments in this field.

Recent Findings

In recurrent acute pericarditis, autoinflammation has been included among causative mechanisms restricting the vague diagnoses of “idiopathic” pericarditis. Cardiac magnetic resonance that detects ongoing pericardial inflammation may guide treatment in difficult-to-treat patients. Development of risk scores may assist identification of patients at high risk for complicated pericarditis, who should be closely monitored and aggressively treated. Treatment with IL-1 inhibitors has been proven efficacious in recurrent forms with a good safety profile. Finally, acute pericarditis has recently attracted great interest as it has been reported among side effects post COVID-19 vaccination and may also complicate SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Summary

Recent advancements in acute pericarditis have contributed to a better understanding of the disease allowing a tailored to the individual patient approach. However, there are still unsolved questions that require further research.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11886-022-01710-8.

The Preferential Use of Anakinra in Various Settings of FMF: A Review Applied to an Updated Treatment-Related Perspective of the Disease

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), the most frequent monogenic autoinflammatory disease, is manifested with recurrent and chronic inflammation and amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis, driven by overproduction of interleukin 1 (IL-1) through an activated pyrin inflammasome. Consequently, non-responsiveness to colchicine, the cornerstone of FMF treatment, is nowadays addressed by IL-1- blockers. Each of the two IL-1 blockers currently used in FMF, anakinra and canakinumab, has its own merits for FMF care. Here we focus on anakinra, a recombinant form of the naturally occurring IL-1 receptor antagonist, and explore the literature by using PubMed regarding the utility of anakinra in certain conditions of FMF. Occasionally we enrich published data with our own experience. To facilitate insights to anakinra role, the paper briefs some clinical, genetic, pathogenetic, and management aspects of FMF. The clinical settings of FMF covered in this review include colchicine resistance, AA amyloidosis, renal transplantation, protracted febrile myalgia, on- demand use, leg pain, arthritis, temporary suspension of colchicine, pediatric patients, and pregnancy and lactation. In many of these instances, either because of safety concerns or a necessity for only transient and short-term use, anakinra, due to its short half-life, is the preferred IL-1 blocker.

Immunomodulating Therapies in Acute Myocarditis and Recurrent/Acute Pericarditis

The field of inflammatory disease of the heart or "cardio-immunology" is rapidly evolving due to the wider use of non-invasive diagnostic tools able to detect and monitor myocardial inflammation. In acute myocarditis, recent data on the use of immunomodulating therapies have been reported both in the setting of systemic autoimmune disorders and in the setting of isolated forms, especially in patients with specific histology (e.g., eosinophilic myocarditis) or with an arrhythmicburden. A role for immunosuppressive therapies has been also shown in severe cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a condition that can be associated with cardiac injury and acute myocarditis. Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials are assessing the role of high dosage methylprednisolone in the context of acute myocarditis complicated by heart failure or fulminant presentation or the role of anakinra to treat patients with acute myocarditis excluding patients with hemodynamically unstable conditions. In addition, the explosion of immune-mediated therapies in oncology has introduced new pathophysiological entities, such as immune-checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis and new basic research models to understand the interaction between the cardiac and immune systems. Here we provide a broad overview of evolving areas in cardio-immunology. We summarize the use of new imaging tools in combination with endomyocardial biopsy and laboratory parameters such as high sensitivity troponin to monitor the response to immunomodulating therapies based on recent evidence and clinical experience. Concerning pericarditis, the normal composition of pericardial fluid has been recently elucidated, allowing to assess the actual presence of inflammation; indeed, normal pericardial fluid is rich in nucleated cells, protein, albumin, LDH, at levels consistent with inflammatory exudates in other biological fluids. Importantly, recent findings showed how innate immunity plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of recurrent pericarditis with raised C-reactive protein, with inflammasome and IL-1 overproduction as drivers for systemic inflammatory response. In the era of tailored medicine, anti-IL-1 agents such as anakinra and rilonacept have been demonstrated highly effective in patients with recurrent pericarditis associated with an inflammatory phenotype.

Anakinra in Paediatric Rheumatology and Periodic Fever Clinics: Is the Higher Dose Safe?

OBJECTIVE

Anakinra has been increasingly used in off-label indications as well as dosing and mode of administration in a variety of inflammatory conditions. We aimed to review our clinical practice and compare treatment outcomes with published data.

METHODS

Clinical data from electronic records were retrospectively reviewed for patients treated with anakinra over the past 6 years for autoinflammatory diseases (AID).

RESULTS

From 47 eligible patients (27 female patients), 32 were children. Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) was the indication for anakinra therapy in 42.6% of patients. Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) was the most common underlying diagnosis (19/47) followed by the spectrum of AID. Off-label use was noted in 38.3% patients. Recommended dose was exceeded in 21 children (mean induction dose 5.1, highest dose 29.4 mg/kg/day) and two adults; five patients were treated intravenously. The mean treatment duration for SJIA was 1.4 years, that for AID was 2.2 years, and that for patients with higher anakinra dose was 9.7 (19.3) months. The mean follow-up duration was 2.7 (1.7) years. Treatment was effective in the majority of SJIA and cryopyrinopathy patients as well as those with MAS. Anakinra was well-tolerated without any major adverse effects even in patients with long-term administration of higher than recommended doses including two infants treated with a dose of over 20 mg/kg/day.

CONCLUSION

Our results support early use of anakinra in the individually tailored dosing. In patients with hyperinflammation, anakinra may be lifesaving and may even allow for corticosteroid avoidance. Further studies are needed in order to set up generally accepted response parameters and define condition-specific optimal dosing regimen.

Pharmacologic treatment of acute and recurrent pericarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Recurrence is the most frequent complication following acute pericarditis and may occur in 30% patients, rising to 50% in case of multiple recurrences, lack of colchicine treatment or use of glucocorticoids. Available treatments include aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), colchicine, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressive agents, immunoglobulins, anti-interleukin-1 (IL-1) agents.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to assess the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for acute and recurrent pericarditis. Bibliographic databases were searched (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library) using the terms "acute pericarditis" or "recurrent pericarditis" and "colchicine" or "NSAIDs" or "glucocorticoids" or "immunosuppressive agents" or "immunoglobulins" or "anti-IL1 agents." Random-effects meta-analysis was used to assess the risk of recurrent pericarditis. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger test, and meta-regression was performed to assess sources of heterogeneity.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Eleven RCTs assessed the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for acute and recurrent pericarditis (colchicine and anti-interleukin-1 agents). Colchicine, assessed in nine RCTs, was effective in the reduction of recurrent pericarditis, compared with standard treatment (17% vs .34%, RR=0.50; 95% CI 0.42-0.60, P<0.001), without any differences according to clinical setting (i.e. acute pericarditis, recurrent pericarditis, post-pericardiotomy syndrome; P=0.58). Anti-interleukin-1 agents (anakinra, rilonacept), assessed in two RCT, were effective in the reduction of recurrences, compared with placebo (10% vs.78%, RR=0.14; 95% CI 0.05-0.35, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A correct pharmacological management of pericarditis is key to prevent recurrences. Colchicine is the mainstay of treatment in acute and recurrent pericarditis, while anti-IL1 agents are a valuable option in case of recurrent pericarditis refractory to conventional drugs.

Autoinflammatory Diseases and Cytokine Storms-Imbalances of Innate and Adaptative Immunity

Innate and adaptive immune responses have a well-known link and represent the distinctive origins of several diseases, many of which may be the consequence of the loss of balance between these two responses. Indeed, autoinflammation and autoimmunity represent the two extremes of a continuous spectrum of pathologic conditions with numerous overlaps in different pathologies. A common characteristic of these dysregulations is represented by hyperinflammation, which is an exaggerated response of the immune system, especially involving white blood cells, macrophages, and inflammasome activation with the hyperproduction of cytokines in response to various triggering stimuli. Moreover, hyperinflammation is of great interest, as it is one of the main manifestations of COVID-19 infection, and the cytokine storm and its most important components are the targets of the pharmacological treatments used to combat COVID-19 damage. In this context, the purpose of our review is to provide a focus on the pathogenesis of autoinflammation and, in particular, of hyperinflammation in order to generate insights for the identification of new therapeutic targets and strategies.

Emerging Therapies for Recurrent Pericarditis: Interleukin-1 inhibitors

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is a complex inflammatory disorder associated with adverse outcomes and poor quality of life. After the first episode of acute pericarditis, a non‐negligible group of patients will fail to achieve complete remission despite treatment and will be challenged by side effects from the chronic use of medications like corticosteroids. The cause of RP remains unknown in the majority of cases, mainly due to a gap in knowledge of its complex pathophysiology. Over the past 2 decades, the interleukin‐1 (IL‐1) pathway has been uncovered as a key element in the inflammatory cascade, allowing the development of pharmacological targets known as IL‐1 inhibitors. This group of medications has emerged as a treatment option for patients with RP colchicine‐resistance and steroid dependents. Currently, anakinra and rilonacept, have demonstrated beneficial impact in clinical outcomes with a reasonable safety profile in randomized clinical trials. There is still paucity of data regarding the use of canakinumab in the treatment of patients with RP. Although further studies are needed to refine therapeutic protocols and taper of concomitant therapies, IL‐1 inhibitors, continue to consolidate as part of the pharmacological armamentarium to manage this complex condition with potential use as monotherapy. The aim of this review is to highlight the role of IL‐1 pathway in RP and discuss the efficacy, safety, and clinical applicability of IL‐1 inhibitors in the treatment of RP based on current evidence.

Interleukin-1 and the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Pericardial Disease

Purpose of Review

Pericarditis is a generally benign disease, although complications and/or recurrences may occur in up to 30% of cases. New evidence on the pathophysiology of the disease has accumulated in recent years.

Recent Findings

Recently, it has been shown that the activation of the NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome is central in the pathophysiology of pericarditis. These findings derive from clinical data, an experimental animal model of acute pericarditis supporting a role for the NLRP3 inflammasome in pericarditis, and from indirect evidence of inhibitors of NLRP3 inflammasome in clinical trials.

Summary

Pericarditis is regarded as a stereotypical response to an acute damage of the mesothelial cells of the pericardial layers. NLRP3 inflammasome, a macromolecular structure sensing damage and releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines, is centrally involved as it releases interleukin (IL)-1β, whose auto-induction feeds an autoinflammatory disease, mostly responsible for recurrences. Colchicine, an inhibitor of NLRP3 inflammasome formation, and IL-1-targeted therapies, such as anakinra and rilonacept, were found to effectively blunt the acute inflammation and reduce the risk for recurrences.

A case report: symptomatic pericarditis post-COVID-19 vaccination

BACKGROUND

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccine. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recently reported increase in myopericarditis incidence post-COVID-19 vaccination. Post-vaccination myopericarditis as side effect has been reported, however, is infrequent. We described a case of pericarditis post-first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

CASE SUMMARY

A patient presented with typical symptoms of pericarditis and related electrocardiogram and echocardiogram changes, 7 days post receiving the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine. No other causes were identified from series of investigations. Patient had good symptomatic relief with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication.

DISCUSSION

The incidence of pericarditis post-vaccination is rare, with limited reporting in previous literatures. No causal relationship has yet to be established due to small number of cases. The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination currently outweigh the side effect profile and are recommended as the first-line approach to control the current pandemic.

Rilonacept: A Newly Approved Treatment for Recurrent Pericarditis

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of rilonacept for the prevention and treatment of recurrent pericarditis (RP).

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was conducted between January 2006 and April 2021 using the following terms: rilonacept, pharmacology, pericarditis, recurrent pericarditis, interleukin (IL) antagonist, and pharmacology; prescribing information was also used.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

English-language studies assessing pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of IL antagonists were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Rilonacept traps IL-1α and IL-1β. In the Phase III trial, rilonacept was associated with a lower risk of recurrence, more persistent clinical response, and higher amount of days with no or minimal pericarditis symptoms, compared with placebo. The median time to pain response was 5 days, and median time to normalization of C-reactive protein was 7 days with rilonacept. All patients receiving rilonacept during the run-in period were able to be weaned off of standard background therapy, leading to transition to rilonacept monotherapy. The most common adverse effects were upper respiratory tract infections and injection site reactions.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Rilonacept may be used for the prevention and treatment of multiple recurrences in patients receiving background therapy for RP, and reduction in risk of recurrence in adults and adolescents ≥12 years with elevated C-reactive protein. Rilonacept may be considered to wean patients from standard background therapy.

CONCLUSION

Rilonacept is a safe, once weekly, subcutaneously administered IL-1 "trap," indicated for the treatment of RP, and reduction in risk of recurrent pericarditis in adults and children ≥12 years of age.

Inflamed Colon and Pericardium: A Rare Combination of Colitis and Recurrent Pericarditis

A 29-year-old woman with severe ulcerative colitis presented with complicated recurrent pericarditis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed improvement in pericardial inflammation with a prolonged course of anti-inflammatory therapy, but she developed several relapses on biologics. Rilonacept (newer interleukin-1 antagonist), disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and pericardiectomy may be considered in such patients. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Pericarditis: Definitions and New Treatments

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The purpose of the review is to analyze the pathogenetic mechanisms that underlie acute pericarditis, with attention to autoimmune and autoinflammatory pericarditis, and, in addition, to review the available therapeutic armamentarium.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies have been published on the use of anti-IL-1 drugs in recurrent pericarditis, including anakinra and rilonacept. The latest, the RHAPSODY study, based on the use of rilonacept in recurrent pericarditis, has recently reached phase 3 with promising results in terms of efficacy and safety. Alterations in the function of the inflammasome and the consequent overproduction of IL-1 play a pivotal role in the genesis of autoinflammatory pericarditis. Recent studies added evidence to the importance of anti-IL-1 drugs in the treatment of recurrent pericarditis with raised C-reactive protein. In the era of tailored medicine, anti-IL-1 agents may be very useful in the subset of patients with recurrent pericarditis and a clear inflammatory phenotype.

The Role of Rilonacept in Recurrent Pericarditis

Recurrent pericarditis is associated with significant morbidity and adverse impact on quality of life. Contemporary studies have emphasized the key role of autoinflammatory pathways in its pathophysiology, mainly through the activation of inflammasomes and the production of interleukin (IL)-1α and IL-1β. The IL-1 pathway has emerged as a promising target for the treatment of these patients. A novel IL-1 inhibitor, rilonacept, functions as an IL-1 trap binding to the circulating IL-1α and IL-1β mitigating their inflammatory response. Recently, the RHAPSODY phase III clinical trial evaluated the use of rilonacept in patients with recurrent pericarditis, who were refractory to colchicine, or steroid-dependent. Rilonacept significantly reduced symptoms, inflammatory markers and recurrent episodes, and increased successful withdrawal of steroids. The safety profile of the medication is favourable and well tolerated by patients, with local injection site reaction being the most common side effect described. These results have shifted the paradigm of the understanding of the disease and promise to become part of the armamentarium of medications for the standard of care of these patients, with potential use as monotherapy. The changing landscape of therapeutics and pathophysiology warrants increased recognition and understanding from the international cardiology community about this novel drug and its implication in managing these complex patients.The objective of this review is to describe the bio-action of rilonacept in the treatment of recurrent pericarditis.

Recurrent pericarditis: an update on diagnosis and management

Recurrent pericarditis is a true challenge for clinicians, especially when the patient becomes unresponsive or not tolerant to conventional treatments. An accurate diagnosis of recurrent pericarditis, possibly supported by advanced imaging tools, is critical to provide timely and appropriate treatment of symptoms and prevention of further episodes. The incessant research on the inflammatory pathways underlying cardiovascular diseases, led recently to the assessment of anti interleukin-1 agents in the setting of recurrent pericarditis. This review will focus on the diagnostic assessment of recurrent pericarditis, along with the most modern therapeutic advances in this field. Bibliographic databases were searched (MEDLINE/PubMed, BioMed Central, the Cochrane Collaboration Database of Randomized Trials, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Google Scholar) using the terms "recurrent pericarditis" AND "diagnosis" OR "treatment" OR "IL-1" OR "inflammation".

Management of acute and recurrent pericarditis in pregnancy

This review summarizes the currently available evidence on the management of acute and recurrent pericarditis during pregnancy, focusing on the safety of diagnostic procedures and treatment options for the mother and foetus. Family planning should be addressed in women with recurrent pericarditis of reproductive age and adjustment of therapy should be considered before a planned pregnancy. The treatment of pericarditis in pregnancy is similar to that for non-pregnant women but considers current knowledge on drug safety during pregnancy and lactation. The largest case series on this topic described 21 pregnancies with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis. Pregnancy should be planned in a phase of disease quiescence. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can be used at high dosages until the 20th week of gestation (except low-dose aspirin 100 mg/die). Colchicine is allowed until gravindex positivity; after this period, administration of this drug during pregnancy and lactation should be discussed with the mother if its use is important to control recurrent pericarditis. Prednisone is safe if used at low-medium doses (2,5 - 10 mg/die). General outcomes of pregnancy in patients with pericarditis are good when the mothers are followed by a multidisciplinary team with experience in the field.

Idiopathic recurrent pericarditis - a new orphan autoinflammatory disease? A retrospective analysis of cases of idiopathic recurrent pericarditis and a design of а double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RPH-104 treatment in patients with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis

Aim To analyze cases of idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP) in the structure of pericardial diseases of various origins from patient visits to the Multidisciplinary Federal Center.Material and methods A retrospective analysis of case records was performed for patients admitted to the V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Center from January 1, 2015 through January 1, 2020 for pericardial effusion of different etiologies.Results For the study period, 4 981 new cases of pericardial damage of different etiologies were found. Among these cases, postpericardiotomy syndrome accounted for 4 360 cases and pericarditis for 621 cases. IRP was detected in 34 cases, which amounted to 5.4 %. Based on the study data, the estimated IRP prevalence in the Russian Federation can be 1.1 cases per 100 thousand population.Conclusion IRP should be regarded as a new autoinflammatory disease, the prevalence of which borders on that of adult Still disease and should be addressed within the concept of orphan diseases. Current knowledge of the pathogenesis and data from recent studies demonstrated a great importance of interleukin-1 blockade as a leading mechanism for achieving remission. This has justified conduction of a randomized clinical study at the Center.

IL-1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Monogenic Periodic Fever Syndromes: From the Past to the Future Perspectives

Autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs) represent a rare and heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by recurrent episodes of inflammation and a broad range of clinical manifestations. The most common symptoms involve recurrent fevers, musculoskeletal symptoms, and serositis; however, AIDs can also lead to life-threatening complications, such as macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) and systemic AA amyloidosis. Typical monogenic periodic fever syndromes include cryopyrin-associated periodic fever syndrome (CAPS), tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency/hyper IgD syndrome (MKD/HIDS), and familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). However, a number of other clinical entities, such as systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD), Kawasaki disease (KD) and idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP), display similar phenotypical and immunological features to AIDs. All these diseases are pathophysiologicaly characterized by dysregulation of the innate immune system and the central pathogenic role is attributed to the IL-1 cytokine family (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-18, IL-36Ra, IL-36α, IL-37, IL-36β, IL-36g, IL-38, and IL-33). Therefore, reasonable therapeutic approaches aim to inhibit these cytokines and their pathways. To date, several anti-IL-1 therapies have evolved. Each drug differs in structure, mechanism of action, efficacy for the treatment of selected diseases, and side effects. Most of the available data regarding the efficacy and safety of IL-1 inhibitors are related to anakinra, canakinumab, and rilonacept. Other promising therapeutics, such as gevokizumab, tadekinig alfa, and tranilast are currently undergoing clinical trials. In this review, we provide sophisticated and up-to-date insight into the therapeutic uses of different IL-1 inhibitors in monogenic periodic fever syndromes.

Interleukin-1 Blockade in Polygenic Autoinflammatory Disorders: Where Are We now?

Polygenic autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs), such as systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), adult-onset Still's disease, Kawasaki disease, idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP), Behçet’s Syndrome, Crystal-induced arthropatihes such as gout or Calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease are characterized by the overexpression of inflammasome-associated genes, leading to a dysregulation of the innate immune response. The IL-1 cytokine family (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-18, IL-36Ra, IL-36α, IL-37, IL-36β, IL-36g, IL-38, IL-33) was defined to be principally responsible for the inflammatory nature of polygenic AIDs. Several clinical trials were initiated, and IL-1 blockade has been proven to cause a rapid reduction of clinical symptoms and normalization of laboratory parameters in the majority of cases. Randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials, together with registry-based clinical trials and open-label, retrospective and prospective observational studies, supported the efficacy and safety of IL-1 inhibitors in the treatment of polygenic AIDs. Most of the current data are focused on the therapeutic use of anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, canakinumab, an anti-IL-1β monoclonal antibody, and rilonacept, a soluble decoy receptor. However, other promising agents, such as gevokizumab, IL-1β blocking monoclonal antibody, tadekinig alfa, a human recombinant IL-18-binding protein, and tranilast, an analog of a tryptophan metabolite, are currently being tested. Anakinra, canakinumab and rilonacept caused impressive improvements in both systemic and musculoskeletal symptoms. Furthermore, the anti-IL-1 therapy allowed corticosteroid tapering and, in some cases, even withdrawal. This article reviews the current IL-1 inhibitors and the results of all clinical trials in which they have been tested for the management of broad spectrum of polygenic AIDs.

An update on the pathophysiology of acute and recurrent pericarditis

Pericarditis is an inflammatory disease of the pericardium. Progress has been done in recent years in the understanding of its pathophysiology. In particular, pre-clinical and clinical studies have contributed to increasing our knowledge on the role of interleukin (IL)-1 and NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine- rich repeat, and pyrin domain- containing protein 3) inflammasome. Based on current evidence, pericarditis should be considered as an inflammatory reaction to various stimuli, including chemical/physical, infectious, or ischemic ones, with a viral infection being a common etiology. Interaction of pathogens or irritants with toll-like receptor (TLRs) and stimulation of IL-1 receptor by IL-1α and IL-1β lead to an increased transcription of pro-inflammatory genes, including those needed for NLRP3 inflammasome assembly. This pathway is confirmed indirectly by the beneficial effect of colchicine (an indirect NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor) and IL-1 blockers in patients with recurrent pericarditis. More recently, a direct evidence of the NLRP3 inflammasome within the inflamed pericardium has been provided as well. It may, however, occur that selfantigens on the surface of mesothelial cells or microbial peptides may stimulate autoreactive T cells along with B cells producing anti-heart antibodies, although less evidence is available on this. Some uncertainties still remain about the role of neutrophils, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and pericardial interstitial cells in recurrent and constrictive pericarditis. Unraveling these aspects might have a direct impact on the development of novel targeted therapies, especially considering the increasing number of drugs targeting NETs.