1
|
Bai F, Beringheli T, Vitaletti V, Santoro A, Molà F, Copes A, Gemignani N, Pettenuzzo S, Castoldi R, Varisco B, Nardo R, Lundgren LB, Ligresti R, Sala M, Albertini L, Augello M, Biasioli L, Bono V, Rovito R, Bini T, Passarella S, Orfeo NV, Monforte AD, Marchetti G. Clinical Outcome and 7-Day Virological Clearance in High-Risk Patients with Mild-Moderate COVID-19 Treated with Molnupiravir, Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir, or Remdesivir. Infect Dis Ther 2024; 13:1589-1605. [PMID: 38829439 PMCID: PMC11219607 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-024-00994-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We compared the effectiveness and virological clearance (VC) at day 7 (T7) post-treatment with molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and remdesivir in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients at high risk (HR) for clinical progression. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study enrolling HR patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (Jan-Oct 2022) treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir or 3 days of remdesivir. We investigated clinical recovery at T7 (resolution of symptoms for ≥ 72 h or all-cause death), VC at T7 (PCR/antigenic negative nasopharyngeal swab), and median time to VC (days from symptom onset to the first negative swab). Factors associated with VC were investigated by logistic regression. RESULTS In the study, 92/376 (43.8%) patients received molnupiravir, 150/376 (24.7%) nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and 134/376 (31.5%) remdesivir. Forty-nine (13%) patients were unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated. Patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were younger and presented immunodeficiencies more frequently; remdesivir was used more commonly in patients hospitalized for other diseases. A high proportion of patients obtained clinical recovery without differences among the therapies (97.5% for molnupiravir, 98.3% for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and 93.6% for remdesivir); 12 (3.7%) patients died. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was associated with a higher proportion of T7 VC and a shorter time to VC compared to molnupiravir/remdesivir, also after adjustment for age and immunodeficiency (AOR 0.445 RDV vs. NMV-r, 95% CI 0.240-0.826, p = 0.010; AOR 0.222 MNP vs. NMV-r, 95% CI 0.105-0.472, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS SARS-COV-2 antiviral treatments are an excellent therapeutic strategy in HR patients. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir showed a higher proportion of VC as early as 7 days after treatment, confirming its likely superiority in indirect comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Bai
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
| | - Tomaso Beringheli
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Virginia Vitaletti
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Santoro
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Molà
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Copes
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicole Gemignani
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Sofia Pettenuzzo
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Castoldi
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedetta Varisco
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Nardo
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Brando Lundgren
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Ligresti
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Sala
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Albertini
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Augello
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Biasioli
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Bono
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Rovito
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Teresa Bini
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonella d'Arminio Monforte
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marchetti
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Via A. Di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bartalucci C, Limongelli A, Nicolini LA, Ponzano M, Tigano S, Farinella ST, Carrega G, Malerba G, Magnè F, Balletto E, Giacobbe DR, Riccio G, Cenderello G, Taramasso L, Bruzzone B, Vena A, Di Biagio A, Mikulska M, De Maria A, Dentone C, Bassetti M. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for the prevention of severe COVID-19: a retrospective study during Omicron BA.1 variant surge. J Chemother 2024; 36:283-290. [PMID: 38095569 DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2023.2289269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2024]
Abstract
Among treatment options for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) showed to be effective in preventing disease progression, but real-world data during the Omicron variant surge are still lacking. Multicentre retrospective study evaluating the effectiveness of sotrovimab and casirivimab-imdevimab in fragile patients with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection between November 2021 and March 2022. Unfavourable outcome was defined as increased need for oxygen supplementation and/or death. Of 268 study-participants, 12 (4.48%) previously needed supplemental oxygen, while 6 (2.24%) had active solid neoplasia (2.24%); 186 (69%) have previously received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Overall, 22 (8%) had unfavourable outcomes (42% versus 6% of patients with and without previous oxygen need and 50% versus 7% of patients with and without active solid neoplasia). Both supplemental oxygen therapy before SARS-CoV-2 infection and solid malignant tumour have shown to be risk factors for treatment failure. Log-rank test did not identify differences between sotrovimab and casirivimab-imdevimab treatment. Despite diffusion of Omicron variant, the rate of unfavourable outcome was higher than expected. The presence of underlying risk factors, including solid cancer and previous oxygen therapy are independently associated with risk of COVID-19 progression, suggesting the need for antiviral treatments not limited to mAbs and implementation of vaccine campaign.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Bartalucci
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessandro Limongelli
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Marta Ponzano
- Section of Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Gemma Malerba
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Sanremo Hospital, Imperia, Italy
| | - Federica Magnè
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elisa Balletto
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | | | - Lucia Taramasso
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Bianca Bruzzone
- Hygiene Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Antonio Vena
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Antonio Di Biagio
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Malgorzata Mikulska
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea De Maria
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Chiara Dentone
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Bassetti
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Quercia R, Di Perri G, Pein C, Bodie J, Singh RSP, Hendrick V, Boffito M. Ritonavir: 25 Years' Experience of Concomitant Medication Management. A Narrative Review. Infect Dis Ther 2024; 13:1005-1017. [PMID: 38609668 PMCID: PMC11098990 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-024-00959-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Ritonavir is a potent inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme and is commonly used as a pharmacokinetic (PK) enhancer in antiviral therapies because it increases bioavailability of concomitantly administered antivirals. Decades of experience with ritonavir-enhanced HIV therapies and, more recently, COVID-19 therapies demonstrate that boosting doses of ritonavir are well tolerated, with an established safety profile. The mechanisms of PK enhancement by ritonavir result in the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with several classes of drugs, thus making co-medication management an important consideration with enhanced antiviral therapies. However, rates of DDIs with contraindicated medications are low, suggesting these risks are manageable by infectious disease specialists who have experience with the use of PK enhancers. In this review, we provide an overview of ritonavir's mechanisms of action and describe approaches and resources available to mitigate adverse events and manage concomitant medication in both chronic and short-term settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romina Quercia
- Chief Medical Affairs Office, Pfizer Inc, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | - Carolina Pein
- Chief Medical Affairs Office, Pfizer Inc, New York City, NY, USA.
| | - Jennifer Bodie
- Chief Medical Affairs Office, Pfizer Inc, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Marta Boffito
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zheng Z, Zhou J, Song Y. Safety of RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase Inhibitors, Molnupiravir and VV116, for Oral Treatment of COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 2024; 49:275-285. [PMID: 38751873 PMCID: PMC11091272 DOI: 10.30476/ijms.2024.99837.3196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Background The RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) inhibitors, molnupiravir and VV116, have the potential to maximize clinical benefits in the oral treatment of COVID-19. Subjects who consume these drugs may experience an increased incidence of adverse events. This study aimed to evaluate the safety profile of molnupiravir and VV116. Methods A comprehensive search of scientific and medical databases, such as PubMed Central/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, was conducted to find relevant articles in English from January 2020 to June 2023. Any kind of adverse events reported in the study were pooled and analyzed in the drug group versus the control group. Estimates of risk effects were summarized through the random effects model using Review Manager version 5.2, and sensitivity analysis was performed by Stata 17.0 software. Results Fifteen studies involving 32,796 subjects were included. Eleven studies were placebo-controlled, and four were Paxlovid-controlled. Twelve studies reported adverse events for molnupiravir, and three studies described adverse events for VV116. The total odds ratio (OR) for adverse events in the RdRp inhibitor versus the placebo-controlled group was 1.01 (95% CI=0.84-1.22; I2=26%), P=0.88. The total OR for adverse events in the RdRp inhibitor versus the Paxlovid-controlled group was 0.32 (95% CI=0.16-0.65; I2=87%), P=0.002. Individual drug subgroup analysis in the placebo-controlled study showed that compared with the placebo group, a total OR for adverse events was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.85-1.10; I2=0%) in the molnupiravir group and 3.77 (95% CI=0.08-175.77; I2=85%) in the VV116 group. Conclusion The RdRp inhibitors molnupiravir and VV116 are safe for oral treatment of COVID-19. Further evidence is necessary that RdRp inhibitors have a higher safety profile than Paxlovid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zequn Zheng
- Ningbo Institute of Innovation for Combined Medicine and Engineering, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, No. 378 Dongqing Road, Yinzhou District, Ningbo
- Department of Cardiology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou University, Shantou, 515000, China
| | - Jiaozhi Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yongfei Song
- Ningbo Institute of Innovation for Combined Medicine and Engineering, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, No. 378 Dongqing Road, Yinzhou District, Ningbo
- School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Veronese N, Di Gennaro F, Frallonardo L, Ciriminna S, Papagni R, Carruba L, Agnello D, De Iaco G, De Gennaro N, Di Franco G, Naro L, Brindicci G, Rizzo A, Bavaro DF, Garlisi MC, Santoro CR, Signorile F, Balena F, Mansueto P, Milano E, Giannitrapani L, Fiordelisi D, Mariani MF, Procopio A, Lattanzio R, Licata A, Vernuccio L, Amodeo S, Guido G, Segala FV, Barbagallo M, Saracino A. Real life experience on the use of Remdesivir in patients admitted to COVID-19 in two referral Italian hospital: a propensity score matched analysis. Sci Rep 2024; 14:9303. [PMID: 38654033 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59957-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Remdesivir (RDV) was the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication for COVID-19, with discordant data on efficacy in reducing mortality risk and disease progression. In the context of a dynamic and rapidly changing pandemic landscape, the utilization of real-world evidence is of utmost importance. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of RDV on patients who have been admitted to two university referral hospitals in Italy due to COVID-19. All patients older than 18 years and hospitalized at two different universities (Bari and Palermo) were enrolled in this study. To minimize the effect of potential confounders, we used propensity score matching with one case (Remdesivir) and one control that never experienced this kind of intervention during hospitalization. Mortality was the primary outcome of our investigation, and it was recorded using death certificates and/or medical records. Severe COVID-19 was defined as admission to the intensive care unit or a qSOFAscore ≥ 2 or CURB65scores ≥ 3. After using propensity score matching, 365 patients taking Remdesivir and 365 controls were included. No significant differences emerged between the two groups in terms of mean age and percentage of females, while patients taking Remdesivir were less frequently active smokers (p < 0.0001). Moreover, the patients taking Remdesivir were less frequently vaccinated against COVID-19. All the other clinical, radiological, and pharmacological parameters were balanced between the two groups. The use of Remdesivir in our cohort was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality during the follow-up period (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.37-0.86; p = 0.007). Moreover, RDV was associated with a significantly lower incidence of non-invasive ventilation (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.20-0.36). Furthermore, in the 365 patients taking Remdesivir, we observed two cases of mild renal failure requiring a reduction in the dosage of Remdesivir and two cases in which the physicians decided to interrupt Remdesivir for bradycardia and for QT elongation. Our study suggests that the use of Remdesivir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is a safe therapy associated with improved clinical outcomes, including halving of mortality and with a reduction of around 75% of the risk of invasive ventilation. In a constantly changing COVID-19 scenario, ongoing research is necessary to tailor treatment decisions based on the latest scientific evidence and optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Veronese
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Gennaro
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Luisa Frallonardo
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| | - Stefano Ciriminna
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Roberta Papagni
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Luca Carruba
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Diletta Agnello
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppina De Iaco
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Nicolò De Gennaro
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Di Franco
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Liliana Naro
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Gaetano Brindicci
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Angelo Rizzo
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Davide Fiore Bavaro
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Garlisi
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Carmen Rita Santoro
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Fabio Signorile
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Flavia Balena
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Pasquale Mansueto
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Eugenio Milano
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Lydia Giannitrapani
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Deborah Fiordelisi
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Michele Fabiano Mariani
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Procopio
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Rossana Lattanzio
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Anna Licata
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Laura Vernuccio
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Simona Amodeo
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giacomo Guido
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Vladimiro Segala
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Mario Barbagallo
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Annalisa Saracino
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11 Cap, 70124, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Garcia-Vidal C, Teijón-Lumbreras C, Aiello TF, Chumbita M, Menendez R, Mateu-Subirà A, Peyrony O, Monzó P, Lopera C, Gallardo-Pizarro A, Méndez R, Calbo E, Xercavins M, Cuesta-Chasco G, Martínez JA, Marcos MA, Mensa J, Soriano A. K-Means Clustering Identifies Diverse Clinical Phenotypes in COVID-19 Patients: Implications for Mortality Risks and Remdesivir Impact. Infect Dis Ther 2024; 13:715-726. [PMID: 38489118 PMCID: PMC11058153 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-024-00938-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The impact of remdesivir on mortality in patients with COVID-19 is still controversial. We aimed to identify clinical phenotype clusters of COVID-19 hospitalized patients with highest benefit from remdesivir use and validate these findings in an external cohort. METHODS We included consecutive patients hospitalized between February 2020 and February 2021 for COVID-19. The derivation cohort comprised subjects admitted to Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. The validation cohort included patients from Hospital Universitari Mutua de Terrassa (Terrassa) and Hospital Universitari La Fe (Valencia), all tertiary centers in Spain. We employed K-means clustering to group patients according to reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) values and lymphocyte counts at diagnosis, and pre-test symptom duration. The impact of remdesivir on 60-day mortality in each cluster was assessed. RESULTS A total of 1160 patients (median age 66, interquartile range (IQR) 55-78) were included. We identified five clusters, with mortality rates ranging from 0 to 36.7%. Highest mortality rate was observed in the cluster including patients with shorter pre-test symptom duration, lower lymphocyte counts, and lower Ct values at diagnosis. The absence of remdesivir administration was associated with worse outcome in the high-mortality cluster (10.5% vs. 36.7%; p < 0.001), comprising subjects with higher viral loads. These results were validated in an external multicenter cohort of 981 patients. CONCLUSIONS Patients with COVID-19 exhibit varying mortality rates across different clinical phenotypes. K-means clustering aids in identifying patients who derive the greatest mortality benefit from remdesivir use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Garcia-Vidal
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
- CIBERINF, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Christian Teijón-Lumbreras
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tommaso Francesco Aiello
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Mariana Chumbita
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rosario Menendez
- Respiratory Department, Hospital Universitari La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Aina Mateu-Subirà
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Universitari Mutua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olivier Peyrony
- Emergency Department, Hôpital Saint Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Patricia Monzó
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Lopera
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Gallardo-Pizarro
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Raúl Méndez
- Respiratory Department, Hospital Universitari La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Esther Calbo
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Universitari Mutua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mariona Xercavins
- CATLAB. Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Genoveva Cuesta-Chasco
- Microbiology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, ISGLOBAL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José A Martínez
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBERINF, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ma Angeles Marcos
- CIBERINF, Barcelona, Spain
- Microbiology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, ISGLOBAL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Mensa
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alex Soriano
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBERINF, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Amani B, Amani B. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of molnupiravir versus sotrovimab for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Immun Inflamm Dis 2024; 12:e1262. [PMID: 38652021 PMCID: PMC11037253 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.1262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of molnupiravir and sotrovimab in the treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, medRxiv, and Google Scholar were systematically searched to identify relevant evidence up to December 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions tool. Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA). RESULTS Our search identified and included 13 studies involving 16166 patients. The meta-analysis revealed a significant difference between the molnupiravir and sotrovimab groups in terms of the mortality rate (odds ratio [OR] = 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16, 3.70). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of hospitalization rate (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.47, 1.06), death or hospitalization rate (OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 0.81, 2.83), and intensive care unit admission (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.07, 4.84). In terms of safety, molnupiravir was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.21, 2.30). CONCLUSION The current findings indicate that sotrovimab may be more effective than molnupiravir in reducing the mortality rate in COVID-19 patients. However, no statistical difference was observed between the two treatments for other effectiveness outcomes. The certainty of evidence for these findings was rated as low or moderate. Further research is required to provide a better comparison of these interventions in treating COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahman Amani
- Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public HealthTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Behnam Amani
- Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public HealthTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Haddad AJ, Hachem RY, Moussa M, Jiang Y, Dagher HR, Chaftari P, Chaftari AM, Raad II. Comparing Molnupiravir to Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (Paxlovid) in the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 in Immunocompromised Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1055. [PMID: 38473412 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir has been shown to reduce the risk of COVID-19 progression by 88% compared to placebo, while Molnupiravir reduced it by 31%. However, these two agents have not been compared head-to-head. We therefore compared the safety and efficacy of both agents for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in immunocompromised cancer patients. METHODS We identified 240 cancer patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and treated with Molnupiravir or Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir. Patients were matched using a 1:2 ratio based on age group (18-64 years vs. ≥65) and type of cancer. The collected data included demographics, comorbidities, and treatment outcome. RESULTS Both groups had comparable characteristics and presenting symptoms. However, dyspnea was more prevalent in the Molnupiravir group, while sore throat was more prevalent in the Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir group. The rate of disease progression was comparable in both groups by univariate and multivariable analysis. Treatment with Molnupiravir versus Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir revealed no significant difference in disease progression by multivariable analysis (adjusted OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.56-3.14, p = 0.70). Patients who received Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir, however, were significantly more prone to having drug-drug interactions/adverse events (30% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in cancer patients, Molnupiravir was comparable to Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in preventing progression to severe disease/death and rebound events, and it had a superior safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea J Haddad
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ray Y Hachem
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mohamed Moussa
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ying Jiang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Hiba R Dagher
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Patrick Chaftari
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Anne-Marie Chaftari
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Issam I Raad
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jang YR, Oh Y, Kim JY. Determining and Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19. J Korean Med Sci 2024; 39:e52. [PMID: 38374626 PMCID: PMC10876432 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend using nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment, but its potential drug interactions and contraindications limit its applicability in certain categories of patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in managing COVID-19 among hospitalized patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study among hospitalized COVID-19 patients who received molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and did not require baseline supplemental oxygen from February 2022 to January 2023. We compared the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir with a focus on disease progression. RESULTS The study included 401 high-risk, hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients who received molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir. No significant difference was found in disease progression, the composite outcome of disease progression (4.0% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.782), and O2 supplementation via nasal prong (21.8% vs. 14.8%, P = 0.115) between the patients treated with molnupiravir and those treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir. This finding was similar after 1:1 propensity-score matching. In the multivariate analysis, molnupiravir treatment was not significantly associated with progression to severe disease. CONCLUSION In conclusion, our findings suggest that similar to nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, molnupiravir has a distinct potential role in COVID-19 treatment, transcending its current perceived status as only a secondary option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Rock Jang
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Yoonju Oh
- Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Jin Yong Kim
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kwok WC, Tam TCC, Ho JCM, Lam DCL, Ip MSM, Ho PL. Real-World Effectiveness Study of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir or Molnupiravir in Hospitalized Unvaccinated Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases and Moderate COVID-19 at Presentation. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2024; 19:77-86. [PMID: 38222320 PMCID: PMC10787548 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s440895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV-r) and molnupiravir (MOL) were developed as out-patient anti-viral for mild COVID-19. There was limited data on their role in treating COVID-19 for hospitalized patients, especially among adult patients who are unvaccinated and had chronic respiratory diseases. Methods A territory-wide retrospective study was conducted in Hong Kong to compare the efficacy of NMV-r and MOL against COVID-19 in unvaccinated adult patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchiectasis and interstitial lung diseases presenting with moderate COVID-19 from 16th February 2022 to 15th March 2023. Results A total of 1354 patients were included, 738 received NMV-r and 616 received MOL. NMV-r was more effective in reducing 90-day mortality with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) of 0.508 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.314-0.822, p = 0.006). Patients who received NMV-r also had significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) than those receiving MOL, with median LOS of 4 (Interquartile range [IQR] = 2-7) for NMV-r and 6 (IQR = 3-10) for MOL (p-value < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the development of respiratory failure and severe respiratory failure in the two groups. Discussion NMV-r was more effective than MOL among unvaccinated adults with chronic respiratory diseases who were hospitalized for moderate COVID-19 without hypoxaemia on admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wang Chun Kwok
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China
| | - Terence Chi Chun Tam
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China
| | - James Chung Man Ho
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China
| | - David Chi Leung Lam
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China
| | - Mary Sau-Man Ip
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China
| | - Pak Leung Ho
- Department of Microbiology and Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lv B, Gao X, Zeng G, Guo H, Li F. Safety Profile of Paxlovid in the Treatment of COVID-19. Curr Pharm Des 2024; 30:666-675. [PMID: 38415446 DOI: 10.2174/0113816128280987240214103432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the urgent and widespread application of Paxlovid, a novel antiviral drug for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in clinical practice, concerns regarding its actual efficacy and safety have emerged. In order to provide more evidence to support its clinical application, we sought to perform a descriptive analysis of cases who experienced at least one Paxlovid-related adverse event (AEs) and reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) in the post-marketing period. METHODS Individual adverse event reports between January 1, 2022 and September 30, 2022, were downloaded from the FAERS website. We completed a descriptive study about the safety of Paxlovid in the treatment of COVID-19. Further, we also analyzed the onset time of Paxlovid-related AEs. RESULTS As of 30 September 2022, 16,529 de-duplicated cases were submitted to the FDA, and 5,860 (35.45%) were female. The average age was 58.38 years (S.D. 15.50). Most reports (12,390, 74.96%) were submitted by consumers and 1,436 (8.68%) concerned serious outcomes. The most frequently reported AEs were disease recurrence (7,724, 16.23%), dysgeusia (2,877, 6.05%), and diarrhoea (1,448, 3.04%). The median onset time of Paxlovid-related AEs was 8 days (interquartile range,1-10 days), and most of the cases (2,629, 19.12%) occurred on the day after Paxlovid initiation. CONCLUSION This study indicates that the most common AEs reported with Paxlovid in post-marketing experience are consistent with the safety assessment of antiviral drugs. Even without emerging apparent safety concerns, the incidence of serious outcomes was unexpectedly high, and a few cases of potential new AEs occurred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Lv
- Department of Emergency, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China
| | - Xin Gao
- Department of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China
| | - Guoqiang Zeng
- Department of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China
| | - Hui Guo
- Department of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China
| | - Faping Li
- Department of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhong X, Wang C, Huang L, Zhao Y, Li T, He J, Zhang X. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir co-administration inpatients with rheumatic disease infected with SARS-CoV-2: a real-world study. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1288402. [PMID: 38125894 PMCID: PMC10730682 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1288402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The breakthrough development of novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines and oral antivirals have played a critical role in curtailing the spread of the pandemic and dramatically reducing the morbidity and mortality rates among those infected. Among these oral antivirals, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR) has been repurposed successfully for use against coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and is now readily available on the market with promising therapeutic effects. The availability of convenient and effective NR treatments for COVID-19 greatly mitigates the severity of the epidemic and contributes to an early end to the pandemic. Furthermore, certain patient subgroups, specifically those with rheumatic disease (RD) who are currently undergoing intensive immunodeficiency and/or immunosuppressive treatments, continue to be vulnerable and at a higher risk of experiencing severe consequences from COVID-19. Additionally, it has also been observed that NR exhibited prevalent drug-drug interactions of clinical significance, and more instances of COVID-19 rebound were being recognized with increasing frequency. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on a real-world RD population who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and treated with NR. The time of symptom resolution, length of hospitalization, and response rate were assessed. Results were compared among the standard regimen and non-standard regimen groups, early NR regimen and late NR regimen groups, and the NR indication regimen and NR non-indication regimen groups. During the course, all grades of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) directly associated with NR administration and associated with drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were also monitored. Results: A total of 32 patients with RD, who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and received NR, were retrospectively identified and divided into different groups. We found that the standard regimen group and the early NR regimen group had a shorter median time of symptom resolution compared to the control group [9.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 8.3-11.3) vs. 21.5 (IQR16.0-24.0) days, p < 0.001 and 9.0 (IQR 8.3-11.3) vs. 23.0 (IQR 18.0-24.0) days, p = 0.0]. We further found that even if the NR administration time exceeds 5 days, patients with RD who receive the NR indication regimen can still derive certain benefits from it. The proportion of patients who showed symptom improvement was higher in the NR indication regimen compared to the NR non-indication regimen group (n = 13/17 vs. 3/6, 76.5% vs. 50.0%) at the end of follow-up, and there was a statistical difference (p = 0.0) in the response rate of patients between the two groups. We also analyzed the effect of comorbidities on patient response rates and found that the percentage of patients who showed symptom improvement was higher in the group with <4 comorbidities compared to the group with ≥ 4 comorbidities (n = 7/7 vs. 16/25, 100.0% vs. 64.0%) at the end of follow-up. During the course, all grades of ADRs and grade ≥3ADRs directly associated with NR administration were not observed in any of the 32 cases. Despite discontinuing warfarin prior to NR application (using NR immediately on the first day of warfarin withdrawal), one patient still experienced an increased international normalized ratio [INR, 5.32(0.90-1.20)] and coagulation disorders (weak positive fecal occult blood test) on the second day after using NR. The INR levels decreased to nearly normal values, and coagulation disorders returned to normal after 2 days of discontinuing NR (the seventh day after the initial administration of NR). Conclusion: We showed NR therapy to be associated with a favorable outcome and an acceptable safety profile in an immunosuppressed population with RD during the Omicron surge. Early use of NR (within 5 days of symptom onset) could improve the prognosis of patients. NR administration for symptoms and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection after >5 days may also mitigate progression to severe disease and is a viable strategy. Our results highlight the importance of early utilization and/or NR indication, which may yield clinical advantages for patients with RD infected with SARS-CoV-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Zhong
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chao Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Lin Huang
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yue Zhao
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Tianyi Li
- College of Pharmaceutical Engineering of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Jing He
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohong Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Park JJ, Kim H, Kim YK, Lee SS, Jung E, Lee JS, Lee J. Effectiveness and Adverse Events of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Versus Molnupiravir for COVID-19 in Outpatient Setting: Multicenter Prospective Observational Study. J Korean Med Sci 2023; 38:e347. [PMID: 37904658 PMCID: PMC10615643 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and adverse reactions of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in high-risk outpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS This multicenter prospective observational study evaluated the rate of hospitalization, death, and adverse events within 28 days of oral antiviral agent prescription (molnupiravir, n = 240; nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, n = 240) to 480 nonhospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 from August 2, 2022 to March 31, 2023. RESULTS Patients receiving molnupiravir had a higher prevalence of comorbidities (85.8% vs. 70.4%; P < 0.001) and a higher Charlson comorbidity index (2.8 ± 1.4 vs. 2.5 ± 1.5; P = 0.009) than those receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Three patients required hospitalization (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir group, n = 1 [0.4%]; molnupiravir group, n = 2 [0.8%]; P = 1.000). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was associated with a higher risk of adverse events than molnupiravir (odds ratio [OR], 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-3.03), especially for patients aged 65 years and older (OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.71-5.39). The severity of adverse events in both groups was mild to moderate and improved after discontinuation of medication. In the molnupiravir group, age ≥ 65 years (OR, 0.43 95% CI, 0.22-0.86) and appropriate vaccination (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.91) reduced the occurrence of adverse events. CONCLUSION The rates of hospitalization and death were low and not significantly different between high-risk patients who received either nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir. Although adverse events were more frequent with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir than with molnupiravir, none were severe. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir can be safely used to treat COVID-19, while molnupiravir could be considered as an alternative treatment option for high-risk groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Ju Park
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyunji Kim
- Korean Physician's Association, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Kyun Kim
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea
| | - Seung Soon Lee
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Eunju Jung
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Jin Seo Lee
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jacob Lee
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rinaldi M, Campoli C, Gallo M, Marzolla D, Zuppiroli A, Riccardi R, Casarini M, Riccucci D, Malosso M, Bonazzetti C, Pascale R, Tazza B, Pasquini Z, Marconi L, Curti S, Giannella M, Viale P. Comparison between available early antiviral treatments in outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a real-life study. BMC Infect Dis 2023; 23:646. [PMID: 37784051 PMCID: PMC10546723 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08538-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the clinical impact of three available antivirals for early COVID-19 treatment in a large real-life cohort. METHODS Between January and October 2022 all outpatients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 referring to IRCCS S. Orsola hospital treated with an early antiviral therapy were enrolled. A comparison between patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NTV/r), molnupiravir (MPV) and remdesivir (RDV) was conducted in term of indications and outcome. To account for differences between treatment groups a propensity score analysis was performed. After estimating the weights, we fitted a survey-weighted Cox regression model with inverse-probability weighting with hospital admission/death versus clinical recovery as the primary outcome. RESULTS Overall 1342 patients were enrolled, 775 (57.8%), 360 (26.8%) and 207 (15.4%) in MPV, NTV/r and RDV group, respectively. Median age was 73 (59-82) years, male sex was 53.4%. Primary indication was immunosuppression (438, 32.6%), the median time from symptom onset to drug administration was 3 [2-4] days. Overall, clinical recovery was reached in 96.9% of patients, with hospital admission rate of 2.6%. No significant differences were found in clinical recovery nor hospitalization. Cox regression showed a decreased probability of hospital admission/ death among prior vaccinated patients compared with unvaccinated (HR 0.31 [95%CI 0.14-0.70], p = 0.005]). No difference in hospitalization rates in early treatment compared to late treatment were found. CONCLUSIONS No differences among MPV, NTV/r and RDV in terms of clinical recovery or hospitalization were found. Patients not vaccinated had a significant increased risk of hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Rinaldi
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy.
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Caterina Campoli
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mena Gallo
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
| | - Domenico Marzolla
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Zuppiroli
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Riccardi
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Martina Casarini
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Daniele Riccucci
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marta Malosso
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Cecilia Bonazzetti
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Renato Pascale
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Beatrice Tazza
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Zeno Pasquini
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Marconi
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefania Curti
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
| | - Maddalena Giannella
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Viale
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 11, Bologna, 40137, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lahouati M, Cazanave C, Labadie A, Gohier P, Guirlé L, Desclaux A, Gigan M, Malvy D, Pedeboscq S, Xuereb F, Duvignaud A. Outcomes of targeted treatment in immunocompromised patients with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19: a retrospective study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:15357. [PMID: 37717101 PMCID: PMC10505186 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42727-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe the outcomes of targeted COVID-19 treatments in immunocompromised patients with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 during the period of expansion of the different Omicron subvariants in France. A retrospective monocentric observational study was performed. All immunocompromised patients aged 18 or more, with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild COVID-19, and who had received a targeted treatment with sotrovimab, tixagevimab/cilgavimab, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or remdesivir at the Bordeaux University Hospital from 1st January 2022 to 31st December 2022 were eligible. The primary outcomes of interest was defined as a composite of either (i) progression to moderate (WHO-Clinical Progression Scale at 4 or 5) or severe COVID-19 (WHO-CPS ≥ 6), or (ii) the occurrence of COVID-19-related death. The secondary outcomes of interest were the components of the primary outcome. Outcomes were collected until day 30 after targeted treatment administration or at discharge for patients still hospitalised in relation with COVID-19 at day 30. 223 immunocompromised patients received targeted treatment for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild COVID-19: 114 received sotrovimab, 50 tixagevimab/cilgavimab, 49 nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and 10 remdesivir. Among 223 treated patients, 10 (4.5%) progressed to moderate or severe disease: three patients (1.3%) progressed to moderate COVID-19 and 7 (3.1%) patients progressed to severe disease. Among them, 4 (1.8%) died of COVID-19. More than 95% of immunocompromised patients with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild COVID-19 treated by targeted therapies during the Omicron subvariants era did not progress to moderate or severe disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lahouati
- Service de Pharmacie Clinique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
- Inserm, UMR 1034, Biology of Cardiovascular Diseases, Université de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
| | - C Cazanave
- Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - A Labadie
- Service de Pharmacie Clinique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - P Gohier
- Service de Pharmacie Clinique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - L Guirlé
- Service de Pharmacie Clinique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - A Desclaux
- Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Gigan
- Service de Pharmacie Clinique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - D Malvy
- Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France
- Inserm UMR 1219, IRD EMR 271, Bordeaux Population Health, Université de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - S Pedeboscq
- Service de Pharmacie Clinique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - F Xuereb
- Service de Pharmacie Clinique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
- Inserm, UMR 1034, Biology of Cardiovascular Diseases, Université de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - A Duvignaud
- Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France
- Inserm UMR 1219, IRD EMR 271, Bordeaux Population Health, Université de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Torti C, Olimpieri PP, Bonfanti P, Tascini C, Celant S, Tacconi D, Nicastri E, Tacconelli E, Cacopardo B, Perrella A, Buccoliero GB, Parruti G, Bassetti M, Biagetti C, Giacometti A, Erne EM, Frontuto M, Lanzafame M, Summa V, Spagnoli A, Vestri A, Di Perri G, Russo P, Palù G. Real-life comparison of mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection at risk for clinical progression treated with molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir during the Omicron era in Italy: a nationwide, cohort study. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2023; 31:100684. [PMID: 37547273 PMCID: PMC10398591 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Comparative data on mortality in COVID-19 patients treated with molnupiravir or with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir are inconclusive. We therefore compared all-cause mortality in community-dwelling COVID-19 patients treated with these drugs during the Omicron era. Methods Data collected in the nationwide, population-based, cohort of patients registered in the database of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) were used. To increase completeness of the recorded deaths and date correctness, a cross-check with the National Death Registry provided by the Ministry of the Interior was performed. We included in this study all patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 treated within 5 days after the test date and symptom onset between February 8 and April 30, 2022. All-cause mortalities by day 28 were compared between the two treatment groups after balancing for baseline characteristics using weights obtained from a gradient boosting machine algorithm. Findings In the considered timeframe, 17,977 patients treated with molnupiravir and 11,576 patients with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir were included in the analysis. Most patients (25,617/29,553 = 86.7%) received a full vaccine course including the booster dose. A higher crude incidence rate of all-cause mortality was found among molnupiravir users (51.83 per 100,000 person-days), compared to nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir users (22.29 per 100,000 person-days). However, molnupiravir-treated patients were older than those treated with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir and differences between the two populations were found as far as types of co-morbidities were concerned. For this reason, we compared the weight-adjusted cumulative incidences using the Aalen estimator and found that the adjusted cumulative incidence rates were 1.23% (95% CI 1.07%-1.38%) for molnupiravir-treated and 0.78% (95% CI 0.58%-0.98%) for nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir-treated patients (adjusted log rank p = 0.0002). Moreover, the weight-adjusted mixed-effect Cox model including Italian regions and NHS centers as random effects and treatment as the only covariate confirmed a significant reduced risk of death in patients treated with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir. Lastly, a significant reduction in the risk of death associated with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir was confirmed in patient subgroups, such as in females, fully vaccinated patients, those treated within day 2 since symptom onset and patients without (haemato)-oncological diseases. Interpretation Early initiation of nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir was associated for the first time with a significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality by day 28 compared to molnupiravir, both in the overall population and in patient subgroups, including those fully vaccinated with the booster dose. Funding This study did not receive funding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Torti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, “Magna Graecia” University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Pier Paolo Olimpieri
- Italian Medicines Agency, Via del Tritone 181, 00187 Rome, Italy
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonfanti
- Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Carlo Tascini
- Department of Medicine (DAME), Infectious Diseases Clinic, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Simone Celant
- Italian Medicines Agency, Via del Tritone 181, 00187 Rome, Italy
| | - Danilo Tacconi
- Department of Specialised and Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases Unit, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Emanuele Nicastri
- National Institute for Infectious Disease Lazzaron Spallanzani, IRCCS, Via Portuense 292, 00149, Rome, Italy
| | - Evelina Tacconelli
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy
| | - Bruno Cacopardo
- Department of Internal and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania School of Medicine, Catania, Italy
| | - Alessandro Perrella
- Division Emerging Infectious Disease and High Contagiousness, D. Cotugno Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | | | - Giustino Parruti
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Unit, Pescara General Hospital, Pescara, Italy
| | - Matteo Bassetti
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Policlinico San Martino Hospital—IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
| | - Carlo Biagetti
- Unit of Infectious disease Infermi Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy
| | - Andrea Giacometti
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Elke Maria Erne
- Department of Infectious Disease, Azienda Sanitaria dell’Alto Adige, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Italy
| | - Maria Frontuto
- Infectious Diseases Unit, A.O.R. San Carlo, Potenza, Italy
| | | | - Valentina Summa
- Italian Medicines Agency, Via del Tritone 181, 00187 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Spagnoli
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Annarita Vestri
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Di Perri
- Department of Medical Sciences at the Unit of Infectious Diseases, University of Torino, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Russo
- Italian Medicines Agency, Via del Tritone 181, 00187 Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio Palù
- Italian Medicines Agency, Via del Tritone 181, 00187 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhao Q, Zheng B, Han B, Feng P, Xia Z, Jiang H, Ying Y, Zhu J, Fei C, Xiang J, Shen L, Luo Q, Wu Y, Wusiman A, Xin C, Zhang M, Li G, Li X. Is Azvudine Comparable to Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir in Real-World Efficacy and Safety for Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19? A Retrospective Cohort Study. Infect Dis Ther 2023; 12:2087-2102. [PMID: 37486556 PMCID: PMC10505125 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00845-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Azvudine and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir are more extensively used to treat COVID-19 in China due to their earlier approval by the National Medical Products Administration. However, there has been a scarcity of research directly comparing the clinical outcomes between azvudine and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir till now. We aimed to make a head-to-head comparison of the efficacy and safety of azvudine or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in China. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data collected from Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province between December 2022 and January 2023. All-cause mortality, risk of progressing to a critical condition, proportion with nucleic-acid negative conversion (PNANC), time to first nucleic-acid negative conversion (TFNANC), length of hospital stay and incidence of adverse events were systematically assessed as outcomes. Multi-model regression analysis, propensity-score-matching analysis, subgroup analysis and several sensitivity analyses were applied to compare these outcomes. RESULTS This study included a total of 1571 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, among whom 272 received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and 156 received azvudine. We found no significant differences in all-cause mortality (HR 1.41; 95% CI 0.56-3.56; P = 0.471), risk of progressing to critical COVID-19 (HR 1.67; 95% CI 0.78-3.60; P = 0.189), PNANC (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69-1.09; P = 0.220), length of stay (β - 0.82; 95% CI - 2.78 to 1.15; P = 0.414) and adverse event rate (3.21% vs. 4.41%, P = 0.538) between the two groups, although azvudine was slightly less effective than nirmatrelvir-ritonavir. Meanwhile, the azvudine group exhibited a significantly longer TFNANC (β 2.53; 95% CI 0.76-4.29; P = 0.005) than the nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group. Results were similar for propensity-score matching and multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION Azvudine probably possessed comparable efficacy and safety to nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, although it was less effective than nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for some outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinqin Zhao
- Department of Pharmacy, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310012, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Bei Zheng
- Department of Pharmacy, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310012, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Bing Han
- Department of Pharmacy, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310012, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Pinpin Feng
- Department of Pharmacy, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310012, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Zhongni Xia
- Department of Pharmacy, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310012, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Hong Jiang
- Department of Pharmacy, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310012, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yin Ying
- Department of Pharmacy, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310012, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jun Zhu
- Department of Pharmacy, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310012, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Cheng Fei
- Department of Pharmacy, The 72nd Group Army Hospital of PLA, Huzhou, 313000, China
| | - Junlei Xiang
- Department of Pharmacy, Longquan People's Hospital, Longquan, 323700, China
| | - Lingli Shen
- Department of Pharmacy, Linping Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hangzhou, 311100, China
| | - Qiliang Luo
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhaotong Mental Health Center, Zhaotong, 657000, China
| | - Yinhuan Wu
- Department of Pharmacy, Ruian Fifth People's Hospital, Ruian, 325200, China
| | - Ayiguzhali Wusiman
- Department of Pharmacy, Fourth People's Hospital of Aksu Region, Aksu, 843000, China
| | - Chuanwei Xin
- Department of Pharmacy, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310012, Zhejiang Province, China.
| | - Meiling Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310012, Zhejiang Province, China.
| | - Gonghua Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310012, Zhejiang Province, China.
| | - Xiang Li
- School of Basic Medical Sciences and Forensic Medicine, Hangzhou Medical College, No. 8 Yikang Street, Lin'an District, Hangzhou, 311399, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Basoulis D, Tsakanikas A, Gkoufa A, Bitsani A, Karamanakos G, Mastrogianni E, Georgakopoulou VE, Makrodimitri S, Voutsinas PM, Lamprou P, Kontos A, Tsiakas S, Gamaletsou MN, Marinaki S, Sipsas NV. Effectiveness of Oral Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir vs. Intravenous Three-Day Remdesivir in Preventing Progression to Severe COVID-19: A Single-Center, Prospective, Comparative, Real-Life Study. Viruses 2023; 15:1515. [PMID: 37515201 PMCID: PMC10383489 DOI: 10.3390/v15071515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) and three-day course remdesivir (3RDV) have been approved as early treatments for COVID-19 outpatients not requiring supplemental oxygen. Real-life data on the efficacy of antivirals among immunocompromised patients or directly comparing their effectiveness in preventing hospitalization and/or death are scarce. METHODS Prospective, observational study conducted in a tertiary care hospital, from 1 January 2022 until 15 March 2023, during the prevalence of the Omicron variant. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to account for differences between treatment groups. RESULTS We included 521, mainly immunocompromised (56%), patients in our analysis; 356 (68.3%) received 3RDV and 165 (31.7%) NMV/r. Overall, 15/521 (2.9%) patients met the primary end-point of hospitalization at 30 days (3RDV arm: 10/356, 2.8% vs. NMV/r arm: 5/165, 3%, p = 1). On IPTW-adjusted univariable analysis, the choice of treatment did not affect outcomes. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, we found that one (OR 0.26, 95%CI 0.07-0.99, p = 0.049) or two (OR 0.06, 95%CI 0.01-0.55, p = 0.014) vaccine booster shots reduced the risk for adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION In our patient population of high-risk, mainly immunocompromised, vaccinated patients during the prevalence of the Omicron variant, NMV/r and 3RDV were equally effective early treatments for the prevention of hospitalization and/or death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Basoulis
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Laiko General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
- Department of Pathophysiology, Laiko General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Aikaterini Gkoufa
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Laiko General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
| | - Aikaterini Bitsani
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Laiko General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
- Haematology Clinic and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Laiko General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - Vasiliki E Georgakopoulou
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Laiko General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
- Department of Pathophysiology, Laiko General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - Panagiota Lamprou
- Pulmonology Department, Laiko General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Kontos
- Department of Pathophysiology, Laiko General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
| | - Stathis Tsiakas
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Laiko General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Smaragdi Marinaki
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Laiko General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
- Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 27 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos V Sipsas
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Laiko General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
- Department of Pathophysiology, Laiko General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
- Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 27 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ye L, Fan S, Zhao P, Wu C, Liu M, Hu S, Wang P, Wang H, Bi H. Potential herb‒drug interactions between anti-COVID-19 drugs and traditional Chinese medicine. Acta Pharm Sin B 2023:S2211-3835(23)00203-4. [PMID: 37360014 PMCID: PMC10239737 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has spread worldwide. Effective treatments against COVID-19 remain urgently in need although vaccination significantly reduces the incidence, hospitalization, and mortality. At present, antiviral drugs including Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (PaxlovidTM), Remdesivir, and Molnupiravir have been authorized to treat COVID-19 and become more globally available. On the other hand, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been used for the treatment of epidemic diseases for a long history. Currently, various TCM formulae against COVID-19 such as Qingfei Paidu decoction, Xuanfei Baidu granule, Huashi Baidu granule, Jinhua Qinggan granule, Lianhua Qingwen capsule, and Xuebijing injection have been widely used in clinical practice in China, which may cause potential herb-drug interactions (HDIs) in patients under treatment with antiviral drugs and affect the efficacy and safety of medicines. However, information on potential HDIs between the above anti-COVID-19 drugs and TCM formulae is lacking, and thus this work seeks to summarize and highlight potential HDIs between antiviral drugs and TCM formulae against COVID-19, and especially pharmacokinetic HDIs mediated by metabolizing enzymes and/or transporters. These well-characterized HDIs could provide useful information on clinical concomitant medicine use to maximize clinical outcomes and minimize adverse and toxic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Ye
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Drug Metabolism & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China
| | - Shicheng Fan
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Drug Metabolism & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China
| | - Pengfei Zhao
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Design and Evaluation,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510006,China
| | - Chenghua Wu
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Drug Metabolism & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China
| | - Menghua Liu
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Drug Metabolism & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China
| | - Shuang Hu
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Drug Metabolism & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China
| | - Peng Wang
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Drug Metabolism & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China
| | - Hongyu Wang
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Drug Metabolism & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China
| | - Huichang Bi
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Drug Metabolism & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Amani B, Akbarzadeh A, Amani B, Shabestan R, Khorramnia S, Navidi Z, Rajabkhah K, Kardanmoghadam V. Comparative efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2023; 95:e28889. [PMID: 37368841 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) with molnupiravir in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To end this, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, medRxiv, and Google Scholar were systematically searched to collect relevant evidence up to February 15, 2023. The risk of bias was evaluated using the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions tool. Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Eighteen studies involving 57 659 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed a significant difference between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in terms of all-cause mortality rate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.67), all-cause hospitalization rate (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.54-0.69), death or hospitalization rate (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.38-0.99), and negative polymerase chain reaction conversion time (mean difference = -1.55, 95% CI: -1.74 to -1.37). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of COVID-19 rebound (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.71-1.07). In terms of safety, although the incidence of any adverse events was higher in the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir group (OR = 2.52, 95% CI: 1.57-4.06), no significant difference was observed between the two treatments in terms of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.69-2.00). The present meta-analysis demonstrated the significant superiority of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir over molnupiravir in improving clinical efficacy in COVID-19 patients during the prevalence of Omicron variant. These findings, however, need to be further confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahman Amani
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
| | - Arash Akbarzadeh
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Behnam Amani
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
| | - Rouhollah Shabestan
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Saeed Khorramnia
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
| | - Zia Navidi
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
| | - Kourosh Rajabkhah
- Department of Curative Affairs, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
| | - Vida Kardanmoghadam
- Research Department, Deputy of Research and Technology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Akinosoglou K, Rigopoulos EA, Schinas G, Kaiafa G, Polyzou E, Tsoupra S, Tzouvelekis A, Gogos C, Savopoulos C. Remdesivir Use in the Real-World Setting: An Overview of Available Evidence. Viruses 2023; 15:v15051167. [PMID: 37243253 DOI: 10.3390/v15051167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
In the years of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), various treatment options have been utilized. COVID-19 continues to circulate in the global population, and the evolution of the Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus has posed significant challenges to the treatment and prevention of infection. Remdesivir (RDV), an anti-viral agent with in vitro efficacy against coronaviruses, is a potent and safe treatment as suggested by a plethora of in vitro and in vivo studies and clinical trials. Emerging real-world data have confirmed its effectiveness, and there are currently datasets evaluating its efficacy and safety against SARS-CoV-2 infections in various clinical scenarios, including some that are not in the SmPC recommendations according for COVID-19 pharmacotherapy. Remdesivir increases the chance of recovery, reduces progression to severe disease, lowers mortality rates, and exhibits beneficial post-hospitalization outcomes, especially when used early in the course of the disease. Strong evidence suggests the expansion of remdesivir use in special populations (e.g., pregnancy, immunosuppression, renal impairment, transplantation, elderly and co-medicated patients) where the benefits of treatment outweigh the risk of adverse effects. In this article, we attempt to overview the available real-world data of remdesivir pharmacotherapy. With the unpredictable course of COVID-19, we need to utilize all available knowledge to bridge the gap between clinical research and clinical practice and be sufficiently prepared for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Akinosoglou
- Division of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece
- School of Medicine, University of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece
| | | | | | - Georgia Kaiafa
- 1st Medical Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, AHEPA, University Hospital of Thessaloniki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Eleni Polyzou
- Division of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece
- School of Medicine, University of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece
| | - Stamatia Tsoupra
- Division of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece
- School of Medicine, University of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece
| | - Argyrios Tzouvelekis
- School of Medicine, University of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece
- Department of Pulmonology, University General Hospital of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece
| | | | - Christos Savopoulos
- 1st Medical Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, AHEPA, University Hospital of Thessaloniki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cegolon L, Pol R, Simonetti O, Larese Filon F, Luzzati R. Molnupiravir, Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir, or Sotrovimab for High-Risk COVID-19 Patients Infected by the Omicron Variant: Hospitalization, Mortality, and Time until Negative Swab Test in Real Life. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:721. [PMID: 37242504 PMCID: PMC10221734 DOI: 10.3390/ph16050721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. Several drugs which are easy to administer in outpatient settings have been authorized and endorsed for high-risk COVID-19 patients with mild-moderate disease to prevent hospital admission and death, complementing COVID-19 vaccines. However, the evidence on the efficacy of COVID-19 antivirals during the Omicron wave is scanty or conflicting. Methods. This retrospective controlled study investigated the efficacy of Molnupiravir or Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (Paxlovid®) or Sotrovimab against standard of care (controls) on three different endpoints among 386 high-risk COVID-19 outpatients: hospital admission at 30 days; death at 30 days; and time between COVID-19 diagnosis and first negative swab test result. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to investigate the determinants of hospitalization due to COVID-19-associated pneumonia, whereas time to first negative swab test result was investigated by means of multinomial logistic analysis as well as Cox regression analysis. Results. Only 11 patients (overall rate of 2.8%) developed severe COVID-19-associated pneumonia requiring admission to hospital: 8 controls (7.2%); 2 patients on Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (2.0%); and 1 on Sotrovimab (1.8%). No patient on Molnupiravir was institutionalized. Compared to controls, hospitalization was less likely for patients on Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (aOR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.03; 0.89) or Molnupiravir (omitted estimate); drug efficacy was 84% for Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir against 100% for Molnupiravir. Only two patients died of COVID-19 (rate of 0.5%), both were controls, one (a woman aged 96 years) was unvaccinated and the other (a woman aged 72 years) had adequate vaccination status. At Cox regression analysis, the negativization rate was significantly higher in patients treated with both antivirals-Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (aHR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.25; 2.26) or Molnupiravir (aHR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.08; 1.94). However, COVID-19 vaccination with three (aHR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.51; 2.73) or four (aHR = 2.48; 95% CI: 1.32; 4.68) doses had a slightly stronger effect size on viral clearance. In contrast, the negativization rate reduced significantly in patients who were immune-depressed (aHR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.52; 0.93) or those with a Charlson index ≥5 (aHR = 0.63; 0.41; 0.95) or those who had started the respective treatment course 3+ days after COVID-19 diagnosis (aOR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.38; 0.82). Likewise, at internal analysis (excluding patients on standard of care), patients on Molnupiravir (aHR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.21; 2.50) or Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (aHR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.32; 2.93) were more likely to turn negative earlier than those on Sotrovimab (reference category). Nonetheless, three (aHR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.33; 2.74) or four (aHR = 2.20; 95% CI: 1.06; 4.59) doses of COVID-19 vaccine were again associated with a faster negativization rate. Again, the negativization rate was significantly lower if treatment started 3+ days after COVID-19 diagnosis (aHR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.32; 0.92). Conclusions. Molnupiravir, Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir, and Sotrovimab were all effective in preventing hospital admission and/or mortality attributable to COVID-19. However, hospitalizations also decreased with higher number of doses of COVID-19 vaccines. Although they are effective against severe disease and mortality, the prescription of COVID-19 antivirals should be carefully scrutinized by double opinion, not only to contain health care costs but also to reduce the risk of generating resistant SARS-CoV-2 strains. Only 64.7% of patients were in fact immunized with 3+ doses of COVID-19 vaccines in the present study. High-risk patients should prioritize COVID-19 vaccination, which is a more cost-effective approach than antivirals against severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Likewise, although both antivirals, especially Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir, were more likely than standard of care and Sotrovimab to reduce viral shedding time (VST) in high-risk SARS-CoV-2 patients, vaccination had an independent and stronger effect on viral clearance. However, the effect of antivirals or COVID-19 vaccination on VST should be considered a secondary benefit. Indeed, recommending Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in order to control VST in high-risk COVID-19 patients is rather questionable since other cheap, large spectrum and harmless nasal disinfectants such as hypertonic saline solutions are available on the market with proven efficacy in containing VST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Cegolon
- Department of Medical, Surgical & Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34147 Trieste, Italy; (F.L.F.); (R.L.)
- Occupational Medicine Unit, University Health Agency Giuliano-Isontina (ASUGI), 34129 Trieste, Italy
| | - Riccardo Pol
- Infectious Disease Unit, University Health Agency Giuliano-Isontina (ASUGI), 34129 Trieste, Italy; (R.P.)
| | - Omar Simonetti
- Infectious Disease Unit, University Health Agency Giuliano-Isontina (ASUGI), 34129 Trieste, Italy; (R.P.)
| | - Francesca Larese Filon
- Department of Medical, Surgical & Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34147 Trieste, Italy; (F.L.F.); (R.L.)
- Occupational Medicine Unit, University Health Agency Giuliano-Isontina (ASUGI), 34129 Trieste, Italy
| | - Roberto Luzzati
- Department of Medical, Surgical & Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34147 Trieste, Italy; (F.L.F.); (R.L.)
- Infectious Disease Unit, University Health Agency Giuliano-Isontina (ASUGI), 34129 Trieste, Italy; (R.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Li Y, Liu Y, Wen L, Chen H, Wang W, Tian M, Cheng Y, Xue H, Chen C. Clinical efficacy analysis of paxlovid in children with hematological diseases infected with the omicron SARS-CoV-2 new variant. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1160929. [PMID: 37181421 PMCID: PMC10167044 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1160929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To summarize the clinical characteristics of children with hematological malignancies co-infected with novel coronavirus and explore the safety and effectiveness of Paxlovid treatment. Methods From December 10, 2022, to January 20, 2023, the clinical data of children with hematological diseases diagnosed with novel coronavirus infection in the outpatient and emergency department of the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were retrospectively analyzed. Results According to whether to give paxlovid or not, it is divided into group A (paxlovid group) and group B (non-paxlovid group). The length of fever was 1-6 days in group A and 0-3 days in group B. The viral clearance time was shorter in group A than in group B. The inflammatory indexes CRP and PCT were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P < 0.05). Twenty patients were followed up for 1 month after leaving the hospital, and there were 5 cases of reappearance of fever, 1 case of increased sleep, 1 case of physical fatigue and 1 case of loss of appetite within 2 weeks. Conclusions Paxlovid has no apparent adverse reactions in children 12 years old and younger with underlying hematological diseases infected with the new coronavirus. Focusing on the interaction between paxlovid and other drugs is necessary during the treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixian Li
- Pediatric Hematology Laboratory, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yong Liu
- Pediatric Hematology Laboratory, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Luping Wen
- Department of Pharmacy, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hui Chen
- Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Wenqing Wang
- Pediatric Hematology Laboratory, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Mengyao Tian
- Pediatric Hematology Laboratory, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yucai Cheng
- Pediatric Hematology Laboratory, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hongman Xue
- Pediatric Hematology Laboratory, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Chun Chen
- Pediatric Hematology Laboratory, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Petrakis V, Rafailidis P, Trypsianis G, Papazoglou D, Panagopoulos P. The Antiviral Effect of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir during COVID-19 Pandemic Real-World Data. Viruses 2023; 15:v15040976. [PMID: 37112956 PMCID: PMC10144059 DOI: 10.3390/v15040976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 and the prevalence of Omicron variants have reduced the risk of the severe clinical progress of COVID-19. However, the risk of breakthrough infections has increased, and early administration of an effective antiviral treatment is significant in order to prevent the severe progression of COVID-19 in vulnerable patients with comorbidities. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included in a matched-pair retrospective study based on age, gender, comorbidities and vaccination status. They were divided into two groups: group A (n = 200) consisted of outpatients at increased risk of severe clinical progress who were treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and group B (n = 200) consisted of non-hospitalized patients who did not receive antiviral treatment. Demographic data, clinical outcome (death, intubation), days of hospitalization, time for recovery, adverse events and treatment compliance were reported. RESULTS The median age (75.24 ± 13.12 years in the study group and 76.91 ± 14.02 years in the comparison group) and the proportion of males (59% vs. 60.5%, respectively) were similar between the two groups. A total of 6.5% of patients in group A and 10.5% in group B were unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Three patients from group A (1.5%) and one hundred eleven (55.5%) from group B required hospitalization. The duration of hospitalization (3 days vs. 10 days in group B, p < 0.001) and the total time needed for recovery (5 days vs. 9 days, p < 0.001) was shorter in the study group. A rebound of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 8-12 days after diagnosis was documented in 6.5% of patients in group A and 8% of patients in group B. CONCLUSION Oral treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in high-risk non-hospitalized patients was safe and effective in preventing the severe clinical progress of COVID-19 pneumonia. Early administration of antiviral agents in vulnerable outpatients combined with a full vaccination scheme is significant in order to avoid hospitalization and severe clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios Petrakis
- Department of Infectious Diseases, 2nd University Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital Alexandroupolis, Democritus University Thrace, 68132 Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Petros Rafailidis
- Department of Infectious Diseases, 2nd University Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital Alexandroupolis, Democritus University Thrace, 68132 Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Grigorios Trypsianis
- Department of Medical Statistics, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, 69100 Komotini, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Papazoglou
- Department of Infectious Diseases, 2nd University Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital Alexandroupolis, Democritus University Thrace, 68132 Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Periklis Panagopoulos
- Department of Infectious Diseases, 2nd University Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital Alexandroupolis, Democritus University Thrace, 68132 Alexandroupolis, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tian F, Chen Z, Feng Q. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir compared with other antiviral drugs for the treatment of COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2023; 95:e28732. [PMID: 37183808 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
At present, there are some differences in the research results of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir compared with other antiviral drugs for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir compared with other antiviral drugs and the impact of different antiviral drugs on the short- and long-term effects of COVID-19. PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Web of Science, Google Scholar, and MedRxiv were searched to identify relevant studies from inception to March 30, 2023. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the effects of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir compared with other antiviral drugs for the treatment of COVID-19 patients and safety outcomes. The RoB1 and ROBINS-I were used to assess the bias risk of the included studies. Revman 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis (PROSPERO Code No: CRD42023397816). Twelve studies were included, including 30 588 COVID-19 patients, of whom 13 402 received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir. The meta-analysis results showed that the nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group had a lower proportion of patients than the control group in terms of long-term mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.66), hospitalization (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.37-0.53, short term; OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36-0.77, long term), and disease progression (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.83, short term; OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48-0.74, long term), and nirmatrelvir ritonavir showed little difference in safety compared to the control group. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir can reduce the mortality and hospitalization of COVID-19 patients compared with other antiviral drugs. Further large-scale studies remain to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangyuan Tian
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhaoyan Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qiyi Feng
- Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine, West China Hospital, Precision Medicine Research Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Real-World Study on Effectiveness of Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir–Ritonavir in Unvaccinated Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases with Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection Managed in Out-Patient Setting. Viruses 2023; 15:v15030610. [PMID: 36992319 PMCID: PMC10055981 DOI: 10.3390/v15030610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
While molnupiravir (MOV) and nirmatrelvir–ritonavir (NMV-r) were developed for treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 infection, there has been a lack of data on the efficacy among unvaccinated adult patients with chronic respiratory diseases, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchiectasis. A territory-wide retrospective cohort study was conducted in Hong Kong to investigate the efficacy of MOV and NMV-r against severe outcomes of COVID-19 in unvaccinated adult patients with chronic respiratory diseases. A total of 3267 patients were included. NMV-r was effective in preventing respiratory failure (66.6%; 95% CI, 25.6–85.0%, p = 0.007), severe respiratory failure (77.0%; 95% CI, 6.9–94.3%, p = 0.039) with statistical significance, and COVID-19 related hospitalization (43.9%; 95% CI, −1.7–69.0%, p = 0.057) and in-hospital mortality (62.7%; 95% CI, −0.6–86.2, p = 0.051) with borderline statistical significance. MOV was effective in preventing COVID-19 related severe respiratory failure (48.2%; 95% CI 0.5–73.0, p = 0.048) and in-hospital mortality (58.3%; 95% CI 22.9–77.4, p = 0.005) but not hospitalization (p = 0.16) and respiratory failure (p = 0.10). In summary, both NMV-r and MOV are effective for reducing severe outcomes in unvaccinated COVID-19 patients with chronic respiratory diseases.
Collapse
|
27
|
HIV and COVID-19 Co-Infection: Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, and Treatment. Viruses 2023; 15:v15020577. [PMID: 36851791 PMCID: PMC9962407 DOI: 10.3390/v15020577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has been a global medical emergency with a significant socio-economic impact. People with HIV (PWH), due to the underlying immunosuppression and the particularities of HIV stigma, are considered a vulnerable population at high risk. In this review, we report what is currently known in the available literature with regards to the clinical implications of the overlap of the two epidemics. PWH share the same risk factors for severe COVID-19 as the general population (age, comorbidities), but virological and immunological status also plays an important role. Clinical presentation does not differ significantly, but there are some opportunistic infections that can mimic or co-exist with COVID-19. PWH should be prime candidates for preventative COVID-19 treatments when they are available, but in the setting of resistant strains, this might be not easy. When considering small-molecule medications, physicians need to always remember to address potential interactions with ART, and when considering immunosuppressants, they need to be aware of potential risks for opportunistic infections. COVID-19 shares similarities with HIV in how the public perceives patients-with fear of the unknown and prejudice. There are opportunities for HIV treatment hidden in COVID-19 research with the leaps gained in both monoclonal antibody and vaccine development.
Collapse
|
28
|
Molnupiravir: A Versatile Prodrug against SARS-CoV-2 Variants. Metabolites 2023; 13:metabo13020309. [PMID: 36837928 PMCID: PMC9962121 DOI: 10.3390/metabo13020309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The nucleoside analog β-D-N4-hydroxycytidine is the active metabolite of the prodrug molnupiravir and is accepted as an efficient drug against COVID-19. Molnupiravir targets the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) enzyme, which is responsible for replicating the viral genome during the replication process of certain types of viruses. It works by disrupting the normal function of the RdRp enzyme, causing it to make mistakes during the replication of the viral genome. These mistakes can prevent the viral RNA from being transcribed, converted into a complementary DNA template, translated, or converted into a functional protein. By disrupting these crucial steps in the viral replication process, molnupiravir can effectively inhibit the replication of the virus and reduce its ability to cause disease. This review article sheds light on the impact of molnupiravir and its metabolite on SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, such as delta, omicron, and hybrid/recombinant variants. The detailed mechanism and molecular interactions using molecular docking and dynamics have also been covered. The safety and tolerability of molnupiravir in patients with comorbidities have also been emphasized.
Collapse
|