Understanding and Addressing Hair Disorders in Transgender Individuals

A Review of Best Practices for Gender-Affirming Laser Hair Removal

BACKGROUND

Permanent hair reduction is an integral part of gender-affirming medical care, especially for transgender patients undergoing surgeries such as phalloplasty and vaginoplasty. Hair removal helps reduce complications and alleviate gender dysphoria associated with unwanted facial and body hair.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the methods, efficacy, and access issues of hair removal in transgender patients, with a focus on its role in surgical preparation and gender dysphoria reduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was conducted to analyze the effectiveness of laser hair removal (LHR) and electrolysis for permanent hair reduction. The review also explored regional regulatory barriers and insurance coverage limitations affecting access to these services.

RESULTS

Laser hair removal and electrolysis are both effective for hair removal, with LHR being less painful and faster. Laser hair removal is often preferred but requires multiple treatments and proper laser settings. Insurance coverage remains inconsistent, limiting access to these procedures. Postoperative hair regrowth in neovaginal or neourethral sites can be managed with hormonal adjustments and further treatments.

CONCLUSION

Hair removal plays an essential role in reducing surgical complications and gender dysphoria in transgender patients. A multidisciplinary approach between dermatologists and surgeons is essential, and addressing regulatory and access barriers is critical for equitable care.

Estrogen hormone therapy stabilizes lateral hairline in transfeminine patients: Implications for facial feminization surgery

BACKGROUND

Although several studies report on the suppressing effects of estrogen therapy on facial and body hair in transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) individuals, few studies have elucidated its effects on hairline stability on the scalp. In this study, we assessed the influence of estrogen therapy on forehead length.

METHODS

All TGNB patients, aged 30 years or older, assigned male at birth (AMAB) seeking facial feminization surgery were included in the study. Central and forehead lengths were collected at the initial consultation visits. Variables, including age, duration of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), presence of spironolactone, and presence of other hair treatments, such as finasteride, dutasteride, or minoxidil, that potentially influence hair growth were collected by chart review. Multivariable linear regressions were constructed with relevant predictor variables while also incorporating global health scores as a proxy for psychological effects on hair loss.

RESULTS

Overall, 171 patients were included in this study, with a median age of 36.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 32.0-46.0) years and median HRT duration of 2.0 (IQR 1.0-6.0) years. Multivariable linear regressions revealed no significant predictors for central forehead length. However, lateral forehead length was positively predicted by age (B=0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.03-0.08], p < 0.001) and hair treatment (B=0.66, 95% CI [0.14-1.18], p = 0.01), but negatively predicted by HRT duration (B=-0.07, 95% CI [-0.10 to -0.04], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although older age is a predictor of lateral hairline recession in TGNB AMAB individuals, lateral forehead length was also predicted to decrease by 0.07 cm with each year of feminizing hormone therapy in patients over 30 years of age.

Immunologic Outcomes in Cross-Sex Solid Organ Transplants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Inform Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Of nearly 90 hand and 50 face transplant recipients, only five have received a cross-sex vascularized composite allotransplantation (CS-VCA). CS-VCA has the potential to expand the donor pool and has been proven anatomically feasible and ethically acceptable in previous studies. However, there is a lack of immunologic data. This study evaluated the immunologic feasibility of CS-VCA through analysis of the solid organ transplant literature, given the paucity of CS-VCA data. The authors hypothesize that rates of acute rejection (AR) and graft survival (GS) in CS versus same-sex (SS) solid organ transplantation are similar.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Studies comparing GS or AR episodes in CS and SS adult kidney (KT) and liver transplant (LT) populations were included. Odds ratios were calculated for overall GS and AR for all SS and CS transplant combinations [male-to-female (MTF), female-to-male, and overall].

RESULTS

A total of 693 articles were initially identified with 25 included in the meta-analysis. No significant difference in GS was noted between SS-KT versus CS-KT [OR, 1.04 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.07); P = 0.07), SS-KT versus MTF-KT [OR, 0.97 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.04); P = 0.41), and SS-LT versus MTF-LT [OR, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91 to 1.00); P = 0.05). No significant difference in AR was noted between SS-KT versus MTF-KT [OR, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.02); P = 0.57), SS-LT versus CS-LT [OR, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.53 to 1.16); P = 0.22], or SS-LT versus female-to-male LT [OR, 1.03 (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.12); P = 0.47]. For the remaining pairings, GS was significantly increased and AR was significantly decreased in the SS transplants.

CONCLUSIONS

Published data suggest immunologic feasibility of CS-KT and CS-LT with the potential for generalization to the VCA population.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

In theory, CS-VCA could expand the potential donor pool, ultimately leading to decreased wait times for recipients and improve the likelihood of establishing a immunologically favorable donor-recipient match.

Skin manifestations in adults with gender dysphoria on hormone treatment in the outpatient clinic of Hospital de San José, Bogotá-Colombia

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive healthcare for patients with gender dysphoria includes access to gender-affirming hormone therapy. It may cause cutaneous and adnexal side effects, which often affect quality of life, are underdiagnosed, and do not receive timely treatment. The literature on this subject is scarce. The main objective was to identify skin manifestations secondary to hormone treatment in adults with gender dysphoria.

METHODS

Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. A search was performed in the database of patients with gender dysphoria older than 18 years treated at the dermatology and/or endocrinology outpatient clinic of the Hospital de San José de Bogotá in the period 2015-2021. Medical records of patients on hormone therapy with skin manifestations were selected, while patients using other medications as possible triggers were excluded.

RESULTS

In total, 85 patients were included, with a predominance of young transgender men (average age was 27 ± 9 years) in whom the main manifestation was acne (87%), followed by androgenetic alopecia and acanthosis nigricans. Transgender women presented more acne, androgenetic alopecia, hypertrichosis, seborrheic dermatitis, and melasma. The majority received treatment, mainly topical therapies. More than half of the patients were treated by the endocrinology and dermatology services.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin manifestations in patients with gender dysphoria on hormone therapy are frequent, so they should be known and taken into account in the multidisciplinary approach to these patients, which should involve dermatologists. This is the first Colombian and Latin American study focused on documenting skin manifestations in patients with gender dysphoria undergoing hormone therapy.

The dermatologist's guide to beards: a review of structure, function, care and pathology

Facial hair is a commonly desired feature for many individuals. Despite a breadth of dermatology literature covering strategies for removing facial hair, there are no known articles summarizing strategies for facial hair growth or reviewing common facial hair pathologies. Here, we assess Google Trends to describe significant increases in search terms related to facial hair growth and maintenance over the last decade, suggesting an increased public interest in this topic. Next, we review ethnic differences that may affect facial hair distribution, growth, and predisposition to certain facial hair pathologies. Lastly, we review studies on agents used for facial hair growth and review common facial hair pathologies.

Supporting transgender patients with their personal hygiene

Attending to one's personal hygiene is a private and ritualistic act that is linked to self-expression and is important for one's well-being and self-esteem. Providing effective support with personal hygiene to patients can demonstrate thoughtfulness and sensitivity to their individual needs. Nurses in all fields of nursing may encounter patients who identify as transgender, but many nurses have expressed concerns about their lack of knowledge and confidence in that area of care. This article discusses the use of gender-affirming language and the factors to consider when supporting transgender patients with their personal hygiene as part of personalised, equitable and inclusive nursing care.

Androgenetic alopecia in transgender and gender diverse populations: A review of therapeutics

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) management is a significant clinical and therapeutic challenge for transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patients. Although gender-affirming hormone therapies affect hair growth, there is little research about AGA in TGD populations. After reviewing the literature on approved treatments, off-label medication usages, and procedures for treating AGA, we present treatment options for AGA in TGD patients. The first-line treatments for any TGD patient include topical minoxidil 5% applied to the scalp once or twice daily, finasteride 1 mg oral daily, and/or low-level laser light therapy. Spironolactone 200 mg daily is also first-line for transfeminine patients. Second-line options include daily oral minoxidil dosed at 1.25 or 2.5 mg for transfeminine and transmasculine patients, respectively. Topical finasteride 0.25% monotherapy or in combination with minoxidil 2% solution are second-line options for transmasculine and transfeminine patients, respectively. Other second-line treatments for any TGD patient include oral dutasteride 0.5 mg daily, platelet-rich plasma, or hair restoration procedures. After 6-12 months of treatment, AGA severity and treatment progress should be assessed via scales not based on sex; eg, the Basic and Specific Classification or the Bouhanna scales. Dermatologists should coordinate care with the patient's primary gender-affirming clinician(s) so that shared knowledge of all medications exists across the care team.

Androgenetic alopecia incidence in transgender and gender diverse populations: A retrospective comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a significant challenge for many transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients, but the rate of AGA among TGD patients receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) compared to cisgender patients has not yet been studied on a large scale.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the incidence of AGA among TGD patients receiving GAHT compared to cisgender patients.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using electronic health records from 37,826 patients seen at Fenway Health between August 1, 2014, and August 1, 2020. Crude and adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) for AGA were calculated using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

TGD patients receiving masculinizing GAHT had aIRR 2.50, 95% CI 1.71-3.65 and 1.30, 95% CI 0.91-1.86 compared to cisgender women and cisgender men, respectively. The rate of AGA for TGD patients receiving feminizing GAHT was not significantly different compared to cisgender men but was significantly increased compared to cisgender women (aIRR 1.91, 95% CI 1.25-2.92).

LIMITATIONS

Inability to determine causation and limited generalizability.

CONCLUSION

TGD patients receiving masculinizing GAHT have 2.5 times the rate of AGA compared to cisgender women, whereas TGD patients on feminizing GAHT did not have a significantly increased rate of AGA compared to cisgender men.

Characterizing Dermatological Conditions in the Transgender Population: A Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose

This study aimed to demonstrate the effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and gender-affirming procedures on the skin in transgender individuals.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study among transgender people. Skin conditions related to GAHT were assessed, including acne (using the Investigator's Global Assessment, IGA), postacne sequelae, melasma, hypertrichosis in androgen-sensitive areas (HAAs) in transgender men (TM) and hirsutism in transgender women (TW) (using the modified Ferriman-Gallwey score, mFG score), and hair loss (using the Hamilton-Norwood and Ludwig scale) at baseline, 6 months after GAHT, and the day on which the questionnaire was completed. Dermatological problems after gender-affirming procedures were evaluated.

Results

A total of 159 patients, including 134 TM and 25 TW, were eligible to participate. The median duration of GAHT was 23 and 36 months in TM and TW, respectively. In TM, the median IGA score of facial acne increased from 1 at baseline to 3 after 6 months and decreased to 2 after 2 years of GAHT. The mFG score indicated HAA in all TMs after testosterone treatment. A total of 88.1% of TM had no hair loss before hormone therapy. However, after 2 years of GAHT, 76.1% of TM developed male pattern hair loss (MPHL), and 26.1% of them had moderate-to-severe MPHL. In TW, the median IGA and mFG scores decreased after 3 years of hormone therapy, and the proportion of female pattern hair loss (FPHL) in TW increased to 16% after GAHT. In both groups, the most common skin complication after gender-affirming surgery was hypertrophic scarring.

Conclusions

GAHT in TM resulted in acne and MPHL, whereas GAHT in TW caused melasma and FPHL.

Managing Dermatologic Effects of Gender-Affirming Therapy in Transgender Adolescents

Transgender adolescents seek gender-affirming medical care to address gender identity and incongruence. Improved understanding of the dermatologic impact of gender-affirming medical care such as pubertal suppression, hormone therapy, and surgeries can enhance patient outcome. Pubertal suppression treats dysphoria associated with development of secondary sex characteristics, including androgen-driven acne. Gender-affirming hormone therapy influences acne and hair development in transgender adolescents. Dermatologists can help manage skin effects associated with chest binding and gender-affirming hormone therapy and surgery. Provision of patient-centered gender-affirming care in dermatologic and multidisciplinary settings is essential to improve skin and overall outcomes of gender-affirming therapy.

Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8

Background: Transgender healthcare is a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary field. In the last decade, there has been an unprecedented increase in the number and visibility of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people seeking support and gender-affirming medical treatment in parallel with a significant rise in the scientific literature in this area. The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) is an international, multidisciplinary, professional association whose mission is to promote evidence-based care, education, research, public policy, and respect in transgender health. One of the main functions of WPATH is to promote the highest standards of health care for TGD people through the Standards of Care (SOC). The SOC was initially developed in 1979 and the last version (SOC-7) was published in 2012. In view of the increasing scientific evidence, WPATH commissioned a new version of the Standards of Care, the SOC-8. Aim: The overall goal of SOC-8 is to provide health care professionals (HCPs) with clinical guidance to assist TGD people in accessing safe and effective pathways to achieving lasting personal comfort with their gendered selves with the aim of optimizing their overall physical health, psychological well-being, and self-fulfillment. Methods: The SOC-8 is based on the best available science and expert professional consensus in transgender health. International professionals and stakeholders were selected to serve on the SOC-8 committee. Recommendation statements were developed based on data derived from independent systematic literature reviews, where available, background reviews and expert opinions. Grading of recommendations was based on the available evidence supporting interventions, a discussion of risks and harms, as well as the feasibility and acceptability within different contexts and country settings. Results: A total of 18 chapters were developed as part of the SOC-8. They contain recommendations for health care professionals who provide care and treatment for TGD people. Each of the recommendations is followed by explanatory text with relevant references. General areas related to transgender health are covered in the chapters Terminology, Global Applicability, Population Estimates, and Education. The chapters developed for the diverse population of TGD people include Assessment of Adults, Adolescents, Children, Nonbinary, Eunuchs, and Intersex Individuals, and people living in Institutional Environments. Finally, the chapters related to gender-affirming treatment are Hormone Therapy, Surgery and Postoperative Care, Voice and Communication, Primary Care, Reproductive Health, Sexual Health, and Mental Health. Conclusions: The SOC-8 guidelines are intended to be flexible to meet the diverse health care needs of TGD people globally. While adaptable, they offer standards for promoting optimal health care and guidance for the treatment of people experiencing gender incongruence. As in all previous versions of the SOC, the criteria set forth in this document for gender-affirming medical interventions are clinical guidelines; individual health care professionals and programs may modify these in consultation with the TGD person.

Facial Masculinization from Procedures to Payment: A Review

As the demand for gender-affirming procedures continues to increase, patients and providers have a greater imperative to understand the current state of facial masculinization. Facial reconstruction for transgender women has been shown to treat gender dysphoria effectively and reduce rates of discrimination and victimization. Although facial masculinization surgery for transgender men is less common, there are multiple surgical and nonsurgical options to supplement the effect of hormone therapy on facial appearance, including but not limited to: receding the hair line, flattening the forehead, expanding the supraorbital ridge, increasing the dorsal nasal projection, squaring the jaw, and augmenting the chin. This review aims to summarize these techniques for providers who wish to inform transgender male patients about their options and discuss them in the context of patient satisfaction and availability of insurance coverage.

Laser therapy is a safe and effective treatment for unwanted hair in adults undergoing male to female sex reassignment

Reduction in unwanted facial and body hair is an important goal in the process of sex reassignment. Laser treatment is a popular, well-established safe and effective method of reducing unwanted hair growth. In the UK a limited number of laser treatment and electrolysis sessions are publically funded for people undergoing sex reassignment. To date, published evidence on efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) has focused on treatment of women and men not undergoing sex reassignment. In the current study, data were collected prospectively from 2015 to 2020 at a UK regional laser centre. Patients were included if they were transgender women aged > 16 years old and seeking laser treatment for unwanted hair at any body site. The study demonstrated significant reductions in hair growth and significant patient satisfaction, with no AEs. Laser treatment is a safe and effective method of managing unwanted hair growth in the transgender transfeminine population.

Narrative review of facial gender surgery: approaches and techniques for the frontal sinus and upper third of the face

Facial gender confirmation surgery (FGCS) is a series of procedures which seek to harmonize a patient's face with his/her self-image and gender identity. Originally described in San Francisco in the 1980s, FGCS has evolved to encompass all elements of the craniofacial skeleton and facial soft tissue. This field in plastic and reconstructive surgery has quickly gained more attention in the past decade due to the pioneering work of groups around the world along with increased social acceptance and medical care of the transgender community. This narrative review focuses on the upper third of the face. Key differences in the forehead and the hairline of cis men and women are discussed which inform pharmacologic and surgical interventions. Hairline modifying therapies including pharmacotherapy and hair transplantation are explained. Virtual surgical planning (VSP), a tool broadly used in surgical fields, has a special role in FGCS and we offer advice in using VSP when addressing the frontal sinus. Use of VSP allows the surgeon to provide reproducible and accurate results. We then discuss the history of the frontal sinus setback and offer our algorithmic approach to recontouring the forehead with detailed description of the operative steps and decision making. Finally, postoperative care and complications considered.

Feasibility and Perception of Cross-sex Face Transplantation to Expand the Donor Pool

Background:

A major challenge in face transplantation (FT) is the limited donor allograft pool. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of cross-sex FT (CSFT) for donor pool expansion by: (1) comparing craniomaxillofacial metrics following CSFT versus same-sex FT (SSFT); and (2) evaluating the public and medical professionals’ perception of CSFT.

Methods:

Seven cadaveric FTs were performed, resulting in both CSFT and SSFT. Precision of bony and soft tissue inset was evaluated by comparing pre- versus post-operative cephalometric and anthropometric measurements. Fidelity of the FT compared to the virtual plan was assessed by imaging overlay techniques. Surveys were administered to medical professionals, medical students, and general population to evaluate opinions regarding CSFT.

Results:

Five CSFTs and 2 SSFTs were performed. Comparison of recipients versus post-transplant outcomes showed that only the bigonial and medial intercanthal distances were statistically different between CSFT and SSFT (P = 0.012 and P = 0.010, respectively). Of the 213 survey participants, more were willing to donate for and undergo SSFT, compared with CSFT (donate: 59.6% versus 53.0%, P = 0.001; receive: 79.5% versus 52.3%, P < 0.001). If supported by research, willingness to receive a CSFT significantly increased to 65.6% (P < 0.001). On non-blinded and blinded assessments, 62.9% and 79% of responses rated the CSFT superior or equal to SSFT, respectively.

Conclusions:

Our study demonstrates similar anthropometric and cephalometric outcomes for CSFT and SSFT. Participants were more reticent to undergo CSFT, with increased willingness if supported by research. CSFT may represent a viable option for expansion of the donor pool in future patients prepared to undergo transplantation.

Physiology and Medical Treatments for Alopecia

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common hair loss disorder in men and women. The characteristic and reproducible balding pattern in AGA negatively affects self-image and the external perceptions of the balding patient. The phenotypical changes are driven by dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and its precursor testosterone. DHT induces follicle miniaturization and hair cycle changes until resulting hairs no longer extrude through the skin surface. AGA is inherited in a polygenetic pattern and is susceptible to epigenetic and environmental factors. Currently, minoxidil, finasteride, and photolaser therapy are the only Food and Drug Administration-approved medical treatments for AGA.

Excess hair, hair removal methods, and barriers to care in gender minority patients: A survey study

BACKGROUND

In gender minority patients, electrolysis and laser hair removal may be necessary to reduce facial and body hair in individuals seeking a more feminine appearance and/or modified gender expression. These procedures may also be required preoperatively for some gender-affirming surgeries.

AIMS

To identify (a) the frequency of unwanted facial and body hair, (b) the use of various hair removal methods, and (c) associated barriers to care in gender minority patients.

METHODS

An online-based patient survey was distributed via social media on Facebook^® , YouTube^® , and Instagram^® in fall 2018. Respondents were at least 18 years old and self-identified as a gender minority.

RESULTS

In total, 991 responses were recorded with a completion rate of 77%. Considering excess hair, 84% of transwomen on feminizing hormone therapy (FHT: estrogen and anti-androgen therapy), 100% of transwomen not on FHT, and 100% of nonbinary individuals on FHT reported excess facial/body hair. Laser hair removal (18%) and electrolysis (17%) had similar rates of use in this cohort and were more commonly reported for nonsurgical gender-affirming purposes than preoperative preparation. Cost was the most frequently cited barrier to care.

CONCLUSION

As the majority of transwomen and nonbinary people on feminizing hormone therapy had persistent excess facial/body hair, routine use of gender-affirming hormones is not sufficient to fully eliminate unwanted hair. There remains a critical need to advocate for more comprehensive insurance coverage for laser hair removal and electrolysis in gender minority patients.

A Portable Electrospinner for Nanofiber Synthesis and Its Application for Cosmetic Treatment of Alopecia

A portable, handheld electrospinning apparatus is designed and constructed using off-the-shelf components and 3D-printed parts. The portable electrospinner is used to generate nanofibers with diameters ranging from 85 to 600 nm; examination of these fibers is achieved with scanning electron microscopy. This portable electrospinner has similar capabilities to standard stationary benchtop electrospinners in terms of the diversity of polymers the device is able to spin into nanofibers and their resulting size and morphology. However, it provides much more ambulatory flexibility, employs current-limiting measures that allow for safer operation and is cost effective. As a demonstration of the device's unique application space afforded by its portability, the device is applied in direct-to-skin electrospinning to improve the aesthetics of simulated hair loss in a mouse model by electrospinning dyed polyacrylonitrile nanofibers that mimic hair. The superficial nanofiber treatment for thinning hair is able to achieve an improvement in appearance similar to that of a commercially available powder product but outperforms the powder in the nanofiber's superior adherence to the affected area. The portable electrospinning apparatus overcomes many limitations of immobile benchtop electrospinners and holds promise for applications in consumer end-use scenarios such as the treatment of alopecia via cosmetic hair thickening.

Health considerations for transgender women and remaining unknowns: a narrative review

Transgender (trans) women (TW) were assigned male at birth but have a female gender identity or gender expression. The literature on management and health outcomes of TW has grown recently with more publication of research. This has coincided with increasing awareness of gender diversity as communities around the world identify and address health disparities among trans people. In this narrative review, we aim to comprehensively summarize health considerations for TW and identify TW-related research areas that will provide answers to remaining unknowns surrounding TW's health. We cover up-to-date information on: (1) feminizing gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT); (2) benefits associated with GAHT, particularly quality of life, mental health, breast development and bone health; (3) potential risks associated with GAHT, including cardiovascular disease and infertility; and (4) other health considerations like HIV/AIDS, breast cancer, other tumours, voice therapy, dermatology, the brain and cognition, and aging. Although equally deserving of mention, feminizing gender-affirming surgery, paediatric and adolescent populations, and gender nonbinary individuals are beyond the scope of this review. While much of the data we discuss come from Europe, the creation of a United States transgender cohort has already contributed important retrospective data that are also summarized here. Much remains to be determined regarding health considerations for TW. Patients and providers will benefit from larger and longer prospective studies involving TW, particularly regarding the effects of aging, race and ethnicity, type of hormonal treatment (e.g. different oestrogens, anti-androgens) and routes of administration (e.g. oral, parenteral, transdermal) on all the topics we address.

Dermatologic Conditions in Transgender Populations

Transgender persons receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy and procedures may face specific skin conditions. Skin diseases in transgender patients often are underdiagnosed and underrecognized despite their important impact on quality of life and mental health. This article discusses pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of common skin diseases in the transgender populations. For transmasculine patients, conditions include acne vulgaris and male pattern hair loss. For transfeminine patients, conditions include hirsutism, pseudofolliculitis barbae, and melasma. Postprocedural keloids and other cutaneous complications are discussed. Unique aspects of skin health in transgender persons should be considered in the context of multidisciplinary gender-affirming care.

Dermatologic Surgical Care for Transgender Individuals

BACKGROUND

Transgender individuals experience common and unique dermatologic concerns from severe acne associated with testosterone therapy in transmen to complications due to illicit silicone injections in transwomen. Currently, 2 survey studies and 4 reviews have addressed the dermatologic care of transgender individuals. However, none of them provide a focus on the dermatologic surgeon.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the dermatologic considerations in transgender individuals and the role of dermatologic surgeon in their care.

METHODS

The PubMed and MEDLINE databases were reviewed in June 2018 using keywords, such as transgender, procedures, hair removal, laser, and hormone therapy.

RESULTS

In total, 48 relevant publications addressing dermatologic care in transgender patients were reviewed. According to the literature, there are several critical dermatologic considerations in transgender patients, including hair growth and removal, acne vulgaris, facial procedures to masculinize and feminize the face, scar removal, and sexually transmitted infections.

CONCLUSION

As dermatologic surgeons have the privilege to improve the health care of transgender patients, they must understand the common and unique concerns of transgender individuals. Given the considerable spectrum of physical goals expressed by transmen and transwomen, individual patient preference must ultimately guide his/her/their dermatologic care.