Managing Cardiovascular and Cancer Risk Associated with JAK Inhibitors

Inflammatory bowel disease and cardiac function: a systematic review of literature with meta-analysis

Background

Morphological and functional cardiac involvement is rarely described in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) but there is evidence that they have an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events despite the lower prevalence of traditional CV risk factors.

Objectives

Our systematic review and meta-analysis examined the relationship between IBD and cardiac function, namely the incidence of heart failure (HF) and subclinical echocardiographic changes.

Data sources and methods

Two medical databases, PubMed and Scopus, were systematically searched up to September 2022 to identify all studies reporting HF and/or echocardiographic changes in IBD patients.

Results

The qualitative analysis comprised a total of 18 studies (14 retrospective and 4 prospective studies) involving 59,838 patients. IBD was associated with subtle systolic and diastolic alterations, vascular dysfunction, increased risk for HF hospitalizations, and globally worse CV outcomes. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the IBD population, we found statistically significant reduced early to late diastolic transmitral flow (E/A), higher E to early diastolic mitral annular tissue velocity (E/e'), and decreased global longitudinal strain. Increased left atrial diameter and area were also present in IBD patients but no statistical significance was reached. Inter-atrial and right intra-atrial conduction delays were observed.

Conclusion

The IBD population has an increased risk for left ventricular and atrial dysfunction, vascular changes, arrhythmias, and HF hospitalization. Screening with sensitive imaging like speckle tracking echocardiography could identify early subclinical changes. IBD is in fact a CV risk factor and tight inflammation control may reduce CV risk.

Does Concomitant Use of Methotrexate with JAK Inhibition Confer Benefit for Cardiovascular Outcomes? A Commentary

This commentary explores the potential cardiovascular (CV) benefits of combining methotrexate (MTX) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While European guidelines recommend MTX as first-line treatment, concerns about the CV risks associated with JAKis have emerged. This article reviews the existing literature to assess the role of concomitant MTX in reducing CV risk when used with JAKis. Clinical trials confirm the efficacy of JAKis in combination with MTX in terms of treatment outcomes in RA. However, the number of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) reported is too low to draw conclusions on adverse CV outcomes. Indirect evidence does, however, suggest potential protective effects of MTX on CV outcomes, as several mechanisms may contribute to MTX's cardioprotective effects, including reduced inflammation, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation, increased cholesterol efflux, and adenosine accumulation. These mechanisms and the available data may support the case for CV benefits of concomitant MTX when JAKis are used in the treatment of patients with RA, although further research is needed. In particular, the lipid paradox associated with RA highlights the complex relationship between RA treatments (MTX, JAKis, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, and interleukin (IL)-6 receptor inhibitors), inflammation, different lipid profiles, and CV risk. In the absence of contraindications and when MTX is tolerated, this commentary suggests the concomitant use of MTX and JAKis as a preferred option for optimizing CV protection in patients with RA.

Comparative Effectiveness of Upadacitinib and Tofacitinib in Ulcerative Colitis: A US Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

There are limited real-world data comparing the effectiveness of upadacitinib and tofacitinib in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a multi-institutional database, to compare the effectiveness of upadacitinib and tofacitinib in patients with UC. The primary aim was to assess the risk of a composite outcome of hospitalization requiring intravenous steroids and/or colectomy within 6 and 12 months. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed for demographics, comorbid conditions, mean hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, albumin, and calprotectin, and prior UC medications including recent oral or intravenous steroid use between the cohorts. Risk was expressed as adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

There were 526 patients in the upadacitinib cohort (mean age 40.4 ± 16.3, 44.8% female sex, 76.6% White race) and 1,149 patients in the tofacitinib cohort (mean age 42 ± 17.1, 41.9% female sex, 76% White race). After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in the risk of the composite outcome of need for intravenous steroids and/or colectomy within 6 months (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.49-1.09). However, there was a lower risk of the composite outcome (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.89) in the upadacitinib cohort compared with the tofacitinib cohort within 12 months. There was no difference in the risk of intravenous steroid use (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48-1.02) but lower risk of colectomy (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27-0.79). In sensitivity analysis, there was also a lower risk of the composite outcome (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.94), including lower risk of intravenous steroid use (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.99) and colectomy (aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.92) in the upadacitinib cohort compared with the tofacitinib cohort within 12 months.

DISCUSSION

This study utilizing real-world data showed that upadacitinib was associated with improved disease-specific outcomes at 12 months compared with tofacitinib in patients with UC.

A Systematic Overview of Contraindications and Special Warnings for Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: Establishing a Framework to Create a "Safety Checklist"

BACKGROUND/AIM

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the contraindications, special warnings, and boxed warnings with the aim to establish a framework to create a prescription safety checklist for a class of drugs or disease indication. This study covers biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs).

METHODS

We identified contraindications, boxed warnings, and special warnings provided by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The study included b/tsDMARDs approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) within the drug-classes anti-CD20, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-1 inhibitors (IL-1i), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA) 4, interleukin-12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i), interleukin 6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri), Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors (PDE4i), interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), and interleukin-23 inhibitors (IL-23i).

RESULTS

All drug classes, except PDE4i, had contraindications and/or warnings related to infections, including tuberculosis. A warning about herpes zoster was listed for anti-CD20, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, and JAKi, while a warning about hepatitis reactivation was listed for anti-CD20, TNFi, IL-1i, CTLA4-Ig, IL-6Ri, and JAKi. Malignancy risk was mentioned for all drug classes except PDE4i, IL-17i, and IL-23i. Other warnings included demyelinating disease (TNFi, CTLA4-Ig, and IL-6Ri), heart failure (anti-CD20 and TNFi), major adverse cardiac events (JAKi and IL-12/23) and venous thromboembolism (JAKi), hyperlipidemia (IL-6Ri and JAKi), liver impairment (TNFi, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, and JAKi), kidney impairment (IL-1i, JAKi, and PDE4i), inflammatory bowel disease (IL-17i), gastrointestinal perforation (IL-6Ri, JAKi), cytopenia (anti-CD20, TNFi, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, JAKi), and depression (PDE4i). Contraindications and warnings appeared to increase with the passage of time since the drug's approval.

CONCLUSION

This review provides an overview to establish the framework to create an easily accessible and actionable prescription safety checklist from individual medical product prescription information provided by regulatory medical authorities.

An evaluation of mirikizumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) aims to reduce symptoms and complications by decreasing intestinal inflammation. A proportion of patients do not respond to, do not tolerate, or are inappropriate candidates for current therapies. Interleukin (IL)-23 is a therapeutic target and mirikizumabis the first p19-targeted IL-23 antibody approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active UC.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the pro-inflammatory effects of IL-23 and outlines the pharmacokinetics of mirikizumab. It provides a synopsis of the available phase II and phase III evidence for the efficacy and safety of mirikizumab in UC.

EXPERT OPINION

The mirikizumab clinical development program demonstrated its superiority over placebo and its favorable safety profile in the treatment of UC. Its positioning in therapeutic algorithms remains to be fully understood but mirikizumab has proven efficacy in both advanced therapy (AT)-naïve and AT-experienced patients. The inclusion in the license of extended induction for non-responders as well as rescue intravenous dosing allows for flexibility in patient with limited primary response and secondary loss of response.

Tyrosine Kinase 2 Inhibition With Zasocitinib (TAK-279) in Psoriasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

New, effective, and well-tolerated oral therapies are needed for treating psoriasis. Zasocitinib, a highly selective allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, is a potential new oral treatment for this disease.

Objective

To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of zasocitinib in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 11, 2021, to September 12, 2022, at 47 centers in the US and 8 in Canada. The study included a 12-week treatment period and a 4-week follow-up period. Key eligibility criteria for participants included age 18 to 70 years; a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of 12 or greater; a Physician's Global Assessment score of 3 or greater; and a body surface area covered by plaque psoriasis of 10% or greater. Of 287 patients randomized, 259 (90.2%) received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Intervention

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive zasocitinib at 2, 5, 15, or 30 mg or placebo orally, once daily, for 12 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients achieving 75% or greater improvement in PASI score (PASI 75) at week 12. Secondary efficacy end points included PASI 90 and 100 responses. Safety was also assessed.

Results

In total, 259 patients were randomized and received treatment (mean [SD] age, 47 [13] years; 82 women [32%]). At week 12, PASI 75 was achieved for 9 (18%), 23 (44%), 36 (68%), and 35 (67%) patients receiving zasocitinib at 2, 5, 15, and 30 mg, respectively, and 3 patients (6%) receiving placebo. PASI 90 responses were consistent with PASI 75. PASI 100 demonstrated a dose response at all doses, with 17 patients (33%) achieving PASI 100 with zasocitinib, 30 mg. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred for 23 patients (44%) receiving placebo and 28 (53%) to 31 (62%) patients receiving the 4 different doses of zasocitinib, with no dose dependency and no clinically meaningful longitudinal differences in laboratory parameters.

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial found that potent and selective inhibition of TYK2 with zasocitinib at oral doses of 5 mg or more once daily resulted in greater skin clearance than placebo over 12 weeks.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04999839.

Review: Risk Stratification of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis for Treatment With Tofacitinib

Higher age (65 years or over), long-term smoking, or a previous cardiovascular event (such as heart attack) should be considered safety risks when considering treatment with tofacitinib versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for people with ulcerative colitis.

Prevalence of Cardiovascular and Cancer Risk Factors Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Prescribed JAK Inhibitors and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors: A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

The study was to determine the prevalence of baseline risk factors for cardiovascular outcomes and cancer among commercially-insured patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during their first dispensed treatment for either tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or JAK inhibitors (JAKi).

METHODS

Patients with RA from August 16, 2019 to March 31, 2022 were identified in the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases. The first date that a TNFi or JAKi was dispensed was the index date, and baseline risk factors were assessed among patients continuously eligible for 12 months before the index date. Patients who had the following were stratified into an elevated risk category: age ≥65 years, smoking, or a history of a major adverse cardiovascular event, venous thromboembolism, or cancer. The prevalence of modifiable risk factors was also reported: hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and diabetes. The crude prevalence and prevalence difference (PD) were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 12,673 patients (TNFi [n = 7,748; 61%] and JAKi [n = 4,925; 39%]) met inclusion criteria. The prevalence of elevated risk was the same for all patients using TNFi (n = 2,051; 26%) and JAKi (n = 1,262; 26%). Compared with patients having low risk, patients with an elevated risk also had a higher prevalence of at least one primary modifiable risk factor for both patients using JAKi (79% vs 58%; PD 21%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 18%-24%) and TNFi (81% vs 60%; PD 21%, 95% CI 19%-23%).

CONCLUSION

In recent years, JAKi and TNFi were used in similar proportions to treat RA among commercially-insured patients at elevated cardiovascular and cancer risk. Because uncontrolled disease, modifiable comorbidities, and treatment with JAKi are associated with these adverse events, future studies evaluating how practice patterns may be affected by the emergence of safety data will be of value.

JAK inhibitors to treat STAT3 gain-of-function: a single-center report and literature review

Objective

The signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) gain-of-function (GOF) syndrome (STAT3-GOF) is an inborn error of immunity (IEI) characterized by diverse manifestations of immune dysregulation that necessitate systemic immunomodulatory treatment. The blockade of the interleukin-6 receptor and/or the inhibition of the Janus kinases has been commonly employed to treat diverse STAT3-GOF-associated manifestations. However, evidence on long-term treatment outcome, especially in the case of adult patients, is scarce.

Methods

Clinical data, including laboratory findings and medical imaging, were collected from all seven patients, diagnosed with STAT3-GOF, who have been treated at the Hannover University School, focusing on those who received a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (JAKi). Previously published cases of STAT3-GOF patients who received a JAKi were evaluated, focusing on reported treatment efficacy with respect to diverse STAT3-GOF-associated manifestations of immune dysregulation and safety.

Results

Five out of seven patients diagnosed with STAT3-GOF were treated with a JAKi, each for a different indication. Including these patients, outcomes of JAKi treatment have been reported for a total of 41 patients. Treatment with a JAKi led to improvement of diverse autoimmune, inflammatory, or lymphoproliferative manifestations of STAT3-GOF and a therapeutic benefit could be documented for all except two patients. Considering all reported manifestations of immune dysregulation in each patient, complete remission was achieved in 10/41 (24.4%) treated patients.

Conclusions

JAKi treatment improved diverse manifestations of immune dysregulation in the majority of STAT3-GOF patients, representing a promising therapeutic approach. Long-term follow-up data are needed to evaluate possible risks of prolonged treatment with a JAKi.

Survey of Potential Drug Interactions, Use of Non-Medical Health Products, and Immunization Status among Patients Receiving Targeted Therapies

In recent years, several changes have occurred in the management of chronic immunological conditions with the emerging use of targeted therapies. This two-phase cross-sectional study was conducted through structured in-person interviews in 2018-2019 and 2022. Additional data sources included ambulatory medical records and the itemized reimbursement reporting interface of the National Health Insurance Fund. Drug interactions were analyzed using the UpToDate Lexicomp, Medscape drug interaction checker, and Drugs.com databases. The chi-square test was used, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. In total, 185 patients participated. In 53% of patients (n = 53), a serious drug-drug interaction (DDI) was identified (mean number: 1.07 ± 1.43, 0-7), whereas this value was 38% (n = 38) for potential drug-supplement interactions (mean number: 0.58 ± 0.85, 0-3) and 47% (n = 47) for potential targeted drug interactions (0.72 ± 0.97, 0-5) in 2018. In 2022, 78% of patients (n = 66) were identified as having a serious DDI (mean number: 2.27 ± 2.69, 0-19), 66% (n = 56) had a potential drug-supplement interaction (mean number: 2.33 ± 2.69, 0-13), and 79% (n = 67) had a potential targeted drug interactions (1.35 ± 1.04, 0-5). Older age (>60 years; OR: 2.062), female sex (OR: 3.387), and polypharmacy (OR: 5.276) were identified as the main risk factors. Screening methods and drug interaction databases do not keep pace with the emergence of new therapeutics.

Evaluating the Usage of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatology and Its Impact on Cardiovascular Risk

Background/purpose Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been widely used in treating rheumatological conditions like rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Despite their efficacy, there are concerns regarding major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with JAK inhibitors. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of MACE, VTE, and the impact on lipid profiles in patients being treated with JAK inhibitors. Methods We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of patients aged 45-65 years old treated with Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, or Upadacitinib in a rheumatology clinic. We collected data on demographics, comorbidities, medication use, laboratory results, and cardiac complications potentially related to JAK inhibitors. Results Among 100 patients prescribed JAK inhibitors, 71 were included in the study (with an average treatment duration of 2.5 years). The majority of patients were white (72%), followed by Hispanic (6%), Indian (11%), African American (10%), and Asian (1%). Patients were being treated primarily for RA (57%), followed by PsA (17%), colitis (20%), and alopecia areata (6%). There were no significant cases of VTE reported, with one patient developing a pulmonary embolism (PE) during treatment while also having COVID-19, making it difficult to attribute it solely to the medication. Similarly, only one case of atrial fibrillation occurred. However, 43% (31 patients) experienced worsening of their lipid profile, with increased cholesterol (18%), LDL (12.5%), both LDL and cholesterol (11%) or triglycerides (1.5%). In relation to diabetes mellitus (DM), 24 patients who experienced worsening of their lipid panel did not have a history of DM. Conclusion The study findings suggest that patients on Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, and Upadacitinib did not exhibit a high risk for MACE or DVT. However, there was a notable incidence of lipid panel worsening among patients, where 24 patients out of 31 did not have diabetes. Further research and monitoring may be needed to better understand the long-term effects of JAK inhibitors on cardiovascular health and lipid profiles in these patient populations. This real-world data reflects the current evidence that JAK inhibitors do not significantly raise the risk of MACE in patients with RA but do increase cholesterol levels in these patients that should be monitored closely.

Post-marketing safety concerns with abrocitinib: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Abrocitinib was newly approved for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. The present study was to assess abrocitinib-related adverse events (AEs) using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

Disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms, were employed to quantify the signals of abrocitinib-related AEs.

RESULTS

A total of 3,177,744 reports of AEs were collected from the FAERS database, of which 1370 reports were identified with abrocitinib as the primary suspect drug. Abrocitinib-induced adverse events (AEs) occurred across 27 system organ classes (SOCs). A total of 68 preferred terms (PTs) with significant disproportionality, meeting the criteria of all four algorithms simultaneously, were identified. Unexpected significant AEs, such as increased blood cholesterol, venous embolism, hypoacusis, cellulitis, and tuberculosis, might also occur. The median onset time for abrocitinib-associated AEs was 182 days (interquartile range [IQR] 47-527 days).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study were consistent with clinical observations. Additionally, unexpected safety signals for abrocitinib were identified, which provided supportive information for the safety profile of abrocitinib. Prospective clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Changes in Characteristics of Patients Initiating and Discontinuing Advanced Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis Following the Release of Safety Data

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of emerging safety data on practice patterns by describing the characteristics of patients initiating and discontinuing advanced therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) before and after January 2021.

METHODS

This cohort study evaluated US veterans with RA between April 2019 and September 2022. This period was divided into two 664-day periods before and after January 2021. Eligible patients had ≥1 diagnosis code for RA and initiated a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), non-TNFi biologic, or JAK inhibitor (JAKi). We tested for interaction within regression models to determine whether changes in patient characteristics for tofacitinib recipients were different from changes observed for other therapies. We also evaluated factors associated with therapy discontinuation in Cox models adjusted for age, sex, and duration on therapy, including assessment for effect modification.

RESULTS

When comparing patients with RA initiating tofacitinib before (n = 2,111) with those initiating tofacitinib after (n = 1,664) January 2021, there was a decrease in mean age (64.1 vs 63.0 years) and in the proportion with cardiovascular comorbidities (all P < 0.01). These changes were significantly different from those observed for patients initiating TNFi or non-TNFi biologics. Among active advanced therapy recipients, the likelihood of discontinuation was higher for tofacitinib than TNFi (hazard ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.26, P < 0.001). The higher rate of tofacitinib discontinuation was more pronounced in the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Recent safety data significantly affected prescribing practices for advanced therapies, with a reduction in JAKi initiation and an increase in JAKi discontinuation among older patients and those at high cardiovascular risk.

Implementation of regulatory guidance for JAK inhibitors use in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: An international appropriateness study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) proposed measures to address severe side effects linked to Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). Use of these medications in individuals aged 65 and older, those at high cardiovascular risk, active or former long-term smokers, and those with increased cancer risk should be considered only if no alternatives exist. Caution is advised when administering JAKi to patients at risk of venous thromboembolism. We aim to implement recommendations from regulatory guidelines based on areas of uncertainty identified.

METHODS

A two-round modified Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness methodology study was conducted. A panel of 21 gastroenterologists, dermatologists and rheumatologists used a 9-point Likert scale to rate the appropriateness of administering a JAKi for each proposed clinical scenario. Scores for appropriateness were categorized as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate. Two rounds were performed, each with online surveys and a virtual meeting to enable discussion and rating of each best practice.

RESULTS

Round 1 involved participants rating JAKi appropriateness and suggesting descriptors to reduce uncertainty. Survey results were discussed in a virtual meeting, identifying areas of disagreement. In round 2, participants rated their agreement with descriptors from round 1, and the level of uncertainty and disagreement reduced. Age flexibility is recommended in the absence of other risk factors. Active counseling on modifiable risks (e.g., overweight, mild hyperlipidemia and hypertension) and smoking cessation is advised. Uncertainty persists regarding cancer risk due to various factors.

CONCLUSIONS

We outlined regulatory guidance without a personalized evaluation of the patient's risk profile might lead to uncertainty and become an arid technicality. Therefore, we identified gaps and implemented PRAC recommendations to help health professionals in clinical practice.

Clinician and patient views on janus kinase inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are new targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) licenced in the UK to treat rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritides. Unlike currently often prescribed biological DMARDs, they target a different part of the inflammatory pathway and are taken orally. The aim of this study was to explore what UK-based rheumatology clinicians and inflammatory arthritis (IA) patients think about the awareness, prescription and use of JAKi; how they compare with biologics; and how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected how JAKi are viewed and prescribed.

METHODS

Rheumatology clinicians and IA patients completed online surveys and participated in interviews/focus groups between September 2021 and January 2022. Survey data were analysed descriptively, and interview/focus group data underwent an inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

66.6% of patients had at least some awareness of JAKi, 73.0% from their rheumatology team. Problems getting earlier access to these drugs were raised by some patients, with many being prescribed JAKi after multiple other therapies had failed. 91.5% of clinicians prescribed JAKi in keeping with their local guidelines, with 72.3% prescribing them frequently as a monotherapy. Some clinicians had lingering safety concerns over JAKi use. Despite experiencing side effects and knowing of possible long-term risks, patients felt overall the benefits of JAKi outweighed the risks. 39.3% of patients were 'very satisfied' on JAKi, compared with 25.0% on biologics. Patients on JAKi appreciated their short half-life when it comes to infections, and their convenience as an oral therapy. When JAKi were discontinued in patients, it was predominantly due to inefficacy and non-cardiovascular adverse events. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in increased prescription of JAKi as an alternative to injections and infusions, primarily to avoid potentially exposing patients to the coronavirus. Some patients believed their JAKi may confer some protection against developing severe COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

JAKi are an effective treatment option for IA and are liked by patients. The COVID-19 pandemic appears to have impacted their prescription favourably. However, clinicians have safety concerns over JAKi use. Any decision to go on a JAKi should be informed and take into account individual patient risk factors, circumstances and preferences.

Upadacitinib in end stage renal disease: A case of acute severe ulcerative colitis

Recent data, indicating that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be a risk factor for future chronic kidney disease, highlight the need to study the safety and clinical effectiveness of advanced IBD therapies in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD), defined as an eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m2. Upadacitinib, a selective oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in the management of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. There is also emerging data indicating that JAK inhibition may be clinically effective in the setting of steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). There is, however, a lack of "real-world" data documenting the use of JAK inhibitors in patients with ESRD. Here, we report the use of upadacitinib in a patient with ESRD for the management of steroid-refractory ASUC, demonstrating, for the first time, the safe and clinically effective use of upadacitinib in this population.

JAK inhibitors and black box warnings: what is the future for JAK inhibitors?

INTRODUCTION

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have dramatically improved the treatment of various autoimmune and myeloproliferative disorders. Recently, concern has arisen regarding their safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we provide a comprehensive summary of the major current and emerging JAKi and their indications, address recent studies on comparative safety, and provide insight into their future and use. We emphasize that the application of the research findings on a case-by-case basis should consider a patient's age, comorbidities, disease for which JAKi is being considered, disease activity, the JAKi target(s), alternate treatment options available for the patient, and the planned duration of JAKi.

EXPERT OPINION

Rheumatologists are used to prescribing therapies in which a risk-to-benefit assessment is required as well as to screening and monitoring the safety of medications. Thus, rheumatologists are already practiced in applying specific criteria to effectively screen and monitor patients who are candidates for JAKi therapy. Ongoing research will help to clarify any mechanisms underlying differential safety signals between JAK and other therapies, what the balance between risk and efficacy is, who the susceptible subpopulations are, and whether safety signals are shared between different JAKis and across indications.