1
|
Attri B, Nagendra L, Dutta D, Shetty S, Shaikh S, Kalra S, Bhattacharya S. Prandial Insulins: A Person-Centered Choice. Curr Diab Rep 2024; 24:131-145. [PMID: 38568467 DOI: 10.1007/s11892-024-01540-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Postprandial hyperglycemia, or elevated blood glucose after meals, is associated with the development and progression of various diabetes-related complications. Prandial insulins are designed to replicate the natural insulin release after meals and are highly effective in managing post-meal glucose spikes. Currently, different types of prandial insulins are available such as human regular insulin, rapid-acting analogs, ultra-rapid-acting analogs, and inhaled insulins. Knowledge about diverse landscape of prandial insulin will optimize glycemic management. RECENT FINDINGS Human regular insulin, identical to insulin produced by the human pancreas, has a slower onset and extended duration, potentially leading to post-meal hyperglycemia and later hypoglycemia. In contrast, rapid-acting analogs, such as lispro, aspart, and glulisine, are new insulin types with amino acid modifications that enhance their subcutaneous absorption, resulting in a faster onset and shorter action duration. Ultra-rapid analogs, like faster aspart and ultra-rapid lispro, offer even shorter onset of action, providing better meal-time flexibility. The Technosphere insulin offers an inhaled route for prandial insulin delivery. The prandial insulins can be incorporated into basal-bolus, basal plus, or prandial-only regimens or delivered through insulin pumps. Human regular insulin, aspart, lispro, and faster aspart are recommended for management of hyperglycemia during pregnancy. Ongoing research is focused on refining prandial insulin replacement and exploring newer delivery methods. The article provides a comprehensive overview of various prandial insulin options and their clinical applications in the management of diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhawna Attri
- Department of Endocrinology, Sarvodaya Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India
| | - Lakshmi Nagendra
- Department of Endocrinology, JSS Medical College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysore, Karnataka, India
| | - Deep Dutta
- Department of Endocrinology, Center for Endocrinology Diabetes Arthritis and Rheumatism (CEDAR) Super-Speciality Healthcare, Dwarka, Delhi, India
| | - Sahana Shetty
- Department of Endocrinology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Shehla Shaikh
- Department of Endocrinology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sanjay Kalra
- Department of Endocrinology, Bharti Hospital, Karnal, Haryana, India
| | - Saptarshi Bhattacharya
- Department of Endocrinology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, Mathura Road, Delhi, 110076, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Neal DN, Zaharieva DP, Morrison D, McCarthy O, Nørgaard K. Exercising Safely with the MiniMed™ 780G Automated Insulin Delivery System. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024; 26:84-96. [PMID: 38377316 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
The physical and psychological benefits of exercise are particularly pertinent to people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The variability in subcutaneous insulin absorption and the delay in offset and onset in glucose lowering action impose limitations, given the rapidly varying insulin requirements with exercise. Simultaneously, there are challenges to glucose monitoring. Consequently, those with T1D are less likely to exercise because of concerns regarding glucose instability. While glucose control with exercise can be enhanced using automated insulin delivery (AID), all commercially available AID systems remain limited by the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous insulin delivery. Although glycemic responses may vary with exercises of differing intensities and durations, the principles providing the foundation for guidelines include minimization of insulin on board before exercise commencement, judicious and timely carbohydrate supplementation, and when possible, a reduction in insulin delivered in anticipation of planned exercise. There is an increasing body of evidence in support of superior glucose control with AID over manual insulin dosing in people in T1D who wish to exercise. The MiniMed™ 780G AID system varies basal insulin delivery with superimposed automated correction boluses. It incorporates a temporary (elevated glucose) target of 8.3 mmol/L (150 mg/dL) and when it is functioning, the autocorrection boluses are stopped. As the device has recently become commercially available, there are limited data assessing glucose control with the MiniMed™ 780G under exercise conditions. Importantly, when exercise was planned and implemented within consensus guidelines, %time in range and %time below range targets were met. A practical approach to exercising with the device is provided with illustrative case studies. While there are limitations to spontaneity imposed on any AID device due to the pharmacokinetics associated with the subcutaneous delivery of current insulin formulations, the MiniMed™ 780G system provides people with T1D an excellent option for exercising safely if the appropriate strategies are implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David N O'Neal
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Endocrinology, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
- Australian Centre for Accelerating Diabetes Innovations, Parkville, Australia
| | - Dessi P Zaharieva
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Dale Morrison
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Endocrinology, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
- Australian Centre for Accelerating Diabetes Innovations, Parkville, Australia
| | - Olivia McCarthy
- Copenhagen University Hospital-Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
- Technology, Exercise and Medicine Research Centre, Applied Sport, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - Kirsten Nørgaard
- Copenhagen University Hospital-Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Giorgino F, Battelino T, Bergenstal RM, Forst T, Green JB, Mathieu C, Rodbard HW, Schnell O, Wilmot EG. The Role of Ultra-Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs in Diabetes: An Expert Consensus. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023:19322968231204584. [PMID: 37937585 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231204584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
Ultra-rapid-acting insulin analogs (URAA) are a further development and refinement of rapid-acting insulin analogs. Because of their adapted formulation, URAA provide an even faster pharmacokinetics and thus an accelerated onset of insulin action than conventional rapid-acting insulin analogs, allowing for a more physiologic delivery of exogenously applied insulin. Clinical trials have confirmed the superiority of URAA in controlling postprandial glucose excursions, with a safety profile that is comparable to the rapid-acting insulins. Consequently, many individuals with diabetes mellitus may benefit from URAA in terms of prandial glycemic control. Unfortunately, there are only few available recommendations from authoritative sources for use of URAA in clinical practice. Therefore, this expert consensus report aims to define populations of people with diabetes mellitus for whom URAA may be beneficial and to provide health care professionals with concrete, practical recommendations on how best to use URAA in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Giorgino
- Section of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Andrology and Metabolic Diseases, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Tadej Battelino
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, UCH-University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Thomas Forst
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
- Clinical Research Services, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jennifer B Green
- Division of Endocrinology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Chantal Mathieu
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Oliver Schnell
- Forschergruppe Diabetes eV at the Helmholtz Centre, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Emma G Wilmot
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
- Academic Unit for Translational Medical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nørgaard SK, Søholm JC, Mathiesen ER, Nørgaard K, Clausen TD, Holmager P, Do NC, Damm P, Ringholm L. Faster-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart in the treatment of type 1 or type 2 diabetes during pregnancy and post-delivery (CopenFast): an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2023; 11:811-821. [PMID: 37804858 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(23)00236-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Faster-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is considered safe for use during pregnancy and breastfeeding but has not been evaluated in this population. We aimed to evaluate the effect of faster aspart versus insulin aspart on fetal growth, in women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes during pregnancy and post-delivery. METHODS This open-label, single-centre, superiority trial was conducted at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. Participants aged 18 years or older with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were stratified by diabetes type and insulin treatment modality (multiple daily injections or insulin pump), randomly assigned 1:1 to faster aspart or insulin aspart, from 8 weeks and 0 days (8+0) of gestation to 13+6 weeks of gestation, and followed up until 3 months post-delivery. Primary outcome was infant birthweight SD score. Secondary outcomes included HbA1c as well as maternal and fetal outcomes in all participants during the trial. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03770767. FINDINGS Between Nov 11, 2019 and May 10, 2022, 109 participants were included in the faster aspart group and 107 in the insulin aspart group. Primary outcome data were available in 203 (94%) of 216 participants, and no participants discontinued treatment during the trial. Mean birthweight SD score was 1·0 (SD 1·4) in the faster aspart group versus 1·2 (1·3) in the insulin aspart group; estimated treatment difference -0·22 [-0·58 to 0·14]; p=0·23. At 33 weeks of gestation, mean HbA1c was 42 mmol/mol (SD 6 mmol/mol; 6·0% [SD 0·9%]) versus 43 mmol/mol (SD 7 mmol/mol; 6·1% [SD 1·2%]); estimated treatment difference -1·01 (-2·86 to 0·83), p=0·28. No additional safety issues were observed with faster aspart compared with insulin aspart. INTERPRETATION Treatment with faster aspart resulted in similar fetal growth and HbA1c, relative to insulin aspart, in women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Faster aspart can be used in women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes during pregnancy and post-delivery with no additional safety issues. FUNDING Novo Nordisk. TRANSLATION For the Danish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidse K Nørgaard
- Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Julie C Søholm
- Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Elisabeth R Mathiesen
- Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Nørgaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Tine D Clausen
- Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pernille Holmager
- Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nicoline C Do
- Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Damm
- Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lene Ringholm
- Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dovc K, Bergford S, Fröhlich-Reiterer E, Zaharieva DP, Potocnik N, Müller A, Lenarcic Z, Calhoun P, Fritsch M, Sourij H, Bratina N, Kollman C, Battelino T. A Comparison of Faster Insulin Aspart with Standard Insulin Aspart Using Hybrid Automated Insulin Delivery System in Active Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Double-Blind Crossover Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther 2023; 25:612-621. [PMID: 37404205 PMCID: PMC10460686 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the use of faster acting (FIA) and standard insulin aspart (SIA) with hybrid automated insulin delivery (AID) in active youth with type 1 diabetes. Research Design and Methods: In this double-blind multinational randomized crossover trial, 30 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (16 females; aged 15.0 ± 1.7 years; baseline HbA1c 7.5% ± 0.9% [58 ± 9.8 mmol/mol]) underwent two unrestricted 4-week periods using hybrid AID with either FIA or SIA in random order. During both interventions, participants were using the hybrid AID (investigational version of MiniMed™ 780G; Medtronic). Participants were encouraged to exercise as frequently as possible, capturing physical activity with an activity monitor. The primary outcome was the percentage of sensor glucose time above range (180 mg/dL [10.0 mmol/L]) measured by continuous glucose monitoring. Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis, mean time above range was 31% ± 15% at baseline, 19% ± 6% during FIA use, and 20% ± 6% during SIA use with no difference between treatments: mean difference = -0.9%; 95% CI: -2.4% to 0.6%; P = 0.23. Similarly, there was no difference in mean time in range (TIR) (78% and 77%) or median time below range (2.5% and 2.8%). Glycemic outcomes during exercise or postprandial periods were comparable for the two treatment arms. No severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis events occurred. Conclusions: FIA was not superior to SIA with hybrid AID system use in physically active children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Nonetheless, both insulin formulations enabled high overall TIR and low time above and below ranges, even during and after documented exercise. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04853030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klemen Dovc
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Simon Bergford
- Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation, Inc., Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Dessi P. Zaharieva
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Nejka Potocnik
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Physiology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Alexander Müller
- Interdisciplinary Metabolic Medicine Trials Unit, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ziva Lenarcic
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Peter Calhoun
- Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation, Inc., Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Maria Fritsch
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Harald Sourij
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Natasa Bratina
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Craig Kollman
- Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation, Inc., Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Tadej Battelino
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leohr JK, Dellva MA, LaBell E, Coutant DE, Linnebjerg H. Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetic Profile of Ultra Rapid Lispro Administered Subcutaneously at Different Injection Sites. Clin Ther 2022; 44:836-847. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
7
|
Hunt NJ, McCourt PAG, Kuncic Z, Le Couteur DG, Cogger VC. Opportunities and Challenges for Nanotherapeutics for the Aging Population. FRONTIERS IN NANOTECHNOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fnano.2022.832524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Nanotherapeutics utilize the properties of nanomaterials to alter the pharmacology of the drugs and therapies being transported, leading to changes in their biological disposition (absorption, distribution, cellular uptake, metabolism and elimination) and ultimately, their pharmacological effect. This provides an opportunity to optimize the pharmacology of drugs, particularly for those that are dependent on hepatic action. Old age is associated with changes in many pharmacokinetic processes which tend to impair drug efficacy and increase risk of toxicity. While these age-related changes are drug-specific they could be directly addressed using nanotechnology and precision targeting. The benefits of nanotherapeutics needs to be balanced against toxicity, with future use in humans dependent upon the gathering of information about the clearance and long-term safety of nanomaterials.
Collapse
|
8
|
De Block CEM, Van Cauwenberghe J, Bochanen N, Dirinck E. Rapid-acting insulin analogues: Theory and best clinical practice in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2022; 24 Suppl 1:63-74. [PMID: 35403348 DOI: 10.1111/dom.14713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Since the discovery of insulin 100 years ago, insulin preparations have improved significantly. Starting from purified animal insulins, evolving to human insulins produced by genetically modified organisms, and ultimately to insulin analogues, all in an attempt to mimic physiological insulin action profiles seen in individuals without diabetes. Achieving strict glucose control without hypoglycaemia and preventing chronic complications of diabetes while preserving quality of life remains a challenging goal, but the advent of newer ultra-rapid-acting insulin analogues may enable intensive insulin therapy without being too disruptive to daily life. Ultra-rapid-acting insulin analogues can be administered shortly before meals and give better coverage of mealtime-induced glucose excursions than conventional insulin preparations. They also increase convenience with timing of bolus dosing. In this review, we focus on the progress that has been made in rapid-acting insulins. We summarize pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, clinical trial data supporting the use of these new formulations as part of a basal-bolus regimen and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, and provide a clinical perspective to help guide healthcare professionals when and for whom to use ultra-fast-acting insulins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe E M De Block
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology & Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
- University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Paediatrics (LEMP), Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Jolijn Van Cauwenberghe
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology & Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
- University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Paediatrics (LEMP), Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Niels Bochanen
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology & Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
- University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Paediatrics (LEMP), Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Eveline Dirinck
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology & Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
- University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Paediatrics (LEMP), Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Piro S, Purrello F. Acute diabetes complications. JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS 2021. [DOI: 10.36150/2499-6564-n457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
10
|
Grant M, Heise T, Baughman R. Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin and Subcutaneous Insulin Lispro in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Clin Pharmacokinet 2021; 61:413-422. [PMID: 34773608 PMCID: PMC8891188 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-021-01084-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was performed to satisfy a US Food and Drug Administration post-marketing requirement to compare the dose responses for Technosphere® Insulin (TI; MannKind Corporation, Westlake Village, CA, USA) and subcutaneous insulin lispro (LIS) across a wide range of doses. OBJECTIVES This single-center, open-label, randomized, cross-over study defined the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic curves for inhaled TI vs subcutaneous LIS in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus. METHODS Each volunteer received six treatments while undergoing euglycemic clamps: three doses of TI (10, 30 and 120 U) and LIS (8, 30, and 90 U). Primary endpoint was area under the glucose infusion rate vs time curve from start of treatment administration to end of clamp. Key secondary endpoints included readouts of insulin exposure and timing of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles. RESULTS Insulin exposure was more than dose proportional, increasing with dose1.08 for LIS and dose1.35 for TI. Time to reach 10% of the maximum glucose infusion rate was 7 to 15 min for TI vs 21 to 38 min for LIS. End of effect was dose dependent for both treatments, ranging from 2 to 6 h (TI) and 5 to 10 h (LIS). Glucose infusion rate exhibited saturation for both treatments. Technosphere Insulin produced a lesser total effect per unit insulin than LIS due to its faster absorption and correspondingly shorter duration of exposure. The difference was large enough to require significantly different doses to achieve the same total effect. CONCLUSIONS Technosphere Insulin has a considerably faster onset and shorter duration of action than LIS. Consequently, the overall effect of TI is smaller than that of LIS and unit-for-unit dose conversion is not appropriate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02470637; 12 June, 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marshall Grant
- MannKind Corporation, 30930 Russell Ranch Rd, Suite 300, Westlake Village, CA, 91362, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart: A Review of its Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties and the Clinical Consequences. Clin Pharmacokinet 2021; 59:155-172. [PMID: 31667789 PMCID: PMC7007438 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-019-00834-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is insulin aspart (IAsp) with two added excipients, l-arginine and niacinamide, to ensure formulation stability with accelerated initial absorption after subcutaneous administration compared with previously developed rapid-acting insulins. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of faster aspart have been characterised in clinical pharmacology trials with comparable overall methodology. In subjects with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 (T2D) diabetes, the serum IAsp concentration–time and glucose-lowering effect profiles are left-shifted for faster aspart compared with IAsp. In addition, faster aspart provides earlier onset, doubling of initial exposure, and an up to 2.5-fold increase in initial glucose-lowering effect within 30 min of subcutaneous injection, as well as earlier offset of exposure and effect. Similar results have been shown using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). The improved pharmacological properties of faster aspart versus IAsp are consistent across populations, i.e. in the elderly, children, adolescents and the Japanese. Thus, the faster aspart pharmacological characteristics more closely resemble the mealtime insulin secretion in healthy individuals, giving faster aspart the potential to further improve postprandial glucose control in subjects with diabetes. Indeed, change from baseline in 1-h postprandial glucose increment is in favour of faster aspart versus IAsp when used as basal-bolus or CSII treatment in phase III trials in subjects with T1D or T2D. This review summarises the currently published results from clinical pharmacology trials with faster aspart and discusses the potential clinical benefits of faster aspart compared with previous rapid-acting insulin products.
Collapse
|
12
|
Svehlikova E, Mursic I, Augustin T, Magnes C, Gerring D, Jezek J, Schwarzenbacher D, Ratzer M, Wolf M, Howell S, Zakrzewski L, Urschitz M, Tschapeller B, Gatschelhofer C, Feichtner F, Lawrence F, Pieber TR. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Three Different Formulations of Insulin Aspart: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study in Men With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2021; 44:448-455. [PMID: 33328285 PMCID: PMC7818330 DOI: 10.2337/dc20-1017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and safety of a novel formulation of insulin aspart (AT247) versus two currently marketed insulin aspart formulations (NovoRapid [IAsp] and Fiasp [faster IAsp]). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This single-center, randomized, double-blind, three-period, crossover study was conducted in 19 men with type 1 diabetes, receiving single dosing of trial products (0.3 units/kg) in a random order on three visits. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed during a euglycemic clamp lasting up to 8 h. RESULTS Onset of insulin appearance was earlier for AT247 compared with IAsp (-12 min [95% CI -14; -8], P = 0.0004) and faster IAsp (-2 min [-5; -2], P = 0.0003). Onset of action was accelerated compared with IAsp (-23 min [-37; -15], P = 0.0004) and faster IAsp (-9 min [-11; -3], P = 0.0006). Within the first 60 min, a higher exposure was observed for AT247 compared with IAsp by the area under the curve (AUC) glucose infusion rate (GIR) from 0 to 60 min (AUCAsp0-60min: treatment ratio vs. IAsp 2.3 [1.9; 2.9] vs. faster IAsp 1.5 [1.3; 1.8]), which was underpinned by a greater early glucose-lowering effect (AUCGIR,0-60min: treatment ratio vs. IAsp 2.8 [2.0; 5.5] vs. faster IAsp 1.7 [1.3; 2.3]). Furthermore, an earlier offset of exposure was observed for AT247 compared with IAsp (-32 min [-58; -15], P = 0.0015) and faster IAsp (-27 min [-85; -15], P = 0.0017), while duration of the glucose-lowering effect, measured by time to late half-maximum effect, did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS AT247 exhibited an earlier insulin appearance, exposure, and offset, with corresponding enhanced early glucose-lowering effect compared with IAsp and faster IAsp. It therefore represents a promising candidate in the pursuit for second-generation prandial insulin analogs to improve postprandial glycemic control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Svehlikova
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ines Mursic
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Thomas Augustin
- Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, HEALTH - Institute for Biomedicine and Health Sciences, Graz, Austria
| | - Christoph Magnes
- Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, HEALTH - Institute for Biomedicine and Health Sciences, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Jan Jezek
- Arecor Limited, Little Chesterford, U.K
| | - Daniela Schwarzenbacher
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Maria Ratzer
- Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, HEALTH - Institute for Biomedicine and Health Sciences, Graz, Austria
| | - Michael Wolf
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | | | - Martina Urschitz
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Bernd Tschapeller
- Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, HEALTH - Institute for Biomedicine and Health Sciences, Graz, Austria
| | - Christina Gatschelhofer
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Franz Feichtner
- Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, HEALTH - Institute for Biomedicine and Health Sciences, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Thomas R Pieber
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria .,Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, HEALTH - Institute for Biomedicine and Health Sciences, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Heise T, Linnebjerg H, Coutant D, LaBell E, Zijlstra E, Kapitza C, Bue‐Valleskey J, Zhang Q, Dellva MA, Leohr J. Ultra rapid lispro lowers postprandial glucose and more closely matches normal physiological glucose response compared to other rapid insulin analogues: A phase 1 randomized, crossover study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020; 22:1789-1798. [PMID: 32436641 PMCID: PMC7540588 DOI: 10.1111/dom.14094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and glucodynamic (GD) characteristics of ultra rapid lispro (URLi; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana), Fiasp® (Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), Humalog® (Eli Lilly and Company) and NovoRapid® (Novo Nordisk), in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a randomized, double-blind, four-period, crossover study, conducted in 68 patients with T1D. Patients received the same individualized subcutaneous dose of each study drug immediately prior to a liquid test meal. For comparison, 12 healthy subjects received the same test meal. RESULTS URLi had a significantly faster insulin absorption compared to the other insulins tested. Early half-maximal drug concentration was reached 13 minutes after administration of URLi, which was 6 minutes faster than Fiasp, 13 minutes faster than Humalog, and 14 minutes faster than NovoRapid (all P <0.0001). Early insulin exposure was significantly greater and late insulin exposure was reduced after URLi compared to the other insulins. URLi achieved the greatest numerical reduction in postprandial glucose (PPG) at 2 hours post-meal (7 mg/dL vs Fiasp) and was significantly different from Humalog (21 mg/dL) and Novo Rapid (29 mg/dL). Additionally, glucose excursions over the first 3 hours post-meal with URLi were comparable to those in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS URLi demonstrated the fastest insulin absorption and the greatest numeric PPG-lowering effect compared to the other insulins tested. URLi more closely matched the early physiological glucose control observed in healthy subjects.
Collapse
|
14
|
Attri B, Goyal A, Gupta Y, Tandon N. Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimen for Hospitalised Patients with COVID-19 and Diabetes Mellitus: A Practical Approach. Diabetes Ther 2020; 11:2177-2194. [PMID: 32683660 PMCID: PMC7368619 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-020-00873-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has rapidly crossed international boundaries and placed increasing demands on healthcare facilities worldwide. Patients with diabetes and uncontrolled blood glucose levels are at increased risk for poor clinical outcomes and in-hospital mortality related to COVID-19. Therefore, achieving good glycaemic control is of paramount importance among hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Basal-bolus insulin therapy is a safe and effective intervention for the management of hyperglycaemia in hospitalised patients. The aim of this article is to provide a practical guidance for the use of the basal-bolus insulin regimen in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus. METHODS This guidance document was formulated based on the review of available literature and the combined personal experiences of the authors. We provide a comprehensive review on the use of the basal-bolus insulin regimen, including its principles, rationale, indications, prerequisites, initiation, and dose titration, and also suggest targets for blood glucose control and different levels of capillary blood glucose monitoring. Various case scenarios are used to illustrate how optimal glucose control can be achieved, such as through adjustments in doses of prandial and basal insulin, the use of correctional insulin dosing and changes in the timing and content of major and minor meals. CONCLUSION The practical guidance for the use of the basal-bolus insulin regimen in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus presented here can be used for patients admitted to hospital for indications other than COVID-19 and for those in ambulatory care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhawna Attri
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Alpesh Goyal
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Yashdeep Gupta
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
| | - Nikhil Tandon
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Clinical Pharmacology of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Versus Insulin Aspart Measured as Free or Total Insulin Aspart and the Relation to Anti-Insulin Aspart Antibody Levels in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Clin Pharmacokinet 2020; 58:639-649. [PMID: 30402720 PMCID: PMC6451708 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-018-0718-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is an ultra-fast-acting formulation of insulin aspart (IAsp). This post hoc analysis investigated the pharmacokinetics of faster aspart versus IAsp, measured as free or total IAsp, and the relationship between anti-IAsp antibodies and the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of faster aspart and IAsp. Methods Free and total IAsp concentrations and anti-IAsp antibodies were determined in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus receiving subcutaneous faster aspart and/or IAsp in four single-dose clinical pharmacology trials (n = 175) and a 26-week phase IIIa trial (n = 1040). Pharmacodynamics were assessed by euglycaemic clamp or meal test, respectively. Results The pharmacokinetic profile was left-shifted and early exposure was greater with faster aspart versus IAsp independent of free or total IAsp assay. The faster aspart-IAsp difference in the time to 50% of maximum IAsp concentration in the early part of the pharmacokinetic profile (tEarly 50 % Cmax) [95% confidence interval (CI)] was − 8.8 [− 10.0 to − 7.5] and − 7.6 [− 8.8 to − 6.4] min for free and total IAsp, respectively. The faster aspart/IAsp ratio for the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) for IAsp from time zero to 30 min (AUCIAsp,0–30 min) [95% CI] was 1.88 [1.74–2.04] and 1.77 [1.64–1.90] for free and total IAsp. Higher anti-IAsp antibody levels were associated with a lower ratio of free/total IAsp for the total AUC for IAsp (AUCIAsp,0–t). Early glucose-lowering effect (AUC for the glucose infusion rate [GIR] from time zero to 60 min [AUCGIR,0–60 min]) was greater by 25–44% for faster aspart versus IAsp independent of anti-IAsp antibody levels. Total glucose-lowering effect (total AUC for GIR [AUCGIR,0–t]) in a clamp and 1-h postprandial glucose increment in a meal test appeared essentially unaffected by anti-IAsp antibodies. Conclusions Faster aspart provides accelerated pharmacokinetics versus IAsp regardless if based on free or total IAsp assay. Higher anti-IAsp antibodies increase total IAsp concentrations but do not influence faster aspart nor IAsp pharmacodynamics. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT01618188, NCT02003677, NCT01934712, NCT02568280, NCT01831765. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40262-018-0718-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
16
|
Davis A, Kuriakose J, Clements JN. Faster Insulin Aspart: A New Bolus Option for Diabetes Mellitus. Clin Pharmacokinet 2020; 58:421-430. [PMID: 29978361 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-018-0696-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Since the approval of bolus insulin, it has been used frequently in clinical practice for the management of type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus for postprandial control. Another new product is faster insulin aspart (Fiasp, Novo Nordisk), a fast-acting insulin with 100 units/mL. Several studies have been conducted evaluating the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of faster insulin aspart, compared with insulin aspart. This new bolus insulin provides greater glucose-lowering effect at 20 min, following subcutaneous administration. Faster insulin aspart had a greater reduction in hemoglobin A1c concentrations from baseline in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus when compared with insulin aspart, whereas the two bolus insulins were similar in this outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Depending on the trial, the safety profile may differ between these two insulins with severe or confirmed hypoglycemia. Based on the clinical evidence for efficacy and safety, faster insulin aspart can be considered a viable option for those patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus who desire to inject immediately prior to a meal or within 20 min following a meal. However, additional studies should be completed to determine the role of faster insulin aspart in pregnant and pediatric patients, along with patients prescribed insulin pumps. This article evaluates and summarizes the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of faster insulin aspart for patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus, and summarizes its application to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigayle Davis
- Presbyterian College, Presbyterian College School of Pharmacy, 307 North Broad Street, Clinton, SC, 29325, USA
| | - Jolly Kuriakose
- Presbyterian College, Presbyterian College School of Pharmacy, 307 North Broad Street, Clinton, SC, 29325, USA
| | - Jennifer N Clements
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Presbyterian College School of Pharmacy, 307 North Broad Street, Clinton, SC, 29325, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Evans M, Wilkinson M, Giannpolou A. Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart: The Rationale for a New Mealtime Insulin. Diabetes Ther 2019; 10:1793-1800. [PMID: 31485918 PMCID: PMC6778592 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-019-00685-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Attenuating postprandial hyperglycaemia is a critical factor in the achievement of optimal glucose control. Prandial insulin analogues have been developed to replicate the physiology of normal endogenous insulin secretion and action, with the aim of limiting postprandial glucose excursions. There is still, however, a significant unmet need, with many people failing to achieve desired glycaemic control targets despite the current armamentarium of prandial insulin analogues. Such insulins have a delayed onset and a longer duration of action than endogenous insulin production. There has been considerable focus on attempts to accelerate the time-action profile of prandial exogenous insulin in order to produce a more physiological profile. One such approach is to modify the insulin formulation. Fast-acting insulin aspart is a modified formulation of insulin aspart containing niacinamide and L-arginine. It has an earlier onset of action than aspart. In an extensive trial programme, this faster aspart demonstrated similar HbA1c reductions to those achieved with aspart but superior postprandial glucose reductions, with no increase in hypoglycaemia. Furthermore, administration of faster aspart up to 20 min after the start of a meal permitted similar glucose control to aspart given preprandially. These data, taken in totality, illustrate the potential role of faster insulin aspart in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Evans
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospital Llandough, Penlan Road, Penarth, CF64 4XX, UK.
| | - Mathew Wilkinson
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospital Llandough, Penlan Road, Penarth, CF64 4XX, UK
| | - Angeliki Giannpolou
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospital Llandough, Penlan Road, Penarth, CF64 4XX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart and the Need for New Mealtime Insulin Analogues in Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: A Canadian Perspective. Can J Diabetes 2019; 43:515-523. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
19
|
Pieber TR, Svehlikova E, Brunner M, Halberg IB, Due Thomsen KM, Haahr H. Fast-acting insulin aspart in people with type 2 diabetes: Earlier onset and greater initial exposure and glucose-lowering effect compared with insulin aspart. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019; 21:2068-2075. [PMID: 31069935 PMCID: PMC6771872 DOI: 10.1111/dom.13767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To investigate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) versus insulin aspart (IAsp) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS In a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, 61 people with T2D usually treated with insulin ± oral antidiabetic drug(s) received single-dose faster aspart and IAsp (0.3 U/kg) on separate visits. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessment were collected frequently until 12 hours post-dose. Glucose-lowering effect was determined in a euglycaemic clamp lasting up to 12 hours post-dose (target 5.0 mmol/L). RESULTS The serum IAsp pharmacokinetic profile and glucose-lowering effect profile were shifted to the left for faster aspart versus IAsp. Least squares mean (± SE) onset of appearance was 3.3 ± 0.3 minutes for faster aspart, which was 1.2 minutes earlier than for IAsp (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.8;-0.5; P = .001). Onset of action for faster aspart was 8.9 minutes earlier (95% CI -12.1;-5.7; P < .001) than for IAsp. During the first 30 minutes after dosing, 89% larger IAsp exposure (ratio faster aspart/IAsp 1.89 [95% CI 1.56;2.28]; P < .001) and 147% greater glucose-lowering effect (2.47 [95% CI 1.58;6.22]; P < .001) were observed for faster aspart compared with IAsp. Offset of exposure (time to 50% of maximum IAsp concentration in the late part of the pharmacokinetic profile) occurred earlier for faster aspart (difference faster aspart - IAsp -36.4 minutes [95% CI -55.3;-17.6]; P < .001). The treatment difference of faster aspart - IAsp in offset of glucose-lowering effect (time to 50% of maximum glucose infusion rate in the late part of the glucose infusion rate profile) was -14.4 minutes (95% CI -34.4;5.5; P = .152). CONCLUSIONS In people with T2D, faster aspart was associated with earlier onset and greater initial exposure and glucose-lowering effect compared with IAsp, as previously shown in people with type 1 diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R. Pieber
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal MedicineMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
| | - Eva Svehlikova
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal MedicineMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
| | - Martina Brunner
- CF Clinical Research Center, Center for Medical ResearchMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Evans M, Ceriello A, Danne T, De Block C, DeVries JH, Lind M, Mathieu C, Nørgaard K, Renard E, Wilmot EG. Use of fast-acting insulin aspart in insulin pump therapy in clinical practice. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019; 21:2039-2047. [PMID: 31144428 PMCID: PMC6773364 DOI: 10.1111/dom.13798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is a novel formulation of insulin aspart (IAsp) containing the additional excipients niacinamide and L-arginine. The improved pharmacological profile and greater early glucose-lowering action of faster aspart compared with IAsp suggests that faster aspart may be advantageous for people with diabetes using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). The recent onset 5 trial was the first to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an ultra-fast-acting insulin in CSII therapy in a large number of participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Non-inferiority of faster aspart to IAsp in terms of change from baseline in HbA1c was confirmed, with an estimated treatment difference (ETD) of 0.09% (95% CI, 0.01; 0.17; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority [0.4% margin]). Faster aspart was superior to IAsp in terms of change from baseline in 1-hour post-prandial glucose (PPG) increment after a meal test (ETD [95% CI], -0.91 mmol/L [-1.43; -0.39]; P = 0.001), with statistically significant improvements also at 30 minutes and 2 hours. The overall rate of severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycaemia was not statistically significantly different between treatments, with an estimated rate ratio of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.85; 1.16). A numerical imbalance in severe hypoglycaemic episodes between faster aspart and IAsp was seen in the treatment (21 vs 7) and the 4-week run-in periods (4 vs 0). Experience from clinical practice indicates that all pump settings should be reviewed when initiating faster aspart with CSII, and that the use of continuous glucose monitoring or flash glucose monitoring, along with a good understanding of meal content and bolus type, may also facilitate optimal use. This review summarizes the available clinical evidence for faster aspart administered via CSII and highlights practical considerations based on clinical experience that may help healthcare providers and individuals with T1D successfully initiate and adjust faster aspart with CSII.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Evans
- Wellcome Trust/MRC Institute of Metabolic Science and Department of MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Antonio Ceriello
- IRCCS MultiMedicaMilanItaly
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS)BarcelonaSpain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (CIBERDEM)MadridSpain
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic DiseasesIRCCS MultiMedicaSesto San GiovanniItaly
| | - Thomas Danne
- Diabeteszentrum für Kinder und JugendlicheKinderkrankenhaus auf der BultHannoverGermany
| | - Christophe De Block
- Department of Endocrinology‐Diabetology‐MetabolismAntwerp University HospitalEdegemBelgium
| | - J. Hans DeVries
- Academic Medical CenterUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Profil Institute of Metabolic ResearchNeussGermany
| | - Marcus Lind
- Department of Molecular and Clinical MedicineUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
- Department of MedicineNU ‐ Hospital GroupTrollhättan/UddevallaSweden
| | - Chantal Mathieu
- Clinical and Experimental EndocrinologyUniversity Hospital LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | | | - Eric Renard
- Montpellier University Hospital, Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition and Institute of Functional GenomicsUniversity of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERMMontpellierFrance
| | - Emma G. Wilmot
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustDerbyUK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nally LM, Sherr JL, Van Name MA, Patel AD, Tamborlane WV. Pharmacologic treatment options for type 1 diabetes: what's new? Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2019; 12:471-479. [PMID: 30892094 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2019.1597705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The expanding variety of insulins, including biosynthetic human insulin and rapid and long-acting insulin analogs, have dramatically transformed the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D) over the past 25 years. Moreover, increasing interest in the use of novel drugs developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) as adjunctive therapies for T1D remains a work in progress. Areas Covered: We reviewed articles published up to December 2018 in PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov for recent developments in the pharmacologic treatment of T1D, including inhaled insulin, ultrafast and ultralong-acting insulins and adjunctive therapies including pramlintide, metformin, GLP-1 receptor agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2, and SGLT1/2 inhibitors. Expert Opinion: With the creation of ultrafast-acting insulin analogs and very prolonged duration of action of basal insulins, it is possible to more closely mimic physiologic insulin secretion. Adjunctive therapies, likewise, may also overcome some of the abnormal physiology that is a hallmark of T1D. Therefore, individualized consideration of the efficacy of these agents must be measured alongside the potential adverse effects when choosing an adjunctive therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Nally
- a Yale Children's Diabetes Program , Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven , CT , USA
| | - Jennifer L Sherr
- a Yale Children's Diabetes Program , Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven , CT , USA
| | - Michelle A Van Name
- a Yale Children's Diabetes Program , Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven , CT , USA
| | - Anisha D Patel
- a Yale Children's Diabetes Program , Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven , CT , USA
| | - William V Tamborlane
- a Yale Children's Diabetes Program , Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven , CT , USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Heise T, Pieber TR, Danne T, Erichsen L, Haahr H. A Pooled Analysis of Clinical Pharmacology Trials Investigating the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Characteristics of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes. Clin Pharmacokinet 2017; 56:551-559. [PMID: 28205039 PMCID: PMC5385193 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-017-0514-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is insulin aspart (IAsp) in a new formulation aiming to mimic the fast endogenous prandial insulin release more closely than currently available insulin products. In a post hoc analysis of pooled data from six clinical pharmacology trials, the pharmacological characteristics of faster aspart and IAsp were compared. Methods The analysis included 218 adult subjects with type 1 diabetes from six randomised, double-blind, crossover trials in the faster aspart clinical development programme. Subjects received subcutaneous dosing (0.2 U/kg) of faster aspart and IAsp. In three trials, a 12-h euglycaemic clamp was performed (target 5.5 mmol/L; 100 mg/dL) to assess pharmacodynamics. Results The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles were left-shifted for faster aspart versus IAsp. Onset of appearance occurred 4.9 min earlier (95% confidence interval [CI] faster aspart-IAsp: [−5.3 to −4.4], p < 0.001), early exposure (AUCIAsp,0–30min) was two times greater (estimated ratio faster aspart/IAsp 2.01 [1.87–2.17], p < 0.001) and offset of exposure (tLate 50% Cmax) occurred 12.2 min earlier [−17.9 to −6.5] (p < 0.001) for faster aspart versus IAsp. Accordingly, onset of action occurred 4.9 min earlier [−6.9 to −3.0] (p < 0.001), early glucose-lowering effect (AUCGIR,0–30min) was 74% greater (1.74 [1.47–2.10], p < 0.001) and offset of glucose-lowering effect (tLate 50% GIRmax) occurred 14.3 min earlier [−22.1 to −6.5] (p < 0.001) for faster aspart versus IAsp. Total exposure and total glucose-lowering effect did not differ significantly between treatments. Conclusions Faster aspart has the potential to better mimic the physiologic prandial insulin secretion and thereby to improve postprandial glucose control compared with IAsp. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02035371, NCT01924637, NCT02131246, NCT02033239, NCT02003677, NCT01618188. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40262-017-0514-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Heise
- Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH, Hellersbergstrasse 9, 41460, Neuss, Germany.
| | - Thomas R Pieber
- Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Thomas Danne
- Children's and Youth Hospital AUF DER BULT, Janusz-Korczak-Allee 12, 30173, Hannover, Germany
| | - Lars Erichsen
- Novo Nordisk A/S, Vandtårnsvej 114, 2860, Søborg, Denmark
| | - Hanne Haahr
- Novo Nordisk A/S, Vandtårnsvej 114, 2860, Søborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Faster aspart is a new formulation of insulin aspart (IAsp) produced by adding the excipients niacinamide and L-arginine. As this new, "ultra-rapid insulin" is available in the EU-market and Canada, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics data is summarized. RECENT FINDINGS Faster aspart shows an earlier onset of appearance of insulin in the bloodstream after subcutaneous administration and an earlier onset of glucose-lowering action and a higher glycemic effect within the first 30 min. Faster aspart administered by pump is indeed faster than conventional aspart with a faster on (- 11 min), faster off (- 24 min), and more than 100% greater insulin action within the first 30 min. Tolerability of faster aspart is similar to that of Iasp; the same holds true for compatibility in pump use. Faster aspart shows a faster occurrence of insulin in the blood compared with IAsp in subcutaneous injection. Improvements over current analogs may be more pronounced in pumps than with injections. Data from phase IIIa studies confirm the reduction of postprandial glucose excursions that can be achieved with faster aspart.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torben Biester
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes Center for Children and Adolescents, Janusz-Korczak-Allee 12, 30173, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Olga Kordonouri
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes Center for Children and Adolescents, Janusz-Korczak-Allee 12, 30173, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Danne
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes Center for Children and Adolescents, Janusz-Korczak-Allee 12, 30173, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The complexity of modern insulin-based therapy for type I and type II diabetes mellitus and the risks associated with excursions in blood-glucose concentration (hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia) have motivated the development of 'smart insulin' technologies (glucose-responsive insulin, GRI). Such analogs or delivery systems are entities that provide insulin activity proportional to the glycemic state of the patient without external monitoring by the patient or healthcare provider. The present review describes the relevant historical background to modern GRI technologies and highlights three distinct approaches: coupling of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to deliver devices (algorithm-based 'closed-loop' systems), glucose-responsive polymer encapsulation of insulin, and molecular modification of insulin itself. RECENT FINDINGS Recent advances in GRI research utilizing each of the three approaches are illustrated; these include newly developed algorithms for CGM-based insulin delivery systems, glucose-sensitive modifications of existing clinical analogs, newly developed hypoxia-sensitive polymer matrices, and polymer-encapsulated, stem-cell-derived pancreatic β cells. SUMMARY Although GRI technologies have yet to be perfected, the recent advances across several scientific disciplines that are described in this review have provided a path towards their clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nischay K. Rege
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Scientist Training Program, Case Western Reserve University
| | | | - Michael A. Weiss
- Chairman of Institute for Therapeutic Protein Design, Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Biochemistry, and Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mathieu C, Gillard P, Benhalima K. Insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes mellitus: getting better all the time. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2017; 13:385-399. [PMID: 28429780 DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus consists of external replacement of the functions of β cells in an attempt to achieve blood levels of glucose as close to the normal range as possible. This approach means that glucose sensing needs to be replaced and levels of insulin need to mimic physiological insulin-action profiles, including basal coverage and changes around meals. Training and educating patients are crucial for the achievement of good glycaemic control, but having insulin preparations with action profiles that provide stable basal insulin coverage and appropriate mealtime insulin peaks helps people with type 1 diabetes mellitus to live active lives without sacrificing tight glycaemic control. Insulin analogues enable patients to achieve this goal, as some have fast action profiles, and some have very slow action profiles, which gives people with type 1 diabetes mellitus the tools to achieve dynamic insulin-action profiles that enable tight glycaemic control with a risk of hypoglycaemia that is lower than that with human short-acting and long-acting insulins. This Review discusses the established and novel insulin analogues that are used to treat patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and provides insights into the future development of insulin analogues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal Mathieu
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Pieter Gillard
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Katrien Benhalima
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|