1
|
Wang L, Levinson R, Mezzacappa C, Katona BW. Review of the cost-effectiveness of surveillance for hereditary pancreatic cancer. Fam Cancer 2024; 23:351-360. [PMID: 38795221 PMCID: PMC11255025 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00392-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/27/2024]
Abstract
Individuals with hereditary pancreatic cancer risk include high risk individuals (HRIs) with germline genetic susceptibility to pancreatic cancer (PC) and/or a strong family history of PC. Previously, studies have shown that PC surveillance in HRIs can downstage PC diagnosis and extend survival leading to pancreatic surveillance being recommended for certain HRIs. However, the optimal surveillance strategy remains uncertain, including which modalities should be used for surveillance, how frequently should surveillance be performed, and which sub-groups of HRIs should undergo surveillance. Additionally, in the ideal world PC surveillance should also be cost-effective. Cost-effectiveness analysis is a valuable tool that can consider the costs, potential health benefits, and risks among various PC surveillance strategies. In this review, we summarize the cost-effectiveness of various PC surveillance strategies for HRIs for hereditary pancreatic cancer and provide potential avenues for future work in this field. Additionally, we include cost-effectiveness studies among individuals with new-onset diabetes (NoD), a high-risk group for sporadic PC, as a comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Wang
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Blvd. 751 South Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Rachel Levinson
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Bryson W Katona
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Blvd. 751 South Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sivaprasad S, Bailey C, Downey L, Gilbert R, Gale R, Kotagiri A, Mahmood S, Morgan-Warren P, Napier J, Narendran N, Pearce I, Rennie C, Talks J, Wojcik R, Jandhyala R. Real-world service costs for neovascular-AMD clinics in the United Kingdom: structured literature review and scenario analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2024; 40:1221-1233. [PMID: 38814914 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2362278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) emphasize drug costs as the differentiator between NICE recommended anti-VEGF treatments but may neglect real-world non-drug costs of running nAMD services in the UK. To address this, this study identified real-world non-drug service cost items relevant to UK NHS nAMD clinics, including costs arising from operational strain (demand exceeding capacity). METHODS Cost items were identified by a structured literature review of peer-reviewed and grey literature, and an expert panel of 10 UK-based ophthalmologists with relevance to real-world practice. These items underwent meta-synthesis and were then determined in a consensus exercise. RESULTS Of 237 cost items identified, 217 (91.6%) met the consensus threshold of >0.51 and were included in the nAMD Service Non-Drug Cost Instrument (nAS). Sensitivity of cost items taken from UK Health Technology Assessment (HTA) using the nAS as the reference standard was low (HTAmin: 1.84%, 95% CI 0.50-4.65%; HTAmax: 70.51%, 95% CI 63.96-76.49%). False negative rates showed variable likelihood of misclassifying a service by cost burden depending on prevalence. Scenario analysis using cost magnitudes estimated annual per-patient clinic cost at £845 (within capacity) to £13,960 (under strain) compared to an HTAmin estimate of £210. Accounting for cost of strain under an assumed 50% increase in health resource utilization influenced cost-effectiveness in a hypothetical genericisation scenario. CONCLUSION Findings suggested that HTA underestimates UK NHS nAMD clinic cost burden with cost of strain contributing substantial additional unmeasured expense with impact on CEA. Given potential undertreatment due to strain, durability is suggested as one of the relevant factors in CEA of nAMD anti-VEGF treatments due to robustness under limited capacity conditions affecting UK ophthalmology services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sobha Sivaprasad
- NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Bailey
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Louise Downey
- Ophthalmology Research Team, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospital, UK
| | - Rose Gilbert
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bayer PLC, Reading, UK
| | - Richard Gale
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bayer PLC, Reading, UK
- Ophthalmology and Clinical Visual Science, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
- Department of Ophthalmology, York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Ajay Kotagiri
- Sunderland Eye Infirmary, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields UK
| | - Sajjad Mahmood
- Manchester Eye Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Nirodhini Narendran
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ian Pearce
- Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Christina Rennie
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - James Talks
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kopp PT, Yang C, Yang H, Katz JN, Paltiel AD, Hunter DJ, Callahan LF, Mihalko SL, Newman JJ, DeVita P, Loeser RF, Miller GD, Messier SP, Losina E. Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based Diet and Exercise for Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis and Obesity or Overweight. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2024; 76:1018-1027. [PMID: 38450873 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Obesity exacerbates pain and functional limitation in persons with knee osteoarthritis (OA). In the Weight Loss and Exercise for Communities with Arthritis in North Carolina (WE-CAN) study, a community-based diet and exercise (D + E) intervention led to an additional 6 kg weight loss and 20% greater pain relief in persons with knee OA and body mass index (BMI) >27 kg/m2 relative to a group-based health education (HE) intervention. We sought to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of the usual care (UC), UC + HE, and UC + (D + E) programs, comparing each strategy with the "next-best" strategy ranked by increasing lifetime cost. METHODS We used the Osteoarthritis Policy Model to project long-term clinical and economic benefits of the WE-CAN interventions. We considered three strategies: UC, UC + HE, and UC + (D + E). We derived cohort characteristics, weight, and pain reduction from the WE-CAN trial. Our outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS In a cohort with mean age 65 years, BMI 37 kg/m2, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain score 38 (scale 0-100, 100 = worst), UC leads to 9.36 QALYs/person, compared with 9.44 QALYs for UC + HE and 9.49 QALYS for UC + (D + E). The corresponding lifetime costs are $147,102, $148,139, and $151,478. From the societal perspective, UC + HE leads to an ICER of $12,700/QALY; adding D + E to UC leads to an ICER of $61,700/QALY. CONCLUSION The community-based D + E program for persons with knee OA and BMI >27kg/m2 could be cost-effective for willingness-to-pay thresholds greater than $62,000/QALY. These findings suggest that incorporation of community-based D + E programs into OA care may be beneficial for public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul T Kopp
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Heidi Yang
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey N Katz
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - David J Hunter
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Paul DeVita
- East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| | | | - Gary D Miller
- Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | - Elena Losina
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith DRM, Turner J, Fahr P, Attfield LA, Bessell PR, Donnelly CA, Gibb R, Jones KE, Redding DW, Asogun D, Ayodeji OO, Azuogu BN, Fischer WA, Jan K, Olayinka AT, Wohl DA, Torkelson AA, Dinkel KA, Nixon EJ, Pouwels KB, Hollingsworth TD. Health and economic impacts of Lassa vaccination campaigns in West Africa. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.02.26.24303394. [PMID: 38978680 PMCID: PMC11230338 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.26.24303394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
Lassa fever is a zoonotic disease identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as having pandemic potential. This study estimates the health-economic burden of Lassa fever throughout West Africa and projects impacts of a series of vaccination campaigns. We also model the emergence of "Lassa-X" - a hypothetical pandemic Lassa virus variant - and project impacts of achieving 100 Days Mission vaccination targets. Our model predicted 2.7M (95% uncertainty interval: 2.1M-3.4M) Lassa virus infections annually, resulting over ten years in 2.0M (793.8K-3.9M) disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). The most effective vaccination strategy was a population-wide preventive campaign primarily targeting WHO-classified "endemic" districts. Under conservative vaccine efficacy assumptions, this campaign averted $20.1M ($8.2M-$39.0M) in lost DALY value and $128.2M ($67.2M-$231.9M) in societal costs (International dollars 2021). Reactive vaccination in response to local outbreaks averted just one-tenth the health-economic burden of preventive campaigns. In the event of Lassa-X emerging, spreading throughout West Africa and causing approximately 1.2M DALYs within two years, 100 Days Mission vaccination averted 22% of DALYs given a vaccine 70% effective against disease, and 74% of DALYs given a vaccine 70% effective against both infection and disease. These findings suggest how vaccination could alleviate Lassa fever's burden and assist in pandemic preparedness.
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang D, Ito S, Waldron C, Butt A, Zhang E, Krumholz HM, Al-Samkari H, Goshua G. Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab therapy in the care of patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Blood Adv 2024; 8:2835-2845. [PMID: 38537061 PMCID: PMC11176968 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024012589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/30/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT No US Food and Drug Administration- or European Medicines Agency-approved therapies exist for bleeding due to hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), the second-most common inherited bleeding disorder worldwide. The current standard of care (SOC) includes iron and red cell supplementation, alongside the necessary hemostatic procedures, none of which target underlying disease pathogenesis. Recent evidence has demonstrated that bleeding pathophysiology is amenable to systemic antiangiogenic therapy with the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor bevacizumab. Despite its high cost, the addition of longitudinal bevacizumab to the current SOC may reduce overall health care resource use and improve patient quality of life. We conducted, to our knowledge, the first cost-effectiveness analysis of IV bevacizumab in patients with HHT with the moderate-to-severe phenotype, comparing bevacizumab added to SOC vs SOC alone. The primary outcome was the incremental net monetary benefit (iNMB) reported over a lifetime time horizon and across accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds, in US dollar per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Bevacizumab therapy accrued 9.3 QALYs while generating $428 000 in costs, compared with 8.3 QALYs and $699 000 in costs accrued in the SOC strategy. The iNMB of bevacizumab therapy vs the SOC was $433 000. No parameter variation and no scenario analysis, including choice of iron supplementation product, changed the outcome of bevacizumab being a cost-saving strategy. Bevacizumab therapy also saved patients an average of 133 hours spent receiving HHT-specific care per year of life. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, bevacizumab was favored in 100% of all 10 000 Monte Carlo iterations across base-case and all scenario analyses. Bevacizumab should be considered for more favorable formulary placement in the care of patients with moderate-to-severe HHT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Satoko Ito
- Section of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Ayesha Butt
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Ellen Zhang
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Harlan M. Krumholz
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | - Hanny Al-Samkari
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Cambridge, MA
| | - George Goshua
- Section of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Slejko JF, Mattingly TJ, Wilson A, Xie R, Chapman RH, Amill-Rosario A, dosReis S. Patient-Informed Value Elements in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Major Depressive Disorder Treatment: A Literature Review and Synthesis. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024:S1098-3015(24)02404-5. [PMID: 38852668 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Prior work identified 6 key value elements (attributes of treatment and desired outcomes) for individuals living with major depressive disorder (MDD) in managing their condition: mode of treatment, time to treatment helpfulness, MDD relief, quality of work, interaction with others, and affordability. The objective of our study was to identify whether previous cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) for MDD treatment addressed any of these value elements. A secondary objective was to identify whether any study engaged patients, family members, and caregivers in the model development process. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review to identify published model-based CEAs. We compared the elements of the published studies with the MDD patient value elements elicited in prior work to identify gaps and areas for future research. RESULTS Of 86 published CEAs, we found that 7 included patient out-of-pocket costs, and 32 included measures of productivity, which were both priorities for individuals with MDD. We found that only 2 studies elicited measures from patients for their model, and 2 studies engaged patients in the modeling process. CONCLUSIONS Published CEA models for MDD treatment do not regularly include value elements that are a priority for this patient population nor do they include patients in their modeling process. Flexible models that can accommodate elements consistent with patient experience are needed, and a multistakeholder engagement approach would help accomplish this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia F Slejko
- Patient-Driven Values in Healthcare Evaluation (PAVE) Center, Department of Practice, Sciences and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - T Joseph Mattingly
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Alexandra Wilson
- Patient-Driven Values in Healthcare Evaluation (PAVE) Center, Department of Practice, Sciences and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard Xie
- Innovation and Value Initiative, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | | | - Alejandro Amill-Rosario
- Patient-Driven Values in Healthcare Evaluation (PAVE) Center, Department of Practice, Sciences and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Susan dosReis
- Patient-Driven Values in Healthcare Evaluation (PAVE) Center, Department of Practice, Sciences and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hendy LE, Spees LP, Tak C, Carpenter DM, Thomas KC, Roberts MC. An evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of population genetic screening for familial hypercholesterolemia in US patients. Atherosclerosis 2024; 393:117541. [PMID: 38677159 DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.117541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Familial hypercholesterolemia is an underdiagnosed genetic metabolic condition limiting the clearance of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increasing lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease. Population genetic screening in unselected individuals could quickly identify cases of familial hypercholesterolemia and enable early prevention, but the economic impact of widespread screening on patients has not been studied. METHODS We assessed the cost-effectiveness of population genetic screening for familial hypercholesterolemia in 20 and 35-year-old adults in the United States from the perspective of patients. We developed a decision tree Markov hybrid model to examine diagnoses, cardiovascular disease, cardiac events, quality of life, and costs under population genetic screening compared to family-based cascade testing. RESULTS While population genetic screening increased diagnoses and reduced incidence of cardiovascular disease, population genetic screening was not cost-effective compared to cascade testing at current levels of willingness to pay. Lower genetic testing costs, combined screening with other genetic conditions, and support to maintain lipid-lowering therapy use over time could improve the cost-effectiveness of population genetic screening. CONCLUSIONS Future research is needed to examine how cost-sharing strategies may affect the cost-effectiveness of screening to patients and how families and providers experience the clinical and economic outcomes of population screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Hendy
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, USA.
| | - Lisa P Spees
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, USA
| | - Casey Tak
- University of Utah, College of Pharmacy, USA
| | - Delesha M Carpenter
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, USA
| | - Kathleen C Thomas
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, USA
| | - Megan C Roberts
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Waldron C, Ito S, Wang D, Allen C, Viswanathan G, Bona RD, Cuker A, Goshua G. Cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with recombinant vs plasma-derived VWF in severe von Willebrand disease in the United States. Blood 2024; 143:2332-2335. [PMID: 38635764 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024024209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with recombinant von Willebrand factor (rVWF) vs with plasma-derived von Willebrand factor (pdVWF) for patients with severe Von Willebrand disease. We found that rVWF is a cost-saving factor replacement compared with pdVWF across all willingness-to-pay thresholds in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Satoko Ito
- Section of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Cecily Allen
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Robert D Bona
- Section of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Adam Cuker
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - George Goshua
- Section of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pendharkar SR, Kaambwa B, Kapur VK. The Cost-Effectiveness of Sleep Apnea Management: A Critical Evaluation of the Impact of Therapy on Health Care Costs. Chest 2024:S0012-3692(24)00660-3. [PMID: 38815624 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
TOPIC IMPORTANCE OSA is a widespread condition that significantly affects both health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). If left untreated, OSA can lead to accidents, decreased productivity, and medical complications, resulting in significant economic burdens including the direct costs of managing the disorder. Given the constraints on health care resources, understanding the cost-effectiveness of OSA management is crucial. A key factor in cost-effectiveness is whether OSA therapies reduce medical costs associated with OSA-related complications. REVIEW FINDINGS Treatments for OSA have been shown to enhance HRQoL, particularly for symptomatic patients with moderate or severe disease. Economic studies also have demonstrated that these treatments are highly cost-effective. However, although substantial empirical evidence shows that untreated OSA is associated with increased medical costs, uncertainty remains about the impact of OSA treatment on these costs. Randomized controlled trials of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy have failed to demonstrate cost reductions, but the studies have had important limitations. Observational studies suggest that PAP therapy may temper increases in costs, but only among patients who are highly adherent to treatment. However, the healthy adherer effect is an important potential source of bias in these studies. SUMMARY OSA management is cost-effective, although uncertainties persist regarding the therapy's impact on medical costs. Future studies should focus on reducing bias, particularly the healthy adherer effect, and addressing other confounding factors to clarify potential medical cost savings. Promising avenues to further understanding include using quasiexperimental designs, incorporating more sophisticated characterization of OSA severity and symptoms, and leveraging newer technologies (eg, big data, wearables, and artificial intelligence).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin R Pendharkar
- Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Billingsley Kaambwa
- Health Economics, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia; National Centre for Sleep Health Services Research: A NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Vishesh K Kapur
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Park J, Joo H, Kim D, Mase S, Christensen D, Maskery BA. Cost-effectiveness of mask mandates on subways to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the United States. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302199. [PMID: 38748706 PMCID: PMC11095714 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community-based mask wearing has been shown to reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. However, few studies have conducted an economic evaluation of mask mandates, specifically in public transportation settings. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of implementing mask mandates for subway passengers in the United States by evaluating its potential to reduce COVID-19 transmission during subway travel. MATERIALS AND METHODS We assessed the health impacts and costs of subway mask mandates compared to mask recommendations based on the number of infections that would occur during subway travel in the U.S. Using a combined box and Wells-Riley infection model, we estimated monthly infections, hospitalizations, and deaths averted under a mask mandate scenario as compared to a mask recommendation scenario. The analysis included costs of implementing mask mandates and COVID-19 treatment from a limited societal perspective. The cost-effectiveness (net cost per averted death) of mandates was estimated for three different periods based on dominant SARS-CoV-2 variants: Alpha, Beta, and Gamma (November 2020 to February 2021); Delta (July to October 2021); and early Omicron (January to March 2022). RESULTS Compared with mask recommendations only, mask mandates were cost-effective across all periods, with costs per averted death less than a threshold of $11.4 million (ranging from cost-saving to $3 million per averted death). Additionally, mask mandates were more cost-effective during the early Omicron period than the other two periods and were cost saving in January 2022. Our findings showed that mandates remained cost-effective when accounting for uncertainties in input parameters (e.g., even if mandates only resulted in small increases in mask usage by subway ridership). CONCLUSIONS The findings highlight the economic value of mask mandates on subways, particularly during high virus transmissibility periods, during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study may inform stakeholders on mask mandate decisions during future outbreaks of novel viral respiratory diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joohyun Park
- Division of Global Migration Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Heesoo Joo
- Division of Global Migration Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Daniel Kim
- Division of Global Migration Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America
- Georgia Institute of Technology, H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Sundari Mase
- Division of Global Migration Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Deborah Christensen
- Division of Global Migration Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Brian A. Maskery
- Division of Global Migration Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sittimart M, Rattanavipapong W, Mirelman AJ, Hung TM, Dabak S, Downey LE, Jit M, Teerawattananon Y, Turner HC. An overview of the perspectives used in health economic evaluations. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2024; 22:41. [PMID: 38741138 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-024-00552-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The term 'perspective' in the context of economic evaluations and costing studies in healthcare refers to the viewpoint that an analyst has adopted to define the types of costs and outcomes to consider in their studies. However, there are currently notable variations in terms of methodological recommendations, definitions, and applications of different perspectives, depending on the objective or intended user of the study. This can make it a complex area for stakeholders when interpreting these studies. Consequently, there is a need for a comprehensive overview regarding the different types of perspectives employed in such analyses, along with the corresponding implications of their use. This is particularly important, in the context of low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), where practical guidelines may be less well-established and infrastructure for conducting economic evaluations may be more limited. This article addresses this gap by summarising the main types of perspectives commonly found in the literature to a broad audience (namely the patient, payer, health care providers, healthcare sector, health system, and societal perspectives), providing their most established definitions and outlining the corresponding implications of their uses in health economic studies, with examples particularly from LMIC settings. We then discuss important considerations when selecting the perspective and present key arguments to consider when deciding whether the societal perspective should be used. We conclude that there is no one-size-fits-all answer to what perspective should be used and the perspective chosen will be influenced by the context, policymakers'/stakeholders' viewpoints, resource/data availability, and intended use of the analysis. Moving forward, considering the ongoing issues regarding the variation in terminology and practice in this area, we urge that more standardised definitions of the different perspectives and the boundaries between them are further developed to support future studies and guidelines, as well as to improve the interpretation and comparison of health economic evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manit Sittimart
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | | | | | - Trinh Manh Hung
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (OUCRU), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Saudamini Dabak
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Laura E Downey
- The George Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mark Jit
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- School of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yot Teerawattananon
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hugo C Turner
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Marshall H, Ward J, Wang B, Andraweera P, McMillan M, Flood L, Bell C, Sisnowski J, Krause V, Webby R, Childs E, Gunathilake M, Egoroff N, Leong L, Lawrence A, Baird R, Freeman K, Menouhos D, Whiley DM, Karnon J, van Hal S, Lahra MM. Comprehensive observational study evaluating the enduring effectiveness of 4CMenB, the meningococcal B vaccine against gonococcal infections in the Northern Territory and South Australia, Australia: study protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079144. [PMID: 38719318 PMCID: PMC11086485 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The effectiveness of antibiotics for treating gonococcal infections is compromised due to escalating antibiotic resistance; and the development of an effective gonococcal vaccine has been challenging. Emerging evidence suggests that the licensed meningococcal B (MenB) vaccine, 4CMenB is effective against gonococcal infections due to cross-reacting antibodies and 95% genetic homology between the two bacteria, Neisseria meningitidis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, that cause the diseases. This project aims to undertake epidemiological and genomic surveillance to evaluate the long-term protection of the 4CMenB vaccine against gonococcal infections in the Northern Territory (NT) and South Australia (SA), and to determine the potential benefit of a booster vaccine doses to provide longer-term protection against gonococcal infections. METHODS AND ANALYSES This observational study will provide long-term evaluation results of the effectiveness of the 4CMenB vaccine against gonococcal infections at 4-7 years post 4CMenB programme implementation. Routine notifiable disease notifications will be the basis for assessing the impact of the vaccine on gonococcal infections. Pathology laboratories will provide data on the number and percentage of N. gonorrhoeae positive tests relative to all tests administered and will coordinate molecular sequencing for isolates. Genome sequencing results will be provided by SA Pathology and Territory Pathology/New South Wales Health Pathology, and linked with notification data by SA Health and NT Health. There are limitations in observational studies including the potential for confounding. Confounders will be analysed separately for each outcome/comparison. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The protocol and all study documents have been reviewed and approved by the SA Department for Health and Well-being Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2022/HRE00308), and the evaluation will commence in the NT on receipt of approval from the NT Health and Menzies School of Health Research Human Research Ethics Committee. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings and public forums.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Marshall
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - James Ward
- Poche Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Bing Wang
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Prabha Andraweera
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mark McMillan
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Louise Flood
- Communicable Disease Control Branch, Department for Health and Wellbeing, Government of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Charlotte Bell
- Communicable Disease Control Branch, Department for Health and Wellbeing, Government of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jana Sisnowski
- Communicable Disease Control Branch, Department for Health and Wellbeing, Government of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Vicki Krause
- Centre for Disease Control & Environmental Health, NT Health, Northern Territory Government, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Rosalind Webby
- Centre for Disease Control & Environmental Health, NT Health, Northern Territory Government, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Emma Childs
- Immunisation and Notifiable Diseases, NT Health, Northern Territory Government, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Manoji Gunathilake
- Centre for Disease Control & Environmental Health, NT Health, Northern Territory Government, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Natasha Egoroff
- Centre for Disease Control & Environmental Health, NT Health, Northern Territory Government, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Lex Leong
- SA Pathology, SA Health, Government of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Andrew Lawrence
- SA Pathology, SA Health, Government of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rob Baird
- Territory Pathology, NT Health, Northern Territory Government, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Kevin Freeman
- Territory Pathology, NT Health, Northern Territory Government, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Dimitrios Menouhos
- Territory Pathology, NT Health, Northern Territory Government, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - David M Whiley
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland and Pathology Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sebastian van Hal
- Microbiology, NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Monica M Lahra
- Microbiology, NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nguyen V, Ha DA, Tran OM, Nguyen HL, Goldberg RJ, Allison JJ, Fleming NS, Nguyen PK. Cost-utility analysis of community-based interventions for hypertension control in Vietnam. RESEARCH SQUARE 2024:rs.3.rs-4328156. [PMID: 38766151 PMCID: PMC11100880 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4328156/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Between 2010 and 2011, stakeholders implemented a multi-faceted community-based intervention in response to the escalating issue of uncontrolled hypertension in Hung Yen province, Vietnam. This initiative integrated expanded community health worker services, home blood pressure self-monitoring, and a unique "storytelling intervention" into routine clinical care. From the limited societal perspective, our study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of this intervention using a Markov model with a one-year cycle over a lifetime horizon. The analysis, based on a cohort of 671 patients, reveals a lifetime incremental cost of approximately VND 90.37 million (USD 3,930) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. With a willingness to pay at three times GDP (VND 259.2 million per QALY), the intervention proves cost-effective 80% of the time. This research underscores the potential of the community-based approach to effectively control hypertension, offering valuable insights into its broader implications for public health.
Collapse
|
14
|
Ranasinghe S, Nadeshkumar A, Senadheera S, Samaranayake N. Calculating the cost of medication errors: A systematic review of approaches and cost variables. BMJ Open Qual 2024; 13:e002570. [PMID: 38626938 PMCID: PMC11029430 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medication errors are an unnecessary cost to a healthcare system and patients of a country. This review aimed to systematically identify published cost variables used to calculate the cost of medication errors and to explore any updates on findings already known on calculating the cost of medication errors during the past 10 years. METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, Emerald and JSTOR were searched, using keywords "medication error" AND "cost" and predetermined inclusion criteria. Duplicate articles were removed. Quality check was done using 10 criteria. Cost variables used in calculating the cost of medication errors were extracted from each article. RESULTS Among 3088 articles, 33 articles were selected for review. Most studies were conducted in Western countries. Cost variables used (types and number) by different studies varied widely. Most studies (N=29) had used direct costs only. A few studies (N=4) had used both direct and indirect costs for the purpose. Perspectives considered when calculating cost of medication errors also varied widely. A total of 35 variables used to calculate medication error costs were extracted from selected articles. CONCLUSION Variables used to calculate the cost of medication errors were not uniform across studies. Almost a decade after systematic reviews previously reporting on this area, a validated methodology to calculate the cost of medication errors has still not been reported to date and highlights the still pending necessity of a standard method to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakunika Ranasinghe
- Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
| | - Abarna Nadeshkumar
- Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
| | - Savini Senadheera
- Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
| | - Nithushi Samaranayake
- Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dewi PEN, Thavorncharoensap M, Rahajeng B. Cost-utility analysis of using high-intensity statin among post-hospitalized acute coronary syndrome patients. Egypt Heart J 2024; 76:47. [PMID: 38615282 PMCID: PMC11016526 DOI: 10.1186/s43044-024-00478-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-hospitalized acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients in Indonesia National Insurance does not pay for the use of high-intensity statin (HIS) for secondary prevention after ACS hospitalization. Moreover, a cost-utility analysis needs to be conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of prescribing HIS and low-to-moderate-intensity statin (LMIS) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). This study aimed to estimate the cost-utility of long-term HIS treatment in post-hospitalized ACS patients in Indonesia compared to current practice. RESULTS This study compared the economic outcomes of long-term HIS and LMIS in Indonesian post-hospitalized ACS patients. A lifetime Markov model predicted ACS-related events, costs, and QALY from a payer perspective. A systematic review estimated treatment-specific event probabilities, post-event survival, health-related quality of life, and Indonesia medical-care expenses from published sources. This study conducted probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) using 1000 independent Monte Carlo simulations and a series of one-way deterministic sensitivity analyses utilizing a tornado diagram. The economic evaluation model proved that intensive HIS treatment can increase per-patient QALYs and care expenditures compared to LMIS. The use of HIS among post-hospitalized ACS patients had ICER 31.843.492 IDR per QALY gained, below the Indonesia willingness-to-pay (WTP) for terminal disease and life-saving treatment. CONCLUSION From the Indonesia payer perspective, using HIS for post-hospitalized ACS patients in Indonesia is cost-effective at 31.843.492 IDR per QALY gained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi
- Doctor of Philosophy Program in Social, Economic, and Administrative Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
- Department of Pharmacy Profession, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Bantul, Indonesia.
| | - Montarat Thavorncharoensap
- Social and Administrative Pharmacy Excellence Research (SAPER) Unit, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Health Technology Assessment Graduate Program, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Bangunawati Rahajeng
- Department of Pharmacy Profession, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Bantul, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schlander M, van Harten W, Retèl VP, Pham PD, Vancoppenolle JM, Ubels J, López OS, Quirland C, Maza F, Aas E, Crusius B, Escobedo A, Franzen N, Fuentes-Cid J, Hernandez D, Hernandez-Villafuerte K, Kirac I, Paty A, Philip T, Smeland S, Sullivan R, Vanni E, Varga S, Vermeulin T, Eckford RD. The socioeconomic impact of cancer on patients and their relatives: Organisation of European Cancer Institutes task force consensus recommendations on conceptual framework, taxonomy, and research directions. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e152-e163. [PMID: 38547899 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00636-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
Loss of income and out-of-pocket expenditures are important causes of financial hardship in many patients with cancer, even in high-income countries. The far-reaching consequences extend beyond the patients themselves to their relatives, including caregivers and dependents. European research to date has been limited and is hampered by the absence of a coherent theoretical framework and by heterogeneous methods and terminology. To address these shortages, a task force initiated by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) produced 25 recommendations, including a comprehensive definition of socioeconomic impact from the perspective of patients and their relatives, a conceptual framework, and a consistent taxonomy linked to the framework. The OECI task force consensus statement highlights directions for future research with a view towards policy relevance. Beyond descriptive studies into the dimension of the problem, individual severity and predictors of vulnerability should be explored. It is anticipated that the consensus recommendations will facilitate and enhance future research efforts into the socioeconomic impact of cancer and cancer care, providing a crucial reference point for the development and validation of patient-reported outcome instruments aimed at measuring its broader effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schlander
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Mannheim Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Alfred Weber Institute (AWI), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Institute for Innovation & Valuation (InnoVal(HC)), Wiesbaden, Germany.
| | - Wim van Harten
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands; Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Phu Duy Pham
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Mannheim Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Julie M Vancoppenolle
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Jasper Ubels
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Mannheim Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Olaya Seoane López
- The Support Team, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Camila Quirland
- Health Technology Assessment Unit, Arturo López Perez Foundation, Santiago, Chile; School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Felipe Maza
- Health Technology Assessment Unit, Arturo López Perez Foundation, Santiago, Chile
| | - Eline Aas
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Agustín Escobedo
- Oncology Care Management, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nora Franzen
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Diego Hernandez
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Iva Kirac
- Genetic Counseling Unit, University Hospital for Tumors, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Artus Paty
- Department of Medical Information, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Thierry Philip
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI), Brussels, Belgium; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Sigbjørn Smeland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Elena Vanni
- Business Controlling, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy; Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Sinisa Varga
- Institute for Gastroenterological Tumours, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Thomas Vermeulin
- Department of Medical Information, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Rachel D Eckford
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Baek HS, Ha J, Kim K, Bae JS, Kim JS, Kim S, Lim DJ, Kim CM. Cost-Utility Analysis of Early Detection with Ultrasonography of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective Study on a Korean Population. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2024; 39:310-323. [PMID: 38590123 PMCID: PMC11066449 DOI: 10.3803/enm.2023.1870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGRUOUND There is debate about ultrasonography screening for thyroid cancer and its cost-effectiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of early screening (ES) versus symptomatic detection (SD) for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in Korea. METHODS A Markov decision analysis model was constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness of ES and SD. The model considered direct medical costs, health outcomes, and different diagnostic and treatment pathways. Input data were derived from literature and Korean population studies. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. Willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at USD 100,000 or 20,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to address uncertainties of the model's variables. RESULTS In a base case scenario with 50 years of follow-up, ES was found to be cost-effective compared to SD, with an ICER of $2,852 per QALY. With WTP set at $100,000, in the case with follow-up less than 10 years, the SD was cost-effective. Sensitivity analysis showed that variables such as lobectomy probability, age, mortality, and utility scores significantly influenced the ICER. Despite variations in costs and other factors, all ICER values remained below the WTP threshold. CONCLUSION Findings of this study indicate that ES is a cost-effective strategy for DTC screening in the Korean medical system. Early detection and subsequent lobectomy contribute to the cost-effectiveness of ES, while SD at an advanced stage makes ES more cost-effective. Expected follow-up duration should be considered to determine an optimal strategy for DTC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-Sang Baek
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Jeonghoon Ha
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwangsoon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja Seong Bae
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sungju Kim
- Healthcare Group, Lee & Ko, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Jun Lim
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul-Min Kim
- Department of Family Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abreu P, Correia M, Azevedo E, Sousa-Pinto B, Magalhães R. Rapid systematic review of readmissions costs after stroke. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2024; 22:22. [PMID: 38475856 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-024-00518-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroke readmissions are considered a marker of health quality and may pose a burden to healthcare systems. However, information on the costs of post-stroke readmissions has not been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVES To systematically review information about the costs of hospital readmissions of patients whose primary diagnosis in the index admission was a stroke. METHODS A rapid systematic review was performed on studies reporting post-stroke readmission costs in EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science up to June 2021. Relevant data were extracted and presented by readmission and stroke type. The original study's currency values were converted to 2021 US dollars based on the purchasing power parity for gross domestic product. The reporting quality of each of the included studies was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. RESULTS Forty-four studies were identified. Considerable variability in readmission costs was observed among countries, readmissions, stroke types, and durations of the follow-up period. The UK and the USA were the countries reporting the highest readmission costs. In the first year of follow-up, stroke readmission costs accounted for 2.1-23.4%, of direct costs and 3.3-21% of total costs. Among the included studies, only one identified predictors of readmission costs. CONCLUSION Our review showed great variability in readmission costs, mainly due to differences in study design, countries and health services, follow-up duration, and reported readmission data. The results of this study can be used to inform policymakers and healthcare providers about the burden of stroke readmissions. Future studies should not solely focus on improving data standardization but should also prioritize the identification of stroke readmission cost predictors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Abreu
- Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Manuel Correia
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Santo António- Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Elsa Azevedo
- Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Bernardo Sousa-Pinto
- MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rui Magalhães
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
MIHEVC M, ZAVRNIK Č, MORI LUKANČIČ M, VIRTIČ POTOČNIK T, PETEK ŠTER M, KLEMENC-KETIŠ Z, POPLAS SUSIČ A. Bottom-Up Analysis of Telemonitoring Costs: A Case Study in Slovenian Primary Care. Zdr Varst 2024; 63:5-13. [PMID: 38156340 PMCID: PMC10751888 DOI: 10.2478/sjph-2024-0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Telemonitoring improves clinical outcomes in patients with arterial hypertension (AH) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), however, cost structure analyses are lacking. This study seeks to explore the cost structure of telemonitoring for the elderly with AH and T2D in primary care and identify factors influencing costs for potential future expansions. Methods Infrastructure, operational, patient participation, and out-of-pocket costs were determined using a bottom-up approach. Infrastructure costs were determined by dividing equipment and telemonitoring platform expenses by the number of participants. Operational and patient participation costs were determined by considering patient training time, data measurement/review time, and teleconsultation time. The change in out-of-pocket costs was assessed in both groups using a structured questionnaire and 12-month expenditure data. Statistical analysis employed an unpaired sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square test. Results A total of 117 patients aged 71.4±4.7 years were included in the study. The telemonitoring intervention incurred an annual infrastructure costs of €489.4 and operational costs of €97.3 (95% CI 85.7-109.0) per patient. Patient annual participation costs were €215.6 (95% CI 190.9-241.1). Average annual out-of-pocket costs for both groups were €345 (95% CI 221-469). After 12 months the telemonitoring group reported significantly lower out-of-pocket costs (€132 vs. €545, p<0.001), driven by reduced spending on food, dietary supplements, medical equipment, and specialist check-ups compared to the standard care group. Conclusion To optimise the cost structure of telemonitoring, strategies like shortening the telemonitoring period, developing a national telemonitoring platform, using patient devices, integrating artificial intelligence into platforms, and involving nurse practitioners as telemedicine centre coordinators should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matic MIHEVC
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Metelkova ulica 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Črt ZAVRNIK
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Metelkova ulica 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Majda MORI LUKANČIČ
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Metelkova ulica 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tina VIRTIČ POTOČNIK
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Metelkova ulica 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
- University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Taborska ulica 8, 2000Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Marija PETEK ŠTER
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Zalika KLEMENC-KETIŠ
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Metelkova ulica 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
- University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Taborska ulica 8, 2000Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Antonija POPLAS SUSIČ
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Metelkova ulica 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mattingly TJ. A Research Framework to Improve Health Disparity Evidence Gaps in Value Assessments. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:253-259. [PMID: 38085442 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01340-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
A value assessment is intended as a tool for evaluating healthcare treatments to gauge value and inform decisions. Economic value assessments typically incorporate a cost-effectiveness analysis, focusing on costs and health outcomes important to payers, missing important information to ensure existing markets optimize resource allocation. Despite frequent calls for more explicit consideration of health equity impacts in value assessments, health economists continue to develop models informed by traditional cost and quality-of-life data that do not capture differences experienced by health disparity populations. This conceptual paper proposes a research framework to enhance data collection and analysis to address these gaps and better quantify the value of a health innovation, and better assess how a new intervention impacts health disparities. The framework comprises three distinct phases that build on one another: (1) contextualization of lived experiences for disadvantaged communities; (2) individual-level quantification of health disparities for cost and quality-of-life measures; and (3) quantifying community-level impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Joseph Mattingly
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, 30 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lathe J, Silverwood RJ, Hughes AD, Patalay P. Examining how well economic evaluations capture the value of mental health. Lancet Psychiatry 2024; 11:221-230. [PMID: 38281493 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00436-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
Health economics evidence informs health-care decision making, but the field has historically paid insufficient attention to mental health. Economic evaluations in health should define an appropriate scope for benefits and costs and how to value them. This Health Policy provides an overview of these processes and considers to what extent they capture the value of mental health. We suggest that although current practices are both transparent and justifiable, they have distinct limitations from the perspective of mental health. Most social value judgements, such as the exclusion of interindividual outcomes and intersectoral costs, diminish the value of improving mental health, and this reduction in value might be disproportionate compared with other types of health. Economic analyses might have disadvantaged interventions that improve mental health compared with physical health, but research is required to test the size of such differential effects and any subsequent effect on decision-making systems such as health technology assessment systems. Collaboration between health economics and the mental health sciences is crucial for achieving mental-physical health parity in evaluative frameworks and, ultimately, improving population mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Lathe
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Department of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Richard J Silverwood
- Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, Institute of Education, Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alun D Hughes
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Department of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Praveetha Patalay
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Department of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, Institute of Education, Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tu LH, Melnick E, Venkatesh AK, Sheth KN, Navaratnam D, Yaesoubi R, Forman HP, Mahajan A. Cost-Effectiveness of CT, CTA, MRI, and Specialized MRI for Evaluation of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Dizziness. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222:e2330060. [PMID: 37937837 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.30060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Underlying stroke is often misdiagnosed in patients presenting with dizziness. Although such patients are usually ineligible for acute stroke treatment, accurate diagnosis may still improve outcomes through selection of patients for secondary prevention measures. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of differing neuroimaging approaches in the evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with dizziness who are not candidates for acute intervention. METHODS. A Markov decision-analytic model was constructed from a health care system perspective for the evaluation of a patient presenting to the ED with dizziness. Four diagnostic strategies were compared: noncontrast head CT, head and neck CTA, conventional brain MRI, and specialized brain MRI (including multiplanar high-resolution DWI). Differing long-term costs and outcomes related to stroke detection and secondary prevention measures were compared. Cost-effectiveness was calculated in terms of lifetime expenditures in 2022 U.S. dollars for each quality-adjusted life year (QALY); deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS. Specialized MRI resulted in the highest QALYs and was the most cost-effective strategy with US$13,477 greater cost and 0.48 greater QALYs compared with noncontrast head CT. Conventional MRI had the next-highest health benefit, although was dominated by extension with incremental cost of US$6757 and 0.25 QALY; CTA was also dominated by extension, with incremental cost of US$3952 for 0.13 QALY. Non-contrast CT alone had the lowest utility among the four imaging choices. In the deterministic sensitivity analyses, specialized MRI remained the most cost-effective strategy. Conventional MRI was more cost-effective than CTA across a wide range of model parameters, with incremental cost-effectiveness remaining less than US$30,000/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis yielded similar results as found in the base-case analysis, with specialized MRI being more cost-effective than conventional MRI, which in turn was more cost-effective than CTA. CONCLUSION. The use of MRI in patients presenting to the ED with dizziness improves stroke detection and selection for subsequent preventive measures. MRI-based evaluation leads to lower long-term costs and higher cumulative QALYs. CLINICAL IMPACT. MRI, incorporating specialized protocols when available, is the preferred approach for evaluation of patients presenting to the ED with dizziness, to establish a stroke diagnosis and to select patients for secondary prevention measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long H Tu
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 20 York St, New Haven, CT 06510
| | - Edward Melnick
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Arjun K Venkatesh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Kevin N Sheth
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Reza Yaesoubi
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Howard P Forman
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 20 York St, New Haven, CT 06510
| | - Amit Mahajan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 20 York St, New Haven, CT 06510
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ma G, Meyer CL, Jackson-Morris A, Chang S, Narayan A, Zhang M, Wu D, Wang Y, Yang Z, Wang H, Zhao L, Nugent R. The return on investment for the prevention and treatment of childhood and adolescent overweight and obesity in China: a modelling study. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. WESTERN PACIFIC 2024; 43:100977. [PMID: 38456086 PMCID: PMC10920044 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Background The rapid increase in child and adolescent overweight and obesity (OAO) in China has a significant health and economic impact. This study undertook an investment case analysis to evaluate the health and economic impacts of child and adolescent OAO in China and the potential health and economic returns from implementing specific policies and interventions. Methods The analysis estimates the reduction in mortality and morbidity from implementing a set of evidence-based interventions across China between 2025 and 2092 using a deterministic Markov cohort model. Modelled interventions were identified by literature review and expert recommendation and include fiscal and regulatory policies, eHealth breastfeeding promotion, school-based interventions, and nutritional counselling by physicians. The study applies a societal costing perspective to model the economic impact on healthcare cost savings, wages, and productivity during adulthood. By projecting and comparing the costs between a status quo scenario and an intervention scenario, the study estimates the return on investment (ROI) for interventions separately and in combination. Findings Without intervention China will experience 3.3 billion disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due its current levels of child and adolescent OAO and a lifetime economic impact of CNY 218 trillion (USD 31.6 trillion), or a lifetime CNY 2.5 million loss per affected child or adolescent (USD 350 thousand). National implementation of all five interventions would avert 179.4 million DALYs and result in CNY 13.1 trillion of benefits over the model cohort's lifetime. Implementing fiscal and regulatory policies had the strongest ROI, with benefits accruing at least 10 years after implementation. Scaling up China's current school-based interventions offers China significant health and economic gains, however, the ROI is lower than other modelled interventions. Interpretation Effective prevention and treatment of child and adolescent OAO is critical to China's health and economic development. Multiple interventions offer a comprehensive approach to address the various factors that increase risk of child and adolescent OAO. Nonetheless, fiscal and regulatory policies offer the strongest health and economic gains. Funding Funding was provided by UNICEF China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guansheng Ma
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Christina L. Meyer
- Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Man Zhang
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Daphne Wu
- Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Youfa Wang
- International Obesity and Metabolic Disease Research Center, Global Health Institute, School of Public Health, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shannxi, China
| | - Zhenyu Yang
- National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Huijun Wang
- National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Li Zhao
- Department of Health Policy and Management, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Rachel Nugent
- Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mendoza-Jiménez MJ, van Exel J, Brouwer W. On spillovers in economic evaluations: definition, mapping review and research agenda. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024:10.1007/s10198-023-01658-8. [PMID: 38261132 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01658-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
An important issue in economic evaluations is determining whether all relevant impacts are considered, given the perspective chosen for the analysis. Acknowledging that patients are not isolated individuals has important implications in this context. Increasingly, the term "spillovers" is used to label consequences of health interventions on others. However, a clear definition of spillovers is lacking, and as a result, the scope of the concept remains unclear. In this study, we aim to clarify the concept of spillovers by proposing a definition applicable in health economic evaluations. To illustrate the implications of this definition, we highlight the diversity of potential spillovers through an expanded impact inventory and conduct a mapping review that outlines the evidence base for the different types of spillovers. In the context of economic evaluations of health interventions, we define spillovers as all impacts from an intervention on all parties or entities other than the users of the intervention under evaluation. This definition encompasses a broader range of potential costs and effects, beyond informal caregivers and family members. The expanded impact inventory enables a systematic approach to identifying broader impacts of health interventions. The mapping review shows that the relevance of different types of spillovers is context-specific. Some spillovers are regularly included in economic evaluations, although not always recognised as such, while others are not. A consistent use of the term "spillovers", improved measurement of these costs and effects, and increased transparency in reporting them are still necessary. To that end, we propose a research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María J Mendoza-Jiménez
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL), Guayaquil, Ecuador.
| | - Job van Exel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bulamu NB, Kaambwa B, Beks H, Versace VL, Clark RA. Health economics in nursing research: what you need to know to include economic evaluation methodology in your research. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2024; 23:99-106. [PMID: 38170820 DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Due to limited resources and constant, ever-changing healthcare challenges, health economics is essential to support healthcare decisions while improving health outcomes. Economic evaluation methodology facilitates informed decision-making related to the efficient allocation of resources while positively impacting clinical practice. In this paper, we provide an overview of economic evaluation methods and a real-world example applying one method of economic evaluation (cost-utility analysis) in nursing research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norma B Bulamu
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Billingsley Kaambwa
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hannah Beks
- Deakin Rural Health, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vincent L Versace
- Deakin Rural Health, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robyn A Clark
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Catalá-López F, Ridao M, Tejedor-Romero L, Caulley L, Hutton B, Husereau D, Alonso-Arroyo A, Bernal-Delgado E, Drummond MF, Moher D. Transparency, openness, and reproducible research practices are frequently underused in health economic evaluations. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 165:111208. [PMID: 37939742 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the extent to which articles of economic evaluations of healthcare interventions indexed in MEDLINE incorporate research practices that promote transparency, openness, and reproducibility. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We evaluated a random sample of health economic evaluations indexed in MEDLINE during 2019. We included articles written in English reporting an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in terms of costs per life years gained, quality-adjusted life years, and/or disability-adjusted life years. Reproducible research practices, openness, and transparency in each article were extracted in duplicate. We explored whether reproducible research practices were associated with self-report use of a guideline. RESULTS We included 200 studies published in 147 journals. Almost half were published as open access articles (n = 93; 47%). Most studies (n = 150; 75%) were model-based economic evaluations. In 109 (55%) studies, authors self-reported use a guideline (e.g., for study conduct or reporting). Few studies (n = 31; 16%) reported working from a protocol. In 112 (56%) studies, authors reported the data needed to recreate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the base case analysis. This percentage was higher in studies using a guideline than studies not using a guideline (72/109 [66%] with guideline vs. 40/91 [44%] without guideline; risk ratio 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.15-1.97). Only 10 (5%) studies mentioned access to raw data and analytic code for reanalyses. CONCLUSION Transparency, openness, and reproducible research practices are frequently underused in health economic evaluations. This study provides baseline data to compare future progress in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferrán Catalá-López
- Department of Health Planning and Economics, National School of Public Health, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Department of Medicine, University of Valencia/INCLIVA Health Research Institute and CIBERSAM, Valencia, Spain; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Manuel Ridao
- Institute for Health Research in Aragon (IISA), Zaragoza, Spain; Data Science for Health Services and Policy Research, Aragon Health Sciences Institute (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain; Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Tejedor-Romero
- Department of Health Planning and Economics, National School of Public Health, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Preventive Medicine Unit, La Princesa University Teaching Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance, Spanish Medicines and Healthcare Products Agency (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Lisa Caulley
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Clinical Medicine and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Don Husereau
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo
- Department of History of Science and Documentation, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Information and Social and Health Research (UISYS) Joint Research Unit, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Enrique Bernal-Delgado
- Data Science for Health Services and Policy Research, Aragon Health Sciences Institute (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain; Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - David Moher
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sevilla JP. COVID-19 vaccines should be evaluated from the societal perspective. J Med Econ 2024; 27:1-9. [PMID: 38014424 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2287935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates the importance of valuing vaccines from a broad societal perspective (SP), as opposed to a narrower health-payer perspective (HPP). COVID-19's catastrophic global impacts extend not only to its health-related effects, but also to the profound macroeconomic losses caused by lockdowns required for disease control, leading to the worst global economic crisis in a century. COVID-19 vaccination (CV) has been the central policy tool for resolving this economic crisis, and it has been hypothesized that this macroeconomic benefit alone justifies the cost of CV many times over. Yet HPP-based vaccine valuations are wholly insensitive to this enormous benefit, not allowing it to influence the allocation of given health budgets nor the determination of the magnitudes of such budgets, thereby risking inadequate societal spending on CV. HPP allocates given health budgets to maximize only health, giving no weight to macroeconomic outcomes, causing allocative inefficiency by not allowing welfare-improving trade-offs of health for wealth. HPP assumes health budgets are optimal, not scrutinizing whether their scale adequately reflects the macroeconomic benefits of health spending, thereby risking productive inefficiency by foregoing health spending increases such as on CV that could raise both population-level health and wealth. These allocative and productive inefficiencies in turn distort for-profit R&D incentives, risking dynamic inefficiency. And since the socio-economic and health burdens of COVID-19 are disproportionately borne by the worse off, HPP's failure to promote optimal levels of societal investment in CV may disproportionately burden the worse off as well, exacerbating inequality. Vaccine valuations from the societal perspective allow the allocation and determination of health budgets to reflect macroeconomic and distributional values, thereby promoting allocative, productive, and dynamic efficiency, as well as equity. These considerations of efficiency and equity support evaluating CV, and to ensure a level playing field, all vaccines, from a societal perspective.
Collapse
|
28
|
Fariman SA, Nosrati M, Rahmani P, Nikfar S. A cost-effectiveness analysis of linagliptin add-on to insulin treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease in Iran. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2023; 22:1263-1271. [PMID: 37975115 PMCID: PMC10638343 DOI: 10.1007/s40200-023-01243-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Purpose With the high prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), determining optimal treatment strategies has become a major concern. Linagliptin is aDPP-4 inhibitor that does not require dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of adding linagliptin to insulin therapy in patients with T2DM and mild (stage 2) or moderate (stage 3) CKD from a health system perspective in Iran. Methods We developed a cost-utility model using a decision tree and ran it separately for T2DM patients with mild or moderate CKD. Clinical outcomes and health-state utility values were extracted from published studies. Direct medical costs were obtained from national tariffs in Iran in 2021. We adopted an annual time horizon and calculated the difference in costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) to obtain the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). To capture parameter uncertainties, one-way sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results In T2DM patients with mild CKD, the linagliptin add-on strategy was associated with an additional $23.69 cost and 0.0148 QALYs per patient, resulting in an ICER of 1600.37 USD/QALY. In moderate CKD, the strategy was associated with $22.59 more costs and 0.0191 more QALYs, and the ICER was estimated at 1182.72 USD/QALY. In both populations, the ICER was mainly driven by the impact of HbA1c on utility, cost of linagliptin, and the reduction in insulin usage by adding linagliptin to the treatment. Conclusion With a cost-effectiveness threshold of $1550 USD/QALY in Iran, adding linagliptin to insulin is cost-effective in patients with T2DM and moderate CKD. However, for those with mild CKD, it seems that the associated costs outweigh the expected benefits. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-023-01243-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soroush Ahmadi Fariman
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 16 Azar St., Enghelab-E Islami Sq, Tehran, Iran
| | - Marzieh Nosrati
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 16 Azar St., Enghelab-E Islami Sq, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parham Rahmani
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 16 Azar St., Enghelab-E Islami Sq, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shekoufeh Nikfar
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 16 Azar St., Enghelab-E Islami Sq, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fariman S, Momeni Nasab F, Faraji H, Afzali M. Cost-Effectiveness of Ibrutinib as First-line Treatment for Older Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Iran. Value Health Reg Issues 2023; 38:93-100. [PMID: 37806264 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ibrutinib versus chemoimmunotherapy for frontline treatment of elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Iran. METHODS We developed a partitioned survival model with 3 health states (progression-free survival, post-progression survival, and death) and a lifetime horizon. State memberships were determined by parametric survival analysis of the ALLIANCE (A041202) randomized controlled trial's results, comparing first-line ibrutinib with bendamustine plus rituximab. Direct medical costs were calculated from an Iranian health system perspective. Utility values were extracted from the literature to calculate the incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with each strategy. To address parameter uncertainties, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also performed. RESULTS In the base-case analysis, ibrutinib and bendamustine plus rituximab were associated with $3739.72 and $3991.20 costs per patient as the first-line treatment strategy, respectively. They resulted in an average of 2.86 and 2.66 QALYs per patient. Thus, first-line ibrutinib was associated with 0.20 incremental QALY and $251.48 cost-saving per patient and was therefore the "dominant" strategy. In deterministic sensitivity analysis, drug prices were the key drivers of model outputs. However, none of the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratios exceeded the currently accepted threshold by the Iranian Food and Drug Administration ($1550 per QALY). In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, 63.3% of iterations were cost-saving and 77.4% were cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that ibrutinib as a first-line treatment appears to be the dominant strategy, compared with the standard of care, for unselected older adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Iran.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soroush Fariman
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Pharmaceutical Strategic Analysis and Research (PASAR), Tehran, Iran; Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Fatemeh Momeni Nasab
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Pharmaceutical Strategic Analysis and Research (PASAR), Tehran, Iran
| | - Hoda Faraji
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Pharmaceutical Strategic Analysis and Research (PASAR), Tehran, Iran
| | - Monireh Afzali
- Pharmaceutical Strategic Analysis and Research (PASAR), Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chen E. Stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis on population benefits. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2023; 21:78. [PMID: 37884980 PMCID: PMC10605454 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00488-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Dealing with randomness is a crucial aspect that cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) tools need to address, but existing stochastic CEA tools have rarely examined risk and return from the perspective of population benefits, concerning the benefits of a group of individuals but not just a typical one. This paper proposes a stochastic CEA tool that supports medical decision-making from the perspective of population benefits of risk and return, the risk-adjusted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The tool has a traditional form of ICER but uses the cost under a risk-adjusted expectation. Theoretically, we prove that the tool can provide medical decisions trimming that promote the risk-return level on population benefits within any intervention structure and can also serve as a criterion for the optimal intervention structure. Numerical simulations within a framework of mean-variance support the conclusions in this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ermo Chen
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100871, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Van Muylder A, D'Hooghe T, Luyten J. Economic Evaluation of Medically Assisted Reproduction: A Methodological Systematic Review. Med Decis Making 2023; 43:973-991. [PMID: 37621143 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231188129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medically assisted reproduction (MAR) is a challenging application area for health economic evaluations, entailing a broad range of costs and outcomes, stretching out long-term and accruing to several parties. PURPOSE To systematically review which costs and outcomes are included in published economic evaluations of MAR and to compare these with health technology assessment (HTA) prescriptions about which cost and outcomes should be considered for different evaluation objectives. DATA SOURCES HTA guidelines and systematic searches of PubMed Central, Embase, WOS CC, CINAHL, Cochrane (CENTRAL), HTA, and NHS EED. STUDY SELECTION All economic evaluations of MAR published from 2010 to 2022. DATA EXTRACTION A predetermined data collection form summarized study characteristics. Essential costs and outcomes of MAR were listed based on HTA and treatment guidelines for different evaluation objectives. For each study, included costs and outcomes were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS The review identified 93 cost-effectiveness estimates, of which 57% were expressed as cost-per-(healthy)-live-birth, 19% as cost-per-pregnancy, and 47% adopted a clinic perspective. Few adopted societal perspectives and only 2% used quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Broader evaluations omitted various relevant costs and outcomes related to MAR. There are several cost and outcome categories for which available HTA guidelines do not provide conclusive directions regarding inclusion or exclusion. LIMITATIONS Studies published before 2010 and of interventions not clearly labeled as MAR were excluded. We focus on methods rather than which MAR treatments are cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS Economic evaluations of MAR typically calculate a short-term cost-per-live-birth from a clinic perspective. Broader analyses, using cost-per-QALY or BCRs from societal perspectives, considering the full scope of reproduction-related costs and outcomes, are scarce and often incomplete. We provide a summary of costs and outcomes for future research guidance and identify areas requiring HTA methodological development. HIGHLIGHTS The cost-effectiveness of MAR procedures can be exceptionally complex to estimate as there is a broad range of costs and outcomes involved, in principle stretching out over multiple generations and over many stakeholders.We list 21 key areas of costs and outcomes of MAR. Which of these needs to be accounted for alters for different evaluation objectives (determined by the type of economic evaluation, time horizon considered, and perspective).Published studies mostly investigate cost-effectiveness in the very short-term, from a clinic perspective, expressed as cost-per-live-birth. There is a lack of comprehensive economic evaluations that adopt a broader perspective with a longer time horizon. The broader the evaluation objective, the more relevant costs and outcomes were excluded.For several costs and outcomes, particularly those relevant for broader, societal evaluations of MAR, the inclusion or exclusion is theoretically ambiguous, and HTA guidelines do not offer sufficient guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Van Muylder
- Department Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (AVM, JL); Research Group Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ Systems, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Belgium (TD); Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA (TD); Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Research and Development, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (TD). The review was written at the Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy. It was presented at the ESHRE 38th Annual Meeting (Milan 2022). The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Astrid Van Muylder and Jeroen Luyten have no conflicting interests to declare. The participation of Thomas D'Hooghe to this publication is part of his academic work; he does not see a conflict of interest as Merck KGaA was not involved in writing this article. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: We acknowledge an internal funding from KU Leuven for this study. The funding agreement ensured the authors' independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. The following authors are employed by the sponsor: Astrid Van Muylder and Jeroen Luyten
| | - Thomas D'Hooghe
- Department Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (AVM, JL); Research Group Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ Systems, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Belgium (TD); Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA (TD); Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Research and Development, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (TD). The review was written at the Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy. It was presented at the ESHRE 38th Annual Meeting (Milan 2022). The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Astrid Van Muylder and Jeroen Luyten have no conflicting interests to declare. The participation of Thomas D'Hooghe to this publication is part of his academic work; he does not see a conflict of interest as Merck KGaA was not involved in writing this article. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: We acknowledge an internal funding from KU Leuven for this study. The funding agreement ensured the authors' independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. The following authors are employed by the sponsor: Astrid Van Muylder and Jeroen Luyten
| | - Jeroen Luyten
- Department Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (AVM, JL); Research Group Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ Systems, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Belgium (TD); Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA (TD); Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Research and Development, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (TD). The review was written at the Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy. It was presented at the ESHRE 38th Annual Meeting (Milan 2022). The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Astrid Van Muylder and Jeroen Luyten have no conflicting interests to declare. The participation of Thomas D'Hooghe to this publication is part of his academic work; he does not see a conflict of interest as Merck KGaA was not involved in writing this article. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: We acknowledge an internal funding from KU Leuven for this study. The funding agreement ensured the authors' independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. The following authors are employed by the sponsor: Astrid Van Muylder and Jeroen Luyten
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Corlis J, Zhu J, Macul H, Tiberi O, Boothe MAS, Resch SC. Framework for determining the optimal course of action when efficiency and affordability measures differ by perspective in cost-effectiveness analysis-with an illustrative case of HIV treatment in Mozambique. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2023; 21:62. [PMID: 37705101 PMCID: PMC10498553 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00474-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a standard tool for evaluating health programs and informing decisions about resource allocation and prioritization. Most CEAs evaluating health interventions in low- and middle-income countries adopt a health sector perspective, accounting for resources funded by international donors and country governments, while often excluding out-of-pocket expenditures and time costs borne by program beneficiaries. Even when patients' costs are included, a companion analysis focused on the patient perspective is rarely performed. We view this as a missed opportunity. METHODS We developed methods for assessing intervention affordability and evaluating whether optimal interventions from the health sector perspective also represent efficient and affordable options for patients. We mapped the five different patterns that a comparison of the perspective results can yield into a practical framework, and we provided guidance for researchers and decision-makers on how to use results from multiple perspectives. To illustrate the methodology, we conducted a CEA of six HIV treatment delivery models in Mozambique. We conducted a Monte Carlo microsimulation with probabilistic sensitivity analysis from both patient and health sector perspectives, generating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the treatment approaches. We also calculated annualized patient costs for the treatment approaches, comparing the costs with an affordability threshold. We then compared the cost-effectiveness and affordability results from the two perspectives using the framework we developed. RESULTS In this case, the two perspectives did not produce a shared optimal approach for HIV treatment at the willingness-to-pay threshold of 0.3 × Mozambique's annual GDP per capita per DALY averted. However, the clinical 6-month antiretroviral drug distribution strategy, which is optimal from the health sector perspective, is efficient and affordable from the patient perspective. All treatment approaches, except clinical 1-month distributions of antiretroviral drugs which were standard before Covid-19, had an annual cost to patients less than the country's annual average for out-of-pocket health expenditures. CONCLUSION Including a patient perspective in CEAs and explicitly considering affordability offers decision-makers additional insights either by confirming that the optimal strategy from the health sector perspective is also efficient and affordable from the patient perspective or by identifying incongruencies in value or affordability that could affect patient participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jinyi Zhu
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Hélder Macul
- Programa Nacional de Controle de ITS-HIV/SIDA, Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Orrin Tiberi
- Programa Nacional de Controle de ITS-HIV/SIDA, Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique
| | | | - Stephen C. Resch
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sharma D, Prinja S, Aggarwal AK, Rajsekar K, Bahuguna P. Development of the Indian Reference Case for undertaking economic evaluation for health technology assessment. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. SOUTHEAST ASIA 2023; 16:100241. [PMID: 37694178 PMCID: PMC10485782 DOI: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Background Health technology assessment (HTA) is globally recognised as an important tool to guide evidence-based decision-making. However, heterogeneity in methods limits the use of any such evidence. The current research was undertaken to develop a set of standards for conduct of economic evaluations for HTA in India, referred to as the Indian Reference Case. Methods Development of the reference case comprised of a four-step process: (i) review of existing international HTA guidelines; (ii) systematic review of economic evaluations for three countries to assess adherence with pre-existing country-specific HTA guidelines; (iii) empirical analysis to assess the impact of alternate assumptions for key principles of economic evaluation on the results of cost-effectiveness analysis; (iv) stakeholder consultations to assess appropriateness of the recommendations. Based on the inferences drawn from the first three processes, a preliminary draft of the reference case was developed, which was finalised based on stakeholder consultations. Findings The Indian Reference Case provides twelve recommendations on eleven key principles of economic evaluation: decision problem, comparator, perspective, source of effectiveness evidence, measure of costs, health outcomes, time-horizon, discounting, heterogeneity, uncertainty analysis and equity analysis, and for presentation of results. The recommendations are user-friendly and have scope to allow for context-specific flexibility. Interpretation The Indian Reference Case is expected to provide guidance in planning, conducting, and reporting of economic evaluations. It is anticipated that adherence to the Reference Case would increase the quality and policy utilisation of future evaluations. However, with advancement in the field of health economics efforts aimed at refining the Indian Reference Case would be needed. Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The research was undertaken as part of doctoral thesis of Sharma D, who received scholarship from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepshikha Sharma
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Shankar Prinja
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Arun K. Aggarwal
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Kavitha Rajsekar
- Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
| | - Pankaj Bahuguna
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jiao B, Basu A. Associating Health-Related Quality-of-Life Score with Time Uses to Inform Productivity Measures in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:1065-1077. [PMID: 36877451 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01246-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Second Panel on Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine recommended that cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) explicitly incorporate the valuation of productive time from a societal perspective. We developed a new approach to capture productivity impacts in CEA without direct evidence on these impacts by associating varying levels of health-related quality-of-life (HrQoL) score with different time uses in the United States. METHODS We conceptualized a framework that estimates the association between HrQoL score with productivity through time uses. We used the American Time-Use Survey (ATUS) from year 2012-2013, when data on a Well-Being Module (WBM) was additionally collected alongside ATUS. The WBM measured the quality of life (QoL) score using a visual analog scale. To operationalize our conceptual framework, we employed an econometric approach that addressed three technical issues in the observed data: (i) distinction between overall QoL and HrQoL, (ii) correlation across different categories of time use and the share structure of time-use data, and (iii) reverse causality between time uses and HrQoL score in a cross-sectional setting. Furthermore, we developed a metamodel-based algorithm to summarize the numerous estimates from the primary econometric model efficiently. Finally, we illustrated the use of our algorithm to calculate productivity and time spent seeking care costs in an empirical CEA of a prostate cancer treatment. RESULTS We provide the estimates of the metamodel algorithm. Incorporating these estimates into the empirical CEA reduced the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio by 27%. CONCLUSION Our estimates can facilitate the inclusion of productivity and time spent seeking care in CEA as recommended by the Second Panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boshen Jiao
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 357631 H375Q, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anirban Basu
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 357631 H375Q, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kim DD. Accounting for Nonhealth and Future Costs in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Distributional Impacts of a US Cancer Prevention Strategy. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:1151-1164. [PMID: 37195368 PMCID: PMC10189225 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01275-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide up-to-date and comprehensive US data tables to estimate future net resource use, including nonlabor market production, and examine distributional impacts of including nonhealth and future costs in cost-effectiveness results. METHODS Using a published US cancer prevention simulation model, the paper evaluated the lifetime cost effectiveness of implementing a 10% excise tax on processed meats across age- and sex-specific population subgroups. The model examined multiple scenarios accounting for cancer-related healthcare expenditure (HCE) only, cancer-related and unrelated background HCE, adding productivity benefits (i.e., patient time, cancer-related productivity loss, and background labor and nonlabor market production), and with nonhealth consumption costs, adjusted for household economies of scale. Additional analyses include using population-average versus age-sex-specific estimates for quantifying production and consumption value, as well as comparing direct model estimation versus postcorrections with Meltzer's approximation for incorporating future resource use. RESULTS Accounting for nonhealth and future costs impacted cost-effectiveness results across population subgroups, often leading to changes in "cost-saving" determination. Including nonlabor market production had a noticeable impact on estimating future resource use and reduced the bias toward undervaluing productivity among females and older populations. The use of age-sex-specific estimates resulted in less favorable cost-effectiveness results compared with population-average estimates. Meltzer's approximation provided reasonable corrections among the middle-aged population for re-engineering cost-effectiveness ratios from a healthcare sector to a societal perspective. CONCLUSION With updated US data tables, this paper can help researchers conduct a comprehensive value assessment to reflect net resource use (health and nonhealth resource use minus production value) from a societal perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D Kim
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hospital Medicine, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Ave., MC 5000, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Koń B, Jakubczyk M. Measuring the Indirect Cost of Illness Using EQ-5D-5L While Accounting for Job Characteristics. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:1051-1064. [PMID: 37148531 PMCID: PMC10163582 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01267-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is used to measure treatment effects on the quality of life. For cost-utility analyses, EQ-5D-5L profiles are assigned numbers representing societal preferences (index weights). On the cost side, the indirect costs are frequently included: the value of product lost due to illness-related absences (absenteeism) or diminished productivity (presenteeism). The possibility to use EQ-5D data to estimate absenteeism and presenteeism (A&P) would be useful, if real-world data on A&P are lacking. However, beyond-health factors may also matter for A&P. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess how A&P depend on the EQ-5D-5L profile, while accounting for job characteristics (e.g. remote or in-office). METHODS We surveyed 756 employed Poles. Respondents reported their job characteristics and evaluated the impact of eight hypothetical EQ-5D-5L profiles on A&P (two blocks of states used). Econometric modelling was used to establish the determinants of A&P. RESULTS Both A&P increase with health problems as indicated across EQ-5D-5L dimensions (especially mobility and self-care), and this impact differs from the impact on index weight (e.g. pain/discomfort barely impact the A&P). The job characteristics mattered: absenteeism decreases in sedentary occupations and increases in those occupations performed remotely or requiring cooperation, while presenteeism increases in jobs performed remotely and decreases for those requiring creative thinking. CONCLUSIONS The entire EQ-5D-5L profile, not just index weights, should be used to estimate A&P. That job characteristics matter may be relevant in applications, as some diseases concentrate in specific subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beata Koń
- Decision Analysis and Support Unit, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Michał Jakubczyk
- Decision Analysis and Support Unit, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kostic AM, Leifer VP, Selzer F, Hunter DJ, Paltiel AD, Chen AF, Robinson MK, Neogi T, Collins JE, Messier SP, Edwards RR, Katz JN, Losina E. Cost-Effectiveness of Weight-Loss Interventions Prior to Total Knee Replacement for Patients With Class III Obesity. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023; 75:1752-1763. [PMID: 36250415 PMCID: PMC10375659 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Class III obesity (body mass index >40 kg/m2 ) is associated with higher complications following total knee replacement (TKR), and weight loss is recommended. We aimed to establish the cost-effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and lifestyle nonsurgical weight loss (LNSWL) interventions in knee osteoarthritis patients with class III obesity considering TKR. METHODS Using the Osteoarthritis Policy model and data from published literature to derive model inputs for RYGB, LSG, LNSWL, and TKR, we assessed the long-term clinical benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of weight-loss interventions for patients with class III obesity considering TKR. We assessed the following strategies with a health care sector perspective: 1) no weight loss/no TKR, 2) immediate TKR, 3) LNSWL, 4) LSG, and 5) RYGB. Each weight-loss strategy was followed by annual TKR reevaluation. Primary outcomes were cost, quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), discounted at 3% per year. We conducted deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to examine the robustness of conclusions to input uncertainty. RESULTS LSG increased QALE by 1.64 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and lifetime medical costs by $17,347 compared to no intervention, leading to an ICER of $10,600/QALY. RYGB increased QALE by 0.22 and costs by $4,607 beyond LSG, resulting in an ICER of $20,500/QALY. Relative to immediate TKR, LSG and RYGB delayed and decreased TKR utilization. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, RYGB was cost-effective in 67% of iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY. CONCLUSION For patients with class III obesity considering TKR, RYGB provides good value while immediate TKR without weight loss is not economically efficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra M. Kostic
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Valia P. Leifer
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Faith Selzer
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David J. Hunter
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney and Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - A. David Paltiel
- Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Antonia F. Chen
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Malcolm K. Robinson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tuhina Neogi
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jamie E. Collins
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen P. Messier
- Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Salem, NC, USA
| | - Robert R. Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey N. Katz
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation and Immunity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Losina
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Rühling S, Schwarting J, Froelich MF, Löffler MT, Bodden J, Hernandez Petzsche MR, Baum T, Wostrack M, Aftahy AK, Seifert-Klauss V, Sollmann N, Zimmer C, Kirschke JS, Tollens F. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic QCT-based osteoporosis screening for the prediction of incident vertebral fractures. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1222041. [PMID: 37576975 PMCID: PMC10422975 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1222041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Opportunistic quantitative computed tomography (oQCT) derived from non-dedicated routine CT has demonstrated high accuracy in diagnosing osteoporosis and predicting incident vertebral fractures (VFs). We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of oQCT screening compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the standard of care for osteoporosis screening. Methods Three screening strategies ("no osteoporosis screening", "oQCT screening", and "DXA screening") after routine CT were simulated in a state-transition model for hypothetical cohorts of 1,000 patients (women and men aged 65 years) over a follow-up period of 5 years (base case). The primary outcomes were the cumulative costs and the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) estimated from a U.S. health care perspective for the year 2022. Cost-effectiveness was assessed based on a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $70,249 per QALY. The secondary outcome was the number of prevented VFs. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the models' robustness. Results Compared to DXA screening, oQCT screening increased QALYs in both sexes (additional 2.40 per 1,000 women and 1.44 per 1,000 men) and resulted in total costs of $3,199,016 and $950,359 vs. $3,262,934 and $933,077 for women and men, respectively. As a secondary outcome, oQCT screening prevented 2.6 and 2.0 additional VFs per 1,000 women and men, respectively. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, oQCT screening remained cost-effective in 88.3% (women) and 90.0% (men) of iterations. Conclusion oQCT screening is a cost-effective ancillary approach for osteoporosis screening and has the potential to prevent a substantial number of VFs if considered in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Rühling
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julian Schwarting
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias F. Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maximilian T. Löffler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Jannis Bodden
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz R. Hernandez Petzsche
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Baum
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Wostrack
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A. Kaywan Aftahy
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vanadin Seifert-Klauss
- Department of Gynecology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S. Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fabian Tollens
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hall EW, Panagiotakopoulos L, Wester C, Nelson N, Sandul AL. Cost-Effectiveness of Strategies to Identify Children with Perinatally Acquired Hepatitis C Infection. J Pediatr 2023; 258:113409. [PMID: 37023948 PMCID: PMC10448738 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the optimal testing strategy to identify children with perinatally acquired hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. STUDY DESIGN We used a decision-tree framework with a Markov disease progression model to conduct an economic analysis of 4 strategies, based on combinations of type and timing of test: anti-HCV with reflex to HCV RNA at 18 months among children known to be perinatally exposed (ie, baseline comparison strategy); HCV RNA testing at 2-6 months among infants known to be perinatally exposed (test strategy 1); universal anti-HCV with reflex to HCV RNA at 18 months among all children (test strategy 2); and universal HCV RNA testing at 2-6 months among all infants (test strategy 3). We estimated total cost, quality-adjusted life years, and disease sequalae for each strategy. RESULTS Each of the 3 alternative testing strategies resulted in an increased number of children tested and improved health outcomes. HCV RNA testing at 2-6 months (test strategy 1) was cost-saving and resulted in a population-level difference in cost of $469 671. The 2 universal testing strategies resulted in an increase in quality-adjusted life years and an increase in total costs. CONCLUSIONS Testing of perinatally exposed infants at age 2-6 months with a single HCV RNA test will reduce costs and improve health outcomes, preventing morbidity and mortality associated with complications from perinatal HCV infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric W Hall
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
| | - Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Carolyn Wester
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Noele Nelson
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Amy L Sandul
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chapdelaine A, Vasiliadis HM, Provencher MD, Norton PJ, Roberge P. Moderators of the cost-effectiveness of transdiagnostic CBT for anxiety disorders over an 8-month time horizon using a net-benefit regression framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:596. [PMID: 37291599 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09468-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Access to evidence-based psychological treatment is a concern in many parts of the globe due to government-level financial constraints and patient-level barriers. Transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural therapy (tCBT) is an effective treatment approach that uses a single protocol for anxiety disorders which could enhance the dissemination of evidence-based psychotherapy. In a context of limited resources, the study of treatment moderators can allow to identify subgroups for which the cost-effectiveness of an intervention differs, information that could impact decision-making. So far, there has been no economic evaluation of tCBT for different subpopulations. The objectives of this study, using the net-benefit regression framework, were to explore clinical and sociodemographic factors as potential moderators of the cost-effectiveness of tCBT compared to treatment-as-usual (TAU). METHODS This is a secondary data analysis of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial opposing tCBT added to TAU (n = 117) to TAU only (n = 114). Data on costs from the health system and the limited societal perspectives, as well as anxiety-free days, an effectiveness measure based on the Beck Anxiety Inventory, were collected over an 8-month time horizon and used to derive individual net-benefits. The net-benefit regression framework was used to assess moderators of the cost-effectiveness of tCBT + TAU as opposed to TAU alone. Variables of sociodemographic and clinical nature were assessed. RESULTS Results showed that the number of comorbid anxiety disorders significantly moderated the cost-effectiveness of tCBT + TAU compared to TAU from the limited societal perspective. CONCLUSIONS The number of comorbid anxiety disorders was identified as a moderator affecting the cost-effectiveness of tCBT + TAU compared to TAU from the limited societal perspective. More research is needed to strengthen the case of tCBT from an economic standpoint for large-scale dissemination. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02811458, 23/06/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Chapdelaine
- PRIMUS Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001 12e Avenue N, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Helen-Maria Vasiliadis
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke - Campus de Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada.
- Centre de Recherche Charles-Le Moyne, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada.
| | - Martin D Provencher
- École de psychologie, Université Laval, Pavillon Félix-Antoine-Savard, 2325 All. des Bibliothèques, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Peter J Norton
- The Cairnmillar Institute, 391-393 Tooronga Road, Hawthorn East, Victoria, VIC, 3123, Australia
| | - Pasquale Roberge
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001 12e Avenue N, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), 3001 12e Avenue N, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Goshua G, Calhoun C, Ito S, James LP, Luviano A, Krishnamurti L, Pandya A. Distributional Cost-Effectiveness of Equity-Enhancing Gene Therapy in Sickle Cell Disease in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:779-787. [PMID: 37247420 PMCID: PMC10370480 DOI: 10.7326/m22-3272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gene therapy is a potential cure for sickle cell disease (SCD). Conventional cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) does not capture the effects of treatments on disparities in SCD, but distributional CEA (DCEA) uses equity weights to incorporate these considerations. OBJECTIVE To compare gene therapy versus standard of care (SOC) in patients with SCD by using conventional CEA and DCEA. DESIGN Markov model. DATA SOURCES Claims data and other published sources. TARGET POPULATION Birth cohort of patients with SCD. TIME HORIZON Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE U.S. health system. INTERVENTION Gene therapy at age 12 years versus SOC. OUTCOME MEASURES Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (in dollars per quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] gained) and threshold inequality aversion parameter (equity weight). RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS Gene therapy versus SOC for females yielded 25.5 versus 15.7 (males: 24.4 vs. 15.5) discounted lifetime QALYs at costs of $2.8 million and $1.0 million (males: $2.8 million and $1.2 million), respectively, with an ICER of $176 000 per QALY (full SCD population). The inequality aversion parameter would need to be 0.90 for the full SCD population for gene therapy to be preferred per DCEA standards. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS SOC was favored in 100.0% (females) and 87.1% (males) of 10 000 probabilistic iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY. Gene therapy would need to cost less than $1.79 million to meet conventional CEA standards. LIMITATION Benchmark equity weights (as opposed to SCD-specific weights) were used to interpret DCEA results. CONCLUSION Gene therapy is cost-ineffective per conventional CEA standards but can be an equitable therapeutic strategy for persons living with SCD in the United States per DCEA standards. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Yale Bernard G. Forget Scholars Program and Bunker Endowment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Goshua
- Section of Hematology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (G.G., C.C., S.I.)
| | - Cecelia Calhoun
- Section of Hematology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (G.G., C.C., S.I.)
| | - Satoko Ito
- Section of Hematology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (G.G., C.C., S.I.)
| | - Lyndon P James
- PhD Program in Health Policy, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (L.P.J., A.L.)
| | - Andrea Luviano
- PhD Program in Health Policy, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (L.P.J., A.L.)
| | - Lakshmanan Krishnamurti
- Section of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (L.K.)
| | - Ankur Pandya
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (A.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Klimchak AC, Sedita LE, Rodino-Klapac LR, Mendell JR, McDonald CM, Gooch KL, Malone DC. Assessing the value of delandistrogene moxeparvovec (SRP-9001) gene therapy in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the United States. JOURNAL OF MARKET ACCESS & HEALTH POLICY 2023; 11:2216518. [PMID: 37261034 PMCID: PMC10228300 DOI: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2216518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Background: Delandistrogene moxeparvovec (SRP-9001) is an investigational gene therapy that may delay progression of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a severe, rare neuromuscular disease caused by DMD gene mutations. Early cost-effectiveness analyses are important to help contextualize the value of gene therapies for reimbursement decision making. Objective: To determine the potential value of delandistrogene moxeparvovec using a cost-effectiveness analysis. Study design: A simulation calculated lifetime costs and equal value of life years gained (evLYG). Inputs included extrapolated clinical trial results and published utilities/costs. As a market price for delandistrogene moxeparvovec has not been established, threshold analyses established maximum treatment costs as they align with value, including varying willingness-to-pay up to $500,000, accounting for severity/rarity. Setting: USA, healthcare system perspective Patients: Boys with DMD Intervention: Delandistrogene moxeparvovec plus standard of care (SoC; corticosteroids) versus SoC alone Main outcome measure: Maximum treatment costs at a given willingness-to-pay threshold Results: Delandistrogene moxeparvovec added 10.30 discounted (26.40 undiscounted) evLYs. The maximum treatment cost was approximately $5 M, assuming $500,000/evLYG. Varying the benefit discount rate to account for the single administration increased the estimated value to #$5M, assuming $500,000/evLYG. Conclusion: In this early economic model, delandistrogene moxeparvovec increases evLYs versus SoC and begins to inform its potential value from a healthcare perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexa C. Klimchak
- Global HEOR, RWE & Analytics, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Lauren E. Sedita
- Global HEOR, RWE & Analytics, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Jerry R. Mendell
- Center for Gene Therapy, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics and Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Craig M. McDonald
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | - Daniel C. Malone
- College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kinchin I, Walshe V, Normand C, Coast J, Elliott R, Kroll T, Kinghorn P, Thompson A, Viney R, Currow D, O'Mahony JF. Expanding health technology assessment towards broader value: Ireland as a case study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2023; 39:e26. [PMID: 37129030 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462323000235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Healthcare innovations often represent important improvements in population welfare, but at what cost, and to whom? Health technology assessment (HTA) is a multidisciplinary process to inform resource allocation. HTA is conventionally anchored on health maximization as the only relevant output of health services. If we accept the proposition that health technologies can generate value outside the healthcare system, resource allocation decisions could be suboptimal from a societal perspective. Incorporating "broader value" in HTA as derived from social values and patient experience could provide a richer evaluative space for informing resource allocation decisions. This article considers how HTA is practiced and what its current context implies for adopting "broader value" to evaluating health technologies. Methodological challenges are highlighted, as is a future research agenda. Ireland serves as an example of a healthcare system that both has an explicit role for HTA and is evolving under a current program of reform to offer universal, single-tier access to public services. There are various ways in which HTA processes could move beyond health, including considering the processes of care delivery and/or expanding the evaluative space to some broader concept of well-being. Methods to facilitate the latter exist, but their adaptation to HTA is still emerging. We recommend a multi-stakeholder working group to develop and advance an international agenda for HTA that captures welfare/benefit beyond health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Kinchin
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Charles Normand
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Joanna Coast
- Bristol Population Health Science Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rachel Elliott
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Thilo Kroll
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Philip Kinghorn
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alexander Thompson
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - David Currow
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - James F O'Mahony
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Oliver-Fornies P, Sánchez-Viñas A, Gomez Gomez R, Ortega Lahuerta JP, Loscos-Lopez D, Aragon-Benedi C, Yamak Altinpulluk E, Fajardo Perez M, Aznar-Lou I. Cost Analysis of Low-Volume Versus Standard-Volume Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery. Cureus 2023; 15:e38534. [PMID: 37273354 PMCID: PMC10239207 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Economic evaluation has become an essential decision-making tool for health systems worldwide. This study was aimed at estimating the difference in the use of healthcare resources, days on sick leave, and costs between patients undergoing a standard-volume versus a low-volume ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Methods This is a post-hoc cost analysis of a double-blind, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. Forty-eight patients undergoing ultrasound-guided interscalene block received either 10 ml or 20 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25%. Analyses involved the public healthcare payer perspective (including visits to general practitioners, nursing staff, physiotherapy facilities, hospital admissions, outpatient diagnostic tests, etc.) and the limited societal perspective, including productivity losses (days on sick leave). Measurements were made at one-month and one-year follow-ups post-intervention. Differences in costs were estimated using two-part models adjusted by the costs incurred in the previous year. Results Subjects in the 10 ml group made greater use of general practitioner visits (mean difference [95% CI]: 3.35 [0.219 to 6.49]; p=0.036) and diagnostic tests (2.43 [0.601 to 4.26]; p=0.009), but less use of physical therapy (-12.9 [-21.7 to -4.06]; p=0.004). Mean (SD) cost differences from the public healthcare payer's perspective were 1,461.34 $ (1,541.62) and 1,024.08$ (943.83) for the 10 ml and 20 ml groups, respectively (p=0.293). From the limited societal perspective, the differences were as follows: 7,036.53$ (8,077.58) and 8,666.56$ (9,841.10), respectively (p=0.937). While there were no differences in the above parameters at the one-month follow-up. Conclusion The volume reduction proposed following interscalene block resulted in meaningful, albeit not statistically significant, clinical benefits and lower costs from a limited societal perspective for shoulder surgery. Thus, healthcare use and days on sick leave are variables to be taken into consideration when calculating the economic impact of surgical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Oliver-Fornies
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hospital Universitario de Mostoles, Madrid, ESP
| | - Alba Sánchez-Viñas
- Health Technology Assessment in Primary Care and Mental Health (PRISMA) Research Group, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, ESP
| | - Roberto Gomez Gomez
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, ESP
| | - Juan Pablo Ortega Lahuerta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, ESP
| | - Diego Loscos-Lopez
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Lozano Blesa University Clinical Hospital, Zaragoza, ESP
| | - Cristian Aragon-Benedi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, ESP
| | - Ece Yamak Altinpulluk
- Medicine, UltraDissection, Madrid, ESP
- Pain Medicine, Morphological Madrid Research Center (MoMaRC), Madrid, ESP
- Anesthesiology Research Office, Ataturk University Medical School, Erzurum, TUR
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, USA
| | | | - Ignacio Aznar-Lou
- Health Technology Assessment in Primary Care and Mental Health (PRISMA) Research Group, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, ESP
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rezapour A, Behroozi Z, Nasirzadeh M, Rezaeian M, Barzegar M, Tashakori-Miyanroudi M, Sayyad A, Souresrafil A. Cost-effectiveness of remdesivir for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a systematic review. Infect Dis Poverty 2023; 12:39. [PMID: 37081575 PMCID: PMC10116457 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-023-01092-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Remdesivir is being studied and used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to systematically identify, critically evaluate, and summarize the findings of the studies on the cost-effectiveness of remdesivir in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS In this systematic review, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between 2019 and 2022. We included all full economic evaluations of remdesivir for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Data were summarized in a structured and narrative manner. RESULTS Out of 616 articles obtained in this literature search, 12 studies were included in the final analysis. The mean score of the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) for the studies was 87.66 (high quality). All studies were conducted in high-income countries (eight studies in the USA and one study in England), except for three studies from middle-to-high-income countries (China, South Africa, and Turkey). Six studies conducted their economic analysis in terms of a health system perspective; five studies conducted their economic analysis from a payer perspective; three studies from the perspective of a health care provider. The results of five studies showed that remdesivir was cost-effective compared to standard treatment. Furthermore, the therapeutic strategy of combining remdesivir with baricitinib was cost-effective compared to remdesivir alone. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of the present study, remdesivir appears to be cost-effective in comparison with the standard of care in China, Turkey, and South Africa. Studies conducted in the United States show conflicting results, and combining remdesivir with baricitinib is cost-effective compared with remdesivir alone. However, the cost-effectiveness of remdesivir in low-income countries remains unknown. Thus, more studies in different countries are required to determine the cost-effectiveness of this drug.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aziz Rezapour
- Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zahra Behroozi
- Physiology Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Mostafa Nasirzadeh
- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Occupational Environment Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
| | - Mohsen Rezaeian
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Occupational Environment Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Barzegar
- Department of English Language Teaching, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahsa Tashakori-Miyanroudi
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
| | - Abdollah Sayyad
- Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Aghdas Souresrafil
- Department of Health Services and Health Promotion, School of Health, Occupational Environment Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kim DD, Do LA, Synnott PG, Lavelle TA, Prosser LA, Wong JB, Neumann PJ. Developing Criteria for Health Economic Quality Evaluation Tool. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023:S1098-3015(23)02561-5. [PMID: 37068557 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Because existing publication guidelines and checklists have limitations when used to assess the quality of cost-effectiveness analysis, we developed a novel quality assessment tool for cost-effectiveness analyses, differentiating methods and reporting quality and incorporating the relative importance of different quality attributes. METHODS We defined 15 quality domains from a scoping review and identified 72 methods and reporting quality attributes (36 each). After designing a best-worst scaling survey, we fielded an online survey to researchers and practitioners to estimate the relative importance of the attributes in February 2021. We analyzed the survey data using a sequential conditional logit model. The final tool included 48 quality attributes deemed most important for assessing methods and reporting quality (24 each), accompanied by a free and web-based scoring system. RESULTS A total of 524 participants completed the methodology section, and 372 completed both methodology and reporting sections. Quality attributes pertaining to the "modeling" and "data inputs and evidence synthesis" domains were deemed most important for methods quality, including "structure of the model reflects the underlying condition and intervention's impact" and "model validation is conducted." Quality attributes pertaining to "modeling" and "Intervention/comparator(s)" domains were considered most important for reporting quality, including "model descriptions are detailed enough for replication." Despite its growing prominence, "equity considerations" were not deemed as important as other quality attributes. CONCLUSIONS The Criteria for Health Economic Quality Evaluation tool allows users to differentiate methods and reporting as well as quantifies the relative importance of quality attributes. Alongside other considerations, it could help assess and improve the quality of cost-effectiveness evidence to inform value-based decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D Kim
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Lauren A Do
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patricia G Synnott
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tara A Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- The Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - John B Wong
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kostic AM, Leifer VP, Gong Y, Robinson MK, Collins JE, Neogi T, Messier SP, Hunter DJ, Selzer F, Suter LG, Katz JN, Losina E. Cost-Effectiveness of Surgical Weight-Loss Interventions for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis and Class III Obesity. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023; 75:491-500. [PMID: 35657632 PMCID: PMC9827536 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Class III obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥40 kg/m2 ) is associated with worse knee pain and total knee replacement (TKR) outcomes. Because bariatric surgery yields sustainable weight loss for individuals with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 , our objective was to establish the value of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in conjunction with usual care for knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 . METHODS We used the Osteoarthritis Policy model to assess long-term clinical benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of RYGB and LSG. We derived model inputs for efficacy, costs, and complications associated with these treatments from published data. Primary outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), all discounted at 3%/year. This analysis was conducted from a health care sector perspective. We performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate uncertainty in input parameters. RESULTS The usual care + RYGB strategy increased the quality-adjusted life expectancy by 1.35 years and lifetime costs by $7,209, compared to usual care alone (ICER = $5,300/QALY). The usual care + LSG strategy yielded less benefit than usual care + RYGB and was dominated. Relative to usual care alone, both usual care + RYGB and usual care + LSG reduced opioid use from 13% to 4%, and increased TKR usage from 30% to 50% and 41%, respectively. For cohorts with BMI between 38 and 41 kg/m2 , usual care + LSG dominated usual care + RYGB. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY, usual care + RYGB and usual care + LSG were cost-effective in 70% and 30% of iterations, respectively. CONCLUSION RYGB offers good value among knee OA patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 , while LSG may provide good value among those with BMI between 35 and 41 kg/m2 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra M. Kostic
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Valia P. Leifer
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yusi Gong
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Champaign, IL, USA
| | - Malcolm K. Robinson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jamie E. Collins
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tuhina Neogi
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Boston University of School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen P. Messier
- Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Salem, NC, USA
| | - David J. Hunter
- Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital and Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Faith Selzer
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa G. Suter
- Section of Rheumatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Section of Rheumatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Haven, CT, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jeffrey N. Katz
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Departments of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Losina
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rezapour A, Souresrafil A, Barzegar M, Sheikhy-Chaman M, Tatarpour P. Economic evaluation of next-generation sequencing techniques in diagnosis of genetic disorders: A systematic review. Clin Genet 2023; 103:513-528. [PMID: 36808726 DOI: 10.1111/cge.14313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, massively parallel sequencing or next generation sequencing (NGS) has considerably changed both the research and diagnostic fields, and rapid developments have led to the combination of NGS techniques in clinical practice, ease of analysis, and detection of genetic mutations. This article aimed at reviewing the economic evaluation studies of the NGS techniques in the diagnosis of genetic diseases. In this systematic review, scientific databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and CEA registry) were searched from 2005 to 2022 to identify the related literature on the economic evaluation of NGS techniques in the diagnosis of genetic diseases. Full-text reviews and data extraction were all performed by two independent researchers. The quality of all the articles included in this study was evaluated using the Checklist of Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES). Out of 20 521 screened abstracts, 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. The mean score of the QHES checklist for the studies was 0.78 (high quality). Seventeen studies were conducted based on modeling. Cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis, and cost-minimization analysis were done in 26 studies, 13 studies, and 1 study, respectively. Based on the available evidence and findings, exome sequencing, which is one of the NGS techniques, could have the potential to be used as a cost-effective genomic test to diagnose children with suspected genetic diseases. The results of the present study support the cost-effectiveness of exome sequencing in diagnosing suspected genetic disorders. However, the use of exome sequencing as a first- or second-line diagnostic test is still controversial. Most studies have been conducted in high-income countries, and research on the cost-effectiveness of NGS methods is recommended in low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aziz Rezapour
- Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Aghdas Souresrafil
- Department of Health Services and Health Promotion, School of Health, Occupational Environment Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Barzegar
- Department of English Language, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammadreza Sheikhy-Chaman
- Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parvin Tatarpour
- School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rezapour A, Souresrafil A, Shamsaei M, Barzegar M, Tashakori-Miyanroudi M, Ketabchi E. Economic evaluation of ferric carboxymaltose compared with placebo in iron-deficient patients with heart failure: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pharm 2023:10.1007/s11096-022-01532-2. [PMID: 36805379 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-022-01532-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has been shown that ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) improves symptoms and quality of life in iron-deficient patients with heart failure (HF). AIM We aimed to systematically review studies conducted on the cost-effectiveness of FCM compared to placebo in iron-deficient patients with HF. METHOD We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science to find the relevant studies. After removing duplicates, two authors independently evaluated the titles, abstracts, and full texts. We included studies that investigated the full economic evaluations of FCM in HF patients with iron deficiency (cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis, and cost-benefit analysis) and used the CHEERS tool to evaluate the quality of the studies. RESULTS Seven studies were included which evaluated the economic analysis of treatments with FCM in iron-deficient patients with HF. The CHEERS scores for most of the studies (n = 6) were 0.77 or higher (very good quality). The lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) of FCM ($1801.96) was from Italy, and the highest ICER per QALY of FCM ($25,981.28) South Korea. Results of the studies showed that FCM, compared to placebo, was cost-effective in iron-deficient patients with HF. CONCLUSION FCM is a cost-effective treatment for iron-deficient patients with HF. Considering the fact that all the included studies in the present systematic review took place in high-income countries, we recommend further studies investigating the cost-effectiveness of FCM in low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aziz Rezapour
- Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Aghdas Souresrafil
- Department of Health Services and Health Promotion, School of Health, Occupational Environment Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
| | - Monireh Shamsaei
- Department of Health Services Management, School of Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Mohammad Barzegar
- Department of English Language Teaching, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahsa Tashakori-Miyanroudi
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
| | - Ensiyeh Ketabchi
- Department of Health Services Management, School of Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Getchell M, Mantaring EJ, Yee K, Pronyk P. Cost-effectiveness of sub-national geographically targeted vaccination programs: A systematic review. Vaccine 2023; 41:2320-2328. [PMID: 36781333 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
Immunization is an essential component of national health plans. However, the growing number of new vaccine introductions, vaccination campaigns and increasing administrative costs create logistic and financial challenges, especially in resource-limited settings. Sub-national geographic targeting of vaccination programs is a potential strategy for governments to reduce the impact of infectious disease outbreaks while optimizing resource allocation and reducing costs, promoting sustainability of critically important national immunization plans. We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature to identify studies that investigated the cost-effectiveness of geographically targeted sub-national vaccination programs, either through routine immunization or supplementary immunization activities. A total of 16 studies were included in our review, covering nine diseases of interest: cholera, dengue, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), hepatitis A, Japanese encephalitis, measles, rotavirus, Shigella and typhoid fever. All studies modelled cost-effectiveness of geographically targeted vaccination. Despite the variation in study design, disease focus and country context, studies generally found that in countries where a heterogenous burden of disease exists, sub-national geographic targeting of vaccination programs in areas of high disease burden was more cost-effective than a non-targeted strategy. Sensitivity analysis revealed that cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to variations in vaccine price, vaccine efficacy, mortality rate, administrative and operational costs, discount rate, and treatment costs. This systematic review identified several key characteristics related to geographic targeting of vaccination, including the vaccination strategy used, variations in modelling parameters and their impact on cost-effectiveness. Additional research and guidance is needed to support the appropriateness and feasibility of geographically targeted vaccination and to determine what country context would make this a viable complement to routine immunization programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marya Getchell
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
| | | | - Kaisin Yee
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore
| | - Paul Pronyk
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|