Comparison of clinical features of non-Q wave and Q wave myocardial infarction

Angina due to coronary artery spasm (variant angina): diagnosis and intervention strategies

INTRODUCTION

Since Prinzmetal first described a 'variant' form of angina pectoris, with predominantly resting episodes of pain and cyclic severity variations, it has gradually become apparent that this clinical presentation is caused by episodes of coronary artery spasm (CAS) involving focal or diffuse changes in large and/or small coronary arteries in the presence or absence of 'fixed' coronary artery stenoses. However, most clinicians have only limited understanding of this group of disorders.

AREAS COVERED

We examine the clinical presentation of CAS, associated pathologies outside the coronary vasculature, impediments to making the diagnosis, provocative diagnostic tests, available and emerging treatments, and the current understanding of pathogenesis.

EXPERT OPINION

CAS is often debilitating and substantially under-diagnosed and occur mainly in women. Many patients presenting with CAS crises have non-diagnostic ECGs and normal serum troponin concentrations, but CAS can be suspected on the basis of history and association with migraine, Raynaud's phenomenon and Kounis syndrome. Definitive diagnosis requires provocative testing at coronary angiography. Treatment still centers around the use of calcium antagonists, but with greater understanding of pathogenesis, new management options are emerging.

Prognostic Value of Viable Myocardium in Patients with Non-Q-wave and Q-wave Myocardial Infarction

This study assessed the amount and prognostic value of myocardial viability in patients with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (NQMI) and Q-wave myocardial infarction (QMI). A total of 175 patients with MI and an ejection fraction ≤ 45% underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography. On the basis of clinical criteria and myocardial viability, 110 patients were revascularized. The amount of viable myocardium and the clinical outcome were compared in the NQMI and QMI groups. Patients with NQMI exhibited a larger amount of viable myocardium compared with those with QMI. The mortality rate was 6% in patients with NQMI with viable myocardium and subsequent revascularization, 33% in patients with NQMI without viable myocardium or revascularization, 27% in patients with QMI with viable myocardium and subsequent revascularization, and 33% in patients with QMI without viable myocardium or revascularization. In conclusion, our data suggest that patients with NQMI and viable myocardium have the best prognosis after revascularization.

Comparison of outcome in patients with ST-elevation versus non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry)

Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) are increasingly being treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and we sought to determine risk of adverse outcomes by type of MI. Patients enrolled in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry from 1999 to 2004 who presented with an acute MI as an indication for PCI were studied. Baseline data and in-hospital and 1-year outcomes were compared based on ST-segment elevation (STEMI, n = 903; NSTEMI, n = 583) at presentation. Patients with STEMI were younger, had fewer co-morbidities, and had less extensive coronary artery disease than did patients with NSTEMI. Angiographic success and periprocedural complications were similar by MI type. In-hospital coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, bleeding and recurrent MI were similar but mortality was higher in patients with STEMI (4.0% vs 1.4%, p = 0.004). Cardiogenic shock was associated with the greatest risk of in-hospital death (odds ratio 26.7, 95% confidence interval 11.4 to 62.3, p = 0.0001), but STEMI was also independently predictive of mortality. At 1 year, there was no influence of MI type on outcome. Age, cardiogenic shock, renal disease, peripheral vascular disease, and cancer were predictive of death and MI. Multivessel disease and a larger number of >50% lesions were associated with the need for repeat revascularization. In conclusion, STEMI was associated with a higher likelihood of in-hospital death than was NSTEMI, but long-term outcomes after PCI were independent of MI type. At 1 year, associated co-morbidities were strongly associated with death and MI, whereas only angiographic characteristics predicted the need for repeat revascularization.

Ischemic and viable myocardium in patients with Non–Q-Wave or Q-Wave myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether patients with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (NQMI) have more ischemic viable myocardium (IVM) than patients with Q-wave myocardial infarction (QMI).

BACKGROUND

Non-Q-wave myocardial infarction is associated with higher incidences of cardiac events than QMI, suggesting more myocardium at risk in NQMI.

METHODS

To identify myocardial ischemia, hibernation, and scar, the resting and stress (82)rubidium perfusion and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose metabolic positron emission tomographic imaging (PET) was performed in 64 consecutive patients with NQMI (n = 21) or QMI (n = 43). Echocardiography was performed for assessment of left ventricular function and wall motion index (WMI). The relationships between PET, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic findings were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between NQMI and QMI groups (28 +/- 10% vs. 25 +/- 11%, p > 0.05). Ischemic and viable myocardium was more common in NQMI than in QMI (91% vs. 61%, p < 0.05). The total amount of IVM was significantly higher in NQMI than in QMI (6.5 +/- 5.2 vs. 2.9 +/- 2.8 segments, p < 0.001). Neither the number of Q waves, residual ST-segment depression of >or=0.5 mm or elevation of >or=1 mm, nor LVEF and WMI were significant predictors for IVM. Wall motion index correlated with scar segments (r = 0.54, p < 0.001) and LVEF (r = -0.67, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ischemic and viable myocardium is common in patients with NQMI and left ventricular dysfunction, suggesting that aggressive approaches should be taken to salvage the myocardium at risk in such patients.

Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction

The treatment of non-Q-wave infarction involves the use of antithrombotic therapy (aspirin and heparin) along with appropriate antianginal medication to reduce myocardial oxygen demands and prevent coronary spasm. In certain high-risk patient subgroups (ie, those with recurrent ischemia, persistent or significant ST segment change, congestive heart failure, or hypotension with chest pain), the use of newer agents such as the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists is indicated. The role of angiography appears to be changing. In the past, at least in the United States, angiography was performed on nearly all patients with non-Q-wave infarction. Now, risk stratification into high- and low-risk subgroups can be performed based on clinical criteria. In low-risk individuals, we recommend that noninvasive testing be performed before a decision is made about an invasive evaluation. In high-risk patients, it is appropriate to perform angiography and, based on the angiographic findings, to provide appropriate therapy. Although the results of the Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) study suggest that if bypass surgery is required, it should not be performed acutely, we do not believe that this is necessarily correct. Therapy must be individualized based on the risk-benefit profile of acute revascularization. Furthermore, the use of percutaneous coronary intervention, particularly with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists and stents, is expanding to include multivessel disease, even in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction. Again, we believe therapy must be individualized to include an estimate of short- and long-term risk versus benefit. In the future, however, more data from appropriately designed clinical trials will be required to establish evidence-based therapy.

[Clinical prediction of the early prognosis in acute myocardial infarct]

Several clinical factors can influence the pathophysiology, clinical course and prognosis of acute myocardial by different means. Some of them may be easily detected through the history, physical examination or ECG in an early phase. The knowledge of these factors may help the therapeutic decision making of patients with myocardial infarction. The influence for the main clinical factors (age, sex, risk factors, cardiologic antecedents and evolutive findings) on the short-term prognosis of acute myocardial infarction is reviewed. An analysis of the likely mechanisms of the influence of these factors on infarct prognosis is also performed.

Comparison of short- and long-term prognosis in patients with anterior wall versus inferior or lateral wall non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction. Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israeli Nifedipine Trial (SPRINT) Study Group

We evaluated the early and long-term prognosis of patients with a first non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in relation to infarct site. Among 4,314 patients with a first AMI, 610 (14%) had a non-Q-wave AMI. Of them, 248 patients with anterior wall AMI were compared with 327 patients with inferior/lateral AMI. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups except for higher mean age in the anterior wall group. In-hospital complications were more common among patients with anterior wall AMI than in the inferior/lateral group. Patients with anterior wall AMI also had higher rates of in-hospital (15%), 1-year (12%), and 5-year (36%) postdischarge mortality compared with the inferior/lateral infarction group (10%, 6%, and 22%, respectively). The 1-year cardiac event rate (recurrent AMI and cardiac death) was significantly higher among the anterior wall AMI group than the inferior/lateral AMI group (14.2% and 4.8% respectively, p = 0.001). After adjustment for age, gender, systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior angina, and treatment with various medications, an increased risk for 1-year (odds ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 2.78) and 5-year mortality (relative risk 1.29, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.85) was observed, but it did not reach statistical significance. Anterior wall AMI location emerged as a predictor for higher 1-year cardiac event rate (odds ratio 3.15, 95% CI 1.59 to 6.78). These findings suggest that AMI location is an important prognostic variable for risk stratification of patients with a first non-Q-wave AMI.

Q wave and Non-Q wave myocardial infarction after thrombolysis

OBJECTIVES

We studied the clinical outcome of Q wave and non-Q wave infarction after thrombolytic therapy.

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists over the clinical significance of Q waves after thrombolysis.

METHODS

We studied postthrombolytic angiographic results and short- and long-term clinical outcome in 150 patients with acute myocardial infarction classified as Q wave and non-Q wave on the 24-h and discharge electrocardiograms (ECGs). The results from the two groups were then compared.

RESULTS

Eighty percent of patients had a Q wave and 20% a non-Q wave infarction on the 24-h ECG. The latter patients had lower peak creatine kinase (CK) levels (p < 0.001), but the two groups did not differ significantly otherwise. In 18 patients with a Q wave infarction on the 24-h ECG, pathologic Q waves disappeared. However, in seven patients with a non-Q wave infarction on the 24-h ECG, pathologic Q waves appeared throughout the hospital period. Q wave regression was associated with lower peak CK levels (p < 0.001) and an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.01). Thus, only 72% of patients had a Q wave and 28% a non-Q wave infarction on the discharge ECG. Patients with a non-Q wave infarction on the discharge ECG had higher patency of the infarct-related artery (p < 0.04), lower mean peak CK levels (p < 0.0001), a higher ejection fraction (p = 0.001) and a lower incidence of heart failure (p = 0.06) than patients with a Q wave infarction on the discharge ECG. Although the 2-year incidence of reinfarction and revascularization was higher in patients with a non-Q wave infarction on the discharge ECG (p < 0.05), 2-year mortality was lower (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the early postthrombolytic distinction between Q wave and non-Q wave infarction conveys no significant information, during the hospital period, non-Q wave infarction is associated with a smaller infarct area, improved left ventricular function and lower mortality.

Significance of location (anterior versus inferior) and type (Q-wave versus non-Q-wave) of acute myocardial infarction in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for postinfarction ischemia

Predictors of increased risk for recurrent cardiac events and death after acute myocardial infarction include postinfarction myocardial ischemia, anterior location of the infarct, and non-Q-wave versus Q-wave infarction. Although coronary angioplasty is performed in patients with postinfarction ischemia to alleviate symptoms, the outcome according to location and type of infarction and the effect on prevention of subsequent myocardial infarction and death are not known. To determine if location and type of myocardial infarction provide prognostic information in patients with postinfarction ischemia, we analyzed morbidity and mortality during and after coronary angioplasty according to the location (anterior vs inferior) and type (Q-wave vs non-Q-wave) of myocardial infarction in 505 consecutive patients. The incidence of recurrent angina, repeat coronary angioplasty, coronary bypass surgery, reinfarction, and death during long-term follow-up after hospital discharge (mean 34 +/- 19 months) for the 440 patients with an initial successful angioplasty was also compared. During the procedure, there was no difference in the primary success rate or mortality among the different groups; however, more patients with anterior non-Q-wave myocardial infarction underwent emergent bypass grafting after unsuccessful coronary angioplasty (p = 0.001). Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analyses controlling for age, gender, number of diseased vessels, location, type of infarction, and year of coronary angioplasty revealed that more patients with anterior infarction had > or = 1 cardiac event (repeat angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, reinfarction, or death) than did those with inferior infarction (RR 1.80, 95% confidence interval [Ci] 1.22 to 2.65, p = 0.003).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of coronary angiographic findings during the first six hours of non-Q-wave and Q-wave myocardial infarction

The angiographic features of non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction (AMI) soon after symptom onset have not been previously reported. Accordingly, this study reviewed the coronary angiographic findings of 86 patients with AMI studied within 6 hours of symptom onset: 58 had Q-wave and 28 had non-Q-wave AMI. Patients with Q-wave and non-Q-wave AMI were comparable in terms of clinical characteristics, frequency of 1-vessel disease, and infarct-related artery location. Thrombus was observed in 49 patients (84%) with Q-wave AMI versus 12 (43%) with non-Q-wave AMI (p = 0.0002). Whereas complete occlusion of the infarct-related artery was present in 53 patients (91%) with Q-wave AMI, total coronary occlusion was present in only 11 (39%) with non-Q-wave AMI (p = 0.0001). Collaterals to occluded infarct arteries were seen in 10 patients (19%) with Q-wave AMI versus 5 (45%) with non-Q-wave AMI (p = 0.06). Residual perfusion of the infarct artery by either anterograde or collateral flow was typical of patients with non-Q-wave AMI (22 of 28, 79%) but was uncommon in those with Q-wave AMI (15 of 58, 26%) (p = 0.0001). Thus, coronary angiography performed within 6 hours of symptom onset demonstrates important differences between Q-wave and non-Q-wave AMI. Non-Q-wave AMI is characterized by partial perfusion of the infarct-related artery by either anterograde or collateral flow, and a lower incidence of thrombus than Q-wave AMI.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Emergency department two-dimensional echocardiography in the diagnosis of nontraumatic cardiac rupture

Myocardial rupture is a catastrophic complication of acute myocardial infarction that usually results in sudden death. If diagnosed quickly, patients with myocardial rupture may be salvaged. This report describes the application of emergency department two-dimensional echocardiography in the diagnosis of six cases of myocardial rupture over two years. Each demonstrated a characteristic hemopericardium on limited single-window examination. These included four patients who met institutional guidelines for thrombolytic therapy. Three patients survived surgical repair, with two long-term survivors.

Long-term prognosis of medically treated patients with acute myocardial infarction and one-vessel coronary artery disease

Long-term prognosis was studied in 156 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with 1-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). During a mean follow-up period of 110 months, 19 patients (14%) had reinfarction, 15 (9.6%) died (including 7 deaths of cardiac origin) and 15 (9.6%) were hospitalized for worsening of angina. A coronary arteriogram was obtained twice in 54 patients. The coronary arteriogram revealed multivessel CAD in all cases with reinfarction (n = 14). Ten percent of the patients with multivessel disease experienced a reinfarction during the initial 3 years after the onset of the first AMI. The recurrence rate of AMI in patients with 1-vessel disease increased gradually from the third year after the onset of their first AMI, reaching 10% in 6.7 years. The recurrence of AMI at the same region as the original infarction was detected in only 1 patient. Six of 19 patients (32%) with recurrence of AMI died and 13 survived after the reinfarction. It was difficult to predict future progression from the outcome of the comparison between the first and second coronary arteriograms. Thus, in patients with uncomplicated AMI with 1-vessel CAD, the prognosis is relatively good and the frequency of reinfarction is very low with conservative treatment.

Difference in plasminogen activator inhibitor activity between non-Q-wave infarction and Q-wave infarction

We examined the plasma levels of tissue plasminogen activator antigen and plasminogen activator inhibitor activity in 14 patients with non-Q-wave infarction and in 27 patients with Q-wave infarction before the start of thrombolytic therapy and in 34 control subjects. The mean level of plasma tissue plasminogen activator antigen (ng/ml) was higher (P < 0.01) both in the patients with non-Q-wave infarction and in those with Q-wave infarction than in the control subjects (10.3 +/- 1.9, 9.5 +/- 0.8 vs. 5.8 +/- 0.3), and there was no difference in the level between the patients with non-Q-wave infarction and those with Q-wave infarction. The mean level of plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor activity (IU/ml) was lower (P < 0.01) in the patients with non-Q-wave infarction than in those with Q-wave infarction (7.3 +/- 2.0 vs. 17.1 +/- 2.2), and there was no difference in the level between the patients with non-Q-wave infarction and the control subjects (7.3 +/- 2.0 vs. 4.1 +/- 2.6). The patency rate of infarct-related coronary artery before thrombolytic therapy was higher (P < 0.01) in the patients with non-Q-wave infarction than in those with Q-wave infarction (54% vs. 15%). We conclude that plasminogen activator inhibitor activity was lower in non-Q-wave infarction than in Q-wave infarction and this may be related to the higher patency rate of infarct-related coronary artery in non-Q-wave infarction.

Risk stratification by early exercise testing after an episode of unstable coronary artery disease. The RISC Study Group

After stabilization of symptoms by medication a predischarge exercise test was performed in 855 men admitted with suspected unstable angina (54%) or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (46%). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the number of leads with ST-depression at exercise, low maximal work load, increasing age and ST-elevation in electrocardiogram at rest had independent prognostic value concerning the risk of myocardial infarction or death during the following year. Therefore a combination of extension of ST-depression and peak work load was used to define 'high and low risk response' at the exercise test. After 1 year the mortality in patients with 'high risk' compared to 'low risk' exercise response was 3.6% and 0% (P < 0.001) and the risk of either myocardial infarction or death was 15.4% and 3.9% (P < 0.0001), respectively. ST-depression, occurrence of angina and low peak load at exercise were independent predictors of future severe angina. After 1 year 29.5% of patients with any of these indicators at exercise had incapacitating symptoms that necessitated referral for coronary angiography compared to 4.8% in the group without these findings (P < 0.0001). The predictive value of the exercise test remained high in subgroups based on inclusion diagnosis, age or findings in electrocardiogram at rest and independently of treatment with beta-blockade, other antianginal medication or aspirin at the time of the exercise test.

Prodromal chest pains: clues to the pathogenesis of non-Q wave acute myocardial infarction?

Prodromal chest pains were recorded from consecutive admissions to a single coronary care unit and the symptoms of those with Q wave and non-Q wave acute myocardial infarction were compared. Of 809 admissions there were 201 with Q wave ad 88 with non-Q wave infarction. The non-Q wave infarction group was older, included more women and a greater proportion had suffered a previous myocardial infarct. Effort angina was equally common in both groups, but in the Q wave infarction group, angina was more often of recent onset, within the previous 4 weeks. Symptoms to indicate worsening angina, more prolonged, intense or frequent pain, were equally common in both groups. These findings suggest that although the extent of coronary artery disease may differ, Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction share a common pathogenic mechanism.

Effects of diltiazem on recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with non-Q wave myocardial infarction

Diltiazem has been reported to reduce the short-term in-hospital reinfarction rate in patients with a non-Q wave myocardial infarction. In the long-term Multicenter Diltiazem Postinfarction Trial, there were 514 patients with non-Q wave myocardial infarction; 279 patients were randomized to the placebo group and 235 to the treatment group. The average follow-up period was 25 months. There was no difference in baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups. Early reinfarction (less than or equal to 6 months) occurred in 17 patients in the placebo group and in 2 patients in the diltiazem group (p less than 0.001). Late reinfarction (greater than 6 months) occurred in 13 patients in the placebo group and in 14 patients in the diltiazem group (p = NS). Initial and reinfarction electrocardiograms (ECGs) were analyzed by using a coding system that permitted identification of standard anatomic areas involved in the infarction process. Thirty-one of the 46 patients had a localized infarction on index and reinfarction ECGs. In the early reinfarction group, 10 (77%) of 13 infarctions occurred in the same ECG region in which the initial infarction had occurred; all 10 were in patients in the placebo group. Among the 18 patients with late reinfarction, the site of the second infarction was the same as that of the first in 9 patients and differed in 9. There was no difference between the placebo and diltiazem groups with respect to location of the infarction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Increased risk of death and cardiac arrest from encainide and flecainide in patients after non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. CAST Investigators

This report examines whether in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial death and cardiac arrest from encainide, flecainide and moricizine during the titration phase and from encainide and flecainide during the follow-up phase were related to presence (Q-wave acute myocardial infarction [Q-AMI]) or absence (non-Q-AMI) of pathologic Q waves. In all, 2,371 patients (70% with Q-AMI, 26% with non-Q-AMI, and 4% unknown) entered the titration phase, starting 117 +/- 163 days after index AMI and lasting for an average of 21 days. For the titration phase, no significant differences existed between Q-AMI and non-Q-AMI patients for death and cardiac arrest rate, ventricular premature complex suppression rate, and nonrandomization rate. A total of 1,498 patients entered the follow-up phase of an average of 10 months (starting 129 +/- 158 days after the index AMI), and were randomized to encainide or flecainide, or their matching placebos. In the placebo group, non-Q-AMI patients had a significantly lower rate of death and cardiac arrest than Q-AMI patients (1.0 and 4.6%, respectively; p = 0.04). Encainide and flecainide significantly elevated death and cardiac arrest rate in both non-Q-AMI patients (8.7%, p less than 0.01) and Q-AMI patients (7.8%, p = 0.04). The relative risk for encainide or flecainide over placebo in the non-Q-AMI patients was 8.7, which was significantly higher than 1.7 observed for the Q-AMI patients (p = 0.03). None of the baseline characteristics had any significant interaction with encainide or flecainide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Identification of first acute Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction by multivariate analysis of body surface potential maps

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute non-Q wave myocardial infarction (NQMI) appear to have more jeopardized residual myocardium at high risk for subsequent angina, reinfarction, or malignant arrhythmias than patients with acute Q wave myocardial infarction (QMI). Unfortunately, conventional electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria have limited utility in recognizing NQMI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The present study combines the increased information content of body surface potential maps (BSPM) over the 12-lead ECG with the power of multivariate statistical procedures to identify a practical subset of leads that would allow improved diagnosis of NQMI. Discriminant analysis was performed on 120-lead data recorded simultaneously in 159 normal subjects and 308 patients with various types of myocardial infarction (MI) by using instantaneous voltages on time-normalized P, PR, QRS, and ST-T waveforms as well as the duration of these waveforms as features. Leads and features for optimal separation of 159 normals from 183 patients with recent or old QMI (group A) were selected. A total of six features from six torso sites accounted for a specificity of 96% and a sensitivity of 94%. All lead positions were outside the conventional electrode sites and selected features were voltages at mid-P, early and mid-QRS, and before and after the peak of the T wave. The discriminant function was then tested on 57 patients with acute NQMI (group B) and 68 patients with acute QMI (group C): Rates of correct classification were 91% and 93%, respectively. Because of the possible deterioration of the results caused by ST-T abnormalities also present in other clinical entities, a second classification model including an independent group of 116 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) but without MI was developed. Two additional measurements were required, namely, P wave duration and a mid-QRS voltage on a lead located 10 cm below V1. Testing the model on both acute MI groups produced correct classification rates of 88% for acute NQMI and 93% for acute QMI. Group mean BSPM were plotted for the three MI groups at successive instants throughout the PQRST waveform. Typical patterns for each MI group were identified during PQRST by removing the corresponding normal variability at each electrode site from sequential MI maps. These standardized maps or discriminant maps provided information on the capability of each measurement at each electrode site and at each instant to separate each class of MI from the normal group (N). Striking similarities were observed between the three MI groups, particularly at mid-QRS and throughout ST-T. The closest resemblance was between acute NQMI and old QMI. Discriminant analysis was also performed on the 12-lead ECG: The first classification model (N versus MI) produced correct classification rates of 85% for acute QMI and 70% for NQMI. With the second model (MI versus N or LVH), correct rates were 81% and 65%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of acute NQMI and QMI (also in the presence of LVH) can be improved substantially by appropriate selection of ECG leads and features. Comparison of discriminant maps from groups A, B, and C does not support the concept of acute NQMI as a distinct ECG entity but rather as a group with infarcts of smaller size. However, pathophysiological and clinical differences between acute NQMI and acute QMI influence long-term risks and may define different therapeutic approaches.

Non-Q- and Q-wave infarction after thrombolytic therapy with intravenous streptokinase for chest pain and anterior ST-segment elevation

The clinical features of patients treated with streptokinase for chest pain and anterior ST-segment elevation who subsequently develop non-Q-wave infarction are unknown. Of the 75 consecutive patients who initially presented with chest pain and ST-segment elevation in the anterior leads (V1-V6, I, aVL) and were treated with intravenous streptokinase (time from symptoms to treatment averaged less than 3 hours), 32 (43%) developed a non-Q-wave and 43 (57%) a Q-wave myocardial infarction. Twenty seven of 32 patients (84%) from the non-Q-wave group and 39 of 43 (91%) from the Q-wave group were studied by angiography at 5.16 +/- 2.88 days after the onset of myocardial infarction. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was 13 +/- 6 vs 20 +/- 7 mm Hg (p less than 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction was 60 +/- 8 vs 49 +/- 14% (p less than 0.001) and the infarct vessel patency rate was 85 vs 72% (p = 0.44) in patients with a non-Q versus a Q-wave infarction, respectively. In summary, when patients presenting with chest pain and ST-segment elevation are treated with streptokinase, a significant portion of these symptoms will evolve into a non-Q-wave infarction. Patients with a non-Q-wave infarction will have a better preserved left ventricular function than patients who develop a Q-wave infarction. This suggests the need for equal distribution of such patients in randomized trials of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction to avoid misinterpreting data between groups.

Secular trends in Q wave and non-Q wave acute myocardial infarction. The Minnesota Heart Survey

The Minnesota Heart Survey examined trends of Q wave and non-Q wave acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using a 50% random sample of all hospital discharges of patients with AMI or another acute coronary disease from 35 of 36 hospitals in 1970 and 30 of 31 hospitals in 1980 in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area. A total of 1,901 and 1,864 potential AMI cases were abstracted in 1970 and 1980, respectively. Electrocardiograms were coded according to the Minnesota code. AMIs were validated by computerized algorithm based on chest pain, enzymes, electrocardiograms, and autopsy. This study shows that with the use of a consistent, standard diagnostic algorithm, attack rates for Q wave AMI did not change significantly between 1970 and 1980 and that attack rates for non-Q wave AMI decreased significantly during the same decade. However, when the more sensitive cardiac enzymes creatine phosphokinase and creatine phosphokinase-MB were considered, attack rates of both Q wave and non-Q wave AMIs increased. This research documents four important trends for community AMI rates that are at variance with those reported by others. There was a decline in non-Q wave AMI attack rates from 1970 to 1980; women had outcomes equal to or worse than those for men for both case-fatality and 7-year survival rates; patients with non-Q wave AMIs had worse in-hospital prognoses than those with Q wave AMIs; and 7-year survival rates were worse for Q wave AMI in 1980. These findings demonstrate the need for standard diagnostic criteria for Q wave and non-Q wave AMI if trends are to be monitored. In the future, as new trials of operative and nonoperative therapies of AMI are undertaken, these considerations will increase in importance.

Non Q wave infarction: exercise test characteristics, coronary anatomy, and prognosis

The exercise test characteristics, coronary anatomy, and prognosis of patients discharged after non Q wave myocardial infarction were compared with those in whom Q wave infarction occurred. Of the 339 patients studied, all of whom were less than or equal to 70 years, 87 (26%) had had a non Q wave infarction. There were no significant differences in the exercise test characteristics between the two groups, and in those 149 patients in whom angiography was performed triple vessel disease was present in 36/114 (32%) of the Q wave group and 9/35 (26%) of the non Q wave group. The infarct related artery was more often patent in the non Q wave group (27/35 (77%] than in the Q wave group (53/114 (46%]. The one year mortality and the reinfarction and angina rates were similar in the two groups and the exercise test remained a good discriminator for predicting patients at risk of future cardiac events in both groups. In view of the similar outcome and severity of coronary disease in those aged less than or equal to 70 with non Q wave infarcts, the distinction between Q and non Q wave infarction need not influence management decisions in patients after myocardial infarction.

Risk stratification in patients with first non-Q wave infarction: limited value of the early low level exercise test after uncomplicated infarcts. The Multicenter Post-Infarction Research Group

Risk stratification using clinical and historical variables plus early low level exercise testing was performed in 141 patients with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction. The 111 patients who performed the exercise test had a 3.6% cardiac mortality rate in the first year compared with 13.3% in the 30 patients who could not exercise (p = 0.063), and a 1 year incidence rate of recurrent cardiac events (cardiac death or recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction) of 10.8% compared with 23.3% (p = 0.127). Patients who developed ischemia (ST depression or angina) during the test had an increased incidence of cardiac events in the year after the infarction (odds ratio greater than 3, p less than 0.05). When patients were subgrouped by the presence or absence of pulmonary congestion, the discriminatory value of the exercise test was seen to reside primarily in the cohort with pulmonary congestion. For example, ST depression during exercise in this group identified patients with a 71% incidence of cardiac events in the year after the infarction compared with 5.3% for those without ST depression (odds ratio 45, p = 0.002). In the patients without pulmonary congestion, the exercise test had no discriminatory value. It is concluded that early low level exercise testing has a limited role after an uncomplicated non-Q wave infarction, but is useful in patients with clinical markers of higher risk.

Initial ECG in Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction

The initial ECGs in 440 patients admitted for suspected acute myocardial infarction were retrospectively analyzed to determine predictive values of these ECGs for acute myocardial infarction and to determine differences in the initial ECG for Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction. One hundred (23%) of the study patients were diagnosed as having an acute myocardial infarction. Acute injury was seen in 47% of these patients (positive predictive value [PPV], 84%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 72% to 92%), ischemia in 15% (PPV, 39%; 95% CI, 24% to 57%), and left ventricular hypertrophy with strain in 11% (PPV, 19%; 95% CI, 4% to 29%). Forty-three patients were diagnosed as having a Q wave infarction and 50 patients as having a non-Q wave infarction. Seventy-two percent of the patients with a Q wave infarction had acute injury as the initial ECG interpretation compared with 38% in the non-Q wave infarction group (P less than .001). In contrast, only 17% of patients with Q wave infarction had an initial ECG interpretation of ischemia or strain as compared with 36% of patients with non-Q wave infarction (P = .03). Because of the relatively high incidence of acute myocardial infarction in patients admitted with an initial ECG interpretation of ischemia or left ventricular hypertrophy with strain, prospective studies must be performed to determine if selective patients with acute ST segment depression or ischemic T wave inversion in the setting of suspected acute myocardial infarction may benefit from early thrombolytic therapy.

"Non-Q wave," alias "nontransmural," myocardial infarction: a specific entity

Although Q wave and non-Q wave MI are often referred to as "transmural" and "nontransmural," there is no anatomic evidence to justify this distinction. Nevertheless, a distinction is important, because the two entities have a different prognosis. At the present time, between 25% and 35% of MIs are non-Q wave. They are frequently observed in patients with previous coronary events. They occur in a relatively older population and involve a slightly higher proportion of women than do Q wave MIs. The degree of cardiac damage is less, reflected by a smaller rise in enzyme level and less impairment of left ventricular ejection fraction; early reperfusion may occur, after spontaneous thrombolysis or resolution of coronary spasm. The immediate mortality rate is half that of Q wave MI but identical in the long term. Reinfarction and angina are more frequent because of a peri-infarction zone of ischemia maintained by a high-grade coronary stenosis and inadequate collateral circulation. Early characterization of those MIs likely to progress is important. Diltiazem seems effective in this context if given between 24 and 72 hours of the onset of the event. Other therapeutic approaches need further assessment.

Angiographic coronary morphology in postinfarction angina

To investigate the pathophysiologic relevance of angiographically irregular coronary stenoses in postinfarction angina (PIA), we analyzed the clinical course and coronary angiograms of 73 patients studied within 30 days of infarction. Coronary lesions were classified as smooth or irregular. Thirty-six patients had PIA (Group 1) and 37 had an uncomplicated course (Group 2). Irregular lesion(s) in patent infarct-related arteries were found in 77% of Group 1 vs. 24% of Group 2 patients (P less than 0.005). Irregular lesion(s) in any coronary artery were found in 58% of Group 1 versus 19% of Group 2 patients (P less than 0.002). Other univariate predictors of PIA included older age, hypertension, angina before myocardial infarct, lower peak creatine kinase, three-vessel disease, and higher modified Gensini score. Multivariate analysis ranked lesion irregularity as the strongest predictor of PIA. Our data suggests that ruptured atherosclerotic plaques may be important in the pathogenesis of PIA. It is possible that lesion irregularity is associated with an active process and/or a residual thrombus, which may be responsible for postinfarction angina.

The ECG in acute myocardial infarction

The initial ECG is the most rapid and readily available tool in the emergency department for the evaluation of patients presenting with suspected myocardial infarction. However, studies have shown that the initial ECG is diagnostic of acute myocardial infarction in only a minority of patients. This paper discusses the importance of the initial ECG and other information in aiding the disposition of patients with suspected myocardial infarction. Classic electrocardiographic descriptions are discussed as well as the newer terminology of Q wave versus non-Q wave infarction and ST segment versus T wave infarction. A brief review is made of the electrophysiology of the ECG changes seen in myocardial infarction. Finally, clinical studies are presented that establish a definite role for the use of the initial ECG.

Non-Q wave versus Q wave myocardial infarction: regional myocardial metabolism and blood flow assessed by positron emission tomography

This study compared regional myocardial blood flow at rest and during supine exercise as well as regional myocardial glucose utilization in the fasting condition in 22 patients, 11 with antecedent non-Q wave and 11 with antecedent Q wave infarction. With use of N-13 (nitrogen-13) ammonia and F-18 (fluorine-18) deoxyglucose as tracers of blood flow and exogenous glucose utilization and positron emission tomography, hypoperfused areas were noted at rest and during exercise in all 11 patients (100%) with Q wave infarction. Among the 11 patients with non-Q wave infarction such areas were noted in only 5 (45%) at rest and in 8 (73%) during exercise. Furthermore, segmentally enhanced F-18 deoxyglucose uptake corresponding to the infarcted areas (identified electrocardiographically) was seen in 10 (91%) of the 11 patients with non-Q wave infarction but in only 4 (36%) of the 11 patients with Q wave infarction (p less than 0.01). In conclusion, segmental F-18 deoxyglucose uptake as a possible sign of myocardial viability was seen more frequently in non-Q wave than in Q wave infarction and, importantly, regionally enhanced F-18 deoxyglucose uptake occurred even in the absence of segmental rest or exercise blood flow abnormalities, or both, in 5 (45%) of 11 patients with non-Q wave infarction.

Prognostic significance of angina pectoris before first acute myocardial infarction

To delineate the clinical significance and prognostic importance of a history of chronic or new onset angina pectoris before acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 732 consecutive patients admitted for a first AMI were studied and divided into 3 groups. Two hundred patients (27%) had chronic angina before AMI (greater than 1 month); 247 patients (34%) had new onset angina before AMI (less than 1 month) and the 285 remaining patients (39%) never had angina before AMI. All clinical characteristics were similar in the group of patients with chronic angina and in the group of patients with new onset angina, including in-hospital mortality (10 vs 9%) and 3-year post-hospital mortality (16 vs 16%). Compared to the 285 patients without angina, the 447 patients with angina before AMI were older, more likely to be women, and had a higher frequency of anterior AMI and early post-infarction angina. Both groups had a similar in-hospital mortality (10 vs 8%, not significant), but patients with angina had a higher 3-year post-hospital mortality (16 vs 7%, p less than 0.001). In the group of patients with angina before AMI who were discharged from the hospital, the comparison of nonsurvivors and survivors showed that the patients who died were older, presented more frequently with a non-Q-wave myocardial infarct and more often had left ventricular failure and complete bundle branch block during hospital stay. Chronic and new onset angina before AMI have the same clinical characteristics and deleterious long-term prognostic significance.

Postinfarction angina

In conclusion, the PIA patient is at high risk, with higher early as well as late mortality. The pathophysiology of PIA is complex and may vary from patient to patient. The concepts of ischemia at a distance and ischemia in the infarct zone have led to a better understanding of early PIA. Coronary spasm may play an important role in most PIA patients as in the general population of patients with angina pectoris. Medical therapy is efficacious in many, although it may on rare occasion aggravate myocardial ischemia. Urgent coronary arteriography is generally safe and should be performed as soon as possible for medically refractory PIA. CABG appears to be safe in experienced hands, but its timing must be individualized. The IABP should be reserved for more unstable patients for fear of vascular complications. Randomized controlled trials such as the BARI Trial will further compare PTCA with CABG.