Catecholamine-stimulated GTPase activity in turkey erythrocyte membranes

Involvement of G-protein alpha subunit in soybean cyst nematode chemotaxis

The soybean cyst nematode (SCN; Heterodera glycines Ichinohe) is a significant agricultural pest that causes extensive damage to soybean production worldwide. Second-stage juveniles (J2s) of the SCN migrate through the soil and infest the roots of host plants in response to certain chemical substances secreted from the host roots. Therefore, controlling SCN chemotaxis could be an effective strategy for its management. In the present study, we identified the Hg-gpa-3d gene, which encodes the G protein alpha subunit, as a key regulator of SCN chemotaxis. Gene silencing of Hg-gpa-3d reduced the attraction of SCN J2s to host roots, as well as to nitrate ions, a chemoattractant recognized through a mechanism different from that of host recognition. However, silencing of Hg-gpa-3d did not affect avoidance behavior towards unpleasant temperatures or stylet protrusion. These results suggest that Hg-gpa-3d is a crucial gene in the regulation of SCN chemotaxis and provide new insights into the chemotactic mechanisms of the SCN.

Time-resolved cryo-EM of G-protein activation by a GPCR

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) activate heterotrimeric G proteins by stimulating guanine nucleotide exchange in the Gα subunit1. To visualize this mechanism, we developed a time-resolved cryo-EM approach that examines the progression of ensembles of pre-steady-state intermediates of a GPCR-G-protein complex. By monitoring the transitions of the stimulatory Gs protein in complex with the β2-adrenergic receptor at short sequential time points after GTP addition, we identified the conformational trajectory underlying G-protein activation and functional dissociation from the receptor. Twenty structures generated from sequential overlapping particle subsets along this trajectory, compared to control structures, provide a high-resolution description of the order of main events driving G-protein activation in response to GTP binding. Structural changes propagate from the nucleotide-binding pocket and extend through the GTPase domain, enacting alterations to Gα switch regions and the α5 helix that weaken the G-protein-receptor interface. Molecular dynamics simulations with late structures in the cryo-EM trajectory support that enhanced ordering of GTP on closure of the α-helical domain against the nucleotide-bound Ras-homology domain correlates with α5 helix destabilization and eventual dissociation of the G protein from the GPCR. These findings also highlight the potential of time-resolved cryo-EM as a tool for mechanistic dissection of GPCR signalling events.

G protein-coupled receptor signaling: transducers and effectors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are of considerable interest due to their importance in a wide range of physiological functions and in a large number of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs as therapeutic entities. With continued study of their function and mechanism of action, there is a greater understanding of how effector molecules interact with a receptor to initiate downstream effector signaling. This review aims to explore the signaling pathways, dynamic structures, and physiological relevance in the cardiovascular system of the three most important GPCR signaling effectors: heterotrimeric G proteins, GPCR kinases (GRKs), and β-arrestins. We will first summarize their prominent roles in GPCR pharmacology before transitioning into less well-explored areas. As new technologies are developed and applied to studying GPCR structure and their downstream effectors, there is increasing appreciation for the elegance of the regulatory mechanisms that mediate intracellular signaling and function.

cAMP guided his way: a life for G protein-mediated signal transduction and molecular pharmacology-tribute to Karl H. Jakobs

Karl H. Jakobs, former editor-in-chief of Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology and renowned molecular pharmacologist, passed away in April 2018. In this article, his scientific achievements regarding G protein-mediated signal transduction and regulation of canonical pathways are summarized. Particularly, the discovery of inhibitory G proteins for adenylyl cyclase, methods for the analysis of receptor-G protein interactions, GTP supply by nucleoside diphosphate kinases, mechanisms in phospholipase C and phospholipase D activity regulation, as well as the development of the concept of sphingosine-1-phosphate as extra- and intracellular messenger will presented. His seminal scientific and methodological contributions are put in a general and timely perspective to display and honor his outstanding input to the current knowledge in molecular pharmacology.

The experiences of a biochemist in the evolving world of G protein-dependent signaling

This review describes how a biochemist and basic researcher (i.e. myself) came to make a career in the area of receptor-coupled signal transduction and the roles cellular signaling activities play both in normal physiology and in disease. Much of what has been the best part of this research life is due to the time I spent with Bob Lefkowitz (1982-1985), during an extraordinary period in the emerging field of G-protein-coupled receptors. Among my laboratory colleagues were some truly outstanding scientists including Marc Caron, the late Jeffrey Stadel, Berta Strulovici, Jeff Benovic, Brian Kobilka, and Henrik Dohlman, as well as many more. I came to Bob's laboratory after being trained as a physical biochemist and enzymologist. Bob and his laboratory exposed me to a research style that made it possible to connect the kinds of fundamental biochemical and mechanistic questions that I loved to think about with a direct relevance to disease. Indeed, I owe Bob a great deal for having imparted a research style and philosophy that has remained with me throughout my career. Below, I describe how this has taken me on an interesting journey through various areas of cellular signaling, which have a direct relevance to the actions of one or another type of G-protein.

Invited review: Activation of G proteins by GTP and the mechanism of Gα-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis

This review addresses the regulatory consequences of the binding of GTP to the alpha subunits (Gα) of heterotrimeric G proteins, the reaction mechanism of GTP hydrolysis catalyzed by Gα and the means by which GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) stimulate the GTPase activity of Gα. The high energy of GTP binding is used to restrain and stabilize the conformation of the Gα switch segments, particularly switch II, to afford stable complementary to the surfaces of Gα effectors, while excluding interaction with Gβγ, the regulatory binding partner of GDP-bound Gα. Upon GTP hydrolysis, the energy of these conformational restraints is dissipated and the two switch segments, particularly switch II, become flexible and are able to adopt a conformation suitable for tight binding to Gβγ. Catalytic site pre-organization presents a significant activation energy barrier to Gα GTPase activity. The glutamine residue near the N-terminus of switch II (Glncat ) must adopt a conformation in which it orients and stabilizes the γ phosphate and the water nucleophile for an in-line attack. The transition state is probably loose with dissociative character; phosphoryl transfer may be concerted. The catalytic arginine in switch I (Argcat ), together with amide hydrogen bonds from the phosphate binding loop, stabilize charge at the β-γ bridge oxygen of the leaving group. GAPs that harbor "regulator of protein signaling" (RGS) domains, or structurally unrelated domains within G protein effectors that function as GAPs, accelerate catalysis by stabilizing the pre-transition state for Gα-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis, primarily by restraining Argcat and Glncat to their catalytic conformations. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 105: 449-462, 2016.

Neurotransmitter receptor localization: from autoradiography to imaging mass spectrometry

Autoradiography is used to determine the anatomical distribution of biological molecules in human tissue and experimental animal models. This method is based on the analysis of the specific binding of radiolabeled compounds to locate neurotransmitter receptors or transporters in fresh frozen tissue slices. The anatomical resolution obtained by quantification of the radioligands has allowed the density of receptor proteins to be mapped over the last 40 years. The data yielded by autoradiography identify the receptors at their specific microscopic localization in the tissues and also in their native microenvironment, the intact cell membrane. Furthermore, in functional autoradiography, the effects of small molecules on the activity of G protein-coupled receptors are evaluated. More recently, autoradiography has been combined with membrane microarrays to improve the high-throughput screening of compounds. These technical advances have made autoradiography an essential analytical method for the progress of drug discovery. We include the future prospects and some preliminary results for imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) as a useful new method in pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, complementing autoradiographic studies. IMS results could also be presented as density maps of molecules, proteins, and metabolites in tissue sections that can be identified, localized, and quantified, with the advantage of avoiding any labeling of marker molecules. The limitations and future developments of these techniques are discussed here.

G Protein-coupled receptors: Multi-turnover GDP/GTP exchange catalysis on heterotrimeric G proteins

G protein-coupled receptors and heterotrimeric G proteins can diffuse laterally in the plasma membrane such that one receptor can catalyze the activation (GDP/GTP exchange) of multiple G proteins. In some cases, these processes are fast enough to support molecular signal amplification, where a single receptor maintains the activation of multiple G proteins at steady-state. Amplification in cells is probably highly regulated. It depends upon the identities of the G receptor and G protein - some do and some don't - and upon the activities of GTPase-activating proteins, membrane scaffolds, and other regulatory partners.

Modification of heterotrimeric G-proteins in Swiss 3T3 cells stimulated with Pasteurella multocida toxin

Many bacterial toxins covalently modify components of eukaryotic signalling pathways in a highly specific manner, and can be used as powerful tools to decipher the function of their molecular target(s). The Pasteurella multocida toxin (PMT) mediates its cellular effects through the activation of members of three of the four heterotrimeric G-protein families, G(q), G(12) and G(i). PMT has been shown by others to lead to the deamidation of recombinant Gα(i) at Gln-205 to inhibit its intrinsic GTPase activity. We have investigated modification of native Gα subunits mediated by PMT in Swiss 3T3 cells using 2-D gel electrophoresis and antibody detection. An acidic change in the isoelectric point was observed for the Gα subunit of the G(q) and G(i) families following PMT treatment of Swiss 3T3 cells, which is consistent with the deamidation of these Gα subunits. Surprisingly, PMT also induced a similar modification of Gα(11), a member of the G(q) family of G-proteins that is not activated by PMT. Furthermore, an alkaline change in the isoelectric point of Gα(13) was observed following PMT treatment of cells, suggesting differential modification of this Gα subunit by PMT. G(s) was not affected by PMT treatment. Prolonged treatment with PMT led to a reduction in membrane-associated Gα(i), but not Gα(q). We also show that PMT inhibits the GTPase activity of G(q).

Compartmentalization of beta-adrenergic signals in cardiomyocytes

Activation of adrenergic receptors (AR) represents the primary mechanism to increase cardiac performance under stress. Activated βAR couple to Gs protein, leading to adenylyl cyclase-dependent increases in secondary-messenger cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) to activate protein kinase A. The increased protein kinase A activities promote phosphorylation of diversified substrates, ranging from the receptor and its associated partners to proteins involved in increases in contractility and heart rate. Recent progress with live-cell imaging has drastically advanced our understanding of the βAR-induced cAMP and protein kinase A activities that are precisely regulated in a spatiotemporal fashion in highly differentiated myocytes. Several features stand out: membrane location of βAR and its associated complexes dictates the cellular compartmentalization of signaling; βAR agonist dose-dependent equilibrium between cAMP production and cAMP degradation shapes persistent increases in cAMP signals for sustained cardiac contraction response; and arrestin acts as an agonist dose-dependent master switch to promote cAMP diffusion and propagation into intracellular compartments by sequestrating phosphodiesterase isoforms associated with the βAR signaling cascades. These features and the underlying molecular mechanisms of dynamic regulation of βAR complexes with adenylyl cyclase and phosphodiesterase enzymes and the implication in heart failure are discussed.

Comparative genomics uncovers novel structural and functional features of the heterotrimeric GTPase signaling system

Though the heterotrimeric G-proteins signaling system is one of the best studied in eukaryotes, its provenance and its prevalence outside of model eukaryotes remains poorly understood. We utilized the wealth of sequence data from recently sequenced eukaryotic genomes to uncover robust G-protein signaling systems in several poorly studied eukaryotic lineages such as the parabasalids, heteroloboseans and stramenopiles. This indicated that the Gα subunit is likely to have separated from the ARF-like GTPases prior to the last eukaryotic common ancestor. We systematically identified the structure and sequence features associated with this divergence and found that most of the neomorphic positions in Gα form a ring of residues centered on the nucleotide binding site, several of which are likely to be critical for interactions with the RGS domain for its GAP function. We also present evidence that in some of the potentially early branching eukaryotic lineages, like Trichomonas, Gα is likely to function independently of the Gβγ subunits. We were able to identify previously unknown Gγ subunits in Naegleria, suggesting that the trimeric version was already present by the time of the divergence of the heteroloboseans from the remaining eukaryotes. Evolution of Gα subunits is dominated by several independent lineage-specific expansions (LSEs). In most of these cases there are concomitant, independent LSEs of RGS proteins along with an extraordinary diversification of their domain architectures. The diversity of RGS domains from Naegleria in particular, which has the largest complement of Gα and RGS proteins for any eukaryote, provides new insights into RGS function and evolution. We uncovered a new class of soluble ligand receptors of bacterial origin with RGS domains and an extraordinary diversity of membrane-linked, redox-associated, adhesion-dependent and small molecule-induced G-protein signaling networks that evolved in early-branching eukaryotes, independently of parallel systems in animals. Furthermore, this newly characterized diversity of RGS domains helps in defining their ancestral conserved interfaces with Gα and also those interfaces that are prone to extensive lineage-specific diversification and are thereby responsible for selectivity in Gα-RGS interactions. Several mushrooms show LSEs of Gαs but not of RGS proteins pointing to the probable differentiation of Gαs in conjunction with mating-type diversity. When combined with the characterization of the 7TM receptors (GPCRs), it becomes apparent that, through much of eukaryotic evolution, cells contained both 7TM receptors that acted as GEFs and those as GAPs (with C-terminal RGS domains) for Gαs. Only in some lineages like animals and stramenopiles the 7TM receptors were restricted to GEF only roles, probably due to selection imposed by the rate-constants of the Gαs that underwent lineage-specific expansion in them. In the alveolate lineage the 7TM receptors occur independently of heterotrimeric G-proteins, suggesting the prevalence of G-protein-independent signaling in these organisms.

Discovery of G protein signaling

The mechanism of transmembrane signaling by the receptor-activated adenylyl cyclase was an enigma. It was suggested that hydrolysis of GTP is a turn-off mechanism that resets the active adenylyl cyclase to the inactive state. To test this hypothesis, we developed a specific GTPase assay and found that the catecholamine adrenergic agonists stimulated the hydrolysis of GTP. To resolve the question of how the hormone concurrently stimulates GTP hydrolysis and activates the adenylyl cyclase, we suggested the regulatory GTPase cycle. Thus, because the hormone facilitates the binding of GTP, which is subsequently hydrolyzed, the regulatory cycle results in a hormone-stimulated GTPase activity. This model also predicts that two mechanisms could account for stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity-either by the familiar hormone stimulation of the activation reaction or by an inhibition of the turn-off reaction. Indeed, we showed that cholera toxin enhances adenylyl cyclase activity by inhibition of GTP hydrolysis. Finally, we also showed that the hormone-activated receptor stimulates adenylyl cyclase activity by facilitating the exchange of bound GDP for free GTP. Thus, we presented, for the first time, an explicit mechanism for receptor action.

Over-expression of GTP-binding proteins and GTPase activity in mouse astrocyte membranes in response to Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus infection

Intracerebral infection with Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) induces a demyelinating disease that resembles human multiple sclerosis. In order to delineate the early events in this virus-induced neuroinflammatory disease, we have analyzed global GTPases gene activation following TMEV infection of murine brain astrocytes. DNA hybridization microchip analysis demonstrated that 10 sequences described as GTPbinding proteins and GTPases in different protein databases were over-expressed, in response to this infectious agent in astroglial cells. We have first characterized both the GTP-binding and GTPase activities in uninfected astrocyte membranes from a biochemical point of view. The increase in such activities was further validated in TMEV-infected astrocytes, peaking 2-4 h after infection. Over-expression is also induced by the inflammation-related chemokines interleukin-6 and interferon-gamma but not by interleukin-1alpha or tumor necrosis factor-alpha. From the many GTPases that could be over-expressed we have studied two, because of its biological significance; Ras p21 and the subunit alphai2 of G proteins. Western blots revealed increases in both proteins after infection with TMEV, in accordance with the previous enzymologic results. An increase in the active form of Ras (the GTP bound form) in cell lysates was also confirmed by affinity binding to a glutathione-S-transferase-fusion protein, following TMEV infection. A final demonstration of physiological up-regulation is provided by UV cross-linking of membrane proteins with the hydrolysis-resistant GTP agonist GTP [gamma-(35)S]. This technique allow us to detect, after SDS-PAGE, the increase of two further majoritary GTPbinding proteins with MW of 62 and 49 KDa. A quantitative analysis of four selected genes coding for p21 ras, Galphai2 subunit of protein G, Munc-18 and protein interacting with C kinase 1, was performed by real-time RT-PCR to verify the microarray results. The study of GTPase activity and of the above genes by RT-PCR in brains of sick mice, demonstrated a significative increase in mRNA coding for p21ras and protein interacting with C kinase 1 in vivo. Here we demonstrate that one of the mechanisms triggered by TMEV infection of astrocytes is the up-regulation of proteins related to GTP metabolism, one important signal transduction system in mammalian cells.

G-Proteins and GPCRs: From the Beginning

From the point of view of a participant observer, I tell the discovery stories of trimeric G-proteins and GPCRs, beginning in the 1970s. As in most such stories, formidable obstacles, confusion, and mistakes make eventual triumphs even more exciting. Because these pivotally important signaling molecules were discovered before the recombinant DNA revolution, today's well-trained molecular biologist may find it amazing that we learned anything at all.

Heterotrimeric G-proteins: a short history

Some 865 genes in man encode G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins) function to transduce signals from this vast panoply of receptors to effector systems including ion channels and enzymes that alter the rate of production, release or degradation of intracellular second messengers. However, it was not until the 1970s that the existence of such transducing proteins was even seriously suggested. Combinations of bacterial toxins that mediate their effects via covalent modification of the alpha-subunit of certain G-proteins and mutant cell lines that fail to generate cyclic AMP in response to agonists because they either fail to express or express a malfunctional G-protein allowed their identification and purification. Subsequent to initial cloning efforts, cloning by homology has defined the human G-proteins to derive from 35 genes, 16 encoding alpha-subunits, five beta and 14 gamma. All function as guanine nucleotide exchange on-off switches and are mechanistically similar to other proteins that are enzymic GTPases. Although not readily accepted initially, it is now well established that beta/gamma complexes mediate as least as many functions as the alpha-subunits. The generation of chimeras between different alpha-subunits defined the role of different sections of the primary/secondary sequence and crystal structures and cocrystals with interacting proteins have given detailed understanding of their molecular structure and basis of function. Finally, further modifications of such chimeras have generated a range of G-protein alpha-subunits with greater promiscuity to interact across GPCR classes and initiated the use of such modified G-proteins in drug discovery programmes.

The discovery of signal transduction by G proteins: a personal account and an overview of the initial findings and contributions that led to our present understanding

The realization that there existed a G-protein coupled signal transduction mechanism developed gradually and was initially the result of an ill fated quest for uncovering the mechanism of action of insulin, followed by a refocused research in many laboratories, including mine, on how GTP acted to increase hormonal stimulation of adenylyl cyclase. Independent research into how light-activated rhodopsin triggers a response in photoreceptor cells of the retina and the attendant biochemical studies joined midway and, without the left hand knowing well what the right hand was doing, preceded classical G protein research in identifying the molecular players responsible for signal transduction by G proteins.

N-terminally truncated variant of the mouse GAIP/RGS19 lacks selectivity of full-length GAIP/RGS19 protein in regulating ORL1 receptor signaling

The regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) are a family of proteins with conserved RGS domains and play essential roles in regulating G protein-mediated signal transduction and physiological events. GAIP/RGS19 (G alpha interacting protein, also classified as RGS19), a member of the RGS family, has been shown to negatively regulate the signaling of many G protein-coupled receptors, including the opioid receptors. Two GAIP/RGS19 mRNA variants, resulted from an alternative splicing of exon 2 of the GAIP/RGS19 gene, were identified in multiple mouse tissues. One of the transcripts consists of a complete set of exons and encodes a full-length GAIP/RGS19 protein, and the other does not have exon 2 and therefore encodes an N-terminal 22 residue truncated short GAIP/RGS19 protein. When co-expressed with either the opioid-receptor-like (ORL1) receptor or one of the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors, by transfecting dual-expression plasmids into COS-7 cells, the full-length GAIP/RGS19 was more effective than the N-terminally truncated variant and was more selective in regulating the ORL1 receptor signaling than in regulating the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors, as measured by the effectiveness to increase the agonist-stimulated GTPase activity and to reverse the agonist-induced inhibition of cyclic AMP accumulation. In the same assays, the N-terminally truncated GAIP/RGS19 did not distinguish ORL1 from the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors. In contrast, co-expression of RGS4 with either ORL1 or opioid receptors showed the selectivity of RGS4 for regulating opioid receptors was mu > kappa > delta > ORL1, an order completely different from that of GAIP/RGS19. The results suggest that GAIP/RGS19 prefers regulating ORL1 receptor signaling over other opioid receptors, and that the N-terminal domain of GAIP/RGS19 plays a crucial role in its receptor preference.

Computational modeling reveals how interplay between components of a GTPase-cycle module regulates signal transduction

Heterotrimeric G protein signaling is regulated by signaling modules composed of heterotrimeric G proteins, active G protein-coupled receptors (Rs), which activate G proteins, and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which deactivate G proteins. We term these modules GTPase-cycle modules. The local concentrations of these proteins are spatially regulated between plasma membrane microdomains and between the plasma membrane and cytosol, but no data or models are available that quantitatively explain the effect of such regulation on signaling. We present a computational model of the GTPase-cycle module that predicts that the interplay of local G protein, R, and GAP concentrations gives rise to 16 distinct signaling regimes and numerous intermediate signaling phenomena. The regimes suggest alternative modes of the GTPase-cycle module that occur based on defined local concentrations of the component proteins. In one mode, signaling occurs while G protein and receptor are unclustered and GAP eliminates signaling; in another, G protein and receptor are clustered and GAP can rapidly modulate signaling but does not eliminate it. Experimental data from multiple GTPase-cycle modules is interpreted in light of these predictions. The latter mode explains previously paradoxical data in which GAP does not alter maximal current amplitude of G protein-activated ion channels, but hastens signaling. The predictions indicate how variations in local concentrations of the component proteins create GTPase-cycle modules with distinctive phenotypes. They provide a quantitative framework for investigating how regulation of local concentrations of components of the GTPase-cycle module affects signaling.

Pressure effects on the GTPase activity of brain membrane G proteins of deep-living marine fishes

In marine fishes, heterotrimeric guanyl nucleotide binding proteins (G proteins), which couple cell surface membrane receptors to their effector elements, are sensitive to hydrostatic pressure. The intrinsic high affinity GTPase activity of the alpha subunits of G proteins in three signaling systems coupled to adenylyl cyclase, the A(1) adenosine receptor, the muscarinic cholinergic receptor and the beta-adrenergic receptor, was tested at pressures up to 340 atm. Brain membrane preparations from four members of the deep-sea teleost fish family Macrouridae were studied. Coryphaenoides armatus, C. filifer, C. rupestris and Macrourus berglax have depth distributions which together span 100-5810 m. Increased pressure inhibited basal GTPase activity only in M. berglax, which of the four species has the shallowest center of abundance. Increased hydrostatic pressure did not alter the response of GTPase activity to the beta-adrenergic receptor agonist isoproterenol. Increased pressure decreased the stimulation of GTPase activity by the A(1) adenosine receptor agonist cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) in C. armatus and M. berglax, and by the muscarinic cholinergic receptor agonist carbamyl choline in C. armatus, C. filifer and M. berglax. Decreased agonist-stimulation of the GTPase activity at elevated pressure may result from pressure-induced changes in conformational states or inhibition of agonist binding. The binding of the non-hydrolyzable GTP analog guanosine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate (GTP[S]) in response to CPA was determined at 5 degrees C and atmospheric pressure. Six macrourid species and a morid were studied. The halftime (t(1/2)) values for GTP[S] binding, ranging from 20.8 to 40.9 min, are similar to values previously reported for two other cold-adapted fishes.

Trichoderma atroviride G-protein alpha-subunit gene tga1 is involved in mycoparasitic coiling and conidiation

The soil fungus Trichoderma atroviride, a mycoparasite, responds to a number of external stimuli. In the presence of a fungal host, T. atroviride produces hydrolytic enzymes and coils around the host hyphae. In response to light or nutrient depletion, asexual sporulation is induced. In a biomimetic assay, different lectins induce coiling around nylon fibers; coiling in the absence of lectins can be induced by applying cyclic AMP (cAMP) or the heterotrimeric G-protein activator mastoparan. We isolated a T. atroviride G-protein alpha-subunit (Galpha) gene (tgal) belonging to the fungal subfamily with the highest similarity to the Galpha1 class. Generated transgenic lines that overexpress Galpha show very delayed sporulation and coil at a higher frequency. Furthermore, transgenic lines that express an activated mutant protein with no GTPase activity do not sporulate and coil at a higher frequency. Lines that express an antisense version of the gene are hypersporulating and coil at a much lower frequency in the biomimetic assay. The loss of Tgal in these mutants correlates with the loss of GTPase activity stimulated by the peptide toxin Mas-7. The application of Mas-7 to growing mycelial colonies raises intracellular cAMP levels, suggesting that Tgal can activate adenylyl cyclase. In contrast, cAMP levels and cAMP-dependent protein kinase activity drop when diffusible host signals are encountered and the mycoparasitism-related genes ech42 and prb1 are highly expressed. Mycoparasitic signaling is unlikely to be a linear pathway from host signals to increased cAMP levels. Our results demonstrate that the product of the tga1 gene is involved in both coiling and conidiation.

Reduction in cholesterol and sialic acid content protects cells from the toxic effects of beta-amyloid peptides

beta-Amyloid (Abeta) is the primary protein component of senile plaques associated with Alzheimer's disease and has been implicated in the neurotoxicity associated with the disease. A variety of evidence points to the importance of Abeta-membrane interactions in the mechanism of Abeta neurotoxicity and indicates that cholesterol and gangliosides are particularly important for Abeta aggregation and binding to membranes. We investigated the effects of cholesterol and sialic acid depletion on Abeta-induced GTPase activity in cells, a step implicated in the mechanism of Abeta toxicity, and Abeta-induced cell toxicity. Cholesterol reduction and depletion of membrane-associated sialic acid residues both significantly reduced the Abeta-induced GTPase activity. In addition, cholesterol and membrane-associated sialic acid residue depletion or inhibition of cholesterol and ganglioside synthesis protected PC12 cells from Abeta-induced toxicity. These results indicate the importance of Abeta-membrane interactions in the mechanism of Abeta toxicity. In addition, these results suggest that control of cellular cholesterol and/or ganglioside content may prove useful in the prevention or treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Lack of effects by sigma ligands on neuropeptide Y-induced G-protein activation in rat hippocampus and cerebellum

It has been suggested that neuropeptide Y (NPY) and sigma (sigma) receptor ligands may share a putative NPY/sigma receptor in rat brain. To study whether NPY and sigma receptor ligands have an inverse agonism at this putative NPY/sigma receptor, we measured their effects on G-protein activity in rat brain. Using [35S]GTPgammaS autoradiography, we found that NPY-induced G-protein activation exhibited a discrete distribution pattern in rat brain. G-protein activation in superficial cortical layers and hippocampal CA1-3 region was mainly attributed to Y1 and Y2 receptors, respectively. In the presence of 10 microM sigma-receptor agonist BD737 or 10 microM sigma-receptor antagonist haloperidol, the distribution and density of [35S]GTPgammaS binding stimulated by 10 nM NPY was not significantly altered. In rat cerebellar membranes, NPY stimulated high-affinity GTPase activity in a dose-related manner, with maximal effects of 29% increase over basal level seen at 500 nM. This NPY-elicited GTPase activity was not significantly affected by micromolar concentrations of the sigma-receptor antagonists Dup734 or haloperidol. Since no significant effects by sigma-receptor ligands on NPY-induced G-protein activation were observed, we did not see an inverse agonism of NPY and sigma-receptor ligands at the putative NPY/sigma receptor measured at the level of G-protein activation, suggesting that sigma receptors and NPY receptors do not represent a common population in rat hippocampus and cerebellum. It is also suggested that G-protein activation is not a convergent point for the signal transduction mechanisms of NPY receptors and sigma receptors.

Biological activities of two porcine growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor isoforms

Binding of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) to two isoforms (G3R and G5R) of the porcine GHRH receptor was studied. Both G3R- and G5R-cDNA were isolated from a porcine anterior pituitary cDNA library and have an identical primary structure from aa 1 to 418 and a different aa sequence from aa 419 to 423. In addition, the G5R isoform contains an extra C-terminal tail of 28 aa. The G3R and G5R mRNAs arise from alternative splicing of a single precursor mRNA for GHRH receptors. A mammalian cell expression vector containing either G3R or G5R cDNA under the regulation of a strong human cytomegalovirus promoter was constructed and used to transfect a human embryonic kidney 293 cell line. Two stable transfectants (293/G3R-4 and 293/G5R-12) were isolated on the basis of high expression of the receptor mRNAs. Both G3R and G5R mRNAs were expressed at similarly high levels in 293/G3R-4 and 293/G5R-12 cells; however, GHRH binding to 293/G3R-4 cells was much greater than that observed for 293/G5R-12 cells. Basal as well as GHRH-stimulated GTPase activity and intracellular cAMP concentration are also significantly greater in 293/G3R-4 cells as compared to 293/G5R-12 cells. We conclude that the modification of GHRH receptor at the C-terminal region hindered GHRH binding to the receptor and thus attenuates its biological activities.

Different domains in the third intracellular loop of the GLP-1 receptor are responsible for Galpha(s) and Galpha(i)/Galpha(o) activation

It has previously been shown that the GLP-1 receptor is primarily coupled to the adenylate cyclase pathway via activation of Galpha(s) proteins. Recent studies have shown that the third intracellular loop of the receptor is important in the stimulation of cAMP production. We have studied the effect of three synthetic peptide sequences derived from the third intracellular loop of the GLP-1 receptor on signal transduction in Rin m5F cell membranes. The whole third intracellular loop strongly stimulates both pertussis toxin and cholera toxin-sensitive G proteins, while the N-terminal half exclusively stimulates cholera toxin-sensitive G proteins and the C-terminal half only stimulates pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins as demonstrated by measurements of GTPase activity. These data confirm that the principal stimulatory G-protein interaction site resides in the third intracellular loop, but also suggest that the GLP-1 receptor is not only coupled to the Galpha(s) but also to the Galpha(i)/Galpha(o) type of G proteins and that distinct domains within the third intracellular loop are responsible for the activation of the different G-protein subfamilies.

Substrate assisted catalysis -- application to G proteins

The idea that both the substrate and the enzyme contribute to catalysis (substrate assisted catalysis; SAC) is applicable to guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins). Naturally occurring SAC uses GTP as a general base in the GTPase reaction catalyzed by G proteins. Engineered SAC has identified a putative rate-limiting step for the GTPase reaction and shown that GTPase-deficient oncogenic Ras mutants are not irreversibly impaired. Thus, anti-cancer drugs could potentially be designed to restore the blocked GTPase reaction.

The role of G protein activation in the toxicity of amyloidogenic Abeta-(1-40), Abeta-(25-35), and bovine calcitonin

More than 16 different proteins have been identified as amyloid in clinical diseases; among these, beta-amyloid (Abeta) of Alzheimer's disease is the best characterized. In the present study, we performed experiments with Abeta and calcitonin, another amyloid-forming peptide, to examine the role of G protein activation in amyloid toxicity. We demonstrated that the peptides, when prepared under conditions that promoted beta-sheet and amyloid fibril (or protofibril) formation, increased high affinity GTPase activity, but the nonamyloidogenic peptides had no discernible effects on GTP hydrolysis. These increases in GTPase activity were correlated to toxicity. In addition, G protein inhibitors significantly reduced the toxic effects of the amyloidogenic Abeta and calcitonin peptides. Our results further indicated that the amyloidogenic peptides significantly increased GTPase activity of purified Galpha(o) and Galpha(i) subunits and that the effect was not receptor-mediated. Collectively, these results imply that the amyloidogenic structure, regardless of the actual peptide or protein sequence, may be sufficient to cause toxicity and that toxicity is mediated, at least partially, through G protein activation. Our abilities to manipulate G protein activity may lead to novel treatments for Alzheimer's disease and the other amyloidoses.

Evidence that the sigma(1) receptor is not directly coupled to G proteins

Sigma (sigma) receptors have been implicated in psychosis, cognition, neuroprotection, and locomotion in the central nervous system. The signal transduction mechanisms for sigma receptors have not been fully elucidated. In this study, we examined the possible coupling between sigma(1) receptors and heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) in rodent brain. In sigma(1) receptor-rich cerebellar membrane preparations, the competitive binding curves of two sigma(1) agonists, (+)pentazocine and 1S,2R-(-)-cis-N-[2-(3, 4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexylamine (BD737), were unaffected by the addition of 10 microM guanosine-5'-O-(gamma-thio)-triphosphate (GTPgammaS). Neither (+)pentazocine (1-100 microM) nor BD737 (0.01-10 microM) stimulated GTPase activities significantly above basal levels in agonist-stimulated GTPase activity assays in cerebellar membranes. Furthermore, when using the method of agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding as assessed by autoradiography, we did not observe significant stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding in rat brain sections by either (+)pentazocine or BD737. The above results demonstrate that the sigma(1) receptor is not likely be directly coupled to G proteins.

Deletion analogues of transportan

Several shorter analogues of the cell penetrating peptide, transportan, have been synthesized in order to define the regions of the sequence, which are responsible for the membrane translocation property of the peptide. Penetration of the peptides into Bowes melanoma cells and the influence on GTPase activity in Rin m5F cellular membranes have been tested. The experimental data on cell penetration have been compared with molecular modeling of insertion of peptides into biological membranes. Omission of six amino acids from the N-terminus did not significantly impair the cell penetration of the peptide while deletions at the C-terminus or in the middle of the transportan sequence decreased or abolished the cellular uptake. Most transportan analogues exert an inhibitory effect on GTPase activity. Molecular modeling shows that insertion of the transportan analogues into the membrane differs for different peptides. Probably the length of the peptide as well as the location of aromatic and positively charged residues have major impact on the orientation of peptides in the membranes and thereby influence the cellular penetration. In summary, we have designed and characterized several novel short transportan analogues with similar cellular translocation properties to the parent peptide, but with reduced undesired cellular activity.

The superfamily of heptahelical receptors

Despite a growing appreciation of functional analogies between visual and hormonal signalling systems in the early 1980s, the discovery of the close structural relationship between rhodopsin and the beta2-adrenergic receptor, and of the existence of a larger 'superfamily' of such receptors, came as a total surprise. Here I provide a personal perspective on events leading up to and flowing from this exciting discovery that opened up a vast field of research.

Autoradiography of receptor-activated G-proteins in post mortem human brain

The agonist-stimulated guanosine 5'-(gamma-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate binding assay was used to anatomically localize receptor-activated G-proteins by autoradiography in post mortem human brain. The optimal conditions for guanosine 5'-(gamma-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate binding to human brain sections were established in post mortem samples of the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, basal ganglia, brainstem and cerebellar cortex. An excess of GDP (2mM) was required to decrease basal activity and obtain effective stimulation by specific agonists. guanosine 5'-(gamma-[(35)S]Thio)triphosphate binding was increased after stimulation with specific agonists of different G-protein-coupled receptors. They include cannabinoid (WIN55212-2), mu-opioid ([D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4), Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin), serotonin-1A [(+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin] and serotonin-1B/1D (sumatriptan), cholinergic muscarinic receptors (carbachol) and alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (UK14304). Such stimulation reached 1458%, 440%, 188%, 219%, 61% and 339%, respectively, over the basal levels. In tissue sections, the use of the above-mentioned agonists (10(-4)M) showed patterns of anatomical distribution similar to those already described by receptor autoradiography, with high densities over the hippocampus (serotonin-1A receptors), cortex (alpha(2)-adrenoceptors) and striatum (mu-opioid receptors). The highest binding levels were reached with the cannabinoid receptor agonist in most of the analysed brain regions. Carbachol produced only moderate stimulation of those same regions. The blockage of agonist-stimulated guanosine 5'-(gamma-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate binding by selective antagonists verified that the effect was receptor mediated. This technique provides a method to identify modifications of the receptor-mediated activation of G-proteins in post mortem human brain with anatomical resolution. It also provides valuable information on the level of drug efficacy in the human species.

Inverse agonism at heptahelical receptors: concept, experimental approach and therapeutic potential

Inverse agonists (negative antagonists) are ligands that stabilize the inactive conformation (R) of receptors according to the two-state receptor model. The active conformation (R*) of heptahelical receptors, i.e. G protein-coupled receptors, has high affinity for G proteins. According to ternary complex models of receptor activation, the R*G complex is in equilibrium with R + G, with spontaneous activity in the absence of agonist. Inverse agonists, having a higher affinity for R, shift R*G towards R + G, decreasing the spontaneous activity of receptors. Agonists have the opposite effect, with a higher affinity for R*. Neutral antagonists have the same affinity for R and R* and compete for both agonists and inverse agonists. Inverse agonists have been recently proposed for a variety of heptahelical receptors. Methods to detect inverse agonists among antagonists are based on the determination of ligand affinity at R and R* with binding experiments, and on the modulation of G protein activity (GTP binding and hydrolysis) or of effector activity. Receptor inverse agonists, but also G protein antagonists and GTPase inhibitors, decrease spontaneous G protein activity corresponding to R*G. Receptor agonists, G protein agonists and GTPase inhibitors increase effector basal activity, but receptor inverse agonists decrease it. The therapeutic potential of inverse agonists is proposed in human diseases ascribed to constitutively active mutant receptors and may be extended to diseases related to wild-type receptor over-expression leading to the increase of R*. Some of the therapeutic effects of presently used receptor antagonists may be related to their inverse agonist properties. Inverse agonists lead to receptor upregulation, offering new approaches to tolerance and dependence to drugs.

Regulation of GTPase and adenylate cyclase activity by amyloid beta-peptide and its fragments in rat brain tissue

Modulation of GTPase and adenylate cyclase (ATP pyrophosphate-lyase, EC 4.6.1.1) activity by Alzheimer's disease related amyloid beta-peptide, A beta (1-42), and its shorter fragments, A beta (12-28), A beta (25-35), were studied in isolated membranes from rat ventral hippocampus and frontal cortex. In both tissues, the activity of GTPase and adenylate cyclase was upregulated by A beta (25-35), whereas A beta (12-28) did not have any significant effect on the GTPase activity and only weakly influenced adenylate cyclase. A beta (1-42), similar to A beta (25-35), stimulated the GTPase activity in both tissues and adenylate cyclase activity in ventral hippocampal membranes. Surprisingly, A beta (1-42) did not have a significant effect on adenylate cyclase activity in the cortical membranes. At high concentrations of A beta (25-35) and A beta (1-42), decreased or no activation of adenylate cyclase was observed. The activation of GTPase at high concentrations of A beta (25-35) was pertussis toxin sensitive, suggesting that this effect is mediated by Gi/G(o) proteins. Addition of glutathione and N-acetyl-L-cysteine, two well-known antioxidants, at 1.5 and 0.5 mM, respectively, decreased A beta (25-35) stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in both tissues. Lys-A beta (16-20), a hexapeptide shown previously to bind to the same sequence in A beta-peptide, and prevent fibril formation, decreased stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity by A beta (25-35), however, NMR diffusion measurements with the two peptides showed that this effect was not due to interactions between the two and that A beta (25-35) was active in a monomeric form. Our data strongly suggest that A beta and its fragments may affect G-protein coupled signal transduction systems, although the mechanism of this interaction is not fully understood.

An antibody directed against residues 100-119 within the alpha-helical domain of Galpha(s) defines a novel contact site for beta-adrenergic receptors

A polyclonal antiserum that recognizes residues 100-119 within the alpha-helical domain of Galpha(s) (K-20) caused a dissociation of G(s) into its component subunits and activated a cholera toxin-sensitive high affinity GTPase. Consistently, the antibody mimicked the stimulatory effects of the beta-adrenergic agonist, isoproterenol, on adenylyl cyclase, which is mediated by Galpha(s), and its inhibitory action on NADPH-dependent H(2)O(2) generation, a Gbetagamma-mediated response. A peptide corresponding to the target sequence of K-20 not only neutralized the receptor-mimetic effects of the antibody but inhibited the whole spectrum of isoproterenol action as well, including its antagonistic effects on adenylyl cyclase and NADPH-dependent H(2)O(2) generation. By contrast, COOH-terminal anti-Galpha(s) selectively inhibited the stimulatory effect of isoproterenol on cAMP formation without affecting its inhibitory effect on NADPH-dependent H(2)O(2) generation. The data are consistent with the concept that beta-adrenergic receptors interact with multiple sites on Galpha(s) each playing a distinct role, and strongly suggest that antibody K-20 defines a novel contact site for beta-adrenergic receptors that localizes to the alpha-helical domain and is essential for eliciting the complete spectrum of beta-adrenergic responses.

Reversals of age-related declines in neuronal signal transduction, cognitive, and motor behavioral deficits with blueberry, spinach, or strawberry dietary supplementation

Ample research indicates that age-related neuronal-behavioral decrements are the result of oxidative stress that may be ameliorated by antioxidants. Our previous study had shown that rats given dietary supplements of fruit and vegetable extracts with high antioxidant activity for 8 months beginning at 6 months of age retarded age-related declines in neuronal and cognitive function. The present study showed that such supplements (strawberry, spinach, or blueberry at 14.8, 9.1, or 18.6 gm of dried aqueous extract per kilogram of diet, respectively) fed for 8 weeks to 19-month-old Fischer 344 rats were also effective in reversing age-related deficits in several neuronal and behavioral parameters including: oxotremorine enhancement of K(+)-evoked release of dopamine from striatal slices, carbachol-stimulated GTPase activity, striatal Ca(45) buffering in striatal synaptosomes, motor behavioral performance on the rod walking and accelerod tasks, and Morris water maze performance. These findings suggest that, in addition to their known beneficial effects on cancer and heart disease, phytochemicals present in antioxidant-rich foods may be beneficial in reversing the course of neuronal and behavioral aging.

GPCR-Galpha fusion proteins: molecular analysis of receptor-G-protein coupling

The efficiency of interactions between G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) is greatly influenced by the absolute and relative densities of these proteins in the plasma membrane. The study of these interactions has been facilitated by the use of GPCR-Galpha fusion proteins, which are formed by the fusion of GPCR to Galpha. These fusion proteins ensure a defined 1:1 stoichiometry of GPCR to Galpha and force the physical proximity of the signalling partners. Thus, fusion of GPCR to Galpha enhances coupling efficiency can be used to study aspects of receptor-G-protein coupling that could not otherwise be examined by co-expressing GPCRs and G proteins as separate proteins. The results of studies that have made use of GPCR-Galpha fusion proteins will be discussed in this article, along with the strengths and limitations of this approach.

Effects of guanine, inosine, and xanthine nucleotides on beta(2)-adrenergic receptor/G(s) interactions: evidence for multiple receptor conformations

The aim of our study was to examine the effects of different purine nucleotides [GTP, ITP, and xanthosine 5'-triphosphate (XTP)] on receptor/G protein coupling. As a model system, we used a fusion protein of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor and the alpha subunit of the G protein G(s). GTP was more potent and efficient than ITP and XTP at inhibiting ternary complex formation and supporting adenylyl cyclase (AC) activation. We also studied the effects of several beta(2)-adrenergic receptor ligands on nucleotide hydrolysis and on AC activity in the presence of GTP, ITP, and XTP. The efficacy of agonists at promoting GTP hydrolysis correlated well with the efficacy of agonists for stimulating AC in the presence of GTP. This was, however, not the case for ITP hydrolysis and AC activity in the presence of ITP. The efficacy of ligands at stimulating AC in the presence of XTP differed considerably from the efficacies of ligands in the presence of GTP and ITP, and there was no evidence for receptor-regulated XTP hydrolysis. Our findings support the concept of multiple ligand-specific receptor conformations and demonstrate the usefulness of purine nucleotides as tools to study conformational states of receptors.

Modulation of agonist stimulated adenylyl cyclase and GTPase activity by L-pro-L-leu-glycinamide and its peptidomimetic analogue in rat striatal membranes

L-prolyl-L-leucyl-glycinamide (PLG), also known as melanocyte-stimulating hormone release inhibiting factor (MIF-1), is an endogenous brain tripeptide. Previous studies have shown that PLG, and its peptidomimetic analogues, render dopamine D2 receptors more responsive to agonists by maintaining the high-affinity binding state of the receptors. In the present study, we examined the effect PLG and its analogue 3(R)-[(2(S)-pyrrolidylcarbonyl)amino]-2-oxo-1-pyrrolidineacetam ide (PAOPA) on dopamine-stimulated adenylyl cyclase and NPA-stimulated GTPase activity in rat striatal membranes. Dopamine-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity was inhibited by both PLG and PAOPA in a dose-dependent manner, whereas R(-)-propylnorapomorphine (NPA)-stimulated low Km GTPase activity was significantly increased by 1 microM PLG or 1 nM PAOPA. These results suggest that PLG and PAOPA maintain the high affinity state of the D2 receptor by increasing GTP hydrolysis through stimulation of agonist-induced GTPase activity.

Modest cholinergic deafferentation fails to alter hippocampal G-proteins

The integrity of hippocampal G-protein mediated signalling following ibotenate induced lesion of the medial septum was examined. The lesion was confined histologically to the septum and induced a 23% reduction in hippocampal choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity and G-proteins levels and related enzyme activities were measured in the hippocampus following a 21 day survival period. The relative levels of five G-protein subunits (Gbeta, G(alpha)o, G(alpha)i1, G(alpha)i2, and G(alpha)s-L), basal GTPase, the degree of carbachol- or baclofen-stimulated GTPase activities, and the basal and fluoroaluminate-stimulated adenylate cyclase activities were apparently unaffected. To determine if our assay methodology was sensitive to changes in pre-synaptic signalling, we compared G-protein density in synaptosomes with total hippocampal homogenates. The concentration of G(alpha)q/11, G(alpha)i1, and G(alpha)i2. were significantly lower in synaptosomes, while G(alpha)o, was only marginally reduced. Thus, modest lesions of the medial-septal nucleus fail to alter G-protein signalling. However, our findings that G-protein density is lower in synaptosomal membranes than in total homogenates, indicates that the analysis of signalling events in synaptosomes following deafferentation could clarify adaptive changes which may occur at the presynaptic level.