The endothelin receptor antagonist, BQ-123, inhibits angiotensin II-induced contractions in rabbit aorta

Mechanism of protective actions of sparsentan in the kidney: lessons from studies in models of chronic kidney disease

Simultaneous inhibition of angiotensin II AT1 and endothelin ETA receptors has emerged as a promising approach for treatment of chronic progressive kidney disease. This therapeutic approach has been advanced by the introduction of sparsentan, the first dual AT1 and ETA receptor antagonist. Sparsentan is a single molecule with high affinity for both receptors. It is US Food and Drug Administration approved for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) and is currently being developed as a treatment for rare kidney diseases, such as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of sparsentan in these conditions. In parallel with clinical development, studies have been conducted to elucidate the mechanisms of action of sparsentan and its position in the context of published evidence characterizing the nephroprotective effects of dual ETA and AT1 receptor inhibition. This review summarizes this evidence, documenting beneficial anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and hemodynamic actions of sparsentan in the kidney and protective actions in glomerular endothelial cells, mesangial cells, the tubulointerstitium, and podocytes, thus providing the rationale for the use of sparsentan as therapy for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and IgAN and suggesting potential benefits in other renal diseases, such as Alport syndrome.

Dual inhibition of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and endothelin-1 in treatment of chronic kidney disease

Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a pivotal role in treatment of chronic kidney diseases (CKD). However, reversal of the course of CKD or at least long-term stabilization of renal function are often difficult to achieve, and many patients still progress to end-stage renal disease. New treatments are needed to enhance protective actions of RAAS inhibitors (RAASis), such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and improve prognosis in CKD patients. Inhibition of endothelin (ET) system in combination with established RAASis may represent such an approach. There are complex interactions between both systems and similarities in their renal physiological and pathophysiological actions that provide theoretical rationale for combined inhibition. This view is supported by some experimental studies in models of both diabetic and nondiabetic CKD showing that a combination of RAASis with ET receptor antagonists (ERAs) ameliorate proteinuria, renal structural changes, and molecular markers of glomerulosclerosis, renal fibrosis, or inflammation more effectively than RAASis or ERAs alone. Practically all clinical studies exploring the effects of RAASis and ERAs combination in nephroprotection have thus far applied add-on designs, in which an ERA is added to baseline treatment with ACEIs or ARBs. These studies, conducted mostly in patients with diabetic nephropathy, have shown that ERAs effectively reduce residual proteinuria in patients with baseline RAASis treatment. Long-term studies are currently being conducted to determine whether promising antiproteinuric effects of the dual blockade will be translated in long-term nephroprotection with acceptable safety profile.

New approaches for managing preeclampsia: clues from clinical and basic research

PURPOSE

One of the most common, and most vexing, obstetric complications is preeclampsia-a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity. Hallmarked by new-onset hypertension and a myriad of other symptoms, the underlying cause of the disorder remains obscure despite intensive research into its etiology. Although the initiating events are not clear, one common finding in preeclamptic patients is failure to remodel the maternal arteries that supply the placenta, with resulting hypoxia/ischemia. Intensive research over the past 2 decades has identified several categories of molecular dysfunction resulting from placental hypoxia, which, when released into the maternal circulation, are involved in the spectrum of symptoms seen in these patients-in particular, angiogenic imbalance and the activation of innate and adaptive immune responses. Despite these new insights, little in the way of new treatments for the management of these patients has been advanced into clinical practice. Indeed, few therapeutic options exist for the obstetrician treating a case of preeclampsia. Pharmacologic management is typically seizure prophylaxis, and, in severe cases, antihypertensive agents for controlling worsening hypertension. Ultimately, the induction of labor is indicated, making preeclampsia a leading cause of premature birth. Here, the molecular mechanisms linking placental ischemia to the maternal symptoms of preeclampsia are reviewed, and several areas of recent research suggesting new potential therapeutic approaches to the management of preeclampsia are identified.

Physiology of endothelin and the kidney

Since its discovery in 1988 as an endothelial cell-derived peptide that exerts the most potent vasoconstriction of any known endogenous compound, endothelin (ET) has emerged as an important regulator of renal physiology and pathophysiology. This review focuses on how the ET system impacts renal function in health; it is apparent that ET regulates multiple aspects of kidney function. These include modulation of glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow, control of renin release, and regulation of transport of sodium, water, protons, and bicarbonate. These effects are exerted through ET interactions with almost every cell type in the kidney, including mesangial cells, podocytes, endothelium, vascular smooth muscle, every section of the nephron, and renal nerves. In addition, while not the subject of the current review, ET can also indirectly affect renal function through modulation of extrarenal systems, including the vasculature, nervous system, adrenal gland, circulating hormones, and the heart. As will become apparent, these pleiotropic effects of ET are of fundamental physiologic importance in the control of renal function in health. In addition, to help put these effects into perspective, we will also discuss, albeit to a relatively limited extent, how alterations in the ET system can contribute to hypertension and kidney disease.

Regulation of blood pressure and salt homeostasis by endothelin

Endothelin (ET) peptides and their receptors are intimately involved in the physiological control of systemic blood pressure and body Na homeostasis, exerting these effects through alterations in a host of circulating and local factors. Hormonal systems affected by ET include natriuretic peptides, aldosterone, catecholamines, and angiotensin. ET also directly regulates cardiac output, central and peripheral nervous system activity, renal Na and water excretion, systemic vascular resistance, and venous capacitance. ET regulation of these systems is often complex, sometimes involving opposing actions depending on which receptor isoform is activated, which cells are affected, and what other prevailing factors exist. A detailed understanding of this system is important; disordered regulation of the ET system is strongly associated with hypertension and dysregulated extracellular fluid volume homeostasis. In addition, ET receptor antagonists are being increasingly used for the treatment of a variety of diseases; while demonstrating benefit, these agents also have adverse effects on fluid retention that may substantially limit their clinical utility. This review provides a detailed analysis of how the ET system is involved in the control of blood pressure and Na homeostasis, focusing primarily on physiological regulation with some discussion of the role of the ET system in hypertension.

Short-term angiotensin-1 receptor antagonism in type 2 diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats normalizes endothelin-1-induced mesenteric artery contraction

Endothelin (ET)-1 and angiotensin II (Ang II) are likely candidates for a key role in diabetic vascular complications. We demonstrated previously that an enhanced ET-1-induced contraction is present in mesenteric arteries from Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats at the chronic stage of type 2 diabetes. Here, we investigated whether short-term treatment of such rats with losartan, an angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist, might normalize the ET-1-induced contraction. In mesenteric arteries from GK rats at the chronic stage (34-38 weeks) (vs. those from age-matched control Wistar rats): (1) the ET-1-induced contraction was enhanced, (2) the levels of ET-1 and Ang II were increased, (3) ET-1-stimulated ERK2 phosphorylation was increased, and (4) the ACh-induced endothelium-dependent relaxation was reduced. Mesenteric arteries isolated from such GK rats following treatment with losartan (25mg/kg/day for 2 weeks) exhibited reduced ET-1- and Ang II-induced contractions, suppressed ET-1-stimulated ERK phosphorylation, and increased ACh-induced relaxation, while the rats exhibited normalized plasma NO metabolism and their mesenteric arteries exhibited increased basal NO formation. However, such losartan treatment did not alter the increased levels of ET-1 and Ang II seen in GK mesenteric arteries. Our data suggest that within the timescale studied here, losartan normalizes ET-1-induced mesenteric artery contraction through a suppression of ERK activities and/or by normalizing endothelial function.

Novel Dual Action AT1 and ETA Receptor Antagonists Reduce Blood Pressure in Experimental Hypertension

Angiotensin II and endothelin-1 activate their respective AT(1) and ET(A) receptors on vascular smooth muscle cells, producing vasoconstriction, and both peptides are implicated in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension. Angiotensin II potentiates the production of endothelin, and conversely endothelin augments the synthesis of angiotensin II. Both AT(1) and ET(A) receptor antagonists lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients; thus, a combination AT(1)/ET(A) receptor antagonist may have greater efficacy and broader utility compared with each drug alone. By rational drug design a biphenyl ET(A) receptor blocker was modified to acquire AT(1) receptor antagonism. These compounds (C and D) decreased Sar-Ile-Angiotensin II binding to AT(1) receptors and endothelin-1 binding to ET(A) receptors, and compound C inhibited angiotensin II- and endothelin-1-mediated Ca(2+) transients. In rats compounds C and D reduced blood pressure elevations caused by intravenous infusion of angiotensin II or big endothelin-1. Compound C decreased blood pressure in Na(+)-depleted spontaneously hypertensive rats and in rats with mineralocorticoid hypertension. Compound D was more efficacious than AT(1) receptor antagonists at reducing blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats, and its superiority was likely due to its partial blockade of ET(A) receptors. Therefore compounds C and D are novel agents for treating a broad spectrum of patients with essential hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases.

Endothelin ETA receptor-subtype specific antagonism does not mitigate the acute systemic or renal effects of exogenous angiotensin II in humans

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II (Ang II) is assumed to play a pathophysiological role in a variety of vascular diseases. Animal studies indicate that these effects are partly attributed to stimulation of endothelin-1 (ET-1) release. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the acute effects of Ang II on systemic and renal haemodynamics in healthy subjects can be influenced by endothelin ET(A)-receptor blockade.

DESIGN

The study design was balanced, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind, two-way cross-over, in 10 healthy male subjects.

METHODS

Subjects received stepwise increasing intravenous doses of Ang II (0.65, 1.25, 2.5, 5 ng kg(-1) min(-1) for 15 min per dose level) in the presence or absence of BQ-123 (60 microg min(-1)), a specific ETA-receptor antagonist. Renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were assessed by the para-aminohippurate and inulin plasma clearance method, respectively. Renal vascular resistance (RVR) was calculated from mean arterial pressure (MAP) and renal plasma flow.

RESULTS

Ang II decreased RPF by 34% and GFR by 9% and increased RVR by 94% and MAP by 27% (ANOVA, P < 0.001 vs. baseline, for all parameters). BQ-123 did not alter these renal and systemic haemodynamic responses to a significant degree. In addition, BQ-123 had no significant haemodynamic effect under baseline conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term increase of circulating Ang II levels causes systemic and renal pressor effects, which are not mitigated by endothelin ETA-receptor blockade. This suggests that the pressor response to Ang II cannot be accounted for by the acute release of vasoactive ET-1.

Amelioration of post-ischaemic renal injury by contralateral uninephrectomy: a role of endothelin-1

BACKGROUND

Previous studies showed that unilateral renal damage is attenuated by prior contralateral uninephrectomy (Nx) in ischaemia-induced acute renal failure (ARF). Since renal ischaemia increases endothelin-1 (ET-1) production in the kidney, we examined whether the alteration of renal ET-1 content may contribute to the nephrectomy-induced attenuation of renal injury.

METHODS

Ischaemic renal injury was provoked by 60-min left renal artery occlusion (RAO). Removal of the right kidney was performed just before RAO in the Nx group. Forty-eight hours after release of the clamp, renal ET-1 content was measured in both non-nephrectomized and unilaterally nephrectomized rats. We also examined the effects of a selective ET(A) receptor (FR139317) and monoclonal ET antibody (AwETN40) on the RAO-induced changes in renal haemodynamics at 2 and 48 h after RAO respectively.

RESULTS

The plasma concentration of ET-1 did not change in the two groups of ARF rats, but the cortical content of ET-1 increased to a lesser extent in Nx animals after ischaemia. Prior removal of the right kidney significantly facilitated the percentage recovery of left renal blood flow (RBF) during the first 2 h after release of the clamp. The percentage recovery of inulin clearance (Cin) by the kidney was also significantly better in Nx than sham-Nx rats at 48 h after RAO. Continuous administration of FR139317 (50 mg/kg/day) using osmotic minipumps for 3 days significantly attenuated exogenous ET-1-induced decrease in Cin and RBF. Infusion of FR139317 restored the decrease in RBF to control values during first 2 h in sham-Nx rats. However, FR139317 and AwETN40 did not ameliorate the RAO-induced decline of Cin in sham-Nx or Nx rats at 2 and 48 h after ischaemia respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Contralateral uninephrectomy prior to ischaemia-induced ARF attenuated the increase in cortical ET-1 content and subsequent renal response to ischaemic injury. This beneficial effect of unilateral nephrectomy, however, was not mediated through well-preserved RBF due to reduced intrarenal ET-1 action.

Endothelin-A receptor antagonist inhibits angiotensin II and noradrenaline in man

AIMS

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictor produced by the vascular endothelium. The interactions of ET with the mediators of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin-system in humans are unclear.

METHODS

We studied the effects of the ETA-selective antagonist BQ-123 and the ETB-selective antagonist BQ-788 (both 10(-10)-10(-8) M) on ET-1 (10(-16)-10(-10) M), angiotensin II (AT, 10(-16)-10(-10) M) and noradrenaline (NA, 10(-16)-10(-10) M) induced vasoconstriction in the human skin microcirculation in vivo in 25 healthy male volunteers using laser Doppler flowmetry and double injection technique.

RESULTS

BQ-123 caused a dose-dependent vasodilatation (maximum effect: + 949 +/- 84 AUC-PU, P < 0.001), whereas BQ-788 induced mild vasoconstriction (maximum effect: -388 +/- 96 AUC-PU, P < 0.01). In the presence of BQ-123, but not BQ-788, ET-1, AT and NA caused markedly less vasoconstriction at any tested agonist dose; the effect was most pronounced on ET-1 (maximum effect at 10(-14) M: + 814 +/- 93 AUC-PU vs ET alone, P < 0.001), followed by noradrenaline (maximum effect at 10(-16) M: +580 +/- 107 AUC-PU vs NA alone, P < 0.01) and angiotensin II (maximum effect at 10(-14) M: + 493 +/- 111 AUC-PU vs AT alone, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ETA-selective antagonism inhibits vasoconstriction to AT and NA in vivo in healthy subjects. This beneficial effect may be useful for the treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease including hypertension especially in combination therapy with sympatholytic agents and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system.

Endothelium-dependent desensitization to angiotensin II in rabbit aorta: the mechanisms involved

The aim of this study was to characterize the role of the endothelium in angiotensin II-desensitization and its mechanisms of action. Rabbit aortic rings were exposed to increasing doses of angiotensin II (Ang II, 10–9 to 2.5 × 10–6) to generate two cumulative dose-response curves (CDRC I and II). A 50-min interval separated CDRC I and II. Desensitization was observed at all doses in unrubbed aortic tissue and at lower doses in rubbed aortic tissue. Tachyphylaxis was greater in arteries with endothelium. Treatment of intact rings with L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 10–4 M) did not prevent this phenomenon. However, indomethacin (10–5 M) and miconazol (10–6 M) attenuated Ang II-desensitization. Treatment of unrubbed rings with nifedipine (10–6 M) and cromakalim (10–6 M) inhibited the effect of indomethacin. To confirm the involvement of K+ channels, unrubbed and rubbed aortic rings were treated with the KCa2+ blockers apamin (10–7 M), tetraethylammonium (TEA, 10–3 M), and iberiotoxin (10–8 M), and the KATP blocker glibenclamide (10–5 M). In both arteries apamin, TEA, and glibenclamide abolished the tachyphylaxis without changes in the maximal response. Iberiotoxin diminished Ang II-desensitization in rubbed but not unrubbed arteries. Results from this study suggest that Ang II-desensitization involves endothelium-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Endothelium-dependent desensitization could be mediated by a cyclooxygenase-cytochrome P450 product, which could act by increasing KCa2+ channel activity.Key words: angiotensin II, rabbit aorta, desensitization, endothelium, cyclooxygenase products.

Effect of losartan on angiotensin II-mediated endothelin and prostanoid excretion in humans

Angiotensin II (Ang II) stimulates renal prostanoid and vascular endothelin-1 (ET-1) release. Most known Ang II effects are mediated by AT1 receptors. Our aim was to determine whether AT1 receptor activation mediates Ang II-evoked renal prostanoid and ET-1 release. Eleven healthy men were randomized in a crossover, double-blind fashion to receive 100 mg/day of losartan or matching placebo, for 8 days. Blood and urine were sampled before and after a 2-h infusion of Ang II at a rate previously determined to increase mean arterial pressure (MAP) by 25 to 30 mm Hg in each subject. After a 14-day washout, subjects received the alternate treatment. Pretreatment with losartan had little effect on baseline MAP, but increased plasma renin activity, and virtually eliminated the pressor response to Ang II infusion. Angiotensin II significantly increased prostanoid excretion after placebo; the prostanoid response to Ang II was even greater after losartan. Plasma ET-1 was not altered by Ang II infusion, with or without losartan. In contrast, urine ET-1 excretion rate decreased to 40% of baseline after Ang II but not after losartan pretreatment; losartan alone had no effect. We conclude that Ang II decreases renal ET-1 synthesis and release through the AT1 receptor. In contrast, Angiotensin II-mediated renal prostanoid synthesis does not require activation of AT1 receptors. These findings indicate that AT1 receptor antagonists could provide renal protection through indirect mechanisms.

Evidence for vasoconstriction mediated by the endothelin-B receptor in domestic swine

Endothelin-1 (ET-1), a potent vasoactive and mitogenic peptide, has been implicated in a number of cardiovascular diseases, including congestive heart failure, neointimal hyperplasia associated with restenosis, and hypertension. The vasoconstriction induced by ET-1 is thought to be mediated mainly by its action on ET(A) receptors on vascular smooth muscle cells. Recent studies have indicated that vasoconstriction also may be mediated by stimulation of an ET(B)-receptor subtype. Increased use of the pig as a cardiovascular model prompted us to examine the receptor profile in this species using ABT-627, a potent, nonpeptide antagonist of the ET(A) receptor. The precursor to ET-1, big ET-1 (0.02 nmol/kg/min), was infused intravenously in domestic swine, resulting in a sustained increase in mean blood pressure of 38 +/- 3 mm Hg. After stabilization of the pressor response, ABT-627 (0.1-10 microg/kg/min) or vehicle was infused for 30 min. Whereas vehicle infusion had no appreciable effect, a dose-related reversal of the pressor response to big ET-1 (11-100%) was observed by the end of the ABT-627 infusion. Blood samples were assayed for plasma concentrations of ABT-627; peak levels ranged from 9 +/- 2 to 937 +/- 168 ng/ml. In a separate group of pigs, the highest dose of ABT-627 produced only a modest reversal of the hypertensive response to an infusion of angiotensin II (300 ng/kg/min). Additional results indicate that the vasoconstrictor effects produced by sarafotoxin 6C (0.03 and 0.3 nmol/kg), an agonist of the ET(B) receptor, are not blocked by treatment with ABT-627 (10 microg/kg/min). However, complete blockade of the S6C response could be achieved using the ET(B) antagonist, A-192621 (0.33 mg/kg/min). Our results define the dose-response relation for the ET(A)-receptor antagonist ABT-627 in the vasculature of the domestic pig and suggest the presence of an ET(B)-receptor subtype that mediates vasoconstriction in this species.

Action of AT1 receptor antagonists on angiotensin II-induced tone in human isolated subcutaneous resistance arteries

1. Human isolated subcutaneous arteries were studied under isometric conditions in a myograph. 2. Addition of angiotensin II (AII) induced a concentration-dependent increase in tone in isolated arteries. The active metabolite of candesartan (CV 11974), losartan and the active metabolite of losartan, E-3174 antagonized AII-induced tone in a non-competitive manner, but the AT2 selective antagonist, PD123319, was without effect on responses to AII. The effects of candesartan, losartan and E-3174 were analysed using a classical model of non-competitive antagonism and a two-state receptor model. 3. Mechanical removal of the endothelium; pre-incubation with Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L-NAME); pre-incubation with indomethacin, a cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor; or pre-incubation with BQ 485, an endothelin antagonist; had no significant effect on contractions induced by AII. 4. Our results suggest AII contracts human isolated resistance arteries by an action on AT1 receptors and does not involve release of endothelial factors. Use of a two-state receptor model successfully described the action of the AT1 antagonists without sacrificing assumptions regarding the competitive nature of binding of these antagonists.

Endothelin receptor antagonists influence cardiovascular morphology in uremic rats

BACKGROUND

In is generally held that renal failure results in blood pressure (BP)-independent structural changes of the myocardium and the vasculature. The contribution, if any, of endothelin (ET) to these changes has been unknown.

METHODS

We morphometrically studied random samples of the left ventricle myocardium and small intramyocardial arteries in subtotally (5/6) nephrectomized (SNx) male Sprague-Dawley rats treated with either the selective ETA receptor antagonist BMS182874 (30 mg/kg/day) or the nonselective ETA/ETB receptor antagonist Ro46-2005 (30 mg/kg/day) in comparison with either sham-operated rats, untreated SNx, or SNx rats treated with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor trandolapril (0.1 mg/kg/day).

RESULTS

Eight weeks later, systolic BP was lower in trandolapril-treated SNx compared with untreated SNx animals. No decrease in BP was seen following either ET receptor antagonist at the dose used. A significantly increased volume density of the myocardial interstitium was found in untreated SNx rats as compared with sham-operated controls. Such interstitial expansion was prevented by trandolapril and either ET receptor antagonist. SNx caused a substantial increase in the wall thickness of small intramyocardial arteries. The increase was prevented by trandolapril or BMS182874 treatment. The arteriolar wall:lumen ratio was significantly lower in all treated groups when compared with untreated SNx. In contrast, only trandolapril, but not the ET receptor antagonists, attenuated thickening of the aortic media in SNx animals.

CONCLUSIONS

The ETA-selective and ETA/ETB-nonselective receptor antagonists appear to prevent development of myocardial fibrosis and structural changes of small intramyocardial arteries in experimental chronic renal failure. This effect is independent of systemic BP.

IP3 production in A10 cells, an established aortic smooth muscle cultured cell line: effects of agonist administration procedure and culture conditions

1. After normal culture (10% FBS), medium exchange itself evoked marked increases in IP3 levels in A10 cells that masked the net change in IP3 in response to vasopressin (100 nM). 2. Low-serum (0.3% FBS) culture for 10 days abolished the increase in IP3 by medium exchange, and increased expression of cGMP kinase. 3. Stimulation of cells with vasopressin (100 nM) by a pipetting procedure, increased IP3 levels irrespective of culture conditions. 4. This cell line therefore could be used in a contractile form (after low-serum culture) with pipetting procedure to observe IP3 response, especially with regard to interactions with the cGMP signaling system.

Differential action of angiotensin II and activity of angiotensin-converting enzyme in human bypass grafts

OBJECTIVE

The activity of the renin-angiotensin system may be important in determining the performance of coronary artery bypass grafts. We have examined the activity of tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme and the effects of angiotensin II in vessels used as bypass grafts.

METHODS

Organ bath studies were used to determine the vasoactive effect of angiotensin II. The activity of the angiotensin-converting enzyme was assessed by metabolism of a specific synthetic substrate.

RESULTS

The saphenous vein produced greater maximum responses to angiotensin II than did the internal thoracic artery. This response was not modified by inhibition of nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase, or by an endothelin receptor antagonist in either vessel. Losartan, an AT1 receptor antagonist, inhibited the vasoconstrictor response in both blood vessels. Homogenates of saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery displayed tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme activity, which was inhibited by captopril. Enzyme activity was threefold greater in the vein. Both the contractile response to angiotensin II and the enzyme activity were retained in venous grafts removed up to 20 years after coronary bypass surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that marked differences exist in angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and AT1 receptor responses in the saphenous vein compared with the internal thoracic artery. These findings may have important implications for the performance of the vein when used as a coronary artery bypass graft and may have clinical implications for the use of angiotensin-converting inhibitors and AT1 receptor antagonists in the prevention and treatment of vein graft disease.

Effects of angiotensin-II infusion at pressor and subpressor doses on endothelin-1 plasma levels in healthy men

Several lines of evidence suggest that effects of angiotensin-II (A-II) could be mediated in part by endothelin-1 (ET-1): A-II enhances production and secretion of ET-1 which in turn may contribute to the pressor effects and mitogenic actions of A-II. We have conducted a randomized controlled cross-over study to investigate whether A-II increases ET-1 plasma levels in humans at pressor doses. Each of the eight healthy male volunteers received a subpressor and pressor dose of A-II which were assessed by titration of the individual dose dependent blood pressure responses to A-II-infusion. The mean subpressor dose of A-II was 0.62 ng/kg/min. (range: 0.31-1.25); the mean pressor dose of A-II was 8.44 ng/kg/min. (range 2.5-20), yielding an average increase in mean arterial pressure by 35% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24-45%). Plasma ET-1 concentrations increased significantly only in response to pressor doses of A-II (Friedman ANOVA p=0.022): ET-1 increased by 89 % (CI: 24-154%) over baseline (1.7 pmol/L; CI: 1.4-2.0) 60 min. after starting the pressor infusion of A-II and remained elevated throughout the 4-hours observation period. In conclusion, A-II at pressor doses but not at subpressor doses induced an increase in plasma levels of ET- 1 in healthy subjects. This finding may be of relevance for various diseases associated with increased production of A-II and could potentially have therapeutic implications.

Role of endothelin in the pathophysiology of renal ischemia-reperfusion in normal rabbits

The present study addressed the acute effects of endothelin-1 on renal function and neutrophils accumulation in the setting of in vivo severe (60 min) acute ischemia/reperfusion. Ischemia/reperfusion decreased renal functional parameters and increased renal neutrophil accumulation and medullary congestion. All these parameters markedly improved with the intrarenal administration of anti-endothelin-1 antiserum. Comparatively, the intrarenal infusion of endothelin-1 decreased renal function and increased neutrophil accumulation. Abnormalities in renal histology were, however, less pronounced than with ischemia/ reperfusion. In experiments using rabbit isolated perfused kidneys, endothelin-1 induced the accumulation of labeled neutrophils. This accumulation was similar to that observed in kidneys obtained after 60 minutes of ischemia plus 60 minutes of reperfusion. Both endothelin and ischemia/ reperfusion effects were counteracted by an anti-endothelin antibody. In further in vitro studies, we found that endothelin-1-induced the expression of the CD18 antigens on the neutrophil surface. In subsequent experiments based on this effect of ET-1 on CD18 antigens, a blockade of both ischemia/reperfusion-induced and endothelin-1-induced neutrophil accumulation was obtained by infusion an anti-CD18 antibody. In conclusion, our experiments disclosed the critical role of endothelin-1 as a major promoter of early neutrophil accumulation after ischemia/reperfusion, which occurred through an integrin-mediated mechanism.

Cardiac fibroblasts produce leukemia inhibitory factor and endothelin, which combine to induce cardiac myocyte hypertrophy in vitro

Cardiac fibroblasts in culture produce factor(s) that induce hypertrophy of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes in vitro. As in vivo, the myocyte hypertrophy response in culture is characterized by an increase in cell size and contractile protein content, and by the activation of embryonic genes, including the gene for atrial natriuretic peptide. The purpose of this study was to identify the factor(s) produced by fibroblasts that induce myocyte hypertrophy. The fibroblast hypertrophy activity was inhibited using a combination of the endothelin A receptor blocker BQ-123 and an antibody to leukemia inhibitory factor. The individual antagonists each caused a partial inhibition. The mRNAs for both leukemia inhibitory factor and endothelin were detected by RT-PCR analysis and the concentration of both proteins was determined to be approximately 200 pmol/L in the conditioned medium using immunoassays. Purified leukemia inhibitory factor and endothelin each induced distinctive morphological changes in the myocytes. Their combination generated a different morphology similar to that induced by fibroblast conditioned medium. Each factor also induced atrial natriuretic peptide production, but both were required for the myocytes to produce the levels measured after exposure to fibroblast conditioned medium. These results show that hypertrophy activity produced by cardiac fibroblasts in culture is a result of leukemia inhibitory factor and endothelin.

Identification of endothelin receptors in normal and hyperplasic human prostate tissues

Specific endothelin-1 (ET1) binding sites have been demonstrated in membranes derived form normal (NP) and benign hyperplasic (BPH) human prostate using an 125I-ET1 binding assay. 125I saturation experiments and Scatchard analysis demonstrated the existence of a homogeneous population of binding sites with high affinity (Kd(app)) and density (B(max)), respectively, 106 +/- 15 pM and 1086 +/- 399 fmol/mg protein for NP (n = 5) and 168 +/- 26 pM and 964 +/- 445 fmol/mg protein for BPH (n = 5). We demonstrated the presence of two subtypes of ET1 receptors, ETA and ETB, by means of the following ET1 competitors: ET2, ET3, and BQ123 (which is selective for the ETA receptor), and IRL1620 and sarafotoxine c (S6c) (which are selective for the ETB receptor). The displacement curves allowed us to conclude that the large majority (85%) of the ET1 receptors in normal and hyperplasic human prostate are of the A subtype.

Effects and interactions of endothelin-1 and angiotensin II on matrix protein expression and synthesis and mesangial cell growth

Mesangial cell growth and accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins constitute key features of progressive glomerular injury. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) and angiotensin II (Ang II), two potent vasoconstrictor agents, evoke a number of similar responses in mesangial cells. In rat mesangial cells, we compared ET-1 and Ang II effects on matrix protein production and cell proliferation as well as the potential interaction between the two hormones. When cells in 0.5% fetal calf serum were incubated for 24 hours with various concentrations of ET-1 or Ang II, both peptides stimulated, in a dose-dependent manner, fibronectin and type IV collagen mRNA expression, fibronectin synthesis, and mitogenesis. Incubation with specific receptor antagonists of both hormones demonstrated that endothelin subtype A (ETA) and angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptors were involved. Preincubation of cells with two different protein kinase C inhibitors or with a neutralizing anti-transforming growth factor-beta antibody, but not an unrelated IgG, diminished the peptide-induced fibronectin synthesis. A dual interrelation seems to exist between ET-1 and Ang II. Thus, the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan and the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors quinaprilat and captopril diminished the ET-1-mediated effects, whereas, the ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123 diminished the Ang II-induced fibronectin synthesis and mesangial cell proliferation. Our results suggest that ET-1 and Ang II stimulate matrix protein synthesis and mesangial cell mitogenesis through ETA and AT1 receptors, respectively, by complicated mechanisms, implicating protein kinase C activation, synthesis of transforming growth factor-beta, and release of one peptide by the other. These data could be important for a better understanding of the participation of vasoactive substances in the pathogenesis of glomerulosclerosis.

Characterization of the endothelin receptor selective agonist, BQ3020 and antagonists BQ123, FR139317, BQ788, 50235, Ro462005 and bosentan in the heart

1. In this study we used ligand binding techniques to determine the affinity and selectivity of endothelin receptor agonists and antagonists in human left ventricle which expresses both ETA and ETB receptors, and compared these results with cardiovascular tissues from rat and porcine hearts. 2. The linear tripeptide antagonist, FR139317 competed for [125I]-ET-1 binding to human left ventricle with over 200,000 fold selectivity for the ETA receptor (KD ETA = 1.20 +/- 0.28 nM, KDETB = 287 +/- 93 microM). The ETA-selective non-peptide antagonist, 50235, competed with lower affinity and selectivity (KDETA = 162 +/- 61 nM, KDETB = 171 +/- 42 microM) in this tissue. BQ123 and FR139317 also showed high selectivity (greater than 20,000 fold) and affinity in rat (BQ123: KDETA = 1.18 +/- 0.16 nM, KDETB = 1370 +/- 1150 microM; FR139317: KDETA = 2.28 +/- 0.30 nM, KDETB = 292 +/- 114 microM) and pig heart (BQ123: KDETA = 0.52 +/- 0.05 nM, KDETB = 70.4 +/- 4.0 microM; FR139317: KDETA = 2.17 +/- 0.51 nM, KDETB = 47.1 +/- 5.7 microM) (n > or = 3 individuals +/- s.e.mean). 3. Although BQ3020 competed with over 1000 fold selectivity for the ETB subtype in human heart (KDETB = 1.38 +/- 0.72 nM, KDETA = 2.04 +/- 0.21 microM) the peptide inhibited only the binding of [125I]-ET-1 at concentrations greater than 100 nM in rat and porcine heart. This is in contrast to the data from the ETA-selective antagonists which indicated the presence of ETB sites in these tissues from animal hearts. 4. The peptide antagonist, BQ788, had a low, micromolar affinity (KD = 1.98 +/- 0.13 microM) using human left ventricle and no significant selectivity for the human ETB-subtype in this tissue. 5. The non-peptide ET antagonists, Ro462005 (KD = 50.3 +/- 9.5 microM) and bosentan (Ro470203; KD = 77.9 +/- 7.9 nM) competed monophasically for [125I]-ET-1 binding sites in human left ventricle. 6. The results show that the ETA antagonists, BQ123 and FR139317, are highly selective for ETA receptors in all cardiac tissues tested, whereas BQ788 has a low affinity and no selectivity in this human tissue. Further we showed that there are species differences in the binding of BQ3020 to the ETB receptors in the hearts derived from human, rat and pig.

Local angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition blunts endothelin-1-induced increase in forearm vascular resistance

OBJECTIVE

The physiologic role of endothelin-1 is not well established; however, it may have a role in modulation of peripheral vascular tone complimentary to angiotensin II. In vitro and animal studies suggested an interrelationship between angiotensin II and endothelin-1 vasoconstriction. We hypothesized that local vascular or systemic renin-angiotensin II systems must be intact for endothelin-1-mediated vasoconstriction in humans.

METHODS

To test this hypothesis, responses to brachial artery infusion of endothelin-1 alone and endothelin-1 plus local low-dose infusion of enaliprilat were studied in seven healthy male and seven healthy female volunteers.

RESULTS

In these subjects, baseline forearm vascular resistance (mean +/- SEM; 24 +/- 3.5 mm Hg.ml/dl forearm vol/min) increased with a 38.2 ng/min endothelin-1 infusion (61.8 +/- 6.8 mm Hg.ml/dl forearm vol/min; p < 0.01). Forearm vascular resistance decreased when 38.2 ng/min endothelin-1 was infused concomitantly with a local 5 micrograms/min infusion of enaliprilat (45.5 +/- 5.9 mm Hg.ml/dl forearm vol/min; p < 0.01 compared with endothelin-1 alone).

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that an endothelin-1-induced increase in forearm vascular resistance is inhibited by local forearm angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition.

Heterogeneity in vascular smooth muscle responsiveness to angiotensin II. Role of endothelin

We compared the role of endothelium and of endothelin in mediating the vasoconstrictor responses to angiotensin II (Ang II) in three vascular smooth muscle preparations--aorta, mesenteric artery, and tail artery--isolated from adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. The vasoconstrictor potency for Ang II in blood vessels with endothelium varied in the following rank order: aorta > mesenteric artery > tail artery. Although the maximal tension responses to Ang II were similar for mesenteric and tail arteries, it was significantly lower in aorta. Endothelium removal led to a leftward shift in the concentration-response curves to Ang II in the aorta but a rightward shift in the mesenteric artery. Strikingly, Ang II failed to evoke tension responses in tail artery in the absence of endothelium. The endothelin-A (ETA)-selective antagonist BQ-123 blocked the responses to Ang II in a noncompetitive manner, with partial and complete attenuation of responses in the endothelium-intact mesenteric and tail artery preparations, respectively. In contrast, BQ-123 did not affect the responses to Ang II in the aorta. BQ-123 also failed to affect the responses to Ang II in endothelium-denuded mesenteric artery rings. The Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptor-selective antagonist losartan competitively blocked the responses to Ang II in the three tissues (pA2, 8.3 to 8.7) when endothelium was present. These data suggest that there are endothelium-dependent regional variations in vascular tissue sensitivity to Ang II.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of endothelin receptor antagonism with bosentan on peripheral nerve function in experimental diabetes

1. The effects of the non-selective endothelin (ET) receptor (ETA/ETB) antagonist, bosentan, on sciatic nerve dysfunction in experimental diabetes were investigated. 2. Rats with 5-6 weeks untreated streptozotocin-diabetes exhibited characteristic slowed motor nerve conduction velocity (mean +/- s.d., 36.6 +/- 3.4 m s-1) and nerve laser Doppler flux (197 +/- 64 arbitrary units) compared to age-matched control animals (42.7 +/- 2.4 m s-1 and 398 +/- 77 arbitrary units, respectively). Preventative treatment of diabetic rats with bosentan at 100 mg kg-1 day-1 p.o. attenuated both these deficits (39.7 +/- 3.0 m s-1 and 305 +/- 56 arbitrary units, respectively) without affecting mean arterial pressure. 3. In control and untreated diabetic rats, ET-1, 1 nmol kg-1 i.v., caused an initial hypotension (duration, 30 +/- 13 and 26 +/- 9 s, respectively; change in mean arterial pressure, -27 +/- 13 and -25 +/- 7 mmHg, respectively) followed by prolonged hypertension (change in mean arterial pressure, 52 +/- 18 and 31 +/- 5 mmHg, respectively). Effectiveness of the chronic bosentan treatment was demonstrated by inhibition of the hypotensive response to ET-1 in treated diabetic rats (duration, 5 +/- 2 s; change in mean arterial pressure, -4 +/- 2 mmHg) although the hypertension was unaltered (change in mean arterial pressure, 32 +/- 9 mmHg). 4. Acute i.v. administration of 10 mg kg-1 bosentan caused variable and transient rises in nerve laser Doppler flux in control (78 +/- 63 arbitrary units) and untreated diabetic rats (93 +/- 77 arbitrary units). Acute bosentan blocked the hypotensive response to subsequent ET-1 administration and attenuated the later hypertension (change in mean arterial pressure, 21 +/-9 mmHg in control, 29 +/- 10 mmHg in diabetic).5. Our results indicate that oral treatment of diabetic rats with an ET receptor antagonist can improves ciatic nerve perfusion and conduction, suggesting that the vasoconstrictor action of endogenous ET may contribute to peripheral nerve dysfunction in experimental diabetes.

Endothelin receptor antagonism

Following the original report by Yanagisawa et al. (1988) more than 7 years ago, compelling evidence that ET plays an important role in the local regulation of smooth muscle tone and cell growth has been reported. In addition, many studies point to a significant role for endothelin in nonvascular function. The investigation of the endothelin system has been greatly advanced in the last 2 to 3 years through significant advances in the development of potent and selective ET receptor antagonists. These agents have proven to be essential tools for elucidating the biological significance of the ET system, leading to the realization that antagonism of the ET system may have significant therapeutic potential. As emphasized in this review, the importance of chronic blockade of the ET system may be a critical aspect of future research in this exciting area. Confounding issues remain the lack of information about the role of the ETB receptor, the apparent pharmacological evidence for additional ET receptor subtypes, and species variation in the tissue distribution of ET isoforms and receptor subtypes. Along with the greater ability to understand the endothelin system provided by potent and selective pharmacological agents, is the important contribution of modern molecular biology techniques, highlighted by the insights gained from recent reports of results from ET gene disruption studies. Kurihara et al. (1994) found that ET-1-deficient homozygous mice die at birth of apparent respiratory failure secondary to severe craniofacial abnormalities. Subsequently, Yanagisawa's laboratory has presented and published a series of complementary gene disruption studies. First, Hosoda et al. (1994) demonstrated remarkably, that ETA receptor knockout mice bear morphological abnormalities nearly identical to ET-1 knockout mice. Second, they found that disruption of the ET-3 peptide and ETB receptor genes result in homozygous mice that share identical phenotypic traits (i.e., coloration changes and aganglionic megacolon) which are similar to a previously known natural mutation, the Piebald-Lethal mouse (Hosoda et al., 1994; Baynash et al., 1994). This phenotype has a human corollary known as Hirschsprung's Disease and it is now known that the disease, though multigenic, results from a missense mutation of the ETB receptor gene in some individuals (Puffenberger et al., 1994). Taken together these data indicate that the endothelin system is essential to correct embryonic neural crest development, a completely novel finding within the superfamily of guanine-protein-linked receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Endothelin and endothelin antagonists: pharmacology and clinical implications

Endothelins (ET) are a family of peptides with potent biological properties. Endothelial cells produce exclusively ET-1 while other tissues produce ET-2 and ET-3. The production of ET requires an increase in intracellular Ca2+. This increase can be induced by physical chemicals (i.e. hypoxia) or receptor-operated stimuli (i.e. thrombin, angiotensin II, arginine vasopressin, transforming growth factor beta 1, interleukin-1). Most of ET is released abluminally towards vascular smooth muscle and less luminally. The main vascular effect of ET are vasodilation (transient), profound and sustained vasoconstriction as well as proliferation of vascular smooth muscle. These biological effects are mediated by distinct receptors. Three ET receptors have been cloned, i.e. ETA-, ETB- and ETC-receptors. In vascular tissue ETA-receptors are expressed on vascular smooth muscle and responsible for vasoconstriction. ETB-receptors are expressed on endothelium and linked to nitric oxide and/or prostacyclin release. Activation of these receptors explains the transient vasodilation with intraluminal application of ET. Vascular smooth muscle cells can express ETB-receptors which contribute to ET-induced vasoconstriction particularly at lower concentrations. The role of the recently cloned ETC-receptor in the vasculature is still uncertain. ET production is increased (as judged from circulating plasma levels) in vascular disease and atherosclerosis in particular, in myocardial infarction and heart failure, pulmonary hypertension and renal disease. ET production is increased in arterial hypertension remains controversial. Non-peptidic ET antagonists have been developed which either block ETA- receptors or ETA- and ETB-receptors simultaneously. The advantage of ETA-receptors is that they leave the endothelium-dependent vasodilation to ET (via ETB-receptor) intact. However, ETB-mediated contraction remains unaffected by these antagonists. In contrast ETA-/ETB-antagonists fully prevent ET-induced vasoconstriction, however, they also inhibit the endothelial effects of the peptide. ET antagonists interfere with the effects of ET in isolated vascular tissue (including that obtained from humans) as well as in vivo. In humans, ETA as well as ETA-/ETB-antagonists inhibit endothelin-induced vasoconstriction. Hence in summary ET are a family of potent peptides with profound effects in the vasculature. Several studies suggest a role of ET in cardiovascular disease. The newly developed ET-antagonists are potent and selective tools to delineate the (patho-)physiological roles of ET and may become a new class of cardiovascular drugs.

BMS-180560, an insurmountable inhibitor of angiotensin II-stimulated responses: comparison with losartan and EXP3174

1. This study compares the activity of BMS-180560 (2-butyl-1-chloro-1-[[1-[2-(2H-tetrazol-5-yl)phenyl]-1H-indol-4- yl]methyl]-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylic acid), an insurmountable angiotensin II (AII) receptor antagonist, with that of losartan and EXP3174 in functional and biochemical models of AII-receptor activation. 2. BMS-180560 selectively inhibited [125I]-Sar1Ile8AII ([125I]SI-AII) binding to rat aortic smooth muscle (RASM) cell and rat adrenal cortical AT1 receptors (Ki = 7.6 +/- 1.2 and 18.4 +/- 3.9 nM respectively) compared to adrenal cortical AT2 receptors (Ki = 37.6 +/- 1.3 microM). The Ki values of BMS-180560 and EXP3174, but not losartan, varied as a function of the BSA concentration used in the assays, indicating that the diacid drugs bound to albumin. 3. BMS-180560 (3-300 nM) increased the KD of SI-AII for RASM cell AT1 receptors. Only at high concentrations of BMS-180560 (300 nM) were Bmax values decreased. 4. BMS-180560 inhibited AII-stimulated contraction of rabbit aorta with a calculated KB = 0.068 +/- 0.048 nM and decreased maximal AII-stimulated contraction at 1 nM BMS-180560 by 75%. In the presence of 0.1% BSA, a higher KB value (5.2 +/- 0.92 nM) was obtained. Losartan behaved as a competitive antagonist with a KB = 2.6 +/- 0.13 nM. Contraction stimulated by endothelin-1, noradrenaline, KCl, or the TXA2 receptor agonist U-46619 were unaffected by BMS-180560 (1 nM). 5. AII stimulated the acidification rates of RASM cells as measured by a Cytosensor microphysiometer with an EC50 of 18 nM. Losartan (30 nM) shifted the AII concentration-effect curves in a competitive manner whereas BMS-180560 (0.01 and 0.1 nM) decreased the maximum responses by 60 and 75% respectively. Inhibition by losartan and BMS-180560 could be reversed following washout although recovery took longer for BMS-180560. 6. In [3H]-myoinositol-labelled RASM cells, losartan (30 and 200 nM), shifted the EC50 for AII-stimulated [3H]-inositol monophosphaste formation to higher values, with no change in the maximal response. By contrast, EXP3174 (0.1 to 1 nM) decreased the maximal response in a concentration-dependent manner (17-55%). BMS-180560 (3 and 10 nM) increased the EC50 for AII and decreased the maximum response by 30 and 80% respectively. The inhibition by EXP3174 and BMS-180560 could be reversed by inclusion of losartan (200 nM) indicating that the inhibition was not irreversible. 7. In conclusion, BMS-180560 is a potent, specific, predominantly competitive, reversible All receptor antagonist, which displays insurmountable receptor antagonism. At concentrations of BMS-180560 which have no effect on receptor number, BMS-180560 produced insurmountable antagonism of AII-stimulated second messenger formation, extracellular acidification, and smooth muscle contraction.

Pathophysiological role of endothelin revealed by the first orally active endothelin receptor antagonist

Since its discovery, endothelin-1 has attracted considerable scientific interest because of its extremely potent and long-lasting vasoconstrictor effect and its binding to G-protein-coupled receptors. Plasma concentrations of endothelin-1 are low and its release by endothelial cells is polarized towards the basolateral side, suggesting that it is a paracrine factor and not a hormone. Consequently, the effect of injected endothelin-1 may not reflect the effect of endogenous endothelin-1. In contrast, blockade of the action of endogenous endothelin-1 using receptor antagonists should be a valuable means of investigating its physiological and pathological effects. We report here evidence for the pathophysiological role of endothelin-1 as brought by the first synthetic orally active nonpeptide antagonist of endothelin receptors, Ro 46-2005.

Comparative effects of the two endothelin ETA receptor antagonists, BQ-123 and FR139317, on endothelin-1-induced contraction in guinea-pig iliac artery

The effects of two recently introduced endothelin ETA receptor antagonists, BQ-123 and FR139317, were investigated and compared in guinea-pig isolated iliac artery. Endothelins and sarafotoxins induced contraction of guinea-pig iliac artery with a pharmacological profile characteristic of the ETA receptor. The rank order of agonist potency was (mean EC50 values, nM): endothelin-1 (11.7) > or = endothelin-2 (14.9) > or = vasoactive intestinal contractor (19.5) > sarafotoxin S6b (49.8) > or = [Ala3,11]endothelin-1 (55.0) > sarafotoxin S6a (> 100) > endothelin-3 (> or = 1000). The C-terminal hexapeptide, endothelin-(16-21), sarafotoxin S6c and sarafotoxin S6d were neither agonists nor antagonists at concentrations up to 10, 3 and 1 microM, respectively. Both FR139317 (1-10 microM) and BQ-123 (0.1-1 microM) surmountably antagonized the effects of endothelin-1. Schild analysis suggested competitive antagonism for FR139317 (Schild slope 1.32 +/- 0.21, pA2 5.82 +/- 0.16, n = 5), but not for BQ-123 (Schild slope 0.28 +/- 0.08, n = 5), which was however more potent (apparent pKB 6.6-7.2) than FR139317. The potency of FR139317 was particularly low with respect to the reported affinity for ETA receptors, suggesting heterogeneity among ETA receptors. Thus, the endothelin receptor present in guinea-pig iliac artery has the following features: (1) rank order of agonist potencies of the ETA type; (2) low potency of FR139317 and (3) non-competitive antagonism by BQ-123.

Structure-activity studies of endothelin leading to novel peptide ETA antagonists

With the goal of producing receptor antagonists, numerous monocyclic and bicyclic endothelin analogs were prepared and tested for vasoconstrictor activity, receptor affinity and functional antagonist activity. Bis-penicillamine endothelin analogs containing Ala or Asn at position 18 were functional antagonists, with Ki values of 20-40 nM but KB values of about 1 microM (e.g., [Pen1,11, Nle7, Ala18]-endothelin-1, Ki = 42 nM, KB = 1.2 microM). While these peptides are antagonists at the ETA receptor, they appear to be at least partial agonists at another receptor subtype.

Competitive and non competitive interactions of BQ-123 with endothelin ETA receptors

BQ-123 (cyclo[D-Trp-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu]) is a competitive antagonist of the ETA receptor subtype for endothelins in aortic myocytes, and a non-competitive antagonist in human neuroblastoma cells. In the present study, using indo-1 loaded rat brain capillary endothelial cells, we demonstrate that BQ-123 acts either as a non-competitive antagonist of endothelin-1 action on [Ca2+]i depending on the experimental conditions used. A simple hypothesis to account for these results is that BQ-123 forms stable complexes with ETA receptors that are, however, less stable than the complexes formed by endothelin-1 and ETA receptors.

Receptor externalization determines sustained contractile responses to endothelin-1 in the rat aorta

The role of receptor internalization and recycling in the vasoconstrictor action of endothelin-1 (ET-1) is investigated using a combination of biochemical and physiological experiments. The binding of 125I-ET-1 to cultured aortic myocytes is first defined. Binding is rapidly followed by an internalization of the peptide. Part of the receptor sites then slowly reappears at the cell surface via a cycloheximide-insensitive mechanism. Evidence that externalizing receptors are functional and can trigger contractions is presented. Finally, the actions of cyclo[D-Trp-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu] (BQ-123), an antagonist of ETA receptors, are investigated. BQ-123 prevents 125I-ET-1 binding to aortic myocytes (dissociation constant, 10 nM). It prevents the constricting action of ET-1 but not that of angiotensin II. BQ-123 also relaxes almost completely aortic strips that have been precontracted by ET-1 irrespective of the time of its addition. It is concluded that a recycling of internalized ET-1 receptors occurs in ET-1-treated aortic myocytes. This process amplifies the action of the peptide and is probably responsible for the unique contractile action of ET-1.

Determination of the drug-receptor dissociation constant of endothelin-1 using photorelaxation of rabbit isolated thoracic aorta

An in vitro preparation of rabbit thoracic aorta was tested in order to determine whether isometric contractile force induced by endothelin-1 (ET-1) in this preparation is changed when the tissue is exposed to ultraviolet (UV) light. After constriction of an aortic segment to a steady-state level of tension with ET-1, a flash of UV light induced a transient decrease in tension that returned exponentially to equilibrium. This response was endothelium-independent and sensitive to the extracellular sodium concentration. The rate of return to the baseline tension after photorelaxation increased with increasing concentrations of ET-1. UV light had only a slight photorelaxing effect at very low and very high ET-1 concentrations and a much larger effect at concentrations near the A50 value of ET-1. Since an irreversible antagonist does not yet exist for ET-1, the partial irreversible blockade method for getting the dissociation constant (KD) functionally was not possible. The relaxation method, using UV light as a perturbation of ligand-receptor equilibrium, was used instead to obtain KD as well as the forward (k1) and reverse (k2) rate constants of ET-1 in this tissue.