On the importance of the "antagonist assumption" to how receptors express themselves

CGRP physiology, pharmacology, and therapeutic targets: migraine and beyond

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a neuropeptide with diverse physiological functions. Its two isoforms (α and β) are widely expressed throughout the body in sensory neurons as well as in other cell types, such as motor neurons and neuroendocrine cells. CGRP acts via at least two G protein-coupled receptors that form unusual complexes with receptor activity-modifying proteins. These are the CGRP receptor and the AMY1 receptor; in rodents, additional receptors come into play. Although CGRP is known to produce many effects, the precise molecular identity of the receptor(s) that mediates CGRP effects is seldom clear. Despite the many enigmas still in CGRP biology, therapeutics that target the CGRP axis to treat or prevent migraine are a bench-to-bedside success story. This review provides a contextual background on the regulation and sites of CGRP expression and CGRP receptor pharmacology. The physiological actions of CGRP in the nervous system are discussed, along with updates on CGRP actions in the cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, immune, hematopoietic, and reproductive systems and metabolic effects of CGRP in muscle and adipose tissues. We cover how CGRP in these systems is associated with disease states, most notably migraine. In this context, we discuss how CGRP actions in both the peripheral and central nervous systems provide a basis for therapeutic targeting of CGRP in migraine. Finally, we highlight potentially fertile ground for the development of additional therapeutics and combinatorial strategies that could be designed to modulate CGRP signaling for migraine and other diseases.

Pharmacologically distinct phenotypes of α1B -adrenoceptors: variation in binding and functional affinities for antagonists

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The pharmacological properties of particular receptors have recently been suggested to vary under different conditions. We compared the pharmacological properties of the α1B -adrenoceptor subtype in various tissue preparations and under various conditions.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

[(3) H]-prazosin binding to α1B -adrenoceptors in rat liver (segments, dispersed hepatocytes and homogenates) was assessed and the pharmacological profiles were compared with the functional and binding profiles in rat carotid artery and recombinant α1B -adrenoceptors.

KEY RESULTS

In association and saturation-binding experiments with rat liver, binding affinity for [(3) H]-prazosin varied significantly between preparations (KD value approximately ten times higher in segments than in homogenates). The binding profile for various drugs in liver segments also deviated from the representative α1B -adrenoceptor profile observed in liver homogenates and recombinant receptors. L-765,314 and ALS-77, selective antagonists of α1B -adrenoceptors, showed high binding and antagonist affinities in liver homogenates and recombinant α1B -adrenoceptors. However, binding affinities for both ligands in the segments of rat liver and carotid artery were 10 times lower, and the antagonist potencies in α1B -adrenoceptor-mediated contractions of carotid artery were more than 100 times lower than the representative α1B -adrenoceptor profile.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

In contrast to the consistent profile of recombinant α1B -adrenoceptors, the pharmacological profile of native α1B -adrenoceptors of rat liver and carotid artery varied markedly under various receptor environments, showing significantly different binding properties between intact tissues and homogenates, and dissociation between functional and binding affinities. In addition to conventional 'subtype' characterization, 'phenotype' pharmacology must be considered in native receptor evaluations in vivo and in future pharmacotherapy.

Phenotype pharmacology of lower urinary tract α(1)-adrenoceptors

α(1)-Adrenoceptors are involved in numerous physiological functions, including micturition. However, the pharmacological profile of the α(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes remains controversial. Here, we review the literature regarding α(1)-adrenoceptors in the lower urinary tract from the standpoint of α(1L) phenotype pharmacology. Among three α(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes (α(1A), α(1B) and α(1D)), α(1a)-adrenoceptor mRNA is the most abundantly transcribed in the prostate, urethra and bladder neck of many species, including humans. In prostate homogenates or membrane preparations, α(1A)-adrenoceptors with high affinity for prazosin have been detected as radioligand binding sites. Functional α(1)-adrenoceptors in the prostate, urethra and bladder neck have low affinity for prazosin, suggesting the presence of an atypical α(1)-adrenoceptor phenotype (designated as α(1L)). The α(1L)-adrenoceptor occurs as a distinct binding entity from the α(1A)-adrenoceptor in intact segments of variety of tissues including prostate. Both the α(1L)- and α(1A)-adrenoceptors are specifically absent from Adra1A (α(1a)) gene-knockout mice. Transfection of α(1a)-adrenoceptor cDNA predominantly expresses α(1A)-phenotype in several cultured cell lines. However, in CHO cells, such transfection expresses α(1L)- and α(1A)-phenotypes. Under intact cell conditions, the α(1L)-phenotype is predominant when co-expressed with the receptor interacting protein, CRELD1α. In summary, recent pharmacological studies reveal that two distinct α(1)-adrenoceptor phenotypes (α(1A) and α(1L)) originate from a single Adra1A (α(1a)-adrenoceptor) gene, but adrenergic contractions in the lower urinary tract are predominantly mediated via the α(1L)-adrenoceptor. From the standpoint of phenotype pharmacology, it is likely that phenotype-based subtypes such as the α(1L)-adrenoceptor will become new targets for drug development and pharmacotherapy.

Influence of tissue integrity on pharmacological phenotypes of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the rat cerebral cortex

Distinct pharmacological phenotypes of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) have been proposed. We compared the pharmacological profiles of mAChRs in intact segments and homogenates of rat cerebral cortex and other tissues by using radioligand binding assays with [(3)H]N-methylscopolamine ([(3)H]NMS). Recombinant M(1) and M(3) mAChRs were also examined. The density of mAChRs detected by [(3)H]NMS binding to rat cerebral cortex segments and homogenates was the same (approximately 1400 fmol/mg tissue protein), but the dissociation constant of [(3)H]NMS was significantly different (1400-1700 pM in segments and 260 pM in homogenates). A wide variation in [(3)H]NMS binding affinity was also observed among the segments of other tissues (ranging from 139 pM in urinary bladder muscle to 1130 pM in the hippocampus). The mAChRs of cerebral cortex were composed of M(1), M(2), M(3), and M(4) subtypes, which showed typical subtype pharmacology in the homogenates. However, in the cortex segments the M(3) subtype showed a low selectivity for M(3) antagonists (darifenacin, solifenacin) and was not distinguished by the M(3) antagonists from the other subtypes. Recombinant M(1) and M(3) mAChRs showed high affinity for [(3)H]NMS and subtype-specific pharmacology for each tested ligand. The present binding study under conditions where tissue integrity was kept demonstrates a wide variation in [(3)H]NMS binding affinity among mAChRs of many rat tissues and the presence of an atypical M(3) phenotype in the cerebral cortex, suggesting that the pharmacological properties of mAChRs are not necessarily constant, rather they may be significantly modified by tissue integrity and tissue type.

Alpha 1-adrenoceptor pharmacome: alpha 1L-adrenoceptor and alpha 1A-adrenoceptor in the lower urinary tract

Alpha(1)-adrenoceptors are involved in physiological functions such as urinary excretion and ejaculation in the lower urinary tract (LUT). Several alpha(1) antagonists are clinically used for the treatment of urinary obstruction in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. At present, three classical alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes (alpha(1A), alpha(1B), and alpha(1D)) have been identified, among which the alpha(1A) and alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor subtypes have been regarded as the main targets of alpha(1) antagonist therapy for LUT symptoms. Prazosin has been used as a prototypic, classical antagonist, to characterize alpha(1)-adrenoceptors pharmacologically, (i.e. all classical alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes show high-affinity for the drug). However, we found that alpha(1)-adrenoceptors in the LUT show atypical low-affinity for prazosin. Therefore, the concept alpha(1L)-receptor, which indicates alpha(1)-adrenoceptor(s) showing low-affinity for prazosin has been introduced. A recent study demonstrated that the alpha(1L)-adrenoceptor is a specific phenotype present in the many intact tissues including human LUT, and that it originates from the ADRA1A gene. Therefore, the alpha(1L)-adrenoceptor in the LUT is now re-defined as alpha(1A(L))-adrenoceptor. The physiological and pharmacological difference between classical alpha(1A(H),) and alpha(1A(L)) which is the native receptor expressed in the LUT is of special interest as it provides fundamental bases for urological alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor blocking pharmacotherapy. Here, we briefly review the alpha(1)-adrenoceptors in the LUT with special reference to phenotype-based (pharmacome) analysis.

Evaluation of beta1L-adrenoceptors in rabbit heart by tissue segment binding assay

[(3)H]-CGP12177 biphasically bound to beta-adrenoceptors with high and low affinities in the segments and crude membranes of rabbit left ventricle. The low-affinity sites for [(3)H]-CGP12177 in the segments was double in density, compared to the density of high-affinity sites. Total abundance of the beta-adrenoceptors decreased to approximately 10% upon tissue homogenization, and the proportion of low-affinity sites was the same as that of the high-affinity sites in the membranes. The majority of the high-affinity binding sites of [(3)H]-CGP12177 in the segments and the membranes were beta(1H)-adrenoceptor, being highly sensitive to propranolol and beta(1)-antagonists (atenolol and ICI-89,406), whereas the low-affinity binding sites showed a beta(1L)-profile (less sensitive to propranolol and beta(1)-, beta(2)-, and beta(3)-antagonists). Furthermore, a part of the beta(1L)-adrenoceptors was insensitive to atenolol, ICI-89,406, and/or isoproterenol. The present binding study clearly shows that beta(1L)-adrenoceptors occur as a distinct phenotype from beta(1H)-adrenoceptors in rabbit ventricle. However, quantitative imbalance between beta(1H)- and beta(1L)-adrenoceptors and divergent ligand-beta(1L)-adrenoceptor interactions suggest a possibility that the beta(1L)-adrenoceptor may not reflect a simple conformational change or allosteric state in the beta(1)-adrenoceptor molecule.

Identification of alpha 1L-adrenoceptor in mice and its abolition by alpha 1A-adrenoceptor gene knockout

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The alpha(1L)-adrenoceptor has pharmacological properties that distinguish it from three classical alpha(1)-adrenoceptors (alpha(1A), alpha(1B) and alpha(1D)). The purpose of this was to identify alpha(1L)-adrenoceptors in mice and to examine their relationship to classical alpha(1)-adrenoceptors.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Radioligand binding and functional bioassay experiments were performed on the cerebral cortex, vas deferens and prostate of wild-type (WT) and alpha(1A)-, alpha(1B)- and alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor gene knockout (AKO, BKO and DKO) mice.

KEY RESULTS

The radioligand [(3)H]-silodosin bound to intact segments of the cerebral cortex, vas deferens and prostate of WT, BKO and DKO but not of AKO mice. The binding sites were composed of two components with high and low affinities for prazosin or RS-17053, indicating the pharmacological profiles of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors and alpha(1L)-adrenoceptors. In membrane preparations of WT mouse cortex, however, [(3)H]-silodosin bound to a single population of prazosin high-affinity sites, suggesting the presence of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors alone. In contrast, [(3)H]-prazosin bound to two components having alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor and alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor profiles in intact segments of WT and DKO mouse cortices, but AKO mice lacked alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor profiles and BKO mice lacked alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor profiles. Noradrenaline produced contractions through alpha(1L)-adrenoceptors with low affinity for prazosin in the vas deferens and prostate of WT, BKO and DKO mice. However, the contractions were abolished or markedly attenuated in AKO mice.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

alpha(1L)-Adrenoceptors were identified as binding and functional entities in WT, BKO and DKO mice but not in AKO mice, suggesting that the alpha(1L)-adrenoceptor is one phenotype derived from the alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor gene.

Native profiles of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor phenotypes in rabbit prostate

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

alpha(1)-Adrenoceptors in the rabbit prostate have been studied because of their controversial pharmacological profiles in functional and radioligand binding studies. The purpose of the present study is to determine the native profiles of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor phenotypes and to clarify their relationship.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Binding experiments with [3H]-silodosin and [3H]-prazosin were performed using intact tissue segments and crude membrane preparations of rabbit prostate and the results were compared with alpha(1)-adrenoceptor-mediated prostate contraction.

KEY RESULTS

[3H]-Silodosin at subnanomolar concentrations bound specifically to intact tissue segments of rabbit prostate. However, [3H]-prazosin at the same range of concentrations failed to bind to alpha(1)-adrenoceptors of intact segments. Binding sites of [3H]-silodosin in intact segments were composed of alpha(1L) phenotype with low affinities for prazosin (pKi=7.1), 5-methyurapidil and N-[2-(2-cyclopropylmethoxyphenoxy)ethyl]-5-chloro-alpha,alpha-dimethyl-1H-indole-3-ethamine hydrochloride (RS-17053), and alpha(1A)-like phenotype with moderate affinity for prazosin (pKi=8.8) but high affinity for 5-methyurapidil and RS-17053. In contrast, both radioligands bound to a single population of alpha(1)-adrenoceptors in the membrane preparations at the same density with a subnanomolar affinity, showing a typical profile of 'classical' alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors (pKi for prazosin=9.8). The pharmacological profile of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor-mediated prostate contraction was in accord with the alpha(1L) phenotype observed by intact segment binding approach.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Three distinct phenotypes (alpha(1L) and alpha(1A)-like phenotypes in the intact segments and a classical alpha(1A) phenotype in the membranes) with different affinities for prazosin were detected in rabbit prostate. It appears that the three phenotypes are phenotypic subtypes of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors, but are not genetically different subtypes.

A study of antagonist affinities for the human histamine H2 receptor

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Ligand affinity has been a fundamental concept in the field of pharmacology and has traditionally been considered to be constant for a given receptor-ligand interaction. Recent studies have demonstrated that this is not true for all three members of the G(s)-coupled beta-adrenoceptor family. This study evaluated antagonist affinity measurements at a different G(s)-coupled receptor, the histamine H(2) receptor, to determine whether antagonist affinity measurements made at a different family of GPCRs were constant.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

CHO cells stably expressing the human histamine H(2) receptor and a CRE-SPAP reporter were used and antagonist affinity was assessed in short-term cAMP assays and longer term CRE gene transcription assays.

KEY RESULTS

Nine agonists and seven antagonists, of sufficient potency at the H(2) receptor to examine in detail, were identified. Measurements of antagonist affinity were the same regardless of the efficacy of the competing agonist, time of agonist incubation, cellular response measured or presence of a PDE inhibitor.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Antagonist affinity at the G(s)-coupled histamine H(2) receptor obeys the accepted dogma for antagonism at GPCRs. This study further confirms that something unusual is indeed happening with the beta-adrenoceptors and is not an artefact related to the transfected cell system used. As the human histamine H(2) receptor does not behave in a similar manner to any of the human beta-adrenoceptors, it is clear that information gathered from one GPCR cannot be simply extrapolated to predict the behaviour of another GPCR. Each GPCR therefore requires careful and detailed evaluation on its own.

Multiple GPCR conformations and signalling pathways: implications for antagonist affinity estimates

Antagonist affinity measurements have traditionally been considered important in characterizing the cell-surface receptors present in a particular cell or tissue. A central assumption has been that antagonist affinity is constant for a given receptor-antagonist interaction, regardless of the agonist used to stimulate that receptor or the downstream response that is measured. As a consequence, changes in antagonist affinity values have been taken as initial evidence for the presence of novel receptor subtypes. Emerging evidence suggests, however, that receptors can possess multiple binding sites and the same receptor can show different antagonist affinity measurements under distinct experimental conditions. Here, we discuss several mechanisms by which antagonists have different affinities for the same receptor as a consequence of allosterism, coupling to different G proteins, multiple (but non-interacting) receptor sites, and signal-pathway-dependent pharmacology (where the pharmacology observed varies depending on the signalling pathway measured).

“Phenotypic” pharmacology: The influence of cellular environment on G protein-coupled receptor antagonist and inverse agonist pharmacology

A central dogma of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) pharmacology has been the concept that unlike agonists, antagonist ligands display equivalent affinities for a given receptor, regardless of the cellular environment in which the affinity is assayed. Indeed, the widespread use of antagonist pharmacology in the classification of receptor expression profiles in vivo has relied upon this 'antagonist assumption'. However, emerging evidence suggests that the same gene-product may exhibit different antagonist pharmacological profiles, depending upon the cellular context in which it is expressed-so-called 'phenotypic' profiles. In this commentary, we review the evidence relating to some specific examples, focusing on adrenergic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptor systems, where GPCR antagonist/inverse agonist pharmacology has been demonstrated to be cell- or tissue-dependent, before going on to examine some of the ways in which the cellular environment might modulate receptor pharmacology. In the majority of cases, the cellular factors responsible for generating phenotypic profiles are unknown, but there is substantial evidence that factors, including post-transcriptional modifications, receptor oligomerization and constitutive receptor activity, can influence GPCR pharmacology and these concepts are discussed in relation to antagonist phenotypic profiles. A better molecular understanding of the impact of cell background on GPCR antagonist pharmacology is likely to provide previously unrealized opportunities to achieve greater specificity in new drug discovery candidates.

A comparison of the antagonist affinities for the Gi- and Gs-coupled states of the human adenosine A1-receptor

The antagonist affinity for a given receptor is traditionally considered to be constant, reflecting the chemical nature of the specific ligand-receptor interaction. However, recent observations with all three beta-adrenoceptors have cast doubt on this basic pharmacological principle. The extent to which this finding applies to other G protein-coupled receptors and their interaction with different G proteins is unknown. Therefore, we studied the influence of different agonists on antagonist affinity measurements for Gi- and Gs-coupled conformations of the adenosine A1-receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing the human adenosine A1-receptor and a cAMP-response element (CRE)-secreted placental alkaline phosphatase reporter gene. Gi-coupled inhibition of [3H]cAMP accumulation via the A1-receptor was observed at low concentrations of agonist; however, a small increase in [3H]cAMP accumulation was also seen at higher agonist concentrations. This biphasic response was more evident for A1-stimulated CRE-gene transcription. The inhibitory component was abolished by pretreatment with pertussis toxin, whereas the stimulatory component was augmented, suggesting that the responses were due to an A1-Gi-coupled inhibition followed by an A1-Gs-coupled stimulation. However, the antagonist affinity values measured at the Gi-coupled and Gs-coupled conformations of the receptor were the same in both functional responses and whole-cell binding. Thus, in marked contrast to the beta-adrenoceptors, the A1-receptor conforms to the long-held principle of pharmacology that antagonist affinity measurements are constant regardless of the response being measured and the competing agonist used to stimulate that response. This was true even when the receptor was shown, in the same assay, to exist in two different conformational states coupled to two different G proteins.

Evidence for a secondary state of the human beta3-adrenoceptor

There are three members of the beta-adrenoceptor family, all of which are primarily coupled to G(s) proteins. Recent studies using the huge range of beta-ligands now available have given remarkable new insights into their pharmacology. beta1-adrenoceptors exist in at least two active conformations, whereas beta2-adrenoceptors are able to induce signaling via different agonist-induced receptor conformational states, and their affinity for antagonists can be altered by highly efficacious agonists. This study therefore examined the pharmacology of the human beta3-adrenoceptor stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Several compounds described previously as beta-antagonists have agonist properties at the beta3-adrenoceptor. Antagonist affinity measurements varied at the beta3-adrenoceptor in a manner similar to those observed at human beta1-adrenoceptors and unlike those seen at beta2-adrenoceptors. Some ligands (e.g., fenoterol and cimaterol) were more readily inhibited by all antagonists, whereas other ligands [e.g., alprenolol and 1-(2-ethylphenoxy)-3-[[(1S)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-naphthalenyl]amino]-(2S)-2-propanol hydrochloride [SR 59230A]) stimulated responses that were more resistant to antagonism. Alprenolol inhibited fenoterol-induced beta3-adrenoceptor responses while acting as an agonist at higher concentrations. This is highly suggestive of two active conformational states of the beta3-adrenoceptor. (S)-4-[2-Hydroxy-3-phenoxypropylaminoethoxy]-N-(2-methoxyethyl)phenoxyacetamide (ZD 7114) stimulated a two-component response, of which the first component was more readily antagonized than the second. Taken together, these experiments suggest that the human beta3-adrenoceptor exists in at least two different agonist conformations with a similar high- and low-affinity pharmacology analogous to, if not as pronounced as, the beta1-adrenoceptor. Both conformations are present in living cells and can be distinguished by their pharmacological characteristics. In this respect, the human beta3-adrenoceptor seems similar to the human beta1-adrenoceptor.

Site of action of beta-ligands at the human beta1-adrenoceptor

Antagonist affinity measurements have traditionally been considered important in defining the receptor or receptor subtypes present within cells or tissues. Any change in this value has normally been taken as evidence for the presence of a second receptor. However, highly efficacious ligands induce a time and phosphorylation-dependent change in the beta2-adrenoceptor resulting in 10-fold lower affinity for antagonists. Also the beta1-adrenoceptor is now considered to exist in two different active conformations which are distinguished by their pharmacological properties. In this study, the site of action of a range of beta-agonists and beta-antagonists was determined using the human beta1-adrenoceptor stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells with cyclic AMP response element reporter genes. Adrenaline and noradrenaline were confirmed as having agonist actions via the catecholamine site, whereas all antagonists had higher affinity for the catecholamine rather than secondary site. However, the rank order of affinity for the two sites was different suggesting that they are indeed separate entities. The measurements of antagonist affinity at the catecholamine site, however, were found to depend upon the agonist present. For example, xamoterol, cimaterol, terbutaline, and formoterol agonist responses were more readily antagonized by CGP 20712A[2-hydroxy-5-(2-[{hydroxy-3-(4-[1-methyl-4-trifluoromethyl-2-imidazolyl]phenoxy)propyl}amino]ethoxy)benzamide] than the catecholamine responses themselves. This, however, was not related to agonist efficacy as has previously been reported for the human beta2-adrenoceptor. Therefore, it may be that some agonists (e.g., cimaterol) purely activate the catecholamine site and others purely activate the secondary site (e.g., CGP 12177 [(-)-4-(3-tert-butylamino-2-hydroxypropoxy)-benzimidazol-2-one]), whereas the others (e.g., catecholamines) activate both sites to differing degrees.

Influence of agonist efficacy and receptor phosphorylation on antagonist affinity measurements: differences between second messenger and reporter gene responses

The ability of an antagonist to bind to a receptor is an innate property of that ligand-receptor chemical interaction. Provided no change in the antagonist or receptor chemical nature occurs, this affinity should remain constant for a given antagonist-receptor interaction, regardless of the agonists used. This fundamental assumption underpins the classification of receptors. Here, measurements of beta2-adrenoceptor-mediated cAMP accumulation and cAMP response-element (CRE)-mediated reporter-gene transcription revealed differences in antagonist affinity that depended upon agonist incubation time and the efficacy of the competing agonist. In cAMP accumulation studies (10-min agonist incubation), antagonist affinities were the same regardless of the agonist used. The CRE-reporter gene assay (5 h of incubation) antagonist affinities were 10-fold lower in the presence of isoprenaline and adrenaline than when salbutamol or terbutaline were present (e.g., log KD propranolol -8.65 +/- 0.08, n = 22, and -9.68 +/- 0.07, n = 17, for isoprenaline and salbutamol-induced responses, respectively). Isoprenaline and adrenaline were more efficacious in functional studies, and their ability to internalize GFP-tagged human beta2-adrenoceptors. Longer-term cAMP studies also showed significant differences in KD values moving toward that seen with gene transcription. Agonist-dependent differences in antagonist affinity were reduced for reporter-gene responses when a phosphorylation-deficient mutant of the beta2-adrenoceptor was used. This study suggests that high-efficacy agonists induce a chemical modification in beta2-adrenoceptors (via phosphorylation) that reduces antagonist affinities. Because reporter-gene assays are used for high-throughput screening in drug discovery, less efficacious or partial agonists may be more reliable than highly efficacious agonists when reporter-gene techniques are used to estimate antagonist affinity.

Tiotidine, a histamine H2 receptor inverse agonist that binds with high affinity to an inactive G-protein-coupled form of the receptor. Experimental support for the cubic ternary complex model

Knowing the importance for research and pharmacological uses of proper ligand classification into agonists, inverse agonists, and antagonists, the aim of this work was to study the behavior of tiotidine, a controversial histamine H2 receptor ligand. We found that tiotidine, described previously as an H2 antagonist, actually behaves as an inverse agonist in U-937 cells, diminishing basal cAMP levels. [3H]Tiotidine showed two binding sites, one with high affinity and low capacity and the other with low affinity and high capacity. The former site disappeared in the presence of guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate, indicating that it belongs to a subset of receptors coupled to G-protein, showing the classic binding profile for an agonist. Considering the occupancy models developed up to now, the only one that explains tiotidine dual behavior is the cubic ternary complex (CTC) model. This model allows G-protein to interact with the receptor even in the inactive state. We showed by theoretical simulations based on the CTC model of dose-response and binding experiments that tiotidine biases the system to a G-protein-coupled form of the receptor that is unable to evoke a response. This theoretical approach was supported by experimental results in which an unrelated G-protein-coupled receptor that also signals through Galphas-protein (beta2-adrenoreceptor) was impeded by tiotidine. This interference clearly implies that tiotidine biases the system to Galphas-coupled form of the H2 receptor and turns Galphas-protein less available to interact with beta2-adrenoreceptor. These findings not only show that tiotidine is an H2 inverse agonist in U-937 cells but also provide experimental support for the CTC model.

Pharmacological characterisation of cannabinoid receptors inhibiting interleukin 2 release from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

The effects of a range of cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists on phytohaemagglutinin-induced secretion of interleukin-2 from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were investigated. The nonselective cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55212-2 ((R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[4-morpholinylmethyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-naphthyl) methanone mesylate) and the selective cannabinoid CB(2) receptor agonist JWH 015 ((2-methyl-1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-1-napthalenylmethanone) inhibited phytohaemagglutinin (10 microg/ml)-induced release of interleukin-2 in a concentration-dependent manner (IC(1/2max), WIN55212-2=8.8 x 10(-7) M, 95% confidence limits (C.L.)=2.2 x 10(-7)-3.5 x 10(-6) M; JWH 015=1.8 x 10(-6) M, 95% C.L.=1.2 x 10(-6)-2.9 x 10(-6) M, n=5). The nonselective cannabinoid receptor agonists CP55,940 ((-)-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethyl-hepthyl)-phenyl]4-[3-hydroxypropyl]cyclo-hexan-1-ol), Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and the selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonist ACEA (arachidonoyl-2-chloroethylamide) had no significant (P>0.05) inhibitory effect on phytohaemagglutinin-induced release of interleukin-2. Dexamethasone significantly (P<0.05) inhibited phytohaemagglutinin-induced release of interleukin-2 in a concentration-dependent manner (IC(1/2max)=1.3 x 10(-8) M, 95% C.L.=1.4 x 10(-9)-3.2 x 10(-8) M). The cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist SR141716A (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride) (10(-6) M) did not antagonise the inhibitory effect of WIN55212-2 whereas the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist SR144528 (N-(1,S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicyclo(2,2,1)heptan-2-yl)-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide) antagonised the inhibitory effect of WIN55212-2 (pA(2)=6.3+/-0.1, n=5). In addition, CP55,940 (10(-6) M) and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (10(-6) M) also antagonised the inhibitory effects of WIN55212-2 (pA(2)=6.1+/-0.1, n=5 and pA(2)=6.9+/-0.2, n=5). In summary, WIN55,212-2 and JWH 015 inhibited interleukin-2 release from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells via the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor. In contrast, CP55,940 and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol behaved as partial agonists/antagonists in these cells.

Inhibition of improgan antinociception by the cannabinoid (CB)(1) antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716A): lack of obligatory role for endocannabinoids acting at CB(1) receptors

Improgan, a nonopioid antinociceptive agent, activates descending, pain-relieving mechanisms in the brain stem, but the receptor for this compound has not been identified. Because cannabinoids also activate nonopioid analgesia by a brain stem action, experiments were performed to assess the significance of cannabinoid mechanisms in improgan antinociception. The cannabinoid CB(1) antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chloro phenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716A) induced dose-dependent inhibition of improgan antinociception on the tail-flick test after i.c.v. administration in rats. The same treatments yielded comparable inhibition of cannabinoid [R-(+)-(2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-mor pholinyl)methyl]pyrol[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl)(1-naphthalenyl)methanone monomethanesulfonate, WIN 55,212-2] analgesia. Inhibition of improgan and WIN 55,212-2 antinociception by SR141716A was also observed in Swiss-Webster mice. Radioligand binding studies showed no appreciable affinity of improgan on rat brain, mouse brain, and human recombinant CB(1) receptors, ruling out a direct action at these sites. To test the hypothesis that CB(1) receptors indirectly participate in improgan signaling, the effects of improgan were assessed in mice with a null mutation of the CB(1) gene with and without SR141716A pretreatment. Surprisingly, improgan induced complete antinociception in both CB(1) (-/-) and wild-type control [CB(1) (+/+)] mice. Furthermore, SR141716A inhibited improgan antinociception in CB(1) (+/+) mice, but not in CB(1) (-/-) mice. Taken together, the results show that SR141716A reduces improgan antinociception, but neither cannabinoids nor CB(1) receptors seem to play an obligatory role in improgan signaling. Present and previous studies suggest that Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol may act at both CB(1) and other receptors to relieve pain, but no evidence was found indicating that improgan uses either of these mechanisms. SR141716A will facilitate the study of improgan-like analgesics.

Inverse agonist properties of dopaminergic antagonists at the D(1A) dopamine receptor: uncoupling of the D(1A) dopamine receptor from G(s) protein

The interaction of dopaminergic antagonists with the D(1A) dopamine receptor was assessed in PC2 cells that transiently express this receptor. The maximal binding and dissociation constants for the D(1A) dopamine receptor, using the ligand [(125)I]SCH23982 were 0.38 +/- 0.09 nM and 1 to 4 pmol/mg, respectively, when assessed 48 h after transfection with cDNA encoding the rat D(1A) receptor. Basal adenylyl cyclase activity increased 50 to 60% in membranes of transfected PC2 cells compared with control membranes. The dopaminergic antagonists clozapine, cis-flupenthixol, (+)-butaclamol, haloperidol, chlorpromazine, and fluphenazine inhibited constitutive adenylyl cyclase activity in membranes of cells expressing the D(1A) receptor. SCH23390, a selective D(1) dopamine receptor antagonist, and (-)-butaclamol did not alter basal cyclase activity, whereas dopamine increased enzyme activity in membranes expressing the D(1A) dopamine receptor. The coupling of D(1A) receptors with G(s) proteins was examined by immunoprecipitation of membrane G(salpha) followed by immunoblotting with a D(1A) dopamine receptor monoclonal antibody. Clozapine, cis-flupenthixol, (+)-butaclamol, haloperidol, and fluphenazine but not SCH23390 or (-)-butaclamol decreased D(1A) receptor-G(salpha) coupling by 70 to 80%, and SCH23390 was able to prevent the receptor-G(salpha) uncoupling induced by haloperidol or clozapine. These results indicate that some dopaminergic antagonists suppress basal signal transduction and behave as inverse agonists at the D(1A) dopamine receptor. This action of the dopamine receptor antagonists may contribute to their antidopaminergic properties that seem to underlie their clinical actions as antipsychotic drugs.

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of relative agonist efficacy

Historically, the ability of a ligand to bind to its receptor and the ability to subsequently activate that receptor have been described as the properties of affinity and intrinsic efficacy, respectively. These properties were originally believed to be independent of one another; both are possessed by ligands classed as "agonists," and they have served as the quantitative foundation of the drug and receptor classification process. Although affinity has been interpreted readily in physicochemical terms, equivalent molecular models for efficacy remain elusive. In recent times, there has been a significant paradigm shift in our understanding of the interrelationship between affinity and intrinsic efficacy, particularly on theoretical grounds, yet the actual methods available to measure these parameters remain largely operational. Nevertheless, a number of approaches, based on both functional measurements and radioligand binding studies, are available to quantify agonist efficacy on a relative scale and, to date, these remain the most practical. This commentary discusses the most common of these methods, their advantages and limitations, the dependence of the expression of agonism on the chosen assay system, and the impact of recent biochemical and molecular biological advances on the study of efficacy. Additionally, some of the more contemporary theories regarding the molecular nature of efficacy are briefly discussed, as well as the caveats that always must be borne in mind when any determinations of relative agonist efficacy are made.

A pH-dependent model of the activation mechanism of the histamine H2 receptor

A pH-dependent model of agonist action for the histamine H2 receptor was developed by taking into account the different ionic states of the amino acid residues that constitute the agonist-binding pocket of the receptor. The model offers the possibility of examining diverse mechanistic pathways to yield the active form of the receptor according to the molecular structure of the ligand. The rationale is valid for either tautomeric or non-tautomeric agonists and provides new insight into the mechanism of receptor activation. The subsequent application of the operational model of agonism allows one to derive agonist concentration- effect relationships that may prove useful for both the simulation of agonist profiles under different physiological conditions and the estimation of the pharmacologic parameters of efficacy and potency. General principles involved in the formulation are expected to be valid for other G-protein-coupled receptors.

Down-regulation of melanocortin receptor signaling mediated by the amino terminus of Agouti protein in Xenopus melanophores

Agouti protein and Agouti-related protein (Agrp) regulate pigmentation and body weight, respectively, by antagonizing melanocortin receptor signaling. A carboxyl-terminal fragment of Agouti protein, Ser73-Cys131, is sufficient for melanocortin receptor antagonism, but Western blot analysis of skin extracts reveals that the electrophoretic mobility of native Agouti protein corresponds to the mature full-length form, His23-Cys131. To investigate the potential role of the amino-terminal residues, we compared the function of full-length and carboxyl-terminal fragments of Agrp and Agouti protein in a sensitive bioassay based on pigment dispersion in Xenopus melanophores. We find that carboxyl-terminal Agouti protein, and all forms of Agrp tested, act solely by competitive antagonism of melanocortin action. However, full-length Agouti protein acts by an additional mechanism that is time- and temperature-dependent, depresses maximal levels of pigment dispersion, and is therefore likely to be mediated by receptor down-regulation. Apparent down-regulation is not observed for a mixture of amino-terminal and carboxyl-terminal fragments. We propose that the phenotypic effects of Agouti in vivo represent a bipartite mechanism: competitive antagonism of agonist binding by the carboxyl-terminal portion of Agouti protein and down-regulation of melanocortin receptor signaling by an unknown mechanism that requires residues in the amino terminus of the Agouti protein.

Interactions of ligands with active and inactive conformations of the dopamine D2 receptor

The affinities of 19 pharmacologically diverse dopamine D2 receptor ligands were determined for the active and inactive conformations of cloned human dopamine D2 receptors expressed in Ltk cells. The agonist [3H]quinpirole was used to selectively label the guanine nucleotide-binding protein-coupled, active receptor conformation. The antagonist [3H]raclopride, in the presence of the non-hydrolysable GTP-analogue Gpp(NH)p and sodium ions and in the absence of magnesium ions, was used to label the free inactive receptor conformation. The intrinsic activities of the ligands were determined in a forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP assay using the same cells. An excellent correlation was shown between the affinity ratios (KR/KRG) of the ligands for the two receptor conformations and their intrinsic activity (r=0.96). The ligands included eight structurally related and enantiopure 2-aminotetralin derivatives; the enantiomers of 5-hydroxy-2-(dipropylamino)tetralin, 5-methoxy-2-(dipropylamino)tetralin, 5-fluoro-2-(dipropylamino)tetralin and 2-(dipropylamino)tetralin. The (S)-enantiomers behaved as full agonists in the cyclic AMP assay and displayed a large KR/KRG ratio. The (R)-enantiomers were classified as partial agonists and had lower ratios. The structure-affinity relationships of these compounds at the active and the inactive receptor conformations were analysed separately, and used in conjunction with a homology based receptor model of the dopamine D2 receptor. This led to proposed binding modes for agonists, antagonists and partial agonists in the 2-aminotetralin series. The concepts used in this study should be of value in the design of ligands with predetermined affinity and intrinsic activity.

Pharmacological analysis of G-protein activation mediated by guinea-pig recombinant 5-HT1B receptors in C6-glial cells: similarities with the human 5-HT1B receptor

1. The guinea-pig recombinant 5-hydroxytryptamine1B (gp 5-HT1B) receptor stably transfected in rat C6-glial cells was characterized by monitoring G-protein activation in a membrane preparation with agonist-stimulated [35S]-GTPgammaS binding. The intrinsic activity of 5-HT receptor ligands was compared with that determined previously at the human recombinant 5-HT1B (h 5-HT1B) receptor under similar experimental conditions. 2. Membrane preparations of C6-glial/gp 5-HT1B cells exhibited [3H]-5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT) and [3H]-N-[4-methoxy-3,4-methylpiperazin-1-yl) phenyl]-3-methyl-4-(4-pyridinyl)benzamide (GR 125743) binding sites with a pKd of 9.62 to 9.85 and a Bmax between 2.1 to 6.4 fmol mg(-1) protein. The binding affinities of a series of 5-HT receptor ligands determined with [3H]-5-CT and [3H]-GR 125743 were similar. Ligand affinities were comparable to and correlated (r2: 0.74, P<0.001) with those determined at the recombinant h 5-HT1B receptor. 3. [35S]-GTPgammaS binding to membrane preparations of C6-glial/gp 5-HT1B cells was stimulated by the 5-HT receptor agonists that were being investigated. The maximal responses of naratriptan, zolmitriptan, sumatriptan, N-methyl-3-[pyrrolidin-2(R)-ylmethyl]-1H-indol-5-ylmethyl sulphonamide (CP 122638), rizatriptan and dihydroergotamine were between 0.76 and 0.85 compared to 5-HT. The potency of these agonists showed a positive correlation (r2: 0.72, P=0.015) with their potency at the recombinant h 5-HT1B receptor. 1-naphthylpiperazine, (+/-)-cyanopindolol and (2'-methyl-4'-(5-methyl[1,2,4] oxadiazole-3-yl)biphenyl-4-carboxylic acid [4-methoxy-3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)phenyl]amide (GR 127935) elicited an even smaller response (Emax: 0.32 to 0.63). 4. The ligands 1'-methyl-5-(2'-methyl-4'-(5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazole-3-yl) biphenyl-4-carbonyl)-2,3,6,7tetrahydrospiro [furo[2,3-f]indole-3-spiro-4'-piperidine] (SB224289), methiothepin and ritanserin displayed inhibition of basal [35S]-GTPgammaS binding at concentrations relevant to their binding affinity for the gp 5-HT1B receptor. Methiothepin and SB224289 behaved as competitive antagonists at gp 5-HT1B receptors; pA2 values were 9.74 and 8.73, respectively when 5-HT was used as an agonist. These estimates accorded with the potencies measured in antagonism of zolmitriptan-mediated inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP formation. Ketanserin acted as a weak antagonist (pK(B): 5.87) at gp 5-HT1B receptors. 5. In conclusion, the recombinant gp 5-HT1B receptor shares important pharmacological similarities with the recombinant h 5-HT1B receptor. The finding that negative activity occurs at these receptors further suggests that SB224289, methiothepin and ritanserin are likely to be inverse agonists.

5-HT 1B/D receptor antagonists

1. 5-Hydroxytryptamine-1B (5-HT 1B, formerly designated 5-HT 1D beta) and 5-hydroxy-tryptamine-1D (5-HT 1D, formerly designated 5-HT 1D alpha) receptors are distinct molecular entities that mediate serotonergic neurotransmission. Both are G-protein-coupled receptors without introns in their coding region, negatively coupled to adenylate cyclase; their precise function in human beings remains to be defined. In brain, they are highly enriched in the globus pallidus and the substantia nigra. 2. Presynaptic 5-HT 1B/D receptors take part in the control of the release not only of 5-HT itself, but also of other neurotransmitters-for example, acetylcholine, glutamate, dopamine, noradrenaline and gamma-aminobutyric acid. Selective blockade of central 5-HT 1B/D autoreceptors should facilitate 5-HT neurotransmission and may offer a novel approach to antidepressant therapy. Other 5-HT 1B/D receptors are located postsynaptically; those receptors may be supersensitive in the pathophysiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder and may be a potential target for its treatment. 3. Few if any ligands show selectivity for 5-HT 1B or 5-HT 1D receptors or both. Most pharmacological studies have been performed with nonselective antagonists-for example, metergoline, I-naphthylpiperazine, methiothepin, ketanserin and ritanserin. Recently, a novel series of benzanilides have been reported as the first examples of selective 5-HT 1B/D receptor antagonists. GR 127935, a representative compound of this series, displays mixed agonist-antagonist properties both in vitro and in vivo. It induces upon systemic administration in the guinea pig either an opposite (decrease) effect or a small increase (65%, 5 mg/kg) in the concentration of cortical extracellular 5-HT compared with fluoxetine (218%, 10 mg/kg). The importance of blockade of 5-HT 1B/D receptors in the raphé region, their possible interaction with 5-HT 1A receptors, and consequent inhibition of 5-HT release in terminal 5-HT 1B/D receptor-containing regions are discussed. 4. To find out whether the available so-called 5-HT 1B/D receptor antagonists are indeed antagonists and not partial agonists, efficacy was measured at recombinant human 5-HT 1B and 5-HT 1D receptor sites by using a [35S]-GTP gamma S binding assay to membrane preparations of stably transfected rat C6-glial cell lines. Metergoline and the selective 5-HT 1B/D receptor ligands GR 127935 as well as GR 125743 showed significant intrinsic activity (43% to 69%) at the 5-HT 1D receptor subtype, whereas the nonselective ligand 1-naphthylpiperazine yielded less (15% to 19%) intrinsic activity at both receptor subtypes. In contrast, the nonselective ligands methiothepin, ketanserin and ritanserin are inverse agonists because they displayed negative efficacy (-14% to -28%). Differential blockade of 5-HT 1B/D receptors by neutral antagonists and inverse agonists is discussed in relation to the 5-HT tone on 5-HT 1B/D receptors. 5. It can concluded that 5-HT 1B/D receptor ligands modulate 5-HT neurotransmission through a terminal 5-HT 1B/D receptor. Future work should be directed toward the identification of selective 5-HT 1B and 5-HT 1D receptor ligands that display either neutral antagonist or inverse agonist properties to evaluate the therapeutic potential of 5-HT 1B/D receptor blockade.

Heterogeneity and complexity of alpha 1-adrenoceptors in the ovine uterine artery and umbilical vein

To understand the subtypes of alpha 1-adrenoceptors in the regulation of uterine and umbilical vascular function, the subtypes of alpha 1-adrenoceptors in the ovine uterine artery and umbilical vein were investigated pharmacologically. The use of the irreversible alpha 1B-adrenoceptor antagonist, chloroethylclonidine, revealed the heterogeneity of alpha 1-adrenoceptors in these two tissues. Chloroethylclonidine showed different patterns of action. While it depressed the maximal contraction to norepinephrine in the umbilical vein, it did not decrease the maximal response in the uterine artery. The alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonist, 2-(2,6-dimethoxyphenoxyethyl) aminomethyl-1,4-benzodioxane (WB 4101), competitively inhibited norepinephrine-induced contractile responses in the ovine uterine artery and umbilical vein with intermediate pA2 values of 8.30 and 8.45, respectively. Combined use of chloroethylclonidine with either prazosin or WB 4101 produced an additive inhibition of norepinephrine-induced contractions in both tissues, suggesting an interaction of WB 4101 with a chloroethylclonidine-insensitive alpha 1-adrenoceptor. However, the chloroethylclonidine-insensitive alpha 1-adrenoceptor differed on the affinity for prazosin in the uterine artery and umbilical vein. The Ca2+ channel blocker, nifedipine, inhibited contractions to both the chloroethylclonidine-sensitive alpha 1-adrenoceptor (alpha 1B subtype) and the chloroethylclonidine-insensitive alpha 1-adrenoceptor in both tissues. Prazosin, WB 4101 and chloroethylclonidine all inhibited norepinephrine-induced contraction due to the release of calcium from intracellular stores in both tissues. Our results suggest that there is heterogeneity and complexity of alpha 1-adrenoceptors in the ovine uterine artery and umbilical vein. Both the chloroethylclonidine-sensitive and insensitive alpha 1-adrenoceptor may use both intracellular and extracellular Ca2+ sources.

A match between binding to beta-adrenoceptors and stimulation of adenylyl cyclase parameters of (-)isoproterenol and salbutamol on rat brain

Inhibition experiments of (-)[3H]CGP 12177 binding by (-)isoproterenol and salbutamol were performed on synaptosomes prepared from rat brain cortex and cerebellum. Adenylyl cyclase (AC) stimulation experiments on slices of these structures were also performed, with measuring [14C]cAMP obtained from [14C]adenine. Studying beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors (beta 2AR) separately, dissociation constants of (-)isoproterenol for the high- (KH) and low- (KL) affinity states are 8 and 206 nM, respectively, for beta 1AR, vs 20 and 900 nM for beta 2AR. With salbutamol, KH and KL for beta 2AR are 37 and 1250 nM, respectively, vs 430 and 8500 nM for beta 1AR. In any case, the proportion of high-affinity state (RH) of beta 2AR in the cerebellum (59% and 35% for (-)isoproterenol and salbutamol, respectively) is twice that of beta 1AR (30% and 18%). Surprisingly, the RH of cortex beta 2AR with (-)isoproterenol (30%) is significantly lower than in the cerebellum, but not with salbutamol (35%). To allow meaningful comparisons of potencies in stimulating [14C]cAMP production, we define the coupling efficiency (CE), applicable to specified beta AR subtype and agonist, and expressed as the maximal production of mol cAMP.mol-1 beta AR.min-1. The order of CE was always in favor of (-)isoproterenol vs salbutamol on cerebellum beta 2AR > on cortex beta 2AR > on cortex beta 1AR. This order indicates the partial agonism of salbutamol for both beta AR subtypes, and an intrinsic better coupling of beta 2AR vs beta 1AR in rat brain. Moreover, this order corresponds roughly to that of RH. Hence, CE is directly correlated with RH at least for these two agonists. EC50 for cAMP production for each subtype and agonist is in the same order than the respective KL, and might only reflect the rapid return of receptor to low-affinity state after the activation of Gs protein. In binding experiments on the whole beta AR in both areas, the pseudo-Hill coefficient did not reach 1 with 0.3 mM guanosine 5'-(beta, gamma-imido)triphosphate (GppNHp). This dysfunction of GppNHp in rat brain structures might be caused by a major difference in the regulation of coupling in the ternary complex as compared with peripheral tissues.

How efficacious are 5-HT1B/D receptor ligands: an answer from GTP gamma S binding studies with stably transfected C6-glial cell lines

The intrinsic activity of a series of 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin, 5-HT) receptor ligands was analysed at recombinant h5-HT1B and h5-HT1D receptor sites using a [35S]GTP gamma S binding assay and membrane preparations of stably transfected C6-glial cell lines. Compounds either stimulated or inhibited [35S]GTP gamma S binding to a membrane preparation containing either h5-HT1B or h5-HT1D receptors. The potencies observed for most of the compounds at the h5-HT1B receptor subtype correlated with their potencies measured by inhibition of stimulated cAMP formation on intact cells. Apparent agonist potencies in the [35S]GTP gamma S binding assay to C6-glial/h5-HT1D membranes were, with the exception of 2-[5-[3-(4-methylsulphonylamino)benzyl-1 2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-1H-indol-3-yl] ethanamine (L694247), 5- to 13-times lower than in the cAMP assay on intact cells. This suggests that receptor coupling in the h5-HT1D membrane preparation is less efficient than that in the intact cell. It further appeared that 6-times more h5-HT1D than h5-HT1B binding sites were required to attain a similar, maximal (73%), 5-HT-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding response: Hence, the h5-HT1B receptor in C6-glial cell membranes could be more efficiently coupled, even though some compounds more readily displayed intrinsic activity at h5-HT1D receptor sites [e.g. dihydroergotamine and (2'-methyl-4'-(5-methyl[1,2,4]oxadiazol-3-yl)biphenyl-4-carboxylic acid [4-methoxy-3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)phenyl]amide (GR127935)]. Efficacy differences were apparent for most of the compounds (sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, rizatriptan, N-methyl-3-[pyrrolidin-2(R)-ylmethyl]-1H-indol-5-ylmethyl sulfonamide (CP122638), dihydroergotamine, naratriptan and GR127935) that stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding compared to the native agonist 5-HT. The observed maximal responses were different for the h5-HT1B and h5-HT1D receptor subtypes. Few compounds behaved as full agonists: L694247, zolmitriptan and sumatriptan did so at the h5-HT1B receptor and only L694247 at the h5-HT1D receptor. GR127935 (10 microM) exerted little effect on [35S]GTP gamma S binding via h5-HT1B receptors (10% stimulation), but potently (pA2: 9.11) antagonized h5-HT1B receptor-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding. Ketanserin and methiothepin inhibited [35S]GTP gamma S binding (by 13-28%) in the absence of an agonist, but were potent and competitive antagonists in the presence of an agonist via h5-HT1B (methiothepin) and h5-HT1D (methiothepin and ketanserin) receptors. The results document the utility of using [35S]GTP gamma S binding studies to assess agonist efficacy, and to characterize 5-HT1B/D receptor ligands as apparently neutral antagonists and inverse agonists at the G-protein level.

Novel (R)-2-amino-5-fluorotetralins: dopaminergic antagonists and inverse agonists

A series of secondary and tertiary N-alkyl derivatives of (R)-2-amino-5-fluorotetralin have been prepared. The affinities of the compounds for [3H]raclopride-labeled cloned human dopamine (DA) D2 and D3 receptors as well as [3H]-8-OH-DPAT-labeled rat hippocampal 5-HT1A receptors were determined. In order to selectively determine affinities for the high-affinity agonist binding site at DA D2 receptors, the agonist [3H]quinpirole was used. The intrinsic activities of the compounds at DA D2 and D3 receptors were evaluated in a [35S]GTP gamma S binding assay. The novel compounds were characterized as dopaminergic antagonists or inverse agonists. The antagonist (R)-2-(butylpropylamino)-5-fluorotetralin (16) bound with high affinity (Ki = 4.4 nM) to the DA D3 receptor and was the most D3-selective compound (10-fold). (R)-2-[[4-(8-Aza-7, 9-dioxospiro[4.5]decan-8-yl)butyl]propylamino]-5-fluorote tralin (18) bound with very high affinity to both DA D3 and 5-HT1A receptors (Ki = 0.2 nM) and was also characterized as a dopaminergic antagonist. (R)-2-(Benzylpropylamino)-5-fluorotetralin (10) behaved as an inverse agonist at both DA D2 and D3 receptors. It decreased the basal [35S]GTP gamma S binding and potently inhibited the DA-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding. It is apparent that the intrinsic activity of a 2-aminotetralin derivative may be modified by varying the N-alkyl substituents.

Activation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors via their allosteric binding sites

Ligands that bind to the allosteric-binding sites on muscarinic acetylcholine receptors alter the conformation of the classical-binding sites of these receptors and either diminish or increase their affinity for muscarinic agonists and classical antagonists. It is not known whether the resulting conformational change also affects the interaction between the receptors and the G proteins. We have now found that the muscarinic receptor allosteric modulators alcuronium, gallamine, and strychnine (acting in the absence of an agonist) alter the synthesis of cAMP in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the M2 or the M4 subtype of muscarinic receptors in the same direction as the agonist carbachol. In addition, most of their effects on the production of inositol phosphates in CHO cells expressing the M1 or the M3 muscarinic receptor subtypes are also similar to (although much weaker than) those of carbachol. The agonist-like effects of the allosteric modulators are not observed in CHO cells that have not been transfected with the gene for any of the subtypes of muscarinic receptors. The effects of alcuronium on the formation of cAMP and inositol phosphates are not prevented by the classical muscarinic antagonist quinuclidinyl benzilate. These observations demonstrate for the first time that the G protein-mediated functional responses of muscarinic receptors can be evoked not only from their classical, but also from their allosteric, binding sites. This represents a new mechanism of receptor activation.