Serum lipid and lipoprotein changes induced by new oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol plus levonorgestrel or desogestrel

Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release

The stress response differs between women using hormonal contraception and naturally cycling women. Yet, despite ample evidence showing that the stress response differs across the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling women, limited work has investigated whether the stress response differs across the hormonal contraceptive cycle, during which synthetic hormones are taken most of the month but not all of it. To induce a stress response, women using hormonal contraception completed the cold pressor test during either the active phase, when hormones are present, or during the inactive phase, when hormones are not present. Saliva was collected and assayed for free cortisol and progesterone levels prior to stress onset, immediately after stress termination, and 15-min post stress onset. Free cortisol and progesterone increased to a similar degree across both hormonal contraceptive phases in response to the cold pressor test. Post-hoc investigation indicates that the progestin “generation” (classification of synthetic progestins based on the compounds they are derived from) can differentially affect the free steroid response to cold pressor test stress, with the largest effects observed in women using formulations containing second-generation progestins. These findings indicate that progestin generation, particularly second-generation progestins, may have a more impactful influence on the stress response than hormonal contraceptive cycle phase. Potential mechanisms driving this effect and need for additional research are discussed.

Lipid profile in women over 35 years old using triphasic combined oral contraceptives

Twenty-nine women aged 35 years old or more, using triphasic combined oral contraceptive (COC) were evaluated during six cycles for the following parameters: total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and its subfraction HDL2, triglycerides, apoproteins A and B, Castelli risk index I and II (cholesterol/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C) and apoprotein ratio (apoprotein B/apoprotein A). The same laboratory measurements were done in a control group of 49 non-COC-user women. The results showed that there were no differences on most of the studied parameters between user and nonuser women. There was a significant reduction of HDL-C and HDL2-C, although within the normal range. In addition, it was observed a significant increment of triglycerides and apoprotein B at 6 months of follow-up only in user group (p < 0.05), although within the normal range. It is concluded that the use of levonorgestrel triphasic COC appeared to have no additional adverse impact when used by women aged over 35 years. Further studies are needed to obtain conclusive data.

Serum lipid and lipoprotein changes induced by preparations containing low-dose ethinylestradiol plus levonorgestrel

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects on lipid metabolism of a new low-dose monophasic combination oral contraceptive with 100 microg levonorgestrel and 20 microg ethinylestradiol. Sixty healthy women aged 18-45 years were administered the medication during three cycles. The study participants were screened for lipid changes. The differences in cholesterol and triglyceride levels were not statistically significant, but high-density lipoprotein levels were significantly lower and low-density lipoprotein levels were significantly higher than the baseline. Women at risk of cardiovascular disease should be carefully monitored even when using low-dose preparations.

Effect of dienogest-containing oral contraceptives on lipid metabolism

In a double-blind, controlled, randomized, four-arm, bicentric clinical study, the effect of four oral contraceptives (OCs) on lipid metabolism was investigated. Four groups composed of 25 volunteers each (mean age 26.1 +/- 4.5 years; body mass index 21.9 +/- 2.8 kg/m(2)) were treated for six cycles with monophasic combinations containing 21 tablets with either 30 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) + 2 mg dienogest (DNG) (30 EE/DNG), 20 microg EE + 2 mg DNG (20 EE/DNG), 10 microg EE + 2 mg estradiol valerate (EV) + 2 mg DNG (EE/EV/DNG), or 20 microg EE + 100 microg levonorgestrel (LNG; EE/LNG). The study was completed by 91 women. Blood samples were taken by venipuncture after at least 12 h fasting on Days 21-26 of the control cycle and Days 18-21 of the first, third, and sixth treatment cycle. There were clear differences between the effects of EE/LNG and the formulations containing estrogens and DNG. Although EE/LNG did not change the triglycerides levels, a significant increase was observed during treatment with the DNG-containing preparations. Although EE/LNG significantly reduced HDL-CH and HDL(2)-CH, there was a nonsignificant increase with the DNG-containing OCs. No change was observed in the levels of HDL(3)-CH. A significant rise in apolipoprotein A1 occurred during intake with the three DNG-containing formulations, but not with EE/LNG. In contrast to the women treated with combinations of estrogens and DNG, apolipoprotein B rose significantly in the women in the EE/LNG group. Lipoprotein (a) was significantly reduced by 30 EE/DNG and EE/LNG and remained unaltered with 20 EE/DNG and EE/EV/DNG. Altogether, the changes in lipid metabolism caused by the DNG-containing formulations appeared to be more favorable than those observed with EE/LNG. In OCs with DNG, the EE dose does not seem to play a major role with respect to the effect on lipids.

The role of triphasic levonorgestrel in oral contraception: a review of metabolic and hemostatic effects

Epidemiological studies suggesting a possible association between the use of combined oral contraceptives and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease have led to extensive investigations into the effect of oral contraceptives on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, and on hemostasis. Since this association was originally suggested, the steroid dose in oral contraceptives has been significantly reduced and new progestogens have been developed. Also, triphasic formulations have been introduced which offer a well-balanced estrogen/progestogen ratio, allowing a further reduction in the progestogen dose per cycle, and thus helping to minimize unwanted metabolic and hemostatic effects. The metabolic interactions of triphasic levonorgestrel, the first triphasic formulation to be introduced, have received particular attention. Lipid metabolism appears to be largely unaffected by triphasic levonorgestrel, most studies reporting no significant change in high- (HDL-C) or low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Several studies have reported a decrease in the lipoprotein subfraction HDL2-C levels, but in most cases measurements of the LDL-C/HDL-C and apolipoprotein A-1/B ratios reveal no clinically significant effects. Concerning lipids, most studies suggest that triphasic levonorgestrel has less metabolic impact than the monophasic formulation. In common with all currently available oral contraceptives, triphasic levonorgestrel appears to have some effect on carbohydrate metabolism. The study results vary, however; some investigators have found an impairment of glucose tolerance, whereas others have not detected any significant effect. Compared with lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, fewer studies have investigated the effect of triphasic levonorgestrel on hemostasis. In common with all estrogen-containing oral contraceptives, levonorgestrel appears to stimulate some procoagulant activity, elevating the levels of factors VII and X, and fibrinogen. However, the effect of triphasic levonorgestrel appears to be balanced, with most studies reporting a corresponding increase in anti-coagulant-fibrinolytic activity. Although most of the studies reviewed here reported some statistically significant metabolic interactions, many authors comment that the changes are probably not clinically relevant in terms of an altered risk of cardiovascular disease. The true risk of vascular disease associated with modern low-dose oral contraceptives remains to be confirmed when sufficient epidemiological data eventually become available.

Lipid metabolism effects with desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives

Desogestrel is a gonane progestogen that in early studies had an improved ratio between desired progestational effects and undesired androgenic effects. A review of more than 50 clinical studies suggests that desogestrel differs from progestins currently used in oral contraception in that it does not interfere with the estrogen effects on lipoprotein metabolism. This profile is attributable to the high selectivity of desogestrel.

A clinical comparison of two triphasic oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel or norethindrone: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study

Menstrual bleeding patterns were investigated in young women taking either a levonorgestrel triphasic, Triquilar, or a norethindrone triphasic, Ortho 7/7/7, two commonly prescribed low-dose oral contraceptives. The levonorgestrel triphasic contains ethinyl estradiol (EE) 30 micrograms + levonorgestrel (LNG) 50 micrograms for the first six days, EE 40 micrograms + LNG 75 micrograms for the following five days, and EE 30 micrograms + LNG 125 micrograms for the last ten days. The norethindrone triphasic contains EE 35 micrograms + norethindrone (NET) 0.5 mg for the first seven days, EE 35 micrograms + NET 0.75 mg for the following seven days and EE 35 micrograms + NET 1.0 mg for the last seven days. Three hundred women from 16 to 25 years of age were randomized to the levonorgestrel triphasic (n = 150) or the norethindrone triphasic (n = 150) groups. Assessments were made from daily diary cards and from bimonthly investigator interviews over 6 pill cycles. The results showed a higher incidence of intermenstrual bleeding (breakthrough bleeding and/or spotting) in the norethindrone triphasic group (NET group) than in the levonorgestrel triphasic group (LNG group): 44.9% of patients (66/147) randomized to the LNG group reported intermenstrual bleeding one or more times during the study compared with 61.9% (91/147) randomized to the NET group (p = 0.0036). Furthermore, in subjects who did not miss any pills, the proportion of patients with intermenstrual bleeding in each cycle was significantly greater (p < 0.02, cycles 1-4, 6; p > 0.05, cycle 5) and was experienced for more days per cycle (p < 0.05, cycle 1) and for more cycles per patient (p < 0.05, 5 cycles) in the NET group compared with the LNG group. Intermenstrual bleeding was also less frequently observed in the LNG group than in the NET group in patients who missed pills (p < 0.05, cycles 3, 5 and 6). In addition, early withdrawal bleeding occurred more often in the NET group than in the LNG group (p < 0.05, cycles 1, 3 and 4). The incidence of amenorrhea was similar in both groups. These results demonstrate a significantly lower incidence of intermenstrual bleeding and therefore better cycle control with the levonorgestrel triphasic Triquilar, compared with the norethindrone triphasic Ortho 7/7/7.

The effect of low-dose oral contraceptives on lipids and lipoproteins in two at-risk populations: young female smokers and older premenopausal women

Young women who smoke and women over age 35 are considered to be at high risk for cardiovascular complications associated with oral contraceptive use. This study evaluated the effects of low-dose oral contraceptives on lipid and lipoprotein concentrations in 45 high-risk patients before, during, and after 6 months of treatment. Neither group showed a significant change from baseline in cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol or cholesterol ratios. Triglycerides increased and HDL2a levels decreased significantly in both groups but returned to baseline after treatment was discontinued, with the largest changes in both triglycerides and HDL2a levels occurring at 1 month. The change in triglyceride and HDL2a blood levels were within the laboratories' reference range. The lipid profile of these patients, therefore, was not worsened significantly through 6 months of oral contraceptive use. The young women who smoked did have consistently lowered levels of HDL cholesterol and its HDL2a subfraction when compared to their elder non-smoking cohort.

Desogestrel: using a selective progestogen in a combined oral contraceptive

Desogestrel is the most selective progestogen used in oral contraceptives (OCs). The clinical characteristics of the monophasic combined OC containing 150 micrograms desogestrel and 30 micrograms EE per tablet (Marvelon) are in accordance with the strong progestogenic and minimal androgenic effects of desogestrel: a very high contraceptive efficacy is combined with minimal and, in the case of lipid metabolism, even potentially positive effects on metabolic parameters. Through increasing the plasma levels of sex hormone binding globulin, and thereby decreasing the plasma levels of free testosterone, the desogestrel-containing OC also has substantial beneficial effects on acne.

Effect of low-dose oral contraceptives on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in women with recent gestational diabetes: results of a controlled, randomized, prospective study

Women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus were randomly assigned to one of two low-dose oral contraceptives to evaluate the effect of low-dose oral contraceptives on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. A cohort of similar women requesting a non-oral-contraceptive method served as controls. The two oral contraceptives studied were ethinyl estradiol (0.035 mg)-norethindrone (0.40 mg) and ethinyl estradiol (0.030 to 0.040 mg)-levonorgestrel (0.050 to 0.125 mg). A 75 gm, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test and a fasting lipid profile (total cholesterol, triglyceride, high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterols) were performed at entry, after 3 months, and after 6 to 13 months of treatment. The prevalence of diabetes at 6 to 13 months (27/156 patients) was not significantly different between groups (non-oral-contraceptive group, 17%; ethinyl estradiol-norethindrone, 15%; ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel, 20%). When examined by prior gestational diabetes mellitus class, diabetes mellitus was present in 7% of prior class A1 and 29% of women with prior class A2 disease (p less than 0.001). Mean cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly improved in all three groups at 3 months and at 6 to 13 months, whereas triglycerides remained unchanged. There were no differences in cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or triglycerides levels between the groups. After 6 to 13 months, there was a significant increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the ethinyl estradiol-norethindrone group compared with the ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel and non-oral-contraceptive groups.

A comparative study of the effects of a monophasic and a triphasic oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism

A comparative study of the effects of a monophasic and a triphasic oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG) on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism was conducted on 45 Singapore women under the WHO Special Programme of Research in Human Reproduction. The women were randomly allocated to one of the two pill groups--a triphasic preparation containing low doses of LNG and EE in various proportions and a monophasic preparation of 150 micrograms LNG and 30 micrograms EE, and an additional 18 women, choosing to use IUDs, were recruited as controls. Blood samples were taken at admission, 3 and 12 months thereafter. For both pill groups, total cholesterol decreased with duration of use, while HDL cholesterol decreased slightly at 3 months and thereafter increased. LDL cholesterol decreased slightly at 3 months, returning to baseline at 12 months for the monophasic group, while remaining unchanged at 12 months for the triphasic group. The monophasic preparation appeared to lower total, LDL and HDL cholesterols to a greater extent at 3 months than the triphasic preparation. Compared with IUD users, for the monophasic group, both total and HDL cholesterols were significantly lower at 3 months and HDL and LDL cholesterols were lower at 12 months. In addition, ratios of HDL cholesterol/LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol/total cholesterol were significantly lower at 12 months. Changes in triglycerides were minimal for both pill groups. However, at 3 months, triglycerides for the triphasic group were significantly higher than the IUD users, but this observation was not of any clinical importance since comparison of changes with their respective pretreatment values were not statistically significant. These results indicate that these changes are related to the dosage and estrogen-progestogen ratio of the preparation. Furthermore, the monophasic preparation may have a disadvantage over the triphasic preparation since it appears to cause more disturbance in lipid metabolism. However, it is noted that these changes in lipids and lipoproteins were minimal and did not appear to be of any clinical significance.

Effects of ethinyl estradiol combined with desogestrel and cyproterone acetate on glucose tolerance and insulin response to an oral glucose load: a one-year randomized, prospective, comparative trial

To investigate the effects of two slightly estrogen-dominant, monophasic, low-dose oral contraceptives on carbohydrate metabolism, 40 healthy young women were randomly allocated to receive either 30 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol + 150 micrograms of desogestrel, a 19-nortestosterone-derived progestin (Marvelon; n = 21) or 35 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol + 2 mg of cyproterone acetate, a 17-acetoxyprogesterone derivative (Diane-35; n = (19) for a prospective observation period of 1 year. At baseline, 6, and 12 months, blood glucose, plasma insulin, and plasma C-peptide levels were measured during an oral glucose tolerance test. Although the changes were absent (Marvelon) or minimal (Diane-35) at 6 months, both groups had a slight increase in blood glucose levels at 12 months; overall glucose tolerance remaining, however, within the normal range. Plasma insulin levels remained unchanged in the Diane-35-group, which suggested increased insulin resistance, but were significantly decreased in the Marvelon group despite significant rises in plasma C-peptide levels. Comparison of plasma C-peptide and insulin changes suggests enhanced pancreatic insulin secretion and increased hepatic insulin metabolism with both Marvelon and Diane-35.

Clinical aspects of the relationship between oral contraceptives, abnormalities in carbohydrate metabolism, and the development of cardiovascular disease

Although large epidemiologic studies indicated no difference in the frequency of diabetes mellitus in nonusers and everusers of high-dose combination oral contraceptives, other studies had shown an increased risk of impaired glucose tolerance in current users, which is estimated to be roughly twice as frequent as that in nonusers. Women at risk of developing impaired glucose tolerance while receiving high-dose oral contraceptives either had previous gestational diabetes mellitus or were older, obese, or had a positive family history of diabetes mellitus. The tendency to decreased glucose tolerance seems essentially related to the dosage and chemical structure of the progestogen used in oral contraceptives, namely, estrane and particularly gonane progestins. However, increased frequency of impaired glucose tolerance and potentially diabetes mellitus are obviously not linked to the use of the more potent gonane progestins. The use of low-dose oral contraceptives, particularly with reduced progestogen content (such as in the triphasic formulations and last-generation monophasic preparations), is accompanied by a low risk of impaired glucose tolerance, even in previous gestational diabetes mellitus. The mechanism of decreased glucose tolerance in oral contraceptive users is unknown but seems related partially to increased peripheral resistance that is potentially caused by a postreceptor defect in insulin action. Changes in insulin production or metabolic clearance rate are not excluded by recent, sophisticated investigations of carbohydrate metabolism in oral contraceptive users. Impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus, chronic hyperglycemia, and hyperinsulinemia are believed to increase atherogenic risk either by their direct action or their effects on lipid metabolism. Newer epidemiologic studies now indicate that the incidence of cardiovascular disease in low-dose, low-risk, current oral contraceptive users has been substantially decreased. The use of low-dose oral contraceptives with reduced dosages of better adapted progestogens seems effective in decreasing alterations in carbohydrate metabolism and may thereby contribute to decrease further atherogenic risk in oral contraceptive users.

Time-dependent alterations in lipid metabolism during treatment with low-dose oral contraceptives

The effect of sex steroids on lipid metabolism depends on the type and dose of the compounds, the route of administration, and the duration of treatment. Therefore the composition of an oral contraceptive determines the resultant effect on lipids and lipoproteins. During 12 months of treatment, the effects of two oral contraceptives containing 30 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol and 150 micrograms of desogestrel (EE/DG) or 75 micrograms of gestodene (EE/GSD) on 19 serum parameters of lipid metabolism were followed in 11 women each. There was no change in total cholesterol and phospholipids. Total triglyceride levels were significantly elevated only by EE/GSD. After 3 and 6 months of intake of both preparations, a transitory increase in the triglyceride content of very low-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein and a decrease in low-density lipoprotein-phospholipids was observed. After 12 months, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very low-density lipoprotein phospholipids, and apolipoprotein B were significantly elevated, whereas very low-density lipoprotein triglycerides and all components of low-density lipoprotein were unchanged. Most of the components of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were increased as a result of a rise in HDL3 and apolipoprotein A2, whereas HDL2 and apolipoprotein A1 were not altered. There was no significant difference between the effects of the two preparations, although those of EE/GSD were mostly more pronounced. The increase in high-density lipoprotein, very low-density lipoprotein, and total triglycerides reflects a slight preponderance of the effect of the estrogen component. Because low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol were not changed, treatment with both formulations is in all probability not associated with an elevated risk of atherosclerosis.

Changes in lipid metabolism during 12 months of treatment with two oral contraceptives containing 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 75 micrograms gestodene or 150 micrograms desogestrel

The effect of two oral contraceptives containing 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol + 75 micrograms gestodene (EE/GSD) or 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol + 150 micrograms desogestrel (EE/DG) upon serum lipids and lipoproteins were measured in 11 women each on days 1, 10, and 21 of the first, third, sixth, and twelfth treatment cycle and compared to the levels on days 1, 10, and 21 of the preceding control cycle. There was no change in total cholesterol (CH) and phospholipids (PL), while total triglycerides (TG) were significantly elevated only during treatment with EE/GSD. After 3 and 6 months of intake of both oral contraceptives, a transitory increase in the TG content of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and a decrease in LDL-PL was observed. After 12 months, VLDL-CH, VLDL-PL, and apolipoprotein B were significantly elevated, while VLDL-TG and all components of LDL were unchanged. Most of the components of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were increased due to a rise in HDL3 and apolipoprotein A-II, while HDL2 and apolipoprotein A-I were not altered. There was no significant difference between the effects of the two preparations, although those of EE/GSD were mostly more pronounced. The time-dependent change in the effects of the oral contraceptives on various parameters of lipid metabolism demonstrates that the relevance of results of short-time studies may be questionable. There was also a significant alteration in some parameters between day 1 and 10 of the treatment cycles and a tendency to return to the pretreatment levels during the pill-free week, e.g., in total TG and in the PL component of VLDL, LDL and HDL. The increase in HDL, VLDL, and total TG reflects a slight preponderance of the effect of ethinylestradiol on lipid metabolism. The unchanged total CH and LDL-CH and the elevated HDL levels indicate that the risk of the development of atherosclerosis is in all probability not increased during treatment with both preparations.

Lipids, cardiovascular disease, and oral contraceptives: a practical perspective

Figure 9 is an attempt to summate the influences of life-style on lipid parameters. Based on the work of Nikkila, it shows the source of the production of HDL and LDL, the factors that can affect these lipoprotein levels, and where in the cascade of lipoprotein metabolism these factors exert influence. The source of HDL production is the liver and the intestine. At this stage, diet, exercise, hormones, genetics, drugs, and certain disease states can affect HDL levels. Lecithin-cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT) esterifies HDL-free cholesterol in plasma, and HDL3 is formed that in turn is transformed to HDL2. At the same time, VLDL from the gut and the liver will be converted, under the influence of LPL, to HDL2 and LDL. Thus HDL2 is being formed by the breakdown of VLDL and from the transformation of HDL3 to HDL2. Insulin, exercise, alcohol, fats, drugs, and diet affect lipoprotein lipase and consequently influence levels of LDL and HDL2 indirectly. Progestogens increase and estrogens decrease hepatic endothelial lipase, thus affecting the HDL2 concentration. It is at this point that combination OCs influence HDL2. The balance between estrogen and progestogen in a given contraceptive determines the extent and direction of HDL2 concentration. A separate pathway in the liver also catabolizes HDL2 and HDL3. LDL is generated partly from catabolism of VLDL and is partly secreted from the liver. The removal of LDL is mediated by receptors in both the liver and peripheral tissues. It is here that the Brown-Goldstein theory plays a major role. If LDL receptors are present in an insufficient number or are defective, then the C will accumulate and atherosclerosis may follow. Thus two key enzymes, LCAT and LPL, control the production of HDL2 and LDL, whereas a third enzyme, hepatic endothelial lipase, catabolizes HDL2.

Influence of a triphasic oral contraceptive preparation on plasma lipids and lipoproteins

The influence of a triphasic oral contraceptive preparation on plasma lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein levels was studied in 20 women during 12 treatment cycles. Multiple blood samples representing all phases of the therapeutic cycle as well as posttherapy were obtained. Total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol fluctuated transiently in the earlier part of the study but after 9 and 12 cycles of therapy did not differ from baseline. Cyclic elevations in total cholesterol corresponding to changes in LDL cholesterol were noted twice. Total high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol remained remarkably stable over the entire study while HDL2 cholesterol decreased and HDL3 cholesterol increased. Triglycerides (total and lipoprotein fractions) increased during treatment and fell to baseline levels within one posttreatment cycle. Very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol was also elevated during the study. Apolipoprotein (apo) AI, apo AII, and apo B rose under therapy, the latter increase producing a lowered LDL cholesterol/apo B ratio. Apolipoprotein E showed a temporary decrease early in the study but otherwise remained unchanged.

A study comparing a gestoden triphasic formulation with a fixed combination OC

Metabolic parameters were studied in 30 patients over 12 treatment cycles in a double-blind randomized comparative trial of the new progestogen gestoden in a triphasic formulation against a fixed dose combination pill containing desogrestrel, in Bandung, Indonesia. The results of this laboratory experience affirm findings in similar previous metabolic studies that: (1) the changes induced by modern low-dose pills are clinically and statistically insignificant; (2) throughout the treatment cycles, the values of the various laboratory tests remain well within the normal range; and (3) the favorable balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis is maintained. Results of lipoprotein, coagulation, fibrinolytic and liver function tests in 27 patients are presented. Gestoden's pharmacologic profile and the worldwide clinical experience with the triphasic gestoden formulation in 4285 women are discussed.

Clinical evaluation of a new combined oral contraceptive desogestrel--ethinylestradiol

A clinical study was performed with a new progestogen, desogestrel, in a 0.15 mg dose associated with 0.03 mg of ethinylestradiol and was administered cyclically during 21 days; 632 cycles were evaluated in 56 women. Side-effects were scarce and generally of a mild nature. Monthly bleeding was normal and present in all cycles. Patients with irregular cycles were normalized to 28/29 days. The intermenstrual bleeding (spotting) was an isolated event in 16 cycles. Mastalgia, the most frequent symptom, disappeared spontaneously in the majority of patients. In only 2 cases was it necessary to stop medication because of side-effects. The contraceptive effect was excellent; no pregnancies occurred. A progestative effect was evident in the cervical mucus and the endometrium. The patients who started treatment with acne improved noticeably. In the mild cases, acne disappeared completely. A discrete improvement in hirsutism was reported. The body-weight variation was not significant. Biochemical studies revealed an increase in HDL-C and a decrease in the ratio LDL-C/HDL-C. Cholesterol and triglycerides did not show variations, which could indicate a lesser cardiovascular risk.

Clinical aspects of three new progestogens: desogestrel, gestodene, and norgestimate

Three new 19-nortestosterone progestogens, which are chemically related to levonorgestrel, are now clinically available in combination oral contraceptives in Europe. Desogestrel and norgestimate must be transformed to metabolites for all or part of their biologic activity; gestodene is active in its original form. Compared with present low-dose monophasic and triphasic levonorgestrel formulations, the new combinations appear to be equivalent in efficacy and type and frequency of side effects. Cycle control may be slightly improved with the gestodene preparation and somewhat poorer with the desogestrel regimen. As with the present triphasics, most changes reported in coagulation indexes for the new combinations remained within normal limits, as did changes in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. There is no present evidence that either the norgestimate or aesogestrel formulation provides a clinical improvement over the levonorgestrel triphasic. In the gestodene combination, the progestogen's increased biologic activity allows further reduction of total steroid dose.

Changes in lipoprotein composition in women receiving two low-dose oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol and gonane progestins

In a prospective double-blind study of the effects of two low-dose oral contraceptives (OCs) on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, two groups of eighteen young healthy women selected at random were submitted to a six months' use of either monophasic ethinylestradiol (EE) + desogestrel (DG) or triphasic EE + levonorgestrel (LNG). Total cholesterol (C), triglycerides (TG), phospholipids (PL), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) together with apoproteins A-I, A-II, B and lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase activity (LCAT) were determined in serial plasma samples collected before, at three and six months during, and one month after OC use. Cholesterol and apoproteins (A-I, A-II, B) composition of lipoproteins (HDL-2, HDL-3, LDL) isolated by ultracentrifugation were additionally determined. On Mono-EE + DG, plasma TG (+39.3%, +45.6%), PL (+21.9%, +16.8%) and apo A-I (+35.5%, +23.3%) levels were significantly increased at 3 and 6 months of use; plasma HDL-C (+24%) and Apo A-II (+21.4%) were transiently increased at 3 months. Lipid and apoprotein composition of HDL-2, HDL-3 and LDL were unchanged. On Tri-EE + LNG, a slight but not significant decrease in HDL-C was observed throughout the study while other plasma lipids and apoproteins were unchanged. Ultracentrifugation revealed a lower content of C (-44.2%) and apo A-I (-44.6%) in HDL-2. LCAT activity expressed as molar esterification rate (MER) rose in a more sustained way during EE + DG use than during EE + LNG treatment. Covariance analysis shows a further significant difference between results of both treated groups for the Apo AI/Apo B ratio that was increased by Mono-EE + DG.

Metabolic effects of oral contraceptives

Combination oral contraceptives (OCs) are probably not an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease but through their metabolic actions, may partly amplify the effects of known risk factors for cardiovascular disease. This review of the literature and our own data indicate that use of high-dose, progestogen-dominant OCs induces a potentially atherogenic lipoprotein profile (high low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol:high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio), mostly attributable to the antiestrogenic action of the progestogen content of these OCs. In contrast, lower-dose combination OCs with reduced amounts of progestogens and slight estrogen dominance, either monophasic or multiphasic, produce strikingly fewer adverse effects on lipoproteins. Moreover, use of low-dose, as opposed to high-dose, OCs results in almost unchanged glucose tolerance, marginally increased or unchanged insulin and glucagon responses to glucose, and probably unchanged levels and activity of peripheral insulin receptors. Further in-depth studies of low-dose OC formulations are mandatory to ascertain reduced metabolic risk of these OCs.

Effects of seven low dose combined oral contraceptives on high density lipoprotein subfractions

The effects on lipid metabolism of seven combined oral contraceptives were investigated, particularly the effects on high density lipoprotein (HDL) subfractions, which were separated by density gradient ultracentrifugation. There were no differences between the preparations in the effects on the LDL fraction, the so-called atherogenic particle, but there were marked differences in the effects on the anti-atherogenic HDL fraction, of which the effects on HDL-2 were most pronounced. After treatment with monophasic cyproterone acetate and biphasic desogestrel, the cholesterol and phospholipid contents of the HDL-2 fraction were significantly higher than those found after treatment with the other preparations. The lowest values were found after treatment with monophasic levonorgestrel, whereas monophasic desogestrel, triphasic levonorgestrel, monophasic norethisterone and triphasic gestoden induced intermediate values for these variables. The levels of HDL-2 reflect the intrinsic androgenicity of the various progestogens used in the preparations.

Clinical and metabolic study of a new pill containing 20 mcg ethinylestradiol plus 0.150 mg desogestrel

The clinical and metabolic effects of a short-term treatment with a combination contraceptive pill containing 0.150 mg desogestrel and 20 mcg ethinylestradiol were evaluated in a group of 17 healthy women. In spite of the low estrogen content, the pill exerted a good cycle control and the incidence of irregular bleedings was low. The minor side effects commonly associated with oral contraceptive (OC) use rarely occurred, and an improvement of premenstrual symptoms was reported during pill intake. As for the different biochemical parameters tested, the formulation induced a significant increase of fibrinopeptide A (FPA) plasma levels. However, the resulting increase of peptide was lower than that induced by pills containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol. No significant modifications of plasma total cholesterol (T-CH) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-CH) were observed, while triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-CH) concentrations and the HDL-CH/LDL-CH ratio significantly increased. A significant increase of apolipoproteins AI (Apo AI) and apolipoproteins AII (Apo AII) concentrations was also observed. Moreover, the pill did not alter fasting insulin and glucose levels and their response to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). It may be concluded that this new formulation can be considered acceptable for clinical use, mainly in consideration of the minor or no changes in the biochemical parameters regarded as risk factors for venous and arterial diseases.

Comparative effects of monophasic desogestrel plus ethinyloestradiol and triphasic levonorgestrel plus ethinyloestradiol on lipid metabolism

The effects of the monophasic oral contraceptive preparation desogestrel plus ethinyloestradiol (EE) and triphasic levonorgestrel plus EE on lipid metabolism were compared. Sixteen young healthy female volunteers received monophasic desogestrel plus EE (21 X 150/30), whereas eighteen women received triphasic levonorgestrel plus EE (6 X 50/30 + 5 X 75/40 + 10 X 125/30) for six consecutive cycles. The lipid composition of the various lipoprotein fractions was estimated after separation in a density gradient by ultracentrifugation. In addition, the apolipoproteins A-I and B were assessed. HDL-cholesterol (precipitation method), HDL-2 cholesterol, HDL-2 phospholipids and the ratio apolipoprotein A-I to apolipoprotein B were significantly higher in the monophasic desogestrel group than in the triphasic levonorgestrel group after three and six treatment cycles. HDL-cholesterol (gradient), HDL-phospholipids (gradient), HDL-3 phospholipids and apolipoprotein A-I were only significantly higher after six treatment cycles. No differences between the groups were observed for the other lipid variables studied including triglycerides and VLDL-triglycerides.